{"meta":{"query_hash":"5dfb096496e5","filters":{"venue":"the Journal of Thought"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5dfb096496e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=the+Journal+of+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W2144043630","doi":"","title":"Critical Vulnerability: An Imperative Approach to Educational Leadership","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Solidarity; Psychology; Rumor; Vulnerability (computing); Sociology; Lying; Illusion; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.15064399786530014,"score_gpt":0.4603399336666178,"score_spread":0.30969593580131766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144043630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093896456,0.00048571939,0.01102709,0.65286285,0.0028508322,0.00027748162,0.0000017976752,0.000019338562,0.23857842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800773,0.000011526265,0.0066932593,0.0039310358,0.0035307438,0.000001577309,5.2881006e-7,0.000006951455,0.0057470296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771595,0.0012188376,0.00026283882,0.000073421,0.00048362173,0.0002453123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956933,0.0032457928,0.00012594291,0.00012047038,0.00052462105,0.00028986044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00996176,0.000063076266,0.00010851988,0.00006260385,0.0010013939,0.000098608434,0.00037746324,0.00006145292,0.0006728354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064622336,0.000044513035,0.000056319946,0.000580881,0.00028010426,0.0005095048,0.0000126877585,0.0003688384,0.00005315972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030044478,0.00080074015,0.001092987,0.0000071581803,0.000037957798,9.351765e-7,0.2553484,0.000027272576,0.00025066404,0.68653965,0.046798687,0.008795072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021364487,0.00017103327,0.020555627,0.000014010505,0.0000966908,0.000052453543,0.50768,0.0000048911666,0.00039155298,0.033890106,0.43672168,0.00020832078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007422751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014956584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8861809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014911908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005976328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7736364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169641666","doi":"","title":"Teaching for Democracy: The Risks and Benefits of Teaching in the Danger Zone","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Critical and Liberation Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Commit; Sociology; Democratic education; Covert; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Law; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0782484506770099,"score_gpt":0.39826067284472927,"score_spread":0.32001222216771935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169641666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9261435,0.0009816239,0.005137962,0.056509763,0.00017648768,0.0001773312,0.0000028903528,0.0000035193118,0.010866909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965797,0.000081222584,0.00081867364,0.00082251977,0.0008322375,6.6403317e-7,1.4959545e-7,0.000004105399,0.00086070714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986358,0.00058923394,0.00029251105,0.000039636354,0.00027961226,0.00016318823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968543,0.0028236764,0.00015777264,0.00008466042,0.000046197747,0.000033368982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013717405,0.000049464223,0.00011083351,0.00003724167,0.00071661884,0.000041149564,0.00032635976,0.00003673082,0.000009797617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007271497,0.000020934016,0.000054281514,0.00007361525,0.0001610823,0.00014747941,0.000025876037,0.00042346094,3.6866305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002450902,0.0001782646,0.0031325952,0.00001893052,0.000038829767,0.0000037054012,0.21158104,0.00016959278,0.0009051383,0.54574794,0.0040543634,0.23392454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001535201,0.00041607142,0.07200711,0.00021657847,0.00030471498,0.00015565015,0.15876833,0.00026064497,0.00094648683,0.115333535,0.64977884,0.0002768597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051135913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018806545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015093066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028679222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5511725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W226956693","doi":"","title":"Autonomy as a Liberal Justification: Three Objections","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Autonomy; Liberal education; Liberal democracy; Democracy; Cultural pluralism; Sociology; Democratic ideals; State (computer science); Liberalism; Law; Political science; Politics; Liberal arts education; Epistemology; Higher education","score_opus":0.02734856451383109,"score_gpt":0.36142635761409625,"score_spread":0.33407779310026514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W226956693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3113738,0.0016690468,0.009435105,0.06032795,0.0038137075,0.00026881148,9.389434e-7,0.00005316695,0.6130575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95064425,0.00040442307,0.0015836591,0.0007781338,0.0025595,0.0000011786731,2.6423186e-7,0.000007402424,0.044021208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.00012727719,0.00028594132,0.00004308192,0.0003120145,0.00016381574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990167,0.00022746726,0.00025636647,0.0001398105,0.00023266657,0.00012699714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003110794,0.00004951266,0.000083305844,0.000076240045,0.00059253996,0.000069894675,0.00035533673,0.000045847242,0.00029304874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027365482,0.000032600306,0.000081972656,0.00034212245,0.00009337117,0.00009779545,0.000011309503,0.00022513198,0.00015089315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020438053,0.0001627467,0.006034046,0.0000066596504,0.0001405945,0.000014313131,0.08293453,0.00014787813,0.00080394605,0.27893114,0.5626129,0.06800687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000237083,0.00006187002,0.023263138,0.000026566295,0.00008469436,0.00012641818,0.010998949,0.000006113687,0.00059297966,0.07553646,0.8889461,0.000119582626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102189966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024069387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6392704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014478964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000690811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4557398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W260196296","doi":"","title":"Textbook Publishing, Textbooks, and Democracy: A Case Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Indoctrination; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Publishing; Pedagogy; Ideology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1035483488651405,"score_gpt":0.40258869603996866,"score_spread":0.2990403471748282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W260196296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535102,0.0015001002,0.00018961162,0.0070738955,0.0008726308,0.00012391535,5.28961e-7,0.000019606116,0.0367095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176323,0.00006404935,0.0003241557,0.00034358058,0.0014937876,2.9047703e-7,3.357653e-8,0.000009170942,0.0060016755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984712,0.00040210408,0.00034538002,0.000076107026,0.0004350952,0.00027010773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998296,0.0008498959,0.00030111053,0.00013469734,0.00017309419,0.00024518013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009021141,0.000080391845,0.00017223222,0.00011513916,0.0010798748,0.0001762707,0.0003416777,0.000061558436,0.00006389243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000794508,0.00005160543,0.000054066764,0.00019635893,0.0002608761,0.00043120037,0.000039026818,0.00046429498,0.000005455467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018699013,0.0006506991,0.055240523,0.000009594683,0.00015506154,0.003692907,0.7700771,0.0000034807865,0.00004560377,0.0071164616,0.08275655,0.080065005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054420525,0.00034811287,0.004539599,0.000019331219,0.00014808853,0.0030377817,0.51802003,0.0000011573592,0.0000071223367,0.002613109,0.47058776,0.00013369927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025363788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060860785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3878312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012204776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026759182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8305633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W286032172","doi":"","title":"The Meaning of the Concept of Education: Searching for the Lost Arc","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Vocational education; Nothing; Sociology; Ideology; Politics; Democracy; Feeling; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.032021071784863624,"score_gpt":0.2747028371946881,"score_spread":0.24268176540982445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W286032172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41122815,0.03190071,0.0018393004,0.20866455,0.017092437,0.0017458755,0.00009356098,0.000018202434,0.3274172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929383,0.000077512,0.00009969745,0.00019420063,0.00272233,0.000002946421,5.4953114e-7,0.000007945672,0.0039565377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990752,0.00018280644,0.00036580977,0.000032506916,0.00023945744,0.00010427411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997555,0.001317893,0.0006129842,0.00023536211,0.00026637164,0.000012400358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258877,0.00006400954,0.00010599713,0.000021633108,0.0007934593,0.0000601791,0.0005924632,0.000014188022,0.000068188194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012703323,0.00002308792,0.00012984402,0.000044267577,0.00042420323,0.00013020352,0.000038931732,0.00019266666,0.0000015492988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054253393,0.000060150876,0.000028106502,0.000019164596,0.000059844955,3.034386e-8,0.03423006,0.000283921,0.00026190263,0.9333055,0.02639917,0.005297903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033745883,0.00013138531,0.0012275887,0.00030980186,0.00028217433,0.000040543026,0.03564197,0.00016297222,0.010752675,0.5941262,0.356886,0.00010121914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000824635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078420446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5817101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019295336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016108094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61027277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991700924","doi":"","title":"Qualities of Democracy: Links to Democratic Leadership","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Accountability; Democratic ideals; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.19630920730151305,"score_gpt":0.39583581346664903,"score_spread":0.19952660616513598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991700924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35901335,0.0036751209,0.000956742,0.62136185,0.0009404371,0.00017299755,0.0000017196904,0.000023697336,0.0138541125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98219156,0.00005781468,0.000863656,0.0010919991,0.0011358806,7.857607e-7,1.3469744e-7,0.000006906715,0.014651238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822754,0.00069754117,0.00039465367,0.00004625969,0.0004209461,0.00021304934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986623,0.0006196167,0.0003300599,0.00011342524,0.00020867465,0.00006594058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026556158,0.00007346226,0.00019444695,0.00008884705,0.00025148646,0.000023801053,0.0003824977,0.00006778207,0.00008736778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049676315,0.00004798391,0.000093052404,0.00028995745,0.00028862705,0.0001229147,0.000016779984,0.0002922779,0.000016919583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010939834,0.00021093954,0.013644988,0.000058648227,0.00010867479,0.0000023323719,0.7628739,0.0001580182,0.00077479053,0.028735287,0.18996702,0.0033560153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025393534,0.00010696311,0.02151578,0.00011937702,0.00011535694,0.000009290174,0.90131575,0.0000015624106,0.0016924425,0.020423809,0.05429598,0.00014975735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045038687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084571197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62317824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059850532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018563397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1956727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33925755","doi":"10.3390/membranes11050320","title":"Engaging Community: Notes on the Necessity of Reflection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost","keywords":"Sociology; Cognitive dissonance; Pedagogy; Ideology; Narrative; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Politics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.10543853946310536,"score_gpt":0.4385421471363569,"score_spread":0.33310360767325153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33925755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85784835,0.00021603014,0.0006431872,0.05768825,0.0005400499,0.00008046446,3.04189e-7,0.0000072111393,0.08297618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0003850575,0.0009546186,0.00056696316,0.0009045242,6.198415e-7,6.553781e-8,0.0000048269885,0.00029847762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457824,0.0046763453,0.00022307788,0.000028170298,0.0003884326,0.00010575352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936757,0.005167502,0.00068953057,0.00020412222,0.00023585281,0.00002729253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011653394,0.000052174953,0.00009796935,0.00005674,0.0012599186,0.000039544357,0.00054407405,0.000034585024,0.00006417148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038965186,0.000026777629,0.00005765034,0.0003110721,0.00021221912,0.00042915292,0.000032852997,0.00084896566,0.000008916706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007539216,0.0011281965,0.009771212,0.000022187089,0.0002732118,8.431124e-7,0.57527065,0.0021425758,0.036292493,0.039409712,0.009334413,0.32560056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062077976,0.00064899906,0.03869,0.00033813863,0.00040742758,0.000060631864,0.1830272,0.0001612556,0.18188895,0.062217727,0.5316343,0.00030463928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055348803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075405114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5222998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017024607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012442042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49904913","doi":"","title":"For Novice and Informed Readers: A Review of Key Questions for Educators","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"the Journal of Thought","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Sociology; Key (lock); Pedagogy; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08895779704292085,"score_gpt":0.4547409195792963,"score_spread":0.36578312253637546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49904913","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.9273216e-7,0.9886522,0.0003965442,0.007922785,0.00063601387,0.0008244912,0.000016272863,0.0000045331685,0.0015464578],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.52266e-7,0.98703486,0.009918783,0.0006973133,0.0007067673,0.00004173968,0.0000073589063,0.000011728582,0.001580926],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844176,0.00024497698,0.00081782497,0.0000624437,0.00026472143,0.000168263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964413,0.0020310872,0.0008414665,0.00011546594,0.00048130043,0.00008939974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035861826,0.0001229837,0.00074208016,0.00008848848,0.00023834244,0.000028309065,0.0003572036,0.00009995544,0.000020137579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026959428,0.00007235512,0.00030517552,0.00025845045,0.0001794273,0.00009222948,0.000017233739,0.00017653912,0.0000014648535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607308,0.000094991025,9.579295e-7,0.09418911,0.00014666429,1.4578785e-7,0.0055289343,7.215865e-8,2.8734082e-8,0.040399287,0.16776596,0.69186527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058767633,0.000030356216,8.79086e-7,0.06291822,0.000774362,0.000012720421,0.0010369092,4.365581e-8,2.393691e-7,0.002777424,0.9323111,0.00007898547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027131498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003820831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76454514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012876137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026473312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46962517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}