{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1890,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":4,"predictions_cover":1890,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"8ca7e4049b65","filters":{"topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2112987370","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121","title":"WHAT AFFECTS VOTER TURNOUT?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":785,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voter turnout; Political science; Empirical research; Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Political economy; Demographic economics; Development economics; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Voting; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02959882914025985,"gpt":0.40903497435652,"spread":0.3794361452162602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002192403,0.00009252864,0.0002450515,0.00004937468,0.0002412379,0.00008841635,0.000391057,0.00005129468,0.0003368598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002628511,0.00007059818,0.00008924899,0.0006357594,0.0009694844,0.001502151,0.00005481883,0.00009610558,0.0002489245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000414522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003801045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009468854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972467,0.000204287,0.0003117132,0.0002326285,0.0009017417,0.001102958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998379,0.0002407672,0.00007413844,0.0002090258,0.0003375737,0.0007594837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001205432,0.00003677584,0.0003436978,0.0002920968,0.000001431458,5.343139e-7,0.0004757752,1.199121e-7,0.0001038903,0.9876089,0.001139138,0.009996423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003429546,0.0006197163,0.03051034,0.01687471,0.0001028346,0.000008305795,0.001969324,0.00006870129,0.006409836,0.03677439,0.9054345,0.0008844114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2827458,0.02664378,0.0001844874,0.5193212,0.002229762,0.001889567,0.00003914428,0.0001997869,0.1667465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918272,0.001163516,0.0001107732,0.005382406,0.0005106421,0.00001140438,8.072578e-7,0.000004099204,0.0009891228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5746068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235111501","doi":"10.1093/0199276382.001.0001","title":"Losers' Consent","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":776,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Ambivalence; Incentive; Political system; Globe; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08865578436428453,"gpt":0.3863393075751876,"spread":0.2976835232109031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002010839,0.00007505446,0.0001296575,0.00002488917,0.0001317134,0.00003775274,0.00008068665,0.0002246717,0.00519173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007095199,0.00006683415,0.00005962406,0.00002311766,0.00013747,0.00003404209,0.000008682466,0.0001013995,0.00226779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009301738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006552166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05271888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00007016215,0.000148192,0.0001104378,0.0002523295,0.0002425985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995077,0.0001562148,0.00004604829,0.0000851853,0.00005583016,0.0001489966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.543208e-7,0.000003802321,0.00002809979,0.000005732958,0.000004495683,6.248493e-7,0.000168557,1.320969e-7,3.851957e-7,0.6151874,0.3840828,0.0005175159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002796026,0.000009658821,0.00002306765,0.0000276439,0.00001050602,9.106449e-8,0.00001736145,0.000001013838,0.000002003233,0.01764168,0.9821451,0.00009385754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003472013,0.0000990976,0.00001495796,0.003306209,0.0002655499,0.0001655879,0.000003952743,0.00007001116,0.9960399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01476426,0.00001473981,0.00002264152,0.0005083164,0.00225141,0.00000569129,0.00001009662,0.000008229506,0.9824146],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5980624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21913495","doi":"10.1093/0199252017.001.0001","title":"The Presidentialization of Politics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":772,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Appeal; Autonomy; Political economy; Political science; Power (physics); Voting; State (computer science); Democracy; Presidential system; Political system; Political culture; Economic system; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0374834270715563,"gpt":0.3571410541080172,"spread":0.3196576270364609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003010573,0.0000511489,0.00009244958,0.00001709206,0.0002774341,0.0000416604,0.0001205951,0.0001467922,0.000285956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001478894,0.00003531113,0.00004924358,0.00003146767,0.0002028763,0.00003955853,0.00001081947,0.00005459099,0.00005073861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000127492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005104868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006369133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02097344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991149,0.000102312,0.0002275856,0.0000609564,0.0003107485,0.0001835218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999364,0.0002095526,0.0001164793,0.0001039081,0.0001493847,0.00005674292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.565677e-7,0.000002552117,0.00003771356,0.00000805968,0.000006229602,3.29356e-8,0.0002339471,0.000001231107,9.130986e-7,0.9176058,0.08175923,0.0003439549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001711947,0.000008484198,0.00007814086,0.00001982872,0.0000167381,2.584788e-8,0.00002106351,0.000007298813,0.00002110064,0.08332256,0.9164439,0.00004373756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004025962,0.0002170577,0.0001113772,0.00113735,0.0002324108,0.0001754068,0.000004119276,0.00002079834,0.9980612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04241277,0.00004550149,0.000008489013,0.00004092586,0.001356818,0.000004118137,0.000007688507,0.000006634946,0.956117],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8346847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024557722","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12401","title":"The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":720,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; King's College London","keywords":"Status quo; Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Democracy; Political science; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Political efficacy; Prime minister; Survey data collection; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1846541023847336,"gpt":0.4823620117056363,"spread":0.2977079093209026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106593,0.0001331087,0.0003553518,0.000103684,0.0008039965,0.0001538332,0.0006771253,0.00006302338,0.000121719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04119278,0.00008279787,0.0002746966,0.0003003479,0.001104058,0.0001384095,0.00008293019,0.0007168814,0.0001756752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008617891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007051874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000722788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884706,0.007287195,0.0008227719,0.0001962125,0.001518193,0.001705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852315,0.01074199,0.0001514023,0.0001848589,0.0005300181,0.003160295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004368055,0.00004193141,0.001828956,0.00007817824,0.00002902034,0.00004914093,0.0004040369,0.000002795275,0.0002212916,0.984962,0.0110855,0.0008603036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004655273,0.0399598,0.006980275,0.0002089523,0.0001443752,0.0000314317,0.003713969,0.0001492067,0.00816579,0.1553462,0.7801401,0.0005046833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2984912,0.0001592017,0.001164749,0.581512,0.0005759891,0.001353999,0.00007957209,0.00004498477,0.1166184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949278,0.000006246574,0.0000290824,0.00150856,0.002868218,0.000003551851,0.000001509952,0.00002642937,0.0006285705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155643382","doi":"10.1093/pan/mpl008","title":"The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Analysis","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Inference; Range (aeronautics); Survey research; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Survey data collection; Survey methodology; Data science; Experimental data; Politics; Psychology; Management science; Econometrics; Epistemology; Applied psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06365078579159351,"gpt":0.3727602341563828,"spread":0.3091094483647893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009597048,0.00005584666,0.0001511162,0.00002609495,0.000446679,0.00004275768,0.0002081873,0.00004716611,0.00009985372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006468506,0.00002793376,0.0001806641,0.0007968515,0.0004741008,0.00002460748,0.00002712906,0.00005085659,0.00001319862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009015392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005361083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3058921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1210158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979581,0.0008505728,0.0002766955,0.0001032481,0.0003753536,0.0004359981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986724,0.0008205577,0.00006181835,0.0002161388,0.0001319218,0.000097168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001901058,0.00002644024,0.1804307,8.819122e-7,0.00004291679,7.083889e-8,0.0000484719,0.00001043747,0.00005372804,0.8191727,0.0001936735,0.00001811449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004874111,0.00001549837,0.941023,0.000002257797,0.0001897544,3.516898e-8,0.000165696,0.000237367,0.0009083058,0.05461559,0.002726136,0.00006761666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340021,0.0001319014,0.0003233091,0.01245648,0.0001342857,0.0001693079,0.00001967304,0.00002351444,0.0527394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967389,6.543556e-7,0.00000759454,0.0001004565,0.0001530766,0.00001057883,0.000003991362,0.000002399181,0.002982374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7645571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522396107","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511576614","title":"Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":527,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Parliament; Dissent; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Incentive; Political economy; Socialization; Law; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03552734825640166,"gpt":0.2763093780847725,"spread":0.2407820298283709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001600263,0.0001798311,0.0002692457,0.00005997387,0.0005150407,0.00006518929,0.000187931,0.0002850174,0.000004343152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001926089,0.0002007533,0.00008003218,0.00001205339,0.0004361589,0.00009015813,0.00008810987,0.0002411721,0.00000699461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004481357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003263218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005093279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986987,0.0001722714,0.0001518738,0.0002763816,0.0002716124,0.0004291915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991494,0.0001022682,0.0001081081,0.0001876471,0.00008326297,0.0003692932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007576607,0.000009544739,0.00005318377,0.00003255438,0.00002305805,0.00002619672,0.0002470574,1.597688e-7,0.00000214363,0.8319063,0.1672897,0.0004025518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001927084,0.00004808099,0.0002851227,0.00008697718,0.0001184192,8.315944e-7,0.0001295045,0.00000908371,0.00001321513,0.0002717252,0.9986012,0.0002431433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002589526,0.0001124564,0.0000286961,0.0002542442,0.0001267864,0.0003385446,0.000116757,0.00008511201,0.9963479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01856283,0.00003639873,0.00001916831,0.0001520512,0.0006391995,6.283847e-7,0.00005622743,0.00001266169,0.9805208],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498624896","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0015","title":"Public Opinion and Public Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":519,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Representation (politics); Public opinion; Policy studies; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Function (biology); Public economics; Mechanism (biology); Public relations; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09853957913221659,"gpt":0.293824686430625,"spread":0.1952851072984085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001940452,0.0001649482,0.0002086148,0.0001822428,0.0006560913,0.0001742228,0.0002611555,0.0005581451,0.00007695086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007368882,0.0001852267,0.00007904538,0.00001468442,0.0005378225,0.0001982834,0.0001354644,0.000374705,0.000002460506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004476125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007181177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988208,0.00008192953,0.0001275453,0.0002596874,0.0002847975,0.0004252853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898,0.00007486383,0.0001319759,0.0002028992,0.0001678863,0.0004423994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004456519,0.000004621405,0.00009283929,0.00001918188,0.00002085051,0.00000257583,0.0002560297,7.594175e-9,0.000007705077,0.9946881,0.0003659804,0.004537655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337015,0.0000266591,0.00005481366,0.0000252183,0.00001674037,7.614253e-7,0.00003072232,0.000001857661,0.000004101771,0.01294026,0.9865682,0.0001969929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003751467,0.00003924524,0.0000344442,0.001534416,0.0002612872,0.0002711764,0.00003803775,0.00009853318,0.9973477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08476345,0.0001407596,0.00003287175,0.00007411044,0.0007995295,8.56265e-7,0.00001875626,0.0000186269,0.914151],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169495003","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x","title":"Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Kurtosis; Distribution (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Politics; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); Public economics; Economics; Political science; Economic system; Law; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05250744969455836,"gpt":0.426014744330123,"spread":0.3735072946355647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698965,0.00008007709,0.0002901475,0.0002026426,0.0001411409,0.00008207817,0.0003502814,0.00002283058,0.00004152127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001354859,0.00006219519,0.00005983186,0.00153591,0.002780892,0.0004959679,0.00001379254,0.0002027823,0.00001656881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009667898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009501672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01745531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007942351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974927,0.000285661,0.0003697413,0.0001456493,0.0007313136,0.000974991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981251,0.0002518272,0.000171923,0.00007968752,0.0005969418,0.0007744593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002120031,0.00007747294,0.004309955,3.510071e-7,0.000001998565,0.000008057096,0.004393212,0.00001023731,0.001740877,0.9887071,0.00003496046,0.0006945797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005093488,0.00290706,0.7235574,0.00008887431,0.00002044623,0.00002626245,0.04128765,0.0003253818,0.002150423,0.2280286,0.0007539112,0.0003446777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484197,0.00001751001,0.0001205789,0.0172326,0.0001198574,0.00007668541,8.519394e-7,0.000009918101,0.03400227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,6.732143e-7,0.0002282563,0.0006651049,0.0002459873,6.138775e-7,5.523428e-8,0.000001812907,0.00004879158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7606785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093590710","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00152.x","title":"Where does turnout decline come from?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":469,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Turnout; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1401965918452219,"gpt":0.4655272949867104,"spread":0.3253307031414885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006593708,0.00008269095,0.0002076605,0.0001350402,0.0003651349,0.0002024612,0.0004926109,0.0000478324,0.0005678398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004241539,0.00005633091,0.0001137132,0.0002735088,0.0006529283,0.0002053354,0.00009540244,0.000705897,0.0005900941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003555902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004609621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009820051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002485547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938927,0.002966037,0.0005559803,0.0001339447,0.001445116,0.001006252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968911,0.0009361643,0.00008605004,0.0001553395,0.0008124193,0.001118965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004791008,0.0001397897,0.005880835,0.00001495954,0.00002368694,0.000288412,0.001464291,0.000004712163,0.0008818785,0.9888661,0.001152855,0.001234594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002462255,0.001228598,0.1699492,0.0008184348,0.00004075377,0.00001982801,0.004180129,0.000007201106,0.002055139,0.5405169,0.2783268,0.0003947425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676923,0.000290507,0.0004224358,0.05368431,0.0004492531,0.0001246615,0.00001311353,0.00002197843,0.07730145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953029,0.00002461714,0.0002977149,0.0002655117,0.003235629,6.52806e-7,9.431203e-7,0.00001786662,0.0008541267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4483492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646705","doi":"10.1093/0199253137.001.0001","title":"Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":451,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personality psychology; Personality; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Personality type; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Variety (cybernetics); Empirical research; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08148991266034258,"gpt":0.343360839587723,"spread":0.2618709269273803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003038744,0.00008060651,0.0002469576,0.00002910019,0.0002958651,0.00002867253,0.00006932163,0.0001245747,0.0005733509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001733111,0.00004773549,0.00008457634,0.00004056756,0.00111305,0.00004246142,0.000007893279,0.0001107124,0.00001990129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005889116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001270215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01094086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01349996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991404,0.0001747468,0.000193326,0.00008397867,0.0002378631,0.0001697037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990634,0.0006739376,0.00007438949,0.00007280971,0.00006472728,0.00005072241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001554424,0.000004897198,0.001132691,0.00002290583,0.00004679853,7.982305e-8,0.005722593,1.1195e-7,2.135212e-7,0.9507716,0.04222561,0.00007088957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008851364,0.0001029919,0.002968483,0.0001285602,0.0004744777,0.000001662189,0.008522824,0.0001041468,0.000006105664,0.5976298,0.3886955,0.0004802877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000658737,0.0004927192,0.00002159883,0.007167184,0.0001136894,0.0002563439,0.000005071982,0.00002411772,0.9912605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1716579,0.00003168442,0.000007164872,0.0001807518,0.0001564275,0.00001299728,0.000001399262,0.000004980171,0.8279467],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3531418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147872545","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfn017","title":"Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":446,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homosexuality; Public opinion; Cohort; Demography; Politics; Attitude change; Cohort effect; Psychology; General Social Survey; Cohort study; Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Population; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09422929284971764,"gpt":0.321792967793562,"spread":0.2275636749438443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006574785,0.00006973927,0.0002158383,0.00007738044,0.0001233154,0.0000276171,0.0001153799,0.00003771941,0.00002820723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005420372,0.00005138381,0.00001296898,0.0005291443,0.0002813076,0.0001804078,0.000006141453,0.00009467437,9.562032e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002068524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005934273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.000522432,0.0003058303,0.0001305215,0.0003018684,0.0003048439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994284,0.0002418666,0.00008374848,0.00009077956,0.00006432195,0.00009091391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001185578,0.00002424787,0.955767,0.00001332737,0.00000377725,0.000001006803,0.01820169,4.855812e-7,2.886555e-7,0.02468429,0.00006379836,0.00122823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004439547,0.0000532328,0.993545,0.00002549232,0.000001133135,6.375768e-7,0.00153903,0.0004878906,3.649946e-7,0.0006991088,0.003133743,0.00007043465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916952,0.0002157289,0.000005120026,0.00730526,0.0002072287,0.000314158,0.00001367338,0.00000706207,0.0002365612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994894,0.00007982807,0.000002553502,0.0001869848,0.00009620953,0.00008205285,0.00001667864,0.000002767111,0.00004357458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03777798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2095371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053862697","doi":"10.1177/1354068807073852","title":"Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Democracy; Politics; Economics; Competition (biology); Political economy; Political science; Econometrics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04446686238281978,"gpt":0.3666321926704811,"spread":0.3221653302876614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001445738,0.00006057198,0.0001376641,0.00003217769,0.0002376635,0.00003209286,0.00007436538,0.00006435982,0.00004813345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006356377,0.00004191806,0.00003601296,0.0001247749,0.001359154,0.00009307421,0.00001763973,0.00007050142,0.000007041901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006972184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007730613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008122339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003403373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.0002886084,0.0003030636,0.00009147833,0.0002551792,0.0004364836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998719,0.0007898825,0.00007218934,0.00009359884,0.0001439895,0.0001813578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001050425,0.00001656002,0.01699866,0.00001665726,0.000004510103,2.381499e-7,0.001711331,5.892781e-7,0.00006677941,0.9810808,0.00003684196,0.0000565716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146002,0.0001395768,0.03797476,0.00008891461,0.00008069295,0.000004155512,0.008958916,0.0005605252,0.00532649,0.9193311,0.02612216,0.0002666607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9157369,0.00009324761,0.003677328,0.006534528,0.0002520895,0.0003181119,0.00001567398,0.00004106197,0.07333104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990931,0.000003666352,0.00006443972,0.0003077204,0.0002769449,0.000004744214,0.000004569468,0.000004162061,0.0002406574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08335617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016278092","doi":"10.1257/aer.96.4.1271","title":"A Theory of Participation in Elections","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Turnout; Voting; Economics; Obligation; Duty; Microeconomics; Function (biology); Public economics; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03719464436897175,"gpt":0.382361681226886,"spread":0.3451670368579142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006310102,0.00003746804,0.0001929925,0.0000291411,0.00003663117,0.000005302793,0.00004858577,0.00001167399,0.000177105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008901019,0.0000365206,0.00004150772,0.0001645796,0.0001687163,0.00006760337,0.000003525883,0.00002896084,0.00007157468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001207241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008006727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05236803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03324011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990974,0.0003125308,0.0003129705,0.00007937311,0.00003968051,0.000158052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995946,0.0001318829,0.0001500683,0.00007658926,0.00001510921,0.0000317847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003268123,0.00005655702,0.09399644,0.00009926529,0.000005684608,1.847891e-7,0.0001934956,0.00003930707,0.00003978904,0.857276,0.001468596,0.0468214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002851724,0.0002008845,0.626597,0.001119843,0.00009600371,7.616812e-7,0.0003137191,0.0001222325,0.0002038613,0.09278966,0.2778475,0.0004233509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956053,0.005086254,0.000168344,0.003903223,0.0001126665,0.0005273436,0.000003923284,0.00002993955,0.09456299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981801,0.001166053,0.00002321233,0.0001810252,0.00007690498,0.00005253789,0.000002209022,0.000003182908,0.0003148026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592290488","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12313","title":"The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Göteborgs Universitet; National Science Foundation; Vetenskapsrådet; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Austrian Science Fund; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Pledge; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Power (physics); Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1015374552639146,"gpt":0.4697373691619765,"spread":0.3681999138980619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548821,0.00007619745,0.0002571902,0.00004972465,0.001279166,0.0001587684,0.000850038,0.00001326021,0.00002377844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00223642,0.00003541246,0.0001216106,0.0002982719,0.004935342,0.0002268124,0.00005722219,0.0001577607,0.000003148902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003068464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004963447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02796051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008277093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977286,0.000319404,0.0004356604,0.0001077645,0.0008321656,0.0005764464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974228,0.0007337095,0.0007271867,0.0002800846,0.0005329206,0.0003033546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009622731,0.0003178913,0.1949735,0.00000119666,0.00005547548,9.720685e-7,0.0121283,0.00002545565,0.001636967,0.7900805,0.00008125571,0.0006021978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351788,0.003886144,0.9605002,0.00004069248,0.00001783263,0.000001604561,0.02402651,0.00008846334,0.001900447,0.009300468,0.00003815648,0.00006433364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913171,0.000006002701,0.00003046152,0.0030581,0.0001316415,0.000166858,0.000001891042,0.000002116124,0.005285845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998246,9.979465e-7,0.000005658413,0.00002400463,0.0001021304,0.000003542286,1.358103e-8,0.000002235948,0.00003678093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101299999","doi":"10.1177/1081180x02238783","title":"Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":370,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Foreign policy; Public opinion; Polling; Political science; Mass media; Opinion poll; Public relations; Media coverage; Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Politics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07359663818563902,"gpt":0.374175154339043,"spread":0.300578516153404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007954551,0.00008870425,0.0001664053,0.0001624111,0.0001636794,0.000227044,0.0002701624,0.00008918489,0.0002834513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004017396,0.00008022801,0.00008026264,0.00008705234,0.0002126739,0.0004744527,0.00002638689,0.0001530513,0.00002477737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002082592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004939166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001406716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009972038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980645,0.000311239,0.0004554007,0.00009139195,0.00073031,0.0003471239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979793,0.0003364332,0.0002523489,0.00007527695,0.0009704112,0.0003861623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003232537,0.000040418,0.006549561,0.000005224393,0.00004920141,0.000004974625,0.0009932264,0.000003368458,0.00002759599,0.9890572,0.002927551,0.000338406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003651236,0.00004453569,0.00227854,0.00003812393,0.00001169771,0.00003488395,0.0003687868,0.00001876067,0.0002757547,0.1926702,0.8037974,0.00009616517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2825966,0.001470858,0.009779952,0.03054749,0.009963903,0.0006420201,0.0001796827,0.00011203,0.6647075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951977,0.0002003034,0.0004508277,0.0004442621,0.002996928,0.000003033135,0.000003319802,0.000009546395,0.0006940632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4809489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147590467","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264","title":"Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":368,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Legislature; Political science; Inflation (cosmology); Process (computing); Public relations; Value (mathematics); Public opinion; Media coverage; Public administration; Public economics; Politics; Economics; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1208611365445037,"gpt":0.4524716581728181,"spread":0.3316105216283144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001518603,0.00005356186,0.0001140835,0.00004990182,0.0002818896,0.0001146312,0.0001249337,0.00003435351,0.00004387962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001373939,0.00004365366,0.00001681553,0.00008405381,0.00005857672,0.0001358059,0.00001527435,0.0001631694,6.763022e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000517527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983177,0.0004507351,0.0004366727,0.0000913536,0.0003867589,0.0003168026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.0008677763,0.000146075,0.00003324297,0.0001762437,0.0001715123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002290658,0.00003310228,0.735186,0.0001225986,0.00002627861,0.000007969449,0.07584795,0.00001226957,0.00000790042,0.05401715,0.07740998,0.0573059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009393067,0.00005204917,0.1193535,0.0001501134,0.000002634132,0.00001268854,0.04787893,0.0003289933,0.00000942081,0.00330199,0.8277732,0.0001971707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6054025,0.002918834,0.00001370879,0.3901894,0.0009130101,0.0002141474,0.0001718498,0.000004131609,0.0001724424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954894,0.0002053594,0.0000188338,0.003760271,0.0004343356,0.00001267087,0.00001034507,0.000003400602,0.00006543739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7503632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3254747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020497411","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.00084","title":"Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":347,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Politics; Dominance (genetics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Prime minister; Political economy; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1742206036016166,"gpt":0.4432722198981079,"spread":0.2690516162964913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006962796,0.00007975652,0.00018404,0.00006772867,0.000700371,0.0001538622,0.0004102524,0.00003009982,0.000186133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004556197,0.00004534327,0.00009307437,0.0002874211,0.001582606,0.0002215136,0.00009990078,0.0005202079,0.00001529668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003809733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006147037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001301907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879698,0.009571419,0.000534126,0.0001153661,0.001237926,0.0005713821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971652,0.001611911,0.0001753763,0.0001795033,0.0005501223,0.0003178623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008008388,0.0001210669,0.01901435,0.00004965905,0.00006973466,0.00001892581,0.008501147,0.00001429334,0.002238804,0.9587021,0.01098107,0.0002087827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001201003,0.001147649,0.8189232,0.0005296236,0.0001660628,0.00006053056,0.03375805,0.00005739828,0.01707051,0.08690625,0.03988321,0.000296478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650783,0.0003193727,0.0002094454,0.005093094,0.0002927047,0.0002817006,0.00000437357,0.000004498857,0.0287165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986206,0.00001518724,0.00002033994,0.00006284195,0.0005212027,0.000002077047,1.755851e-7,0.000008142029,0.0007494307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9292522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993021756","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x","title":"Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Outcome (game theory); Control (management); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Microeconomics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07739236580483107,"gpt":0.4151013237480304,"spread":0.3377089579431994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000458801,0.00006807505,0.0001245431,0.00002706704,0.0005855808,0.00003546262,0.00002138963,0.000041014,0.00001656642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004415321,0.00005098096,0.00001398006,0.000103129,0.0004805413,0.0001175073,0.00001525252,0.00006953088,0.00001264561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001376666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002402917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01906077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02394191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989076,0.00006419079,0.0001392603,0.0001190617,0.0002061702,0.000563679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.0004377982,0.00002532783,0.00004280957,0.00009973342,0.0002246349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006065729,0.000005222129,0.4213876,0.000009793873,0.00001491323,0.000002154687,0.0008539476,9.065369e-8,0.00002192994,0.5763903,0.00006363515,0.001244392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240997,0.0001397582,0.9069076,0.00007491682,0.0000484539,0.000003954762,0.005211824,0.000005633993,0.0003277796,0.08086804,0.005991961,0.0001959947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976782,0.0003236056,0.0005621001,0.007187737,0.00009985594,0.0001107032,7.873886e-7,0.00006165145,0.01487156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988039,0.000007331527,0.0002086058,0.000321896,0.0003861032,0.00000341459,2.417536e-7,0.000005092063,0.0002634362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4955222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098588068","doi":"10.1177/0010414006299098","title":"The Mass Media's Political Agenda-Setting Power","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Scrutiny; Politics; Mass media; Political communication; Government (linguistics); Political science; Newspaper; Power (physics); Media relations; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2295521963620845,"gpt":0.48782608821665,"spread":0.2582738918545655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042141,0.0001950749,0.000363218,0.00004221729,0.001992301,0.0001223556,0.0002508839,0.000100661,0.00005860802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003253399,0.0001287751,0.0001178546,0.0002606238,0.002374403,0.0001205878,0.00007678442,0.0002691013,0.0002617911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000519815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001181365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001719745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00545283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957649,0.0005534114,0.0005255532,0.0002650572,0.0006363888,0.00225465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915513,0.007087169,0.00007110434,0.0001786157,0.0004492537,0.0006625436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001513329,0.00002732462,0.008136687,0.000005845612,0.00006133248,0.000005797876,0.004604351,1.593771e-7,0.0000390089,0.9837554,0.003250628,0.00009838772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004653172,0.0001929186,0.09283978,0.00008169311,0.00007817138,0.000002678457,0.1049048,0.00002416697,0.002203994,0.5503045,0.2482732,0.0006287516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3654688,0.003186246,0.001941286,0.07593703,0.002533709,0.0008529642,0.00002864137,0.0003215687,0.5497297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967982,0.00000540257,0.0001165957,0.001061181,0.001158552,0.00002849413,0.000001784327,0.000009931661,0.0008198872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6313294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138082499","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000347","title":"Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":308,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Notice; Representation (politics); Politics; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public expenditure; Public economics; Structuring; Government spending; Work (physics); Preference; Public administration; Economics; Political economy; Welfare; Law; Public finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09131300604692778,"gpt":0.3873635727920647,"spread":0.296050566745137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660904,0.00008231547,0.0001662178,0.0003404923,0.0006723169,0.001124898,0.0007186677,0.00008499828,0.00006282711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004966463,0.0000650295,0.00004543828,0.001361365,0.001794783,0.001244837,0.00005200177,0.0003544677,0.000005577094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005177652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001103865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06284576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03938669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967111,0.0005336438,0.0004464836,0.0001639696,0.0009908038,0.001154011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982766,0.0003866431,0.0001371072,0.00009071112,0.0003423656,0.0007666033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001321367,0.00006725476,0.01461345,0.000003897524,0.000001839697,0.00000717391,0.0005352873,0.000001220415,0.000009275778,0.9775327,0.0001501796,0.007076441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008774799,0.0003172381,0.7235562,0.0003570186,0.00001407105,0.0009100844,0.01110362,0.00106185,0.00002238656,0.1731054,0.08820596,0.0004687068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214196,0.0001490868,0.0001131742,0.07161045,0.0001874815,0.000123662,0.000007029028,0.00001133205,0.006378165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974731,0.00003468767,0.0001049899,0.001102932,0.001249504,0.000004472763,0.00000142566,0.000003730264,0.00002514992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798022091","doi":"10.1017/s1049096518000367","title":"Explaining the Trump Vote: The Effect of Racist Resentment and Anti-Immigrant Sentiments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":295,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Resentment; Political science; Immigration; Voting; Victory; Political economy; Presidential election; Democracy; Politics; Presidential system; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03520424065615878,"gpt":0.3814721839239279,"spread":0.3462679432677691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744215,0.0001572858,0.0002383913,0.00006749554,0.0022174,0.0002252423,0.0005429821,0.00007395586,0.0000330678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002059523,0.00008377717,0.00007441019,0.0004884676,0.009534516,0.0002112872,0.0001517704,0.0001693654,0.00003675512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002532805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002740899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03145028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001092625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995784,0.0006346946,0.0003920354,0.0003037214,0.001102159,0.001783323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974914,0.001190627,0.00009955269,0.0003562103,0.0002118122,0.0006504063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006452124,0.00002203712,0.0399151,0.00001361631,0.00000860148,0.000001011924,0.002461245,3.87318e-7,0.0008057987,0.9563662,0.0001392695,0.0002602327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002303827,0.003779672,0.6011276,0.0004289652,0.0005095135,0.00004694097,0.01382488,0.003837217,0.204936,0.116596,0.0512055,0.001403927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735003,0.00003770419,0.0000552717,0.01296883,0.0004306167,0.0004500764,0.00001310156,0.00002979438,0.01251431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982557,0.000002153093,0.00002317787,0.0005830112,0.0007571132,0.0000213756,9.097625e-7,0.000008357127,0.0003481673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984396639","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00632.x","title":"The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Economics; Portfolio; Bargaining power; Politics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Portfolio allocation; Political science; Financial economics; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1350843593231312,"gpt":0.4380228780870555,"spread":0.3029385187639243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01409297,0.00006665295,0.000109157,0.0001097485,0.001033389,0.0001960272,0.0004289097,0.00006582173,0.00001405156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005217248,0.00003970337,0.00007049104,0.0004252172,0.0009860914,0.0003032864,0.00003429138,0.0009316097,0.00001779281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001925715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004689678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007306405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001737171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918966,0.005586379,0.0006197093,0.0001022212,0.001242812,0.0005522818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959334,0.002370259,0.0001934205,0.000188964,0.001013606,0.0003003377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002107807,0.00002521237,0.01695779,0.00000659651,0.0000063826,0.000005423432,0.001128246,0.0000324414,0.0004625508,0.9803455,0.0005474662,0.0004612344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003222773,0.0004613732,0.6918429,0.0001503005,0.0000313674,0.000008629067,0.008169233,0.0003524307,0.0011789,0.2892541,0.008092485,0.0001360524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970126,0.0002683072,0.0001833043,0.01603319,0.0001512005,0.0001483619,0.000001138146,0.000007814797,0.01308063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976282,0.00000662215,0.00008099465,0.00005622236,0.001481995,0.000001998888,0.000002495218,0.00001149327,0.000729955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6910915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122715487","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.00587","title":"Left–right party ideology and government policies: A meta–analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Government (linguistics); Meta-analysis; Logistic regression; Public policy; Public economics; Empirical research; Regression analysis; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Politics; Econometrics; Statistics; Economic growth; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2398160790978629,"gpt":0.4754878727448341,"spread":0.2356717936469712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008676371,0.00009394793,0.0004250196,0.0001945468,0.00038502,0.0001369085,0.0002836353,0.00004287345,0.001357694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002542376,0.00006627673,0.0003030129,0.0005355055,0.0008428799,0.0001550998,0.00008446864,0.0004408789,0.00008453116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002324529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001407958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00301748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001381132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917681,0.00504851,0.0005236794,0.00015509,0.001457094,0.001047564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970045,0.00126793,0.00009691577,0.0001511607,0.000442481,0.001037003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002985874,0.00008469564,0.02007303,0.000007588208,0.002943457,0.0002376216,0.001181878,0.000003546622,0.0000845192,0.9740533,0.001134188,0.0001663778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001212732,0.00222084,0.3404706,0.00004003637,0.01626533,0.0001562589,0.005699886,0.0001266005,0.0004239807,0.07634559,0.556439,0.0005991248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7049308,0.000869365,0.0009168201,0.06248143,0.0001399165,0.0001898741,0.00001282071,0.0000186795,0.2304402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995097,0.00004479096,0.0000667128,0.000480418,0.0006076844,0.000001135085,3.281024e-7,0.00001043092,0.003691476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869341281","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x","title":"Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Causality (physics); Spurious relationship; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Perception; Economics; Voting; Variable (mathematics); Panel data; Political science; Public economics; Econometrics; Law; Psychology; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1146257380675136,"gpt":0.3945179183706359,"spread":0.2798921803031224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003388242,0.00006381304,0.0002305648,0.00003661872,0.0006338502,0.0001055573,0.0004593321,0.00001839535,0.000008135466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001871245,0.00003927839,0.00002189088,0.0002190981,0.0153899,0.000491176,0.0001277823,0.0001272852,0.000002472372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000743007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004292679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06279677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001613045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983354,0.0003149588,0.0003020495,0.0001646168,0.0003197223,0.0005632766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983164,0.000543104,0.0001601473,0.0001916354,0.00014013,0.000648594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001832704,0.00001537368,0.04600686,0.000001761382,0.000005886195,0.000003396015,0.001302098,4.88675e-7,0.00002061601,0.9499143,0.0001628756,0.002548018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009134891,0.0004981279,0.8681412,0.00003733303,0.00006884523,0.0002824519,0.005168063,0.0008227651,0.0001408236,0.09807533,0.02552337,0.0003282501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615025,0.0001391855,0.00006081687,0.03704669,0.0001099659,0.00006114591,0.000006655757,0.00000514223,0.001067879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985264,0.000119094,0.0002069595,0.0006808899,0.0003861922,6.350361e-7,1.911498e-7,0.00000251376,0.000077139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128221199","doi":"10.1177/0010414005284374","title":"Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Cabinet (room); Proportional representation; Representation (politics); Government (linguistics); Survey data collection; Public administration; National election; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Law; Democracy; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1776658495383456,"gpt":0.4747246020252204,"spread":0.2970587524868748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002398627,0.0001331693,0.0003231685,0.00005488692,0.0005730526,0.0000834792,0.00006047721,0.00006391038,0.00003493972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004298854,0.00008572255,0.00004765528,0.0001961369,0.00138762,0.0001819854,0.00005580332,0.00009519095,0.00003891124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002094182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009474116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01509416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00557362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981139,0.0003258539,0.0003474241,0.000261422,0.0003447651,0.0006066902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985926,0.0007213387,0.00007537416,0.00008495039,0.0003236109,0.0002021301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005748373,0.00001839583,0.2697888,0.00001179875,0.00003104267,0.000001171978,0.001201158,5.613234e-7,0.00003442616,0.7275329,0.00130479,0.0000691892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471688,0.00007011972,0.5741067,0.00003209369,0.00003660069,5.265985e-7,0.003071938,0.000009066473,0.0008071704,0.4141158,0.007316933,0.0001858924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.939091,0.0001959784,0.0001127506,0.03002902,0.0001613556,0.0004333313,0.00003874441,0.00006960431,0.02986818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955099,0.000003785929,0.00007785681,0.0003137577,0.001697158,0.00005869662,0.00001237594,0.000005296504,0.002321221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3134171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987209076","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00194.x","title":"Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual‐Level Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":279,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Voting; Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Multilevel model; Public economics; Proposition; Government (linguistics); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Positive economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06481555450135508,"gpt":0.3867787262321502,"spread":0.3219631717307951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653237,0.00008865077,0.0003518687,0.0001464625,0.0003857111,0.0001669929,0.0002920997,0.00002384858,0.0000429873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003272801,0.00007356187,0.00009245982,0.0006534177,0.003237945,0.0004155804,0.00003865973,0.0001324175,0.000008722613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004174989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004684889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07297788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005510396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978296,0.0001814668,0.0004431082,0.0001719194,0.0005954457,0.0007784266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983937,0.000411926,0.0003752625,0.00006807246,0.0001802646,0.0005708455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004757321,0.00002566899,0.1645753,0.000001086474,0.00002832307,0.000001795538,0.000704047,0.00007530615,0.00009699906,0.8334553,0.00004150267,0.0009898958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001196381,0.0001341089,0.9925524,0.00001263253,0.0001079201,0.000004870634,0.001017354,0.0008214862,0.0002394475,0.004656669,0.0002190704,0.0001143963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938029,0.00002415509,0.001235323,0.001668621,0.00009215233,0.00005197109,0.00002278529,0.000007117766,0.003094997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.000001190986,0.001019731,0.0001395054,0.0003536154,0.00000121293,3.861892e-7,0.000002742825,0.00006642189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115365533","doi":"10.1017/s0022381614000085","title":"Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Ideology; Social psychology; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Sample (material); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06102927442900199,"gpt":0.3473653025244689,"spread":0.2863360280954669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002079606,0.00003927725,0.0001072788,0.00005371643,0.0002374516,0.00002608715,0.000156578,0.00004789243,0.00005121376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008076545,0.00002676818,0.00005135855,0.0001501985,0.0001230104,0.0001357423,0.000008092687,0.00009858962,0.000009132947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007000122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00116044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003141749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998494,0.0006365328,0.0003291772,0.00002536745,0.0003003977,0.0002145516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988062,0.0003421821,0.0002359731,0.00008096681,0.0004047504,0.0001299012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001426982,0.00004802176,0.01588105,0.00001497992,0.00001881738,8.141414e-8,0.005583489,0.00003012192,0.001196902,0.9767644,0.000191885,0.0002688093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001651389,0.001390958,0.1650943,0.0003122744,0.0008148138,0.00005079286,0.01415465,0.006571355,0.004904796,0.4245546,0.3798023,0.0006977675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743494,0.0000531555,0.01153878,0.005768231,0.0002787827,0.00006542154,0.000002236152,0.00001220526,0.007931826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984413,0.00001429497,0.0003780284,0.0001090093,0.0007767463,2.118361e-7,4.219888e-7,0.000004399172,0.0002756052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5522098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.182631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120643638","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x","title":"Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Irish; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Focus (optics); Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03452882814731853,"gpt":0.3423258635713111,"spread":0.3077970354239925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247522,0.00008491958,0.0002505353,0.000108097,0.0002453026,0.0001070204,0.0002105661,0.00002560928,0.0000154172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001194694,0.00005449196,0.00002469854,0.0008130114,0.005339957,0.0001985949,0.00002237219,0.0002201093,0.000001279468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004441875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002664494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9285508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980378,0.0002030973,0.0003449038,0.0001284964,0.0005264887,0.0007592366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983209,0.000408719,0.0001503726,0.0000649049,0.0001471174,0.000908036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003701368,0.00001087227,0.08961732,0.000001107622,0.000003924497,0.00001311394,0.0008547627,0.000006530562,0.00004838176,0.9084516,0.00006548929,0.0008898643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00587608,0.001038712,0.769124,0.0002662395,0.00007944286,0.0002341211,0.005088963,0.00005549758,0.0005070388,0.2042193,0.01297248,0.0005380596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672603,0.00003292064,0.00005385065,0.03223707,0.0001122374,0.00009138347,0.000001994779,0.000003061155,0.0002071681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989908,0.00000336313,0.00006092767,0.0006800233,0.0001618397,9.849208e-7,1.078705e-7,0.000002588811,0.00009939808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7042323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147266353","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.479","title":"Hate Crime: An Emergent Research Agenda","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Task (project management); Data collection; Population; Data science; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2570394951629482,"gpt":0.5477262221446134,"spread":0.2906867269816653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768066,0.00005670659,0.0002495513,0.00003351408,0.0002676822,0.000004664373,0.0001914682,0.0001089694,0.001053768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001054126,0.00004946165,0.00007367948,0.0002141318,0.0006688797,0.0001256145,0.00002705937,0.0001549817,0.0002266785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000569085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001567709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006998222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000621656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99677,0.001974585,0.0003378304,0.0001572865,0.0002974148,0.000462881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989064,0.000207091,0.00007782412,0.0001546112,0.0005050061,0.0001491111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001441147,0.0001895952,0.01165073,0.001157829,0.00003403566,0.000009711141,0.01988656,3.317905e-7,0.0004192648,0.8762057,0.06566624,0.02476554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006412269,0.0002794898,0.01194774,0.000444172,0.00001548128,7.926789e-7,0.002169872,0.000001397519,0.00002079274,0.01658594,0.968374,0.00009622356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7117811,0.1119872,0.00004903861,0.04422973,0.0009369659,0.001423358,0.00005152539,0.00009672772,0.1294443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968282,0.02863113,0.00002327254,0.001202376,0.0004040087,0.00003328441,0.0000144608,0.000005886128,0.001403551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171919272","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523","title":"PARTY IDENTIFICATION: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Identification (biology); Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05466091510984383,"gpt":0.4073869465026128,"spread":0.352726031392769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002287774,0.00008580147,0.0002907253,0.00004816781,0.0001762792,0.00002809886,0.0004200641,0.00005153977,0.0004306264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002953445,0.00005987017,0.0000773932,0.0009575856,0.00131034,0.0004230019,0.00004275356,0.00006318147,0.00004177175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001777256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006892993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03580213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002228035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972091,0.0002083329,0.0006864552,0.0002303216,0.000951592,0.0007141369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982669,0.0002830046,0.0002148194,0.0002321919,0.0006944192,0.0003087036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003180112,0.00006902849,0.002974163,0.0005316635,0.000001565145,3.114807e-7,0.0001050901,2.053228e-7,0.0004503814,0.9942302,0.001046547,0.0005876661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004906314,0.0005362428,0.6211585,0.007414096,0.000173776,0.000003658117,0.001158129,0.00006640236,0.02441131,0.2264004,0.1173492,0.0008376052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7263746,0.007044657,0.0006631644,0.03059492,0.0010287,0.002207791,0.0003537919,0.0001324505,0.2315999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971637,0.0001808271,0.00007562667,0.0003576416,0.0001577607,0.00001536738,0.000003182453,0.000003185791,0.0020427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779364895","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000569","title":"Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Status quo bias; Politics; Personality; Status quo; Discounting; Work (physics); Appeal; Regret; Subject (documents); Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003232516648837,"gpt":0.529907989688136,"spread":0.4295847380232523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001580272,0.0001210021,0.0004645012,0.00005311251,0.001128452,0.00008244597,0.001294671,0.00002202574,0.00006601519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00582324,0.0000813696,0.0001033166,0.0007334727,0.007163021,0.0005054931,0.0002235048,0.0001116803,0.000004390633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002201325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004776967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08893482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003210759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961251,0.0008992601,0.0005598633,0.0003722577,0.001172799,0.0008707145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997394,0.000415753,0.0005816254,0.0008928734,0.0003738916,0.0003418316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002683527,0.001665944,0.183028,0.0001120536,0.00002346413,0.000002816126,0.01124299,0.0000013199,0.00239252,0.7885038,0.00007180402,0.01292842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325223,0.001925571,0.9100647,0.002322638,0.0001330128,0.000002910638,0.06378818,0.00006498083,0.006638729,0.01399671,0.0002447469,0.0003853191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855804,0.0001818361,0.00003655632,0.001878339,0.00011586,0.0008992093,0.000006906029,0.00001353855,0.01128729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.00002965431,0.000126461,0.0003594862,0.00008056714,0.00003541517,2.013913e-7,0.000006804278,0.00002907147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7745072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732266619","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12145","title":"It's (Change in) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the Media, and Public Opinion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Perception; Recession; Affect (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Media coverage; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03613873549765027,"gpt":0.3564727057531193,"spread":0.320333970255469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005431013,0.00007690831,0.0001834604,0.0001430713,0.0004268927,0.0002576458,0.0006772236,0.00002881222,0.0000278511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007558039,0.00004186212,0.0000440723,0.0005022289,0.003748802,0.0005654081,0.00004096928,0.0002176066,0.000009806414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002420901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005040303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01075889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005840173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976988,0.0006600083,0.0003449547,0.0001366826,0.0003823461,0.0007772222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.0009799976,0.0002210711,0.0001371441,0.00006060984,0.0005383126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001835473,0.00001492947,0.05585374,0.000001175084,0.000001689339,3.233301e-7,0.003533621,1.908192e-7,0.000001842826,0.930728,0.00009545363,0.009767232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520951,0.0005566184,0.7351522,0.00003057353,0.00001438804,0.00002913727,0.01989388,0.0001487923,0.00001234759,0.0540705,0.1896308,0.000208697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7311432,0.00006889152,0.00004839741,0.2614736,0.0005537755,0.0001359211,0.000001465484,0.000005031844,0.006569743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931105,0.00002277071,0.000027219,0.004455968,0.002370747,0.000006876652,1.653285e-7,0.000003160902,0.000002559026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016627412","doi":"10.1017/s0007123401000242","title":"Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Portfolio; Legislature; Proportionality (law); Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Financial economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02739009286232246,"gpt":0.3463217589814241,"spread":0.3189316661191017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005480525,0.00004661645,0.0001771486,0.00004381713,0.0002411001,0.00009385854,0.0002362854,0.00003739799,0.00006847719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002837926,0.00003632675,0.00004458045,0.0004699173,0.003161335,0.0004606169,0.00003260397,0.0001362035,0.000001235518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002374245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004250318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03597753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002886688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974552,0.0002931806,0.0005417039,0.0001085576,0.001090092,0.0005112711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988623,0.0002347491,0.0002217532,0.00005727827,0.000292737,0.0003311285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001989841,0.00008324693,0.1203273,0.0000057508,0.000001744326,0.00002324138,0.0002158165,0.000001240618,0.0001289002,0.8774125,0.00003516362,0.001745192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000496418,0.00004571967,0.9196445,0.0001187641,0.000007945207,0.0001754636,0.0005532228,0.00003600312,0.0001234826,0.07812012,0.0006222884,0.00005601412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884573,0.0000982866,0.0001894617,0.003072866,0.0001182211,0.0001266999,0.000004334981,0.000002933184,0.0079299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994203,0.00005130117,0.00007874941,0.000200809,0.0001350401,0.000002443687,1.539425e-7,0.000001823043,0.0001093236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970767025","doi":"10.1177/1354068808099979","title":"Patterns of Party Integration, Influence and Autonomy in Seven Federations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Incentive; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Public administration; Federalism; Federal state; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03654335932395034,"gpt":0.3482235693503902,"spread":0.3116802100264399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002573887,0.00006239057,0.0001241043,0.000043454,0.000162005,0.00004990081,0.00005511048,0.00006438064,0.000026651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002609928,0.0000590904,0.00001952885,0.0001073679,0.00006835778,0.0001872293,0.000006702524,0.00007409738,0.000006450276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008526339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001816878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01146013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.0001389136,0.0002786059,0.0001017666,0.0001365443,0.0002777946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995295,0.0001085977,0.00005756276,0.00008442737,0.00009520821,0.0001246978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001024669,0.00004265523,0.2187233,0.000007842728,0.000001994142,4.86863e-7,0.006630483,0.00002756564,0.0001691119,0.7738858,0.00007469503,0.0004350248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002347481,0.0001000816,0.9106992,0.00008010279,0.00001245901,6.90969e-7,0.001129538,0.0004687722,0.001364075,0.07598177,0.009750379,0.0001782125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911581,0.00002402836,0.0003291616,0.003247476,0.00004015581,0.0001577693,0.00001411212,0.00002014622,0.005009071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988377,0.000004703944,0.00008823496,0.0003564796,0.0000928352,0.000009862597,0.000006264625,0.000002592354,0.0006012875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6979041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099253260","doi":"10.1017/s1755773913000088","title":"Testing the national identity argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National identity; Patriotism; Argument (complex analysis); Pride; Identity (music); Political science; Economic Justice; Social identity theory; State (computer science); Welfare state; Sociology; Democracy; Political economy; Gender studies; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Social group; Social science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1655066420511378,"gpt":0.4235669806738721,"spread":0.2580603386227343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006476101,0.00007420766,0.0001089885,0.00002383773,0.0009673203,0.0003290046,0.0005692277,0.00001148892,0.0006188393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806288,0.00004554068,0.00004899735,0.0008762087,0.001132729,0.0007016548,0.00009467214,0.0001088939,0.003880423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002956554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002973086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005037409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006766768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967446,0.0006988804,0.0002982632,0.0002047916,0.00114067,0.000912795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984183,0.0003301557,0.00006089002,0.0001272342,0.0005133841,0.0005499959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[4.023146e-8,0.00001347199,0.001205329,0.00004041088,9.593174e-7,3.535643e-7,0.00004725091,2.019771e-7,0.0001601499,0.9939226,0.002186336,0.002422931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008879637,0.00005964016,0.6180917,0.001376244,0.0000336279,0.000007846624,0.0001304009,0.0001701907,0.00004519357,0.1655681,0.2140538,0.0003744464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02341144,0.001058104,0.00007543164,0.08882072,0.0002329668,0.00081639,0.000002111195,0.00009483908,0.885488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900596,0.00005272314,0.00009573891,0.008830765,0.000489451,0.00002292974,3.606466e-7,0.000004947402,0.00044355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976727838","doi":"10.1017/s1049096508080505","title":"On the Limits to Inequality in Representation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Griffin; Democracy; Politics; Representation (politics); Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Representative democracy; Public policy; Sociology; Law; History; Classics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2118829640297605,"gpt":0.4594372019255752,"spread":0.2475542378958147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002054402,0.0001217572,0.0001720958,0.0001620263,0.001132458,0.000105672,0.0004906433,0.00007966606,0.0001101376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01068279,0.00008998709,0.00005287487,0.001180701,0.001847048,0.0002482555,0.00005354944,0.0002141579,0.0003617101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009313627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007812226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04952077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003095153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956575,0.0004581575,0.0003911399,0.0003594561,0.001159625,0.001974099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969906,0.00126047,0.0000426865,0.0003541048,0.0002257346,0.001126467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003231446,0.00006640009,0.03481521,0.000001965474,7.742013e-7,0.000004003895,0.002378603,0.00001067285,0.0001610245,0.9621912,0.0003262426,0.00004070339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001992095,0.0001963349,0.533576,0.00004543223,0.000006341872,0.000004224898,0.001563957,0.0002512136,0.004112668,0.4553916,0.004313513,0.0003394936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8858163,0.000002389725,0.00009075057,0.04409461,0.0002377197,0.0003589332,0.000007304526,0.0000478456,0.06934418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992275,9.173625e-7,0.00005082942,0.006494161,0.0004033251,0.00004262971,0.000001008113,0.00000736234,0.0007247544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5067996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161490657","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00135","title":"The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Similarity (geometry); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Logit; Politics; Variation (astronomy); Test (biology); Voting behavior; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06822017273372011,"gpt":0.351417004593491,"spread":0.2831968318597708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133765,0.00006791493,0.0001627805,0.00003083652,0.0004368722,0.00004840823,0.0002152043,0.00005781213,0.00002759927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005999008,0.00003815072,0.00006430833,0.0001186103,0.000552613,0.00008393219,0.00001607463,0.0001974176,0.000002573615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004266847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005427836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001927165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001213582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984523,0.0003952089,0.0004226069,0.00003635862,0.000343662,0.000349874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981139,0.001078861,0.0003177011,0.00009904875,0.0002367133,0.0001537839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002557953,0.000155433,0.3369367,0.00005632448,0.0002255032,0.000004562772,0.01504716,0.000004590603,0.001491297,0.6340254,0.008864578,0.003162897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008623468,0.001093666,0.5637827,0.0001598563,0.000771228,0.00007603734,0.003389104,0.001104417,0.000656341,0.05524427,0.3723615,0.0004985225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912001,0.0006553993,0.00002432105,0.007155774,0.0001958589,0.0000759862,0.000006767109,0.0000051071,0.0006806997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.0003430005,0.000009907728,0.0002144077,0.0007544124,5.413927e-7,2.555481e-7,0.000006427977,0.0003476761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3360112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087243505","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.00027","title":"Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Voting; Politics; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Ideology; Political economy; Ranked voting system; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5379475133274344,"gpt":0.4965041706856168,"spread":0.04144334264181765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005951021,0.0000521109,0.0001260518,0.0002046598,0.0001784222,0.00008796185,0.000154872,0.00003299878,0.0001883436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002226203,0.00004402085,0.00003132855,0.0002482361,0.0002609048,0.0001931016,0.00004569151,0.0005234689,0.00007719122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001361142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002978232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003484369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005089782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952667,0.002908113,0.0003527138,0.00009576776,0.000646202,0.0007304741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986927,0.0004143004,0.00004729066,0.00005786067,0.0002433214,0.0005445117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009613066,0.00008903167,0.08655775,0.00001653663,0.000003212394,0.00009993369,0.003294048,9.142727e-8,0.00005981184,0.9021953,0.0008898188,0.006784805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005485322,0.0006054579,0.9751093,0.0003166047,0.000004478413,0.00001876321,0.001718073,0.00009667861,0.00003759854,0.002165151,0.01925061,0.0001288049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.945339,0.0004059475,0.00001521913,0.01117082,0.00018263,0.000119673,0.000001580299,0.000007475222,0.04275766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980587,0.00003789499,0.00003438157,0.00008218628,0.001347437,0.000001265937,2.011291e-7,0.00000966176,0.0004282153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9000302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5267347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152422646","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02001.x","title":"Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Behavioural economics; Political science; Nudge theory; Public policy; Positive economics; Contrast (vision); Public economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04526367010438347,"gpt":0.37897163435536,"spread":0.3337079642509765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009018993,0.0001679462,0.000227008,0.00006035365,0.0009703243,0.0003292485,0.0003222726,0.0001184307,0.00009769902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009317053,0.0001212516,0.0001510641,0.0002175416,0.0002693357,0.0003241342,0.000008301556,0.0001919463,0.000119229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000133091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001900405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00813454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002622857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971379,0.000318051,0.0003257642,0.000228469,0.0003759498,0.001613839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987459,0.0004358822,0.00006156063,0.0002592782,0.0001253604,0.0003720891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099259,0.00006044977,0.0001733516,0.000006222644,0.000007226394,0.000001343777,0.01839262,6.626366e-7,0.0001067986,0.979506,0.0008512409,0.0008841824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003729359,0.0006741405,0.004041636,0.00001552513,0.00006311349,0.000002250358,0.03086832,0.0002390324,0.00008760045,0.9617686,0.001618079,0.0002488003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8387136,0.00006926523,0.004799451,0.1075241,0.0006192428,0.001088525,0.00004413283,0.000357835,0.04678389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917976,3.167131e-7,0.00009274735,0.005676377,0.001183904,0.00003844487,0.00000845369,0.00001385177,0.001188348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.153084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091045586","doi":"10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.011","title":"Updating the Bogardus social distance studies: a new national survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Social Science Journal","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Social distance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Scale (ratio); Race (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Test (biology); Sociology; Demography; Gender studies; Geography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1977663982414636,"gpt":0.4844885178015631,"spread":0.2867221195600995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01274373,0.00008775629,0.0001355112,0.0000325244,0.01320459,0.0005438263,0.00075232,0.00004996389,0.0001203483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002545206,0.00004966739,0.00008832153,0.0009726227,0.001975396,0.0005528167,0.00006119944,0.0003397782,0.00005270136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008615376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001528359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00261312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964608,0.0007080245,0.0003203792,0.0001395774,0.001732183,0.0006390427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983993,0.0004543593,0.0002534849,0.00005536659,0.0006780868,0.0001594411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002127688,0.00003929898,0.006290362,0.000002102925,0.0000381702,6.525169e-7,0.1382024,0.00002865526,0.0002085477,0.7612033,0.07763015,0.01633501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007919088,0.00008171652,0.4057111,0.00004703114,0.00006363423,0.00001414285,0.06451273,0.0002506411,0.00008976664,0.1565475,0.3712749,0.0006148953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6134957,0.0005207271,0.0005630072,0.2801071,0.002175571,0.0004974395,0.00001687304,0.00008291846,0.1025406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886643,0.00001316056,0.00003227809,0.001070756,0.008457826,0.000004222595,3.771079e-7,0.000004794887,0.001752274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6046559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133488937","doi":"10.1177/0010414012453032","title":"The Source of Turnout Decline","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Argument (complex analysis); Presidential system; Voter turnout; Demographic economics; Value (mathematics); Panel data; Competition (biology); Voting; Test (biology); Political science; Longitudinal data; Political economy; Economics; Demography; Econometrics; Politics; Sociology; Statistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2746351111109179,"gpt":0.4957791905078055,"spread":0.2211440793968876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006979841,0.00007542359,0.0002256312,0.00001227259,0.0006499866,0.00001924423,0.0001164983,0.00003300359,0.00001930362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009956633,0.00004471984,0.00005760383,0.0001202635,0.001279591,0.00008402329,0.0000661688,0.00007646302,0.00007033271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009008962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003434242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002577454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001946146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998329,0.0003897613,0.0002538937,0.00006874882,0.0002672551,0.0006912915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997476,0.001917441,0.00005820331,0.00009036419,0.0002309822,0.0002269706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000598966,0.0000371988,0.05347989,0.00000609857,0.00004130859,3.239572e-8,0.006529872,5.2109e-7,0.00001954189,0.9381575,0.001579977,0.0001420878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003297947,0.0001741368,0.1658775,0.00006455876,0.00009170232,7.00949e-7,0.04109221,0.00004203281,0.003019833,0.1117887,0.677196,0.000322816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067551,0.008077426,0.0003237416,0.01441138,0.0006310738,0.0003017301,0.000004290843,0.00005009646,0.06944512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997734,0.00001398049,0.00002570622,0.0001764215,0.0006867272,0.00002235842,4.117682e-7,0.00000296681,0.001337499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4999236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976214394","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.t01-1-00022","title":"Challenges to established parties: The effects of party system features on the electoral fortunes of anti‐political‐establishment parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Polarization (electrochemistry); Competitor analysis; Political economy; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Profit (economics); Multi-party system; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Democracy; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1709068807130665,"gpt":0.3996005120243528,"spread":0.2286936313112863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008810299,0.0001740509,0.000464498,0.0002025895,0.0004733564,0.0001703779,0.0008413096,0.00006508852,0.0000798193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01369462,0.00009202132,0.0002092478,0.0005107353,0.001196124,0.0001795877,0.0001155536,0.0006747795,0.00004971901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002328063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001342953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002517294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876133,0.007576982,0.0008935636,0.0002099692,0.002142042,0.001564188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902648,0.007130102,0.0002207953,0.0004245334,0.001111574,0.0008481976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005844812,0.0001945093,0.0009266048,0.0002702362,0.00005416436,0.00003126216,0.003763392,0.00000398683,0.0006536242,0.9855211,0.007899277,0.0006234449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004667012,0.03340313,0.3898931,0.01287123,0.0006490885,0.0001149249,0.1400967,0.0002928894,0.1668856,0.04881011,0.2002814,0.002034789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8883672,0.001290258,0.00002061068,0.04767387,0.0004772509,0.0007090149,0.00001127209,0.00002277116,0.06142771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981838,0.00005060762,0.00001097892,0.0002206407,0.0009585812,0.00001537854,2.831757e-7,0.00002421546,0.000535531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.936711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036999860","doi":"10.1177/1354068810382935","title":"Who selects the party leader?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Setback; Political science; Political economy; Electoral reform; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.157272362730184,"gpt":0.3555826097658028,"spread":0.1983102470356188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005042286,0.00009716313,0.0001318027,0.00002110394,0.0006586823,0.00005639566,0.0002095507,0.00009763031,0.0004210383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003053691,0.00006776478,0.00006222566,0.0001893029,0.0003835136,0.0001198292,0.00002074756,0.0001458873,0.000462318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007354962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01583663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004610732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982398,0.0003463611,0.0002120931,0.0001412571,0.0002933178,0.0007671978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.0001818108,0.00005758445,0.0002104088,0.000108382,0.000264424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001726542,0.00003198515,0.02045862,0.000007484943,0.00001015114,0.000001268137,0.01201676,4.569987e-7,0.00001721212,0.9566309,0.01070456,0.0001188693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568007,0.0001405446,0.05783766,0.000036459,0.00007488148,0.000002659479,0.002831587,0.0001613997,0.003474577,0.1680661,0.766692,0.0004252949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5348175,0.0001713568,0.0001975787,0.007414928,0.000685783,0.0004514336,0.00001555722,0.0001940122,0.4560518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986981,0.000005717321,0.00003865237,0.001110925,0.0007778666,0.00002578206,0.000002120102,0.00001083658,0.01104709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7885647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151387905","doi":"10.1177/0010414012463877","title":"Economics and Elections Revisited","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Endogeneity; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Survey data collection; Accountability; Positive economics; Public economics; Law; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2965668672790601,"gpt":0.482394562183023,"spread":0.1858276949039628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000265353,0.00007458209,0.0002061141,0.00002532751,0.0005262975,0.00003000607,0.00003418797,0.00003608157,0.00002870784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002799944,0.0000638567,0.00002715465,0.00009503649,0.0005053613,0.0001738323,0.0000269485,0.00006425356,0.00007818063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000151163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002396246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001134128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008451555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989021,0.0002053466,0.0001538542,0.00009472266,0.00006571203,0.0005782991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990688,0.0004317409,0.00002587224,0.00005149454,0.0001002396,0.0003218634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001914099,0.00002262876,0.03635036,0.000005097054,0.00003154319,3.909832e-8,0.003154838,1.782739e-7,0.00000598945,0.959305,0.001072722,0.00004971701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003603664,0.000159202,0.2060162,0.00005091153,0.000125534,0.000003052132,0.01718082,0.00007698461,0.0006819319,0.1513957,0.6234054,0.0005438432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073316,0.003701433,0.00006077122,0.00649709,0.0002586837,0.0002121537,0.000007097961,0.00005841696,0.08187278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982072,0.00007903256,0.0000556806,0.000289281,0.0006843025,0.00002564947,0.000001116195,0.000002989534,0.0006547309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8079093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4047908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047661309","doi":"10.1177/1065912908314713","title":"The Political Resocialization of Immigrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resocialization; Political socialization; Immigration; Politics; Socialization; Biology and political orientation; Adaptation (eye); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Psychology; American political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.198422205777519,"gpt":0.489765840549163,"spread":0.2913436347716439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290647,0.00008313201,0.0001726252,0.00009012922,0.001768352,0.00007090474,0.0003294376,0.0001399824,0.00007285737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003544552,0.00006130816,0.00009069068,0.0005122287,0.002949241,0.0001380757,0.00001917728,0.0002983405,0.0001645193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002827828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006545881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08981132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008944096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939204,0.001922041,0.0004198572,0.0001878145,0.001548159,0.002001751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953147,0.002834397,0.00003808109,0.0002464149,0.0007796226,0.0007868156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000201918,0.00005935735,0.00711812,0.000009236332,0.000007285156,0.000003912318,0.001822432,2.724751e-8,0.0001304899,0.9887579,0.00146972,0.0006013354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000424625,0.0009768292,0.0652016,0.00005154671,0.00001206453,0.000004771735,0.01440872,0.00009801921,0.00102142,0.8752214,0.04234373,0.0002352097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8085927,0.0001334908,0.0002831805,0.05531095,0.0002938997,0.0006750607,0.00002240076,0.00008347824,0.1346049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.000006293978,0.00001585749,0.0001328648,0.000668516,0.00004113856,0.000002838894,0.00001114288,0.001662804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1888659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138544629","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000022","title":"Gone For Good: Deindustrialization, White Voter Backlash, and US Presidential Voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Voting; White (mutation); Politics; Presidential election; Presidential system; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0499160684999227,"gpt":0.4028032889315541,"spread":0.3528872204316315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001587562,0.0001101862,0.000336586,0.00003557212,0.0005928414,0.0002030228,0.0001812709,0.00004196907,0.0001559866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003954784,0.00009772412,0.00007369605,0.001089126,0.00174437,0.0003051464,0.00006302378,0.00008465436,0.00002393834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001840031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000819097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007334916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001755502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973252,0.0003334797,0.0003918635,0.0003878352,0.0004310897,0.001130568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.0003119926,0.0001196937,0.0001513305,0.0004188371,0.0007834054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001618432,0.00002487033,0.01971768,0.0001818374,0.000005316603,0.000001356559,0.00008370868,3.610876e-7,0.0001146529,0.9677661,0.0006163011,0.01148622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052325,0.0005362725,0.1220807,0.004331237,0.0006086506,0.00003778735,0.001096863,0.0006199122,0.001976511,0.04851319,0.817493,0.001653506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.38441,0.01607958,0.027748,0.4922356,0.002084763,0.006355833,0.0001417586,0.0004818368,0.07046263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938861,0.0005482461,0.0006649116,0.003528405,0.0005341303,0.00005017546,0.000005001029,0.000008671477,0.0007743967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152366088","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00494.x","title":"Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publicity; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Deliberative democracy; Openness to experience; Scholarship; Public opinion; Law and economics; Democracy; Public relations; Public policy; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05513745947523144,"gpt":0.3471324301915791,"spread":0.2919949707163476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00351503,0.00004317329,0.0000989002,0.00003990329,0.0004459582,0.00003835318,0.0001339712,0.00005079732,0.000008321981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008741078,0.00002337538,0.00002832769,0.0001587797,0.0002386361,0.0001758886,0.0000166202,0.0001625824,6.272535e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004956484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001076023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002869998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001453577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987619,0.0003259203,0.0003398641,0.00002687861,0.0003300082,0.0002154197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998245,0.0008734576,0.0002999369,0.00006230261,0.000429699,0.00008963224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009080576,0.00001445074,0.02112332,0.000005898594,0.000018554,3.097497e-7,0.02340842,0.00002057302,0.0004040523,0.9540346,0.0001185914,0.0008422161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446968,0.0003590673,0.3840617,0.0001696713,0.0002301734,0.00004180242,0.009843097,0.0001571183,0.00688041,0.5930776,0.004554589,0.0001778685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849865,0.0002488519,0.001322312,0.01117039,0.0001333273,0.00007384925,0.000001859109,0.0000034758,0.002059442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987747,0.00001857867,0.00009351535,0.0003967505,0.0005105194,9.499642e-8,2.123488e-7,0.000003703911,0.0002018925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3629383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4338597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166017867","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904030860","title":"Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Representation (politics); Political science; Public policy; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Humanities; Population; Welfare economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06823515340147235,"gpt":0.4140460214721104,"spread":0.3458108680706381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006542833,0.00005459355,0.000132084,0.0002475391,0.0003426351,0.00009907687,0.0001648002,0.000032947,0.00001757262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001758592,0.00005024564,0.00001776751,0.0008005986,0.00107003,0.0003649011,0.000006920245,0.0001319457,0.000002006374],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005158084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02696473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984319,0.0001001685,0.0002272913,0.0001171253,0.000365194,0.0007582935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976375,0.00009357203,0.00006396818,0.00005148077,0.000383463,0.001770075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001809115,0.000004320576,0.01190663,0.000001197045,0.000001198062,0.00001162778,0.003803965,0.00003723901,0.00003601184,0.9840981,0.00005417416,0.00004367358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000320184,0.00008285338,0.8531938,0.00006702382,0.000003128324,0.00002457768,0.0145123,0.00001493406,0.0003197556,0.1303747,0.00097424,0.0001124975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522866,0.00007075435,0.0000355412,0.03489373,0.0003336999,0.00009651247,0.00000580081,0.000001916375,0.01227545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992223,0.000001431268,0.0000523942,0.0003652354,0.0003234844,8.933808e-7,1.615849e-7,0.000001798537,0.00003226182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982530905","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500135","title":"Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Politics; Comparative politics; Voting; National election; Political science; Political economy; Novelty; Government (linguistics); Survey data collection; Panel data; Endogeneity; Primary election; Feeling; Panel survey; Split-ticket voting; General election; Law; Sociology; Economics; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02698824961724305,"gpt":0.3195402222610659,"spread":0.2925519726438229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751892,0.0000661416,0.0001090509,0.00001190551,0.0006734441,0.00006913689,0.0001667534,0.00006240419,0.00007361165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003822448,0.00002954428,0.00005643093,0.0001513687,0.0007770301,0.00009385237,0.00002985788,0.0001373767,0.000007920634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004006772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004791252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1436404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.0005272244,0.0002021848,0.00009337066,0.000238262,0.0003441262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991821,0.0004579766,0.00007771462,0.0001753711,0.0000594105,0.00004743032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008651941,0.00001468232,0.007061842,0.000004516115,0.000007740935,9.510593e-8,0.002208984,7.725793e-7,0.0002035771,0.9851737,0.005171691,0.0001437164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176954,0.00008901018,0.2560088,0.0001006868,0.0001818286,0.000005958664,0.006779572,0.0005069518,0.002917928,0.163964,0.5679517,0.0003165754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8037206,0.0005850395,0.00001247664,0.1090318,0.0002900024,0.0004791738,0.000008279502,0.00002840639,0.08584426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920046,0.00001060569,0.00000369209,0.0002658285,0.0005342456,0.00002556693,4.956896e-7,0.000005440665,0.007149579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8212097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8620622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134797125","doi":"10.1177/1354068801007003004","title":"Democratizing Party Leadership Selection","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Party Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Politics; Political science; Democracy; Process (computing); Task (project management); Political economy; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1936313791580292,"gpt":0.3774362243170837,"spread":0.1838048451590544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004723382,0.0001001957,0.0001352787,0.00004581167,0.0006841851,0.00009726392,0.00009440966,0.0001261289,0.0003947633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003817012,0.00009908189,0.00005784877,0.0002936725,0.0001576638,0.0002054337,0.00000967729,0.0001408919,0.0003715752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000147772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006939026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006762821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.0003039397,0.000239848,0.0001660174,0.0003089656,0.0008477676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992221,0.0001764546,0.00005892555,0.0001045204,0.0001146973,0.0003233278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004727027,0.00005663024,0.1771568,0.00001882162,0.00001333056,0.000003842138,0.002575944,0.00002049571,0.0002910409,0.8112057,0.008039488,0.0006131059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004230104,0.0001417738,0.03141601,0.00006025276,0.00006726577,0.00001257766,0.003009306,0.001250515,0.001849445,0.07796845,0.8832232,0.0005782052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8310973,0.0001552557,0.001532736,0.01510175,0.0007185137,0.0003720846,0.000006390479,0.0003667921,0.1506492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827629,0.000007751905,0.0001066936,0.0008730629,0.001394828,0.00001864824,0.000005435033,0.00001200831,0.01481865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}