{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":336,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":336,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1bce35a7dc59","filters":{"topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2119940882","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1067","title":"Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Elite; Politics; Religiosity; Higher education; Political science; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0219145289510505,"gpt":0.3345333581848509,"spread":0.3126188292338004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002674613,0.0000540952,0.00005967499,0.00001175137,0.0007054884,0.00001077024,0.0001524585,0.00006652908,0.00009584925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005082377,0.00003534585,0.00001904573,0.00005350267,0.000471213,0.0001062732,0.00006381978,0.0001205705,0.00003182087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008858807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004756796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008836242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992107,0.00005553561,0.00009640377,0.00007243643,0.0002105426,0.0003543696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996963,0.00007485892,0.00003600243,0.00007245057,0.00002535999,0.00009506303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001850478,0.00001178056,0.005987842,0.000001914481,0.000004222986,2.381694e-7,0.004468472,0.000002695268,0.000003570921,0.938559,0.05000819,0.0009502182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001480277,0.00001067301,0.003248962,0.00001027063,0.000006533113,6.134044e-7,0.01148138,0.00008598732,0.00005141947,0.01919285,0.9656995,0.00006381045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6530325,0.0004615855,0.0001175386,0.1693719,0.000961213,0.0005585251,0.0001972187,0.00008789718,0.1752117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358447,0.00005990523,0.0001878221,0.001865884,0.0005507611,0.000009547902,0.000003802415,0.000004535339,0.06147306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018090429","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2005.10473275","title":"(If Social Studies is Wrong) I Don't Want to be Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Research in Social Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social studies; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1798743743987661,"gpt":0.5379170040398039,"spread":0.3580426296410378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007802823,0.0001223232,0.0002131925,0.000293258,0.002293303,0.00008171768,0.0005276152,0.0002549657,0.0008596448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001041761,0.0001224633,0.00007124736,0.0009628679,0.001524727,0.0002776802,0.000131703,0.0006572321,0.0003033998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001465255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001779389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001923776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001341288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955665,0.001898593,0.0002925484,0.0002925317,0.001033811,0.0009159623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984342,0.0007106375,0.00006022445,0.0001282136,0.0004647501,0.0002019867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002223711,0.00008920365,0.0001069309,0.000009412903,0.00001074717,2.988683e-7,0.2986081,2.496338e-7,0.00002208435,0.4926397,0.1804898,0.02800126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009803789,0.00001781543,0.0004812874,0.00001512439,0.000005463301,1.160158e-7,0.1944405,8.293154e-7,0.00009308768,0.3034064,0.5013335,0.0001078223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4390791,0.0009648342,0.00001319008,0.3092457,0.001235459,0.000800173,0.00002557002,0.00007448488,0.2485615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545714,0.0003654018,0.0001222618,0.003296014,0.01523017,0.0001465244,0.000006292501,0.00001897334,0.02624298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5154923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140002470","doi":"10.1353/ff.2007.a224763","title":"Institutionalizing Inequalities in Canadian Universities: The Canada Research Chairs Program","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NWSA Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Economic growth; Regional science; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09494134031744512,"gpt":0.403162175172556,"spread":0.3082208348551109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005925167,0.00004902021,0.00006259201,0.0002097213,0.00179878,0.00008030886,0.0003812871,0.00009110723,0.0001561216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216721,0.00003947822,0.0000206823,0.0004387911,0.0006021749,0.0001576642,0.0000206667,0.0008730353,0.000003839462],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02398793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978912,0.0002799221,0.00016935,0.00006239463,0.0007037848,0.0008933399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989113,0.0003649601,0.00003681455,0.00005731741,0.0001953701,0.0004341949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004499545,0.000006679213,0.01635321,0.000003155326,0.000007178469,0.0001461817,0.03156272,0.0000407397,4.537208e-7,0.9195411,0.02991393,0.002420204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007409958,0.000008681822,0.004011707,0.00002257973,0.000001166294,0.00001391015,0.1873372,0.000009316926,0.000001713576,0.002576142,0.8058971,0.00004642296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3971484,0.0007310818,0.00002370779,0.02079549,0.001275624,0.0002137164,0.00001474043,0.00001506087,0.5797822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940492,0.00007936027,0.00005041642,0.000560137,0.001172805,0.000001213695,0.000001104026,0.00000340859,0.00408239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156774856","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v45i2.184441","title":"The University Corporatization Shift: A Longitudinal Analysis of University Admission Handbooks, 1980 to 2010","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatization; Government (linguistics); Front (military); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03933641464583237,"gpt":0.2881681495999621,"spread":0.2488317349541297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005749845,0.00004316241,0.0001001588,0.0003625476,0.0003728591,0.00002271506,0.0002621786,0.00007223515,0.00008518371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001462292,0.00003904627,0.00005602412,0.0008407453,0.000167753,0.0001741443,0.000006216897,0.0001009731,0.000004518246],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006365028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007310138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05822254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1396559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992969,0.0001958926,0.0001256657,0.00005717996,0.0001807469,0.0001436347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983394,0.00007220398,0.0002227361,0.00008189872,0.0004668428,0.0008168948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007439066,0.00002916067,0.4403426,0.000003996717,0.0002009003,0.00000958294,0.02560311,0.0005025668,0.00000972525,0.2227282,0.3093898,0.001106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008614361,0.00003081343,0.2125911,0.0000168749,0.0002477007,6.246008e-7,0.005134936,0.000007908256,0.000006214836,0.001008536,0.7808194,0.00004976384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314147,0.002044484,0.001763299,0.03501693,0.006104093,0.0002498919,0.00005233782,0.00001015967,0.02334413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726859,0.00002890626,0.0001422662,0.00008765786,0.0002545202,3.197171e-8,0.000004624179,0.000002281882,0.02679383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4714296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303660210","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v9i2.1149","title":"Between the Managerial and the Democratic University: Governance Structure and Academic Freedom as Sites of Political Struggle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Academic freedom; Politics; Equity (law); Corporate governance; Sociology; Accountability; Normative; Political science; Public administration; Transparency (behavior); Management; Higher education; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03325500452432013,"gpt":0.3346702477488073,"spread":0.3014152432244872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006140972,0.0001006311,0.0002569603,0.0000167137,0.0008530398,0.000009463492,0.000296494,0.0001888888,0.00001047612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002075272,0.0000547109,0.00003084431,0.0001662491,0.007363447,0.0001118396,0.0002589381,0.0002971259,0.000001123809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007944331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007866283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000521722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986159,0.0004182064,0.0001774692,0.0001485083,0.0002914568,0.0003484515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964343,0.003250732,0.000118729,0.0000739129,0.00006993562,0.00005239102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000419119,0.000001618216,0.006577605,0.00004020559,0.00005421671,0.000001557306,0.01681049,9.810888e-8,0.00001093638,0.9706813,0.005052677,0.0007273931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003240924,0.00005199511,0.04964369,0.0001584427,0.001122731,0.000002641573,0.2554253,0.000006596346,0.00003562346,0.6568218,0.03316157,0.0003286328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290312,0.003314503,0.00003043818,0.04572747,0.001002856,0.0003853365,0.0001974231,0.00002357606,0.02028722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927474,0.003316316,0.00003717357,0.0002739286,0.00261541,0.000001084525,3.265411e-7,0.000004661172,0.001003679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3138594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137343073","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2427","title":"Academic freedom in Canadian higher education: Universities, colleges, and institutes were not created equal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Higher education; Collegiality; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Public relations; Pedagogy; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02327454807762378,"gpt":0.2927060080742302,"spread":0.2694314599966064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003101839,0.0001247938,0.0001772647,0.0006938885,0.0003981555,0.0001032989,0.0003419875,0.0003393701,0.003083473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005649496,0.0001358958,0.00003308175,0.000391992,0.0004121955,0.0007618496,0.000006912434,0.00052793,0.0000392816],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002606839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05510299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8769303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986684,0.0001381762,0.0003291838,0.0001300307,0.0001833915,0.0005508134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974334,0.00008232888,0.0001755123,0.00009843874,0.0003413,0.001869029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003264269,0.00001542701,0.1227742,0.00001156579,0.00001694413,0.000006847154,0.005540577,0.00001129695,0.000008205341,0.4134529,0.457332,0.0008268519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001599565,0.00001759354,0.1424725,0.00008927841,0.000020131,0.00001208934,0.005924386,0.000001358135,0.000002583923,0.002989979,0.8481698,0.000140358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7664034,0.01201993,8.687118e-7,0.07196306,0.01185766,0.0003976743,0.00005500673,0.00001214293,0.1372903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065149,0.0001737057,0.00009711079,0.002655321,0.002149522,0.000005808165,0.00001377861,0.00001111815,0.08837876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4104629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883432303","doi":"10.1017/heq.2018.22","title":"The Paradox of Academic Freedom in the Chinese Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Education Quarterly","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Context (archaeology); Academic freedom; Action (physics); Law; Political science; Higher education; Mathematics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02215153295657275,"gpt":0.3231254830680034,"spread":0.3009739501114307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075632,0.00006016331,0.0001011015,0.00005383606,0.0001516045,0.000004282682,0.0005367781,0.0001064297,0.00009452262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002416947,0.0000384611,0.00004354729,0.0001613963,0.001882767,0.000105546,0.000003527544,0.0001978832,0.00002762465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002150499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001137863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005709717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003769563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989132,0.000291128,0.0003025795,0.00008484717,0.00024962,0.0001586541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998922,0.0004687424,0.0002241568,0.0002123399,0.0001332379,0.00003944927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229594,0.00006090607,0.006371514,0.000007741912,0.00000397949,3.587022e-8,0.4816995,1.146386e-7,0.0000776305,0.255791,0.2340102,0.02196505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001089105,0.0001138176,0.01954738,0.00002016029,0.000007231758,5.832057e-7,0.07032508,0.000008718138,0.000002276577,0.01360609,0.896201,0.00005877133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040875,0.009026804,0.00003602787,0.007608237,0.009315662,0.0003812211,0.000005271772,0.00001572937,0.1695236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911817,0.00007102004,0.00002416388,0.0004204887,0.001142176,0.00001717781,0.000001206829,0.000003995279,0.007138096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6621907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060024691","doi":"10.1177/1532708612446419","title":"Universities Gone Wild","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Institution; Entertainment; State (computer science); Media studies; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Democracy; Narrative; Language change; Higher education; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2226439880275388,"gpt":0.4794449673101391,"spread":0.2568009792826003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00230463,0.0002224924,0.0004541984,0.00005490368,0.00121301,0.00003844231,0.0003860386,0.0003572638,0.000125621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01965688,0.0001712822,0.0001384117,0.0002626673,0.004508364,0.000553494,0.0002735583,0.0004646074,0.00009031405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002358992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008458363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001531991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003154223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966165,0.001455741,0.0002382397,0.0002322117,0.0003677326,0.001089618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935225,0.005651526,0.0000497195,0.0001842575,0.0003220728,0.0002699022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001068138,0.00002159341,0.0006653029,0.00004772603,0.00008528411,0.000003398499,0.07314788,5.209546e-7,0.00005738704,0.8662754,0.05867308,0.001011788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000887946,0.00003791768,0.0003681433,0.00003047345,0.0001031825,0.000003453112,0.454258,2.305055e-7,0.0002001377,0.06640519,0.4782858,0.0002186918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01497855,0.1549358,0.01288096,0.05524826,0.01518277,0.0005784608,0.00009019033,0.001536255,0.7445688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7229265,0.01424981,0.2203062,0.004760941,0.00953983,0.00004575371,0.000006457602,0.00004011053,0.02812438],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289745553","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02242","title":"Words Matter: On the Debate over Free Speech, Inclusivity, and Academic Excellence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Chemistry; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01554590158448131,"gpt":0.2794483637351617,"spread":0.2639024621506804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149582,0.0001070601,0.0001461695,0.00001296397,0.0007595919,0.00002295268,0.001198662,0.00004441811,0.0003087949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000144978,0.00006445403,0.00008737573,0.0001374061,0.0006736601,0.00007560832,0.0004256357,0.001579948,0.000006777465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001304215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006154451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001522353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001406812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983941,0.0002905288,0.0001894474,0.00008591747,0.0007667224,0.0002732759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984471,0.0009873395,0.0002485505,0.0001967347,0.00001841732,0.0001019151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001465994,0.0001121511,0.001578627,0.00003656952,0.00009079985,0.00003797668,0.03503024,0.0004754105,0.5427819,0.004019198,0.4149532,0.0007373258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004386343,0.0004502701,0.005026108,0.0005250112,0.0009831475,0.0008779003,0.0487822,0.001356725,0.2552801,0.1620466,0.517947,0.002338632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.898946,0.00009328534,0.00001192128,0.09661677,0.0001076411,0.00005306834,0.00001017237,0.000006586859,0.004154503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878588,0.00006791355,0.000005579374,0.00968718,0.001996982,0.000001960513,2.605033e-7,0.000009451605,0.0003718499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2875017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6864173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644309234","doi":"","title":"Cogs in the Classroom Factory: The Changing Identity of Academic Labor","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Identity (music); Politics; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Management; Gender studies; Law; Art; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03923948665811623,"gpt":0.3321461080510507,"spread":0.2929066213929345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002884663,0.0001665995,0.0002601641,0.0001253379,0.0002972924,0.00003269189,0.001326322,0.0008650835,0.0003303043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003784785,0.0000957712,0.0001152641,0.0003275668,0.0008177026,0.0001773039,0.00007430901,0.001554954,0.00005047497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008411963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001127828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001594575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977542,0.0004576881,0.0003510287,0.0001747004,0.0007694329,0.0004929098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985908,0.0007873107,0.00025289,0.000248497,0.00006858773,0.0000518998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.72633e-7,0.000003804364,0.0007436381,0.00001599818,0.00001031828,7.899348e-7,0.01392907,4.297911e-7,4.034499e-7,0.8302467,0.1548483,0.000199778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007608871,0.00000548282,0.0002770553,0.00005075664,0.00003457737,5.908253e-7,0.01071266,0.000001555617,0.000003435209,0.1256591,0.8630497,0.0001290007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001001179,0.001976553,0.00006576791,0.003106596,0.0006884846,0.0005399576,0.00005766711,0.00002492452,0.9925389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02671254,0.002492622,0.000009280734,0.003982435,0.00116532,0.00002127145,0.000008356342,0.00001851096,0.9655896],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7082014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6755588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W313022521","doi":"","title":"Who Controls Canadian Universities? Ethnoracial Origins of Canadian University Administrators and Faculty's Perception of Mistreatment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Population; Ethnic group; Representation (politics); Political science; Administration (probate law); Ethnology; Humanities; Sociology; Demography; Law; Art; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09756999910271778,"gpt":0.3615107766827592,"spread":0.2639407775800414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002072849,0.000134733,0.0002854672,0.0006281177,0.0005023054,0.000004430267,0.0001884414,0.0002284092,0.00006423044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009567198,0.0001551537,0.00005952814,0.0005178446,0.001332462,0.0001055761,0.00001119153,0.0001480345,0.000004275841],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007838595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01603836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988631,0.00007689649,0.0001517428,0.0001774687,0.0001582909,0.0005725161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981967,0.00006607801,0.00007932699,0.0001062268,0.0002366024,0.001315059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002325164,0.00001816348,0.01548967,0.0000844095,0.0005803845,0.0002457412,0.2405098,0.00005179022,0.00002780025,0.7261836,0.006582526,0.01020287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009923842,0.0001355537,0.1267136,0.0001147868,0.0002016591,0.000002960903,0.6379059,0.000001650913,0.00003240846,0.0008307694,0.2327327,0.000335681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.94525,0.002936458,0.000001268609,0.008071658,0.0002894742,0.0003036222,0.002325535,0.00001296509,0.04080902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949877,0.003214745,0.00004900681,0.0002141665,0.00009607839,7.885583e-7,0.00001937996,0.000006509922,0.001411666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7253528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103008232","doi":"10.18738/awl.v32i0.90","title":"Queen Bees and Mommy Tracking: How's an Academic Woman Supposed to Get Ahead?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Tracking (education); Focus (optics); Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Pedagogy; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04882027900836802,"gpt":0.3486917092871211,"spread":0.2998714302787531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008267773,0.0001224087,0.0001547723,0.00007025989,0.0003236683,0.00007111063,0.0003123252,0.0003289732,0.0002248852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002185761,0.0001094933,0.00002894213,0.0001471395,0.0002622805,0.0008069951,0.00005817175,0.0003206768,0.00005906126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005902778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006604727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002977657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004175907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984614,0.0001684052,0.0001490545,0.0001787062,0.0002982479,0.0007441746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988565,0.0001449922,0.00003959074,0.0001334804,0.00004020101,0.0007851766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001213539,0.0000543309,0.2209443,0.00001497262,0.00001724204,0.000001317212,0.1072899,9.581486e-7,0.0011575,0.5677945,0.09387128,0.008841683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643961,0.00008319308,0.04656044,0.00001416773,0.00002597204,0.000003432592,0.02161978,0.000014283,0.001481216,0.005364719,0.9241742,0.0003941645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145511,0.0002294539,0.000228491,0.02796846,0.0004216596,0.0002878357,0.00001430915,0.0001814563,0.05611724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814813,0.0001028824,0.0006868969,0.00358318,0.001893175,0.00000815838,0.000004369344,0.00001474765,0.01222526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.830303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4501346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949708513","doi":"10.29173/cjs6305","title":"Professional, Critical, Policy, and Public Academics in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Sociology; Public policy; Order (exchange); Higher education; Sample (material); Policy analysis; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0481666641701464,"gpt":0.3454394957330196,"spread":0.2972728315628732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032225,0.00005681785,0.000146729,0.0001153464,0.0005309436,0.0000178489,0.0003534762,0.0002172472,0.00005389217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002778841,0.00004178571,0.00002122615,0.0001229025,0.001405177,0.00009495884,0.000007559824,0.0008465679,0.000001161112],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04073954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986497,0.0003798022,0.0002386636,0.00005286462,0.0001433848,0.0005355783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985153,0.0006313463,0.00008871697,0.00004821574,0.0001115046,0.000604927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001766012,0.000002069462,0.03530549,0.000001356858,0.000004465679,0.00002393116,0.01072682,0.000001850538,0.000002604424,0.9293858,0.02358796,0.0009559061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002465208,0.00005570202,0.07143123,0.0000318663,0.0000112483,0.0000899625,0.02838927,0.000009046031,0.000001772792,0.5589096,0.3406855,0.0001383256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5304261,0.001540648,0.000002307491,0.4616832,0.0005755798,0.00004623272,0.000007914617,0.000001441992,0.005716632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807555,0.0002102584,0.00002279323,0.01784364,0.0009864048,3.946058e-7,3.005794e-7,0.000002857209,0.0001778415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4503295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9646986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1742900175","doi":"10.14288/workplace.v0i24.186137","title":"Threat Convergence: The New Academic Work, Bullying, Mobbing and Freedom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Mobbing; Dissent; Work (physics); Convergence (economics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Higher education; Economics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08305477946857212,"gpt":0.3494881107497034,"spread":0.2664333312811313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008172783,0.00008651616,0.0001164999,0.00002649671,0.00352218,0.0005847389,0.0006007825,0.000185032,0.0005422269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004827595,0.00006788741,0.00002678673,0.0008953722,0.0004344136,0.0002791609,0.0002080605,0.0004157842,0.00004302883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009230917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1068786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006811516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989712,0.0001491553,0.0001586807,0.0001704648,0.0002389212,0.000311597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999156,0.0002313385,0.00006245668,0.0001441456,0.00007783145,0.0003282268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000704465,0.000004600413,0.001959974,5.383476e-7,0.00001110507,4.514932e-7,0.008460648,0.00003195747,0.000001088139,0.0234118,0.9656774,0.0004334246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003276684,0.00001953167,0.0001219292,0.00001760433,0.00002909498,0.000005041176,0.01156816,0.00007836637,0.000007964078,0.03573472,0.9519738,0.0001161058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00199771,0.001067611,0.000644428,0.01375984,0.001856119,0.0006910809,0.000008340459,0.00006687224,0.979908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06431288,0.000852781,0.0004827628,0.0007065064,0.001350508,0.00004926052,0.000001440947,0.00001260788,0.9322312],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1000671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W381716945","doi":"","title":"You Must Be a Basketball Player: Rethinking Integration in the University","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Mythology; Basketball; Political science; Media studies; Literacy; Sociology; Law; Classics; Art; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02549192342405729,"gpt":0.2876746028428914,"spread":0.2621826794188341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002390346,0.00014943,0.0003166329,0.0001444679,0.0002934869,0.000008526876,0.000593251,0.002586772,0.0007640964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009384198,0.0001171741,0.00005616695,0.00009687147,0.002354337,0.0000471218,0.00007364011,0.00190712,0.00001911021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001654421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008632418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01555468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975401,0.001173788,0.0002242058,0.0002771703,0.0003774314,0.0004073587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.001171229,0.0001070856,0.0001308612,0.00003322864,0.0001467406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217925,0.00002149977,0.0003507663,0.00000775924,0.00001158266,0.0004061774,0.0234877,9.430743e-8,1.433326e-7,0.9227728,0.04365413,0.009265549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155057,0.0001230901,0.0006134888,0.00007773831,0.00005724196,0.0001045023,0.002182767,0.00003534476,2.234535e-7,0.3273906,0.668837,0.0001625229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00259326,0.0008077468,0.0002457374,0.04280022,0.0007304936,0.0002127927,0.000006948604,0.00004121839,0.9525616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09914506,0.007344284,0.0001353192,0.0355322,0.002159809,0.000004513637,0.000186024,0.00001747836,0.8554753],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6251829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587550597","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3856","title":"The Canadian University Copyright Specialist: A Cross-Canada Selfie","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Copyright Act; Negotiation; Selfie; Academic freedom; Political science; Higher education; Work (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Law; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06462500021697054,"gpt":0.3656015146935842,"spread":0.3009765144766136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003652859,0.00005189439,0.00006738627,0.0001289848,0.01633181,0.003168901,0.000722114,0.0001086201,0.00009889287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002622315,0.00003308244,0.00001951584,0.0001355257,0.002025025,0.01381247,0.00003885702,0.0007726472,0.000006468673],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001687778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0235221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9652364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983932,0.0005231588,0.0001804251,0.00004171867,0.0004338566,0.0004276772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971029,0.001166633,0.0002390602,0.0001517706,0.0002866994,0.00105295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003721234,7.740849e-7,0.006160448,0.00000537658,0.00001919322,0.00003463034,0.007080586,0.000001303277,2.346301e-8,0.8578786,0.127152,0.001629885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001289641,0.00001758443,0.01005523,0.00001197379,0.000007786784,0.0000297174,0.01358592,0.00001497554,0.000003097505,0.002430154,0.9736679,0.00004668755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009500325,0.0004232341,5.446339e-7,0.3537654,0.0003182729,0.000102451,0.00001864919,0.000001652402,0.6358695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863409,0.002087716,0.00001425951,0.002701655,0.0006179008,3.100774e-7,0.00000191361,0.000002702632,0.00823269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513492094","doi":"10.29173/cjs1036","title":"Political Affiliation of Canadian Professors","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Status quo; Sociology; Democracy; Liberalism; Prestige; Sexual orientation; Political science; Humanities; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08580767710374163,"gpt":0.3245797170562592,"spread":0.2387720399525176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009380098,0.00005163455,0.0001552007,0.0003031312,0.0007751754,0.000004128025,0.0003537978,0.0002553911,0.0001972958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007295124,0.00003960773,0.00006835486,0.000168696,0.002993376,0.00005726518,0.000003735848,0.0004018543,0.00001295047],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005181849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01239919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8913857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986538,0.0003608409,0.0002556022,0.00004200519,0.0001326189,0.0005551514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984481,0.0002290243,0.0001556213,0.00006968658,0.0002465992,0.0008509178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001724648,0.000001674706,0.03020567,0.000001533463,0.00001667647,0.0000195508,0.03537866,0.000003500237,0.000003421859,0.9174333,0.01689726,0.00003700659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005759872,0.0002191261,0.1394284,0.00003955347,0.00008297076,0.0002867716,0.0507395,0.00001077115,0.00009077182,0.2746677,0.5335888,0.0002696037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8173277,0.0004014236,0.000006609972,0.08244171,0.001119578,0.0000915692,0.00002570909,0.000002911401,0.09858284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996556,0.0000439812,0.00004699293,0.0016804,0.0008549612,5.472094e-7,0.00000101651,0.000004825029,0.0008112926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986727214","doi":"10.7202/050051ar","title":"Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Voice of Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Position (finance); Work (physics); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07346364691874349,"gpt":0.3452364260172395,"spread":0.2717727790984961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002913115,0.00005490107,0.0000716306,0.000036969,0.000727219,0.00001490265,0.0002337739,0.0002087807,0.0002359229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009120948,0.00004211615,0.00003392089,0.0004843689,0.0006011835,0.0001395565,0.00002714097,0.0002875111,0.00005555215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000530403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006181244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001272046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992186,0.000110232,0.0001761625,0.00008888872,0.0002283647,0.0001776856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991457,0.0004950855,0.00009273524,0.0001115441,0.00009892436,0.00005594261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004667194,0.00004001718,0.025815,2.675845e-7,0.0000259179,2.815901e-7,0.2739605,0.0009575937,0.0000209136,0.6020779,0.09016537,0.00693156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001215001,0.00001072676,0.002226792,0.0000101168,0.00001363902,6.154669e-7,0.06007933,0.0002309683,0.0004545729,0.002635658,0.9341402,0.00007589651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2133216,0.0002939267,0.0005503983,0.01017267,0.000157692,0.0002542602,0.00003600015,0.00005038008,0.7751631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649322,0.00003206097,0.0002963477,0.0001191727,0.0003747855,0.00001121814,0.000003579072,0.000003923635,0.0342267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8439748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298752007","doi":"10.2307/369558","title":"Academic Freedom in Canada: A History","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Education Quarterly","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02242435311810338,"gpt":0.2629797085655751,"spread":0.2405553554474718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002815239,0.00008170165,0.0001469537,0.0001076891,0.00003835266,0.000001123241,0.0002806867,0.0001300994,0.006120956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003983951,0.0001017004,0.00003270588,0.00008287392,0.000334856,0.0001630185,0.000001643043,0.0002774803,0.00005660335],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01669617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03375858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9238712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988301,0.0001456781,0.0003301986,0.0001503961,0.0002894768,0.0002541658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994433,0.00008199693,0.0001173116,0.0001543425,0.00005644781,0.000146621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006697636,0.00004138313,0.00317005,0.00001211663,0.000002382339,5.126983e-7,0.08705445,0.000004253128,0.00002333024,0.018809,0.8546519,0.03622393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001004303,0.00002095872,0.005624375,0.00002360929,0.000005689558,6.024642e-7,0.007748429,0.00001247906,3.421071e-7,0.0005959115,0.985761,0.0001061207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3688883,0.01764118,0.000004501816,0.001844855,0.01083861,0.0002301583,0.000006646665,0.00003226601,0.6005135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365412,0.0002000401,0.00009010833,0.0009033917,0.0007316485,0.00002290819,0.000005699761,0.0000103682,0.1614946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4676529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131713631","doi":"10.1590/s0104-40602010000200003","title":"Ensino superior, para quê?","year":2010,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Educar em Revista","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03701376428752939,"gpt":0.3404327192473725,"spread":0.3034189549598431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101675,0.000332435,0.0004706171,0.00007644272,0.0006630604,0.0003836019,0.0008248905,0.0006682531,0.004602193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000892246,0.0003287669,0.0002591177,0.0004228276,0.0008763692,0.0002165868,0.000127578,0.001417908,0.002565866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009050591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001012119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001630729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006946729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971071,0.0002945826,0.000514601,0.0005001168,0.0005788594,0.001004754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980447,0.0002940965,0.0001782032,0.0006765708,0.0001672208,0.0006392083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009855338,0.000131594,0.01141384,0.0001290471,0.00005496289,0.00002043611,0.06488684,1.731285e-7,0.001061692,0.2999171,0.6159625,0.00641193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001551868,0.00003678404,0.003008106,0.00007608074,0.00008867253,0.00001482762,0.01246062,0.000009518043,0.0000750617,0.0006830894,0.9829749,0.0004171823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022529,0.004733643,0.00001523809,0.0145396,0.0168539,0.0004987103,0.00009956546,0.0001337414,0.06087271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8704929,0.0006725684,0.0001572393,0.001561257,0.01121373,0.000007846175,0.00001567689,0.0000475639,0.1158312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3670124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283819427","doi":"10.1093/ips/olac004","title":"The Settler Coloniality of Free Speech","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Sociology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; White (mutation); Enlightenment; Politics; Sociology; Free speech; Public sphere; Indigenous; Embodied cognition; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03009160033048919,"gpt":0.36172228829206,"spread":0.3316306879615709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028907,0.00004884821,0.00009485944,0.00002110596,0.0006388411,0.000008072217,0.0008875201,0.000095405,0.001255957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001626461,0.0000406544,0.00007662179,0.00004147186,0.002371571,0.00002761002,0.0003084613,0.0003410137,0.0000208957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002200727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00386953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001101584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983665,0.0005024686,0.0002220367,0.0001042872,0.0004085252,0.0003961939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981203,0.001484801,0.00007001348,0.0001278352,0.0001069109,0.00009011293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107749,0.00002307737,0.00531627,6.398545e-7,0.00002472814,0.000001602924,0.001273112,0.000001740483,0.00001349092,0.9653843,0.02779595,0.0001540191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001002022,0.0000201255,0.001617923,3.549564e-7,0.000003690568,0.00000226489,0.002242824,0.00001279028,0.00001894293,0.5287213,0.4672283,0.0000313313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2342041,0.0001276053,0.00007032122,0.292592,0.004770458,0.0001612943,0.0004674535,0.00004490926,0.4675618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918844,0.00001187673,0.00005559978,0.002941567,0.001061518,0.00001972375,0.00001083276,0.00000426908,0.004010257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975985333","doi":"10.1108/00251740410538479","title":"The institution of tenure: freedom or discipline?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Decision","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Institution; Academic freedom; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Sociology; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Public administration; Higher education; Law; Medicine; Nursing; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02596515651824139,"gpt":0.3329474311468404,"spread":0.3069822746285991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007432252,0.00006135552,0.00007548273,0.00004964665,0.0006144263,0.00004039951,0.0003363454,0.00006444645,0.00003190002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002270403,0.00003533587,0.00004350224,0.000296406,0.0004039974,0.0001149888,0.0001288044,0.00007647118,0.00005925752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009751065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005073417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003465202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001056964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989309,0.00003337554,0.0002170517,0.0001160151,0.0004907704,0.0002118965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.0001624618,0.00006290004,0.0002081839,0.00004063308,0.00005248042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998038,0.00002621566,0.0004700192,0.000005403294,0.00001063157,0.000005937098,0.001019861,0.0005019965,0.000002209933,0.9531418,0.007242769,0.0375332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006636037,0.00004063423,0.005716654,0.00008298185,0.0000280057,5.915011e-7,0.003381914,0.00003170015,0.00002725201,0.2315452,0.7583861,0.00009538276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1652459,0.0009305723,0.1449086,0.01648855,0.00660869,0.001622106,0.0000195361,0.0001986727,0.6639773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891495,0.001368501,0.002853171,0.0001142166,0.0003608135,0.000009645168,0.000001721234,0.00000545342,0.006136992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4725732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316755484","doi":"10.1017/s1479244311000552","title":"WHAT IS OUR “CANON”? HOW AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORIANS DEBATE THE CORE OF THEIR FIELD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); Canon; History; Conversation; Intellectual history; Window (computing); Core (optical fiber); Center (category theory); Scholarship; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Classics; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology; Telecommunications; Economic history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06689479025574607,"gpt":0.2933707705347841,"spread":0.226475980279038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007315175,0.0002554034,0.0003702368,0.000135384,0.0003981099,0.00002945715,0.0008290673,0.0002370263,0.0008954923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001727468,0.0001974126,0.0002238529,0.0002358427,0.001303685,0.0004255175,0.000111143,0.000624404,0.0001078201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001336638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005410985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003015845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009696589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978478,0.0003074571,0.0003051444,0.0002611887,0.0005020553,0.0007763687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969264,0.001981279,0.0002289014,0.0004332681,0.0001650709,0.0002651417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003347694,0.00003783014,0.00009274961,0.000006988029,0.00003105843,3.883323e-7,0.5340038,9.372307e-7,0.000125297,0.001026104,0.4445128,0.02012858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008833631,0.0001305076,0.000006359981,0.00002729307,0.00003677302,0.00000406873,0.03252041,0.0002867181,0.0007036093,0.0006780995,0.965275,0.0002428621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5906206,0.1495998,0.03280244,0.04321442,0.05236895,0.001732405,0.00008569651,0.0006633027,0.1289124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441363,0.00301291,0.00006339404,0.003948258,0.001776028,0.00001998456,0.000002908174,0.00003719432,0.04700303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5207621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165446868","doi":"10.7202/1006343ar","title":"Attitudes towards Faculty Unions and Collective Bargaining in American and Canadian Universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Politics; Opposition (politics); Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06967344901190645,"gpt":0.3045621184363356,"spread":0.2348886694244291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001604022,0.0000552192,0.00007831254,0.0001846861,0.000576568,0.0000174815,0.00006258159,0.0001417793,0.0000693683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001142372,0.00006053659,0.000008475998,0.0004148924,0.0007506984,0.0001356922,0.00002209601,0.0002370157,0.000002524746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003087235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001603723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6093839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3231815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994725,0.00008203774,0.00007743236,0.00009835611,0.00006841835,0.0002012338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.0001004506,0.00003068718,0.00003953104,0.00003552727,0.0001715732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001791962,0.000009108288,0.5141205,3.451137e-7,0.00001761614,0.000004346648,0.1188122,0.000009445251,3.205906e-7,0.3616985,0.002012986,0.003312771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002187943,0.0000355479,0.6045664,0.00002972903,0.00002176838,0.000001913879,0.3272274,0.000060501,0.000006660644,0.006005807,0.06165942,0.0001660281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5984062,0.0001148256,0.00002003297,0.001188937,0.00003432494,0.00008469508,0.00004936358,0.0000177256,0.4000839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930551,0.0001333689,0.0003553497,0.00006559047,0.00003667282,0.00000210966,0.000005054244,0.000003563534,0.006343198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3946489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6891687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260797510","doi":"","title":"Academic status for Canadian academic librarians: a brief history","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Promotion (chess); Academic freedom; Institution; Academic institution; Political science; Corporate governance; Legal status; Academic integrity; Higher education; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Library science; Psychology; Management; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08811794472979512,"gpt":0.2882684873654773,"spread":0.2001505426356822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002477804,0.0006282342,0.001102121,0.0007035717,0.001406099,0.0001351844,0.005019082,0.004175499,0.006736636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005963102,0.0008826501,0.0004615425,0.000145403,0.002062551,0.003311985,0.0006580664,0.005321514,0.0009002414],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003453026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01023407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4110275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07415681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953715,0.0003431587,0.0006201196,0.001043635,0.0009409724,0.001680676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950208,0.0006816465,0.001008477,0.0007579678,0.000508741,0.002022337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005577363,0.000006763832,0.0003439627,0.00008874871,0.0001199577,0.00002155396,0.005750045,8.396453e-7,0.00002243138,0.5938151,0.3936532,0.006121596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009544591,0.00007111135,0.0005416474,0.0005324663,0.0002658335,0.000004226118,0.001523793,0.000006806157,0.00000593961,0.03257787,0.9626068,0.0009090351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007724477,0.005812305,0.000133804,0.01031256,0.001780358,0.002942106,0.001526334,0.0001194533,0.9766006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00575236,0.008187936,0.002066712,0.004212224,0.001198981,0.000007013055,0.0003549957,0.0001532904,0.9780665],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5689536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298337422","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1418","title":"Civil Disobedience and Academic Freedom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Academic freedom; Law; Civil rights; Relation (database); Subject (documents); Political science; Higher education; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02908658317992825,"gpt":0.3043443928641043,"spread":0.275257809684176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001446635,0.0001238687,0.0001597357,0.00004024055,0.001392883,0.000111702,0.0003375249,0.0002639954,0.0004318928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004770344,0.0001109786,0.00005839339,0.0001226829,0.0008993106,0.0004365366,0.00003393928,0.001007965,0.00004614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007673295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001565382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008956296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03344611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998221,0.0002868123,0.0002746984,0.0001672422,0.0004541172,0.0005961593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999005,0.0001836103,0.0001368616,0.00009987957,0.00007527808,0.0004994204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002359931,0.00000945908,0.004154503,0.000003161699,0.000007666064,0.000009722273,0.002326074,0.000005286624,0.00005451414,0.9888589,0.00399471,0.0005736101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004162281,0.0000379185,0.0003954676,0.00005115966,0.0000289185,0.0002073215,0.002523377,0.00002125442,0.00007468164,0.5218029,0.4742044,0.0002363798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004904558,0.002653386,0.0008845042,0.001847413,0.001346332,0.00007900046,0.000005450162,0.00003912302,0.9882402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918755,0.003265338,0.0009820455,0.0006850373,0.001409536,0.000002108188,3.671196e-7,0.00001269754,0.001767365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388504930","doi":"10.1123/ssj.2023-0090","title":"Brittney Griner, Intersectionality, and “Woke Politics”: A Critical Examination of Brittney Griner’s Return to the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Sport Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Gender studies; Politics; Nationality; Sociology; Race (biology); Patriotism; Sexual orientation; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Law; Immigration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04288384762293954,"gpt":0.3586403980924966,"spread":0.315756550469557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002745264,0.00009503985,0.0002416447,0.0002247044,0.0005086256,0.00001516516,0.0002680971,0.0002253881,0.00009977288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008228286,0.00007771327,0.00008216398,0.000304684,0.002848165,0.00009313886,0.00009483531,0.0005289882,0.000006211286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007439379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001887973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002810084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002173474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984753,0.0001918855,0.0004636619,0.0001322876,0.0003364737,0.0004004223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986476,0.0004473627,0.00017615,0.00008904968,0.0004327643,0.0002070768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003241987,0.00006377917,0.2059617,0.00007302786,0.0001296316,0.00003972299,0.08651396,0.0000819466,0.0001322,0.6708061,0.0353117,0.000853918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005730739,0.00030312,0.5336692,0.0001274236,0.0001044349,0.0002523601,0.09018293,0.0002260678,0.00007847749,0.2552003,0.11902,0.0002626761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971815,0.000140915,0.000122089,0.02533002,0.0007733995,0.00009198816,0.00004747331,0.00002580823,0.001653338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962434,0.000795924,0.0001098954,0.0007621624,0.001102713,0.000002942287,0.0000328036,0.000008971383,0.0009411473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4156058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260804756","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x1400123x","title":"Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tobacco Research Unit; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Ideology; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1669919588282282,"gpt":0.4378918758072756,"spread":0.2708999169790474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002883418,0.0001974042,0.0003638741,0.0001693594,0.0007481943,0.0001279029,0.0006506405,0.001250163,0.00009932504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002520674,0.0001631273,0.0000575509,0.0004659982,0.004979376,0.000220306,0.0001057376,0.001229957,0.00001700707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007431705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004021707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007561714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001061957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969166,0.0007991433,0.0003068357,0.0005183367,0.0006748378,0.0007842402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993158,0.0003034023,0.0001361444,0.00008058919,0.00005728754,0.0001067746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005274394,0.00002092926,0.02669426,0.00000527803,8.023009e-7,0.00008505771,0.002668003,1.460093e-7,0.00001072166,0.003172932,0.9636656,0.003670987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852636,0.00008441711,0.005966526,0.00002587048,0.000009634947,0.00002173227,0.0006585812,0.000003233643,3.952047e-7,0.01560466,0.9771637,0.0002759489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2619127,0.0004385402,0.000002554576,0.7134413,0.0007745242,0.0001643834,0.00002279267,0.00004794379,0.02319533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1957286,0.0001029897,0.00053567,0.78758,0.0123109,0.00002790265,0.00002243373,0.00001529163,0.003676236],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07413872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281781233","doi":"10.26529/cepsj.965","title":"The Policy Efforts to Address Racism and Discrimination in Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Legislation; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Higher education; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Ethnic group; Institutional racism; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08201619487998332,"gpt":0.4269963376468864,"spread":0.344980142766903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007374345,0.00006746574,0.00008484409,0.0001396881,0.00320717,0.00003788969,0.0002078422,0.00001752806,0.00001563865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001096782,0.00004599083,0.00003125021,0.0003159309,0.0003026885,0.00009568586,0.00008831348,0.0001773044,1.493585e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001325871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007524138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2186894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3467217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990059,0.0001601081,0.0002615865,0.00008158403,0.0002255606,0.0002653225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988965,0.000550974,0.0001472745,0.00007514219,0.0002264367,0.0001036555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001074438,0.00005083116,0.001081836,0.00001051874,0.00002654806,8.166491e-7,0.02256206,0.00006725945,6.435853e-7,0.8399605,0.1329925,0.003235708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001951439,0.00002098129,0.01482089,0.00002580532,0.00001363951,0.0001778215,0.06338598,0.000002575087,0.000001573465,0.07867793,0.8426064,0.00007128371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2092196,0.0036038,0.000004559023,0.7746692,0.004465609,0.0005821025,0.0001913943,0.000002924739,0.007260717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869906,0.0004243026,0.00002628768,0.003690391,0.003329465,0.0001940725,0.000006620934,0.000004866181,0.005333397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7777709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089474666","doi":"10.7202/037432ar","title":"Visual Interpretations, Cartoons, and Caricatures of Student and Youth Cultures in University Yearbooks, 1898–19301","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Historical Association","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Yearbook; Construct (python library); Narrative; Institution; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Visual arts; Political science; Social science; Art; Law; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01010660661448765,"gpt":0.262514871022985,"spread":0.2524082644084974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004569684,0.00003579901,0.0001078344,0.00009538311,0.0001486611,0.00001113677,0.0001100192,0.0001159286,0.000001397765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003693801,0.00002966005,0.00003442995,0.0001215961,0.00001685747,0.00007380345,0.000007601286,0.0002185236,1.005457e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01684717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003414727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2035093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4099571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992989,0.0001758271,0.0001431178,0.00004150352,0.0002307995,0.0001098623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994457,0.00007016958,0.0002332862,0.00002468387,0.0000977758,0.0001283897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002642414,0.00007468257,0.6856948,0.000007924672,0.00007208435,0.000008887137,0.203697,0.00002620318,0.00006047394,0.01967663,0.08755787,0.003096971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007114523,0.0001593904,0.7003441,0.00008130012,0.0001938084,0.000002965138,0.01196191,0.0000213363,0.00001293612,0.003604478,0.2827209,0.0001854659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383351,0.002488325,0.000008015701,0.05376457,0.0009006262,0.0001413303,0.00003944182,0.000004701586,0.004317897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957533,0.0001735529,0.00002759427,0.0001830256,0.0001452672,3.021166e-8,3.147137e-7,0.000001274954,0.003715584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2064478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898793626","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2005.3.4.314","title":"From the ‘Culture Wars’ to the Conservative Campaign for Campus Diversity: Or, How Inclusion Became the New Exclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Corporatization; Sociology; Silence; Diversity (politics); Appropriation; Civil rights; Law; Multiculturalism; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Racism; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03047700649795104,"gpt":0.3596282407970028,"spread":0.3291512342990517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007354814,0.0001319256,0.0001109052,0.0000496608,0.003923256,0.0000948745,0.001019013,0.0001926844,0.00004762196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001951928,0.00006168472,0.00006122164,0.0004925569,0.0002393509,0.0001800325,0.0007350024,0.0003020841,0.00001319248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004821325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001508678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1170682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09939504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985907,0.0003601229,0.0001425174,0.0001956084,0.0003646831,0.0003463546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983473,0.001000072,0.0001247903,0.0002861066,0.0001170997,0.0001246147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002045325,0.0000189723,0.0004682388,0.000001237513,0.000005525381,3.2786e-8,0.4813033,0.00002401197,0.000009423447,0.02634016,0.4675604,0.02424824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001392355,0.00001869706,0.00341928,0.00002390877,0.00001931549,5.075852e-7,0.1499608,0.00002644206,0.00003404057,0.03831193,0.8079571,0.00008881611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1004477,0.001301129,0.0003511499,0.8913416,0.002026814,0.001334672,0.00008507419,0.00003357577,0.003078325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929375,0.0005505105,0.0006143261,0.06156941,0.03077679,0.00006675804,0.00003503483,0.00001173959,0.01343795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8297722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144993640","doi":"10.3138/jvme.36.4.375","title":"Faculty Ethics: Ideal Principles with Practical Applications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Sociology; Misconduct; Academic freedom; Professional ethics; Collegiality; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1958386161663034,"gpt":0.5013105699879394,"spread":0.305471953821636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001858707,0.00007082814,0.000133679,0.00006791158,0.0002539088,0.00003144101,0.0002499097,0.0002585654,0.0001950055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002993018,0.00005308386,0.00004646679,0.0001634409,0.0003104573,0.0002911939,0.00001236184,0.0009496261,0.00001289151],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007845873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009040657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001930376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.0002501744,0.000357298,0.00008656528,0.00105058,0.0001955185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984012,0.0003321649,0.0003091077,0.00008718871,0.0003709547,0.0004993762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002987146,0.001769842,0.002205865,0.00006027822,0.0000601521,0.00008776529,0.03106615,0.00001106407,0.00008963937,0.7552065,0.05648281,0.1526612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002212173,0.0006211092,0.004735481,0.000110816,0.00002811158,0.0006335747,0.003721209,0.00001366803,0.000005756963,0.005477016,0.9843488,0.00008317841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2980181,0.0009122275,0.0318179,0.5952435,0.001982907,0.0006103998,0.000007611595,0.00008001442,0.07132741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783392,0.0004407066,0.01207838,0.004709886,0.003704207,0.000008558054,0.000007268293,0.000006253798,0.0007055689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802544775","doi":"10.2307/4146162","title":"Values in Conflict: The University, the Marketplace, and the Trials of Liberal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal education; Sociology; Liberal arts education; Social science; Political science; Higher education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04028227350171295,"gpt":0.3193937662894469,"spread":0.279111492787734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008456505,0.00004274055,0.0001767929,0.0000458942,0.0006296913,0.00001448883,0.000508433,0.0001087926,0.00008169088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001090916,0.0000179306,0.00007000376,0.00007471335,0.004749502,0.00005388041,0.00001371277,0.0003785756,0.000001721511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002382953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04484642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1683103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965297,0.002928945,0.0002470027,0.00003344961,0.00008731666,0.0001735837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964719,0.002991866,0.0002960389,0.00007612258,0.00008232945,0.00008177702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004830215,0.000003442237,0.005653451,0.000001413047,0.00004244745,7.214127e-7,0.1658542,0.00002509134,0.0000018164,0.7595447,0.06609301,0.002731481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008174673,0.00002764532,0.02287775,0.00002011227,0.00009516374,0.00002557428,0.08465253,0.00001938428,0.000003163019,0.1163011,0.7751064,0.00005369526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5773787,0.00547802,0.000002870467,0.3824829,0.0005985405,0.0002363887,0.000009566849,0.000001350367,0.03381169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925237,0.0009407475,0.000009662281,0.002914643,0.000922485,4.180678e-7,2.057844e-7,0.000002243557,0.002685898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7090135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203024029","doi":"10.1089/heq.2021.29008.ncl","title":"Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation: Creating Public Sentiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Equity","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Police brutality; Racism; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Equity (law); Nothing; Equal employment opportunity; Democracy; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1068678621223434,"gpt":0.4298237684705078,"spread":0.3229559063481645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488489,0.00006251604,0.0001419971,0.00002548897,0.001108888,0.00008561739,0.00007601614,0.00009729403,0.0002341329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002840607,0.00006684583,0.00003048427,0.0001562961,0.0001347838,0.0002102211,0.00004398217,0.0001774903,0.00001277967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001998103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001260615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001546422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998499,0.00028008,0.000276691,0.0001366745,0.0003194757,0.0004881278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992743,0.000137933,0.00008262218,0.00007583133,0.00007257817,0.0003567407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003198635,0.00003217423,0.001144175,0.0001333394,0.000006658739,0.000002021516,0.08001841,0.000001016575,0.000003754222,0.8581752,0.00217053,0.05830954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006147701,0.00004932503,0.001713369,0.00006122554,0.00001011579,0.000009457905,0.0179008,0.0002717568,0.00007935426,0.01848468,0.9606166,0.0001885163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1335281,0.006659434,0.005222731,0.1862757,0.002808632,0.0006756269,0.00006895036,0.000272296,0.6644886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924479,0.001240003,0.0005993268,0.003977831,0.001002265,0.00000729977,0.00001796571,0.000005373925,0.0007020715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8528782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136551984","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2004v29n2a1435","title":"The \"Values\" Discussion Group at the University of Toronto, February - May 1949","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Sociology; Media studies; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01669844423913186,"gpt":0.2609469722420378,"spread":0.244248528002906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001084952,0.00003562122,0.00006211492,0.00001042621,0.001711429,0.00001877204,0.0009016755,0.00006402305,0.000119041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001242732,0.00001976278,0.00005613604,0.00005419356,0.0008666318,0.0001764515,0.00003255941,0.000182314,0.000005096059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008311815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008977988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4548477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9053171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991909,0.0003482487,0.0001395016,0.00002698654,0.000151679,0.0001426756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990732,0.0001668589,0.0002094589,0.000266613,0.00009789813,0.0001859395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003530938,0.00002068301,0.01158156,0.000005091316,0.00005875813,0.000005302695,0.1097964,0.0002040326,0.0000683205,0.7691834,0.07818292,0.03085828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002542513,0.00003298533,0.04551219,0.00006818809,0.00003114425,0.000007422337,0.03023114,0.000005956977,0.0000162458,0.02183272,0.901949,0.00005868647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3364044,0.05888949,0.0004419418,0.3500476,0.001521509,0.0004557932,0.00003885012,0.00001554143,0.2521849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934439,0.004463575,0.000113429,0.0001193183,0.00009026238,8.43153e-8,0.000001888936,0.000002820402,0.001764698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8237662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210973238","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.vi0.189143","title":"Academic Freedom and Its Constraints: A Complex History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Politics; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Political freedom; Higher education; Law; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0594408508564687,"gpt":0.3259817819325409,"spread":0.2665409310760722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002711546,0.0000544784,0.0001038323,0.0001124096,0.0001506371,0.00001984773,0.0001382527,0.0001415637,0.003668501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002246269,0.00006024121,0.00003087121,0.00009067898,0.0004128117,0.0001806363,0.000003860916,0.0003229669,0.0000138732],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000742609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01484727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005322127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006907973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992476,0.0001200467,0.0002082692,0.00006951149,0.0001306107,0.0002240111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.00006517854,0.0001403623,0.00004744719,0.0003391795,0.0007127361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.355223e-7,0.00000721981,0.006947288,0.000009008273,0.00001361203,0.00001327513,0.009520796,9.779196e-7,0.000144116,0.3122418,0.6694545,0.00164651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009311731,0.000007339141,0.01406562,0.00003776046,0.00002072915,0.00005504927,0.00267765,9.917243e-7,0.000008330207,0.003439229,0.9795275,0.00006670378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3418502,0.2299902,0.00003995906,0.08011912,0.03420738,0.0002386575,0.00005150915,0.00002184139,0.3134812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644701,0.0003464294,0.0001841489,0.002995437,0.002625481,8.464845e-7,0.000003470228,0.000006245257,0.0293678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6226199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132703345","doi":"10.6017/ihe.2010.58.8469","title":"Academic Freedom and Public Intellectuals in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Higher Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Academic freedom; Public administration; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06236556284438425,"gpt":0.3773167199344675,"spread":0.3149511570900833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005159097,0.00006401293,0.000066749,0.0001854354,0.00005511998,0.00005212152,0.0002701382,0.0001485425,0.0004557656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005668208,0.00006668932,0.0000142599,0.0001786346,0.0001956009,0.0003956271,0.00004049159,0.0002413454,0.00007747496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003168406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000611698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00444634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000294518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990901,0.0001043864,0.0001803705,0.0001388466,0.0003060955,0.0001801594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994747,0.00009611949,0.00006164746,0.0000602718,0.0001335262,0.0001737584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005387477,0.00005399308,0.09968296,0.00000171219,0.000006329399,2.360518e-7,0.01096673,0.000003597184,0.00001293982,0.8092747,0.07540538,0.004585999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000176194,0.000008927826,0.07045932,0.00001879848,0.00000270355,0.000001904476,0.001998184,0.0000431042,0.000005202127,0.08829522,0.838897,0.00009340757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5752712,0.00118768,0.00005987317,0.0620474,0.01021122,0.000163001,0.000005796761,0.00005609205,0.3509977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744117,0.0002191362,0.0001895417,0.0006861404,0.002069932,0.00002005995,0.00001630218,0.000006594562,0.02238066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7634916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6721566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W568981932","doi":"","title":"In Search Of Deep Throat: The Greatest Political Mystery Of Our Time","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insider; Politics; Gossip; Quarter (Canadian coin); Throat; Identity (music); History; Media studies; Political science; Art; Law; Medicine; Sociology; Aesthetics; Surgery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113502453836119,"gpt":0.326178522740881,"spread":0.2950434982025198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007260329,0.0001363835,0.0003808712,0.000103438,0.00006506251,0.000009993166,0.0005965586,0.0005925454,0.002080618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000821414,0.00009432316,0.0001183945,0.0001061765,0.0009248392,0.0000613083,0.00006372594,0.0005006333,0.0002772849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001759242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008549603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005164943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981135,0.0002237111,0.0004088577,0.0001557097,0.0005675012,0.0005307841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990301,0.0004620519,0.00007805551,0.0002272739,0.00008071184,0.0001217888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000628068,0.00002150993,0.000322436,0.0000478788,0.00001932749,0.000003960131,0.004290295,0.000001722939,0.000001750821,0.9389777,0.05604423,0.0002629629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006062352,0.0001957736,0.000539521,0.0004533363,0.0001377965,0.00001092448,0.01045643,0.0001058474,0.0001752448,0.2389248,0.7477435,0.0006505867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003931306,0.0001882598,0.00000416609,0.003180603,0.0001226652,0.0002233404,0.00005240479,0.00001246309,0.995823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061027,0.0001052132,0.00003083466,0.0004627851,0.001021991,0.000002571363,0.000008503534,0.00001595997,0.9373251],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7000529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037726441","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8497.2012.01631.x","title":"Finding His Kronstadt: Howard Fast, 1956 and American Communism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Politics & History","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"EaglePicher (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Ideology; Anguish; Scholarship; Politics; Political science; Narrative; Soviet union; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06276561131452427,"gpt":0.3265900011472642,"spread":0.2638243898327399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001084714,0.0001479135,0.000310181,0.0001915977,0.0003319394,0.00002127466,0.0003852201,0.0001363193,0.000211499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002148773,0.0001525111,0.0001186548,0.0000883789,0.002147183,0.0004109581,0.0000427514,0.0006886945,0.00002101733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001246721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000472962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002476532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006446583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979323,0.0003369537,0.0004272189,0.00007720699,0.0004168122,0.000809531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.0002181789,0.0004811664,0.0001570152,0.0001199445,0.0008461546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001063765,0.0001166346,0.0696265,0.00004054674,0.0001087964,0.00003031587,0.1144147,0.000001625727,0.0002487171,0.4786229,0.3320378,0.004740892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002208334,0.00008645221,0.007610172,0.00004680657,0.00009093519,0.00006994573,0.01321661,4.343333e-7,0.00004859133,0.001210457,0.9772055,0.0001933392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153807,0.005201073,0.0001570013,0.008268269,0.005014065,0.0001353619,0.00003600488,0.00004510194,0.06576247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778332,0.0003867233,0.001340528,0.0006938252,0.002371684,6.380167e-7,0.000001169472,0.00001895086,0.01735333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6451676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7911384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241287851","doi":"10.29173/irie369","title":"Canadian University Social Software Guidelines and Academic Freedom: An Alarming Labour Trend","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Reputation; Public relations; Framing (construction); Institution; Academic institution; Authoritarianism; Loyalty; Political science; Sociology; Academic integrity; Higher education; Psychology; Management; Law; Social psychology; Engineering; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0787733144803036,"gpt":0.3807849915089474,"spread":0.3020116770286438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827186,0.00005989743,0.000102917,0.00007882787,0.0004569963,0.00002303065,0.0005241008,0.0001871094,0.00009739245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004560076,0.00004983921,0.00003555488,0.0001198099,0.0002623655,0.0007501582,0.00004543245,0.0004877925,0.00001292715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001396083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006234758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05427921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0386071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988295,0.0002061626,0.0003167657,0.00004748082,0.000468349,0.0001317609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986087,0.0003789893,0.0002448302,0.00006881138,0.0005982537,0.0001004154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001941084,0.000001173005,0.0004694245,0.0001984277,0.00001015829,6.521518e-8,0.01035977,0.000008938334,6.626946e-7,0.949551,0.01295672,0.02644176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007956864,0.000005477619,0.0007695391,0.0004242151,0.00001588616,0.000001481838,0.002270908,0.0002800715,0.000001811698,0.00568761,0.9903986,0.00006479728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02422585,0.005333237,0.01087452,0.8352591,0.002768756,0.0007551523,0.0007899107,0.0001502895,0.1198431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5868443,0.2336745,0.008349537,0.1614254,0.004900095,0.000007625761,0.000483,0.00002576385,0.004289861],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133542536","doi":"","title":"Change in Higher Education and a Core Value: Academic Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Core (optical fiber); Value (mathematics); Higher education; Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Statistics; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.119222952994046,"gpt":0.2996449897399411,"spread":0.1804220367458952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002130883,0.0001001596,0.0001223171,0.0002429405,0.0002035707,0.000009916355,0.0002938542,0.0002843636,0.0004614481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003762302,0.0001199265,0.00002838581,0.0004897325,0.0004164095,0.0003770237,0.00006812088,0.0003083686,0.00002304601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002238497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002280096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01148982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001320014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990878,0.0001113857,0.0001093962,0.0002092397,0.000159357,0.0003228757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995121,0.0000710146,0.00007141928,0.0001155372,0.00004635334,0.0001836065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001997302,0.00003543647,0.04660551,0.000009058645,0.000005701435,0.00001484682,0.02666758,2.477079e-7,0.000007162407,0.9231459,0.002829954,0.0006585821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004048039,0.00002600808,0.08318998,0.00005367136,0.00003356839,0.000002002718,0.01255851,0.00001609668,0.000005840081,0.01508698,0.8883831,0.0002394669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3922137,0.0007722471,0.0000149862,0.001462192,0.001054843,0.0002758109,0.00001211094,0.00008256143,0.6041116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966744,0.000845142,0.0003076899,0.0004884893,0.0004991525,0.000001852929,0.00000425957,0.000009265679,0.03110014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799894949","doi":"10.1057/s41304-018-0172-9","title":"Introduction: Academic freedom in danger: case studies of Turkey, Hungary and Japan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Political Science","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Political philosophy; Political science; International relations; International political economy; European integration; Academic freedom; Multi-level governance; Political economy; Regional science; Economic history; Politics; International trade; Geography; Sociology; Law; Economics; European union","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04318631496317325,"gpt":0.3573976265935961,"spread":0.3142113116304229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003904896,0.0001098555,0.0001826603,0.000158349,0.0005447369,0.00003034,0.0004524425,0.00006442551,0.00006072292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003975642,0.00009685833,0.00002385461,0.0007056179,0.01725927,0.0003625982,0.0003061208,0.0003597083,0.00006224371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001602113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001993747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001930329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974918,0.000387748,0.0003450452,0.0003783825,0.0004435893,0.0009533723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987633,0.0002780478,0.00006872206,0.0002039918,0.0002050809,0.0004809024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004603737,0.000016674,0.004508984,0.0000131146,0.000003750029,0.00006747919,0.01392734,0.000001040721,0.0005311411,0.9756884,0.003743867,0.001493585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002702704,0.001636547,0.1121948,0.000559565,0.0001914115,0.003391823,0.2067153,0.001512598,0.006742738,0.1130432,0.5487164,0.002592918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8577272,0.0003524838,0.00001309194,0.007352149,0.0009635836,0.0001157064,0.00000776589,0.00004247575,0.1334255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929816,0.00009641323,0.0003362921,0.000420368,0.005245465,0.000001202656,2.57754e-7,0.000008260714,0.000910187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564476812","doi":"10.7202/1070556ar","title":"Safety, Dignity, and the Quest for a Democratic Campus Culture","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Democracy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06361244985980863,"gpt":0.3724829034156291,"spread":0.3088704535558205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005281476,0.00007988857,0.0001353464,0.00002035121,0.0002985139,0.00004158192,0.0001938805,0.0001641948,0.000010457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001953544,0.00005762407,0.00003525833,0.0001821009,0.0009867687,0.0001315698,0.00003477529,0.0002625776,0.000008127215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006229689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002751166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000222553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007968529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999046,0.0002328105,0.0002063215,0.0001681808,0.0001565599,0.0001901069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991823,0.0004692029,0.00006213402,0.00007445342,0.00007221911,0.0001396532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051855,0.00003810268,0.0007300589,0.00002418216,0.000004427632,1.160236e-7,0.06165564,0.000001909607,0.000005469471,0.9296312,0.005999836,0.001857237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005457202,0.000028706,0.000353773,0.0000210565,0.00002217195,9.896578e-7,0.005776963,0.0001759987,0.000004558011,0.9576111,0.03536782,0.00009111997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03466743,0.001565654,0.0006386777,0.9364042,0.00149023,0.001171686,0.00001184536,0.0000553422,0.02399494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809628,0.000504593,0.0002314342,0.01191473,0.00615742,0.00008726969,0.00001408362,0.000007076577,0.0001206275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.363579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084790749","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2002.tb00622.x","title":"The Bog‐like Ground on Which We Tread: Arbitrating Academic Freedom in Canada*","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbitrage; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law and economics; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07391970721934943,"gpt":0.2854494497460023,"spread":0.2115297425266529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004774787,0.0006529648,0.001398298,0.0001763607,0.001257533,0.0000189176,0.002045627,0.001808392,0.0007062952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005865266,0.0006150614,0.0003369797,0.000918299,0.004741612,0.0001572482,0.00007476656,0.004069217,0.00009730147],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0217286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0156928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904191,0.002531681,0.001613844,0.0007976104,0.0002253254,0.004412427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916611,0.00451006,0.0008026644,0.0007310126,0.0003190508,0.001976154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006523399,0.00002815141,0.0415469,0.003014352,0.0002300003,0.0002582064,0.03684421,0.0001424208,0.000005356897,0.5049344,0.3881508,0.02483859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005434417,0.0002428812,0.01594723,0.01047411,0.0002812462,0.00006323005,0.06812782,0.0008072836,9.504536e-7,0.0259326,0.8763801,0.001199086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1908754,0.5515442,0.000001348506,0.2292738,0.005780597,0.0009424749,0.0006630196,0.00002500121,0.02089418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5481941,0.4275785,0.00004935659,0.01836018,0.001667521,0.0001061533,0.00003637871,0.00005157318,0.003956165],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4882293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911256925","doi":"10.7202/1057134ar","title":"Faculty Associations Confront Accountability Governance in Ontario Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Corporatization; Accountability; Autonomy; Corporate governance; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Ideology; Public relations; Sociology; Higher education; Neoliberalism (international relations); Management; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02658984836236988,"gpt":0.3069479117386642,"spread":0.2803580633762943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088198,0.00004401282,0.00009577764,0.00006642736,0.0001087762,0.00003488706,0.0001766949,0.00009565461,0.002794869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003101261,0.00004784164,0.00003532623,0.00009756788,0.0000830942,0.0003711073,0.000002627991,0.0002496715,0.00003041883],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007990386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0331615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9297778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993644,0.00006406516,0.0001654721,0.00005489239,0.0001532855,0.0001978425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992993,0.00004683094,0.0001786174,0.00005685115,0.0002005549,0.0002178254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001311132,0.00001052144,0.8548819,0.000001544025,0.000005714503,5.924094e-7,0.02862525,0.00001301134,9.300697e-7,0.08816707,0.02821478,0.00007733447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006253132,0.000005110544,0.5084028,0.00001142081,0.000004171141,3.700725e-7,0.005494945,1.323825e-7,7.642795e-7,0.001569468,0.4844162,0.00003204945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8825074,0.0003106836,7.156833e-7,0.003629576,0.003053661,0.00007091421,0.00002721619,0.000001856803,0.110398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8871345,0.000004090739,0.0000446292,0.0004054951,0.0002437192,3.90471e-7,0.000007409731,0.000002438753,0.1121573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4562014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995760721","doi":"10.1353/ces.2013.0026","title":"Ideological Orientation of Professors and Equity Policies for Racialized Minorities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Equity (law); Legislation; Egalitarianism; Ethnic group; Political science; Politics; Race (biology); Sexual orientation; Sociology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3127984101923224,"gpt":0.4936024025434586,"spread":0.1808039923511361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003899529,0.00006638366,0.0001829341,0.00006631494,0.0002708503,0.000005752234,0.0001012321,0.0001143105,0.00004410507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001587838,0.0000580859,0.00003024532,0.000105713,0.001311314,0.00009818328,0.00003509261,0.00006259794,0.00000318913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001244726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002714728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.393062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.482995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992007,0.00007926066,0.0001605115,0.00009773011,0.0001082977,0.0003534748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990376,0.0004617851,0.00005972193,0.00005183773,0.0002248331,0.000164185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006838951,0.000007135819,0.01059506,0.0001331635,0.00008968724,4.84974e-7,0.1695483,5.7944e-7,0.00003311296,0.7169454,0.05410026,0.04854003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007485456,0.0001386686,0.3350663,0.00007049645,0.00009770714,8.126967e-7,0.3762736,0.00001169101,0.0001514846,0.253629,0.0334623,0.0003493866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137167,0.04493162,0.00002679767,0.01570274,0.00128467,0.001274453,0.0001008646,0.00004155329,0.02292062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901184,0.003397007,0.0002174914,0.0009251549,0.0003737587,0.0001367612,0.000002985489,0.000004776343,0.004823708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4633163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6109797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165066231","doi":"10.1353/jph.2002.0027","title":"“Being There”: Fact-Finding and Policymaking: The Rockefeller Foundation's Division of Medical Education and the “Russian Matter,” 1925–1927","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy History","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Foundation (evidence); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03663204019691278,"gpt":0.3382179208316073,"spread":0.3015858806346945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001637348,0.00008400622,0.0001773276,0.000169671,0.0004413851,0.00003249239,0.000350654,0.000130076,0.0005382571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001047677,0.00004829337,0.00006904859,0.0001105862,0.001109726,0.000198444,0.00005604763,0.0003827742,0.000007554116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003400196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006464536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00475404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001696603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983798,0.0003589075,0.0003723856,0.00007345203,0.0006223536,0.0001930605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987147,0.0004762754,0.0004912876,0.0001078925,0.00005041693,0.0001593972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001181181,0.00004857821,0.00593727,0.00002582907,0.00003517843,0.000001066956,0.1479526,0.00000170888,0.00001649814,0.7699806,0.05364607,0.02234283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007931852,0.00003498646,0.01408261,0.0001927336,0.0000584642,0.00006699072,0.007000875,0.0001544704,0.000006133238,0.02481103,0.9526747,0.0001238557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4298676,0.01586617,0.0002698205,0.2575106,0.002302582,0.0002881911,0.000002031297,0.00001488601,0.2938782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891662,0.001973502,0.00003869089,0.00287895,0.002030367,0.000001224659,1.441742e-7,0.000008521539,0.003902397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7186718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994649464","doi":"","title":"Thirty Years of Scholarly Literature on University Governance in Canada (1988-2016).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Section (typography); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Library science; Management; Business; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01027831434186144,"gpt":0.2647741997488148,"spread":0.2544958854069534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001726668,0.00003992296,0.00007815212,0.0001262356,0.00006054759,0.00003938717,0.0001367294,0.00006218674,0.0002450365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003967193,0.0000445189,0.0000190842,0.0002318529,0.00007593317,0.0003146486,0.000002067858,0.0002087363,0.000003469091],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007089303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05929358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9032241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9778853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999455,0.00006162262,0.0001437872,0.00005151461,0.000160908,0.0001271891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991898,0.0001425942,0.0001494211,0.00004442197,0.0001444987,0.0003292769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001078238,0.000007719801,0.1031311,0.000007201754,0.000005161982,0.000006177331,0.003010899,0.00000782939,0.000003477525,0.883221,0.009870714,0.0007178977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002119435,0.00005985723,0.5887357,0.0001258706,0.000003485943,0.00001263981,0.00204699,0.000001791173,0.000008560401,0.004361305,0.40436,0.00007183555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277265,0.0002799539,1.810081e-7,0.03403945,0.0004222924,0.00004939214,0.0001263953,3.510811e-7,0.03735549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930489,0.0001387729,0.00003056116,0.000808924,0.0003805684,7.008584e-8,0.000004737632,0.000001991742,0.005585488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902086530","doi":"10.1017/s0021875818001469","title":"The Passion of William F. Buckley: Academic Freedom, Conspiratorial Conservatism, and the Rise of the Postwar Right","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of American Studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Indoctrination; Communism; Faith; Conservatism; Ideology; Passion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Higher education; Theology; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02245307332962373,"gpt":0.3345735364898519,"spread":0.3121204631602282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002280197,0.0001059619,0.0004420133,0.00002981429,0.0008788925,0.00001235493,0.000552841,0.00006988623,0.000005306021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00297471,0.0000417264,0.0001321156,0.0003168811,0.02488057,0.00008989221,0.000152904,0.0004547513,7.450307e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003529383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002874239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002434796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977884,0.0006965874,0.0006330555,0.00007424288,0.0005755837,0.0002321478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947744,0.002655896,0.001608503,0.0001506342,0.0007433728,0.00006717518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001138208,0.00006065057,0.1589248,0.00003607232,0.001349241,0.000003562702,0.09955821,0.000004312935,0.0008308253,0.2973251,0.4303159,0.01045322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001724581,0.0005622065,0.02070592,0.0002606937,0.0002797254,0.00001415148,0.05209959,0.00001027129,0.001068471,0.02638399,0.8967353,0.0001551328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213682,0.02197079,0.00002126792,0.04998168,0.003851373,0.0002591633,0.00002024242,0.000007062049,0.002520163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759684,0.02057673,0.00008836939,0.0006593016,0.002541895,0.00000182177,2.021692e-8,0.000006174886,0.0001572845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4664194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030800919","doi":"10.1037/a0027668","title":"Problems of sex and the problem with nature: A commentary on “Beyond Kinsey”.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Psychology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Human sexuality; Politics; Natural (archaeology); Rhetoric; Special section; Intersection (aeronautics); Section (typography); Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Political science; Law; MEDLINE; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02060003868633618,"gpt":0.2991545544558989,"spread":0.2785545157695627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000754094,0.00006617433,0.0001604772,0.00004229188,0.0000650956,8.248225e-7,0.0001659449,0.0001765631,0.00007763245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000141166,0.00004346377,0.00002522704,0.00005122714,0.002598469,0.00004930169,0.00001421865,0.0002875606,0.000002624375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007600281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004715715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007179524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001683285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991481,0.0002515158,0.0001481853,0.00009441826,0.0001523517,0.0002054778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.0001670027,0.0001430287,0.0001389193,0.00002545131,0.00006071914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002581905,0.0001763676,0.01087491,0.00004853123,0.00004344678,4.392228e-7,0.09452787,9.819611e-7,0.00010912,0.3345299,0.5579137,0.001516616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008859277,0.0001619783,0.001127285,0.0000171506,0.00002141896,0.000003692114,0.0007168434,6.75963e-7,0.000008094084,0.004664857,0.9923336,0.00005851031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08094604,0.01767755,0.00006205201,0.02972913,0.001997378,0.0006916561,0.00001333621,0.00003193672,0.8688509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848453,0.0002392304,0.0004330075,0.01195385,0.000314165,0.00001437298,0.000001638476,0.000007936578,0.002190433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}