{"meta":{"query_hash":"8d31d674b326","filters":{"venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8d31d674b326","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=portal+Libraries+and+the+Academy"},"results":[{"id":"W1967192105","doi":"10.1353/pla.2008.0008","title":"Academic/Research Librarians with Subject Doctorates: Data and Trends 1965–2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Academic community; Sociology; Academic library; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.10962203132032389,"score_gpt":0.3529589699178995,"score_spread":0.2433369385975756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967192105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5138424,0.009309511,0.000041736806,0.12138847,0.00023033253,0.00069133466,0.00033387492,0.00032244518,0.3538399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698436,0.006167383,0.00035262192,0.005495965,0.0006620795,0.00001914871,0.00010770832,0.000016167569,0.017335312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.0002685058,0.0003224499,0.00034112355,0.00066219183,0.0005226889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875534,0.0005420732,0.00012646803,0.00028993047,0.000024725246,0.00026145883],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014372986,0.00014865687,0.00020884835,0.00017317478,0.0022029283,0.00065636326,0.0011721808,0.00017148785,0.00032703433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013962376,0.00008535939,0.000023644463,0.0011327779,0.0047271755,0.029297803,0.0005857724,0.0006925925,0.000017787232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014808786,0.000011766034,0.043639977,0.000009510439,0.000024755414,0.000009084104,0.028797422,0.0000010478054,0.0000013682182,0.87239385,0.049239945,0.0057232003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068344286,0.000045357654,0.019006463,0.00002056033,0.000010159149,0.00004221914,0.0059180344,0.0002839306,0.000032195545,0.011968681,0.96179986,0.00018906948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032632868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007667989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033838055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026723545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968217664","doi":"10.1353/pla.2010.0007","title":"Academic/Research Librarians with Subject Doctorates: Experiences and Perceptions, 1965-2006","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Perception; Sociology; Work (physics); Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02693983520743852,"score_gpt":0.32199279947824766,"score_spread":0.2950529642708091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968217664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92239404,0.0007986313,0.000008485214,0.02576969,0.00016720664,0.0003686579,0.000013782118,0.00009793918,0.050381567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903208,0.0011569818,0.00035489176,0.0033124671,0.0005821512,0.000078939775,0.000009177783,0.000009602199,0.0041749966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818254,0.00020884171,0.0002883569,0.00026286795,0.0005741073,0.00048331477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989468,0.00050697016,0.00010637083,0.00013778181,0.000034325592,0.00026773824],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014214799,0.00014022739,0.00017037285,0.00012451898,0.0022206977,0.0013254426,0.0005998629,0.00020880894,0.0009429472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017302671,0.00007908867,0.000031359454,0.0006716029,0.005815498,0.019968549,0.00019609602,0.0010049513,0.000024396257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055203072,0.0000065747217,0.026487134,0.0000056674494,0.0000067683213,0.0000010833564,0.11231835,2.026708e-7,0.00001725636,0.85533065,0.0041870475,0.0015840865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057671475,0.000058993603,0.01887125,0.000022769114,0.00000883238,0.000022492139,0.17292866,0.00008403397,0.00017347805,0.040105663,0.76689416,0.00025296852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026898808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001774964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81522495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000023836753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025889723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969757043","doi":"10.1353/pla.2006.0006","title":"Analyzing Current Serials in Virginia: An Application of the Ulrich's Serials Analysis System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"State (computer science); Product (mathematics); Computer science; Library science; Union catalog; Resource (disambiguation); World Wide Web; Operations research; Engineering; Cataloging","score_opus":0.007845704501355568,"score_gpt":0.21468634458289734,"score_spread":0.20684064008154177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969757043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739194,0.002363066,0.012180438,0.0018884834,0.00020958396,0.00055654737,0.000014757191,0.0001364528,0.008731269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.000027838922,0.00030761358,0.000051720843,0.000093100694,0.00003070794,0.000007994971,0.0000047892236,0.00016143179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876815,0.00014371086,0.00048337106,0.00025223734,0.00020037533,0.00015214755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928343,0.00012878412,0.00030091128,0.0002369403,0.000012440263,0.000037490277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004139129,0.00011640939,0.00029001097,0.00016304689,0.00017214842,0.0004010882,0.00067561044,0.00005615629,0.0000044331846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017498582,0.00006447245,0.00008176591,0.0018641725,0.00012174446,0.0017586107,0.00030828317,0.00009360263,0.0000010326886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036687386,0.000032061194,0.12590908,0.000028697172,0.0000734317,4.2779646e-7,0.00033204883,0.0004656745,0.00008753221,0.86981624,0.00022163385,0.0029965008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013120254,0.000028999866,0.8680826,0.000048514514,0.0001879475,0.00000885924,0.00024403229,0.035003856,0.0061429325,0.065208465,0.023326786,0.00040502485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009207887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001618706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80460775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007059962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004259371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38677028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983155956","doi":"10.1353/pla.2007.0041","title":"Finding Time for Scholarship: A Survey of Canadian Research University Librarians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Survey research; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.3120017948446834,"score_gpt":0.43801865114474237,"score_spread":0.126016856300059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983155956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6791561,0.00091260904,0.000083338804,0.085286394,0.00014977837,0.0010140655,0.00016903607,0.000065562825,0.2331631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915722,0.00011668787,0.0006474997,0.00019753359,0.00008642868,9.454521e-7,0.0000135622295,0.0000074559252,0.007357657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980907,0.0009634864,0.00014577091,0.00013549077,0.00033581807,0.00032874945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450153,0.0050542904,0.000113533606,0.00007594741,0.000072826035,0.00018184817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02057133,0.00005125735,0.00011247234,0.0003148221,0.0015004793,0.00015590053,0.00041515724,0.00013467068,0.00016140236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004809922,0.000042593812,0.000031005646,0.00075509754,0.00086283486,0.001485205,0.000078520825,0.0003766504,0.000007439177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017498269,0.0000068969457,0.041567948,0.0000052669843,0.0000270026,0.0000013513093,0.0061730556,7.209727e-7,0.0000061896744,0.947089,0.0034470267,0.0015005522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061827415,0.000033756456,0.35765654,0.000019385403,0.000023057873,8.9487474e-7,0.005494056,0.000043554377,0.000086413005,0.031942345,0.60397047,0.0001112584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22502837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13109149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91514665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020801177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000590946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983295782","doi":"10.1353/pla.2014.0031","title":"The Measureable Effects of Closing a Branch Library: Circulation, Instruction, and Service Perception","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Service (business); Perception; Library science; Library circulation; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Marketing; Library automation","score_opus":0.007300544000739285,"score_gpt":0.21955419746455598,"score_spread":0.2122536534638167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983295782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91451985,0.0010741985,0.00011093041,0.053297527,0.00024481132,0.00036890153,0.00000254968,0.000076823526,0.030304383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941207,0.00070069433,0.000120648765,0.004507858,0.00022545065,0.000008029244,0.0000043757605,0.0000050891235,0.00030714142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907255,0.00018714424,0.00023424569,0.000106042535,0.00024060313,0.00015939743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.00040972143,0.0001600244,0.0000846929,0.000022908735,0.000068980466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005620365,0.0000739009,0.00011199628,0.000032058266,0.0013352373,0.00050565874,0.00020507847,0.000072169256,0.000038584745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013642265,0.000041822812,0.000027630607,0.00030626028,0.000755857,0.011313405,0.000073721145,0.00011339382,0.000003518383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027372438,0.0000027795925,0.010826009,0.000034549026,0.0000087751605,2.349316e-8,0.019103812,0.0000040285204,0.000020946036,0.95536596,0.0004449717,0.014160771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009235173,0.000020890933,0.2089257,0.00005473162,0.000024397974,0.0000060093666,0.003716713,0.0015488523,0.00025587744,0.28078735,0.50358635,0.00014962019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011010165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023550292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6745786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000018795926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004969584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994943872","doi":"10.1353/pla.2003.0040","title":"The Information Commons: The Academic Library Of The Future","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Variety (cybernetics); Commons; Space (punctuation); Knowledge management; Resource (disambiguation); Information technology; Public relations; Strengths and weaknesses; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Political science; Library science; Data science; Psychology","score_opus":0.008037748379486813,"score_gpt":0.23404656620015168,"score_spread":0.22600881782066487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994943872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07164431,0.01054625,0.0000130082935,0.53100395,0.001240421,0.0011059633,0.000042067426,0.00010264905,0.3843014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588512,0.0060883,0.000041118317,0.030099953,0.000463163,0.000032482258,0.000007754767,0.0000070182314,0.0044089803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846876,0.0003655674,0.00042800882,0.00006780922,0.00041735804,0.00025250556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873316,0.0006294738,0.0003508346,0.00021062212,0.00001436984,0.00006154198],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010819493,0.000099604884,0.00010808628,0.000022660852,0.0026355814,0.000598099,0.0011735983,0.0001294773,0.00013775115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021536235,0.000034667457,0.000088993256,0.00057358603,0.00232208,0.020167988,0.00020163624,0.00052764354,0.000012871549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015821974,0.0000014746959,0.004123627,0.000003303227,0.0000075075704,2.1085368e-8,0.012614829,0.0000019061042,1.8273306e-7,0.9495649,0.030600477,0.003065971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016220698,0.0000044269386,0.008636023,0.000008655012,0.0000070169863,0.0000024484625,0.016903022,0.000030877698,0.00008946908,0.11159505,0.8625082,0.00005264011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020723011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018596801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002429875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019694628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020738049","doi":"10.1353/pla.2003.0008","title":"A Brief History of the Future of Academic Libraries: Predictions and Speculations from the Literature of the Profession, 1975 to 2000--part two, 1990 to 2000","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Period (music); Citation; Field (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Library science; Work (physics); Tracking (education); History; Political science; Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Archaeology; Pedagogy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.01137356667475177,"score_gpt":0.24492234110651878,"score_spread":0.23354877443176703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020738049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6464109,0.0413684,0.00004026951,0.23139493,0.0032198029,0.0031424605,0.001098444,0.00007989963,0.07324492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526543,0.0010541447,0.0003308976,0.020176597,0.0008531804,0.000053179796,0.000019639483,0.000015394453,0.024842655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982712,0.00033434006,0.00053628307,0.00017989767,0.00045910073,0.00021915017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987921,0.00035334012,0.00037366865,0.0003101249,0.000047100162,0.00012367133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005185416,0.00013680382,0.00021347679,0.00004801532,0.00071260246,0.000106795465,0.00079757284,0.00016764285,0.00036355984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025831177,0.0000600333,0.00010429115,0.000952246,0.001431707,0.004117652,0.0002570225,0.00047013006,0.0000018523201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004557955,0.000011552052,0.010667515,0.000010709151,0.000020742065,5.5416518e-8,0.1254743,0.000022102307,0.000018695484,0.75009763,0.11330166,0.0003294351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025961525,0.000015408195,0.037431084,0.0001532114,0.000027558246,0.0000015344059,0.008747388,0.0000188852,0.00021298435,0.021265367,0.9317845,0.000082454135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018450417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015581038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014431165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007420687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5480834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047171000","doi":"10.1353/pla.0.0113","title":"Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; German; Moral rights; Copyright Act; Law; Political science; Intellectual property; Sociology; History; Copyright law","score_opus":0.02422129449607439,"score_gpt":0.21355672727761424,"score_spread":0.18933543278153986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047171000","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044168938,0.534566,0.000103230996,0.1810577,0.0008394838,0.00089884986,0.00013897986,0.00008851338,0.23813832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91146207,0.07644413,0.00014028314,0.009489632,0.00015727928,0.00004883969,0.000004390373,0.000011248119,0.0022420995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993445,0.000013311364,0.00030320027,0.00017028033,0.000027513046,0.00014114553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994781,0.00011205591,0.00023303839,0.00013214695,0.000005551691,0.000039129638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038495634,0.00010401404,0.00030834123,0.000017033924,0.0002971941,0.0000858476,0.00018785558,0.00005335216,0.00029732156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009992988,0.000056357138,0.000063464046,0.000081518636,0.0008269921,0.00025946792,0.00014837195,0.00029938552,0.000045764336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026767595,0.0000036169859,0.0064211763,0.00002174103,0.00003012255,2.4997527e-7,0.00020484522,8.362089e-8,1.3554892e-7,0.9811449,0.011458812,0.0006875458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000957764,0.000004903426,0.024648704,0.000012915154,0.000013310573,0.000009099964,0.00006680565,0.00021109718,0.0000046791974,0.47873232,0.49524173,0.00009668866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026440892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041215476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":9.517861e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048376914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32554623},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2050280976","doi":"10.1353/pla.2014.0029","title":"What’s the Big Deal? Collection Evaluation at the National Level","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Computer science; Key (lock); Data collection; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Collection development; Operations research; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06266617006472663,"score_gpt":0.2537558340886021,"score_spread":0.19108966402387545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050280976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11648411,0.0070030447,0.009325566,0.4583113,0.0031787506,0.0022352748,0.000012230163,0.0004326377,0.40301707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95035976,0.00025148847,0.00024609035,0.010438821,0.0004096768,0.0001201144,0.000009652655,0.00000930949,0.03815506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853885,0.00020990893,0.00021717003,0.00022138334,0.0006483885,0.00016428805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890417,0.00074956886,0.00013478968,0.0001245323,0.00004313899,0.00004380346],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012219138,0.00011499492,0.00009470236,0.00005021389,0.0013162623,0.0017640499,0.0005839272,0.00005946652,0.00006112347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017387331,0.000049904207,0.000054842876,0.0005264869,0.00030422522,0.0025740878,0.00045133394,0.00015099366,0.000020618949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006004792,0.000010454625,0.00096999947,0.0000034672746,0.00004843521,1.2081054e-7,0.0016573372,0.00007186274,0.000005113235,0.8433576,0.10758653,0.04622903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007878017,0.000021658678,0.030405074,0.0000088984225,0.000013758152,0.000032240732,0.00016964876,0.03334076,0.00054252316,0.27520573,0.65933484,0.00013703803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008115051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010767019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83387566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015909116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013023557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052139151","doi":"10.1353/pla.2012.0019","title":"McGill Library Makes E-books Portable: E-reader Loan Service in a Canadian Academic Library","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Service (business); Computer science; Academic library; Digital library; World Wide Web; Best practice; Mobile device; Electronic book; Multimedia; Library science; Sociology; Business; Management; Marketing","score_opus":0.017211693435303693,"score_gpt":0.20701727022328384,"score_spread":0.18980557678798016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052139151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07934795,0.012819512,0.000044101267,0.06810955,0.00044328402,0.0007613313,0.00008583481,0.00074948795,0.837639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358139,0.0005777796,0.002051264,0.03714631,0.00032563243,0.00007042222,0.00005127299,0.00005453888,0.02390887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997717,0.000097893026,0.000510446,0.00040994637,0.00027900463,0.0009856821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861753,0.00023164901,0.00014776777,0.0002597862,0.0000053952967,0.000737866],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002350436,0.00031421753,0.00032444976,0.00037859098,0.00040783294,0.00075755804,0.0012630282,0.0002784823,0.00023730709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029437088,0.00022105007,0.00006739119,0.0013881873,0.00019267875,0.020414472,0.0008137498,0.0006565841,0.000040958526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046289926,0.000019416639,0.11668753,0.000028791757,0.000031838827,0.000012505489,0.0012291326,0.000003053562,0.0000016923766,0.8390831,0.04044399,0.0024127115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007484608,0.000010937459,0.063102715,0.000037832,0.0000088803,0.000090805144,0.00021798315,0.0007027046,0.0004931946,0.035553023,0.89861876,0.00041468098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019834363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001766605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009869441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003602395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065444062","doi":"10.1353/pla.2004.0043","title":"Library Services for Users of Personal Digital Assistants: A Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Digital library; User satisfaction; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Multimedia; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.02331219386987805,"score_gpt":0.3064973195181085,"score_spread":0.28318512564823045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065444062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92603797,0.002849885,0.011910683,0.04749923,0.00030847493,0.0026796057,0.00014738599,0.00033393092,0.0082328115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98332465,0.00006499279,0.015599196,0.0006690596,0.0000582772,0.0001878936,0.00002517245,0.000010097273,0.000060671257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991703,0.000024133054,0.00022672437,0.00018734434,0.00024229585,0.00014919044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946165,0.00017304049,0.00016436593,0.00011307585,0.000026403872,0.000061490944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016058829,0.00011185638,0.00014654805,0.000060844144,0.00016072256,0.0007076284,0.00034562667,0.000062842184,0.000012163168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008367974,0.00007591807,0.000053981832,0.00022047824,0.0001846714,0.0049418206,0.00028493966,0.00012699566,4.8898795e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010813678,0.00011793148,0.0102893105,0.0001356524,0.0001398284,9.648797e-7,0.0050829914,0.000025870359,0.000019125922,0.9256277,0.00018254748,0.058269903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067692553,0.0006086679,0.12514718,0.00037150964,0.00022604891,0.0001209018,0.009710712,0.18437256,0.0007435364,0.6379899,0.033328395,0.0006113569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000994458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011400386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28763786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067680894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011072101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067947343","doi":"10.1353/pla.2003.0068","title":"Continuing to Build the Future: Academic Libraries and their Challenges","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Leadership and Management in Organizations","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Section (typography); Association (psychology); Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.018401494543750434,"score_gpt":0.2028389475942063,"score_spread":0.18443745305045586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067947343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092665195,0.10722059,0.0005477504,0.6980788,0.0011488124,0.0016849171,0.000011049123,0.00057054433,0.09807232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96105534,0.005125549,0.00008741778,0.030659482,0.0017375693,0.000043879896,0.000008053601,0.000045749166,0.001236977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892974,0.000037827067,0.00025870925,0.0002980178,0.00014448186,0.00033125252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941427,0.00020348185,0.00014744374,0.00018648648,0.000018388622,0.000029909374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004701543,0.00024226744,0.00022856295,0.00009139919,0.00059818587,0.0008158592,0.00042033548,0.00013152264,0.000112065914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016002712,0.00012578878,0.000047693098,0.00038183742,0.00041360222,0.0022073318,0.0004659316,0.0004032995,0.000026293466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023893683,0.000006246583,0.0016757374,0.00005200863,0.00004652416,8.101004e-7,0.0020660101,0.0000014851936,0.0000059079725,0.9784479,0.013053658,0.0046197996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043906015,0.0000040517884,0.003001265,0.000022230466,0.000059449525,0.0000056065255,0.014326065,0.000040826166,0.000072943774,0.15452974,0.8273063,0.00019247491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009196587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058761607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86839014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000017064459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008386138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7867349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082656529","doi":"10.1353/pla.2006.0002","title":"The Eleventh Off-Campus Library Services Conference Proceedings (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Library science; Technician; Theme (computing); Metropolitan area; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; History; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0070870488468229385,"score_gpt":0.2323957991541154,"score_spread":0.22530875030729247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082656529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05257524,0.08014006,0.0000048142856,0.2575694,0.00029599,0.0009781326,0.000026405689,0.00029173685,0.60811824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76709,0.13389589,0.00022788427,0.059010454,0.0012335884,0.00009843238,0.000052292442,0.000022015509,0.03836945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987045,0.000059221435,0.00037063088,0.00015861282,0.00036939944,0.00033762492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00019041299,0.00025842458,0.00008460248,0.000021914675,0.000095422045],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056928926,0.00012502987,0.00015931274,0.000023983797,0.0016071231,0.0011811694,0.0008061923,0.000074363656,0.00037712278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031894375,0.000062498744,0.00006596946,0.00036384581,0.001243853,0.018754782,0.00020053227,0.00020585278,0.000034806813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001531312,0.000004565881,0.003130348,0.000042110754,0.0000054467623,2.7061373e-7,0.0019110069,1.10340395e-7,3.833685e-7,0.94120014,0.049879663,0.0038106667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015829862,0.000006935397,0.0064678835,0.00008954703,0.000009693992,0.0000028725722,0.0026771426,0.00009347002,0.000027767448,0.10772238,0.88264596,0.00009805536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008331728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024269798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83347774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020083633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108462234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098650554","doi":"10.1353/pla.2003.0015","title":"Why Do We Stay? Survey of Long-Term Academic Librarians in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Public relations; Organizational commitment; Psychology; Survey data collection; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.026082605880354024,"score_gpt":0.26239266289086166,"score_spread":0.23631005701050764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098650554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271266,0.008804243,0.000016567075,0.026432373,0.00035095154,0.00045372575,0.00009589331,0.000031262596,0.036688417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882729,0.004452545,0.000035408597,0.006511829,0.00004593302,0.0000071737268,0.000011818874,0.0000066976304,0.00065568404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998221,0.000387442,0.0004914199,0.00015840052,0.0003948945,0.00034686335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989917,0.0005133303,0.00021888301,0.00011200776,0.000016243739,0.00014779725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010274893,0.000115188355,0.0002275125,0.00005754152,0.00026422986,0.00016545998,0.0005123548,0.0001145158,0.00061723526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027644326,0.00007892185,0.000031478034,0.00069533684,0.0006729542,0.009652066,0.000080757345,0.0003495987,0.0000025802804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026824471,0.000004008574,0.5240912,0.000009606736,0.000006658427,0.0000016839172,0.004288371,0.0000032441935,3.4217555e-7,0.4651181,0.0052803406,0.0011695949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073673617,0.000012730022,0.75922066,0.00005792319,0.000006812051,0.0000039861993,0.004543901,0.00003187114,0.00018175133,0.025344612,0.20963284,0.00022615262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3473565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09537845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4397735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015904134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014149273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9211285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112470296","doi":"10.1353/pla.2005.0003","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5182908522097505,"score_gpt":0.5273793628003517,"score_spread":0.009088510590601229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112470296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286788,0.07247968,0.00030722906,0.07489621,0.000101078534,0.00043719268,0.00055231823,0.000023464881,0.022524018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889816,0.008806418,0.00039930662,0.0008291176,0.00009253671,0.000010183665,0.00001818041,0.00000647418,0.0008561955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583566,0.00023515987,0.00069306244,0.0005103577,0.002372656,0.00035309186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175096,0.006874222,0.00026563733,0.0008517688,0.00011507362,0.00014231588],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013707303,0.00012216909,0.00028953713,0.12320668,0.00026719924,0.0019613013,0.0034698723,0.00010188031,0.00021837611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005469949,0.000054726104,0.00005552523,0.46662992,0.00085220014,0.0022764618,0.001512288,0.00035379382,0.000009008653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003389605,0.000078703095,0.20105243,0.0000034023121,0.000017724165,0.0000015282186,0.00035694925,0.0000034495517,0.000016583168,0.14478818,0.05068836,0.6029588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005157445,0.000022988295,0.7365644,0.0000030521323,0.000009486572,0.000020466332,0.0003002249,0.0009055886,0.00002998836,0.018771963,0.2427806,0.00007547257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113807495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022940954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60288334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004258081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044865334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121544412","doi":"10.1353/pla.2005.0018","title":"Digital Authenticity and Integrity: Digital Cultural Heritage Documents as Research Resources","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Advanced Data Storage Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural heritage; Research integrity; Digitization; History; Computer science; Political science; Archaeology; Public relations; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03372216407443585,"score_gpt":0.305842893570072,"score_spread":0.27212072949563615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121544412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359814,0.004654546,0.0023832037,0.02930943,0.00007275111,0.0004251676,0.000089213456,0.0006972725,0.02638703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939646,0.0002708902,0.0027277484,0.0002846496,0.00008716071,0.000015489139,0.000008847582,0.000009772137,0.0026308366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850225,0.00003931102,0.00023349532,0.0004302445,0.00039559478,0.000399124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.0002981985,0.000079554324,0.00033274642,0.00002316588,0.00010559201],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028101256,0.00017263455,0.00019818718,0.00007682604,0.0004359936,0.002927553,0.0011746056,0.00012845383,0.000010542922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042915993,0.000103593695,0.00003818295,0.00029067855,0.0018419217,0.009950668,0.0030353435,0.0007901819,0.00003007166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005453279,0.000025864301,0.0018107978,0.000009835276,0.00003211664,0.00001943053,0.002509599,6.134177e-7,0.000011688741,0.8706978,0.0021758717,0.12265187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000985861,0.00010607989,0.0020555612,0.000042048734,0.000008131723,0.00021127901,0.0041541234,0.0011219952,0.0007342913,0.5487363,0.44147846,0.00036587752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010941499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001073679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4393026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010564209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017033517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152760149","doi":"10.1353/pla.2008.0000","title":"Learning Outcomes, Portfolios, and Rubrics, Oh My! Authentic Assessment of an Information Literacy Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Literacy; Information literacy; Authentic assessment; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Curriculum","score_opus":0.013605033495525587,"score_gpt":0.3078593811503291,"score_spread":0.2942543476548035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152760149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635584,0.00027519272,0.00004078074,0.0057402453,0.00010329128,0.00046916786,0.000009764056,0.00011991423,0.029683264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949266,0.0008006253,0.0015344083,0.0016481736,0.000060733408,0.000017488863,0.000045953413,0.000003974876,0.0009620521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987418,0.00011119085,0.00044476037,0.00010206685,0.0003784217,0.00022176684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992991,0.00012416292,0.00032001338,0.00008554717,0.00003398093,0.0001372121],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062846194,0.00010313086,0.00018895585,0.00009444273,0.0008525444,0.00044930913,0.0002333449,0.00007992377,0.00009061973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114300856,0.00006666668,0.000045577388,0.00028844955,0.0009913616,0.031095868,0.0001085153,0.00022211991,0.000002864699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018513829,0.000030158702,0.15877818,0.000024709114,0.000018395474,0.0000011183238,0.05651051,0.0000064004466,4.3438988e-7,0.73857826,0.00019125133,0.0458421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007777243,0.000116475356,0.5591876,0.000021755155,0.000017188517,0.000015825499,0.007104262,0.003137265,0.000013907955,0.011597291,0.41783026,0.00018047883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014139732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.5805094e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000389588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012393133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156637039","doi":"10.1353/pla.2004.0035","title":"Student Bibliographies Improve When Professors Provide Enforceable Guidelines for Citations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Regina","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.06440320122532313,"score_gpt":0.36486496923760203,"score_spread":0.3004617680122789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156637039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20270808,0.004506372,0.001630068,0.6771994,0.0013787006,0.005409731,0.00018015194,0.0005136645,0.106473826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86751693,0.008538893,0.020598823,0.07386916,0.0020430745,0.0007215986,0.00009919135,0.000040405837,0.026571939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875444,0.000037083148,0.0004162885,0.00015677193,0.0003247314,0.000310668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930483,0.0002039955,0.00018835755,0.00009486832,0.000097338336,0.00011062894],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077285693,0.00010998824,0.00014736716,0.00047308436,0.0013398944,0.00077429344,0.00042570263,0.00008267196,0.00006565964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000321976,0.00006693422,0.000093263225,0.001397221,0.00093079655,0.013887355,0.00009976565,0.00011450402,0.0000065577547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028382394,0.000009150061,0.0011137022,0.000011880955,0.000018546772,1.1823734e-7,0.022563465,0.000019373103,0.000002208972,0.9507131,0.024653563,0.000866516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008747701,0.00003360279,0.0015284695,0.000018633278,0.00001681089,6.558426e-7,0.028820759,0.000045725308,0.00013454905,0.39552018,0.57288194,0.00012387616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003194025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012572408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003406303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015567058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913714907","doi":"10.1353/pla.2019.0002","title":"Designed to Inspire: A One-Year International Exchange of Academic Librarians","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Swap (finance); Academic library; Information exchange; Process (computing); Public relations; Business; Cultural exchange; Political science; Knowledge management; Library science; Management; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0207703951941717,"score_gpt":0.2722128112818117,"score_spread":0.25144241608764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913714907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5100671,0.0006307012,0.00009026584,0.10514929,0.0006192353,0.0008930753,0.000048207698,0.000111586494,0.38239056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97671264,0.0006162096,0.0005733955,0.0135533605,0.00033507295,0.000017645023,0.00001107312,0.000008010717,0.00817261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.000080671256,0.00032244108,0.00014941281,0.000402148,0.00022236884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940073,0.00018148095,0.0001607324,0.00010175029,0.000017973074,0.00013733731],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005643777,0.00008626537,0.0001631912,0.00009970977,0.00019718238,0.00019913951,0.00069832633,0.00012179631,0.0016676271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012537182,0.000060989314,0.00005249745,0.00038745432,0.00042986282,0.011331481,0.0002277697,0.00020093868,0.000108609376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098286546,0.0000068528084,0.011514521,0.000009369008,0.000015031265,1.3652415e-7,0.022762978,0.000002260497,0.000033168486,0.96030825,0.003173613,0.0020755525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000864203,0.00004913566,0.017777208,0.000048474387,0.0000095292235,0.000001041549,0.006054552,0.000070708586,0.00062599627,0.036920216,0.9374056,0.00017336485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069084206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.00939e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93423194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004535535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009987533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149039610","doi":"10.1353/pla.0.0054","title":"Canada, Copyright, and the Common Good","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Fair use; Fair dealing; Work (physics); Law; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.006435374913068947,"score_gpt":0.20066209418973602,"score_spread":0.19422671927666707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149039610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051981743,0.022404233,0.0000014805876,0.37352273,0.00023992067,0.00035570134,0.00004997997,0.000037232883,0.551407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97720766,0.0015009306,0.000004528701,0.0098676765,0.00020661995,0.0000031946586,0.0000017274745,0.0000029011728,0.011204755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993929,0.00009396001,0.00010398187,0.00008613677,0.00016261659,0.00016039982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996176,0.0001654469,0.000051543582,0.000059510945,0.0000042710403,0.00010166464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003016443,0.00005224213,0.00012387204,0.000023545334,0.0017855777,0.00042486313,0.0001861379,0.00005429747,0.00014965671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003359392,0.00003317108,0.00002565175,0.00008590469,0.002235563,0.00025788738,0.000028377082,0.00017835328,0.0000016161663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033034918,0.0000014998815,0.00018033822,0.0000011883388,0.000007386078,0.0000026552718,0.0027194405,7.181153e-8,9.357044e-8,0.91591406,0.07933983,0.0018004094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044601114,0.0000036111921,0.00918961,0.0000030802257,0.00001797333,0.0000030324265,0.000772921,0.000006975898,0.0000011008451,0.08668427,0.90281945,0.00005192786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96685606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9252259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022025008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004317374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153989197","doi":"10.1353/pla.2021.0012","title":"Relationality in the Classroom: Teaching Indigenous LIS in a Canadian Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Injustice; Library science; Commission; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Geography; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0275379024729907,"score_gpt":0.2877647763479977,"score_spread":0.260226873875007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153989197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79103243,0.0009553053,0.0000012618179,0.09569483,0.000064430336,0.00018457988,0.000009951698,0.000009151662,0.112048075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918914,0.00011322266,0.000027233213,0.0067127417,0.00011595804,0.0000097008115,0.000013726327,0.00000232901,0.0011137245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987974,0.00042577065,0.00017568581,0.00013646098,0.0001989728,0.00026569358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994568,0.00033970666,0.000047236383,0.00006520659,0.0000049095233,0.000086123626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014860831,0.00005492265,0.000087183456,0.000039134207,0.0007313033,0.00034923098,0.0002486904,0.00008919842,0.00009924134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002959487,0.000034006545,0.000025251877,0.0003173857,0.00043452514,0.0014481813,0.00002888959,0.0003711959,0.0000037478026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004739102,0.000007067321,0.13932632,0.0000011013059,0.000001761095,0.00001457935,0.045814116,8.8676927e-7,4.9081615e-7,0.8130126,0.0004040999,0.0014122401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031725247,0.000007728553,0.36384767,0.000015002862,0.0000040615178,0.000008183912,0.049637776,0.000043435288,0.000012914286,0.2736438,0.31236255,0.00009962435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20751911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45370176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5393688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015125721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009879951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7977581},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3168013398","doi":"10.1353/pla.2020.0035","title":"Survey of Digital Humanities Online Guides in Canadian Academic Research Libraries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Digital scholarship; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Library science; Digital library; Academic library; Digital content; World Wide Web; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.24784867003656308,"score_gpt":0.31122321910544576,"score_spread":0.06337454906888268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168013398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69103366,0.009993926,2.390913e-7,0.013200062,0.00013161665,0.00042571756,0.0021498804,0.00007017123,0.28299472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991484,0.000318142,0.0000048401303,0.0021964228,0.00045822197,0.0000132329,0.00023685578,0.000036004145,0.0052522924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978306,0.0001803683,0.0006578664,0.00029618468,0.00039349232,0.00064144883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998528,0.0008508382,0.00012818394,0.00014030996,0.00009251035,0.00026014703],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083808496,0.00022804059,0.00043768223,0.00021986272,0.00055306655,0.0017401674,0.0007391612,0.0001371722,0.0008135876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076781196,0.00016053519,0.00007512264,0.00018533487,0.0036036992,0.0037973113,0.0003892144,0.0011116902,0.000017051663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016037813,0.000015372836,0.02162613,0.000048457794,0.000033037875,0.000009138364,0.023923801,8.523924e-7,3.530244e-7,0.94493484,0.008502817,0.00074483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001090976,0.00017858692,0.050343286,0.00010845363,0.000019133682,0.0000051590864,0.033337016,0.00014034667,0.00003357054,0.1798775,0.7344216,0.00044435397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068099424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12090937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7650573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012339513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028692736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230562865","doi":"10.1353/pla.2002.0086","title":"A Brief History of the Future of Academic Libraries: Predictions and Speculations from the Literature of the Profession, 1975 to 2000--part one, 1975 to 1989","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Period (music); Citation; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Tracking (education); History; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Archaeology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01747895608974395,"score_gpt":0.23606203366764056,"score_spread":0.2185830775778966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230562865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5085416,0.04179443,0.000027816006,0.3826779,0.0025610768,0.002967858,0.0011816786,0.00009112135,0.060156498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93753177,0.0022684238,0.00030358607,0.023514332,0.0013649162,0.000059211707,0.000021361522,0.000016875818,0.034919534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829143,0.00023690147,0.00055452297,0.00018383814,0.0005166188,0.00021668631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875057,0.00035467025,0.0003975881,0.0003232986,0.00004931038,0.00012458366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037333212,0.00013612393,0.00022438647,0.000053093703,0.000737885,0.00011523386,0.0009539635,0.00019575095,0.00046783552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019479162,0.00006166472,0.00010631816,0.00097407785,0.0015393376,0.0044237752,0.00039854902,0.0005016048,0.0000026602106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005133493,0.00001997893,0.009350728,0.000017286637,0.000027993747,6.058354e-8,0.15311931,0.000013805328,0.000018933291,0.6532017,0.18338965,0.000789236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002311275,0.000022667886,0.05604308,0.00021829069,0.000032823235,0.000001137613,0.0064738495,0.00006536278,0.0001214482,0.013397667,0.92330223,0.0000903219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015224598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013421693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73991257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010375733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026042524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56752896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250720171","doi":"10.1353/pla.0.0025","title":"Briefly Noted","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Discipline; Sociology; Management; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.012969627542486395,"score_gpt":0.26836826043176076,"score_spread":0.2553986328892744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250720171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07803442,0.0010722115,0.000053076586,0.30436918,0.0001722653,0.00027328587,0.0000070343276,0.00017423369,0.61584425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435638,0.00035379129,0.00018186247,0.05011074,0.00029500588,0.000002410474,0.0000050596227,0.000002103429,0.0054851994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992629,0.00005314633,0.00017408232,0.00009000022,0.00021524073,0.00020459696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966,0.00009531436,0.00007280616,0.000063401734,0.000008153585,0.00010031219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037245426,0.000061343024,0.000090452035,0.00002857315,0.0007113382,0.0004449795,0.0002841473,0.000062263665,0.00035582538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000863444,0.000037017257,0.00003751151,0.00025287387,0.0006602549,0.010970468,0.00003572714,0.00012819718,0.00003225919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018607589,0.0000030988242,0.00033554842,6.1964835e-7,0.0000020977498,4.2174364e-7,0.0071543697,4.326056e-7,0.000001024185,0.9757397,0.008159285,0.008584806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026764258,0.000011491804,0.012553991,0.0000038664148,0.0000032172366,0.0000018542106,0.0012803432,0.00006341142,0.00004548983,0.16922173,0.8164781,0.00006892143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054004744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.779948e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8655294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016702893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056974535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79533243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}