{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":945,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":9,"predictions_cover":945,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2a8bd04c42e9","filters":{"topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property"}},"results":[{"id":"W3123243604","doi":"10.1287/mksc.2017.1051","title":"Changing Their Tune: How Consumers’ Adoption of Online Streaming Affects Music Consumption and Discovery","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":273,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Active listening; Consumption (sociology); Music industry; Early adopter; Digital audio; Purchasing; Diversity (politics); Set (abstract data type); Advertising; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Telecommunications; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03567042852066848,"gpt":0.2389141279069903,"spread":0.2032436993863218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803348,0.0001291325,0.0001493829,0.0002857198,0.001087075,0.001311158,0.0003602016,0.00003000356,0.00007514809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001909607,0.00009543072,0.0000339264,0.0002229466,0.0007427986,0.003391537,0.0004693122,0.0000901342,0.000007031848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002082849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002574845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007932508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007725487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990216,0.00001571173,0.0001124,0.0003196886,0.0002349127,0.000295653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991178,0.0001384885,0.0003098808,0.0002938644,0.0001262202,0.00001377107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002788123,0.0001713178,0.2481963,0.001395109,0.00003079271,0.000008791455,0.0008383387,0.000004504123,0.2739629,0.001108532,0.00149952,0.4725051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005953605,0.00002757288,0.865542,0.001129581,0.00004498577,0.000005785059,0.001721352,0.1228516,0.005322227,0.0001542922,0.002165306,0.0004399813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923753,0.00009451967,0.0002207625,0.0003361591,0.0003560785,0.000154211,0.000002529705,0.00003847612,0.006422002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991981,0.00003499743,0.0001270783,0.00009548086,0.0001890941,0.000002603091,0.000005104263,0.000009069729,0.0003384432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6173458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987624537","doi":"10.1108/07363760510623939","title":"Purchasing pirated software: an initial examination of Chinese consumers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Marketing; Originality; Exploratory research; Business; Value (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Software; Advertising; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02325018238294093,"gpt":0.2571541231995911,"spread":0.2339039408166502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002837715,0.0001818091,0.0003404797,0.0004825283,0.0001492155,0.0001875375,0.0002531187,0.00007546553,0.001897773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00354225,0.0001365795,0.0001238595,0.0004287149,0.0001145946,0.002478651,0.00007415797,0.0002792606,0.00003221629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004036225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006651565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004231533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002992865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982949,0.0001153248,0.0008276007,0.0001441604,0.0003929484,0.0002250543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974576,0.0003750963,0.0009976249,0.0001343404,0.001007218,0.00002816508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001235626,0.0003244135,0.05494571,0.0002734626,0.0001783743,0.00002896521,0.0005150043,0.00004272725,0.01258653,0.00003844293,0.004567374,0.9252633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01061942,0.0004053946,0.508674,0.001976132,0.0008914366,0.0004283198,0.001754767,0.1475174,0.006443122,0.00100257,0.318063,0.002224429],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809895,0.0005609723,0.0007347331,0.0001796115,0.0003964834,0.0001035031,9.620131e-7,0.00003584862,0.01699844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972391,0.00003346149,0.001368181,0.0003478242,0.0008996671,9.245871e-7,0.000004908178,0.00002702548,0.00007892486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.923039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969041768","doi":"10.1007/s10603-005-8489-5","title":"Music Piracy on the Web – How Effective are Anti-Piracy Arguments? Evidence from the Theory of Planned Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Policy","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of planned behavior; Perception; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Control (management)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04505258074671258,"gpt":0.2623569664546328,"spread":0.2173043857079202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086232,0.000237039,0.0003700719,0.0002507482,0.0002639423,0.0003272148,0.0007492047,0.00006726223,0.001524967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002638522,0.0001090832,0.0002622883,0.0003974313,0.0002038632,0.001267801,0.0001554473,0.0004901742,0.000214788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006038135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001058679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003914876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009158463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984784,0.0001630678,0.0004438139,0.0001685678,0.0004744992,0.0002716666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964033,0.001700849,0.001074459,0.0003709781,0.0004260732,0.00002436138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002242121,0.0007726784,0.1627373,0.00009368423,0.0009402874,0.00004497088,0.002607161,0.00002971967,0.009450079,0.00446236,0.7014858,0.1151339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003646413,0.0004616676,0.6359394,0.003448567,0.001304403,0.00004877253,0.003194639,0.002490491,0.0130952,0.009546799,0.3258944,0.0009292732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654598,0.001471281,0.00003582948,0.02828388,0.000319165,0.0003650108,0.00001032213,0.00001685349,0.004037813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897156,0.0002003338,0.0000130744,0.00688306,0.002810132,0.0000069774,0.00000121424,0.00002452214,0.0003450354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4732021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242991768","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495274","title":"The Internationalisation of Copyright Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Copyright law; Cyberspace; Negotiation; Law; Political science; Public domain; Fair use; Intellectual property; Law and economics; History; Sociology; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01946574442339229,"gpt":0.1782659613221221,"spread":0.1588002168987299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001441015,0.0002201014,0.0002250227,0.0001343503,0.000352946,0.0001832548,0.0006630223,0.0001590791,0.00003495857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002098678,0.0001675836,0.0001777024,0.00002294546,0.0003744552,0.0003422796,0.0003472988,0.0002395439,0.00005037471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001469621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006621846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002652233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000903461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990162,0.000013847,0.0002279915,0.0002530886,0.0003148291,0.0001740855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987164,0.0001047857,0.0003819294,0.0003208111,0.0004665984,0.000009455837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004319156,0.000005499965,6.01203e-7,0.00004831711,0.00003269636,0.000004547771,0.000003236858,5.845985e-7,0.000008610077,0.4998455,0.4997798,0.0002274168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000265643,0.000007210654,0.000009345205,0.00009232121,0.0001170227,7.329549e-7,0.000008186083,0.001580863,0.0001625588,0.0002692067,0.9972803,0.000206614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004888877,0.00008304056,0.0002065989,0.00004231346,0.0004397374,0.0002818817,0.00002998336,0.00007551662,0.9987921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007019049,0.000009780285,0.000007243405,0.0001760666,0.000776724,7.910742e-7,0.0001837078,0.00002684744,0.9917998],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4995763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6833859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082569744","doi":"10.1007/s00191-010-0173-5","title":"Don’t blame the P2P file-sharers: the impact of free music downloads on the purchase of music CDs in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Economics","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Industry Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Music industry; Population; Mainstream; File sharing; Blame; Economics; Advertising; Business; Marketing; Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02268439235208419,"gpt":0.1945551867161793,"spread":0.1718707943640951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005943599,0.0001546891,0.0002605582,0.0001481686,0.0001466436,0.00005440542,0.0009573111,0.0000492052,0.0180455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005667862,0.00006736677,0.000243396,0.0002199214,0.0001629732,0.000529696,0.0001778142,0.0005520689,0.00001792539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002503687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007435411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2605729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2683611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988668,0.00002589776,0.0006389282,0.000107525,0.0001587324,0.0002021069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998053,0.0004668224,0.0008013972,0.0004395485,0.0002223393,0.00001686428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931951,0.0001173316,0.004160256,0.00001742636,0.0001304486,0.000004878716,0.0002053301,0.002778107,0.0004756921,0.001333782,0.9889398,0.001543728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002550373,0.0004358846,0.4755291,0.0002849131,0.0001852119,0.0001246184,0.004245716,0.2993667,0.0003609647,0.02726202,0.1889807,0.0006738663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850597,0.0001078363,0.000001950421,0.003508066,0.0005581946,0.0001766183,0.0001007814,0.000002347617,0.01048455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982964,0.00002819356,0.00001132599,0.0006880841,0.0008730746,0.000004101455,0.000008989798,0.00001220377,0.00007760667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7999592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168122477","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2014.1932","title":"Counterfeiters: Foes or Friends? How Counterfeits Affect Sales by Product Quality Tier","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfeit; Advertising; Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Intellectual property; Commerce; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03580641358997975,"gpt":0.2669227558244642,"spread":0.2311163422344845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002461935,0.0003482324,0.0003052198,0.0004219004,0.0007041697,0.002253763,0.001339087,0.00003721607,0.001119087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003872124,0.0002294226,0.00008185766,0.001471734,0.0006316866,0.003849612,0.0007700123,0.0001419699,0.001143177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008843357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001847482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001564734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008009293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968217,0.00003338272,0.0003179482,0.001039782,0.001046099,0.000741093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986578,0.00006698722,0.0002310939,0.000768584,0.0002352249,0.00004035947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002342783,0.0003038625,0.004666811,0.0008121883,0.0000763932,0.000009233396,0.0002355749,0.000007531699,0.005595122,0.01653391,0.9260088,0.04551635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006493652,0.00007226392,0.006123618,0.0001298729,0.00007172695,0.000001723887,0.0004191379,0.02049349,0.001431753,0.0007398411,0.969156,0.000711243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.267385,0.0003183569,0.01221361,0.008335626,0.003298964,0.001900873,0.00001160763,0.0008927859,0.7056432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774593,0.00001903567,0.0001694404,0.003076548,0.0005697901,0.00004929272,0.00001929609,0.00002890193,0.01860847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7100742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568261724","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2012v37n3a2544","title":"The Firm Foundation of Organizational Flexibility: The 360 Contract in the Digitalizing Music Industry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Music industry; Flexibility (engineering); Profitability index; Context (archaeology); Commodity; Devaluation; Publishing; Foundation (evidence); Business; Economics; Visual arts; Management; Art; Finance; Music education; Political science; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05999673943429537,"gpt":0.2478533154472069,"spread":0.1878565760129116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001718712,0.0000599465,0.00007798032,0.00009423705,0.000457283,0.0003128821,0.0007208431,0.00005079704,0.0004476208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00107139,0.0000288201,0.00003817294,0.0004084818,0.0001503623,0.001141365,0.00003323342,0.0003731046,0.00001601716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007019077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001989296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004475747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02449422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992588,0.00007715081,0.0003353803,0.00003311861,0.0001550996,0.0001404908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985694,0.0003584417,0.0003386887,0.0003351828,0.0003808108,0.00001751093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001450941,0.0002779977,0.4964383,0.00006772421,0.0001872118,0.000002770986,0.01774173,0.0002262396,0.0003417539,0.1913741,0.1477656,0.1454314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003551979,0.00001748439,0.3408987,0.0001197531,0.00005495474,0.00002178215,0.004396465,0.003702923,0.00005835977,0.0128586,0.6373795,0.0001362541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304994,0.002308318,0.00008484472,0.01604822,0.0003288709,0.0002429266,0.000001107219,0.000004292557,0.05048203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985014,0.00002414024,0.00000905569,0.001089986,0.0003092285,0.000002006795,0.000009477021,0.000006604042,0.00004813413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4896139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123320666","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2562","title":"Intellectual Property Strategy and the Long Tail: Evidence from the Recorded Music Industry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Music industry; Digitization; Digital rights management; Exploit; Profitability index; Long tail; Intellectual property; Business; Entrepreneurship; Digital audio; Natural experiment; Marketing; Advertising; Computer science; Art; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06448597985767211,"gpt":0.2373312128762174,"spread":0.1728452330185453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918262,0.0002182045,0.0001646146,0.0001327335,0.0009864274,0.001327153,0.001546839,0.00005541068,0.004261794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001387528,0.00006790661,0.00005203423,0.001176322,0.00200897,0.002506501,0.001409259,0.000258715,0.0007540117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004859319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003280233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001545563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003447176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980007,0.00004156154,0.0002770759,0.0006349238,0.0005947516,0.000450957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.0005271668,0.000131933,0.0006328607,0.0001448151,0.00002331175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005436594,0.00007433758,0.006674775,0.00006686537,0.00007743313,0.00001883769,0.001104583,0.000008685178,0.001250647,0.01243007,0.3257056,0.6520445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005136186,0.0001541405,0.1176812,0.002248746,0.0003758007,0.00001099546,0.006160307,0.07794306,0.001365063,0.02986873,0.7571799,0.001875821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6556184,0.0007063905,0.003669871,0.03134636,0.00122592,0.001975338,0.000001784072,0.0002598052,0.3051962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814419,0.0001735694,0.00003502931,0.00352903,0.0004879937,0.00005019355,5.754445e-7,0.00001374257,0.01426798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6501686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549626762","doi":"","title":"Fear, Hope, and Longing for the Future of Authorship and a Revitalized Public Domain in Global Regimes of Intellectual Property","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Intellectual property; Censorship; Law and economics; Political science; Appeal; Human rights; Privilege (computing); Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01674690342175443,"gpt":0.229183866320773,"spread":0.2124369628990186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002850428,0.0001631092,0.0002874404,0.0001578652,0.000191595,0.0001633201,0.0002073481,0.00007751317,0.00009671126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009714147,0.00008223007,0.00008407893,0.0005365299,0.0001373626,0.000545145,0.00006677303,0.0005415033,0.000001455299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003622128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000122754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001073132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998351,0.00006011467,0.0003672439,0.0001889309,0.0001720317,0.0008606992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993021,0.0001329606,0.0002249635,0.0001254774,0.0001973709,0.00001715415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001311822,0.0002115625,0.01125684,0.0004619303,0.0003708707,0.000002795683,0.001390811,0.000002716216,0.0006089405,0.7931005,0.009411091,0.1818701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004033755,0.0004203202,0.001164231,0.0002891751,0.00016588,0.000318549,0.01032269,0.003900888,0.0001528366,0.7340205,0.2446967,0.0005144551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9107926,0.06128129,0.007588363,0.006450023,0.0003479132,0.001081117,0.000002389977,0.00002864048,0.01242761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959809,0.002881424,0.000117933,0.0001275376,0.0002438686,0.00000832043,0.000001150025,0.00001546837,0.0006233518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2352856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3353245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166327137","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Associations and the Economic Viability of Open Access Publishing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The Internet; Electronic publishing; Library science; World Wide Web; Work (physics); Open access publishing; Political science; Internet privacy; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03405644910755814,"gpt":0.2206875827826972,"spread":0.1866311336751391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002816466,0.0001021741,0.0002412436,0.000147068,0.0001866602,0.00783709,0.001900562,0.00005708919,0.004167784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002035085,0.00008238412,0.00009357547,0.0002765333,0.0002748363,0.1349008,0.00338772,0.0001502381,0.0001799859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003654838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007577596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001466548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009434899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993387,0.00001619924,0.0001769273,0.0002136556,0.0001208665,0.0001336375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992399,0.0001580062,0.0002668168,0.0002420763,0.00007553618,0.0000177303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005623024,0.0002039928,0.4951756,0.0001128032,0.0001765123,0.000001446856,0.0001855244,0.00002944188,0.000003426224,0.06968967,0.3877925,0.04606682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002367214,0.00002023314,0.2887442,0.00004350405,0.0000728415,7.121516e-7,0.0002849748,0.01342735,0.0000506362,0.02954858,0.665132,0.000307839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.446913,0.00005839753,0.0000266761,0.008499088,0.00004601108,0.0002747418,0.00007911246,0.00005130684,0.5440516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935297,0.00001478756,0.00007227093,0.0005300991,0.0001350894,1.330681e-7,0.00006732218,0.000009797688,0.005640807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902644089","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198806936.001.0001","title":"The Parody Exception in Copyright Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Intellectual property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0174484635457135,"gpt":0.1955985961035925,"spread":0.178150132557879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003456121,0.0002989562,0.0002932612,0.0001455049,0.0002271645,0.0006458209,0.0004794226,0.0002381317,0.01867366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003867389,0.0001566335,0.0001356383,0.0001265741,0.0001210835,0.0006979189,0.000233292,0.0004254106,0.02265462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001122083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006009107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000838083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004037931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986459,0.000008214201,0.0003685665,0.0003619588,0.0002956488,0.000319699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.0001115517,0.0001673033,0.0004437267,0.0001344245,0.000006460628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003043072,0.00001260422,0.000009851243,0.00006231555,0.00001203168,0.000002099602,0.000009504063,5.074459e-7,0.000005104846,0.1646616,0.831993,0.003201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001988439,0.000008271023,0.00002600964,0.00009218723,0.00002096815,4.061125e-7,0.000009678842,0.002371652,0.000005468695,0.04637051,0.9506131,0.0002828752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003667707,0.000321038,0.00002590844,0.000645281,0.001187472,0.000512741,8.758141e-7,0.0001066444,0.9971634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02625812,0.00009370124,0.000002713096,0.003156515,0.002146185,0.00001852365,0.00009524398,0.00005037654,0.9681786],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1186202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060600872","doi":"10.1353/bh.2013.0010","title":"Copyright and Intellectual Property: The State of the Discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Book history","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Sociology; Law; Fair use; Law and economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01754622164460531,"gpt":0.1698384767907178,"spread":0.1522922551461124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001461553,0.0001299107,0.000135328,0.00005692099,0.0002147335,0.0000610693,0.0003368047,0.00002569691,0.009724922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001480904,0.00004693984,0.00006377495,0.00009872743,0.0004528003,0.0005685512,0.0003084692,0.0001514071,0.0005446057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006651373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009705888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001092579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992778,0.00001579041,0.0002065497,0.0001683721,0.0001716752,0.0001598226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993868,0.00006127123,0.0001106432,0.0002970033,0.0001349597,0.000009248291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002074845,0.00002461385,0.00004777237,0.00003683018,0.00001289114,2.391216e-7,0.0009214846,7.306932e-7,0.001413238,0.0001764577,0.987348,0.009997056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001253585,0.00001195218,0.0007380102,0.00003005633,0.00001953955,0.000001161612,0.0000623312,0.009809826,0.000222299,0.0007578651,0.9881133,0.0001083348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1675722,0.01398658,0.0002059675,0.006632861,0.001717131,0.001669439,0.000002236691,0.0001609009,0.8080527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8318843,0.00007858553,0.00001086553,0.004201147,0.0002991643,0.00003008664,0.0000017923,0.0000261806,0.1634679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6643121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546848542","doi":"10.1002/cb.1526","title":"Download or stream? Steal or buy? Developing a typology of today's music consumer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Download; Popularity; Digital audio; Identity (music); Advertising; Sociology; Psychographic; Preference; Consumption (sociology); Morality; Music industry; Business; Marketing; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Economics; Music education; Art; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1138917720948135,"gpt":0.2905890106886885,"spread":0.176697238593875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006433545,0.0002554059,0.0006118719,0.0004631844,0.00009199696,0.0001247714,0.0004158575,0.0001436083,0.005571185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007068528,0.0001501163,0.0001577181,0.0004415382,0.0001876306,0.0009158195,0.0001720019,0.0003488347,0.0003026816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007373804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006327069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005763163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005189241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.00004230594,0.0009581655,0.0001925836,0.0004422861,0.0003486603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972709,0.0001280496,0.0008855178,0.000218506,0.001433995,0.00006306408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006017441,0.0007118376,0.1567105,0.0002603495,0.0005263269,0.0006998818,0.0009605405,0.000005090458,0.001315637,0.0005021714,0.7575828,0.0747074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01669547,0.00136817,0.04029094,0.001305268,0.002597345,0.001794836,0.007097379,0.0007235331,0.005993944,0.001703779,0.9182584,0.002170965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897037,0.0008787947,0.0002955035,0.0007552343,0.001607094,0.0002336278,0.00000905016,0.00003564344,0.006481315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970673,0.00008050167,0.0006480178,0.0007154831,0.0004255527,0.000003693693,0.00000608431,0.00002424375,0.001029077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1606756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109086849","doi":"","title":"The impact of music downloads and P2P file-sharing on the purchase of music in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Music industry; Upload; File sharing; Download; Advertising; Business; Free riding; Population; Incentive; Computer science; Economics; Music education; World Wide Web; Art; Visual arts; The Internet; Microeconomics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03230986514137032,"gpt":0.1766851656581667,"spread":0.1443753005167964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001696048,0.0001386465,0.0002301827,0.0001425096,0.0002519467,0.00001461747,0.0004232003,0.00003740717,0.004028057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001090865,0.00008573711,0.00009897802,0.0003665719,0.000250483,0.0002678328,0.0002632399,0.0001471399,0.00001374505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001903706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8368859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5294126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991807,0.00001800374,0.0001888532,0.000180992,0.0002252195,0.0002062806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991757,0.0001931433,0.0002197184,0.0002903316,0.000104621,0.00001649439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003558209,0.0006875449,0.1551093,0.0005490535,0.000435049,0.0002418847,0.004971083,0.0008235761,0.007345399,0.003783663,0.7953573,0.02713798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004774887,0.0004334297,0.8639659,0.0005648385,0.0001454568,0.00001601032,0.009170455,0.05056224,0.001706932,0.000964556,0.06676316,0.000932154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841959,0.0001033809,0.000004892122,0.0002472583,0.00005143415,0.0001930304,0.00002411595,0.000009014844,0.01517096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991338,0.00007245711,0.000005753906,0.00006837466,0.00003794264,2.994497e-7,0.000008959844,0.000008175832,0.0006642358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142384719","doi":"","title":"Reconstructing the Author-Self: Some Feminist Lessons for Copyright Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Creativity; Subjectivity; Embeddedness; Epistemology; Individualism; Law; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05515060385463672,"gpt":0.2801106841965684,"spread":0.2249600803419317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128037,0.000192302,0.0001824866,0.00009308542,0.001025826,0.0005601274,0.0003841529,0.00008712901,0.002877432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001594459,0.0001062803,0.0001416008,0.0002605951,0.0001511029,0.0008527749,0.0001384341,0.0001722406,0.0005456684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003083017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001784268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000476056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004475481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986932,0.000005432606,0.0003589306,0.0003008799,0.0001714283,0.0004701749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990934,0.0003107114,0.0001397711,0.0002794049,0.0001594736,0.00001725947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005561464,0.00003980929,0.000168126,0.00004973452,0.00003238542,0.000001804283,0.0001274411,2.08239e-7,0.0002831472,0.8014124,0.1882409,0.009588412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003147045,0.00001346371,0.00005828389,0.00001902375,0.00004621151,0.000005845496,0.0006841891,0.01176927,0.002083772,0.02718153,0.9575779,0.0002458472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01069921,0.0000840572,0.002456453,0.007947485,0.001377931,0.0005529965,0.000002288778,0.000406778,0.9764728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796157,0.000002324545,0.001028799,0.008504663,0.002722634,0.00002022598,0.000009591294,0.00003422465,0.00806182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121980039","doi":"","title":"Feist Goes Global: A Comparative Analysis Of The Notion Of Originality In Copyright Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Misappropriation; Copyright law; Political science; Intellectual property; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02948704350710528,"gpt":0.2516740022383181,"spread":0.2221869587312128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006640098,0.000126701,0.0003577015,0.0001722337,0.0001356646,0.00006057202,0.0003461136,0.00004413418,0.000901901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004649516,0.00007423155,0.0002419501,0.001868441,0.0001443746,0.0004801099,0.00005567709,0.0005024789,0.00002502201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003909421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009160515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004584707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03145216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983931,0.00004455653,0.0004269718,0.0001418013,0.0002810375,0.0007125315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991781,0.00002780654,0.0003904761,0.0001715474,0.0002235412,0.00000850839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002371282,0.0007058601,0.04955317,0.00005389375,0.001488874,0.000001400802,0.0004948165,0.0003864433,0.0004561915,0.9404582,0.003204389,0.002959674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004006703,0.0004080447,0.1147896,0.0002993521,0.00410711,0.00003965044,0.004146358,0.3550652,0.001705555,0.4012915,0.113004,0.001137091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8541764,0.001121584,0.0003788429,0.0006792098,0.0001508976,0.0001474437,0.000003011107,0.00001293768,0.1433297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991981,0.0001719341,0.000005449487,0.0001316481,0.0001167285,0.000001469123,0.00000260513,0.000004144766,0.0003679682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5391667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117275881","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.011","title":"Effect of peer influence on unauthorized music downloading and sharing: The moderating role of self-construal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Upload; Psychology; Construal level theory; Normative; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Differential (mechanical device); Control (management); Association (psychology); Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03628548221982215,"gpt":0.2950475911603009,"spread":0.2587621089404787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006781462,0.0001386666,0.000386012,0.0005320315,0.0002920511,0.0002904929,0.000477293,0.00006634799,0.0001762304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004531075,0.00007373729,0.00007822455,0.0008765003,0.0002137828,0.0007978179,0.0003174023,0.0005721595,0.00001007233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002650358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005918546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002161187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006214024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978517,0.0001342826,0.0005184129,0.000166675,0.001060594,0.0002683497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954796,0.0009882982,0.0004024192,0.0002192235,0.002889431,0.00002101371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007261121,0.0008072655,0.1017855,0.006209418,0.0006274205,0.00003666735,0.003965877,0.00452065,0.5549102,0.02300131,0.01412406,0.2827505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006604403,0.00179879,0.07754149,0.003066444,0.0002864125,0.00009177278,0.001169507,0.8215871,0.05645694,0.0138531,0.01683086,0.0007132122],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843062,0.0001016547,0.00009857606,0.0005479597,0.0001050453,0.0001839473,3.861239e-7,0.000009302876,0.01464688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992536,0.00001532366,0.00007679541,0.00004415941,0.0005284885,0.000003056921,5.822823e-7,0.00001509443,0.00006288477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8170664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5424448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041468707","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.02.011","title":"The Copyright Librarian: A Study of Advertising Trends for the Period 2006–2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scholarly communication; Officer; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08036968015808808,"gpt":0.2684322547940843,"spread":0.1880625746359962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003223623,0.0002392194,0.0003615357,0.0002074615,0.0006934441,0.0004851033,0.002150177,0.0001319013,0.0003556415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055981,0.00008986325,0.0001961328,0.0007549332,0.0002318037,0.003357193,0.000300847,0.0009614493,0.0000267652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002651159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000137916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002543659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977557,0.0001490417,0.0009548174,0.0001427077,0.0006221556,0.0003755815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970337,0.001160151,0.001011151,0.0004225936,0.0003291431,0.00004322682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002498567,0.0001261353,0.001634272,0.00002910718,0.0002857749,0.000003171824,0.005606197,0.0001399609,0.0001486737,0.002491202,0.9701582,0.01687877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004126077,0.0006630428,0.004152233,0.0001643744,0.0008505789,0.00007042773,0.02204826,0.02451101,0.000358028,0.01769784,0.9249943,0.0003637499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6276444,0.03598421,0.003495981,0.2189643,0.008325445,0.003200014,0.00001454813,0.0002033464,0.1021678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990829,0.0001777044,0.00003644079,0.001331737,0.003796966,0.00001078084,0.000001281034,0.0000445182,0.003771571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3631846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5333481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310702759","doi":"10.1126/science.add6124","title":"Legal reform to enhance global text and data mining research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Arcadia Fund","keywords":"Data science; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170491795488974,"gpt":0.3837274246046699,"spread":0.2666782450557725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654906,0.00005999578,0.00006297813,0.0001674274,0.001458507,0.0006916334,0.001516195,0.000007777671,0.001156917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000553515,0.00004596022,0.000007017092,0.00245556,0.0002905354,0.002159698,0.005834396,0.0001323333,0.0002232766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001040769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001827513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002534212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998261,0.000008418304,0.0001002666,0.0005169499,0.0007402668,0.0003731253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993061,0.00001793032,0.0000237928,0.0004831863,0.0001463718,0.00002255167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001608286,0.0001045823,0.002460151,0.00005157081,0.000005437455,0.00002736367,0.0005737377,0.000006077198,0.01646097,0.01486855,0.5837862,0.3814945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004869844,0.00003590347,0.001812812,0.00001017633,0.000001824819,0.000004725532,0.001318087,0.02445554,0.0003067894,0.0006203686,0.971263,0.0001220809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5494626,0.0001194365,0.00004466734,0.003151437,0.0003736584,0.0001459618,0.000005470462,0.0000397797,0.4466569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953571,0.000001994506,0.0002010035,0.001313676,0.0002361475,0.000009152842,0.000003697624,0.00000382076,0.002873394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292754537","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2015-0004","title":"File Sharing and Film Revenues: Estimates of Sales Displacement at the Box Office","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Film industry; Download; File sharing; Panel data; Box office; Endogeneity; Business; Upload; The Internet; Advertising; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03588416493664867,"gpt":0.2642055462238092,"spread":0.2283213812871605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008969742,0.0001107491,0.0003071759,0.0002648177,0.0001374065,0.0001084857,0.000398178,0.00002230594,0.002372013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002905825,0.0000557015,0.0001656215,0.00025252,0.0001170534,0.0003877953,0.0002870155,0.00009102579,0.0001510929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009279217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004372927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003296594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007744362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992075,0.00001695543,0.0004430625,0.00009232747,0.0001001341,0.0001399945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988061,0.000160997,0.000671797,0.0002371368,0.0001032846,0.00002063922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008062241,0.000101157,0.03681061,0.00008756347,0.003368198,0.000002735972,0.00237661,0.01096875,0.0004889694,0.002761346,0.9399585,0.002269311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001878942,0.0001966946,0.03679249,0.0002541995,0.00884713,0.0000556623,0.004606431,0.6615007,0.0009855598,0.023563,0.2605799,0.0007393549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810539,0.001145435,0.0001236821,0.002922924,0.00006765571,0.00008555618,0.00001568356,0.000006450186,0.01457867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969959,0.0001084799,0.00002569691,0.0003699013,0.0006533476,0.000001274249,0.00001235718,0.000009726432,0.001823309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6793787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W199809674","doi":"","title":"The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers: An International and Comparative Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral rights; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Jurisprudence; Reservation of rights; Convention; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04734766415293932,"gpt":0.2539726907372569,"spread":0.2066250265843176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001907413,0.0002010443,0.000332928,0.0003308962,0.0002568849,0.0004131741,0.0002206677,0.0000964843,0.0017076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001070923,0.0001050743,0.00009341038,0.0001497177,0.0002596544,0.0007761124,0.000143742,0.000157994,0.00002052917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000208987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001739641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001551049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002826524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.000007633224,0.0002846843,0.0002673748,0.0002281371,0.000123083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993169,0.00006008124,0.0002125914,0.0001598834,0.0002396443,0.00001088777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002120419,0.00008336297,0.003551516,0.00009288634,0.002069814,0.000003057291,0.0003651322,0.00001414945,0.000008794282,0.1918994,0.7958142,0.005885698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001830121,0.00002613584,0.003337596,0.00002356411,0.0006518263,6.201672e-7,0.00009405015,0.1031576,0.000008873148,0.01165531,0.880616,0.0002453866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009187427,0.000139296,0.00004118567,0.0001070563,0.0001489484,0.0001410709,0.000005411516,0.00002389294,0.9902057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4128582,0.00002234074,0.00003843231,0.00007123237,0.0004477206,0.00000305076,0.0001785125,0.000006177496,0.5863743],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4038313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97815909","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2515581","title":"Intellectual Property Strategy and the Long Tail: Evidence from the Recorded Music Industry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Music industry; Business; Property (philosophy); History; Law and economics; Accounting; Financial economics; Economics; Political science; Visual arts; Law; Art; Music education; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03362550997402094,"gpt":0.2203670288174931,"spread":0.1867415188434721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003520859,0.0002600009,0.0002587172,0.00007430237,0.0008953911,0.001023053,0.000788755,0.000149984,0.001918066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002493313,0.00009845787,0.0001184391,0.000371846,0.0003320866,0.00115194,0.0002459782,0.003758992,0.0002563532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004156877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00366022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006891776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975219,0.0001620959,0.0003752234,0.0003127877,0.0003321196,0.001295855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984199,0.0007907028,0.000237237,0.0003191792,0.0002107244,0.00002220739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002700868,0.0001335833,0.00625273,0.00004462797,0.000636408,0.000006488362,0.002250153,0.00004819757,0.0004666147,0.04874852,0.1525549,0.7861569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005743824,0.0005595598,0.005428918,0.0007198781,0.0005741108,0.0003668742,0.01129483,0.1317135,0.0001664187,0.5212345,0.3207727,0.001424859],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.932974,0.008464409,0.005340842,0.01648951,0.0007792688,0.000684181,6.020184e-7,0.0001150543,0.03515208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876056,0.001490445,0.000005435867,0.002342511,0.003253986,0.00001161362,0.00000224862,0.00003186622,0.005256258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.784732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758391748","doi":"10.5860/crl.79.4.568","title":"Buy, Borrow, or Steal? Film Access for Film Studies Students","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Desk; Class (philosophy); Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Curriculum; Advertising; Business; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3315027868039991,"gpt":0.4489170624008791,"spread":0.1174142755968801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001406978,0.0002976774,0.0004395613,0.0006212186,0.001940517,0.003309994,0.002017414,0.0001172566,0.007828818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003615151,0.0001901503,0.0001161504,0.001818299,0.001142244,0.006724361,0.003121502,0.0003183355,0.0009875799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002960446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001852221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004946021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996806,0.00007059357,0.0004320136,0.0006315559,0.00108275,0.0009770639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964072,0.001038349,0.0001107671,0.0005427856,0.001847902,0.00005302101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001525956,0.0001530582,0.001804232,0.0003791932,0.000139093,0.00001699875,0.0004808212,3.931737e-7,0.00004400518,0.01052596,0.9836,0.001330292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001111817,0.0003466372,0.00123855,0.0001529436,0.00002891039,0.000001109828,0.00434914,0.00467996,0.001627506,0.01768789,0.9684277,0.0003477964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4292776,0.00743318,0.0006043858,0.02679347,0.005788667,0.0100913,0.0003122888,0.001430442,0.5182687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876654,0.0002091727,0.0002457361,0.002174161,0.004405725,0.0005866397,0.00004315472,0.00008950321,0.1155919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4473764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334407661","doi":"","title":"Canadian Copyright: A Citizen's Guide","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Copyright Act; Public domain; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Law; Publication; Political science; Fair use; Sociology; Library science; Law and economics; History; Computer science; Business; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06670540504038275,"gpt":0.2887013782899855,"spread":0.2219959732496027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001578261,0.00009415313,0.0001166836,0.0009582842,0.001804664,0.001467157,0.0002911094,0.000075437,0.001668087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001297693,0.00005625599,0.00003463819,0.000611862,0.0003436806,0.03595749,0.00004883232,0.0005957978,0.0001726811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003571347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001846593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0880628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02990223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998794,0.0000889425,0.0003510766,0.00006754553,0.0003191335,0.0003793135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986992,0.0003376803,0.0001721453,0.0001180942,0.0004234696,0.0002493769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001218456,0.000005574161,0.002000295,0.00004887252,0.00003691981,0.00009811469,0.002244985,0.00000326479,0.000001501894,0.06930696,0.9226366,0.003495041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002141522,0.00004051936,0.001427175,0.00003194181,0.00001297041,0.0003484786,0.001956379,0.001045939,0.00002133532,0.001572797,0.9932393,0.00008901787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02393655,0.0008671808,0.000006457017,0.1222638,0.0001571697,0.0001735379,0.000002467849,0.000008689234,0.8525842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781672,0.0006597672,0.00004598639,0.01698936,0.0006252,0.000002867499,0.000009147722,0.000008320187,0.003492106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212983260","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2021.103559","title":"Antecedents and consequences of explicit and implicit attitudes toward digital piracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information & Management","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Implicit attitude; Implicit-association test; Salience (neuroscience); Idealism; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Attitude; Relativism; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02416998076560696,"gpt":0.2340318183288201,"spread":0.2098618375632132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009465867,0.0001076035,0.0001327856,0.0001567731,0.00008561643,0.0006806406,0.0000936058,0.00002427313,0.0003745236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000511127,0.00008761307,0.00002740796,0.0001957377,0.00006377118,0.004167192,0.000340053,0.00004110994,0.0001037554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001042508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006447182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007135582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005655832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992704,0.000002442368,0.0003022077,0.0001143887,0.0001834596,0.0001270569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999572,0.00001529113,0.0001322944,0.0001169662,0.0001522863,0.00001116271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732921,0.0002099105,0.03293847,0.004823702,0.0004030454,0.00002836091,0.001971052,0.00001881313,0.001458038,0.1159482,0.04322559,0.7988015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003162939,0.00008848698,0.2097465,0.0006689429,0.0002194164,0.00004289851,0.00971307,0.00968591,0.004520239,0.02293657,0.7380401,0.001174841],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6895693,0.0002388698,0.002050794,0.001068904,0.0001812842,0.0003722108,0.00000792056,0.00009155957,0.3064192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983134,0.0001404766,0.0001201799,0.001027385,0.00004220103,0.00001053082,0.00003305505,0.000004336448,0.0003084128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6563433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574701500","doi":"","title":"Laying the Foundation for Copyright Policy and Practice in Canadian Universities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Political science; Public administration; Library science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09062715294281597,"gpt":0.3103437291486707,"spread":0.2197165762058547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005626959,0.0001762045,0.0001456277,0.0008283517,0.0005113786,0.0005306217,0.0003997797,0.00009421349,0.0001195308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004791128,0.0001195562,0.00004994439,0.0005223975,0.0001425317,0.006432198,0.0001855783,0.0001482948,0.000180251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004898774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002801025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01314343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3115012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989044,0.00005928706,0.0001364516,0.0003115406,0.0001483071,0.0004399937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988728,0.0005032925,0.0001180781,0.000218031,0.000235743,0.00005206899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009066886,0.00007760551,0.9545507,0.0001473608,0.0001146229,0.0001311744,0.001378374,0.000003805141,0.001054658,0.02622924,0.0001618237,0.01524396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001639848,0.00004203906,0.2241702,0.0001986373,0.00009136042,0.0000151346,0.002694478,0.00001206717,0.0001235563,0.001370667,0.7692102,0.000431897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969319,0.00004496156,0.000364652,0.01018578,0.0001771606,0.0004017802,0.000007073767,0.00006114391,0.01943837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880959,0.00004440397,0.00001099734,0.002200083,0.0003416171,0.000001401123,0.000008510044,0.00002109436,0.009275926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7690483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947836493","doi":"10.1080/01972243.2019.1616019","title":"Should digital files be considered a commons? Copyright infringement in the eyes of lawyers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Information Society","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Copyright infringement; Elite; Commons; File sharing; State (computer science); Private sector; Public sector; Law; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property; The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03804510043948819,"gpt":0.2296470337011221,"spread":0.1916019332616339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004716629,0.0001052857,0.000127754,0.00004100074,0.0001303694,0.0004045182,0.0003371107,0.00004461085,0.001434239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006922985,0.00005167169,0.0001167674,0.0002893344,0.0001129078,0.002905144,0.000146944,0.000153763,0.0003850134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002119871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001758967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002199639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002967995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991392,0.000008542238,0.0003436322,0.00005764893,0.0003046583,0.0001463333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992844,0.0001585701,0.0001944,0.0002391975,0.0001195375,0.00000384712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006436701,0.00006477107,0.005237407,0.0002308345,0.0000684794,1.536461e-7,0.01968485,0.0001048784,0.00007453079,0.01161342,0.9595993,0.00325697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007255813,0.00001925679,0.003942805,0.00005262784,0.00002114495,0.000001017297,0.02116253,0.03647842,0.0002884185,0.001569574,0.9355581,0.0001804689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6148018,0.00004002812,0.0001096538,0.007470946,0.0001976369,0.0007603045,0.00001479143,0.00006134897,0.3765435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916577,0.000009404988,0.00001805595,0.007974579,0.00006056236,0.00001433664,0.00005032786,0.000004434929,0.0002105521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.376856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809737817","doi":"10.3390/laws7030024","title":"Copyright User Rights and Remedies: An Access to Justice Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Realm; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Fair use; Copyright law; Perspective (graphical); Position (finance); Public rights; Private rights; Political science; Law; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Intellectual property; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04431278751201406,"gpt":0.2999173687818143,"spread":0.2556045812698002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001499285,0.0001717083,0.0001674107,0.0001451261,0.0004683397,0.0007338748,0.00035459,0.00005837063,0.005938546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001479432,0.0001155149,0.00002869078,0.0003594151,0.0001504064,0.002405245,0.000283185,0.00009800809,0.001568848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003380837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001043361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003185502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004401647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989794,0.000009832652,0.0001510466,0.0004031561,0.0001804013,0.0002761882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.00003278789,0.00005295973,0.0002674432,0.0005033718,0.00003799285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000286312,0.0001063873,0.0004729292,0.00007038767,0.00003833022,0.00001140691,0.00189643,4.053381e-7,0.0009169842,0.05008041,0.9448079,0.001312065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003024482,0.00008895847,0.001801132,0.00004011666,0.00008883201,0.000002008129,0.0005072389,0.003552126,0.001205802,0.01741614,0.974676,0.0003192473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2728696,0.00006891006,0.0005157262,0.002152257,0.001104915,0.0003769845,0.00000194814,0.0002129822,0.7226967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815935,0.000003732516,0.0002382093,0.007317669,0.004539968,0.0000135668,0.000004781686,0.00002293152,0.006265638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7164311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771234070","doi":"","title":"Globalizing User Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Law and economics; Fair use; Terminology; Political science; Rhetorical question; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05613920298791426,"gpt":0.2818749044682001,"spread":0.2257357014802859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003098616,0.0003513841,0.0003553636,0.00009466022,0.002005137,0.00232809,0.0006803049,0.0001772701,0.004131743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003623707,0.0002470656,0.0001255275,0.0001215599,0.0002396007,0.002329201,0.0003498637,0.0003983119,0.003745914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000676955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001662744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009502965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00200049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998139,0.00001933901,0.0003202221,0.0005991844,0.0004076921,0.0005146016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986209,0.00006329254,0.0002397189,0.0008185597,0.0001750145,0.00008247713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004510428,0.0003053466,0.01099702,0.0001496897,0.0001360173,0.0001420592,0.00004784844,0.000003675184,0.0008191362,0.3918464,0.5888112,0.006290592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008280242,0.00004802983,0.009148603,0.0001289832,0.00005631163,0.000005348569,0.00001215306,0.001766575,0.0009745018,0.01027689,0.9762819,0.0004726993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3128814,0.0002788358,0.00004405441,0.001390328,0.001350929,0.0003037644,0.000004503733,0.0002215043,0.6835247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881614,0.00003137391,0.00009839587,0.002714544,0.002456624,0.00001599477,0.00001068739,0.0000383469,0.006472573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6770521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541929","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0007","title":"A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Business; Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Software; Computer security; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00991715124233946,"gpt":0.1909535129673466,"spread":0.1810363617250071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403931,0.0001126197,0.0001604051,0.00002905396,0.0006047029,0.0000858411,0.0002670133,0.00004853618,0.007925597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006079929,0.00009884826,0.0001268822,0.00004795905,0.00007307303,0.001668345,0.00009651201,0.0001694255,0.0002481332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001628189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01767349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02223531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993579,0.00001476286,0.0000909213,0.0001354093,0.0001927239,0.0002083231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994042,0.00004462619,0.0001421004,0.0001110407,0.0002752287,0.00002283203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001332113,0.0004342394,0.0005911634,0.00007529268,0.000229131,0.0001087189,0.002008338,0.0005367364,0.00008918605,0.1822153,0.7648747,0.04750514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001291606,0.0001485157,0.001668339,0.0001637698,0.0000997661,0.00001085834,0.001542351,0.002630128,0.00003519745,0.003438632,0.9887106,0.0002602156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01508752,0.001059306,0.001783723,0.001112459,0.0004593359,0.0001503242,7.464897e-7,0.00007742298,0.9802692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993239,0.00004474739,0.001195571,0.001457838,0.002263603,4.295933e-8,0.000001092064,0.0000109564,0.001787077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121888721","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Copyright law; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Incentive; Creativity; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03274674219136245,"gpt":0.2529906108041949,"spread":0.2202438686128324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006861613,0.0001926095,0.0003185437,0.00005923084,0.0003506023,0.0003038504,0.000485604,0.00008674703,0.00250637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001927097,0.0001167349,0.00009181015,0.0003456096,0.0004332486,0.000782551,0.0001484043,0.000324307,0.00116519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002837339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005317533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009861279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986489,0.0000708735,0.0004100369,0.0002645951,0.0002629277,0.0003426581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989806,0.0002723922,0.0001779289,0.0003571645,0.0001854308,0.00002651912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029847,0.00005789583,0.0004479816,0.00002677308,0.00001852641,0.000001253712,0.0002510079,0.00001371148,0.0002946054,0.9315642,0.06666214,0.0005589388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000635107,0.00003564826,0.0007985183,0.00007391696,0.00001737385,5.067925e-7,0.000168821,0.009091685,0.003926913,0.03939505,0.9456177,0.0002388152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1110969,0.0004362333,0.000131052,0.001123365,0.0006080053,0.0003680378,0.000002211726,0.00008955212,0.8861446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944369,0.000003721839,0.00004057166,0.00214501,0.0006139984,0.00001850162,0.00001073115,0.00001717471,0.002713347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8921691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566073897","doi":"","title":"Looking Beyond Intellectual Property in Resolving Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Property law; Intangible property; Indigenous; Law and economics; Tangible property; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Law; Property rights; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02522882928741757,"gpt":0.216274601722334,"spread":0.1910457724349164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000410824,0.0001762067,0.0002968384,0.0003854901,0.0001040464,0.00008646311,0.0001857875,0.00008499959,0.002939773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001174919,0.0001034849,0.00008468985,0.0008901595,0.00008444039,0.0009992295,0.0001000668,0.0001806591,0.00005134613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005057221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005398652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00522521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00336717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987354,0.00002698651,0.0004947069,0.0002465016,0.0002193246,0.0002770894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993265,0.00005814371,0.0001774758,0.0001712572,0.0002578015,0.00000885521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001986631,0.002956933,0.0588075,0.006839416,0.0003511599,0.0000395073,0.09846047,0.0002947278,0.6982896,0.01468095,0.03628302,0.08101013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005483331,0.001077905,0.00739457,0.002318983,0.0002115304,0.00006080005,0.09010624,0.05759471,0.6939429,0.007196266,0.1314992,0.003113595],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8061804,0.0001769348,0.0004284728,0.00003519541,0.0001295719,0.0005366594,3.928209e-7,0.00005168838,0.1924606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971597,0.00002325157,0.0002614943,0.00008442952,0.00008404527,0.00002077741,0.000003739226,0.00002131418,0.002341208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1909793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272571537","doi":"","title":"Trademarks, Property, and Propriety: The Moral Economy of Consumer Politics and Corporate Accountability on the World Wide Web","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Governmentality; Meaning (existential); Intellectual property; Corporate governance; Politics; Commodity; Digital economy; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02843700540856329,"gpt":0.1704324023305394,"spread":0.1419953969219762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003009379,0.0002415081,0.0002197445,0.0001678605,0.002453952,0.0001344636,0.0005696038,0.00008371205,0.0004697543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004417823,0.0001270967,0.0001050943,0.0005125569,0.001686603,0.0009776768,0.0003797647,0.0003347352,0.00004378699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000238725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002077528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009664333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007426212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998836,0.0001033299,0.000187388,0.0003748738,0.0002422443,0.0002561207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988598,0.0002947251,0.0002048879,0.0004023264,0.0001984592,0.000039784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04386013,0.004952063,0.05564217,0.003031049,0.007123291,0.1877435,0.001339536,0.003334777,0.008279652,0.6108439,0.05455605,0.01929382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009007446,0.00004913371,0.009467333,0.0000756134,0.0003003056,0.001715502,0.0008038536,0.006762479,0.0003665063,0.00238223,0.976814,0.0003623093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7547697,0.00005634836,0.000004986243,0.00287407,0.00008200923,0.0004051147,0.00001069623,0.00004296658,0.2417541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689542,0.00006752162,0.00000821327,0.0009765197,0.000111253,4.785957e-7,0.000008215748,0.000009391164,0.0298642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.922258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016258400","doi":"10.1300/j474v17n01_11","title":"Electronic Reserves and the Copyright Challenge in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007065719690883947,"gpt":0.1922538542087513,"spread":0.1851881345178673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002340248,0.000329071,0.000552905,0.0004810942,0.0001614251,0.0004280217,0.001063417,0.00007545681,0.001726253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000154282,0.0001943812,0.0002027657,0.0005677024,0.0001447937,0.004263982,0.0003600631,0.001173197,0.00001747014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009202929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3258946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7599794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966723,0.00009826847,0.00114299,0.0003023169,0.0006668006,0.001117273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984228,0.0003610266,0.000608483,0.0003239716,0.0002332293,0.00005047131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04949999,0.0008216508,0.04634195,0.0008130809,0.002231352,0.001884253,0.002019309,0.0001397754,0.001078727,0.2148798,0.6173643,0.06292579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01616359,0.001473539,0.01253005,0.0009232687,0.0002694882,0.0003312228,0.003368837,0.01348481,0.003406205,0.1126721,0.8338581,0.001518735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553961,0.01578255,0.00003051747,0.008581179,0.0003152053,0.0003651475,5.181125e-7,0.00001765772,0.01951114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994073,0.002885779,0.000008343345,0.001480061,0.0006941329,0.000005767678,0.000004416299,0.00003695753,0.0008115952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4340848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206364195","doi":"10.1287/isre.2021.1094","title":"Pay-What-You-Want Pricing in the Digital Product Marketplace: A Feasible Alternative to Piracy Prevention?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pricing strategies; Product (mathematics); Network effect; Externality; Business; Willingness to pay; Quality (philosophy); Price discrimination; Digital goods; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Industrial organization; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09083551457674685,"gpt":0.3341587644365051,"spread":0.2433232498597582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005255917,0.0001219133,0.0001471328,0.001003757,0.0007201596,0.004316947,0.0006817348,0.00001980163,0.0006457702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008003679,0.00007326782,0.00004994477,0.002142608,0.00003244616,0.009235942,0.0006597302,0.0005072926,0.00139789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001046619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001211527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002418649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971536,0.0001651523,0.0005285271,0.0001959034,0.001547241,0.0004095132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988094,0.000158073,0.0001484325,0.0003367823,0.0005311033,0.00001622213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001106044,0.0004996894,0.00421646,0.001254381,0.00008544513,0.00002725327,0.03287555,0.003603237,0.0001013278,0.008611757,0.7116467,0.2359722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003898217,0.00007240288,0.001083465,0.0001270343,0.000002569725,0.00001239273,0.03345969,0.03801677,0.00001975313,0.0003663845,0.9262891,0.0001606245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3662992,0.0003211627,0.0008270306,0.01050188,0.001980544,0.008353452,0.00001834463,0.0001754332,0.611523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939408,0.000007785623,0.000003983977,0.0003969275,0.0004885212,0.0007015452,0.00005563339,0.00001100031,0.004393856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6276416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W853596052","doi":"","title":"Fragmented Copyright, Fragmented Management: Proposals to Defrag Copyright Management","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Political science; Copyright law; License; Bottleneck; Business; Law and economics; Humanities; Intellectual property; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Economics; Art; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01374852786912956,"gpt":0.2219873461134729,"spread":0.2082388182443433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008363406,0.0009029332,0.0007238792,0.0007261142,0.001022356,0.001332961,0.001183753,0.0002195091,0.03733763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001046822,0.0007361323,0.0003178502,0.001909087,0.0001797828,0.002013294,0.0006670756,0.0005137648,0.02685452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002609145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000304622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005802544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003321682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994819,0.0000891384,0.00104293,0.001449135,0.001148839,0.001450937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977314,0.0000522525,0.0002866037,0.00133158,0.0003732868,0.0002248877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003181311,0.0006523608,0.000590838,0.0006508277,0.0005256422,0.0002610839,0.00006844709,0.0000342464,0.0004952347,0.3927706,0.600742,0.002890538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002161837,0.00007791467,0.000359926,0.0003230816,0.0002569208,0.000007714499,0.0002487246,0.001158813,0.002527676,0.01117202,0.9805556,0.001149774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349017,0.0004734953,0.003477618,0.001085557,0.00186469,0.003230269,0.00001272348,0.0009292172,0.9554363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190132,0.0001172434,0.004633435,0.02001322,0.0009085865,0.0005741977,0.0001347879,0.0002259191,0.05437941],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125530028","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.06.004","title":"Remix rights and negotiations over the use of copy-protected works","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Fair use; Shadow (psychology); Law and economics; Incentive; Intellectual property; Content (measure theory); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Compensation (psychology); Law; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09831207238041621,"gpt":0.2417819565102119,"spread":0.1434698841297957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002345527,0.00008410968,0.0001236317,0.0002293688,0.00006938769,0.0003984978,0.0002600685,0.00008945622,0.0008609817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003031317,0.0000510748,0.00003298939,0.0005044416,0.00005412089,0.001859444,0.00009633928,0.0002092468,0.00001517671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005784745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007899554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004508702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003005295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989646,0.00002486361,0.0004306298,0.0000754611,0.0004359882,0.00006845818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965237,0.0000957065,0.000597636,0.00007573217,0.002690593,0.00001662343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001064412,0.0003415607,0.07029263,0.00001055392,0.0005895824,0.00002622966,0.001228847,0.001484184,0.003370629,0.007596728,0.8882293,0.02576534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01621408,0.0003796018,0.04701655,0.001409625,0.0006723443,0.0002414605,0.0008092517,0.04438873,0.01278373,0.01696521,0.8580692,0.001050205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869279,0.0000608814,0.005526387,0.003404249,0.002779136,0.000212919,0.000003304328,0.00002329064,0.001061987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968474,0.000008800316,0.0001253142,0.0003593822,0.002520842,4.296714e-7,0.00001481378,0.00001143744,0.0001115936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04290455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9427146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232934961","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198754794.001.0001","title":"Copyright User Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Public domain; Political science; Common law copyright; Copyright Act; Fair use; Property rights; User fee; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Law; Business; Economics; Copyright law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02840910160413915,"gpt":0.1948933587673496,"spread":0.1664842571632105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119205,0.0005455838,0.0005487962,0.000348246,0.00116239,0.0007187763,0.001647163,0.0005077284,0.002218964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002131542,0.0004689031,0.0003393727,0.00001651832,0.0003325841,0.001140102,0.001040844,0.0006079517,0.0001617677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001890498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008171478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982446,0.00001202226,0.0002212784,0.0006660086,0.0003924009,0.0004636719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980717,0.00004054475,0.000488915,0.00102338,0.0003349818,0.00004045199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001369041,0.00001753772,0.000002737291,0.0001420937,0.0001138135,0.0001384762,0.00002189537,2.215049e-7,0.000003982791,0.1991783,0.7988515,0.001392505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005983527,0.00001565199,0.000006722306,0.0002176542,0.000307258,0.000002309653,0.000005032027,0.0005146614,0.00003933186,0.003832655,0.9937571,0.0007033247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004139775,0.00005418256,0.000079652,0.00003500314,0.0009351385,0.0004730076,0.00002489147,0.0003034536,0.9980533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001137989,0.0000320129,0.00003867369,0.0002528587,0.001952674,0.000001297675,0.0001280978,0.00006532685,0.9963911],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1953457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595798455","doi":"","title":"From Distribution to Dialogue: Remarks on the Concept of Balance in Copyright Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Public domain; Interpretation (philosophy); Metaphor; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Subject matter; Scope (computer science); Political science; Balance of interests; Proposition; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01337923125324493,"gpt":0.2050287420686038,"spread":0.1916495108153589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001085798,0.00008831525,0.0001735178,0.00001850488,0.00009546365,0.00001858389,0.0002926584,0.00004898481,0.01607746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004785956,0.00007048088,0.00005641777,0.0001084644,0.00008306773,0.0005158465,0.00007070045,0.00007080471,0.00006552455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008877031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008409054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2159151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03897208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994702,0.00001593282,0.00008007447,0.00015866,0.0001458841,0.0001292913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.00005634491,0.00009643104,0.0002083336,0.00008442292,0.00001079553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002493215,0.0006679631,0.0009546899,0.00004865362,0.00008551458,0.00002541593,0.01446658,0.00008030279,0.008540582,0.2236082,0.6959522,0.05307669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003543319,0.0006002634,0.5633492,0.0007107635,0.0001489882,4.377705e-7,0.01529366,0.02984711,0.004946181,0.006698471,0.3738086,0.001053085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4202715,0.0001533116,0.0009321508,0.01028156,0.000183276,0.0003386632,0.00003137784,0.00004079739,0.5677674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986098,0.00001049256,0.00004028508,0.0005607317,0.0001078899,1.124044e-7,0.00004220265,0.000003064941,0.0006254127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5783383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044818988","doi":"10.7202/044293ar","title":"Creative industries and the IPR dilemma between appropriation and creation: some insights from the videogame and music industries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management international","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Creative industries; Appropriation; Openness to experience; Intellectual property; Creativity; Dilemma; Imitation; Business; Work (physics); Commons; Process (computing); Music industry; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Social psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02520988208894067,"gpt":0.2142925357057207,"spread":0.18908265361678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002639122,0.0001749619,0.000150328,0.0001258205,0.0004273534,0.001151936,0.0002695729,0.00008311786,0.0006773723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002916626,0.0000944012,0.00002282541,0.0001826563,0.00046993,0.001436872,0.0005690703,0.0003071205,0.00003083176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001338385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007801207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001238999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001886713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990364,0.00002070058,0.0002312741,0.000293885,0.000298979,0.0001187806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992408,0.0002786496,0.0001584295,0.0001672731,0.0001416878,0.00001312399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003527153,0.00006235701,0.06654243,0.00003932183,0.0007299334,0.00000511208,0.002375351,0.000002479562,0.00007300329,0.6801147,0.0782245,0.1714781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002212506,0.00001542532,0.3418958,0.00006249973,0.0002354153,0.000001237097,0.002138657,0.006063366,0.0001092624,0.07431883,0.5726596,0.0002874729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219727,0.000155149,0.000217139,0.01408499,0.0005134174,0.0005576551,0.00001142069,0.00005667496,0.06243086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445,0.0000779635,0.00004488594,0.001683987,0.001957713,0.00005244172,0.0001073067,0.00001266464,0.001613051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604173171","doi":"10.1080/01972243.2017.1294128","title":"Internet freedom and copyright maximalism: Contradictory hypocrisy or complementary policies?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Information Society","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Internet governance; The Internet; Context (archaeology); Net neutrality; Information policy; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05623867106786559,"gpt":0.2480607705237813,"spread":0.1918220994559157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003582134,0.0001463044,0.0001475512,0.00003212552,0.00101828,0.001449963,0.000528057,0.00004689915,0.00377967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008045547,0.0000787149,0.00008837389,0.0000564064,0.0003561791,0.004751432,0.0003920915,0.000154728,0.000418276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003114475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001706988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003202233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001223056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991926,0.000006095757,0.0002928103,0.000087608,0.0002073229,0.0002135916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991551,0.00004557682,0.0003054432,0.0003526057,0.0001291965,0.00001205364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006461678,0.00001006606,0.0005652611,0.00005026223,0.00005197,2.657443e-7,0.002407987,6.479795e-7,0.00001841075,0.004707058,0.9863321,0.005791419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006795264,0.00001260649,0.006456707,0.00002013956,0.00003417215,0.000003814921,0.001372171,0.05753463,0.00005879519,0.0006882739,0.9329876,0.0001515118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2384189,0.0001956433,0.0036695,0.02731892,0.002261055,0.001406532,0.00006007014,0.0004206671,0.7262487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795253,0.0000513201,0.0001061149,0.01811211,0.0007129582,0.0000135697,0.00005319826,0.00000924548,0.001416233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7411063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1659725686","doi":"","title":"CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada: Case Comment on a Landmark Copyright Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Landmark; Law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Copyright law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Property rights; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02500410964801183,"gpt":0.2528883158151268,"spread":0.2278842061671149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004725635,0.0003112111,0.0005957728,0.000036149,0.0004090204,0.00005863122,0.0001927745,0.00006752166,0.001080931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001133598,0.0001972018,0.0002058753,0.0002113892,0.0002078417,0.0004308879,0.0001102129,0.0002516279,0.00002841553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002999728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001552201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982608,0.00002085853,0.0006669358,0.0003063342,0.0003103013,0.0004347579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989577,0.00003562127,0.0002735741,0.0003786038,0.0002511666,0.0001033299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002697928,0.0001628736,0.00003109622,0.01023594,0.00008600703,0.0001596227,0.00007846816,3.250688e-7,0.000002644016,0.5200555,0.4472003,0.02196023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004272466,0.00003308445,0.000003601826,0.003064349,0.0001147274,0.0002459917,0.00005008366,0.0004889084,0.00009199271,0.0001112328,0.9950946,0.0002742032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006707174,0.07172498,0.000004546701,0.02074327,0.0006211144,0.001370561,0.0001556072,0.00005118694,0.8986216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305609,0.007584633,0.00002356657,0.06112313,0.0004142995,0.00002444354,0.00009791231,0.00002827066,0.0001428567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9238537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122450121","doi":"10.22024/unikent/03/fal.7","title":"What's Feminist About Open Access? A Relational Approach to Copyright in the Academy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Kent","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Criticism; Political science; Feminism; Law and economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1695429822840149,"gpt":0.2723435056772202,"spread":0.1028005233932053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002975396,0.00008069559,0.0001149713,0.0001520486,0.0001688141,0.0003603746,0.001629962,0.00004693333,0.003473778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002380204,0.00005855872,0.00004213943,0.0003871331,0.00007946511,0.003382934,0.000960627,0.0001272885,0.0002481779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002928997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002157617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000135008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993941,0.00001415828,0.0001072765,0.0001869387,0.0001692994,0.0001282543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997027,0.00002274014,0.00008125122,0.0001307526,0.00005157935,0.00001099351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007471303,0.0008895969,0.01388496,0.0001014842,0.00005611359,0.00001274011,0.01514625,0.00002379782,0.00003684262,0.158995,0.8059394,0.004166662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005310529,0.00001607555,0.07620198,0.00007547444,0.00002922764,9.498381e-7,0.005433953,0.003104317,0.00002993948,0.002432402,0.9119728,0.0001718212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05275948,0.00003361569,0.0003616495,0.0015193,0.0001020777,0.0004598758,0.000001222123,0.00001526581,0.9447475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940845,0.00001735306,0.0003061424,0.002335636,0.00007455659,8.900352e-7,0.000009446035,0.000004884298,0.003166589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2266291119","doi":"","title":"Authorship as Public Address: On the Specificity of Copyright vis-à-vis Patent and Trade-Mark","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University","keywords":"Copying; Fair use; Public domain; Intellectual property; Copyright Act; Prima facie; Exclusive right; Law and economics; Copyright infringement; Fair dealing; Space (punctuation); Appeal; Proposition; Law; Copyright law; Reproduction; Political science; Sociology; History; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1400741944055621,"gpt":0.2693258706987942,"spread":0.1292516762932321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003894929,0.0002030716,0.0002307154,0.0001430067,0.0003619438,0.0001653793,0.0003001621,0.00008177328,0.008585197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003708279,0.0001146918,0.00008738178,0.000412193,0.000229886,0.000369149,0.0001236652,0.0002468028,0.0004901252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002195343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002347043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006990626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004421279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988083,0.00003802318,0.0002254356,0.0002865079,0.0003442489,0.0002974623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.0001647151,0.0001465516,0.0003211368,0.00009486382,0.00002843443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003659289,0.0003403666,0.002546572,0.0001310077,0.0000784314,0.00002853966,0.002697434,0.000001452455,0.001789901,0.04608533,0.9421947,0.003740335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006061193,0.000126416,0.01481136,0.0001053461,0.00004575221,0.00001240119,0.001099754,0.005131281,0.005739647,0.002866323,0.9690003,0.0004553137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6161567,0.0002181774,0.00003555851,0.01610175,0.0002012454,0.0002879239,0.000001264871,0.00008364762,0.3669137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992938,0.00008735312,0.00001227019,0.001726221,0.0004482332,0.00001032181,0.00000624075,0.00002350623,0.004747821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3767813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293991509","doi":"","title":"The Property Attributes of Copyright","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Tangible property; Bundle of rights; Public domain; Intellectual property; Scope (computer science); Exclusive right; Object (grammar); Commodification; Intangible property; Property (philosophy); Business; Fair use; Copyright Act; Property rights; Real property; Copyright law; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011898743983163,"gpt":0.2152853432010261,"spread":0.1951663557611945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006407293,0.0001953637,0.0002447545,0.00005261122,0.0005646742,0.0004129857,0.0005973093,0.00007274189,0.003475662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006001748,0.00008690007,0.0001252696,0.000317123,0.0002403368,0.0008147623,0.0002307867,0.0002132372,0.002594337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000204636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002134468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002056613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009134273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986616,0.00002930076,0.0003643324,0.0002697224,0.0003128799,0.0003621011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988355,0.0001529711,0.0001724369,0.0004922508,0.0003206176,0.00002624241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001600313,0.000112785,0.002117493,0.0001490905,0.00006085396,0.000001726195,0.00003487692,0.000005494047,0.002793571,0.2146041,0.766997,0.01296294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003245575,0.00002995212,0.00057139,0.00004563657,0.00002600842,8.765998e-7,0.000025394,0.006838033,0.002952686,0.01092783,0.978065,0.0001926042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04716594,0.000611746,0.0006032639,0.005820445,0.00118904,0.0005776887,0.000003726747,0.0002751101,0.9437531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826999,0.00002235256,0.00007595591,0.002247478,0.001286388,0.00002218812,0.00001163417,0.00002845057,0.01360562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623027653","doi":"10.1017/9781316450901.008","title":"The Canadian Copyright Story","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Liability; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Digital Millennium Copyright Act; The Internet; Fair use; Copyright Act; Political science; Public policy; Service provider; Internet privacy; Public administration; Business; Law; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Service (business); World Wide Web; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03125749522297065,"gpt":0.181083056530304,"spread":0.1498255613073333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002293457,0.0003908186,0.0002989534,0.0002553794,0.004099404,0.0009452977,0.001448627,0.0003467861,0.0001643088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005454354,0.0003050183,0.000234264,0.000005269981,0.0005956098,0.0004404327,0.0004886528,0.0007597675,0.000675584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003753042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003215783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1111818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07779793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986608,0.000009949601,0.0001420474,0.0004470742,0.0002928418,0.0004473045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982131,0.00005887898,0.0003070285,0.0009563121,0.0003933925,0.00007127252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003093229,0.000001152016,5.521546e-7,0.00002308722,0.00005316257,0.00008703655,0.000005564367,4.567825e-8,0.000001096976,0.4528393,0.5447239,0.002234164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225956,0.000007145798,0.0000138169,0.00009094514,0.0001594132,0.000002550704,0.00001028075,0.0003499547,0.000009732939,0.00007773155,0.9986019,0.0004505741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009248683,0.0002732747,0.000007023439,0.0002904827,0.001057022,0.0003917761,0.00003551288,0.0001131332,0.9978225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007807291,0.0000644489,0.000002333378,0.0004694402,0.001201983,7.923383e-7,0.0000438241,0.00005949895,0.9903504],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.453878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15782827","doi":"","title":"Spiritual but not Intellectual? The Protection of Sacred Intangible Traditional Knowledge","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Navajo; Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Innocence; Nothing; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04424866756501607,"gpt":0.219108092529425,"spread":0.1748594249644089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001855713,0.0002013682,0.0002118389,0.0002694242,0.0004970133,0.0001745012,0.0003528064,0.00008277312,0.002228191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008709539,0.0001255176,0.0002001094,0.0005982962,0.0001336707,0.0007129759,0.00004462081,0.001409876,0.0004087842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003114548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007488678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001660891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005140638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978959,0.00006103021,0.0004168321,0.0002056015,0.0003055659,0.001115045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991579,0.0001071544,0.0002219565,0.0001676361,0.0003296353,0.00001569272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007515688,0.0007402064,0.00009644168,0.00009748185,0.0004870308,0.00000301503,0.001053953,0.00003028017,0.01797701,0.8716055,0.04355811,0.06359947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00217081,0.0006386105,0.0002024724,0.0001147051,0.0002112087,0.000624955,0.00600351,0.009506787,0.01878952,0.5681271,0.3928645,0.0007458099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7107428,0.004580852,0.04105239,0.002553257,0.001979496,0.001128786,0.000003904911,0.0001699383,0.2377886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953036,0.0002859549,0.00001716624,0.0002555053,0.001156615,0.00001599664,0.000003673466,0.00002874804,0.002932783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509696337","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0022","title":"Technological neutrality: recalibrating copyright in the information age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Normative; Law and economics; Technological change; Net neutrality; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02550113929871186,"gpt":0.2383122564895001,"spread":0.2128111171907882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001088346,0.0001534946,0.0001845855,0.0001318589,0.0001157409,0.0003446447,0.0005114329,0.0001433294,0.003470444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008253517,0.00006570812,0.00004655033,0.0005121378,0.02230669,0.002186693,0.0002271683,0.0002519167,0.0005442939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002975009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006686229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001880579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001708784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987968,0.00006265935,0.0004180062,0.0001683529,0.0002182427,0.0003358999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.0003874622,0.0000649979,0.0002819953,0.00004258719,0.000007971589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007027773,0.00003107243,0.000158494,0.00001868894,0.000001883343,0.00001055699,0.0002352539,3.866106e-7,0.000114228,0.9885009,0.003974345,0.006883907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003729303,0.00002348033,0.00009013632,0.00009364479,0.000005462492,0.000002539593,0.0004033333,0.001824999,0.0005800151,0.8938332,0.1025903,0.0001799707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1730391,0.00004709137,0.04252963,0.02949026,0.0003917302,0.0007612315,0.000003220019,0.0003839855,0.7533537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911246,0.000006216726,0.00005084554,0.00853951,0.0001952676,0.0000353161,0.000006482296,0.000008103419,0.00003362137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268996141","doi":"","title":"Taking User Rights Seriously","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Centrality; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Originality; Copyright law; Domain (mathematical analysis); Political science; Law and economics; The Internet; Fair use; Law; Intellectual property; Computer science; Sociology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01838005985320854,"gpt":0.2103345409654553,"spread":0.1919544811122467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008514825,0.0001147262,0.0001599701,0.00004774367,0.0002647549,0.00004883398,0.0003000511,0.00005908491,0.2057268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001466693,0.0001118056,0.00009214652,0.00007821521,0.00006497814,0.002464719,0.0001711938,0.00006743488,0.000845585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009593266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001105413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.198036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1784537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993821,0.000005657577,0.00006890573,0.0001892083,0.0001589251,0.0001952052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.00001233591,0.0001474738,0.0001946962,0.0001198526,0.00001467888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008044093,0.0005342239,0.003986028,0.0002767034,0.0002994095,0.00006018638,0.01106299,0.00008327968,0.00582392,0.03175122,0.5466802,0.3986375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000667901,0.00002408723,0.05322176,0.00004199092,0.0000659398,0.000001360263,0.001644813,0.01585813,0.0001294502,0.0001012977,0.927937,0.0003062751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2379567,0.0001524315,0.0003285987,0.001215992,0.0001202022,0.0000966541,5.188039e-7,0.0001050191,0.7600238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803097,0.00001749519,0.0006481573,0.000226292,0.000383616,7.870624e-8,0.000003822448,0.0000091409,0.0184017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.742353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031528136","doi":"10.1108/02641611211258226","title":"Legal aspects of e‐books and interlibrary loan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Originality; Legislature; Value (mathematics); Loan; Reproduction; Computer science; Library science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0152729630137622,"gpt":0.226075220575,"spread":0.2108022575612378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002321356,0.0002227995,0.0002545707,0.0003105422,0.0000922899,0.0003631928,0.0002462802,0.00005322525,0.007057474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004354228,0.0001729891,0.00009859486,0.0001492707,0.00009988606,0.004345984,0.0003800504,0.0001678902,0.0003423704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003332613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001015328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006687935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002782745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998768,0.0000108712,0.0003715499,0.0002336569,0.0002071429,0.0004087204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995228,0.00004355811,0.000153182,0.000199497,0.00004792102,0.00003303938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005159938,0.0004341876,0.06709651,0.0007821352,0.0003238675,0.00002861122,0.002324214,6.504465e-7,0.01476543,0.5036257,0.3104104,0.09969231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007443128,0.0001154803,0.006275626,0.0003883673,0.00009445426,0.00002713723,0.0005769589,0.0006762084,0.01828475,0.007973923,0.9643083,0.0005345297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5323632,0.0007433234,0.000130292,0.0006234521,0.0009686987,0.0002424102,0.000002253693,0.0001339424,0.4647924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958963,0.00001735668,0.0001154969,0.0007318,0.0009055295,0.00001212641,0.00001393653,0.00003301486,0.002274485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6538979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}