{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":636,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":8,"predictions_cover":636,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"f444984e4f2f","filters":{"topic":"Animal testing and alternatives"}},"results":[{"id":"W4236357753","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":5581,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; CHDI Foundation","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Computer science; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Data science; Management science; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8668165380522271,"gpt":0.6101817629386401,"spread":0.256634775113587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845672,0.0001445846,0.0002552885,0.00003738983,0.0005145755,0.0000443043,0.0004201366,0.00008989264,0.00004143072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05528178,0.00008971913,0.0000901564,0.0001877352,0.0002349793,0.00004384251,0.0002703745,0.0002559647,0.00007549382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001683434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000685827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008228249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007661582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974854,0.0002430679,0.001186057,0.0004681636,0.0001418081,0.0004754984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959751,0.001036126,0.0005647566,0.0002268493,0.002103052,0.00009410807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002763179,0.00005950208,0.0136271,0.0000545575,0.0002585842,0.0001184634,0.0006050955,0.000005098499,0.7857104,0.007679283,0.176753,0.01236576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001529495,0.02047965,0.003877613,0.0002104902,0.00008532517,0.0002447373,0.005037978,0.1104643,0.0328186,0.0181121,0.8061761,0.0009636965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470541,0.0007512707,0.0005863346,0.04918769,0.0001348467,0.000422146,0.00006278058,0.0002640134,0.001536832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820225,0.00005300098,0.01392929,0.001511732,0.002030001,0.00008775778,0.00005867047,0.00003230983,0.00027472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047879827","doi":"10.1113/ep088870","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Experimental Physiology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3544,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Data science; Management science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.625448486370448,"gpt":0.6106392324120536,"spread":0.01480925395839439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199235,0.000544887,0.0008467451,0.00008379018,0.001133703,0.0001368658,0.001068401,0.0005285912,0.00007640629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03487796,0.000384181,0.0003583993,0.000198206,0.0005760314,0.00009957497,0.0009513943,0.001196588,0.0001466278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001625555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003468802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003028883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004555357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994191,0.0004743333,0.002392432,0.001270179,0.000776691,0.000895347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991583,0.002764985,0.001875836,0.0005991143,0.003030764,0.0001462243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002072774,0.00003622755,7.496058e-7,0.00002328638,0.0001034161,0.00004018897,0.0001507178,0.00000100691,0.346619,0.0001262412,0.6506485,0.0001778728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005222217,0.005536623,0.00003101458,0.0001307482,0.00001816909,0.00001529606,0.002130544,0.0006920624,0.009578852,0.000807608,0.9800975,0.0004393687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0833777,0.00856808,0.00003465368,0.003929991,0.8980176,0.002004372,0.0006696829,0.0007256299,0.002672331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06435123,0.00009772136,0.004145988,0.0002572185,0.9274426,0.0005863337,0.001266458,0.0001860188,0.001666441],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3370402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043135743","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411","title":"Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":2792,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; CHDI Foundation","keywords":"Elaboration; Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Data science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8715694701422535,"gpt":0.5844541995825973,"spread":0.2871152705596562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077143,0.00005479182,0.00009491052,0.00002330849,0.0001950685,0.00002105592,0.00007823746,0.00003884604,0.00001097545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01325794,0.0000356519,0.00001640124,0.00008400746,0.00008276939,0.00005001594,0.00005898937,0.0001030936,0.000007194159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007116412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001896585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003456082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004792925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.0001076281,0.0003651585,0.0002070795,0.00005923536,0.0001312732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998591,0.0007204158,0.0002679268,0.00006514571,0.0003263272,0.00002918379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001272192,0.00003228152,0.02531969,0.00006555432,0.00009959727,0.00002550609,0.002984273,0.000004955155,0.9362949,0.01451572,0.004982764,0.01440255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00297065,0.04427152,0.1021609,0.0003159203,0.0001984332,0.0002968387,0.02391314,0.6106479,0.06499944,0.03413927,0.1148104,0.001275569],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844675,0.000368444,0.002050832,0.01242146,0.00003479829,0.0002337305,0.00002381762,0.00006318588,0.0003362515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995553,0.00003426376,0.003359223,0.0003601336,0.0005961116,0.00004780358,0.00002319976,0.000007782963,0.00001845016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8712955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709885097","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12141","title":"The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":2088,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Critical appraisal; Checklist; Medicine; Guideline; Randomized controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Clinical study design; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Clinical trial; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9641987842621917,"gpt":0.7638045496857743,"spread":0.2003942345764175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3204975,0.0009497236,0.0344387,0.0001941056,0.0002521701,0.0001514012,0.0009166218,0.0004068405,0.00001560622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7025666,0.0003525215,0.003880983,0.0006425223,0.001180856,0.0005167266,0.0003606952,0.002088655,0.00000210262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001708288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001111126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001113107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003412535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9236153,0.05329663,0.02000862,0.0009977978,0.001663682,0.0004179383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4999137,0.4677504,0.02532971,0.00135611,0.0048337,0.0008163518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001511486,0.0001244326,0.000005977323,0.8821238,0.1078506,0.0001148351,0.000009434597,3.153347e-8,1.005337e-8,0.00006160371,0.002930754,0.006627351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003486073,0.00393047,0.000003962003,0.4914607,0.4866251,0.0008291285,0.0001195,0.00001517728,1.084492e-9,0.00005828783,0.01641069,0.0001983831],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[6.159322e-7,0.9700215,0.003255235,0.01791957,0.0003179767,0.008416981,0.00003048807,0.00002468812,0.00001292525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002642612,0.9538238,0.03742224,0.007451485,0.0006864537,0.0004740364,0.000009973553,0.00004277325,0.00008657353],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4237016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2115785123","doi":"10.1038/sj.bjc.6605642","title":"Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Cancer","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1445,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; University of Leicester; Cancer Research UK; AstraZeneca","keywords":"Medicine; Cancer; Underpinning; Animal welfare; Animal testing; Welfare; Intensive care medicine; Medical physics; Biology; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5279977563874871,"gpt":0.5586178454881463,"spread":0.03062008910065916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009828763,0.00005491373,0.0001659867,0.00006525039,0.000106975,0.00006939162,0.0001676204,0.00003649803,0.0001334961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00152605,0.00004313099,0.00004873861,0.0001023513,0.0001486656,0.000145811,0.00004601129,0.0003772805,1.478229e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001851446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008689566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00880178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006738605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990947,0.0000567879,0.0003636126,0.00009289161,0.000232096,0.0001598656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979885,0.000452726,0.0001968673,0.00006165081,0.001258012,0.00004221447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001541277,0.00009746445,0.0959991,0.0001663897,0.0001473802,0.0003572827,0.0005259466,0.000109081,0.1043129,0.0006134884,0.01700473,0.7791249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001325128,0.0008690393,0.7533348,0.001607143,0.00003488895,0.001315022,0.0006192131,0.0007269737,0.001709511,0.000691413,0.2376089,0.0001578907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977518,0.01914666,0.00001748123,0.002863076,0.0002171105,0.0001134318,0.00007913686,0.000002937309,0.00004220837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926503,0.004786752,0.001708501,0.00006018192,0.0005735623,0.00002090208,1.180426e-7,0.00001371359,0.0001860188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.778967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791419854","doi":"10.1111/bph.14153","title":"Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"British Journal of Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"British Heart Foundation","keywords":"Rubric; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Psychology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1279482992950767,"gpt":0.4508777196240903,"spread":0.3229294203290137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003350547,0.0002900415,0.001062192,0.0001925393,0.0003752659,0.0001454894,0.0001431459,0.000283755,0.0000566473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002414218,0.0002845623,0.000130545,0.0001195423,0.0003710202,0.0001793579,0.0002013014,0.0005686979,1.429982e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004036692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008654727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000445696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001748213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973264,0.000398831,0.001272211,0.0004773671,0.0002356264,0.0002895285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953268,0.000961719,0.002776683,0.00005618679,0.0006959907,0.0001826899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009409013,0.00006067392,0.0001645027,0.0001577509,0.001517948,0.000772732,0.0005056402,0.000001068035,0.05079422,8.903081e-7,0.9386179,0.006465701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01148131,0.01810061,0.004001247,0.002746311,0.008681352,0.02869969,0.001408314,0.004084595,0.01542318,0.0005038072,0.9027023,0.002167306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8411195,0.04986231,0.002911975,0.0001689846,0.1050804,0.0005356942,0.0002407989,0.00003502159,0.00004534875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6831458,0.009310618,0.01959558,0.000199072,0.2865245,0.00005077405,0.0000956099,0.0001198199,0.0009582472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238754411","doi":"10.1177/0271678x20943823","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1343,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Data science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5786057810685971,"gpt":0.5221460265746708,"spread":0.05645975449392626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006445133,0.0003002252,0.0007525104,0.0001348207,0.00066648,0.0002657469,0.0008718016,0.000103782,0.00006669906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04615387,0.0001846454,0.0005335973,0.0004436558,0.0001811366,0.0004296711,0.0002466257,0.0008253417,0.00002062344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001756563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002695126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003255809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003512389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939237,0.0003881587,0.003648399,0.0003750988,0.001011598,0.0006530737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881328,0.0007145017,0.003315621,0.0002956595,0.007181273,0.0003601972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01177668,0.0003936359,0.0038322,0.0001890733,0.002784038,0.001980586,0.003618038,0.0004228585,0.3322829,0.007092661,0.5639864,0.07164086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008174141,0.01114989,0.01014212,0.0006891798,0.001358865,0.004511969,0.006216617,0.04900279,0.03570892,0.01263815,0.8591242,0.0012831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521226,0.007877116,0.001292803,0.03681869,0.0008321975,0.000368674,0.0000485581,0.0000916455,0.000547738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609736,0.0003267032,0.122601,0.001868917,0.01368898,0.00001619175,0.000008215224,0.00009555911,0.0004207991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.296574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042519295","doi":"10.1111/bph.15178","title":"ARRIVE 2.0 and the British Journal of Pharmacology: Updated guidance for 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"British Journal of Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences","keywords":"MEDLINE; Pharmacology; Medicine; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04581470258657911,"gpt":0.3911533060247652,"spread":0.3453386034381861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002787076,0.0004050137,0.001688262,0.0001132377,0.0005722943,0.0004133141,0.001298364,0.0004911178,0.0004393019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002752994,0.000412074,0.0006193725,0.0001946507,0.0009098501,0.0003330475,0.0002784772,0.003779403,0.000006055356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007986987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001158091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001420363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949946,0.001404898,0.001983826,0.0004105402,0.0006635443,0.0005426105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895807,0.003608518,0.004204682,0.00005666696,0.002284662,0.0002647585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008252265,0.000182743,0.000008054862,0.0002049138,0.001748084,0.01807442,0.0001700171,0.00001112434,0.01171551,0.00000365341,0.9516858,0.007943431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02066069,0.003965114,0.00007750533,0.001037786,0.001987441,0.05589941,0.0001505831,0.0002293221,0.0008745257,0.0004083748,0.9142697,0.000439514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.05465269,0.06358911,0.000593005,0.003127895,0.87545,0.0008734534,0.001390462,0.00004565226,0.000277697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07935036,0.02088012,0.001847383,0.001428067,0.8957855,0.000030244,0.00004406975,0.0001384748,0.000495782],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04270899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233435953","doi":"10.1111/bph.15193","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1000,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European Commission; Medical Research Council; Royal Society; National Institutes of Health; Cancer Research UK; AstraZeneca; CHDI Foundation; University of Florida; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Data science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Medicine; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7045201012121219,"gpt":0.6053288038588406,"spread":0.09919129735328136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005332972,0.0001232052,0.0003489073,0.00005921615,0.0006003029,0.0001266949,0.0005512786,0.00006252502,0.0001386677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022592,0.0001038565,0.000192576,0.0002169821,0.0002121482,0.0001625689,0.0001702524,0.0006564202,0.00001290907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003691807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002061955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005565252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005213087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962444,0.0004109835,0.00228318,0.0002398119,0.0003720468,0.0004496287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909687,0.0009155962,0.001910276,0.00005087118,0.005986662,0.0001679025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001898302,0.00003402164,0.0002059028,0.00002089237,0.0001630389,0.003272819,0.0001220269,0.00002980702,0.2572457,0.00005157917,0.7085854,0.02837044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005421558,0.01517495,0.002793384,0.0005157652,0.0002633429,0.04339582,0.00374219,0.02531843,0.03584346,0.002119068,0.8647988,0.0006131801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484825,0.005385858,0.0008856005,0.04367319,0.000772227,0.0002945767,0.00003203946,0.00005353328,0.000420485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779896,0.0007298001,0.01175852,0.00286696,0.006367005,0.00001587837,0.000003907705,0.00003795564,0.0002304255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2214023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71660379","doi":"","title":"Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":970,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Cancer Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Animal model; Cancer; Translational research; Translation (biology); Animal testing; Human studies; Medicine; Computer science; Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Biology; Pathology; Internal medicine; Ecology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6540090175485537,"gpt":0.5072943534983964,"spread":0.1467146640501573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002171856,0.00009413894,0.0003659887,0.00006294226,0.00001567611,0.00002005847,0.00004896561,0.00005607086,0.00001854372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003847727,0.00007522789,0.00005706263,0.00007330864,0.00004142022,0.0001201212,0.00001098502,0.00008602026,0.000003919721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003843976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001130843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005119782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003749836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998389,0.0006388872,0.0004836987,0.000232997,0.00006284327,0.0001925822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985884,0.001175504,0.00009143801,0.00007341651,0.000008422007,0.00006282392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00109564,0.0001931355,0.2643149,0.00001055856,0.00002522296,0.00002281159,0.0003369799,0.00004042287,0.00003989378,0.0003480061,0.00001763051,0.7335548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002583734,0.0004576064,0.9736251,0.00002172538,0.00001727078,0.000004846683,0.00002775625,0.02123511,0.00001770941,0.001337854,0.0005588648,0.0001124822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931551,0.0004530651,0.00007532395,0.0004572755,0.00006567908,0.0003995487,0.00001118716,0.000023143,0.005359671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988592,0.0001882687,0.0001965789,0.00004566226,0.0002270594,0.0003116952,0.000001740083,0.0000100838,0.0001596767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7334424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3067704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253545088","doi":"10.1113/jp280389","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The Journal of Physiology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":626,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; European Commission; Medical Research Council; Royal Society; National Institutes of Health; Cancer Research UK; AstraZeneca; CHDI Foundation; University of Florida; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Data science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5933322096741488,"gpt":0.581428708262798,"spread":0.01190350141135077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119492,0.0003331269,0.0008725366,0.0001019868,0.0008553316,0.00007334605,0.001722338,0.0003370881,0.00002621562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1274922,0.0001599924,0.0003946241,0.0002168012,0.0004834348,0.00008744148,0.0004883687,0.002336722,0.00002403472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007631363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007008454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009976845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007448318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934959,0.001252117,0.003428517,0.0003283945,0.0009147105,0.000580332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683619,0.01122511,0.007107145,0.0004690304,0.01272754,0.000109295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005212624,0.0000155218,0.000001913247,0.00004176309,0.0002668881,0.00004803281,0.0001818347,0.00001836613,0.1139543,0.0000445813,0.8795834,0.0006307844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004409483,0.006789378,0.00007822279,0.0002976199,0.0001314603,0.0001698722,0.001068496,0.0007131891,0.0004852139,0.005191566,0.984434,0.0002000364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.1118281,0.006842433,0.0002654089,0.02808092,0.8510831,0.0009569233,0.000261578,0.0001209615,0.0005605968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02380271,0.0008703209,0.002252195,0.0002038181,0.9720215,0.00001476127,0.00004814697,0.00009053997,0.0006960386],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1209384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240644295","doi":"10.1186/s12917-020-02451-y","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Veterinary Research","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":462,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European Commission; Medical Research Council; Royal Society; National Institutes of Health; Cancer Research UK; AstraZeneca; CHDI Foundation; University of Florida; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Quality (philosophy); Delphi; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Data science; Management science; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9480510731010264,"gpt":0.6799183607383827,"spread":0.2681327123626437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01987101,0.0003261046,0.0004410286,0.0002216285,0.002627228,0.0004875492,0.001518961,0.0001486851,0.0001142279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08886614,0.0002334814,0.0002501679,0.001149585,0.0007485243,0.0002716125,0.001559348,0.001162854,0.000320064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001136013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004674703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002190347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001306706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914897,0.001621933,0.002259605,0.001156787,0.001793485,0.001678476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849252,0.004423499,0.0006008231,0.0008564682,0.008750683,0.0004433874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02467269,0.0001634584,0.005883085,0.0005303101,0.0001873794,0.00187184,0.00148559,0.00004502676,0.4175862,0.003308395,0.5244648,0.01980126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001718471,0.04367251,0.00627216,0.0004921214,0.00002284112,0.001197157,0.01295719,0.1045961,0.003057191,0.003473098,0.8215982,0.0009429418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717845,0.001290513,0.0008686585,0.01941562,0.0002032139,0.001484851,0.00006443264,0.0003758702,0.004512354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963307,0.0001202298,0.02922646,0.0003215605,0.003336298,0.0005168549,0.00004460094,0.0001306491,0.002996322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.414529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W65533086","doi":"10.1007/978-1-61779-108-6_2","title":"Cell Viability Analysis Using Trypan Blue: Manual and Automated Methods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in molecular biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":379,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Hemocytometer; Trypan blue; Reproducibility; Instrumentation (computer programming); Viability assay; Computer science; Biomedical engineering; Engineering; Chromatography; Biology; Chemistry; Cell; Biochemistry; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2311818652455239,"gpt":0.5449882586341825,"spread":0.3138063933886586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002689319,0.0002176985,0.000520927,0.0003283648,0.00006160285,0.00001152575,0.0002143195,0.0001938474,0.0001006056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006048718,0.0001964435,0.0001382199,0.0006073647,0.0002683474,0.00003388397,0.0002346047,0.000238049,0.000002363753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003519373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001846792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006128913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004089704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924369,0.006182809,0.0003957599,0.0005999188,0.00004850217,0.0003360355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.000536275,0.0001566836,0.0003627257,0.00004554371,0.00007549088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001098198,0.0001084491,0.03157905,0.00002523045,0.0002189581,0.0001000183,0.0009935467,0.00003081888,0.9558399,0.0003843014,9.661812e-7,0.01060899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039125,0.002023439,0.1177175,0.00002628102,0.001008512,0.0001633431,0.0009537232,0.3445361,0.5089638,0.02226502,0.0002284232,0.001074775],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4905221,0.0002098236,0.5084371,0.000003050081,0.00004472697,0.00006998123,0.000005296251,0.0001038189,0.0006040974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3377249,0.000003680876,0.6621785,0.00004497194,0.000009853354,0.000007340161,0.00000439604,0.00001381723,0.00001254372],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8010735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383102053","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2023.108082","title":"New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology – Not if, but how and when!","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environment International","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Health Canada; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Universität des Saarlandes; Joint Research Centre; Directorate-General for the Environment; European Food Safety Authority; World Health Organization; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Toolbox; Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Relevance (law); Hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Data science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Engineering; Medicine; Political science; Biology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5802058557839151,"gpt":0.4754869120251127,"spread":0.1047189437588024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006151178,0.0003693605,0.0008047174,0.0002933103,0.00005970594,0.0000620633,0.0005249362,0.0002523268,0.0004912197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001795159,0.0003337542,0.000174908,0.00004325903,0.0001467564,0.0001014558,0.0006079191,0.0004709431,0.0001785352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002620939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003325164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002891252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997874,0.0004076877,0.0004281035,0.0007205711,0.0003113521,0.0002582525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987016,0.0006159394,0.0003384439,0.0002688724,0.000004572838,0.00007051953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005868089,0.0001903967,0.0004830234,0.002812901,0.0008641352,0.0003236603,0.0005053427,0.00002817284,0.000332848,0.009355533,0.006155853,0.9788895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003436662,0.0002717987,0.003054897,0.00157617,0.0001226508,0.000146725,0.0001276955,0.00009461094,0.000006764352,0.001834509,0.9918717,0.0005488697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004303601,0.9830061,0.002823757,0.0005199015,0.0009137829,0.00102639,0.0002592016,0.0003254094,0.006821827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004222381,0.9321835,0.02750484,0.00005870323,0.0007016902,0.0001778881,0.0003230635,0.00009892042,0.03852916],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068542212","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfn255","title":"Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Bringing the Vision to Life","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Toxicological Sciences","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Toxicity; Dialog box; Animal testing; Risk assessment; Test strategy; Function (biology); Computer science; Toxicology; Biology; Computational biology; Medicine; Computer security; Genetics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.528332063747844,"gpt":0.4958544385191255,"spread":0.0324776252287185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197555,0.0003226347,0.000661131,0.0001289535,0.0009204087,0.0002456475,0.002091908,0.0001203695,0.00006178208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005960909,0.0001298888,0.0001676797,0.002120443,0.0004073533,0.00008351506,0.0006580058,0.0005677852,0.0002525069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008101776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006770004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001044667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968638,0.000777583,0.000480891,0.0006987455,0.0005722,0.0006068231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951155,0.004243288,0.0002037065,0.0002514621,0.00002657319,0.0001595024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007606396,0.0001218234,0.0001133215,0.0001369531,0.000005385816,0.000113248,0.0004699096,0.00002829037,0.00002411413,0.000773015,0.0003965419,0.9978098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004700549,0.003742034,0.003827302,0.003987098,0.00002237416,0.0003967937,0.0008609585,0.0001440632,7.357494e-7,0.0001107645,0.9863969,0.0004639548],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03897899,0.9155458,0.00001640889,0.001188108,0.0002828675,0.001554193,0.00001171419,0.0001832082,0.04223876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09748055,0.8972865,0.001892726,0.002531507,0.0005678263,0.0001639815,0.000001213321,0.000017094,0.00005857497],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7136196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977680690","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1001489","title":"Threats to Validity in the Design and Conduct of Preclinical Efficacy Studies: A Systematic Review of Guidelines for In Vivo Animal Experiments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS Medicine","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":310,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Guideline; Preclinical research; Clinical study design; External validity; Systematic review; Clinical trial; Psychological intervention; Research design; Medical physics; Pathology; Psychology; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9295842461842639,"gpt":0.6560114300108751,"spread":0.2735728161733888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004160034,0.0003509465,0.004615477,0.0001363962,0.00001893574,0.000003406489,0.0004135612,0.00008376152,0.00002061817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137243,0.0001660826,0.0001564092,0.0002562698,0.0001579673,0.00003579236,0.0001098674,0.0001739264,0.00000280718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003817818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006082618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002102011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.248339e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951428,0.001399465,0.0025366,0.0003847976,0.0003535889,0.0001827562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875345,0.01059956,0.00103244,0.0004155864,0.0003650552,0.00005286117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005645799,0.0002087298,0.000005006717,0.9942652,0.0002424382,0.00001332981,0.001201225,4.381555e-8,0.00005991913,0.0000175418,0.001235701,0.002694396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005165698,0.004006808,0.000002911753,0.9926037,0.001298169,0.00003447992,0.0005710089,0.00002022573,0.00001157643,0.00004279355,0.0007481916,0.0001435302],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001241721,0.9894144,0.0000292267,0.0002304332,0.00005248971,0.008973855,0.00001651631,0.00001110817,0.00003026369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005016974,0.9949501,0.002504946,0.0001965053,0.0001372923,0.001635583,0.000004343671,0.00002855287,0.00004094002],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0272124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255334215","doi":"10.1242/dmm.024547","title":"Using the mouse to model human disease: increasing validity and reproducibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Disease Models & Mechanisms","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reproducibility; Human disease; Disease; Scrutiny; Preclinical research; Computer science; Limit (mathematics); Biology; Statistics; Psychology; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Pathology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2728133831027819,"gpt":0.4297280680566901,"spread":0.1569146849539082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002710402,0.0007880115,0.0006508203,0.0001370862,0.0009675764,0.0002857247,0.0008496264,0.0002674286,0.00002754819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003567065,0.0005615535,0.0002911343,0.0001205495,0.0001791371,0.0004052171,0.001134166,0.0006084108,0.00001474478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002694463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004558215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003409379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005249824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936131,0.000759331,0.0006138351,0.003018117,0.001285925,0.0007096637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943592,0.0005761817,0.0003717002,0.003248012,0.0004035997,0.001041288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0393519,0.003813727,0.0004602637,0.005718753,0.001236735,0.002529039,0.005421503,0.04425305,0.2516116,0.0716299,0.5713668,0.00260669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009355758,0.0004659356,0.000101961,0.00123891,0.001159654,0.000007436828,0.00007407391,0.4087639,0.0003772453,0.5818551,0.002836157,0.002183999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390955,0.0004402433,0.2204111,0.0002221674,0.1309983,0.001685045,0.006251456,0.0007190328,0.0001771297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870671,0.00003212374,0.004078063,0.0001141266,0.2067969,0.0001453048,0.0002467273,0.0002362433,0.001283508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5685307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240178698","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2020-100115","title":"The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearchThe ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animalresearch","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open Science","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Prioris.ai (Canada)","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research","keywords":"Rigour; Checklist; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Delphi method; Delphi; Quality (philosophy); Management science; Data science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8468322597437643,"gpt":0.6569212643046576,"spread":0.1899109954391067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05504201,0.0009277642,0.001516709,0.0003436479,0.004911812,0.003108656,0.008071125,0.0002092718,0.0001494564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5629936,0.000637922,0.0005641307,0.002870074,0.001621129,0.002025347,0.00540668,0.0006468105,0.00008714034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002150045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002903603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001422328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001540911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977755,0.0003380502,0.01320338,0.003196016,0.002942446,0.002565101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9158593,0.002450526,0.01560746,0.002582603,0.06226324,0.001236806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003897365,0.00009200182,0.004365801,0.0001840439,0.0002139571,0.0004478935,0.0007760749,0.0007993603,0.2589435,0.002524653,0.6920782,0.03567718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002724074,0.004424646,0.002817078,0.001208325,0.0001385741,0.0009352131,0.0131918,0.6453577,0.0248956,0.005823606,0.29631,0.002173315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5169541,0.001949942,0.04955547,0.3905106,0.001938468,0.02843335,0.0009883053,0.001687851,0.007981895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2980285,0.0001753687,0.6708252,0.01325167,0.006461688,0.003342804,0.0002830452,0.0003661356,0.00726563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6445584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799297366","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.04.014","title":"In silico toxicology protocols","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Coca-Cola Foundation","keywords":"In silico; Computer science; Protocol (science); Computational biology; Relevance (law); Reliability (semiconductor); Risk assessment; Identification (biology); Toxicology; Risk analysis (engineering); Biology; Medicine; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1480929342018834,"gpt":0.4638692636950128,"spread":0.3157763294931294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005147205,0.0002399502,0.0004019793,0.0002138053,0.0001955392,0.0000109292,0.0002476061,0.0003400564,0.003562178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006420771,0.0002350229,0.00004613134,0.0001893483,0.001198251,0.0001571707,0.0001943582,0.000387295,0.0002404514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006795469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008584293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001001537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003434198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997848,0.0005530519,0.0003797234,0.0005651392,0.00008082497,0.0005733101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991147,0.00035776,0.000141831,0.0001806298,0.0000621398,0.0001429748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00236174,0.000554178,0.0344513,0.00007223561,0.0000873101,0.0006458721,0.0007862037,0.000002994011,0.9370213,0.009674948,0.01091265,0.003429345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009228424,0.02474886,0.487439,0.00009027984,0.00009663379,0.002834742,0.0002517445,0.002340286,0.1638253,0.01264044,0.2952298,0.001274469],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898211,0.0001234337,0.00001897279,0.0009485624,0.0006713063,0.002471724,0.00000625442,0.000120467,0.005818199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918694,0.000009653748,0.0003316404,0.003722381,0.0009234051,0.001908895,0.000001710023,0.00002634141,0.001206579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7731959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026025998","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1001863","title":"Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Psychological intervention; Confirmatory factor analysis; Translational research; Exploratory research; Psychology; Data science; Biology; Computer science; Structural equation modeling; Artificial intelligence; Biotechnology; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5809196833675287,"gpt":0.5118198366087505,"spread":0.06909984675877823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001237844,0.0001022246,0.0002132436,0.00006196366,0.0001625359,0.0000248395,0.0001457945,0.0001300042,0.00001996619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001740077,0.00008841007,0.00002760806,0.00005467778,0.0003534745,0.0001035227,0.0000900474,0.0003936907,0.00003591304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001244001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001778717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003506681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003830415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982614,0.0007604103,0.0002508648,0.0003598515,0.00009551417,0.0002719791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969634,0.002628191,0.00007387474,0.000159065,0.00008907094,0.00008639839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004597501,0.0001889077,0.6623805,0.0002599474,0.0001604209,0.0000205068,0.003918376,2.916546e-7,0.2101594,0.008072457,0.0001975898,0.1141819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007776617,0.03643418,0.6202701,0.001218675,0.0002838048,0.00009405359,0.003011756,0.02519933,0.01803569,0.1324481,0.1521848,0.003042855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950972,0.0002231403,0.0004929219,0.0002345599,0.0001010459,0.0001318737,0.00002500127,0.0001199117,0.003574335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980596,0.00001268452,0.001091411,0.00004478556,0.0007042154,0.00001978936,0.00002175826,0.00001705087,0.00002864608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1921237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3605258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294307752","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2022.964553","title":"Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Toxicology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"European Food Safety Authority; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Risk analysis (engineering); Agency (philosophy); European union; Regulatory science; Human health; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental health; Medicine; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7842804279719559,"gpt":0.5789251244505718,"spread":0.2053553035213841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002292897,0.0003010882,0.002011508,0.0002610728,0.0001155788,0.00001191763,0.0004394815,0.0002509385,0.000007044308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003269814,0.0002236712,0.0002214548,0.0001591596,0.0001537742,0.00003415129,0.0002732013,0.0002836018,3.756186e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003200549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003486708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002510463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969779,0.001169666,0.0008103492,0.000542082,0.0001716733,0.000328335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991541,0.007093449,0.0009084971,0.0003621572,0.00002311731,0.00007180124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003878428,0.0001805964,0.0005112875,0.01002751,0.0006276499,0.000002537884,0.0002434695,0.00003795041,0.00008371111,0.00140426,0.04108345,0.9454097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00315536,0.03053381,0.001232215,0.008445502,0.001531597,0.00002432846,0.0006248791,0.0003981522,0.0001948094,0.005692122,0.9472716,0.0008955806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005571829,0.9192179,0.05697255,0.0002238007,0.002504627,0.01477342,0.0004841396,0.00007335503,0.0001783989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001137454,0.343444,0.6497386,0.0003058731,0.000658091,0.004052711,0.0001584169,0.0001501218,0.0003547289],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952728789","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003","title":"Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Tel Aviv University; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Royal Society","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Psychology; Translational research; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8331676188394154,"gpt":0.6323431089664556,"spread":0.2008245098729597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009718188,0.0005190911,0.003084165,0.000133252,0.000108299,0.00003778774,0.0006931012,0.0001585072,0.00001283611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798432,0.0003576542,0.0004649028,0.0006629843,0.001565729,0.0001870568,0.0008461817,0.0005703081,0.00001899918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001079521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007145719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001305831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922328,0.001076175,0.00244295,0.003535348,0.0003145759,0.0003981646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952677,0.0000628048,0.001434927,0.002989818,0.0001213417,0.0001234435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001671362,0.0002324596,0.003068845,0.007791327,2.215204e-7,0.00001420072,0.00009492121,8.218623e-9,0.00006117344,0.000008795349,0.00004422206,0.9886671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007022593,0.001093605,0.004166839,0.01639418,0.000197773,0.00007126377,0.00001837734,0.000005530261,0.000001421071,0.00006550282,0.9775708,0.0003444536],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03488729,0.9628613,0.0000027796,0.000002654804,0.0004220259,0.001706887,0.00002588636,0.00004978821,0.0000413671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003153098,0.9958787,0.0005596564,0.00003541377,0.0001186357,0.0001791899,0.000002877687,0.00002777226,0.00004463701],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004740592","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2014.11.003","title":"Use of the viability reagent PrestoBlue in comparison with alamarBlue and MTT to assess the viability of human corneal epithelial cells","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Viability assay; Reagent; MTT assay; Ophthalmology; Biology; Chemistry; Medicine; Cell; Biochemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4124181866458052,"gpt":0.5110109544005811,"spread":0.09859276775477593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004994091,0.0002024601,0.00074656,0.00004421727,0.0001268219,0.00002890001,0.0003856435,0.0001266848,0.00008136897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001925426,0.0000835008,0.0001276489,0.0001981589,0.0008457527,0.00009064846,0.0003678546,0.0007149319,2.180424e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003782913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002552574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002896886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006094169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933752,0.004929346,0.0008931335,0.0002863178,0.0002799323,0.0002360751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922795,0.006496508,0.0007170796,0.0001616726,0.0001728649,0.0001723365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002169799,0.001171827,0.1365012,0.00005004525,0.00007036707,0.00001718414,0.000358104,0.0002775778,0.8507398,0.0004050996,0.00003074461,0.008208201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008766149,0.01151114,0.8507851,0.00005071898,0.0001400923,0.0000591593,0.0001274509,0.002342984,0.1310793,0.002507234,0.0003833923,0.0001368306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961324,0.00004093518,0.002684878,0.0004135526,0.0001325866,0.0004596337,0.00001141218,0.000009001565,0.0001156237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718269,0.0000129596,0.02776378,0.0002704065,0.00009594233,0.00001105402,1.153523e-7,0.000006155363,0.00001274132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3405063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311586872","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2s3.2768","title":"Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentience; Animal testing; Animal ethics; Animal welfare; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Animal species; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Engineering; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5937095141741876,"gpt":0.4926269869387492,"spread":0.1010825272354384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005443307,0.0002563431,0.0006541026,0.000128537,0.0003278999,0.0001072606,0.0001499483,0.0001914583,0.0008346042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009569819,0.0002360435,0.0002801033,0.000141996,0.00006027379,0.00007861163,0.0001802798,0.001013955,0.00005471937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002031198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000737977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001505508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.598515e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979816,0.000578145,0.0004424178,0.000434707,0.0002621928,0.0003009221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983003,0.001105932,0.0002729901,0.0002104499,0.00002050685,0.00008986454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001918285,0.00003716743,0.000002019068,0.001117304,0.0001226329,0.0002169972,0.0001610902,1.317685e-7,9.304829e-7,0.004529136,0.002145506,0.9916479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009762561,0.0001008275,0.00004371585,0.0002845787,0.0001642496,0.0004282247,0.00007984777,0.000003806746,8.44313e-7,0.0001542309,0.9983766,0.000265423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005874072,0.9799795,0.00001152079,0.00007460799,0.0003283023,0.0009434858,0.00004344585,0.0002368812,0.01832354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002945517,0.9866377,0.0004603491,0.000154644,0.0004544979,0.00850142,0.00009777373,0.00006928279,0.000678826],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123672404","doi":"10.1111/iej.13477","title":"PRIASE 2021 guidelines for reporting animal studies in Endodontology: a consensus‐based development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Endodontic Journal","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Delphi method; Medical education; Delphi; Psychology; Computer-assisted web interviewing; Steering committee; Flowchart; Ethics committee; Medicine; Medical physics; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8212455547636435,"gpt":0.6238306399772889,"spread":0.1974149147863545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003191729,0.0006172472,0.00231302,0.0006226629,0.0002139644,0.0001715878,0.0005864453,0.0002066568,0.0001751938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03595889,0.0005082338,0.0008581716,0.0002019379,0.0001285701,0.0001006872,0.0002334055,0.0008853721,0.00002365451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007791866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001808141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001579794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002682039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992671,0.0004068114,0.005061327,0.0007111145,0.0005983583,0.000551366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897671,0.002364178,0.005264969,0.0002322033,0.00223518,0.0001364162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003076084,0.0003093051,0.0004612817,0.003803416,0.002897317,0.02028779,0.0004966992,0.00002531461,0.00003282548,0.0003859617,0.006382427,0.96461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184622,0.0002812484,0.00003405294,0.04041907,0.0003111727,0.0196191,0.0004885592,0.0004382278,0.00001048681,0.00009521389,0.9365472,0.0005710553],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001342086,0.9933209,0.001037781,0.0004736491,0.00275857,0.0005205924,0.00005341302,0.00004330781,0.0004497099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007844408,0.8981449,0.09646983,0.0001601256,0.002860405,0.0002755538,0.0001227435,0.0001114386,0.001070566],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.964039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194873522","doi":"10.1124/jpet.115.228239","title":"Adverse Outcome Pathways—Organizing Toxicological Information to Improve Decision Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Adverse Outcome Pathway; ADME; Context (archaeology); Risk analysis (engineering); Test strategy; Computer science; Biochemical engineering; Pharmacology; Computational biology; Business; Drug; Biology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.352781874473634,"gpt":0.5302013049341451,"spread":0.1774194304605111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006648081,0.0003449044,0.001039599,0.0002431329,0.0001256245,0.00004431313,0.0003207399,0.0002590038,0.0001255972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004475625,0.0002452115,0.0002363248,0.0001368106,0.00007473912,0.0003617816,0.0002621928,0.0006516675,0.00006860026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003221448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001464446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.225001e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.783022e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979873,0.0002276838,0.001106785,0.0001687171,0.0002508917,0.0002586472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983236,0.0003092512,0.0009998737,0.0000797996,0.0001422035,0.0001452235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001214425,0.0002772122,0.00002502399,0.0005541394,0.0004722036,0.0003049351,0.001672211,0.000003773442,0.007526059,0.00006387796,0.0007819114,0.9871042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001098971,0.005445372,0.00001040992,0.001178085,0.0006161463,0.001890885,0.0009266664,0.00004677709,0.0004444503,0.00009623002,0.987848,0.0003980048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03790369,0.9588588,0.0003012391,0.0000299809,0.002138123,0.0004162666,0.00002565502,0.00003492432,0.0002913277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1682109,0.820855,0.006913193,0.002668955,0.001216707,0.00002697118,0.000006251295,0.00006263548,0.00003942021],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406849664","doi":"10.1111/bph.17441","title":"Guidance on the planning and reporting of experimental design and analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"British Journal of Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Computer science; Blinding; False positive paradox; Set (abstract data type); Plan (archaeology); Subject (documents); Section (typography); Information retrieval; Data science; Operations research; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1576232030012404,"gpt":0.4674159953257223,"spread":0.3097927923244819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001938688,0.000147617,0.00069906,0.0001768719,0.0001322977,0.00004708314,0.0001994716,0.0001394109,0.00005116746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002216429,0.0001313956,0.0001354544,0.0001348948,0.0001609649,0.00005637618,0.0001086449,0.0007514836,1.557347e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003457345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001144623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004847302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.311976e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977145,0.0004678887,0.001199147,0.000209302,0.0002586375,0.0001505402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934443,0.002768068,0.003479613,0.00004420355,0.0002208989,0.00004289668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000973704,0.0001043144,0.0004663938,0.00008014569,0.002061438,0.005701888,0.0003310356,0.0001145158,0.04007446,0.000006205896,0.9478153,0.002270602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02768415,0.06137282,0.04092552,0.04042223,0.03754932,0.05207691,0.00852076,0.02032505,0.2647277,0.001561134,0.4390518,0.005782579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7376477,0.04167538,0.001343302,0.0001287289,0.2181121,0.0002422123,0.00008022916,0.00002097405,0.0007494121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8618686,0.0007205121,0.002043891,0.00008203591,0.1350074,0.000007942635,0.000004661865,0.0000200057,0.0002449416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5087635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5358157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803768140","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0197882","title":"ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: Support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Checklist; Medicine; Test (biology); Animal welfare; Observational study; Cohort study; Family medicine; Psychology; Internal medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6425327785247081,"gpt":0.5025211055005485,"spread":0.1400116730241596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01241098,0.0003288139,0.0009959678,0.0002197166,0.0004341167,0.00006305194,0.0006670617,0.0001329777,0.0002228773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0355782,0.0001833937,0.0002134629,0.0004588712,0.001049072,0.0001822259,0.0002819788,0.0004685773,0.000002494436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000252173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003262843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005017036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913628,0.0005465487,0.005501914,0.0007816131,0.001099709,0.0007074644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881091,0.002100355,0.007516155,0.0008717551,0.001309645,0.00009301245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007713525,0.0006143249,0.06318982,0.0002502649,0.0002106475,0.0002427408,0.005689462,0.000001862579,0.9213133,0.0004289717,0.00003165701,0.0003133863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001010205,0.005782635,0.1826897,0.0007252208,0.00007763249,0.0000630939,0.02266544,0.002331622,0.7840175,0.000131011,0.0001393042,0.0003666937],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945359,0.00004354141,0.0000105165,0.00331873,0.00004219661,0.001186932,0.00005596445,0.00005109807,0.0007550876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930232,0.00001459338,0.005740888,0.0001439483,0.0004234417,0.0002595591,0.000004656595,0.00005826159,0.0003314514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1372959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314745102","doi":"10.1021/es501955g","title":"Application of Mass Balance Models and the Chemical Activity Concept To Facilitate the Use of in Vitro Toxicity Data for Risk Assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"ARC Resources (Canada); The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"American Chemistry Council; Unilever","keywords":"Chemical toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Biological system; Toxicity; Metric (unit); Chemistry; Set (abstract data type); In vitro; Range (aeronautics); Environmental chemistry; Computer science; Environmental science; Toxicology; Materials science; Biology; Engineering; Biochemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1322609916274367,"gpt":0.3522900143631718,"spread":0.2200290227357351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006906435,0.00006434676,0.0001300916,0.00004008429,0.00008080422,0.000007611157,0.0006515283,0.00003125295,0.000001024541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001952645,0.00003971623,0.00001240613,0.0001481744,0.002364404,0.0001791322,0.000553584,0.0001076533,5.113266e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004463362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006559593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001128601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001514083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992378,0.00005072343,0.0001280103,0.0003045332,0.0001428509,0.0001360464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990712,0.0003033175,0.0001232534,0.0004806863,0.000004330152,0.00001722618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001291919,0.00004372284,0.005023651,0.000002265369,0.000002367774,6.479013e-8,0.0001279292,0.0003281876,0.9722039,0.0009471666,0.000002216475,0.02118935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004801542,0.0002687243,0.01625292,0.000006447215,0.000006878284,0.000003347583,0.0002292673,0.747752,0.2292197,0.005457377,0.0002475136,0.00007570273],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8334659,0.000009742402,0.1655501,0.0004637662,0.000006340338,0.0003190263,0.0001555072,0.00001044753,0.00001912869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882334,0.000008090687,0.01166794,0.00002367177,0.000003935007,0.00005243789,0.00000285934,0.000002740612,0.000004875558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8711745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952795260","doi":"10.1186/s12917-017-0982-y","title":"Refinement of intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital for euthanasia in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Veterinary Research","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pentobarbital; Saline; Medicine; Post hoc; Righting reflex; Intraperitoneal injection; Anesthesia; Post-hoc analysis; Coefficient of variation; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Reflex; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.490474289496893,"gpt":0.507264774201698,"spread":0.01679048470480504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588247,0.000162503,0.0003028928,0.0003957114,0.0000825428,0.00001506986,0.0003251292,0.00008982007,0.00009771326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004645739,0.0001263506,0.00008899133,0.0004255714,0.0003232829,0.0001913946,0.0002589819,0.0001817396,0.00001979321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001303363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001868961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002577619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976303,0.000484294,0.0005121347,0.0004071728,0.0004829764,0.0004830971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983116,0.0006875325,0.0001458184,0.0003325386,0.0004368812,0.00008566523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006043734,0.0004271867,0.02449803,0.0004862847,0.00002677357,0.00007653778,0.0003821516,0.00000177545,0.9639787,0.0005745937,0.0002514048,0.00325279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01164272,0.1515424,0.4816841,0.00336528,0.00004005885,0.0006229889,0.005647843,0.001448411,0.3333651,0.002685311,0.00647351,0.001482269],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972676,0.000167036,0.0001822855,0.00007716398,0.000137233,0.0005074991,0.0001347558,0.0000323942,0.001494002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978847,0.00002536633,0.00141362,0.000004287831,0.0001661659,0.0001666834,0.000007071603,0.0000310971,0.0003010164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6306137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5152428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784327403","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0187271","title":"Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research","keywords":"Certainty; Clinical study design; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Context (archaeology); Systematic review; Clinical trial; Health care; Grading (engineering); MEDLINE; Evidence-based medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Psychiatry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8758874345966055,"gpt":0.6074038722842977,"spread":0.2684835623123077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606367,0.0004065655,0.001422672,0.00005057767,0.000495755,0.0001754424,0.001093834,0.0001916596,0.00002429735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02977604,0.0002032339,0.0002625668,0.000298823,0.0003414502,0.0001843823,0.0004383905,0.001360431,0.0001341335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004621952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005934833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939736,0.003124675,0.001067127,0.0007272135,0.0007206821,0.0003867682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9390415,0.0593905,0.0006039118,0.000693902,0.0002103379,0.00005982287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001830874,0.002010892,0.003619714,0.01683559,0.003061628,0.0002409896,0.02507703,1.99705e-7,0.00006817745,0.0000488424,0.003855213,0.9449986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004498269,0.005688927,0.002828547,0.8843465,0.003622274,0.00006688814,0.0284618,0.0006011756,0.000003462918,0.001807007,0.07043769,0.001685876],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.08694463,0.9113215,0.000008748827,0.0006174442,0.00005943339,0.0007312175,0.0001890501,0.00006481868,0.00006319168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02488578,0.9711368,0.002893879,0.0001347658,0.0005764909,0.0002402701,0.00003176013,0.00004054551,0.00005970376],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894006377","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s155103","title":"Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Systematic review; CINAHL; Medicine; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychological intervention; Pathology; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5247519240442602,"gpt":0.5733847585611629,"spread":0.0486328345169027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02917358,0.0008876713,0.0072331,0.0003700198,0.0004417389,0.0001193274,0.001805586,0.0005730463,0.000032371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05722552,0.0003951526,0.002303698,0.000715608,0.0002214286,0.0004390525,0.000503414,0.001799861,0.00001488215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002938184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001322659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002804521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004870458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787646,0.00425716,0.01416015,0.0007498647,0.001400372,0.0006678707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602653,0.00209438,0.03176922,0.001389675,0.00391741,0.0005640229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093334,0.0000887722,0.00001299833,0.9165093,0.0002318289,0.000683467,0.001167922,8.64468e-8,0.000001598366,0.00001840783,0.001364576,0.07982775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001927242,0.001233146,0.000009236219,0.8606728,0.001475953,0.006493972,0.0002763459,0.00004497221,2.169339e-7,0.0001620423,0.1290411,0.0003975378],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004034098,0.9914205,0.0003136937,0.002721125,0.0008871931,0.004025484,0.0001779628,0.00004587435,0.000004776459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004952019,0.9686108,0.0276445,0.0004912106,0.002517096,0.0002336193,0.000138367,0.0001519181,0.0001630254],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1276765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553434692","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0166733","title":"The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus; University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital; Université Laval; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research","keywords":"Preclinical research; Operationalization; Medicine; Replicate; Clinical research; Checklist; Research design; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Psychology; Pathology; Statistics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8083252647449544,"gpt":0.5387254055540287,"spread":0.2695998591909257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007293452,0.00009099059,0.0001867583,0.0000612251,0.0002052534,0.00006050818,0.0004859797,0.00004784766,0.00004761668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01383432,0.00004225354,0.00004238539,0.0002565431,0.0002190806,0.00009739432,0.0002332312,0.0004933815,0.0001530754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005112597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004697047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001770896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001808776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970848,0.0008301546,0.0008085783,0.0003082179,0.0005519082,0.0004163411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937999,0.005372599,0.0002917459,0.0003986076,0.0001015879,0.00003557582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001022121,0.001081731,0.9103299,0.00005051398,0.00006484565,0.0005275886,0.002845571,5.620711e-8,0.07148895,0.001037667,0.0003440033,0.01120702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007369238,0.002607489,0.981968,0.001553803,0.00001371475,0.0000494954,0.001396011,0.0007485804,0.002551829,0.007129934,0.001023318,0.0002209143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885398,0.0001928625,0.000003116447,0.005795791,0.0000108603,0.0002360501,0.000003089627,0.00003284461,0.005185592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986311,0.00005997457,0.0005190569,0.0001178657,0.0001836358,0.00006673664,3.351703e-7,0.00001524039,0.0004060141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07163806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075578394","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.001","title":"Pharmaceutical toxicology: Designing studies to reduce animal use, while maximizing human translation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Human health; Animal testing; Computer science; Risk assessment; Expert opinion; Biochemical engineering; Data science; Toxicology; Medicine; Biology; Engineering; Intensive care medicine; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3994238060467961,"gpt":0.4782494792491446,"spread":0.07882567320234851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005302136,0.0003632132,0.0005507309,0.000237936,0.0006057813,0.00004723021,0.0002250187,0.0002980335,0.001188106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008845471,0.0003604254,0.00008085179,0.0001983989,0.0005949467,0.0004359887,0.0001920008,0.0005169052,0.0001511175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004717992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004428753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971511,0.0007676453,0.0005003986,0.0007293061,0.0001323164,0.0007192796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982232,0.001002489,0.0001539775,0.0001588112,0.0001464327,0.0003150642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006110936,0.0001720056,0.004056156,0.00006479758,0.0002948403,0.0001154474,0.001344849,0.0000354502,0.9805785,0.00108222,0.006171257,0.005473407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008172846,0.01732871,0.3025782,0.0002093378,0.0009484426,0.001984234,0.002591969,0.004837193,0.6206015,0.003482904,0.03477792,0.002486833],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943595,0.001273026,0.0001521271,0.001843916,0.000603141,0.0008163576,0.000006799487,0.0002741683,0.0006709837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917938,0.00007034873,0.004163183,0.002753819,0.00049311,0.0002808268,0.00000588924,0.00004726152,0.0003917699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.359977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967977080","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01150.x","title":"Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Human health; Test strategy; Toxicity; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Biology; Business; Medicine; Environmental health; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2535271622579728,"gpt":0.4684436272591837,"spread":0.2149164650012109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008938196,0.0001265818,0.0002745252,0.0001796758,0.00112081,0.00003538692,0.0002669944,0.00002730614,0.00001417452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003538484,0.00009341348,0.0002049414,0.001080024,0.00005462056,0.00006381668,0.00004098,0.0002290432,0.000005417588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001016092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004702183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006139015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000859399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998569,0.0003735473,0.0003450483,0.0003151372,0.0001284833,0.0002688479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983214,0.000782567,0.0003986544,0.0003636206,0.00007923673,0.0000544877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006681043,0.0001863103,0.9905995,0.000006539434,0.0002121657,0.000002372456,0.0009065,0.0003475896,0.0001643895,0.001337703,0.0001001362,0.006130147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001734495,0.000337303,0.9906192,0.000008071353,0.0002529029,0.0000075641,0.0008665115,0.006016505,0.000003290773,0.001305093,0.0003012772,0.0001087911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898716,0.0001700925,0.006697044,0.0004823848,0.00001112862,0.0002456772,0.0002122777,0.00007242239,0.002237366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989925,0.0003631302,0.009329666,0.0001152563,0.00009656202,0.0000802573,0.00005277989,0.00001143919,0.00002596521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006021356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9280396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78887218","doi":"","title":"The welfare of animals used in science: how the \"Three Rs\" ethic guides improvements.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Council on Animal Care","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Cruelty; Premise; Welfare; Distress; Animal rights; Pain and suffering; Animal ethics; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Criminology; Law; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1891366235838955,"gpt":0.3669747386522694,"spread":0.1778381150683739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002056454,0.0001076611,0.0001247078,0.00006367149,0.0003700856,0.0001209032,0.0007088103,0.00003298213,0.000004679923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001191757,0.00005755831,0.00004683302,0.0003892086,0.0004695264,0.0001364904,0.0001095619,0.000197123,0.000002208003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004663287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003156689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001190477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003235155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986902,0.00006924135,0.0002090574,0.0002269111,0.0003806737,0.0004238461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991751,0.0002191629,0.0001537035,0.0003136897,0.00009065829,0.00004773229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004059591,0.0001938356,0.08603764,0.00003412471,0.00004623336,0.00004491009,0.002602146,0.000006964073,0.04721276,0.02526227,0.0003369476,0.8378162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002464491,0.0002416715,0.9926371,0.00001258762,0.000004948716,0.00000511607,0.0006393958,0.0001345304,0.001768927,0.0023775,0.001848737,0.00008305892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805253,0.0003834745,0.000008779944,0.0150312,0.00009432362,0.0004819786,0.000004638541,0.00004174139,0.003428577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993238,0.00001090293,0.00007276767,0.0001495364,0.00006134859,0.0001572261,2.587537e-7,0.000007407983,0.0002167021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2846436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991110088","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2006.05.020","title":"Skin decontamination: Importance of the wash-in effect","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Human decontamination; In vivo; Toxicity; In vitro; Toxicology; Medicine; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Biology; Pathology; Biotechnology; Internal medicine; Biochemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09558272497551076,"gpt":0.39873017667057,"spread":0.3031474516950592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001505134,0.0002120611,0.0008720054,0.00003912839,0.00002222047,0.000005438209,0.0002377698,0.0002726961,0.00002603254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001425527,0.0001323902,0.0001972875,0.0001272754,0.0001439527,0.00001675993,0.0001396519,0.0003127944,0.000003868644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004319808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003134669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004004915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000911086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988762,0.0001697727,0.0004043777,0.0002972017,0.00007333839,0.0001791796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.000597044,0.0002700445,0.0001752022,0.00001205053,0.00002615814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007202367,0.0002586562,0.002254613,0.01337933,0.0001524603,0.00006843706,0.00006433683,7.338864e-8,0.001226016,0.001276417,0.0006541175,0.9805935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654155,0.006160407,0.003534638,0.01229368,0.0005860411,0.001177878,0.00001998755,0.00002113832,0.002799959,0.001519937,0.9691764,0.001055781],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1793484,0.8176639,7.688666e-7,0.00001390704,0.00008856948,0.0002594937,0.00002470937,0.00001567015,0.002584548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3898924,0.6089242,0.0001035061,0.00004349186,0.0003926096,0.0001535576,0.00003627706,0.00004767744,0.0004063392],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5398714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225825761","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1002331","title":"Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Attrition; Statistical power; Biology; Sample size determination; Statistics; Outlier; Stroke (engine); Random effects model; Cancer; Meta-analysis; Mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5029810247221658,"gpt":0.5529461641034543,"spread":0.04996513938128855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003296592,0.0001658582,0.0004746326,0.00008319004,0.00006737472,0.000009459659,0.0003028015,0.000146502,0.00003005742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001702387,0.00007035146,0.00007349353,0.00004884696,0.0003189352,0.00001626602,0.0002002694,0.0003979572,0.00002390092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007832376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002881898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003084403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003646133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979726,0.00117599,0.0002125339,0.0002978291,0.0001093646,0.0002316983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971217,0.002486878,0.0001344414,0.0002079257,0.0000277513,0.00002131707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005261656,0.0007693672,0.002426766,0.0161066,0.0008544364,0.0001111223,0.001367024,3.585024e-8,0.01845902,0.001319542,0.001107718,0.9569522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001723885,0.01230075,0.001339225,0.1117202,0.0002366865,0.0001018019,0.0005838104,0.00001667495,0.002318474,0.00040019,0.8685706,0.0006876144],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0918882,0.9069082,1.641355e-7,0.00008062165,0.00008788132,0.0005934497,0.00008501645,0.000008446038,0.0003480092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07942744,0.9196119,0.000003932089,0.0000169437,0.0001794534,0.0003711,0.000009301979,0.00001837369,0.0003615319],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2868849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982039527","doi":"10.1038/s41598-019-51674-z","title":"Cage aggression in group-housed laboratory male mice: an international data crowdsourcing project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Szkola Glówna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie; Institut de Recherche Clinique De Montréal; Novo Nordisk; Universiteit Maastricht; Medical Research Council; Cardiff University; University of Glasgow; Eisai; University of Oxford; University of Warwick; Wellcome Trust; Francis Crick Institute; University of Aberdeen; Imperial College London; University of Dundee; University College London; École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; AstraZeneca","keywords":"Aggression; Cage; Animal welfare; Population; Demography; Poison control; Welfare; Medicine; Psychology; Environmental health; Biology; Psychiatry; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.153781138734861,"gpt":0.4124548031306308,"spread":0.2586736643957698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002084016,0.0001394325,0.0001539124,0.0002509524,0.0001350587,0.0003135691,0.0005636576,0.00005325587,0.0002928139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002892261,0.000124963,0.00002725416,0.0003639041,0.00009677122,0.001065896,0.0004229626,0.0001866244,0.00009248014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006174351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001201976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002882048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000568207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976333,0.0001198178,0.0004154525,0.001084558,0.0004840013,0.0002628032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981707,0.00004596637,0.000347072,0.001279639,0.00009624144,0.00006039637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114198,0.0002747383,0.5674118,0.00005103072,0.00001559956,0.00461413,0.001554536,0.0000294593,0.4204567,0.00002774652,0.003364695,0.002088086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003569775,0.002013744,0.4927596,0.00621882,0.00006811429,0.008055227,0.007518655,0.08297245,0.0239049,0.001483815,0.3681157,0.003319191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913458,0.00009337946,0.00002259688,0.0000236234,0.004843534,0.0002689149,0.00003120514,0.0001365933,0.003234381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952996,0.000003373605,0.001414516,0.00002186378,0.0001471578,0.000008240145,0.0002933322,0.00002663715,0.002785329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5095841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003927130","doi":"10.1016/0967-0653(95)92058-7","title":"10.1016/0967-0653(95)92058-7","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05433725329963029,"gpt":0.2797569203867446,"spread":0.2254196670871143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001109421,0.0001524926,0.0001540438,0.00003700075,0.00009997775,0.00004311627,0.0002341702,0.00004244484,0.9973795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005907409,0.0001435566,0.00006109219,0.0001236729,0.00003740063,0.00009043067,0.00005452334,0.0001219038,0.9985066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000238776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005126373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.379675e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990903,0.00005236562,0.0001607229,0.0002707585,0.0001505809,0.000275344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994908,0.00008333813,0.00003068594,0.0002381704,0.00003022601,0.0001267628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003648557,0.00008730205,7.745054e-7,0.000008789178,0.00002578613,0.00009619585,0.00006043666,0.00001842436,0.0004023711,0.000003475631,0.2114666,0.787465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001665525,0.0009043199,0.0001213305,0.00003464978,0.000009675849,0.0000602516,0.000002460904,0.0003889209,0.00005370604,0.00001998267,0.9980381,0.0002000072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01877027,0.00008325114,8.57831e-7,0.0001014528,0.00000168355,0.0001033718,0.00001934266,0.0003225306,0.9805973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006380996,2.265665e-7,0.0003539612,0.00004187763,0.0002805674,0.00001342109,0.0000106549,0.00003347722,0.9928848],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5854067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188878397","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105026","title":"Paving the way for application of next generation risk assessment to safety decision-making for cosmetic ingredients","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Computer science; Management science; Business; Engineering; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1356101760021136,"gpt":0.4561804587093286,"spread":0.3205702827072149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007088904,0.0001124592,0.0002170924,0.00005239324,0.0003981035,0.00001274897,0.0001168453,0.0001004987,0.00005108424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002512976,0.00009417006,0.0000623136,0.0000926028,0.00009618895,0.00006025417,0.00009742587,0.0001113456,0.00000149855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005833345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006011773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001542456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000753753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988471,0.0002451288,0.0003123409,0.0003279826,0.00006893541,0.0001985623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972909,0.002125904,0.0002186493,0.0001317768,0.0001861142,0.00004667242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008775892,0.0001620574,0.006949201,0.00006726425,0.0001486052,0.000004236995,0.0003731038,0.0009084278,0.8297377,0.004309485,0.001037838,0.1554245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005887722,0.006662478,0.3556503,0.000152953,0.0009279763,0.000230648,0.0009161392,0.4796986,0.09025759,0.01663035,0.04220833,0.0007769493],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.845184,0.000249028,0.1529522,0.0003106808,0.0004971293,0.0006834074,0.00004794548,0.00001984862,0.00005578402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747107,0.00003565249,0.02391039,0.0005917767,0.0003411005,0.0003452504,0.00001548863,0.0000147176,0.00003494663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7394801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3840144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164815751","doi":"10.1093/ilar.41.2.99","title":"Humane Endpoints for Infectious Disease Animal Models","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"ILAR Journal","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Infectious disease (medical specialty); Animal testing; Disease; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Clinical trial; Distress; Veterinary medicine; Pathology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.376214963882428,"gpt":0.4769951324263528,"spread":0.1007801685439247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003605299,0.0004540698,0.001022427,0.0002143578,0.0004124851,0.0002030472,0.0003946886,0.0001442952,0.0004805069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001271601,0.0003607482,0.0009494291,0.00009360434,0.00005555708,0.0002508812,0.0000640613,0.0008740932,0.0001769611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001299259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002553342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002780067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.529166e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980331,0.0002308395,0.0006663325,0.0003752119,0.0002579061,0.0004366057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.0002322277,0.0005199718,0.0002341915,0.00008229746,0.0003365766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002811512,0.0001700136,0.000003978718,0.004097768,0.0003030698,0.001485917,0.00007263726,0.00001014523,0.000001197615,0.0003504033,0.002272064,0.9909517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000340159,0.001012292,0.00000543201,0.008466977,0.0006599163,0.004747305,0.00000487093,0.000249194,9.021126e-8,0.004042365,0.9800254,0.0004460304],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003124711,0.9945409,0.0005413424,0.00001080929,0.0003393032,0.0004109451,0.0002086796,0.0001108833,0.003524657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001003028,0.9943499,0.0005168561,0.00003406307,0.002765037,0.00005584973,0.00003702969,0.0001237765,0.001114453],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995259631","doi":"10.1038/nbt.2261","title":"Should preclinical studies be registered?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Biotechnology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia Hospital; University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Computational biology; Medicine; Pharmacology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4669688666313941,"gpt":0.5047749897482955,"spread":0.03780612311690135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003849383,0.0006250369,0.0009786511,0.0003417862,0.0001403894,0.00002448033,0.001118886,0.01358756,0.0001191209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002502688,0.0005003144,0.0002829731,0.0002352309,0.0009178078,0.00007798803,0.0007829261,0.01728938,0.0002536104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001261217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004224922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001444527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969808,0.0001929608,0.0005576853,0.001057722,0.0003873066,0.000823501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971139,0.0009178435,0.0005229108,0.001258921,0.0001374458,0.00004901637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007876983,0.00004230583,0.00012071,0.0002211519,0.0003986034,0.001443526,0.00006301681,1.263109e-8,0.000476942,0.0009518757,0.9919944,0.00420865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002109169,0.0009578312,0.0001035648,0.0002326505,0.0001311923,0.0007396162,0.00005861401,0.000002392479,0.0004548173,0.001223819,0.995349,0.0005355721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004784793,0.04059049,0.00001661429,0.9461731,0.003185396,0.0003167945,0.0001282731,0.001577689,0.003226893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08405136,0.001725799,0.004463778,0.8779977,0.01677909,0.00008776948,0.0002017438,0.000231876,0.01446092],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07926656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606084391","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1002151","title":"Applying the ARRIVE Guidelines to an In Vivo Database","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Bioscience Database Center; RIKEN; Japan Science and Technology Agency; National Institutes of Health; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Université de Strasbourg; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; CHIST-ERA; National Human Genome Research Institute; Wellcome Trust; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; PHENOMIN; European Commission; INFRAFRONTIER; Genome Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Biology; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Data science; Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5746571148505991,"gpt":0.4894639404915394,"spread":0.08519317435905976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003007974,0.00008201377,0.0001105526,0.00004605546,0.00003727413,0.000009115259,0.0002492747,0.00003045014,0.00003747272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008722174,0.00005156406,0.00001267802,0.0000851323,0.00004747231,0.00005178642,0.0001525685,0.00009058142,0.0001091464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001544897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002016203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005373139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001124123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992652,0.000140108,0.0001594863,0.0002168545,0.00004785215,0.000170534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994788,0.000119929,0.00003836286,0.0002193024,0.00007106276,0.00007252478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006717115,0.0002637962,0.09273259,0.0000157961,0.00004809416,0.0001822913,0.00311214,0.00005949833,0.8768814,0.00457309,0.006901226,0.01455841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005651952,0.02589528,0.01916738,0.0008687985,0.000126552,0.0008468173,0.03279233,0.06965742,0.06454863,0.03446849,0.7426945,0.003281846],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966705,0.00009418285,0.0002677022,0.0005493575,0.00009331706,0.0002619224,0.00005149904,0.00006624128,0.001945312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930403,0.000003651224,0.005225638,0.001112011,0.0003255469,0.0001926333,0.00001478305,0.000009896458,0.00007556935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2102721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206365012","doi":"10.1186/s12915-021-01184-0","title":"Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: results of a meta-analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Biology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universiteit Maastricht","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Anxiety; Disease; Biology; Stroke (engine); Depression (economics); Gerontology; Internal medicine; Medicine; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8490241385201013,"gpt":0.6041377741872105,"spread":0.2448863643328908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00454183,0.000230903,0.00237817,0.0006699674,0.00009515337,0.00001339569,0.0003109786,0.0001736965,0.0004628746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001950022,0.0001796278,0.0007501491,0.00112089,0.0003926635,0.00004010178,0.0005302703,0.0005530635,0.000004984161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007870888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002835515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006777632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007399774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921284,0.005848444,0.0008656663,0.0006674105,0.0002407066,0.000249344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958346,0.003042408,0.0005583742,0.0003998134,0.000113494,0.00005132552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003056352,0.005768971,0.2999569,0.06301898,0.5553606,0.0017545,0.0006159369,0.00005462705,0.00008786832,0.01111352,0.00119975,0.05801206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001260672,0.002082755,0.03706104,0.0008620177,0.1814476,0.00008105196,0.0003204936,0.0001613734,0.000002248168,0.001470092,0.7740756,0.001175161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0444345,0.9514621,0.00001176221,0.000002713972,0.00003480211,0.0002644258,0.003539147,0.00002122759,0.0002292849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0486239,0.9498217,0.0004291534,0.000006553389,0.0000738284,0.0001578177,0.0008052549,0.0000217582,0.00006002622],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7728758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518532271","doi":"10.3390/ani6090050","title":"A Good Death? Report of the Second Newcastle Meeting on Laboratory Animal Euthanasia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animals","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Newcastle University","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Animal testing; Environmental ethics; Political science; Biology; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1900822062049457,"gpt":0.392813794094207,"spread":0.2027315878892613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004196216,0.0001643578,0.0002116773,0.00004135673,0.0001090633,0.00001642322,0.0002678176,0.00005910062,0.0004227795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004696519,0.00009268352,0.0001045247,0.0001413175,0.00008777327,0.0000914647,0.0001322309,0.0001076619,0.0001090975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003253309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006162304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004294809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001308331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986976,0.0001323552,0.0003501181,0.000327706,0.0002397287,0.0002525139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988037,0.0002952572,0.0003409425,0.0003871358,0.0001150305,0.00005791302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003030158,0.00007046459,0.06273024,0.0000294411,0.00005179843,0.0003946633,0.0002206749,1.266554e-7,0.9302223,0.0042501,0.00112753,0.0005996968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008771632,0.0047958,0.6413975,0.000895584,0.00004424519,0.0007452844,0.0003750061,0.00001670269,0.3179713,0.001156583,0.03123711,0.000487706],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456626,0.0001242319,0.000006818499,0.0002939819,0.00008887114,0.0001112134,0.00007296009,0.00007684134,0.05356244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967868,0.000002656132,0.0003323972,0.0001107164,0.0002119308,0.000008616606,4.771082e-7,0.00003166169,0.002514691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4629139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394800948","doi":"10.1016/j.neuro.2016.05.010","title":"Developing and applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for understanding and predicting neurotoxicity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"NeuroToxicology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Adverse Outcome Pathway; Adverse effect; Neurotoxicity; Outcome (game theory); Stressor; Neuroscience; Function (biology); Computational biology; Bioinformatics; Biology; Computer science; Medicine; Pharmacology; Toxicity; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5403475504071816,"gpt":0.4743081657085132,"spread":0.06603938469866844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004965678,0.0004974391,0.001129152,0.0001239961,0.0006265783,0.0000598304,0.0003160957,0.0002665888,0.00001123978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001039729,0.0003081796,0.000184299,0.0001099428,0.0004245106,0.0001039958,0.0004494567,0.0005330821,0.000005739584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001396094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001175602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003339722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002334418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973646,0.0005163666,0.0006911828,0.0007808876,0.0001294218,0.0005175803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941111,0.00489036,0.0006130866,0.000256868,0.00003122319,0.00009737021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001342057,0.00004233874,0.001783905,0.01305359,0.0002658667,0.0003318076,0.0004459289,4.042096e-7,0.0002455841,0.03984436,0.00006883383,0.9437832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001030777,0.001584536,0.0002177986,0.006468392,0.0002947933,0.001977471,0.0002954852,0.0001506048,0.000009376644,0.002505438,0.9846146,0.0008507152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003825428,0.9648935,0.01366239,0.0002816087,0.001189913,0.01462679,0.0002991926,0.000473489,0.0007477124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02511769,0.9655119,0.001082992,0.0007522438,0.0008768474,0.006157785,0.00001346187,0.0002389503,0.0002480943],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741210495","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2017.07.039","title":"Behavioral outcome measures to improve experimental stroke research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Behavioural Brain Research","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stroke (engine); Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Psychology; Stroke recovery; Mood; Cognition; Compensation (psychology); Test (biology); Task (project management); Rehabilitation; Neuroscience; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9280588658601003,"gpt":0.7007269972593524,"spread":0.2273318686007479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01162389,0.0009514476,0.002322201,0.001872437,0.002334757,0.001347466,0.004411226,0.0007410796,0.0005320301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003344649,0.0007888507,0.0009947874,0.000656674,0.00116519,0.000353421,0.00378756,0.00579427,0.003580311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007918474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008239231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851045,0.004193,0.001364912,0.002126299,0.004367359,0.002843945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927891,0.002161344,0.0003539223,0.002604961,0.001052478,0.001038137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002210535,0.000762965,0.0009588398,0.00144403,0.00008748718,0.002293819,0.0004881825,1.83427e-8,0.001253486,0.0001687443,0.01041558,0.9819058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004630268,0.00685547,0.0005631231,0.005295095,0.00009789183,0.0002622381,0.0007574608,0.000001704144,0.0001097294,0.00002211762,0.9845027,0.001069453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02560609,0.9635586,0.000002310239,0.0002747783,0.0007169958,0.004222829,0.0009008836,0.0002725424,0.004444985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1271497,0.6935455,0.001337517,0.00005498359,0.003217883,0.006774011,0.0003829814,0.001060769,0.1664766],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297261109","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfac097","title":"A Transformative Vision for an Omics-Based Regulatory Chemical Testing Paradigm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toxicological Sciences","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Ottawa; Health Canada","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transformative learning; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Risk assessment; Organism; Risk analysis (engineering); Transcriptome; Toxicogenomics; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Biology; Computational biology; Data science; Business; Psychology; Genetics; Gene; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3736566716877197,"gpt":0.4496138896291028,"spread":0.0759572179413831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076202,0.0001176022,0.0001577161,0.00004587793,0.0009664233,0.00005762697,0.0004534993,0.00003679525,0.0001409929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003034068,0.00008665879,0.00006505501,0.0003094473,0.0004824228,0.000191637,0.0000814139,0.0001662387,0.000004719649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007674429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007248931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008389577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.609135e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986081,0.0001621926,0.0002075229,0.0003902584,0.0003026246,0.0003293434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.0009043419,0.00009607141,0.00008649998,0.00002075438,0.00009915986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001397583,0.001418674,0.003441517,0.00003645126,0.00001256325,0.00004462495,0.00131085,0.002899682,0.9271858,0.02096513,0.000376696,0.0409104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002339553,0.09717546,0.04114571,0.00005669278,0.00003488986,0.0002189174,0.003197444,0.7599849,0.0230134,0.06686307,0.004761448,0.00120851],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947348,0.00002576947,0.0009677343,0.0003846814,0.00006933475,0.000291312,0.00004294293,0.0001942194,0.003289241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857613,1.822433e-7,0.01355471,0.0004471869,0.00006636418,0.0001385555,0.000006155605,0.000005798421,0.00001970529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9041724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7433044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158079075","doi":"10.1002/14651858.ed000078","title":"Systematic Reviews of Preclinical Animal Studies can Make Significant Contributions to Health Care and More Transparent Translational Medicine","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Blinding; Systematic review; Clinical trial; Publication bias; Preclinical research; MEDLINE; Animal testing; Translational research; Alternative medicine; Meta-analysis; Medical physics; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3217898771473379,"gpt":0.5248062748264464,"spread":0.2030163976791085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01395881,0.0009430038,0.01325483,0.0002692791,0.000173011,0.00002212182,0.0007726699,0.0002561979,0.00003041384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05713641,0.0005873367,0.0006418388,0.0003371413,0.0004526359,0.00006204614,0.000121185,0.0005825189,0.00002065169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001845328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003475579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002044899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000137816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814541,0.005957824,0.009536671,0.001000892,0.001595321,0.0004552431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761783,0.01349344,0.006684845,0.001635762,0.001608498,0.0003990825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001402569,0.00008087623,0.000004000431,0.8903242,0.0004087536,0.00001256999,0.00491375,7.80091e-7,0.0001622189,0.0001246222,0.1037384,0.00008956226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009301662,0.003191803,0.000008633891,0.9812315,0.002347523,0.00003528087,0.001807024,0.00004691798,0.000006842356,0.000008692653,0.00991391,0.0004717647],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001604311,0.9185231,0.001930576,0.000578257,0.04523748,0.01947871,0.01398923,0.00005215699,0.0000500085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02215564,0.7943966,0.006531439,0.0002493483,0.1578885,0.008519188,0.009840558,0.0002561052,0.0001625617],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1241265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}