{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":675,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":5,"predictions_cover":675,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"18e1c0866fb4","filters":{"topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice"}},"results":[{"id":"W2074830437","doi":"10.1177/000312240907400302","title":"A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Sociology; Action (physics); Sociological theory; Social theory; Mechanism (biology); Social science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06515577497735647,"gpt":0.4045437338322325,"spread":0.339387958854876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005618713,0.0001520405,0.0007283712,0.00001660977,0.0004793846,0.00001270518,0.0004247715,0.0001293528,0.002173754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004724368,0.0001095575,0.0003218619,0.0003994024,0.002136958,0.0001369289,0.00003796453,0.0003380693,0.00008827414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000441859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001007786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002370273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001074174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936138,0.005056947,0.0004324276,0.0002653215,0.0002956234,0.0003358414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968076,0.002247795,0.0005641882,0.000159022,0.00009914731,0.0001222628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002777011,0.00007149421,0.00001584163,0.00002727491,0.00001584682,0.000005063995,0.001286887,1.501422e-8,0.00006445577,0.8238263,0.001349658,0.1733094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009486563,0.0005131963,0.00285977,0.0001247698,0.00006788591,0.000001938315,0.003508037,1.662754e-7,0.000005916121,0.7237576,0.2688431,0.0002227765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02258213,0.05555889,0.01024668,0.08583025,0.0002314283,0.001897621,0.00003892236,0.0005255643,0.8230885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486318,0.02938175,0.001188376,0.02008268,0.0001370196,0.0000215687,0.000007654529,0.000004563155,0.0005446302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902209517","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44","title":"Distinguishing between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework: A Systematic Review of Lessons from the Field","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":327,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Conceptual framework; Field (mathematics); Systematic review; GRASP; Management science; Epistemology; Experiential learning; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Social science; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1077762467915167,"gpt":0.4924101427268708,"spread":0.3846338959353541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005356562,0.0001834775,0.001104379,0.00005398943,0.0001619318,0.0001386401,0.001202896,0.0003744351,0.001394797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03901238,0.0001068927,0.0003983447,0.0001427526,0.0008940907,0.0002234029,0.0001033358,0.0009786168,0.0000113337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009781312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007078509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004422724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.627029e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935604,0.004356619,0.001149781,0.0001730581,0.0006348098,0.0001252945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449587,0.0514783,0.002535637,0.0002218295,0.0007081618,0.00009736544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001244741,0.00004491066,0.00003921408,0.01730414,0.0005099997,0.000002277041,0.003119059,3.433555e-9,5.531119e-9,0.9500207,0.001539895,0.02740729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001845273,0.0000305752,0.00001399371,0.322304,0.0009517164,0.000004111037,0.0007299755,1.1806e-8,5.818086e-8,0.2978018,0.3780683,0.00007711378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001727248,0.979796,0.0007012564,0.01256123,0.002629136,0.0004085647,0.00003979271,0.000007010018,0.003839755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01114778,0.9814345,0.0005819105,0.002349799,0.004197527,0.00001818969,0.00001896619,0.0000122935,0.0002390641],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.652219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256425898","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00066.x","title":"Publicizing sociology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07112174433277363,"gpt":0.3439985350832004,"spread":0.2728767907504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00744955,0.0002790324,0.001142461,0.0001609328,0.001084271,0.0001463632,0.001211114,0.004042561,0.003810621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005431327,0.0003142928,0.0007455237,0.0001061104,0.00472233,0.0006731196,0.0001100231,0.008861165,0.0001294782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003183946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001092132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000266332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006361657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893867,0.007790678,0.00110033,0.0003547049,0.0004745262,0.0008930447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991619,0.005423226,0.001975775,0.0001674404,0.0006360981,0.0001784583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002773932,0.00003891923,0.0001486243,0.00001480182,0.0002501045,0.003556837,0.008501791,7.622102e-7,0.000004684895,0.007135057,0.9650692,0.01525142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464959,0.0001637427,0.0001873752,0.00007411431,0.00008178132,0.001111498,0.003131742,1.382096e-7,3.607866e-7,0.07406461,0.9205417,0.0002964443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.007297719,0.02118845,0.0000659021,0.8920395,0.002998669,0.0001922663,0.00003551261,0.00006447636,0.07611745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06604858,0.01036472,0.0004526987,0.8619432,0.05132249,0.000009120143,0.00005905168,0.00005077679,0.009749399],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06692956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136297915","doi":"10.1057/9780230370371_2","title":"Ideology, Science, and Social Relations: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Epistemology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Reinterpretation; Epistemology; Explication; Materialism; Philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Reading (process); German; Sociology; Politics; Aesthetics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05113398962408233,"gpt":0.300677996501249,"spread":0.2495440068771667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003097655,0.0002357829,0.0004870916,0.0002481461,0.0008643324,0.00003143122,0.0003905159,0.0006539359,0.0007717781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007444194,0.0002274838,0.0001377505,0.00004024872,0.006718797,0.00001662905,0.0001728694,0.0004530446,0.00004717987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001044136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004910438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004246794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002443725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978737,0.0004731439,0.0004897828,0.0004688635,0.0003817521,0.0003127684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976852,0.0008780884,0.0006755495,0.0002207743,0.0004298862,0.0001104866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001003105,0.000001078062,0.0002673263,0.00002088621,0.00005039221,0.00001267609,0.01055792,1.787029e-8,0.00004270801,0.9774473,0.00003099808,0.01146841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001498021,0.0001235208,0.0008925417,0.00003694722,0.00007406517,0.000008313677,0.0003980105,0.000001465585,0.000009084647,0.9454187,0.05265594,0.0002316539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013251,0.0005792102,0.00005927273,0.0004038321,0.0002987901,0.0004493174,0.00003346158,0.00005911163,0.9967919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408262,0.000115833,0.0001353047,0.0003761869,0.0001715078,0.00001320519,0.00001241009,0.00001854426,0.05833075],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602536105","doi":"10.15453/0191-5096.2871","title":"Dorothy Smith and Knowing the World We Live In","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Sociology; Ethnography; Feminism; Epistemology; Gender studies; Anthropology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04880531098011977,"gpt":0.3415527825637922,"spread":0.2927474715836725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575207,0.0001182045,0.0003033396,0.0000453873,0.002305641,0.00003247141,0.0003956317,0.0002041139,0.0004698262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001361728,0.00006528615,0.0001373111,0.0002209226,0.002265202,0.0002537788,0.00004704635,0.001108268,0.000008526493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009309154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001728318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001149015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003696769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915122,0.007518504,0.0003630724,0.00009853284,0.0001953894,0.0003122796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954811,0.003840158,0.0004304463,0.00008098043,0.0001027782,0.00006457263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002029314,0.00005566211,0.01002031,0.00000598342,0.0001121074,0.00002646322,0.3287535,0.000004442669,0.00002800369,0.6553037,0.001547766,0.003939119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004676835,0.0001013366,0.01887462,0.00001841767,0.00006776296,0.00001645298,0.3074289,4.614004e-7,0.00000450467,0.1770176,0.4958752,0.0001270704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6942134,0.009177372,0.00001228607,0.2472981,0.0004917007,0.0002388926,0.000002384321,0.00001462615,0.04855128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955767,0.001525175,0.00002709823,0.0013885,0.0004613794,0.000003306774,1.61349e-7,0.000007117666,0.001010565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4943275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520960097","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Sociology - 2nd Canadian Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BCcampus eBooks","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03214136159505032,"gpt":0.2972782668544272,"spread":0.2651369052593768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843661,0.0002301903,0.0003232356,0.0001748958,0.001022429,0.00005528006,0.0003461194,0.00108974,0.006181455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00101178,0.0002033127,0.0001459701,0.00002485465,0.0008349289,0.0001244156,0.00004473056,0.0005661311,0.002782353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009668135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01184354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07017735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975861,0.0008845972,0.0002678875,0.0005023438,0.0002296088,0.0005294328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980935,0.0007400451,0.0001928921,0.0002976473,0.0001581171,0.0005178103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732406,0.000002960871,0.000003885599,0.000004189491,0.00002924926,0.00001162033,0.00375476,4.166439e-8,0.000009669775,0.3953415,0.5846031,0.01621174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005980922,0.00005648181,0.00001087463,0.00001921455,0.00001825146,0.000001668473,0.0001540537,1.177137e-8,0.000002415148,0.2946093,0.7048672,0.0002006721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008056626,0.0001018107,0.00005977461,0.02254109,0.003969877,0.0005539985,0.00008378694,0.0001271202,0.972482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004582502,0.00003111362,0.0000366759,0.003017789,0.02808098,0.0000490352,0.000077353,0.00002508767,0.9640995],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1202642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208099687","doi":"10.5840/symposium200812239","title":"A New Philosophy of Society","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06976847846255013,"gpt":0.3159895285197591,"spread":0.246221050057209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004912096,0.00005059167,0.0001079575,0.000008349551,0.0003330997,0.000005441234,0.0001605375,0.00009316866,0.0006942404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001050884,0.00004503302,0.0001370396,0.0001433135,0.0003201039,0.0002018944,0.00002466426,0.0001060649,0.00006422667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001565015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002011437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004540413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005866511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992579,0.0002257793,0.0001162706,0.000106296,0.0001645212,0.0001291911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999362,0.000327973,0.00007674799,0.00010249,0.00003778462,0.00009300542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008951049,0.00009453417,0.007696257,0.00001430456,0.00005798215,0.00001185169,0.07092285,0.000003582679,0.002786522,0.8781113,0.03914975,0.00106158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313056,0.0001125319,0.0009446503,0.00001172214,0.00001207047,0.000003049802,0.001695144,0.000002224812,0.0005438126,0.1378523,0.8583317,0.0001594937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04121976,0.0003586603,0.0003565005,0.01454515,0.0002789764,0.0001244333,0.000002943545,0.00007255137,0.943041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848192,0.0004741266,0.0007370167,0.000518086,0.0004625312,0.000001706347,0.000001170176,0.000003313339,0.01298288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7601446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005695323","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021524","title":"Positivism in sociological research: USA and UK (1966–1990) <sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Sociology; Logical positivism; Sociological research; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Social science; Index (typography); Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2097684005617859,"gpt":0.3976743243448806,"spread":0.1879059237830947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01225183,0.0001214645,0.0004856629,0.0001261909,0.0009074046,0.00009596843,0.0004131683,0.0006318412,0.002288223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006161917,0.0001223856,0.0001498831,0.0002136266,0.004252234,0.0004202338,0.0001091773,0.002162381,0.00006461666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001341891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005226338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001131737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900724,0.008087551,0.0005696715,0.0002666742,0.0003667717,0.0006369064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930705,0.006068593,0.0002614051,0.00008333047,0.0002658573,0.0002503036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000638455,0.00129856,0.2353912,0.00003934028,0.000329399,0.01253855,0.2189131,0.00005579922,0.0004304918,0.3430203,0.05133385,0.136011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002800687,0.001763008,0.1533148,0.0002428353,0.00003846638,0.002195526,0.07216405,0.00006815347,0.000006144694,0.6142884,0.1525073,0.0006106728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318083,0.01059008,0.00001583411,0.009243468,0.0001442655,0.0001541153,0.000006807039,0.0000133145,0.04802383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850181,0.01174349,0.0001813644,0.001045369,0.0007424467,0.000005693797,0.000001232849,0.000008012823,0.001254268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981867280","doi":"10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x","title":"Symbolic interaction and classical greek scholarship: Conceptual foundations, historical continuities, and transcontextual relevancies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Scholarship; Epistemology; Sociology; Pragmatism; Situated; The Symbolic; Conceptualization; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09637948652867526,"gpt":0.3623302768369186,"spread":0.2659507903082433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001734486,0.0001538496,0.000334661,0.00002636093,0.001376753,0.000109578,0.0002237006,0.0001123547,0.00005603054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001779041,0.0001122508,0.00008046476,0.0001501444,0.01149526,0.0003504277,0.00004210918,0.0006737167,0.00001666703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003833828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000160651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003367421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006617489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972866,0.001674298,0.0002516388,0.0002924889,0.000185799,0.0003092381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962454,0.003151548,0.0002542704,0.0001455741,0.00006595359,0.0001371956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006846177,0.0001612273,0.008624313,0.000008178818,0.0001445396,0.00003742775,0.1546273,0.000006317272,0.0003982539,0.7243897,0.0007306348,0.1101875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001169196,0.001229256,0.02380868,0.00003364382,0.0001142951,0.00005729864,0.3862445,0.000003902889,0.00002225868,0.1518352,0.4348852,0.0005964976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590536,0.002007388,0.0008127192,0.03237242,0.0002174157,0.0002312005,0.000009653251,0.0001293173,0.005166303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949529,0.001309738,0.0001611932,0.002077488,0.0002797528,0.00002689939,0.000004274976,0.000008487264,0.001179319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5725545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109064552","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2004.tb00778.x","title":"Disaster or Sustainability: The Dance of Human Agents with Nature's Actants*","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07662643824923976,"gpt":0.3535415740498231,"spread":0.2769151358005833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007602481,0.0005289931,0.001474718,0.00009399238,0.00165041,0.0000148904,0.001701702,0.001545536,0.001319288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008870653,0.0003643509,0.0005108739,0.0007406088,0.0146181,0.0003459548,0.0001505438,0.002178469,0.00001513121],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004431312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007623066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08655987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4072354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992169,0.003850436,0.001048598,0.0007455414,0.0001543342,0.002032113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932336,0.002850714,0.001138058,0.000950166,0.0007893119,0.001038142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001369995,0.0001644391,0.02436995,0.009144532,0.0007216685,0.0005583568,0.1243495,0.00002576931,0.00002300716,0.8294297,0.004498579,0.006577487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264225,0.00224744,0.04582624,0.01040126,0.0009840189,0.000113607,0.2315671,0.000002770272,0.00001432389,0.3773184,0.3289957,0.001265029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.751277,0.1322425,0.00001399877,0.1061046,0.0008448034,0.001512702,0.0003647299,0.00002712856,0.007612505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509141,0.03090159,0.0001056835,0.01492263,0.0004171569,0.0001107362,0.0000523192,0.00003646073,0.002539343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4521113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885214514","doi":"","title":"The Ecological Model of Gay Male Identity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Psychology; Ecology; Biology; Art; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2063974987614689,"gpt":0.404105537663872,"spread":0.1977080389024032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01530642,0.00006460509,0.0001665418,0.00002276221,0.002705845,0.0001168723,0.0006583765,0.00009317819,0.0008501839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002986287,0.00003528703,0.0001083464,0.0001183792,0.001465927,0.0003292038,0.00001298726,0.000427895,0.000006769792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001246888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3084465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958413,0.003200836,0.0003702905,0.0000700216,0.0002645087,0.0002530687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977464,0.001174974,0.000409079,0.0001830074,0.0002112591,0.0002752485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001353269,0.00002313074,0.004306797,0.000001826267,0.000027965,0.00001138057,0.007547264,0.00004671098,0.00004519501,0.9864885,0.00130786,0.0001798975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722338,0.0001353932,0.007589591,0.000005305344,0.00003168573,0.00001431499,0.01318383,0.000006796111,0.00002832493,0.8991255,0.07960758,0.00009946141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8802658,0.0004462471,0.0000776231,0.004268141,0.0002621239,0.0001016049,0.000007107579,0.000003181385,0.1145681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957778,0.00002609052,0.00002859068,0.0003782616,0.0001091205,8.770452e-7,2.099448e-7,0.000002545909,0.003676474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2995702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570659393","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-45023-0","title":"Knowledge and Networks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Knowledge and space","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Heidelberg; Army Research Laboratory; Economic and Social Research Council; Klaus Tschira Stiftung; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Northwestern University","keywords":"Conversation; Space (punctuation); Core (optical fiber); Social knowledge; Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Data science; Social science; Communication; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06273356172736602,"gpt":0.3542615621050472,"spread":0.2915280003776812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001836365,0.0002716059,0.0004685684,0.00004841508,0.001745445,0.0002440153,0.0003216439,0.0008497795,0.0002563088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006112588,0.0002429689,0.000100426,0.00003788035,0.001244728,0.0002845285,0.0002512638,0.0007447311,0.0001705807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004851349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006166832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001130855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983447,0.0006030808,0.0001696248,0.0004489582,0.00009648571,0.0003371745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973812,0.001681514,0.0002215748,0.0003121774,0.0001112435,0.0002922807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004638615,0.00004634079,0.0002513153,0.00007352066,0.00007993059,0.00002771018,0.01665758,7.405744e-8,5.035935e-7,0.5716473,0.3344792,0.07669009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001733906,0.00005557453,0.0001340312,0.0001356627,0.00006144055,0.000002468127,0.0003124691,0.00001694742,1.774564e-7,0.04420451,0.9545947,0.0003086436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008818592,0.1156063,0.00004278572,0.0009217687,0.000743475,0.0002528501,0.000006881888,0.00006992271,0.8822678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02757677,0.02179725,0.000018876,0.00006606157,0.002328118,0.00001012204,0.00001332971,0.00002119968,0.9481683],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6201155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967946771","doi":"10.1017/s0003975610000147","title":"Les sciences sociales françaises entre ancrage local et visibilité internationale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Visibility; Political science; Population; Web of science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Geography; Business; Law; MEDLINE; Demography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1350845541818466,"gpt":0.3891527747732519,"spread":0.2540682205914053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119161,0.0001027927,0.000218538,0.00006818002,0.0008745486,0.00007404559,0.0006163611,0.0001001461,0.001354695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003102081,0.00008036308,0.0001789902,0.0000924588,0.006925828,0.0005961967,0.00007266049,0.0008990396,0.00006124311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003958867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003688673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001006818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001054746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993714,0.005233165,0.0004062875,0.000162186,0.0002596562,0.0002247526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966873,0.002434611,0.000495078,0.00007389917,0.000193128,0.0001159999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008528213,0.0001207812,0.02647223,0.000003738471,0.00004683125,0.0001401743,0.04695605,0.00001419477,0.001187967,0.8967357,0.0008677688,0.02736933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009090063,0.0008060994,0.07282513,0.00003556955,0.0000389934,0.00006916303,0.06639622,0.000006534985,0.00006259177,0.173503,0.6850063,0.0003413691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7330188,0.0005174246,0.002216171,0.006546307,0.0008543446,0.00004879509,0.000003882039,0.00002383234,0.2567705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961455,0.0001602285,0.0008161602,0.001012375,0.0009485127,3.619416e-7,0.000001143643,0.000008120835,0.0009075417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7232327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516028204","doi":"10.29173/cjs6313","title":"What Do ‘We’ Know That ‘They’ Don’t? Sociologists’ versus Non-Sociologists’ Knowledge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexivity; Epistemology; Sociology of knowledge; Complementarity (molecular biology); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social knowledge; Face (sociological concept); Core Knowledge; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.111268456789736,"gpt":0.3674543515958781,"spread":0.2561858948061421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009109131,0.0003147732,0.0006808058,0.0001543353,0.002880898,0.0002674227,0.001655981,0.001010813,0.0009325823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002554278,0.0002168404,0.0005046209,0.000183769,0.005836002,0.0008975341,0.00004346114,0.001919389,0.0001776771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008200596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003506053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003547475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02752762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931872,0.004588887,0.0006026737,0.000315135,0.0002581475,0.001047995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922897,0.005370453,0.000814463,0.0003642908,0.0003980829,0.0007630598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000821826,0.0001205068,0.005368485,0.0000113909,0.0004652531,0.0003337542,0.4132566,0.00004025667,0.00006031469,0.439801,0.03187115,0.1078495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008714463,0.000871758,0.004353045,0.00007626339,0.00007916477,0.00003135205,0.1106586,0.000001813238,0.000007296227,0.3329855,0.5497478,0.0003160263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4549244,0.1877214,0.00008884042,0.2713967,0.01347373,0.0006952171,0.00002048233,0.00008469685,0.07159456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672935,0.0268541,0.00006481163,0.002271269,0.00195377,0.000005490405,0.000003868829,0.00001465296,0.001538516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5178766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084440819","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v40i3.7053","title":"Suicidism: A new theoretical framework to conceptualize suicide from an anti-oppressive perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Injustice; Ableism; Testimonial; Perspective (graphical); Queer; Suicidology; Power (physics); Disability studies; Epistemology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Politics; Law; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1390255175874738,"gpt":0.4534527447868311,"spread":0.3144272271993573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009717713,0.0002716187,0.0006345337,0.00001010825,0.0007657048,0.0001308101,0.0005733481,0.000223678,0.001688988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01338428,0.0002290686,0.0002007751,0.000356787,0.003780959,0.0005590871,0.00009002734,0.0005032752,0.0002007198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001967755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001471666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004474413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009040336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949328,0.002882934,0.0003882141,0.0008642026,0.0004389128,0.0004928948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910289,0.007385487,0.0001254765,0.000414009,0.0002452397,0.0008008789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002717569,0.0001059696,0.00691238,0.00000290058,0.0001085033,0.000007727319,0.4856837,0.000001145075,0.00002299701,0.5041908,0.0006449097,0.002047182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685028,0.0007243317,0.005219684,0.0000150887,0.00003975344,8.81618e-8,0.5425323,0.000003206902,0.00001073977,0.4473734,0.003697291,0.0002155364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8216729,0.001336444,0.001455575,0.1672142,0.0003652709,0.0007296193,0.00009444645,0.0002610541,0.00687046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884236,0.00004269479,0.0007618124,0.009384531,0.001297083,0.0000345898,0.000007981543,0.00001409358,0.00003363114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1667507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163662831","doi":"10.1177/0263276409349283","title":"The Sociological Imagination and its Imperial Shadows","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Sociological imagination; Modernity; Scientism; Power (physics); Politics; Historicism; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02976653128649861,"gpt":0.3380899522909872,"spread":0.3083234210044886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005203816,0.0001325013,0.0001466293,0.000003180632,0.002716864,0.0001675297,0.0002845199,0.0002823901,0.000207973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001286035,0.00007512478,0.0001776841,0.0001163254,0.0007916795,0.0004044819,0.00004086119,0.0004453521,0.00002895123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005519421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005648699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005223091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003101828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973156,0.001773815,0.0001591564,0.0002348438,0.0002043148,0.0003122376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.001240259,0.0001084422,0.0001100896,0.0001052244,0.0001061848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008294285,0.00002499146,0.00001543086,0.000001031236,0.00001834225,8.637828e-7,0.06946564,2.491131e-7,0.00124929,0.9170004,0.004281002,0.007859846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001895539,0.00008048674,0.0005022287,0.000002765972,0.00001652123,0.000001460791,0.03341549,0.000005908757,0.00003987605,0.7298499,0.2357752,0.0001205795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5674193,0.02826117,0.0004660262,0.07195894,0.001068327,0.001274044,0.00002359835,0.0006633914,0.3288652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880126,0.004039112,0.0001140957,0.003401599,0.00088259,0.00001056404,0.000006233833,0.000003784308,0.003529459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4205933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170784963","doi":"10.1007/s10611-010-9251-8","title":"Friedman economic policies, social exclusion, and crime: toward a gendered left realist subcultural theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Law and Social Change","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Social exclusion; Masculinity; Hegemonic masculinity; Hegemony; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1494143457360901,"gpt":0.3588564741086251,"spread":0.2094421283725351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001406947,0.0001990051,0.0003186066,0.00002581418,0.003766307,0.0002550292,0.0002182532,0.0004482282,0.0006240176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001109478,0.0001801237,0.0001099826,0.00004647149,0.00194373,0.0005889627,0.000132925,0.000461772,0.00002058264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005253415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008321711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01121591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003848851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980494,0.0008082878,0.0002122256,0.000339298,0.0001543034,0.0004364253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991621,0.0003814957,0.000135708,0.00009188775,0.0000554838,0.000173303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000789429,0.00001942206,0.0001856006,0.00001183393,0.00002135302,0.000004569751,0.1850956,8.104293e-10,0.0002581775,0.8118731,0.000859255,0.001592081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005365231,0.0000655738,0.01458116,0.000004024033,0.0000704362,0.000007063265,0.04351822,7.23991e-7,0.0000558492,0.2993731,0.6413343,0.0004530232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6351765,0.0006609918,0.00000547399,0.01799025,0.0008397072,0.0004362801,0.000119199,0.0001781188,0.3445934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907904,0.0001801004,0.0000184052,0.003898842,0.003736573,0.00001852986,0.0000347691,0.00001537469,0.001306963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.640475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318701074","doi":"10.1080/19187033.2004.11675157","title":"The Antagonistic Self-Organization of Modern Society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Political Economy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Determinism; Sociology; Reproduction; Marxist philosophy; Epistemology; Social reproduction; Social organization; Body politic; Social system; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social capital; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06446354185561595,"gpt":0.3753138978213615,"spread":0.3108503559657455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009687315,0.00005892812,0.0001421077,0.000007311665,0.000579151,0.00001951138,0.0001485517,0.00006194536,0.00001576502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001492468,0.00004315754,0.00005119378,0.0001220086,0.001298003,0.0001447915,0.00006498401,0.0001236964,0.00001058174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000219477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000168491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008813862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004081509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991402,0.0001970641,0.0002119816,0.0001144722,0.00005933629,0.0002769608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978361,0.001861837,0.00005950876,0.00009099253,0.00009830976,0.00005332393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002873408,0.00003714252,0.001512012,0.000008975656,0.00003379937,0.000001123001,0.01294914,0.000006059048,8.734189e-7,0.9852274,0.00004254463,0.0001780324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001810662,0.00002068325,0.0002841752,0.000007246287,0.000009544115,4.631306e-7,0.02224043,0.000005127644,0.00003090396,0.9557514,0.02140982,0.00005914944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1096503,0.002280341,0.0007760302,0.04902304,0.0005688348,0.000435926,0.000007921196,0.0001119799,0.8371456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983583,0.0003816414,0.0001670738,0.000844111,0.0001348251,0.000007645608,7.087145e-7,0.000003423882,0.0001022645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4782546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211077378","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.02","title":"Aristotle’s \"Nicomachean Ethics\": Laying the Foundations for a Pragmatist Consideration of Human Knowing and Acting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4450428522896528,"gpt":0.6076840632189402,"spread":0.1626412109292874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04221945,0.00009119718,0.0003291969,0.00001937742,0.002385169,0.00001850956,0.0001155065,0.0001826472,0.00008260416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02794796,0.00006714032,0.0001084237,0.00009587393,0.002062903,0.0002073975,0.00002962644,0.0004943605,0.000003397937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004227182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001577316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001793249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903302,0.008674994,0.000506706,0.0001790503,0.0001125198,0.0001964924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9461516,0.05293599,0.0005159318,0.0001029623,0.0002504338,0.00004305358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007382759,0.00001219994,0.0001743482,0.0002330475,0.0000379677,2.745714e-7,0.2718672,2.633815e-8,0.0001018558,0.7222227,0.0001201142,0.005222812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001924116,0.0001305043,0.000263265,0.0004694186,0.0001006825,0.000001398735,0.3282162,0.000001209112,0.00001005695,0.5822136,0.08826543,0.0001358264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2101173,0.2694249,0.1062255,0.2443217,0.000907633,0.008318129,0.00007470018,0.0002589279,0.1603513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902533,0.004193107,0.001630218,0.003595323,0.00009753858,0.0000555953,0.00001982826,0.000006091426,0.0001489418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094443123","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-682x.2008.00248.x","title":"From the 14th Floor to the Sidewalk: Writing Sociology at Ground Level","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Inquiry","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Erikson's stages of psychosocial development; Metaphor; Writing style; Style (visual arts); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics; Psychology; Literature; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4304069685526657,"gpt":0.4167614893758102,"spread":0.01364547917685549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050692,0.000251416,0.0003931348,0.00001433243,0.006384668,0.00006115199,0.001240523,0.0006530104,0.002258891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006466134,0.0001286744,0.0003091462,0.0002146169,0.007252626,0.0001840013,0.0005492422,0.001038009,0.001549222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001930613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001626717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001832146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002340128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917741,0.006049889,0.0004505485,0.0005781957,0.0003897091,0.0007575972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841632,0.01486553,0.0002063436,0.0004343482,0.0001120385,0.0002185055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004443833,0.0001975726,0.0270295,0.000003260388,0.0002227975,0.0001484728,0.6539565,0.00003370827,0.0005364423,0.2028392,0.106313,0.008275153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036555,0.0002307167,0.1853406,0.00001062799,0.00003751763,0.00001212062,0.1503362,0.000006175482,0.00001163412,0.1740642,0.4891355,0.0004491648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979465,0.001580852,0.0003280104,0.08343896,0.001265436,0.0004730345,0.00004729449,0.0001789584,0.014741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958988,0.0003919053,0.000257496,0.02870155,0.006887554,0.00009100865,0.00003077609,0.0000127043,0.004639016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5036203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015773854","doi":"10.1007/s12108-009-9067-0","title":"The Search for Meaning: Revisiting Herbert Blumer’s Interpretation of G.H. Mead","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Dualism; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Pragmatism; Social science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08241632041628162,"gpt":0.4161644271942887,"spread":0.3337481067780071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007060498,0.00008990884,0.0002316224,0.00001132464,0.001581533,0.00005270691,0.0005713782,0.00004994387,0.00001619372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003272334,0.0000497337,0.0001633381,0.0002064178,0.003723293,0.0001147603,0.00003567843,0.0002621323,0.000008249513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005505087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009153631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000614019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001996225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966686,0.002421677,0.0002576299,0.0001639779,0.0001873192,0.0003008392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899947,0.009184355,0.0004126797,0.0002196952,0.0001449864,0.00004360236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005132401,0.00002347482,0.0009932347,0.000004154849,0.00005687914,8.373554e-7,0.04891193,0.00001764957,0.000450223,0.4725927,0.0007450601,0.4756907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004535039,0.0018277,0.01057174,0.00006939626,0.0001153754,0.000002274089,0.3649668,0.0007535977,0.000395956,0.3993514,0.2209876,0.0005046492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6287305,0.002188111,0.01017656,0.1482005,0.000335297,0.001338722,0.00001386008,0.0002127281,0.2088037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964957,0.0005419779,0.0003275211,0.001729176,0.0002795441,0.00001672591,0.000003020107,0.00000472026,0.0006016108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.475186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032116432","doi":"10.1177/0038038512454950","title":"The Role of Subjectivity and Knowledge Power Struggles in the Formation of Public Policy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Sociology; Subjectivity; Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Incentive; Empirical research; Epistemic community; Public policy; Empirical evidence; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Positive economics; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06268214949572389,"gpt":0.3711413207361933,"spread":0.3084591712404694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006222832,0.00003854333,0.0000984856,0.00002383452,0.0003044345,0.000008295985,0.000159752,0.0001172352,0.0000198127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002267943,0.00002139237,0.00003396237,0.0001197864,0.001370898,0.0003169371,0.00003782769,0.0001462421,0.000002618761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002060743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000990054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006337584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004415818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958425,0.003733296,0.000133472,0.00004610324,0.00005700146,0.0001876966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953788,0.004347748,0.0001292209,0.00007998844,0.00003995668,0.00002430878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008783722,0.0000374728,0.06412025,0.000001653583,0.000004394365,2.039335e-8,0.1383805,1.738963e-8,0.0000875141,0.7900317,0.00001732585,0.007310437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001222385,0.00007516334,0.1049707,0.000001986567,0.000004361094,9.076903e-7,0.2535436,0.00000290443,0.0000639077,0.5371703,0.1039939,0.00005014491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148605,0.004582416,0.000008250629,0.00334196,0.0000596204,0.0001065445,0.000002713009,0.000005089115,0.07703288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995105,0.0002845913,0.000004353652,0.00006924788,0.00008907491,0.000007540923,8.616492e-7,0.000001220288,0.00003264622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2528614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5051132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921593828","doi":"10.1177/1056492619836729","title":"The Pursuit of Success in Academia: Plato’s Ghost Asks “What then?”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Chart; Management; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06137694956387515,"gpt":0.3761807700752517,"spread":0.3148038205113766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01077885,0.00008404894,0.0002276415,0.00008764732,0.0001839823,0.0001707875,0.001068336,0.000252037,0.0002816997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003180204,0.00005365206,0.0001248699,0.0002590887,0.0003339708,0.001420033,0.0001653057,0.001018644,0.00003294086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006548429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004980096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002706606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001572693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975834,0.0008995263,0.0005197802,0.0001040148,0.00066847,0.0002247908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972682,0.001763342,0.0006750044,0.0001573182,0.00007447543,0.00006164289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001326442,0.0002946719,0.05227569,0.0001009715,0.0004080217,0.0001505202,0.04659633,0.0002071284,0.00006662294,0.7406536,0.009456863,0.1484632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007714657,0.0001837494,0.02945926,0.0002132319,0.00004238613,0.000003005672,0.1425635,0.000005342427,0.00003078608,0.0523976,0.7741933,0.0001363468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907025,0.004192956,0.0000514178,0.02113369,0.002291498,0.0003505565,5.55901e-7,0.000008549211,0.0812683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867118,0.009413465,0.00003416526,0.0007989773,0.0002758466,0.00000224704,2.362932e-7,0.00000475078,0.002758535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.442556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967730193","doi":"10.1111/cars.12252","title":"Academic Hiring Networks and Institutional Prestige: A Case Study of Canadian Sociology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prestige; Situated; Sociology; Competence (human resources); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Social science; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1150123633484481,"gpt":0.3390347228410339,"spread":0.2240223594925858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007102905,0.0003219779,0.001093967,0.0004529363,0.0009504215,0.000008864701,0.0006894163,0.001180077,0.0004983753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004511525,0.0003316924,0.0002007957,0.000476425,0.003808813,0.0002400125,0.00008481967,0.001497155,0.00001445412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001487227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00547095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.834458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9564809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939628,0.002945487,0.0008534148,0.000625144,0.00008297272,0.001530194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947218,0.002406049,0.0005420763,0.0004302654,0.0003150794,0.001584731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165915,0.0000636402,0.6707062,0.001496999,0.0004299927,0.002183239,0.1333098,0.0002172071,0.00003074909,0.183052,0.001973692,0.006504763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002106178,0.001858645,0.2062644,0.003084267,0.0006839811,0.001310401,0.6116211,0.0002064896,0.00000135373,0.03429373,0.1366799,0.001889563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460216,0.04088496,0.000005721304,0.004660121,0.0005797721,0.001499349,0.0001036622,0.00003318219,0.006211611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765808,0.01942203,0.00006912457,0.003356099,0.000241792,0.00008789429,0.00003839783,0.00001975083,0.0001840948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4783113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500592657","doi":"10.1111/cars.12000","title":"Discipline, Field, Nexus: Re‐Visioning Sociology","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08597544008709189,"gpt":0.3351489111229832,"spread":0.2491734710358913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008869759,0.0007888108,0.002144766,0.0002193909,0.001631529,0.0000423355,0.001892627,0.002968872,0.01870623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01670501,0.0007996939,0.001051575,0.00058848,0.00989606,0.0007164804,0.0002359956,0.00268186,0.001059194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003041063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004465118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1787161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1476359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986483,0.006818899,0.001689831,0.001189862,0.0001436246,0.003674812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851626,0.009273287,0.001215941,0.0009889132,0.0007549588,0.002604323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002619097,0.0001143462,0.01971585,0.005545477,0.0006789984,0.0002896489,0.1160267,0.00001847693,0.00005856514,0.5920758,0.2063097,0.05914025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004770309,0.0008415272,0.01143909,0.005541307,0.0004384917,0.00004854045,0.1509739,0.00006546669,0.000003829295,0.40643,0.4223845,0.001356239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2995573,0.3562795,0.00007446983,0.2762318,0.004198174,0.001697254,0.0003065981,0.0001048002,0.06155009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265638,0.112678,0.0006800189,0.04940129,0.0017511,0.0003152361,0.0001987105,0.00006692953,0.008344887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080892110","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2010.01224.x","title":"In Conversation with the American Sociological Association President: Randall Collins on Emotions, Violence, and Interactionist Sociology","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Conversation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03159995075054992,"gpt":0.3020479848893442,"spread":0.2704480341387943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087567,0.0004971812,0.001378454,0.0001754203,0.001155816,0.00003674493,0.0007532007,0.001320298,0.0007984973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430683,0.0004025877,0.0003266501,0.000486891,0.01322591,0.0003432653,0.00006737441,0.003481338,0.00006605955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00315863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06612213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4026993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894652,0.007025484,0.0008751036,0.0008190512,0.000146368,0.001668802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865286,0.01027268,0.001565406,0.0004536537,0.0004240727,0.0007556038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003953677,0.00025523,0.2727288,0.001714074,0.0007935002,0.0002870214,0.08908737,0.0000374642,0.0001655324,0.5894263,0.02887572,0.01623358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001670586,0.002197752,0.4194204,0.004555184,0.000640858,0.00009821053,0.08956494,0.0000752661,0.000005593432,0.1534577,0.3269439,0.001369645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7248563,0.01902609,0.00001103985,0.2514776,0.001322595,0.0009988156,0.0002363772,0.00002826272,0.002042928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790749,0.09396552,0.0001115707,0.02488766,0.0007277771,0.000179876,0.0000773854,0.00002614966,0.0009491316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4359686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774007885","doi":"10.1177/1936724411436170","title":"Civic Engagement and Public Sociology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Science","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public sociology; Civic engagement; Sociology; Scholarship; Public engagement; Engaged scholarship; Service-learning; Politics; Social engagement; Social movement; Social justice; Social science; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1240347630674723,"gpt":0.3799290320590466,"spread":0.2558942689915743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01587891,0.00007374318,0.0001875154,0.00008447903,0.002218532,0.0001010446,0.0004059555,0.0001096305,0.0002304732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009631155,0.000059863,0.00005982721,0.000362358,0.003511696,0.001084799,0.0001077168,0.0004120253,0.00001381024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003897102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001171099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002771712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981343,0.0004776191,0.0002549674,0.0001089243,0.000523885,0.0005003505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984354,0.000660295,0.0003814375,0.00005036626,0.000150663,0.0003218092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002415183,0.00005916914,0.002017781,0.000001532371,0.000010174,0.000001063475,0.07162308,6.22482e-8,0.001036842,0.9099625,0.0002742206,0.01498944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000418125,0.0001031147,0.02014364,0.000003860794,0.00003164273,0.000006232393,0.1489227,7.593707e-7,0.00009042345,0.2437418,0.5863019,0.0002358451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6045243,0.0003827718,0.0001614627,0.007523363,0.0005755101,0.0001066438,5.817645e-7,0.00001716914,0.3867082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968356,0.000144686,0.0003160595,0.001400312,0.001229001,0.00000226143,1.02319e-7,0.000002938292,0.00006905755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6662207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975118947","doi":"10.1111/socf.12546","title":"Denying Anthropogenic Climate Change: Or, How Our Rejection of Objective Reality Gave Intellectual Legitimacy to Fake News","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Forum","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Ideology; Objectivity (philosophy); Politics; Legitimacy; Appeal; Denial; Social reality; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1717285756727806,"gpt":0.413845170871727,"spread":0.2421165951989464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002611001,0.0002256862,0.0005309549,0.00006257548,0.0008126547,0.00006258867,0.0003765804,0.0005100243,0.0009365738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006071136,0.0001624323,0.0002930992,0.0004603,0.0004876952,0.0005402161,0.0002554821,0.0005728251,0.0002554943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001866077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001176519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008246508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004150453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956896,0.002347119,0.0003429626,0.0005497541,0.0003175716,0.0007529591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966629,0.002413561,0.0002787329,0.0002609706,0.0001772732,0.0002065996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009488251,0.001007751,0.2239147,0.0001510526,0.0004479808,0.00007487497,0.215737,0.00002490446,0.003758971,0.4423434,0.0118823,0.09116889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001151795,0.004338271,0.02116022,0.0001190107,0.00007639419,0.000008891179,0.7333827,0.00003778063,0.0004402749,0.08478764,0.1534632,0.001033807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093343,0.0002997633,0.0007025442,0.04107754,0.001327192,0.001851244,0.00006745093,0.0002655828,0.04507438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955343,0.0008050665,0.0001879791,0.001757396,0.0004797479,0.00006751729,0.00001433543,0.00001252546,0.001141159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5176457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254353280","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(200021)36:2<171::aid-jhbs4>3.3.co;2-x","title":"The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Citation; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2730915584072777,"gpt":0.3859154360869475,"spread":0.1128238776796698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007930081,0.0001018371,0.0003080686,0.0000300672,0.0007983466,0.000008558841,0.002313003,0.0001170691,0.0007089066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001279805,0.00004496683,0.0004666646,0.0003417961,0.0176507,0.0003221916,0.0001216935,0.0003163142,0.000002559851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002565028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006658842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003851613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009296046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953834,0.003055617,0.0005722449,0.0001094284,0.0006669232,0.0002123183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965272,0.0017096,0.001300198,0.0002328346,0.0001741164,0.00005605269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002954776,0.00142362,0.02645251,0.00003769644,0.0002047031,0.000006355921,0.4902439,0.00007888175,0.002482628,0.330961,0.01974832,0.1254057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000582847,0.001911974,0.02176572,0.0002096364,0.0003442815,0.00003782459,0.05395165,0.000004644855,0.0002689337,0.5345447,0.3860929,0.0002848529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667398,0.007442997,0.000002272264,0.006901229,0.002509404,0.0001784736,0.000008278435,0.00000438756,0.0162132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964542,0.0004752468,0.00003303646,0.0002200341,0.0001984066,0.000001902033,3.431305e-8,0.000002437667,0.002614726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4362922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997257078","doi":"10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.473","title":"How Can Feminist Sociology Sustain Its Critical Edge?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Problems","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06411538997925391,"gpt":0.3484035115550724,"spread":0.2842881215758185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002182254,0.0001686106,0.0002875548,0.00003310214,0.002546536,0.0002296792,0.000336669,0.0005078507,0.0003639864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002176051,0.0001642566,0.0001725123,0.0002126419,0.002283312,0.000303649,0.00007114434,0.0005159162,0.00005796535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003275166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001016075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006594863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966122,0.001804545,0.000241257,0.0003461294,0.0002913839,0.0007045106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979057,0.001547931,0.0001290008,0.0000992413,0.000186647,0.00013144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002056659,0.00008535364,0.0008065922,0.00001934083,0.0000134989,0.0000192745,0.01616899,7.107301e-7,0.0001449541,0.9732198,0.008632953,0.0008679922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574298,0.00005114259,0.0003414252,0.000003692868,0.00001492277,8.77464e-7,0.01670005,0.000001657403,0.00001405882,0.4738097,0.508711,0.0001941038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05689223,0.001358396,0.0002709618,0.2633673,0.001079286,0.0007074546,0.00006507772,0.0004319362,0.6758274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762478,0.00002479391,0.00004908934,0.001195056,0.002500258,0.00004590334,0.00001944775,0.00001510363,0.01990257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205091147","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.02","title":"Aristotle’s \"Rhetoric\": A Pragmatist Analysis of Persuasive Interchange","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Sociology; Deliberation; Epistemology; Pragmatism; Politics; Persuasion; Deviance (statistics); Agency (philosophy); Social science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3036157642926188,"gpt":0.5233380484540613,"spread":0.2197222841614425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007439498,0.0001503187,0.001029644,0.0001034716,0.0005369394,0.000003251819,0.0003069774,0.0002060297,0.00237614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008876343,0.0001241201,0.0005321075,0.0008657251,0.003427608,0.0001999414,0.0000536195,0.0003378675,0.0001008437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001792946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003860471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007800483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838138,0.01485202,0.0005593234,0.0002955479,0.0002214533,0.0002578377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904404,0.008266486,0.0006374065,0.0002170736,0.0003352258,0.0001033971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002784482,0.00007956741,0.0009897419,0.0001679468,0.001150813,0.00001404223,0.616931,1.403383e-7,0.000007143617,0.3769224,0.002532256,0.001177188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003922956,0.0005620407,0.004032107,0.0005099484,0.002732166,0.000006837346,0.293188,0.000003951451,0.00000309972,0.1047597,0.5931807,0.0006290992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2040886,0.4811518,0.003512125,0.0332941,0.0007757382,0.002139213,0.0002816526,0.0002259617,0.2745308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956114,0.09962249,0.0004073046,0.002800667,0.00007404615,0.00007587393,0.00005439459,0.000006686815,0.001347145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6915228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049849760","doi":"10.1007/s11133-010-9148-y","title":"Autonomy and Compliance: How Qualitative Sociologists Respond to Institutional Ethical Oversight","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Autonomy; Cross-cultural psychology; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Research ethics; Compliance (psychology); Power (physics); Politics; Field (mathematics); Social science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2715433127148673,"gpt":0.5403279280755688,"spread":0.2687846153607015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01435549,0.000230953,0.0004646147,0.00008265095,0.001811005,0.00006380586,0.0003602608,0.001166172,0.0007331345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02067009,0.0002070094,0.0001285786,0.0001960169,0.01140678,0.0003727632,0.0001460201,0.002251046,0.0001892433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001686064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007680353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000243271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001794439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9820417,0.01623951,0.0003113892,0.0005951906,0.0002791677,0.0005330157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736243,0.02530257,0.0002251434,0.000182901,0.0003217355,0.0003432991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001393594,0.00002316057,0.00008933069,0.00000478178,0.00003740652,0.000005475706,0.4650951,2.439539e-7,0.000590721,0.5323555,0.001274398,0.0003844864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002938671,0.0002029357,0.001255509,0.000006487143,0.000008800132,0.000001576967,0.3478276,0.000001748414,0.00001244159,0.3816595,0.2685091,0.000220333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321913,0.0002738145,0.004091408,0.2145371,0.0009195674,0.0005469511,0.0001186598,0.0001508147,0.0471703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817598,0.0000319535,0.005380462,0.008980941,0.0004118038,0.00007777136,0.00003217157,0.000009439276,0.003315605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2672347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999884261","doi":"10.1525/si.2008.31.3.325","title":"Structure, Agency, and Social Reality in Blumerian Symbolic Interactionism: The Influence of Georg Simmel","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symbolic Interaction","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Giles W. and Elise G. Mead Foundation","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Interactionism; Sociology; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); The Symbolic; Structure and agency; Sociological theory; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05658024268955718,"gpt":0.3522191390109443,"spread":0.2956388963213871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009722466,0.0001264143,0.0002350779,0.00007779734,0.0008550016,0.00003942854,0.0002037947,0.0001644523,0.0002488826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006528497,0.0001015354,0.0000722249,0.0002770538,0.0006944581,0.0008620058,0.00005620802,0.0005201378,0.00001150728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009030645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001068898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009197023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001566326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976364,0.001295419,0.0003825925,0.0002315942,0.000222138,0.0002318146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986258,0.0007569346,0.0003129414,0.0001467244,0.0001102641,0.00004734176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001359759,0.000428975,0.07289746,0.00009952833,0.000201704,0.0000530645,0.6466399,0.0002842362,0.01938213,0.2208749,0.0008975876,0.03688079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004490936,0.00009696344,0.8430643,0.00004318591,0.0000271214,0.00005264079,0.02572778,0.00004899902,0.0006558491,0.04525238,0.08427478,0.0003068765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755369,0.00004734249,0.00001028426,0.003293323,0.0003905549,0.0002382499,0.00001090873,0.00003207311,0.02044037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985097,0.0002173441,0.000009352718,0.0003951214,0.0002630601,0.0000127506,0.000007246954,0.000006832126,0.0005786163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7701669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159420100","doi":"10.1111/cars.12079","title":"Critical Nexus or Pluralist Discipline? Institutional Ambivalence and the Future of Canadian Sociology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Ambivalence; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1275254956858587,"gpt":0.3558497323836269,"spread":0.2283242366977682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027315,0.0003007786,0.001055712,0.000238464,0.001216467,0.00001814268,0.0009939219,0.0008677144,0.0003995154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02407663,0.0002144177,0.0002770398,0.000398787,0.02217833,0.0002633308,0.00008801404,0.0009460957,0.00001266952],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001415118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01196216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6348533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934613,0.003797392,0.0007635647,0.0004782051,0.0001186353,0.001380885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920671,0.004355527,0.0003705051,0.0004327584,0.0006959549,0.002078156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008398313,0.00001201618,0.00665844,0.0005385358,0.00008524873,0.0001018814,0.04839426,0.000003309522,0.000002387206,0.9334812,0.009113696,0.001525024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059769,0.000288279,0.01496882,0.0008985305,0.0002397883,0.00009304209,0.1458116,0.00001780914,7.662561e-7,0.358191,0.4778722,0.0005583429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3178831,0.238138,0.00002938155,0.3974436,0.002421797,0.00172148,0.00133004,0.00006860872,0.04096398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527335,0.0337564,0.0002366159,0.01201386,0.0007550116,0.00009221166,0.00009264047,0.00001525609,0.0003045705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6348503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980415784","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00489.x","title":"On sources and narratives in historical social science: a realist critique of positivist and postmodernist epistemologies*","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nomothetic and idiographic; Epistemology; Positivism; Sociology; Reflexivity; Historiography; Narrative; Criticism; Warrant; Nomothetic; Postmodernism; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03081223998744415,"gpt":0.3353022383273859,"spread":0.3044899983399418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392323,0.00008449562,0.0003949654,0.0000742413,0.0007972522,0.00005551383,0.0002043765,0.0002078453,0.000109928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001473065,0.0000869389,0.00006446843,0.0001236687,0.005757403,0.0003351625,0.00002982059,0.0005126499,5.154207e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001717408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002226848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000817986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001417196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972472,0.00171774,0.0004043804,0.0001836115,0.0002085732,0.0002384497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998071,0.00136666,0.0002835093,0.00003661833,0.0001442262,0.00009799733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001957916,0.0006767915,0.03057345,0.00005855532,0.00009480031,0.001314819,0.293703,0.000003047073,0.00162703,0.5585784,0.001665137,0.1097471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498881,0.001765155,0.2310511,0.0001953416,0.00002747523,0.001027452,0.04870617,0.000001957273,0.00002923,0.7012335,0.01411696,0.0003467925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571949,0.003272765,0.000009049716,0.007050312,0.0000881547,0.00007715316,0.000008424581,0.000007266467,0.03229204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972546,0.00162023,0.00009628633,0.000511873,0.0001522116,0.000001699344,6.123421e-7,0.000003997406,0.0003585621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2449968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W613649340","doi":"","title":"The public sociology debate : ethics and engagement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sociology; Sociology; Syllabus; Sociology of leisure; Scholarship; Historical sociology; Social science; Sociology of law; Medical sociology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2291841919338652,"gpt":0.380566293323328,"spread":0.1513821013894628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01481653,0.0002239538,0.0003102173,0.00002253797,0.003979697,0.0002619705,0.0006642024,0.001150224,0.00006646982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004200774,0.0001552199,0.0001211525,0.000005655418,0.003361185,0.00008527141,0.0003405841,0.003108785,0.00002981897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007661436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006899079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001130919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002987315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892719,0.009274954,0.0002906747,0.000374881,0.0003463628,0.0004412687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978913,0.02010577,0.0003420882,0.0003473363,0.0001299836,0.0001618009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002126463,0.00000401614,0.000002104892,0.00001726666,0.0000821661,0.000006770271,0.01899413,3.365048e-8,6.602727e-7,0.9391149,0.02168929,0.02006735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007486972,0.00003475949,0.00000176134,0.00001306535,0.00002847265,7.410537e-7,0.0004232658,0.000001034705,6.567909e-7,0.3113661,0.6879153,0.0001399032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003554763,0.003945548,0.0000880298,0.006522876,0.0007355424,0.0004599211,0.000009241943,0.0001181051,0.9880852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01721223,0.00220653,0.00002424136,0.002346149,0.0008941152,0.00006834845,0.00001088163,0.00002053932,0.977217],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6662261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116826121","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.2014.006","title":"The End of National Sociological Traditions? The Fates of Sociology in English Canada and French Quebec in a Globalized Field of Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Hegemony; Internationalization; Indigenization; Social science; Lament; Americanization; Field (mathematics); Globalization; Sociological imagination; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05221203162652754,"gpt":0.3602133090794401,"spread":0.3080012774529126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004225621,0.00004542206,0.0001843712,0.0001531968,0.0001797592,0.00001038955,0.0004291688,0.00004518499,0.00002943887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01230288,0.00002724621,0.00003979538,0.0002085192,0.003484557,0.0001352268,0.00002402775,0.0001762008,3.971094e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002694904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002188992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8892388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984813,0.0005351777,0.0004031289,0.00006266028,0.0003988351,0.0001189166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915952,0.007039933,0.0003567126,0.00003370513,0.0009271572,0.00004730111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009789312,0.00003552627,0.08930418,0.000005352706,0.0001814701,0.000009960496,0.05962311,0.00005748697,0.0000703722,0.8422945,0.003546439,0.004773747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008567281,0.0002077901,0.3738819,0.0001051804,0.00001531649,0.000007596845,0.1097697,0.00002279358,0.0001279062,0.4321366,0.08274441,0.0001239622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676384,0.001472635,0.000002575626,0.02051749,0.0005419044,0.00005293958,0.00002210354,6.54917e-7,0.009751283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985438,0.0008741249,0.00002378135,0.0004094405,0.000103543,0.000001854828,3.613225e-7,7.197715e-7,0.00004236392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4101578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008734602","doi":"10.1177/0092055x0803600402","title":"What is Critical About Sociology?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Movement Disorders","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Humanism; Virtue; Critical thinking; Sociological imagination; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1095836622419366,"gpt":0.4247114699319884,"spread":0.3151278076900518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004642931,0.000192721,0.0004036555,0.00004577725,0.003921069,0.00004752277,0.0004836641,0.0007924219,0.002241108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005155015,0.0001781513,0.000227765,0.00004972504,0.008322986,0.001027795,0.0001035552,0.00159582,0.0006851481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002344619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003145396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009237659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920375,0.006258591,0.0003291741,0.0004627349,0.0002078422,0.000704195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914417,0.00788536,0.0001264921,0.0002616895,0.00008010714,0.0002046356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337702,0.00007646204,0.004368865,0.000003529417,0.00003598054,0.00004804859,0.241214,2.91691e-7,0.00005410677,0.7431672,0.008716782,0.00228092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002540474,0.0001528603,0.003748978,0.00001411608,0.00002281141,0.00002406858,0.05612458,0.00000552695,0.000006235797,0.3789888,0.5603418,0.000316241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7585343,0.006197486,0.0005087089,0.07822195,0.002222025,0.0002186816,0.000007246277,0.0004560421,0.1536336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728737,0.002095607,0.000490311,0.01752253,0.001119695,0.00002177234,0.000009310382,0.00001492495,0.005852101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.551625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1909794458","doi":"10.29173/cjs6310","title":"Mapping the Social Space of Opinion: Public Sociology and the Op-Ed in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Public sociology; Sociology; Legitimacy; Civil society; Public opinion; Public administration; Skepticism; Social movement; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09395783911270639,"gpt":0.3131506239184645,"spread":0.2191927848057581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008116243,0.0001000492,0.0003674077,0.00005445943,0.001778743,0.00003084486,0.0007307371,0.0001962347,0.0001577105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002050876,0.00005108078,0.0001062798,0.0001631429,0.005769232,0.000128062,0.00002279883,0.0009419034,0.000001255745],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003998787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007834376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7794211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9445751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937428,0.005174326,0.0004105538,0.00009666623,0.0001538527,0.0004218182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950168,0.004029582,0.0005312092,0.0001113844,0.0001513986,0.0001596187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008303901,0.000005029915,0.006988135,0.000001979033,0.00006490459,0.00002325831,0.1571666,0.000005649938,0.000005746916,0.8290186,0.004325583,0.002311443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144859,0.0001063937,0.0921687,0.00001425894,0.00002009851,0.00005537583,0.2377418,0.000008236938,0.000001071062,0.5119029,0.1566934,0.000142868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4889422,0.004771102,0.000009808113,0.4977454,0.0004897121,0.0001594879,0.000004813773,0.00000197945,0.007875474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924632,0.0003984307,0.000009074972,0.00650698,0.0005385787,0.00000215517,7.384077e-7,0.000003232497,0.00007756983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.503521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105462521","doi":"10.1177/0959354302012005893","title":"Introduction: Varieties of Social Constructionism and the Rituals of Critique","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sociality; Strict constructionism; Constructionism; Social constructionism; Sociology; Epistemology; Realism; Set (abstract data type); Materiality (auditing); Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04067235332739238,"gpt":0.3640404963153667,"spread":0.3233681429879743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061127,0.00006345059,0.0002341229,0.0000268673,0.0004301942,0.000009862637,0.0001571557,0.0001517896,0.004829042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009651472,0.00004640505,0.00006568402,0.00012299,0.008093507,0.0001249662,0.00002365232,0.0002008665,0.00001129119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004432783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001219712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003270088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004334345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953476,0.004051611,0.000242105,0.0001444878,0.00009309263,0.0001211373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977144,0.001853346,0.0001879402,0.0001316634,0.00008857877,0.00002406122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003723786,0.00004242719,0.00005093673,0.000004559045,0.0000374921,4.899132e-7,0.02725875,7.939475e-8,0.0001070285,0.9620026,0.002589802,0.007533482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005230872,0.00005719952,0.0003489492,0.000001270044,0.00002280149,0.00001064285,0.01043852,3.624046e-7,0.00003426966,0.8468181,0.1416968,0.0000479021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2188341,0.002752321,0.0008552602,0.1236564,0.001308893,0.0003323277,0.00001066891,0.00005719403,0.6521929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952775,0.0005810165,0.00006800779,0.0009085021,0.0006324927,0.000007750516,5.668435e-7,0.000003181219,0.002520976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7764434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078206709","doi":"10.1177/0038038507080438","title":"The Trouble with Burawoy: An Analytic, Synthetic Alternative","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Public sociology; Normative; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Leverage (statistics); Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05848881894255827,"gpt":0.3820917223869016,"spread":0.3236029034443433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005756921,0.00009402922,0.0001544132,0.00001982929,0.001560095,0.00004760019,0.0003740507,0.0001655535,0.0002309941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007730203,0.00005479917,0.00005813196,0.0001103155,0.002722443,0.0002266257,0.00002767719,0.0003352311,0.00006968161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006563945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001130234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000652728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001083842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975713,0.001453249,0.0001595964,0.0002246893,0.0001552758,0.0004358962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948448,0.004607822,0.0001342004,0.0001975387,0.00008962826,0.0001260339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002915084,0.00003768521,0.003653538,6.411817e-7,0.00006084854,0.00002470784,0.02656199,0.000003778149,0.00003122617,0.9631615,0.0001025475,0.006070084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003677387,0.0005854252,0.003099491,0.000004108354,0.0000358648,0.000005483571,0.08861262,0.00002186817,0.00004749709,0.4417209,0.4652791,0.0002198444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7712681,0.0004616902,0.001097544,0.00877943,0.0003674194,0.0002274853,0.000002119242,0.00009827527,0.217698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956702,0.0001089722,0.00009699583,0.0007761281,0.0004106816,0.000008328114,0.000002425066,0.000006687078,0.002919555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5214405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160478356","doi":"10.7202/001063ar","title":"Les nouveaux défis épistémologiques de la sociologie","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.523331434087079,"gpt":0.5474353784616451,"spread":0.02410394437456609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01904884,0.0007563425,0.001066627,0.00007170889,0.002297477,0.0002375731,0.0013984,0.004397431,0.03544781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01466191,0.0007141251,0.001028295,0.0004326649,0.01215976,0.0009620926,0.0004477857,0.004029711,0.001315358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004694073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001557816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001886388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9552184,0.04072128,0.000817924,0.001030217,0.0004502712,0.001761843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963117,0.03503227,0.0006581061,0.0005742028,0.0001997021,0.0004187134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006858206,0.0007122331,0.01234719,0.0000698863,0.0004063765,0.0002313093,0.03445158,0.00002833149,0.0001080739,0.794129,0.05631805,0.1011294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005503223,0.0004650421,0.00315894,0.00005523423,0.0001403298,0.00001879886,0.03769983,0.00006225758,0.00002561081,0.6753333,0.2816651,0.0008252452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07859322,0.06647164,0.0009147409,0.1439756,0.004220031,0.0005702354,0.000116978,0.001021415,0.7041161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679534,0.08196545,0.002474382,0.006797425,0.001265254,0.0001178986,0.00002799522,0.00005900687,0.03933924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7893601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682575462","doi":"10.29173/cjs4154","title":"Distorted Universality — Internationalization and its Implications for the Epistemological Foundations of the Discipline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Articulation (sociology); Humanities; Globalization; Constitution; Sociology; Universality (dynamical systems); Epistemology; Ethnology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1782555960251644,"gpt":0.3759320071370773,"spread":0.1976764111119129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155777,0.00003896489,0.00009326682,0.00001792487,0.002480366,0.00001011908,0.0003768302,0.00007804677,0.0000717928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002027148,0.00001887126,0.00008117694,0.00008996417,0.00236958,0.00009865756,0.00001805345,0.0001695176,5.25114e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001060338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006951968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001682525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01977335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988355,0.0007655977,0.0001926181,0.00005110918,0.00005711127,0.00009803806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965729,0.002678745,0.0003171969,0.00008082204,0.000279579,0.00007080784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001644884,0.000007273768,0.02076857,0.000001092157,0.00004444913,4.546334e-7,0.01300483,0.00002767388,0.00001570619,0.9653149,0.0005892013,0.0002094244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002124861,0.00006115281,0.5553877,0.000005490612,0.00006016129,0.00003541883,0.004382148,0.00003883071,0.00000283711,0.3304943,0.1092678,0.00005174074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6814179,0.001260809,0.00328425,0.3085384,0.0005243081,0.0004013718,0.00007378397,0.000004714436,0.004494472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998716,0.0001102775,0.00001762103,0.0004778108,0.0001388438,0.000003461624,0.000003235312,0.000001890646,0.000530838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6348206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391464511","doi":"10.1002/9781394260331.ch81","title":"Sociological Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociological theory; Sociology; Epistemology; Anthropology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08649737858820666,"gpt":0.3927699577839834,"spread":0.3062725791957768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002589006,0.0001278266,0.0002105159,0.00003523855,0.00026716,0.00003110332,0.0003515802,0.0008433498,0.4166264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001308767,0.00009294696,0.0001146427,0.00007139883,0.001475603,0.00004452613,0.00005473916,0.0002166693,0.01066084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002174578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008383541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000195767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001418194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971146,0.002170167,0.0001010967,0.0002536436,0.0001265083,0.0002340006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983084,0.001269868,0.0001225613,0.0001790232,0.00001976628,0.0001004063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008356756,0.00001075111,0.00002090694,0.000001476262,0.00001764008,0.00000357285,0.000420355,5.994127e-10,1.342206e-7,0.4883746,0.5097101,0.00143211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003340611,0.00002773035,0.000004842148,0.00001011891,0.000008955343,2.111861e-7,0.001129933,3.126101e-8,1.469587e-7,0.2167381,0.7819252,0.0001212467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004484194,0.0005528493,0.0003551315,0.001260403,0.0006982583,0.0001781433,0.000004973806,0.0006813979,0.9962643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001359489,0.0004603881,0.0003332874,0.001142261,0.00429193,0.00000943436,0.000007551108,0.000071536,0.9923241],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4059656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2348868337","doi":"10.1093/isr/viw006","title":"Sites of Knowledge (Re-)Production: Toward an Institutional Sociology of International Relations Scholarship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Knowledge production; Production (economics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law; Knowledge management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3589413862487278,"gpt":0.4929407776175398,"spread":0.133999391368812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002796351,0.0001002053,0.0003041739,0.00006709414,0.0002440385,0.000005876401,0.0004855751,0.00009035793,0.00351342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01198729,0.00006965888,0.000151199,0.0001460117,0.001811629,0.0008412168,0.0001278345,0.0001409689,0.000117079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001669694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001743004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002157776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005663371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979857,0.0007682616,0.0005259321,0.0002369276,0.0003685294,0.00011464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969688,0.001173806,0.0003978426,0.0001306869,0.001278813,0.00005001742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007884235,0.0002971366,0.03311409,0.0001672024,0.0006512274,0.000002707794,0.007314309,0.000002425214,0.000346365,0.8933053,0.006696138,0.05802424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002455016,0.00007385614,0.01309367,0.001063746,0.00005524421,0.000003385567,0.001670917,6.07838e-7,0.00008598973,0.05258048,0.9309832,0.0001433872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08984207,0.3838406,0.0004695446,0.1488317,0.005817906,0.0007202576,0.0001512046,0.0001065697,0.3702201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518809,0.1440837,0.0003246522,0.0003076067,0.0005093037,0.00002811231,0.00001776533,0.000003169421,0.002844788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9242871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1890099060","doi":"10.29173/cjs6308","title":"Rethinking Burawoy: Reflections from Canadian Feminist Sociology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Public sociology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.142043850576862,"gpt":0.3764269827375334,"spread":0.2343831321606714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004542305,0.000137973,0.0003344845,0.0001532506,0.004306827,0.00008205652,0.0008030893,0.0006199594,0.001370537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002520801,0.000105939,0.0001962358,0.0001605752,0.003319358,0.000193871,0.000008583102,0.001487242,0.00007319268],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008060085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007485426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6563638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.953584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958415,0.002763957,0.0004176543,0.0001642953,0.0001396467,0.0006729233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962251,0.00204496,0.0003951993,0.0001915544,0.0002259027,0.0009173001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197145,0.000009260028,0.004808447,5.350677e-7,0.0001157944,0.0002281651,0.2926559,0.000009960045,0.00005919469,0.6904986,0.008896715,0.002675484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001058331,0.0001273721,0.005377091,0.000006500366,0.00002889225,0.00002533934,0.01209199,5.508819e-7,0.00000211833,0.5937844,0.3883575,0.00009245667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4466813,0.003161679,0.00004704873,0.29292,0.002324754,0.0001910165,0.00004308234,0.00002815969,0.254603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754515,0.0001005713,0.0001673184,0.02199329,0.001593042,0.000001485042,0.000006233018,0.000007517078,0.0006790013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5287703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591385052","doi":"10.1007/s12108-009-9066-1","title":"Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life:","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social science; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2078560232018531,"gpt":0.4346645197056171,"spread":0.226808496503764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007371927,0.00009476075,0.0002741754,0.00001022296,0.002589321,0.00002783154,0.00105835,0.00004271143,0.00008012586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003573156,0.00004851205,0.0000922666,0.0003169125,0.006313088,0.00009836766,0.00007883557,0.000748809,0.00001511942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003137271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007807744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002717891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984599,0.01467078,0.0002363217,0.00009259967,0.00017867,0.0002226554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917123,0.007213774,0.000488774,0.0004692533,0.00006183942,0.00005407097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002481016,0.0008211436,0.01864263,0.000001261574,0.0001262661,0.000002721031,0.8109587,0.00001994063,0.00008435029,0.08998298,0.004550588,0.07456136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223169,0.0008270437,0.09358523,0.000001582092,0.00002397015,3.268227e-7,0.8642953,6.310588e-7,0.00000285413,0.02307563,0.01798505,0.00008009682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388422,0.0001983365,0.00001896495,0.02037071,0.00007165697,0.0003256432,0.000002386792,0.00006685393,0.04010324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926313,0.0001419501,0.00001342988,0.006808128,0.0001586188,0.0000107387,9.776277e-7,0.000003060917,0.0002317984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0749426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025208995","doi":"10.1080/0158037x.2010.488370","title":"The Routledge companion to social theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Continuing Education","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social theory; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Media studies; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0819796623974761,"gpt":0.4578253936101195,"spread":0.3758457312126434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004958301,0.0000616222,0.0001030946,0.00002596303,0.001131996,0.00006403123,0.000209627,0.00006275632,0.00003012269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006905102,0.0000450333,0.00003444926,0.0001997029,0.000478577,0.0001449601,0.00005531479,0.0002847723,0.00003434589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005646393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008317155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009131472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985603,0.0008571598,0.0001513517,0.0001343611,0.0001127109,0.0001840805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967692,0.002878016,0.00007832678,0.00009876532,0.0001409529,0.00003474648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002642312,0.00003318619,0.002720473,0.000001928502,0.000008541878,1.843958e-7,0.2017321,7.709594e-8,0.00009632456,0.6044148,0.003969449,0.1869965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005748962,0.00001051951,0.01087624,0.00001598243,0.000005196695,1.720027e-7,0.2866635,2.81124e-7,0.000008533921,0.1366161,0.5656686,0.00007746905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8757415,0.0008094733,0.00001832381,0.01483373,0.005434724,0.0002935888,8.089843e-7,0.00004440239,0.1028235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930217,0.0001224308,0.00007266781,0.000339624,0.001262123,0.00006730882,7.946642e-7,0.000003760461,0.005109582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.870651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486807964","doi":"10.29173/cjs6311","title":"Drifting Apart? The Institutional Dynamics Awaiting Public Sociology in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Sociology; Limiting; Positivism; Public sociology; Historical sociology; Social science; Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06053832312583812,"gpt":0.2940811175533248,"spread":0.2335427944274867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00633821,0.0001023829,0.0002457466,0.00006733383,0.002531971,0.00004832123,0.0007780977,0.0002009536,0.0002219343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003625256,0.00006433687,0.00009135014,0.0001698749,0.002575458,0.0002351473,0.00001507089,0.001280113,0.000005161749],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002051432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02203419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8708644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959362,0.00276866,0.0004358405,0.0001075741,0.0001722241,0.0005794619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963493,0.002683737,0.00040702,0.0001109162,0.0001763487,0.0002726466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001289329,0.000005510237,0.03182624,7.339202e-7,0.00002939953,0.0001420312,0.02041729,0.0001391416,0.000002166021,0.9412217,0.0007256054,0.005477338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482894,0.000131938,0.09871764,0.00002175974,0.00002631347,0.0001697488,0.1047252,0.0001739462,7.961907e-7,0.6110178,0.1843163,0.0002502486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7158407,0.001079727,0.00003595337,0.2506668,0.0006989358,0.0001019264,0.000007064078,0.000004308197,0.0315646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870894,0.00005025938,0.00002265565,0.01217664,0.0005615102,0.000001636763,0.000003298281,0.000003377665,0.000091197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3302039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490827655","doi":"10.1111/cars.12038","title":"Committing Canadian Sociology: Developing a Canadian Sociology and a Sociology of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Entitlement (fair division); Historical sociology; Sociology of disaster; Sociological imagination; Social science; Government (linguistics); Globalization; Medical sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06601282709286664,"gpt":0.2998325660563306,"spread":0.233819738963464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01442096,0.0007281625,0.002362599,0.0005351827,0.002759813,0.00001761836,0.001637213,0.002318638,0.0007673071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02047572,0.0007863725,0.0004340113,0.00033253,0.01452573,0.0002271732,0.0001303255,0.001943374,0.00001907401],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008577839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05625803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859072,0.006900601,0.001584972,0.001102963,0.0001614108,0.004342838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866306,0.006402413,0.001095206,0.0007614417,0.0008590898,0.004251293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002107737,0.00001522108,0.09195699,0.001646783,0.0004808916,0.0001730126,0.08467667,0.00000864686,0.00004370829,0.7968782,0.01984378,0.004255082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008223728,0.0004194208,0.07454447,0.001708778,0.0003252245,0.00007532719,0.0903457,0.00004402115,0.000007247091,0.2395914,0.5903105,0.001805537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8063815,0.04079618,0.00004605519,0.1129244,0.001452576,0.001425157,0.0008169176,0.00008310656,0.03607417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504267,0.008767427,0.0006576817,0.03885633,0.0005113757,0.0001267166,0.0002369042,0.00006075521,0.0003561073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5704667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}