{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":434,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":434,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1eaaf7115ce8","filters":{"topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2148664717","doi":"10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545","title":"Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1840277473370287,"gpt":0.4272803656755193,"spread":0.2432526183384906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080087,0.0001724285,0.0002926248,0.0001545793,0.000222476,0.00005771098,0.0003942962,0.0001706967,0.006222025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001380969,0.00009822197,0.0001128244,0.0002487869,0.0007971611,0.0001478663,0.00002939463,0.000726462,0.0001804961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002492159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004689184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006085708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008085683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983039,0.0004848005,0.0005591413,0.0002464872,0.0001585458,0.0002470999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949458,0.003832231,0.0006557421,0.0001936229,0.0002679195,0.0001047246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006560553,0.001194483,0.3711325,0.00003114152,0.0002828513,0.000009797,0.007626059,0.000007405052,0.00001467129,0.3680937,0.2466731,0.004278252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001917709,0.0004396373,0.800384,0.00003280706,0.00004598088,0.002648761,0.004460197,0.000004263291,0.000001850266,0.1130023,0.07689293,0.0001695125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162168,0.01360495,0.00003737596,0.1166528,0.00280424,0.0001321167,0.000003149386,0.00001224669,0.05053636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909394,0.001421554,0.0002264119,0.001648526,0.0009556221,0.00003491666,0.000004813579,0.0000142029,0.004754549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4292516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152379890","doi":"10.3102/00346543076003413","title":"Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Educational Research","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":916,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Concept map; Meta-analysis; Recall; Psychology; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Statistics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.28967462562396,"gpt":0.5270173551507189,"spread":0.2373427295267589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001423049,0.00009822584,0.0004985075,0.0002054,0.0001387496,0.00002414752,0.0001719283,0.00003844918,0.01330156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003498263,0.00006619268,0.0002156574,0.001098056,0.000357122,0.0000498534,0.00003628669,0.0002217565,0.0001255219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003595796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000431833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001181717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009403942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998231,0.0006032926,0.0003105698,0.0002829208,0.0003390331,0.0002331722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963513,0.002555644,0.000114327,0.0002435956,0.0006787684,0.00005638912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001928221,0.0006046192,0.02383758,0.001995342,0.0211967,0.000001028793,0.00078966,0.00002938857,0.000007157892,0.7791627,0.1715738,0.0007827275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003200119,0.0005438295,0.4915689,0.0006054906,0.03231591,0.00005147733,0.004787505,0.0000046941,0.00001671714,0.01314974,0.4562014,0.0004343274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01387422,0.7553679,0.000007176815,0.01433091,0.00004390021,0.0003230106,0.00001744837,0.000005330568,0.2160301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758432,0.01115229,0.0009311123,0.0001445784,0.0002746755,0.00060721,0.0002973574,0.0000184291,0.1107311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.861969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169419728","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x","title":"Spacing Effects in Learning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":595,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Audiology; Developmental psychology; Communication; Medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07560062214700793,"gpt":0.4144685042629443,"spread":0.3388678821159364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005474101,0.00008905263,0.0001202412,0.00009786942,0.000289889,0.00002372541,0.0003688437,0.00006698232,0.0004881814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003496077,0.00006613231,0.00003029297,0.0008315101,0.000835819,0.0001132713,0.00004841238,0.0002722334,0.0004910249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004817867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002134329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001046137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004131102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986323,0.00008791512,0.000151352,0.000461881,0.0002056086,0.000460981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994125,0.0002427915,0.00004483079,0.0001832832,0.00002700779,0.00008963455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005453447,0.0004521965,0.9019008,0.000006181743,0.000003286731,0.000286539,0.002946985,0.0001598997,0.004231973,0.08072594,0.001535143,0.007696528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001807835,0.000177932,0.995528,0.000007357947,5.732914e-7,0.0001359961,0.000581688,0.00001336478,0.00004119934,0.002214224,0.001021171,0.0000977429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8080673,0.0001363358,0.0001440104,0.000361594,0.0006859152,0.00007985505,9.765738e-8,0.00006295505,0.190462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975808,0.00002049559,0.000784517,0.0002622709,0.00007093252,0.0000314369,4.350957e-7,0.000003307655,0.001245768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1895136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154273617","doi":"10.1080/09500690305018","title":"Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":564,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Literacy; Learning sciences; Psychology; Language arts; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Science, technology, society and environment education; Pedagogy; Metacognition; Computer science; Cognition; Linguistics; Experiential learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1109868579968768,"gpt":0.4891045476112504,"spread":0.3781176896143736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007620334,0.00005964728,0.0001040383,0.001041525,0.0002943725,0.000255442,0.001354396,0.00001914343,0.00007879303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002019763,0.00004483272,0.0000252968,0.001517871,0.008461018,0.001191795,0.0001106641,0.0001921888,0.00000394464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001864789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003527128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000188424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001544986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974195,0.0000872982,0.0004331886,0.0002184012,0.001606202,0.0002354603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995177,0.0004642617,0.0004607873,0.0002216201,0.003581543,0.00009484616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006434115,0.000794897,0.06423127,0.00002023682,0.00002923529,0.000008171247,0.1414769,0.00005770334,0.2818379,0.4108923,0.0006496334,0.09993741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000152264,0.0001517624,0.926503,0.0001656239,0.000004609682,0.0002700405,0.05710977,0.00002768733,0.01023722,0.00387371,0.001440422,0.00006386344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869655,0.0007344966,0.00003925878,0.0008695119,0.003427376,0.00007476592,0.000002076451,0.000002003785,0.007884988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997578,0.00004296979,0.001963665,0.00006321562,0.0001459409,0.000003160261,4.493887e-7,0.000002929252,0.0001996893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019923327","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.010","title":"Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Teacher Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":501,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Special education; Special needs; Learning disability; Teaching method; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02496950161091465,"gpt":0.381185245985428,"spread":0.3562157443745134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006496795,0.0001408444,0.0001362721,0.00007451454,0.0004197324,0.00007328641,0.0001235152,0.0001149206,0.00007809464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001699411,0.0001324397,0.00005084771,0.00004536026,0.00004076321,0.0001317455,0.00001697317,0.0003346031,0.0000148946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001122216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006859476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001444322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990152,0.000148298,0.0001960056,0.0003202719,0.00007468342,0.0002455382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994268,0.0001461359,0.0001017446,0.0002171229,0.00003295197,0.00007518924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004764514,0.0008100038,0.01138845,0.00001609162,0.00004043883,1.713769e-7,0.0531845,0.00000563105,0.0001830861,0.1602271,0.07555515,0.6985417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005461548,0.0003806061,0.610145,0.00005240296,0.00007392745,0.00004370821,0.0571923,0.00005763817,0.00001310368,0.04757258,0.2835034,0.0004191583],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8317068,0.001046538,0.0009550977,0.005233359,0.000742117,0.0003111938,0.000001809466,0.0001393451,0.1598637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720184,0.000006372975,0.003223815,0.0008438957,0.0006802209,0.000118151,0.00004791923,0.00001372654,0.02304749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6981226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5400733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053468515","doi":"10.3758/bf03193491","title":"The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":454,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; McGill University","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Cognition; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Relation (database); Linguistics; Cognitive science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01916490523262637,"gpt":0.3157006718418953,"spread":0.2965357666092689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002219758,0.00008316876,0.0001112653,0.00008375468,0.0002913176,0.00002395349,0.00007328944,0.00005992892,0.00003093289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002008977,0.00005886457,0.00002071984,0.000195793,0.0002608057,0.00004959446,0.00002311896,0.00008396487,0.000008444199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001392589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003273497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008796047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003570798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993153,0.00005221899,0.0001920163,0.0001827163,0.0001099255,0.0001478759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985881,0.0008994708,0.0001426464,0.0001341701,0.0002103958,0.00002520812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001094036,0.0005792312,0.008259497,0.005401527,0.0001376247,0.00001463992,0.01261106,0.000005529921,0.840193,0.004446616,0.001522431,0.1257349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005032049,0.0001913248,0.7418974,0.0004602598,0.00003481119,0.00001791353,0.002696552,0.000001238208,0.251747,0.002082531,0.0002753623,0.00009247294],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902531,0.001655387,0.000006211855,0.00003360219,0.000807845,0.0002431688,0.000004741318,0.00001711676,0.006978855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999092,0.00003154681,0.00002975326,0.000008314758,0.00007703301,0.00000696537,0.00001275815,0.000007069029,0.0007345445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7336379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2400428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125930412","doi":"10.3102/00346543074003317","title":"Personal Epistemology and Mathematics: A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Educational Research","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4317121438743917,"gpt":0.6052844763978331,"spread":0.1735723325234415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01086976,0.0003589647,0.00292116,0.0006166818,0.0002212494,0.00002856124,0.0006888488,0.0003504755,0.008207957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02794984,0.0002767477,0.0003541679,0.001199031,0.003261848,0.00007036304,0.0003193523,0.001192769,0.0002388136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000248495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004042898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002438101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003828801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927105,0.002977582,0.001677426,0.0007873771,0.001144971,0.000702142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556372,0.04107306,0.0004177332,0.0007199962,0.001904841,0.000247182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002310986,0.0004105726,0.000008641451,0.6880546,0.0001472407,0.000002006281,0.00009390806,5.959546e-10,4.519948e-8,0.2280804,0.01700499,0.06619529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346851,0.0001389478,0.000150452,0.5164829,0.0005468326,0.0005319362,0.0003970766,3.71076e-8,1.055357e-7,0.008251078,0.4732718,0.0001853629],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005584041,0.9629143,3.705901e-7,0.0127463,0.0001547359,0.001835328,0.0001474585,0.000004236893,0.02219168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001766809,0.9946154,0.0008495264,0.0000682457,0.0001958313,0.001899473,0.00006231182,0.00004640187,0.002245085],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4562669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090334593","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001","title":"Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessing Writing","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"Educational Testing Service","keywords":"Test of English as a Foreign Language; Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); Active listening; Computer science; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Test (biology); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Language assessment; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1472476809860803,"gpt":0.4120701150341848,"spread":0.2648224340481045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003954075,0.0001064652,0.0001556516,0.00009970579,0.00009618766,0.0002573163,0.0000805923,0.00009569255,0.00003675069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007364514,0.00009445318,0.00001824016,0.0001217413,0.00005337272,0.0003594414,0.00001929694,0.000171726,0.000002741024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007018889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006711254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007042761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001147179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990327,0.00009001746,0.0003016795,0.0002579448,0.00007422698,0.0002434806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995784,0.0001839842,0.0000865825,0.00008692632,0.00003826413,0.00002591217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004330896,0.0002616324,0.85646,0.00005062997,0.00001747634,0.000009072796,0.00356892,0.00003345188,0.004233526,0.01598503,0.0002639577,0.119073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006145108,0.0000835945,0.95081,0.0001578242,0.000006570002,0.00001350745,0.04377053,0.003185637,0.0001169144,0.0008477411,0.0002003464,0.0001928541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940862,0.0004012033,0.0004426052,0.002274428,0.0001570361,0.0003994959,0.000003530338,0.00002283258,0.002212668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995907,0.00001193017,0.003185071,0.0001149189,0.0002981085,0.0003145734,0.00003904289,0.00001051018,0.0001188571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1188801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3851689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881780776","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003","title":"The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning and Instruction","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Boredom; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09408641011948811,"gpt":0.3483910866700763,"spread":0.2543046765505882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005892799,0.0001045302,0.0001777218,0.00005184684,0.000394095,0.00002873807,0.00004954104,0.00008947466,0.000008162755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003514322,0.00008159108,0.00002540718,0.0001158109,0.0005616547,0.00006987463,0.00005404476,0.0002935696,0.000001780741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002121536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002453585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004305244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001232469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989839,0.0002427512,0.0003083599,0.0001855522,0.00008757684,0.0001918817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991256,0.0003158044,0.0002674387,0.00009819974,0.0001349258,0.00005801536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001653933,0.0000534329,0.1366076,0.0002410474,0.00005566277,0.00001391333,0.01216031,0.003187891,0.0006081472,0.6840566,0.00004210422,0.162808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004395882,0.003127904,0.2065271,0.0008713383,0.0002420325,0.0245151,0.2577626,0.2943965,0.00005300708,0.2056836,0.001420663,0.001004351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925326,0.0009043592,0.0001601917,0.0008130171,0.0002250877,0.0001113982,0.00000350864,0.00004331615,0.005206584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983968,0.00042265,0.0009225522,0.00001068574,0.00008973697,0.00001604273,0.000007930881,0.00001195522,0.0001216114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.478373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3327188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084299944","doi":"10.1080/00461520701756420","title":"Why Instructional Explanations Often Do Not Work: A Framework for Understanding the Effectiveness of Instructional Explanations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychologist","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":276,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval; University of California, Santa Cruz","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Instructional design; Psychology; Cognition; Learning theory; Mathematics education; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1799185524916297,"gpt":0.4035644427151414,"spread":0.2236458902235117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007651609,0.0002470882,0.0002678822,0.0002545394,0.0009503703,0.00005051487,0.0005010723,0.0002320512,0.001451281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007167738,0.0002049067,0.0002098382,0.0007274839,0.001065662,0.0002456757,0.00004566925,0.0003453988,0.00004759415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000292668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003862093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001217997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000110855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978074,0.0003342135,0.0005536836,0.0005323256,0.0004123501,0.0003599871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992736,0.005985712,0.0003408171,0.0004820136,0.0003681308,0.00008730368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004407136,0.0004025252,0.01441147,0.00002530707,0.000194275,6.785263e-7,0.0007510706,0.000215239,0.0000171138,0.9233806,0.05989872,0.0002623325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004609868,0.0000678576,0.5641059,0.00004653423,0.00002300475,0.000162232,0.003527576,0.000001647692,0.000009397559,0.4247952,0.006622064,0.0001776303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6016126,0.0009776584,0.1828101,0.114069,0.0226169,0.002435636,0.000805332,0.0002002302,0.07447249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812024,0.00002739599,0.01416886,0.001438594,0.00101486,0.001187151,0.0004214558,0.00002872014,0.000510585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5496944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148230310","doi":"10.1002/acp.1418","title":"Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: the role of co‐activation in confronting misconceptions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Reading (process); Cognition; Think aloud protocol; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Empirical research; Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06217314190763983,"gpt":0.384135232307349,"spread":0.3219620903997092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003531945,0.0001337074,0.0002734569,0.0002809741,0.0001399401,0.000005017126,0.0002314227,0.0001054273,0.0001789323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002337858,0.0001121397,0.00002733726,0.0009436142,0.003234717,0.00008967554,0.00003484518,0.0002371736,0.00002702123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002510056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001955695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003438651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007733587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985602,0.0001133318,0.0004609702,0.0003943426,0.0001718432,0.0002992834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979991,0.001135119,0.0003141769,0.0001444583,0.0003810496,0.00002609788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002516355,0.003579374,0.6515373,0.0001207665,0.0001508626,0.00001265504,0.09895514,0.00003569211,0.1221148,0.08470527,0.0003503459,0.03592144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001306647,0.0001390913,0.8959461,0.0001109741,0.000009965004,0.00002013769,0.08445854,0.000003207249,0.01088541,0.006903275,0.00009284646,0.0001238103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8460683,0.0002981743,0.0002097079,0.0001378165,0.00009077843,0.0004552527,0.00001499195,0.00001113646,0.1527138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992753,0.00005528205,0.00007471428,0.0002875883,0.00003115092,0.0002071567,0.00002803786,0.000009421126,0.00003130096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2444088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966791154","doi":"10.1016/s0306-4573(01)00034-6","title":"Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Processing & Management","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hypertext; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics education; Web page; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07561169604868281,"gpt":0.3645816513261622,"spread":0.2889699552774794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003464553,0.0001402459,0.00012787,0.0002865915,0.0002227629,0.0003475525,0.0002452151,0.00003694579,0.001759724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008049346,0.0001273267,0.00001609698,0.0004138466,0.00003903274,0.00168731,0.00006660046,0.0001535262,0.0003137476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001161052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003130877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001158056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006583846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986861,0.000107343,0.0004488736,0.0001796508,0.0003122283,0.0002658508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994866,0.00001778487,0.0001605893,0.0001894305,0.00008387418,0.00006178447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005950032,0.00212332,0.6627829,0.000200283,0.0001095203,0.00003143426,0.09418092,0.0001591983,0.000003121415,0.004564424,0.005843195,0.2299422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006292021,0.0001224577,0.7675004,0.00001909657,0.00002092246,0.000002035105,0.2283457,0.0004847514,6.674948e-7,0.0002613104,0.002463121,0.0001503829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.911158,0.0001358522,0.00008538924,0.0001885376,0.0002159587,0.0008024375,0.000006755025,0.00008145328,0.08732565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977338,0.00002390256,0.0006613095,0.0003233786,0.0000366832,0.0005653721,0.0000367565,0.00000631613,0.0006125208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2297918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977215039","doi":"10.1002/tea.20419","title":"Globalizing students acting for the common good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Consumerism; Science education; Sociology; Goods and services; Egalitarianism; Intangible good; Dualism; Consumption (sociology); Public relations; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Pedagogy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.459982540797794,"gpt":0.5957294216075077,"spread":0.1357468808097138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03036703,0.00005241924,0.0001110525,0.0002835395,0.0008297199,0.0002024605,0.001682724,0.0000290823,0.00002918358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001220019,0.00003161596,0.00005002287,0.000458653,0.0004894077,0.000410314,0.0001651435,0.0008532229,0.000004188371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002022898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002283189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001119906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005477626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977894,0.0003399188,0.0003196674,0.0001360619,0.0009342627,0.0004806351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976108,0.001708346,0.0001837995,0.0001912507,0.000229072,0.00007670759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001688523,0.0003796324,0.8059899,0.00001862653,0.00003588198,0.00004123391,0.03645472,0.00003667831,0.0005109815,0.1146675,0.001907973,0.03978805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003880857,0.0004239835,0.8055751,0.0001508165,0.000005032347,0.0001286211,0.1739426,0.00005699976,0.00007785545,0.01552817,0.003650857,0.00007196976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607127,0.0003752757,0.0002547901,0.001462755,0.0009323919,0.0001537988,5.163735e-7,0.00000458399,0.03610317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978327,0.0000168174,0.001755513,0.00004510495,0.0002026084,0.000008830245,4.47927e-8,0.000003947784,0.0001344412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1374878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477917057","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139048224.017","title":"Learning with Multiple Documents","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03510253904103163,"gpt":0.2483581895389,"spread":0.2132556504978683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006985058,0.00029959,0.0002793369,0.00009146288,0.0002206476,0.00003393644,0.0003196632,0.0003151831,0.0001149188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004581909,0.0002996112,0.0001051046,0.000005205267,0.000227965,0.00007766997,0.0001442285,0.0005327478,0.0001537701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001388722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006145825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007134097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005476976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998928,0.00004609491,0.0001251701,0.0003818855,0.0001732222,0.0003455917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990724,0.0001193147,0.0002162014,0.0003601745,0.00009595781,0.0001359758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002145324,0.00001997235,0.0007318983,0.000041602,0.0003559089,0.000136697,0.0002828409,0.000004967947,0.00000383799,0.9592021,0.03776734,0.00123831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005098046,0.0001198332,0.001857123,0.00006915753,0.0001545886,0.00003670179,0.000695129,9.997293e-7,0.000007552556,0.000005905064,0.9961793,0.0003639475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002642595,0.0004103309,0.00004577865,0.00001653214,0.0004414764,0.0002544052,0.00005194892,0.0001388309,0.9959981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03470693,0.00006007661,0.00007443285,0.00003023991,0.0002191078,0.000001948307,0.00009055781,0.00004397162,0.9647728],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970174244","doi":"10.1598/rt.60.4.4","title":"Authentic Literacy Activities for Developing Comprehension and Writing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Reading Teacher","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Comprehension; Pedagogy; Literacy education; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05316101038506871,"gpt":0.365381661412837,"spread":0.3122206510277683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002512004,0.0000780106,0.00009132353,0.00002613846,0.0002419479,0.00007815353,0.00007784968,0.00004208375,0.00003643111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001374788,0.00005442612,0.00002733668,0.00003956563,0.00006892605,0.00006678903,0.00002691075,0.00007761519,0.000008531405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002771305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001166503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000274924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004790092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994606,0.00005759758,0.0001264192,0.0001332835,0.00004391728,0.0001781266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993429,0.0004552349,0.00005620267,0.0001169234,0.00001884976,0.000009865646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008276098,0.0001105575,0.0625928,0.0001454898,0.0001133691,0.000003539921,0.01892406,0.00001365577,0.002913355,0.8602203,0.02190748,0.03297259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006737176,0.00007860699,0.8098607,0.000246689,0.00007466895,0.0001311808,0.0225092,0.0005032972,0.0003564997,0.130178,0.03491981,0.000467588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844671,0.0006485814,0.001217175,0.001757157,0.0002336976,0.0001309889,0.000001661156,0.00006063345,0.01148293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916173,0.000005545539,0.001910867,0.0000826531,0.0002913569,0.00004301962,0.000009103656,0.00001201416,0.006028204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.747268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2219433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010370946","doi":"10.1037/a0029690","title":"Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Intervention (counseling); Class (philosophy); Elaboration; Critical thinking; Control (management); Teaching method; Attitude change; Pedagogy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06534513349267806,"gpt":0.4074815909226063,"spread":0.3421364574299282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117673,0.0002226704,0.0003322039,0.0003001851,0.0002568409,0.0001203028,0.0001804013,0.0001719399,0.0001648107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009743701,0.0002017541,0.00004384579,0.0001552336,0.0002054989,0.0007609152,0.00008330456,0.0004153721,0.00002130167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006734444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005741328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001047981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001540928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998176,0.0002992106,0.0005690931,0.0002961582,0.0002067572,0.0004527859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985093,0.0003879135,0.0005150005,0.0001471929,0.0001609314,0.000279611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000374934,0.0005081316,0.9181971,0.0001118388,0.0001930653,0.000002882773,0.01565577,9.125164e-7,0.001914581,0.04846606,0.001138543,0.01343618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008382119,0.0007626507,0.9767403,0.00006238867,0.00004914383,0.001094314,0.01407282,3.433209e-7,0.000005511379,0.003549671,0.00263766,0.0001869805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599628,0.009651306,0.00003432585,0.02612824,0.003036267,0.0003320774,0.000007549626,0.00001004042,0.0008373813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932806,0.001499937,0.001099727,0.001482531,0.002252086,0.0001195613,0.00001057609,0.00002281336,0.0002321827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0585432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8227294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094265826","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-3802.2003.00184.x","title":"Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Teaching method; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Learning disability; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08794002450332938,"gpt":0.4967267903227428,"spread":0.4087867658194134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00650765,0.0001829275,0.0004127759,0.001104529,0.0002416176,0.0001081583,0.0006018478,0.0001686091,0.002344175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005143958,0.0001351661,0.0001290255,0.0009250519,0.001047031,0.0003487937,0.00005499489,0.001645492,0.00004253545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005361097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00158952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008007358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004993152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947276,0.002151836,0.000713433,0.0002548025,0.001670804,0.0004815684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916964,0.006483596,0.0008940074,0.0001906506,0.0005289208,0.0002064593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000532132,0.002279532,0.7568754,0.00004798462,0.0001974548,0.00002064425,0.04707613,0.000007844461,0.00001721293,0.1865819,0.005005893,0.001357814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006884941,0.001345093,0.7850721,0.0001762145,0.00001546075,0.0003148027,0.1887032,7.235456e-8,0.00001654721,0.01013227,0.01341502,0.0001206527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8786336,0.0008317162,0.000002712776,0.003296679,0.0009654374,0.000327348,0.000004454367,0.000003695328,0.1159344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932727,0.00005696359,0.0005132814,0.00005814007,0.002495758,0.00007100277,0.000004126077,0.00001668654,0.003511394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1764497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572117753","doi":"10.1002/sce.21260","title":"Values Underpinning STEM Education in the USA: An Analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Next Generation Science Standards; Creativity; Science education; Underpinning; Mathematics education; Relation (database); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1937836346214989,"gpt":0.4782218818707799,"spread":0.2844382472492809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004062497,0.00008861502,0.0001111756,0.0004044921,0.002028751,0.0007867289,0.001926099,0.00003741738,0.00007676947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004276922,0.00005557841,0.00004763267,0.001897642,0.002104975,0.001471133,0.0000706464,0.0001052736,0.000004905205],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003799775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01044376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005203933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002536445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981413,0.0001453471,0.000254873,0.0004060984,0.0008065996,0.0002457985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975861,0.00006089808,0.0003769573,0.00126702,0.0006622275,0.00004683199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006354956,0.000503285,0.6372576,0.000006983956,0.00001719386,5.100022e-8,0.01984794,0.0005305882,0.00779447,0.2984665,0.0008829386,0.03468611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002875215,0.00002859037,0.9585197,0.00001416813,0.00004166354,0.000002051854,0.03848392,0.0006465252,0.0004573888,0.001561773,0.0001472893,0.0000681723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779262,0.0001135966,0.00005864736,0.002381133,0.003699701,0.0002261731,0.000004516553,0.000005377872,0.01558464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986038,0.000009495386,0.0002180813,0.0002414704,0.0002215519,0.00004051072,0.000006160653,0.000003145213,0.0006557811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052117450","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2010.515932","title":"The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: Conceptual and Methodological Issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychologist","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Conceptual change; Epistemology; Self-regulated learning; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03724619503870242,"gpt":0.3824794494529626,"spread":0.3452332544142602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009793693,0.0001997497,0.000253796,0.00007329255,0.0002852274,0.00006219711,0.0004075291,0.0001768533,0.0003811697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001809562,0.0001387668,0.00004271305,0.0001775202,0.001186708,0.00005810085,0.0000700115,0.000753389,0.00003396352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003862018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007587196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002656874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006271106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979084,0.0006385893,0.000408578,0.000459308,0.0002696827,0.0003154334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973783,0.001941608,0.0002860063,0.000269831,0.00005332632,0.00007091068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001831079,0.0008384784,0.9318967,0.000007936352,0.00009793694,0.000002783882,0.003000638,0.0004866539,0.001083996,0.05803844,0.000430013,0.003933322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006089773,0.0004486282,0.969938,0.00001942381,0.00001148641,0.00004207257,0.006884639,0.00002828835,0.00004678507,0.00466048,0.01714063,0.0001706296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871709,0.001121696,0.0001196268,0.007382583,0.0006427565,0.0002538662,0.000002780988,0.00004277428,0.003263061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917262,0.00006284683,0.006367858,0.00009023862,0.0002479965,0.0001097726,0.00004684334,0.00001670911,0.001331508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05337796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5658744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1671099834","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2907","title":"Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Harvard University","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04630920845330529,"gpt":0.4266440509108719,"spread":0.3803348424575667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651177,0.0000737003,0.0000735114,0.000046535,0.0002096372,0.00007411509,0.0001732698,0.00002923746,0.00003509841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001243715,0.00003471415,0.00002885561,0.0001799115,0.0002792343,0.0002522079,0.00001685737,0.0001751492,0.000008433548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003775416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003571001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002133992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993645,0.0000684507,0.0001524631,0.00009329568,0.0001360408,0.0001852612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.0002963671,0.0001077529,0.00009858568,0.00003072971,0.00001742008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001241399,0.0002528196,0.08913072,0.000006005239,0.00004764972,0.000008380522,0.05674167,0.01360169,0.0003132041,0.7879947,0.0007519085,0.04990986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003221356,0.001200174,0.9626873,0.00001106202,0.000004226928,0.000009220097,0.03370053,0.0001820885,0.00001995485,0.001773029,0.0000357153,0.00005460119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316622,0.00007204237,0.00001995791,0.0007820076,0.00009879469,0.0001185478,0.000001677547,0.000007080018,0.06723768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.00002108241,0.00006134211,0.0001314119,0.00003379634,0.000009898996,0.000005274424,0.000001328945,0.00006601658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1612381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147003560","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x","title":"Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Conceptual change; Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2018137721951394,"gpt":0.4878730734704316,"spread":0.2860593012752922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002187572,0.00008896031,0.0002210122,0.0007487811,0.00009237173,0.00008502313,0.0002176035,0.0001319937,0.0001450207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009614521,0.00006748486,0.00002517066,0.0005856744,0.0001947923,0.0002498539,0.00005319356,0.00132794,0.00000956878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007266591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001753159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006313516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002169436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985019,0.0001982084,0.0004016189,0.0001648925,0.0003454435,0.0003879622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974961,0.001852355,0.0001374639,0.0001249752,0.0002823545,0.0001068007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001065374,0.0001286486,0.9780595,0.0001358507,0.0000159869,0.0001702565,0.005211288,0.000009141738,0.008002273,0.004921926,0.001417168,0.001821368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004672976,0.0002102325,0.9560316,0.0004971683,0.000002741447,0.0002753534,0.03275923,0.000009777527,0.0006645305,0.005027738,0.003944068,0.0001103069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877391,0.0005095934,0.000003868996,0.00156602,0.0004797788,0.00009335444,6.775766e-7,0.000005458119,0.009602157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984892,0.0002617393,0.0005614907,0.00001551486,0.0001946314,0.000004576255,9.18791e-7,0.00001049588,0.0004614158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02754794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5769311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050341665","doi":"10.1002/tea.20015","title":"Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Enculturation; Task (project management); Supervisor; Process (computing); Civility; Psychology; Writing process; Prewriting; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Political science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1534310262692533,"gpt":0.5336386349651023,"spread":0.380207608695849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02030799,0.0000758423,0.0001308327,0.001116303,0.001058313,0.0006016964,0.0008348268,0.00004544881,0.00003698672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00197566,0.00006045827,0.00003636974,0.001450192,0.0004548142,0.001369051,0.0001164392,0.001406848,0.00006429349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005441394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007471633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000792857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969252,0.0004641154,0.0003738436,0.000292104,0.001347519,0.0005971604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986949,0.0002263142,0.0001407298,0.000172044,0.0004713516,0.0002946422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003730189,0.001228634,0.06892736,0.0000538859,0.00002785714,0.0008549531,0.3521333,0.05077653,0.1637008,0.2734887,0.0008696721,0.0875653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001314999,0.005896411,0.3976575,0.00101942,0.000006950097,0.002017247,0.5236363,0.0002011872,0.001009594,0.05130271,0.01545562,0.0004820752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809837,0.00008449185,0.0003963676,0.002816996,0.0008827546,0.0001107723,2.611011e-7,0.00001240508,0.0147122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950278,0.000008923308,0.004043839,0.00006117898,0.0002931791,0.000005925668,4.113985e-7,0.000005395656,0.0005532941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3287301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8139794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955084120","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.006","title":"Exploring the antecedents and consequences of epistemic emotions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning and Instruction","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Curiosity; Need for cognition; Surprise; Epistemology; Metacognition; Reading (process); Mediation; Presupposition; Social psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07498826524973265,"gpt":0.3155437508808525,"spread":0.2405554856311198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009882384,0.00003941345,0.0000612588,0.00002658659,0.0001162279,0.00001663247,0.00002750401,0.00002138996,0.00006618723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002087052,0.00002807,0.00001133734,0.00005309632,0.0001545772,0.00008468576,0.00001223508,0.0001017709,0.00001005915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005350388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006525004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003454066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003623715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996523,0.00005668438,0.00009142725,0.0000951295,0.00004025772,0.00006417479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997897,0.00006714075,0.00006230799,0.00005052315,0.00001902358,0.00001136671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002782867,0.00001207284,0.8682543,0.00005750508,0.00004020139,3.951213e-7,0.004397385,0.0000738402,0.005306145,0.08003959,0.00002690051,0.0417638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000147487,0.00008922988,0.964161,0.00003551939,0.000005804283,0.0001182552,0.03228741,0.00001452071,0.0001037601,0.00177302,0.001220036,0.00004393595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915574,0.0001981081,0.000009351363,0.0006593687,0.0007256214,0.00004750089,5.595109e-7,0.00001687895,0.006785244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998576,0.0002865198,0.00004513678,0.000007975667,0.00003709834,0.000007382591,0.000001648715,0.000002732372,0.001035445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09590669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1144661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006575403","doi":"10.1002/sce.10042","title":"Scientists as writers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Publishing; Scholarship; Scientific writing; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Perception; Hard and soft science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science; Linguistics; Literature; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05795170968723685,"gpt":0.3905382827977898,"spread":0.332586573110553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107727,0.00005816936,0.00004422483,0.0001558091,0.0003447267,0.0001472565,0.0003458133,0.00002585607,0.00579217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001141472,0.00005334001,0.00001973778,0.0007890362,0.0005935756,0.0003067156,0.00002173577,0.00005435582,0.004019003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009197259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003514987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002824432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005742083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990921,0.00001889717,0.0001056741,0.0002960937,0.0002323293,0.0002548849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.00003063668,0.00004925938,0.0002697597,0.0001174089,0.00009116493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002966094,0.0005583913,0.02080854,0.000006043971,0.000004254716,0.000001111784,0.008636726,0.000003635772,0.001373772,0.6760969,0.2309418,0.06156586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009727458,0.00009002153,0.8849394,0.00001801454,0.000005283006,0.00009720251,0.01587056,0.00003406965,0.0002845582,0.01134995,0.08699659,0.0002171229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6127794,0.0002664241,0.000007607463,0.003080832,0.005382657,0.00006398295,6.300278e-7,0.00002727813,0.3783912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528725,0.000007916175,0.0003991542,0.0005996866,0.0002085742,0.00002382045,0.000002877186,0.000003315685,0.04588212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8641308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985182336","doi":"10.1017/s0305000908008799","title":"The role of evidentiality in Bulgarian children's reliability judgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Language","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bulgarian; Psychology; Evidentiality; Cognition; Perception; Modality (human–computer interaction); Linguistics; Cognitive development; Pronunciation; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01013570468996418,"gpt":0.2941144697126776,"spread":0.2839787650227135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007204192,0.00007587078,0.0001921032,0.00005175889,0.00009989798,0.00001199832,0.0003087607,0.00005924355,0.0002242352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001929776,0.00004846068,0.0001213652,0.0001105628,0.0001374457,0.00008279912,0.0000286023,0.0002719815,0.000008067032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003759175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005881938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001058541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000767934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988447,0.0001771622,0.0005176049,0.00009153086,0.0002117513,0.0001572629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990604,0.0001762881,0.0003973755,0.0002532427,0.00007178114,0.00004089369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002382954,0.0004771322,0.9805311,0.000007865432,0.0001199608,0.00004054823,0.007346743,0.00003648437,0.0001116603,0.00511048,0.003642895,0.002336816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000335973,0.00007938971,0.9919285,0.0000266476,0.00001073195,0.0002789123,0.003770073,4.265664e-7,0.0002130816,0.001083378,0.002225148,0.00004777976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741938,0.005428622,0.000003233028,0.001606658,0.0004375372,0.00008472332,0.000004997492,0.000004098287,0.01823634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992417,0.0001665153,0.00004951905,0.000104022,0.0002426491,0.00000192403,0.000001759714,0.000005441091,0.0001864508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02504792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2455218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921242204","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006","title":"The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Psychological science; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2784513195949628,"gpt":0.5107281310939378,"spread":0.232276811498975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001220727,0.00008236237,0.0001597634,0.00008030393,0.0006324063,0.00006544884,0.0003915475,0.00004882103,0.00005264648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007695809,0.00005485811,0.00003288104,0.0002928582,0.0002110057,0.0001543121,0.0003794575,0.0001228224,0.00003458087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005582279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005316465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002835587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001770651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990672,0.000122195,0.0001831533,0.0002846544,0.0001515406,0.0001912762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985467,0.0008815291,0.0001168828,0.0001554193,0.0002784646,0.00002100853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008914569,0.009235098,0.2423998,0.0001146032,0.001002649,0.0004738875,0.650859,0.00002408431,0.002101555,0.03434314,0.0118065,0.03872519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001453178,0.001395958,0.1124202,0.00002062624,0.00002814304,0.0001257209,0.8635753,0.000004618957,0.0001097304,0.02073872,0.0000374221,0.00009044839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910219,0.00007569205,0.0000128454,0.0005219666,0.0007758047,0.001203764,0.00000540006,0.00001190157,0.006370682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993721,0.0000112356,0.00005540032,0.00009556226,0.00003265123,0.0001098838,0.000002500371,0.000003468202,0.000317197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2127163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4864022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005462082","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9041-9","title":"Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Empirical research; Psychology; Session (web analytics); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Mathematics education; Protocol analysis; Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07536978327440856,"gpt":0.3312625127068852,"spread":0.2558927294324766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005726653,0.0001295941,0.000178423,0.00005461285,0.0006144898,0.0000981143,0.00005511814,0.00007254633,0.0007360195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076642,0.00009155909,0.00006724795,0.0000801259,0.0001459374,0.00009204667,0.00001022237,0.0001876354,0.00003889691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006694239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002187735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000157976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002029026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990766,0.0001738353,0.0002119838,0.000252124,0.00008414302,0.000201317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.001165495,0.0001095565,0.00008744471,0.00009764885,0.00005054626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004827916,0.0003163439,0.006751851,0.0002090015,0.0007643916,0.00001885711,0.006845987,0.00001371575,0.0023238,0.1564323,0.009180487,0.8166605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002435209,0.001492825,0.7462912,0.00009293138,0.001162649,0.000621947,0.06313281,0.0001639455,0.0005066143,0.06524687,0.1180849,0.0007681565],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103921,0.01387793,0.003118822,0.02947648,0.0008368426,0.001556063,0.00005599334,0.0003043269,0.1403814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904768,0.000303865,0.001182849,0.001265349,0.0001696715,0.0001637464,0.00004087421,0.0000101654,0.006386679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8058897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029500267","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2004.07.012","title":"Thinking about personal theories: individual differences in the coordination of theory and evidence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Cognition; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1140336761839337,"gpt":0.3475363145406219,"spread":0.2335026383566883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00279636,0.0002136506,0.0003109362,0.0000964776,0.0003509426,0.0002379253,0.0005046002,0.000145278,0.0002159527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000361,0.0001349117,0.00005522955,0.0002110765,0.001160187,0.0002924363,0.0001016531,0.0003068326,0.00000241752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001745915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009309791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001483405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002657106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976974,0.0007171298,0.0003383191,0.0003817379,0.0005731753,0.0002922349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970692,0.002491144,0.000196858,0.0001363532,0.00005677456,0.00004966835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005849659,0.0001016555,0.3976845,0.00006185097,0.00005965244,0.000001380135,0.1329022,1.641983e-7,0.000005717316,0.46762,0.0000218317,0.00148258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002546768,0.0001854145,0.6947872,0.0001707125,0.00004095738,0.00001709377,0.1018367,9.178687e-7,0.000004328908,0.2025757,0.000008612008,0.0001177509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845598,0.009709452,0.00005169095,0.003239755,0.0001891319,0.0002094431,0.00007541103,0.00001818781,0.001947112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998882,0.0003458243,0.00007002144,0.0004450034,0.0001021295,0.00005865601,0.00001645987,0.000005335598,0.00007458992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2971027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5501539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969127682","doi":"10.1080/01638530903420960","title":"The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Analogy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain knowledge; Computer science; Natural language processing; Sentence; Artificial intelligence; Control (management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02201854721302503,"gpt":0.3707758710982453,"spread":0.3487573238852203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003634642,0.00007738512,0.0001106533,0.00009468422,0.0001367222,0.00005552037,0.0004377934,0.00004675141,0.00007720359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005883229,0.00005157386,0.00001469397,0.0005577769,0.000753202,0.0001548302,0.00005995329,0.0002555015,0.00002287219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001329288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004631817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001059814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008328015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992251,0.00003108071,0.0001884768,0.0002115287,0.0001048015,0.0002390569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991478,0.0004656448,0.00009117063,0.0001673426,0.000105758,0.00002228335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004733685,0.0003424862,0.8859449,0.00003507299,0.000009795256,0.000002588477,0.01865741,0.00006293077,0.005661065,0.05648435,0.00006025978,0.0326918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000136671,0.00002934291,0.8512877,0.00003917885,0.000003217637,0.000001482409,0.1237951,0.00002121472,0.002696264,0.01988969,0.002008897,0.00009117107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.945408,0.004935275,0.000001421277,0.000378118,0.0002854258,0.00007558461,0.000002203929,0.000014644,0.0488993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994098,0.00008531458,0.0000546558,0.000004366314,0.00005548971,0.00004658016,0.000002761742,0.000005281805,0.0003357726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4647228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983747253","doi":"10.1080/14926150309556580","title":"The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metalanguage; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Science education; Nature of Science; Mathematics education; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02063737893988619,"gpt":0.3374227258914377,"spread":0.3167853469515515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003301218,0.00008745588,0.0003319769,0.00256085,0.000529581,0.00007918185,0.0006331563,0.00005841946,0.00002739559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003344163,0.00006487938,0.00002139005,0.004246218,0.01256216,0.000229257,0.00003186599,0.0001262196,2.875325e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001441005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007503523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008403146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009157793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.00001775105,0.0007223876,0.0002166881,0.0003507181,0.0003092128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964984,0.0001312775,0.00098277,0.0004063296,0.001577463,0.0004037636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004695236,0.000184456,0.2272083,0.00003277109,0.00005308157,0.000002690897,0.01333471,0.00001007054,0.009262386,0.7425932,0.00006495773,0.007248731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086946,0.0003620069,0.7592858,0.00009370208,0.0001409289,0.0002559466,0.2047898,0.0001215515,0.004657073,0.02986246,0.0002046044,0.0001391936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979149,0.0002977949,0.00008713679,0.0005873446,0.0004736274,0.0001073762,0.000006102405,0.00000247052,0.0005233212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947691,0.00001737255,0.005157641,0.00001629773,0.00001077175,0.000005537212,3.864444e-7,0.000003126254,0.00001977087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7127307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984822788","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03307.x","title":"Having our cake and eating it too: seeking the best of both worlds in expertise research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Management science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1007043783122541,"gpt":0.4816653450302703,"spread":0.3809609667180162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001355826,0.00006199502,0.0001027942,0.00009606136,0.0001242556,0.00003076674,0.0001762393,0.0000907235,0.0001726466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00121674,0.00004521412,0.00001679597,0.0002635651,0.00009923866,0.00005633145,0.00002585673,0.0003095928,0.00001003102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006598849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004483558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003579009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004564637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987872,0.0002286271,0.0002582318,0.0001754147,0.000327073,0.0002234077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993696,0.0002741195,0.00005730992,0.0001754147,0.00006781988,0.00005580108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005763604,0.001469813,0.3483183,0.00007089864,0.00001935625,0.000008690584,0.07585142,0.000006704417,0.0004295865,0.0313735,0.1218816,0.4205125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001892438,0.0001270594,0.8332702,0.0003465319,0.000004349596,0.00002654971,0.157366,0.0001258117,0.00001325516,0.002027455,0.00641557,0.00008794726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9046459,0.001642217,0.00002441829,0.07386004,0.000534923,0.0001331824,3.372321e-7,0.000007922553,0.01915103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959778,0.00007221792,0.0001467158,0.001528511,0.0003121858,0.00004920037,0.000004598675,0.000004637784,0.001904196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4849519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993262000","doi":"10.1080/02702710601186407","title":"Compensating for a Limited Working Memory Capacity During Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Comprehension; Eye movement; Task (project management); Reading comprehension; Short-term memory; Cognitive science; Cognition; Linguistics; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1790490983942978,"gpt":0.4180164196606773,"spread":0.2389673212663795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121467,0.0003003498,0.0004237187,0.0002273127,0.0003994385,0.00006346189,0.000479054,0.0003312177,0.0003599965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004228634,0.000313717,0.0001482304,0.0003141842,0.0001808964,0.0001360237,0.00006753438,0.0004185064,0.0001318919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001878285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002623051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001029999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001077752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971662,0.0001507787,0.0007018322,0.0008636037,0.0001889259,0.0009286603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968582,0.001842653,0.0003957886,0.0006471022,0.0001065727,0.000149657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001828898,0.0005684535,0.8062815,0.0001408939,0.0007747717,0.0001254121,0.01906621,0.00007387586,0.1341118,0.01665442,0.006665322,0.01370848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001160386,0.0001738492,0.9845078,0.0003935161,0.00004399816,0.00004539932,0.004018724,0.0000273089,0.001863235,0.004620658,0.0026892,0.0004559096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607549,0.0004427161,0.005122088,0.0008951184,0.003678239,0.00045879,0.00001349113,0.0002148714,0.02841977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866586,0.00003318756,0.009338486,0.0008883856,0.000956097,0.0001017522,0.00003639477,0.00005101967,0.001936048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1782263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153194965","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2021.669908","title":"Epistemic Emotions and Epistemic Cognition Predict Critical Thinking About Socio-Scientific Issues","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Surprise; Critical thinking; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognition; Boredom; Need for cognition; Confusion; Counterfactual thinking; Curiosity; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02323802859073032,"gpt":0.3468261265031887,"spread":0.3235880979124584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004290758,0.0001468878,0.0002016423,0.0001770353,0.0004351507,0.0002377134,0.000140513,0.0001819885,0.0004004967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003439648,0.0001642677,0.00005379062,0.0003302503,0.0004080146,0.0002547217,0.00003630259,0.0002424269,0.00004949056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001842074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005058721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001316351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003660822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983838,0.0002498512,0.0003608567,0.0005048029,0.0001887035,0.0003119734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991301,0.0001678314,0.00008828745,0.0002914529,0.0002392423,0.00008308565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004026015,0.001285609,0.3172088,0.0003754807,0.0001014438,0.00001683226,0.02541959,0.00001149234,0.000530167,0.2181663,0.417363,0.01948102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002878575,0.00003934498,0.5453616,0.0003199455,0.00006618147,0.000123312,0.123418,0.00004701384,0.00006513645,0.3168747,0.01311947,0.0002774762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8960999,0.02930757,0.001815055,0.02500026,0.02413011,0.0003102385,0.000041542,0.0001081425,0.02318715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784102,0.0004392415,0.008039509,0.0003009443,0.0004977905,0.0001551002,0.0004136903,0.00001971306,0.01172383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4042435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6698643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012624029","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.009","title":"Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context: The impact of domain knowledge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain knowledge; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Relation (database); Control (management); Resource (disambiguation); Quality (philosophy); World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0742771599887803,"gpt":0.3775979522298563,"spread":0.303320792241076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003620557,0.0000819843,0.00009293306,0.000119705,0.0001288865,0.00005119043,0.0002118068,0.00003313182,0.00002358098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114918,0.00004920066,0.0000648754,0.0001806492,0.00005964316,0.0001672014,0.00002404271,0.0001460168,0.00004810639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001245232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002353058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001960166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008335449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993013,0.0001800961,0.0002122801,0.00009776143,0.00006046979,0.0001480966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.001009973,0.0001051545,0.0001691092,0.0001035982,0.00002825273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003817488,0.0006191997,0.1392344,0.00003684537,0.0001036225,3.071771e-7,0.4002684,0.006431127,0.00005687666,0.162377,0.2295035,0.06098705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002228676,0.0003677899,0.9599628,0.00008136061,0.000002670772,0.00001332678,0.02415345,0.0007677088,0.00001813124,0.0007802125,0.01354154,0.0000881329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895914,0.00004200689,0.004306868,0.001757535,0.0006870196,0.0005206997,0.000003053081,0.00001319595,0.003078271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985694,0.000003528402,0.000353543,0.0002324405,0.00009903824,0.0001226824,0.00003038891,0.00000553126,0.0005834272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8207284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2963198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171919112","doi":"10.2308/iace.2001.16.1.21","title":"A Research Note on Accounting Students' Epistemological Beliefs, Study Strategies, and Unstructured Problem-Solving Performance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Accounting Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Relevance (law); Dimension (graph theory); Test (biology); Empirical research; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05659632430180668,"gpt":0.4480762427008215,"spread":0.3914799183990148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002867059,0.0002773411,0.000311798,0.0004509157,0.0005263301,0.0008526696,0.0006054926,0.0002214874,0.0002487901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002406893,0.000248851,0.00003087698,0.000837433,0.0002013975,0.0006787911,0.0001804437,0.0008040541,0.00009779321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002749485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004068068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004167438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968316,0.000418691,0.0005984075,0.0007709154,0.0006796725,0.0007007385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998402,0.0005286228,0.0002176811,0.0004871239,0.0003015885,0.00006300791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001015956,0.001350252,0.9590286,0.0000812752,0.0000254845,0.00001214413,0.0158165,0.00008287776,0.00005282234,0.007142369,0.0009727001,0.01533337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003780929,0.0003253217,0.9011516,0.0002037111,0.000008540949,0.00004565276,0.09169055,0.00001926272,0.000004722167,0.0028956,0.003040941,0.0002360252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671103,0.001161921,0.000004233831,0.0008514079,0.00127921,0.000942792,0.00000104401,0.00009249261,0.02855659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960865,0.0001850949,0.0006587518,0.0001246893,0.0008606358,0.0002888459,0.00001978067,0.00003235592,0.00174331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07587405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980724834","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103731","title":"Exploring student information problem solving behaviour using fine-grained concept map and search tool data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Computer science; Cluster analysis; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Concept map; Data science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1810987777128572,"gpt":0.3858767373094124,"spread":0.2047779595965552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002999163,0.0001244038,0.0001306962,0.0001117814,0.0001433979,0.0002186714,0.0003389484,0.00004909698,0.0001042171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008249059,0.0001272234,0.00001975786,0.0001181681,0.00004197148,0.001442508,0.0001808447,0.0001308999,0.00009309108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009972961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002642017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007127832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008256309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989667,0.00007177122,0.0002886369,0.0002801581,0.0001629446,0.000229814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991256,0.0001003026,0.0001174809,0.0004879876,0.0001175268,0.00005107459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008334723,0.0009597074,0.5813689,0.0005154317,0.0002347801,0.00000252592,0.1503436,0.002661445,0.000358976,0.06297841,0.04360853,0.1568844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005596284,0.0001353521,0.9310327,0.0001797276,0.00003785617,0.00003685627,0.05712248,0.00227117,0.00002591594,0.0002355945,0.007992066,0.000370681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916651,0.0002548016,0.002027945,0.0008188768,0.003717724,0.0005144807,0.00001102719,0.00005403245,0.0009359727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879672,0.00001642579,0.01070215,0.0001413343,0.0003150727,0.00003423048,0.0005015915,0.00001100778,0.0003110198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3496638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.518802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011764369","doi":"10.29173/slw6775","title":"Grade 4 Students' Development of Research Skills Through Inquiry-Based Learning Projects","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rote learning; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Pedagogy; Government (linguistics); Psychology; Professional development; Teaching method; Cooperative learning; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1474789133945687,"gpt":0.4383348414395089,"spread":0.2908559280449402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009137321,0.0002183707,0.0003042132,0.000279726,0.000503096,0.000227734,0.000770081,0.0001417504,0.002291115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000480289,0.0001961812,0.00007648183,0.001133911,0.0005154601,0.0004412052,0.0002350457,0.0006988657,0.0004935595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009629596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008706021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001801258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004046067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969929,0.0004631011,0.0005808174,0.0004879369,0.0007610599,0.000714193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982856,0.000779849,0.0001802071,0.0004579114,0.0001653739,0.0001310954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000257872,0.0008564762,0.8932968,0.00009396689,0.0001635215,0.00004705822,0.01939014,0.0001294323,0.0001047274,0.04542523,0.03905562,0.001179091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008018538,0.0001815114,0.7139882,0.0001740953,0.00001101704,0.000009529838,0.03068981,0.000001463982,0.001370759,0.008259362,0.2442063,0.0003061054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.947242,0.001124167,0.0003856631,0.002070165,0.0009142671,0.0005009174,0.000002486717,0.0001939325,0.04756643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959528,0.00003650927,0.01772466,0.0003269211,0.0003758949,0.000266276,0.00006390448,0.00004280464,0.02163499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2051507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494473627","doi":"10.1007/s11423-016-9467-0","title":"Fostering scientific understanding and epistemic beliefs through judgments of promisingness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Technology Research and Development","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Class (philosophy); Exploratory research; Psychology; Educational technology; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3743554120559512,"gpt":0.4580034361717671,"spread":0.0836480241158159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006845275,0.00009869145,0.0001345375,0.0003658145,0.0004974113,0.00004843785,0.0001912169,0.0001176979,0.0001892851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001561442,0.00007264799,0.000008021412,0.0003924861,0.001464764,0.0001111399,0.0003767278,0.0001255664,0.00003467485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002055824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005788839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002048079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001096815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986601,0.0000452842,0.0002633163,0.0004011173,0.0002567887,0.0003734019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990719,0.0003734549,0.00007159494,0.0001982598,0.0002253138,0.00005947322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004999395,0.0002434347,0.08524691,0.00009469659,0.00008704447,0.000002058694,0.003562329,4.725908e-8,0.004909385,0.8890516,0.004036048,0.01271651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005194916,0.0001486673,0.1262014,0.0002708797,0.000002416288,0.00008183494,0.01558894,1.287285e-7,0.003417231,0.8478339,0.005761981,0.0001731078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957491,0.001762589,0.0003736198,0.0333818,0.0004819022,0.0002675547,0.000005690008,0.00003202377,0.006203766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920909,0.00007199019,0.003105002,0.0000155998,0.00003587976,0.0001527909,0.000007539252,0.000008496957,0.004511785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04121766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5396986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152602048","doi":"10.1002/sce.20266","title":"Learning to read scientific text: Do elementary school commercial reading programs help?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Science education; Computer science; Science learning; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05843970476142608,"gpt":0.3799346837971355,"spread":0.3214949790357094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064237,0.0001223907,0.0001062415,0.0003323042,0.001815718,0.0003822659,0.0005346863,0.00004547264,0.001051427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003274626,0.0001180144,0.00003560145,0.001635799,0.001062756,0.0004956651,0.00007859776,0.0001957318,0.001249799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002934884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001903518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006199376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.00007355642,0.000247103,0.0005972478,0.0004388182,0.0005097871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998889,0.00004956501,0.0001065351,0.0003838956,0.0003208804,0.0002501797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003234535,0.0007309487,0.6922479,0.00001327012,0.00001062679,0.000002590387,0.02420512,0.00003833826,0.002415144,0.04223518,0.05635719,0.1817113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343903,0.0002078309,0.8914151,0.00004459518,0.000005688165,0.00005537589,0.04889811,0.000004509925,0.0001660205,0.0009851276,0.05792215,0.0002120739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561231,0.000102539,0.00003212781,0.003271703,0.005952138,0.000373324,0.00000130119,0.00007931459,0.03406447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981932,0.000005749925,0.002075756,0.0003534622,0.0005677689,0.0001317131,0.00004768108,0.000009958218,0.01487588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204491020","doi":"10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.020128","title":"Restructuring physics labs to cultivate sense of student agency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Physics Education Research","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Cornell University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Attribution; Mathematics education; Physics education; License; Restructuring; Preference; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2277047968348543,"gpt":0.5758712050589198,"spread":0.3481664082240655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000538218,0.0001956776,0.0004539528,0.00004449375,0.0001695102,0.000051406,0.0003573933,0.00003670743,0.0003102259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003019726,0.0001795719,0.0001920786,0.001463546,0.0001538345,0.0001124204,0.0002342076,0.000438922,0.0006125369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008597162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002723808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970639,0.000678403,0.0004092196,0.0005623787,0.0007963173,0.0004898326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967477,0.0005621635,0.0001396659,0.0009046873,0.001442405,0.0002033658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002693831,0.004241325,0.003527333,0.002441003,0.0001880314,0.00001125233,0.007701424,0.00005328054,0.0150517,0.8053503,0.05105621,0.1103512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005279752,0.0004704844,0.4580141,0.004772526,0.0001725305,0.00002658741,0.01169111,0.00001783119,0.03407561,0.4330498,0.05611211,0.001069253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470301,0.01004485,0.00008744171,0.003504089,0.0007299929,0.0007394354,0.00002062057,0.00003224135,0.03781118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918003,0.002511536,0.0005355822,0.0006226322,0.001549394,0.0004284049,0.00007163204,0.00003502721,0.002445474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4544868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293254681","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2022.2111431","title":"Students’ Epistemic Commitments in a Heterogeneity-Seeking Modeling Curriculum","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition and Instruction","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Curriculum; Discipline; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Scholarship; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05106861536403803,"gpt":0.3471452419139441,"spread":0.2960766265499061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001523689,0.00007678044,0.00009074812,0.000112144,0.0002793962,0.00003669337,0.00007582039,0.00003410404,0.000284904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007224185,0.00008532326,0.00002528981,0.0001455132,0.00002914759,0.00009608465,0.00007215611,0.0001683837,0.00001207554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008430363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001057443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002633761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003874006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991903,0.0001298348,0.0001987022,0.0002032462,0.0001417236,0.0001361469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997943,0.00001367592,0.0000624723,0.00007578009,0.00002621387,0.00002754609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001798145,0.0009109498,0.954065,0.00006427443,0.0001078507,0.0000222315,0.003324075,0.001600228,0.0007338159,0.01591314,0.0006159584,0.02246269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008310638,0.0007345678,0.7446386,0.0001339505,0.0001008508,0.001410359,0.1841343,0.01554471,0.0000760593,0.0398535,0.004103337,0.0009592026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943646,0.0002621673,0.0001479329,0.0001539187,0.001214443,0.000171042,0.000009117754,0.00003656263,0.003640175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993201,0.00004177778,0.00005546539,0.0001687514,0.00005984665,0.0001929368,0.00007599455,0.000007118735,0.00007798439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2094264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3479382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801835972","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.008","title":"Topic specific epistemic beliefs: Extending the Theory of Integrated Domains in Personal Epistemology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning and Instruction","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Layperson; Reciprocal; Epistemology; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Mathematics education; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02567698617279916,"gpt":0.3028416633241697,"spread":0.2771646771513706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004885868,0.00009250182,0.0001407455,0.00009374008,0.0001986728,0.00001797696,0.00008109706,0.0001039994,0.0005335855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000643024,0.00006642915,0.00003234629,0.0001865943,0.0005503511,0.00005135099,0.00002244073,0.0002927736,0.00002039444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004819283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002282246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003343287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003914136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989674,0.0003546205,0.0002330223,0.0002043529,0.00006703111,0.0001735542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995145,0.000194382,0.0001276445,0.00009593601,0.00004818571,0.00001940844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000231757,0.00004617063,0.4402528,0.00003263131,0.0000487397,0.000004689082,0.01224229,0.000008403507,0.001197884,0.4097368,0.0002019406,0.1359959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005046131,0.0003277139,0.9133824,0.00006432876,0.000007300527,0.0003049777,0.05240509,0.00003851107,0.0000781369,0.01490247,0.01786931,0.0001151414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819386,0.0009926941,0.0002337268,0.0005277531,0.001087075,0.00007490915,0.00000139735,0.00002635163,0.01511751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970381,0.000193332,0.0001405715,0.0000272799,0.0003287733,0.00001191846,0.000008578971,0.000007686184,0.002243818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4731297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5842387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800355571","doi":"10.1187/cbe.17-02-0037","title":"EcoEvo-MAPS: An Ecology and Evolution Assessment for Introductory through Advanced Undergraduates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CBE—Life Sciences Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bachelor; Curriculum; Ecology; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Biology; Geography; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.052046405702389,"gpt":0.4267389537575873,"spread":0.3746925480551983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005859809,0.000138193,0.0001488086,0.0001024638,0.000686584,0.00007334931,0.0002588533,0.00009004507,0.000175072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002225501,0.0001236756,0.00002932064,0.0002661162,0.001025615,0.00059132,0.00003020732,0.00007490789,0.00003355648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001722004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002765821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002074273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985461,0.0001382005,0.0002531257,0.0005892562,0.0001324498,0.0003408802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998969,0.0002471656,0.0001756237,0.0002576757,0.0002573117,0.00009326525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004692823,0.0004993432,0.08104894,0.00003293723,0.00002731311,6.945374e-8,0.002885332,0.00003501799,0.0006185272,0.8423307,0.06745036,0.005024519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002836488,0.001334786,0.7156575,0.0000111727,0.00002264024,0.00001378797,0.03435032,0.00009096001,0.0000605951,0.2168535,0.03108556,0.0002355233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585558,0.0009645524,0.00156944,0.01305791,0.008307553,0.0004789152,0.00001242195,0.00006706913,0.01698629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795246,0.00005221643,0.01678867,0.000976481,0.001449396,0.0002883605,0.00005524447,0.000009594075,0.0008554599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6346085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5280718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913055107","doi":"10.5206/eei.v28i3.7774","title":"Pre-service Teachers' Beliefs: Impact of Training in Universal Design for Learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Exceptionality Education International","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Universal Design for Learning; Likert scale; Learning disability; Special education; Scale (ratio); Mathematics education; Service (business); Pedagogy; Medical education; Developmental psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1018623028192074,"gpt":0.4375724805667772,"spread":0.3357101777475698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000616868,0.0001277779,0.0001472453,0.0002061469,0.00009258983,0.00002975974,0.0002944205,0.000105223,0.004411885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002585367,0.0001323634,0.0001105678,0.0002179583,0.0001306991,0.0002067966,0.0000249748,0.0001445273,0.00006513527],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003759957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00107241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001976124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001619578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987782,0.000158856,0.0003797188,0.000284378,0.0001988255,0.0001999906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985497,0.0004152911,0.0002375055,0.0001414574,0.0006039101,0.0000521554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009048043,0.001496584,0.6502832,0.00003641277,0.0004887402,4.414782e-7,0.1289774,0.005874004,0.001114209,0.1578347,0.03433653,0.0186529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005141295,0.0002323324,0.9604298,0.00004334581,0.000009315523,0.000009641589,0.0192212,0.0003164009,0.00002191986,0.01399508,0.00505854,0.0001483286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972444,0.00004870234,0.01197776,0.002084448,0.002092541,0.0003262737,0.00004003059,0.00003605352,0.0109502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888004,0.000003991499,0.004927782,0.0001332849,0.001859533,0.0001761585,0.0003022549,0.0000141318,0.00378246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3101465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163508249","doi":"10.1002/sce.20401","title":"Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Praxis; Unit (ring theory); Life span; Lifelong learning; Learning sciences; Psychology; Science education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Educational technology; Epistemology; Gerontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02418729754567454,"gpt":0.3525435737983368,"spread":0.3283562762526623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143509,0.00009850189,0.0001115495,0.0002892881,0.0007008701,0.000151889,0.0007199698,0.0000796932,0.00008052584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002112238,0.00007224726,0.00001670828,0.001938346,0.003554246,0.000251348,0.0001242998,0.0002991864,0.00003592201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001809228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002673867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001238821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001521326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988474,0.00001303429,0.0002228399,0.0002924188,0.0002804288,0.0003438483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988537,0.0001422367,0.0001768581,0.0003693811,0.0003054592,0.0001523531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008113103,0.0002952982,0.1135577,0.00005795842,0.00001377045,2.348716e-7,0.01928517,0.0001066265,0.03511205,0.8248426,0.0004898541,0.006230633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001545893,0.0001799168,0.7141327,0.00004799896,0.00001848722,0.0001092536,0.2667176,0.0005141683,0.003862794,0.0039562,0.01001637,0.0002899544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884554,0.0001686062,0.00002581568,0.003539455,0.002440926,0.000149624,0.000001432649,0.00004209887,0.005176667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978942,0.000006565847,0.001024293,0.00007622762,0.0001319746,0.00003485893,9.183702e-7,0.000006474576,0.0008244537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162673407","doi":"10.1038/s41539-021-00091-x","title":"An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"npj Science of Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Neuroimaging; Value (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Order (exchange); Control (management); Nature of Science; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Science education; Computer science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03398931231596522,"gpt":0.3690140533461067,"spread":0.3350247410301415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001345741,0.00009084582,0.0002023194,0.0002546469,0.0001937009,0.00008873229,0.0005291183,0.00002111968,0.0000371408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001803368,0.00007179016,0.000009876792,0.003785622,0.002302186,0.0007560873,0.00007011505,0.0002043857,0.00000194735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007850078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001219907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00147702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000979631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981246,0.000111756,0.0002239781,0.0005386046,0.0006503963,0.0003506562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.00007869851,0.0001916851,0.0003083428,0.0004737429,0.00006058763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007440463,0.0008906503,0.9303533,0.00001280407,0.000004899704,0.00004326729,0.0279285,0.01221486,0.01684186,0.01080353,0.000002050221,0.0008298276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006083027,0.0009782276,0.8243399,0.00007988084,0.000003318276,0.00001533062,0.1717505,0.000351453,0.001631243,0.0001475121,0.000004885906,0.00008940729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907472,0.00004201921,0.00007609871,0.00006643729,0.000105889,0.000147083,5.217675e-7,0.000009715122,0.00880502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989457,0.000001252181,0.0008423524,0.000008679337,0.0000115452,0.00001172465,8.766843e-7,0.000004764662,0.0001731518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.143822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8482499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913416140","doi":"10.1187/cbe.17-07-0118","title":"Identifying Troublesome Jargon in Biology: Discrepancies between Student Performance and Perceived Understanding","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CBE—Life Sciences Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Vocabulary; Scientific literacy; Literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Science education; Linguistics; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1363326132201202,"gpt":0.4274713081484899,"spread":0.2911386949283697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007209038,0.0001239723,0.0001789044,0.0002293647,0.0002610676,0.0001111384,0.000279219,0.00007676359,0.0001824589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004050177,0.0001051345,0.00002601823,0.0003832291,0.0003517608,0.0003975389,0.00005791366,0.0001229657,0.00007400481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002095819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003019356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005056598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005640795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987127,0.0001057575,0.0002690695,0.0004365022,0.000153001,0.0003229657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994237,0.0001813958,0.0001234695,0.0001719066,0.00002905764,0.00007042647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005931684,0.00005074063,0.9415168,0.00002588967,0.000008391568,6.091432e-8,0.005958684,0.00001157898,0.0001769628,0.05167412,0.0001831929,0.0003877138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001473514,0.0001019113,0.8790509,0.00004654575,0.000005526724,0.000002668575,0.1158562,0.00001613513,0.000004696814,0.004370061,0.0002753373,0.00012276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768602,0.0008274837,0.0000411322,0.001361123,0.001867212,0.0002594604,0.000002905243,0.00002820709,0.01875227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984576,0.0001348334,0.0001950551,0.0001187283,0.0001729157,0.00004243397,0.00001518769,0.000006196235,0.0008570622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1098975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4287262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119882414","doi":"10.5539/jel.v3n3p194","title":"Internal Interest or External Performing? A Qualitative Study on Motivation and Learning of 9th Graders in Thailand Basic Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ninth; Psychology; Motivation to learn; Mathematics education; Intrinsic motivation; Space (punctuation); Goal theory; Qualitative research; Self-determination theory; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Autonomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08372333401897743,"gpt":0.4194838902680503,"spread":0.3357605562490729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588661,0.0001146833,0.0002216179,0.0003641828,0.0001155548,0.00005611583,0.00008566972,0.00005270077,0.0001180566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001219723,0.00008874448,0.00003267896,0.0001363213,0.0000657026,0.0001967535,0.00001592474,0.0006783348,0.000002145273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005804841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002053773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002910673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003283151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981589,0.0009464722,0.0004843989,0.0001545687,0.000139245,0.000116416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980987,0.0009467739,0.0006601806,0.00006289702,0.0001672736,0.00006423328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038282,0.001064926,0.6361916,0.00005293145,0.00004832749,9.03053e-7,0.3090435,0.0000698167,0.000161481,0.003035177,0.0003309422,0.0496176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003942744,0.001300549,0.5290378,0.0002450469,0.0000123189,0.00005275726,0.467796,0.00002331805,0.000006173762,0.0003418692,0.0007320648,0.0000578155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951962,0.0002820097,0.0002118639,0.0005182171,0.001120662,0.0001084912,1.529903e-7,0.000004548252,0.002557818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970391,0.00002803161,0.0002767101,0.00008123928,0.0003091857,0.000009775115,0.000002193319,0.00001001902,0.002243726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1587525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3618895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498060053","doi":"","title":"Using Narrative Inquiry to Inform and Guide our (Re) Interpretations of lived experience","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4851272092075068,"gpt":0.5257161655839852,"spread":0.04058895637647836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006103,0.0001584657,0.0002438658,0.0004802623,0.0008237562,0.00006393219,0.0004001329,0.00008420848,0.0001428325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006478324,0.0001498652,0.0000823404,0.0008256932,0.0004189939,0.0006123818,0.0000426238,0.0001390049,0.000006836795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007264363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006334499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001225327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001995733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981955,0.00018037,0.0008561272,0.0002423589,0.0002261167,0.0002995632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977087,0.0002158641,0.0008316684,0.0001880334,0.0008908532,0.0001649213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002031649,0.001945516,0.04577156,0.0002854699,0.0001479352,0.000008919047,0.6880942,0.02131427,0.01255369,0.1826072,0.03214762,0.01492046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002593753,0.0005807921,0.1227389,0.0003910474,0.00005806187,0.001092212,0.8406279,0.0003204822,0.001658289,0.0149612,0.01696691,0.0003448434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765669,0.0003458551,0.001314281,0.00248341,0.002322537,0.000173152,0.0000108606,0.00001175147,0.01677123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577857,0.00003280005,0.04027227,0.000632711,0.0002498362,0.00003054077,0.000003371589,0.00001045744,0.0009823091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.167646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.633575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319833884","doi":"10.1111/jcal.12779","title":"Examining the structure of credibility evaluation when sixth graders read online texts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Credibility; Newspaper; Psychology; Layperson; Ranking (information retrieval); Quality (philosophy); Source credibility; Mathematics education; Computer science; Information retrieval; Advertising; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1448124159301983,"gpt":0.3859667579180717,"spread":0.2411543419878734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509498,0.0001172962,0.0002651752,0.0001582939,0.0001416165,0.00004759721,0.0003088279,0.00009789597,0.0004854773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002878937,0.00007787946,0.0001101134,0.0003129645,0.00009634229,0.0001060277,0.00005383539,0.0006148469,0.000005580149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006216332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004024457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001218808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977672,0.0007978401,0.0006057319,0.0001578614,0.0004816309,0.0001897629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976045,0.0008657086,0.0008257661,0.0002076013,0.000451281,0.00004517431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003599681,0.0003947344,0.2967073,0.0001582285,0.00124801,0.00005682057,0.03783124,0.140329,0.003126116,0.001012856,0.03177104,0.4870046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004366368,0.0003373325,0.9826726,0.00008555622,0.00007196696,0.0001247106,0.00923661,0.004150507,0.00001273021,0.001406321,0.001386191,0.00007879029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944857,0.0003252141,0.00104598,0.001922062,0.001533486,0.00010044,0.000003851977,0.00002900878,0.0005542885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964834,0.0000103167,0.002483437,0.00007292793,0.0007251641,8.77509e-7,0.00002645856,0.00001195007,0.0001854081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5315636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}