{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1849,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":1849,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b8afe4694597","filters":{"topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence"}},"results":[{"id":"W2885549935","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v50i2.2026","title":"Cases of Mistaken Identity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Benoît Bailey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adrienne Einarson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gideon Koren","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07238438431476989,"gpt":0.3793907287514035,"spread":0.3070063444366336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397373,0.0003835915,0.0005328041,0.002276207,0.01997999,0.005851373,0.002024637,0.0131733,0.00628902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03213523,0.0006062528,0.0005760666,0.002152065,0.01536467,0.003969888,0.007143756,0.01396083,0.0007119275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005582492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007175771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04339062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07843374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922155,0.001607479,0.0003593067,0.0009821209,0.002113927,0.002721734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892322,0.004824515,0.001615408,0.001697529,0.001413714,0.001216552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170839,0.0001072073,0.02415987,0.00004999256,0.00004628568,0.08200189,0.04329893,0.0003555461,0.000415727,0.7889938,0.03993199,0.02046788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001086656,0.0001255477,0.03032496,0.0009438598,0.0002196541,0.1735895,0.08508793,0.00460407,0.003763074,0.3507387,0.3502539,0.0002402319],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.529965,0.001435555,0.003199759,0.08678785,0.001546125,0.0000957193,0.0001661511,0.00004878682,0.376755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781377,0.0002950071,0.0005310075,0.006342195,0.0001598432,0.00001831873,0.0000291453,0.00001023237,0.01447652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04339062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08627611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651559902","doi":"","title":"Youth crime and youth justice : comparative and cross-national perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Tonry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony N. Doob","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1470678600080893,"gpt":0.4097403561255992,"spread":0.26267249611751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007676175,0.0003914864,0.0004324882,0.003313415,0.003085289,0.004618207,0.0005413938,0.0009507309,0.003854044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008653117,0.0001528501,0.0003648341,0.005618718,0.003971449,0.003847047,0.00201911,0.001271399,0.0002490169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004078043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003079561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05476354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1508427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996011,0.0001631076,0.00001521205,0.00003046425,0.00009304411,0.00009708043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994836,0.0003114312,0.00004762013,0.00001973136,0.00008204624,0.00005544097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002383839,0.00003515205,0.007393089,0.0003571714,0.00002825118,0.0007660445,0.03632226,0.0005007479,0.0001108928,0.7654191,0.07584,0.1132035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006232085,0.00003825812,0.02954792,0.002222596,0.00007216866,0.001711311,0.07815946,0.000511378,0.0002751951,0.1045648,0.7828676,0.00002315344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04477251,0.2801749,0.002119576,0.02616937,0.001138702,0.0000181252,0.0002916477,0.00004210363,0.645273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6044291,0.2706144,0.003160268,0.003999583,0.0008319856,0.0001097915,0.0006666643,0.00009052774,0.1160977],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05476354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1088896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796572108","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511979170","title":"Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Statutory law; Discretion; Political science; Law; Sentence; Sentencing guidelines; Criminology; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Julian V. Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04085265482509632,"gpt":0.2358256628848379,"spread":0.1949730080597416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566054,0.000463855,0.0004456972,0.001880478,0.004034648,0.003613836,0.001087119,0.002577373,0.007632904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009542976,0.0002291328,0.0005907678,0.0008138923,0.005804329,0.003367293,0.004174211,0.003914052,0.001049162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002419038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002700926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004470164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937447,0.002781778,0.0002617561,0.0003215982,0.002224556,0.0006656797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977273,0.001269843,0.0002920351,0.000172085,0.0004391101,0.00009957822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001795913,0.00004510568,0.001114971,0.0003377556,0.0000274344,0.0005839111,0.01415243,0.002082084,0.0007169978,0.7981854,0.0638085,0.1189274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001010078,0.0001081841,0.004515201,0.001389808,0.00004967433,0.001223907,0.006928357,0.0008648825,0.001264027,0.3090619,0.674505,0.000078898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03854418,0.04055556,0.02211529,0.07839458,0.004468532,0.0001782793,0.0001113007,0.0002066991,0.8154256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7527841,0.02607923,0.008990299,0.008720492,0.003453481,0.0002157588,0.0001418529,0.0001095073,0.1995053],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007632904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02553463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265319787","doi":"","title":"Crimes of Colour: Racialization and the Criminal Justice System in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Criminalization; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal justice; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Race (biology); History","authors":[{"name":"Shoshana Pollack","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kiran Mirchandani","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wendy Chan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1162398073225891,"gpt":0.3889562782725682,"spread":0.2727164709499791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008187341,0.0006726124,0.000524066,0.002087128,0.01654781,0.007192409,0.00150608,0.001734196,0.005106762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397375,0.0003875177,0.0003260628,0.007162314,0.008461935,0.002105365,0.002153421,0.002214213,0.0003303114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1353492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2442953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986833,0.000148445,0.00002940909,0.00008354621,0.0005414814,0.0005138302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984325,0.0002052818,0.0001034239,0.00002328359,0.0006785213,0.0005570221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000615488,0.00007379231,0.01862938,0.001005362,0.00004968546,0.0007483606,0.08769025,0.001075216,0.0002480116,0.1118794,0.5274213,0.2511177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252818,0.00001879334,0.08694913,0.00181895,0.00005125048,0.0002885154,0.09038893,0.0004641252,0.000145936,0.008608509,0.8111609,0.00009234171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0649454,0.6243722,0.0003942229,0.1531965,0.002296616,0.00009832114,0.000705264,0.00005265156,0.1539388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3674313,0.5631279,0.000711198,0.006320084,0.0005808574,0.00005480743,0.0004046586,0.00005524498,0.06131405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1353492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085439619","doi":"10.1177/0964663910378434","title":"Between a Hunch and a Hard Place: Making Suspicion Reasonable at the Canadian Border","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Scrutiny; Objectivity (philosophy); Empirical research; Sociology; Law; Sketch; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Anna Pratt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06945951445316405,"gpt":0.408517035797288,"spread":0.3390575213441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408563,0.0003726235,0.0005979802,0.003484848,0.04428213,0.01981267,0.002715073,0.004083933,0.005676789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140628,0.0006987253,0.0005369915,0.003600569,0.04054439,0.006360083,0.00869059,0.005881058,0.0003874264],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1624729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1599078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878587,0.003246849,0.000342342,0.001032502,0.00449395,0.003025805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861735,0.004275952,0.00119259,0.0006571953,0.005309512,0.002391299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000139052,0.00005046736,0.0305837,0.0001748614,0.00005539405,0.00217769,0.3814104,0.0008785985,0.00110784,0.5197982,0.01934088,0.04428279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005564044,0.00006843499,0.07452738,0.001101921,0.0001453807,0.0006289379,0.5729083,0.002169626,0.001718104,0.1241683,0.2220592,0.0004487043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5084304,0.005651799,0.008285215,0.09990539,0.0003420659,0.0001314763,0.0002742943,0.00007787708,0.3769014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917429,0.0008996848,0.0008198507,0.00155598,0.0000170446,0.000007465701,0.00002791268,0.0000153065,0.004913794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1624729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538339521","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Commission; Criminal justice; Criminal case; Economic Justice; Test (biology); Criminal trial; Index (typography); Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Naughton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3043360029925013,"gpt":0.4566867510715336,"spread":0.1523507480790323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01810007,0.001177763,0.002463292,0.01031013,0.005161542,0.02017881,0.003337967,0.013244,0.0589259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06502341,0.001219539,0.0009652292,0.01102997,0.006546347,0.01138611,0.003680166,0.009156458,0.05150333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03498498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03563398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05654784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9757479,0.004187803,0.00211582,0.001793474,0.01457146,0.001583568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434996,0.02399747,0.003797289,0.003233517,0.02105977,0.004412265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000107775,0.000002356493,0.00001150137,0.0001148549,7.148454e-7,0.00001551179,0.00004504562,0.0000104362,0.000009190136,0.006642238,0.9853548,0.007792382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001880017,0.000002006871,0.0000741839,0.0008805101,0.000001293456,0.00003058222,0.0000573357,0.000009630918,0.000007966125,0.002489344,0.996439,0.000006172233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001722348,0.2811094,0.001141585,0.3470495,0.09063097,0.0005430144,0.0008130742,0.0004509611,0.2780892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005624754,0.1906896,0.002805918,0.1514667,0.05282383,0.001222621,0.001296925,0.0005998058,0.5934699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0589259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1971267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169189483","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.107","title":"Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Publicity; Legislation; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Salience (neuroscience); Prison; Subject (documents); Psychology","authors":[{"name":"C. Ronald Huff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1141885114976563,"gpt":0.3546432759040277,"spread":0.2404547644063714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003434174,0.0002704201,0.0005252265,0.0009116651,0.01662798,0.00524259,0.001024124,0.003079043,0.004969372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01250076,0.0004100591,0.0002537063,0.001955585,0.008226323,0.003207097,0.004764685,0.007003905,0.0006203283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004051989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007888505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06928637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1560651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996867,0.001332574,0.0001075113,0.000159596,0.000613459,0.0009198429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917143,0.002027707,0.001003751,0.0003623005,0.001447618,0.003444368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001345014,0.0006864599,0.1194589,0.000202642,0.00004603822,0.01664894,0.6100035,0.000159914,0.0005425265,0.03716807,0.09511379,0.1198347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001861085,0.000154552,0.06370576,0.0008606287,0.00004082037,0.01260766,0.5555019,0.0002427431,0.0002328826,0.007207097,0.3593122,0.0001152116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8059196,0.0106383,0.0004580492,0.1082811,0.0009273599,0.00003306806,0.0001161535,0.00004102349,0.07358528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654765,0.00928911,0.0001130523,0.01714048,0.0001758616,0.00001775868,0.00004777768,0.00002942038,0.007710159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06928637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1377662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040873337","doi":"10.2307/jj.17610838.13","title":"A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Data Protection Act 1998; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Human rights; Analytics; The Internet; Digital rights; Internet of Things; Data analysis; Computer security; Political science; World Wide Web; Data mining; Law","authors":[{"name":"Teresa Scassa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.069253950882884,"gpt":0.2414035113902561,"spread":0.1721495605073721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039375,0.0005266603,0.000475958,0.002399627,0.01686769,0.01296717,0.002179923,0.006117105,0.009794521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005268578,0.0005589171,0.000465698,0.004897356,0.02127292,0.004033407,0.003879845,0.007959426,0.001248672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1264191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.229083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947243,0.0006163099,0.0001205854,0.0004224059,0.002797866,0.001318446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.0007296011,0.00006537112,0.0001672848,0.001155771,0.0003438019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054134,0.000008649152,0.0001417997,0.00004134682,0.000003234647,0.00012102,0.002693102,0.0002389886,0.00005176146,0.9340775,0.05242813,0.01018893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006013731,0.000005306542,0.0006183463,0.0003156686,0.000008480072,0.0001179896,0.001987637,0.0003638819,0.0001480785,0.09085434,0.9055451,0.00002915969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004326272,0.01535633,0.003117164,0.04263163,0.001132354,0.0001033322,0.0003094453,0.00005155023,0.9329719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2116214,0.02879638,0.005084182,0.02985704,0.0004117331,0.0001486577,0.000349635,0.0001315851,0.7235994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1264191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9172391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996793615","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.121","title":"Showing Remorse: Reflections on the Gap between Expression and Attribution in Cases of Wrongful Conviction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Conviction; Criminal Conviction; Psychology; Disposition; Criminal justice; Attribution; Expression (computer science); Criminology; Inclusion (mineral); Social psychology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Richard Weisman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878678158405966,"gpt":0.3872231436201995,"spread":0.09935532777960288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05164715,0.0004499762,0.0008197551,0.003580555,0.01504216,0.01336424,0.004756653,0.00878333,0.002176328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1356381,0.000718244,0.0007381742,0.002504081,0.1068846,0.01411282,0.02063525,0.01603242,0.0002345071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01802654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06092736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0505269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9327565,0.04779893,0.002269382,0.002451773,0.007705026,0.00701838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325194,0.05080507,0.005453621,0.00318696,0.005841392,0.002193566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005534754,0.00002126188,0.003712637,0.00009168946,0.0000111054,0.001535674,0.8495748,0.00007569804,0.0004185771,0.1298635,0.001552663,0.01308709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008442141,0.00002279056,0.006265819,0.0005145086,0.00001510044,0.001534106,0.917084,0.0001994335,0.0007090971,0.04628819,0.02728641,0.00007210531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5598781,0.009432128,0.01505656,0.2794902,0.001592742,0.00008925025,0.00005553726,0.00008781813,0.1343178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948854,0.0006038029,0.0004380009,0.002594505,0.000115217,0.00002215304,0.000007675162,0.00002238858,0.001310913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06092736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2731395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126101507","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0041","title":"Comparative Criminal Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Principle of legality; Comparative law; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal procedure; Parochialism; Public law; Context (archaeology); Criminal jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Geography; Business","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1392640208775994,"gpt":0.3969144351709777,"spread":0.2576504142933784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001633818,0.0003608815,0.000495166,0.00408098,0.004073433,0.003864377,0.0007342502,0.001809555,0.03128877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004750377,0.0001651314,0.0002555979,0.004525892,0.007128337,0.004936957,0.002097801,0.001962893,0.002292264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003730506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001571298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003212895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004894866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978353,0.001211084,0.0000679563,0.0002287492,0.0005320844,0.0001248442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982419,0.001139512,0.00009495123,0.0002037841,0.0002412999,0.00007848646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001595265,0.000006215431,0.0001096243,0.00004803987,0.000001122401,0.00002266887,0.0007462522,0.00004232284,0.0000168695,0.9716806,0.01138308,0.01594155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002037661,0.00001617552,0.0009279019,0.0002949431,0.000002309882,0.0002643388,0.001327081,0.0001245519,0.0000653371,0.4003893,0.5965806,0.000005499834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003155146,0.02378923,0.005128054,0.007319214,0.0004454387,0.00003029607,0.0001381627,0.00003123417,0.9599633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6564744,0.07273621,0.01929267,0.009772692,0.002921088,0.0004460624,0.001219405,0.0001754591,0.2369621],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03128877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1046714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885547096","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; House of Commons; State (computer science); Law and economics; Commons; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics; Parliament; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Louis Massicotte","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03544045504200584,"gpt":0.3541252779583814,"spread":0.3186848229163756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05439986,0.0009409058,0.001518422,0.008660256,0.007633644,0.01525927,0.003707797,0.01065025,0.01343071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08646967,0.001122748,0.001120971,0.008676646,0.06761131,0.02193615,0.006353222,0.01312079,0.002379524],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02966166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0304154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06039768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04367311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9464422,0.02920382,0.002584372,0.005389757,0.01363832,0.002741484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472206,0.03759817,0.002280799,0.005549141,0.006258023,0.001093284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001287993,0.000001827565,0.00002735227,0.00002741803,0.000001537978,0.000005600551,0.000182486,0.00005810606,0.000002713389,0.9940725,0.003560005,0.002059258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001032714,0.000008574144,0.0001754988,0.0006634947,0.000007174824,0.00002861288,0.0004309337,0.0002861382,0.00003965533,0.8027408,0.1955939,0.00001489455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003784055,0.04668827,0.07086055,0.1671988,0.003988945,0.0003416583,0.0003576003,0.0001638677,0.7066163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6144344,0.07147889,0.09468308,0.0866252,0.007661913,0.002470849,0.0006410315,0.0007156578,0.1212889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413819913","doi":"","title":"Criminalization confusion and concerns: the decade since the Cuerrier decision.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Confusion; Supreme court; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","authors":[{"name":"Alison Symington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635375325936003,"gpt":0.3279187207725473,"spread":0.264381188178947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01760342,0.0005804478,0.0009762103,0.004358349,0.01181682,0.02056191,0.003053128,0.0215552,0.004302816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06022014,0.0006783463,0.0006279303,0.005860497,0.03787107,0.01840946,0.008103705,0.0244245,0.0006724432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03231044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03371238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2022855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3093684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874133,0.003355361,0.0009174183,0.002148578,0.004132723,0.002032654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492819,0.03047667,0.005888252,0.001159165,0.008609595,0.004584383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009944811,0.00005362352,0.003539895,0.0009492007,0.00005443396,0.001547201,0.01569659,0.00009291089,0.0001195738,0.4016393,0.4057166,0.1704912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002033211,0.00003319134,0.007332069,0.003731676,0.00003611844,0.001221822,0.01601168,0.00006208242,0.0001332524,0.03171117,0.9396437,0.00006284389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00594168,0.4261082,0.0001633168,0.5442605,0.004154346,0.00001021888,0.0001040925,0.0000088684,0.01924881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1582385,0.330633,0.0005317375,0.4877491,0.01182934,0.00005432026,0.0002710703,0.00004617461,0.01064674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4022161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084741629","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2001.tb00891.x","title":"The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Charter; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Tsvi Kahana","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06016539205398035,"gpt":0.3195389679592179,"spread":0.2593735759052375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02344448,0.000469708,0.0007473116,0.001855328,0.02488876,0.02755941,0.003870976,0.01679668,0.01330667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02772609,0.0006749819,0.0007260712,0.00203652,0.0820082,0.01535253,0.008816553,0.01522624,0.001439939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06092267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06088711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3973892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3699033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9779795,0.01292341,0.0003364657,0.001833641,0.002647494,0.004279385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770042,0.01458834,0.001566451,0.002143074,0.002908727,0.00178917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009379092,0.000005958542,0.0001418928,0.0000164082,0.000002143588,0.00005268527,0.01313116,0.00009794456,0.00003096652,0.9806908,0.004055613,0.001765105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487215,0.0000285987,0.001397077,0.000542385,0.00002487828,0.0001129838,0.03711702,0.001015472,0.0003992752,0.5383333,0.4208722,0.00008188632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05134884,0.00829233,0.01145726,0.3292321,0.001018513,0.00007628027,0.00008980447,0.0001547728,0.5983301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921088,0.00165402,0.001218118,0.01553577,0.0004767841,0.0001040493,0.00002059129,0.0001260697,0.0597767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6026108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7901523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05971884230427966,"gpt":0.3008158458132109,"spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0171876,0.0005781672,0.0007055797,0.00161477,0.01396407,0.01322091,0.003298918,0.02714548,0.008736799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0374985,0.000709714,0.001352093,0.001792592,0.0364113,0.02063535,0.01575597,0.03213852,0.0006493893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01494885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03404595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03915019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836377,0.0046018,0.0007613894,0.002840784,0.005099745,0.003058653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97216,0.01928922,0.002588127,0.001645038,0.003121263,0.001196323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002917837,0.00003306557,0.0009878952,0.00006199144,0.00001181853,0.0004544424,0.0121883,0.0002941862,0.0002368971,0.9281397,0.04881972,0.00874289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353501,0.0001221068,0.00401112,0.0005519973,0.00004889868,0.0005997769,0.02764254,0.001734526,0.001163812,0.2641763,0.6996056,0.0002081041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0514359,0.003696637,0.01065112,0.8332224,0.002496939,0.00007876852,0.00008552362,0.0001305269,0.09820203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6297315,0.002557473,0.002741416,0.3279506,0.003440157,0.0001323618,0.00004860116,0.0001194716,0.03327836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03404595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556715205","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Cincinnati law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Law; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Homicide; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Fundamental rights","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05866183048251948,"gpt":0.2479129312765329,"spread":0.1892511007940134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246156,0.0002435593,0.0005636312,0.003220255,0.01353844,0.003322924,0.002148838,0.002443711,0.007971374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01659994,0.0004495335,0.0005244819,0.005239152,0.002941284,0.0006957073,0.002593809,0.004346181,0.0003064309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1004699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1973613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946825,0.0003670876,0.0001893095,0.0002871223,0.002441266,0.002032655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859269,0.001688869,0.001379797,0.0003288322,0.006292822,0.004382759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002168533,0.0003725404,0.3210114,0.0006716672,0.0002314046,0.008492304,0.02030024,0.002456036,0.0005048424,0.1456043,0.3225987,0.1775397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014491,0.0001130484,0.728832,0.001804228,0.0002956666,0.002462219,0.02408406,0.002619381,0.0006167382,0.01696662,0.2216969,0.0003642283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5217754,0.02456903,0.000601039,0.120976,0.001225316,0.0003271558,0.003407494,0.00009377001,0.3270248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678019,0.008625742,0.000292478,0.01049218,0.00009087304,0.00002865961,0.0006361607,0.00002297118,0.01200891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1004699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531591372","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1437","title":"The Ideal Victim, the Hysterical Complainant, and the Disclosure of Confidential Records: The Implications of the Charter for Sexual Assault Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Compromise; Charter","authors":[{"name":"Lise Gotell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0424104110898984,"gpt":0.3055980323655133,"spread":0.2631876212756149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007665852,0.000279722,0.0002920191,0.001789111,0.01347252,0.01642832,0.002466513,0.006519212,0.002253367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01323156,0.000361472,0.0003287052,0.001775081,0.07001962,0.00519217,0.004731135,0.005860672,0.0002297585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04033536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07546234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7918937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7742268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913613,0.0023567,0.0002340643,0.0005205524,0.004011945,0.00151537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991954,0.005305887,0.000608892,0.0004753593,0.001241209,0.0004147235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005874701,0.000004507314,0.000315392,0.00001835365,9.428887e-7,0.0002747746,0.01533149,0.00009096845,0.00007430033,0.9754533,0.003638143,0.004791845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003951754,0.00005528063,0.005116926,0.0009726553,0.00004108876,0.001172828,0.09537227,0.001482809,0.001108708,0.4029611,0.4915033,0.0001735644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09474733,0.01730316,0.0141781,0.3342244,0.001403893,0.0001371179,0.0001650908,0.0001071649,0.5377338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385397,0.007685184,0.004232884,0.01593448,0.0006028446,0.00006629687,0.00003971836,0.00003928821,0.03285958],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2081063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4186638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798828826","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139962964.004","title":"Enough About Me: Why Privacy is About Power, not Consent (or Harm)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Internet privacy; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07493607685941893,"gpt":0.2876754027174099,"spread":0.2127393258579909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004923303,0.0004308026,0.0004469629,0.0005844115,0.003037515,0.008890077,0.0009958076,0.005627804,0.01118994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01057565,0.0003642229,0.0003809214,0.0009634143,0.02270113,0.01512605,0.002358904,0.009469794,0.004151226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003106622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00348679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004760192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960117,0.002351366,0.0001014722,0.0003366242,0.0009602288,0.0002385407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948767,0.004189865,0.0001254525,0.0002801147,0.0004111256,0.0001167562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009326866,0.000005879963,0.00006102948,0.0001473521,0.00000394555,0.00008348913,0.005313227,0.00004809925,0.00008250299,0.8258165,0.1427523,0.02567638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005375386,0.000008536409,0.0001737788,0.0008098885,0.000004944884,0.0003169806,0.002406291,0.0001042894,0.0002199294,0.4882202,0.5077168,0.00001309515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002125338,0.07904893,0.01436698,0.3892406,0.005019849,0.00005175372,0.000174767,0.0001072777,0.5098646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2239049,0.0959889,0.01591183,0.1818821,0.005906311,0.0002995861,0.0002617434,0.0004843814,0.4753603],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01118994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03743404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581992304","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Separation of powers; Legislature; House of Commons; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics; Judicial deference; Legislation; Doctrine; Law and economics; Judicial review; Public administration; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02276897726288724,"gpt":0.3046797585109426,"spread":0.2819107812480554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01594251,0.0003848148,0.0007715262,0.001665391,0.01431644,0.01368634,0.00241223,0.004475413,0.01165772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282845,0.0009317456,0.0004898956,0.0023643,0.02952633,0.007091388,0.005614656,0.009654794,0.0009788969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03383918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05008628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4685426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5731637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808083,0.004846363,0.0008421878,0.002497572,0.006950856,0.00405471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865724,0.007146808,0.001057292,0.001445178,0.002855376,0.0009229598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005638158,0.000002722909,0.0001959994,0.000008440308,0.000002025535,0.00002422155,0.001343399,0.00006989555,0.00004509289,0.9930923,0.002586254,0.002623954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000578121,0.00002306886,0.003205067,0.0003659994,0.00003794441,0.0001037131,0.004008493,0.0008528383,0.0005791542,0.5181602,0.4725377,0.00006808111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03949784,0.003351501,0.015684,0.04651304,0.0003752317,0.0001709211,0.0003773216,0.00009256483,0.8939375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8833292,0.002548999,0.008838405,0.01530042,0.000494817,0.0003678499,0.0003012715,0.0001917749,0.08862726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4685426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9316307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201423329","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Criminal justice; Law; Identification (biology); Political science; Psychology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01292478191664596,"gpt":0.3062719541755838,"spread":0.2933471722589379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01973967,0.0003366916,0.0003542957,0.003247201,0.01405915,0.009570113,0.002371381,0.003444894,0.001738399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03013478,0.0003938898,0.0003424171,0.00147662,0.05640424,0.00725652,0.01166042,0.008449976,0.0001639195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009167071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006904332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01238367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01100908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864537,0.008321897,0.0005302032,0.0007912174,0.001943228,0.00195967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975279,0.01638845,0.003414724,0.001348958,0.002093269,0.001475472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002020321,0.00005753657,0.008423325,0.0001107699,0.00001622511,0.001142837,0.2778409,0.0003072021,0.0001388164,0.6900967,0.003992042,0.0178536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001368208,0.00007323996,0.0241736,0.001182105,0.0000374212,0.001867828,0.5007887,0.001938673,0.0008479048,0.3560971,0.1128652,0.0001144535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615709,0.01163155,0.02063305,0.1877347,0.0009005421,0.0001426077,0.00006281082,0.00007151513,0.2172523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924766,0.001182966,0.0005638974,0.002810735,0.0001608695,0.00002178132,0.000006999622,0.000009609421,0.002766507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01973967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1043946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Gray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09892597009970915,"gpt":0.3910029223963675,"spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06869956,0.0005224354,0.001539145,0.004357081,0.005763776,0.01218314,0.006441632,0.0160713,0.01063687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1766278,0.0008468525,0.0009769691,0.004547931,0.01841573,0.01885512,0.006440125,0.01516047,0.001019265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01927178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05564116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02943107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03398724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9592233,0.02120623,0.003152605,0.004150748,0.008546308,0.003720896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8563385,0.08655085,0.01344698,0.01036248,0.02539923,0.007902037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003530175,0.0001628336,0.000749863,0.001197694,0.0000324387,0.0001763192,0.002436407,0.0007951434,0.0001471636,0.7908453,0.05804,0.1453817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007349201,0.0001553117,0.006708688,0.01151445,0.00004705292,0.0003965351,0.00547249,0.0006265131,0.0003060474,0.1975828,0.7770023,0.0001143611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007577456,0.09326778,0.004646309,0.8499409,0.004582012,0.00009037414,0.0001523702,0.0001085195,0.03963432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.384494,0.1241012,0.02423901,0.4403266,0.01228095,0.0005469871,0.0004961967,0.0001749938,0.01334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06869956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3633224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260291965","doi":"","title":"“The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Darcy L. MacPherson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04442344463517078,"gpt":0.3273808466940629,"spread":0.2829574020588921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02622643,0.0005715779,0.002054515,0.003013051,0.006869173,0.008457882,0.005708104,0.05300877,0.004692353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1466274,0.001154316,0.001632451,0.003420465,0.0475981,0.02300797,0.004623041,0.04927852,0.001105112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01033629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01065546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860182,0.005664866,0.001112878,0.002985556,0.003353881,0.0008646004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7643349,0.2137566,0.006119914,0.004225347,0.00939274,0.002170589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082303,0.00003610923,0.0007830667,0.0001758744,0.00003851873,0.000493354,0.003250048,0.0003495132,0.0001037171,0.7861811,0.197675,0.01080554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008650384,0.00003486007,0.001190918,0.000636756,0.00005235652,0.000468521,0.002119775,0.001051664,0.0004763036,0.8399647,0.1537954,0.0001222174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00135503,0.003174613,0.001188878,0.9894736,0.001815494,0.000006106847,0.00003481623,0.000007835449,0.002943564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0937147,0.006044469,0.002840267,0.8536162,0.03879141,0.00006559355,0.00005703438,0.00006058103,0.004809783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05300877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1387003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495532371","doi":"10.5040/9781472561091","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Criminology; Sociology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07231684435059137,"gpt":0.3014732633426873,"spread":0.2291564189920959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01215832,0.0007953717,0.001031215,0.007611318,0.0159906,0.01493144,0.003870188,0.008675974,0.006596474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01367224,0.0005137065,0.0009789296,0.004899148,0.09526319,0.01560575,0.006330637,0.01446759,0.001036258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04282518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02725558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2323472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2160697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864074,0.005879101,0.0003108707,0.001689308,0.004027809,0.001685511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867259,0.009439535,0.0003869749,0.0006545534,0.00224928,0.0005437791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.603639e-7,0.000003098771,0.00006942693,0.00001565088,0.000001234275,0.00002161752,0.001762006,0.00009107558,0.000006580953,0.992229,0.003967116,0.001832158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004852252,0.000005274741,0.0002745712,0.0002261839,0.000004163553,0.00004133384,0.002820828,0.0006007502,0.00003776422,0.8413405,0.154631,0.00001262617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01793597,0.03762778,0.02326353,0.3197078,0.003727739,0.00006690542,0.0001843044,0.0001035564,0.5973824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7889441,0.03470746,0.01270816,0.06834003,0.004090529,0.0002025769,0.0002072442,0.000280547,0.09051941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2323472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4619896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148442110","doi":"","title":"The Grudge Informer Case Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03791083770159604,"gpt":0.2899185551775086,"spread":0.2520077174759126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007586778,0.0004546673,0.0005538093,0.001844059,0.01685558,0.00942669,0.00142925,0.01650999,0.004099939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01500074,0.0005737656,0.0005000143,0.002346001,0.02447105,0.005249107,0.005456166,0.01446919,0.0006120916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01548833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008104211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1147188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1458969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920419,0.002845439,0.0001616616,0.0007546051,0.001615299,0.002581063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945609,0.003999374,0.0003373841,0.0002304071,0.0004732273,0.0003987693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000562821,0.00001140627,0.0007779584,0.00004484266,0.000009123946,0.003434788,0.03822648,0.0001628275,0.0002470077,0.9205559,0.02671455,0.009758813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000675674,0.00005575101,0.004016144,0.0006171012,0.00005978792,0.002776012,0.05369479,0.0002936422,0.0009356881,0.1120267,0.8253418,0.0001149992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1934455,0.01301047,0.002384789,0.3134713,0.002066525,0.00004575912,0.0001026095,0.0000485393,0.4754245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220099,0.00321241,0.0003492045,0.04452542,0.0009934229,0.00001902754,0.00002170731,0.00002744355,0.02884137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.228102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157995933","doi":"10.1177/1362480614568746","title":"Post-Soviet criminal justice: The persistence of distorted neo-inquisitorialism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Persistence (discontinuity); Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Power (physics); Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Solomon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1456656845259538,"gpt":0.3623384010337559,"spread":0.2166727165078021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006720264,0.00009727501,0.0003651952,0.0009624391,0.002418578,0.004584123,0.0005787668,0.0008274671,0.0005258534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01622803,0.0001932471,0.0001574764,0.001364096,0.02250427,0.00308006,0.004197864,0.002661558,0.00008445561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004378477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003094379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004889313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004225365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930972,0.003384745,0.0004247735,0.0006569686,0.001761822,0.0006743881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915282,0.003336907,0.00184625,0.002042867,0.0009658442,0.0002799825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143782,0.00003123542,0.02883592,0.000109495,0.00005670657,0.0003017896,0.07069936,0.001142873,0.0006110308,0.8563492,0.001520672,0.0402274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005756145,0.0001820552,0.1707648,0.0004590066,0.00006272967,0.0009669437,0.03365143,0.002880317,0.002724438,0.7207607,0.06740844,0.00008156297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315538,0.002293132,0.003481754,0.01447396,0.00008669903,0.00001287589,0.00006273336,0.00002372619,0.04801117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994166,0.0001447244,0.0001182484,0.0001398402,0.000008867212,0.00000133401,0.000005480056,0.000001764969,0.0001631351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006720264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03554058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258099037","doi":"10.29173/alr382","title":"Improving Wrongful Conviction Review: Lessons from a Comparative Analysis of Continental Criminal Procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal law; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Paul Jonathan Saguil","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1053995524662607,"gpt":0.4042746286968665,"spread":0.2988750762306058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1432946,0.0002785978,0.001588354,0.02023694,0.005179467,0.008605393,0.003115108,0.002405455,0.002507236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3398042,0.0004678578,0.0009323655,0.02804749,0.008900941,0.006772635,0.005156039,0.001625122,0.0001436245],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04282077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05084747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2594593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4807683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7959409,0.1642468,0.009189854,0.003807026,0.02168826,0.005127082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5573865,0.3188623,0.01511885,0.01526236,0.08930222,0.004067765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006821094,0.0002339035,0.04391998,0.008718245,0.00149466,0.0005197786,0.06561345,0.002239617,0.0004447895,0.3745233,0.02702447,0.4745857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004059366,0.001246538,0.3363031,0.02631355,0.003037446,0.001051547,0.1216714,0.004012942,0.001680647,0.07755627,0.4262788,0.0004418435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2968642,0.4149058,0.01675387,0.09018233,0.001390359,0.001176199,0.0008496897,0.0001536702,0.1777238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318027,0.04368379,0.01538786,0.005443837,0.0003171761,0.000447017,0.0003180403,0.00006103524,0.002538637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7578233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555190754","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683.014","title":"The post-9/11 migration of Britain's Terrorism Act 2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Globe; Political science; Law; Politics; Political economy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03854392250976334,"gpt":0.2594798371329847,"spread":0.2209359146232213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323492,0.000238511,0.0001442183,0.0009875463,0.002836232,0.003420972,0.0005037469,0.001807729,0.003266834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00290479,0.0002957842,0.0001248753,0.001522777,0.004996234,0.001226543,0.001216621,0.003550294,0.0007009492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008594639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005473296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1137152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2302048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982608,0.0004769912,0.00007239977,0.00009694223,0.0008143577,0.0002786251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988562,0.0005303342,0.0002095433,0.00007502835,0.0002489492,0.00007989926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001099786,0.0000616142,0.01029637,0.0004650615,0.00001655934,0.001150788,0.06390764,0.000486469,0.001293866,0.6106166,0.19945,0.1121452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001337137,0.00003711396,0.05131418,0.000560301,0.000009038084,0.0003495992,0.008113958,0.0001130822,0.0007149897,0.0064019,0.9323496,0.00002272616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1720972,0.02148277,0.001267332,0.04085308,0.001607232,0.00008737361,0.0005484107,0.00005087983,0.7620057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7059448,0.01889041,0.0008292478,0.01059712,0.0003756427,0.00010387,0.0006182106,0.00005182549,0.2625888],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1137152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2261066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041054523","doi":"","title":"Committing to Justice: The Case for Impact of Race and Culture Assessments in Sentencing African Canadian Offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Legal culture; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Maria C Dugas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05734236290949063,"gpt":0.3685529271919873,"spread":0.3112105642824967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0241284,0.0006246953,0.0005266668,0.003151577,0.04295771,0.01189078,0.005096974,0.006174578,0.002522721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07865661,0.0007157264,0.0008236137,0.002474835,0.01759213,0.004156149,0.006459069,0.01323482,0.0002156971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1131647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2190723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.964516,0.00852872,0.00087958,0.001570935,0.01363845,0.0108663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590111,0.01412585,0.002088599,0.001321308,0.01620454,0.007248749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000345011,0.0002621829,0.0931438,0.0005426235,0.0001618892,0.01018989,0.2969304,0.002032463,0.002316669,0.3025237,0.0881236,0.2034279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115512,0.0003006453,0.2424337,0.003953217,0.001047884,0.003940009,0.3963069,0.004896752,0.004671282,0.04668544,0.2947184,0.0009301612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4320857,0.006720305,0.003575546,0.3178544,0.001349773,0.0004307551,0.0002189036,0.0001012242,0.2376634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727564,0.001819149,0.00170435,0.0142496,0.0001750354,0.00007494073,0.00002871718,0.00003103333,0.009160878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1131647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.821071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970983722","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831","title":"The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Entrapment; Interview; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Simon Bronitt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1372774496885587,"gpt":0.4025959515357165,"spread":0.2653185018471578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01046491,0.0003041907,0.001161803,0.007481526,0.01762365,0.007251781,0.002144841,0.001677603,0.001893793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741311,0.0006004342,0.0004169839,0.01480533,0.00976778,0.003022106,0.00666173,0.002249549,0.00016871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05757377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08700123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835997,0.005640109,0.0005392444,0.0007480358,0.005189373,0.004283628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728373,0.01013541,0.00423329,0.0007891547,0.008763153,0.003241633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636924,0.0002632839,0.1339967,0.0005110443,0.0001040517,0.00249357,0.7679507,0.0004615285,0.000750961,0.01550711,0.00334086,0.07435657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001295329,0.00008920169,0.409576,0.0006129185,0.00004416174,0.0005577441,0.562438,0.0004501009,0.0003763839,0.0007838771,0.02498262,0.00007605286],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808645,0.004643176,0.0003044268,0.002062242,0.00005334423,0.0000625459,0.00005495081,0.000004700207,0.01195013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915423,0.004509443,0.0003572653,0.0006982777,0.00002065388,0.00003290734,0.00007627239,0.00001281509,0.00274994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05757377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4177288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527184592","doi":"","title":"A Flawed Compass: A Human Rights Analysis of the Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Scrutiny; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Mandate; Law; Public relations","authors":[{"name":"Michael Jackson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Graham Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04969152503861261,"gpt":0.352417466790031,"spread":0.3027259417514184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02826278,0.0006710988,0.0007088759,0.006363136,0.01510718,0.02156246,0.003723461,0.01076545,0.01447279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06230246,0.0005881562,0.00129539,0.00664116,0.03217808,0.01431818,0.008099628,0.0143024,0.001162131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05439634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1125119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5151672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4967193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9571648,0.01338685,0.0007410287,0.00179556,0.01724324,0.009668528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672905,0.01441339,0.001565121,0.001803661,0.01257184,0.002355571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695483,0.00001858218,0.0009281713,0.00004656715,0.000007155367,0.0001138134,0.005321631,0.0002408521,0.00003047771,0.970009,0.01724578,0.006021015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063841,0.0001234385,0.01115559,0.001089035,0.00007561247,0.000187347,0.06395038,0.002176684,0.0004943958,0.4896336,0.4309092,0.0001408519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04113377,0.004877165,0.008619593,0.2906987,0.001014289,0.000649434,0.0006923496,0.00007411492,0.6522406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835339,0.003926885,0.005558528,0.07396449,0.0005085606,0.0004141749,0.0003593208,0.0001418201,0.07978718],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5151672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588436416","doi":"","title":"Disenfranchisement as Punishment: European Court of Human Rights, UK and Canadian Responses to Prisoner Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Voting; European union; European Union law; Convention; Parliament; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jacqueline Hodgson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.065308629649263,"gpt":0.3582365544041626,"spread":0.2929279247548996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795927,0.0004018394,0.0007875519,0.004438297,0.0265357,0.01085749,0.003326767,0.008422116,0.008176726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1045583,0.0005074876,0.0005467357,0.008626457,0.01107268,0.004171779,0.005522651,0.007688659,0.0003642362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1344039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1015494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753704,0.005948526,0.001060956,0.001365226,0.007224362,0.009030409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513058,0.02158534,0.004336003,0.001275708,0.01700644,0.004490636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001104326,0.0002700456,0.1070392,0.0006238576,0.0001839159,0.002724499,0.3392629,0.0008815024,0.0008309752,0.3448356,0.1426792,0.05956397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002996641,0.0001603025,0.2605474,0.001469346,0.0002730718,0.0004569583,0.3673777,0.001229707,0.001145374,0.01421566,0.352338,0.0004868957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6573704,0.007288754,0.0003832172,0.141531,0.0006893621,0.0002044833,0.000666601,0.00001686064,0.1918492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631065,0.002644741,0.0002166942,0.01833482,0.00009210125,0.00005651549,0.0001664984,0.00001832453,0.01536387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1344039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878148134","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1129","title":"Aboriginal Over-representation and R. v. Gladue: Where We Were, Where We Are and Where We Might Be Going","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Representation (politics); Supreme court; Political science; Law; History; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Rudin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05892869499764502,"gpt":0.3632767423738641,"spread":0.3043480473762191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007904348,0.0001584879,0.0005152011,0.001535405,0.005770923,0.004093152,0.001193357,0.003874513,0.002426275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02376907,0.0002210959,0.000453614,0.001933133,0.006533063,0.001931918,0.002269794,0.005437754,0.0002407904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009819085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02547473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5087226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7316551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931322,0.002489411,0.0002227071,0.0004600761,0.002274394,0.001421257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906514,0.004698761,0.001760707,0.0002298264,0.00177391,0.0008854787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513155,0.00008805239,0.06525958,0.002485165,0.0002394371,0.005202497,0.07569709,0.0003302512,0.0005609522,0.5520431,0.1281846,0.169658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007443738,0.0003111509,0.1732353,0.01144207,0.0004854033,0.004144031,0.088884,0.0002250045,0.001221261,0.05587803,0.6638954,0.0002039185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2093785,0.2794949,0.0006646357,0.3107805,0.001793646,0.00004837816,0.0002465846,0.00001828424,0.1975747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8319845,0.08792891,0.0004984176,0.05744597,0.0007388557,0.00002645898,0.00009374264,0.0000143508,0.02126882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945995780","doi":"","title":"The power of persuasion : the politics of the new right in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Black Rose Books","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Kirsten Kozolanka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0318731851168803,"gpt":0.2901918900405461,"spread":0.2583187049236658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003158289,0.0003585773,0.0004768615,0.001092512,0.03158863,0.01323541,0.001364226,0.005822355,0.02057599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008762482,0.0007094266,0.0003167082,0.002107959,0.02644448,0.005767127,0.00386653,0.006497091,0.001295793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1255521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995116,0.00101093,0.000100408,0.0004437333,0.001702701,0.001626314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995397,0.002165402,0.000220297,0.0002443135,0.001102176,0.0008708155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002952597,0.00001175078,0.00102065,0.00004681573,0.000006441097,0.0001857762,0.03362881,0.0001410985,0.00009939619,0.9000078,0.04995988,0.01486196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000369323,0.00001561956,0.006028098,0.0002590489,0.00002476752,0.0001050069,0.02732768,0.0004737005,0.0002446246,0.2063648,0.7590602,0.00005958397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02092698,0.004895946,0.001043777,0.08278185,0.0003110928,0.00004747914,0.0001125775,0.00001956342,0.8898607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4914678,0.003585792,0.0008857823,0.006523701,0.0001747587,0.00006357162,0.00004129644,0.00008055058,0.4971768],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.105375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.764553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991746385","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.002","title":"The disappointing remedy? Damages as a remedy for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Punitive damages; Tort; Law; Human rights; Common law; Proportionality (law); Disappointment; Discretion; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0180758684164944,"gpt":0.299539059668864,"spread":0.2814631912523696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01450976,0.0005164992,0.0008607215,0.001743127,0.005625475,0.0128105,0.00228379,0.01743872,0.006684905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03876739,0.0005198781,0.0009913306,0.0007893739,0.02919559,0.0155405,0.006333695,0.01474576,0.000923635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007619598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01063617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01147554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9751868,0.008910111,0.001137602,0.003468157,0.009011153,0.002286101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860361,0.007095228,0.001503656,0.002725252,0.001716964,0.0009228285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001396199,0.00001534723,0.0002996025,0.00004564083,0.00001429205,0.00007465287,0.0004235434,0.00038591,0.0002230409,0.9799705,0.008340354,0.01019323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006434812,0.0001792974,0.001690546,0.0005610314,0.00005431372,0.0005009691,0.001599855,0.001086659,0.001137304,0.7242601,0.2687605,0.0001049973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02650536,0.03093253,0.03856693,0.6469979,0.005387421,0.0001186059,0.000107835,0.0002199237,0.2511637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554283,0.008463019,0.00957338,0.0654461,0.003415145,0.000109305,0.00002975477,0.0001005379,0.05743445],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07673591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983507877","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0040","title":"Protecting Research Confidentiality : Towards a Research-Participant Shield Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ted Palys","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Lowman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1654605485845764,"gpt":0.403462653446372,"spread":0.2380021048617956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2949574,0.0009872768,0.00201495,0.003190967,0.01017312,0.02318623,0.007256846,0.03762058,0.007569858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3136623,0.001804461,0.002332073,0.002782252,0.05090375,0.02892444,0.01914639,0.02942998,0.003117076],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01104525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05884942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005718075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004481817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7370574,0.1734751,0.01248307,0.01864979,0.0502587,0.008075902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5348292,0.3463087,0.01800579,0.05481104,0.03556535,0.01047986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000278137,0.00002866036,0.000459485,0.0000980122,0.00001180649,0.0001030484,0.002921985,0.0001914365,0.0001675961,0.9824646,0.006631294,0.006894129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001503992,0.0001760323,0.0005571425,0.001456368,0.00006993959,0.000338746,0.002340253,0.001483191,0.001067661,0.8245184,0.1677572,0.00008469465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01422831,0.006923479,0.2447868,0.4982389,0.002940579,0.001870328,0.000348817,0.0003052446,0.2303576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5022209,0.007070922,0.1628983,0.26298,0.005711759,0.006068727,0.0003239452,0.0002722743,0.05245307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345743899","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Paul Marcus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carol A. Brook","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bruno Fiannaca","is_ca":false},{"name":"David J. Harvey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jenny McEwan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Renee Pomerance","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06726659079461812,"gpt":0.3286751651652943,"spread":0.2614085743706762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827179,0.000148581,0.0005495161,0.003125877,0.008964295,0.004424318,0.001313761,0.002223568,0.0144907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02216748,0.0002904586,0.0004285086,0.007958606,0.003704016,0.003278106,0.002232742,0.003822791,0.0004981039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03302597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03186769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9040027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950308,0.00127007,0.0001263389,0.0001950934,0.001327626,0.002050101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920026,0.003566318,0.0008629062,0.0001321219,0.002205241,0.001230865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008437801,0.0006118846,0.1554456,0.001020009,0.0003559752,0.002374291,0.08441006,0.00373096,0.0004634537,0.4954093,0.1117605,0.1435742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009937908,0.0001613962,0.6463712,0.001218198,0.0002098015,0.0002779336,0.1982411,0.00147152,0.0002842658,0.01762571,0.1339525,0.00008707884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5438073,0.02521516,0.0005548804,0.03780267,0.0002855732,0.0001094754,0.0008067535,0.00001327583,0.391405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809542,0.004266869,0.0001061891,0.002568367,0.00003395593,0.00002665781,0.0001445586,0.000006880563,0.01189247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09599733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2396213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143034414","doi":"","title":"General Defences in Criminal Law: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Compromise; Doctrine; Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Alan Reed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Bohlander","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicola Wake","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emma Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.149561597980628,"gpt":0.3894280440194031,"spread":0.2398664460387751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704058,0.0008835049,0.0007267147,0.005965159,0.006009192,0.0105539,0.001660695,0.006550374,0.01918346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910999,0.0003506776,0.0006049544,0.01015458,0.02438641,0.008469427,0.004751809,0.004076498,0.00192339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01316768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003550398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01164092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01259348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965361,0.002131046,0.0001232094,0.0002138169,0.000538004,0.000457753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978934,0.001277148,0.0001952171,0.0001125562,0.0003085613,0.0002131181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006925242,0.00002863423,0.0002793108,0.000231292,0.000003272925,0.00009481571,0.00614494,0.0001235991,0.00003353944,0.9370716,0.0331954,0.02278672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007237504,0.00002166369,0.001195076,0.001267823,0.000003994628,0.0003451454,0.01426632,0.0001067203,0.00004186096,0.1931343,0.7895991,0.00001072122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006709475,0.3826734,0.002061188,0.06875537,0.002255666,0.00002628841,0.00008543348,0.00002969346,0.5374034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4440771,0.4077168,0.002974264,0.02237611,0.007633886,0.0002249654,0.0002850966,0.0001104575,0.1146013],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01918346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09553868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594526090","doi":"","title":"Self-governing Codifications of English Criminal Law and Empire: The Queensland and Canadian Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Politics; Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Barry Wright","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03147503646858546,"gpt":0.258304229251282,"spread":0.2268291927826966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002759216,0.0004955636,0.000430987,0.004368979,0.02436476,0.006323673,0.001869654,0.002126958,0.004718736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111927,0.0003826193,0.0004428671,0.007796488,0.01995087,0.002525374,0.003492688,0.002983145,0.0002846599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1119289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06847829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954986,0.001056501,0.0001757877,0.000245116,0.001913133,0.001110917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951466,0.00163201,0.000254304,0.0003628866,0.002287956,0.0003163154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001657031,0.0000137092,0.001760449,0.00006967338,0.000006577964,0.0005346531,0.06142381,0.0005826058,0.0001715438,0.9136412,0.0129858,0.008793375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000340723,0.00002617297,0.02374677,0.0005249556,0.00004599302,0.0008412505,0.07662223,0.003130578,0.0006089243,0.1173694,0.7768689,0.0001806836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1533263,0.004523283,0.004354814,0.02039566,0.0002844849,0.0001474383,0.0005395634,0.00007087788,0.8163576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187561,0.003468249,0.00406937,0.001220947,0.00006241856,0.0001096576,0.0001807225,0.00008962883,0.07204289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1119289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241033841","doi":"","title":"Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Cynthia A. Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04554061431224795,"gpt":0.3190094333473102,"spread":0.2734688190350623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012656,0.0004427702,0.0005596101,0.004461195,0.007355161,0.005490678,0.001558201,0.004877504,0.004675343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02703739,0.0008039814,0.0005886567,0.005277783,0.002707403,0.001438326,0.002892898,0.003168446,0.0004380573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0576881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2786186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846447,0.001404901,0.0009414885,0.000545754,0.01028033,0.00218286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323706,0.007420657,0.00339716,0.002106479,0.0449013,0.009803781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210827,0.00007354351,0.06359851,0.0004600052,0.00006653779,0.0002574789,0.006497153,0.0004938883,0.0006428723,0.009134666,0.8973455,0.02130869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007776642,0.00005171801,0.3734366,0.0007014996,0.000147682,0.00006696287,0.008280889,0.0005373205,0.0006728278,0.00113765,0.6147878,0.000101346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1790155,0.01698751,0.001962993,0.4900682,0.005296282,0.003130486,0.05212808,0.0002691502,0.2511419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4901454,0.01927339,0.009731906,0.0446206,0.001990268,0.00237985,0.0246366,0.0002023819,0.4070195],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0576881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4185584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751803832","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1172","title":"A More Lasting Comfort?: The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R. v. Ferguson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05607256762659776,"gpt":0.3494054192767731,"spread":0.2933328516501753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01073696,0.0002449917,0.0006418268,0.001021474,0.009996005,0.009440368,0.001444232,0.01333151,0.002408801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0201173,0.0003214515,0.000365874,0.0009526986,0.03081183,0.00782445,0.002072053,0.01586934,0.0003289413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01721324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01458302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3021436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4713688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911378,0.003973243,0.0001924323,0.0009946534,0.002344967,0.001356812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909835,0.006759315,0.0005619343,0.0002095992,0.0007760812,0.0007096135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000226956,0.00001497986,0.0002974073,0.00003087276,0.00000533991,0.0001136845,0.002690777,0.00005862588,0.0001095342,0.927328,0.06240369,0.006924396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006737616,0.00005998306,0.004383605,0.0006377304,0.00003735011,0.000192361,0.01014147,0.0003200821,0.000401576,0.5918494,0.3917917,0.0001174707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01099883,0.0315165,0.0008547722,0.8857708,0.001174944,0.000008805365,0.0000400308,0.000009660164,0.06962576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6048983,0.01382119,0.001191416,0.3497669,0.003461761,0.00003699122,0.00003426692,0.00004509021,0.02674394],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3021436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161752717","doi":"10.1017/s0008197302001551","title":"Digging the Dirt: Disclosure of Records in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Attendance; Anonymity; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Section (typography); Psychology; Sexual violence; Poison control; Medicine; History; Suicide prevention; Business; Medical emergency; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Temkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06966465143572685,"gpt":0.3151801492568423,"spread":0.2455154978211154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03129231,0.0002119533,0.0005460849,0.003269054,0.006166715,0.008199263,0.002159503,0.01528849,0.002334735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1080003,0.0007731314,0.0005422193,0.003251976,0.01470826,0.01301348,0.008159756,0.008814008,0.0002978008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005420806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01237658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03287527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07660334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9700962,0.01809111,0.002190437,0.0008808304,0.005220783,0.003520656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353421,0.05130166,0.006973439,0.002323878,0.002472887,0.001586052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002489963,0.0001436352,0.03510204,0.0005733547,0.00004572357,0.01525294,0.1158399,0.000568672,0.0008043917,0.7474544,0.0157336,0.06823244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002905339,0.001086147,0.1172615,0.009681002,0.0004959361,0.03700498,0.2474743,0.003107007,0.006533558,0.2999922,0.2764428,0.0006301366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.540168,0.01682473,0.007199352,0.2602812,0.001097056,0.0001847137,0.000183312,0.00004151426,0.1740201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671311,0.00702848,0.00212845,0.01757536,0.0005589382,0.0000577654,0.00004974235,0.00001012068,0.005460113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03287527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1654915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497282126","doi":"","title":"When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting an Exclusionary Rule that Vindicates Personal Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Rule of law; Appeal; Search and seizure; Status quo; Convict; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert M Bloom","is_ca":false},{"name":"Erin Macgowan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03988807206243631,"gpt":0.2954435197896745,"spread":0.2555554477272381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0194226,0.0004012803,0.0004471276,0.001352301,0.01177881,0.01488305,0.00293254,0.008597707,0.01227052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0466789,0.0005735548,0.0008377112,0.000730768,0.0170033,0.02150777,0.01640557,0.01277668,0.002600205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004609097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008276501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01889781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815527,0.007324679,0.0007504635,0.002185754,0.004790626,0.003395751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697927,0.01843834,0.00240069,0.00322648,0.003647712,0.002494025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003132734,0.0001038756,0.001518259,0.00004347534,0.00000774523,0.0005161805,0.01545228,0.0003547053,0.0008544945,0.9347635,0.01422205,0.03213203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005896588,0.00014468,0.001907821,0.0006396759,0.00004592329,0.0006425029,0.01428894,0.002325098,0.003477264,0.5515359,0.4248206,0.0001126148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1293116,0.002420464,0.07810879,0.1107286,0.001684811,0.0001815885,0.00004729651,0.0003909684,0.6771259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022558,0.001371469,0.01885543,0.02633351,0.0008238367,0.0001585999,0.00005535988,0.0002581218,0.04988772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0194226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1027178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006647981","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0066","title":"Criminal law as public ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Order (exchange); Law; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Verb; Noun; Philosophy of law; Leverage (statistics); Phrase; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Alice Ristroph","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05364129303452982,"gpt":0.2770848625728848,"spread":0.223443569538355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692574,0.0003462703,0.0004370729,0.002243003,0.007836497,0.01489384,0.001356598,0.005202009,0.009464491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01294573,0.0004775125,0.0004171187,0.002899786,0.05776023,0.01158189,0.005717994,0.004958216,0.0008425114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01801858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01556203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04898794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05718447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924254,0.002497262,0.0003437215,0.0009262708,0.002392616,0.00141476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904681,0.004094687,0.001270402,0.002300044,0.001283567,0.0005832391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001432547,0.000003544959,0.0001654673,0.00000674587,6.066775e-7,0.00003488204,0.001271559,0.0000449604,0.00001226242,0.9959228,0.001044972,0.001490781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001040832,0.00001358326,0.001194421,0.000136148,0.00001060448,0.0002084306,0.003339482,0.0003826501,0.0002085262,0.85812,0.1363616,0.00001401176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0254961,0.001824609,0.009274307,0.02793052,0.0002959804,0.00005052716,0.0001227819,0.00009620374,0.9349089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657173,0.001133353,0.002114312,0.003047512,0.0003250244,0.00005438871,0.0000910956,0.0000559503,0.02746106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04898794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1307346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977191326","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.511","title":"Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Due process; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Process (computing); Sociology; Public law; Sources of law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jo-Anne Wemmers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04523311179069807,"gpt":0.3153036313941911,"spread":0.270070519603493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03097191,0.000386415,0.001240586,0.002531571,0.009781058,0.02166428,0.002967602,0.02306316,0.01000638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0725235,0.0006334006,0.0007005358,0.00253092,0.09232007,0.02587814,0.005637264,0.02013044,0.0005515111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01452573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02171419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04763974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06508818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789878,0.0110578,0.0006033902,0.001881371,0.004377018,0.003092661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404687,0.04935191,0.002237479,0.002889038,0.002895056,0.00215792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102927,0.00001012964,0.0001751361,0.00001396529,0.000002923602,0.00003348806,0.001279428,0.0000558026,0.00001816957,0.9935831,0.00262405,0.002193381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001886822,0.000005105457,0.0005598312,0.00009223087,0.000008287955,0.00004288802,0.001318605,0.0002097371,0.00003417261,0.9772331,0.02046247,0.00001468635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03187696,0.02738675,0.01205453,0.6435516,0.001900456,0.00004576538,0.0001163456,0.000026653,0.283041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503303,0.006634142,0.001673985,0.02388664,0.003317994,0.00006135324,0.00002969744,0.00004957651,0.01401649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1637971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337467981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1466","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Parliament; Punitive damages; Proportionality (law); Political science; Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09996215917625473,"gpt":0.391120778265037,"spread":0.2911586190887823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01302691,0.0003229681,0.0007379213,0.001752176,0.01012053,0.009206424,0.003093377,0.006238222,0.003143681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04019547,0.0008845039,0.0004328486,0.001235943,0.01594143,0.005540653,0.003143956,0.008361142,0.000373458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02003574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04592464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4215326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6300144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868335,0.0031626,0.0008666557,0.00162802,0.004602534,0.002906652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748716,0.01739432,0.002024874,0.0008248632,0.003933808,0.0009504798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002956435,0.00001222879,0.0008273685,0.00007289609,0.000007929624,0.0002316879,0.003667987,0.000138369,0.0005174995,0.9747716,0.005696003,0.01402695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001165751,0.0002575615,0.0227924,0.001647574,0.0002385706,0.0006988773,0.008742405,0.002657791,0.007528652,0.6372476,0.3177467,0.000325391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2331988,0.02102889,0.01835652,0.1333855,0.001324971,0.0002081666,0.0003994938,0.0002631626,0.5918345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682529,0.001988283,0.00315157,0.01074988,0.0002730021,0.0000648589,0.00005157468,0.00004036917,0.01542759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4215326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07964043449649322,"gpt":0.3457996897785181,"spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402265,0.0004083348,0.0007212748,0.00244156,0.01217545,0.009808049,0.002228606,0.01423907,0.002429738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01235929,0.000414716,0.0005858166,0.00198233,0.02114474,0.00726976,0.002814901,0.0132668,0.0003503743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04601696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0285483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7287629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7698148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954746,0.0007989603,0.0001605344,0.0006640127,0.001720282,0.001181534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943805,0.003355786,0.0006164531,0.0001926177,0.0009139792,0.0005407056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677998,0.00002693884,0.003087837,0.00008339556,0.00001584683,0.0005412702,0.006879505,0.0001189872,0.0001145046,0.909933,0.06321676,0.01595509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007071778,0.00009971854,0.03033248,0.003155594,0.0001623534,0.0006832591,0.01463016,0.0005861226,0.001367388,0.2405655,0.7081174,0.000229356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06041097,0.09313384,0.001262351,0.4770701,0.001851189,0.00007682192,0.0003272247,0.00003902152,0.3658284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7553086,0.03143986,0.0008980504,0.1739688,0.001574752,0.00007720176,0.0001688998,0.00003081341,0.03653289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5456688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644065874","doi":"10.5040/9781474202220","title":"Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1106810290761844,"gpt":0.3713923294949639,"spread":0.2607113004187795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043652,0.0006573547,0.0007983738,0.005315504,0.008601768,0.01173293,0.001798673,0.004919388,0.0161367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006747057,0.0003376533,0.0004606948,0.00533127,0.02334468,0.01034867,0.005172047,0.006374542,0.001551719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0156083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003522809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01459487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01804056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939481,0.004016396,0.0001342601,0.0003908591,0.0007736494,0.000736769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966755,0.002041379,0.000216637,0.0002301478,0.0005830101,0.0002534053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003283183,0.00001014057,0.0001013881,0.00006958979,0.000003345127,0.00006829641,0.004610637,0.00004960611,0.00001980075,0.9768178,0.01280522,0.00544071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006657018,0.00003282194,0.00135003,0.000985206,0.000008976991,0.0002803336,0.01456164,0.0001330627,0.00005336222,0.1984346,0.7841399,0.00001348226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00558284,0.07606646,0.001457845,0.02434026,0.001305116,0.00001997004,0.00005612896,0.00002238461,0.891149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6666506,0.1079305,0.003217421,0.02897787,0.006419166,0.000345567,0.0003159043,0.0001443104,0.1859986],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0161367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1132467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231199517","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.153","title":"LEGITIMATING PUBLIC POLICY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Public policy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Policy making; Democratic legitimacy; Policy analysis; Position (finance); Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04989982207217115,"gpt":0.2841927202892959,"spread":0.2342928982171248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0775707,0.0008143728,0.001250063,0.005191708,0.01657806,0.02212119,0.003741478,0.0105277,0.006542996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320067,0.0007036582,0.0008458187,0.003045503,0.07397242,0.01047318,0.01225088,0.01394403,0.001063541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03902913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1043208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1681696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1470766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9291922,0.02549607,0.002256923,0.007998297,0.0271637,0.007892774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8979909,0.05126405,0.005258881,0.01713945,0.02467619,0.003670597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002971774,0.000005630344,0.0002184753,0.00002273228,0.000005301065,0.0000228194,0.001736566,0.0002710056,0.00005307907,0.9917254,0.002105672,0.003830228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002557202,0.00001045306,0.0005187466,0.0002729371,0.00002006231,0.00002527173,0.001576673,0.0007422355,0.0003732842,0.8380347,0.1583726,0.0000274094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02031098,0.002465256,0.09124777,0.231267,0.001550364,0.0002823531,0.0001935989,0.0004368757,0.6522458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935832,0.001570665,0.0231374,0.01552735,0.001097218,0.0002735171,0.0001389321,0.0001792239,0.02224385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1681696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.410238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217361879","doi":"","title":"Rights-vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Charter; Legislation; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Publishing; Obligation; Bill of rights; Public administration; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Janet L. Hiebert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03275547374255387,"gpt":0.3047101050061511,"spread":0.2719546312635972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01261759,0.0003941854,0.0008571023,0.006260553,0.0142129,0.01042098,0.001701748,0.001791563,0.004878808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04974211,0.0003770934,0.001158354,0.01302723,0.01256041,0.004826003,0.005431076,0.004462822,0.0002064247],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1531339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1406013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748039,0.002509482,0.0006692345,0.001498902,0.01397244,0.006546018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630473,0.007744155,0.005836785,0.001681064,0.01716191,0.004528742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003930801,0.000374403,0.3150604,0.0004294176,0.0002910343,0.001210889,0.09257296,0.001681513,0.0009579898,0.4616297,0.02111677,0.1042819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001252174,0.000156795,0.754544,0.0005684609,0.0003205333,0.0003264141,0.1054814,0.002288446,0.00139631,0.01853062,0.1159112,0.0003505287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529021,0.00319371,0.002212003,0.02117536,0.0002027324,0.0003936703,0.00103688,0.00006688154,0.3188166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835777,0.0009414699,0.001294544,0.001509464,0.00002468052,0.00006240181,0.0003944837,0.00004370964,0.01215157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1531339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782384083","doi":"","title":"Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Edward Andrew","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03377678052959541,"gpt":0.2963913922807696,"spread":0.2626146117511742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002036998,0.00126315,0.001407757,0.01130817,0.01290753,0.008657812,0.003508181,0.005274127,0.08684333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01653448,0.001395345,0.001228022,0.01068613,0.001474675,0.001634536,0.001558687,0.005045036,0.02651636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08045926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3237459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913583,0.0003092198,0.0004531254,0.0006141951,0.004962909,0.002302312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97026,0.001113203,0.000655944,0.0006921605,0.02545513,0.001823611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001955021,0.00002529233,0.001405003,0.0001032033,0.000009496389,0.00005629126,0.0001538403,0.0001269946,0.00006067869,0.01885266,0.9675092,0.01167782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001839735,0.0000124973,0.01060171,0.0002565318,0.00002297588,0.0000445816,0.0003442632,0.0002900108,0.0001508744,0.00136252,0.9868401,0.00005556011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00798948,0.005204026,0.001216377,0.02658203,0.005612083,0.001455044,0.1811541,0.00141928,0.7693675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02119155,0.003843862,0.001701152,0.009055447,0.0003597306,0.000555543,0.03011621,0.0003564594,0.93282],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08684333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5837755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234091314","doi":"","title":"Textual Regulation of Child Welfare: A Critique of the Ontario Risk Assessment Model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Risk assessment; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Gerald A. J. de Montigny","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02088124975943659,"gpt":0.3100175373163193,"spread":0.2891362875568826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02820771,0.0009898886,0.002015664,0.005062075,0.008214058,0.01196704,0.007606701,0.009183028,0.01015542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07439159,0.001354876,0.001552002,0.005831838,0.04329262,0.008948428,0.004134583,0.008693391,0.0009965631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07600807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07142099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8123765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7839705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9673125,0.009930186,0.001562237,0.002661195,0.01660092,0.001933035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9348828,0.04760434,0.003305359,0.003159274,0.01027868,0.0007694004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001406801,0.00000659635,0.0003380727,0.00009821303,0.00001385696,0.00002428408,0.001506845,0.0007025787,0.00002556444,0.9824622,0.00748463,0.007323098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006159791,0.000009204581,0.002024252,0.0006103904,0.00008288344,0.00004356671,0.001038391,0.00380746,0.0001730004,0.9062887,0.08580173,0.00005895926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01707351,0.01837617,0.1166934,0.3850575,0.0008733882,0.0002700998,0.00157509,0.0002132459,0.4598676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431262,0.01601202,0.03904194,0.03429709,0.002007262,0.0008376965,0.0003911118,0.0002785097,0.06400813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1876235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5514798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}