{"meta":{"query_hash":"8b596a0629fb","filters":{"venue":"revista de derecho público"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8b596a0629fb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=revista+de+derecho+p%C3%BAblico"},"results":[{"id":"W2978029557","doi":"10.31672/55.8","title":"LOS ACTOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS DEPARTAMENTALES Y SU CONTROL POR LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO DIRECTO","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019239750598205943,"score_gpt":0.3498415249561466,"score_spread":0.3306017743579407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978029557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129211,0.012550119,0.0027856769,0.0033444858,0.00058913935,0.003770067,0.0012860649,0.0003801804,0.06237322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900719,0.0032861666,0.0005126659,0.0016650927,0.0007355043,0.00029081551,0.000035949335,0.00008557179,0.0033163202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249184,0.0018593079,0.0010546871,0.0012368513,0.0012922045,0.0020651114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515486,0.0019281954,0.00071903033,0.00084280147,0.0005031341,0.0008519725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002262368,0.0009067809,0.001468228,0.00030665923,0.0011626708,0.0014666558,0.0014048741,0.00050994084,0.0019213705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014198427,0.00093358156,0.000678913,0.001043739,0.0015168451,0.00069228123,0.00033281549,0.0008793936,0.0014170564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042146049,0.0009870575,0.6963073,0.0009147956,0.0013552549,0.00021047947,0.003922318,0.000081260216,0.02349169,0.24597323,0.01888907,0.007446062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033222493,0.00032280086,0.11893645,0.0023147846,0.0008650329,0.00011636396,0.0038331756,0.000726902,0.0036353942,0.0017244311,0.86221,0.0019924233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012441715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008403229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003118552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031042579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293228088","doi":"10.31672/60.4","title":"LA HUMANIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO Y DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; International law; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Private law; Human rights; Humanities; Public law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03694159231555253,"score_gpt":0.3590153476992917,"score_spread":0.32207375538373917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293228088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80867755,0.030508947,0.01408706,0.020324508,0.0036812809,0.00351646,0.0017755658,0.0011737704,0.11625485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863453,0.0035598848,0.0010486379,0.0017165641,0.0013357757,0.0005862931,0.00015962488,0.00013963705,0.0051082675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875466,0.003807769,0.0017197409,0.0019415758,0.0030718632,0.0019124509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938076,0.00214237,0.0010751215,0.0010695341,0.0011069033,0.0007984281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004044834,0.001226502,0.0014637398,0.0010124809,0.0043828897,0.0017491347,0.0035183807,0.0004920513,0.0073035895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00204463,0.0013840402,0.00090901426,0.0026066995,0.0024162605,0.0009465153,0.0033456385,0.002982023,0.001142207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034729656,0.0014905928,0.08741754,0.00026256498,0.0011167915,0.00037240156,0.008713813,0.00016745561,0.0007672771,0.81549,0.058204122,0.025650125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015259889,0.0002659788,0.015793495,0.00067947054,0.00030671782,0.00039323114,0.007643129,0.0006083486,0.00015586968,0.00749778,0.96350914,0.0016208779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009077337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045945137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90530497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004077505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032357865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}