{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1268,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":7,"predictions_cover":1268,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e6de177b9b09","filters":{"topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability"}},"results":[{"id":"W1984190418","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1006388108","title":"Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1605,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Greenhouse gas; Developing country; International trade; Montreal Protocol; Consumption (sociology); Emissions trading; International economics; Clean Development Mechanism; Economics; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Business; Environmental science; Economic growth; Chemistry; Ozone layer","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02754898177466035,"gpt":0.266947827531908,"spread":0.2393988457572477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006164275,0.0000799913,0.00009499593,0.00007047518,0.00007104278,0.000006947505,0.0007906852,0.00005663106,0.0003913585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001442272,0.00005572477,0.00005092939,0.0004478351,0.0006301338,0.0005210459,0.0001518779,0.0001119603,0.000004006596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001522217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005273673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003166331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.115292e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984867,0.000006348153,0.0002501439,0.0002302685,0.0008827496,0.0001437788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998013,0.00002995718,0.00009410698,0.000006897294,0.000005609915,0.00006208725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004351938,0.0001588138,0.6429943,0.000007007594,0.000004679989,1.85448e-8,0.002436961,0.0000564373,0.3515921,0.0008981506,0.0005271694,0.001280858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009941605,0.00003417538,0.7309857,0.00001454684,0.000002146911,9.114132e-7,0.0002595499,0.0002227628,0.2428585,0.02539076,0.00007680622,0.00005465987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790787,0.000006345836,0.000003605355,0.002986226,0.00001648578,0.0001557345,0.00001262859,0.000004820191,0.01773544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980271,0.000008525308,0.001532184,0.000362531,0.00001473307,0.000006040074,1.400793e-7,0.000002686552,0.00004600482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1087335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4285102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147058642","doi":"10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4","title":"\\nUSEtox - The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Radboud Repository (Radboud University)","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1508,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotoxicity; Process (computing); Life-cycle assessment; Environmental science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Engineering; Toxicity; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01600807116923657,"gpt":0.2412982422080951,"spread":0.2252901710388586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003919701,0.0003955474,0.0004021164,0.0001329348,0.001382405,0.00009835618,0.0004300811,0.0002274517,0.000125932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003771144,0.000320817,0.0001978756,0.0002800916,0.0005560523,0.000875302,0.0003572523,0.0003951918,0.000003263272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002188517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007752875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002107092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000563644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975975,0.0003486425,0.0003970583,0.00066081,0.0003760723,0.0006198738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986889,0.0001537442,0.0002375464,0.0005487361,0.00001638743,0.0003547221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001954378,0.0009776494,0.9137397,0.00002913109,0.00008056808,0.00006319517,0.00364349,0.03807932,0.04199508,0.0002705012,0.0008304826,0.0000954612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001463637,0.0003543112,0.9241979,0.00001047573,0.00005581147,0.00002345256,0.001379912,0.0642885,0.005591758,0.0002902643,0.001780759,0.0005632824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957784,0.00001924951,0.0008268903,0.0002047173,0.0001426809,0.001085958,0.00008719313,0.00007355521,0.001781314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811,0.00004898444,0.0002552392,0.00009422807,0.00004797655,0.00001042972,0.00005242918,0.00002936734,0.001351359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03640332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145917034","doi":"10.1080/09535314.2013.769938","title":"BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Systems Research","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of South Australia; York University","keywords":"Database; Resolution (logic); Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04600855165208286,"gpt":0.3114954301456746,"spread":0.2654868784935918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258087,0.0001694904,0.0002110555,0.00005007625,0.0003984231,0.0001820791,0.0002709073,0.0001226717,0.0007964581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008942593,0.0001590598,0.00003074074,0.0001232632,0.0005667575,0.0007048768,0.0009848581,0.000201289,0.001942373],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006372425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002999212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06421405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008995915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977507,0.0003592381,0.000310413,0.0005893303,0.0003093703,0.0006809426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989678,0.0001115763,0.00007230832,0.0005159446,0.000009871897,0.0003224927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008296755,0.0001374833,0.9599038,0.0001509507,0.000030186,0.00002755211,0.0003430807,0.00238191,0.004772508,0.0008610043,0.02894544,0.002363063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001197268,0.0001432426,0.9230254,0.00005123505,0.000006834615,0.0001078837,0.001123027,0.05523542,0.0002567816,0.0003212056,0.01814249,0.0003891735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962893,0.0002700113,0.0002839129,0.0001806727,0.0002113514,0.001036638,0.00006098841,0.00003346392,0.001633727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969055,0.0000515047,0.0003490345,0.00002583759,0.0001131047,0.0001282588,0.00001938174,0.00001700733,0.002390393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06331446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013534207","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848","title":"Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":992,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental economics; Incentive; Business; Renewable energy; Industrial organization; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01074817708299487,"gpt":0.2681713046765889,"spread":0.257423127593594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000490837,0.0001051162,0.0001717027,0.000005517371,0.00004266247,0.000009373553,0.00009753049,0.00009011578,0.00006072009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002470897,0.00009451916,0.0000143173,0.0002178987,0.0003051795,0.00008123382,0.000353863,0.0000784743,0.000001708994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001308132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007201812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004945244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003708339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993535,0.00001304423,0.000131995,0.0002183548,0.0001354936,0.0001476532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997324,0.00001130581,0.00004717695,0.0001278328,0.000002530076,0.00007879755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003668875,0.0002307565,0.6498892,0.000682954,0.00009527086,0.00000792415,0.001728184,0.001498791,0.03117166,0.1080372,0.01137593,0.1952454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009422482,0.0005844362,0.8608196,0.0001060908,0.0002044175,0.00000904102,0.009381641,0.0002412311,0.02526031,0.02085434,0.0807576,0.0008390787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651769,0.0006820265,0.0004203318,0.008982086,0.000008026934,0.0002417622,0.00001092432,0.00005942591,0.0244185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926173,0.001382889,0.002777293,0.003174215,0.000004650272,0.00002188943,0.000002940771,0.000004389711,0.00001440117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2109303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3854379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624010061","doi":"10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8","title":"The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":793,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Mitacs; Hydro-Québec; Universität Kassel; Danone; European Commission; L'Oreal USA; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Water scarcity; Scarcity; Life-cycle assessment; Environmental resource management; Water use; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Robustness (evolution); Stakeholder; Water resources; Natural resource economics; Economics; Production (economics); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03628127805101604,"gpt":0.3267580078505165,"spread":0.2904767297995004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660854,0.0001648856,0.0002076265,0.00004214716,0.0007074045,0.0003723773,0.0008152048,0.00005553645,0.0003739131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001291,0.00007145887,0.0001600914,0.000008259189,0.0003759381,0.0004907346,0.0003162223,0.0002069343,0.00002885405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006282581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005770032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006276392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001624424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979026,0.0001367834,0.0006120001,0.0001751099,0.0008312726,0.0003422287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986954,0.0001674835,0.0004870124,0.0004247196,0.0001136439,0.0001117876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001119256,0.0004792759,0.2378045,0.00003686886,0.0002120409,0.00001311551,0.001114439,0.08628936,0.6695254,0.00008037023,0.0002330872,0.003092327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001701835,0.0001870719,0.3061728,0.0000792385,0.00005681923,0.00001722359,0.0002250854,0.5012838,0.188193,0.001386334,0.0005050699,0.0001917222],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828929,0.00000217443,0.008805912,0.007161874,0.0003760973,0.0002813357,0.00001423598,0.000005924188,0.0004595194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.00001740006,0.0007285123,0.0003838972,0.00008408932,0.00001180569,0.00002009132,0.00001739593,0.0002007242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4813324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5440854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065202886","doi":"10.1021/es9030003","title":"Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":686,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Life-cycle assessment; Global warming; Environmental science; Global-warming potential; Radiative forcing; Fossil fuel; Time horizon; Climate change; Renewable energy; Biofuel; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental economics; Land use; Engineering; Production (economics); Waste management; Mathematics; Economics; Civil engineering; Ecology; Mathematical optimization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.002953326160970894,"gpt":0.278498686286031,"spread":0.2755453601250601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006017851,0.0002761286,0.0002313418,0.0002145092,0.0003218527,0.00004573941,0.000621614,0.0001898169,0.0008736107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000800221,0.0002668326,0.0000387067,0.001120129,0.001743493,0.0006908054,0.001368985,0.0003751774,0.0007109054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002333693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002719368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001510242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002134165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997476,0.00002504481,0.0002965276,0.0009013306,0.0004680352,0.0008330337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990675,0.00002006296,0.00008826808,0.0004977115,0.000001756323,0.0003246832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007834853,0.0001084831,0.4026352,0.000001414858,0.000001725328,0.000007874929,0.00006644045,0.0002711047,0.5708257,0.00005176307,0.000003501118,0.026019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003423652,0.000212452,0.964811,0.000005148176,0.000006681213,0.00009865778,0.0003215957,0.01046653,0.02098037,0.001729163,0.0006553953,0.000370664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970716,0.00002534516,0.0002519364,0.0004734217,0.00005899546,0.0007379256,0.00001560858,0.00008346294,0.001281727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977713,0.00001207648,0.001887778,0.0001214006,0.000006064653,0.00007294196,0.000004260125,0.0000144743,0.0001096788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5621758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163231468","doi":"10.1007/s11367-012-0489-5","title":"Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":675,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Life-cycle assessment; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05996091326998313,"gpt":0.4037488930782351,"spread":0.3437879798082519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003076782,0.0001823425,0.00023431,0.00009092642,0.00015781,0.0001789675,0.0005769055,0.0000553043,0.0003505687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006229255,0.0001360207,0.0001735785,0.0001238048,0.00006449098,0.00231828,0.0002830531,0.0003414111,0.00001383098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002169185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001466086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003193525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001467765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974045,0.0002040991,0.0008105244,0.0001640578,0.001028947,0.0003878288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984231,0.0003249508,0.0007233704,0.0001865239,0.00008425647,0.0002577965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000468114,0.002762363,0.6337791,0.00002788949,0.000370934,0.00001943654,0.003331808,0.3205658,0.01914339,0.0006188833,0.0001064473,0.01880575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001550313,0.0002317171,0.6408759,0.00007862443,0.00008555321,0.00007820716,0.005893727,0.3489671,0.0001297689,0.001170976,0.0006608362,0.0002772553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.931032,0.00004830784,0.06413551,0.002409158,0.0005919559,0.0003113977,0.00001063149,0.00000767216,0.001453342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904453,0.00007455897,0.008243406,0.0006557159,0.0004823998,0.00002308584,0.00001730623,0.0000228931,0.00003539408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05941322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5672343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791880383","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107","title":"A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":641,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; University College London","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Natural resource economics; Investment (military); Economics; Carbon price; Business; Portfolio; Emissions trading; Environmental economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02267153823698701,"gpt":0.3040172868449202,"spread":0.2813457486079332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062899,0.0002528618,0.0007186627,0.000231597,0.0001678667,0.0000174425,0.0001723985,0.0002364162,0.0000324821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007743816,0.0001475019,0.0001840873,0.0006454914,0.0006731822,0.0002226169,0.0001179851,0.0004023784,0.000001175694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006911587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001257959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001381832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002026805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981759,0.000188283,0.0007768655,0.0003371206,0.0003164549,0.0002054332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975023,0.00003087931,0.001760645,0.0003896257,0.0002613658,0.00005519517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005794678,0.0001668444,0.0003274796,0.01326631,0.000224162,0.000002560231,0.0002301952,0.0002261848,0.00003006711,0.000113189,0.004628594,0.9807265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001315088,0.0005965484,0.0001285427,0.01730404,0.0009602194,0.001101597,0.0008052793,0.000007513872,0.0001767771,0.0002893325,0.9782923,0.0002063389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008997396,0.9914774,0.0006343447,0.005390536,0.0002235959,0.001275987,0.000004393684,0.000008229385,0.00008577462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002402614,0.9957597,0.0007366853,0.0001793624,0.0004979923,0.00006444184,0.00000792732,0.00002612741,0.0003251323],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6014953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912085350","doi":"10.1007/s11367-019-01583-0","title":"IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":554,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Hydro-Québec; ArcelorMittal; Alcoa Foundation","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Environmental science; Economics; Production (economics); Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124195530205506,"gpt":0.3762722910874773,"spread":0.3638527380669268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002865589,0.0003667423,0.0005254816,0.0001426217,0.0001357385,0.0002775046,0.001807082,0.00007663414,0.01429282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001680022,0.0002279841,0.0007249535,0.000305126,0.0001809238,0.0008858822,0.0006994875,0.0005952512,0.0002272395],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000605371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001045753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005713807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950354,0.0005035402,0.00099923,0.0003423684,0.002613173,0.0005062985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973546,0.0004294229,0.0009914736,0.0005400903,0.0001092797,0.0005751203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005899323,0.000958693,0.8574761,0.000006910951,0.0009839085,0.00005486574,0.0002664283,0.1227251,0.002451424,0.0005512754,0.007472829,0.006462505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002080551,0.0004610312,0.9703755,0.00003386289,0.00006658384,0.0001331437,0.0003818771,0.01879909,0.00003554783,0.003777286,0.003581231,0.0002742459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701342,0.00007038451,0.004883894,0.007295462,0.0006519617,0.0004285949,0.00002612106,0.00002140202,0.01648798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874407,0.00005391824,0.009334365,0.002195398,0.0002756918,0.00001029402,0.00001322522,0.00003276269,0.0006436221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1128994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040267049","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005","title":"Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":525,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Mittuniversitetet; FPInnovations; European Commission; Government of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Displacement (psychology); Range (aeronautics); Pulp and paper industry; Materials science; Engineering; Agronomy; Composite material; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0240427155716962,"gpt":0.2811777937370524,"spread":0.2571350781653562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011813,0.000322904,0.0006893989,0.0003638765,0.0002721792,0.00002477847,0.0008173644,0.00007117079,0.007602312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001201512,0.0002476945,0.0006659916,0.001880369,0.005290598,0.0008023168,0.0006176097,0.0002204794,0.00005932922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006094936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005186145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003263328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004033197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965648,0.0000728574,0.0005954173,0.0007430997,0.001383919,0.0006399064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981816,0.00004573577,0.0003703353,0.001048366,0.00000457224,0.0003493981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001620485,0.0008003449,0.345256,0.000006134579,0.00173161,0.000001061836,0.001339026,0.001835349,0.6480582,0.0003453596,0.000008966879,0.0006017662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001524332,0.0001451971,0.7004301,4.994569e-7,0.0085687,0.000001925448,0.0003521254,0.0002193815,0.2892718,0.0001768079,0.0004253192,0.0002557403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973841,0.00003427669,0.00004711887,0.0001647845,0.00006241122,0.0004479217,0.00010996,0.00001831735,0.001731133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998969,0.00002211474,0.0004690576,0.00004968784,0.00001950722,0.00002012438,0.0000214162,0.00001435703,0.0004147483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3587864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097858905","doi":"10.1177/0956247810392270","title":"Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: moving forward","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Urbanization","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":496,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Per capita; Metropolitan area; Carbon dioxide equivalent; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Consumption (sociology); Tonne; Megacity; Carbon footprint; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Economic growth; Environmental protection; Economics; Economy; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01037538410132712,"gpt":0.1867661762961759,"spread":0.1763907921948488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001340241,0.000147825,0.0001048868,0.00002311994,0.0002043412,0.00002206876,0.00006545528,0.00006623023,0.003217654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002208678,0.0001334142,0.000019781,0.00005208293,0.000296266,0.0003747696,0.0002408391,0.00006978787,0.0000597672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001794769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001296139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000824722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991475,0.00003734762,0.0001561443,0.0002837452,0.0001668575,0.0002083437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996138,0.00001580411,0.00005252129,0.0001688896,8.198463e-7,0.000148139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001660267,0.00008476892,0.983994,0.00001029833,0.000006471923,0.000004679241,0.003038409,0.00003233494,0.001283477,0.0001979047,0.000349487,0.01098158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003501476,0.0001730834,0.9851882,0.000007937695,0.00003122279,0.00001315004,0.001086196,0.0007996582,0.00153644,0.003893712,0.006640187,0.00028009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921992,0.0002020031,0.001601171,0.00007099767,0.00002273525,0.0002024848,0.000002453965,0.00003647737,0.005662415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952293,0.0006551272,0.001604511,0.0001111202,0.00001644457,0.0000111553,0.000008264487,0.00001872657,0.002345333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01070149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019811626","doi":"10.1065/lca2006.05.250","title":"Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Agroscope; Universiteit Leiden","keywords":"Land use; Impact assessment; Life-cycle assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Environmental planning; Natural resource; Agriculture; Environmental science; Agricultural land; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering; Production (economics); Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0153856868788478,"gpt":0.3449538560785508,"spread":0.329568169199703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517273,0.0001895595,0.0002443174,0.00006569458,0.00009646747,0.0001896143,0.0006841627,0.00006389521,0.000632045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001635399,0.0001256809,0.0002001769,0.0001140256,0.0001156573,0.000634197,0.0002284605,0.0003204226,0.000007249344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002136649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00180969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005714504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974822,0.0001339036,0.0008339108,0.0001853775,0.001061383,0.0003032184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986305,0.0003624324,0.0006141116,0.000218535,0.00004417622,0.000130254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368598,0.0005727691,0.9552628,0.000003276888,0.00007771258,0.00002202706,0.0001922922,0.04058758,0.0004418599,0.001251637,0.0009064307,0.0005447593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001220632,0.0002178185,0.9687133,0.00003453504,0.00002325458,0.00002184885,0.0003806306,0.007181344,0.00009564081,0.02079658,0.001171995,0.0001424286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877743,0.0000227858,0.008508655,0.00244559,0.0003708544,0.000353341,0.00002483268,0.000006943108,0.0004927231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750592,0.00002193854,0.0240397,0.0005296469,0.0002110862,0.0000210518,0.00001169707,0.00001792039,0.0000877655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03340623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6920449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159642665","doi":"10.5194/hess-14-1259-2010","title":"A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrology and earth system sciences","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Water use; Virtual water; Environmental science; Water balance; Footprint; Agricultural engineering; Carbon footprint; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Water resources; Water scarcity; Greenhouse gas; Agronomy; Geography; Engineering; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005756730906358865,"gpt":0.2266976325632462,"spread":0.2209409016568873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007136834,0.00007550351,0.0001371247,0.0000126981,0.0002135412,0.00001149217,0.0001100807,0.00006660483,0.00003807017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008105786,0.00004045369,0.00001794347,0.00006855369,0.0023525,0.00009620324,0.0002727187,0.00006394839,8.125223e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001390089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007694436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00237423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001501581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991875,0.00009802662,0.0001581389,0.0002147263,0.0001621751,0.0001794338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997243,0.00002261944,0.00005896215,0.0001318346,0.000003548805,0.00005873232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006905918,0.0000180099,0.9832149,0.00003512193,0.000003365765,5.891896e-7,0.0002822466,0.0003057194,0.01357798,0.001422719,0.000001097476,0.001131317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529531,0.0001686494,0.9909277,0.000006657008,0.000009715913,0.00004926914,0.0003529864,0.005756057,0.00191335,0.0005650332,0.00004821206,0.00004940198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982585,0.00003276544,0.00003979774,0.0003603643,0.00009089687,0.0001612875,0.000003909639,0.000004706971,0.001047759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997299,0.000006116552,0.0001982313,0.00002242234,0.000006434259,0.000003282296,2.147015e-7,0.000001104844,0.00003233246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01166463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8667886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027895002","doi":"10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60017-1","title":"From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CIRP Annals","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Life-cycle assessment; Design for the Environment; Product (mathematics); Engineering; Product lifecycle; Legislation; Order (exchange); Environmental impact assessment; Sustainable design; Production (economics); Ecodesign; Product design; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); New product development; Manufacturing engineering; Marketing; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01774305597391129,"gpt":0.2978222428511025,"spread":0.2800791868771912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002864614,0.0001414222,0.0001430415,0.00002866276,0.0002182658,0.00007472523,0.0001068096,0.00004252641,0.003485892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001752628,0.0001343159,0.00003615115,0.0001497971,0.000197182,0.0005545767,0.0002628847,0.0001057845,0.0001964362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000470644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002432409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009557131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005419524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985737,0.00006177658,0.0001521496,0.0004626337,0.0002523108,0.0004974541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999182,0.00002202941,0.00003876639,0.0003159365,0.00001282505,0.0004284441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001802727,0.001719661,0.776877,0.00004698968,0.0001010711,0.00003624255,0.05779858,0.02094528,0.007281776,0.001395526,0.05181429,0.08180327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509596,0.00009679883,0.9043624,0.000003177527,0.000007880717,0.000001208509,0.02567022,0.0001387644,0.0007812779,0.002027996,0.06656125,0.0001980891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743044,0.0002950845,0.00008845572,0.01299922,0.00003568032,0.0003757538,0.000007176777,0.00004020115,0.01185405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919483,0.00008001563,0.001259463,0.0008633507,0.000194919,0.00003097237,0.000003926755,0.00001269018,0.005606333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1274853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157325458","doi":"10.1007/s11367-012-0519-3","title":"Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Life cycle inventory; Scarcity; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Production (economics); Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05985550641693069,"gpt":0.4281539515574213,"spread":0.3682984451404906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00401703,0.0001661049,0.0003424316,0.00007874893,0.00005172028,0.00005828987,0.0004744091,0.0000449041,0.001501291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003627669,0.000105819,0.0001664241,0.0001044732,0.0002158792,0.001107579,0.000434,0.0003342448,0.000003632078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001004217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001112577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004836963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000396255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974819,0.0005902009,0.0008087733,0.0001278078,0.0007156777,0.0002756824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.0002746031,0.0006225784,0.000221927,0.00004090212,0.0002900213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004991648,0.0004746705,0.9865591,0.00009916737,0.0001346236,0.000005528424,0.0003712765,0.001614021,0.002086409,0.00005839142,0.001301884,0.007245042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005413675,0.00009469996,0.9938639,0.0005754821,0.00004428007,0.00003782246,0.000387004,0.001977132,0.0001923416,0.000423037,0.001739504,0.0001234576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992963,0.003367696,0.0008872647,0.001575178,0.0002677813,0.0002002222,0.000009202506,0.000003764096,0.0007259565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842873,0.002732184,0.01106428,0.001761801,0.0001111913,0.000006411111,0.000003434581,0.00001364205,0.00001973689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01017702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978855141","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.006","title":"Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: policy implications for the cement industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Kyoto Protocol; Global warming; Natural resource economics; Negotiation; Greenhouse gas removal; Environmental science; Business; Climate change mitigation; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Environmental protection; Economics; Ecology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01954847643656249,"gpt":0.3116714705009725,"spread":0.29212299406441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006521082,0.0002757751,0.000158693,0.0001061497,0.0013996,0.00007843749,0.0006553382,0.000127236,0.0002956224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001229416,0.0002048396,0.00007822614,0.0005525475,0.002745546,0.0006484461,0.001099035,0.0002721401,0.00005427622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002225968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005641148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001466609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007337651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975424,0.00003792228,0.0002924214,0.0006347616,0.0004356601,0.001056848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986092,0.00008133209,0.0001147426,0.0006581239,0.000002010457,0.00053457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002580149,0.0004260835,0.6461072,0.000008589058,0.00001076365,6.664521e-7,0.003132936,0.0005022467,0.1204452,0.003204261,0.0001847017,0.2259516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313846,0.00009070555,0.9695016,0.000005127991,0.00001981161,0.0000182062,0.0007398313,0.0006884444,0.004896616,0.0007666646,0.02266238,0.0002792156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591222,0.0001328744,0.00002698639,0.03375927,0.0000379965,0.001180264,0.00008720715,0.00003995156,0.005613233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950036,0.0004055355,0.0004148568,0.002766835,0.0004196986,0.0003836557,0.000006064056,0.0000237868,0.0005759035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3233944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086743034","doi":"10.1021/es703145t","title":"Building a Model Based on Scientific Consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Chemicals: The Search for Harmony and Parsimony","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Harmony (color); Reuse; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0200620968143519,"gpt":0.3137794024974896,"spread":0.2937173056831377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001410965,0.0002543275,0.0002775831,0.0002049687,0.001216127,0.00003973584,0.0007446124,0.0001335748,0.000120915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839267,0.0001857079,0.0001324259,0.0006125419,0.01295511,0.0001790298,0.0005092847,0.0002187494,0.000005888226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001023154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000129498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002917932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001890693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973055,0.00003492409,0.0003387654,0.0008345793,0.0006819897,0.0008042831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986959,0.0002276792,0.0001388569,0.0006845895,0.000007279985,0.0002456867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001092814,0.0006107781,0.183813,0.00001637922,0.00001185037,0.000002281436,0.0002979791,0.1177384,0.6923963,0.0004934361,0.0003267264,0.004183466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001058957,0.0007337014,0.1324683,0.000009506578,0.0000230246,0.00001337994,0.0005743332,0.7366076,0.1252548,0.002582701,0.0003590388,0.0003146963],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873475,0.00003626246,0.009457907,0.00141123,0.00004452444,0.001347294,0.00008820512,0.00003818063,0.0002289366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820685,0.0000098879,0.01748729,0.0001885991,0.000008162603,0.0001416776,0.000005252836,0.00001988802,0.00007077891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195630781","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25300-4","title":"Global scenarios of resource and emission savings from material efficiency in residential buildings and cars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Reuse; Resource efficiency; Efficient energy use; Pillar; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Resource (disambiguation); Production (economics); Business; Natural resource economics; Engineering; Waste management; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005382522924483098,"gpt":0.2587908494343391,"spread":0.253408326509856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000172754,0.00007741195,0.0001124378,0.00001426221,0.0001262707,0.00002757406,0.0002849287,0.0001482375,0.0001105882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001786233,0.00007646129,0.00001920859,0.0001957327,0.0003893229,0.0001150797,0.001156456,0.0002178818,8.904833e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001643403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001350979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992443,0.000126479,0.0001685915,0.0001955271,0.0001450202,0.0001201221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992098,0.00007513069,0.00005400767,0.0005903658,0.00000577374,0.00006488186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002499935,0.0001400289,0.9499879,0.000007796528,0.000003767828,0.000003741968,0.0009433913,0.0000269992,0.04588472,0.0001716709,0.0005028479,0.002302136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025368,0.00001571278,0.9888121,0.00002368414,0.00001143469,0.000006436801,0.0007122734,0.0001672212,0.00399068,0.0007940673,0.005131848,0.00008081109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961682,0.001208412,0.000005478617,0.00113208,0.00002238673,0.00009784572,0.00004037216,0.000008346069,0.00131688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973293,0.0002031618,0.002287047,0.00009546894,0.00000590588,0.000002859107,0.000031573,0.000004143053,0.00004053455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04189404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3118001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563516517","doi":"10.1021/es0629110","title":"Embodied Environmental Emissions in U.S. International Trade, 1997−2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":310,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; International trade; Trade volume; Economics; International economics; China; Currency; Work (physics); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004748401430120979,"gpt":0.2394229197184192,"spread":0.2346745182882982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001329394,0.0004035228,0.0002923881,0.0006233999,0.0004851178,0.00004239614,0.001520328,0.0003002308,0.006809081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007899796,0.0003972006,0.0001072639,0.001185096,0.005827844,0.0008791409,0.001353053,0.0006074103,0.0008189374],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002330815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005552421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005874253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956858,0.00003518611,0.0006290176,0.001137882,0.001111544,0.001400567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.00004338095,0.0001601607,0.0007334054,4.182415e-7,0.0004225679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004135834,0.0008389634,0.7202696,0.000001466418,0.000005870745,0.0001126217,0.0005634126,0.0002560514,0.2398629,0.0001875563,0.0001621871,0.03769803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009251334,0.0001920657,0.8932244,0.000009309126,0.000009576013,0.0001159917,0.004500937,0.0002974251,0.05582849,0.001902667,0.04239434,0.0005996416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791621,0.00009694766,0.0002064142,0.001552908,0.0002845642,0.0004927231,0.00003408576,0.0001290314,0.01804123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.00007984931,0.001166612,0.0003725612,0.00003513199,0.00002936506,0.0000282169,0.00003087737,0.0005530985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1840344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126591300","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.006","title":"Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas; Product (mathematics); Environmental science; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Environmental economics; Climate change; Carbon footprint; Fossil fuel; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biochemical engineering; Waste management; Engineering; Production (economics); Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05043122701957424,"gpt":0.3451407949550323,"spread":0.294709567935458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001514199,0.00008654919,0.0001650332,0.00003239309,0.0001802678,0.00008286333,0.00008120195,0.0000474283,0.000391256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001145217,0.00006070962,0.00002003168,0.0001183673,0.0002814852,0.000234939,0.00008843868,0.00008737544,0.000002482234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006234101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009661508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007122099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986714,0.0005820243,0.0003086692,0.0001685978,0.0001238553,0.0001454373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985374,0.001188025,0.00008938136,0.0001296191,0.000006975366,0.00004857986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633452,0.0001343166,0.9031541,0.0002953202,0.00001335484,0.00000210396,0.003547743,0.0004295822,0.04484082,0.0006649813,0.0001509755,0.04675036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001683452,0.00003709751,0.9873297,0.00008535833,0.00001471808,0.000002144167,0.004683192,0.003327214,0.00115651,0.00236283,0.0007382911,0.0000945839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860954,0.0001901661,0.0007405526,0.01188581,0.00002517315,0.0002828042,0.000001635875,0.00001141774,0.0007670774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985836,0.0001573137,0.01283293,0.001120267,0.000009121244,0.00002898738,0.000003277035,0.000004818151,0.000007231045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08417561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4283979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965601747","doi":"10.1162/108819806775545349","title":"Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries: An Approach to Making Life‐Cycle Management Strategic","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":298,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Blekinge Tekniska Högskola; University of British Columbia; University of Tokyo","keywords":"Sustainability; Backcasting; Process management; Life-cycle assessment; Industrial ecology; Sustainability organizations; Management science; Business; Social sustainability; Sustainability science; Strategic management; Sustainable development; Product lifecycle; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); New product development; Production (economics); Economics; Marketing; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02130685220706827,"gpt":0.2648983866461297,"spread":0.2435915344390615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733691,0.0002346212,0.0004523891,0.0001140164,0.0003384776,0.0001803645,0.0004627826,0.0002745347,0.0009014697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001800389,0.0002072919,0.0001347219,0.0002909467,0.0008920317,0.000412456,0.0002374449,0.0004524364,0.00005299633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003284557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002925569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003963604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006812944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973105,0.000399476,0.0008807479,0.000348832,0.0004557302,0.0006047474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987739,0.00005999115,0.0004366322,0.0003185803,0.00004063966,0.0003702012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003233792,0.006959219,0.6620162,0.0003146206,0.000399487,0.001620698,0.002292061,0.1965499,0.0003463568,0.07920647,0.008876132,0.03818507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01206357,0.007310529,0.718367,0.0001053696,0.000542604,0.001910537,0.1552172,0.002409213,0.0002367728,0.07808564,0.02183673,0.001914742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357542,0.000006850688,0.0004222136,0.0005176351,0.0004301676,0.0006886995,0.000005069432,0.00002260007,0.06215255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980512,6.831152e-7,0.001208361,0.0002140218,0.0003085355,0.0000147422,0.000003122941,0.00001652012,0.0001827625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1941407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132441590","doi":"10.1007/s11367-011-0316-4","title":"USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Environmental science; Sensitivity (control systems); Life-cycle assessment; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05216591897586682,"gpt":0.340249799953123,"spread":0.2880838809772562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102867,0.000162958,0.0003983991,0.0000808368,0.00008665262,0.00003560921,0.0003618618,0.00005006871,0.0002929002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001347057,0.000107633,0.0001680835,0.0001384094,0.000200542,0.0003440772,0.0003132265,0.0001890179,6.103382e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007656268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000697662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004430193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981361,0.0001909624,0.0006336092,0.0001931481,0.0006526395,0.0001935635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989653,0.0001732592,0.0003784495,0.0001782509,0.00005939129,0.0002454134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001523766,0.0009718279,0.8710372,0.000008869401,0.0004714591,0.000005336814,0.005786599,0.009257529,0.1119522,0.0001346326,0.00005768161,0.0001642599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005118912,0.0003047467,0.973725,0.00002506341,0.00009819331,0.000003794905,0.00545579,0.004363481,0.01501302,0.0003614273,0.00001295515,0.0001246373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968432,0.00001733229,0.001474223,0.0005584521,0.00006157703,0.0003131912,0.00002496489,0.000004574481,0.0007025552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975219,0.000008444887,0.002194544,0.0002003471,0.00003339157,0.00001253324,0.000003964353,0.000007443843,0.00001738624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1026878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4389146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157753571","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x","title":"Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Carbon sequestration; Carbon cycle; Climate change; Biomass (ecology); Carbon neutrality; Time horizon; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Production (economics); Computer science; Business; Carbon dioxide; Economics; Ecology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01551448424535934,"gpt":0.258596956467993,"spread":0.2430824722226336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008422289,0.0001397561,0.0002858727,0.00005804197,0.00007796807,0.00001566015,0.0001381337,0.0001851433,0.0008181349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001050604,0.0001024897,0.00005024584,0.0001215639,0.000287128,0.0003682559,0.0001303196,0.0004275898,0.000005549777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006457834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001030312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005892106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987133,0.0002106447,0.0003597283,0.0001226616,0.0002456478,0.0003480709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990304,0.00009533695,0.0003519609,0.0001335697,0.000007061193,0.0003817469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001836976,0.0002758262,0.9960126,0.000002728432,0.00004377719,0.00003068114,0.0001307268,0.0005342707,0.001030189,0.000004034454,0.0002672604,0.00148416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001777549,0.001061735,0.9949781,0.000006624402,0.00005737858,0.000139535,0.000694687,0.0002964667,0.0001075926,0.00006118486,0.0006767054,0.0001424711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976221,0.00008664144,0.00001512409,0.0006120002,0.0002950659,0.0001926347,0.000003288884,0.000005826601,0.001167353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999351,0.00002273996,0.0002399932,0.0001564032,0.000146865,0.000003357178,0.000001453151,0.00001232225,0.00006583073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00172897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8958004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063315616","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.009","title":"Green energies and the environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Renewable energy; Environmentally friendly; Energy consumption; Environmental science; Energy conservation; Environmental economics; Efficient energy use; Air conditioning; Environmental engineering; Ozone layer; Environmental protection; Sustainable development; Greenhouse gas; Global warming; Natural resource economics; Environmental impact of the energy industry; Waste management; Climate change; Engineering; Energy policy; Ozone; Meteorology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005211563399819559,"gpt":0.1947216430173497,"spread":0.1895100796175301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131667,0.0002743101,0.0004125323,0.00002836291,0.0005372622,0.00008783897,0.0001814221,0.00007951962,0.0005412691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003395771,0.0001679244,0.00009560359,0.0001541611,0.0009640369,0.0003296982,0.000609925,0.00008423236,0.00001905955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002114128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000881374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05729039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005257941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980877,0.0002593692,0.0003805719,0.0004275645,0.000215192,0.0006295755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992407,0.0000787333,0.0001175144,0.0004352959,0.000003746962,0.0001240038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000666366,0.001106623,0.2348885,0.001524491,0.0001616841,0.0003549368,0.002637828,0.04753803,0.00499935,0.2914205,0.084947,0.3297547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007768149,0.00004747977,0.005459215,0.000008453792,0.00004317001,0.0000179386,0.0007389379,0.0003993474,0.0003598908,0.0290083,0.9628803,0.000260141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6426247,0.1580158,0.003176523,0.004098194,0.00008398887,0.002035507,0.000005395213,0.0001270042,0.1898329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7391143,0.03584384,0.0004175051,0.0008858118,0.00008830187,0.000256334,0.0000135074,0.00003219116,0.2233482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8779333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9489872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118181057","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001","title":"Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundación Caja Madrid","keywords":"Virtual water; Commodity; Grain trade; Water resources; International trade and water; Water use; Water security; Business; Water trading; Water conservation; Productivity; Food security; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Water scarcity; International trade; Economics; Agriculture; Trade barrier; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01451521958850839,"gpt":0.228767823054133,"spread":0.2142526034656246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001876821,0.00008133683,0.0001339303,0.00001476301,0.0000188555,0.000008865723,0.0001993008,0.00007294326,0.006216576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008475513,0.00006036605,0.00004696019,0.0000246015,0.0001349924,0.0001562986,0.00006930901,0.00009036926,0.00006812229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003847713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003835121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006157025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003141045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992799,0.00001928505,0.0002643016,0.0001916949,0.00004131687,0.0002035608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997677,0.00001442223,0.00004575806,0.0001159095,6.044997e-7,0.00005566904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003924477,0.0006440208,0.9870557,0.00000193871,0.000004186413,0.00001580103,0.000263302,0.006801185,0.001802974,0.001108482,0.00003986768,0.002223327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002367137,0.0001430779,0.9642902,4.802428e-7,0.000001240533,0.00000239428,0.0001224812,0.001138251,0.0008240147,0.03277989,0.0003758546,0.00008538897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726094,0.000002749607,0.000001549805,0.001724181,0.00003746415,0.0001028882,0.000003772743,0.000007315015,0.02551065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.00001594145,0.0001828778,0.0006363809,0.00001391713,0.00000304627,0.000007360336,0.000002548896,0.0002008493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03167141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998574888","doi":"10.1007/s11367-010-0172-7","title":"A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Life cycle inventory; Freshwater ecosystem; Life-cycle assessment; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Computer science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0202617119618982,"gpt":0.3401368181506926,"spread":0.3198751061887944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019774,0.0001172982,0.0001543083,0.00005283905,0.00007312043,0.00021831,0.0006502363,0.0000670571,0.001053492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004369872,0.00007769352,0.0001244567,0.00006370337,0.0001544078,0.0008009069,0.0002060541,0.0004870592,0.00000958795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004155075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006452994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000181886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985074,0.00006511796,0.000453664,0.0001328705,0.0006295991,0.0002112874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989308,0.0004267165,0.0002955137,0.0001963428,0.0000344432,0.0001162184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001216627,0.0005137286,0.9715431,0.000003418902,0.00006449206,0.00003096444,0.0004271773,0.003901715,0.008080096,0.001492311,0.0008118342,0.01300954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007073925,0.00007621018,0.9622261,0.00002733743,0.00001552077,0.00003814947,0.0006014676,0.004150831,0.0006965122,0.02242008,0.008913031,0.0001273729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898049,0.000009088542,0.004505222,0.00429137,0.0006943386,0.0001679931,0.00001106363,0.000005144664,0.0005109444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965595,0.00001312093,0.03319469,0.0008707147,0.0002275365,0.000009872358,0.000002930421,0.0000123854,0.00007372868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02868946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598951025","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.027","title":"Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore's carbon emissions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Policy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Natural resource economics; Input–output model; Quarter (Canadian coin); Agricultural economics; Final demand; Economics; Disadvantaged; Energy demand; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Economic growth; Geography; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009660927864924842,"gpt":0.2925116576355687,"spread":0.2828507297706438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000744261,0.00009884144,0.0001668171,0.00008297581,0.0002698216,0.00003357016,0.0001662542,0.00005366678,0.0001609295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006457828,0.00008476406,0.00006887309,0.0001352745,0.00039982,0.0001589566,0.0002700574,0.00004523662,7.849025e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001727304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02615073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006677127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999319,0.00003405859,0.0001409817,0.0001826573,0.0001439841,0.0001793012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992998,0.00001648289,0.0001248189,0.0004231026,0.000002651912,0.0001331931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001857174,0.00004375324,0.9501109,0.000004853243,0.000118095,0.000004192204,0.0007236333,0.002995227,0.01968042,0.001231117,0.00004133149,0.02502791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001148208,0.00002869423,0.9859536,0.000002215423,0.0000960249,0.000001621936,0.00004707994,0.00743242,0.004271389,0.001615351,0.0003425604,0.00009417362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837913,0.00001479454,0.00003836358,0.0003966807,0.0000182823,0.00002659461,0.000007838682,0.00000872826,0.01569741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989443,0.00001518252,0.0001609352,0.00008943224,0.00003056453,0.000001974081,0.00001087,0.000005740756,0.000741029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03584275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977622155","doi":"10.1021/es072108l","title":"Anthropogenic Nickel Cycle: Insights into Use, Trade, and Recycling","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nickel; Scrap; Material flow analysis; China; Metallurgy; Life-cycle assessment; Materials science; Production (economics); Environmental science; Business; Waste management; Geography; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008453694759029648,"gpt":0.230263818059741,"spread":0.2218101233007114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002789395,0.0003415662,0.0002856905,0.0002844461,0.001516871,0.00004175875,0.0006999793,0.0002381098,0.0008006067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009479256,0.000314746,0.00006662867,0.00113455,0.01639234,0.001485275,0.001313466,0.0003978268,0.0003196607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001221793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002438112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000197959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004077975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969994,0.00004889798,0.0003736893,0.001077726,0.000665949,0.0008343327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987869,0.0000425261,0.0001197619,0.0007094958,0.000001190321,0.0003401625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001395045,0.0002646628,0.7460105,0.000002918921,0.000005997285,0.00006792518,0.001203413,0.0001741004,0.2363969,0.0001310983,0.00006230094,0.01566629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004896075,0.0003034952,0.924604,0.000006367504,0.00001415026,0.0003233392,0.001536831,0.0006771236,0.05726722,0.002911173,0.01131426,0.0005524547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997337,0.0003423629,0.0001464558,0.0006352202,0.0001016845,0.0003808769,0.000003005546,0.000150873,0.0009024978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961653,0.0009554618,0.002195382,0.0002632776,0.0000163585,0.00002700726,0.000003761047,0.00002661091,0.0003467902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1791296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118004422","doi":"10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-volsi2006-nosi2-1","title":"Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Energy Journal","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Energy (signal processing); Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008484459739324927,"gpt":0.2075504961204628,"spread":0.1990660363811378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009227028,0.0001910359,0.0001706967,0.00004307297,0.0006751975,0.00009442079,0.0008933386,0.00004352967,0.001588766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006675299,0.00009386353,0.0001763769,0.0001839345,0.0001680372,0.000222442,0.0003053055,0.0003496553,0.00002835726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004910271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003908436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001556211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008410359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979779,0.0002817004,0.0004060157,0.0002092133,0.0007015248,0.0004236804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990628,0.00002676309,0.0001747707,0.0004823001,0.00001794489,0.0002354484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001176768,0.0001088133,0.0004168594,0.000001152012,0.00002561317,0.000005632707,0.001516085,0.7623928,0.002708435,0.001251413,0.1714326,0.06002284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004962615,0.0003266063,0.01435597,0.00001698141,0.00006320046,0.001046597,0.002715594,0.002916786,0.01446654,0.02516099,0.9380918,0.0003426958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901208,0.0005379035,0.01021212,0.1877564,0.00245106,0.0001585773,0.000003394577,0.00001419338,0.00874557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720246,0.0003597692,0.0001917968,0.001244271,0.01772354,0.000002847622,5.608053e-7,0.0000212933,0.008431355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023555815","doi":"10.3390/buildings2030245","title":"A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Buildings","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wood Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cross laminated timber; Engineering; Embodied energy; Life-cycle assessment; Civil engineering; Building design; Enclosure; Reinforced concrete; Architectural engineering; Structural engineering; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01733829737986469,"gpt":0.3112548094990865,"spread":0.2939165121192218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006082109,0.000278298,0.0004212474,0.00007478801,0.0001667325,0.00003563807,0.0002750893,0.00009425735,0.002354287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712989,0.0002382989,0.0000952876,0.0003993149,0.0005429833,0.0007816821,0.0003506432,0.0002015933,0.00009801887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006390786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003154784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006473944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005975774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979606,0.0001355783,0.0004768853,0.0003684481,0.0004830846,0.0005753943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987625,0.0001504002,0.0002975948,0.0003234695,0.00002318321,0.0004427921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001530835,0.0002764124,0.2370549,0.0002436977,0.0003781722,0.00002306834,0.0219602,0.2554448,0.4737986,0.00449127,0.0015782,0.003219866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003386836,0.0009705235,0.7314118,0.0001706042,0.0001743033,0.00006803451,0.008412243,0.1107336,0.1332021,0.0001534166,0.009862396,0.001454159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895723,0.00001781849,0.003927404,0.0001217888,0.0001500932,0.0006378995,0.00001930337,0.00005707384,0.005496259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737518,0.000009830624,0.02507542,0.0002269854,0.00004384634,0.00003448535,0.000006421285,0.00002157423,0.0008295845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4943569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033721316","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13018","title":"LC‐IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Impact assessment; Environmental science; Human health; Environmental resource management; Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Industrial ecology; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental economics; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Environmental health; Cartography; Economics; Biology; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04322784206134282,"gpt":0.3418833504174322,"spread":0.2986555083560894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261053,0.0001777514,0.0005032247,0.000043331,0.0001005293,0.0000312283,0.0003735066,0.0002453367,0.01284658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001168954,0.0001382527,0.0002650316,0.0002463881,0.0002008844,0.0003651282,0.0002441655,0.0007355869,0.0000994277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000978431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000270887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001241457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001474055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977935,0.0005531555,0.0006834439,0.0002051578,0.0004079225,0.0003568136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983158,0.0002605029,0.0005737594,0.0001580844,0.00001677823,0.0006750449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001060085,0.0005689805,0.9010358,0.000006507974,0.0001853764,0.0002925831,0.0007427244,0.02033082,0.005147699,0.00009036435,0.05920951,0.01132949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009756212,0.005162925,0.9285673,0.00001372204,0.0001954238,0.0002188028,0.001601906,0.00670807,0.0006110843,0.002162616,0.04448902,0.0005129246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818227,0.00001110278,0.001376408,0.01293218,0.0002632375,0.000240302,0.000006773702,0.00001104152,0.003336206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991281,0.00001263949,0.00535801,0.00278612,0.0004487232,0.000003426238,0.000002730761,0.00001536231,0.00009201706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02753143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090189841","doi":"10.1021/es902555a","title":"Life Cycle Emissions and Cost of Producing Electricity from Coal, Natural Gas, and Wood Pellets in Ontario, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kementerian Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Cofiring; Coal; Tonne; Greenhouse gas; Natural gas; Waste management; Environmental science; Cost of electricity by source; Environmental engineering; Combined cycle; Engineering; Life-cycle assessment; Pellets; Electricity generation; Economics; Power (physics); Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003008701552290267,"gpt":0.1908944636898247,"spread":0.1878857621375344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002769438,0.0002054452,0.000253252,0.0001285305,0.0002637623,0.00001782358,0.0003646527,0.0001022775,0.0005603452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001530719,0.0001912793,0.00001833095,0.0004582185,0.002001293,0.0003414607,0.0004743095,0.000409297,0.000004122777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002065714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001601542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6170332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6293247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979746,0.00002901062,0.00028938,0.0007014769,0.0004310286,0.0005744844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.00003208662,0.0001045732,0.0003557972,0.000001286554,0.0002922264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843925,0.0001630601,0.8362558,0.000001296491,0.000002118742,0.00001372786,0.0004594332,0.0002021602,0.1510992,0.00001177161,0.00007590224,0.01169711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563443,0.0001391433,0.9679419,0.000008413132,0.000006480489,0.0000161913,0.0008233893,0.0005238453,0.02840644,0.0009293124,0.0006397726,0.0002087334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974597,0.0002531195,0.000009499672,0.001262676,0.00003719875,0.0003943345,0.000008924955,0.00001908797,0.0005554492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991229,0.00006002701,0.0003849702,0.00029398,0.000004337419,0.000007785306,0.000004418657,0.000006184338,0.0001154221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1316862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7800145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620737138","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.206","title":"LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Life-cycle assessment; Weighting; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01863756199481648,"gpt":0.3231835362340974,"spread":0.3045459742392809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001630157,0.0001155372,0.0001566949,0.00001646955,0.0008196722,0.0002252791,0.0002877845,0.00006270269,0.0001338612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002760785,0.00007514151,0.00005439615,0.00004267874,0.000853133,0.001348119,0.0001806339,0.000379549,0.00001748797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001365815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001421963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008146928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988229,0.0001149531,0.0003554366,0.0001885345,0.0003493744,0.0001687815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.00004440283,0.0007504218,0.0003921289,0.00002822366,0.0001002111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000132467,0.0000956267,0.9718528,0.00001865882,0.0000314902,0.00001036445,0.005657031,0.009812375,0.001774866,0.00008940516,0.001174357,0.009350604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001502832,0.0001152681,0.9802606,0.00003601384,0.00002080287,0.00005982795,0.001534455,0.0001557785,0.005947256,0.008755521,0.00285992,0.0001042939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911466,0.0002491676,0.00009941856,0.006730468,0.000455691,0.0001279819,8.379578e-7,0.000006735238,0.001183076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997043,0.00008507727,0.00152539,0.0002619603,0.0006110356,0.000001669222,1.863319e-7,0.00001075385,0.0004609473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009656596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6304339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082341199","doi":"10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045843","title":"Advances Toward a Net-Zero Global Building Sector","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zero-energy building; Embodied energy; Greenhouse gas; Carbon neutrality; Climate change; Efficient energy use; Natural resource economics; Business; Architectural engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Engineering; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008980868029409457,"gpt":0.2502889246436397,"spread":0.2413080566142302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002338702,0.000225893,0.0003730046,0.000007240633,0.00008556014,0.00001189769,0.0002397437,0.00005548143,0.001889875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008029908,0.0001746105,0.0001199916,0.000127602,0.0005113728,0.0003018748,0.0004461329,0.0001037142,0.00007612559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009920621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003288601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004535153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001127914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984281,0.00009298935,0.0003661024,0.0004065339,0.0004117573,0.0002944845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993328,0.00003488797,0.0001597203,0.000193164,0.000002019544,0.0002773752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001638735,0.0003610396,0.6245962,0.007238565,0.00007097788,0.00003682894,0.005431633,0.0005004414,0.002318331,0.0002057268,0.006191297,0.3528851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003670048,0.0005234811,0.1176198,0.0005001373,0.00008538518,0.000009024602,0.0009340689,0.00006176731,0.0003689825,0.0005283443,0.878599,0.0004030043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8636642,0.1200425,0.0004900583,0.003672892,0.00003663983,0.0006793697,0.00007441999,0.00003800829,0.01130195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977997,0.09855775,0.001010514,0.002470628,0.00004435642,0.00001402236,0.00000580136,0.00001260338,0.00008460239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8724077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988205435","doi":"10.1021/es1030883","title":"Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unavailability; Life-cycle assessment; Context (archaeology); Water scarcity; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Water quality; Scarcity; Environmental economics; Human health; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Effluent; Water resources; Risk analysis (engineering); Production (economics); Environmental engineering; Engineering; Business; Environmental health; Reliability engineering; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03662605684036645,"gpt":0.2642328852097457,"spread":0.2276068283693793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000607559,0.0002257336,0.0002674358,0.000404766,0.0002658191,0.00001474568,0.0005443154,0.0001311706,0.001061539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003072029,0.0002044673,0.00005236156,0.0007256957,0.002367348,0.0008388624,0.0004647545,0.0002383254,0.00008639398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001512744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00101339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004358669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976376,0.0000587066,0.0004435059,0.0006472365,0.0005156902,0.000697271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990926,0.000009380088,0.000177868,0.000545543,0.000001753477,0.0001728181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002689222,0.0005229489,0.564503,0.000003665567,0.000002159138,0.000006520473,0.0009561002,0.0003905862,0.4319757,0.0001713875,0.000006757166,0.001434279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003514906,0.0005970752,0.9118352,0.0000250209,0.00000316456,0.000009386338,0.0004809747,0.001485135,0.08376194,0.0009188423,0.0002680022,0.0002637811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982237,0.000009677427,0.00008466716,0.0001954311,0.00003781124,0.0003830971,0.00001939556,0.00004958443,0.0009966558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989909,0.00004240593,0.0005502977,0.0002420549,0.000005791434,0.00002203198,0.00001716527,0.00001718737,0.0001121847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3482138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514368667","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.051","title":"Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Water use; Water scarcity; Life-cycle assessment; Footprint; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Water resources; Water resource management; Business; Computer science; Economics; Production (economics); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723898021909124,"gpt":0.2456006941186998,"spread":0.2183617138996086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002713846,0.0002897513,0.0002414899,0.00008903194,0.0004820467,0.00007786682,0.0005164766,0.0002143965,0.004088043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001835885,0.00008201988,0.00009134909,0.0001228521,0.001083775,0.00009205886,0.001009143,0.0003752535,0.0005588938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008438115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008800615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001287411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968669,0.0008435786,0.0003574786,0.0006095694,0.0003469319,0.0009755137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998614,0.0005598171,0.00003275443,0.0005065612,0.000003120692,0.0002837554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002294705,0.001203162,0.710273,0.00001935377,0.00005625388,0.0001930294,0.01540684,0.00007849836,0.2627947,0.002448285,0.0004888747,0.004743316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000460118,0.0005897924,0.8488302,0.00001421306,0.000008220695,0.000007476018,0.001120931,0.000008206077,0.1262916,0.01680113,0.005585108,0.0002829107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530931,0.000002001624,0.0001925008,0.04441077,0.00006332629,0.0008542169,0.000004846942,0.00004054674,0.001338725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977817,0.00001281226,0.00003057722,0.001378976,0.00002141136,0.0001360178,0.000001259409,0.00001751667,0.0006197644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1385572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981000588","doi":"10.1111/jiec.12954","title":"Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Emerging technologies; Maturity (psychological); Context (archaeology); Life-cycle assessment; Computer science; Emerging markets; Technology readiness level; Set (abstract data type); Industrial ecology; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Management science; Business; Systems engineering; Engineering; Production (economics); Sustainability; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01793006089169132,"gpt":0.3073883513702872,"spread":0.2894582904785959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001702436,0.000123386,0.0004423113,0.00009893769,0.00003868506,0.000005682637,0.0002173394,0.0003168452,0.002490465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008406982,0.00009411074,0.00008769289,0.0001129897,0.000369268,0.0001669305,0.0004424945,0.0003907634,0.000001046047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008350126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006281742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002319507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002493881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983043,0.0002458157,0.0006702112,0.0001548529,0.0004362378,0.00018855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987282,0.0002016869,0.0007550113,0.0002037463,0.00002805283,0.00008332994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001554312,0.0002629642,0.9599248,0.00001825414,0.00002726222,0.000002099873,0.00003656535,0.0001649417,0.02834015,0.00001898127,0.0008999174,0.01014868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001170781,0.001455066,0.9773173,0.00003344765,0.00006643248,0.00002966574,0.0006682138,0.0003868204,0.01748287,0.0009908964,0.0002868738,0.0001116354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969888,0.0000368994,0.00001906011,0.0007690416,0.0001246919,0.0004837972,0.000006238417,0.00001173046,0.001559688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990686,0.0000988688,0.0007333886,0.00002212528,0.00002047346,0.000006548106,9.940986e-7,0.000006491625,0.00004251269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01739255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038155353","doi":"10.1162/jie.2007.1220","title":"A Spatial Analysis of Residential Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Greenhouse gas; Census; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental engineering; Environmental protection; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02590532495247848,"gpt":0.2920722070287753,"spread":0.2661668820762969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748121,0.0001217014,0.0004317446,0.0001679969,0.00007691937,0.00001126747,0.0004044032,0.000222215,0.002886793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007995172,0.00008175309,0.0002665166,0.0005515313,0.0003019038,0.0001932812,0.0001180999,0.0003916212,0.000002177058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002220785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005200235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01915134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09896249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978417,0.0003494324,0.0008715733,0.0001371778,0.0004418371,0.0003582605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998641,0.0004201678,0.0005363338,0.0002331067,0.00001561466,0.0001537694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006072564,0.0005521624,0.9870569,0.000001140942,0.0001824317,0.0001265439,0.0008035118,0.0008354533,0.001175616,0.00003002931,0.001796414,0.00683252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284493,0.00091831,0.9865222,0.000004566725,0.0004570618,0.00003732492,0.008210232,0.0001133516,0.0005448862,0.0002251203,0.001580351,0.0001021206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970326,0.00002581238,0.0001907219,0.0004471235,0.0002253851,0.0001515156,0.000008136244,0.000002322695,0.001916382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995579,0.0000215029,0.0001021029,0.00008724307,0.0001585928,9.690654e-7,0.00000249284,0.000006039732,0.00006316532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07981116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015325442","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.018","title":"Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Copper; Tailings; Material flow analysis; Environmental science; Tailings dam; Lithosphere; Copper mining; Geology; Waste management; Metallurgy; Materials science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004632455790527608,"gpt":0.207617823716781,"spread":0.2029853679262534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001529522,0.0001452865,0.0002771439,0.00004963622,0.00007376499,0.00002791547,0.0001469107,0.00008741261,0.00368706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002726408,0.0001287747,0.00009241924,0.0002252123,0.0002470392,0.0002253181,0.0002706204,0.0001604091,0.0002205344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005609306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.00005192247,0.0002664435,0.0003909911,0.00004895893,0.0003451397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.0000514508,0.0000660429,0.0001998438,0.000001051042,0.0001537749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165304,0.0002313126,0.9175028,0.000001353904,0.00002517708,0.000003398999,0.0002451358,0.06643902,0.00001534121,0.000004429539,0.00003939838,0.0154761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002304902,0.00007294269,0.9393142,2.138371e-7,0.00003007525,0.000001015645,0.0002721065,0.05259899,0.000002876432,0.00009454357,0.007226695,0.0001557968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970848,0.0000395782,0.00003592702,0.0003815863,0.00002914971,0.0002132165,0.00001512427,0.00001713937,0.002183483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976097,0.0003578878,0.001067897,0.0007102321,0.00001010839,0.00001976801,0.00002189601,0.000006202449,0.0001963527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02181146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985892314","doi":"10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.011","title":"Development of agri-pellet production cost and optimum size","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioresource Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Tonne; Pellets; Pellet; Straw; Environmental science; Total cost; Biomass (ecology); Production (economics); Yield (engineering); Pulp and paper industry; Mathematics; Agricultural engineering; Waste management; Environmental engineering; Agronomy; Engineering; Economics; Materials science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005280146321462525,"gpt":0.2154840979740236,"spread":0.2102039516525611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002166598,0.0001102312,0.0001233445,0.00004660068,0.0001010015,0.000005091576,0.0001678844,0.0001738596,0.0005556869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001829091,0.00009626098,0.00001714622,0.0001978656,0.0009611381,0.00005243154,0.0003229506,0.0001967234,0.00005476372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007448818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000817457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002056664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000801475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991781,0.00001058576,0.0001836483,0.0002735917,0.0001243284,0.0002298146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995427,0.0000157795,0.00007066636,0.0003042796,0.000003801817,0.00006274935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001482317,0.0001272916,0.2484785,0.00001010443,0.000005497282,0.000001637229,0.0005461931,0.000008495777,0.6832105,0.00009821625,0.0001916468,0.06730709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002621491,0.00007258839,0.5696532,0.000004422965,0.00000865499,0.00003258082,0.001265899,0.00003068063,0.3126025,0.0005668256,0.115287,0.0002135497],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972371,0.00001487565,0.00004398672,0.0008017533,0.00005404029,0.0002850753,0.000001236764,0.00007180318,0.00149011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812448,0.000004572659,0.01823431,0.00002563054,0.00001100346,0.00001980088,0.000001218088,0.000008572115,0.0004500741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.370608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010340634","doi":"10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9","title":"The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis","keywords":"Environmental science; Atmospheric dispersion modeling; Dispersion (optics); Atmospheric sciences; Atmospheric emissions; Deposition (geology); Sensitivity (control systems); Air pollution; Ecology; Engineering; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0161099452251154,"gpt":0.2760521357230176,"spread":0.2599421904979022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009853652,0.00006171405,0.0001108385,0.00001338157,0.0001023273,0.00001711395,0.000146777,0.00002181469,0.000003666712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008126748,0.00003262725,0.00003997983,0.00004752078,0.00009463132,0.0003033738,0.00008236963,0.00009235168,4.101901e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002379269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002165102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001498751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001149281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990516,0.0001380894,0.0003288892,0.00006594048,0.0003368903,0.00007859256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991074,0.0004503136,0.0003262087,0.00006958743,0.00001984421,0.00002665012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008092882,0.0001292855,0.9533718,0.000008918231,0.00001243802,0.000002914097,0.005259366,0.005878456,0.02502147,0.0000881551,0.00000128846,0.010145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002687454,0.00005628157,0.8938395,0.00002630245,0.000006095933,0.0000195322,0.008184094,0.09556486,0.001001881,0.000984542,0.00001563955,0.00003245732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979199,0.00005151756,0.0012987,0.000459451,0.00003672471,0.0001812669,0.000004255961,7.223765e-7,0.00004744643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993727,0.0001829255,0.000399477,0.00002034473,0.00001430172,0.000003770412,9.815632e-7,0.000003301958,0.00000218481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08968641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1330501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023230188","doi":"10.1007/s11367-014-0759-5","title":"The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Log-normal distribution; Robustness (evolution); Monte Carlo method; Probability density function; Probability distribution; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009036539094697198,"gpt":0.2855883745154514,"spread":0.2765518354207542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931092,0.00008205673,0.00009658313,0.00001577535,0.0002017557,0.00005033708,0.001510627,0.00002162308,0.00002305656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002105722,0.00003365369,0.0001136833,0.0001273949,0.0002321469,0.0001151537,0.0004635046,0.0002231597,0.000008522871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005694826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004379113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002831747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003078559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982936,0.0002043381,0.0004185773,0.00009509084,0.0008376617,0.0001507201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998988,0.0002385574,0.0003260749,0.0003510113,0.00003186858,0.00006446658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001360052,0.0008962168,0.8104316,0.000006566939,0.0001221423,7.094839e-7,0.001328446,0.1257237,0.0008619904,0.01934496,0.004645604,0.03650208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002407733,0.00004732041,0.962432,0.000006469293,0.00001234431,0.00000917445,0.00078751,0.01451722,0.000149548,0.006709673,0.01504112,0.00004683804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420637,0.00001989844,0.02286116,0.03018102,0.000211276,0.0003969959,0.00001067641,0.000003276098,0.004251939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990227,0.00001512274,0.0002629151,0.0004716315,0.0001212996,0.00002916967,0.000001798544,0.000006131699,0.00006924655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1520004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2807145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010512122","doi":"10.1038/nclimate2160","title":"Low-carbon infrastructure strategies for cities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Climate Change","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Electrification; Work (physics); Climate change mitigation; Business; Natural resource economics; Electricity; Redevelopment; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009660353066331649,"gpt":0.2528947242573908,"spread":0.2432343711910591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002424251,0.0002005007,0.0001747858,0.00002613054,0.0001402779,0.00005598488,0.0002077786,0.0003072391,0.0005976615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005119103,0.0001655106,0.0000779312,0.0000944541,0.0002126816,0.0003334777,0.0001705205,0.0002972882,0.00002470133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002116974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003968107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002996351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008030294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988291,0.00003725301,0.0001392115,0.000305518,0.0002127405,0.0004761564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994947,0.00005537687,0.00006410414,0.0002778544,0.000006421936,0.0001014851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005887302,0.0005295651,0.799131,0.00157543,0.00005847641,0.00001659538,0.01751727,0.0004899851,0.03651213,0.03389826,0.0103406,0.09934199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001096339,0.0004617652,0.8913808,0.00004661715,0.00004213586,0.000008307856,0.00528262,0.00254615,0.004623425,0.04829698,0.04542924,0.0007856155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742091,0.00009132254,0.00005253136,0.000442506,0.0002887429,0.0005154852,0.00004215385,0.00007469354,0.02428346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977338,0.00005108858,0.0004001613,0.001255608,0.0002941476,0.00009915893,0.00003367845,0.00002395565,0.0001083773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09855638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6749327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251461150","doi":"10.1007/s11367-011-0294-6","title":"USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotoxicity; Key (lock); Sensitivity (control systems); Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Engineering; Biology; Ecology; Toxicity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05006353110826041,"gpt":0.3340069652118776,"spread":0.2839434341036172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001046068,0.0001620223,0.0003991715,0.00008305829,0.00006662551,0.0000346769,0.000353941,0.00004624225,0.0002826251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001681355,0.0001057815,0.0001678737,0.0001462064,0.0001953473,0.0003629374,0.0003258141,0.0001860404,9.846232e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007367656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009103455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008012254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.0001849628,0.0006156469,0.0001925117,0.0006225397,0.000201066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989188,0.000216767,0.0003817077,0.0001683782,0.00005769587,0.0002566397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002625228,0.001003562,0.9279587,0.0000103696,0.0006086165,0.000006304219,0.005895888,0.01911226,0.04465625,0.0001109417,0.00006024749,0.0003143711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757635,0.0001807645,0.9665138,0.00002315093,0.00009857333,0.000004020409,0.004745065,0.01615382,0.0113131,0.0003421509,0.00002608653,0.0001237332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957493,0.00001617201,0.002441325,0.0007017649,0.00007426764,0.0003379119,0.00003063916,0.00000439928,0.0006442196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965733,0.00001698727,0.003112532,0.0002299252,0.00002819965,0.00001329515,0.000003203448,0.000007313603,0.00001522375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0385551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4313643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027258005","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13012","title":"Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Phase (matter); Industrial ecology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Chemistry; Biology; Sustainability; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1496740299148836,"gpt":0.3804821717468091,"spread":0.2308081418319255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017321,0.00007947374,0.0003076974,0.000007803085,0.00007785918,0.00001131504,0.0001789847,0.00009429008,0.00114289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007551017,0.00004687984,0.00009445216,0.00007852682,0.0002074164,0.0001432291,0.00009416515,0.0002530366,0.000007141421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008941449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002808261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003515721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005193236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988415,0.0003811026,0.0004301444,0.0001097121,0.00009707972,0.000140496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985197,0.0009074736,0.0003315577,0.00006813477,0.00001147051,0.0001616162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008450421,0.001110885,0.2576488,0.0003801586,0.0005742735,0.00007368784,0.002643516,0.007723579,0.007427043,0.0002019337,0.1407404,0.5730253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0496731,0.04213604,0.521823,0.0004434316,0.005376563,0.0006650995,0.005230709,0.04659326,0.003503481,0.01001196,0.3127865,0.001756884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9193414,0.003179619,0.009682373,0.06619524,0.0002971571,0.001039842,0.000007907637,0.000007666966,0.0002487345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883977,0.0005938912,0.001465352,0.00931851,0.0001866715,0.00001262529,5.643701e-7,0.000004963144,0.00001975952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5712684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2133737065","doi":"10.1021/es403928f","title":"Complementarities of Water-Focused Life Cycle Assessment and Water Footprint Assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Life-cycle assessment; Social media; Computer science; Altmetrics; Footprint; Library science; Sustainability; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Geography; Archaeology; Production (economics); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006993492712171697,"gpt":0.2481752649131365,"spread":0.2411817722009648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007885128,0.0003397251,0.0003729739,0.0002434656,0.0005720595,0.0000842191,0.0008553258,0.0001379731,0.01094995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001122319,0.0002332515,0.00007040308,0.000259626,0.007045927,0.0006623153,0.003024291,0.0003192034,0.0002604383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00142089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000235468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008195861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002930771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965754,0.0000662071,0.0005516637,0.0008157507,0.0008971081,0.001093931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988255,0.00002304744,0.0001017633,0.0007055956,0.000004946937,0.000339141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004234347,0.0003395468,0.4352433,0.00000920582,0.0000114918,0.000003071866,0.0003965288,0.0002441575,0.5501292,0.0003200036,0.00002087436,0.01327839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006321614,0.0004754008,0.7669251,0.00000589579,0.0000179205,0.00001491075,0.003728224,0.001044204,0.2186883,0.006619341,0.001467051,0.0003814497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924254,0.00001983629,0.0003117191,0.002204619,0.0000792554,0.000876927,0.000009718246,0.00007983931,0.003992644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942375,0.00003204622,0.005151416,0.0002055561,0.000009947486,0.0001550239,0.00001290408,0.00002209168,0.0001735289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3316818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021985597","doi":"10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z","title":"Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Joint Research Centre; European Commission; Steelcase; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Interim; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005972709859430764,"gpt":0.2063129344597261,"spread":0.2003402246002953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005988478,0.00021066,0.0001469043,0.00008920976,0.0003171623,0.00005951707,0.0001533354,0.000177205,0.0005343076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004603644,0.0001840849,0.00003582942,0.0001044195,0.0008517691,0.0003991267,0.0002480094,0.0001022451,0.00003968957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004905456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006451175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07294519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01322311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988925,0.00001262827,0.0001669887,0.0003383865,0.00009578654,0.0004936751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994882,0.00002014873,0.00004756842,0.000237075,8.316939e-7,0.0002061455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007105293,0.00005522603,0.592584,0.00001208897,0.00001133655,0.000001299594,0.0003524919,0.00005741298,0.003836859,0.0002491279,0.001560161,0.4012729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003249051,0.000178017,0.9546537,0.000002555674,0.00001226377,0.00000929705,0.02874098,0.0009175907,0.004057765,0.003688727,0.00709461,0.0003195196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974505,0.00006412884,0.00005118299,0.0008166204,0.00001658744,0.0006271329,0.00006435129,0.0001128341,0.0007966242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998543,0.0002636429,0.000301291,0.0002838311,0.00001046205,0.00004722852,0.00008194365,0.00002127482,0.0004473895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4009534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633290044","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.008","title":"Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Bottle; Reuse; Plastic bottle; Cold chain; Carton; Waste management; Food packaging; Life-cycle assessment; Data collection; Business; Environmental science; Engineering; Operations management; Production (economics); Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01645043734369544,"gpt":0.2798063158020864,"spread":0.263355878458391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001787606,0.0001147608,0.0002358929,0.00007206797,0.00007528056,0.00001812646,0.0001329433,0.00004449603,0.0001390783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006238682,0.00006996182,0.0001215044,0.000183401,0.0001799778,0.0003992417,0.00004677985,0.0002028093,0.000004975889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007068908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009783232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005084634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001393903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983178,0.0002752365,0.0005018558,0.0001308373,0.0006248596,0.0001494136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988096,0.0000581108,0.0006607884,0.0002458415,0.00007683368,0.0001487939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005690359,0.0008899536,0.6932313,0.00006091551,0.0001562458,0.000005777626,0.002858264,0.2480097,0.03793571,0.00004466,0.01149644,0.004742027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006232043,0.001570624,0.9677273,0.00006669103,0.00007219978,0.0001190847,0.006946122,0.001271189,0.02033688,0.0006110201,0.0005018783,0.0001537859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99629,0.00008536035,0.0001371249,0.001602536,0.0003517056,0.0002609382,0.000002712949,0.000004570755,0.001265049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995207,0.00003041167,0.0001133464,0.00002966016,0.0001124578,0.000002332772,7.053478e-7,0.00001056404,0.0001798434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.274496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2852961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020938520","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.022","title":"Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Building and Environment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Global warming; Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Environmental impact assessment; Civil engineering; Engineering; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05222778061043197,"gpt":0.3129443662454474,"spread":0.2607165856350154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008942613,0.0001860527,0.00025309,0.00003731135,0.00004610643,0.00001185725,0.00009304216,0.00009173745,0.000007353165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003928518,0.0001693457,0.00001760534,0.00007436437,0.0002156369,0.00008663037,0.0005623416,0.00006655081,9.779658e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000587905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007140811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005585189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004052557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985549,0.0001282514,0.0002608594,0.0005077117,0.0002647833,0.0002834578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.00005326097,0.00007178324,0.0001664497,0.000001523324,0.0002761183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005240425,0.0001896005,0.6606759,0.00003907872,0.00001478939,0.000005279242,0.001127532,0.0011908,0.01693309,0.0007018177,0.000005076025,0.3190646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005347338,0.0002090266,0.989639,0.00002394375,0.00001370118,0.00001486256,0.0008922305,0.000910403,0.002502723,0.003072942,0.00193517,0.00025121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948987,0.001174662,0.002535824,0.0003208168,0.00001771357,0.0002167274,0.000002240958,0.0000107399,0.0008225456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679092,0.001776212,0.0301628,0.00007392225,0.000008275418,0.00004582949,0.000001572579,0.000008269111,0.00001388374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3289631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6905716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996327757","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119594","title":"Comparative life-cycle assessment of traditional and emerging oily sludge treatment approaches","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Waste management; Incineration; Environmental science; Ecotoxicity; Energy recovery; Refinery; Waste treatment; Hazardous waste; Engineering; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04885299799979402,"gpt":0.2810954403860826,"spread":0.2322424423862886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003766846,0.00009951906,0.0002302404,0.0000403724,0.0000515913,0.00001106893,0.00005725683,0.00002864532,0.0004632371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001624245,0.00007496313,0.00007019944,0.0000658228,0.000149625,0.0004593944,0.00002049914,0.0001017912,0.000005991933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003428371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002228481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000225261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004589177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990441,0.00008197986,0.0003069874,0.0001534601,0.0003018597,0.000111599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994793,0.00002563423,0.0002842337,0.0001145686,0.00001017582,0.00008612083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002803275,0.002413036,0.7433066,0.00007808749,0.0001819404,0.000004404206,0.005885371,0.1632083,0.04578429,0.0001441783,0.0006258891,0.03808752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006126306,0.001089962,0.9820688,0.00001197204,0.00004436102,0.00006055236,0.003418827,0.001962314,0.008610661,0.0005654855,0.00144793,0.0001065248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954965,0.00005231019,0.00005537195,0.0006214038,0.0001543121,0.000203155,0.000002057602,0.000003114831,0.003411835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982328,0.00003717213,0.001153515,0.00001644001,0.0001064165,0.000002587308,0.000002361142,0.000005376914,0.0004432951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2387621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5072122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}