{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":348,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":348,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"99b75695bc28","filters":{"topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities"}},"results":[{"id":"W1965449772","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002","title":"Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Perception; Subject (documents); Web accessibility; Content analysis; Disability studies; Information science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07163372747329368,"gpt":0.3818103625733069,"spread":0.3101766351000132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00969581,0.0001448998,0.0002039853,0.001494294,0.001933712,0.01947403,0.002085071,0.0000844654,0.0002409473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003145474,0.00009647402,0.000060013,0.0172187,0.01871431,0.4152277,0.001159174,0.0004333484,0.0000421978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009903091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005598341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003203381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994807,0.0004657046,0.0007274525,0.0003877249,0.002764122,0.000847979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974599,0.0009423832,0.0001470216,0.0006826324,0.0003803726,0.000387688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002079337,0.00006880626,0.7454342,0.00007722897,0.000004649565,1.410099e-7,0.05507396,0.000002536122,0.00001291005,0.168686,0.00008887905,0.03052991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001255987,0.00003668521,0.9328728,0.0000221974,0.000003716242,7.718162e-7,0.04512367,0.001143665,0.00009514648,0.0171886,0.003264571,0.0001225231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712047,0.00006393163,0.000006508072,0.01130532,0.00005043035,0.001156043,0.00002997235,0.00007799617,0.1161051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985242,0.00022317,0.0002368711,0.0007243993,0.0000277955,0.0001383454,0.0000317435,0.000002528174,0.00009090715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3957537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151774557","doi":"10.1177/0145482x0910300905","title":"Accessibility of e-Learning and Computer and Information Technologies for Students with Visual Impairments in Postsecondary Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Postsecondary education; Assistive technology; Low vision; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Multimedia; Visually impaired; Access to information; Educational technology; Blindness; Braille; Information technology; Psychology; Computer science; Higher education; Mathematics education; Human–computer interaction; Information access; World Wide Web; Political science; Optometry; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009832597077761334,"gpt":0.3851912734799425,"spread":0.3753586764021811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520905,0.0001362018,0.000324734,0.000354821,0.0001371721,0.0003242517,0.0002315532,0.00009735793,0.000005069988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002694124,0.0001075065,0.00005258366,0.0003046219,0.000314325,0.004422417,0.0000851117,0.0001699013,1.94671e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001917325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003981716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004857672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004770621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998313,0.00009522702,0.0007042309,0.0001439316,0.0005186259,0.0002249517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986407,0.0001438669,0.0006445737,0.00006129138,0.0004237387,0.00008582802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007821008,0.005068351,0.8141837,0.0002035835,0.00003271511,0.00000131627,0.01034984,0.000007124111,0.00003902323,0.0002437314,0.0000194995,0.169069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003013879,0.01695707,0.8909532,0.0004793323,0.00004239142,0.00002225139,0.08234859,0.0001989468,0.0003678066,0.005109407,0.000261507,0.0002455854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984899,0.0001064254,0.0001801029,0.0003249693,0.0001203366,0.0006229865,0.000003921701,0.00002441225,0.000126976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.00005909362,0.0005657787,0.00005523718,0.00004344993,0.000009002718,0.000004770711,0.000004508658,0.00001390573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1688234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.438399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499864900","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.869","title":"Universal instructional design principles for Moodle","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Instructional design; Computer science; Plug-in; Universal Design for Learning; Set (abstract data type); Distance education; Sample (material); Universal design; Multimedia; Online learning; Online course; Design elements and principles; Educational technology; Mathematics education; World Wide Web; Psychology; Software engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2031378276034871,"gpt":0.487209246645314,"spread":0.2840714190418269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008325533,0.00004813764,0.0001193512,0.0000572071,0.0003025643,0.0002387052,0.001018793,0.00003188396,0.0002371579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01017317,0.00003581863,0.00003796836,0.000266124,0.0007898707,0.0004868293,0.0003947136,0.0003404246,0.000003488218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008588619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004105858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005714404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985721,0.0003185989,0.0002247055,0.0001551474,0.0005499354,0.0001795268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974717,0.001838832,0.00008195516,0.0001056987,0.0004465909,0.00005519167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169758,0.00009876509,0.02822037,0.0004322058,0.00002170249,6.945e-7,0.000482527,0.00005851604,0.0000417734,0.9381267,0.0008742451,0.03152548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000808438,0.0001174351,0.01236548,0.002472523,0.000008256619,0.000004056526,0.01858465,0.001122145,0.0001186066,0.1339998,0.8302391,0.0001595851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7055938,0.002921505,0.001715428,0.05251689,0.0006641396,0.004835899,0.0003291134,0.0000484396,0.2313748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995231,0.002266369,0.001089735,0.00004097349,0.00008130614,0.0000878167,0.00006306149,0.000004668613,0.00113505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238552967","doi":"10.19030/cier.v9i1.9548","title":"Evaluating The Usability And Accessibility Of LMS “Blackboard” At King Saud University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Usability; Blackboard (design pattern); Computer science; Upload; Multimedia; World Wide Web; USable; Human–computer interaction; Software engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2323167924172977,"gpt":0.5166406642588522,"spread":0.2843238718415545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01402644,0.0001283281,0.0002518265,0.0001854698,0.0007149436,0.0001542414,0.0009740667,0.000113364,0.0003875421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254827,0.00008783905,0.00007570852,0.0009148243,0.005538546,0.001737223,0.0006579245,0.000223854,0.0000185617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001046654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002335247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00982839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00443939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944679,0.00288518,0.0004747229,0.0006059795,0.001122254,0.0004439638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943128,0.003736227,0.0001791358,0.0007839387,0.0008042164,0.0001837162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001803933,0.0004047661,0.8994851,0.0001253809,0.00001076061,4.830661e-7,0.02587016,5.330415e-7,0.0006563172,0.01410097,0.001348872,0.05781623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006380768,0.0002363095,0.6614145,0.0003858053,0.000006648228,4.480193e-7,0.1621513,0.0000339225,0.0009053721,0.1074508,0.06648904,0.0002878001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276766,0.001135379,0.000002582304,0.01065429,0.0002074477,0.0009465246,0.00002232832,0.00003428471,0.0593206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872754,0.0001585992,0.0001135329,0.00002904435,0.0001063839,0.000023427,0.000004147187,0.000008881023,0.01228063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2380706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161261009","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.04.004","title":"Computer and World Wide Web Accessibility by Visually Disabled Patients: Problems and Solutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Survey of Ophthalmology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; National Eye Institute","keywords":"Web Accessibility Initiative; Obstacle; Computer science; Universal design; Assistive technology; Visually impaired; Disabled people; Visual impairment; Human–computer interaction; Emerging technologies; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; The Internet; Medicine; Web intelligence; Artificial intelligence; Web development; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1326413141073628,"gpt":0.4019306598052748,"spread":0.269289345697912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003446742,0.0004690276,0.001945451,0.0001947384,0.000344821,0.0002112932,0.0006787737,0.000416227,0.0001997655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001738518,0.0004130972,0.0002077883,0.0006950488,0.003436362,0.0007434936,0.0006677694,0.0003282098,0.000009175806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002130173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005075906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00443792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00794133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942083,0.00252411,0.001226946,0.0009611002,0.0003916846,0.0006878356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994782,0.00349008,0.0006671861,0.0004693959,0.0003419841,0.0002494126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002524036,0.001309772,0.4475578,0.007476962,0.0002069709,0.00000330873,0.0005876218,3.601534e-7,2.415324e-8,0.000803072,0.001842628,0.5401862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009822553,0.0006476695,0.2683085,0.003536792,0.0004139149,0.00004617569,0.0001247937,0.00001554171,7.359021e-8,0.006592274,0.7175776,0.001754427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04633489,0.9285354,0.000004340328,0.00006234844,0.0004249771,0.001937935,0.001735023,0.00006362775,0.02090143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1445728,0.8513662,0.0001736093,0.00002082068,0.0001110181,0.000154196,0.0009528333,0.00006806634,0.002580506],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.715735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104650792","doi":"10.21432/t2d60s","title":"Developing a Holistic Approach for E-Learning Accessibility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Knowledge management; Educational technology; Web Accessibility Initiative; Instructional design; World Wide Web; Multimedia; The Internet; Psychology; Web development; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics education; Web application security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04563998661152596,"gpt":0.3295156908618201,"spread":0.2838757042502941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001078699,0.00009571122,0.0002317532,0.0004245654,0.00083586,0.0002042162,0.0003051809,0.0001864508,0.00001237525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006452161,0.00009324825,0.00005850936,0.0004766799,0.001010957,0.0003325446,0.00002385923,0.0004732133,0.00000112931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004367628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002424845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002181374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01097103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989212,0.00006553966,0.0003006753,0.0001812217,0.0001181751,0.0004131612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.0001298651,0.0002085538,0.00006902697,0.00033633,0.000268326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001928277,0.000030123,0.5202471,0.0001260418,0.00005226413,0.00001859768,0.007457913,0.0004404723,0.00002373607,0.4046199,0.00002306617,0.06694155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001770511,0.0007503374,0.006505985,0.0002837187,0.00007625858,0.000154685,0.2046816,0.00006990365,0.0002331175,0.6515854,0.1332221,0.0006663469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755664,0.0006343257,0.01214558,0.003255443,0.00013903,0.000164773,0.000002234895,0.00006489875,0.00802728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909779,0.00001983656,0.008590684,0.00001629848,0.00007758616,0.0000067267,0.000001770688,0.00001088,0.0002983201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5137411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7724305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997907270","doi":"10.1145/1805986.1806019","title":"AChecker","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Web accessibility; World Wide Web; Web Accessibility Initiative; Open source; Web standards; Web service; Web development; Web application security; Programming language; Software","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01642391002527279,"gpt":0.3471901396611005,"spread":0.3307662296358277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002851861,0.00002925417,0.00003581723,0.00001154934,0.0001243687,0.0001294813,0.0001787232,0.00003913416,0.005153968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004580008,0.00002414297,0.00003238839,0.00008031254,0.0004378804,0.0004476867,0.00002721166,0.00006676623,0.0004649509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009890593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005602233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001283811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01956729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995473,0.0000115519,0.00006009636,0.0000878237,0.0001535498,0.000139654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997106,0.00005263649,0.000009173387,0.0001243217,0.00003399512,0.00006931287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.837745e-7,0.00003468395,0.04252033,0.000001256724,0.000001282736,1.159376e-7,0.00233683,1.363177e-8,0.0001293575,0.9406621,0.001971008,0.01234222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005814037,0.000007223166,0.01890627,8.157327e-7,0.00000178569,1.71407e-7,0.009094629,0.000002496884,0.0005327726,0.2596816,0.7116019,0.0001122904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4727747,8.6385e-7,0.000003796247,0.000864074,0.0001788997,0.00003207743,5.403531e-7,0.00007850074,0.5260665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565688,3.761859e-7,0.0004131484,0.0001492047,0.0001194704,0.000003868596,5.125678e-7,0.000002488265,0.04274217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7096308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020776366","doi":"10.1145/2533682.2533683","title":"Evaluating a Tool for Improving Accessibility to Charts and Graphs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Business Machines Corporation","keywords":"Usability; Lexicon; Computer science; Screen reader; Graph; Set (abstract data type); Human–computer interaction; Partially sighted; Artificial intelligence; Visually impaired; Theoretical computer science; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07939364549560197,"gpt":0.4096464691966764,"spread":0.3302528237010744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007017549,0.0001929829,0.0002097999,0.0002066845,0.001152974,0.0009968347,0.0003890039,0.00008872231,0.0003759043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002961503,0.0001985699,0.0001554094,0.0002349943,0.0001659307,0.002540161,0.00003155118,0.0001822784,0.00004121705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005352182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001368779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981204,0.0001432317,0.0004405532,0.0006049841,0.0003259983,0.000364871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981919,0.0007288203,0.0001250147,0.0004803492,0.0003116709,0.0001622247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006197745,0.0003567291,0.001006671,0.000117245,0.00003396808,1.808955e-7,0.007041985,0.0002029756,0.001109411,0.001331648,0.0001483383,0.9885889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006103895,0.01042654,0.172924,0.001201034,0.0004617443,0.00002753124,0.03503493,0.05955737,0.01163496,0.6896343,0.008234917,0.004758684],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8999145,0.000003764345,0.09571697,0.001059658,0.0008701252,0.001654233,0.00001701591,0.0002205693,0.0005431662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862745,0.00000121904,0.01215466,0.0003124796,0.00017894,0.0006296844,0.000006817518,0.00002024275,0.0004213939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980512242","doi":"10.1108/07378830710840437","title":"Web accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; World Wide Web; Originality; Web page; Computer science; Accreditation; Home page; Web design; Web standards; Library science; Descriptive statistics; The Internet; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01797522592769975,"gpt":0.2738318340219451,"spread":0.2558566080942454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004630116,0.0001973069,0.0002680904,0.0004881214,0.0003158439,0.000756005,0.0008642168,0.0002338721,0.001539681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001270694,0.0002049119,0.0000938871,0.002101778,0.001021368,0.02228453,0.0006764311,0.0003302688,0.00001978889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005738398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003553733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004823117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980357,0.0001721786,0.0003461462,0.0005634498,0.0003139841,0.0005685926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988549,0.0003420454,0.00008840801,0.000400745,0.00001025429,0.000303602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001157898,0.0001447007,0.8428582,0.00002968484,0.000006590104,0.00002688913,0.001516449,1.281399e-7,0.00001255734,0.1051991,0.003512527,0.04657744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004823233,0.00005168105,0.7004404,0.00004855575,0.000007012426,9.539913e-7,0.01551819,0.000007934072,0.0006949985,0.1274859,0.1548742,0.0003877991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6163571,0.000192811,0.000003474502,0.00264398,0.00007178202,0.0001416495,0.00005070736,0.0005939376,0.3799446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727491,0.00008267157,0.001337085,0.0002577491,0.0001149675,0.000001936859,0.00004158988,0.00002479682,0.02539015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.356392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981593253","doi":"10.2196/14372","title":"A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature Review and Development of GoodWeb","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Interactivity; Computer science; World Wide Web; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.258065969551988,"gpt":0.5523409875110322,"spread":0.2942750179590442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141285,0.000413911,0.002154112,0.0005083576,0.0004528461,0.0004373462,0.001125838,0.0004131088,0.0003835367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00174108,0.0003060199,0.0003040231,0.002368369,0.0009377451,0.0008976478,0.001046277,0.001213442,0.001448231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006202079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00266065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002377176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003641555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936028,0.001846564,0.001145936,0.0005951182,0.001979811,0.000829843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942244,0.002500652,0.0003495543,0.0006429413,0.001936805,0.0003456501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006320388,0.00009980018,0.000004791547,0.2426583,0.0001193363,9.413183e-7,0.04461065,2.053468e-8,2.1213e-8,0.004271331,0.003044201,0.7051843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004793511,0.0001051486,0.00001950321,0.1504036,0.00005387571,0.000001339671,0.003547986,1.474122e-7,2.957919e-7,0.001932645,0.8436224,0.0002650852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004910123,0.9638495,0.000009151813,0.000198225,0.00008956193,0.005846466,0.0002373263,0.0000347651,0.02968588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004268088,0.9962829,0.0007146938,0.00008939488,0.00005974394,0.0008894956,0.00008155659,0.00003425452,0.001805279],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095578099","doi":"10.1108/07378831111116976","title":"Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Usability; Reading (process); Documentation; Multimedia; Software; Session (web analytics); Screen reader; World Wide Web; Database; Originality; Psychology; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2002920575855738,"gpt":0.3932029280974928,"spread":0.192910870511919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005601824,0.00008302164,0.0001226827,0.0000457065,0.0006280481,0.0001751607,0.0008684407,0.00002920186,0.0001661624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004632573,0.0000531025,0.00003401286,0.0003090568,0.005680779,0.002589956,0.0006138933,0.0001090077,0.0000027683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003136057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001181434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001652798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001164057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.0002130276,0.000113613,0.0002973209,0.0004338434,0.0002934815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984439,0.001029236,0.00003061593,0.0003570409,0.00005079707,0.000088426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005319883,0.0003993896,0.4408332,0.00004514887,0.00001371815,0.000001269883,0.07665497,4.974694e-8,8.536792e-7,0.4794798,0.0002837382,0.001755875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009783413,0.0001816281,0.0569755,0.00005990223,0.00001076678,6.953651e-7,0.8043787,0.000005139309,0.0002690521,0.07554913,0.06139558,0.0001955629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578663,0.0000509672,0.00002434614,0.0009321501,0.00003216192,0.0008211545,0.0001355644,0.0001282566,0.04000911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879963,0.00005454603,0.001596409,0.00004213755,0.00004225158,0.00003398181,0.00001366788,0.000009487583,0.01021123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567604534","doi":"10.1007/11788713_163","title":"Helping People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Graphical Information Through Natural Language: The iGraph System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Comprehension; Human–computer interaction; Process (computing); Natural language; Graph; Natural (archaeology); Visualization; Program comprehension; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Programming language; Theoretical computer science; Software","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009990331072652335,"gpt":0.2928908622050047,"spread":0.2829005311323523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059084,0.0003720863,0.0003779072,0.0003745903,0.000785031,0.002477542,0.002159537,0.0001955157,0.00001278876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001701177,0.0002459014,0.0001319002,0.001229589,0.00158444,0.003438387,0.0006457346,0.0005285823,0.00002124319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005852293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004760267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004081672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01719469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964796,0.0000722689,0.0004810868,0.0006234179,0.001668641,0.0006749262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983925,0.0004623358,0.0002474141,0.0005038676,0.0002743179,0.0001195406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002976909,0.0003008513,0.03036421,0.001410111,0.0001414523,0.00008698673,0.2614675,0.05386765,0.00001572196,0.1048636,0.0009827012,0.5462016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007406456,0.005623599,0.1396439,0.02281882,0.0005787461,0.0005215898,0.01182156,0.2260533,0.001796244,0.5311619,0.03163197,0.02094189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1512935,0.0004307326,0.761192,0.004380196,0.003338964,0.004349635,0.00007272539,0.0007212558,0.07422101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962538,0.00000261056,0.002031172,0.001160276,0.0003372926,0.00003236544,0.00002066252,0.00001703693,0.0001447627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8449604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207039276","doi":"10.1109/asew52652.2021.00053","title":"Learning Sentiment Analysis for Accessibility User Reviews","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sentiment analysis; Naive Bayes classifier; Popularity; Support vector machine; tf–idf; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Bag-of-words model; Boosting (machine learning); Information retrieval; Term (time)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06717810131145494,"gpt":0.3932527963324494,"spread":0.3260746950209944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962721,0.0001100729,0.0003628149,0.00005586748,0.0004321665,0.0004888634,0.0002640815,0.00006279363,0.003606774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002867704,0.00009552351,0.0005647044,0.001107911,0.000214744,0.0007833284,0.0001182,0.00007431179,0.00006452521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001653054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005000389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008313983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981148,0.0003327365,0.0004238193,0.00047604,0.0003158601,0.0003368019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987866,0.0003509085,0.0001074461,0.0003554476,0.0002712839,0.0001283109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044163,0.0002878077,0.9421038,0.0001012177,0.0002554037,7.235948e-7,0.00453999,0.00004282491,0.00003469814,0.02979284,0.001628312,0.02120192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002814078,0.00004017191,0.06422275,0.00002225875,0.0005385792,1.307847e-7,0.02735445,0.0001616037,0.0012122,0.02467176,0.8810703,0.0004244305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7024682,0.0005862421,0.004157776,0.001730546,0.0002215334,0.0008156681,0.00001473275,0.0002091574,0.2897962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8955565,0.00007121742,0.001934679,0.0002101775,0.00008721432,0.00008994432,0.0000327827,0.000007013461,0.1020105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.879442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145422031","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.185.3869","title":"Technology Integration for Students with Disabilities: Empirically Based Recommendations for Faculty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Adaptation (eye); Sample (material); Medical education; Psychology; Assistive technology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4490256415916569,"gpt":0.6137609149944456,"spread":0.1647352734027888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232898,0.00007681375,0.00009034335,0.0002206284,0.0009717458,0.0003263952,0.0002289076,0.00007276668,0.0005109065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437979,0.00006543986,0.00003079017,0.0005640338,0.0007460564,0.0005806264,0.00002400075,0.00008559281,0.000009420412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005599523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001570123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002438116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979825,0.0001690804,0.0002081643,0.0003153477,0.001010163,0.0003147573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938026,0.003134432,0.00004986731,0.0001467929,0.002761515,0.0001047634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008357188,0.002878856,0.4202909,0.0001160851,0.00006408006,2.200151e-8,0.01714402,0.00004528111,0.0000464079,0.3294834,0.04594315,0.1831521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001165525,0.0008597694,0.02873165,0.00007234331,0.00002134716,3.839263e-7,0.08579426,0.001482811,0.00005769597,0.7946508,0.08698776,0.0001756582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532913,0.0000391671,0.002267095,0.1350694,0.0001164957,0.003174385,0.00014283,0.0000281061,0.005871241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841739,0.00001085807,0.004764524,0.00007685303,0.0001912148,0.004519241,0.001097182,0.000009391966,0.005156832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4651674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135724278","doi":"10.1353/lib.2006.0025","title":"Closing the 95 Percent Gap: Library Resource Sharing for People with Print Disabilities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library trends","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Publishing; Physical access; Subsidy; Resource (disambiguation); Shared resource; Universal design; Public relations; Reading (process); Web accessibility; Business; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02219871576737162,"gpt":0.2644653412884477,"spread":0.2422666255210761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002168866,0.0002364642,0.0002606484,0.00007101607,0.0008262455,0.001546767,0.0009188313,0.00008544634,0.0009656205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006532411,0.0001584988,0.0002073632,0.0006127519,0.0009269202,0.004729002,0.0003486529,0.000150246,0.00001006029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005167381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005673482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008472901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979563,0.0001086582,0.000364004,0.0005416955,0.0004169313,0.0006124545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985213,0.0006888825,0.00009875333,0.000557599,0.00001349845,0.0001199304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001455735,0.000266397,0.5444695,0.000107907,0.00002413817,9.112255e-7,0.0178066,0.00007200942,0.000002510611,0.4075058,0.0191948,0.01040385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000510691,0.0001897415,0.1332381,0.0001247081,0.00004247599,0.000002609661,0.06025698,0.0001909976,0.0001979978,0.1554595,0.6491829,0.0006033083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5403014,0.0002208384,0.00000898386,0.00957106,0.00008332356,0.00026352,0.00008079418,0.0004907667,0.4489793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189394,0.0000107799,0.0005808735,0.0002966554,0.0006372123,0.0001473452,0.0001608422,0.00006193526,0.07916501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6299881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267886875","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnv057","title":"Web Accessibility for Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Disability Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Gerontologist","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Web accessibility; Digital divide; Government (linguistics); Universal design; Internet access; Business; Accommodation; Internet privacy; European union; State (computer science); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1287922831245495,"gpt":0.4154270340458301,"spread":0.2866347509212807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003133212,0.0001764149,0.000664715,0.00004243902,0.0002970047,0.0001355995,0.001058198,0.0001094606,0.0001390652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002259936,0.0001154168,0.0004081689,0.0008639593,0.006440041,0.0006106549,0.0001552631,0.00009798873,0.000007213355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004227035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000266326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01177418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1680295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974868,0.0005326226,0.0005890594,0.0004770665,0.000496303,0.0004181964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967848,0.001421389,0.0003017248,0.0008377645,0.0004897494,0.0001645918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001176276,0.001737415,0.7875918,0.000129965,0.0008363311,2.598856e-7,0.1310619,0.00009930218,0.000004216199,0.06545419,0.002294216,0.009614195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001632608,0.0002353266,0.6345602,0.00003333224,0.001044463,1.785299e-7,0.2995951,0.001941843,0.0001311721,0.05541086,0.004929021,0.0004858559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364675,0.0002227931,0.0001649896,0.001469896,0.0001748195,0.001130701,0.0003144917,0.0001006455,0.05995411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990571,0.000002789214,0.0002285773,0.00005817565,0.00006330332,0.0001737991,0.00003628067,0.000004793663,0.0003751825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1685332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168931649","doi":"10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18646","title":"Information and communication technology related needs of college and university students with disabilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Learning Technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dawson College; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Canadian Council on Learning","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; ICTS; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Higher education; Medical education; Citation; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Medicine; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03701050373580847,"gpt":0.3665061523910508,"spread":0.3294956486552423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002415653,0.00005884813,0.0001441485,0.001249338,0.0003420844,0.0000313616,0.0004001707,0.0002379542,0.00001054824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020528,0.00005788195,0.000007953218,0.002350317,0.005833774,0.001180167,0.0005695092,0.0005484035,0.000003913946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001968824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008267863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005556646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004758907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998746,0.0003538013,0.0001738145,0.00007171728,0.000305239,0.0003494253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.0004573802,0.0000691903,0.0002180958,0.0001788822,0.00004953724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002054032,0.00004736007,0.6750647,0.00002857982,0.000005828373,9.167145e-8,0.0136604,0.000001036938,0.000006477344,0.3061396,0.000003923658,0.00502138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004187863,0.0002144323,0.03484991,0.00008589005,0.000003387527,0.00000308449,0.9188781,0.00000817482,0.00004958042,0.03768798,0.007719391,0.00008124916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840928,0.000269074,0.000002962229,0.00347542,0.000007746284,0.000301609,0.000003212441,0.0001178895,0.01172934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991699,0.0002511636,0.0001856621,0.000001011383,0.000001930915,0.000008565759,0.000002529632,0.000003799224,0.0003754483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808031846","doi":"10.1145/3196709.3196760","title":"Designing for Situational Visual Impairments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Situational ethics; Computer science; Key (lock); Mobile device; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Computer security; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.045293060983877,"gpt":0.4042679593288752,"spread":0.3589748983449982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000506561,0.00004486818,0.00005328512,0.00002225429,0.000387905,0.0001497577,0.0001284349,0.00003038854,0.0008462871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005279365,0.00004057193,0.00004754889,0.00009202258,0.000449351,0.0005793566,0.0000260412,0.0000135533,0.0001206795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007854339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001358371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002564352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992975,0.00002538122,0.0001097592,0.0001365588,0.0002252306,0.0002055422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.0002057829,0.00002437895,0.00005260715,0.0001601646,0.00006189026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016303,0.0008684556,0.1389712,0.0000466251,0.00007069667,4.402861e-7,0.04770915,0.000002202819,0.0009497084,0.7129022,0.02613587,0.07218038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000933983,0.0009684919,0.01900121,0.00002420659,0.00002111901,5.049346e-7,0.05880784,0.0005170121,0.006577003,0.8425372,0.07008535,0.000526097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6312376,0.000003069282,0.01150009,0.000514282,0.0002265476,0.0003728333,0.000006495709,0.0001236052,0.3560154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860661,1.961749e-7,0.004905892,0.0001902798,0.0003736387,0.00003176112,0.000005265534,0.000004473,0.008422397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3548284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9266251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024264357","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10736059","title":"Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library Websites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; Screen reader; Ranking (information retrieval); World Wide Web; Web Accessibility Initiative; Guideline; Work (physics); Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Web standards; Web page; Internet privacy; Engineering; Political science; Web development; Psychology; Visually impaired; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07150974705608026,"gpt":0.3540025323051733,"spread":0.282492785249093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181048,0.0002450868,0.000505919,0.0003982635,0.0006145903,0.001116916,0.0009092155,0.0001086948,0.007125445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000893754,0.0001780554,0.0003352729,0.001321224,0.001801281,0.01548332,0.0002302106,0.0004308602,0.00004947348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006287161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003719205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009975454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006065433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967482,0.0007376308,0.0007472359,0.0002605225,0.0008660745,0.0006403197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981066,0.0005655618,0.000464843,0.0002759827,0.00007910348,0.0005078889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001060476,0.0002838772,0.9185282,0.00003353716,0.000874051,0.000002069369,0.01919815,0.00004123057,0.00004899532,0.01005884,0.05027696,0.0005480249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000244818,0.00005881254,0.8731694,0.00004432817,0.0003262753,0.000009877252,0.01626592,0.00001743157,0.0006815453,0.02555749,0.083337,0.0002871548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357924,0.0002855951,0.000001670011,0.006893096,0.0002465073,0.0002273264,0.000327798,0.00008508954,0.05614052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960681,0.00006349853,0.0003388813,0.0002205628,0.0005097784,0.000006908915,0.0000434957,0.00001594841,0.03811989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04535888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1765209183","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110701.015","title":"Library and Information Services to the Visually Impaired-The Role of Academic Libraries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Library science; Newspaper; Visually impaired; Politics; Braille; Service (business); Gens; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01350861623976274,"gpt":0.2501930499602788,"spread":0.2366844337205161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006217171,0.00006514557,0.00007470296,0.00009660636,0.001411067,0.0004711729,0.001257235,0.00005995429,0.00008367264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001581278,0.00004390178,0.00002790093,0.001116957,0.002984221,0.0114942,0.00017201,0.00009345293,0.00001687244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005672948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04006945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03400801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989352,0.00005303061,0.0001745327,0.0001221183,0.0003478678,0.0003673039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993786,0.00006349734,0.00007345657,0.0001240926,0.00005273392,0.0003076083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003508816,0.000002554098,0.0784042,0.000006442292,0.000001691862,5.162677e-8,0.1824507,4.867813e-8,0.000007983495,0.7151238,0.0001395254,0.02385947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003686253,0.0000320272,0.2314561,0.00001583948,0.000006901257,2.971984e-7,0.3735698,0.00001329278,0.0003436877,0.07987393,0.3144951,0.0001560506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5576968,0.00009931381,5.539101e-7,0.003055433,0.00008427245,0.0002292648,0.00003467008,0.00002838369,0.4387714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980083,0.00001093352,0.00002730641,0.001691249,0.00008399639,0.00001278169,0.000001397902,0.000003068157,0.0001610169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592705519","doi":"10.1080/24750158.2017.1298399","title":"Public Libraries and Access for Children with Disabilities and Their Families: A Proposed Inclusive Library Model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Library and Information Association","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Public access; Universal design; Focus group; Focus (optics); Library science; Information access; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03327062700064706,"gpt":0.2756322820844449,"spread":0.2423616550837978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003618556,0.0001238631,0.0002012117,0.00008368563,0.00132367,0.005748,0.0005268965,0.0001062258,0.00001295476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009218226,0.00007446041,0.00006572099,0.00009082369,0.0006325475,0.1230497,0.0003260079,0.0001398872,2.025745e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003464449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003029745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001403041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009604258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990119,0.00008217921,0.0003901221,0.00008369553,0.0002436345,0.000188513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0002442329,0.001102943,0.0001533259,0.00007361464,0.0001137216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001121468,0.000032386,0.8723059,0.00007959202,0.00009338198,2.157067e-8,0.02254539,0.00001555728,0.000001418071,0.09668268,0.002840571,0.005290917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001245615,0.0001956457,0.7342405,0.0001355986,0.00005004534,0.000005066776,0.03657924,0.0003774902,0.0004299642,0.214302,0.01216697,0.0002719237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392586,0.00002995871,0.00002389944,0.05126052,0.00008610603,0.000515195,0.0001726571,0.00003136563,0.008621672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968662,0.000212655,0.0003230876,0.0004854109,0.0001160592,0.000007514376,0.00001722649,0.000007954346,0.001963895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1380655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163756696","doi":"10.1109/icse43902.2021.00143","title":"Semantic Web Accessibility Testing via Hierarchical Visual Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; USable; Semantic Web; Social Semantic Web; World Wide Web; Web accessibility; Inference; Process (computing); Web testing; Semantic analytics; Globe; Semantic Web Stack; Data Web; Web standards; Information retrieval; Data science; Web page; Web modeling; Artificial intelligence; Web intelligence; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04211480257468035,"gpt":0.365715285434231,"spread":0.3236004828595507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00123141,0.0001638573,0.0003843419,0.0001332491,0.0005327885,0.0007086995,0.0004417583,0.0001172824,0.002934072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00501608,0.0001506567,0.0003379234,0.00377594,0.0008553157,0.00103453,0.000310713,0.0001870912,0.0001013469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001805872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007021707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002675673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02335101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970844,0.0004102405,0.0004898971,0.0006933821,0.0007649595,0.0005571709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975865,0.001184175,0.0000848718,0.0004464375,0.0004164947,0.0002814854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008163854,0.0005164433,0.9643229,0.00004060113,0.0001954351,0.00001441967,0.001546527,0.00001654383,0.000265715,0.009693204,0.00007723938,0.02330279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004811122,0.00008939485,0.7778724,0.00003414739,0.000748471,0.00000379492,0.01833932,0.01584746,0.001367011,0.1810434,0.00315086,0.001022686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7295724,0.00003058607,0.0007129777,0.0009210618,0.0001072252,0.0001113974,0.000007518791,0.0002578931,0.268279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930989,0.000002736324,0.001485327,0.0002763787,0.000148769,0.00001206416,0.00001828301,0.00001048134,0.004947103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2635265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011051756","doi":"10.1145/1296843.1296865","title":"Techniques to assist in developing accessibility engineers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Computer science; Course (navigation); Engineering management; Software engineering; Systems engineering; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03571702692044892,"gpt":0.3735038597976439,"spread":0.337786832877195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003068365,0.0001082376,0.0001544311,0.0001855738,0.0001238582,0.0001977467,0.0004530719,0.00009195517,0.0001497867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001353514,0.0001024554,0.00005077593,0.0009428793,0.0002208508,0.0008699996,0.0001171838,0.00008864215,0.0000359797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007525508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002038307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004126407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06694376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984038,0.00004366243,0.0003730349,0.0003217794,0.0003607717,0.0004969453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.0002771179,0.00003126734,0.0002205233,0.00009336407,0.0001632255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960951,0.0001548603,0.5340061,0.00004368756,0.000005622534,0.000004598503,0.0130348,0.000001601781,0.00006564352,0.3289929,0.0005397645,0.1231209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001301408,0.00003991732,0.820619,0.00008061007,0.000002847481,3.194912e-7,0.03486041,0.000003066892,0.01281298,0.06662434,0.0642421,0.0005842224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6047834,0.000005685104,0.004887469,0.001654928,0.00009272194,0.0003159532,0.000001185055,0.0002891161,0.3879695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868169,0.000001578045,0.01090497,0.0006951286,0.0000644402,0.00002134011,0.00000136675,0.000008311179,0.001485894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3864836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9500821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037812907","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2013.853329","title":"Use of Assistive Technologies in Academic Libraries: A Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assistive Technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Assistive technology; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08482083936834164,"gpt":0.3389796641667621,"spread":0.2541588247984204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006161747,0.0002038239,0.0004741071,0.0007226662,0.0001349637,0.0001060874,0.0009909749,0.0007923142,0.0001596675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528952,0.0001922462,0.00007189015,0.002409715,0.005734872,0.001887825,0.0005026007,0.0005078685,0.0001326441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002469385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003006004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009832558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006845934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978138,0.000233088,0.0005647516,0.0004959071,0.0003116265,0.0005808756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972833,0.00158481,0.0002661933,0.0004724667,0.0003442688,0.00004892618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001478571,0.0001001418,0.8856322,0.00001143851,0.0000193309,0.000001401963,0.0002506762,5.238358e-7,0.00008488461,0.08469944,0.0008062323,0.02837895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001299176,0.00008007469,0.89307,0.00005830865,0.000005748279,4.616967e-7,0.01539811,0.00000691895,0.001130883,0.08723968,0.002664235,0.0002156707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801694,0.000196928,0.0000652236,0.003462411,0.0001035704,0.0006615134,0.00006244762,0.0008862385,0.01439231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976927,0.00006569245,0.0009700393,0.00002561598,0.000008305891,0.0002272326,0.00001001118,0.00001623406,0.0009841537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02816328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732451113","doi":"10.1145/3058555.3058563","title":"Teaching Accessibility to the Masses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Web accessibility; Web Accessibility Initiative; Web standards; Computer science; World Wide Web; Curriculum; Web development; Web design; Process (computing); Web 2.0; Audit; Key (lock); Web application; Multimedia; The Internet; Web application security; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06784090585213416,"gpt":0.4201376684251873,"spread":0.3522967625730532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002135267,0.0000813627,0.0001011659,0.00001621746,0.003844073,0.002498759,0.002063353,0.00003918514,0.0004025821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00527552,0.00004934833,0.00007797398,0.00004075914,0.0006720208,0.001827265,0.0004751897,0.0001150863,0.0002563763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000891619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001063709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02613921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06252948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987462,0.0001336937,0.0001595073,0.0002730831,0.0003827646,0.0003047807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984279,0.000224902,0.00007106276,0.001079694,0.00006246093,0.0001339528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001033738,0.0001119441,0.3806257,0.00001129249,0.00001027272,5.596603e-7,0.0165887,0.000001158273,0.000009646114,0.4313223,0.006052718,0.1652553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007076572,0.00002113344,0.3014408,0.00001146436,0.000006345819,1.32481e-7,0.02365078,0.000008065583,0.00008854751,0.135999,0.538514,0.0001889227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4407932,0.000004303256,0.00004759412,0.02262337,0.0002204753,0.0001914703,0.000003296494,0.00007683814,0.5360395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631029,0.000001282337,0.0003261126,0.0006332262,0.000276567,0.00002319716,4.137567e-7,0.000005430828,0.0356309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5324613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248553086","doi":"10.1145/1090785","title":"Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Event (particle physics); Computer science; Library science; Special Interest Group","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05504265564602762,"gpt":0.3602925336157961,"spread":0.3052498779697685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005974321,0.0002810456,0.0004060303,0.00008659467,0.0002465345,0.0009580721,0.003340452,0.0002782183,0.003228106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001109583,0.000191406,0.0001650817,0.0002547984,0.002148591,0.001182292,0.001175984,0.0003384015,0.0001033011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002582872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003791439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001299143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001333302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974843,0.00005042248,0.0005265315,0.0006489064,0.0009805262,0.0003093489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980693,0.0004514008,0.0004399395,0.0003517912,0.0005702479,0.0001173003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002441134,0.001430686,0.08414128,0.001024991,0.000354448,3.313663e-7,0.02180286,0.00002878286,0.00005167727,0.3106627,0.5038509,0.07640719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002717445,0.0005483572,0.1850579,0.004256655,0.0002331624,0.000003993216,0.06253533,0.0004651772,0.003880762,0.17095,0.5653161,0.004035157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2515434,0.000029927,0.000003913632,0.003150364,0.001816557,0.0004797783,0.0001368184,0.00003480534,0.7428044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953296,0.0001042401,0.0001314087,0.0002504839,0.0004382284,0.00002334106,0.00001593199,0.0000146529,0.1036921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366762681","doi":"10.1145/3587281.3587291","title":"The State of Accessibility in Blackboard: Survey and User Reviews Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Blackboard (design pattern); Mobile apps; Mobile device; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Inclusion (mineral); Web accessibility; World Wide Web; Multimedia; The Internet; Web standards; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1105379530261276,"gpt":0.4188386880155269,"spread":0.3083007349893992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01250451,0.00009375269,0.0002561694,0.0000499385,0.0002381587,0.0002298546,0.000323212,0.00002470988,0.00003588316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003739238,0.00005766418,0.00004473105,0.0007855973,0.0008242487,0.0006030512,0.0002425483,0.00007806393,0.00001966027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005161515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009229676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07885448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7619222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972899,0.001281089,0.000556486,0.0002936003,0.0002946873,0.0002842472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976158,0.001724165,0.0001007232,0.000388603,0.00009907648,0.00007159152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001387067,0.0001430158,0.9615455,0.00002627662,0.000006237844,0.00001383593,0.01829656,8.238357e-7,3.814604e-7,0.000178,0.0003299663,0.01944552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001680492,0.00004654256,0.9200212,0.000008203824,0.000003608622,6.805599e-7,0.0706527,0.0000139456,0.00000383305,0.007624229,0.001365714,0.00009130478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916439,0.0001674071,6.901851e-7,0.0001293895,0.00008137119,0.00111218,0.00001929695,0.00005000752,0.006795774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949364,0.000217766,0.000006409098,0.00001408804,0.00000813891,0.00004011988,0.000001379281,0.000005387358,0.004770317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6830677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157792901","doi":"10.1080/10400430903519944","title":"Multiple Perspectives on the Accessibility of E-Learning in Canadian Colleges and Universities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assistive Technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Learning disability; Exploratory research; Psychology; Medical education; Service provider; Web accessibility; Service (business); Medicine; The Internet; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Marketing; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01169638117072058,"gpt":0.2811691306358726,"spread":0.269472749465152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006144783,0.00008093412,0.0001458674,0.0002856775,0.000353961,0.00003873668,0.0003526603,0.0001630437,0.0001189675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003120168,0.00006481443,0.00002778247,0.000547964,0.003668237,0.0002062603,0.00008765967,0.0003339468,0.000004386043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006564012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1975242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991333,0.0001010182,0.0001213414,0.0002486121,0.0001206928,0.0002750563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988057,0.0007536049,0.00006563789,0.0001884791,0.0001247864,0.00006181218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008412197,0.00002932276,0.6324831,0.000002941073,0.000005130824,9.576227e-7,0.003762199,3.06832e-7,0.00004999733,0.3626537,0.00001175523,0.0009922292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005713,0.00004756656,0.5488449,0.00001105127,0.000002935916,2.399179e-7,0.4381842,0.00001161259,0.0002508226,0.009622339,0.002850715,0.00007301773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938239,0.00002935799,7.058858e-7,0.005567936,0.00004505704,0.000179086,0.0000145128,0.00005943795,0.10028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992543,0.00000885438,0.00004823596,0.00001338719,0.000009808152,0.00001227603,6.509403e-7,0.000004242962,0.0006482171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506669403","doi":"10.1023/a:1011323308477","title":"VoiceGrip: A Tool for Programming-by-Voice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Speech Technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Programmer; Syntax; Programming language; Usability; Symbol (formal); Code (set theory); Confusion; Range (aeronautics); Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01785288856041286,"gpt":0.3474971288228051,"spread":0.3296442402623923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007617463,0.00009741348,0.0001840328,0.0003180907,0.0001024407,0.0001891478,0.001221454,0.0001690245,0.0001030422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002423296,0.0000897244,0.0001586447,0.0003002073,0.0005552167,0.0007305861,0.00007844502,0.0001977787,0.00002223911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002941587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001857637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001308077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003812228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984671,0.0000229182,0.0004869507,0.0001516523,0.0005958955,0.0002754898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980708,0.0001945659,0.0003487528,0.0001163889,0.001211804,0.00005766744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001645616,0.000365187,0.03523612,0.000007838581,0.0001589865,0.00004508757,0.0006926043,0.000001493985,0.0004484928,0.05277294,0.006762837,0.9033439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004756334,0.0001835807,0.0001996232,0.0000324295,0.00001288207,0.0001114142,0.002850471,0.000002255035,0.001073907,0.0762451,0.9187052,0.0001074954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.947059,0.000311679,0.002403987,0.04063853,0.001403502,0.0003616072,0.00002963048,0.0001425004,0.007649566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986572,0.0001003989,0.009612439,0.0001971861,0.0006510587,0.00002375813,0.000004547552,0.00001325553,0.002825368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9119424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3658855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462544119","doi":"","title":"Digitally enhanced? An examination of the the information behaviours of visually impaired postsecondary students.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Braille; Art; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.013177716737005,"gpt":0.3002976497661364,"spread":0.2871199330291314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003481425,0.00007455476,0.0001199971,0.0003749926,0.000531618,0.0006783272,0.001727324,0.00004279621,0.00002935329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001979126,0.00004859624,0.00008527985,0.001102847,0.002390105,0.02778894,0.00004550234,0.0001142123,0.000003286684],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005344849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006719604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005638731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02304547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974844,0.00005928081,0.0008326854,0.00004739685,0.001342784,0.000233381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966335,0.00005674265,0.001011549,0.0002210818,0.001819125,0.0002579553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221765,0.0001275693,0.05615019,0.00006940545,0.00002389608,4.949569e-7,0.6375675,0.003046563,0.0002020245,0.09527361,0.00007262859,0.2074339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000329689,0.0002204408,0.9077103,0.00009186938,0.00001118828,0.00000591844,0.08461152,0.00001095036,0.00279284,0.003536017,0.0005764412,0.0001028811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769213,0.000007269941,0.0002377123,0.0004170661,0.0003309964,0.0002536576,0.00004843855,0.000004442261,0.02177919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997191,0.00000229943,0.00005685381,0.0001864166,0.0000155752,0.000001688424,0.000003689137,0.000001659929,0.00001275063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465290874","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2463","title":"Developing Guidelines for Evaluating the Adaptation of Accessible Web-Based Learning Materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Educational technology; Blended learning; Web Accessibility Initiative; Flexibility (engineering); Synchronous learning; Adaptation (eye); Web standards; Active learning (machine learning); World Wide Web; Multimedia; Cooperative learning; The Internet; Web development; Web intelligence; Teaching method; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5008332216134435,"gpt":0.5940215433725538,"spread":0.09318832175911029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02463648,0.00006941211,0.0002090154,0.00006775308,0.0003826263,0.0002501575,0.001142437,0.00002914284,0.0001604484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05691795,0.00003500691,0.000046505,0.0003720779,0.0005175289,0.000498619,0.0003878027,0.000124634,0.000002225899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001506789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008126819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001511679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002888653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970148,0.001111065,0.0006141117,0.0001804345,0.0008644241,0.0002152268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992957,0.004647067,0.0003287813,0.0001257981,0.001912716,0.00002866844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007349134,0.0001407725,0.09955742,0.005319402,0.000102619,7.617618e-7,0.00212343,0.001286993,0.003455624,0.2659012,0.001584493,0.6197924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007207269,0.001266858,0.02691584,0.1478271,0.00009744152,0.000003518204,0.1340209,0.01833512,0.01085159,0.2012113,0.4513044,0.0009587216],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813482,0.005576473,0.00494733,0.09892285,0.0002018219,0.002848167,0.0001501326,0.00002681403,0.005978234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943296,0.003942649,0.0009123988,0.00009477716,0.00005413859,0.0002001619,0.00004501675,0.000006657467,0.0004146194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.951026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065960433","doi":"10.1108/07378830210432561","title":"Evaluating opportunities for expanded information access: a study of the accessibility of four online databases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"CNIB Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Encyclopedia; Computer science; The Internet; Resource (disambiguation); Online search; Online database; Database; Multimedia; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4810065202438676,"gpt":0.44241098276796,"spread":0.0385955374759076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006680575,0.0001268306,0.0002625715,0.00009927938,0.000260759,0.0002049202,0.001233679,0.00004931969,0.0003586612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00173118,0.00009296677,0.0001176422,0.0005119632,0.0004571643,0.0127417,0.0005769927,0.00008366667,6.993448e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002773488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000174293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005208637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004128196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979685,0.000234056,0.0007495849,0.000192786,0.000639868,0.0002152282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980951,0.000587425,0.0004956889,0.0006119666,0.0001547478,0.00005505814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001997821,0.004275691,0.7376764,0.001078709,0.00009872428,4.44125e-7,0.04541191,0.00004549389,0.00006681112,0.01020729,0.003662094,0.1972766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003621294,0.00145701,0.2768012,0.0005090242,0.0002112562,0.000001142465,0.6311889,0.002843434,0.006130456,0.0671483,0.009237629,0.0008503089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828457,0.00003879571,0.00002008653,0.0007438088,0.0001299959,0.001614342,0.0005760472,0.0001185587,0.01391262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981692,0.00001629655,0.0006348946,0.0001167473,0.00005151021,0.000105223,0.00005092501,0.000009795213,0.0008453588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.585777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9237425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594295181","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2621","title":"Use of Social Media in Uncovering Information Services for People with Disabilities in China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Tourism; Social media; Information needs; The Internet; China; Special needs; Work (physics); Public relations; Social needs; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Business; Internet privacy; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1039731552483115,"gpt":0.4439942289269814,"spread":0.3400210736786698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489655,0.00005430894,0.0002193422,0.00008266498,0.0002258002,0.0004996907,0.0009313305,0.00002710004,0.00003339856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01112934,0.00003881472,0.0000275427,0.00020585,0.000564012,0.002770805,0.0004517257,0.0001854701,6.027354e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001442431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001657401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02119278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05597277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986063,0.0002225725,0.0003550022,0.0001022951,0.0005413596,0.0001725197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977064,0.001699441,0.0002032275,0.0001260635,0.0002411249,0.00002373026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216294,0.00007549233,0.9173393,0.002851621,0.000008736473,2.185927e-7,0.02383534,0.00009793848,0.00000109442,0.0424387,0.00003173751,0.01309819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006818225,0.00005101888,0.8497045,0.007161148,0.000003224504,2.715683e-7,0.1153509,0.0003945885,0.00001166391,0.01781882,0.008727399,0.00009457623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878232,0.000219069,0.00000602675,0.004118626,0.0000273895,0.0006880372,0.0001268079,0.000002719788,0.00698807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984828,0.001243659,0.00002963802,0.0000115407,0.00001491827,0.00008551311,0.00008861815,0.000002544172,0.00004079011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09151561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594338580","doi":"10.1145/2993420","title":"Making the field of computing more inclusive","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the ACM","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Autodesk (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1212165848855399,"gpt":0.4831099000019649,"spread":0.361893315116425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006730602,0.0000368814,0.00008334653,0.00001081931,0.002099699,0.00008892702,0.038529,0.00002790403,0.000009632085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05987867,0.00002303118,0.00008709195,0.00007300887,0.002551216,0.0002189689,0.03230568,0.0001021631,0.000001520988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002686032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007594199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002169953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993777,0.0001391549,0.0001754992,0.00005660397,0.000168554,0.00008253816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770455,0.001852726,0.0003511699,0.02059944,0.0001405792,0.00001051997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009437974,0.0002324396,0.2670058,0.00005734363,0.00006427363,3.277564e-8,0.1334018,0.00002884058,0.00006986834,0.5618473,0.01314188,0.02414103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008875411,0.00001239843,0.1526234,0.0001861406,0.00002496134,1.643192e-7,0.04592573,0.0001263076,0.0005315171,0.7898525,0.01054666,0.00008145512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5366663,0.0002079492,0.000004590726,0.2454352,0.00009653407,0.000215525,0.000008172624,0.00001346469,0.2173523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975552,0.0000198681,0.002054742,0.0001978564,0.00001792341,0.000003210369,4.308821e-7,0.000002679295,0.0001481042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4608889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565901981","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07394138624283565,"gpt":0.3176651337889941,"spread":0.2437237475461585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001270979,0.00005166217,0.00006657369,0.00002748242,0.0001032771,0.0001102158,0.00103922,0.0000488046,0.0008418243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00343603,0.00003184495,0.0000486246,0.000171673,0.001012384,0.0003572089,0.0002209526,0.0000676917,0.00003244494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006669923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001741677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002180795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992894,0.000005477783,0.0001133524,0.0001330122,0.0003489477,0.0001097942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994942,0.0001208244,0.00006606083,0.0001195896,0.0001861036,0.00001321671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003806135,0.0001214691,0.07644784,0.000005978803,0.000009451566,3.618337e-8,0.004085433,1.232677e-7,0.00003741242,0.9018677,0.00370222,0.01371856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002686442,0.0001401538,0.1055525,0.0001358541,0.00001133101,4.471023e-7,0.2012133,0.00009904603,0.006970462,0.6320775,0.05322633,0.0003043956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4077541,0.000003171118,4.907488e-7,0.009987963,0.0001032939,0.00008066995,0.000006230083,0.00009283089,0.5819713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885967,0.000009404299,0.0001072468,0.00004134676,0.00001571988,0.00001075041,1.640652e-7,0.000002050388,0.0112166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5808427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9217386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982954775","doi":"10.1145/2677199.2688806","title":"Tactile Letters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Texture (cosmology); Interface (matter); Dyslexia; Space (punctuation); Learning to read; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process); Linguistics; Image (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09025065650068977,"gpt":0.3578687287256123,"spread":0.2676180722249226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000322199,0.00003410877,0.00004687549,0.00001526052,0.00006928171,0.0001407009,0.0001619816,0.0000180877,0.0004751717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004490858,0.00002944112,0.00002843883,0.0001037173,0.0002825092,0.0006932961,0.00002949603,0.00002381205,0.000447331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009209736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008719296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003716828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002439013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993948,0.00003242398,0.00006843257,0.00009411784,0.0002542997,0.0001558868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996571,0.00004743876,0.00001294907,0.0001023632,0.00004086122,0.0001392971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001389225,0.000158918,0.09644067,0.000006815949,0.00001083416,0.000002198795,0.03268233,0.000007271807,0.00005154654,0.6222663,0.233229,0.01513025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001856959,0.00002420983,0.002455284,0.000003169354,0.000003463377,2.852637e-7,0.06521734,0.000006036378,0.0002260696,0.0872987,0.8443936,0.0001861802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4089636,0.000004924189,0.00002285021,0.002622764,0.0001465659,0.00004313197,7.487405e-7,0.00009713722,0.5880983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843507,4.046891e-7,0.0001934162,0.0006183014,0.0001004287,0.000004422912,8.709721e-7,0.000002958906,0.01472854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6111646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5749684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008914037","doi":"10.1145/1367497.1367502","title":"Keysurf","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; User interface; Web navigation; Web page; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Process (computing); Key (lock); World Wide Web; Selection (genetic algorithm); Web application; Character (mathematics); Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07225276750013712,"gpt":0.3316969040166385,"spread":0.2594441365165013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001454312,0.00003060747,0.00004607601,0.000013046,0.0002673512,0.00003394697,0.0001437231,0.0000226893,0.00175827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000242272,0.00002636545,0.00003784284,0.0001134654,0.0005834868,0.0004394113,0.00002220295,0.0000221426,0.0004882835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003539911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008311422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002421036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001880065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994712,0.00002375355,0.00007072925,0.00008915359,0.000198305,0.0001467822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997336,0.00006332504,0.000009724792,0.0000960676,0.0000342485,0.0000630159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003413629,0.0001115168,0.2641433,0.00000380952,0.000004626178,0.000003264406,0.01723664,6.453242e-7,0.000005448779,0.6960728,0.01610805,0.006306504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001738023,0.00003519196,0.08633025,0.00000408078,0.000002666081,0.000002458978,0.0228466,0.000005099105,0.0002648795,0.168496,0.7215626,0.000276347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4548312,0.000007939169,0.000008305892,0.0004447353,0.00005443438,0.00003296264,5.055694e-7,0.00009537768,0.5445246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247473,0.000008859935,0.0001597494,0.0001517113,0.00005858777,0.000002937314,4.792964e-7,0.000002273139,0.07486808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7054545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147804670","doi":"10.1109/icalt.2014.167","title":"Designing and Reflecting on Disability-Aware E-learning Systems: The Case of ONTODAPS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"USable; Usability; Computer science; Special needs; Assistive technology; Learning disability; Face (sociological concept); Multimedia; Architecture; Disabled people; Human–computer interaction; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Psychology; Engineering; Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06516541195397825,"gpt":0.3765374500495008,"spread":0.3113720380955226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002960723,0.00009999838,0.0001799515,0.00002017631,0.0007719673,0.0002623204,0.0001783427,0.00005769092,0.00003417071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263303,0.00006579387,0.00005294343,0.0001790297,0.0009568899,0.0003609269,0.00007445285,0.0001523894,0.000004805261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003257431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01641237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01088875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982882,0.0007080442,0.000282754,0.0002531403,0.0002200454,0.0002478457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967555,0.002742361,0.0001134086,0.0002293275,0.00008234212,0.00007700065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005710536,0.0002440977,0.1943181,0.0005010876,0.00004699751,0.000009754846,0.06661501,0.0006010031,0.0001074745,0.6653146,0.0001301915,0.07205459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003124092,0.0004310048,0.002253229,0.0002435773,0.00003598592,0.00003369413,0.968366,0.002365295,0.0004791624,0.02145931,0.00364089,0.0003794425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217112,0.0000266676,0.0002682735,0.0003231785,0.0000909697,0.0002381513,0.00000128386,0.00009061878,0.1772496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.000001957101,0.00009254355,0.00003285419,0.00009473572,0.00001474338,5.315128e-7,0.000008835801,0.0009517389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.901751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576985424","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-18452-9_2","title":"Beyond Standards: Unleashing Accessibility on a Learning Content Management System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Inclusion (mineral); Archetype; The Internet; Learning Management; Order (exchange); Management science; Knowledge management; Process management; World Wide Web; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04464721909530543,"gpt":0.2973486111818673,"spread":0.2527013920865618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004583409,0.0005385287,0.000655706,0.0005258007,0.0009313688,0.001321097,0.00241225,0.0003293767,0.0001440232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005700163,0.000480948,0.0002365,0.0004346931,0.002965744,0.001106359,0.0009912757,0.0009111832,0.00005330579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003292686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007186948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006126603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001380363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938053,0.0001518616,0.000742952,0.001723517,0.002670906,0.0009054128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997265,0.0005823468,0.0004118136,0.0009593837,0.0005060683,0.0002754331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000673814,0.00009133956,0.00145889,0.0004708193,0.0000386709,0.0000595343,0.01337096,0.001431839,0.000001673699,0.3730202,0.00001587627,0.6099728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008521935,0.0006702296,0.002147408,0.005317274,0.00008439302,0.000008008397,0.0006766828,0.002677581,0.0001958085,0.9711886,0.01388126,0.002300564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006271843,0.0003034797,0.2373708,0.0002799603,0.002444938,0.001472112,0.00004610298,0.0004936566,0.7513171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991644,0.00003103585,0.004591206,0.0002980677,0.0003791958,0.00002528937,0.000006129654,0.00004427234,0.002980782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967132760","doi":"10.1145/3315002.3332429","title":"The Value of Being Different","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Significant difference; Computer security; Internet privacy; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.012063756469997,"gpt":0.2928019071185328,"spread":0.2807381506485357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002988316,0.00003318748,0.0000630556,0.000007129599,0.0001198088,0.00007935786,0.0002524317,0.00001803021,0.0002768503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001906357,0.00001805996,0.0000538213,0.00006035274,0.0002984358,0.0001810363,0.00005498273,0.00002514615,0.00005447228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003080435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003024667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008947225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00128445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994,0.00004334875,0.0001119777,0.00007494271,0.0002376893,0.0001320928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993706,0.0003881399,0.00002749486,0.0001558675,0.00003169969,0.00002622943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001952083,0.00001861284,0.1285528,0.000005627795,0.000003489475,8.034537e-9,0.002676851,6.279504e-7,0.00002326524,0.8649035,0.0000616451,0.003751579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001325224,0.00005623496,0.1105698,0.00001942826,0.000005694243,4.082391e-8,0.05958464,0.00004410519,0.001595275,0.8022909,0.02557533,0.0001260714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5550256,0.000008251473,0.000002243914,0.0004497471,0.0001076176,0.0000781191,4.033888e-7,0.00001558324,0.4443125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752724,0.000005895456,0.00001089975,0.00002670369,0.00002040882,0.000002394192,2.197512e-7,0.000002130792,0.02465897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4202468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3031317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231179736","doi":"","title":"EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES -- Accessibility and Web Design : Why Does It Matter?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language learning & technology","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; The Internet; Public relations; Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Web standards; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0146116525664749,"gpt":0.3100663299062478,"spread":0.2954546773397729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009668882,0.0002389267,0.0003381141,0.0004038131,0.0006540248,0.0002995772,0.000861481,0.0004503205,0.0007397666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002860754,0.0001961988,0.0000674826,0.001056295,0.002114943,0.0007520494,0.000521937,0.0006204683,0.00008323444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007411298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008339788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003178491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977347,0.0002226839,0.0003500371,0.0006767479,0.000290704,0.0007251002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988244,0.0003295392,0.0001633677,0.0005359193,0.00008324879,0.00006355267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003575737,0.0001162032,0.7401243,0.00006852525,0.00003786446,0.0000745291,0.01636742,0.00002615982,0.0013958,0.00603337,0.0005325091,0.2351875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006483344,0.0002224306,0.006960298,0.0001646713,0.00005507983,0.00004814393,0.7208767,0.0002302892,0.002897523,0.09852213,0.1683349,0.001039465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427119,0.00109152,0.0008000784,0.02088125,0.0001312786,0.000389443,0.000003248333,0.003394104,0.03059714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926916,0.0002055606,0.001606017,0.0002301085,0.00004415259,0.00007152465,0.000002895596,0.0000274938,0.005120683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.733164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8099925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66606","doi":"10.1177/0145482x0309700304","title":"Strategies Used by Visually Impaired Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments to Manage the Visual Demands of Their Professional Role","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Visually impaired; Visual impairment; Psychology; Blindness; Low vision; Professional development; Medical education; Applied psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Optometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01494207154579674,"gpt":0.3708064137778576,"spread":0.3558643422320609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489684,0.0005105563,0.001008148,0.0003726848,0.0004401555,0.0004588487,0.001412855,0.0002089646,0.0001148754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002950594,0.000315372,0.000450461,0.001127184,0.001040459,0.002021972,0.0002545855,0.0004362628,0.00000410454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004207304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003097401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004393401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992668,0.001084254,0.001783467,0.0004307221,0.003174117,0.000859462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962505,0.0004955609,0.001627328,0.0003083693,0.0007982548,0.0005200382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00477594,0.06528281,0.6700659,0.00040715,0.001697575,0.00003688521,0.2414281,0.0002632735,0.009486228,0.001464572,0.001285554,0.003806036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006098732,0.0297239,0.09060325,0.0008872527,0.00031749,0.00003058824,0.8547474,0.0000664651,0.01262392,0.002707216,0.001329826,0.0008639922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965444,0.0001478935,0.0001747519,0.0002604814,0.0004460526,0.001320889,0.00003601111,0.00003710073,0.001032376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989406,0.00001727328,0.0001018916,0.00009263065,0.0001232928,0.00004335024,0.000008338518,0.00005311123,0.0006194694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6133193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592029863","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000387","title":"Accessibility limits recall from visual working memory.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Working memory; Recall; Encoding (memory); Object (grammar); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cued speech; Psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08171335900988569,"gpt":0.4302558420613692,"spread":0.3485424830514836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358858,0.0001518775,0.0003031688,0.00007880776,0.001339384,0.0005517203,0.0004359857,0.0001812075,0.0004638022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001165656,0.0001448199,0.0001402818,0.0000531165,0.001238206,0.00172096,0.00009215584,0.0004753884,0.00001836804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007456655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000621971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001195308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007585792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980994,0.0004605204,0.0004878488,0.0003255041,0.0003604863,0.0002662294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983901,0.0002586819,0.0008239842,0.0001975911,0.0001464783,0.0001831578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003894334,0.003247536,0.2883918,0.00003997656,0.000401018,0.0001549301,0.05462816,0.000007248545,0.08508004,0.0007517167,0.0006801464,0.562723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008144805,0.002832853,0.6789301,0.0008870747,0.0002616207,0.0001021962,0.1718764,0.00004214517,0.06532833,0.06442869,0.005917294,0.001248479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.873125,0.0006923552,0.00002618473,0.0006059258,0.0009959869,0.0001175891,0.000001718428,0.00002902337,0.1244062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983553,0.00009126908,0.0001688131,0.0002668089,0.0006960519,0.00000555523,0.000004867956,0.00001298724,0.0003983657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5614746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605201204","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_18","title":"Accessibility of E-Commerce Websites for Vision-Impaired Persons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"JavaScript; Animation; Visually impaired; Computer science; Web accessibility; Low vision; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Web page; Human–computer interaction; Computer graphics (images); Optometry; Medicine; Web standards","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03090012122887054,"gpt":0.3254490902445379,"spread":0.2945489690156674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951163,0.0004184085,0.0007625255,0.0004029698,0.0005195747,0.0005301409,0.00260474,0.0003967871,0.00015459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001880966,0.0003789043,0.0003706519,0.0004298231,0.005876984,0.000808798,0.0005998967,0.0003547862,0.00001718009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004694213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001115554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003859818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002790449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960465,0.00008146686,0.0007297358,0.001297853,0.00113563,0.0007088255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950187,0.002784175,0.0004431459,0.001037555,0.0004996933,0.0002167884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009721047,0.0002580005,0.007986759,0.0007434341,0.00003863337,0.000002256149,0.01430531,0.001095528,0.00009213672,0.07098448,0.0004367745,0.9039595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005543241,0.0005750539,0.003602478,0.0008942627,0.00004520415,0.000001980577,0.00003952238,0.01128256,0.0005819226,0.9649883,0.01626364,0.001170783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0208485,0.0003775886,0.8641686,0.002456905,0.00209059,0.002359755,0.0001481618,0.0002611378,0.1072887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772916,0.000009798041,0.01831294,0.0004388847,0.0004896424,0.00002298507,0.00001418038,0.00003740887,0.003382541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901140760","doi":"10.1109/iemcon.2018.8614771","title":"A Voice Controlled E-Commerce Web Application","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Web application; IBM; Analytics; User interface; Web service; Serviceability (structure); Service (business)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02141595217772369,"gpt":0.3371757008495896,"spread":0.3157597486718659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000631267,0.00006542471,0.0001392162,0.00002753749,0.0002986697,0.0001654204,0.0002978668,0.0000507523,0.000667662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005974587,0.00005373902,0.00007084349,0.0002187889,0.0008254086,0.000492101,0.00004279877,0.00003611113,0.001509349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007213321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001082243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001981426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01669626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999091,0.00007529123,0.0001790801,0.0001917572,0.0002582713,0.0002045695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992409,0.0002331713,0.00004849546,0.0002236917,0.0001684765,0.0000852081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001362549,0.000235927,0.01968082,0.000009254993,0.00002241014,8.279191e-8,0.005769758,1.58217e-7,0.0002486307,0.9425567,0.007243386,0.02409662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002769046,0.0001369311,0.007036811,0.00000993394,0.00002768823,3.156616e-7,0.02401956,0.0006977322,0.0002796909,0.1755714,0.7890703,0.0003805432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2605679,0.000009673593,0.0002821191,0.002450626,0.00009516627,0.0003978669,0.000002575639,0.0001878749,0.7360062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767427,0.000001862641,0.0001729933,0.0006175711,0.0003120341,0.00007333273,0.0000018908,0.000005415472,0.02207218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7818269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030064064","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2012.578","title":"The Missing Link: Intention to Produce Online Content Accessible to People with Disabilities by Non-professionals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Perception; Computer science; Psychology; Test (biology); Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Universal design; Applied psychology; Multimedia; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06708564413744972,"gpt":0.3699209344348136,"spread":0.3028352902973639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551581,0.0002097895,0.0002508782,0.00004991649,0.001115587,0.0006921068,0.0006747798,0.00007033395,0.000256095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002944192,0.0001199086,0.00008743568,0.0006037111,0.0004441803,0.001917105,0.0002927073,0.0001390709,0.0001212824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001894353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005369102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02470952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973657,0.0001643882,0.0004331346,0.0004086,0.0007955472,0.0008326346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977866,0.0007288636,0.00009331578,0.0004858836,0.0003871526,0.0005181493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033916,0.001952488,0.7207124,0.000147399,0.00007000116,1.41898e-7,0.121576,0.000004769127,0.001102685,0.02179282,0.0377095,0.09459261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003632183,0.0003198553,0.17875,0.0003431969,0.00003350728,9.721524e-7,0.7424541,0.00001446742,0.004174392,0.005192637,0.06761196,0.0007416388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031437,0.0001185086,0.0003562219,0.07099169,0.0005789647,0.001305868,0.00004277037,0.0001416274,0.02332063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471746,0.000005324592,0.0008078754,0.00127308,0.0003009333,0.0001544479,0.00002278697,0.00002241717,0.05023853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6208781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097625210","doi":"10.1177/0265532211404195","title":"Test review: ACCESS for ELLs <sup>®</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Testing","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ell; Psychology; Test (biology); Language proficiency; Mathematics education; Teaching method; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1337333077180752,"gpt":0.3811891609412508,"spread":0.2474558532231756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037435,0.00014157,0.0002274705,0.00003839436,0.0003029229,0.0002027643,0.0007528855,0.00005873586,0.00052089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02243293,0.0001296657,0.0001051325,0.0004351246,0.0002944165,0.001050471,0.0001460225,0.0000910075,0.00007847642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007245631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001149795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003177557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005711977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985617,0.00005889945,0.0003228203,0.0003198603,0.0002648245,0.0004718684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997835,0.001400597,0.0001316215,0.0003184953,0.0001832787,0.0001309501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002309784,0.0008700556,0.4358202,0.004529818,0.00005005013,0.00003362805,0.1875175,0.000008624997,0.0001629313,0.01352007,0.01677255,0.3406915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004293988,0.001884846,0.06081007,0.02067779,0.001044333,0.0000512759,0.4171112,0.003021856,0.006448138,0.2746371,0.2019059,0.008113514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2912447,0.003688116,0.00007261761,0.0003570868,0.0001154107,0.001334959,0.00007815366,0.0006427832,0.7024662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862995,0.00005961528,0.006145985,0.001249018,0.0004111899,0.0001500319,0.00001587488,0.00003567201,0.005633131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.696833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092264259","doi":"10.1145/1085313.1085320","title":"Accessibility of graphics in technical documentation for the cognitive and visually impaired","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"IBM (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; The Internet; Graphics; Documentation; World Wide Web; XHTML; Multimedia; Presentation (obstetrics); Retrievability; Cognition; Internet privacy; XML; Human–computer interaction; Markup language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03723107448193877,"gpt":0.4022739519822331,"spread":0.3650428775002944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317435,0.00006047706,0.0001112444,0.00003950884,0.0001261562,0.0001093289,0.0001705614,0.00005573949,0.00006887553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001248958,0.0000416092,0.00005541571,0.0002439908,0.00101326,0.0009880415,0.00005310964,0.00004825335,7.20782e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000602017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008707446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04262568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999115,0.0000670993,0.0002748552,0.0001816487,0.0002067674,0.0001546129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982203,0.001465584,0.00006822382,0.00008996248,0.0001196658,0.0000362374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002868308,0.0006883156,0.5097254,0.00009310726,0.00002482744,9.063828e-8,0.01578049,0.00000275867,0.0001189376,0.3113461,0.00010161,0.1618316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009238299,0.0001450843,0.8016862,0.00003510986,0.00002839732,2.079967e-7,0.03956767,0.0002353815,0.0008120991,0.1559564,0.0004518349,0.0001578371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798484,0.00006948033,0.000435534,0.001550269,0.00002222651,0.0009189865,0.00001638032,0.00003505471,0.01710366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992638,0.00002756209,0.0002740422,0.0001261037,0.00002747817,0.00008143273,0.00000308133,0.000003433234,0.000193025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2919608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888264706","doi":"10.1002/leap.1197","title":"An assessment of the accessibility of PDF versions of selected journal articles published in a WCAG 2.0 era (2014–2018)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Screen reader; Workflow; Adobe; Information retrieval; Visually impaired; Multimedia; Library science; Database; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03531294135233561,"gpt":0.3693097138274648,"spread":0.3339967724751292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006764801,0.0001343973,0.0003790981,0.0002420812,0.0003383206,0.001668409,0.001962738,0.0001750937,0.00180898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01517221,0.0001011913,0.0001600343,0.002182056,0.001684941,0.01285462,0.0003121099,0.0004811759,0.000002456492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002866524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001595454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006829972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959008,0.001055282,0.001044692,0.0003588486,0.001180511,0.0004598954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961275,0.0005632876,0.0008911716,0.0007245971,0.001514738,0.0001786581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005367326,0.0007148552,0.9697407,0.00006058961,0.00002894083,2.734201e-7,0.01325454,0.00002554244,0.002086146,0.007763144,0.001268709,0.005002812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005480562,0.0001701403,0.9219065,0.0001127395,0.00002013495,7.211125e-7,0.02294083,0.0003727242,0.003049168,0.05031234,0.0004289638,0.0001376186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541217,0.00002192754,0.00003947469,0.002845799,0.0003574681,0.0002695636,0.00001700516,0.0000287417,0.04229831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987544,0.000004888763,0.000846395,0.00005215563,0.0001261176,0.000005069113,0.00000487033,0.00001064232,0.0001954389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04783421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981956847","doi":"","title":"Public access to research data in language documentation: Challenges and possible strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln)","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canarie","funders":"Universität zu Köln; Volkswagen Foundation","keywords":"Documentation; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3526547041530748,"gpt":0.443558721869071,"spread":0.09090401771599621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003374534,0.0004538335,0.000580671,0.002861778,0.0009899259,0.005837303,0.006142524,0.0005797096,0.001182952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006305555,0.0005660828,0.0001202608,0.002380275,0.0009803351,0.05287568,0.01192737,0.001115291,0.0001718554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00165257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1414677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937271,0.001069779,0.0004339618,0.001947484,0.001685717,0.001135983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952288,0.0007108088,0.000251962,0.002348183,0.0008964306,0.0005637849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000952937,0.0004476354,0.01074108,0.0006559451,0.000230672,0.00007574714,0.1022877,0.000319434,0.00000513462,0.8652292,0.004724151,0.01518806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001205208,0.0001034157,0.06415062,0.0004053387,0.00009519289,0.000001873254,0.7745457,0.0002271967,0.000004565345,0.1090548,0.04903384,0.00117224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4996751,0.002410935,0.0001328563,0.05526434,0.0007448206,0.002453156,0.0005542974,0.000309187,0.4384553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843344,0.001228228,0.0004673794,0.0001284662,0.000168583,0.00001949908,0.001082651,0.00004533226,0.01252544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7561744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}