{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1206,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":1206,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"07ce411f68b1","filters":{"topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2110581795","doi":"10.1002/smj.448","title":"Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":743,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Minnesota","keywords":"Centrality; Business; Industrial organization; Cluster (spacecraft); Function (biology); Economic geography; Structural holes; Business cluster; Network structure; Marketing; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02653619104081247,"gpt":0.2349366297506314,"spread":0.2084004387098189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006214968,0.0002256179,0.0001794316,0.0003997279,0.0004372355,0.0009644208,0.0002271053,0.00007420694,0.0004684494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004239102,0.0001989888,0.00003994589,0.0009445374,0.00007266151,0.001614693,0.0001347923,0.0003096851,0.00007300186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003556993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001349192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001523392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001456003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.0000119503,0.0004319934,0.0002450609,0.0002588665,0.0003647707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992651,0.000009295349,0.0003323686,0.0001487384,0.0002272174,0.00001732401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006019733,0.00007229789,0.002804643,0.0001372443,0.00008272499,0.00004821913,0.000008097938,0.001289692,0.00001937636,0.9641008,0.00154738,0.02982926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005285578,0.00006613119,0.03358901,0.0004448147,0.0002923451,0.0002232587,0.003303853,0.1255384,0.00001298258,0.5829552,0.2466911,0.001597261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3038826,0.0004627361,0.005545089,0.00593916,0.001078152,0.0003513874,6.935833e-7,0.0001600165,0.6825802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934291,0.0001511157,0.0007516271,0.002377844,0.002657743,0.000008770789,0.00001915648,0.00002238961,0.0005822293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6895465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9299933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116240960","doi":"10.1002/smj.447","title":"The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":530,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alliance; Multinational corporation; Transaction cost; Diversity (politics); Industrial organization; Sample (material); Business; Economic geography; Structural equation modeling; Economics; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01554182982704549,"gpt":0.2218301503587018,"spread":0.2062883205316563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001073715,0.0001621725,0.0001325411,0.00008884736,0.0011481,0.0002674384,0.0004034172,0.00003857769,0.0001470862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008954503,0.0001083027,0.00007410821,0.0004148169,0.00007004967,0.0006794672,0.0001888635,0.0002403149,0.0001048754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004036734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000754763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006088695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008084762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987723,0.00002199899,0.0003272214,0.0001493341,0.000443559,0.0002856335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992129,0.00004536473,0.000427668,0.000152905,0.0001510596,0.00001017067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001098681,0.0001295356,0.1112481,0.0003934996,0.0002389201,0.00002199356,0.00001888704,0.03226095,0.00001817165,0.8056483,0.005084515,0.04383843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01287928,0.0009426725,0.5241442,0.001553085,0.0006630949,0.00004529075,0.0007636214,0.1713784,0.0004250995,0.1351367,0.1502994,0.001769192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7547719,0.00008074183,0.00009396632,0.001196244,0.000650248,0.0002333685,4.692187e-7,0.00003143015,0.2429416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973167,0.0001544163,0.0001171887,0.0003399104,0.001489099,0.000006737142,0.000006801311,0.000008834072,0.0005602921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6705116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8830373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034605018","doi":"10.1177/0146167205282148","title":"On the Benefits of Giving as Well as Receiving Autonomy Support: Mutuality in Close Friendships","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":509,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Autonomy; Well-being; Friendship; Political science; Psychotherapist; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193887605413072,"gpt":0.2755436807420942,"spread":0.2436048046879635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001450651,0.0001665884,0.0002471434,0.0001177476,0.0003554551,0.00007907734,0.0001642421,0.0002048006,0.004608162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001302389,0.0001459192,0.00006467089,0.0003539921,0.0002713626,0.0001583292,0.00005394795,0.0003236895,0.0003666171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002329761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002928352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002854564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002510729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987272,0.00007830885,0.0004099713,0.0003379968,0.0001769252,0.0002695708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999311,0.00015083,0.0002841235,0.0001351616,0.0001132142,0.000005726098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001382318,0.0002663348,0.04114625,0.000104842,0.00001454159,0.00000373988,0.0005333431,0.000005960305,0.00007427491,0.9444446,0.01159935,0.001668508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006237285,0.00002158751,0.7790748,0.00003500131,0.0000149258,0.000002664075,0.0007373367,0.00001066529,0.00001727726,0.08959062,0.1296702,0.0002011987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7904704,0.00002967268,0.000007705258,0.04991796,0.0001612456,0.0001286248,0.000004319921,0.00002843756,0.1592517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886619,0.000005639807,0.00001527532,0.01007521,0.0005851586,0.00001619305,0.00003604847,0.0000126793,0.0005918833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.854854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903127205","doi":"10.1002/smj.2245","title":"Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Batten Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia; Darden School Foundation","keywords":"Conceptualization; Competition (biology); Transaction cost; Competitive advantage; Industrial organization; Field (mathematics); Economics; Stakeholder; Conceptual framework; Dynamics (music); Time horizon; Database transaction; Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Management; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02621933188076603,"gpt":0.2429671665601844,"spread":0.2167478346794184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008397604,0.0002679832,0.0002417151,0.0004051861,0.0005554553,0.0006209798,0.0002976695,0.0001091788,0.001414556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003326843,0.0002430608,0.0001036203,0.0006667265,0.00009983814,0.0009631115,0.0001231054,0.0005010556,0.0004625409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007486461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001831471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002677409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002270566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982819,0.00003272725,0.0005066657,0.0003178683,0.0004285031,0.000432317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989158,0.00004771908,0.0004641331,0.000216811,0.0003306341,0.00002492937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003027868,0.00006429141,0.001807185,0.00008981152,0.00006552458,0.00003012291,0.00001405481,0.0001295898,0.00001522466,0.9943634,0.0002980995,0.003092445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009818836,0.00002451697,0.003817298,0.0003572714,0.00008840206,0.00003637951,0.004267136,0.03221641,0.000005856685,0.9386917,0.01902905,0.0004841292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06564823,0.00003239171,0.01862028,0.002070758,0.001818078,0.0002289343,0.000001576675,0.0001609241,0.9114189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877157,0.00002514598,0.007122129,0.002398,0.002200421,0.00001104194,0.00005331872,0.00003219729,0.0004420677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160403557","doi":"10.1177/0309132513507823","title":"Institutional change in economic geography","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in Human Geography","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Universität Heidelberg","keywords":"Institutional change; Perspective (graphical); Institutional economics; Space (punctuation); Entrepreneurship; Action (physics); Economic geography; Unintended consequences; Economic system; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Neoclassical economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02584745855462025,"gpt":0.2512937083347626,"spread":0.2254462497801424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002488267,0.0002076398,0.0001982748,0.002025199,0.0001745068,0.0003848478,0.0002731897,0.0001170831,0.0007765266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004219416,0.0002120613,0.00008391919,0.001216099,0.0002654294,0.003335872,0.0001036394,0.0002131693,0.0001782028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002553118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001029707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003801016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005831544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.000008677045,0.0004136781,0.0003510498,0.0001460108,0.00039386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995229,0.000007223837,0.000169921,0.0001955474,0.00009435019,0.0000100274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006731879,0.0001257145,0.8897853,0.00007896603,0.000008392787,0.000004945585,0.00001641884,0.00002089852,0.000004201515,0.09588396,0.00009473071,0.01396969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006061504,0.000007569348,0.9769038,0.00008308094,0.000005299992,6.667495e-7,0.00002022064,0.001160429,0.000004576517,0.01713331,0.003817303,0.0002575684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889694,0.0006629521,0.000007075838,0.000753402,0.0003793095,0.000653033,0.000001776281,0.0001129882,0.008460021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975724,0.0000151568,0.0001017263,0.0006841622,0.0006704762,0.0008170414,0.0001182783,0.00001786256,0.000002923961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08711847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8647611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088876082","doi":"10.2307/3069312","title":"ALLIANCE-BASED COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Organizational behavior; Competitive advantage; Psychology; Process management; Industrial organization; Marketing; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0336487771241042,"gpt":0.238333310993336,"spread":0.2046845338692318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003777365,0.0001582941,0.0001827033,0.000317507,0.0001992962,0.000152741,0.0003483794,0.0000807114,0.001743679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001478404,0.0001489164,0.00008363932,0.0006628674,0.00008332451,0.001108359,0.00007099762,0.0003301875,0.0002728121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004434066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002719231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004676974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001393464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987655,0.00000970543,0.0004308877,0.0001688302,0.0003658583,0.0002591871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992819,0.0000149701,0.000501705,0.00007603924,0.000113995,0.00001139505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003760208,0.0001720742,0.005410888,0.0002669504,0.0000973968,0.00001759655,0.000006407373,0.0005804872,0.0000357711,0.9385448,0.02161032,0.03321972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004840263,0.00004131098,0.1402023,0.0008032406,0.0003604829,0.00002264004,0.0006073621,0.147655,0.0002303141,0.06534047,0.6389129,0.0009837749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05270914,0.0005538137,0.01043306,0.05096794,0.000909677,0.0005693751,0.000004759881,0.0001876432,0.8836646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922099,0.0001671065,0.000996701,0.005033703,0.0006550361,0.000005896774,0.000009405353,0.00001985335,0.0009024077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110621765","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0390","title":"Process Capabilities and Value Generation in Alliance Portfolios","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Conceptualization; Portfolio; Corporate governance; Business; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Relational capital; Knowledge management; Function (biology); Industrial organization; Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Intellectual capital; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02545578391337169,"gpt":0.235209541452655,"spread":0.2097537575392833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475311,0.00006415219,0.00005964446,0.0001771092,0.0003288213,0.0001461906,0.0001110826,0.00002710787,0.00007079895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003105075,0.00006210796,0.000002854106,0.00364842,0.0002243879,0.00348372,0.00003056874,0.00003857711,0.00002505964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002169518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008974877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000734998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001583213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992914,0.00000225712,0.0001533671,0.0002164088,0.0002144128,0.0001221139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999235,0.00000322685,0.00008492551,0.00008277308,0.0005887449,0.000005272429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003351545,0.00005925416,0.7842051,0.00007771802,9.895298e-7,0.00000450583,0.0005544611,0.002953065,0.03456585,0.1764564,0.0004256256,0.0006936607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002766705,0.000004341651,0.9548773,0.00001895506,0.000003230788,0.0000139603,0.0003011875,0.03063807,0.01077959,0.002125229,0.0007285018,0.0002330246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960274,0.00001597508,0.0008613932,0.0007121788,0.0001162386,0.00009890139,1.721672e-7,0.0000432408,0.002124506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988687,0.00001595035,0.0001205547,0.0007066766,0.0001939304,0.000003532485,0.00001379321,0.000006969647,0.00006987037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1743312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026055374","doi":"10.1002/smj.289","title":"Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: the performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Industrial organization; Core (optical fiber); Competition (biology); Business; Resource (disambiguation); Collusion; Marketing; Group (periodic table); Corporate group; Economics; Management; Corporate governance; Psychology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02749321708045136,"gpt":0.2273127836156327,"spread":0.1998195665351814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004860308,0.0002349009,0.0002161703,0.0001496168,0.0007949207,0.0006661667,0.0002096656,0.00006747676,0.0004605639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002689687,0.0001690624,0.00003736819,0.0004533882,0.0002876043,0.001111103,0.0001313802,0.0004346084,0.000006116656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001671054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008436699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004755452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005471216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986592,0.00001769417,0.0004766075,0.0002416036,0.0002872772,0.0003176367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991505,0.00001952164,0.0004909667,0.0001497501,0.0001699337,0.00001939601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006069056,0.00004628801,0.002879192,0.0005211792,0.0001173698,0.00003267067,0.0002262093,0.00009402145,0.0003247125,0.9940534,0.00006200316,0.001582316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005457237,0.0004244323,0.1387563,0.0009786346,0.0003666695,0.00079804,0.0514113,0.08456139,0.00009298195,0.7148975,0.0009693707,0.001286219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8857521,0.0003927898,0.00001358841,0.0004208247,0.0002699754,0.0002074532,0.000007113691,0.0000245754,0.1129115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985006,0.0002704345,0.0002015103,0.0005047721,0.0003754156,0.00000508146,0.00002451875,0.00001667196,0.0001010034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2791559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6894166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152171","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.1.73","title":"Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cooperativeness; Business; Industrial organization; Investment (military); Structural equation modeling; Information sharing; Stylized fact; Structural holes; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Social capital; Personality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03722793309597468,"gpt":0.2932993400803494,"spread":0.2560714069843747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003423245,0.0002320781,0.000190703,0.0003054881,0.0006724508,0.0004512906,0.0001539714,0.00007422904,0.00002092122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007061609,0.0002065208,0.00001129786,0.001476713,0.001085638,0.003993454,0.00002260772,0.0002038048,0.000003206545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006285527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002128333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002679696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006032703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984222,0.0000186941,0.0003183824,0.0004881781,0.0003303991,0.000422166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.00003838628,0.0002380111,0.000155551,0.000443164,0.00003511675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003643369,0.00005174116,0.9627889,0.00006059003,0.000008948128,0.00003501881,0.004775142,0.001594232,0.0005674058,0.0182495,0.000114568,0.01138958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005216728,0.0002585163,0.9508361,0.00005393266,0.000005338115,0.000009368858,0.00470562,0.04269944,0.00006426637,0.0004137214,0.0001747984,0.0002572736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927307,0.00002061687,0.00004124688,0.0008560825,0.0001221332,0.0003267486,0.000008399172,0.00002672442,0.005867366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989892,0.00001424172,0.00008192885,0.0006751037,0.0001089683,0.00001863682,0.00001944765,0.000008575234,0.00008393168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0411052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8421672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097399646","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1100.1229","title":"Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alliance; Social capital; Selection (genetic algorithm); Empirical evidence; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Strategic Choice; Structural holes; Strategic alliance; Business; Network formation; Knowledge management; Empirical research; Social network (sociolinguistics); Position (finance); Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01150383618498034,"gpt":0.2201594921199031,"spread":0.2086556559349227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002452836,0.00009252418,0.00009087727,0.0003275774,0.0004951027,0.0002631544,0.0002446087,0.00003985076,0.00003892146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006373312,0.00006601538,0.00001203768,0.005125752,0.0004474038,0.001441701,0.0001883499,0.0001516926,0.000009074919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002330381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001591176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002024799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001019003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989046,0.000006091325,0.0002905814,0.0002378829,0.0003360429,0.0002247275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991167,0.00001317806,0.0002989668,0.000170961,0.0003963114,0.000003895523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003380854,0.00001551089,0.01516893,0.00002534136,0.000004761589,1.729319e-7,0.000004800329,0.004651798,0.0005695141,0.9736653,0.0004286426,0.005431411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240259,0.000008446901,0.5311329,0.00003144844,0.00005803683,0.00000231525,0.0001603436,0.3756185,0.00006039898,0.0824792,0.008988037,0.0002201156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7810847,0.00003599,0.1159207,0.002665763,0.002062562,0.0008618667,1.720486e-7,0.0001280377,0.09724022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984509,0.000003374278,0.0003407282,0.0005254574,0.0004789006,0.00002354805,0.000003782895,0.000005501898,0.0001677452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.380798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1775603347","doi":"10.1002/smj.2116","title":"Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Interdependence; Alliance; Congruence (geometry); Affect (linguistics); Business; Panel data; Marketing; Industrial organization; Business administration; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Econometrics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03348163255515199,"gpt":0.2372707296633466,"spread":0.2037890971081946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004651182,0.0002068439,0.0001582606,0.0002762059,0.0003803927,0.002545709,0.0001378898,0.00006391115,0.0004716802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001225124,0.0001793365,0.00004354974,0.0005713938,0.00004565057,0.005084333,0.00005840997,0.0002078136,0.0001569395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004284719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001276537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004331875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009178651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987149,0.00002227606,0.000332789,0.0002197598,0.000327162,0.0003831162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990174,0.00001384711,0.0004803913,0.000130941,0.0003323243,0.00002508674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006732997,0.0001135493,0.002197809,0.001075645,0.0001461568,0.00008983079,0.00006420114,0.0003472255,0.001953933,0.9452599,0.00701027,0.04167413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002354787,0.00007342025,0.04384144,0.0003101054,0.0001713782,0.0001017788,0.006578125,0.04472878,0.00009150142,0.8900566,0.01091868,0.0007734339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7169363,0.0003229009,0.005576923,0.005754953,0.0006799126,0.0008936397,0.000001067482,0.0001697905,0.2696645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969016,0.0002832222,0.0008549186,0.0006781901,0.0005999357,0.00003708711,0.00004466002,0.00001842342,0.0005820002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2799652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045496750","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2014.04.001","title":"Toward a structural view of co‐opetition in supply networks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Industrial organization; Business; Supply chain; Competition (biology); Supply network; Perspective (graphical); Network dynamics; Corporate governance; Relational view; Network governance; Task (project management); Network theory; Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01949335894091582,"gpt":0.2458586567488016,"spread":0.2263652978078858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005611245,0.00009644708,0.0001910158,0.0004359806,0.00006874276,0.0001671565,0.0001604058,0.00003618023,0.0001965618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002491824,0.00008127719,0.00005006434,0.0005917104,0.00002734757,0.001452059,0.00003766393,0.0001185156,0.00001047704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000279592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009887023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004708482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003487352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.0000169339,0.0005955691,0.0000870006,0.0001759521,0.0001160655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992495,0.000009196128,0.0002797862,0.0001042858,0.0003513697,0.000005902321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006061097,0.0001052275,0.006680374,0.0003359598,0.00005315722,0.00001081761,0.0000341084,0.1647888,0.0001364826,0.8114628,0.00238799,0.01394369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005203792,0.0001784149,0.3621856,0.001160686,0.000271534,0.0000338691,0.0009257134,0.4846536,0.0001745377,0.0248223,0.1197088,0.0006812186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6526119,0.000393866,0.1787672,0.009045776,0.001745375,0.0009750219,0.000002171821,0.00004571512,0.156413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974744,0.0000527214,0.001177898,0.0007400289,0.0004638193,0.000005360159,0.00002301993,0.000008462617,0.00005429513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7866405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3314388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157272513","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1120.0811","title":"The Persistent Effect of Geographic Distance in Acquisition Target Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Geographical distance; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economic geography; Marketing; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Data science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004479683561730691,"gpt":0.1918758202235552,"spread":0.1873961366618245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000575095,0.00006185286,0.00006242599,0.0002167965,0.0003765138,0.0002919249,0.000176438,0.00002442968,0.0001385629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002276231,0.00004301866,0.00001300041,0.005534327,0.0001724164,0.002183098,0.00003493598,0.00004411676,0.00005587008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002861117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002148721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001531008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001242975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993055,0.000007683663,0.0001652906,0.0001463791,0.0002391686,0.0001359103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989939,0.00001634552,0.0001491552,0.00009086206,0.0007458614,0.000003910158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006682616,0.00001796521,0.9377892,0.00003656354,0.000001759981,5.133053e-8,0.0000186722,0.0006785174,0.0329179,0.02714414,0.0001113028,0.001277239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001986627,0.00001415901,0.9702358,0.00002158864,0.000005499695,6.333269e-7,0.0000645928,0.02055967,0.007392693,0.0009007654,0.0005189378,0.00008698645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994617,0.00001640355,0.002900007,0.0007269594,0.0001916922,0.0002137225,1.274041e-7,0.0000330617,0.001300987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997199,0.000004246271,0.00004204787,0.0001176603,0.00006579152,0.000008543047,0.000008399705,0.000005480885,0.00002792728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0324466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2895878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620967894","doi":"","title":"Tracking strategies : --toward a general theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strategist; Tracking (education); Management; Strategic management; Strategic planning; Mirroring; Dominion; Engineering; Business; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03875464981848294,"gpt":0.2506037446112655,"spread":0.2118490947927826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006720221,0.0004405284,0.0003639301,0.0006273585,0.0001684226,0.001003827,0.0003273327,0.0005099202,0.003061149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002575425,0.0003873782,0.0001394859,0.0003741693,0.0001211961,0.00240545,0.0001054229,0.0004687162,0.0009495505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006465979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002283941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009638369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005579944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983277,0.000005464503,0.0004955319,0.0004185144,0.0003559132,0.000396861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998798,0.00003470005,0.0004013476,0.000273449,0.0004848058,0.000007743617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003566875,0.00002015251,0.00002347646,0.000362373,0.00004384708,0.00002413254,0.00001154499,0.00002992689,0.00003527388,0.9441174,0.04104917,0.01424706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002190142,0.000004703913,0.0006590232,0.0001224498,0.00008337171,0.000003366406,0.0001482866,0.0001773588,0.0000119019,0.4333538,0.5646831,0.0005336851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002856837,0.0001786055,0.0126408,0.0002359355,0.0009443636,0.0002385503,0.000002127064,0.0004196068,0.9850543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03568963,0.00001910571,0.0003534018,0.004343427,0.01033364,0.00001330053,0.0006511424,0.0001296924,0.9484667],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5236339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519828764","doi":"10.1177/1470593116657908","title":"Market system dynamics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Theory","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Scholarship; Harm; Market system; Positive economics; Economics; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Market economy; Social science; Law; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007788641476217978,"gpt":0.185864735384378,"spread":0.17807609390816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005132237,0.0001457029,0.0001304064,0.0001709416,0.0001843758,0.0001409036,0.0002077569,0.00007793757,0.001103973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008244679,0.00009863658,0.00004629336,0.0003891965,0.00006367479,0.0007594401,0.0001084083,0.00006414516,0.0004029384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000755799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001189546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001465067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006824282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990269,0.00009417057,0.0002429253,0.0002280569,0.0001526212,0.00025531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990078,0.0003799813,0.0001935321,0.0002432281,0.0001694542,0.000006042245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005953409,0.00001938216,0.01106111,0.0003296921,0.00001785467,0.00000815396,0.000002211357,0.000001077268,0.0003309143,0.9098473,0.007970238,0.06981678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003612006,0.00001924596,0.5867846,0.003762376,0.000220491,0.00004547318,0.001891036,0.02758388,0.0001615675,0.1047551,0.2689258,0.002238415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1358937,0.00003287096,0.01330822,0.001738303,0.001055339,0.0001677361,0.000004084313,0.0006394658,0.8471602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936566,0.000002256944,0.0001141068,0.0004493902,0.0009319005,0.00001360738,0.000008785053,0.00003130129,0.004792091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8577628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147862767","doi":"10.2307/41410418","title":"Value Cocreation and Wealth Spillover in Open Innovation Alliances1","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Open innovation; Spillover effect; Value (mathematics); Business; Industrial organization; Value creation; Knowledge spillover; Marketing; Knowledge management; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03255090790053469,"gpt":0.2732236561661632,"spread":0.2406727482656285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005328741,0.0001055524,0.0001221884,0.0002309599,0.00008814496,0.0003103522,0.0001169513,0.00006424876,0.0001319714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002176002,0.0001015628,0.000007856777,0.001084236,0.00002306268,0.004446872,0.00001989666,0.00008147727,0.0001196078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002560735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001421584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001400358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001200473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992343,0.000008901031,0.0002798724,0.0001546776,0.000110996,0.0002113153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995719,0.000009387702,0.0001770701,0.0001105206,0.0001253211,0.000005838114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006221965,0.0001428869,0.277113,0.0001405116,0.000007699413,0.000001024257,0.0003593145,0.00001022331,0.001089677,0.661769,0.003034424,0.05627001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009037242,0.00002817762,0.9448712,0.00007049823,0.00001010962,0.00000142406,0.0005237262,0.001655191,0.00004513432,0.008389884,0.04327776,0.0002232074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626586,0.0000644558,0.0008606982,0.001544691,0.0003133849,0.0003062664,8.570279e-7,0.00003531656,0.03421569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971372,0.000002608738,0.0002005246,0.001800172,0.0005491301,0.00002125109,0.00008553869,0.00001159813,0.0001919153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4141611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130140918","doi":"10.1002/smj.819","title":"Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Industrial organization; Business; Competitive advantage; Marketing; Panel data; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02648283030695503,"gpt":0.2393728870480704,"spread":0.2128900567411153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734044,0.000177788,0.0001807693,0.0001325911,0.0003543498,0.0002668367,0.0002629622,0.00003874844,0.00029997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004584432,0.0001176834,0.0000473615,0.0004988449,0.00006794952,0.0005936217,0.00006221328,0.0002078138,0.000009501486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007837242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001069381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001266951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001539537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988346,0.00002510071,0.000409381,0.0001713072,0.0002629348,0.0002966928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992068,0.00001212295,0.000446125,0.0001514977,0.0001719551,0.00001153842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006556683,0.00004769166,0.002610927,0.00008317032,0.00004095801,0.00004748375,0.00003115236,0.0002502693,0.00003918011,0.9930942,0.0004339745,0.003255405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008176531,0.0001129907,0.03985991,0.0002827486,0.0001493303,0.00003849828,0.007668879,0.002548198,0.00001710047,0.9472769,0.0009961716,0.0002315514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2350775,0.0007197891,0.0631327,0.01259303,0.001955162,0.001727994,0.000005232617,0.000107293,0.6846813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973876,0.0001547499,0.0006534051,0.0009276035,0.0007509056,0.000005119624,0.000006721493,0.000008961069,0.0001049121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4798991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989724711","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.034","title":"How does proximity affect interfirm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica","keywords":"Agribusiness; Business; Context (archaeology); Marketing; Cluster (spacecraft); Perspective (graphical); Affect (linguistics); Economic geography; Cognitive dimensions of notations; Scale (ratio); Space (punctuation); Cognition; Economics; Geography; Agriculture; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05195766156274772,"gpt":0.3203696311051679,"spread":0.2684119695424202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009707368,0.0002467103,0.0005477741,0.001414514,0.0004000385,0.00124836,0.0006823575,0.0001370133,0.00007651644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003786784,0.0001628396,0.00006695685,0.003806281,0.0001711463,0.006722074,0.0002904365,0.0006325076,0.00000760999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005780981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001271328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002487168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003284922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996706,0.0004221014,0.0008345676,0.0003199285,0.001284911,0.0004324834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862142,0.0002968397,0.000922336,0.0004094447,0.01212836,0.0000287789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02386761,0.02877681,0.4908644,0.01665083,0.001140786,0.000357648,0.002137843,0.01510761,0.1235347,0.01958898,0.01230503,0.2656678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005849435,0.0005247762,0.9604137,0.0009446348,0.000125661,0.00005273362,0.003851608,0.01862566,0.001000391,0.001325473,0.006702903,0.0005830213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901446,0.00002255386,0.003491052,0.004225514,0.0007337735,0.000609821,9.454603e-7,0.0000264398,0.0007452607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.0000075164,0.000228314,0.0001139469,0.002653343,0.00001777304,0.00001212802,0.00004045864,0.0001339918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4695493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096414010","doi":"10.1177/0008125620973713","title":"Tackling Societal Challenges with Open Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Management Review","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk","keywords":"Open innovation; Set (abstract data type); Business; Social innovation; Section (typography); Marketing; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08160659177615183,"gpt":0.2772044917251608,"spread":0.195597899949009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005008428,0.0002226272,0.0003209934,0.0000994829,0.000166697,0.0003596634,0.0005095185,0.00004020759,0.0004613014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004261676,0.0001746439,0.00004103887,0.002098483,0.0000349065,0.001484945,0.0004054614,0.0001293673,0.001132238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001911541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001366945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000111042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002999253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986562,0.000009570173,0.000438844,0.0004009863,0.0002654492,0.0002289419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991071,0.000005775492,0.0003566201,0.0002332257,0.0002865558,0.00001067792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003946242,0.00006765525,0.0003775973,0.02213477,0.0001116615,0.00002691126,0.00001129707,0.00003142688,0.00001722722,0.7776701,0.04794764,0.1515642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004777183,0.00001308878,0.0007306648,0.001794675,0.0001606204,0.000001206826,0.00008295798,0.0004900291,0.000004574082,0.001349001,0.9946004,0.0002951019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003059028,0.03744568,0.01450871,0.2422891,0.0003551916,0.00572344,0.00001423854,0.0007603036,0.6958443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5169594,0.08108801,0.006424393,0.388157,0.003401382,0.0009919815,0.001808252,0.0002404398,0.00092913],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W431713138","doi":"","title":"Management in Networks: On multi-actor decision making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Hierarchy; Computer science; Control (management); Process (computing); Management science; Process management; Game theory; Knowledge management; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Business; Engineering; Political science; Microeconomics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03349076542035619,"gpt":0.2563421246066918,"spread":0.2228513591863356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005432048,0.0006469388,0.0005621997,0.0006773141,0.0004278639,0.0004826613,0.001490795,0.0002835223,0.00003168386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000968727,0.0005995694,0.00006056337,0.0005972659,0.00009455167,0.001358341,0.001622384,0.0007053384,0.00008070656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006877521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000266782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001811326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001207491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970927,0.0000271096,0.00071857,0.001149857,0.0004086815,0.000603068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979602,0.0001770584,0.0005555312,0.001227671,0.00005787457,0.00002167912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001910283,0.0007593526,0.02098557,0.006929727,0.0006675302,0.001448806,0.0006085748,0.06727083,0.000008347401,0.04590772,0.05359377,0.7999095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001107309,0.00001651795,0.08378332,0.008208885,0.0001403722,0.00001056137,0.0001169265,0.6580968,8.981867e-8,0.00261094,0.2448449,0.0010633],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05389208,0.00384618,0.0409253,0.0003590881,0.006041271,0.003655513,0.0003540209,0.001210423,0.8897161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8426178,0.01299322,0.01138771,0.01011313,0.01938705,0.0001995177,0.04760834,0.0009512804,0.05474198],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138792223","doi":"10.1177/0001839214549042","title":"Imprint–environment Fit and Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprinting (psychology); Psychology; Core (optical fiber); Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02971660357635197,"gpt":0.2493571018375177,"spread":0.2196404982611658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005208233,0.0001257351,0.00009798165,0.0001351553,0.0004094221,0.0003944315,0.0002046123,0.00003073493,0.0001167459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002321673,0.0001081911,0.00001406084,0.0004707258,0.0005837834,0.002622284,0.0000218378,0.00008501906,0.000239585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001517647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003493968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002352643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005725002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989907,0.000004278669,0.000175722,0.0003274102,0.0002535864,0.0002482902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.00001339361,0.000125943,0.0001755852,0.00009747101,0.00001637128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171953,0.0001564198,0.05273146,0.0001308044,0.000008745948,0.000002772625,0.0004577215,0.00001910051,0.01661155,0.6428374,0.0002017116,0.2867806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004811068,0.0005524512,0.9517453,0.00003402724,0.00001550341,0.000008260751,0.001095752,0.02246452,0.001298532,0.006577215,0.01527745,0.0004499326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598731,0.000004293801,0.001022121,0.0009640658,0.000154917,0.0001077597,4.194887e-7,0.00004260893,0.03783073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.000001055536,0.0003024574,0.000596186,0.0002269123,0.00001173572,0.000002798866,0.000005747823,0.0001154507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530270572","doi":"10.1002/smj.2592","title":"Value capture theory: A strategic management review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value capture; Popularity; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Management science; Cooperative game theory; Strategic management; Game theory; Foundation (evidence); Operations research; Value creation; Knowledge management; Management; Economics; Mathematical economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03292889603582656,"gpt":0.2452418953348715,"spread":0.2123129992990449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049928,0.0005502013,0.0004585104,0.0006019889,0.0005266365,0.0008220947,0.0008467941,0.0001285325,0.004036762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009046877,0.0003581496,0.0002356508,0.001359883,0.0001296682,0.001514237,0.000235696,0.0003842895,0.001172005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003922812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001541095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006058523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967397,0.00007529492,0.000932438,0.0005990138,0.0008369607,0.0008165331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982087,0.00002728622,0.0007765872,0.000583961,0.000351217,0.00005225897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007363376,0.0001145017,0.00007619985,0.002087052,0.0002745513,0.0003827106,0.00000344739,0.000007501185,0.00005422682,0.9878968,0.003982451,0.005046932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001544941,0.00002431197,0.0003305695,0.003363249,0.0005111815,0.00008406163,0.001506205,0.00007105472,0.000005027746,0.9630782,0.02884702,0.000634158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005402855,0.002621547,0.001393308,0.008581623,0.001309201,0.0008400476,0.000003863916,0.0002447273,0.9796028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663862,0.01092581,0.000773055,0.009651565,0.002011874,0.0001000753,0.00004357121,0.00009654117,0.01001134],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160245309","doi":"10.1287/isre.1100.0296","title":"Information Technology, Network Structure, and Competitive Action","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial organization; Competitive advantage; Network structure; Business; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Marketing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03782368992681066,"gpt":0.3024324541896812,"spread":0.2646087642628706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070573,0.0001057982,0.0001175297,0.001114352,0.0005069649,0.001269631,0.0001585532,0.0002310039,0.00006671436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002384184,0.00009484115,0.00001207079,0.001909972,0.0001477561,0.01396974,0.0001197938,0.0006125233,0.000521106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002648377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004251503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003832606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000594628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987611,0.00001289998,0.0004169645,0.0000694429,0.0004530979,0.0002865227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977444,0.00003318001,0.0002523651,0.0001796529,0.001779424,0.00001097607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000261602,0.00000439733,0.006421673,0.0002721266,0.000008340327,1.604651e-7,0.00006565177,0.0002135445,0.0002836776,0.9726018,0.00381083,0.01629164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004952966,0.00001264336,0.03048261,0.00006917837,0.000004800324,0.0000187138,0.003101966,0.009537734,0.0001331058,0.0085526,0.9473979,0.0001934874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.847241,0.00003580535,0.003916003,0.002203423,0.00310886,0.001450648,0.00001976672,0.0004620796,0.1415624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986024,0.00000565859,0.0001151141,0.0002048562,0.0007615957,0.00004645026,0.0002287551,0.000005278486,0.00002985411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772977738","doi":"10.1002/smj.2746","title":"Attacking your partners: Strategic alliances and competition between partners in product markets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embeddedness; Alliance; Competition (biology); Portfolio; Business; Product (mathematics); Industrial organization; Exploratory research; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1308151919294555,"gpt":0.339062733668522,"spread":0.2082475417390666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001464623,0.0003137687,0.0003346606,0.0004402959,0.0007710647,0.003567125,0.0005356251,0.00008175843,0.00016445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002160925,0.0002815387,0.00006320308,0.0003241787,0.0001498463,0.003149567,0.0001556921,0.0004113872,0.0000545266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005189032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003666175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006437453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008718506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980035,0.00003233208,0.0006425442,0.0004060467,0.0004237775,0.0004917597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983957,0.00001517191,0.0009954169,0.0003473863,0.000214646,0.00003162437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001283377,0.0001127109,0.1119342,0.0005385095,0.0001344387,0.0004140436,0.00002587928,0.0001140678,0.00004671623,0.8816772,0.0002689902,0.00460495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002838519,0.00004215538,0.4445641,0.0007450093,0.0002003949,0.00003239295,0.003256877,0.001286678,0.00001423203,0.5379702,0.008272955,0.0007765335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.658813,0.0001526371,0.00004676672,0.003001864,0.0005922564,0.0002703734,9.827369e-7,0.00004183619,0.3370803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964987,0.00024104,0.0002185613,0.0002745208,0.002405473,0.00001264529,0.00002745122,0.00002483787,0.0002967841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.343707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509243669","doi":"10.1093/jeg/lbw020","title":"Structure and evolution of global cluster networks: evidence from the aerospace industry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Geography","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster (spacecraft); Linkage (software); Aerospace; Transaction cost; Global value chain; Economic geography; Industrial organization; Database transaction; Empirical evidence; Centrality; Value (mathematics); Business; Network structure; Computer science; Economics; International trade; Engineering; Comparative advantage; Distributed computing; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01147761218746499,"gpt":0.2096923870561912,"spread":0.1982147748687262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002754001,0.00008770654,0.0001454999,0.00006358717,0.0000611908,0.00008755681,0.0001701709,0.0001245748,0.00009068508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004578832,0.00004895508,0.00006427543,0.0001991245,0.00009844715,0.001554078,0.0000526324,0.0001411493,0.000002482641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003414493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002797906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003538677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001184315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993958,0.00001014929,0.0003342823,0.00009204321,0.00006630059,0.0001014096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998908,0.00006565968,0.0007564974,0.0001080212,0.0001542674,0.000007499942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007151528,0.000005247516,0.9914926,0.000007395277,0.00004279479,3.302945e-7,0.000002960997,0.0007048454,0.0001178272,0.003874972,0.00214315,0.001536333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000400356,0.00001086906,0.9868073,0.0002123393,0.000048578,0.000004538664,0.00005042881,0.0004095448,0.00001191742,0.01141204,0.0005657277,0.00006636379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928253,0.0008690949,0.001382273,0.004145477,0.0006033708,0.0000526086,0.000005749301,0.000004375288,0.0001117255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982792,0.00005522353,0.00007627848,0.0003335364,0.001248065,3.856964e-7,7.197293e-7,0.000004075939,0.000002489769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007537071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.199633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092893718","doi":"10.1287/msom.3.4.273.9969","title":"Agility in Retail Banking: A Numerical Taxonomy of Strategic Service Groups","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Marketing; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Empirical research; Flexibility (engineering); Service (business); Retail banking; Agile manufacturing; Sample (material); Industrial organization; Process management; Knowledge management; Computer science; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06031503852822555,"gpt":0.2337661206051303,"spread":0.1734510820769048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004392746,0.0003075279,0.0003110392,0.0005141468,0.0002473975,0.0003677209,0.0004691039,0.00009793068,0.001151456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005960575,0.000310744,0.00005553486,0.001870951,0.00002384546,0.001798325,0.0002920422,0.0002276442,0.0002487718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008698858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002239976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004065308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004080089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980392,0.00002408409,0.0007074177,0.0005051957,0.0003273094,0.0003967716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.0000150326,0.0001949146,0.0005298419,0.0002855939,0.00001591282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005105848,0.002583158,0.0392822,0.005899861,0.0003557244,0.0002065241,0.0004468666,0.3875878,0.0008239051,0.5361581,0.0004557924,0.02568944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004846791,0.00005151036,0.6351811,0.0006844492,0.0003414409,0.00001643734,0.005829385,0.2132109,0.001255508,0.01580644,0.1206799,0.00209608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151496,0.00002042003,0.002409152,0.004938115,0.000236758,0.0008954963,0.000002081619,0.0001406605,0.07620772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940301,0.00001415489,0.001056897,0.004077736,0.0002303515,0.0002075362,0.0001677451,0.00002978587,0.0001857459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5958989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039378687","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.005","title":"Utilizing e‐business technologies in supply chains: The impact of firm characteristics and teams","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transactional leadership; Transaction cost; Business; Purchasing; Supply chain; Context (archaeology); Business-to-business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Database transaction; Empirical research; Supply chain management; Electronic business; Sample (material); Information technology; Knowledge management; Business model; Computer science; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01831063526782725,"gpt":0.2666949018198487,"spread":0.2483842665520214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000972016,0.0001139855,0.0001848261,0.0006476207,0.000130381,0.0001800979,0.0001991212,0.00004743626,0.00002292977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001033248,0.00007280232,0.00004251321,0.001160083,0.00007799176,0.001037987,0.000101388,0.0001529774,0.000002111376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004859139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002230645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001540611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006356245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989918,0.000005594145,0.0005925481,0.00008707919,0.0001704744,0.00015247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990636,0.0000206108,0.0003357533,0.0001383327,0.0004376893,0.000004021046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003319311,0.0008643243,0.4803949,0.0006652321,0.0003432155,0.0001482247,0.0003856259,0.009502509,0.003858132,0.3089977,0.002008702,0.1924995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005027575,0.00002415344,0.9909426,0.0001769301,0.0000388684,0.00001212845,0.002848945,0.003475351,0.00005512346,0.0005907001,0.001227175,0.0001052797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912078,0.0001598205,0.003543215,0.001979345,0.000179036,0.0002286158,0.000001208314,0.00001787823,0.002683048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990221,0.0001920106,0.0004884644,0.00008743825,0.0001505171,0.000003543414,0.000006315084,0.00000847399,0.00004111887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5105477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2968792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271848889","doi":"10.1002/smj.2488","title":"Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università Bocconi; World Bank Group","keywords":"Alliance; Portfolio; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Ambidexterity; Industrial organization; Revenue; Balance (ability); Scope (computer science); Marketing; Dual (grammatical number); Knowledge management; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06275419079971016,"gpt":0.252109396829277,"spread":0.1893552060295668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007323365,0.0002298583,0.0001937367,0.0001114818,0.0003423106,0.0008564626,0.0002743379,0.00007110073,0.0001863947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008623578,0.0002046458,0.00003985527,0.0006040371,0.00009018322,0.002147289,0.0001461524,0.0003019318,0.0001208521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003720274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002682236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003271162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005573535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985037,0.00001289241,0.0004143126,0.0002779854,0.0004150816,0.0003760254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991679,0.000004731668,0.0003576523,0.0002082615,0.0002302844,0.00003121365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022814,0.0001480359,0.01396712,0.0005559355,0.0001091438,0.0002444502,0.00006918096,0.0002288038,0.0000455438,0.9623389,0.01557971,0.006484993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003312221,0.0001064658,0.03438554,0.0003833029,0.0001842112,0.0002492158,0.004730256,0.006824892,0.00002719135,0.6285214,0.3202752,0.001000054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4532291,0.0002716344,0.0001458818,0.001368577,0.0004098364,0.0001649297,4.736592e-7,0.00007708603,0.5443325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948214,0.0003054358,0.0007331743,0.001847952,0.00111134,0.000009772635,0.00001637407,0.00002209747,0.001132409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5432001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8345212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009002164","doi":"10.1177/0149206314541152","title":"Locus of Uncertainty and the Relationship Between Contractual and Relational Governance in Cross-Border Interfirm Relationships","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Business; Adaptation (eye); Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0352947834327119,"gpt":0.2941240155925982,"spread":0.2588292321598863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002264513,0.00009026949,0.0001949343,0.0001744715,0.0001258835,0.0001022472,0.00009051976,0.00005471722,0.0000311305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006697118,0.00006411733,0.00003076021,0.0003553962,0.0001762015,0.0009682932,0.00006833441,0.0002823455,0.000002941983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002314672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008570897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000505962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003356192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989206,0.00004179174,0.0006076916,0.0000967021,0.0002391773,0.0000940695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983346,0.0005656942,0.0007922072,0.00009102956,0.0002097185,0.000006730381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001275092,0.00001409901,0.4856423,0.00006552602,0.0000196058,7.855216e-7,0.00003530039,0.001055883,6.121116e-7,0.5100422,0.0001144871,0.002881749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002336299,0.000009774451,0.9470644,0.0001312532,0.00005081262,0.00000269183,0.0001091498,0.001242234,6.137421e-7,0.04113796,0.007848896,0.00006593336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791685,0.0001926742,0.00360099,0.005476343,0.0001436288,0.0001733304,0.00000106116,0.000005604902,0.01123787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991581,0.00002781395,0.0002066175,0.0001894786,0.0002461523,0.000002734763,0.000004110616,0.000006614248,0.000158391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4689042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2614629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388075352","doi":"10.18280/ijsdp.181016","title":"A Systematic Review of Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities of Firms and Future Research Avenues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Dynamic capabilities; Management science; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Business; Engineering; Environmental science; Knowledge management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04977542063417423,"gpt":0.3341889659670798,"spread":0.2844135453329056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003159252,0.0001909906,0.001087198,0.001200633,0.0001003438,0.000142994,0.0002390891,0.0001075912,0.000009301967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000623805,0.0001426908,0.00007251213,0.0006038786,0.00009595896,0.0004253121,0.0001465942,0.0002910243,7.840858e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007123563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002976151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001965747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001064457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977907,0.00006613015,0.001267304,0.0001453721,0.0005605122,0.000169964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960948,0.0003189524,0.001530565,0.00007616213,0.001966711,0.0000128708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001966165,0.0000147884,0.00003659755,0.9743161,0.0002528634,0.0001300405,0.0003388622,0.000001408979,1.321158e-7,0.003040902,0.0001952888,0.02165337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001776,0.00001379715,0.0001099759,0.7048192,0.0002719244,0.00004147701,0.006611255,0.00002601732,3.963138e-7,0.0004234549,0.2873557,0.0001491673],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001483552,0.9974369,0.00001584848,0.000251417,0.0001331334,0.0004625158,0.000003779206,0.000006452693,0.0002063766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006130875,0.9985975,0.000123465,0.00006734435,0.0002787223,0.0000240763,0.00006833098,0.00002165345,0.0002058444],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2871604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.581876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024414741","doi":"10.1177/0170840600212002","title":"The Evolution of Collective Strategies among Organizations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Joins; Scope (computer science); Diversity (politics); Organizational ecology; Politics; Outcome (game theory); Business; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01245950901366644,"gpt":0.2243993574089667,"spread":0.2119398483953002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000136039,0.000103857,0.0001219065,0.0001020896,0.0009004403,0.0001779799,0.00011429,0.00004229598,0.0003722218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003820844,0.0000765218,0.00001248856,0.00470121,0.000202956,0.001299763,0.00003852768,0.00005035058,0.0001057718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008334676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001023114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001388156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001455742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993265,0.000009482338,0.0002621487,0.0001299908,0.0001535659,0.0001182971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970987,0.00004172005,0.0001832814,0.0001243442,0.002549222,0.000002684207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002931924,0.0001085283,0.1701812,0.0001242695,0.0002213763,7.860353e-7,0.001090718,0.003639459,0.001108377,0.8053495,0.01532631,0.002820188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006585485,0.00001885471,0.9147491,0.00007484497,0.0001236457,0.000001741108,0.02840293,0.0008814313,0.001058065,0.03848078,0.01515634,0.000393684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.939209,0.0007655742,0.004250287,0.001823905,0.0004381131,0.0003695765,0.000002569026,0.0002571462,0.05288382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977804,0.0001321985,0.00002872705,0.00007631686,0.0002445088,0.000007204886,0.00002290324,0.00001911608,0.001688643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.692555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015412057","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400206","title":"Development of archetypes of international marketing strategy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Business Studies","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; International business; Conceptualization; Contingency theory; Marketing; International marketing; Marketing management; Multinational corporation; Marketing strategy; Marketing research; Computer science; Economics; Knowledge management; Management science; Business; Management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03980683219816733,"gpt":0.2790534853036235,"spread":0.2392466531054562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009185941,0.0001570838,0.00034026,0.0006531675,0.00007229155,0.00006022633,0.0003808471,0.00004964411,0.0001268901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005429492,0.0001287324,0.00008645255,0.0005547173,0.0001157705,0.001191728,0.0001476248,0.0001150876,0.000005238634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006375242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007424773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005134055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978668,0.000009716046,0.001242912,0.0001188576,0.0006372869,0.0001244387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991639,0.00008741303,0.001921485,0.00007064727,0.006276894,0.000004525422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003584177,0.002607671,0.5677302,0.003407015,0.004636579,0.00009807034,0.0006533457,0.0125885,0.1289665,0.1702576,0.01427505,0.09119526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026893,0.000008327062,0.9621749,0.0007842436,0.00006316999,0.00002052149,0.001158151,0.0002945876,0.003040766,0.002691229,0.02852766,0.0002095584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976458,0.0006975289,0.001149186,0.001699708,0.002196452,0.00007161856,0.000004004766,0.00001374188,0.01770981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935146,0.0001488717,0.005000927,0.00006465796,0.001084318,0.00000265757,0.000023413,0.00001303731,0.0001475093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3944446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5249553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163248085","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1090.1022","title":"Arms Race or Détente? How Interfirm Alliance Announcements Change the Stock Market Valuation of Rivals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Arms race; Competitor analysis; Event study; Competition (biology); Stock (firearms); Industrial organization; Valuation (finance); Stock market; Marketing; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09793191078039795,"gpt":0.2930519623631868,"spread":0.1951200515827888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847064,0.0001795916,0.0001554573,0.0002766066,0.0003444383,0.0005049693,0.0009086601,0.00002972974,0.0001758167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009314514,0.0001188679,0.00003746843,0.002913949,0.0002489155,0.00356879,0.000230953,0.00008546189,0.0000546681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004609524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001672324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009722506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980775,0.00001332276,0.0002853076,0.0004090714,0.0008542362,0.0003605793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987521,0.00001428676,0.0004234834,0.0004443601,0.0003561307,0.000009704249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007986191,0.00118678,0.03684796,0.001223438,0.0001298984,0.000032766,0.0008360682,0.0005024354,0.008952296,0.2317009,0.07790465,0.6398842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001345558,0.000118132,0.7970204,0.0003909171,0.0001251236,0.000001811952,0.001307096,0.04658611,0.0004413604,0.008321807,0.1437655,0.0005762154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.629716,0.000601956,0.04944122,0.1461634,0.005253795,0.008310276,0.00001623721,0.0005883122,0.1599088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928737,0.00009361804,0.0005441185,0.003562188,0.0002839917,0.00006123928,0.0000127756,0.000008114454,0.002560236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.486943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998052301","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1040.0213","title":"Formation of Alliances in Internet-Based Supply Exchanges","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Industrial organization; Joint venture; Profit (economics); Competitor analysis; Purchasing; Marketing; Commerce; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02498120859963127,"gpt":0.2407169026512133,"spread":0.2157356940515821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802843,0.00007553591,0.00007629163,0.0006143914,0.00005589074,0.0001340344,0.0003268245,0.00001651628,0.0001243372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001536164,0.000069554,0.00001447531,0.001746563,0.0001302168,0.003167423,0.00009179532,0.00003644914,0.00008452865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003595997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000667074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009920904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001294631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991319,0.000002348031,0.0002201101,0.0001741706,0.0002883189,0.0001831189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999622,0.000004775704,0.0001515348,0.0001293748,0.00008874309,0.000003580523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007868977,0.0003571964,0.05272879,0.001192067,0.000006109302,0.000006412073,0.0001708979,0.009829627,0.003548366,0.6311011,0.004414353,0.2965664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001254308,0.0000208309,0.40983,0.0004000609,0.00001963611,3.684869e-7,0.0005309707,0.4730781,0.01201587,0.003135988,0.0993078,0.0004060945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305944,0.00006409654,0.01710306,0.006448287,0.0003630714,0.0004768242,5.247411e-7,0.00009468583,0.1448551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973951,0.000006534883,0.001312016,0.000991905,0.0000790779,0.00001735285,0.000007410122,0.00000363604,0.0001869531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6279651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919425111","doi":"10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01021.x","title":"A Geographical Political Economy of Evolution in Economic Geography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Geography","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Plural; Politics; Field (mathematics); Human geography; Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Economic geography; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Sociology; Economic system; Economy; Social science; Political science; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00742407117723184,"gpt":0.2020714639548098,"spread":0.1946473927775779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004180174,0.0002860446,0.0004361853,0.00231586,0.00009818078,0.0001512615,0.0003186538,0.0002046472,0.0002924654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009768321,0.0003235799,0.0003106536,0.000597978,0.0002086631,0.001684195,0.00005468833,0.0002230198,0.0001835774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000809368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005593119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001482795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001555954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997991,0.00001304633,0.0008276069,0.0004967545,0.00006462719,0.0006069863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.00002952956,0.0003524409,0.0003480746,0.00006724382,0.00003035413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040492,0.00008375844,0.3692396,0.0000255285,0.00002109067,9.527327e-7,0.000002043185,0.0002420775,0.00002218637,0.6296632,0.0001647698,0.0004943456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007293735,0.000028041,0.7006418,0.00002389219,0.00002327682,0.000002016669,0.00004099316,0.001967407,0.00002415766,0.2928962,0.003343367,0.0002795524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8553224,0.0001194466,0.0001890291,0.003852456,0.0004500932,0.000312456,0.00001014149,0.0001079518,0.1396361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974927,0.000005898526,0.0001276933,0.001609832,0.0006466176,0.00002262023,0.00007345327,0.00001822549,0.000002955696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.336767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996552134","doi":"10.7202/1009022ar","title":"Pour une approche contingente de la spécificité de la PME","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Chemistry; Molecular biology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237766209795597,"gpt":0.2583072259937143,"spread":0.2359295638957583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003918545,0.0004092945,0.0003421606,0.000406352,0.0001525585,0.001005241,0.000387406,0.0005646531,0.001085114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005267204,0.0005047966,0.0001973465,0.0004207247,0.0002702413,0.002407347,0.0002129479,0.0008935891,0.0007554873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006444901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002602118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004013357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975532,0.0004860797,0.0006700287,0.0004792009,0.0001793459,0.0006321336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936699,0.004750609,0.0007231973,0.0003290061,0.0004403791,0.00008685936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503699,0.0009983069,0.3477843,0.0006019093,0.0002079098,0.00005820927,0.0005368082,0.01063912,0.002079522,0.572778,0.02415228,0.04001329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630075,0.000009886968,0.2998016,0.001145078,0.0001807106,0.0002778736,0.0002639174,0.02752643,0.0003977299,0.03357545,0.6345755,0.0006157701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7881016,0.001690215,0.03484742,0.09815218,0.001220435,0.0003749101,0.00003097903,0.0002243757,0.07535788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8910633,0.00592074,0.01626918,0.003632969,0.004838656,0.000133651,0.000332245,0.0001309576,0.07767835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229224874","doi":"10.1007/978-3-322-90232-0_9","title":"Multinational Enterprises and Clusters: An Organizing Framework","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Gabler Verlag eBooks","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Business; Economic geography; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02654951358640437,"gpt":0.2230442191828837,"spread":0.1964947055964793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002014032,0.000407933,0.0003094717,0.0003501129,0.0003076232,0.0005299399,0.0001931307,0.0004714046,0.0009998963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004881425,0.0004190323,0.00005448934,0.00005583884,0.000115233,0.0008531848,0.0001361385,0.0004388234,0.0001754536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004009662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003791701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003609376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002189725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985464,0.000005334135,0.000381135,0.0004949752,0.0003072325,0.0002649216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988893,0.00003475225,0.0003678184,0.000292158,0.0003977451,0.00001817363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000450124,0.0000266043,0.0004407978,0.0003147254,0.00006787627,0.00001871235,0.00006337615,0.000009316339,0.00008761978,0.9858757,0.003707272,0.009343048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006049529,0.00002074277,0.0007966279,0.0006523256,0.0001534971,0.00001317526,0.00007354009,0.000380789,0.00002743359,0.1535173,0.8428364,0.000923262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00177379,0.0001199308,0.001654748,0.0002454978,0.0008147073,0.0003316134,0.000007800381,0.0001957331,0.9948562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2745414,0.00005808998,0.006664009,0.02745695,0.007258249,0.00005807083,0.0008170801,0.0006009858,0.6825451],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087780084","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.065","title":"The dark-side of coopetition: Influences on the paradoxical forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness across product-market strategies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cooperativeness; Coopetition; Great Rift; Business; Product (mathematics); Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Game theory; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08839429801795184,"gpt":0.3429844623115946,"spread":0.2545901642936427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003123068,0.0001519984,0.0003507689,0.0001349751,0.0006261572,0.0005614343,0.0005584142,0.00005749579,0.00007923689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506423,0.00007994086,0.00004909401,0.002270339,0.001291678,0.001549657,0.0001887197,0.0004489472,0.000003283511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001216527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009893365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003754325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978045,0.0001629649,0.0006798111,0.0001791502,0.0009012042,0.0002723453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923975,0.0007878986,0.0006202637,0.000179127,0.005997431,0.00001774119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01189598,0.0008937161,0.07159316,0.005735834,0.0005634425,0.00009977093,0.002113533,0.0118082,0.07392275,0.7884144,0.006078133,0.02688108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001700098,0.0003293685,0.9241934,0.00164117,0.00005226098,0.0000307689,0.01800967,0.001522375,0.01258528,0.008163653,0.03140907,0.0003628977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723678,0.0005076635,0.0002432027,0.02211352,0.0001695316,0.0002817562,0.000007018587,0.000006811345,0.004302756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987541,0.0003414201,0.00001854157,0.0002132959,0.0006169293,0.000009486178,0.000003105077,0.00001248736,0.00003067636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5413924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043148945","doi":"10.1191/0309132503ph419oa","title":"The place of locational analysis: a selective and interpretive history","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in Human Geography","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Enlightenment; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rationalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Sensibility; Positive economics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01030033395172029,"gpt":0.2302254852066497,"spread":0.2199251512549294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004195141,0.00009497302,0.0001283442,0.0006233787,0.000134326,0.0000618541,0.0001053729,0.00004134273,0.0000402253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004529268,0.00007579247,0.00005227006,0.001488992,0.0003589594,0.0004027542,0.00002800723,0.0001070954,0.000001015698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002654653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001783027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008213206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001385982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993158,0.00002109157,0.0002270197,0.0001727505,0.0001308902,0.0001324399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993497,0.00004279468,0.000217635,0.0001110252,0.0002752657,0.000003571276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002587251,0.00006206548,0.7314664,0.00003931469,0.0001309178,4.528758e-7,0.000112237,0.00002659299,0.000005609693,0.2672107,0.0001288853,0.0007909854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002709471,0.00001440005,0.9793675,0.00005006882,0.0001397961,3.662239e-7,0.0003096401,0.0009695535,0.00002919051,0.01136854,0.007327806,0.0001522096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970344,0.006530363,0.0002853063,0.0001962735,0.0001642916,0.0003267302,0.000001081405,0.00004200877,0.02210994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997134,0.00001073437,0.00006551757,0.00007966867,0.00003552112,0.000063358,0.000009583851,0.000006045975,0.00001621631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2558421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3090727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124973946","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0733","title":"Greener Pastures: Outside Options and Strategic Alliance Withdrawal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Alliance; Embeddedness; Matching (statistics); Business; Industrial organization; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02624415173784801,"gpt":0.2393347022789571,"spread":0.2130905505411091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000342339,0.0000909286,0.00006472698,0.0001300949,0.0004976477,0.0004609535,0.0001591969,0.0000361431,0.0002038894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001089746,0.00007929121,0.000005499554,0.003113715,0.0002212398,0.004453036,0.00007735311,0.00005795417,0.0001795227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001745114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004253227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001109332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992013,0.000003003759,0.0001361061,0.0001871444,0.0002395831,0.0002328489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991956,0.000005886226,0.0001102271,0.0001266402,0.0005449533,0.00001670877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001864047,0.00003908086,0.2437,0.00002181197,0.000001966885,3.458184e-7,0.00006962887,0.00007879994,0.01397951,0.7413902,0.0002847071,0.0004321456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002566926,0.0000046922,0.9851113,0.00002458168,0.00001887523,0.000009067107,0.0004844834,0.001663259,0.001423616,0.005380684,0.005305741,0.0003170394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972141,0.00008916722,0.004415928,0.001906231,0.0005780172,0.0001388757,8.646761e-7,0.0001511502,0.02057878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976205,0.00001105757,0.0005249474,0.001099596,0.0005529588,0.000002452214,0.00001548946,0.00001111276,0.0001618659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4444985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487784592","doi":"","title":"Pricing as a Strategic Capability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Business; Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Pricing strategies; Industrial organization; Strategic management; Capital (architecture); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02375163660572005,"gpt":0.2283435765168959,"spread":0.2045919399111759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007689156,0.0003369972,0.0003499028,0.0003296045,0.0004061965,0.0003578196,0.0002379668,0.0001936949,0.005316359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003204427,0.0003404207,0.0001214275,0.0008409768,0.0002508839,0.001852145,0.00004674217,0.0003144587,0.002260608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002481466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004160121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001618776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981143,0.00003025179,0.0005788542,0.0005509401,0.0002223653,0.0005032918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988231,0.00007895728,0.000377116,0.0004480131,0.0002439656,0.00002882021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001890536,0.0001281669,0.4996395,0.0001265462,0.00003125802,0.00001388535,0.00002620905,0.00003267701,0.0005166576,0.4979715,0.001118821,0.0003758425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004260616,0.00010058,0.4710111,0.0002799357,0.0002777026,0.0002210669,0.002944018,0.001991975,0.001962793,0.1683606,0.3453028,0.003286827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6371807,0.00008785665,0.00008911836,0.0002107175,0.001119666,0.0002153239,0.000001513334,0.0001772231,0.3609179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969577,0.00000833484,0.0002270214,0.001510808,0.0006427005,0.00003484569,0.00002393313,0.0000372282,0.0005574806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3603604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122191013","doi":"","title":"R&D, Organization Structure, and the Development of Corporate Technological Knowledge","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Control (management); Industrial organization; Business; Knowledge management; Database transaction; Range (aeronautics); Empirical research; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01300914210987855,"gpt":0.2013710652745779,"spread":0.1883619231646993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008232639,0.00008768575,0.000108857,0.0001222414,0.000281144,0.00007729978,0.0001372411,0.00006494909,0.00001626046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008989581,0.00005325375,0.00001316251,0.0007907307,0.0001440772,0.0003789757,0.0000505286,0.0004651369,0.000009014165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000495722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008855824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001624291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991618,0.000006539466,0.0002508685,0.0000867026,0.00009770674,0.0003963774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992708,0.000007172772,0.0003521464,0.00005884386,0.0003081185,0.000002916756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002766692,0.00002090572,0.002136519,0.00001276506,0.00002463831,1.73458e-7,0.00003218771,0.00003796136,0.0007532751,0.9840847,0.000003291281,0.01286586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001713714,0.000008803157,0.0118213,0.00002352564,0.00002651299,0.00004661225,0.0005209725,0.00004868396,0.00136413,0.9837359,0.0005801499,0.0001096806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729162,0.0003811932,0.02484173,0.001033267,0.0000849361,0.00009897522,1.305129e-7,0.00003266408,0.0006109465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994469,0.00007706328,0.0002145,0.00006756257,0.0001488145,0.000001027323,0.000007269181,0.000009112902,0.00002770843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02653078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2171625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945173697","doi":"10.1108/jbim-07-2018-0217","title":"Developing and validating a multi-dimensional measure of coopetition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coopetition; Competitor analysis; Construct (python library); Business; Competition (biology); Marketing; Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Industrial organization; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06237617526497181,"gpt":0.2396452749406772,"spread":0.1772690996757054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002318172,0.0001416684,0.0003332037,0.0003185783,0.0001199832,0.0001602178,0.00007957374,0.0001354693,0.00007008656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00119425,0.0001185525,0.00003279652,0.0007316467,0.00004878454,0.001511597,0.00009176703,0.000233442,0.000001755378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001805979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001027683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006985982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003235608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987434,0.0000351334,0.0006633004,0.0001383641,0.0002722202,0.0001476116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972631,0.0001288144,0.001150086,0.00006127996,0.001385826,0.0000108318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003524885,0.0002643,0.7120662,0.002811634,0.0002644008,0.00003370066,0.00009206437,0.001440446,0.07925901,0.02362726,0.001071168,0.175545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01115937,0.00007343211,0.9555205,0.008510148,0.0002482424,0.0001832827,0.001039106,0.01002232,0.001066567,0.0007094086,0.01061631,0.0008513283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966101,0.0001575446,0.0007030086,0.0009460801,0.0006832795,0.0001335622,9.023478e-7,0.000009087113,0.000756424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971664,0.00002453258,0.001831605,0.0001684941,0.0007675126,8.411244e-7,0.000005614432,0.0000145703,0.00002041039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2434543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4834429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041591216","doi":"10.1002/mde.1201","title":"Competing in groups","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Clique; Embeddedness; Centrality; Diversity (politics); Value (mathematics); Investment (military); Microeconomics; Business; Industrial organization; Economics; Politics; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01667835458134544,"gpt":0.2067945412698782,"spread":0.1901161866885328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002509309,0.0000981107,0.000141266,0.0002300564,0.00009325583,0.0002968694,0.00009025345,0.00005545717,0.00005673026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003099753,0.00009660388,0.00002047834,0.0002373988,0.00002922639,0.001024105,0.0001089191,0.0000632419,0.0001245201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002298072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007116094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002037683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003293686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999347,0.000001288478,0.000274187,0.0002032031,0.00003547164,0.00013887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997474,0.00002037437,0.0001003231,0.0001000666,0.00002626514,0.000005584067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682339,0.00005617709,0.00528187,0.00003598811,0.000004870348,0.00001108544,0.00002482377,0.006779584,0.00007174717,0.8929864,0.0001010374,0.0944782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003301503,0.0000112505,0.1144146,0.00007934682,0.00000972725,0.000004935475,0.0003432144,0.00660402,0.00002577964,0.8403664,0.03443955,0.0003996754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808674,0.00001991479,0.001844667,0.0005891626,0.0006395694,0.00009074118,5.046103e-7,0.00003523922,0.01591278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971725,0.00002521865,0.001010592,0.001122102,0.0006332613,0.000004100646,0.00001264908,0.00001061968,0.000008924012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1091327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3939392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623348935","doi":"10.1177/1056492617712895","title":"Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Koneen Säätiö; World Anti-Doping Agency; Foundation for Economic Education","keywords":"Collective action; Coopetition; Corporate governance; Relevance (law); Subject matter; Work (physics); Bridge (graph theory); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Management; Economics; Game theory; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05602536175590918,"gpt":0.2989747886317045,"spread":0.2429494268757953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399471,0.0001575197,0.0002562524,0.0005428587,0.0003965224,0.0009903091,0.000388311,0.00003533918,0.0003614849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002098583,0.0001293737,0.00006441453,0.0003594773,0.00006613679,0.002744073,0.0003325361,0.0001282068,0.0001204154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001832307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001008879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003327389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000134156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989431,0.00002331833,0.000409565,0.0001680383,0.0002908259,0.0001651786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983945,0.00002156443,0.0007026945,0.0003490311,0.0005136516,0.00001857777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005716231,0.0001654029,0.01036045,0.0001792713,0.0007705162,0.000115487,0.0001483099,0.0002602873,0.0007493994,0.03525271,0.9491897,0.002236837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006219415,0.00002629199,0.2218462,0.00007481689,0.0005235751,0.00001076819,0.0002907375,0.00004652688,0.00004090981,0.001487767,0.7748498,0.0001806818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5713705,0.0001400779,0.0143198,0.391668,0.002218901,0.0004536775,0.000002207318,0.00005234245,0.01977451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8724332,0.00006676454,0.001509228,0.1245806,0.0006070277,0.000008766647,0.000005440035,0.00003401902,0.0007549355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3010627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126264239","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2006.01.001","title":"A coevolutionary theory of the multinational firm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Coevolution; Multinational corporation; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Industrial organization; Ambiguity; Subsidiary; Vagueness; Macro; Process (computing); Competitive advantage; Adaptation (eye); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01029530765244705,"gpt":0.2119792580236312,"spread":0.2016839503711842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005103971,0.00008174507,0.00009497552,0.000308299,0.00007314534,0.00005426968,0.0004085057,0.00002794304,0.0003234742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005309048,0.00005687627,0.0001120499,0.0003522513,0.00006056821,0.0007453475,0.0001299509,0.0000962156,0.00001670132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005391389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001636622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002878552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004766123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987916,0.000009975383,0.0004970996,0.00007390329,0.000547445,0.00008000196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982454,0.0000291089,0.0008183149,0.00008880589,0.0008156992,0.000002735708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008750727,0.000207099,0.02262182,0.00004785365,0.00008758721,0.000006282679,0.000004043557,0.002525324,0.0003040664,0.9561912,0.01577774,0.002139497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006858301,0.000005958421,0.8272288,0.0001035566,0.00004577907,0.00001140461,0.00009118395,0.001304657,0.0000759722,0.08577845,0.08459193,0.0000764694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.536835,0.0003365404,0.02084035,0.0179798,0.006892432,0.000442737,0.00001121218,0.00003838495,0.4166236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962122,0.00000749107,0.0006878047,0.0006311184,0.001048186,0.000003101306,0.00001088077,0.000007238722,0.001391932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8704127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3541816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610277214","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v8n3p1","title":"Strategic Alliance Success Factors: A Literature Review on Alliance Lifecycle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Portfolio; Critical success factor; Strategic alliance; Marketing; Phase (matter); Industrial organization; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1302342683225167,"gpt":0.3764375116185054,"spread":0.2462032432959887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006982989,0.0007317935,0.001635189,0.0004853407,0.0002247573,0.002465722,0.001965241,0.0004339486,0.0001951434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006721027,0.0005588959,0.0005607586,0.0009508392,0.0001008912,0.004501624,0.0001032462,0.000862028,0.0001338533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001642367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007736401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001201615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001553404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960182,0.0000465859,0.001948761,0.0004833029,0.001205763,0.0002973522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876685,0.00008896064,0.006921088,0.0005204714,0.00476691,0.00003411774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003669355,0.001202087,0.0001857653,0.1270332,0.001240676,0.001994442,0.00001603023,0.00008120931,0.000006224381,0.05632138,0.01354398,0.7980081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003161925,0.00003545051,0.0003905303,0.1825605,0.0004342685,0.0001985241,0.000005356393,0.00001893619,0.000001568446,0.0007913538,0.8147694,0.0004779153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007559822,0.9877762,0.0001207558,0.00225706,0.004945156,0.0005516188,0.00005217366,0.00004471846,0.004176673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003825722,0.9867917,0.00006557093,0.0008473189,0.006917502,0.00003119604,0.00118956,0.0000754822,0.0002559548],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8012255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005585668","doi":"10.5465/amr.2001.4378037","title":"Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational IssuesCooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues, edited by FaulknerDavid O. and de RondMark. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Review","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Management; Sociology; Organizational behavior; Strategic management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01978214643299314,"gpt":0.2350623904122333,"spread":0.2152802439792402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004373672,0.0004732862,0.0006244505,0.0002113626,0.0003496712,0.0003461667,0.0003072731,0.000205913,0.001041747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004409765,0.0004831112,0.00002677039,0.00100354,0.0002531975,0.002709516,0.0003358815,0.0002203232,0.00002460271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001731121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008957228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005740798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980443,0.00004817942,0.0006469087,0.0006952129,0.0001989261,0.0003664497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988989,0.00003641772,0.0005307651,0.00015744,0.0003176878,0.00005875242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000163114,0.0001750798,0.01493115,0.004913786,0.0004847404,0.00001520788,0.00005046498,0.001237015,0.0001203708,0.5291194,0.4277549,0.02103471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001376718,0.0000176497,0.0366876,0.0007932352,0.0003805312,0.00001606522,0.0001402398,0.001131621,0.00003238799,0.001180826,0.957619,0.0006241629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1898286,0.498365,0.007762547,0.1740259,0.001142409,0.01181886,0.0006885518,0.001070298,0.1152978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1598789,0.8102889,0.001324346,0.006444278,0.001929393,0.00002782922,0.002365079,0.0001667189,0.01757455],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5298641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138224606","doi":"10.1108/ijebr-12-2020-0871","title":"The impact of the interaction between an entrepreneurial marketing orientation and coopetition on business performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coopetition; Marketing; Competitor analysis; Business; Market orientation; Structural equation modeling; Entrepreneurial orientation; Market intelligence; Entrepreneurship; Economics; Microeconomics; Game theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05484755688956699,"gpt":0.364153912010019,"spread":0.309306355120452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001994147,0.0001222179,0.0001491884,0.0002936097,0.0003283338,0.000596749,0.0004478682,0.00006628405,0.0001444335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001238508,0.00007686841,0.0001027481,0.0007169688,0.0001361156,0.001520605,0.0001685768,0.0004299211,0.000005833317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001082105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000181993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000314635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000296486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978,0.0002254379,0.00053293,0.0002055682,0.001044482,0.0001915727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936603,0.0003468365,0.0006529831,0.0002107773,0.005111059,0.00001805939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002112429,0.0002725364,0.9455531,0.00002386933,0.0001020183,0.00002142557,0.00008734353,0.002132235,0.01038014,0.001494766,0.0004518481,0.03736834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009686179,0.00006120938,0.9922484,0.0002110405,0.0000328444,0.00003497353,0.0002077925,0.0003935178,0.005018525,0.0003679861,0.0003755911,0.00007953783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956491,0.00001901532,0.00001833262,0.0014423,0.002110329,0.0001275879,0.000007241591,0.000006851508,0.0006192262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966541,0.00007914154,0.000009926809,0.00002616007,0.003110658,0.000004013887,0.0000427581,0.000013359,0.00005988407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04669531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5754464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022335329","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1343","title":"Digitalization, Entrepreneurial Orientation & Internationalization of Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Business; Industrial organization; Industrial Revolution; Orientation (vector space); Commerce; Political science; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02898741489094782,"gpt":0.2576742739663604,"spread":0.2286868590754126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000272105,0.0001878755,0.0002842477,0.0007671945,0.0000807458,0.00008415755,0.0002422205,0.00009176663,0.0002333404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003956118,0.0001880094,0.0000301067,0.004946507,0.0001074108,0.0008734049,0.0002065523,0.00008853579,0.0000550906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001843841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001661674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007564734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003928437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984026,0.00001058373,0.0008744625,0.0003528406,0.0002247017,0.0001347976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980435,0.0000120865,0.0008396275,0.0002043015,0.0008945965,0.00000582114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005761228,0.0001027168,0.06412888,0.006968666,0.0001212116,0.000002550148,0.00002324978,0.00002772447,0.003834675,0.8888152,0.00845963,0.02745794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004085429,0.0000650022,0.03762661,0.004362714,0.0006991117,0.000009734146,0.0001890559,0.0004442523,0.004105475,0.05406484,0.8932483,0.001099504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4422777,0.007082878,0.3702727,0.1484529,0.001565939,0.005776922,0.00002811762,0.002062495,0.02248037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666141,0.006983722,0.004095456,0.0190861,0.0004301874,0.0001906865,0.00235657,0.00005080968,0.0001924118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7666802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}