{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":830,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":830,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"96a3cec3f989","filters":{"topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records"}},"results":[{"id":"W2292507041","doi":"10.3897/phytokeys.59.6261","title":"World checklist of hornworts and liverworts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhytoKeys","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":754,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Phylum; Taxon; Marchantiophyta; Taxonomy (biology); Biology; Ecology; Nomenclature; Flora (microbiology); Taxonomic rank; Species richness; Geography; Genus","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008525526032875432,"gpt":0.1837582842231413,"spread":0.1752327581902659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005413646,0.00006521469,0.0001147887,0.000005425267,0.00006615088,0.000005668536,0.00005864372,0.0000198358,0.0003330369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008330898,0.00001610884,0.00004162924,0.0001190667,0.00008694724,0.00004394089,0.00006334606,0.00002347427,0.00001158595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004590492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001278547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008931142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009010368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995592,0.00001240554,0.00009876786,0.0001292944,0.0000712235,0.0001291154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997852,0.00007040449,0.00004752037,0.00002814497,0.00002503768,0.00004369701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002849258,0.00007409463,0.178108,0.00001634369,0.00002978681,0.000005019533,0.0000616656,6.097839e-8,0.06538574,0.0005937674,0.01811916,0.7375779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008494675,0.00007491527,0.8235549,0.00003922444,0.000005855176,0.000001646192,0.000033813,8.426866e-7,0.003210993,0.0005463306,0.1723579,0.0000886002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837777,0.0005778182,0.000001411883,0.001371531,0.0004434953,0.00005799786,0.00001472547,0.0000195052,0.0137358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961787,0.000428204,0.00002714059,0.00006150696,0.0005701502,0.000003366039,9.038886e-7,3.727759e-7,0.002729657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7374893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3646521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011850984","doi":"10.1038/s41477-020-0618-2","title":"Anthoceros genomes illuminate the origin of land plants and the unique biology of hornworts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Plants","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université Laval","funders":"National Institute for Basic Biology; Functional Genomics Center Zurich; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft; Kato Foundation for Promotion of Science; Georges and Antoine Claraz Foundation; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Universität Zürich; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Institute of Genetics; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Bryophyte; Sporophyte; Genome; Pyrenoid; Lineage (genetic); Evolutionary biology; Gene; Genetics; Botany; Chloroplast","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01258355526030261,"gpt":0.2210164017145745,"spread":0.2084328464542719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001517473,0.00008889243,0.0002245889,0.000003707757,0.0001097263,0.000005926747,0.0001939032,0.0001383321,0.00002097686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002938039,0.000019364,0.00004537074,0.00009839406,0.0002831126,0.00001438704,0.00008779841,0.0002214913,9.170125e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000183515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004214363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001658708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003040959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994493,0.00007862476,0.0001378434,0.0001379431,0.00006794165,0.0001284139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994676,0.0003312542,0.0001086792,0.00003567163,0.00002566557,0.00003115604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003359124,0.0001909344,0.535632,0.0002178251,0.0007707482,0.00004334525,0.008109559,0.00001097073,0.09169762,0.005569563,0.03014336,0.324255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444799,0.0006838666,0.6573021,0.00008969937,0.00004930131,0.00005482348,0.002391511,0.0001802367,0.01034502,0.001880387,0.3252297,0.0003485527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856281,0.008365332,2.958796e-7,0.004662042,0.0002927715,0.0001627148,0.000305687,0.0000086476,0.0005743936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994371,0.004826503,0.00000847538,0.0004375739,0.0003083564,0.000002582889,0.00001867588,5.437934e-7,0.00002630773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3239064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1066944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128382228","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2000.0615","title":"Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":247,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Gametophyte; Sporophyte; Bryophyte; Sporangium; Botany; Gemma; Leafy; Moss; Evolutionary biology; Plant evolution; Dothideomycetes; Marchantia polymorpha; Phylogenetics; Spore; Genome; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1115237429329858,"gpt":0.3118283233066961,"spread":0.2003045803737103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004250338,0.0002688082,0.000881949,0.00001446165,0.000911265,0.00002088481,0.00060721,0.0003356068,0.00004035773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006489584,0.0000808933,0.0008664512,0.0009489797,0.002058842,0.00004138238,0.00005624442,0.0003023254,8.438887e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002090538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004163141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001133589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000137117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982352,0.0001516469,0.0005844104,0.0005977862,0.0001572429,0.0002736924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982743,0.001030533,0.0003941229,0.0001208679,0.0001201984,0.00005999035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004255525,0.0004363481,0.0006153446,0.0006282142,0.0004704163,6.455266e-8,0.000167647,0.00002408445,0.00009194808,0.004150216,0.00008955216,0.9932836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009755364,0.006722945,0.09474384,0.004738124,0.002113236,0.00003582753,0.0007045373,0.0001603244,0.00006470284,0.2583521,0.6288897,0.002499114],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01818454,0.9665007,0.0001640854,0.007314987,0.0005548298,0.002527867,0.004012704,0.0000607042,0.0006795864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09170481,0.9069496,0.0004869402,0.00004973987,0.0005204008,0.000211102,0.00003322389,0.000002275231,0.00004184257],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.758589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110130585","doi":"10.1139/b06-120","title":"Interactions between mosses (Bryophyta) and fungi","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Botany; Bryophyte; Spore; Host (biology); Hypha; Symbiosis; Zoospore; Gametophyte; Ecology; Bacteria","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01164448635918253,"gpt":0.192236793472725,"spread":0.1805923071135425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006892961,0.00006389558,0.0001329021,0.00001716822,0.0002298498,0.00005133503,0.00008138546,0.00003009985,0.0002024498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001343604,0.00002418362,0.0000620982,0.000125763,0.00005903729,0.00008793989,0.000007527132,0.0001113231,0.000003832771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003070991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01121093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1971945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995182,0.00001532082,0.0001732056,0.00006469396,0.00005819515,0.0001703394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995329,0.00006720974,0.00009090354,0.00001645524,0.0000763846,0.0002161312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001091465,0.00002187572,0.6073145,0.000006986156,0.00009248075,0.0001399203,0.00009562048,0.00000523103,0.009814848,0.0003995454,0.119932,0.2621661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003934306,0.00007288793,0.6393973,0.00001567724,0.00001152411,0.00005136224,0.0001507144,0.000001164264,0.00003453872,0.0004164081,0.3597566,0.00005250379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902242,0.00289963,0.000003065946,0.002379943,0.0009937378,0.00002781324,0.00003648572,0.000003321807,0.003431837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961256,0.00007115945,0.00005112642,0.00007108296,0.003101003,3.47376e-7,0.000001128137,5.503438e-7,0.0005779617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2621136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160376427","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00123.x","title":"The ones we left behind: Comparing plot sampling and floristic habitat sampling for estimating bryophyte diversity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecology; Floristics; Sampling (signal processing); Ordination; Habitat; Species diversity; Forest ecology; Geography; Gamma diversity; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0720751626970954,"gpt":0.2540298437137258,"spread":0.1819546810166304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001637957,0.0001103319,0.0001453619,0.00000542804,0.01339644,0.00009065176,0.0001363296,0.00004720259,0.000005947949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008418139,0.00004891747,0.00006859719,0.00004411051,0.0001798631,0.0001216872,0.001429767,0.00009943639,0.000001937485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003359001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002747377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004391867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004000444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993014,0.0000171826,0.0001095014,0.0002133446,0.00009714406,0.0002613949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.0005355366,0.00005839797,0.00003493414,0.0000642699,0.00009007923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195403,0.0001338986,0.9009372,0.00006259912,0.0001376978,0.000001225497,0.002595198,0.0002567282,0.0003124448,0.003985252,0.001866044,0.08959219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002619059,0.00008902596,0.9635006,0.0000397277,0.00009713235,0.000005202957,0.002242203,0.005155097,0.000008523682,0.00204848,0.026331,0.0002211273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918486,0.0005692846,0.003939537,0.002405779,0.0005371792,0.0001679676,0.0004234941,0.00004911665,0.00005898226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971256,0.0002905444,0.001807704,0.00003482696,0.0006345182,0.000002224138,0.00006412595,5.084474e-7,0.00003990431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08937106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016003350","doi":"10.1139/b03-063","title":"Changes in forest floor bryophyte (moss and liverwort) communities 4 years after forest harvest","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Disturbance (geology); Forest floor; Moss; Species richness; Ecology; Canopy; Old-growth forest; Quadrat; Environmental science; Geography; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124485672479838,"gpt":0.1814194020195281,"spread":0.1689708347715443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001878942,0.0001011376,0.0001921375,0.00003634338,0.0001433857,0.00007160038,0.000130527,0.00006239906,0.0002284804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002629434,0.00004520776,0.00005336095,0.0001619279,0.0001475348,0.00009875961,0.00001424818,0.0001860806,0.0000030495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004527015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004874672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01526668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9596955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993305,0.00005545811,0.00017323,0.00007041919,0.00007919996,0.0002912411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.00005030533,0.00008129083,0.00003632575,0.00005830343,0.000281663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002092357,0.00001584847,0.9827002,0.000007292535,0.00002418261,0.0003218379,0.000730074,0.000006779223,0.00007773862,0.0001037523,0.001445257,0.01454616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001371449,0.0001981099,0.8866474,0.00007547253,0.000007185136,0.00008654575,0.002019623,0.000005384593,0.000003536162,0.0001975228,0.1105209,0.0001011484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946985,0.003247262,3.922574e-7,0.0007436769,0.0007134274,0.00006181721,0.00003034579,0.000002242515,0.0005023292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984267,0.0006051123,0.00004001013,0.0003075752,0.0003648497,0.000003065179,8.525765e-7,0.000001413226,0.0002503844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156147700","doi":"10.1139/b05-036","title":"Short-term effects of timber harvest and forest edges on ground-layer mosses and liverworts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Moss; Abundance (ecology); Clearcutting; Logging; Biodiversity; Ecology; Forest management; Old-growth forest; Forest ecology; Lichen; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01238423337954861,"gpt":0.1970627783090622,"spread":0.1846785449295136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000076292,0.00009134009,0.0001820063,0.00001803387,0.0001548522,0.00004310782,0.00007114634,0.00005044502,0.00003605399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002588314,0.0000350717,0.00004984358,0.00006653374,0.0001305701,0.0001015572,0.00001236745,0.00009473785,0.000001025609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002383654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001928082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001269927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1279821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994743,0.00001919016,0.0001603775,0.00009125246,0.00007787776,0.0001769575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994345,0.0001090852,0.00007515786,0.00002345689,0.00005711185,0.0003006788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003887882,0.00005671996,0.5618023,0.00005032623,0.0001107301,0.000227109,0.0003493824,0.0000100896,0.005576359,0.0001898882,0.007701378,0.4238868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009238654,0.0004198491,0.9746302,0.0001115709,0.00001963733,0.00009389457,0.00008798265,0.000004499283,0.0001517726,0.0000447793,0.02426293,0.0000805241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942228,0.003997571,6.08105e-7,0.0008901898,0.0004168404,0.0000593808,0.000007979942,0.000001755967,0.0004028531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981297,0.0006358444,0.00003069827,0.0001297913,0.0008663838,6.301591e-7,3.549104e-7,9.613482e-7,0.0002056968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4238063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110498187","doi":"10.3732/ajb.0900384","title":"Inferring the higher‐order phylogeny of mosses (Bryophyta) and relatives using a large, multigene plastid data set","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Clade; Phylogenetic tree; Maximum parsimony; Sister group; Bryophyte; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetics; Taxon; Phylogenomics; Supermatrix; Botany; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09235701748700961,"gpt":0.2709229817134233,"spread":0.1785659642264137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002651979,0.0001144014,0.0003018203,0.00001146785,0.0001962565,0.00001357688,0.0003422817,0.00002444996,0.00007253292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006591174,0.00003571658,0.00006006832,0.0003139887,0.0003960541,0.0001465424,0.0002388119,0.0001543682,5.640147e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000776195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001275318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004794901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001527765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991079,0.00008708062,0.0003133291,0.0001417092,0.0001577866,0.0001921792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989759,0.0001977765,0.0005447475,0.00008800217,0.0001281262,0.00006544717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006414134,0.0005288708,0.4837559,0.00002965164,0.001161844,0.00006200728,0.004768884,0.00003492623,0.3556919,0.0001779278,0.001832822,0.1513139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001640994,0.0006361972,0.9887689,0.0000537887,0.00005208347,0.00004706891,0.004001265,0.0001303765,0.0001987408,0.00007289794,0.00576348,0.000111143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976406,0.001457767,0.00003667846,0.000144286,0.0004064568,0.00004851983,0.00006061137,0.00000431033,0.000200745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968808,0.0006915362,0.001857127,0.0000639444,0.0004834809,3.865524e-7,8.282051e-7,0.000001453405,0.00002045083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5050129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1509466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387326464","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16249","title":"Comprehensive phylogenomic time tree of bryophytes reveals deep relationships and uncovers gene incongruences in the last 500 million years of diversification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Phylogenetics; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenomics; Diversification (marketing strategy); Macroevolution; Coalescent theory; Molecular clock; Biome; Ecology; Gene; Clade; Genetics; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01778826537458338,"gpt":0.213820431845578,"spread":0.1960321664709946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003046875,0.00005794013,0.0002222017,0.00003354504,0.00006891248,0.000006733479,0.00014949,0.00002060302,0.000006699086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004372422,0.0000232721,0.00006678793,0.0006288232,0.0002729079,0.00005296445,0.00003105598,0.00009189898,0.00000270897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001412165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000688671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001857619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001973038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992397,0.0001563194,0.0002796296,0.00008033761,0.0001504411,0.0000935218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988208,0.0005811194,0.000451364,0.0000333286,0.00008782367,0.00002560333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001334811,0.00007016725,0.4861117,0.00001168555,0.00009543334,0.0000128741,0.002365311,0.0001499327,0.3013431,0.00002493188,0.0006577991,0.2090236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009862564,0.0004914177,0.9896056,0.00002602429,0.00001515887,0.000009565952,0.008841071,0.00002143088,0.0001293761,0.0002024592,0.0005146748,0.00004457214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987298,0.0005198119,8.6418e-7,0.0005159426,0.0001038373,0.00006177968,0.00001549116,0.000002314254,0.00005016763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983591,0.001375589,0.0001084307,0.00003046159,0.0001145765,6.690071e-7,0.000001728702,6.038113e-7,0.000008774628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5034939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048902898","doi":"10.1111/nph.16874","title":"The hornworts: morphology, evolution and development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"New Phytologist","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Division of Undergraduate Education; Division of Integrative Organismal Systems; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Division of Environmental Biology; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Biology; Botany; Key (lock); Plant evolution; Extant taxon; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04988046552397158,"gpt":0.2717289630996328,"spread":0.2218484975756612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001153652,0.0002753276,0.0007038001,0.000004765359,0.0006347894,0.00006007456,0.0003058062,0.0002209986,0.00003747295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000524145,0.0000668444,0.0001469369,0.0002101912,0.0002310506,0.00002001555,0.0002639033,0.0002846443,0.00008499038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006767383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007848183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001358521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008525672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987909,0.00008457506,0.0003273602,0.0003966704,0.0001042958,0.0002961927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993311,0.0002762831,0.000205465,0.00005944227,0.00001981563,0.0001079565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000244819,0.00000583467,0.00002640335,0.0001157147,0.00004256219,0.000006583075,0.00000561316,6.217111e-9,4.151651e-7,0.0001068061,0.02590202,0.9737856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002894612,0.00006947251,0.0009879132,0.000255229,0.00005115254,0.00004458497,0.00004620078,1.57068e-7,1.266259e-7,0.00007547863,0.9982541,0.0001866899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001285918,0.9962822,0.000004295845,0.001221552,0.001293011,0.000321877,0.00001491083,0.00005803044,0.0007913238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003434371,0.9972047,0.00009539603,0.0000647663,0.001948323,0.00004158809,0.00003877293,0.000001459481,0.000570642],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4882351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107119753","doi":"10.1139/b04-139","title":"What do we know about hybridization among bryophytes in nature?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Reproductive isolation; Biology; Hybrid; Interspecific hybridization; Taxon; Evolutionary biology; Plant evolution; Ecology; Botany; Genetics; Gene; Genome","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005338741246150883,"gpt":0.1925793296513848,"spread":0.1872405884052339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001585013,0.0001006933,0.0001782964,0.00004054181,0.0001568868,0.0001507485,0.0001870572,0.0001116031,0.0001359139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004985926,0.000040478,0.0000972756,0.0003658753,0.00007891298,0.0003666757,0.000009664416,0.0003091194,0.000005521596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001425444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001034801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003474963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3119911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992063,0.00002527163,0.000257495,0.0001125072,0.0001215984,0.000276828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993773,0.0000318126,0.0001417611,0.00003010271,0.0001223788,0.0002966977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004350378,0.00009677836,0.1948698,0.00002292106,0.00009421542,0.0008830751,0.001290375,0.0004604212,0.004709661,0.001265572,0.01167639,0.7845873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002617506,0.0001792593,0.7437083,0.0007696861,0.000008941792,0.00007457005,0.00159144,0.000004208208,0.0001521609,0.002315589,0.2507594,0.0001746745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198557,0.06967384,0.000001592893,0.00642967,0.003732869,0.00006249888,0.000007304226,0.000003515866,0.0002330649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824107,0.01581378,0.0000403682,0.0002414981,0.001371765,8.845074e-7,8.535515e-7,0.000001131827,0.0001189606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7844126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7005633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145556971","doi":"10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0189:pomals]2.0.co;2","title":"Predictors of moss and liverwort species diversity of microsites in conifer-dominated boreal forest","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Moss; Ecology; Boreal; Taiga; Bryophyte; Biology; Species diversity; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01445923624216193,"gpt":0.2187775546872231,"spread":0.2043183184450611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003846125,0.00004469277,0.0001466963,0.00003999009,0.0001184521,0.00001199544,0.0001623196,0.00002159915,0.000002834133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006874687,0.00001729099,0.00003832165,0.0004627761,0.000526383,0.0002330678,0.00009455236,0.00005363893,1.280696e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002507129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002491713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003025287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009590806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993209,0.00001209912,0.0002414065,0.00007435463,0.0002602043,0.00009106133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.0000628472,0.000291843,0.0000152193,0.0002789796,0.00004184386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003149209,0.00005819774,0.8776168,0.000009917485,0.000005905762,0.00000302026,0.0008618967,0.0001098068,0.1197471,0.0001347292,0.0000104303,0.001410706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023899,0.000343671,0.9888514,0.00006053894,0.000006607811,0.000008555599,0.0007578087,0.00001572068,0.009394759,0.0002563383,0.00003343782,0.0000321193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990218,0.000236741,0.000006771476,0.0001808947,0.0002345039,0.0000413858,0.000003580481,0.000001210612,0.00027312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999517,0.0002470021,0.0001559954,0.00001036658,0.00006053551,1.027762e-7,3.15289e-7,1.505531e-7,0.000008519053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1112347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.193948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096464505","doi":"10.3732/ajb.94.11.1853","title":"Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Inbreeding depression; Biology; Selfing; Inbreeding; Outbreeding depression; Sporophyte; Zoology; Ecology; Botany; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01184328418559905,"gpt":0.2171663714759508,"spread":0.2053230872903518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004263574,0.0002145046,0.0005967982,0.00009555345,0.00008510902,0.00004676063,0.0002207422,0.00003895082,0.00003230283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002727654,0.00007499736,0.00006279462,0.001205461,0.0003850498,0.000200012,0.00005314,0.0003387847,9.267272e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001027772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002601236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001226299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01641394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984116,0.00005734789,0.0005198649,0.0002210915,0.0003434552,0.0004466216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990686,0.000249957,0.0004636012,0.0000481278,0.00006691118,0.0001027763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00192656,0.0001722654,0.9554722,0.000006662651,0.00002508,0.0005250226,0.000671084,0.0001057947,0.02630426,0.000009404726,0.00006484285,0.01471687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007335697,0.002342789,0.976711,0.0003898794,0.000009772944,0.000111556,0.01763054,0.00001696,0.001057499,0.00001899847,0.0007647841,0.0002126721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982225,0.0002920967,0.000005927967,0.0005436424,0.0001681232,0.0001201107,0.000005739384,0.000008741278,0.0006331494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986212,0.0004087216,0.0003361962,0.0001328911,0.0003448355,0.000002311866,5.756806e-7,0.000002659127,0.0001506069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02524677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9159366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104746817","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00615.x","title":"CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL SYSTEM AND LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN MOSSES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Marsden Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Asexual reproduction; Sexual reproduction; Biological dispersal; Apomixis; Phylogenetic tree; Trait; Evolutionary biology; Life history theory; Spore; Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Reproduction; Evolution of sexual reproduction; Ploidy; Life history; Ecology; Botany; Genetics; Gene; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01145493621730159,"gpt":0.180050167512595,"spread":0.1685952312952934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001056869,0.00006802088,0.0001287774,0.00001470268,0.00005775582,0.000002794158,0.00004364789,0.00007958949,0.00001300815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002253122,0.00002848729,0.00001836439,0.0001701024,0.00004432947,0.00006569832,0.00001181907,0.00006431679,0.000003192226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002487368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001232142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009669872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006422236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994377,0.00003937228,0.000166171,0.0001449141,0.00008805181,0.0001237873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998142,0.00002485726,0.00006985017,0.00001812209,0.00003640638,0.00003656792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007487164,0.001144152,0.2162026,0.0003905004,0.0001247382,0.00001913996,0.002581902,0.0004745123,0.4292975,0.0376709,0.04782197,0.2635234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000131219,0.0003349794,0.9960032,0.00003593164,0.000007980441,0.000003906002,0.001107785,0.0008926072,0.000006612237,0.00007838848,0.001325604,0.00007177602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992248,0.00570686,0.00001909622,0.0001737678,0.0005234863,0.0001000742,0.000005841017,0.00003739666,0.001185467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995558,0.00003033831,0.00001478693,0.00001240679,0.0002495076,0.000002088544,0.000004077343,2.946667e-7,0.0001306445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7798006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1461802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992116890","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.1397","title":"Organellomic data sets confirm a cryptic consensus on (unrooted) land‐plant relationships and provide new insights into bryophyte molecular evolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université Laval; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bryophyte; Biology; Plastid; Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Monophyly; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenomics; Chloroplast DNA; Marchantia polymorpha; Botany; Gene; Genetics; Chloroplast; Clade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0175957608667702,"gpt":0.2188148132902015,"spread":0.2012190524234313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001973689,0.0001436631,0.0003229155,0.000026267,0.0001519943,0.00003784095,0.0002386844,0.00004675224,0.00003659438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009545917,0.00005746805,0.00005500325,0.0002812057,0.0001456806,0.00008418953,0.00009159746,0.0002902859,0.00002862381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004527703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005168085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007128135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003843142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989047,0.0001376455,0.0003157803,0.0002387059,0.0002198746,0.0001832804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989483,0.0002766819,0.0004093894,0.0001186655,0.00008213064,0.0001648269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002000465,0.0004402093,0.1814352,0.00005850757,0.0008179124,0.000482571,0.001766804,0.0001420598,0.4635586,0.00154629,0.02252485,0.3252266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001246374,0.005512105,0.9161909,0.0003451414,0.0001544186,0.0005959409,0.003380945,0.001136097,0.0002717743,0.00289941,0.06768114,0.0005857829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948105,0.001398089,0.000016249,0.002909967,0.0005090542,0.0001427714,0.00001564587,0.00001236304,0.0001853739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986451,0.000248248,0.0004501416,0.0002084441,0.0003676751,4.43615e-7,0.000008090096,0.000002132804,0.00006966871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7347557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2343479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246354010","doi":"10.1639/0007-2745(2004)107[88:psoffb]2.0.co;2","title":"Propagule Sources of Forest Floor Bryophytes: Spatiotemporal Compositional Patterns","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Bryologist","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Propagule; Diaspore (botany); Bryophyte; Species richness; Ecology; Extant taxon; Biology; Plant community; Biological dispersal; Geography; Seed dispersal","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01571924215098637,"gpt":0.2068000573239351,"spread":0.1910808151729487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001325021,0.0001199569,0.0001724899,0.000005638001,0.0003172892,0.00002087612,0.0002957954,0.00005641689,0.0001442155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001576605,0.0000332788,0.0001130386,0.0001381868,0.0003483971,0.00004108027,0.0001044163,0.0001025592,0.00002458679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002625742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009795321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003723024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004298643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992133,0.00003911957,0.0002019614,0.0001696304,0.0001680354,0.0002079947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996448,0.00006860243,0.0001253294,0.00006576991,0.00005952473,0.00003594065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004533856,0.001570992,0.8775706,0.0001149054,0.0002896487,0.00007027062,0.0009030352,0.002234739,0.02502556,0.01130674,0.005131798,0.07532837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002243092,0.0004595746,0.9932493,0.000039908,0.00001339121,0.00002672022,0.0004907922,0.00002338733,0.001098115,0.001808672,0.002432202,0.0001336213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936066,0.00024033,0.00004015612,0.004496382,0.0004185549,0.0001891865,0.00009107184,0.000041786,0.0008759883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986303,0.00005032073,0.00007927929,0.0002152325,0.0008428055,0.00001433862,0.00003880796,8.995776e-7,0.0001279687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1156788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5628124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099734777","doi":"10.1139/b01-129","title":"Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian Forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Canopy; Clearcutting; Species evenness; Forestry; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Perennial plant; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03407920766300288,"gpt":0.2419457316552188,"spread":0.2078665239922159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002212206,0.00008456026,0.0001976172,0.0000312762,0.0004234597,0.00005430312,0.0001893181,0.00006943873,0.00002081232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006606022,0.00003082087,0.00004088974,0.0002094231,0.0001778665,0.00008083227,0.00001308617,0.0004417222,4.150453e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001646346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000187901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01194381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8468236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993026,0.0001350999,0.0002285721,0.00005960577,0.00009053642,0.0001835747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994132,0.0001715747,0.0001285658,0.00003603682,0.00007757223,0.0001730814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208651,0.00005052545,0.9442889,0.00001702152,0.00004587843,0.00005605767,0.004671854,0.00004159523,0.001231493,0.0002513731,0.02710759,0.02220564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001551978,0.0002968058,0.9916558,0.00005265102,0.00001105,0.0001263852,0.003279879,0.0001245255,0.00001095437,0.0001997824,0.004020138,0.00006684133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988434,0.006725523,2.072832e-7,0.004157349,0.0002104043,0.00007921235,0.0000372091,0.000001475429,0.0003546239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991699,0.0003194748,0.0000393286,0.0002448556,0.000169799,8.319188e-7,0.000002416405,8.360115e-7,0.00005250102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8348798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124542793","doi":"10.3732/ajb.1000171","title":"Morphologically cryptic biological species within the liverwort <i>Frullania asagrayana</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Reproductive isolation; Coalescent theory; Gene flow; Monophyly; Evolutionary biology; Population; Species complex; Genetic structure; Paraphyly; Zoology; Genetics; Phylogenetics; Genetic variation; Gene; Clade; Phylogenetic tree","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0103783707119921,"gpt":0.1958153629424567,"spread":0.1854369922304646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000556408,0.0001749652,0.0003896045,0.00001017823,0.000313244,0.000062773,0.0005998156,0.0000635812,0.0006015185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001583038,0.00004203667,0.0002645798,0.0003919934,0.0009702498,0.00005650121,0.0001095048,0.0006215847,0.0000335959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000130688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001501472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000905299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002540079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986848,0.0001183585,0.0004379126,0.0001800751,0.0002843013,0.0002945435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.0003761638,0.0005796198,0.00008024278,0.0001715145,0.0001467921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996317,0.0003160071,0.09642534,0.000001808005,0.000204293,0.0002349187,0.0002875003,0.0000059985,0.7603045,0.001335533,0.01417006,0.1264144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238714,0.002477697,0.8927742,0.00001199959,0.00002928821,0.0005079606,0.002467581,0.000006901689,0.00020021,0.0005510657,0.1006463,0.0002029412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991021,0.0001901844,0.000005992707,0.005488416,0.001649344,0.00007620275,0.000007965931,0.00001978909,0.001541057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951062,0.0003660064,0.0007776332,0.001150015,0.002430454,0.000001929745,6.371372e-7,0.000001230026,0.0001658827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6586206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016636129","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00713.x","title":"Stress tolerance of rare and common moss species in relation to their occupied environments and asexual dispersal potential","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Council; University of Alberta","keywords":"Desiccation tolerance; Bryophyte; Biology; Moss; Asexual reproduction; Desiccation; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Rare species; Ecology; Deserts and xeric shrublands; Common species; Botany; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01501892403103895,"gpt":0.1988077900092184,"spread":0.1837888659781795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007147028,0.00005304912,0.0001787536,0.00001231405,0.00005151894,0.000006315129,0.00005202877,0.00004875744,0.00009758257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001169388,0.0000200002,0.00002260519,0.00004809499,0.00006369773,0.00005181465,0.00004530672,0.00008104801,5.522073e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001161106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.514329e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002641824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001033989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995475,0.00003985525,0.0001966967,0.00006901181,0.00005462657,0.00009232952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997498,0.00006746873,0.0001214494,0.00001335901,0.00001028345,0.0000376323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000143757,0.0001921144,0.9381459,0.000007215957,0.00002831016,0.0000262164,0.0007032134,0.0001641317,0.02718634,0.00003200244,0.0004832542,0.03288759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002300537,0.0005145831,0.9966568,0.00001119777,0.000004694205,0.00002132976,0.0007807279,0.0001552833,0.0001020708,0.00003753846,0.001445814,0.00003995047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997799,0.0003827193,0.000001222355,0.001360208,0.000299752,0.0000496196,0.00001601844,7.48438e-7,0.00009066105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991447,0.0004811724,0.00002446953,0.00005031471,0.0002262364,4.877904e-7,9.099028e-7,3.327803e-7,0.00007137159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0585109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1068461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004010228","doi":"10.1007/s00299-007-0409-5","title":"Revelation of ancestral roles of KNOX genes by a functional analysis of Physcomitrella homologues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plant Cell Reports","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physcomitrella patens; Biology; Gene; Mutant; Genetics; Phenotype; Gene knockout; Gene family; Gene targeting; Gene expression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01432112412801854,"gpt":0.1984035432747311,"spread":0.1840824191467126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002329767,0.00007044084,0.000267709,0.00002435915,0.00003741601,0.000001894181,0.00003887693,0.0000546614,0.00008304608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009838051,0.00002744304,0.0001529293,0.0003475623,0.00006284127,0.00002206238,0.00001948865,0.0000320998,2.495406e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004930513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004819454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005213683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001006601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991457,0.00001463404,0.0004200258,0.0001449472,0.0001669483,0.0001076801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992486,0.0001184994,0.0004955976,0.00003936896,0.00007275063,0.00002521333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006252865,0.0002003495,0.4705846,0.0000293454,0.0002589917,0.00001672613,0.0000643505,0.0001238453,0.5137417,0.00001151708,0.002830677,0.01207532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003907311,0.0001280019,0.9048828,0.00001462103,0.0001935487,0.00001206878,0.0002221577,0.00004119237,0.08793944,0.00005018311,0.006394332,0.00008254068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962344,0.001721332,0.00001600839,0.00001890254,0.0002832901,0.00004909517,0.0001167341,0.000005770478,0.001554521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.0003201317,0.0000666925,0.000004283832,0.0001257283,8.232277e-7,0.0002471907,3.443956e-7,0.0002472904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4342982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1119095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385697318","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.003","title":"Adaptive evolution of the enigmatic Takakia now facing climate change in Tibet","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cell","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Biology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Abiotic component; Adaptation (eye); Climate change; Moss; Ecosystem; Adaptive evolution; Ecology; Cryptobiosis; Evolutionary biology; Gene; Genetics; Desiccation; Paleontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0279360758566095,"gpt":0.212485672524215,"spread":0.1845495966676055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009846473,0.00004730836,0.00008114992,0.000006129494,0.0000847479,0.000003731483,0.00009068083,0.00003056384,0.00003049929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004846671,0.00001339469,0.00004520686,0.0003866024,0.0000280864,0.00002525336,0.00009087016,0.00004893352,0.00005220129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001830241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001498012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003314305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001981074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995735,0.0000289678,0.00009002072,0.00008624557,0.00006944146,0.0001518009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999859,0.0000424827,0.00004693413,0.00002597063,0.00001310211,0.00001244845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009368287,0.0003637479,0.4843702,0.0003672851,0.00003468749,0.00001346031,0.007639943,0.0001503295,0.3440358,0.001105091,0.01233998,0.1494858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005820049,0.00005997472,0.9947771,0.00004573512,0.000003245372,2.25374e-7,0.0013047,0.0008334126,0.0007063298,0.0001901778,0.00196646,0.0000544838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956271,0.0001901157,2.992888e-7,0.00046359,0.0004916651,0.0001353024,0.00001924886,0.00001679546,0.003055905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994064,0.0001657149,0.000004680065,0.00002359551,0.0001871165,0.00001048466,0.000002292213,3.326651e-7,0.0001994096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5104069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1105486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468788094","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12637","title":"So close and yet so far away: long‐distance dispersal events govern bryophyte metacommunity reassembly","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","keywords":"Metacommunity; Biological dispersal; Bryophyte; Propagule; Ecology; Metapopulation; Biology; Spatial ecology; Colonisation; Habitat; Population; Colonization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01204145461508788,"gpt":0.2312698871861736,"spread":0.2192284325710858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004078101,0.0001395627,0.0003736374,0.00001241664,0.0003667179,0.00002736206,0.0002733333,0.000114628,0.0001959998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001395117,0.00004131764,0.0001563597,0.0001021356,0.0002010691,0.0001581786,0.0001582316,0.0002017256,0.00001511316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005959078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002340745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001598338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008609069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988825,0.0001783625,0.0003484398,0.0001457665,0.000153168,0.0002917121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988841,0.0004164391,0.0003800541,0.0000612029,0.0001270877,0.00013116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006484338,0.000639952,0.6206598,0.00002543347,0.0004903291,0.0001520261,0.0002391496,8.897034e-7,0.031032,0.001442315,0.01885933,0.3258103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004075764,0.0006836843,0.8707291,0.0000291989,0.00003708431,0.0001097323,0.0001339279,0.000002986852,0.00005905096,0.0009297347,0.126763,0.000114883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890814,0.00151723,0.00001677061,0.00704626,0.002011842,0.00006829343,0.000033386,0.000008127895,0.000216642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941633,0.003883193,0.00006982958,0.0003370278,0.0009757142,0.000001696549,0.000001017622,0.0000014335,0.0005668013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3256955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4804062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380899748","doi":"10.1111/boj.12408","title":"Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae<i>s. l</i>.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Russian Science Foundation; Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation; Russian Foundation for Basic Research","keywords":"Biology; Polyphyly; Phylogenetic tree; Lineage (genetic); Clade; Evolutionary biology; Genus; Phylogenetics; Maximum parsimony; Molecular phylogenetics; Zoology; Botany; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01037058711539129,"gpt":0.2103343551544961,"spread":0.1999637680391048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004459055,0.0001297495,0.000251424,0.000006509706,0.0002193802,0.00003281339,0.000190946,0.000104061,0.000008571207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002286135,0.00003481712,0.0001711184,0.0002472117,0.0002051236,0.00006756547,0.0001609534,0.0002335866,0.000001047427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007775187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001308658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003676542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000818589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989367,0.00011237,0.0003388309,0.0001747445,0.0002164488,0.0002208811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989743,0.0005645338,0.0002394132,0.00005278172,0.0000771931,0.00009180641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003712139,0.0004867925,0.4023747,0.00004167332,0.0001844542,0.0000267319,0.0006509888,0.00002938882,0.2196107,0.0006376526,0.005037897,0.3705477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005593275,0.0004987434,0.9914237,0.0001999823,0.0000260083,0.0000749145,0.0003056794,0.00007437018,0.0001472381,0.001834981,0.004693361,0.0001616716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897336,0.002204308,0.00004359267,0.007463352,0.0004286992,0.00008477527,0.000008117649,0.000006651147,0.00002691119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961628,0.002504208,0.0001349592,0.0002721988,0.0008793853,9.484694e-7,7.413529e-8,0.00000144004,0.00004399861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.589049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1687317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754288637","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12579","title":"Long‐term community change: bryophytes are more responsive than vascular plants to nitrogen deposition and warming","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vascular plant; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Environmental change; Ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Climate change; Plant community; Biology; Temperate climate; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05365873726431308,"gpt":0.3034054489953796,"spread":0.2497467117310665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514911,0.00008168046,0.0001562769,0.00003946032,0.001999617,0.0002333605,0.0004518813,0.00003142802,0.000002975775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002570927,0.00003256754,0.00005869531,0.0001428083,0.000254066,0.0006726278,0.0001648832,0.0001562213,0.000002851157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002865546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001336295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001307532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004703391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.00007636479,0.0001830644,0.0001135382,0.0003694229,0.000169308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989074,0.00009826507,0.0004339633,0.00008183625,0.0003369747,0.0001415186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001480624,0.0001172215,0.5999814,0.00003478928,0.00004031553,0.00005225919,0.00549374,0.000007235541,0.2144073,0.0000147866,0.00009675568,0.1796061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001146973,0.0002636566,0.9950444,0.0001858499,0.00001080198,0.00006026112,0.0009951349,0.00002937026,0.003038051,0.000106081,0.00007362913,0.00007802905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969984,0.0004815664,0.00001558515,0.001731219,0.0006130605,0.0001051926,0.000004398935,0.000004915712,0.00004566476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987953,0.000208261,0.0002231053,0.0002068703,0.0005548886,0.000002629312,6.308547e-7,5.769825e-7,0.000007690249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.395063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331518797","doi":"10.15298/arctoa.19.19","title":"The genus Schistidium (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia: comments on selected taxa and key for identification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctoa","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador; Russian Foundation for Basic Research","keywords":"Taxon; Key (lock); Identification (biology); Identification key; Genus; Zoology; Geography; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008192080390983356,"gpt":0.2140043283979368,"spread":0.2058122480069534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001717188,0.00008201718,0.00008658054,0.00000628609,0.0004774607,0.00005496819,0.0001302525,0.00005631441,0.00001185678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007721984,0.00002595241,0.00002949708,0.0001677401,0.00007139588,0.00003316669,0.00003729568,0.0001466699,0.00001049451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000949976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003605526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002389299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00513542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993787,0.00002471811,0.0001366055,0.0001820166,0.00008138281,0.0001965599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995874,0.0002159535,0.00006405573,0.00005144334,0.00004469164,0.00003642676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000387778,0.0004584993,0.1218697,0.00003575315,0.00008222014,0.000003847756,0.000419639,0.000002035774,0.1837694,0.01344682,0.05794091,0.6215834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001516431,0.0001100059,0.745211,0.000005943868,0.000003661973,0.000001242276,0.00007107975,0.0000564589,0.0003976741,0.0004749124,0.2534428,0.00007356896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910664,0.0001211019,0.000001509174,0.006411023,0.001398352,0.0002917189,0.00002256294,0.00001929604,0.0006680522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984822,0.0001436294,0.00003686778,0.0001626951,0.000535574,0.00005061677,0.00001995771,8.920351e-7,0.0005675162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6233413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.367229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983916916","doi":"10.1139/b02-060","title":"Sporophyte production and spore dispersal phenology in <i>Sphagnum</i>: the importance of summer moisture and patch characteristics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Sporophyte; Mire; Sphagnum; Biological dispersal; Peat; Biology; Phenology; Spore; Ecology; Bryophyte; Botany; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01326945737480194,"gpt":0.1833048024466267,"spread":0.1700353450718247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001325632,0.00007546465,0.0001817898,0.00001174039,0.0001023268,0.00001349464,0.00007855716,0.00005054174,0.00009238685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006003139,0.00002551349,0.00003027695,0.000128078,0.0001837207,0.00005258645,0.000009812481,0.0001549102,3.246272e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001914574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001456728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003321857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2264512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994344,0.00002308394,0.000229542,0.00009483413,0.0000588997,0.0001592346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995949,0.00002611314,0.0001706982,0.00002996004,0.00006403281,0.0001143422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127591,0.00001137969,0.9725059,0.00000657209,0.00001377633,0.0000558652,0.0004225041,2.298073e-7,0.000914299,0.00004641165,0.002493437,0.0235169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006863771,0.0001178125,0.9755583,0.00003438833,0.00001107032,0.0001201021,0.0006889836,0.000008950043,0.00001339095,0.00005272673,0.02326746,0.00005813127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865534,0.00656407,1.117765e-7,0.005986354,0.0006526753,0.00005889994,0.00001947493,9.517236e-7,0.0001640327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974109,0.00159714,0.00001088416,0.0001692989,0.0006852377,6.035264e-7,4.817661e-7,7.784623e-7,0.0001247046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2231293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7876641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965105308","doi":"10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00076.x","title":"Ancestry of <i>KNOX</i> genes revealed by bryophyte (<i>Physcomitrella patens</i>) homologs","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Phytologist","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physcomitrella patens; Biology; Gene; Bryophyte; Genetics; Phylogenetic tree; Gene duplication; Bryopsida; Plant evolution; Homology (biology); Homeobox; Gene family; Genome; Botany; Gene expression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02684226676459156,"gpt":0.2337001135403771,"spread":0.2068578467757855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001080157,0.0002559314,0.0004840612,0.000009493425,0.0002085168,0.00002258774,0.000400065,0.000183692,0.0002496698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002677409,0.0001003152,0.0002048675,0.0004462611,0.0003011985,0.00006960162,0.0001221188,0.000176958,0.00004048739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001709589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001603874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001829461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009399829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984467,0.00006783543,0.000378654,0.0004420482,0.0001958094,0.000468961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992643,0.000142431,0.0002417596,0.0001340643,0.00007902599,0.0001383915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001698495,0.0002883237,0.2584066,0.00002824935,0.0000709743,0.00003607036,0.00003333374,0.000005518777,0.1482603,0.0001248728,0.3824666,0.2101094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006432901,0.0007703984,0.230832,0.00005168008,0.00003926496,0.00005375845,0.0002242257,0.00001015534,0.00707825,0.001770932,0.7580024,0.0005236054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746836,0.008985761,0.00001182008,0.003222109,0.001639569,0.0002098514,0.00009300769,0.0001063199,0.01104797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869471,0.00496619,0.0002716992,0.0006496248,0.0018841,0.00001290255,0.00004423369,0.000002820017,0.005221333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3755358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4090734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278476911","doi":"10.1111/nph.13887","title":"Analyses of transcriptome sequences reveal multiple ancient large‐scale duplication events in the ancestor of Sphagnopsida (Bryophyta)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Phytologist","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Innovation and Advanced Education; UT-Battelle; Laboratory Directed Research and Development; U.S. Department of Energy; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation; Language Literacy and Culture, University of Maryland, Baltimore County","keywords":"Biology; Gene duplication; Evolutionary biology; Genome; Adaptation (eye); Gene; Sphagnum; Tandem exon duplication; Dominance (genetics); Genetics; Ecology; Peat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05402573632541878,"gpt":0.2953602394048036,"spread":0.2413345030793848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002677954,0.0001225228,0.0002878598,0.0000155714,0.00008460572,0.000003678394,0.0003768061,0.00007017393,0.00005424674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006178045,0.0000329172,0.0001350832,0.0004910983,0.0001856234,0.00008454709,0.00003086612,0.00006181761,0.000004704006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000205168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001360442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001452798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005412331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988075,0.00009923426,0.0003511116,0.0002566218,0.0002306142,0.0002549448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.0002408077,0.0002238709,0.0001057621,0.00006481023,0.00004002316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007719459,0.0002626884,0.4045031,0.00002395492,0.00001894599,0.000001658611,0.0003682188,0.000004199128,0.5669811,0.0000508889,0.001970928,0.02573712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659301,0.0002889651,0.9778442,0.00005706681,0.00001353472,0.000002124416,0.0006333666,0.000007835965,0.01241955,0.000372401,0.007896689,0.0000982799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955267,0.001045987,0.00004768428,0.002174784,0.0004423693,0.0002249302,0.00007719974,0.00001354807,0.0004468384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.0002835949,0.0001680132,0.0001063754,0.0002736515,0.00002062231,0.000007118006,7.201232e-7,0.000158546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5733411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3020208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159104365","doi":"10.1139/a03-016","title":"Patterns of bryophyte diversity in humid coastal and inland cedarhemlock forests of British Columbia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","keywords":"Bryophyte; Western Hemlock; Ecology; Understory; Habitat; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Temperate rainforest; Old-growth forest; Species diversity; Biology; Ecosystem; Canopy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01483680458350724,"gpt":0.1883897081406559,"spread":0.1735529035571487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001422489,0.00006089974,0.0002635715,0.000002597116,0.00006818764,0.000006497431,0.00006688743,0.00003517528,0.0001572994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009682421,0.0000374235,0.00006729767,0.00005067959,0.0000689914,0.00003785432,0.0001569631,0.00005103905,0.000002333118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009709522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.578616e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006637098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08052167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993572,0.00006311834,0.0002207053,0.0001525549,0.00009029012,0.0001161315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997947,0.00002568747,0.0001096749,0.00003195408,8.291956e-7,0.00003722131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002257658,0.00006905139,0.9408252,0.00002072547,0.000003733468,0.000002087349,0.00002592745,4.471212e-8,0.001734022,3.966365e-7,0.0005895079,0.0567271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001495359,0.0001279986,0.9452848,0.00007440947,0.000006134826,0.000005652105,0.0001403113,3.799838e-7,0.00005176824,0.00003164898,0.05405658,0.00007078877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950029,0.004291309,5.07335e-7,0.00000893488,0.00009949008,0.000202758,0.0001223297,0.00000159991,0.0002702195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809417,0.01863972,0.00002662908,0.0000203201,0.00002977861,0.000003988654,0.000009988926,5.221868e-7,0.0003273995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07388457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035425598","doi":"10.1139/x04-209","title":"Bryophyte community differences between edge and interior environments in temperate rain-forest fragments of coastal British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Vancouver Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Bryophyte; Transect; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Temperate rainforest; Habitat; Windthrow; Temperate climate; Context (archaeology); Logging; Snag; Geography; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0429425620037911,"gpt":0.2599672068528807,"spread":0.2170246448490896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022277,0.00008281673,0.0003004936,0.00005293701,0.0005284649,0.0001911774,0.0004042269,0.00008576346,0.0002034976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001076162,0.00005119294,0.00006178219,0.0002523039,0.0006001729,0.0001361045,0.0001130581,0.0006811747,0.000002703797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000912897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009478074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4175587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984376,0.0003234106,0.0003847439,0.0001142021,0.0002887113,0.000451301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990833,0.0002173131,0.0001148438,0.00005217309,0.00009955951,0.0004327612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009352772,0.00002855741,0.9552404,0.000008764373,0.00002150902,0.0000231544,0.0002049988,0.000001486705,0.0002728867,0.000001945343,0.001234187,0.04295276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003068746,0.0006259037,0.988171,0.000190913,0.000003912602,0.00001844898,0.0009996734,0.000005633435,0.00001470913,0.0001459729,0.009433233,0.00008375335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998453,0.0004618726,2.711377e-7,0.0003882797,0.0001537516,0.0001366165,0.0001384714,0.000001079215,0.0002666558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998628,0.0003398011,0.00001714594,0.00002221932,0.0004680725,0.000003014573,0.000008121436,0.000001578953,0.0005120125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.574753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5863198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039812070","doi":"10.1139/b09-089","title":"Responses of boreal epiphytic bryophytes to different levels of partial canopy harvestThis paper is one of a selection of papers published as part of the special Schofield Gedenkschrift.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epiphyte; Bryophyte; Moss; Biology; Ecology; Taiga; Lichen; Abundance (ecology); Canopy; Species richness; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01712782631316236,"gpt":0.226276554048388,"spread":0.2091487277352256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001999892,0.0001446911,0.0004662988,0.00001977089,0.00008541286,0.00001019234,0.0002820456,0.0001376359,0.003281915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004193388,0.00005437562,0.0002366899,0.0004134705,0.0002485309,0.00008199646,0.0001161557,0.0001712895,7.718151e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007531821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004632154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002153626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005487044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998526,0.00009561759,0.0005611535,0.0002212539,0.0003851246,0.0002108648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989223,0.00024398,0.0004084542,0.0001357982,0.0002202113,0.00006925718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003508004,0.0002278055,0.04503386,0.00003438469,0.00007049375,1.540634e-7,0.0002265524,4.824044e-7,0.9452945,0.0003250711,0.001967994,0.006467891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001466418,0.0005581111,0.6816717,0.00005896735,0.0000311039,8.201477e-7,0.0001360847,0.00000145011,0.3115427,0.00008981948,0.005689199,0.00007343213],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938346,0.00005804973,3.063156e-7,0.001778243,0.00128762,0.0002484501,0.0002029456,0.000006233487,0.002583523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982336,0.00005611685,0.00005720638,0.00009095633,0.001107114,0.00000953619,8.67784e-7,0.000001797676,0.0004428678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6366378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986352910","doi":"10.1139/x06-168","title":"Persistence of ground-layer bryophytes in a structural retention experiment: initial effects of level and pattern of overstory retention","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; University of Oregon; U.S. Forest Service; Western Washington University; Washington State University","keywords":"Basal area; Species richness; Understory; Bryophyte; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Biology; Plant cover; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Canopy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07622671460348497,"gpt":0.2842259152282761,"spread":0.2079992006247912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003926771,0.00006831454,0.0002098642,0.0001132716,0.00009610773,0.00001326764,0.0001403724,0.00006560278,0.0000338392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007492102,0.00003205948,0.00008776543,0.0002987192,0.0003497105,0.0001133873,0.00002456354,0.0001726801,1.543564e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007780477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008297213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06553187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2064893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998922,0.0001219044,0.0003259079,0.0001006012,0.0002967318,0.0002327911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999166,0.0001376306,0.0001890681,0.00003407999,0.000366584,0.0001067042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001521592,0.00005244038,0.8313323,0.0003159723,0.00004795925,0.00007287428,0.000962331,0.00001566353,0.141804,0.0003097686,0.0005232196,0.02441132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000310777,0.0008563681,0.9930945,0.0002666229,0.000006189771,0.00001617095,0.001059436,0.00002326229,0.003818881,0.0003986536,0.00009749919,0.00005164263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974191,0.001838652,0.000001447098,0.0001034635,0.0003063502,0.0001121466,0.00002301069,5.484877e-7,0.0001953503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996238,0.00006260406,0.00002145503,0.000003161158,0.0002430511,0.000001385135,0.000003505191,9.22634e-7,0.00004013379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1617622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9406908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169295445","doi":"10.1111/bij.12200","title":"Intercontinental genetic structure in the amphi-Pacific peatmoss<i>Sphagnum miyabeanum</i>(Bryophyta: Sphagnaceae)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Journal of the Linnean Society","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Biological dispersal; Moss; Ecology; Genetic structure; Isolation by distance; Population; Range (aeronautics); Bryophyte; Sporophyte; Biogeography; Botany; Genetic variation; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009527352559231672,"gpt":0.1796284664137754,"spread":0.1701011138545438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003354775,0.000240388,0.0003590879,0.00000419944,0.0003451338,0.0001097922,0.001128235,0.0002142981,0.0004126752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007028037,0.00005293963,0.0007657681,0.0003924123,0.0003318538,0.00009488886,0.0002371091,0.0006795645,0.00001509198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004422832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009816414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007955598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006002264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982007,0.0003048536,0.0005628624,0.0002264863,0.000290426,0.0004146608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990072,0.0002968206,0.0003781723,0.0001093694,0.000125866,0.00008252703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001694638,0.0008773044,0.4755362,0.00003545186,0.0003912747,0.00004240618,0.003610409,0.00003892464,0.1439804,0.0001261137,0.269369,0.1058231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003583527,0.000492982,0.9434595,0.00004269029,0.00002121968,0.0001362493,0.006735449,0.00003275886,0.0001629745,0.001340561,0.04702461,0.0001926772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866408,0.002077103,0.000002770013,0.008748721,0.001991237,0.0003050192,0.00002411586,0.00001176033,0.0001985275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939933,0.0008447338,0.0003569295,0.001658197,0.003007667,0.00000549288,0.000003595781,0.000001602117,0.0001284972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4679233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4518504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823538767","doi":"10.1043/0363-6445-27.3.435","title":"The Circumscription of the Dicranaceae (Bryopsida) Based on the Chloroplast Regions trnL—trnF and rps4","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioOne Complete (BioOne)","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Polyphyly; Monophyly; Biology; Subfamily; Zoology; Clade; Evolutionary biology; Maximum parsimony; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.260463536816549,"gpt":0.1962562402234993,"spread":0.06420729659304966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002634858,0.0002188989,0.000224757,0.00001067687,0.001754307,0.00007737138,0.0005046444,0.00008653311,0.0001924253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007835701,0.00005327653,0.0002048555,0.00043726,0.0006720316,0.0000401587,0.0001583427,0.0002186393,0.00002846046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002262092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004766497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002880515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001148002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998518,0.0001910505,0.000285538,0.000314507,0.0003356051,0.0003553056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987996,0.0006153982,0.0001881631,0.0002507573,0.00007614745,0.00006995923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042757,0.001226522,0.02562421,0.0001026384,0.0003954564,0.00001137315,0.001161923,0.00003662308,0.2469027,0.02577314,0.5171692,0.1811686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040859,0.0004540675,0.494291,0.0001131573,0.00004145479,0.00001096284,0.0009595957,0.002488167,0.0004278257,0.0004371557,0.5000674,0.0003006643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8965223,0.002045446,0.00001562894,0.09212944,0.001955017,0.0008239037,0.0001976052,0.00007600509,0.006234629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967239,0.0006007154,0.00001020086,0.001092131,0.0006106531,0.00002342395,0.000006571011,0.000002690037,0.0009296476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4686668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805358780","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2018.00858","title":"Relating Bryophyte Assemblages to a Remotely Sensed Depth-to-Water Index in Boreal Forests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Plant Science","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; Royal Alberta Museum; University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta","keywords":"Bryophyte; Taiga; Environmental science; Boreal; Ecology; Index (typography); Geography; Forestry; Physical geography; Remote sensing; Biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01371977239351246,"gpt":0.2276205521722315,"spread":0.213900779778719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006467108,0.0001575052,0.0002304069,0.0001197976,0.000352358,0.00008176296,0.0004885074,0.00007872408,0.000008773393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001344183,0.00005927761,0.00003600516,0.00145868,0.0002514809,0.0001838122,0.0002663244,0.000161928,0.00003343742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001035957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001919899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001438601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02023117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979884,0.00004243433,0.0002669065,0.0005642478,0.0003709111,0.0007671103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995766,0.00004895346,0.00004335095,0.00008613963,0.00005860204,0.0001862998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423271,0.00004504065,0.8840303,0.0000051012,0.000003682186,0.00005777069,0.001520882,0.00006205127,0.03330693,0.00001985169,0.01649634,0.06430966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001159146,0.0002519787,0.9874109,0.00007768356,0.000001240328,0.000009381165,0.0005744956,0.001697025,0.002194845,0.0002706214,0.007185168,0.0002107432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918704,0.00002270104,0.0001195687,0.00109851,0.002910512,0.0002815277,0.00001469965,0.0000323408,0.003649745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967886,0.00001086847,0.001941496,0.0004678,0.0005741619,0.000008796387,0.000004981071,0.000001258865,0.0002019864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1033805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913834085","doi":"10.11646/bde.40.2.1","title":"Morphology supports the setaphyte hypothesis: mosses plus liverworts form a natural group","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Taxon; Monophyly; Biology; Bryophyte; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Moss; Phylogenetics; Clade; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0156429988381067,"gpt":0.1817894055807576,"spread":0.1661464067426509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001632627,0.0001607272,0.000178665,0.0000140582,0.003569155,0.00003147084,0.0002078218,0.0001026734,0.0001090752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002250266,0.00005864308,0.00011329,0.0002473802,0.0004359987,0.0002003262,0.0007535787,0.0001370459,0.00003778869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006078869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005592916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002191215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989719,0.00005430606,0.0001253555,0.0003202658,0.0001751824,0.0003529935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995818,0.00009816712,0.00009051626,0.0000710753,0.00008730567,0.0000712105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001645564,0.0004701909,0.6743621,0.0001045157,0.0005679316,0.0001321614,0.0069904,0.000005549252,0.01070154,0.004576691,0.140631,0.1598123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001875295,0.0003022039,0.9814358,0.00001357525,0.00004369592,0.00004098815,0.0009876945,0.0001206232,0.00002179756,0.001581736,0.01509151,0.0001727915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949369,0.0008110007,0.00001039784,0.000780771,0.002434114,0.0001906721,0.00003119479,0.00006322036,0.0007417072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963928,0.0003551359,0.00003846097,0.0003664963,0.00234726,0.000004843778,0.00001185829,9.073286e-7,0.0004822305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3070737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952784881","doi":"10.1038/s41598-019-45039-9","title":"Genome of the tropical plant Marchantia inflexa: implications for sex chromosome evolution and dehydration tolerance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Marchantia polymorpha; Genome; Gene; Genetics; Evolution of sexual reproduction; Chromosome; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01194638692736842,"gpt":0.2067980300709235,"spread":0.1948516431435551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001816854,0.00005703477,0.000102397,0.000007229083,0.0003306521,0.00003752504,0.00007934092,0.00003096084,0.0000216484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001833238,0.00001896709,0.00005985822,0.0001999992,0.0001319908,0.00005626698,0.00006690109,0.00003385435,0.000001410973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001562438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001319432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002362899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001550925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992529,0.00001568861,0.0002065388,0.0002832063,0.0001084793,0.000133204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996055,0.00003283012,0.0001497267,0.0001115319,0.00007248125,0.00002788697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007431139,0.00003408126,0.2072994,0.00002346233,0.000009028178,3.990842e-7,0.0000824934,0.00001539574,0.7882919,0.0004992163,0.0008631253,0.002874053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003818144,0.00004975398,0.9592991,0.00001093068,0.000006007286,0.00002797269,0.0000513571,0.00010176,0.001398087,0.003395787,0.03556495,0.00005611702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957225,0.0002029643,0.00002166979,0.0008215389,0.00259311,0.0004570607,0.0000263953,0.00001059766,0.0001442153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989133,0.000009659641,0.00004166947,0.00001319388,0.0001817326,0.00002152631,0.00002996841,4.782045e-7,0.0007884907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2543142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016878103","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.008","title":"Nuclear DNA content variation and evolution in liverworts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Division of Emerging Frontiers; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Genome size; Genome; Phylogenetic tree; Ploidy; Plant evolution; GC-content; Phylogenetics; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00807887250600649,"gpt":0.1619365506400935,"spread":0.153857678134087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006825733,0.00009035409,0.00009786329,0.00001418386,0.000124022,0.00003577642,0.00003786729,0.00007781502,0.00002265202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001080641,0.00004299324,0.0000261686,0.0001155147,0.0000489967,0.00004097711,0.00006381579,0.00005327692,0.000007620458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003670625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002374971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001673071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000296964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00003982254,0.0001269149,0.0002024507,0.00008683979,0.0001659109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998115,0.00001190833,0.0000424703,0.00003108791,0.00004998528,0.00005302997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009936643,0.0000604847,0.07825073,0.000009637792,0.00001419515,0.000002313571,0.0001226725,0.00002049974,0.900043,0.002197508,0.0001061084,0.01916296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001260769,0.0001541662,0.9948103,0.00001153595,0.000007836572,0.000004267975,0.0001552652,0.001777842,0.0001241053,0.002383057,0.0003393713,0.0001061282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997261,0.001576578,0.00009562263,0.0005188058,0.0001760663,0.0002077184,0.000003527014,0.0000125473,0.000148085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993441,0.0003063666,0.0001215009,0.00007360925,0.0001149424,0.00001085202,0.00000589465,0.000001097912,0.0000216378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9165596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2529194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998922443","doi":"10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.004","title":"A new species of Cladophialophora (hyphomycetes) from boreal and montane bryophytes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mycological Research","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Hyphomycetes; Botany; Conidium; Monophyly; Dothideomycetes; Ascomycota; Phylogenetics; Clade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04871653867279604,"gpt":0.2759647352714488,"spread":0.2272481965986527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003481636,0.0001342751,0.0003133619,0.00002140257,0.0002697144,0.00005812168,0.0002695102,0.0001669185,0.001406486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001541814,0.00004535591,0.00008622965,0.0005207795,0.0003559598,0.00004614847,0.0003210903,0.0002950741,0.00003204056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002777717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001653538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01915228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003070733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982709,0.0001436427,0.0002521928,0.0003723259,0.0004835214,0.0004774607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983967,0.001197061,0.0000503913,0.00006629551,0.0001487022,0.0001408759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004509987,0.0003499718,0.06016089,0.00001756673,0.00004386468,0.00009735694,0.000067999,0.000001467153,0.6548315,0.005457659,0.1506998,0.1278209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001716248,0.000684434,0.9103245,0.00001359744,0.000004473571,0.000002004279,0.000227244,0.000009631397,0.00101601,0.0134775,0.07396532,0.00010365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766571,0.002346324,0.000001722084,0.001041961,0.0002082243,0.0002082861,0.00005883985,0.00003205818,0.01944551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934829,0.0009369305,0.0004930259,0.00004155344,0.002333639,0.00001182418,0.00003019801,0.000001033459,0.002668829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747386246","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12999","title":"Bryophyte abundance, diversity and composition after retention harvest in boreal mixedwood forest","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Agriculture and Forestry","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Boreal; Biodiversity; Deciduous; Taiga; Basal area; Environmental science; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Lichen; Biology; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01222842940754872,"gpt":0.2005953366277631,"spread":0.1883669072202144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001817452,0.00007241884,0.0002012257,0.00001504372,0.0006772401,0.00003559051,0.0001496047,0.00008598895,0.00002497593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005722522,0.00003025062,0.00005487582,0.00003110985,0.000126589,0.0001291204,0.0002915976,0.0001442112,0.000002566537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002710243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003171139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001236291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005547586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994605,0.00001556281,0.0001885499,0.0001085671,0.00007657096,0.0001502688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995391,0.00003703044,0.0002988101,0.00003334313,0.00004158174,0.00005014752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004924097,0.0001047527,0.981187,0.000008484334,0.00002669984,0.00004433198,0.0001239921,0.000003965147,0.001746606,0.000273131,0.0006191171,0.01536951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004144751,0.0002938346,0.9952599,0.00001189019,0.00001343671,0.00002210176,0.00008755489,0.00001003927,0.00002918061,0.001608128,0.00218489,0.00006459859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964089,0.00004829419,0.000001669225,0.0009767911,0.0007903588,0.00007565095,0.000005424192,0.000002907429,0.001689941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989808,0.0002306819,0.00008152759,0.000116559,0.000560322,0.000002475615,0.000002134788,4.679063e-7,0.00002508335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5208852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074261397","doi":"10.1139/x10-156","title":"Elevational gradients of bryophyte diversity, life forms, and community assemblage in the southern Appalachian Mountains","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; Michigan Technological University","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecology; Ordination; Basal area; Deciduous; Species richness; Biology; Balsam; Geography; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05538002359029989,"gpt":0.2761763596707559,"spread":0.220796336080456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002445302,0.00005993604,0.0001232265,0.00007345545,0.00113097,0.00005027126,0.0005633339,0.00006128932,0.00004924411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002957446,0.00002088505,0.00005387357,0.0003480767,0.000345749,0.00008184642,0.0001151663,0.001117203,0.000001888005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000279533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001202529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08954403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9080091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988798,0.0002632699,0.0001790437,0.00005852203,0.000331817,0.0002875392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.0003868141,0.00008055576,0.00005430594,0.0002467255,0.0002620412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001576497,0.00004005758,0.9937577,0.000007551192,0.00001233129,0.00001165075,0.001760568,0.000001384791,0.0004165385,0.0008875039,0.0007843336,0.002304677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000138403,0.0002883931,0.9847949,0.00001658734,0.000002622969,0.0000171955,0.007839699,0.000006391273,0.000003635381,0.003032645,0.003818588,0.00004090489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967169,0.00008232449,2.280185e-7,0.001966891,0.0001766878,0.00009599749,0.00004590826,7.165061e-7,0.0009143697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995495,0.00002731501,0.000008566733,0.00006630789,0.0003023156,9.837772e-7,0.000004375436,6.086292e-7,0.00004004651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9165187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225001930","doi":"10.1080/03736687.2022.2054615","title":"Unveiling the nature of a miniature world: a horizon scan of fundamental questions in bryology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bryology","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université Laval; Royal Alberta Museum","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Fundación BBVA; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bryophyte; Scope (computer science); Ecology; Library science; Biology; Environmental ethics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007956306459096474,"gpt":0.2366935405809634,"spread":0.2287372341218669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004928046,0.00008252706,0.0003350034,0.00006229027,0.0001494278,0.000003354652,0.0003144944,0.00009242627,0.0004100272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005364596,0.00002820638,0.0001662089,0.0005997373,0.0001852753,0.00002954734,0.0001573205,0.000790106,4.10821e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005184516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003441015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001711727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002114195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998836,0.000268966,0.0004490823,0.000101255,0.0001686163,0.0001760148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990284,0.000308587,0.0005088903,0.00004096291,0.00008287814,0.00003024846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002897928,0.002857716,0.5365137,0.00009731445,0.0007779747,0.000322117,0.004055299,0.001125945,0.2387236,0.008768882,0.07063239,0.1332271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005313201,0.00358162,0.8638253,0.0000386843,0.00004104579,0.0004941711,0.004889454,0.00002326252,0.0001834784,0.00116012,0.1251187,0.0001128596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856246,0.003066095,3.28025e-7,0.008508968,0.002155555,0.00007683978,0.0000276973,0.000002373548,0.0005376154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987361,0.0001726027,0.00006957372,0.0002123209,0.0005691244,0.000003155519,0.000002844377,7.893736e-7,0.0002335077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3273115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4489511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103886992","doi":"10.1890/12-1944.1","title":"Stochastic processes dominate during boreal bryophyte community assembly","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecological succession; Ecology; Taiga; Habitat; Community structure; Boreal; Niche; Ecological niche; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01167097052240191,"gpt":0.2071927954100853,"spread":0.1955218248876834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104781,0.000125832,0.0002057834,0.000008515677,0.0006782415,0.00003358228,0.0002444477,0.00009650055,0.0004935978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009791999,0.0000455682,0.00004912286,0.0001970434,0.000104275,0.00009521549,0.0001834179,0.0002380538,0.0002329634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002472564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009006739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001773117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991435,0.0001111739,0.0001593113,0.0001590608,0.0000673812,0.0003596025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993569,0.0003255048,0.00007480231,0.00005524106,0.0001140401,0.00007353618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000553956,0.004644022,0.2533048,0.001075461,0.0008351925,0.0001100799,0.005172254,0.0001875944,0.2631474,0.0009100449,0.1209765,0.3490827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001553403,0.0003020469,0.9965298,0.000008372722,0.000007280659,0.00001467655,0.0005352505,0.00001950897,0.0001910884,0.0006053059,0.001492396,0.0001389316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937791,0.00008359351,0.000001705116,0.00138524,0.0008909293,0.0002250563,0.000008743229,0.00007107392,0.003554614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981496,0.0000307725,0.00002297479,0.0001929168,0.0007371021,0.00008040253,0.00001280785,0.000001054476,0.0007723899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.743225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.540455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513395547","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2016-0054","title":"The Early Cretaceous Apple Bay flora of Vancouver Island: a hotspot of fossil bryophyte diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Bryophyte; Biology; Cenozoic; Bay; Flora (microbiology); Ecology; Cretaceous; Gemma; Botany; Moss; Paleontology; Geology; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00996450483412687,"gpt":0.1852369985014401,"spread":0.1752724936673133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001337059,0.00009258102,0.0001797058,0.000003561656,0.0003484346,0.000007533678,0.0002630928,0.00005300069,0.0001312755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002543122,0.00002154155,0.0001346781,0.0001400498,0.0001806868,0.00004715713,0.0002627257,0.00004303554,0.00000984943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001083385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004757333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004677394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009833641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992579,0.00003281041,0.0001641488,0.0001505127,0.0001934828,0.0002012017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994661,0.0002055263,0.0001273326,0.00007620543,0.00008342609,0.00004140303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006831188,0.000260076,0.1537185,0.0000303308,0.0002708989,0.00001322367,0.0008703018,6.986487e-7,0.2022963,0.0003363125,0.1806119,0.4609083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002858964,0.0003844438,0.7983257,0.00003143788,0.00001985707,0.000001072727,0.0003686143,0.000003208044,0.0007541457,0.000629417,0.1990678,0.0001283893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954596,0.0007309121,0.000008710894,0.0004037269,0.001054327,0.000114087,0.0001151353,0.00001447163,0.00209906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963461,0.000400957,0.00001841843,0.0000179089,0.0003843062,0.000003097517,1.448002e-7,6.215215e-7,0.002828484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6446072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5487403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023379503","doi":"10.1139/b06-148","title":"Sphagnum establishment and expansion in black spruce (Picea mariana) boreal forests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Sphagnum; Black spruce; Taiga; Bryophyte; Peat; Ecology; Boreal; Moss; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009464224747038608,"gpt":0.2001548516330166,"spread":0.190690626885978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004343188,0.0000893947,0.0001652698,0.00003732875,0.0001141056,0.00004581634,0.0001186719,0.00006833646,0.00009126261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003877569,0.00003594833,0.00005047632,0.0002197226,0.00008551335,0.0001071233,0.00001593668,0.0001538678,0.000001768371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009032877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005946499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02190115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7795652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991491,0.00001929047,0.0002653593,0.0001051428,0.0001174297,0.0003436548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.0000613993,0.0001060037,0.00002627302,0.00006837758,0.0004648332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005986169,0.00002550375,0.7053766,0.000007875172,0.00002073608,0.0008378078,0.0003634621,0.000004750694,0.001238431,0.0001620329,0.01048402,0.2814189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766797,0.0002097096,0.9551089,0.00004393796,0.000005835836,0.00006068436,0.0008852194,0.000009201774,0.00003713748,0.0002284788,0.04314908,0.00008510688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940988,0.001260544,0.000003637206,0.002060998,0.0007660318,0.00006692299,0.000009037669,0.000002026858,0.001732011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986318,0.0001608644,0.00007278427,0.0002145809,0.0007958644,2.621568e-7,8.910513e-7,8.303965e-7,0.0001221053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.757664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024657653","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.20902","title":"Methodology significantly affects genome size estimates: Quantitative evidence using bryophytes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cytometry Part A","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Genome size; Genome; Biology; Computational biology; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1557919673452872,"gpt":0.3446947207539748,"spread":0.1889027534086876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007294669,0.0002398193,0.0004122577,0.00002986685,0.0004260537,0.00006842856,0.0003341943,0.0001671268,0.0007937379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001642403,0.00009309248,0.0001587088,0.0009490967,0.0003500746,0.0001748534,0.0001608602,0.00032275,0.0000962212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002154241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001695664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001140573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002392311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984031,0.0001729294,0.0002345029,0.0004869611,0.0002032162,0.0004993464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947591,0.004707654,0.0001589664,0.0001085472,0.000115007,0.0001506754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004864925,0.00005466782,0.01792316,0.00002258271,0.00004970269,0.00001574184,0.0001190905,0.000005553051,0.9775684,0.0001907554,0.000365823,0.003635834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002040928,0.001045791,0.9659611,0.0001044226,0.000094188,0.00005847139,0.001196851,0.0004213765,0.01084207,0.0009441335,0.01841444,0.0007130773],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939858,0.001586584,0.0001304974,0.0005240521,0.003131215,0.0002399748,0.00003196737,0.0001032326,0.0002667172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765826,0.0001544981,0.02128022,0.0001745046,0.00164592,0.00001957511,0.000005413773,0.000002828923,0.0001344597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8690874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203278786","doi":"10.3732/ajb.1500360","title":"Exploring the fossil history of pleurocarpous mosses: Tricostaceae fam. nov. from the Cretaceous of Vancouver Island, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Paleontological Society","keywords":"Moss; Biology; Bay; Gametophyte; Cretaceous; Botany; Gemma; Bryophyte; Ecology; Paleontology; Archaeology; Pollen; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04513186129149885,"gpt":0.1926492107021255,"spread":0.1475173494106266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002611605,0.000119281,0.0003816301,0.000006694951,0.00007673087,0.000007472593,0.0004453725,0.00001397977,0.00003092846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261852,0.00003217372,0.0001466071,0.0002612032,0.0003041367,0.00007991833,0.00006426834,0.0001945094,4.227757e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001871944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002434003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2625622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5532557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987302,0.0001204909,0.0004234828,0.000102525,0.0004413441,0.0001819961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982376,0.0005311915,0.000782384,0.00008554381,0.0002673895,0.00009592176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005986461,0.0001508059,0.02157527,0.000005911899,0.0004201556,0.00006442117,0.004513999,0.0001008127,0.006020292,0.000007016639,0.5348222,0.4317205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003457681,0.001346025,0.1097542,0.00004815155,0.00008527953,0.00002825989,0.03331139,0.00002481653,0.00009995186,0.00004637417,0.8547532,0.0001566056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875842,0.006945509,0.000007837274,0.001425617,0.003201546,0.00006038326,0.00004133578,0.000002876646,0.0007306488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979974,0.0006339659,0.00004228233,0.0002612127,0.0008331632,0.000001819307,2.55057e-7,0.000001612156,0.0002282653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4315639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7423485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414394134","doi":"10.1038/s41588-025-02325-9","title":"Bryophytes hold a larger gene family space than vascular plants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Genetics","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Horizontal gene transfer; Gene; Gene family; Genetic diversity; Extant taxon; Vascular plant","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007301292246713342,"gpt":0.2141507321872349,"spread":0.2068494399405215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001021439,0.0001808929,0.0002080667,0.00001486616,0.0002473166,0.00004604191,0.0002872153,0.0003624303,0.00003410441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001789228,0.00006599879,0.0001559058,0.0003502317,0.00004881994,0.00001974808,0.0001538919,0.0003617049,0.00002241454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001640193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001158554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004551925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002212405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989389,0.00003342843,0.0001426931,0.0003368403,0.0002125033,0.0003355913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996546,0.00006093868,0.00004464904,0.000103725,0.00007350151,0.00006259567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001039396,0.0004288575,0.1620463,0.00007521717,0.0006074419,0.00005061047,0.0001885798,0.00006328902,0.3847339,0.0006323759,0.2757042,0.1753653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001160907,0.00005794691,0.5399865,0.00001954782,0.00001922389,0.000001211639,0.00009180442,0.00003283591,0.003786875,0.0002946358,0.4554488,0.0001445155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579311,0.03264092,0.000005701711,0.001376745,0.003452257,0.0001731507,0.00007221323,0.00005967124,0.004288249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886545,0.005467285,0.0004350064,0.001648493,0.001855777,0.000009781123,0.00003571608,0.000001630175,0.001891831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.380947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2795394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201282298","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2015.12.004","title":"Is the sword moss (Bryoxiphium) a preglacial Tertiary relict?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Infection and Immunity; Applied Scientific Research Fund; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Moss; Biogeography; Taxon; Archipelago; Paleontology; Continental drift; Gondwana; Flora (microbiology); Biology; Old World; Subspecies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01535743920250696,"gpt":0.2071226881643617,"spread":0.1917652489618548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001247008,0.0001115772,0.00009259471,0.00000536858,0.0002256804,0.00003892129,0.0001250283,0.00007629053,0.000008917876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001580698,0.00003763207,0.00006529123,0.0001531773,0.00009995607,0.0000173583,0.0001257476,0.00007696365,0.00001010358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001944403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008121678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002669556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001465923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992399,0.00005259806,0.0001199622,0.0002096924,0.0001694881,0.000208419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997154,0.00001503865,0.00004285692,0.0000671106,0.00007128238,0.00008833358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001804335,0.0003304798,0.1757556,0.0000332191,0.0002299176,0.00003155037,0.001456157,0.0001846448,0.5351874,0.003549126,0.06300595,0.2200555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003032629,0.000451699,0.8506122,0.00001627143,0.00004846176,0.00002185478,0.0004288927,0.001277723,0.002428566,0.007285774,0.1368205,0.0003047771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897892,0.004494888,0.0001076727,0.004127675,0.0005052543,0.0001627245,0.0000103084,0.0000195945,0.000782668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982818,0.0002255409,0.0000781485,0.0006560621,0.0006135312,0.00001293903,0.000006878181,0.000001239588,0.0001238545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6748565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1735774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800759208","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0352","title":"Changes in bryophytes assemblages along a chronosequence in eastern boreal forest of Quebec","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Chronosequence; Ecology; Bryophyte; Species richness; Biological dispersal; Biology; Biodiversity; Taiga; Basal area; Old-growth forest; Habitat; Ecological succession","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05526661774434931,"gpt":0.301838730863391,"spread":0.2465721131190417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129846,0.0001062091,0.0002712409,0.000230102,0.0001431337,0.0000543894,0.0004879165,0.0000979132,0.0000816092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002331193,0.00004554898,0.00006390675,0.0008920213,0.0005916747,0.0001349662,0.00004906485,0.0003793988,0.000007155599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002114446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004348937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6689228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.0001533613,0.0003457528,0.0001623169,0.0003261548,0.000645443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988244,0.0002239472,0.0001220431,0.00006165121,0.0004391671,0.0003288366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453579,0.00002282395,0.9636755,0.00001524735,0.000008113814,0.0001682801,0.0003520673,0.000004106899,0.0008162183,0.0001544506,0.0009479683,0.03380068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001827773,0.0009393474,0.9915461,0.0002691161,0.000001591308,0.00002222599,0.001090847,0.00002769313,0.000284191,0.0005315356,0.005020314,0.00008424025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946381,0.0008521531,3.867749e-7,0.002488087,0.0003617693,0.0001364759,0.00001146038,0.000001559029,0.001509979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982309,0.0001853039,0.00001898878,0.0000287849,0.001341041,0.000004738102,0.000002579189,0.000001610809,0.0001860926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3306761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3332818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}