{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":361,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":361,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ddf3f4342c8a","filters":{"topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement"}},"results":[{"id":"W4393020831","doi":"10.7202/cjeap","title":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":796,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Educational administration; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Higher education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06274158396036893,"gpt":0.4351107334613354,"spread":0.3723691495009665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669934,0.0004620288,0.000666906,0.005082765,0.0005617281,0.002167056,0.0007992268,0.0003707476,0.01122035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004694911,0.0004046627,0.0002753577,0.001261879,0.0004478193,0.0008634697,0.00002318307,0.0008083195,0.0005106766],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001395456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3041648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03636357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.243216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952775,0.0002353005,0.002360503,0.0004474278,0.001132899,0.0005463897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990369,0.001359616,0.002028375,0.0003123246,0.002745919,0.003184805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002735425,0.00008422317,0.004048428,0.0000773287,0.0001560131,0.000009655507,0.001434333,0.00001041399,0.00002586191,0.1591621,0.8315051,0.003459135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003491921,0.0007611738,0.03095579,0.0003289513,0.0001174028,0.001873231,0.001446312,0.000009475394,0.00005795161,0.0974414,0.866217,0.0004421756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09809518,0.01284457,0.00003357468,0.781904,0.01358362,0.000522425,0.001942932,0.000002010173,0.09107165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.792788,0.0003900202,0.000468182,0.002120352,0.01316965,0.0000129677,0.0003299668,0.00003880086,0.1906821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7797837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019919421","doi":"10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z","title":"Large-scale reform comes of age","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Scale (ratio); Aside; Government (linguistics); Literacy; Period (music); Political science; Education reform; Public administration; Economic growth; Higher education; Economics; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1772283069319048,"gpt":0.4583744611215807,"spread":0.2811461541896759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001632937,0.0000844203,0.0002405944,0.000364547,0.00006494678,0.00005499301,0.0004957635,0.00003500187,0.001659849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004076166,0.00005642381,0.0001570835,0.0004115826,0.00003294116,0.000565487,0.00002569701,0.0001154783,0.00003772057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003166509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009277891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001905558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975868,0.00004670291,0.0008031403,0.0001149728,0.001302514,0.0001458242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975007,0.0003933853,0.0008515788,0.0001917166,0.0009443402,0.0001182708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003007728,0.01029624,0.2349298,0.00004596442,0.0001911703,0.000009253528,0.03506488,0.00001411504,0.009559762,0.2656198,0.3851776,0.05879064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003340156,0.0003933495,0.8285917,0.00003727142,0.00001413195,0.00001890724,0.00558106,0.00001367042,0.0004715245,0.1187635,0.04569407,0.00008676898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8923149,0.0007392917,0.00009519603,0.08910476,0.0017397,0.00013404,0.00002196013,0.000002077984,0.01584808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905586,0.00004143809,0.002359566,0.001519577,0.001381466,0.000003835319,0.000008150595,0.000003666581,0.004123659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5936619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W111764503","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_34","title":"Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3653124517781081,"gpt":0.4527251577660352,"spread":0.08741270598792711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001644487,0.0002392318,0.0003943227,0.001007191,0.00005857984,0.0004213543,0.001799761,0.0001015971,0.04247398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000340032,0.0001741877,0.0000643406,0.0002370696,0.00003217935,0.0005854323,0.0005586076,0.0004521074,0.01143101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001451096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001735711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001997537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007418939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963124,0.00002234714,0.000873198,0.0008713476,0.001689045,0.0002316153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973682,0.0006563324,0.0002896939,0.00142078,0.0001649838,0.00009999433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002034881,0.00003327595,0.00206414,0.00000276131,0.00001551878,0.000004574159,0.00002925939,0.000001854958,0.000005901356,0.2309409,0.7420434,0.02485639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001086136,0.00001297293,0.0004352341,0.00005517508,0.000007867833,6.49132e-7,0.00007642571,0.0001771358,0.000004403128,0.1244706,0.8744316,0.0002193493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008257171,0.0002179866,0.0001172678,0.004544251,0.0005956963,0.0002591057,0.00003720549,0.00002169535,0.9941242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003746623,0.00005051873,0.001884883,0.0009294818,0.0003304837,0.000009277358,0.00008733172,0.00002052373,0.9929409],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1323881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035232611","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3001","title":"To know is not enough: research knowledge and its use","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Knowledge production; Process (computing); Knowledge creation; Knowledge management; Production (economics); Educational research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Business; Social science; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Downstream (manufacturing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3999012410373326,"gpt":0.5852096756919933,"spread":0.1853084346546607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002917854,0.00007705008,0.0001966856,0.0002486614,0.0000878364,0.0001507354,0.0003272761,0.00002520447,0.002271074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00456896,0.00005519326,0.00004303653,0.0009393134,0.00002678121,0.0006063787,0.0001134292,0.00008001518,0.002389525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006292846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006381522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007621568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004751767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980144,0.0002356017,0.0005098255,0.0003040914,0.00078073,0.0001553406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995548,0.001024305,0.0001378816,0.000399242,0.002736798,0.000153795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.151362e-7,0.0002231008,0.001457396,0.0004416947,0.000003406668,5.468551e-9,0.0005958749,2.238254e-8,0.001472527,0.00710258,0.706139,0.2825635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000329396,0.00007419522,0.06269713,0.001640814,0.000006463368,5.665348e-7,0.0004134134,0.00001430451,0.001490306,0.00213327,0.9314201,0.00007648697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7452517,0.1251534,0.00002018266,0.1138907,0.001152046,0.00264831,0.00001106328,0.000009830916,0.01186269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784981,0.05324532,0.002460333,0.00631635,0.0003830941,0.0006036961,0.00001502,0.00001393305,0.05846412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.282487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066817954","doi":"10.1007/s10833-009-9107-0","title":"The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Education and Child Care","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Evidence-based policy; Evidence-based practice; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3932935653185909,"gpt":0.5261540201418202,"spread":0.1328604548232293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299595,0.00008727959,0.0001611459,0.000425708,0.00008761026,0.0001306586,0.0004172621,0.00003181281,0.00004781547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02751985,0.00005095101,0.00005812523,0.0007569363,0.0000627609,0.002930938,0.0000295562,0.0001546304,0.000004125791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002015137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007882891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002860189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975715,0.00019526,0.000878055,0.0001477642,0.001065984,0.0001414634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884903,0.008553541,0.0012261,0.000195859,0.00143645,0.00009771236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003951479,0.002244523,0.2990164,0.00002591072,0.00004880906,0.000001780675,0.008625169,0.00001757196,0.004693375,0.3018073,0.02408736,0.3590367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001301299,0.0002321391,0.8794424,0.0001576636,0.00001326737,0.0000708551,0.007579931,0.00001692004,0.0001030885,0.08375751,0.02842191,0.00007420011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5887353,0.007754461,0.000009803339,0.4016999,0.0007506368,0.000156324,0.000001768156,8.324423e-7,0.0008909829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891065,0.001453552,0.001904732,0.005092603,0.001579938,0.00001219206,0.000001127045,0.000003663029,0.0008456342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.580426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156855199","doi":"10.3102/01623737022004357","title":"Power and Politics in the Adoption of School Reform Models","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Education reform; Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Process (computing); Public administration; Sustainability; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public relations; Economic growth; Economics; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1507326485546578,"gpt":0.4970251549872353,"spread":0.3462925064325775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003470145,0.00007908913,0.000148176,0.0007426881,0.0001171077,0.0001127883,0.0001760139,0.0000350368,0.004391372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005240427,0.0000517356,0.00006793295,0.001545968,0.00007681164,0.0003648571,0.00001471655,0.00006577664,0.00003318929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006006098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009195157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001460981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976767,0.0002693984,0.0004950807,0.0002181314,0.001228353,0.0001123183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986128,0.0004865942,0.0001471353,0.0002515222,0.0004305583,0.00007145171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002588093,0.0005600401,0.07123416,0.000007285634,0.000235086,4.440465e-8,0.01045673,0.007152297,0.00005195538,0.8724257,0.003659745,0.03419104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001590738,0.0000230046,0.6872438,0.000002921161,0.0001035493,9.491096e-7,0.002757199,0.02301989,0.000003392797,0.2850631,0.001566708,0.00005651563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124329,0.0002161416,0.00007056484,0.05434098,0.00003065908,0.0001792052,0.00001613711,0.000001767463,0.03271164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951637,0.00008668088,0.0003222642,0.001396429,0.0001311354,0.00004322462,0.00006431201,0.00000231335,0.002789975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6160096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118924728","doi":"10.14507/epaa.v12n56.2004","title":"Making research matter more","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Value (mathematics); Educational research; Sociology; Element (criminal law); Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3053672443206844,"gpt":0.6016219892569954,"spread":0.296254744936311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001525471,0.0001257254,0.0002241318,0.00397773,0.0004373769,0.0004854876,0.0008253636,0.000029906,0.001632453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009971955,0.00009755907,0.0002562804,0.005403489,0.0002329409,0.0003423165,0.0001600116,0.0001986716,0.001257658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001676525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006479518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001000472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967204,0.0003052578,0.0005719846,0.0005352335,0.001497183,0.000369963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976968,0.0008726667,0.0001924515,0.0007921144,0.0002983803,0.0001476579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471118,0.001611863,0.4376106,0.00001218555,0.0006320691,6.693452e-7,0.03103132,0.003244887,0.001858737,0.4064234,0.04888357,0.06866597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000725633,0.00001591818,0.6043305,0.0000100079,0.00004654279,8.769354e-7,0.007434803,0.00009158769,0.0002238969,0.3630957,0.02457117,0.0001063948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6173674,0.0001526901,0.007390509,0.2308278,0.0003454097,0.000289448,0.00001509446,0.00002860088,0.143583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672304,0.00001044217,0.005138713,0.00301981,0.0007443626,0.00008043399,0.00003466352,0.000009233914,0.02373198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3498629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091552216","doi":"10.1080/14748460.2011.550431","title":"Mobilising research knowledge in education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Review of Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); State (computer science); Empirical research; Sociology; Educational research; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.407933284586701,"gpt":0.576233315392721,"spread":0.1683000308060201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007715979,0.0001013061,0.0002621269,0.0006990224,0.00006672,0.00003806226,0.0005917936,0.00004319788,0.001630737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002418287,0.00008029906,0.00007934022,0.002131665,0.00008072807,0.0004502528,0.00007779567,0.000172956,0.0003493602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002042988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003177577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003044048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006632625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969744,0.0005817558,0.0009926416,0.0003796675,0.0008720065,0.0001995054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964533,0.0005682732,0.0003308978,0.0006527152,0.001908127,0.00008671301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007400994,0.003042765,0.03020385,0.001134698,0.000003982726,4.264136e-8,0.002139361,9.031233e-8,0.0004597965,0.03425477,0.08453662,0.8442166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002202461,0.0002406213,0.416658,0.01266064,0.00002333672,0.000004240006,0.01590086,0.00002160709,0.003337885,0.1314476,0.419163,0.0003219146],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5391193,0.1990334,0.00005471957,0.002985354,0.003732553,0.001754294,0.000002351813,0.0000136056,0.2533044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652146,0.01961536,0.004116885,0.0009041055,0.0002841849,0.0005203863,0.00003401026,0.00001524349,0.009295208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8438947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010090529","doi":"10.3102/0013189x035002013","title":"What Doesn’t Work: The Challenge and Failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to Conduct Meaningful Reviews of Studies of Mathematics Curricula","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Researcher","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Curriculum; Work (physics); Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3994733679764119,"gpt":0.5175000983925453,"spread":0.1180267304161334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004973921,0.0001132128,0.0003087953,0.0001264691,0.0001204857,0.0002393553,0.0007631048,0.00003822761,0.0005322295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003923567,0.00005219886,0.0001055031,0.000842619,0.0004313643,0.0007377992,0.0003601458,0.0001790508,0.00001771693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005458482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002654236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004503142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001288241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968477,0.0003215508,0.0007647784,0.0002493097,0.001637208,0.0001793771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945555,0.003189765,0.0004403958,0.0006070318,0.00115248,0.0000548365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006406637,0.004432121,0.07518371,0.0009382174,0.0003710126,2.519292e-7,0.08234047,0.0003098447,0.005119503,0.156494,0.5548887,0.1198581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004705042,0.0002208264,0.282986,0.006396703,0.00006780002,0.000002501336,0.3565649,0.00003487425,0.003451424,0.2985481,0.05092215,0.0003341218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8368778,0.03206743,0.00001747871,0.1291611,0.0006607051,0.0008347096,0.000002695555,0.000002299722,0.0003758139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843219,0.006782876,0.002553019,0.0002513074,0.000284453,0.0001327475,0.000002889678,0.00001328381,0.005657546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.582754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770613859","doi":"10.3102/0013189x17743488","title":"The Dilemmas of Educational Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Researcher","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Dilemma; Accountability; Competition (biology); Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Test (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3390799236725423,"gpt":0.5682681978393833,"spread":0.229188274166841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004471227,0.00009043478,0.0001133631,0.0001229394,0.00154728,0.0007211718,0.002364201,0.00003766184,0.009055066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01683889,0.00005165418,0.00009866594,0.000183781,0.0006007132,0.0005208091,0.0003105878,0.0001770625,0.00077599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002407793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002611188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006413247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003158948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963007,0.0001248665,0.0004932161,0.000295149,0.00250976,0.0002763288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921476,0.004467405,0.0004170707,0.00130632,0.001508712,0.0001529409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000234242,0.0002510733,0.1019856,0.000003553161,0.00002462877,3.72876e-8,0.0001854033,9.535678e-7,0.0002884584,0.6289582,0.2568373,0.01144148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007377245,0.00002042071,0.6091689,0.00000667356,0.000001456881,5.290489e-7,0.000440929,0.00001867359,0.0001993966,0.2700512,0.1199729,0.00004506706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1880477,0.0002745672,0.00001071988,0.5431353,0.001832623,0.0002556436,0.00002934646,0.000002548785,0.2664115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7713133,0.00003301425,0.0004735083,0.0001031071,0.00101707,0.0001083008,0.00002057508,0.000007079642,0.226924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5832657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550403609","doi":"10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1","title":"The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Scale (ratio); Literacy; Focus (optics); Core (optical fiber); Political science; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Pedagogy; Telecommunications; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06217200803353029,"gpt":0.4137523916548771,"spread":0.3515803836213468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002430544,0.00009802912,0.0001913109,0.0003632544,0.00009263941,0.00006765359,0.0006641226,0.00006343336,0.0001629951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001410524,0.00004550401,0.0001153949,0.0004504426,0.00006402123,0.0005476598,0.00005443892,0.0001560291,0.00003521437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004495919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001649655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002666318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005462687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972803,0.000107237,0.001011225,0.0001535964,0.001292361,0.0001552932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946225,0.002019706,0.001287382,0.0002619266,0.001721401,0.00008710496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858935,0.001897577,0.167802,0.00006085203,0.0001043262,8.631001e-7,0.002954751,0.000003210467,0.02540059,0.2767202,0.1314634,0.3934064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008288908,0.0004895019,0.7383592,0.0005845494,0.00002528518,0.00003024941,0.02259486,0.00001213017,0.003270173,0.07103692,0.1625749,0.0001934095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416994,0.002734051,0.0000367649,0.1465079,0.006695717,0.0003691993,0.00002102532,0.000001629002,0.001934331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941268,0.00008250322,0.000262252,0.000371068,0.001623807,0.00005822429,0.000002190698,0.000006125597,0.003467011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5705572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2926418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983949565","doi":"10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x","title":"Using data to support educational improvement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ministry of Education and Child Care","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Data science; Knowledge management; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5729116068459882,"gpt":0.5914743349389096,"spread":0.01856272809292137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009523775,0.0002822558,0.000309444,0.0003668474,0.0007907636,0.0003798606,0.001150019,0.00006906506,0.01716572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002532561,0.0002437913,0.00007075669,0.0008388679,0.0001724385,0.001773869,0.0006156723,0.0001842769,0.0002764126],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008636583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007289428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002441478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001137195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923185,0.0003259483,0.001205736,0.001406622,0.004377117,0.0003661245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938186,0.001460957,0.0004173559,0.001571877,0.002373523,0.0003577132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003351561,0.002356694,0.8399504,0.00001828512,0.00007072533,1.725713e-7,0.001082572,0.0003208209,0.005371096,0.01199339,0.09438781,0.04441447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004879148,0.0001286852,0.9345005,0.000007925356,0.00004411086,0.00001434336,0.001179701,0.01157585,0.00006393185,0.03753353,0.01414955,0.0003139248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519051,0.00005192179,0.001440684,0.03811243,0.001870631,0.001457268,0.0001948144,0.00001774548,0.00494946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707683,0.00000981536,0.02274924,0.002447888,0.0008855059,0.0002988775,0.0009421558,0.00001608073,0.001882176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09455007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47101223","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0015.003","title":"Predictors of Educator’s Valuing of Systematic Inquiry in Schools","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variance (accounting); Relevance (law); Exploratory research; Medical education; Value (mathematics); Medicine; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3838212522965732,"gpt":0.506814129178217,"spread":0.1229928768816438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01226135,0.00008603389,0.0003629735,0.00114575,0.00003830417,0.000092401,0.0004479513,0.00005095997,0.0002875268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005816371,0.00006633748,0.0001119014,0.001033022,0.00006732433,0.0004697507,0.000009429882,0.000136373,0.000006611624],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004018026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00583431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007502328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003509972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957548,0.0004723785,0.001693326,0.0001279275,0.001767239,0.0001842955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955229,0.0003093847,0.001399272,0.0002383448,0.002264174,0.0002659544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001390649,0.000208385,0.9505356,0.0003700196,0.00006379027,0.000002927648,0.004715934,0.0007688257,0.0003358633,0.0004640937,0.001809667,0.04071101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001421502,0.001175078,0.9218672,0.004734701,0.0002620705,0.00004883312,0.04621554,0.004375058,0.0006013688,0.01825941,0.0008147054,0.0002245636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955839,0.0008773927,0.0001405759,0.0006167907,0.001340484,0.001086473,0.000002169075,0.000001520005,0.0003507077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985282,0.000008369994,0.001156202,0.00002356178,0.0001630163,0.00005298762,0.000002932559,0.000005643511,0.00005910895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0414996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159234700","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v14i3.103","title":"Lodico, M., Spaulding, D. &amp; Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bass (fish); Mathematics education; Action research; Graduate students; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6915520625741661,"gpt":0.631627214069601,"spread":0.05992484850456514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09543531,0.0001528299,0.0002932973,0.003311508,0.001022874,0.001284131,0.00177682,0.0001395867,0.01093669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07643433,0.0001089287,0.0000925909,0.003259613,0.0005533023,0.001295517,0.0001286904,0.002208525,0.001385621],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01816937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07896779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3005852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9848658,0.007602756,0.001040564,0.0004263737,0.005239356,0.0008251626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662159,0.02164443,0.0004330474,0.000815473,0.009055453,0.001835681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001938759,0.0001426986,0.004675479,0.000002497629,0.00004604589,0.00001124803,0.003796428,0.0003026846,0.0009408788,0.004485611,0.9621369,0.0232656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003129944,0.0002104232,0.05159333,0.00004263223,0.000007679584,0.00003374139,0.01671162,0.00003215549,0.0002548337,0.2007224,0.7299717,0.000106487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3587092,0.002883629,0.02360695,0.5464849,0.0168166,0.001736561,0.0001675883,0.000009701861,0.0495849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8256921,0.0001068128,0.09395421,0.003537682,0.008776634,0.0001773376,0.00005605787,0.00007532135,0.06762382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5429472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629552702","doi":"","title":"A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1018781136707829,"gpt":0.3945997738268004,"spread":0.2927216601560175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003647301,0.0001888208,0.0004904128,0.0002676004,0.0002194831,0.0000369455,0.0006099731,0.0007158848,0.001465472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009252267,0.0001091322,0.00004136607,0.0001487787,0.001504646,0.00006935352,0.0001446872,0.000836831,0.00004317977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001550774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001622668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1196885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7830043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970909,0.0005422095,0.0005326782,0.000530145,0.0009083619,0.0003957549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975129,0.001609853,0.0001557032,0.0003224299,0.0001152553,0.0002838813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002085293,0.0002301322,0.7528662,0.00002976855,0.00003277008,0.0005411875,0.006868236,1.413601e-8,2.244185e-7,0.132821,0.05904402,0.04754554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274559,0.0003553173,0.5012596,0.00003974765,0.00002092914,0.0007085939,0.0005523979,0.0001637023,2.817664e-7,0.2253306,0.270687,0.000254513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5820104,0.01111257,0.00001431424,0.1334464,0.00362026,0.001691416,0.00009075182,0.00002255496,0.2679913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240671,0.001921349,0.00002416521,0.02583272,0.0004701787,0.0002386995,0.0001303156,0.00001167079,0.04730383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6633158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563351758","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-09-2016-0022","title":"The school as a learning organisation: a review revisiting and extending a timely concept","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Point (geometry); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1365991319840879,"gpt":0.4823095961498968,"spread":0.345710464165809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131882,0.0002739104,0.001104402,0.0001429635,0.00227002,0.0003660338,0.000875535,0.0001082181,0.0006253308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008356812,0.0001163088,0.0002878088,0.0002521556,0.000217442,0.0005133022,0.0007037517,0.00232632,0.00007045682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001174733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001104941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006013437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.958651e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922437,0.004416188,0.001680149,0.0001766193,0.001276315,0.0002070019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859765,0.009992145,0.00276982,0.0003197523,0.0007027906,0.0002390524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077775,0.00004181561,0.00005260312,0.001385303,0.00006800229,0.000003090038,0.0004938695,9.013416e-9,0.000002026143,0.001363976,0.003357185,0.9932243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001729461,0.000259039,0.0002745199,0.06140974,0.0001655945,0.0004013511,0.006004725,6.306795e-7,3.916636e-7,0.01388303,0.9172481,0.0001798862],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001442934,0.9938397,0.00001176661,0.003293873,0.000506081,0.0003510461,0.000006560007,0.000005070244,0.0005430154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001173376,0.9922815,0.00008783086,0.0003358095,0.0005127122,0.00001722432,0.000005647695,0.00001521194,0.005570676],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327834449","doi":"10.1332/174426413x662806","title":"Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: a cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organisations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence & Policy","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Scope (computer science); Business; Sample (material); Linkage (software); Public relations; Non profit; Profit (economics); Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3146913365958519,"gpt":0.6042387864213071,"spread":0.2895474498254552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007654686,0.0001062788,0.0002578441,0.0009562565,0.0003025565,0.0002853951,0.0005646845,0.00005072255,0.0002185209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01787951,0.00009416107,0.00007444844,0.007580128,0.0001734864,0.0008139643,0.000173769,0.0001661321,0.00003293815],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001126625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005649509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8164812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966003,0.0005021538,0.0008302674,0.000441494,0.001273457,0.0003523079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935013,0.003900886,0.0002596431,0.0006821446,0.001520421,0.0001355909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121208,0.0003378519,0.87848,0.00002360689,0.00004864232,0.000001320435,0.01884232,0.001543372,0.002877882,0.01110589,0.003200154,0.08352686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009858884,0.00004624241,0.9731705,0.00005367432,0.00002224988,0.000003904151,0.01127371,0.005085331,0.001439479,0.004621253,0.004064811,0.0001202581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994948,0.0001632775,0.0002506145,0.003111043,0.0002351744,0.0002344858,0.00001301552,0.000006975833,0.001037409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997328,0.00001576483,0.0002097538,0.0001625131,0.0002554747,0.000080404,0.000008855017,0.000007102693,0.001932174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1297712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056904549","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2011.630849","title":"Analyzing Educational Policies: A Learning Design Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Knowledge management; Bridge (graph theory); Mathematics education; Sample (material); Learning sciences; Management science; Psychology; Educational technology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2615281290588068,"gpt":0.4602500111288912,"spread":0.1987218820700845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00891626,0.0001027687,0.0001838689,0.0004281339,0.001011284,0.0003534393,0.001550953,0.00002831934,0.0007398166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009649072,0.00005365379,0.0001965417,0.00146033,0.0003779407,0.0007514262,0.00012661,0.0004810555,0.00004897248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000996519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008867172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004356393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965856,0.0007357,0.0005862282,0.00022026,0.001637677,0.0002344988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958788,0.001673318,0.001257763,0.0001401197,0.0009594045,0.0000906321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000440565,0.0002478534,0.8755863,0.000002073719,0.00007764973,0.000001264484,0.03692544,0.0327635,0.00255534,0.04213253,0.00511229,0.004551723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974563,0.001119165,0.620158,0.00009793919,0.0000524297,0.00009904854,0.1162825,0.003389561,0.001540355,0.2509673,0.005735705,0.0002605781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246664,0.0005443164,0.01339621,0.02648792,0.002057757,0.000155056,3.033162e-7,0.00001293816,0.03267908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853619,0.00001316646,0.006989233,0.0001757337,0.0003231885,0.000001720868,3.204487e-8,0.000004455046,0.007130613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2554283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159089846","doi":"","title":"Educational Research in Educational Practice: Predictors of Use","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational research; Explanatory power; Psychology; Medical education; Practitioner research; Pedagogy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3968927095728387,"gpt":0.575716112335675,"spread":0.1788234027628363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00759319,0.00007225404,0.0001270625,0.0006734654,0.00008524572,0.0001666617,0.0004866885,0.00004232255,0.004371619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089122,0.00005420057,0.00004030877,0.001199392,0.000140615,0.001088967,0.0001050326,0.0001676887,0.0003819767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001186713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004226517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001010518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958827,0.0005396684,0.000644603,0.0003458012,0.002375675,0.0002115695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741011,0.02360051,0.0001812246,0.0004165549,0.00160099,0.00009960611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001492098,0.0007642682,0.5355393,0.000002936134,0.0000065376,2.089497e-8,0.0003008506,0.00002151346,0.000388928,0.3670145,0.0941569,0.001789319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001523601,0.00007279036,0.7644584,0.00001092281,0.00000189081,0.000001068671,0.001295878,0.0002298847,0.0001312894,0.1063621,0.1272232,0.00006033038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7719356,0.00002793579,0.0001563263,0.1016136,0.0009947318,0.0002592123,0.00000604915,0.000003633202,0.1250029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569076,0.000006361241,0.006474411,0.0004157873,0.0003900715,0.00005563031,0.00001828505,0.0000051487,0.03572667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2606524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070716600","doi":"10.1207/s15430421tip4502_2","title":"Organizational Learning in Schools and School Systems: Improving Learning, Teaching, and Leading","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Into Practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; School system; Pedagogy; Psychology; Organizational learning; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02062466405053192,"gpt":0.3650704326940655,"spread":0.3444457686435335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01280436,0.0001509792,0.0001994935,0.0003082764,0.0005913248,0.001052658,0.0002077667,0.00006848947,0.0002044079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03994291,0.0001288098,0.00001717745,0.00030305,0.00006573529,0.001787512,0.0001750948,0.00099765,0.0001959936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002059621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000733875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002575759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961749,0.001875419,0.0005462682,0.0004655209,0.000715545,0.0002223175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935019,0.005476669,0.0004657248,0.0001641943,0.0002921293,0.00009937068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001028691,0.0001854697,0.3407481,0.00004102137,0.00002918858,0.000008366622,0.002716589,0.001221791,0.01350109,0.6234664,0.001496365,0.01648267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002213811,0.0006408311,0.07307164,0.0002677657,0.0001258667,0.0002204325,0.1920542,0.01530241,0.0005171199,0.503203,0.211195,0.0011879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363576,0.001238606,0.006294259,0.004315093,0.0003051644,0.0003427557,7.878648e-7,0.00008697881,0.05105876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745181,0.00001837249,0.003611942,0.0002495441,0.0002395535,0.00001725818,0.000006863461,0.00001819837,0.02132022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2676765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162600991","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.523793","title":"Governments and education reform: some lessons from the last 50 years","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Education policy; Evidence-based policy; Public administration; Education reform; Focus (optics); Public relations; Economic growth; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06010694855741876,"gpt":0.4466992463021345,"spread":0.3865922977447158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104029,0.00008950748,0.0001323078,0.000208003,0.0001387976,0.0003299273,0.0005437401,0.00004836443,0.0002889717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001290656,0.00005465331,0.00006965463,0.0002988648,0.00007477301,0.0008091961,0.00006528999,0.0002738003,0.00006636749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002221243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003467323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007117414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001113277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998161,0.00007110823,0.0005639332,0.000148973,0.0009288276,0.0001261932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979701,0.0003769746,0.0007640149,0.0003242927,0.0004033723,0.0001612515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002166841,0.001052253,0.07757869,0.000002739601,0.00004974724,1.409682e-7,0.003140141,0.00000112641,0.01342328,0.1485288,0.2537872,0.5024142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001122709,0.00003249942,0.667879,0.00001299705,0.00001185704,0.00001094507,0.005766009,0.000002092125,0.0001752327,0.1098598,0.2160837,0.00005355799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.912162,0.00021517,0.00001587427,0.0796093,0.00371532,0.00008960647,0.00001288496,0.000002409119,0.004177434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846908,0.00009931606,0.001341576,0.004666935,0.004328663,0.000008960649,0.000005409942,0.000007909819,0.004850438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976592601","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006","title":"Towards a culture of inquiry for data use in schools: Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional interruption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies In Educational Evaluation","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Context (archaeology); Interrupt; Psychology; Cognition; Professional development; Professional learning community; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6261356046479121,"gpt":0.6152237617204723,"spread":0.01091184292743974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006410231,0.0001816397,0.0003085441,0.0004248333,0.0001988042,0.000131089,0.0006383477,0.00008579212,0.0008905276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266252,0.0001424045,0.00007444229,0.0008044334,0.0001898691,0.002994863,0.0003768601,0.0002820936,0.00003279109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006380085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001559298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000301485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002597026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953836,0.0005143115,0.001225193,0.0006690272,0.001963032,0.0002448594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938967,0.001626312,0.0006183388,0.0004212922,0.003382054,0.00005535666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002282535,0.001393693,0.6410271,0.0001699273,0.0002892593,2.102071e-7,0.09045049,0.004427765,0.002267256,0.03118856,0.1548406,0.07371683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144853,0.000116368,0.5327826,0.0004131242,0.00003397467,0.00000214785,0.1774884,0.02236508,0.00004878639,0.2629205,0.002454131,0.000230111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795668,0.0008599313,0.002061425,0.01014537,0.004626671,0.002169377,0.00004713238,0.00001100515,0.0005122518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819555,0.00006089274,0.01391618,0.0002681821,0.0004000742,0.001447568,0.0008185916,0.00001074125,0.001122236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2317319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9754857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2637316373","doi":"10.1080/00131881.2017.1310364","title":"Developing a knowledge network for applied education research to mobilise evidence in and for educational practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Ministère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interim; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Public relations; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7984463683845637,"gpt":0.7159018534817203,"spread":0.08254451490284342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03655767,0.000157945,0.0002327768,0.001063405,0.002686725,0.001706418,0.00168904,0.00009856758,0.0002049548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1504796,0.0001508229,0.00005342346,0.001216476,0.0003417599,0.00120777,0.0005506538,0.0003984042,0.0002726403],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001054273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02020877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003201405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006433959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945531,0.000524479,0.0007193699,0.001099598,0.002250463,0.0008529165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9185361,0.07071911,0.0002336581,0.001007135,0.009149048,0.0003549001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002954,0.0008161201,0.01292522,0.00007065902,0.00001331219,2.733358e-8,0.002653561,0.00002365842,0.0004190146,0.6229895,0.2958361,0.06395737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002570426,0.0001374732,0.2905356,0.0002093619,0.000002990681,0.000001539995,0.006207483,0.0001558019,0.00008144133,0.4637561,0.2384851,0.0001700977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.285949,0.001957147,0.001740732,0.6754354,0.002962005,0.008560524,0.00003367538,0.000008473443,0.02335303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221965,0.00011447,0.1168335,0.0007709734,0.004381814,0.0180751,0.00006514544,0.00003383259,0.03752864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6746645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041656","doi":"10.1080/09695940802164226","title":"Educational assessment in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Political science; Scale (ratio); Public administration; Multiculturalism; Educational assessment; Regional science; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1406251533691962,"gpt":0.4873947963953773,"spread":0.3467696430261811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003451661,0.0002420646,0.0003079517,0.0007748446,0.0002619664,0.000187493,0.0005265267,0.00006428916,0.0005262162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005543177,0.0002249535,0.00003959303,0.001473195,0.00008588162,0.00165235,0.0001753748,0.0005170541,0.00002473625],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00340097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07757267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.701249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5307347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952347,0.0008067368,0.001220214,0.0006697995,0.00163473,0.0004337633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899126,0.00821395,0.0006158214,0.0005501459,0.0004694066,0.0002380547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002175097,0.001274644,0.6957066,0.00001134497,0.00001565164,0.000004390798,0.001261436,0.0002466888,0.00007357115,0.2831981,0.006912924,0.01127289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003232677,0.00003405358,0.7957795,0.00002029313,0.000005895901,0.00006660655,0.01154044,0.0004376271,0.000009466598,0.01391034,0.1776639,0.0002086495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7096179,0.0002043839,0.00009488407,0.16283,0.001205648,0.0005285803,0.00001498225,0.000008729876,0.125495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741686,0.0005398653,0.01223469,0.006482939,0.0004153137,0.0003016885,0.00005448835,0.00001459151,0.005787834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2692878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9276567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031154009","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00097.x","title":"<scp>chapter</scp>3
Evidence in Practice: A Framing of the Terrain","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Framing (construction); Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1422777777405123,"gpt":0.4702803615081581,"spread":0.3280025837676458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007445425,0.00007913998,0.0001281739,0.00006256392,0.0001966738,0.00002425365,0.0009062497,0.00003881057,0.00001453978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009495988,0.00004138002,0.0002478471,0.0005464351,0.0001471519,0.0002512067,0.0001437636,0.0001251455,0.000001333495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005320959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002077383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007617509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971846,0.0000887177,0.000645995,0.0001763333,0.001793093,0.0001112603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988968,0.008565577,0.0009432141,0.0003027275,0.001203581,0.0000168932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001665007,0.01406588,0.388238,0.0001651276,0.001135595,2.734722e-8,0.301066,0.002621801,0.040982,0.1232446,0.08096015,0.04735425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004102803,0.000169339,0.7841137,0.0001178363,0.00008007998,5.768948e-7,0.1747858,0.0004686579,0.002660809,0.02831344,0.008833615,0.0000459022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872028,0.0003338806,0.0003186394,0.006973469,0.0008448266,0.00154489,0.000007824659,0.000002471096,0.002771261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959151,0.00001043424,0.0011803,0.0004175232,0.0001408296,0.00005532901,5.955924e-7,0.000005394009,0.002274546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3958756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322503168","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2182737","title":"Data literacy assessments: a systematic literature review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literacy; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Information literacy; Field (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; Psychology; Medical education; Data science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; MEDLINE","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2563835509897077,"gpt":0.588095050840592,"spread":0.3317114998508843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01693645,0.0002879606,0.0005319071,0.001112119,0.0002346311,0.001416578,0.001494548,0.00009092638,0.0001802076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02707397,0.0002244812,0.00006092557,0.00481967,0.00005403433,0.005758511,0.0008481569,0.0004486456,0.0002416726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003166376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002500518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932129,0.001977629,0.001650778,0.0009884859,0.001748299,0.0004219318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839876,0.01162622,0.00110246,0.002156306,0.0009086838,0.0002187508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006922458,0.00368059,0.01459902,0.04968821,0.0002824512,0.00003850583,0.005548608,0.00003232995,0.0001581655,0.6062237,0.1742519,0.1454274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004375722,0.0001243095,0.0432422,0.02900849,0.0001667067,0.0001674075,0.0112015,0.004123088,0.000003251252,0.02032772,0.8906622,0.0005355408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03455831,0.1235802,0.00164963,0.6338046,0.007024258,0.01093865,0.0007978038,0.0005004221,0.1871461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2766623,0.4786966,0.06798269,0.09411259,0.002858414,0.003702938,0.005563969,0.000144727,0.07027572],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7164104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620181230","doi":"10.1016/s1474-7863(2002)8","title":"School-Based Evaluation: An International Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Advances in program evaluation","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); International school; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2245832923039882,"gpt":0.5851132948064103,"spread":0.3605300025024221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01166566,0.0004137557,0.0004244647,0.001068735,0.000149531,0.0006429388,0.001354033,0.0002639196,0.01645237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005295776,0.00037046,0.000187382,0.0006654823,0.000161085,0.003124133,0.00008962591,0.0005029112,0.0006428837],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004680314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003220249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001022883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002534186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863913,0.0008201777,0.001297082,0.001428261,0.009718569,0.0003446034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902453,0.0006796075,0.001065632,0.0009854659,0.006852121,0.0001718432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003963663,0.000772088,0.002441616,0.000007713144,0.00003211217,0.000001094932,0.0002702093,0.006515202,0.000002175869,0.008905776,0.006723704,0.9742887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001382578,0.0004712549,0.004778758,0.0001147278,0.0001065688,0.000001281318,0.0007484599,0.2110484,0.000007005588,0.3948751,0.3860469,0.0004190411],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007314822,0.006629516,0.000546101,0.002175817,0.004920705,0.007671793,0.00004787759,0.0001152263,0.9771615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.154797,0.001903275,0.05810278,0.002412457,0.008346654,0.03080892,0.008563512,0.0002949154,0.7347705],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281746126","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13246","title":"Conceptions and perspectives of data literacy in secondary education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Technology","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conceptualization; Framing (construction); Competence (human resources); Literacy; Everyday life; Critical literacy; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.079984828869092,"gpt":0.4371178791524661,"spread":0.3571330502833741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001471322,0.00005887963,0.0001911666,0.000937151,0.0001453786,0.00006960959,0.0009662326,0.00003203556,0.002965943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001697376,0.0000663949,0.00003269194,0.0009383613,0.0002001837,0.0007999205,0.0003582557,0.0003717759,0.000002383364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001201323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002498973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006032597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003420906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982168,0.0001268499,0.0007577554,0.0002438826,0.0005549562,0.00009977239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976807,0.0006281323,0.0006310755,0.0002726341,0.0007451457,0.00004235357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002344373,0.002405919,0.1094627,0.000008531496,0.00003740594,0.00000369863,0.002401875,0.00001285371,0.0008384204,0.1026733,0.04415537,0.7379765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004365808,0.0002006081,0.454062,0.00004986006,0.000009049084,0.001559116,0.07418876,0.0000280039,0.00002822345,0.4225198,0.04681234,0.0001055868],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420242,0.01418675,0.00004563732,0.04166634,0.0005874574,0.0001152023,0.0001060427,0.000002476392,0.001265928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920924,0.0003389184,0.006290651,0.0001357216,0.0001232643,0.00002205698,0.00003336371,0.000004637341,0.0009589975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7378709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005343729","doi":"10.1007/s10833-012-9189-y","title":"No one way: Differentiating school district leadership and support for school improvement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"School district; Urban district; Educational leadership; Order (exchange); Qualitative research; Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Business; Socioeconomics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3178365217462274,"gpt":0.4286004817442991,"spread":0.1107639599980717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002335305,0.0001558356,0.0002691787,0.0003177005,0.0001892594,0.0002357129,0.0003530597,0.00005419626,0.003475763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00379729,0.000117174,0.0001479932,0.0002281011,0.00004127509,0.001331673,0.00006685943,0.0001915257,0.0001418226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002397543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004351329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008460971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000278341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972939,0.00004838258,0.0008851083,0.0001970434,0.001205906,0.000369604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959618,0.001284936,0.0009151025,0.0001822729,0.001104486,0.000551438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001838166,0.002974097,0.7934711,0.0001520056,0.0002686026,2.479115e-7,0.001822278,4.732518e-7,0.009311374,0.01834961,0.1234717,0.0499947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007230924,0.0005802212,0.9609389,0.00005582605,0.00006704035,0.00001218106,0.002589151,0.00002443161,0.0004369438,0.009180174,0.02519134,0.0002007459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9157546,0.002740378,0.002389274,0.06518143,0.008988081,0.001377658,0.0001120248,0.00001028757,0.00344624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752903,0.00003631352,0.005295459,0.001832331,0.008218681,0.0001204802,0.00003176825,0.00001496641,0.009159729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114529949","doi":"10.1787/5k9flcwwv9tk-en","title":"A Literature Review of School Practices to Overcome School Failure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"OECD education working papers","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Education and Child Care","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Political science; Work (physics); Czech; Economic growth; Business; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2240336494038234,"gpt":0.5030863048362813,"spread":0.2790526554324579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039122,0.0005652489,0.001602975,0.0009027645,0.0001784804,0.0006432462,0.001616223,0.0002972887,0.007640327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006666334,0.0003994066,0.0006936948,0.002591136,0.00004275176,0.0006138674,0.0002230002,0.0007706909,0.002995862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004836736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004816937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001193273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007843099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938876,0.0006878892,0.00199119,0.0009157941,0.002061299,0.0004562275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991428,0.001548011,0.004170228,0.001510742,0.0006449331,0.0006981572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001930764,0.0002027821,0.0003981163,0.01680447,0.00007563759,2.162539e-7,0.0001316984,8.069492e-8,0.000002774451,0.0005115088,0.1128497,0.8690211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003324405,0.00002720543,0.0002650271,0.1341093,0.0004504533,0.00001399829,0.0002660607,3.430252e-8,4.688175e-7,0.0000961695,0.864382,0.0003560084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002562215,0.9557569,0.000003167613,0.005076345,0.00340492,0.001713661,0.00002579116,0.00002662354,0.03399004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002810555,0.9589089,0.003111597,0.003693525,0.001878577,0.000658071,0.0002425069,0.00005035663,0.03142843],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644824633","doi":"","title":"Education Governance for the Twenty-First Century: Overcoming the Structural Barriers to School Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Brookings Institution Press eBooks","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04706376791960495,"gpt":0.3408078832681554,"spread":0.2937441153485504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274351,0.0004773919,0.0003795598,0.0001335863,0.00199739,0.001436455,0.002421942,0.0002394894,0.0003922471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00186887,0.0002559712,0.0003105772,0.00007703521,0.0003317347,0.0005863293,0.000475624,0.0005401068,0.0001068207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002360742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004004922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001077057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003084461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955679,0.00006294018,0.001028818,0.0008450621,0.002018897,0.000476355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955484,0.0007137878,0.001113797,0.001319065,0.0009307826,0.0003741596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000443358,0.000009825345,0.00003718593,0.00003313413,0.00006848825,1.183775e-7,0.0008061934,0.00007385955,0.00002097212,0.6331533,0.3218742,0.04387833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623009,0.00004957245,0.0009290117,0.0002326899,0.00007947699,0.000004498012,0.0007371274,0.0002228989,0.0001320649,0.02327917,0.9737112,0.0003600271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001263402,0.001582157,0.001934,0.005662743,0.01450424,0.007216923,0.0002783496,0.00009162565,0.9674665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04352343,0.00007391811,0.0005748637,0.005196556,0.002529135,0.002094954,0.00006168018,0.00005049727,0.945895],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6518369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472042817","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000001282","title":"Using a Logic Model to Assist in the Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of Educational Programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Logic model; Medical education; Program evaluation; Engineering management; Process management; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6403997961832618,"gpt":0.6326379658529381,"spread":0.007761830330323738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007718191,0.00006730945,0.0001169617,0.0001931121,0.00004829397,0.00000993198,0.0002815693,0.00003351469,0.0003383781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001529944,0.00002980247,0.00001067716,0.0003931508,0.00008725229,0.0001633296,0.00003688373,0.00006931715,0.000004405779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007857982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003348579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005290772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001886519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973007,0.0001744681,0.0005493531,0.0002150985,0.001640009,0.0001203069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983878,0.000837614,0.0002215289,0.0001518409,0.0003508162,0.00005044072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670485,0.00003901014,0.7756201,0.000005769192,0.0000112474,6.675147e-8,0.01583877,0.0002798929,0.009356787,0.05665509,0.01765519,0.1245213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001189498,0.0001688531,0.4360837,0.0001754954,0.00004726743,0.000004505748,0.02412609,0.008505466,0.0001468925,0.5285571,0.000897424,0.00009771963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280769,0.0002012139,0.00445555,0.06603482,0.0001064951,0.0004953949,0.000002337582,0.000001620407,0.0006256556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974914,0.000007449582,0.0007052869,0.00129404,0.0001519955,0.00008833463,0.000006922918,0.000002604822,0.0002519844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.471902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3705003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189207471","doi":"10.14507/epaa.v23.2355","title":"Knowledge brokers in education: How intermediary organizations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Bridging (networking); Stakeholder; Order (exchange); Intermediary; Business; Public policy; Political science; Public administration; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2293882585973673,"gpt":0.535952897215502,"spread":0.3065646386181347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004720536,0.000189568,0.0002970002,0.005227448,0.000410293,0.001031914,0.001045205,0.00004922406,0.00004917766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05479333,0.0001429248,0.0001018446,0.01019744,0.0004654019,0.001098745,0.0004015377,0.000369894,0.00007231786],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004419446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01179347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001656472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009585822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951472,0.00194224,0.000667995,0.0005970625,0.001288725,0.0003567346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863321,0.009496389,0.0005780095,0.0007830901,0.002395786,0.0004146852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003393407,0.001357566,0.4370735,0.00001620221,0.0005500651,3.285341e-7,0.0592787,0.0001217756,0.0001115417,0.2465782,0.107486,0.1473922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760066,0.00004090986,0.6440943,0.00004805178,0.0001372667,0.000004850855,0.09268137,0.000553965,0.00002806361,0.1385847,0.1234582,0.0001922189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1998613,0.001542032,0.004699153,0.7284507,0.0007643268,0.0007000068,0.00005351329,0.00003874352,0.06389027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748741,0.0001551264,0.001316708,0.002216234,0.003213201,0.0001338174,0.0001486687,0.00001718673,0.017925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7750127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49191897","doi":"","title":"Situating Myself in Research.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexive pronoun; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5323094129026502,"gpt":0.5832171018372068,"spread":0.05090768893455655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006723152,0.00005851751,0.0001213046,0.00198107,0.0001705898,0.0002077237,0.0004503177,0.00003310743,0.0008205476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007617097,0.00004780392,0.00004200578,0.001709293,0.00007734296,0.0005995584,0.000009790976,0.0003083977,0.00006577896],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008090964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01112207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002634621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02286681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978016,0.0003444187,0.0005676064,0.000137587,0.0009097513,0.0002390246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955881,0.0009381062,0.000297918,0.0001351553,0.00267716,0.0003635613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800383,0.0002804737,0.4632365,0.000003422444,0.00001850279,0.00002162874,0.04443089,0.00009033686,0.0004732104,0.03625154,0.1570616,0.298114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002566981,0.0001758747,0.5222375,0.00007449152,0.000003208479,0.00003746004,0.1163663,0.000080414,0.0001729645,0.2291283,0.1313532,0.0001137213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633426,0.0003523132,0.0001865749,0.01136401,0.001533155,0.0001181732,0.000001093587,8.444077e-7,0.02310121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947343,0.00001214654,0.0006413208,0.0002945862,0.0004808125,0.000005960027,0.000001734351,0.000004505646,0.003824645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2980002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086483769","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2011.552748","title":"Teachers' Perceptions of Large-Scale Assessment Programs Within Low-Stakes Accountability Frameworks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Testing","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; University of Alberta; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Seriousness; Scale (ratio); Perception; Psychology; Standardized test; Educational assessment; Medical education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Political science; Geography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1565396694431699,"gpt":0.4547954859236611,"spread":0.2982558164804912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412601,0.0001292225,0.0002556754,0.0002778123,0.00008688297,0.0001823994,0.001169253,0.00009539515,0.001052153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002661093,0.00009419346,0.0001873204,0.0003304415,0.0001094315,0.0007775953,0.0001453055,0.0005656308,0.00001453018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000184828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004309205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007326438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004993418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995809,0.0001343233,0.001459755,0.0002205616,0.002199648,0.000176694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935382,0.0008107817,0.001604583,0.0002346497,0.003700829,0.0001109372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002431274,0.001204979,0.9524676,0.000003747883,0.00007983964,0.000003655844,0.007977939,0.00009605121,0.001891529,0.000607079,0.0004257336,0.03521755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005354072,0.0004076211,0.9347942,0.0002473034,0.00003339819,0.00004529777,0.03869751,0.002424833,0.0005604048,0.02169471,0.0004015026,0.0001578059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733058,0.00001944042,0.0205525,0.000654172,0.00157114,0.0001191629,0.00001458485,0.00001073099,0.003752508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541455,0.000001585646,0.1452105,0.0001401936,0.0003119141,0.000006120892,0.000004076792,0.000007512785,0.0001725333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1246581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112646295","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-11-2019-0031","title":"A research model to study research-practice partnerships in education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coproduction; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Computer science; Adaptation (eye); General partnership; Process management; Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Corporate governance; Data science; Management science; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7597262785143118,"gpt":0.637465048551401,"spread":0.1222612299629109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04370246,0.00008985619,0.0002245849,0.0005673799,0.0008547025,0.0002123386,0.001029238,0.00004705986,0.00008100591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498285,0.0000584688,0.00004276677,0.001333437,0.0001115231,0.0008770272,0.0008365156,0.003090172,0.00004341023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001530374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001369191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008117004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861644,0.009271499,0.00077504,0.000169897,0.00336572,0.0002534677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886848,0.00694534,0.0002232221,0.0002815327,0.0034599,0.0004051585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003613172,0.03859371,0.0784096,0.00005775626,0.00009433633,0.00003369346,0.5996367,0.0002928703,0.004604058,0.02699524,0.1704624,0.0772065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004751702,0.002189293,0.08285081,0.00006106007,0.0000049688,0.00000784316,0.7712028,0.0003414535,0.00006150481,0.1399504,0.002774055,0.00008069636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124206,0.000173113,0.00002532828,0.08551835,0.0002268567,0.0003425787,0.000001936762,0.00000201125,0.001289215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996191,0.00001406539,0.001143387,0.001615927,0.0002389158,0.00003011196,0.000001025432,0.000005793652,0.00075972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1715661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330806132","doi":"10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0102","title":"Research Committee: Positioning Mathematics Education Researchers to Influence Storylines","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Mathematics education; Perception; Philosophy of mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Reform mathematics; Connected Mathematics; Core-Plus Mathematics Project; Math wars; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.534210016411487,"gpt":0.6417490670643551,"spread":0.1075390506528681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06058627,0.0002098896,0.0003359165,0.004171205,0.00122825,0.001458434,0.001978411,0.0001389821,0.0002943437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03470866,0.0001395916,0.0001285604,0.00316928,0.0002984229,0.001327276,0.0003196257,0.0009599357,0.0006760368],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002172822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007058367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006846029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007574027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894887,0.001187979,0.001629691,0.0005933116,0.005982003,0.001118336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726422,0.01398703,0.0004073656,0.0009822488,0.0112934,0.0006877699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009857885,0.007190743,0.01292004,0.0003998981,0.00004944923,0.000002143855,0.01609715,0.0001029895,0.03358601,0.2398654,0.4699854,0.2197022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000363204,0.0003270028,0.009022028,0.001363306,0.000005091638,0.00003087427,0.04870787,0.000284745,0.001188056,0.9045458,0.03394452,0.0002174824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978501,0.0002631732,0.0072738,0.08351418,0.001631811,0.003013846,0.00001623552,0.00002273265,0.006414105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.800023,0.0001803506,0.1407618,0.0004352995,0.001752096,0.002186923,0.00001234434,0.00008635822,0.05456188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6646804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113835886","doi":"10.1007/s10833-012-9183-4","title":"Understanding school districts as learning systems: Some lessons from three cases of complex transformation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Accountability; Construct (python library); Set (abstract data type); Scale (ratio); Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Geography; Computer science; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6554748656545721,"gpt":0.4837887592329715,"spread":0.1716861064216006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551912,0.0001144017,0.0002663429,0.0004027076,0.0001776174,0.000138378,0.0003219174,0.00004727119,0.001517517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001442637,0.00008656831,0.0001272887,0.0003589133,0.00004582458,0.002175563,0.00002502072,0.0001883356,0.0000731883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004195595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004423771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001933264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002520847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971994,0.0001360402,0.0009152992,0.0001081513,0.001446629,0.000194552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957156,0.002223909,0.001153369,0.0001260234,0.0005500184,0.0002310326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115298,0.001148433,0.62695,0.00005887744,0.0002106751,0.000001195641,0.008739835,0.0002263498,0.002621762,0.3380056,0.01990038,0.002025323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005550722,0.0002807078,0.8860741,0.0001860025,0.00008176573,0.00006731609,0.03485356,0.0003253184,0.000174124,0.06734464,0.009854193,0.0002032363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690767,0.002150691,0.002661873,0.02126032,0.002679564,0.0002443003,0.00006408434,0.0000040406,0.001858437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967974,0.00006712573,0.0003041664,0.0001493858,0.002368167,0.00001398517,0.00004626143,0.000007783226,0.0002457695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802587860","doi":"10.7202/1050839ar","title":"Knowledge Mobilization Practices of Educational Researchers Across Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Outreach; Publishing; Dissemination; Higher education; Public relations; Intermediary; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Marketing; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2290150161277411,"gpt":0.5349643678763977,"spread":0.3059493517486566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001890501,0.00009689419,0.0001684158,0.0002791141,0.000242308,0.0001814381,0.000673415,0.00005034715,0.004856254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003190401,0.00008060451,0.00005501287,0.0009379219,0.0002117405,0.0007049591,0.00001782873,0.0001464142,0.00004272991],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008115707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04983964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4258053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9046232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997697,0.0001983668,0.0007848211,0.0001870406,0.0008605929,0.0002722117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916225,0.0008835164,0.001545168,0.0002889785,0.005104476,0.0005553758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714304,0.000188135,0.3252493,0.00001282744,0.00003608259,3.648045e-7,0.002584475,0.00001423776,0.0004281919,0.004900519,0.655718,0.01085064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001114919,0.0001111429,0.3873673,0.00003316266,0.0000100153,0.000007606755,0.004075878,0.000009411681,0.0006231085,0.006551662,0.601019,0.00008023999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498507,0.002509886,0.00002598004,0.02659295,0.008333663,0.0001664424,0.00002617876,0.000001126549,0.01249302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586661,0.000006113759,0.000565066,0.0004301344,0.001468112,0.000006944685,0.00001247605,0.000008804573,0.03883621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4788179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100039465","doi":"10.14507/epaa.v21n2.2013","title":"Assessing Organizational Efforts to Mobilize Research Knowledge in Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Public relations; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.145821204745497,"gpt":0.5534439290710644,"spread":0.4076227243255675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311343,0.0001852931,0.0003227807,0.007843748,0.0003787579,0.001323885,0.0008518511,0.00005306917,0.002422404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003809693,0.0001584312,0.0001492858,0.01421497,0.0001280311,0.001190653,0.0002258319,0.0002333864,0.001396148],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003424567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006852488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002265128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005296108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957206,0.000812094,0.0009702826,0.0007743619,0.00126629,0.0004563601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950087,0.002284007,0.0002302294,0.0008066163,0.001289784,0.0003806269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000658229,0.003809582,0.4542501,0.00001596179,0.0001406899,7.545613e-8,0.01522066,0.0006622864,0.004610164,0.1342546,0.05743361,0.3295957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006452762,0.0000243749,0.8087195,0.00002342528,0.0000242774,5.766987e-7,0.01671748,0.0009455208,0.0002866141,0.1545271,0.01849681,0.0001698175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9139982,0.0001692147,0.001366343,0.02729172,0.0004757963,0.0006859787,0.000003691019,0.00002155284,0.05598754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682983,0.00001648916,0.005870408,0.001074969,0.0008092863,0.0006182776,0.0001170406,0.00001675546,0.02317843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3544694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W944434266","doi":"10.1007/s11092-015-9224-7","title":"Juggling multiple accountability systems: how three principals manage these tensions in Ontario, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Negotiation; Mandate; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2865166200978165,"gpt":0.4540437544114345,"spread":0.167527134313618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01659711,0.0003323362,0.0004661094,0.0002741613,0.0002651783,0.0008296712,0.0005953899,0.000102623,0.001462609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005165966,0.0002676469,0.00007566452,0.0006759102,0.000131463,0.001453105,0.0002400272,0.0004005366,0.00001965559],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006059891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01753351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8374575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917656,0.0006977224,0.001176315,0.001109423,0.004816791,0.0004342116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918509,0.00304066,0.0005387631,0.000952447,0.003263129,0.0003541247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002152015,0.0005128988,0.9897052,0.00001248329,0.00001899583,2.358355e-7,0.0008886769,0.001094104,0.00003720897,0.002048631,0.004154616,0.001505451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008406676,0.00003442592,0.9186205,0.00002515242,0.00002874164,0.000002577681,0.01274178,0.03055405,0.000005045766,0.02311672,0.01375048,0.0002799173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976284,0.0001570541,0.0002538894,0.0155245,0.002349422,0.001909127,0.0000524029,0.00001834938,0.003451269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959942,0.000002620113,0.001256798,0.0004672329,0.0002203686,0.0007176913,0.0002051473,0.00001398428,0.001121926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1505448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594650178","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8","title":"PATHWAYS – A Case of Large-Scale Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Scientific Inquiry-Based Science Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Professional development; Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Science education; Pedagogy; Political science; Empirical evidence; Professional learning community; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Chemistry; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2142039520844149,"gpt":0.5595032115501248,"spread":0.3452992594657099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00774935,0.0001318655,0.000240871,0.001771315,0.0002718319,0.0007266048,0.001772162,0.00004698721,0.0004777896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003775574,0.0001028259,0.0001330821,0.000679281,0.0004611148,0.004373084,0.0001087801,0.0001527753,0.000009076121],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004795602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01577094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004451646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001683898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949166,0.0002008507,0.001526476,0.0003527772,0.002815327,0.0001879557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840314,0.0009236509,0.004265779,0.0006269863,0.01003119,0.0001210253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006295118,0.01089051,0.438459,0.00008299513,0.00009814063,0.00003467182,0.0156084,0.0008469976,0.1193115,0.0362194,0.01249613,0.3653228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001871483,0.000475273,0.8480188,0.000834165,0.00007796337,0.000117813,0.03310411,0.0005401078,0.08550034,0.01397527,0.01520951,0.0002751184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729158,0.0003212633,0.0006796534,0.01434868,0.01098349,0.0002543007,0.00001931726,0.000002712664,0.0004748102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904405,0.00001071461,0.008319473,0.0004327116,0.0004449188,0.00001932325,0.00001142396,0.000007824457,0.0003130532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4095598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066691673","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00455.x","title":"Scientific Research in a Democratic Culture: Or What's a Social Science For?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Publishing; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Sociology; Parallels; Educational research; Publication; Political science; Science education; Public administration; Social science; Law; Politics; Pedagogy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2679681046168105,"gpt":0.5150483244066693,"spread":0.2470802197898587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03377732,0.0001413263,0.0002335563,0.001629666,0.0009915808,0.001455561,0.001857175,0.00009674157,0.00003259533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007122607,0.0000924812,0.00007531466,0.009609822,0.000959121,0.003852543,0.0001439227,0.0005961634,0.0000353773],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008107165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001306605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001191015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950652,0.0005723108,0.0008316712,0.0006853588,0.0023265,0.0005189555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606,0.001346005,0.000319943,0.00054982,0.001624839,0.00009936288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008361901,0.007381879,0.1063051,0.0001372088,0.0000316677,0.000002034688,0.1448825,0.00009339398,0.0325743,0.1268737,0.01024617,0.5706359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105967,0.0002796617,0.1588902,0.0003611647,0.000009494143,0.000003295072,0.268458,0.00008426979,0.002060805,0.5604652,0.008053044,0.0002288731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826716,0.0002990124,0.00003729318,0.0124427,0.001989186,0.001364586,0.000004696379,0.000008471235,0.001182452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918687,0.00002878199,0.00324676,0.000161718,0.0001851689,0.0004467219,0.000004994991,0.00001109706,0.004045999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.570407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134565605","doi":"10.29173/cmplct19017","title":"Schools and Complexity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Geography; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2463271301677511,"gpt":0.458815260035897,"spread":0.2124881298681459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002085138,0.000124147,0.0002507361,0.0003360573,0.0002044053,0.0006351943,0.0007278571,0.00004104671,0.0002155627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008476725,0.0001024192,0.00006354821,0.0001346007,0.0002509446,0.001255649,0.0001320506,0.0002176432,0.00001578613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007084043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002209938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001019553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004061345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.0002413981,0.0007212092,0.0002413133,0.001029457,0.0001253035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968545,0.0003545241,0.0006201015,0.0002172407,0.001705702,0.0002479278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001123771,0.0007937028,0.1236732,0.00000876321,0.00005918937,3.058377e-7,0.0007308107,0.00001306822,0.001369101,0.7210738,0.005632636,0.146533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002665212,0.0001648579,0.4908856,0.00002195147,0.000007649315,0.00005798223,0.0008772445,0.001185309,0.000145185,0.4887572,0.01753923,0.00009130857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736947,0.00006493359,0.01152588,0.01050934,0.001451939,0.00008764381,0.00001053216,0.000008279509,0.002646707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840132,0.00003812826,0.01320798,0.001607548,0.0008626719,0.000002884432,0.00002013489,0.000005392628,0.0002420464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3672124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6125193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540170921","doi":"10.22230/ijepl.2013v8n7a449","title":"Research Use by Leaders in Canadian School Districts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"School district; Empirical research; Geography; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5077447757821844,"gpt":0.5358639058231887,"spread":0.0281191300410043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002314213,0.00009195178,0.0001280251,0.002346028,0.00008585008,0.0008723277,0.0007243151,0.00006723598,0.0009130066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00860004,0.00007462695,0.00004972794,0.0007392591,0.0001664058,0.001649797,0.00002986852,0.0003949858,0.0001783365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008321189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004686524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1866065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01571134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997096,0.0002602893,0.000659558,0.0001854655,0.001448611,0.0003500486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956497,0.001282708,0.0002476698,0.0001410702,0.002101396,0.000577441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001953763,0.0002927432,0.3227013,0.000003881757,0.00003440191,0.00000199325,0.002632017,0.00001192461,0.0005142541,0.01313865,0.6308094,0.0298399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004011796,0.00008668619,0.685362,0.00007557347,0.000003001003,0.00003470063,0.05663506,0.0000474609,0.0001506718,0.03005959,0.2270057,0.0001383863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7521399,0.0004632063,0.00003100367,0.2419885,0.001134526,0.0001657847,0.00001080348,0.000002178979,0.004064094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804676,0.00005418946,0.0001789803,0.00512698,0.0008798515,0.00001529847,0.000009984401,0.000006473173,0.01326064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4038037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027104879","doi":"10.1108/jea-01-2013-0013","title":"Knowledge influencers: leaders influencing knowledge creation and mobilization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Administration","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Influencer marketing; Originality; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Knowledge creation; Mobilization; Psychology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Business; Marketing; Social psychology; Creativity; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09881028079269458,"gpt":0.4572810162542921,"spread":0.3584707354615976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002604885,0.0001493519,0.00022687,0.0004923299,0.0002062338,0.0003276438,0.0002914392,0.00007615543,0.0003247008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004095555,0.0001208937,0.00008522466,0.0005494395,0.0001489892,0.001365855,0.00002961542,0.0001526943,0.00006852715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001826278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00154278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004925694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004379315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974446,0.000235856,0.001155325,0.0002542961,0.0007613195,0.0001486222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947451,0.002044464,0.0009526641,0.0001873814,0.001886546,0.0001838739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002430035,0.002717683,0.4944392,0.0001232476,0.0001422599,5.597208e-7,0.02084627,0.0009259414,0.01856376,0.3055286,0.0323897,0.1240797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009737871,0.001280844,0.7941556,0.0001640712,0.00008100871,0.00009401487,0.01041909,0.003030986,0.002900406,0.1296051,0.05691884,0.0003762669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753469,0.0003666278,0.00281074,0.009527978,0.001041899,0.0001613435,0.000002293693,0.000005679318,0.0107366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943988,0.00002400214,0.002068822,0.0002009884,0.0009922351,0.00001253728,0.00001583012,0.000008920824,0.002277866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2997164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4929903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075058422","doi":"10.1108/09534811311307914","title":"A case study of district leadership using knowledge management for educational change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Context (archaeology); Learning organization; Knowledge management; Grounded theory; Focus group; Value (mathematics); Distributed leadership; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Public relations; Senior management; Sociology; Leadership style; Shared leadership; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5516726850082176,"gpt":0.4550795019429906,"spread":0.09659318306522702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359945,0.000201271,0.0003312728,0.0009723427,0.0002042424,0.000183914,0.0006241055,0.00003789407,0.0007861361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001418626,0.0001598181,0.000124029,0.001416397,0.00003912022,0.0008399233,0.0002350467,0.00008391264,0.00003687165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002524457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007696993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004140637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001811619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966714,0.0001036055,0.001215482,0.0003113,0.001447474,0.0002507625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959102,0.0003963446,0.0010808,0.0002948866,0.002179182,0.0001386409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003106573,0.04689254,0.2981662,0.00218458,0.005241636,0.0006465724,0.07732413,0.0004357168,0.0004678785,0.2256844,0.1106162,0.2320296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009000657,0.003102113,0.4322223,0.0003866093,0.001351569,0.001143417,0.4918326,0.004013274,0.0001573895,0.04456561,0.01101361,0.001210819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970187,0.0005859745,0.01341295,0.006573081,0.002442901,0.005236166,0.00003279683,0.00001272934,0.001516411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891347,0.00001830232,0.007651435,0.0003358093,0.001112295,0.0002374953,0.0000145268,0.00002582328,0.001469626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4145085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509314224","doi":"10.1177/0013161x16664116","title":"Tied to the Common Core","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Administration Quarterly","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Public relations; Advice (programming); Psychology; Perception; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Social psychology; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1236235182580297,"gpt":0.4441466857326857,"spread":0.320523167474656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001073485,0.0001287081,0.0001191101,0.0001277277,0.0002844359,0.000298214,0.0007040109,0.00003479361,0.003899364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004602405,0.00006304905,0.00007348241,0.0004312299,0.00006593136,0.0003739918,0.00001812708,0.00005815634,0.004862749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009263306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001247602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002381739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974917,0.0000986781,0.0005967418,0.0003814066,0.001234723,0.00019676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969167,0.001682792,0.0002068437,0.0005586559,0.0004557204,0.0001793505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005415672,0.000427107,0.02561966,0.000001474559,0.00001857224,3.606911e-7,0.001937208,0.000001584837,0.003565822,0.2934818,0.4921538,0.1827385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213487,0.0007899277,0.4588787,0.00001293984,0.000006938432,0.000009353286,0.002303645,0.00001533633,0.0004734091,0.1882794,0.348828,0.0001889584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5445765,0.00001255652,0.002016512,0.4448698,0.00172685,0.0003656561,0.00004622651,0.00001959248,0.006366272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565904,5.081611e-7,0.0007088553,0.002714555,0.0009423783,0.0001883043,0.00002912638,0.000007396523,0.03881847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4421553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559117819","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3277","title":"Data literacy conceptions, community capabilities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Inclusion (mineral); Literacy; Carpentry; Set (abstract data type); Information literacy; Focus group; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2800858412546827,"gpt":0.4692893992592451,"spread":0.1892035580045624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02523066,0.0001029723,0.000229922,0.0001495137,0.0009992511,0.0002551666,0.006035648,0.00003231389,0.0003481843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005606336,0.00004276909,0.00006604535,0.0002526445,0.0004047757,0.003258114,0.001179887,0.0008748766,0.0001074061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007968053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002660229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008602042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004881113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942425,0.002883214,0.001559932,0.00001011482,0.001154579,0.0001495987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779909,0.0166965,0.001309869,0.002590138,0.001325927,0.00008666956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023754,0.0007533173,0.007809134,0.0000387931,0.0001386146,8.644695e-8,0.5261009,0.00005427463,0.0003872978,0.004444689,0.2406212,0.2195494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006490168,0.0004007522,0.0213267,0.0001119085,0.0000449807,0.00006383097,0.7159591,0.0001497374,0.0001499113,0.09246345,0.1685527,0.0001279092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813464,0.000054144,0.007471103,0.007490922,0.0003520462,0.00008886275,0.0001189513,0.000007048342,0.00307053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969109,0.0001079597,0.001001391,0.001221041,0.00008106495,7.772641e-7,0.00001094757,0.000003703525,0.0006621685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2194214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523113335","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v25i1.431","title":"Research use in education: An online survey of school practitioners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Connotation; Relevance (law); Survey research; Pedagogy; Psychology; Perception; Point (geometry); Medical education; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Applied psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5029226430744302,"gpt":0.5636984683140667,"spread":0.06077582523963643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005222417,0.0001051731,0.0001741339,0.001263691,0.0002016042,0.0004108037,0.0006627597,0.00006303823,0.002539042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01907727,0.0000687202,0.00004727206,0.00154155,0.0000832058,0.002877346,0.00005681574,0.0003277123,0.0001787943],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004448333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0148812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007871402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001570849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951121,0.00146302,0.001030872,0.0003323264,0.001801666,0.0002599826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900807,0.002234789,0.0005734267,0.0005050487,0.006124307,0.0004817471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005117774,0.002784034,0.6876361,0.000002415762,0.000007229416,1.404067e-7,0.0001951425,0.000006981322,0.002579241,0.0008886948,0.1996345,0.1062143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002423426,0.0001282715,0.9481574,0.00009056008,0.000002326714,0.00002338827,0.008549276,0.000004412474,0.0001594512,0.01159479,0.03095485,0.00009289615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887793,0.0001457063,0.0002731507,0.007695949,0.002263323,0.0002040605,0.0000234179,0.000004915389,0.0006101473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972994,0.0001468432,0.003437715,0.0004410509,0.0006757806,0.00002949579,0.00004064839,0.00001169221,0.02222276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2605213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}