{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1177,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1177,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"25201e07f843","filters":{"topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2061592058","doi":"10.1142/9789814417358_0016","title":"Choices, Values, and Frames","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"World Scientific handbook in financial economic series","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06283925947885162,"gpt":0.3116454462296101,"spread":0.2488061867507585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003102002,0.0006730233,0.001417069,0.00195067,0.0005952327,0.003253437,0.001476815,0.0004934795,0.009859551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000513664,0.0006172658,0.0003123008,0.0001821332,0.001707738,0.001298485,0.0006810721,0.0006652766,0.009578068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003883064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007332147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009022753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944675,0.00005875529,0.002049671,0.002165947,0.0006255158,0.000632643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996217,0.0007822523,0.0009771839,0.001555517,0.0001835347,0.0002845228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007859666,0.00003260049,0.0006361394,0.00001498152,0.00001626057,0.00004241677,0.0006019358,0.00008734815,0.00002057332,0.0811348,0.3172947,0.6000396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001910497,0.00002991322,0.0002875928,0.0002382341,0.00001233071,0.00001052669,0.00002701248,0.00007499674,0.0000306991,0.4132799,0.5853775,0.0004402045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0958621,0.008562867,0.00004078096,0.0006568111,0.01805557,0.00122868,0.0005837147,0.000152563,0.8748569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005222631,0.0002886057,0.001061676,0.0001962953,0.0004930805,0.00004010893,0.00003744792,0.00007111746,0.9925891],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167366201","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x00003435","title":"Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Heuristics; Construal level theory; Rationality; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Axiom; Task (project management); Norm (philosophy); Computational model; Rational analysis; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3357910294845187,"gpt":0.4575863162823712,"spread":0.1217952867978525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004177982,0.0001352595,0.0002228094,0.0001460101,0.0009156243,0.0009866175,0.001100263,0.00006864739,0.0004184891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005540837,0.00007312846,0.00008368977,0.0007673118,0.0007634495,0.0005007982,0.00009126124,0.00009993775,0.00002645786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001629283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002553849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007162662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979312,0.0001094368,0.0005521329,0.0005988197,0.0005173004,0.0002911307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966602,0.002722959,0.0001362218,0.0003036088,0.00008926704,0.00008777374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009953591,0.00007325037,0.2867758,2.657472e-7,9.194845e-7,3.656422e-7,0.0003169696,0.00002153185,0.0000324271,0.002217812,0.001671277,0.7088794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002082127,0.0001217247,0.8889785,0.000008787847,0.00001106354,0.00001273361,0.0007533397,0.0006216817,0.00001421411,0.100682,0.008444285,0.0001434189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865448,0.0001642043,0.0001754384,0.01215712,0.0001359165,0.000293947,0.0001095393,0.00001907868,0.0003999894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997541,0.00002140559,0.001135962,0.0004623884,0.00005168442,0.00008503839,0.000005318493,0.000003712574,0.0006934992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.708736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9513976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968966047","doi":"10.1126/science.1238041","title":"Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2909,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Poverty; Tamil; Cognition; Perspective (graphical); Poverty rate; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1192544323498718,"gpt":0.4042429212987717,"spread":0.2849884889488999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328146,0.00009617153,0.0001410663,0.0003040867,0.0004149498,0.001155206,0.0008988985,0.0000396432,0.002754274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003377979,0.00006273614,0.00006447429,0.001319747,0.0005462699,0.001946472,0.0002280085,0.00009383457,0.0123978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000421189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001645692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005892818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001399727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975798,0.00003552014,0.0003486081,0.0006091451,0.001111244,0.0003157563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979509,0.0006007595,0.000149098,0.0004157108,0.0007008792,0.0001826983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007239924,0.00002598902,0.006607544,1.660179e-7,8.552241e-7,9.508018e-7,0.0001053323,0.000007835883,0.00393773,0.0002396035,0.004996361,0.9840704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000349981,0.0002653477,0.4440228,0.00002560889,0.00001504193,0.00002144988,0.00334784,0.003490643,0.003410462,0.5252811,0.01938775,0.0003820001],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785978,0.00003333371,0.002174895,0.0003496485,0.001056774,0.0001324523,0.000005202575,0.00004175041,0.01760821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970601,0.000002255724,0.000411386,0.0009846307,0.00005280569,0.000009926328,4.663718e-7,0.000004090804,0.001474298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122592429","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x","title":"A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1948,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Ambiguity; Decision-making models; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2157617532183749,"gpt":0.4175990168238284,"spread":0.2018372636054535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464858,0.0001902164,0.0005574108,0.001900192,0.0001281387,0.0002561207,0.001210498,0.0001376759,0.001749072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002392796,0.0001568279,0.0002968397,0.001916389,0.0001007893,0.0006242725,0.0003454053,0.0001658793,0.001383664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000193024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001074568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009953101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003778742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969206,0.00004726298,0.00138487,0.0006819527,0.0006335315,0.0003318167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958407,0.002116198,0.0006118845,0.001062367,0.0002209352,0.0001479027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003210831,0.0001271848,0.001999957,6.70284e-7,0.000005053938,9.524633e-7,0.0000832454,0.06680766,0.00002309653,0.0009573338,0.003574162,0.9263886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008145441,0.0001399082,0.02136115,0.0000415409,0.0000264976,0.0000105507,0.0003194791,0.3892919,0.0002514888,0.5520987,0.03510284,0.0005414756],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090992,0.0001631873,0.07026913,0.0003411191,0.0002935534,0.0001071181,0.00004476356,0.00003715301,0.01964478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612458,0.00002024483,0.03771996,0.0003707266,0.00008394434,0.000004746364,0.000001039764,0.00001884907,0.0005346522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9258471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991011913","doi":"10.1002/bdm.414","title":"A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1865,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Construct (python library); Expected utility hypothesis; Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170302024439043,"gpt":0.3829458248159893,"spread":0.2659156223720849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656786,0.0006340348,0.001369538,0.002006488,0.001524664,0.001836974,0.001866188,0.0004303216,0.002872855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001180324,0.0004880458,0.001032989,0.001363686,0.0004030293,0.001763689,0.0005730452,0.002058016,0.0006126005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006203675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007791947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002684172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897375,0.0009436671,0.003854342,0.001126971,0.003560494,0.0007770251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892672,0.00280027,0.004568108,0.001416189,0.001278117,0.0006701068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001155283,0.0003794699,0.3669881,8.068766e-7,0.00001449985,0.0001348676,0.001200167,0.0004538324,0.0002334883,0.000007660229,0.002569922,0.6279017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003027675,0.001120542,0.9060094,0.0006180365,0.0009128036,0.001818711,0.006753746,0.0009424826,0.00005332103,0.04802612,0.02947904,0.001238064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696465,0.001469503,0.02608004,0.00004948712,0.0020329,0.0002743541,0.0001587252,0.00005677701,0.0002317867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903582,0.003063927,0.09276636,0.00002675487,0.0003831738,0.000006863917,6.689658e-7,0.00007325324,0.00009704755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6266636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751778071","doi":"10.1177/1745691617708630","title":"Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":987,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","keywords":"Generality; Cog; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Programming language; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3898253117507056,"gpt":0.564905420205657,"spread":0.1750801084549514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004207874,0.0002619311,0.0003679203,0.0003097791,0.001368626,0.001653426,0.003458711,0.0001401054,0.002998634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01346492,0.0001613689,0.0001945817,0.0005594496,0.003273639,0.0004625099,0.0003174852,0.0003628942,0.002772258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002653538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007404015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001188798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001196623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944537,0.0001769099,0.0005154632,0.002407024,0.001826758,0.0006200905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959424,0.0006117315,0.0003426896,0.002139799,0.0003552616,0.0006080832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005037088,0.001477465,0.002239332,3.487091e-7,0.000006487783,0.00006325493,0.00141122,0.0001035296,0.007014561,0.008756673,0.01225412,0.9661693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009701944,0.003150751,0.8929378,0.00004053851,0.00001067782,0.00003583129,0.003645456,0.0002499299,0.0006124408,0.08172671,0.01591821,0.0007015044],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8647593,0.0000035086,0.0001969994,0.01041469,0.0009034071,0.0003634135,0.00005929459,0.00006845665,0.123231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927462,0.000005546633,0.002173069,0.004576932,0.0001357522,0.00002073975,8.547177e-7,0.000007514778,0.0003334131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995081088","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.844729","title":"Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":878,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Reliability (semiconductor); Variance (accounting); Information processing; Reflection (computer programming); Dual (grammatical number); Prime (order theory); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0971559523513711,"gpt":0.3998446609970647,"spread":0.3026887086456936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002455324,0.0001587858,0.0002533663,0.0002334361,0.00071664,0.002141278,0.0006783258,0.0001283089,0.0001033946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005012612,0.0001038106,0.0001009686,0.0007718413,0.0001097013,0.006912984,0.0001514248,0.0002796069,0.0001335076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001654769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002134436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000148727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974502,0.0001666008,0.0008171753,0.0003053641,0.001022856,0.0002378298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965795,0.0009017548,0.001020736,0.0004493721,0.0009683575,0.00008025792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009325528,0.00003975572,0.01889487,0.000004429999,0.000002237958,3.752558e-7,0.004516492,0.0001251045,0.002795122,0.00006517062,0.0001001123,0.973447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001374066,0.0005364796,0.594467,0.003495363,0.0001312667,0.0001245317,0.05112343,0.111546,0.01823728,0.2169483,0.001042015,0.0009742499],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892233,0.00002564425,0.005010036,0.0001296026,0.0003673043,0.000234902,0.000002567223,0.00008315415,0.004923478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935919,0.000001449183,0.006022366,0.0002120545,0.00006449072,0.00001246108,0.000006154259,0.00001318868,0.00007594798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090789917","doi":"10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672","title":"On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":842,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Debiasing; Cognitive bias; Heuristics; Neglect; Confirmation bias; Framing effect; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Axiom independence; Anchoring; Axiom; Persuasion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3236853605658563,"gpt":0.4712949365361573,"spread":0.1476095759703009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004298305,0.00008313053,0.0003431351,0.00010768,0.0003773078,0.0000375677,0.0002470186,0.000136966,0.000153318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003840262,0.0000490703,0.0001352671,0.000147993,0.0009949558,0.000212329,0.00004864268,0.0004278612,0.000004708985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001320347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000624417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001766082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001460538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980643,0.0004906062,0.000581482,0.0001942815,0.0005658609,0.0001034895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926639,0.006097185,0.0006926205,0.00008889253,0.0004118673,0.0000455718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003447035,0.001278795,0.3468562,0.00001207222,0.0003167443,0.0002128258,0.1712531,0.000008333303,0.0005669562,0.0638053,0.007495073,0.4047475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004760734,0.0003805491,0.4841104,0.00003400994,0.00002587516,0.00022059,0.005201946,0.000007136117,0.00001397999,0.5092431,0.000221156,0.0000651889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932619,0.0001501278,0.0003066381,0.004804984,0.0002057951,0.00004796261,0.00001715979,0.000001784072,0.00120366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985142,0.00004916713,0.0001157791,0.001204315,0.00008316369,4.18762e-7,1.594167e-7,0.000002857309,0.00002991479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4454378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.459743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171935043","doi":"10.5465/amr.2006.22527462","title":"Integrating Theories of Motivation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":734,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Behaviorism; Psychology; Cumulative prospect theory; Construct (python library); Organizational behavior; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Prospect theory; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198505807613475,"gpt":0.4149025042002149,"spread":0.2950519234388674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00337767,0.0001003835,0.0004229652,0.0001647386,0.00003588733,0.00002594907,0.000624244,0.00004174078,0.0002906473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006185661,0.00006726264,0.0001509459,0.0005498635,0.00007873865,0.0002256581,0.0001633674,0.00008414527,0.00006645467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001428168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004661855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001212133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.849219e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977461,0.00009967614,0.00123219,0.0002493099,0.0005677406,0.0001049974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983579,0.0005215876,0.0007967842,0.000235064,0.00007108268,0.00001759499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002282851,0.00002836114,0.00211778,0.0001944765,0.000005936186,2.812033e-7,0.000008062068,0.00001728545,0.00001939286,0.1559211,0.0111021,0.8305829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001350849,0.00002716096,0.01845743,0.002662977,0.00008109748,0.000001133353,0.0001256035,0.0000440474,0.0004590956,0.7328511,0.2450265,0.000128823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6669038,0.07500775,0.01298442,0.008568027,0.0004162866,0.001882952,0.00002577776,0.00008956896,0.2341214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842212,0.009055112,0.004873363,0.0005573691,0.00003230157,0.00001118311,0.000002954696,0.000007386401,0.001239169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8304541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3182384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143177887","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001","title":"Intuition, reason, and metacognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":694,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Intuition; Metamemory; Feeling; Task (project management); Fluency; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.511818764827479,"gpt":0.4999096014207356,"spread":0.01190916340674342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399579,0.0001443743,0.0002748338,0.0003284467,0.0001256021,0.00007924783,0.0002659431,0.0001387086,0.002932739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002035429,0.0001169226,0.00007681346,0.0003338499,0.0003494639,0.0003041537,0.00009695457,0.000160107,0.002423787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008699077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001695672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009807197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001812023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981381,0.0002272594,0.0005023936,0.0006790049,0.0002306284,0.0002226148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812,0.0006883022,0.0002169093,0.000295647,0.0005467806,0.0001323342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001312903,0.0001284545,0.009565426,4.944856e-7,0.00001348418,0.00002407923,0.000601219,1.214383e-8,0.0001027456,0.0009171009,0.003140107,0.9853756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007424172,0.0002790076,0.2076563,0.00002038353,0.00004862892,0.0001478435,0.0007786972,0.000012552,0.0003739098,0.7837989,0.00593776,0.0002035855],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8878378,0.0001770862,0.0189832,0.0002014803,0.0006483686,0.0001372706,0.00003913291,0.00004710475,0.09192858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964789,0.0000632939,0.001284682,0.001858057,0.00006689907,0.00002318966,0.000009637178,0.00001262421,0.0002026899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.985172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249947943","doi":"10.4324/9780203496398-12","title":"Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Social Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":662,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2674986600634576,"gpt":0.4029378538166409,"spread":0.1354391937531834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589521,0.0002277734,0.0004616768,0.000426914,0.0002251695,0.0002283349,0.0001870144,0.0004925657,0.001738496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001169839,0.0002164677,0.0001697137,0.0001558899,0.0002190444,0.0002357198,0.0001117987,0.000347575,0.0008870328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004079028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001731793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003568692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002445705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976394,0.00006449746,0.0007855484,0.0006447644,0.0006431115,0.0002226862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983447,0.0006165414,0.0004255168,0.0001938524,0.000341509,0.00007791184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008589846,0.00008076772,0.0006432038,0.000009084642,0.000008720968,0.00003310575,0.0002106371,0.00000485723,0.0000124318,0.02053885,0.001272816,0.9770997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004924303,0.00005378537,0.005928543,0.0001257992,0.00004630294,0.000005398565,0.0000785977,0.00001206218,0.00001458555,0.9754374,0.01752702,0.0002780838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7054924,0.000457537,0.0001378129,0.0006799658,0.0007716994,0.0006675998,0.0007940764,0.00009150636,0.2909074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885498,0.0001284898,0.00004259949,0.0001055834,0.0002188903,0.000007037018,0.0001723861,0.00002155786,0.01075369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147664728","doi":"10.1287/mksc.1060.0254","title":"Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":612,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Test (biology); Contrast (vision); Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0584662893362493,"gpt":0.3772242976406483,"spread":0.318758008304399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06653059,0.000145455,0.0002512737,0.0003911998,0.0006249193,0.0005023816,0.004194032,0.00005523466,0.0003052218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07851387,0.00008671562,0.00009511658,0.003254998,0.001323666,0.0004717166,0.000795167,0.0002056399,0.0002232581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008788468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004580683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003523433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002497038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950479,0.0001983087,0.0009207035,0.0008255558,0.002455862,0.0005516217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917468,0.00490186,0.0006233159,0.001831475,0.0007432,0.0001533644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002434413,0.0001305415,0.0114626,0.000004757936,0.00000307675,0.0000214206,0.001188656,0.0001397639,0.01226201,0.005673221,0.02059858,0.9482719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006616609,0.0002448138,0.5622595,0.0001383673,0.00002313185,0.0001395964,0.002982916,0.001409534,0.02391769,0.2464609,0.1611306,0.0006313267],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075248,0.00002851156,0.0005173541,0.001008044,0.001811889,0.0001840447,0.000006199311,0.00002373686,0.08889546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931737,0.000002631696,0.004687956,0.0001913538,0.0004844644,0.000001789877,1.472228e-7,0.000008032152,0.001449922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115836035","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00567.x","title":"It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":523,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Negativity effect; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Reinforcement; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1246645158950091,"gpt":0.4201495567008496,"spread":0.2954850408058405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002864777,0.0001264284,0.0003084661,0.0002942725,0.0001323655,0.00004973763,0.000396872,0.0001423389,0.00008002455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008346534,0.00008144098,0.00008883203,0.0007286526,0.0002547654,0.0002401838,0.0001023885,0.0002414801,0.00007016622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000246987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003179233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009400675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004181046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998078,0.0001914173,0.000776366,0.0004515943,0.000257334,0.000245306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971576,0.001749468,0.0003308859,0.0005763714,0.0001233613,0.00006232592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000786503,0.0003926937,0.1950803,0.000005599757,0.00002187041,0.000006307307,0.003113996,0.001297191,0.0546033,0.0004764642,0.005110368,0.7391054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006048786,0.0001772413,0.8641046,0.00003539624,0.00001257298,0.000009749425,0.001614766,0.001691954,0.0005783781,0.1243113,0.00671436,0.0001448273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939319,0.00005745428,0.001624145,0.000994407,0.0008898188,0.0001686121,0.00002436088,0.00001659307,0.002292707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986014,0.0000359206,0.000822071,0.0002088636,0.0001386662,0.000006139065,0.000003922224,0.000008039321,0.0001750073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7389606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3321067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621487820","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001","title":"What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Decoupling (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5084308370774361,"gpt":0.5253165416008257,"spread":0.01688570452338967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003715711,0.0002347576,0.0005851687,0.000482761,0.00009617887,0.0002274514,0.0007054603,0.0001779481,0.0004830576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002619438,0.0001848719,0.0001742314,0.000573158,0.0003980492,0.0006794943,0.0001981993,0.0002895583,0.0008484448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003669123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009288997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008606641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968218,0.0002496136,0.000925327,0.0008765045,0.000766675,0.0003601042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963493,0.0009707721,0.0005235612,0.0006927032,0.001239672,0.0002239381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001060278,0.001166853,0.02874513,0.0000124791,0.0001370441,0.0001505998,0.009650537,0.005425521,0.0004049279,0.0008983339,0.007795307,0.944553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004133555,0.0009883128,0.0126589,0.0001707108,0.0001863484,0.00004265042,0.02857761,0.06601157,0.0006955147,0.8835312,0.002237531,0.0007661076],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627094,0.0002870713,0.02189129,0.0005103546,0.001325331,0.0002541389,0.00007977142,0.00003807282,0.01290456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965498,0.00004293477,0.0007069712,0.001585918,0.00005746789,0.00001925949,0.000009238297,0.00002074674,0.001007673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005512101","doi":"10.1287/mksc.1040.0109","title":"Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":450,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Product (mathematics); Product category; Business; Dimension (graph theory); Product type; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08857236628370567,"gpt":0.3841716594215719,"spread":0.2955992931378663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01359187,0.0001292589,0.0001890018,0.0001939982,0.0005131556,0.001230241,0.0006701521,0.00005037021,0.0002981552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008056256,0.00009652595,0.00002884426,0.0005673089,0.0005810252,0.000827533,0.0005290282,0.0001248618,0.00008663828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007436286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001047932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005069781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006038159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974266,0.0001335073,0.0004038524,0.0007669132,0.0009358419,0.0003332431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968907,0.002050729,0.0001684362,0.0004651542,0.000220169,0.0002047705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003734626,0.00003108756,0.05598743,0.000001646274,0.000001926652,0.000002696038,0.0003697858,0.00003262695,0.0008519035,0.0001995219,0.01020455,0.9322795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003879102,0.0001046333,0.5451908,0.00006131407,0.00001807941,0.00006358472,0.0004304774,0.01607381,0.0002851776,0.01997539,0.4169824,0.0004264046],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881569,0.0002137206,0.0001702171,0.001646788,0.0003873436,0.00008472095,0.000004070303,0.00003128163,0.009304964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852279,0.00003850649,0.01285193,0.0008859466,0.00008877938,0.000001925157,2.505215e-7,0.000006372811,0.0008983711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9318531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165067","doi":"10.1177/1745691612454303","title":"Hindsight Bias","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":445,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Overconfidence effect; Psychology; Debiasing; Cognitive bias; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Intervention (counseling); Sensemaking; Meaning (existential); Neglect; Social psychology; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3982961838288664,"gpt":0.5334642844091555,"spread":0.1351681005802891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00793758,0.000193515,0.0002762601,0.0004438746,0.0005181455,0.0005484507,0.002223858,0.00009881455,0.002676585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007992332,0.0001104354,0.0001625778,0.002238399,0.001432032,0.001006596,0.0002320802,0.0002985817,0.00649738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001810297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002927258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004734462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.007109e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956135,0.0001527398,0.0004699993,0.001277944,0.001735392,0.0007503812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967173,0.001142773,0.0002090886,0.00114101,0.0002733907,0.0005164043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001216793,0.00256244,0.0397467,2.432126e-7,0.000003666433,0.00001209286,0.005416661,0.00003880225,0.002664702,0.0672933,0.01158501,0.8705547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004835907,0.0008859081,0.7531896,0.00001309831,0.000007196596,0.00007543773,0.01230334,0.0001567683,0.0005981514,0.1745982,0.05704534,0.0006432841],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8777983,0.0001296813,0.0004919556,0.001161484,0.001785857,0.0001054808,0.00000496765,0.00007782304,0.1184445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962773,0.00001694728,0.001914447,0.0007582638,0.0002341167,0.000008053677,1.694804e-7,0.000006460677,0.0007842279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8699114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086594387","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002","title":"Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":431,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Heuristic; Cognitive psychology; Think aloud protocol; Epistemology; Thinking processes; Confirmation bias; Inference; Heuristics; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Moral reasoning; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1551283694678041,"gpt":0.4458791039409492,"spread":0.290750734473145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00344494,0.00007688474,0.0001788391,0.0003049526,0.00006843412,0.00009976952,0.0001764105,0.00007272285,0.00007221854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001360237,0.00006288233,0.00004699469,0.0004390463,0.00007674898,0.0003432662,0.00004487061,0.0001071831,0.0000640424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002191835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003034494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006022847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002062748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984825,0.00003564543,0.0005828474,0.000228108,0.0005132299,0.0001576292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983346,0.0009339208,0.0002274828,0.0001683189,0.0002977602,0.0000379329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001850783,0.0001503907,0.0893654,0.000008964673,0.000005097056,0.00005127728,0.005846036,0.00008248969,0.003850734,0.00234285,0.00002980554,0.8980819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004429102,0.00006679432,0.06525344,0.0001600003,0.000010484,0.00001309734,0.006525047,0.00006785006,0.07474244,0.8521692,0.0003975574,0.0001511641],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987898,0.000052917,0.001742222,0.00002722494,0.0004055705,0.00008286681,0.00000542409,0.00002156243,0.009764237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995002,0.000005426388,0.0003395113,0.00002289846,0.00008035886,0.000002820658,0.000002325166,0.000006093406,0.00004041969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8979307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2564267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130478903","doi":"10.1177/0956797614563958","title":"Scarcity Frames Value","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":410,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Scarcity; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Statistics; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4736337629158719,"gpt":0.5508557516161008,"spread":0.07722198870022884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010059,0.0001346011,0.0002511811,0.0002254344,0.000277542,0.0007948967,0.002978808,0.0001025169,0.0004932975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01085063,0.00007844126,0.00009989263,0.002084827,0.001406364,0.0006439172,0.0004371704,0.0002168336,0.00415747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008613313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009064498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002029057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002528049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957492,0.0001212828,0.000517156,0.001090543,0.002045545,0.0004762781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972407,0.0005519612,0.0001664804,0.0009932406,0.000418131,0.0006294722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003390973,0.0002551224,0.0421444,1.24227e-7,6.647806e-7,0.00002055703,0.0001992495,0.0002066172,0.0005346414,0.00607249,0.01665274,0.9338795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002654253,0.0002823515,0.1328373,0.000004529883,0.000002510425,0.00004511767,0.0003066013,0.001186691,0.0002111027,0.8292539,0.03537625,0.0002282341],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398131,0.00003267081,0.002116625,0.001454864,0.001585052,0.00008450905,0.000003865297,0.00007894594,0.0548304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905776,0.000002542576,0.007701045,0.001248096,0.00008960229,0.000004553773,2.11878e-7,0.000003600973,0.0003727478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970094891","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102","title":"Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JAMA Psychiatry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Borderline personality disorder; Clinical psychology; MEDLINE; Discounting; Delay discounting; Psychiatry; Impulsivity; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1057808425814239,"gpt":0.4651655582559394,"spread":0.3593847156745155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003105188,0.0009673409,0.003166625,0.002153656,0.0002026162,0.001227433,0.003369313,0.001060745,0.0006447027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001743596,0.0007048118,0.001581723,0.003794244,0.0001124831,0.0008540188,0.0001747031,0.001652983,0.006634796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001942797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007983275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007959937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914284,0.0004234284,0.00353967,0.002165785,0.001558204,0.0008845268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993189,0.002764266,0.00178876,0.001887181,0.0001318802,0.0002389513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002176057,0.0003176229,0.003510459,0.001664346,0.00002454525,0.000008557656,0.000149953,0.00006788048,1.729441e-9,0.0002698937,0.003822763,0.9901422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007909415,0.0001317932,0.0002265282,0.00673989,0.0004471592,0.00008343286,0.0005283314,0.00008176945,4.472255e-9,0.08794719,0.9020087,0.001014287],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01039471,0.9707485,0.00008184353,0.0008745938,0.009314161,0.001520106,0.000120666,0.00008134137,0.006864053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002268482,0.9950308,0.0007033059,0.0003925207,0.0007212055,0.0001982005,0.00004996678,0.0001660415,0.000469533],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097949912","doi":"10.1086/656570","title":"The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Causality (physics); Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Attribution; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2388857080904566,"gpt":0.497472383848759,"spread":0.2585866757583023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01324408,0.0000921278,0.0002909762,0.0003611146,0.0006163836,0.0005664097,0.0004073604,0.00008963309,0.0001290545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008827368,0.0000461029,0.00006637971,0.0003988915,0.001394308,0.0003537768,0.000156424,0.0010047,0.00001160139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002751429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000527083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004419212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004886888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99671,0.00035729,0.0007384937,0.0002251478,0.001719172,0.0002499039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855291,0.01189453,0.0003744351,0.0003777664,0.001614053,0.0002101835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002225482,0.00002787831,0.3147074,0.000001194736,0.00001887285,0.00001116755,0.0002351988,7.427864e-7,0.0007935179,0.0001784408,0.0007299852,0.683073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008937492,0.0004456926,0.9213261,0.00006083063,0.00002647215,0.0005827603,0.001994932,0.0002172898,0.0001191954,0.03165911,0.04257171,0.0001021784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996842,0.001079839,0.00006570192,0.001504761,0.0002423077,0.00010203,0.000009527274,0.000001890335,0.0001519869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990843,0.0002797467,0.000453251,0.00001016369,0.00004245737,0.000001319459,8.823945e-8,0.000006683183,0.0001220007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6829709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085887099","doi":"10.1037/a0028857","title":"Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive bias; Blind spot; Sophistication; Cognition; Response bias; Heuristics; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Social cognition; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4443054255554618,"gpt":0.5126332451784136,"spread":0.06832781962295181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006803591,0.00009636646,0.0003039386,0.0001130166,0.0003575514,0.0001274164,0.0003204019,0.0001366898,0.0003182811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001425024,0.00004967342,0.0001819144,0.0001470782,0.0004533568,0.0003041854,0.00004343277,0.0003297203,0.00008761424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002413427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004099723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001002435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001438674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980312,0.0004592821,0.0006656483,0.0001642223,0.0004778149,0.0002018508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969747,0.001642254,0.0007582892,0.0001153839,0.0004144101,0.00009493286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001617554,0.0005724384,0.08580781,0.000004186074,0.0001060243,0.00001409677,0.02421054,7.604577e-7,0.0006315177,0.005152325,0.009675507,0.8722072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001355019,0.0001573933,0.8591945,0.00001267007,0.0001246524,0.0001991333,0.009534732,0.00001245976,0.0000425989,0.1023357,0.02686252,0.0001686495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767428,0.0001265823,0.0005387121,0.02020441,0.001358274,0.00005219043,0.00003234288,0.000003079728,0.0009415863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953585,0.00003578203,0.0001177005,0.003100027,0.001202594,0.000001030998,8.937707e-7,0.00000501723,0.0001784932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3484955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497821641","doi":"10.1257/jel.20191074","title":"Measuring Time Preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2192429771433443,"gpt":0.3586980483545494,"spread":0.1394550712112051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001561446,0.0001490953,0.0005104797,0.0002179468,0.00006491847,0.001089281,0.001087431,0.0001179387,0.001212798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009468861,0.00009958912,0.0003091875,0.000200401,0.0000355228,0.001139407,0.0001013411,0.0003879227,0.001412973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006818499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001577172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.908005e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001036445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978883,0.00009817439,0.001228728,0.0002805362,0.0003386857,0.000165525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977612,0.0004594363,0.0009846863,0.0002566509,0.0002632651,0.0002747733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006747645,0.0001245843,0.01600214,0.0000143693,0.0001517057,0.0002864806,0.008168517,0.005327534,0.003010094,0.0008284572,0.2695666,0.6958447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00275767,0.001517897,0.007346027,0.0005236446,0.0001201115,0.001007084,0.001169503,0.009468748,0.002661562,0.3430354,0.6292768,0.001115613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904853,0.0007172361,0.00008033329,0.002840094,0.0009608062,0.0000467452,0.00002845357,0.00001121695,0.004829845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964243,0.00002860351,0.001369904,0.000702859,0.001006572,3.871342e-7,0.00000114094,0.0000110417,0.0004552492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6947291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013660131","doi":"10.1002/bdm.683","title":"A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard Business School; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stochastic game; Competition (biology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1433559998342561,"gpt":0.4207473031054966,"spread":0.2773913032712405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513952,0.0002972608,0.0007176154,0.0006446995,0.0003299964,0.001446471,0.0009719542,0.000231157,0.0008235265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001158228,0.0002298374,0.0002942024,0.0005556525,0.0001206301,0.002702948,0.0001513006,0.0004807429,0.00006832281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006606347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001136052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007630166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946666,0.0001827734,0.002225476,0.0006459431,0.001987129,0.0002920855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948398,0.001886643,0.001676632,0.0006055871,0.0007209062,0.0002704339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000269861,0.0002202649,0.07419473,2.759579e-7,0.000005588207,0.00007879453,0.0008399134,0.0001626861,0.005352173,0.00002884257,0.0008376809,0.9180092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263014,0.0006975618,0.8201799,0.0005653703,0.0001128169,0.0001474455,0.001599352,0.001752114,0.00027392,0.163782,0.009286573,0.0003399665],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759563,0.0005135692,0.02081032,0.0001470006,0.002203128,0.0001181366,0.00008815348,0.00003466714,0.0001287289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707935,0.00007094371,0.02813558,0.0002727015,0.0006737429,0.000001946272,0.000004869994,0.00001570375,0.00003101071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084895529","doi":"10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00009-6","title":"Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine","keywords":"R-CAST; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Decision support system; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Evidential reasoning approach; Medical decision making; Scope (computer science); Knowledge management; Medical research; Clinical decision support system; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1583580500140952,"gpt":0.4752569490948088,"spread":0.3168988990807136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01205792,0.0004196347,0.003685434,0.003621572,0.00006852945,0.0002190381,0.002524015,0.0009676946,0.001998683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01854788,0.0002581117,0.001239219,0.002185403,0.0003970737,0.0007630354,0.0003890871,0.001569498,0.0002906547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009322095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000121819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003053082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981481,0.0002697633,0.01205801,0.0002067606,0.005557231,0.000427289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808927,0.00940209,0.008074165,0.0005788569,0.0005323465,0.0005198662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001391928,0.0002013442,0.000005329247,0.0005212079,0.00004319526,0.0001712522,0.0003128545,0.000008051022,1.80421e-8,0.00002679655,0.005497918,0.9931981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004918611,0.0002135597,0.000003784471,0.04069631,0.0002297873,0.00146798,0.0004684242,0.002444074,1.134041e-7,0.0101107,0.943604,0.0002694354],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001796221,0.9752366,0.01735849,0.0001169988,0.003292628,0.0003328832,0.00007688173,0.00001335019,0.001775959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001524891,0.9888721,0.00910654,0.0001202481,0.000324625,0.000002972468,0.000008205386,0.0000269083,0.00001355544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969624676","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2941","title":"Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumer choice; Econometric model; Consumer behaviour; Task (project management); Choice set; Empirical research; Econometrics; Construct (python library); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1552349688658422,"gpt":0.3955967711956773,"spread":0.2403618023298351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639053,0.0004696116,0.0008751075,0.0004658656,0.001014405,0.0006532934,0.0006457231,0.0002996213,0.001009724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002991503,0.0003837329,0.00009004847,0.0006447986,0.002459942,0.0008008847,0.0007794212,0.0002579202,0.000008825531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005717173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001461448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004678153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001132623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952472,0.0001391135,0.001613484,0.001353731,0.001285838,0.0003606621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925787,0.004935722,0.0006400672,0.0005797312,0.0008740203,0.0003917402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000230359,0.001054567,0.8921451,0.00004329012,0.00001744115,0.000007401432,0.0003167016,0.00002752911,0.0003925138,0.01211744,0.001392336,0.09225529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002529787,0.000343423,0.3035353,0.0001064775,0.0003174721,0.0002276067,0.000433881,0.003656823,0.0001482214,0.6851957,0.002739205,0.0007661748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398336,0.0005770732,0.05808447,0.00007861619,0.00007285982,0.0008121023,0.0002291152,0.0000418634,0.0002703154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386817,0.0002165092,0.06056896,0.0001260786,0.00005590945,0.0000878447,0.000126174,0.00005702821,0.00007982532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122664019","doi":"10.1257/app.20170048","title":"Do Risk Preferences Change? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":325,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Seismology; Geography; Geology; Meteorology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1746640953632861,"gpt":0.3562616397659082,"spread":0.1815975444026221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004394085,0.000518063,0.001042682,0.0002951115,0.001097395,0.002591525,0.003450233,0.0001360511,0.003070918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005081648,0.0003609564,0.0004152036,0.0002770249,0.001577813,0.001216273,0.0005448856,0.0007614407,0.01079055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003589087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003275141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004847347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953811,0.0002671362,0.001981522,0.001291921,0.000292897,0.0007854784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913507,0.003210437,0.003068002,0.001714215,0.000157886,0.0004987924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001621592,0.00002313222,0.1012423,2.172781e-7,0.00006863273,0.000001019468,0.001649444,0.000460916,0.000007039695,0.0002119453,0.003350882,0.8928223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001292631,0.0009425075,0.5001333,0.00009980613,0.0002369889,0.000231893,0.01969447,0.004045438,0.0001504965,0.3518952,0.119538,0.00173932],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915243,0.0002151262,0.000343224,0.00157675,0.002195466,0.0003338039,0.0002453114,0.00004894866,0.003517024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911297,0.001579073,0.001859981,0.001305741,0.003907895,0.00003932083,0.000004529697,0.00005697386,0.000116775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.891083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124328514","doi":"10.2308/jmar-50726","title":"The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":322,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Phenomenon; Microeconomics; Empirical research; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1771256799378747,"gpt":0.4798260455893569,"spread":0.3027003656514822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05956225,0.0001537697,0.0004439646,0.001776257,0.0007132132,0.001279865,0.001943236,0.00007062482,0.00002626804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01177003,0.00008268507,0.0001987545,0.001388324,0.0001679253,0.0002523288,0.000529161,0.0006189889,0.0001245257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001206715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003307803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009782475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002833629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934759,0.0008956582,0.001093798,0.0003094041,0.003757426,0.0004678137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823134,0.01474812,0.00106911,0.0006731743,0.001102411,0.00009376798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000164215,0.00007289195,0.01244191,0.00001331164,0.00001873692,0.0000161377,0.00004378935,0.0002395912,0.0001282836,0.0003151556,0.003147232,0.9833987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01218988,0.01798865,0.452348,0.003334278,0.0007352652,0.0001876699,0.009337525,0.04361826,0.0211456,0.05614841,0.3811232,0.001843204],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929147,0.0001239374,0.0003370545,0.0008482949,0.0005800493,0.0004373952,0.000001592797,0.000007562631,0.00474935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984216,0.00009584655,0.0005097797,0.00003746423,0.0002795201,0.00001820359,3.389146e-7,0.00001834248,0.000618888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2431859568","doi":"10.1017/s0033291716000866","title":"Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Medicine","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Homewood Research Institute; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Meta-regression; Sample size determination; Delay discounting; Obesity; Psychology; Random effects model; Regression analysis; Statistics; Demography; Econometrics; Medicine; Economics; Clinical psychology; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Impulsivity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5675461112680579,"gpt":0.5435027870232559,"spread":0.02404332424480193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007740624,0.0005133225,0.008138223,0.001523565,0.00005259513,0.0000491979,0.00124057,0.0004772699,0.002225698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003565518,0.0002107196,0.001829117,0.002390224,0.0004920946,0.0001230425,0.0002933447,0.0005268063,0.00008429207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004013196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001790192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004117102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000730936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931716,0.0006105054,0.003262074,0.001434548,0.001160643,0.0003606216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914054,0.005242017,0.001644101,0.001357199,0.0001512817,0.0001999524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001191902,0.0001134048,0.00009922805,0.00007031055,0.004927156,0.00002473396,0.00003893495,7.990205e-7,1.390619e-7,0.00006126278,0.0003121335,0.99434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001579028,0.00311616,0.00265992,0.003239049,0.3293963,0.0001577792,0.0003348171,0.00005560511,1.324875e-7,0.1416652,0.5163495,0.001446601],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00935456,0.9877096,0.0006445982,0.0004355406,0.0002725359,0.0004116893,0.0001338454,0.00001903174,0.001018561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04855445,0.950332,0.0005370671,0.0001671502,0.0001171033,0.00004474408,0.00001607975,0.00001962008,0.0002117585],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023548979","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6","title":"Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Mental accounting; Flexibility (engineering); Ambiguity; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Construct (python library); Process (computing); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.199411575573643,"gpt":0.4636348922484119,"spread":0.2642233166747689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007379828,0.0001187847,0.0004113677,0.0002491636,0.0001790373,0.00006891587,0.0005515054,0.00009538516,0.0002513976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002235775,0.00005629499,0.0001698885,0.0002159591,0.0005132674,0.0001997259,0.00005510443,0.0002944544,0.00004020466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003168665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002834771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000164623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001546251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973258,0.0005506898,0.001222783,0.00023326,0.0005331593,0.0001343004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987206,0.01023318,0.001768967,0.0004921893,0.0002641826,0.00003549351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002084751,0.0003486388,0.5485029,0.000005648411,0.00008068457,0.000006860907,0.0003144103,0.0002097199,0.02163713,0.001273794,0.0136141,0.4119214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001490447,0.000840412,0.9511925,0.000109887,0.000151416,0.0003171828,0.0004458798,0.0002252812,0.008474466,0.02909568,0.007527648,0.0001291823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963005,0.0003352504,0.0004321479,0.001084571,0.0007769678,0.0001886333,0.00001435815,0.000002532628,0.0008650635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.00008938374,0.0001965935,0.00005899338,0.00004286712,0.000001924009,6.368019e-7,0.000005930849,0.00004136794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4117922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129925846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000117","title":"Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Public economics; Public opinion; Term (time); Consumption (sociology); Public policy; Politics; Causation; Time preference; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037275285382455,"gpt":0.4058885393364178,"spread":0.3021610107981724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01465103,0.00009995684,0.0003283784,0.0002341436,0.0006098732,0.001525192,0.001651748,0.00004844284,0.0001185029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01281849,0.00005024015,0.0001531662,0.0008876927,0.007094469,0.001296861,0.0003081422,0.0002884289,0.000008563823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005851716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005351756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004307419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962253,0.0002961828,0.0009227911,0.0002025241,0.001620139,0.0007330633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954079,0.002564705,0.0005339175,0.0002913444,0.0006560173,0.0005461446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002234123,0.00006466469,0.003313365,0.00000197345,0.000005711116,0.000009626357,0.0004668369,0.000002568206,0.0001655367,0.7222499,0.003332367,0.2703651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009402003,0.0001340112,0.1393868,0.0002004861,0.00002867019,0.009431452,0.01162673,0.0001773527,0.0002582142,0.8100639,0.02751106,0.0002411445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479182,0.001970139,0.0004580531,0.04568646,0.001333264,0.00008954971,0.00002138732,0.000003929754,0.002519001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966817,0.0001898547,0.0004101112,0.00175111,0.0009450452,0.000001095359,7.983901e-8,0.000004088051,0.0000168982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2701239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131123655","doi":"10.1093/qje/qju033","title":"The Psychological Effect of Weather on Car Purchases*","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Purchasing; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Intertemporal choice; Consumer behaviour; Mental accounting; Variety (cybernetics); Durable good; Econometrics; Advertising; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Cognitive psychology; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07184151106119721,"gpt":0.3848994100086736,"spread":0.3130578989474764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01062905,0.0001619993,0.0005218908,0.0001285622,0.0002037037,0.0002732596,0.001790914,0.00008730979,0.0001083637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007727825,0.00006617371,0.0004388818,0.0001036939,0.0002679916,0.0001637235,0.00003161801,0.0003265768,0.0002580655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004190285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002396383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000377932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001137559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974641,0.0005785561,0.001292183,0.0002087608,0.0002413315,0.0002150474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900516,0.007494285,0.001351418,0.000859356,0.0001426617,0.0001006283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004979776,0.00005612672,0.0005968683,4.9111e-7,0.0000228673,0.000002125941,0.0003062403,0.0006660399,0.00006355614,0.002473436,0.002041431,0.9932728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003697785,0.03501877,0.008399332,0.00009003073,0.0001553432,0.0005727814,0.002086502,0.006139438,0.001164204,0.8404999,0.1016591,0.0005167757],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994878,0.00006137977,0.0002275181,0.001312863,0.001391154,0.00009615916,0.000005379667,0.000004012498,0.002023561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.00002819508,0.00008187557,0.000178354,0.0002973897,0.000001613691,1.262144e-7,0.00001193515,0.0001324027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3683838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140237961","doi":"10.1007/s11002-005-5897-x","title":"The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Time preference; Discounting; Intertemporal choice; Preference; Temporal discounting; Variety (cybernetics); Delay discounting; Function (biology); Economics; Psychology; Key (lock); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08003616924439622,"gpt":0.3722128846263321,"spread":0.2921767153819359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385388,0.0002289507,0.0004292811,0.0001400792,0.0002647899,0.0002947714,0.001382401,0.00008140316,0.0001457085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002215866,0.0001397047,0.0002429985,0.0002392102,0.0002254009,0.000234226,0.0002989448,0.000260649,0.00008374119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007063486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001708338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000499392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001694952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963069,0.0006427665,0.0011775,0.0006683862,0.0008082827,0.0003961625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958574,0.00208718,0.0009463883,0.0009253955,0.00009982957,0.00008379573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008386568,0.0002094527,0.652034,0.000003769341,0.00004005782,0.00001255025,0.0003847548,0.00002308035,0.00525369,0.00001902178,0.0413138,0.2998672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001054876,0.00005211741,0.9459797,0.0002239315,0.0000423431,0.000008219784,0.001627633,0.002100657,0.0002229857,0.005411245,0.04284009,0.000436178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790306,0.00007950046,0.001111283,0.01826586,0.000977415,0.0001624742,0.00002826846,0.00003227882,0.0003123063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961876,0.000006234572,0.001259112,0.002188595,0.0001797345,0.0000113746,0.000006422908,0.00002287889,0.0001380286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.299431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136762929","doi":"10.1111/1467-9280.01438","title":"Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristic; Psychology; Process (computing); Ideal (ethics); Simple (philosophy); Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3179719015263955,"gpt":0.5405903908261886,"spread":0.2226184892997932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01060812,0.0002374827,0.0004988022,0.0004513052,0.0004417642,0.0002767465,0.002928871,0.0002278261,0.002341298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008984349,0.0001361737,0.0002283457,0.002853208,0.001570674,0.0007718081,0.0003317227,0.0003632596,0.0005412249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000633877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006458187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001171901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001455537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993522,0.0002749771,0.001317674,0.001626191,0.002600672,0.0006584397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953251,0.002046358,0.000504518,0.001304212,0.0005208668,0.000298932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001436881,0.001170928,0.005497519,6.898396e-7,0.000001447034,0.00001927767,0.0001172796,0.0008854974,0.00268228,0.04148307,0.002848164,0.9451501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003504961,0.0003259772,0.04863675,0.00004228486,0.000003619849,0.00008367477,0.0001747295,0.001599649,0.0001943665,0.9463657,0.001981219,0.0002415156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168022,0.00005485876,0.02876182,0.0001549206,0.002036081,0.000192122,0.000007343672,0.00004878839,0.0519419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571099,0.00001022838,0.0421316,0.0005266035,0.00003100787,0.00001145317,2.430589e-7,0.000007303663,0.0001716339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965931042","doi":"10.1177/0963721419855658","title":"Logic, Fast and Slow: Advances in Dual-Process Theorizing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":247,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Sketch; Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Inference; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognitive science; Deliberation; Logical reasoning; Psychology; Task (project management); Key (lock); Thinking processes; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Moral reasoning; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1260769883794588,"gpt":0.5129724884774227,"spread":0.3868955000979639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003966857,0.0001584965,0.0003004613,0.0007015237,0.0002098935,0.0003525901,0.0007307742,0.00007612712,0.0003230447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00200814,0.0001048284,0.00005295665,0.003503021,0.000719912,0.00115279,0.0002029952,0.0003615009,0.0003332106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008956304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003346659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005102796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003859008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969069,0.0001126636,0.0006293698,0.001223545,0.0006885972,0.0004389212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983649,0.0007337355,0.0001648612,0.0004782418,0.0001240839,0.0001341375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001543736,0.0002162089,0.1292567,0.000001225095,1.543226e-7,0.000003832794,0.0001478649,0.0002983723,0.0001703742,0.002351008,0.00003529759,0.8675035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005809644,0.0001909979,0.3974898,0.0001158589,0.000002138917,0.00004439648,0.001426943,0.002209644,0.00006493076,0.5778935,0.0195839,0.000396976],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732892,0.001286989,0.0003089269,0.0002013666,0.003390567,0.000193488,0.000004550876,0.00004147002,0.02128343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988112,0.0006209671,0.0003572228,0.00007442643,0.00003493164,0.00002144554,3.730973e-7,0.000003657569,0.00007581334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8671065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4282859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037625086","doi":"10.1257/aer.98.3.1145","title":"Strotz Meets Allais: Diminishing Impatience and the Certainty Effect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Certainty; Representation (politics); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07887972630349924,"gpt":0.3963949627792216,"spread":0.3175152364757223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004591714,0.0002442113,0.001194288,0.00007799737,0.0003187178,0.0002065669,0.001073402,0.00002875886,0.0002261515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002024542,0.0001340148,0.0002923438,0.0002314235,0.001296377,0.0003755041,0.0002728507,0.0001754696,0.0008207211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008912448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009875907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004389189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005769074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970382,0.0005951118,0.00110664,0.0006793102,0.0002677492,0.0003130173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938612,0.003989254,0.0009162697,0.001020196,0.00004892728,0.0001641362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003020775,0.000007978086,0.006717433,0.00001108038,0.00001162922,0.000006035204,0.0001545144,0.00002908507,0.000001023416,0.0001744048,0.007135597,0.985721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003358285,0.001315572,0.0461686,0.001475992,0.0003219323,0.001164336,0.0009051889,0.005353816,0.00004421166,0.01165053,0.9266121,0.001629433],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780034,0.01371037,0.00004448881,0.003857968,0.0003130608,0.0005923435,0.0000112304,0.00003128562,0.003435877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587423,0.03804714,0.0003244141,0.002641845,0.00006292275,0.00005935552,0.000001502926,0.00001561494,0.0001049165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128221441","doi":"10.1177/1088868314530517","title":"Decision-Making Under Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Situational ethics; Management science; Causal decision theory; Decision theory; Empirical research; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Heuristic; Social psychology; Decision engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Business decision mapping; Computer science; Epistemology; Decision support system; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2217928585404065,"gpt":0.5086566347586318,"spread":0.2868637762182253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008715402,0.0001967439,0.0007553108,0.00009249883,0.0005966387,0.0001577013,0.0005936688,0.0002008286,0.001403399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002757792,0.0001479666,0.0003140509,0.0003507539,0.0003461143,0.0001735926,0.0001313777,0.0003483201,0.0007769029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002396146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002607258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001337478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000438378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996653,0.000895018,0.000856374,0.0007760047,0.0005273719,0.000292281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962059,0.002556986,0.0004624726,0.0005063858,0.0001705294,0.00009772188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001666693,0.0000450894,0.004966727,0.00001991923,0.00001000268,0.000001332318,0.0001917779,6.388083e-7,9.670002e-7,0.002459568,0.01814969,0.9741376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002596999,0.00004686244,0.1248613,0.0002773047,0.00007036931,0.00003843214,0.00012565,0.00004652434,7.044724e-8,0.5610886,0.3129524,0.0002327022],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433041,0.0180537,0.01405121,0.01113763,0.001142235,0.0002578606,0.00004123229,0.00006116692,0.01195085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714777,0.00614405,0.001448803,0.02053188,0.0002722661,0.00001039198,0.000002583217,0.00001399155,0.00009829098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129320919","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x","title":"Smarter Than We Think","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Anterior cingulate cortex; Heuristic; Cued speech; Prefrontal cortex; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Lie detection; Cognition; Deception; Neuroscience; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3717587999860366,"gpt":0.4932927876770059,"spread":0.1215339876909693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003739608,0.0001516606,0.0002564987,0.000246701,0.0007119776,0.0003605589,0.002847718,0.0001005745,0.00181663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002064811,0.00008559165,0.0001410656,0.001816614,0.001786283,0.0006329815,0.0003084818,0.0002270496,0.00638215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004388858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004723915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007666604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000421847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961033,0.00008328993,0.0005548153,0.001148707,0.001591159,0.0005186607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976751,0.0005690386,0.0001672694,0.001053765,0.0002033867,0.0003314326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003814388,0.0003749954,0.04032817,2.140445e-7,0.000001185037,0.0001160628,0.0007442861,0.00002548818,0.002155682,0.001547205,0.02748595,0.9271826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003377734,0.0003732857,0.5949761,0.000009093388,0.000002938795,0.0003920113,0.0002567626,0.0005233012,0.0002580173,0.336836,0.06565337,0.0003814098],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478122,0.00004017842,0.001022681,0.00261374,0.001286828,0.00008953097,0.0000036102,0.00008676223,0.04704446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939805,0.0000387475,0.003317341,0.001123703,0.00009396239,0.000004209295,2.160722e-7,0.000004335554,0.001436953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975384768","doi":"10.1126/science.1160769","title":"Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-Makers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Categorization; Psychology; Task (project management); Social psychology; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Information processing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08991233316250512,"gpt":0.3960210399360344,"spread":0.3061087067735292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003828334,0.0001660146,0.0003921611,0.0006547268,0.0008753318,0.0002509209,0.00217412,0.00009128087,0.0006531052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005018376,0.000121171,0.000181197,0.002845896,0.001094381,0.001251449,0.0003241153,0.0001499463,0.0004255727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002045361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006519882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002406918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005244948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948583,0.00006912823,0.001028893,0.0006971381,0.00294957,0.0003970233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960152,0.001674997,0.0006380766,0.000903178,0.000529971,0.0002385815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001951255,0.0002657284,0.1155735,0.000001605797,0.00001106054,0.00001737515,0.001972635,0.0003510375,0.001736342,0.0005809453,0.01476839,0.8647019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007966713,0.0002105928,0.8909042,0.00006419375,0.0000211757,0.000088907,0.00262513,0.01581971,0.001769997,0.06962935,0.01765073,0.0004193698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941259,0.0001189542,0.0004037498,0.0003497969,0.00225873,0.0001785932,0.0000762809,0.0000618998,0.002426095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915876,0.00003343286,0.007826034,0.0001222423,0.0001056001,0.000004859925,0.000002306612,0.000008256243,0.0003097104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591092602","doi":"10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7","title":"Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06192809353097678,"gpt":0.41030064360943,"spread":0.3483725500784532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004489049,0.0002194095,0.0007671303,0.0001141698,0.0002928318,0.0002619242,0.003471989,0.0000967874,0.001527699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01409429,0.0001381231,0.0003918379,0.0002947458,0.0003692775,0.00008516807,0.000574472,0.0002956227,0.00205957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008837417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002828626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003712807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969936,0.0003301509,0.001278085,0.0007596047,0.0003303638,0.000308212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939721,0.001542313,0.0009266399,0.003186612,0.0001781879,0.0001941113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002814208,0.0001310279,0.02461675,0.0001462667,0.000009208172,0.000002168719,0.00009398486,0.00001190668,0.0001020245,0.01731152,0.1024942,0.8550528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005245999,0.00007788647,0.2253232,0.01149336,0.00006848897,0.00003161617,0.00003952543,0.00002502773,0.00006165516,0.1021107,0.6598164,0.0004274283],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7833191,0.008561391,0.0006432442,0.1797468,0.002047034,0.002607168,0.00003469705,0.0000420653,0.02299855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853969,0.00168584,0.008393236,0.003984178,0.00007869366,0.0001441658,8.884846e-7,0.00002464563,0.0002914823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126221177","doi":"10.1080/14622200412331320743","title":"The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Cancer Council Victoria; University of Illinois at Chicago; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Regret; Tobacco control; Smoking cessation; Cohort; Survey data collection; Medicine; Psychology; Environmental health; Demography; Public health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2505839060083555,"gpt":0.4783369772387701,"spread":0.2277530712304147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02781935,0.0001800036,0.0003292797,0.0003646026,0.0006224232,0.001276756,0.003531256,0.0001480912,0.0005761601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03231444,0.0001078026,0.0001355569,0.001688872,0.00111746,0.0006694012,0.0005509445,0.0006137933,0.0002321615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000835433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001564718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03075152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03158467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922956,0.001218121,0.0009409527,0.0006732928,0.004286445,0.0005856153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831975,0.01294331,0.0003420019,0.001166019,0.002226527,0.0001246519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029864,0.00005098122,0.9474791,2.230714e-7,0.00001458688,0.000003762391,0.001751964,0.002052182,0.00006985849,0.0005151931,0.003126919,0.04463654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001944604,0.00009499065,0.9746216,0.00005644885,0.000005732879,0.00000200117,0.004901096,0.002824072,0.0002228438,0.01013847,0.005049184,0.0001389861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893024,0.0000921359,0.00006282298,0.008557697,0.0005086857,0.0005768941,0.0001323296,0.00001273642,0.000754277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992076,0.00006883622,0.00007427062,0.0001910282,0.0001414025,0.00003850898,0.0000134783,0.00001571509,0.0002492066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04449755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509303870","doi":"10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9","title":"Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Behavior Analyst","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Psychology; Computer science; Actuarial science; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1248767971500037,"gpt":0.4031964225730444,"spread":0.2783196254230407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003476969,0.0001646568,0.0003282072,0.0001546072,0.0005051916,0.0002659106,0.0008867654,0.00005889742,0.00005138366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002443556,0.00006685248,0.0002054646,0.0003388429,0.0002731545,0.0003929063,0.0002235306,0.00009702849,0.00002263794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003600778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003536462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004542074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004158845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978689,0.0001148071,0.0008416365,0.0003885663,0.0005357546,0.0002503422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916669,0.006710062,0.0005587831,0.0007867196,0.000216896,0.00006065988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137675,0.0000292862,0.3081734,0.000002663457,0.00001572284,0.000001471119,0.0001972597,0.00009248805,0.00327889,0.000116623,0.0002341184,0.6878443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005772029,0.00009426659,0.9771618,0.0002933871,0.0006661746,0.00003698586,0.001176586,0.01104456,0.001287843,0.006118861,0.001215475,0.000326858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934192,0.0003693885,0.004676789,0.0006831653,0.0003974573,0.0003341339,0.00003641736,0.00003479519,0.00004859642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998653,0.00002185519,0.0006745484,0.0000346928,0.0001269122,0.00005815619,0.000001100604,0.00001615946,0.0004135537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6875174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3885576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106984223","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00098-6","title":"Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Frequency; Psychology; Weighting; Set (abstract data type); Word lists by frequency; Bayesian probability; Judgement; Bayesian inference; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Bayes' theorem; Base (topology); Posterior probability; Word (group theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Bayesian statistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2041705962477142,"gpt":0.4010806634724031,"spread":0.1969100672246888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001331353,0.0001086674,0.000195981,0.0001371535,0.00008134612,0.0001999829,0.0002621172,0.00008956745,0.00492599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001132032,0.00008891749,0.00005126977,0.0003957279,0.00009717231,0.0005221995,0.0000300587,0.0001562123,0.003386827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008077767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005692324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002116499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002862416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981314,0.0001131024,0.0006628262,0.0004038227,0.0004514637,0.000237369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985744,0.0008039618,0.00009035213,0.000309743,0.0001315982,0.00008996746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001139423,0.000133599,0.001352993,0.000002349059,0.000001241814,0.000007780204,0.0001101852,0.00005937416,0.0000303734,0.0002829365,0.0004633828,0.9974418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001044417,0.0001278247,0.02613634,0.00003610561,0.000009583378,0.000006218537,0.00009209764,0.0008847074,0.00006420233,0.9679573,0.003469205,0.000172039],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615769,0.00001405247,0.0007259781,0.0001374253,0.0002517591,0.0002711955,0.0000630385,0.00004007419,0.03691959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968811,0.00001237632,0.002819007,0.000067951,0.00002985863,0.00003561396,0.00003351874,0.000006760652,0.0001137957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041745738","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012","title":"The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Psychology; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Processing fluency; Verbal fluency test; Feeling; Cognition; Metamemory; Social psychology; Neuropsychology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09725029981884653,"gpt":0.403945180666073,"spread":0.3066948808472265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002815526,0.000138709,0.0002554256,0.0001698842,0.0005198712,0.0002615833,0.0002646493,0.00008686554,0.0001300459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004338652,0.00009224516,0.0001347598,0.0002648855,0.0001808857,0.0008503317,0.00009656293,0.0001165902,0.0001142084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002036326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004395094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008829121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001436122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982064,0.000113421,0.0006156212,0.0002928172,0.0004847404,0.0002870154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954948,0.003178225,0.0003638756,0.0002199849,0.0006486317,0.00009452106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008242283,0.00008149245,0.008634653,0.000003772104,0.00003075516,5.458274e-7,0.004946786,0.000003041661,0.001727836,0.002064054,0.00009530145,0.9823294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004893067,0.0002214299,0.01783236,0.00008623903,0.0002499238,0.00001710741,0.0366761,0.001081768,0.007509589,0.9325164,0.003059068,0.000260704],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985388,0.0008012408,0.0006329238,0.00006470618,0.0002716736,0.000263125,0.00005179257,0.00002262515,0.01250392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983963,0.00004548738,0.001147548,0.000167043,0.0001366213,0.00002901463,0.00001345239,0.00001338041,0.00005117787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030299881","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2881","title":"Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion–Exclusion Effects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Information processing; Inclusion (mineral); Need for cognition; Purchasing; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Decision quality; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0275843643319885,"gpt":0.3520217450133791,"spread":0.3244373806813906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177417,0.0003537826,0.0005735615,0.0007170684,0.003032415,0.0006125786,0.0005767879,0.0002555609,0.001185972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004927799,0.0002832694,0.00007759927,0.001101797,0.0002461159,0.002136285,0.001573268,0.0001295338,0.00004052407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008083029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001773507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005355311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003502149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959816,0.00005904738,0.001482262,0.0006172523,0.001571728,0.0002880631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922652,0.003983032,0.0007732812,0.0003416768,0.002459235,0.0001775845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004585723,0.0002271593,0.02108145,0.0001249455,0.000005971292,0.000004650395,0.001965287,0.00006956876,0.001728664,0.0003116839,0.0005319279,0.9734901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009525416,0.001801755,0.1805064,0.003349719,0.000722882,0.0002971004,0.001707054,0.001241617,0.02087309,0.7619207,0.01582758,0.002226704],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856271,0.0004624296,0.01243513,0.00007478749,0.0001359801,0.0008205074,0.0001644648,0.00006426514,0.00021535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940436,0.0001350657,0.005114472,0.0001945959,0.00006133089,0.00006189459,0.0001623006,0.00003828842,0.0001883796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152999879","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.960520","title":"Collective Risk Management in a Flight to Quality Episode","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Quality (philosophy); Quality management; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Economics; Finance; Management system; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06599872250646012,"gpt":0.4194888761972835,"spread":0.3534901536908234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03498624,0.000185304,0.0003785695,0.0009887506,0.0002996568,0.0002851919,0.001066111,0.00009366294,0.0001084494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001282874,0.0001441646,0.0001926987,0.001515367,0.0000379792,0.0002705051,0.0001749554,0.001462385,0.0006286343],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003985274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002484887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02153048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946739,0.0003130671,0.001258475,0.0005361433,0.001004022,0.002214405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978427,0.0008327878,0.0004555106,0.0004702764,0.0001815012,0.0002171915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002918668,0.0001372354,0.0284391,3.310214e-7,0.00003637579,0.00003232893,0.00053331,0.0002718332,0.00001532493,0.01472325,0.0004959884,0.9550231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007044423,0.0002343311,0.04475709,0.00001163125,0.00001468388,0.00008533754,0.004764321,0.00004646557,0.00005909878,0.9386094,0.01049916,0.0002140731],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373681,0.0002592399,0.04891704,0.0004705001,0.0004640661,0.0002269583,0.000004647383,0.00001781359,0.01227161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921849,0.0002397168,0.001489845,0.0002143983,0.0001191074,0.000005327836,3.720963e-7,0.00001539084,0.005730965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.954809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888832","doi":"10.1037/a0030174","title":"Risk preferences and aging: The “Certainty Effect” in older adults’ decision making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Certainty; Psychology; Risk-seeking; Preference; Young adult; Loss aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04221512767164729,"gpt":0.3142742559925534,"spread":0.2720591283209061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00749815,0.0003119863,0.000424616,0.0002716332,0.0002834825,0.0006466053,0.001087042,0.000108407,0.0002090078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006831789,0.0001735079,0.0001198198,0.0008616141,0.0001687532,0.000661833,0.0004589884,0.0004960977,0.0002748979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008923888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003714782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007901663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001443717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953654,0.0009311545,0.0008726214,0.0007367926,0.0008747412,0.001219278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993805,0.004458549,0.0004122976,0.0008635218,0.0001073736,0.0003532781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000752484,0.00004806144,0.4398567,0.000001682095,0.000003313006,0.00000523062,0.002915424,0.00003071533,0.000001770374,0.00002493337,0.0006198855,0.556417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000693702,0.00004293062,0.9811179,0.000133217,0.0000249355,0.00001629487,0.0005580569,0.0003534755,0.00005596785,0.005138804,0.0116111,0.0002535997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943054,0.001243181,0.0003017509,0.0002482955,0.001751601,0.0006225359,0.00001470585,0.00005201528,0.00146053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986959,0.0002448045,0.0004284924,0.0001904652,0.000251962,0.00004270803,0.000001402907,0.00002934834,0.0001149005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5561634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8178782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122068380","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1070","title":"Can Uncertainty Improve Promotions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Marketing; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2268147619303301,"gpt":0.504219783122352,"spread":0.2774050211920219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1336212,0.0001050571,0.0003136763,0.0009116007,0.0003734479,0.0007755674,0.001593138,0.0001307181,0.001262519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09940202,0.00006907184,0.0002122286,0.0008437949,0.0002528519,0.0002902671,0.0003120431,0.002090419,0.0001434307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001158141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006780218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004610272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002026376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937362,0.001517361,0.001163508,0.0003154215,0.002745751,0.0005217346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812801,0.01351618,0.0006332865,0.0006683846,0.003570081,0.0003319134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000370987,0.0001471432,0.01209827,0.000003343411,0.000009787484,0.00006512717,0.000192471,0.00004175245,0.01082523,0.0001209568,0.02012002,0.9560049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002217339,0.001442507,0.143301,0.0003177924,0.00003265871,0.00107578,0.006482835,0.004951386,0.002088828,0.4844789,0.3529572,0.0006537241],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885626,0.00002201349,0.00003324789,0.00517067,0.0014622,0.0001109424,0.000008110015,0.000007472659,0.004622706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959284,0.00001397349,0.00158919,0.00003626872,0.0005684111,0.000002283329,2.813997e-7,0.00001307703,0.001848121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030031047","doi":"10.1198/tast.2009.0001","title":"Splitting a Predictor at the Upper Quarter or Third and the Lower Quarter or Third","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Statistician","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Statistics; Voting; Linear regression; Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Regression analysis; Simple linear regression; Regression; Geography; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05089347011071178,"gpt":0.3687126660059382,"spread":0.3178191958952264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003427054,0.0003070034,0.000622344,0.00009290566,0.0009348925,0.0007997556,0.00134712,0.00004637711,0.0007477711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002116003,0.0001020226,0.0001555922,0.0006039458,0.001823312,0.0001847618,0.0002180372,0.0003460881,0.00070803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006375643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002925417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006352388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963413,0.0006680455,0.0009057528,0.0006270954,0.0009257186,0.0005320397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882063,0.009394536,0.0007418272,0.001365871,0.0001492703,0.0001422406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003859212,0.0001308743,0.001492065,0.000001525823,0.00004864558,0.0002633535,0.009308543,0.00002803225,0.00002737224,0.00252347,0.24566,0.7366569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006421682,0.007567975,0.32437,0.0002201797,0.000750447,0.002412589,0.0972733,0.02244152,0.00004258252,0.3262648,0.2101112,0.002123797],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698534,0.00007690358,0.003931178,0.02064379,0.0005079752,0.000520065,0.0001838984,0.00006420234,0.004218561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825507,0.00002472312,0.001432871,0.01126059,0.0002780979,0.00002545925,0.000002594386,0.00002069435,0.004404237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.910053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997697391","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.007","title":"The Maximization Paradox: The costs of seeking alternatives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Psychology; Maximization; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1978969323030818,"gpt":0.3878109505490901,"spread":0.1899140182460083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251387,0.0001171421,0.0002135744,0.00005500063,0.0006241108,0.0006680635,0.0008449712,0.00004954279,0.00006424145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009482938,0.00005196446,0.00008074116,0.0002238548,0.0004154833,0.000240474,0.00009414198,0.0001333581,0.000008874773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001216135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003043938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007745568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008424006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.0002764666,0.0004611589,0.0002798762,0.0008201835,0.0001713826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968409,0.002383224,0.0003270645,0.0002726982,0.000124118,0.00005199217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002766719,0.00004643859,0.07995969,6.85338e-7,0.00001360956,4.29977e-7,0.003415824,0.000008655989,0.00002558506,0.01038432,0.0002947061,0.9058224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001211499,0.0001046195,0.783108,0.0000202819,0.00001636542,0.0000042571,0.003489538,0.001213192,0.00004571728,0.210838,0.0009521958,0.00008662615],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938972,0.0005340146,0.0004840985,0.003342093,0.0001828734,0.00009906908,0.00004294191,0.00001017319,0.001407517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992823,0.0001695413,0.00009471518,0.000265216,0.00005477332,0.000002956628,0.000002612815,0.00000221123,0.0001256433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6442152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144130856","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02453.x","title":"Order in Choice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vineland Research and Innovation Centre; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence (biology); Psychology; Wine tasting; Sequence learning; Wine; Cognitive psychology; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2702629065633216,"gpt":0.5464889363158811,"spread":0.2762260297525596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004642301,0.0001078083,0.0002057078,0.0003343941,0.0001652235,0.0004370467,0.002160999,0.00007656765,0.0008688494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006994028,0.00006533584,0.00005209835,0.003959307,0.000451941,0.0005309068,0.0000784737,0.0002003375,0.001486119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005487398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003202224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001345517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001640593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970015,0.00005977439,0.0005193457,0.0009431013,0.00102959,0.0004466815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998298,0.0005446188,0.0001114129,0.00068109,0.000173196,0.0001917037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001002278,0.0002149477,0.01690042,3.699625e-8,7.62752e-8,0.00001239316,0.00004134053,0.0001248922,0.001198137,0.0009306175,0.001367019,0.9792001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001804337,0.0001681857,0.727708,0.000004185651,4.264978e-7,0.00001150182,0.00003071534,0.0004697464,0.00005405947,0.2613105,0.009939767,0.0001224879],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353576,0.00001925891,0.0003724928,0.00265999,0.000538685,0.00007688679,7.458564e-7,0.00003684458,0.06093747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946117,0.000004283208,0.00257231,0.002494292,0.00004950604,0.000002191821,1.163482e-7,0.000001646426,0.0002638932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}