{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":207,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":207,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0eb1897fd3be","filters":{"topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W1955731170","doi":"10.14201/alh.2702","title":"¿Juicio político o golpe legislativo? Sobre las crisis constitucionales en los años noventa","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"AMÉRICA LATINA HOY","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Demise; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02567557322084683,"gpt":0.3614975637651267,"spread":0.3358219905442798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006486686,0.0006553503,0.0009140859,0.0002748227,0.001676088,0.0003246494,0.0008699854,0.0002866316,0.0003506002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008264755,0.0006356248,0.0004067952,0.001264286,0.001957116,0.0007815927,0.0002902438,0.0005863334,0.001161476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000451536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009481327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007503689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951864,0.0005727158,0.0008422165,0.0009617221,0.001434367,0.001002546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968385,0.001260224,0.0004905463,0.0005201008,0.0005479027,0.0003427619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091284,0.0007866525,0.01612185,0.0000425509,0.0003306064,0.0001109409,0.01019264,0.00015424,0.0004125854,0.8830212,0.07161759,0.01710006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001624172,0.0006674831,0.1980275,0.0006923727,0.0004099766,0.00004004814,0.01718869,0.0001950218,0.0004108975,0.02259168,0.7564529,0.001699296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05422663,0.002093571,0.0008980875,0.07098699,0.001299498,0.001402737,0.0003729292,0.0003656755,0.8683539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896369,0.004815616,0.001001584,0.00138479,0.001093067,0.00003516629,0.00002401825,0.00002168832,0.001987186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041108799","doi":"10.25267/rejucrim.2020.i1.6","title":"Neoconstitucionalismo ambiental y derechos de la Naturaleza en el marco del nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano: El caso de Colombia","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Jurídicos y Criminológicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322238755475989,"gpt":0.3630203612159443,"spread":0.3307964856683454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223219,0.001282415,0.0018155,0.0003039352,0.002425319,0.000906309,0.001802306,0.0007493966,0.0004485741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005231734,0.001398269,0.0008450583,0.00149718,0.007177765,0.000692566,0.001022591,0.002040293,0.0003923124],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002834097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006797905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001601652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001222603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891123,0.003649136,0.00142173,0.001743862,0.001886037,0.002186893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919157,0.004320598,0.0008799805,0.0006336923,0.0007612453,0.001488756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004182086,0.0009056526,0.1975343,0.0005833576,0.001003971,0.001246166,0.02650645,0.0002123623,0.002596317,0.7387174,0.02381499,0.006460794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004649582,0.0007027916,0.2748432,0.002138108,0.002353955,0.001061805,0.02222177,0.001698403,0.000833277,0.003036714,0.6829625,0.003497941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476166,0.01354726,0.002775853,0.01359871,0.0006325223,0.002560225,0.000809768,0.0005074931,0.01795159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835696,0.005643299,0.002729441,0.00566494,0.001670078,0.0004084023,0.00008042126,0.00009339214,0.0001404917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25274199","doi":"10.1080/13554794.2014.959974","title":"Derechos fundamentales y ordenanzas locales.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neurocase","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02950913759273814,"gpt":0.3554300108121799,"spread":0.3259208732194417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002364607,0.00009380528,0.0001160633,0.00004735577,0.0007493553,0.00006336906,0.0001855468,0.00003144059,0.000227203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005570138,0.0000899461,0.00004844941,0.0001982807,0.000866159,0.0001462405,0.0000682653,0.000100121,0.0005381049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006196128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003835458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998899,0.0001969002,0.0001202927,0.0002149779,0.0003195063,0.0002493684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999335,0.0002891632,0.00004221645,0.0001271305,0.00009067431,0.0001158234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210121,0.0002448159,0.05777547,0.00002234131,0.00003695369,0.0000917163,0.006937565,0.00007354807,0.001150332,0.8557503,0.0318201,0.04604481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001778674,0.00004163388,0.006439223,0.0000149148,0.00000945783,0.00000623914,0.001230932,0.00004083933,0.0002054526,0.002466335,0.9892266,0.0001404552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219983,0.0003555078,0.005700307,0.004332261,0.0007467992,0.0003079115,0.000006523943,0.0002420884,0.2663103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973626,0.00007070244,0.0001868322,0.0008847385,0.0002795725,0.00001664759,0.000001043621,0.000005261849,0.001192577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6916429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037193026590334,"gpt":0.3821074223838061,"spread":0.2783881197247727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008245661,0.000108389,0.0002101072,0.0000810543,0.0008891957,0.0000809702,0.001471715,0.00006051071,0.00008992384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003975517,0.00005959915,0.00005667729,0.0001107643,0.001998449,0.0003265715,0.0003054398,0.0001637311,0.00001782017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005735764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00314273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01533742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985124,0.0002196586,0.000265697,0.0002016223,0.0005375877,0.0002630025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990739,0.0002464062,0.0001642204,0.0003569575,0.0001273182,0.00003121944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503044,0.0004566756,0.1560912,0.0001803661,0.00007625946,0.0000238285,0.3271187,0.0007355549,0.0008254285,0.5126362,0.0004938901,0.001211592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006057231,0.0000364913,0.9516612,0.0007415487,0.00006755469,0.000001625792,0.01333068,0.00001056217,0.00197775,0.003131516,0.02819326,0.0002420396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220252,0.000612462,0.00003071977,0.006238244,0.0004036201,0.0007766921,0.0000178373,0.000008719328,0.1698865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.00003749456,0.00004907147,0.000120427,0.0001483386,0.00001817441,3.0782e-7,0.000002431,0.0001128706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.855864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130081002","doi":"10.22201/iij.24484873e.2006.117.3893","title":"Federalismo y democracia","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02042563772523292,"gpt":0.3382811987181178,"spread":0.3178555609928849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009026202,0.0006206069,0.0009016569,0.0002311078,0.002543121,0.0007592679,0.0009421092,0.0003035601,0.0005218045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001900032,0.0006691746,0.000400442,0.0009715384,0.002156401,0.00037335,0.0002465352,0.0005894819,0.001338985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007355766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001217283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008345976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00269446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994887,0.0008773263,0.0008070477,0.0008609585,0.001184228,0.001383467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997748,0.0006068992,0.0003968679,0.0005003038,0.000387313,0.0003606003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009178437,0.0005711566,0.1314895,0.00005485498,0.0001776001,0.00009866408,0.001406551,0.0003055354,0.0005540681,0.7478116,0.1119663,0.005472313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007704429,0.0000518489,0.3059272,0.000227287,0.0001425258,0.00001650759,0.001369576,0.0003296607,0.000755283,0.02623551,0.6632947,0.0008794554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4529922,0.009347592,0.002544822,0.01575935,0.001331027,0.000818712,0.00009637687,0.0003914894,0.5167184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891434,0.001118154,0.001603159,0.0008994059,0.001800572,0.00007852762,0.00002431983,0.00003780026,0.005294606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3601015","doi":"10.1227/00006123-198705000-00004","title":"¿Nuevos derechos a debate?: razones para no resistir","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05989594409544469,"gpt":0.3570506483159381,"spread":0.2971547042204934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00106035,0.000321422,0.0003987205,0.0001596907,0.001652377,0.000190757,0.0004985728,0.0002364532,0.0008252221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003539945,0.0003288947,0.0001857477,0.0006194536,0.0009063042,0.0004209971,0.0000804194,0.0004006962,0.001740907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004670844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001380254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006159604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967794,0.0006941112,0.0004116918,0.0005629369,0.000665013,0.0008868648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977394,0.000795072,0.0001564144,0.0003790869,0.0006149396,0.0003151156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000146042,0.0004139852,0.1074207,0.00004717417,0.0003094641,0.0001928902,0.009039614,0.00008111535,0.0009898631,0.7514071,0.1265813,0.003370752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000676852,0.00008760591,0.01894453,0.0000993256,0.00007292598,0.00002785426,0.001738455,0.00006354929,0.001231759,0.05418575,0.9220847,0.0007867214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2390237,0.003637495,0.006907011,0.005372756,0.001448745,0.001303416,0.00005420036,0.0006256124,0.741627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826002,0.0006501836,0.007450181,0.001081952,0.0003496876,0.0001670765,0.000008257785,0.00002407628,0.007668409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527246274","doi":"10.7202/1067950ar","title":"GOBERNANZA EN DERECHOS HUMANOS: HACIA UNA EFICACIA Y EFICIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03184959978510107,"gpt":0.3281575067089187,"spread":0.2963079069238176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006569501,0.0004865336,0.0005957638,0.0002372356,0.0008735305,0.0004149816,0.001755763,0.0002961148,0.001391533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002402805,0.0005973424,0.0004395837,0.000724592,0.00100985,0.0006373401,0.0003776539,0.0007511036,0.001799701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001645536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001918994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002914734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956933,0.0003098458,0.0008530006,0.0009827067,0.001424398,0.0007367627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997391,0.0006244559,0.0004751865,0.0002761329,0.0007266383,0.0005065869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000147691,0.0003097161,0.01726296,0.00008963955,0.0003391434,0.0001446185,0.01697495,0.0006076136,0.000899388,0.955517,0.003761337,0.003945969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009784485,0.0001719436,0.05406774,0.0008035632,0.0001422984,0.00005004727,0.002492156,0.003333595,0.0002395991,0.01092544,0.9258248,0.0009704078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4818977,0.00158971,0.004575487,0.05521199,0.002660857,0.000987191,0.0006547117,0.000363351,0.4520591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903874,0.001296554,0.0005624268,0.00264874,0.003565036,0.00007837162,0.00006316477,0.00003527924,0.001363009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522761415","doi":"10.7202/1067945ar","title":"DESARROLLO DE LA JURISPRUDENCIA EN CHILE SOBRE LA CONSULTA INDÍGENA: LOS CASOS DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL Y LA CORTE SUPREMA","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0169789391120667,"gpt":0.3152872854229678,"spread":0.2983083463109011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739887,0.0005758147,0.0007666852,0.0002550579,0.0007217399,0.000547949,0.00141363,0.0005606811,0.0008037214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004463351,0.0006930623,0.0004860437,0.0006245628,0.002961052,0.0005252485,0.0003933562,0.001185405,0.0003928011],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001387102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002093213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946851,0.001485608,0.0008304561,0.0009371073,0.001278418,0.0007833127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993151,0.00463444,0.0005099395,0.0002603676,0.0007945886,0.0006496255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004587696,0.0004968509,0.06744476,0.000130532,0.000945695,0.001062981,0.01302803,0.0007362359,0.00139307,0.9010866,0.01009445,0.003121998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00308938,0.0001632547,0.09041347,0.001002362,0.0004297589,0.00114022,0.002916008,0.006173227,0.0004024575,0.01030887,0.8827024,0.001258552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5906475,0.001114033,0.003991248,0.01424872,0.0009491746,0.0009403548,0.00266379,0.0002544492,0.3851907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922594,0.002399714,0.0008615705,0.001299972,0.002109924,0.000127543,0.0001210506,0.00004482477,0.0007759645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516817049","doi":"10.5944/trc.30.2012.7013","title":"Las claúsulas notwithstanding y override del constitucionalismo canadiense","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Teoría y Realidad Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Political science; Cartography; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04512527493505379,"gpt":0.3508835650899628,"spread":0.305758290154909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00225168,0.0009950678,0.001155151,0.0005624582,0.003256543,0.0004117652,0.0008903788,0.0005086007,0.002003517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001518953,0.001027485,0.000511359,0.001296443,0.007474358,0.001480616,0.0005133132,0.0009386592,0.001594712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001747151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004355066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005742738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921845,0.0007555901,0.001219572,0.001058346,0.002341335,0.002440688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994418,0.001834104,0.0006460904,0.0006546155,0.0009076273,0.001539546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001592442,0.0003187187,0.1193703,0.00005352845,0.0004192259,0.00007600604,0.003798682,0.00008785287,0.0002748833,0.8607818,0.01405012,0.0006096169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840051,0.0001046287,0.04053072,0.0008510855,0.0005205366,0.0003106949,0.005099789,0.00008650983,0.0003279116,0.004283178,0.9442105,0.001834416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4164001,0.00991645,0.001901017,0.0110893,0.009938137,0.001737471,0.002445569,0.0005299026,0.5460421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915544,0.001146329,0.0008165065,0.001101849,0.003401178,0.00009381857,0.0001170854,0.0000495603,0.001719259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525482541","doi":"10.7202/1068392ar","title":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROMOTION AND PROTECTION. STRATEGIC EXPLOITATION OF WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Exploit; International relations; International relations theory; Human rights; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06725276993745051,"gpt":0.3183040711625607,"spread":0.2510513012251102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004776655,0.00008189919,0.000227268,0.000112912,0.0002009454,0.00002269581,0.0002110925,0.00003328029,0.00006431573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003489685,0.00007477696,0.00006500494,0.0001849144,0.001297492,0.0002239938,0.0000526331,0.0001123578,0.000001238416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001430858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000157899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00573766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003216179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988078,0.0001931849,0.0004369429,0.0001646714,0.0003186674,0.00007866771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985596,0.0001788302,0.0005574612,0.00006944201,0.0005659077,0.00006875023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054937,0.00006213775,0.003898217,0.00005890015,0.0001334343,0.000001248728,0.011056,0.00007972724,0.001237312,0.982744,0.00002208985,0.0006014708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01347077,0.002886465,0.2774197,0.004952363,0.001039318,0.0001834624,0.1881781,0.09884876,0.007515909,0.3800436,0.02354516,0.001916348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9136707,0.00004401906,0.003533987,0.00590724,0.0001674676,0.0005689225,0.00006261102,0.00002692873,0.07601809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994199,0.00002491022,0.0002328974,0.00001420462,0.0001286336,0.00004937598,0.00001004183,0.000003785735,0.0001162154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8673664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982482568","doi":"10.4000/bifea.10314","title":"La autonomía indígena «tutelada» en Bolivia","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01530858619065359,"gpt":0.2845539177996795,"spread":0.2692453316090259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001567792,0.0006728342,0.0008842519,0.0002209321,0.001197863,0.0003215394,0.0009705377,0.0006019788,0.01151428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005650479,0.0006822867,0.0004128241,0.000738005,0.003560354,0.0003989388,0.0004718031,0.0008037296,0.008469283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005735378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001254918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008235274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004060641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955611,0.0007558073,0.0007105241,0.0009064531,0.0008709096,0.001195185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972755,0.001268406,0.000274437,0.0004760946,0.0003269494,0.0003786705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008323782,0.0004793307,0.1017551,0.000259806,0.0003869871,0.0001605501,0.01680896,0.0007148611,0.0001616017,0.8120961,0.05763523,0.009458184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008438498,0.0001132235,0.05672137,0.0005614733,0.0001360079,0.00005883034,0.003300771,0.0001014533,0.00006702964,0.0006827474,0.9366442,0.0007690142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4413243,0.03412925,0.0005421169,0.02663063,0.005134092,0.001050625,0.0001052932,0.0002568512,0.4908268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958205,0.006163223,0.001805058,0.0009370196,0.001723799,0.000103547,0.00001334057,0.00004107286,0.0310079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.879009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W987159862","doi":"10.18356/f1e4ed5d-en","title":"Human rights and the state in Latin America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Bureaucracy; Context (archaeology); Democracy; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Latin Americans; Law; Irony; Successor cardinal; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1468759811353986,"gpt":0.4476057635699187,"spread":0.30072978243452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609153,0.000599997,0.0011164,0.001240886,0.003980389,0.0003330866,0.00179535,0.000647466,0.0016657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003430745,0.0004760621,0.0002207237,0.002117962,0.01418186,0.0003820285,0.001067045,0.005232631,0.001077345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006057027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001213664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2496512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5961677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911264,0.003345497,0.0005689355,0.001139923,0.00219749,0.0016218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955857,0.001676873,0.0003664117,0.0006474704,0.001237624,0.0004858932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001266815,0.0007800322,0.007609068,0.0002189502,0.0005599278,0.0007329992,0.02523172,0.0002790173,0.00005861579,0.06897892,0.8932838,0.001000173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003046358,0.0001384869,0.02552151,0.0003573573,0.00005714946,0.000004277653,0.00482,0.00001752819,0.000005745983,0.00407593,0.9612731,0.0006825958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.8039355,0.001087183,0.00004978553,0.01437261,0.0017293,0.004134522,0.002722969,0.0001333909,0.1718347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3157577,0.002136124,0.0003173884,0.0000610284,0.001224154,0.0000197672,0.000364882,0.00003599199,0.6800829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891085224","doi":"10.7202/1067015ar","title":"Entre théories et pratiques : la nature, sujet de droit dans la constitution équatorienne, considérations critiques sur une vieille antienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01619906769008311,"gpt":0.3133602146104657,"spread":0.2971611469203826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021507,0.0004021179,0.000522286,0.000148855,0.0006314096,0.0003974933,0.0006416196,0.0004807924,0.0003666937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00388726,0.0005238778,0.000283287,0.000750736,0.003267224,0.001314119,0.0001621038,0.0009901545,0.00008665508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001379154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00495598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007524325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0629779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996402,0.0009596788,0.000704209,0.0006785626,0.0006693631,0.0005861552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959882,0.001850244,0.0003739271,0.0002075559,0.001200004,0.0003800013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006287896,0.000279577,0.009931111,0.00009057145,0.0002912156,0.0002680181,0.04129391,0.0003160225,0.0003956785,0.9369008,0.009629982,0.000540262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006568467,0.0001281132,0.008652924,0.0008050557,0.000185777,0.0002850195,0.01709418,0.002573389,0.0008597327,0.1433596,0.8246729,0.0007265235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1468307,0.00396519,0.02269274,0.1015625,0.002165819,0.0006628777,0.001244511,0.0003338071,0.7205418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861755,0.004277131,0.001861528,0.002686156,0.001263721,0.0001039574,0.0001781004,0.00002639067,0.003427482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376461794","doi":"10.7764/r.483.4","title":"El Congreso Nacional y la interpretación constitucional en el proceso legislativo: criterios y momentos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01675891498004329,"gpt":0.3616723546161334,"spread":0.3449134396360901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232937,0.0005969628,0.0008221498,0.0003212104,0.002724262,0.0006269974,0.001175994,0.000175792,0.002572167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001410127,0.0006442452,0.0004159579,0.0008897775,0.002291056,0.0005721005,0.001087629,0.001216209,0.0001859203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003419455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001493621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005336314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931765,0.002337939,0.0008358972,0.0009983345,0.001706608,0.0009447107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963197,0.002081143,0.0004738376,0.0004030758,0.0003904669,0.0003318397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002142689,0.0004462094,0.03054422,0.00027647,0.0004694737,0.0001327219,0.01884047,0.0001703076,0.0003370573,0.9345055,0.01071032,0.003353019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009194002,0.0001662643,0.01216097,0.0007169047,0.0001657749,0.0001691387,0.005483233,0.0005632665,0.00003884207,0.003865498,0.9749231,0.0008275929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.671783,0.03471057,0.003127313,0.03252954,0.002877992,0.004774848,0.004425183,0.0006585221,0.245113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941562,0.002020001,0.000210078,0.000929009,0.0008913955,0.0004833573,0.00007807319,0.00003673956,0.001195088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908946625","doi":"","title":"Derecho Internacional Público","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bourgeoisie; Decolonization; Politics; China; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cultural revolution; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; History; Development economics; Economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09008762961630809,"gpt":0.3883331898214233,"spread":0.2982455602051152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245326,0.0005929618,0.0007318743,0.0002739413,0.001197928,0.0001575944,0.001140865,0.0004341713,0.02562214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004346962,0.0004434294,0.0004645604,0.0002269839,0.003770708,0.0004005654,0.0006666202,0.0005035591,0.01789962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001241958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003252712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002319039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003935287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996016,0.000297038,0.0006261059,0.0008766016,0.001447438,0.0007368144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970365,0.001175679,0.0003626577,0.000344682,0.0007745658,0.0003059849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000196475,0.0000402576,0.0008956916,0.00001292106,0.0002312132,0.00001414421,0.001631807,2.007593e-7,0.00001005453,0.6489222,0.3439253,0.0042966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002699308,0.00005244214,0.0005642545,0.0006371069,0.00006258841,0.000005270147,0.00139693,0.00000290484,0.00002212005,0.02419253,0.9721541,0.0006397769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009922556,0.001369795,0.004366491,0.01211282,0.003504047,0.000508429,0.0001513194,0.0001502271,0.9777377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04293143,0.001664343,0.00009323563,0.0006017108,0.002537663,0.00005266102,0.00001472642,0.00002328694,0.952081],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6282288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467685831","doi":"10.22201/iij.24485306e.2011.7.7760","title":"Federalism and constitutional Judicial Review in Mexico and the united states: a Normative Assessment of two Different Jurisdictional schemes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06372745995547327,"gpt":0.3919226954474803,"spread":0.328195235492007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399774,0.0001535538,0.0006016858,0.00004844427,0.0005073611,0.00001784298,0.0001461017,0.00002206939,0.0002219396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772319,0.00009786224,0.00007468063,0.0003327268,0.01168396,0.000147213,0.0001107527,0.0001709604,0.000002068922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008270259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002687777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002059215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002423859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978876,0.0008078741,0.0004963686,0.0001962797,0.0004346122,0.0001772328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989333,0.0004156984,0.0002289162,0.0001024001,0.0002443381,0.00007537431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096369,0.00005030733,0.005063386,0.000560893,0.00005249508,0.000001469807,0.001127636,3.552614e-7,4.345685e-7,0.9923201,0.0005055228,0.0003077604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004269748,0.0001451654,0.04933574,0.05234514,0.0007545644,0.00002902821,0.001752287,0.0001558051,0.00002561339,0.1217558,0.7686276,0.0008034402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03681921,0.8089717,0.002589361,0.03478909,0.0003522786,0.004569547,0.0001875387,0.00006558464,0.1116557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6175178,0.3787048,0.0002288029,0.003351664,0.00002823564,0.0001373154,0.00001797296,0.000002134125,0.0000112335],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958725854","doi":"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.7543","title":"Jurisdicción especial indígena, derecho colombiano y normativa internacional: la necesidad de un equilibrio en el marco de la extracción de minerales y el impacto de género.","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios Socio-Jurídicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01044598603240283,"gpt":0.3571321026702119,"spread":0.3466861166378091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004555246,0.001033393,0.001331482,0.0003857508,0.001550406,0.0007494787,0.001825007,0.001038788,0.0009321673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001954211,0.001089206,0.000738612,0.000909046,0.003095921,0.00107077,0.001050102,0.001800841,0.0007605621],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004314218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005679821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002158041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009872697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892181,0.004784713,0.001093085,0.001071993,0.001525915,0.002306184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916359,0.005832818,0.0007299399,0.0005722063,0.0004082603,0.0008209111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004190631,0.001053415,0.7912357,0.0002007896,0.001134479,0.0002699663,0.09026432,0.0001651229,0.007168469,0.08638102,0.01592863,0.00577902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002925063,0.0004194594,0.8945105,0.0009038908,0.0004566631,0.0002084475,0.01999395,0.00037189,0.001840205,0.01439908,0.06230075,0.001670057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572237,0.00324271,0.001143186,0.007306203,0.0007148249,0.001277402,0.0001815781,0.0002852252,0.02862514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893081,0.003982566,0.001874698,0.0008039097,0.002277967,0.0002710014,0.00002128692,0.0001044932,0.001355936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1032748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405214092","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v18i4.4367","title":"The Chilean Constitutional Process Narrated Through a Spiral","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Spiral (railway); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1332613908672854,"gpt":0.4944646090901137,"spread":0.3612032182228284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009404569,0.0001693497,0.0002353987,0.00004746303,0.005927855,0.0001471412,0.000309145,0.00006786662,0.00002994683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001856932,0.0001271019,0.00008612845,0.00107755,0.0134931,0.0003534513,0.0001294939,0.0003350985,0.00009133936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004384211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009917269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009022632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002062415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.0002701072,0.0002992634,0.0003185835,0.0006108281,0.0004717804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.001210708,0.00005465978,0.00006938901,0.0004351074,0.0000326618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548663,0.00002072982,0.0003269881,0.00007173041,0.0001363217,0.00003350726,0.1083864,0.00002344435,0.000002708769,0.8584583,0.03191742,0.0006069951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000201128,0.00002117885,0.0007698887,0.0002319318,0.0001403846,0.000003536393,0.4186057,0.00002086865,0.000006608924,0.07462209,0.5051093,0.0002673194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03658184,0.07838251,0.0006297514,0.03006189,0.01658193,0.001099613,0.00006012103,0.0005458252,0.8360565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929667,0.002316207,0.00004996384,0.0002858276,0.002900669,0.0001354544,0.000002015855,0.000005872544,0.001337253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360609899","doi":"10.38116/9786556350486cap1","title":"DEMASIADO CONOCIDO PARA IGNORARLO, DEMASIADO NUEVO PARA RECONOCERLO: LA CONDICIÓN DEL DERECHO HUMANO AL AGUA A NIVEL MUNDIA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Livros","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08318372939461795,"gpt":0.4015641302636914,"spread":0.3183804008690735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00177848,0.0008963704,0.001301643,0.0004939145,0.002783371,0.0006275602,0.001280435,0.0005777034,0.001198944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001085443,0.0009607783,0.0005718691,0.001908477,0.004440222,0.0009397814,0.000626596,0.0007747288,0.006279584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002859081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002087937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932883,0.001203292,0.001158935,0.001492749,0.001162184,0.001694488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994882,0.002708782,0.0006411117,0.0007060557,0.0005041687,0.0005578424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002871763,0.0007978463,0.4461221,0.0002821238,0.001690511,0.0007431782,0.03554568,0.000224927,0.001424959,0.3076914,0.1915156,0.01367448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002389562,0.0003855447,0.4766083,0.0009413609,0.0004323352,0.00005345463,0.03081542,0.0006641057,0.0004284979,0.01260153,0.4725413,0.00213864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8518322,0.006338815,0.000620958,0.01196442,0.002374242,0.002337203,0.0004983929,0.001066169,0.1229676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850138,0.005320783,0.0004235078,0.00134696,0.0008357958,0.0003637951,0.00006728166,0.00007517565,0.006552858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919089751","doi":"10.15210/interfaces.v7i1.6946","title":"DIREITO CANADENSE: ALGUMAS PARTICULARIDADES.","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Population; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04563948030960855,"gpt":0.3032451758728577,"spread":0.2576056955632491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002126511,0.0009228727,0.000986876,0.0005217247,0.003539501,0.000500131,0.001176288,0.0008391098,0.000374881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001978684,0.0009486827,0.0005415458,0.001721821,0.0002835323,0.001492227,0.0006126314,0.001214537,0.0002572148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002740734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002730701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005652719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004179144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913429,0.001546123,0.001247845,0.001106479,0.002258218,0.002498409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994832,0.0007884128,0.0006899374,0.0008140304,0.00103012,0.001845504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001253449,0.0008340769,0.0073527,0.00008390498,0.0004791738,0.0001448556,0.02106386,0.00004576402,0.0005173106,0.9539712,0.01464332,0.0007384928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008024389,0.00005854666,0.02841763,0.0002536209,0.0003072635,0.0004008171,0.00637334,0.0001153697,0.0004446208,0.0002858413,0.9614912,0.001049284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127054,0.02022932,0.004250381,0.1373859,0.01311931,0.002689401,0.0003567557,0.001133607,0.7081299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909872,0.0006084046,0.0005258558,0.0004587208,0.003351611,0.0003333307,0.00007856415,0.00006847217,0.00358785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9536853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173603788","doi":"10.7202/1079424ar","title":"Strategies for Compliance with Non-Binding International Decisions: The Spanish Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Jurisdiction; Human rights; Treaty; Constitution; Covenant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); International law; International human rights law; State responsibility; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07169632879697992,"gpt":0.3707533080734708,"spread":0.2990569792764909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004405231,0.0001315684,0.0001610965,0.00007439606,0.0008631716,0.0004043041,0.0005633105,0.00004941268,0.000242984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008138096,0.0001182421,0.0001160915,0.0002215448,0.0004541973,0.0004316664,0.00008554086,0.0001633746,0.00003897508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005543572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00141525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001222217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04515289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986324,0.00006232644,0.0002546438,0.00032512,0.0004556309,0.0002698353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974141,0.001089254,0.0001457078,0.0001721747,0.001099137,0.0000796809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006418955,0.00007744682,0.002430247,0.000007437417,0.0002036125,0.0006984687,0.005208361,0.0006027136,0.0001514176,0.9854933,0.002550693,0.002512085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263768,0.00006695759,0.00495352,0.0007981634,0.00009907089,0.003072276,0.08117149,0.00620556,0.0002185145,0.0837068,0.8178413,0.000602592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3041165,0.0004352336,0.1610643,0.02958731,0.003571011,0.0009629419,0.0004526853,0.0001348077,0.4996752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906368,0.0001942717,0.004637815,0.0004330407,0.0008757434,0.000174226,0.00004234231,0.0000112223,0.002994546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112410071","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.16","title":"Algunos aspectos de la metateoría de Principia iuris","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0429984970210146,"gpt":0.3582962455993283,"spread":0.3152977485783137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983949,0.0007678218,0.0009389551,0.0003313552,0.002466212,0.0003979917,0.00129858,0.0006618988,0.0009789451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002513112,0.0008150758,0.0005684476,0.001062355,0.004026396,0.0006073649,0.0004361632,0.001281762,0.001461679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001696779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003851088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002949106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003650196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928477,0.002291412,0.000844465,0.00103374,0.001145372,0.001837291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953889,0.002438938,0.0004392942,0.000625831,0.0004776096,0.0006294741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003725958,0.002034885,0.6184602,0.0002880634,0.002293671,0.002186418,0.08532866,0.001107415,0.006083584,0.2041087,0.07063392,0.007101894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00274845,0.0003169207,0.4405847,0.0006344354,0.0007965793,0.0009502233,0.006620429,0.00148098,0.01274311,0.02929359,0.5013288,0.0025017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365438,0.00736869,0.005829753,0.004507472,0.0006486643,0.001079345,0.0001860558,0.000500305,0.1433359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832547,0.007122931,0.004177342,0.0009307666,0.0009906354,0.0002190433,0.00001633939,0.0000702208,0.003218038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4306949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32847991","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2020-106470","title":"El constitucionalismo latinoamericano y la codificación en el siglo XIX","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Cancer Research Society","keywords":"Humanities; Latin Americans; Political science; Art; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03147410561429315,"gpt":0.3499861123954017,"spread":0.3185120067811086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032677,0.0005586202,0.0007736826,0.0003306629,0.001827611,0.0001784781,0.0008378372,0.0002801171,0.002805509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002452718,0.0006018826,0.0003111426,0.001139205,0.00911695,0.0004896707,0.0002484705,0.0007642924,0.001339904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007338975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00227419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002371699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008822019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946539,0.001034099,0.0007429199,0.0008938404,0.001434197,0.001240996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944084,0.003574,0.0003818489,0.0004203428,0.0005967483,0.0006186833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004353297,0.0003661948,0.02000235,0.00001497478,0.0002223015,0.0001753044,0.008007674,0.0004347909,0.0003441214,0.9363589,0.02826508,0.005764827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389203,0.0001329843,0.02846327,0.0001764006,0.0004082293,0.0002597447,0.007679015,0.001126404,0.00008821966,0.009121472,0.9495709,0.001584138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07760645,0.001917951,0.01662295,0.01573848,0.001710705,0.001048305,0.0003371101,0.0007083685,0.8843096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883059,0.0008411351,0.004465326,0.002443012,0.0009786353,0.0001514241,0.00002877999,0.00003070681,0.002755056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483182129","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.07.006","title":"THE EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE NOTION OF AN EARLY STAGE IN THE CASE OF BREWER CARÍAS. IS THE INTER-AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AT RISK?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Universidad de Guadalajara; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Human rights; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02873666139703228,"gpt":0.3671250199010589,"spread":0.3383883585040267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003357768,0.00009947774,0.0003710868,0.00001818406,0.0009187509,0.00001556139,0.0003473622,0.00001647238,0.00001262041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002942312,0.00003222357,0.00009023256,0.0002689166,0.007821352,0.00009721524,0.0000815675,0.0000822915,0.000001873868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007273402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003553402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05252035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1529329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971332,0.001845463,0.0004351893,0.0001440393,0.0003101712,0.000131933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997377,0.001481903,0.0005585852,0.0003387684,0.0002202871,0.00002348008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000370054,0.00002693067,0.002206007,0.0002894459,0.00005760109,0.000008395001,0.01179143,3.573844e-7,0.00003554692,0.9806787,0.0001707094,0.004697885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005086338,0.002137595,0.2320009,0.04284495,0.003264918,0.0002709137,0.1163034,0.00007169354,0.001547312,0.03077804,0.5642431,0.001450721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730465,0.01789157,0.00002699257,0.00357549,0.00008390502,0.001030497,0.00004704428,0.000007687039,0.004290277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933796,0.006384905,0.000006849363,0.000053856,0.0000349273,0.0000493695,3.717717e-7,0.000002381316,0.00008776532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052861333","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09502008000200006","title":"CONTRADICCIONES DE LOS FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA CON EL ESTADO CONSTITUCIONAL: NOTAS PARA SU REINTERPRETACIÓN","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03338402854603395,"gpt":0.3697234840550985,"spread":0.3363394555090646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002236223,0.0007756452,0.001223144,0.0002993501,0.002315023,0.0007074263,0.0009130021,0.0004988945,0.0005921079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002808568,0.0008090218,0.0005225808,0.0007757688,0.008970698,0.0005275381,0.0002390212,0.001022381,0.0003729181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001756771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00538061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007945577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001147949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931712,0.002274401,0.001031193,0.0009938806,0.001042462,0.001486936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941121,0.003455674,0.000596409,0.0005711728,0.0005140344,0.0007506009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002481796,0.0005703182,0.1905455,0.0002563565,0.0006234425,0.0007512207,0.006697261,0.0001438907,0.001101091,0.7873241,0.009674831,0.002063787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003040648,0.000251724,0.0888112,0.003644453,0.0007495912,0.001836225,0.003550144,0.001097459,0.0009265252,0.005346045,0.8887736,0.001972353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7781785,0.04545223,0.0258483,0.006843242,0.0008978618,0.003009055,0.0009728509,0.0006325247,0.1381655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977167,0.01929338,0.001114989,0.001090714,0.000656857,0.0001718266,0.00002929059,0.00004439918,0.0004315511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612632780","doi":"10.18041/0124-0102/advocatus.27.935","title":"La necesidad de repensar el derecho Hiperconsumo y macdonalización de la sociedad","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"ADVOCATUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01896485669643357,"gpt":0.392379435333268,"spread":0.3734145786368344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002320906,0.0003768616,0.000442222,0.0001122775,0.001033236,0.0002371117,0.000667306,0.0004062897,0.0005104666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002120639,0.0003047184,0.0002699349,0.0004606778,0.005007279,0.0003957297,0.000260216,0.0003945747,0.0008326444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008878586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002694917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001779798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953524,0.001946709,0.0004035964,0.0006289867,0.0006631256,0.001005145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944972,0.004294957,0.0002149009,0.0003761741,0.0002707645,0.0003460337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007808256,0.0002659468,0.2434795,0.00005695909,0.0003106005,0.0001664065,0.01256138,0.000004457155,0.006325586,0.6769212,0.01817745,0.04165233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109443,0.00007046642,0.2555159,0.0006790276,0.0001920772,0.00008608423,0.005552813,0.00001357177,0.001980998,0.05046336,0.6835806,0.0007707424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581836,0.008277069,0.002312298,0.01420251,0.0005804015,0.0004523828,0.0001040346,0.0002767565,0.3156109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850378,0.009995556,0.0007711653,0.0005440422,0.0005023141,0.00006905725,0.000002180643,0.00002681747,0.00305107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6654031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563267976","doi":"10.5347/isonomia.v0i13.556","title":"El derecho como técnica social de control y reforma","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03394486707102085,"gpt":0.3627048328390092,"spread":0.3287599657679883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593566,0.001006433,0.001765049,0.0002562749,0.00354027,0.001529214,0.001499658,0.0007942688,0.001499694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002693441,0.001097651,0.001004951,0.001502848,0.002505407,0.0008535245,0.0005987928,0.00153112,0.001121646],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005713756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008337157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007321055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910228,0.002512736,0.001544434,0.001430792,0.001272165,0.002217021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943967,0.001712932,0.0008419941,0.0008882686,0.001419665,0.0007404074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005953652,0.00141314,0.0877315,0.0006844213,0.001940264,0.0006918507,0.01361926,0.0001149871,0.001777334,0.7871935,0.07443815,0.02980025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003581702,0.0002284027,0.04279221,0.001066289,0.0009459003,0.000165537,0.008256784,0.0009816674,0.0005647552,0.01418037,0.9250854,0.002150977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4436449,0.05720697,0.02822333,0.06934049,0.002626952,0.003763966,0.002520899,0.00135655,0.3913159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848493,0.004986965,0.002091872,0.00332764,0.002388919,0.0002263578,0.00006783508,0.00008793782,0.001973177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791516439","doi":"","title":"The Quantitative Tactics Used to Delegitimize a Right to the City Social Justice Movement in Bogotá, Colombia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Movement (music); Social justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07993507558470733,"gpt":0.408271349659017,"spread":0.3283362740743097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048781,0.0001370132,0.0001755849,0.00005153505,0.002724422,0.0002456898,0.0006420876,0.00003223899,0.00005650257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001249769,0.00008868204,0.00005378082,0.0005315825,0.0008590132,0.0001747092,0.0002514411,0.0001433338,0.0002646116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003039922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002051368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006267188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1926781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981325,0.0003404992,0.000245753,0.0002651147,0.0005701733,0.0004459281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978659,0.001366163,0.00009958621,0.0001505471,0.0004279185,0.00008984814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002121474,0.0001015926,0.01214341,0.000003682142,0.0001325977,0.00001268173,0.1551647,0.00009911209,0.0002057027,0.7972651,0.03359408,0.001065263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007831044,0.0003887508,0.08614872,0.00008035733,0.0001131895,7.456728e-7,0.05960007,0.0003980542,0.001574764,0.02906525,0.8212819,0.0005651485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848055,0.0001316261,0.0027309,0.07792573,0.001718214,0.001152197,0.00003804736,0.00005104094,0.03144677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950573,0.00004467987,0.000534945,0.002439798,0.0007004405,0.0001381124,7.041716e-7,0.000005945417,0.001078067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7876878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006335579","doi":"10.35707/dostresmil/1907","title":"El régimen jurídico de los actos administrativos del Banco de la República, ¿derecho administrativo o derecho económico?","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dos mil tres mil","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04419801381961101,"gpt":0.4407117384034791,"spread":0.3965137245838681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892155,0.000919128,0.001085602,0.0002244305,0.004925393,0.00183513,0.002421218,0.0007157885,0.001018472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003217784,0.0009380382,0.0005451641,0.0003385855,0.006306514,0.001033748,0.000549668,0.001062866,0.0003963334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008799329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002407501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00753253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934933,0.001468732,0.0009819708,0.001339601,0.001104503,0.00161185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940947,0.002152522,0.001035173,0.001463406,0.0004374462,0.000816781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001180302,0.002929749,0.6020956,0.0004631853,0.001939355,0.001035709,0.02211818,0.00003206884,0.008509448,0.2391363,0.0781036,0.04245649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003539033,0.000737709,0.4047208,0.001251443,0.0005720959,0.0001592132,0.009804442,0.0003289154,0.01215235,0.01631617,0.5481254,0.00229238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701367,0.003599073,0.0003326737,0.006964373,0.0006308391,0.001036254,0.0007141054,0.0002220254,0.4163639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870073,0.00426807,0.001427452,0.0003724602,0.001076912,0.0002906062,0.00002407148,0.00005907624,0.005474023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4700218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757225934","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3804","title":"La incidencia democrática de la nebulosa obligación de claridad del Dictamen relativo a la secesión del Quebec = Democratic Impact of the vague Obligation of Clarity in the Reference re Secession of Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Obligation; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02310144802289439,"gpt":0.3872741607202332,"spread":0.3641727126973388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008393692,0.0005159114,0.0009655996,0.0001506849,0.001258104,0.0009371327,0.002191802,0.0007787545,0.0000328718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008221466,0.0003273413,0.0004881058,0.0008498118,0.005241388,0.001150458,0.0005271055,0.001694261,0.000004220159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001308591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004588016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1924138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07050886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850237,0.01149326,0.001225956,0.0005341188,0.00112265,0.0006003262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908325,0.005365332,0.002029916,0.0009806399,0.0006354548,0.0001561729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002024268,0.0003740931,0.6980528,0.0004774081,0.000258537,0.00004283701,0.07078184,0.0002800189,0.0126169,0.2134402,0.001171236,0.002301702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631522,0.00008517805,0.9758965,0.00296735,0.0002904779,0.00003688132,0.009998283,0.00027373,0.0007750717,0.006265057,0.002387302,0.0003609565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718395,0.001451933,0.0002921754,0.001556031,0.0000450345,0.0007804893,0.00011444,0.00002467709,0.02389568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978296,0.000920016,0.0005987471,0.00006006404,0.00011058,0.00005502977,0.00001080736,0.00002036639,0.0003947568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2778437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506244429","doi":"10.18046/prec.v5.1972","title":"Entre la Seguridad Democrática y la Legalidad Democrática. Políticas Constitucionales y la reelección presidencial en Colombia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Principle of legality; Democracy; Referendum; Political science; Politics; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Presidential election; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01218836229077518,"gpt":0.3307613786242818,"spread":0.3185730163335067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030017,0.000461102,0.0007341165,0.0002008842,0.001397214,0.0007660319,0.0009945828,0.0003373481,0.0006776782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008110406,0.0004623957,0.0003044597,0.000554627,0.003852007,0.0004896234,0.0004553642,0.0006636601,0.0005079419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003230058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001523082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000239666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001139713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923801,0.003932503,0.0007235465,0.0008205879,0.00130106,0.000842205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991389,0.006940416,0.0002988503,0.0004566892,0.0004323737,0.0004826284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001068135,0.0001833038,0.02000093,0.00007932151,0.0001697103,0.00005567918,0.003315473,0.000007331154,0.0002592629,0.9557337,0.01548338,0.004605103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006787156,0.00007933356,0.03092065,0.0004670291,0.0002424784,0.00008459993,0.001039483,0.00005828303,0.0001238762,0.006906706,0.9587944,0.0006044501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1234614,0.002203971,0.003759105,0.01157948,0.0005324356,0.001412923,0.00009163247,0.0005660263,0.856393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931426,0.001254152,0.001156406,0.0002072304,0.0006347733,0.0001170189,0.00001574049,0.0000323945,0.003439655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566921996","doi":"","title":"El derecho del espacio exterior y el futuro de la humanidad","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02250365175707525,"gpt":0.3119870365520831,"spread":0.2894833847950078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002703927,0.001051584,0.001045287,0.0007133121,0.004209913,0.001362326,0.001833382,0.001389167,0.0003098626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002931595,0.001079832,0.0006253583,0.001508235,0.0006883711,0.001171794,0.0007467747,0.002521202,0.0001508333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001418303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004358659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003242691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00249835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916472,0.001819765,0.001232882,0.001555487,0.001948446,0.001796247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941568,0.001619708,0.0008206453,0.001012546,0.001258328,0.001132007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000224715,0.0009584982,0.006531657,0.0001059384,0.000317502,0.0002732601,0.0106259,0.00002874629,0.01435832,0.9620776,0.001816272,0.002681595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001320241,0.0001023564,0.06117086,0.0002903295,0.0002287668,0.0007501407,0.002929387,0.0001446914,0.001014674,0.003656476,0.9272459,0.001146239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4852368,0.001620796,0.002658038,0.026247,0.004616887,0.001242571,0.000178664,0.0007427739,0.4774565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900957,0.001188337,0.003435315,0.0004061183,0.003600591,0.0003883793,0.00005720554,0.0000885058,0.0007398219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147117113","doi":"","title":"Aportes del derecho comparado a los sistemas alternativos de resolución de amparos del derecho de acceso a la información en Chile","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derechos Fundamentales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Freedom of information; Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Access to information; Cartography; Welfare economics; Geography; Law; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05936737371831189,"gpt":0.374712998961684,"spread":0.3153456252433721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003464236,0.001124988,0.001452123,0.0004903947,0.002113641,0.001396027,0.002115767,0.0005891291,0.0006904124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001285355,0.001190253,0.0007127355,0.001023467,0.003028999,0.00121362,0.000769016,0.001239631,0.0003503243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003822787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003208737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005384599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002170245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913195,0.002401407,0.00157917,0.001134472,0.001251287,0.002314109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945847,0.002088981,0.001090558,0.0008143622,0.0003902366,0.001031104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004818689,0.001598086,0.8346684,0.001054374,0.001352658,0.0003215987,0.05554706,0.00006742994,0.0026321,0.09217908,0.004313452,0.005783881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00510924,0.0008822602,0.4538327,0.009188686,0.002080277,0.001350384,0.05066638,0.003327863,0.02022649,0.0143664,0.4339592,0.005010122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9298838,0.01363419,0.01129789,0.0006574119,0.0002377577,0.0021788,0.0004247585,0.0004114778,0.04127393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522,0.01006736,0.01198819,0.0008236212,0.0005303791,0.0005288718,0.00004934457,0.00009296093,0.0006992892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4296457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217670636","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722021000300303","title":"EL DERECHO A LA ALIMENTACIÓN ADECUADA EN CHILE Y SU NECESARIA CONSAGRACIÓN COMO DERECHO FUNDAMENTAL EN LA NUEVA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista chilena de derecho privado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01581440022953749,"gpt":0.3489154664599118,"spread":0.3331010662303743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003695857,0.001675638,0.00228501,0.0004572569,0.002809713,0.003107995,0.002143561,0.001149524,0.002281296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003290442,0.001809291,0.001089124,0.00194896,0.004299539,0.001141059,0.001793044,0.002613311,0.001062404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002138254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005411499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001023077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004769881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834781,0.007803002,0.001940332,0.002416932,0.002129878,0.0022317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889835,0.006658745,0.001034491,0.001506746,0.0007159575,0.001100617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003374742,0.002224003,0.1711389,0.00104715,0.003141377,0.001373584,0.01836163,0.00004645023,0.003618125,0.7545472,0.01956308,0.02460096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004224778,0.0002386595,0.056417,0.004507688,0.001264175,0.001144673,0.01113723,0.0001306916,0.003397246,0.005712218,0.9089732,0.002852418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6343178,0.05345278,0.003158887,0.01630082,0.002720952,0.005061492,0.003573781,0.001124239,0.2802892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667248,0.026147,0.002494781,0.001319385,0.001449978,0.0002669164,0.0003360952,0.0001451137,0.001115963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8894101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1713673456","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v45i0.531","title":"BIENES CONSTITUCIONALES: EL OBJETIVO DE LA TEORÍA CONSTITUCIONAL","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02553223115709057,"gpt":0.3491885178630568,"spread":0.3236562867059662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002811161,0.0007335912,0.0008866695,0.0004356334,0.001849511,0.0003813949,0.001130039,0.0006592823,0.001470924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214371,0.0007424964,0.0004451927,0.001139324,0.01875293,0.0007482423,0.0003528254,0.0009524488,0.0006863641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005564142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001895311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00136035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934052,0.002376401,0.0008137548,0.0009593177,0.001158676,0.001286638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993732,0.004087062,0.0004091498,0.0005149661,0.0006782168,0.0005785885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001394605,0.0004837413,0.2841749,0.00006810864,0.0003869445,0.0004119577,0.013547,0.00005206086,0.0006205041,0.6959443,0.003248546,0.000922432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001758127,0.0001916717,0.4211358,0.0009750371,0.0004640324,0.0003624829,0.01012229,0.0001489294,0.001097057,0.04468972,0.5175689,0.001485979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.450593,0.01678787,0.00514125,0.001453974,0.0009570982,0.0006362589,0.0003972522,0.0003005714,0.5237327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896531,0.006107758,0.001914817,0.0007759372,0.0007371203,0.0001071645,0.00002102841,0.00003924152,0.0006438516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6512546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64984606","doi":"10.15581/009.40.29270","title":"Propiedad y derechos subjetivos","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Filosófico","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Divergence (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05083625474904832,"gpt":0.403124759786123,"spread":0.3522885050370747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600859,0.0001239616,0.0001588002,0.00007001902,0.001295173,0.00009289034,0.0003124726,0.00007105528,0.0008900338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026456,0.0001165004,0.00005494956,0.0004148876,0.002035433,0.0002565997,0.00008499625,0.0001329811,0.002102541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001333846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005099317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00446128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01591325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998606,0.0001298126,0.0001707745,0.0002856586,0.0004221741,0.0003855891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.0001353951,0.00006416312,0.0001876884,0.0005274931,0.0001078546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004758151,0.000151761,0.08873574,0.000007020981,0.00007315216,0.00001518223,0.01964023,6.506392e-7,0.0004931782,0.8003549,0.07689025,0.01359037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209801,0.000122803,0.074381,0.00003327109,0.0000186937,0.000002149294,0.001526903,0.0000129721,0.001190056,0.01046178,0.9117286,0.0003008283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3120222,0.0005260043,0.00107827,0.008848542,0.001138638,0.0005821761,0.00001388366,0.0002961177,0.6754942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930285,0.00005580805,0.0005602685,0.0004567802,0.0007834645,0.00003546293,0.000002705051,0.000006075792,0.005070966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8348383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200235447","doi":"10.18042/cepc/igdes.5.02","title":"La futura Constitución chilena será escrita con mujeres","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"IgualdadES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03411169070354164,"gpt":0.3703583418329354,"spread":0.3362466511293937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006256904,0.0004161599,0.0006187952,0.0001201631,0.001425528,0.0007094475,0.0004944864,0.0002639223,0.001208765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001269213,0.0004154837,0.0002626273,0.0008244212,0.004753448,0.0005350407,0.0003985157,0.0005160786,0.0007925544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001872159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001784941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006919179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001826955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962572,0.00095114,0.0004953252,0.0007477583,0.0008805117,0.0006680262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971795,0.001296267,0.0001929598,0.0003875332,0.0007084222,0.0002352907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003428348,0.0002988798,0.02258935,0.000106795,0.0003376095,0.0003882028,0.01369377,0.00001536614,0.001275631,0.935931,0.01596595,0.009363138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757665,0.00006677548,0.05329989,0.0007648015,0.0001834494,0.00006907281,0.06027761,0.000013425,0.003207238,0.005508753,0.8750309,0.0008023042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4934687,0.02746879,0.00009343768,0.01428083,0.002361901,0.0004018717,0.0002535806,0.0002336337,0.4614373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900895,0.005704886,0.0002619911,0.0004698698,0.001150599,0.00002900472,0.00001996998,0.00001860578,0.002255585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569107309","doi":"10.35487/rius.v2i22.2008.144","title":"Los derechos de las minorías en la filosofía política y en el derecho internacional","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA IUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02196502933268199,"gpt":0.3917464396357335,"spread":0.3697814103030516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001160171,0.0003745248,0.0005179897,0.0001361134,0.0004938318,0.0002873923,0.0008072237,0.0002445327,0.001006104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662875,0.000286124,0.0002785884,0.0003214396,0.001515364,0.0003346317,0.0003638968,0.0003194497,0.001237469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008898851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002924113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002435099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961749,0.001340216,0.0004899119,0.0005816276,0.0007315022,0.0006818412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952301,0.003667963,0.0002214523,0.000329624,0.0002671714,0.0002836409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007887682,0.0001984237,0.06913289,0.0001135302,0.0002683116,0.00008453001,0.00340714,9.523892e-7,0.001336868,0.8921871,0.01422389,0.01896755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006051463,0.00008909685,0.05273158,0.001861181,0.0001403874,0.0000371613,0.000839496,0.00001280616,0.0003280436,0.00840357,0.9344045,0.000547023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529514,0.01425441,0.01081043,0.05828083,0.001510254,0.001684382,0.0008783028,0.0003813189,0.2592487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880104,0.003899933,0.0007276079,0.0002288758,0.0009266377,0.0000517051,0.000003613422,0.00002181784,0.006129414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283020440","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.2.526","title":"La gobernanza de la British Columbia Assembly of First Nations: una estrategia para salir de la Ley India","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Norteamérica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0179012092521432,"gpt":0.3402953360641047,"spread":0.3223941268119615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002206717,0.0002002655,0.0004337954,0.0001211032,0.002980392,0.0007745285,0.000730517,0.0001983688,0.000584674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001437728,0.0003277895,0.000202475,0.001427319,0.002716386,0.0002627379,0.0003716273,0.0006922137,0.00002334706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007668161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002728179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1633609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995137,0.002422439,0.0004828829,0.0004515419,0.0009701722,0.0005359646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943792,0.004595525,0.0003959105,0.0002203183,0.0002353287,0.0001737017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000249279,0.001031504,0.8743124,0.0001145799,0.0002569388,0.0002968867,0.01207424,0.0004432714,0.0001142095,0.07604281,0.03280167,0.002486588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004914253,0.0001033483,0.6902782,0.0002148154,0.00008291569,0.00008970647,0.01090024,0.00005588614,0.00001451541,0.002995798,0.2944379,0.0003352003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7271902,0.001358725,0.00006652462,0.0004002472,0.0001735857,0.0003400251,0.0002776694,0.00007351219,0.2701195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948807,0.003160167,0.0002924655,0.00007474059,0.0001643431,0.0002384544,0.00001425331,0.0000206503,0.001154274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2689652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125089694","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v55i0.15579","title":"Pluralismo liberal, razón pública y libertades básicas","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01723952913908484,"gpt":0.3591622275219714,"spread":0.3419226983828866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009086814,0.0006093492,0.0009155519,0.0002198725,0.001630946,0.001060312,0.0008641801,0.0004698228,0.001843399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001562464,0.0006275329,0.0004928671,0.002008402,0.003753002,0.0008173052,0.0004576496,0.0008564658,0.0007755597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003433957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001137547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002146918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942956,0.001652421,0.000729486,0.001001577,0.001148938,0.001172008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952501,0.002505972,0.0002984966,0.0006878543,0.0007929475,0.0004645945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001206558,0.0008448696,0.07348998,0.0001990366,0.001001809,0.001524111,0.02535114,0.0001933715,0.002498723,0.7337511,0.1524842,0.008541027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007562921,0.0000779166,0.05332071,0.0004248133,0.0002462704,0.00007187525,0.003722313,0.0001819161,0.001353315,0.01024469,0.9287487,0.0008512133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5510249,0.0521898,0.0009825177,0.07267851,0.001657994,0.0006256647,0.0002333383,0.0004176212,0.3201896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738309,0.01203835,0.0008993204,0.002673586,0.001282285,0.00006170296,0.00004396926,0.0000461601,0.009123705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143537392","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN EL SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE: ENTRE LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL Y LOS CÓDIGOS PROVINCIALES","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02755976374352757,"gpt":0.3469596325434041,"spread":0.3193998687998765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002284559,0.001856749,0.002421892,0.0006261548,0.004739254,0.001198338,0.0021377,0.001201624,0.001716455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003066881,0.001967252,0.001355458,0.001617983,0.01150376,0.001246031,0.0008182448,0.001970775,0.0006519826],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002937723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01489525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003678382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01017751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864618,0.002898627,0.002493814,0.002459954,0.002995904,0.002689902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907733,0.003546616,0.001266918,0.001144622,0.001305435,0.001963072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004457895,0.00139952,0.1629559,0.0007956092,0.001432518,0.002410828,0.004597847,0.00003916322,0.0008575667,0.806129,0.01798317,0.000953086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002353153,0.0003970833,0.1051842,0.001764537,0.000794767,0.003049607,0.003660402,0.00009391656,0.0002819165,0.0009590974,0.8790318,0.002429573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8609747,0.01351384,0.0004253627,0.02187289,0.002117222,0.005227138,0.007437068,0.0007875253,0.08764423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888009,0.003490332,0.001272848,0.0007593777,0.00198414,0.0003596749,0.0003773475,0.0001168575,0.002838511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519123424","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.23","title":"Valores y problemas de la democracia constitucional cosmopolita","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04282536453676809,"gpt":0.3551379383358712,"spread":0.3123125737991031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001497019,0.0007135525,0.0008409005,0.0003149231,0.003230989,0.0003178635,0.001058106,0.000648086,0.0007927406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002212882,0.0007542953,0.0004537128,0.0008345634,0.008524787,0.0006066099,0.0003964147,0.00111467,0.001150113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001194794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004516278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001328276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002892201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934764,0.00174768,0.0008459744,0.0009654296,0.001389862,0.00157469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950455,0.002771372,0.000408534,0.0004844763,0.000616684,0.0006734493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001595844,0.0007860682,0.3265381,0.0001486238,0.0005313326,0.0006292872,0.01490681,0.000322589,0.0005154322,0.5782137,0.0762717,0.0009767463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003196782,0.0003307475,0.2684822,0.001256695,0.0005297034,0.001406056,0.007249997,0.001304527,0.001672685,0.2076454,0.5041109,0.002814148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.629255,0.007541128,0.004757414,0.009762865,0.000980876,0.001526788,0.0004946025,0.0005383473,0.345143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867041,0.004897131,0.003822601,0.001052077,0.001190666,0.0001878855,0.00003045785,0.00005008865,0.002065062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4278392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243864889","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"Derechos fundamentales en el sistema constitucional canadiense: entre la Carta constitucional y los códigos provinciale","year":2008,"lang":"eu","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2566796131274736,"gpt":0.5644755498180939,"spread":0.3077959366906203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380762,0.0009094588,0.001832951,0.0009917411,0.003596257,0.001230116,0.003987395,0.0003899968,0.01722984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002221223,0.000912378,0.0005523115,0.001907569,0.008113336,0.003266961,0.001946533,0.001072588,0.0001350412],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001531002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01089615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01751697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03523606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910493,0.001870042,0.001870593,0.001211208,0.002802042,0.001196763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917638,0.003265648,0.001687775,0.0005446593,0.001774274,0.0009637881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003906177,0.001038688,0.8215287,0.0002400982,0.001310249,0.0009883716,0.006434717,0.0007693132,0.002491354,0.05045654,0.1128725,0.00147875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002587408,0.00005349805,0.4880115,0.003469856,0.0006774196,0.00067587,0.007838673,0.0001228211,0.002033493,0.004095297,0.4879135,0.002520651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7979172,0.0516958,0.0003690827,0.00185951,0.003620242,0.002913035,0.002372251,0.0001072417,0.1391457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810296,0.01477603,0.0003044031,0.0004006402,0.0009850294,0.0001411658,0.00005185861,0.00004776203,0.002263478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.375041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108959183","doi":"10.32457/riem.vi3.434","title":"Consideraciones sobre el Régimen Municipal Argentino","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista iberoamericana de estudios municipales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07759291257997766,"gpt":0.3563236753302094,"spread":0.2787307627502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001546998,0.0008725531,0.001531524,0.0003347309,0.002190593,0.0002987747,0.001440773,0.0002048708,0.0007010252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001036778,0.0008957136,0.0005745691,0.001477316,0.00629229,0.0005263029,0.0008497583,0.0007142028,0.0007107563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005963762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001193264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009525704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003062017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931999,0.00176149,0.001176325,0.001090299,0.001092462,0.001679486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957576,0.0009717835,0.000934973,0.0011386,0.0005916145,0.0006054273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001668083,0.0008975393,0.1654516,0.0002171169,0.001495138,0.0002788439,0.07789655,0.00003159852,0.0001230154,0.7408707,0.003367777,0.00920324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001801734,0.0009472772,0.2123436,0.002056569,0.002192647,0.0001182162,0.1367849,0.0005009988,0.0002342946,0.004449882,0.635113,0.003456924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8498128,0.02459444,0.0001300477,0.001691474,0.0006268022,0.001241804,0.000117199,0.000286209,0.1214992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574355,0.0389342,0.00155947,0.0004621766,0.0005384088,0.0001857406,0.00001463696,0.00006220098,0.0008076827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913908320","doi":"10.7202/1055494ar","title":"La jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos como fuente de derecho. Una revisión de la doctrina del “control de convencionalidad”","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01073277403643461,"gpt":0.3271572615737502,"spread":0.3164244875373156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397439,0.000646406,0.001254547,0.0003314551,0.0009618123,0.0006719767,0.001576589,0.0007506411,0.0003948633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053192,0.0008990348,0.0006796916,0.0008617082,0.002815828,0.0004445909,0.0002830418,0.001804658,0.0003996846],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005106152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00432864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005608277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904752,0.004715488,0.0009572404,0.001012468,0.0007563184,0.002083233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915336,0.005825739,0.0007375395,0.00067967,0.0004068431,0.0008165485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003095331,0.0005235139,0.7670059,0.0006032347,0.0006814579,0.0007376919,0.01249715,0.0006289432,0.006332118,0.2033858,0.002348636,0.004946068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00494139,0.0004922969,0.7561854,0.007324473,0.001165575,0.002182595,0.007710067,0.004804044,0.002683328,0.09668495,0.1131646,0.00266127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221834,0.004065804,0.01225287,0.001781966,0.0002449807,0.001141434,0.000157735,0.0002195352,0.0579523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872308,0.006488712,0.002461288,0.001547609,0.0006616277,0.0002389278,0.00001508711,0.00007590371,0.001279987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132386362","doi":"","title":"Derechos humanos electorales: el caso Yatama contra el Estado de Nicaragua, análisis desde la perspectiva del sistema electoral costarricense","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01939600698913381,"gpt":0.3375664959680133,"spread":0.3181704889788795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001047197,0.0003983201,0.0005634332,0.0003511345,0.001665298,0.0003293268,0.000735157,0.0003564624,0.0002715532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001003498,0.0004619896,0.0003005739,0.001052599,0.001596493,0.0007041664,0.00008940566,0.0006051348,0.00007094843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001977439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00184791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007423578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01483437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958546,0.001413991,0.0002962278,0.0006591027,0.0007085635,0.001067541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969279,0.001561064,0.0002298552,0.0003572029,0.0004812328,0.0004427393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006859455,0.0008546659,0.1771609,0.00004323281,0.000575619,0.001461985,0.07378633,0.0003167158,0.01072572,0.7023087,0.02630958,0.00577068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003935987,0.0005284564,0.8195573,0.0003039107,0.000552535,0.0001277226,0.05326842,0.0004719392,0.001226858,0.01851405,0.09948255,0.002030286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348183,0.001849741,0.001515088,0.001955569,0.0001570038,0.0006134569,0.00005334743,0.0002947273,0.05874276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972733,0.0004545663,0.0008192352,0.0005009202,0.0003464114,0.00001836458,0.00001353301,0.00002274295,0.0005509057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6837946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214812954","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.90192","title":"La désobéissance civile ou l’expression vertueuse d’un désaccord sur les valeurs fondamentales de la démocratie constitutionnelle","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04022877128376393,"gpt":0.3057225903604062,"spread":0.2654938190766423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001152113,0.000897181,0.0008892216,0.0002479079,0.005612498,0.0004613671,0.0008897882,0.0009942307,0.001603472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001077769,0.0009982866,0.0005785814,0.0001641639,0.02327726,0.0004056603,0.0005286555,0.001757475,0.0003350077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001146739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00212294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005887313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002041289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994426,0.001932538,0.0008336322,0.001041891,0.0009645778,0.0008014167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926502,0.005333341,0.0005807647,0.0005106609,0.0004068966,0.0005181406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006087495,0.000205497,0.001485464,0.0001103556,0.0002896416,0.0004075099,0.003491088,0.0001473697,0.001375135,0.9783503,0.01074566,0.003331111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00149024,0.0001714332,0.002160482,0.00275972,0.0005933722,0.0002693207,0.004485469,0.0002128075,0.001771237,0.4487049,0.5356903,0.001690667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01751089,0.003521063,0.006107217,0.002710601,0.0007710675,0.0008931161,0.001069723,0.0003849977,0.9670313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980763,0.001515353,0.003420316,0.0004063434,0.0008721117,0.0003006472,0.0001145402,0.00007540549,0.01253233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164812074","doi":"","title":"A quienes sancionar? Maximos responsables y participacion determinante en la Jurisdiccion Especial para la Paz","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1228031128527298,"gpt":0.427438487425281,"spread":0.3046353745725512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001316705,0.0004466761,0.0009702753,0.0001899688,0.002169921,0.0008672207,0.003849128,0.0003219985,0.001657238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005589499,0.0005172385,0.0002605085,0.001282473,0.002795184,0.00362901,0.00571311,0.0003368954,0.0002446756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003005663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001600518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003718349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949997,0.002012303,0.0004336437,0.0009668739,0.0009639746,0.0006234756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963344,0.001740392,0.0006605349,0.0003897328,0.0004716712,0.0004033093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01707313,0.002307145,0.2462769,0.001400611,0.001512676,0.002747081,0.2262415,0.0006364363,0.01248324,0.397322,0.06569847,0.02630079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002318473,0.0003164462,0.1422115,0.0007802589,0.0004286478,0.000009840189,0.02640118,0.0004977401,0.001383281,0.001292115,0.8233162,0.001044272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101123,0.0004857368,0.000997843,0.02825207,0.0003554642,0.001104067,0.0001951667,0.00008094429,0.05841645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935651,0.003224727,0.0003390586,0.0001507943,0.0002630653,0.000008016799,0.00001826153,0.00002233493,0.002408621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313887162","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000200071","title":"¿Cómo Conciliar la Libertad Religiosa con las Normas Antidiscriminación? Tres Mecanismos y sus Fundamentos en el Sistema Jurídico Chileno","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios constitucionales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02104654103475285,"gpt":0.3331763754094064,"spread":0.3121298343746535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002174451,0.001022236,0.001479534,0.000445408,0.00621699,0.0003779494,0.001472506,0.0002536694,0.00118637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001277076,0.001070011,0.0006704433,0.001157632,0.006058492,0.0006191083,0.001829854,0.001150786,0.0005057783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004015527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001076821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002536549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903104,0.002665329,0.001326933,0.001517971,0.00292308,0.001256301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933358,0.004161479,0.0007681703,0.0006845446,0.0006072358,0.0004428147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003272076,0.0009828679,0.0656816,0.0001780036,0.001106176,0.0005208651,0.01588134,0.0002367437,0.0004518172,0.8916183,0.02201602,0.0009990499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002556503,0.0005740674,0.06856848,0.0005225824,0.0007544177,0.0002353535,0.03361084,0.00004479415,0.0002727952,0.002801591,0.8884829,0.001575617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7544276,0.01887733,0.00008073231,0.01640445,0.003376653,0.002652774,0.001509131,0.0004137446,0.2022576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869323,0.0066248,0.0001758129,0.0006391966,0.000801139,0.0007091005,0.0001056366,0.00005352085,0.003958515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794104303","doi":"10.7202/1043464ar","title":"REVUE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE 2015 EN DROIT MUNICIPAL","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02040146345710089,"gpt":0.3349545461673124,"spread":0.3145530827102115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002265808,0.0003399385,0.000530119,0.0001068575,0.0007080943,0.0001040764,0.0008970469,0.000362526,0.001015401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002656299,0.0003192608,0.0002590223,0.000557471,0.002716779,0.0006630698,0.0004009578,0.0004272608,0.002148157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001535398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007941163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003704609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004574345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962373,0.001374624,0.0004946907,0.0006214973,0.000419839,0.0008520411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953475,0.003345592,0.0002440503,0.0004707797,0.0002800127,0.0003120854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275711,0.0001804293,0.0330568,0.0000754592,0.0001295525,0.000172416,0.0197997,0.00009334676,0.0005792645,0.9193317,0.01726102,0.009277512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005540745,0.00008451626,0.03273507,0.001504545,0.0001525506,0.0001060583,0.001616837,0.0002276067,0.00009451052,0.0298587,0.932488,0.0005775145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4637113,0.03281756,0.01326173,0.3428017,0.01033715,0.001046443,0.0002650812,0.0002962498,0.1354628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377989,0.009928228,0.001556746,0.0002101795,0.004841716,0.00006067754,0.000002036041,0.00002468538,0.04557687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.915227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}