{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":457,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":457,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ca2806f781cb","filters":{"topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W1987636686","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332336","title":"Rhetoric and the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":560,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; State (computer science); Sociology; Public administration; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03162158993094817,"gpt":0.3318990754674336,"spread":0.3002774855364854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078973,0.00007614369,0.0001279677,0.00001699474,0.0005332296,0.000115915,0.0002037948,0.00007299143,0.0007245272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002250861,0.00004865997,0.0000695111,0.0001360073,0.002022632,0.000115662,0.0000277357,0.0001708645,0.0001102785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002968082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003745223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001614517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002648508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.00105508,0.0001157711,0.0001365733,0.0001967095,0.000504959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973295,0.002123773,0.0000117366,0.0001569828,0.00003989834,0.0003380468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004716387,0.00002839563,0.0000126706,0.000001639036,0.00000466178,0.000002564649,0.0005592723,7.797236e-9,0.000001365712,0.9937367,0.00008424535,0.005521263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002482512,0.00001910005,0.00006416355,0.000003569752,0.00001040707,0.000002615175,0.0008588634,0.000002192909,0.000005823098,0.892511,0.1062066,0.00006741752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005337683,0.0004483098,0.0002892951,0.09741288,0.0001605199,0.0001150245,0.00000258985,0.00007215463,0.8961616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907776,0.00002467212,0.00003098431,0.007024426,0.0008221616,0.000004217115,4.447161e-7,0.000004175567,0.001311382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7933065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132809789","doi":"10.5040/9781472544735","title":"Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; University of Cambridge; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Toleration; Democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Multiculturalism; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03620869441018944,"gpt":0.303448114551807,"spread":0.2672394201416176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005483473,0.0003457509,0.0005108722,0.0001972909,0.002481227,0.003299349,0.001217354,0.0004649347,0.000206335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004373976,0.000265012,0.0001792935,0.0001025279,0.001602903,0.0005724711,0.000271273,0.001094837,0.0001641022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003940682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009902765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001260368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965991,0.0008750943,0.0004941676,0.0006481915,0.0008308056,0.0005525947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947997,0.003488209,0.0002204222,0.0006822105,0.0003234185,0.0004860806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005729102,0.000009317588,6.543477e-7,0.00008675315,0.00003032532,0.000006516941,0.002215091,7.994275e-7,0.000002453484,0.8600292,0.1299682,0.00759349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002449982,0.0000111816,0.000001293077,0.00009403032,0.0002439101,0.000003120636,0.00008268442,0.000004781125,0.000003703957,0.4611076,0.5380014,0.0002012854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005750823,0.0003545007,0.0002858888,0.03064005,0.001327955,0.0008946281,0.00003924781,0.0002067667,0.9661934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0239522,0.00003753118,0.0002701349,0.00756351,0.006313938,0.00008092364,0.0000564859,0.00006626969,0.961659],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139642768","doi":"10.1177/0191453714545340","title":"Rebooting discourse ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universalization; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Subject (documents); Transcendental number; Reboot; Normative ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1124666166389731,"gpt":0.4302021660708303,"spread":0.3177355494318572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196073,0.000226131,0.0003397306,0.00007702511,0.003416767,0.0001724063,0.0004858499,0.0003964471,0.0004015573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003580345,0.0002491423,0.0002765373,0.0003152635,0.001957645,0.0003330315,0.0000926561,0.0009898167,0.0003024545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008365147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001032151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001475453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004091589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996149,0.001506327,0.0003598862,0.000411567,0.0008404597,0.0007327313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972469,0.001863674,0.00007026011,0.0002328191,0.0002680373,0.0003183256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001690473,0.00008647531,0.00003325835,0.00004293427,0.00001268906,0.000005873725,0.01947049,4.015105e-7,0.0000687456,0.977476,0.0002361152,0.002550109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002196835,0.00003936933,0.00003212773,0.00003985803,0.0000384284,7.717808e-7,0.001820429,0.000008872343,0.00005210323,0.8946974,0.1027506,0.0003003822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007564461,0.0000739372,0.001103203,0.170972,0.0009160748,0.000202469,0.00002078684,0.0003042237,0.8188428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804258,0.00001331619,0.0002363497,0.007635518,0.01112355,0.00002302873,0.000007189114,0.00004003155,0.0004952374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034192068","doi":"10.1177/0191453709340635","title":"Habermas and analytical Marxism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Marxist philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Convergence (economics); Order (exchange); Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05466725794605905,"gpt":0.368482156864734,"spread":0.3138148989186749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006747718,0.0002076055,0.0003343058,0.00008716619,0.001495082,0.0001619352,0.0002577439,0.0002390424,0.0003706272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004060894,0.0002267008,0.0001823768,0.0003133311,0.001217374,0.000330229,0.00004523857,0.0003590283,0.00009976888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006178136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004192622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003440756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003715249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978591,0.0003485474,0.0002933104,0.0003864331,0.0005021023,0.0006105144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989518,0.0003413467,0.00003400439,0.0001535554,0.0001351384,0.0003841844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003163348,0.0001194092,0.00004273564,0.00001171162,0.00001237069,0.00003303185,0.002985802,6.170953e-8,0.00004351018,0.9911476,0.0005240696,0.00504805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002840971,0.00007860129,0.0005610985,0.00001573413,0.00004957767,0.000002876248,0.0003261411,0.00001028979,0.00001717947,0.9484535,0.04992682,0.0002740958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01720514,0.0003281433,0.0001126864,0.2002435,0.0002716789,0.0002117801,0.00002230226,0.0002070469,0.7813977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986829,0.00004426208,0.0001605673,0.008542715,0.003952581,0.000007235192,0.000004678668,0.00001583086,0.0004431176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014573544","doi":"10.2304/power.2010.2.2.140","title":"Power, Emancipation, and Complexity: Employing Critical Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Power and Education","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical theory; Sociology; Emancipation; Dignity; Context (archaeology); Articulation (sociology); Power (physics); Construct (python library); Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04228959514216029,"gpt":0.3913237729072227,"spread":0.3490341777650624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006718176,0.00005280138,0.00006299395,0.00003298356,0.0005176473,0.00009784452,0.00004825601,0.00005992912,0.0008917502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009892086,0.00005213516,0.00001524664,0.00006504245,0.0006503139,0.0001926593,0.00001666945,0.0001292435,0.00001687154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006877515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006288386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004266768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002392316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994305,0.0001179224,0.00008475122,0.0001346772,0.00009512408,0.0001369707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992884,0.0003809393,0.00001174168,0.00008207076,0.00008644253,0.000150447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008114914,0.00006483436,0.002321547,0.000006698279,0.000001687117,1.169462e-7,0.008572449,2.888992e-9,0.0001229166,0.9846671,0.0002884609,0.003946131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003894051,0.00001657919,0.01410735,0.000007949727,0.000006647796,0.000002296893,0.002849637,8.056381e-7,0.00002328083,0.930824,0.05204744,0.00007505609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626322,0.0002553349,0.0002997042,0.01109314,0.00153391,0.0001021921,0.00000359113,0.00004403649,0.2240359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982442,0.00001522125,0.0002864996,0.0009041172,0.0002841248,0.000008838494,0.000002781901,0.000004682792,0.0002495149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.235612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009330847","doi":"10.1159/000271568","title":"A Study of Kohlberg’s Structural Theory of Moral Development: a Critique of Liberal Social Science Ideology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Development","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Ideology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Epistemology; Criticism; Sociology; Moral development; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06885024388715177,"gpt":0.3797230345041986,"spread":0.3108727906170469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845111,0.000146746,0.000387069,0.0002142583,0.0007576027,0.00001586889,0.0005602884,0.0000823062,0.0002469937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001665987,0.0001417522,0.00005433548,0.0004682516,0.001521935,0.0001792605,0.0001111293,0.0001320446,0.000002254286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000961788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005822459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003000052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008051244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976796,0.0003302933,0.0006773209,0.0002730956,0.0006595984,0.0003800809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.0001188191,0.0001921723,0.0001367999,0.0003291704,0.0001002458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007268276,0.0003295623,0.004268549,0.00002032673,0.00002536885,0.000004185304,0.1562232,7.967495e-7,0.001054344,0.8323063,0.00001250613,0.005682121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001286145,0.0005597926,0.3837414,0.0000658124,0.00002635309,0.000002043955,0.01362765,4.285707e-7,0.02013065,0.5798076,0.0003765915,0.0003755549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570928,0.00002002888,0.00001557318,0.0001028781,0.00007517495,0.0002932505,0.000001317354,0.0000213486,0.04237768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998714,6.398787e-7,0.0008841375,0.00009502289,0.00006437344,0.000009665206,0.0000020846,0.000005918478,0.0002241057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3794729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5826945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301306909","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618970","title":"Social Philosophy after Adorno","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Capitalism; Critical theory; Democracy; Social philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Politics; Law; Social relation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04017680709834062,"gpt":0.2733372957823582,"spread":0.2331604886840175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004655409,0.0003469754,0.0004277757,0.000198249,0.0009453009,0.00007729761,0.0007129532,0.0008996832,0.00004921977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003385181,0.0004488219,0.0004385754,0.00003485477,0.001864529,0.0001370976,0.0002701605,0.000798813,0.0000980441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005223487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000340217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001309252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005867301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977969,0.000299242,0.0001996135,0.0005240903,0.0005931194,0.000587068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987592,0.0002376116,0.0001228829,0.0003121526,0.0002149728,0.0003531716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002773736,0.00002291871,0.000001013108,0.00007192371,0.00006536138,0.0004984817,0.0006888529,3.097756e-8,8.608337e-7,0.9209162,0.07693084,0.0005261485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003089877,0.00002714017,0.000004719797,0.00009273942,0.0001705844,0.000001410537,0.00009761759,2.616869e-7,0.00000905126,0.007361992,0.9914232,0.0005022258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005792372,0.0001262853,0.00006148243,0.0002514973,0.0004255887,0.0003957417,0.0002936499,0.000220811,0.998167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01743766,0.00002972929,0.00002083404,0.0004756326,0.003664721,0.000001337702,0.00004235427,0.00004285248,0.9782849],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975290864","doi":"10.1177/0090591705274867","title":"Normativizing Hybridity/Neutralizing Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Essentialism; Identity (music); Orthodoxy; Politics; Sociology; Identity politics; Cultural identity; Epistemology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Anthropology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04172689706387978,"gpt":0.3666921770762609,"spread":0.3249652800123811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457038,0.0001239037,0.0001609973,0.00004146425,0.0006031682,0.00008914405,0.0002641005,0.000110064,0.001224108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009829476,0.0001123289,0.0001297025,0.0001397419,0.0005890152,0.0003522334,0.00005104258,0.0002921055,0.0008141139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003985613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003404591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007508811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977593,0.0007610936,0.0002014384,0.0001887206,0.0002946094,0.0007947781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998414,0.0008441664,0.0000211512,0.0001731875,0.00006216305,0.0004853008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001414792,0.00005582346,0.00003387554,0.000008329108,0.000008381031,0.000004421385,0.003001495,9.392164e-7,0.00006484322,0.993799,0.0003559864,0.002652796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007767102,0.00001132604,0.00001218593,0.00001481308,0.00001121606,0.000002839271,0.001546307,0.000005986887,0.0007659756,0.6993178,0.2981101,0.000123723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01278068,0.0001756747,0.001088675,0.0130507,0.000219537,0.0001134272,0.00001583534,0.0002170933,0.9723384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894453,0.00001318745,0.0005256234,0.005708038,0.002595284,0.000007725952,0.000003011658,0.0000124829,0.001689319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007138063","doi":"10.1177/0191453707077017","title":"On the philosophy/rhetoric binaries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Epistemology; Rationality; Rhetorical question; Politics; Philosophy of language; Political philosophy; Sociology; Facticity; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07139913334783482,"gpt":0.3537702362300089,"spread":0.282371102882174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003043041,0.0003627165,0.0003887964,0.0001594471,0.004663173,0.0002081265,0.0008375535,0.0003325907,0.001121704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001664859,0.0003020998,0.0004182851,0.000870397,0.002659657,0.0003073078,0.0001066206,0.0007763374,0.000746667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002172446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000945434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007255703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002489239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960625,0.0006417582,0.0005051319,0.0005107748,0.001184361,0.001095496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954343,0.003434986,0.00009707142,0.0003904352,0.0002942955,0.0003488601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001340073,0.0002290586,0.00001681783,0.00002337365,0.00002390147,0.00004593302,0.007599616,2.526347e-7,0.00007974587,0.9895027,0.001685607,0.0006590211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512352,0.0001140582,0.00006412568,0.00003756033,0.00003838692,0.00000154252,0.001120558,6.763112e-7,0.0001878622,0.9193404,0.07848135,0.0003621899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154481,0.0002146827,0.0002367556,0.1696846,0.001438737,0.000453367,0.00003877547,0.000301515,0.8121834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757549,0.00002362261,0.00003945065,0.01250797,0.01098859,0.00003881116,0.000006485782,0.00005195054,0.0005881808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W650563720","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498664","title":"The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Emancipation; Philosophy; Politics; Marxist philosophy; Political philosophy; Materialism; State (computer science); Modernity; Humanities; Religious studies; Epistemology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02665946200784923,"gpt":0.3046398069268622,"spread":0.277980344919013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249947,0.0002424669,0.0002377724,0.00007813513,0.001089533,0.0003887323,0.0007631318,0.0003633138,0.0002358016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003791249,0.0001385547,0.0001281985,0.0001832664,0.001254861,0.000109589,0.00006652759,0.0007153539,0.0001976833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001233487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006109746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001477792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001861628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979062,0.000421768,0.0003260101,0.000295739,0.0005470719,0.0005031861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975744,0.001670665,0.00005855215,0.0004003109,0.00005196415,0.0002440445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004348218,0.00001225669,0.00001612692,0.0000107898,0.000006708813,0.000008607658,0.0004364642,1.716817e-7,6.584548e-8,0.8595853,0.1394181,0.0005010808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006429432,0.00001453869,0.000006467223,0.00003954386,0.00001130987,0.000001016334,0.000179934,3.08121e-7,1.510543e-7,0.5031094,0.496468,0.0001050724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009817254,0.001724532,0.00001085191,0.07926339,0.0002444348,0.0004226072,0.00002486683,0.00004469716,0.9182548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01379242,0.0006694581,0.00004135098,0.006859616,0.005798938,0.00001439752,0.00001697608,0.00002978437,0.9727771],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3570499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8379915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726066","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00092","title":"“Two Concepts of Liberty” Through African Eyes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Economic Justice; Happiness; Negative liberty; Conscience; Sociology; Politics; Law; Face (sociological concept); CLARITY; Political freedom; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Social science; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04612343532145446,"gpt":0.3880059057040161,"spread":0.3418824703825616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007129303,0.0001529544,0.0004755819,0.0001988538,0.0002012835,0.00003331449,0.0004665332,0.0001213815,0.003522572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000581155,0.0001279832,0.0003750789,0.0007844795,0.001750215,0.000437124,0.00002598767,0.000385043,0.00008333205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007724507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001539283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001662897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002724278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973559,0.0004879457,0.0007260107,0.0001460733,0.0007294885,0.000554524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978953,0.0009155612,0.0001647094,0.0001837179,0.0003036061,0.0005371197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483058,0.0002459263,0.00008540892,0.00001998136,0.00003989986,0.00003748046,0.0019527,0.000003343541,0.00006162353,0.9959007,0.0002117393,0.001292895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005200924,0.0003080347,0.00009783221,0.00008180311,0.00005396848,0.00001846159,0.0005051676,0.000001228673,0.0004110482,0.9376008,0.06026427,0.0001373171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06936702,0.0003819499,0.00004214227,0.02920562,0.0003093933,0.00009168267,0.00002510594,0.00002032208,0.9005567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935475,0.00005575894,0.0006366345,0.001906433,0.003546673,0.000001063058,6.518474e-7,0.00001505518,0.0002902463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766158129","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2017.1391650","title":"Living with others: fostering radical cosmopolitanism through citizenship politics in Berlin","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Solidarity; Sociology; Citizenship; Politics; Global citizenship; Pluralism (philosophy); Communitarianism; Refugee; Hospitality; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Tourism; Epistemology; Liberalism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1513339496412486,"gpt":0.4278017408978917,"spread":0.2764677912566431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002133889,0.0002637992,0.0003553194,0.0000339901,0.002371501,0.000564441,0.0009055124,0.0006052835,0.00009740808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005135454,0.0002671731,0.000108165,0.0001334235,0.00387814,0.0003415776,0.0003373189,0.001210997,0.00005426356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006009816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005943942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005874607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001410321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962853,0.0008049061,0.000380961,0.0004057322,0.0008156318,0.00130744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965649,0.001960553,0.0001292414,0.0006810058,0.0001847475,0.000479545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008594911,0.00006179196,0.006658018,0.00004784244,0.00002183381,0.00006279066,0.0116805,0.000002576535,0.000002236416,0.9813197,0.00006901605,0.00006515982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003618025,0.00008453357,0.00137264,0.0003799077,0.00002953489,0.00001251059,0.005242945,0.00001066014,0.00001767298,0.9824951,0.009644673,0.0003480613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1378306,0.0001819329,0.0007469532,0.02919753,0.00065344,0.000295162,0.000152033,0.0001411536,0.8308011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916937,0.00005288141,0.001556059,0.004936178,0.001426241,0.00000736806,0.000002881659,0.00002897316,0.0002957232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8538631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322403315","doi":"10.1332/204986014x13912564145762","title":"Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition and its potential for aligning social work with social justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical and Radical Social Work","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Autonomy; Oppression; Social identity theory; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Power (physics); Social identity approach; Agency (philosophy); Social psychology; Social group; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04784752488130457,"gpt":0.3207335299529946,"spread":0.2728860050716901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159865,0.000198038,0.0004323072,0.00004156489,0.004259828,0.0001161813,0.0001433655,0.0004393129,0.0001922962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001693108,0.000177076,0.0001493895,0.0004563344,0.003258029,0.0001538848,0.00005796424,0.0003372945,0.000009443852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002633749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004368588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004484377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001818841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974903,0.000833532,0.0003111183,0.0003702512,0.00040819,0.0005865508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969646,0.002441415,0.00006124641,0.00004171733,0.0002056998,0.0002853131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089504,0.0001327168,0.0000150486,0.0001587921,0.00003730273,0.000003235784,0.005101479,9.849513e-8,0.00005976319,0.9561175,0.0005131391,0.0369659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001065598,0.0001945135,0.0006527352,0.00009370244,0.0005291433,0.000001833598,0.002668142,0.00001175587,0.00005408066,0.9800225,0.01431216,0.0003938676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6651084,0.001610502,0.04907363,0.2160562,0.002442648,0.001942815,0.0003829468,0.0004654689,0.06291739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926298,0.00001490134,0.0005403579,0.0009381488,0.005682813,0.00003389289,0.00001571472,0.00002419896,0.0001201907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3275213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936966095","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.163","title":"The Disappearing Intellectual in the Age of Economic Darwinism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Politics; Sociology; Individualism; Political economy; Ideology; Capitalism; Commodification; Democracy; Political science; Law; Economics; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06421265074898252,"gpt":0.3972932893115022,"spread":0.3330806385625197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008472535,0.00003790183,0.00004905682,0.00006051942,0.0001815229,0.00002445937,0.0003067958,0.00003575668,0.00005972619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007063227,0.00002490017,0.00002566641,0.0001468899,0.0003094208,0.00006018982,0.0000190227,0.0001087701,0.00001247888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006326187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001826382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008266429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005150252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993231,0.0002884839,0.0001297863,0.00006787071,0.00005975124,0.000130991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992346,0.0005847008,0.00002404559,0.0001319735,0.000007363237,0.00001736292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008088431,0.00004206083,0.0004272553,0.000001745811,9.067834e-7,7.162224e-8,0.2038274,6.679398e-7,0.000005137686,0.7835417,0.0001382504,0.01200666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003504068,0.00001210985,0.01174005,0.000009848145,0.000001699405,3.110658e-7,0.06432166,0.000001535842,0.00004610875,0.8889349,0.03485663,0.00004009046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5086629,0.0001721042,0.000003032679,0.006012912,0.0006056938,0.0001381896,0.000001100106,0.000005186822,0.4843989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983101,0.0001120914,0.00001607853,0.0003886623,0.001083598,0.00001811967,0.000001166568,0.000002672419,0.00006750306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4896472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773001936","doi":"10.3138/topia.11.49","title":"The Vanishing Table, or Community in a World that is No World","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Contemporary society; Dynamics (music); Exegesis; Social science; Aesthetics; History; Literature; Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1520668525052734,"gpt":0.3746052637129905,"spread":0.2225384112077171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289388,0.00009587404,0.0002149145,0.00008030599,0.002461354,0.0002169916,0.0004215204,0.00002732441,0.0001642736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001076043,0.00005318516,0.00007730009,0.0004967675,0.0006532049,0.0003755934,0.00002622989,0.0005700096,0.0000133448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004194023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003669825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07363033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987745,0.0003448675,0.000245715,0.00005525904,0.0002112244,0.0003683933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987023,0.0005706529,0.00008982861,0.00008892424,0.0002692377,0.0002790927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066744,0.00003327092,0.004961002,0.00002460763,0.0001994044,0.0002019782,0.183538,0.00004445144,0.000006719181,0.7926348,0.01505605,0.003192996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003377703,0.00005759463,0.001529693,0.0002463135,0.00002392645,0.000008276672,0.05835578,1.394395e-7,0.00003168123,0.2060176,0.7332572,0.0001340386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5215532,0.01116854,0.00000227541,0.1690809,0.002352318,0.0003083074,0.00002161691,0.00001860271,0.2954943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896128,0.0004226949,0.00005727465,0.001673712,0.0004661946,0.000002073317,1.864775e-7,0.000003861419,0.007761247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8749264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160050294","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700101","title":"Adorno, ideology and ideology critique","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Positivism; Epistemology; Dialectic; Rationality; Criticism; Sociology; Identity (music); Critical theory; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04565241091050539,"gpt":0.3737988335249703,"spread":0.328146422614465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009598437,0.0002709703,0.0004800905,0.0001345172,0.001764549,0.000090384,0.0003720397,0.0004636669,0.001175896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009910264,0.000311738,0.0001889775,0.0003641436,0.003158516,0.0003695173,0.0001333005,0.0005062394,0.0001762107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007527074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008106313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003402657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001193781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968753,0.0009367939,0.0004093201,0.000537273,0.0003672741,0.0008740028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.0009223657,0.00005582854,0.0002004039,0.0002501886,0.0003737377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005950687,0.0001113473,0.0007053722,0.00002881604,0.000023394,0.0001491868,0.004603839,8.698549e-8,0.0001076778,0.9917459,0.0004795638,0.001985302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003893327,0.00008712728,0.0005267643,0.00001562768,0.00004356885,0.00002540928,0.0008158057,0.000002207631,0.0000246807,0.8928165,0.1049355,0.0003174976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07112266,0.001008641,0.0004296891,0.221079,0.001023848,0.0003664845,0.00003638297,0.0003297708,0.7046035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798486,0.0002444326,0.000147484,0.01440777,0.004674746,0.00005174999,0.000008078233,0.00003511623,0.000581993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966430463","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.1","title":"The Philosophic Origins of Deliberative Ideals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Pragmatism; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Democratic theory; Mill; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics; Mathematics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06121836852054163,"gpt":0.304456024999669,"spread":0.2432376564791274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005326082,0.0002320132,0.0003772739,0.00007692418,0.001504624,0.00007582352,0.001083633,0.0004462269,0.00006732123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000142013,0.0001941849,0.0002387818,0.00006185297,0.002273731,0.0001038876,0.0002576856,0.0004896178,0.000002578228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002748144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003897833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005621804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977781,0.0007601813,0.0002180638,0.0003263539,0.0005073884,0.0004098958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997895,0.0008871714,0.0002239636,0.0004169736,0.0003864107,0.0001904578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001236367,0.00002104788,0.00000181997,0.00004881748,0.0001073328,0.00001136982,0.001643485,1.966248e-7,3.098585e-7,0.9841492,0.008357152,0.005535699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722726,0.00006665635,8.088859e-7,0.0001561391,0.0001130124,3.991163e-7,0.0005015685,0.000001337409,0.00002968424,0.1181886,0.8805791,0.0001904277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004839682,0.000348228,0.00004283076,0.0004053166,0.000789088,0.0003822966,0.000355943,0.00006027931,0.9971321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0651436,0.02991859,0.0001102791,0.0001434427,0.003086644,0.000003863797,0.00004971083,0.00004030159,0.9015036],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117084082","doi":"10.1177/0952695106066539","title":"Marxism and the convergence of utopia and the everyday","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Ideology; Epistemology; Utopia; Sociology; Aesthetics; Episteme; Defamiliarization; Transcendental number; Philosophy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Everyday life; Politics; Art history; Law; History; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0340278719630708,"gpt":0.2787053200126448,"spread":0.244677448049574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195241,0.00005258749,0.0001320732,0.00001972389,0.0009554487,0.00001717727,0.0005410817,0.00002545837,0.0001281649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001804517,0.00002351012,0.00006185466,0.0001165336,0.03124651,0.00009423559,0.00008294234,0.00006836365,0.000001115123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002416448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006005765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001750106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001794745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987453,0.0005357302,0.0001604187,0.0001206045,0.0003256219,0.0001122997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989895,0.0006922546,0.0001100372,0.0001510807,0.00003623793,0.00002087403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001514342,0.000007385439,0.0005787049,0.000006013966,0.000001799547,6.44211e-8,0.006082646,0.000001388035,0.0001137544,0.9924728,0.0006508174,0.00006948174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004463652,0.00001591932,0.00246875,0.00001894744,0.00002090903,7.986943e-7,0.0008910913,0.00002445072,0.00006266219,0.8766718,0.1193207,0.00005759266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5229947,0.004560129,0.000007586892,0.007491851,0.000818407,0.0002540803,0.000002460551,0.00001021467,0.4638606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892434,0.00004167302,0.00001313972,0.0002100629,0.00008475158,0.000003176621,3.642828e-8,0.000001364187,0.0104024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4662487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115227555","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v9i2.238","title":"Neoliberalism in the Information Age, or Vice Versa? Global Citizenship, Technology, and Hegemonic Ideology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Hegemony; Ideology; Globalization; Sociology; Citizenship; Political economy; Sovereignty; Politics; Capital (architecture); Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08368079160751099,"gpt":0.4411138956885716,"spread":0.3574331040810607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004883522,0.0002337969,0.0003342715,0.0001458323,0.002602874,0.003656974,0.003825206,0.0003961384,0.0001413641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001577998,0.0001950011,0.0001640829,0.001969614,0.0009384847,0.01648183,0.001048879,0.0005787439,0.00000946087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008474241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006127364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003780609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006427284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970238,0.0007644054,0.0009812897,0.0001434408,0.0003983865,0.0006886528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970827,0.0004067221,0.000477255,0.0005037751,0.001344478,0.000185123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002818876,0.00004606754,0.0002901,0.00007083305,0.0000310804,0.000005539708,0.03915634,0.000006640129,7.186964e-8,0.9480777,0.008734786,0.003298885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310822,0.00007931614,0.0007810286,0.00003870326,0.0000325105,0.00008790306,0.1379595,0.00005472653,0.000002080374,0.7122613,0.1471915,0.0002007247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353378,0.002370461,0.01609941,0.2084591,0.0008534574,0.01068443,0.0003940859,0.0003942941,0.6254069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826593,0.001738616,0.002212547,0.01270548,0.0000581266,0.0003473053,0.000106377,0.000006779546,0.0001654539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8473215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049740818","doi":"10.1177/0191453705050607","title":"The substantive dimension of deliberative practical rationality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rationality; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Democracy; Solidarity; Discourse ethics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08146968872510021,"gpt":0.4101920957423619,"spread":0.3287224070172617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001492138,0.0001482722,0.0002398091,0.0000301149,0.002522997,0.00007985648,0.0002198779,0.0001478949,0.0001815574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001473294,0.0001229057,0.0002019794,0.0002824481,0.00221353,0.0004356331,0.00005625941,0.0003228313,0.00006887206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003964458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006545564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972014,0.001018796,0.0004162526,0.0002450806,0.0007306891,0.0003877759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965297,0.00254246,0.0001031269,0.0001552527,0.0005311603,0.0001382852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137735,0.0001704714,0.00001840638,0.00000722105,0.0000283502,0.000003201054,0.009180161,6.296759e-7,0.0002484637,0.9885353,0.000628887,0.001065075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002272877,0.0000420227,0.0001350913,0.00001222649,0.00003694902,8.700973e-7,0.001635802,0.0000115372,0.0007155184,0.9397321,0.0573007,0.0001499318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05708705,0.00054212,0.0005656331,0.406852,0.0006177808,0.0006069033,0.00009093164,0.0001206308,0.533517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947826,0.0000566523,0.0003916725,0.001597728,0.002966614,0.00002338914,0.000005858827,0.00001387675,0.0001615832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035103261","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12518","title":"Neoliberalism and the racialized critique of democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Technocracy; Sociology; Authoritarianism; Political economy; Panacea (medicine); Political science; Scholarship; Antipathy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04029197380884929,"gpt":0.3385585376774321,"spread":0.2982665638685828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002679242,0.00003272086,0.00009348108,0.000009312265,0.0003591554,0.00002411346,0.00007070191,0.00003208455,0.0003805418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007404993,0.00002515032,0.00003958221,0.0001316562,0.001311472,0.00005997224,0.00001963503,0.00005903579,0.000008470181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002285777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003554827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005635487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000635367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993654,0.000308891,0.0001148086,0.00006443339,0.00007700713,0.00006949186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986343,0.001161115,0.00002341929,0.00005408016,0.00005376995,0.00007335072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002210826,0.000003458691,0.0001023282,0.000003854434,0.000004711601,3.353349e-7,0.01015199,0.000002458892,0.00003195457,0.9886687,0.000215891,0.0007922362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004348848,0.000005446779,0.00002969452,0.000005880747,0.00002030387,4.846389e-7,0.001035949,0.0001107963,0.00005943828,0.9277329,0.07052162,0.00004254854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0196662,0.0003752154,0.001215296,0.3142655,0.00008930308,0.0002743841,0.0000137445,0.00004083803,0.6640595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958942,0.00006738993,0.0001371589,0.003631181,0.0001679865,0.000001742776,8.950189e-7,0.000002284241,0.00009719757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4832174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040660157","doi":"10.1521/siso.2012.76.4.433","title":"Democratic Revolution <i>in Permanenz</i>","year":2012,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"Science & Society","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Democracy; Democratic revolution; Social Democratic Party; German; Expression (computer science); Russian revolution; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Politics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334221266079689,"gpt":0.3444249320347663,"spread":0.3110028054267974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008242511,0.0002027561,0.0002459777,0.00005131762,0.001949252,0.0001548497,0.0007559325,0.000204669,0.0007891042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005028754,0.0001961502,0.0002662919,0.002649452,0.005415483,0.001824457,0.0001776974,0.0004602882,0.001044681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006125707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004045969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001645289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001668526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961585,0.0003461802,0.0003591835,0.0004732019,0.00110346,0.001559445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985702,0.0002883705,0.00008434367,0.0003410722,0.0001281776,0.000587836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001124116,0.0004675394,0.01174598,0.00008120148,0.000008183502,0.000001747933,0.1384647,0.000009631656,0.005967292,0.8346136,0.006782637,0.001846173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00128073,0.0002578853,0.04382924,0.0005581543,0.0001712524,0.00001977085,0.1198146,0.002715251,0.002042989,0.6291743,0.1978491,0.00228678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.702946,0.003328323,0.0001703756,0.008300394,0.003952945,0.0005975621,0.00001984135,0.0001037278,0.2805808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950875,0.0005091173,0.0004109206,0.001650082,0.00136985,0.000009997467,0.000001487424,0.00001014361,0.0009509085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2921415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386840721","doi":"10.3386/w31688","title":"Zero-sum Thinking and the Roots of US Political Differences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Sage Foundation","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Politics; Mathematics; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5684568042418918,"gpt":0.5869978038883034,"spread":0.01854099964641154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01557108,0.0001054935,0.0004255187,0.0002776066,0.000428146,0.00008164229,0.0005723453,0.0002911718,0.0002593756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007696208,0.00007827972,0.0001478011,0.0001683088,0.003857286,0.00008047475,0.0002200037,0.0005844863,0.00003340284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003423432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001886066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007417886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004975073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960814,0.0008604351,0.0004815118,0.0002748876,0.001905037,0.0003967727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872917,0.01129572,0.0001279316,0.0001534834,0.001005912,0.0001252655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005123133,0.00001976269,0.0006918281,0.00007650387,0.00006062575,0.000001065815,0.0003192161,0.000001844098,0.000001862228,0.9966608,0.001874976,0.0002403259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001992067,0.00002304466,0.0008931344,0.0001035579,0.00001191238,0.00000137556,0.0003242591,0.00001992031,0.000008071853,0.9911717,0.007172629,0.00007118617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008539644,0.0004100227,0.000001485672,0.01051459,0.0004408982,0.0003356836,0.00009750297,0.00001288771,0.9796473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936371,0.0008093752,0.00001249048,0.00002578055,0.001111192,0.00002713152,0.00002529028,0.00001274475,0.004338829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165117462","doi":"10.1023/a:1008994221249","title":"Deconstructing Diplomacy: Derridean Political Theory and U.N. Deal-Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; International relations; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Civil society; Reading (process); Politics; Declaration; Philosophy of law; Sociology; International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01497176293597851,"gpt":0.3533498309519053,"spread":0.3383780680159268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758298,0.00008865339,0.000126376,0.00001479518,0.0007686407,0.0001285134,0.00007084779,0.00009442885,0.000694009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001930603,0.00008787104,0.00003225211,0.00004878182,0.001136203,0.0001938366,0.00002309727,0.000151551,0.000008767163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000203021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002792203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001757929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.0004594626,0.0001281052,0.0001934056,0.00009581989,0.0003738063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984581,0.001210368,0.00000888141,0.00007458984,0.00002332584,0.0002247699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002320577,0.00001129103,0.0006742698,0.00001406832,0.00000511868,0.00001487193,0.001124326,3.617437e-8,0.000009418818,0.9889148,0.000004664447,0.009203959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001021738,0.00001764049,0.0001134867,0.00004360089,0.00001281282,0.00002259861,0.00151896,0.000002214933,0.00005809402,0.9639149,0.03407238,0.0001211386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2753907,0.0002745492,0.00009432142,0.002635485,0.00002887732,0.00006690383,0.000005771665,0.0000646775,0.7214388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992072,0.00005498383,0.0002899762,0.007116077,0.0003026274,0.000005017915,6.737229e-7,0.00000898157,0.0001496369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7598912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321509047","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2016.1153191","title":"Micropolitics and Collective Liberation: Mind/Body Practice and Left Social Movements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Conversation; Meditation; Sociology; Social movement; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03083507179619012,"gpt":0.3731306934789508,"spread":0.3422956216827607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009969297,0.00009740621,0.0001164408,0.00005525474,0.001461479,0.0002532772,0.000182949,0.00008054281,0.0002377701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00305386,0.00007448323,0.00002187098,0.0002469869,0.004940717,0.0007716851,0.0001150081,0.00009131827,0.00003339545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003047921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006765766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003351907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002011957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979944,0.0001848412,0.0001501121,0.000347715,0.0004998847,0.0008230168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977163,0.001094872,0.00002900686,0.00008647228,0.0001930286,0.0008803346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001483775,0.0000343036,0.0003110712,0.000001989651,0.000003262138,0.000002769298,0.002571311,2.810646e-9,0.001678759,0.993207,0.0002197038,0.001955037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003755492,0.00009535551,0.002062483,0.0000157141,0.00001638676,0.000009445054,0.001577909,0.000003264705,0.002312017,0.9036915,0.08966537,0.0001750048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1457118,0.00004242939,0.000807676,0.1190662,0.0004236253,0.0002887265,0.00003009534,0.00004479731,0.7335846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887708,0.000009554424,0.0006890599,0.002970435,0.0007381157,0.000001561806,2.02779e-7,0.000004745971,0.006815541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488223519","doi":"10.1177/0263276416656760","title":"Critique of Accelerationism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Left-wing politics; Sociology; Capital (architecture); Power (physics); Dynamism; Politics; Aesthetics; Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Manifesto; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0280739955222351,"gpt":0.3446837481018791,"spread":0.316609752579644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215038,0.0000777049,0.0001210447,0.000005146606,0.0003839702,0.000023518,0.0002039568,0.0001485526,0.001326365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002981777,0.00004829057,0.0002005324,0.0001114944,0.0008410809,0.0002127059,0.00002535776,0.00008820259,0.00004681598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003632858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000424496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005377815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998954,0.0003878882,0.0001383146,0.0001367212,0.0001927306,0.0001903255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992314,0.0003596299,0.00003709782,0.0001403242,0.0001446441,0.00008690177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013601,0.0000342274,0.00001562772,0.000007238854,0.00001570693,3.028058e-7,0.02643655,8.973591e-8,0.009613134,0.9595087,0.002625298,0.0017295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000148935,0.0000202177,0.00002045255,0.00002414974,0.00001179102,3.118738e-7,0.005975467,1.069069e-7,0.00506428,0.8902796,0.09837044,0.00008425167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06708265,0.0007621848,0.01486993,0.02138923,0.0006041235,0.0004516794,0.00008759097,0.0003041741,0.8944485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934771,0.0002362534,0.0004217509,0.001113738,0.0005461645,0.000008110003,0.000001641255,0.000006756452,0.004188508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150150645","doi":"10.1177/1474885114554466","title":"Rawls on the embedded self: Liberalism as an affective regime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Politics; Passions; Sociology; Enlightenment; Normative; Economic Justice; Public reason; Counterintuitive; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02702076838405795,"gpt":0.3202145593831995,"spread":0.2931937909991416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01303195,0.0001520751,0.0002322885,0.00007006354,0.0005039755,0.0001422305,0.0006764261,0.00004718045,0.0007450118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005351323,0.0000867178,0.0002259733,0.0001303634,0.0009086466,0.0002197037,0.00004937335,0.0006204369,0.0005893016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000615803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006139022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005192293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.847056e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812774,0.01723058,0.000336567,0.0001650212,0.000479801,0.0005106515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940013,0.004716462,0.0001240178,0.0003011471,0.0001837171,0.0006734033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001696843,0.0001458455,0.000002953031,0.000002709537,0.00003278453,0.00006929152,0.005595315,9.437206e-7,0.00003844229,0.9919985,0.0003316471,0.001611876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002978623,0.0008051868,0.0001270108,0.00005294552,0.00003839031,0.00003094547,0.002141103,0.000002907337,0.0002842956,0.9351472,0.06094195,0.0001302275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1294854,0.00001703906,0.0005300543,0.01596165,0.0004621724,0.0001037131,0.00000279191,0.00005395085,0.8533832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859929,0.000004018627,0.0001184284,0.009008356,0.003868542,6.27422e-7,3.267518e-7,0.00002936005,0.0009774467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8157358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W787845032","doi":"10.33137/q.i..v30i2.11923","title":"The Unpolitical. On the Radical Critique of Political Reason","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni d italianistica","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03805648408435122,"gpt":0.349391039996119,"spread":0.3113345559117678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347695,0.0001430326,0.0001905187,0.00002141495,0.001120256,0.0001180089,0.0005717137,0.0001486146,0.001332992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007239111,0.00008402585,0.0001554678,0.0001678205,0.002893276,0.00005285187,0.00002378762,0.0003762797,0.0003588432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006992443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001127781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001323571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001097895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972342,0.0008719557,0.0003160825,0.000224498,0.000604923,0.00074838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935396,0.005535717,0.000036306,0.0004017028,0.000109102,0.0003775705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004837418,0.0001341533,0.00001251401,0.000004196281,0.000008128384,0.000009863598,0.0003095001,9.123051e-8,0.00001948067,0.9962562,0.002304263,0.0008932743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005703127,0.000162454,0.0002254518,0.00003099112,0.00001860387,0.000002609716,0.001367298,0.00001383074,0.0002762974,0.8001505,0.1975912,0.0001037768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003695477,0.00006956762,0.0002086498,0.2087621,0.0001779613,0.0002189315,0.00003208259,0.0000605058,0.7867747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926266,0.00001687961,0.00005283137,0.005473397,0.0007199189,0.000009147158,0.000002058836,0.000009896467,0.001089264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911651451","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1072","title":"The Aesthetic Post-Communist Subject and the Differend of Rosia Montana","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Communism; Capitalism; Politics; Subjectivity; Political subjectivity; Sociology; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Aesthetics; Political economy; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06951820121626492,"gpt":0.4054616002760549,"spread":0.33594339905979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002161937,0.00008166982,0.0002028907,0.00001243208,0.002631279,0.00002596313,0.0002478755,0.00004962791,0.000005312936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001267566,0.00004650218,0.00005976355,0.0001718989,0.005421451,0.00006562283,0.0001520529,0.0001928907,0.000002632891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003932067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001487173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003519778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007475843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981987,0.001065014,0.0001725164,0.00006883346,0.0002008007,0.0002941278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967012,0.003010548,0.00005307061,0.0001147628,0.00008514037,0.00003532139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001065237,0.0000297026,0.0002561802,0.00002191317,0.00002029872,4.22119e-7,0.1324895,4.747919e-8,0.000003769699,0.8644948,0.0001703287,0.002406524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008628217,0.00004653114,0.004415829,0.00003905258,0.0003377092,0.000001733086,0.5477151,0.000002064223,0.000008758581,0.4177504,0.02864592,0.0001739987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6491219,0.03342404,0.000006073116,0.02704246,0.001854122,0.0004825052,0.00001763556,0.00003225027,0.288019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963399,0.002555176,0.000007667597,0.0002869451,0.0006268233,0.00001816634,2.934851e-7,0.000005324568,0.0001596718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4467444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100431627","doi":"10.1177/0191453706066977","title":"Adorno’s critical materialism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Epistemology; Humanity; Reductionism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Marxist philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Historical materialism; Character (mathematics); Law; History; Theology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03960191063407867,"gpt":0.3584147300057363,"spread":0.3188128193716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008655987,0.0002989252,0.0004242304,0.0001101617,0.00240175,0.0003265062,0.0004863906,0.0003624674,0.002248183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006362995,0.0003408701,0.000323412,0.0003683415,0.002367968,0.0004765534,0.00009320927,0.0003541149,0.0006361824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001344196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008927826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007168996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003885408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996507,0.0006932797,0.0005090713,0.000501861,0.0008021435,0.0009865826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847,0.0006473039,0.00004810315,0.0002371618,0.0003102212,0.0002871885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004432672,0.0002359406,0.00002702032,0.0000498621,0.000009652731,0.00006046747,0.0015747,1.586968e-7,0.000516096,0.9943869,0.002831529,0.0002634166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268918,0.00003366899,0.0001310255,0.00002341274,0.00004559056,0.000003028199,0.0003146225,0.000001142316,0.0002361931,0.8596027,0.1389667,0.0003729742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01472342,0.0002574883,0.0002503119,0.1095276,0.002214898,0.0002992085,0.0001597313,0.0005241532,0.8720431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774328,0.000008700662,0.0002617237,0.003164401,0.01825872,0.00005458432,0.00002553867,0.00005200552,0.0007415524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323019201","doi":"10.5840/symposium20131713","title":"Hegel’s Theory of Second Nature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01184639042571342,"gpt":0.2832250545808543,"spread":0.2713786641551409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004412436,0.00005263457,0.00009139276,0.00002399004,0.0001331653,0.00002405173,0.0001793899,0.0001449033,0.01009646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008744083,0.00004565053,0.00005246235,0.00009742873,0.0003305464,0.0001466693,0.00002446087,0.00016558,0.0003627196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001111808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002570627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004293229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001221911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992754,0.0002169561,0.00009908995,0.0001006769,0.0001435381,0.0001643219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.0002883622,0.00002390096,0.0001308037,0.00008044679,0.00008598768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006565791,0.00002472075,0.00005378821,0.00001155408,0.000006577166,5.543332e-7,0.001863843,2.262079e-7,0.005472947,0.9910931,0.001184074,0.0002820759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006114785,0.00002063254,0.0001380063,0.000007406793,0.000004939762,3.100784e-7,0.0007954446,5.578062e-7,0.002954742,0.9071588,0.0887928,0.00006520128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1136567,0.0001521748,0.000009010872,0.004162845,0.0003975433,0.000136203,0.000009718119,0.00003271698,0.8814431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936848,0.000009124215,0.00003883042,0.000564684,0.0003303883,0.000007895403,0.000001744079,0.00000518404,0.005357307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8800281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048454396","doi":"10.1111/j.1466-769x.2007.00303.x","title":"The <i>micro‐fascism</i> of Plato’s good citizen: producing (dis)order through the construction of risk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02514603058989694,"gpt":0.3224563289161229,"spread":0.2973102983262259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002466988,0.0001515119,0.0002361954,0.000102881,0.001538265,0.00004528176,0.0004396446,0.0001364005,0.00003205306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008687144,0.0001021385,0.000159246,0.001567675,0.004002128,0.0001801097,0.00002874488,0.0003670996,0.000007894146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008074647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001642725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002499682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978836,0.0004168288,0.0004873381,0.0002713352,0.0005356983,0.0004052516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971253,0.001769416,0.0002926379,0.000451046,0.0002877362,0.00007384401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453523,0.00009055463,0.0003137052,0.00001522558,0.00002800694,7.222532e-7,0.02042632,0.00001111189,0.0004398665,0.9623495,0.00009744138,0.01608216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357011,0.00005636622,0.0002786452,0.0001703474,0.00006546551,0.000005435827,0.004843029,0.000002386972,0.00661145,0.9787312,0.008872123,0.0001278707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1964101,0.002082139,0.00261062,0.03849591,0.003445739,0.000829214,0.0000734661,0.00011982,0.755933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970819,0.0001165055,0.001226393,0.0001741237,0.001344986,0.00000325925,0.000002370726,0.0000169066,0.00003354229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8006718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075400578","doi":"10.1177/0191453711402940","title":"Cold, cold, warm: Autonomy, intimacy and maturity in Adorno","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronomy; Autonomy; Maturity (psychological); Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Epistemology; Duty; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08404735499115382,"gpt":0.3280106894571286,"spread":0.2439633344659748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058917,0.000264908,0.0004416442,0.000143606,0.0009817844,0.0001054456,0.0003957247,0.0003111497,0.0006491594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003255217,0.0003084749,0.0001606859,0.0004235657,0.00168894,0.0004959711,0.0001502683,0.0005349254,0.0001220417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000179345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001632388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008931753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001069114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974002,0.0005635377,0.0004340181,0.0004892685,0.0003997669,0.0007132412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.0003376229,0.00006352323,0.0001955312,0.0001476084,0.0003276287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654896,0.0002798332,0.0009456555,0.0000563074,0.00001557867,0.00005244634,0.02330797,2.181039e-8,0.0001313993,0.9744706,0.0001120184,0.0005616369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005730026,0.00006219414,0.001594797,0.00004219016,0.00003716163,0.000001491159,0.0009562288,0.000003058345,0.0002840364,0.9672977,0.02875897,0.0003891175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1561875,0.0005985752,0.00004929732,0.01960511,0.0007571405,0.0007551085,0.0000833536,0.0002838786,0.82168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955415,0.0000487219,0.0003459191,0.002198301,0.001553428,0.00006808559,0.000003500779,0.00003252402,0.0002080275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.839354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115658982","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00443.x","title":"Authenticity, Community, and Modernity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08179630603265138,"gpt":0.3912404577666179,"spread":0.3094441517339666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007673313,0.00008262765,0.0001643909,0.00003486793,0.004933318,0.00009980684,0.0004709467,0.000127564,0.0002475441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000698205,0.00006068192,0.0001777496,0.00006815717,0.001605761,0.0001364416,0.00008141963,0.001001311,0.000002371689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001472778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004616489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984065,0.0008667872,0.0002057069,0.00005676052,0.0002439684,0.0002202573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975952,0.00187252,0.000123573,0.0001142239,0.0001808454,0.0001136619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001083494,0.0001138975,0.0006885622,0.000006810177,0.00002355332,5.036242e-7,0.02809119,1.408855e-7,0.0007499204,0.9649683,0.00008391467,0.005164895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002573926,0.00005060203,0.003558512,0.000006050575,0.0001247371,0.000007952089,0.01382271,0.000002620021,0.0001602762,0.9787745,0.003155391,0.00007925917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849985,0.00003763278,0.0006735622,0.003901994,0.0008987071,0.0001968793,0.00003600115,0.00001858889,0.009238087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983049,0.00001495843,0.00007437987,0.0001225682,0.0007552556,0.000005008679,7.105555e-7,0.00001047032,0.0007117621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01426849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163111576","doi":"10.1177/0090591703251146","title":"Heidegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Liberalism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01867336995970931,"gpt":0.3056367691413799,"spread":0.2869633991816706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279963,0.00006682565,0.0001243226,0.000009475344,0.0003876266,0.00002778495,0.0001695272,0.00006404183,0.0003269089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00191287,0.00003584203,0.00009325313,0.0001042229,0.003593672,0.00005931893,0.00003701657,0.0001489277,0.00001448206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000205892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005609267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003352642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966488,0.002612272,0.0001442005,0.0001059298,0.00019059,0.0002981783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970615,0.002574564,0.00002404138,0.0001747998,0.00004068292,0.0001244496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231012,0.00002815834,0.0001201604,0.000005274162,0.000009685415,2.875448e-7,0.001808367,1.032872e-7,0.00001075781,0.9977472,0.00002908266,0.0002085689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185656,0.0000108829,0.0001704956,0.000009419036,0.00002485944,0.000001453105,0.001335566,0.000002619067,0.0003501451,0.9820203,0.01570378,0.0000519667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09591335,0.0002380435,0.0001192608,0.01203513,0.0002762017,0.000265337,0.00001018735,0.00003877969,0.8911037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.00001112656,0.00003670682,0.002074102,0.0002243429,0.000007641837,2.049819e-7,0.000005007955,0.0005881009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9011394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W647528545","doi":"","title":"Dialectics of the Ideal: Evald Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Marxism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Dualism; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Humanities; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03467144792118766,"gpt":0.315600115052399,"spread":0.2809286671312114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005348165,0.000140891,0.0002676906,0.00002794322,0.0003104083,0.00004520037,0.0002829172,0.0002928847,0.00416351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004912972,0.00009187966,0.0001283336,0.00006018751,0.001464587,0.00006802901,0.0001136508,0.0002904403,0.00005132765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003871497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001801911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005585238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008352728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987784,0.0003209597,0.0001930365,0.0001848943,0.0003423018,0.000180424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853,0.0009339029,0.00009476297,0.0002121906,0.0001279375,0.0001012517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005291471,0.00001104821,0.000008264773,0.0000285537,0.00002256556,3.890667e-7,0.001449456,4.877805e-8,0.000001980014,0.9470026,0.05045092,0.001018893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004182572,0.0000211439,0.00001403784,0.0000447023,0.00003902685,2.170435e-7,0.0001868179,7.027394e-7,0.000009825759,0.6230361,0.3765244,0.0000811987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004448068,0.000481621,0.00001676054,0.002783582,0.0003074743,0.0003914119,0.00002975049,0.0000235959,0.9959213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04456231,0.0004861441,0.00006213391,0.0006891781,0.0007486898,0.00001062278,0.000003135618,0.00001738469,0.9534204],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3260735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242810885","doi":"10.4324/9781315732619","title":"Meaning, Madness and Political Subjectivity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05953255750351585,"gpt":0.3519898368751271,"spread":0.2924572793716113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001095411,0.0001332813,0.0002392571,0.0000393427,0.0002317198,0.00007793678,0.0001455235,0.0003613561,0.0009586822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005257792,0.0001227658,0.00005732382,0.00003591306,0.0009927736,0.00008606644,0.00007701796,0.0002901491,0.0001389641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000198898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005156829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002768244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000266875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986721,0.0002161798,0.0001078402,0.0002424787,0.0003617265,0.0003996899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987112,0.000472138,0.00001991356,0.0001321936,0.0001130855,0.0005514629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007245342,0.00001327503,0.00001193272,0.00001532991,0.000007963874,0.000008272265,0.000575072,3.485203e-9,1.33306e-7,0.986793,0.01221116,0.0003566313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003817784,0.00001445637,0.000001104311,0.00001304773,0.0000136121,0.000001086837,0.0001376611,2.313897e-7,9.037843e-7,0.5702673,0.4294111,0.0001013317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002982459,0.00009809886,0.00003631326,0.001866091,0.0002834637,0.0001208597,0.00002119991,0.00009256959,0.9974516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1284224,0.00001094993,0.00004509178,0.0005368787,0.001772752,0.000003212066,0.000007458705,0.00001649034,0.8691847],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4171999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134621737","doi":"","title":"Postimperial reflections on crisis, knowledge, and Utopia: Transgresstopic critical hermeneutics and the \"Death of European man\"","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Utopia; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09093965163110136,"gpt":0.3733656356835169,"spread":0.2824259840524155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005565168,0.00009857776,0.0002218215,0.00003441037,0.0004733478,0.00003249244,0.0001281661,0.00003493091,0.0008933373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001573155,0.0000759125,0.00005937356,0.0001057602,0.0006990342,0.00005752772,0.00001256217,0.0001406695,0.0000267722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004987804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003461193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007635573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01544921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998538,0.0007735833,0.0002012057,0.0001687429,0.00009537365,0.0002230883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999196,0.0002540305,0.00001901127,0.0001550687,0.00003439004,0.0003415022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008148901,0.00002906022,0.00004355874,0.0002680459,0.0000166707,0.00001209008,0.002141863,3.504387e-8,0.000001493763,0.984914,0.003580866,0.008984174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003588282,0.00009788103,0.0001388792,0.0007573671,0.0001789114,0.00001101822,0.0004368399,0.000003026681,0.000003125306,0.03036932,0.9675043,0.0001405085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005963341,0.1185308,0.000003139557,0.1247768,0.0005846645,0.0007370882,0.0001081372,0.00002441417,0.7492716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030029,0.08463815,0.00002649877,0.01169874,0.0003017734,0.00001070218,0.000002702698,0.000009274134,0.000309303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494847580","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3869","title":"On the Negative Possibility of Suffering: Adorno, Feminist Philosophy, and the Transfigured Crip To Come","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Capitalism; Relation (database); Philosophy; Modernity; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Critical theory; Epistemology; Disability studies; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Gender studies; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05139405893137396,"gpt":0.344396300931874,"spread":0.2930022420005001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002382,0.0001801438,0.0004144655,0.00001240808,0.00094092,0.00007308977,0.0003715207,0.00005727122,0.0001588189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002129128,0.00009528202,0.0001628457,0.0002628401,0.008384096,0.0001049915,0.00003521943,0.000201225,0.00003226281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006424177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001672404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001257872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005648057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973277,0.001304394,0.0003779608,0.0003457281,0.0003544663,0.0002896936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911295,0.00803694,0.00005157031,0.0004774235,0.0001793465,0.0001252217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002872651,0.0001788246,0.001334304,0.00004861804,0.0000650717,1.622977e-7,0.1570372,2.500536e-7,0.000009480063,0.8393376,0.0001353038,0.001565919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003969202,0.0004933816,0.008986935,0.00003265746,0.00002618481,1.246925e-7,0.08845586,0.000003747107,0.00002213757,0.9012546,0.0002118412,0.0001155899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8479806,0.0001086297,0.000009729443,0.12074,0.0001615468,0.001420479,0.0000443531,0.00003240772,0.02950218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982615,0.000007751741,0.00001283719,0.001333981,0.0001421768,0.0002051093,5.097849e-7,0.00000657855,0.00002962626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1502808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634437789","doi":"","title":"Confronting mass democracy and industrial technology : political and social theory from Nietzsche to Habermas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Weimar Republic; Sociology; Art history; Law; History; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06258850026775864,"gpt":0.3114444079458243,"spread":0.2488559076780657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007412714,0.0002761555,0.0005181073,0.0001571201,0.0009825502,0.0001574204,0.0002706583,0.001573648,0.001801659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007429142,0.0002735228,0.00007935636,0.00009748177,0.001868228,0.0001013653,0.0002115998,0.0009280068,0.00008486029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001146938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001600031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009837213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003265256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978548,0.0003706141,0.0003119938,0.0005171209,0.0002990673,0.0006463581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979675,0.001411933,0.00006074543,0.0001477303,0.00007300844,0.0003391194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341772,0.00001326439,0.00009363669,0.000007247571,0.00004503723,0.00001461641,0.0008548952,4.35548e-9,0.00001356595,0.9830707,0.00706479,0.008788117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002251582,0.00002952649,0.000002883041,0.00003061779,0.00006393629,9.931662e-7,0.001085364,7.412778e-7,0.000009904402,0.6755151,0.3228012,0.0002346685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001069208,0.0003624213,0.0002909586,0.03613131,0.0003354888,0.0003759941,0.0001247119,0.0001726651,0.9611372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.334749,0.00005113755,0.000923736,0.003393909,0.00878896,0.00002320527,0.00004041235,0.000072439,0.6519573],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3336797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566166706","doi":"10.1353/sub.2006.0051","title":"Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SubStance","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Relation (database); Philosophy; Negation; Epistemology; Critical theory; Michel foucault; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01314663769710281,"gpt":0.329554673388496,"spread":0.3164080356913932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002975498,0.0001269202,0.0001666399,0.00003678134,0.0004717922,0.0001219358,0.0003097734,0.0001174478,0.000976163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009761748,0.000133116,0.00007478848,0.0003010039,0.0004565733,0.0002639889,0.00001664227,0.0001684368,0.0002094165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008168853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004256653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001569548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007641155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983773,0.0002419663,0.0002118435,0.0003413256,0.0003725006,0.0004551218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983434,0.0008828549,0.00001696258,0.0002500231,0.0002823978,0.0002243241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007773226,0.00002020304,0.0001637442,0.00000521617,0.000002178866,0.00003104654,0.001877147,6.490499e-7,0.001900146,0.993196,0.002556039,0.0001699738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007951472,0.00001272233,0.001972102,0.00005113258,0.000006780698,3.51154e-7,0.0007043993,3.221804e-7,0.001018465,0.8681659,0.1277822,0.0002062254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5892655,0.001486977,0.0006168183,0.08032461,0.001092184,0.0002789791,0.0003830637,0.0002503187,0.3263015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917721,0.00001254258,0.00189086,0.003170284,0.001378483,0.00001351123,0.00001537276,0.00001482615,0.001732061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4025066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006904020","doi":"10.1080/19460171003714914","title":"Policy discourse and public spheres: the Habermas paradox","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Policy Studies","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Public discourse; Public sphere; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09989064019166997,"gpt":0.4860740455972372,"spread":0.3861834054055672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005328113,0.0001645744,0.0002385062,0.00007069083,0.001913568,0.0002243246,0.0003317979,0.0001067268,0.00010201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02771517,0.0001087727,0.00008793141,0.0004179572,0.01106032,0.0002630982,0.0002131306,0.0004345533,0.00006837304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003157253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001834822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001189968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002267126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981951,0.00032581,0.0002009113,0.0002551092,0.0003065137,0.0007165535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960583,0.003085239,0.00001824426,0.0002805902,0.0001678595,0.0003897761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005918695,0.00005668431,0.0006010592,0.00001887915,0.00002858929,0.000004421952,0.005187583,2.189743e-8,0.00003795027,0.9884465,0.001478083,0.004134341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009769638,0.00002586201,0.0002862244,0.00001070976,0.00002341682,0.000004163819,0.02896623,0.000001206168,0.00001587793,0.8841296,0.08629631,0.000142677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09797123,0.001171943,0.00001563905,0.7589814,0.000483976,0.0001947119,0.00002663449,0.0001052373,0.1410492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987992,0.000319513,0.00006570212,0.00583036,0.005325675,0.00003447357,5.156759e-7,0.00001289746,0.0004188095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8900208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784772827","doi":"10.20396/cemarx.v0i10.10919","title":"Feminismos interseccional e da reprodução social: rumo a uma ontologia integrativa","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Cadernos Cemarx","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1371194444556925,"gpt":0.3980071783889655,"spread":0.260887733933273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001757319,0.0005165678,0.0006996765,0.0001295937,0.001816647,0.0002940464,0.001024717,0.0007987382,0.006084877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00189666,0.0004855257,0.0004535032,0.0007129039,0.003951604,0.0003632632,0.0003516871,0.001071737,0.00253531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002108899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002773897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000186243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003545358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950319,0.001143099,0.0007582659,0.001179534,0.0007853237,0.001101875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974761,0.0008101956,0.0002623391,0.0005838833,0.0004145692,0.0004528927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004934415,0.0003934566,0.001079975,0.00008215729,0.0001566975,0.00007019848,0.1055767,5.783506e-8,0.0003993729,0.844737,0.03663234,0.0103786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001380684,0.001656633,0.001805032,0.0005622183,0.0002838084,0.00004570066,0.09934741,0.0001247951,0.001690998,0.3825319,0.5087629,0.00180794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1949122,0.0008795921,0.001495769,0.1016966,0.009866497,0.001506478,0.0003181479,0.0005611562,0.6887636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742537,0.00002923911,0.00007685854,0.002929651,0.006783579,0.00003988767,0.0000288868,0.00005029584,0.01580795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7793415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061539504","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901778080","title":"Deliberation and Deconstruction: Two Views on the Space of a Post-National Democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Democracy; Deliberation; Politics; Sociology; Openness to experience; Epistemology; Deliberative democracy; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05376413697243991,"gpt":0.3561475372091352,"spread":0.3023834002366952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001835328,0.00004584721,0.00008261197,0.00012885,0.0007627796,0.00009903891,0.0002295154,0.0000255011,0.0003074144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003479371,0.00003234132,0.00003809942,0.0003688933,0.00275662,0.0003031193,0.000007054672,0.0001312606,0.000005335357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001778389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004044258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006411635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988266,0.0001432235,0.0001924823,0.00008045283,0.0004022528,0.0003549964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980099,0.0004912494,0.00005836104,0.00005469385,0.0004600685,0.0009256791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004741533,0.000004932276,0.0007216152,7.148312e-7,0.00000140651,0.000005636358,0.0004120498,0.000003107435,0.0001761326,0.997566,0.00004154623,0.001062099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001283166,0.0001047023,0.01140647,0.00003531264,0.000008193093,0.0001606324,0.001362981,0.0000404516,0.0004073913,0.978078,0.008194688,0.00007287161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7835574,0.00004200223,0.0001526407,0.09456868,0.0003317927,0.00006780922,0.000008366008,0.000002004455,0.1212694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976185,0.000004369159,0.0001978871,0.001772954,0.0003695481,3.494327e-7,8.566016e-8,0.000001599376,0.00003474038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2140611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494117478","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200002202","title":"Hegel on Contingency, or, Fluidity And Multiplicity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Contingency; Epistemology; Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03414680956318124,"gpt":0.2950716970416733,"spread":0.2609248874784921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475465,0.0001334729,0.0002791778,0.00001073495,0.0004765785,0.00001844323,0.0003614358,0.0001590523,0.0005536399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006369377,0.0001000207,0.0003173149,0.0001181063,0.001353386,0.00002823563,0.0001340912,0.0001951048,0.00001683139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004916499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003970231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001452471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007924301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984749,0.0003394171,0.0002868513,0.0002279997,0.0003926771,0.0002781865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985816,0.000828483,0.0001116015,0.0002629962,0.0001090259,0.0001063296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001132622,0.001852699,0.01291406,0.000670933,0.0003567831,0.000004217233,0.03412704,0.00007196079,0.005399507,0.7460868,0.1554732,0.04191018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001730565,0.0002589597,0.004081939,0.0003363141,0.00008602125,0.000005052603,0.003494685,0.0001266118,0.01063649,0.0831214,0.8956665,0.0004553983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8270992,0.0007976991,0.00005355602,0.1126313,0.0002014836,0.0006553023,0.00009533924,0.00007518955,0.0583909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948083,0.0002215051,0.001371398,0.001462716,0.0003270991,0.000005739235,7.381951e-7,0.00001080188,0.001791748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6061968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21183699","doi":"10.1182/blood-2010-08-304048","title":"Hegel and Deleuze: Together Again for the First Time","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Blood","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01921826813102106,"gpt":0.2744788537352402,"spread":0.2552605856042191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000294964,0.00003893975,0.00004957591,0.000006025232,0.0004163763,0.0000604018,0.0001036364,0.00003910174,0.0004696012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001560708,0.00002595751,0.00003039528,0.00004179368,0.0001886967,0.00006107685,0.00001726309,0.00003672166,0.000155928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002543136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007507601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001191812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002871014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996307,0.0000371661,0.00005033763,0.00007896683,0.000067004,0.0001357633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.0006131812,0.000009291994,0.0000770162,0.00002735324,0.00004886464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001045853,0.0001575937,0.000264384,0.0000132697,0.00004161405,8.105099e-7,0.005220761,5.702323e-7,0.0002704473,0.9829792,0.004021367,0.007019537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004203295,0.0000423671,0.000211511,0.000007820611,0.00003849932,7.316692e-7,0.0004506897,0.00005689983,0.0002240087,0.658126,0.3403239,0.00009724756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.541254,0.001925049,0.0002804922,0.1044194,0.0002612517,0.001736294,0.00003088809,0.0001482362,0.3499444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997298,0.00002003758,0.0001453863,0.0009683887,0.0003757358,0.00005260749,4.759848e-7,0.000004998199,0.001134361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.456044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5141804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332652228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.946470","title":"The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640576270109966,"gpt":0.2739537506377253,"spread":0.2475479879366256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00724861,0.0001754418,0.0004145296,0.0001221028,0.002766336,0.0001110826,0.001089147,0.0001304217,0.0001176411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003662683,0.0001126014,0.0004726082,0.0003066621,0.006497096,0.0002426629,0.00008611769,0.0006536994,0.00000738151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000143052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001891263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002083531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004382686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968821,0.00117463,0.0006744437,0.0002125922,0.0006867475,0.0003694638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942567,0.004250257,0.000475876,0.0003613739,0.0004295166,0.0002262528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005251188,0.00007767199,0.00001855106,0.00005457238,0.0001066003,0.000002985544,0.00153948,0.000003795901,0.00001862624,0.97097,0.010429,0.01625354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072872,0.00008716062,0.00005127822,0.0001251804,0.00008232926,0.00005627089,0.0001973342,0.00001978706,0.000004631565,0.5925049,0.4057039,0.000094387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006988248,0.2452191,0.001968707,0.168622,0.01670713,0.003152367,0.0001649382,0.0001078774,0.5570697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888091,0.003999478,0.000115021,0.001233202,0.003710382,0.00004137288,0.000001202884,0.00003045178,0.002059809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434030348","doi":"10.1177/1368431016655066","title":"Beyond global modernity, global consciousness and global governmentality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Modernity; Governmentality; Sociology; Consciousness; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Social science; Natural (archaeology); Global citizenship; World-system; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02246285176636226,"gpt":0.312103491005901,"spread":0.2896406392395387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489347,0.0001593367,0.0002722519,0.000009127726,0.0006588852,0.000111759,0.0004519467,0.00006300565,0.0003294366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005982282,0.0001193447,0.0001912748,0.0001731843,0.001619109,0.0003467984,0.0001690595,0.0001261136,0.00006412984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006912876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001129706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001339018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001925729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948962,0.003527731,0.0004098146,0.0001818378,0.0006335567,0.0003508204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989005,0.0002465974,0.0002562381,0.00009709824,0.0001568656,0.000342639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003709305,0.00008442252,0.0044604,0.000005632631,0.00006009419,0.0001120121,0.0009275564,1.382025e-7,0.000030744,0.9529308,0.0005019515,0.04051533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009386634,0.0001005074,0.009003469,0.00003623175,0.00005648352,0.00004539379,0.002074051,1.044335e-7,0.00000736623,0.9737515,0.01381281,0.0001734458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3080613,0.0003109579,0.003377773,0.006628757,0.0007617585,0.00008558053,0.0003552197,0.00003622957,0.6803824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974676,0.00005189224,0.00007455785,0.0006799367,0.001552874,2.447663e-7,3.696902e-7,0.000008399234,0.0001640696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6894064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099609746","doi":"10.1177/02632760122051797","title":"Oh, My Others, There is No Other!","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Politics; Absolute (philosophy); Dialectic; Identity politics; Political science; Universalism; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575169065292314,"gpt":0.3193180810597296,"spread":0.2935663904068065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001522665,0.0002051398,0.0002125948,0.000007801946,0.0009433742,0.0001037887,0.0004666384,0.000308075,0.01198894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001259116,0.0001586581,0.0004375024,0.0002950752,0.0009219344,0.0002150434,0.0000437588,0.0003462436,0.001194295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008032987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004188538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001192082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002876019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981056,0.0005463203,0.0001756665,0.0003230775,0.0003602855,0.0004890278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.0002353539,0.00005654584,0.0003121562,0.0001283358,0.0002037793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005323345,0.00007852722,0.00008225189,0.000009586597,0.00005852152,0.000002971561,0.1006764,5.668861e-7,0.0003900991,0.8857657,0.01183612,0.00104611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001514687,0.00002185998,0.000009657028,0.00001677788,0.00001917328,0.000001064533,0.01716347,0.000001098081,0.00008700797,0.4367739,0.5456033,0.0001512752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02195716,0.001469439,0.0003846293,0.005288203,0.0003839457,0.0002999564,0.00006041259,0.0003170815,0.9698392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205871,0.001017346,0.0005146865,0.02042322,0.003274652,0.00002102633,0.000007994971,0.00004666624,0.0541073],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9157318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140885663","doi":"10.1177/1478210314566735","title":"Re-imagining spaces, collectivity, and the political dimension of contemporary art","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Aesthetics; Sociology; Sociality; Politics; Contextualization; Value (mathematics); Phenomenon; Creativity; Social science; Epistemology; Art; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05390843624564358,"gpt":0.4026604847035414,"spread":0.3487520484578978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001025532,0.00005155945,0.0001131704,0.00009200229,0.0001335844,0.00003445754,0.00008312533,0.00005046881,0.000006849935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002170776,0.00003917672,0.00002185663,0.0002827167,0.0007443206,0.0001135695,0.00003413232,0.0001053711,0.000003168337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008194629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007435075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006322944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989219,0.0005443475,0.0001247503,0.00009668051,0.0001625822,0.0001497293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990904,0.0005766764,0.00003706135,0.0001017154,0.00007128412,0.0001228995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007353278,0.0000681017,0.0013983,0.000006229714,0.000002145775,1.414573e-7,0.02800557,4.782645e-7,0.000007786787,0.9661284,0.003730979,0.0005783367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003834006,0.00002026516,0.0005727804,0.0000261415,0.000004344869,8.607104e-7,0.07455173,0.00001208135,0.00005624113,0.8915251,0.03279346,0.00005356668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09727974,0.0007554356,0.00000676733,0.1705353,0.0005220968,0.0002280128,0.000002941682,0.00001906333,0.7306507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967182,0.00001815722,0.00006363587,0.001803837,0.001152325,0.00001290171,0.000002230644,0.000003898876,0.0002247812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}