{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2822,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":145,"predictions_cover":2822,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1f8cf9af973a","filters":{"topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W2903777941","doi":"10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7","title":"Privacy in the age of medical big data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Big data; Internet privacy; Patient privacy; Data science; Corporate governance; Information privacy; Computer science; Data collection; Business; Health care; Political science; Data mining; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8215093696215826,"gpt":0.7083387038173126,"spread":0.11317066580427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03936291,0.0004390568,0.003381023,0.0005334248,0.00004214035,0.00001009095,0.00674642,0.005715641,0.000702763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2501934,0.0001946414,0.0002669508,0.001734436,0.002410759,0.00002990495,0.001842709,0.0246538,0.00007067364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009934172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003461848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001178074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004060782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871265,0.0009325523,0.002030134,0.001030562,0.008362656,0.000517644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497102,0.04136557,0.000608974,0.007355625,0.0005536305,0.0004059945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000408329,0.0002714883,0.00003078486,0.056882,0.0002077142,0.00170889,0.0002823763,4.556005e-10,2.886942e-7,0.003103386,0.08815519,0.8493171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009814422,0.0004413608,0.00005668287,0.1225821,0.0007339426,0.0002514828,0.00004226834,0.000002075474,2.122937e-7,0.001375673,0.8734112,0.0001215587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004583332,0.9592808,0.00002010068,0.0287958,0.001495121,0.001329259,0.00004783943,0.00002168512,0.009004847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005907688,0.983815,0.0001630967,0.004409023,0.008876804,0.00003216,0.001581699,0.00006483021,0.0009983354],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128659393","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.011","title":"A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1398,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"Medical Research Council; European Commission","keywords":"Clinical trial; Intervention (counseling); Research design; Medicine; Management science; Clinical study design; Outcome (game theory); Work (physics); Computer science; Nursing; Pathology; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6123364426840952,"gpt":0.6530127906231212,"spread":0.04067634793902608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1686979,0.0002955026,0.004841938,0.0004303553,0.00007787057,0.00001649948,0.0008406078,0.001784506,0.0003494038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7577561,0.0002083893,0.001573039,0.0003285158,0.0005746391,0.0001308893,0.0001440942,0.007877238,0.000231195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002869616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007680826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001939285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.97685,0.008438193,0.01174381,0.0006605323,0.001350974,0.0009564921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.567142,0.4213021,0.005740419,0.001319359,0.001593061,0.002903112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2969731,0.004033454,0.09599841,0.0002237486,0.001035872,0.001424806,0.0002224756,0.00002107109,0.000529076,0.02451657,0.4366851,0.1383363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1384822,0.08619488,0.2892422,0.002263198,0.0007189625,0.0007174877,0.0002239856,0.0001563926,0.0001673205,0.3634344,0.1176395,0.0007594299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8212293,0.0009393726,0.007112515,0.1606039,0.003634984,0.001676775,0.00001389648,0.00005270538,0.00473647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7073911,0.003927127,0.1238005,0.1500832,0.01202271,0.00003696612,0.00001375604,0.00007482812,0.002649781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5890582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969881216","doi":"10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6","title":"Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1002,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Brain Institute; SickKids Foundation; Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Software deployment; Harm; Health care; Psychological intervention; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Process management; Psychology; Business; Nursing; Political science; Software engineering; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5198019094089994,"gpt":0.686093318272577,"spread":0.1662914088635776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01252298,0.0007944478,0.005628917,0.00080345,0.0002937203,0.00002921449,0.0007780088,0.004215304,0.0003517747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1317332,0.0005084276,0.001168219,0.0007576376,0.0003143062,0.00004057842,0.0002334062,0.01751537,0.0001574149],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009050722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008491958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004038383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007086588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929032,0.0005500453,0.001853116,0.001516622,0.002054244,0.001122732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591423,0.03506922,0.0009141399,0.00148912,0.00265022,0.0007350552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001235228,0.00007211375,0.000009282113,0.3263091,0.0004071345,0.00002257938,0.0003444457,2.620417e-7,0.000002202526,0.002820227,0.05960035,0.6091771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004004722,0.005713088,0.000002039782,0.09588736,0.001277256,0.00005423349,0.00009605342,0.00002815365,0.0000017948,0.000430041,0.8921751,0.0003301403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[4.2882e-7,0.9637623,0.0002712327,0.02018102,0.00246303,0.009679231,0.0002950534,0.0001330774,0.003214671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000008741232,0.9285262,0.00499985,0.005414955,0.005215623,0.0007456363,0.00340611,0.0002980809,0.05138483],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8325748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032535554","doi":"10.2471/blt.08.050955","title":"The Declaration of Helsinki and public health","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":979,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Declaration of Helsinki; Medical research; Declaration; Helsinki declaration; Medicine; Health promotion; Public relations; Political science; Research ethics; Medical ethics; Ethical code; Alternative medicine; Law; Informed consent; Nursing; Psychiatry; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3052360125683313,"gpt":0.4722539584431552,"spread":0.1670179458748238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003816304,0.0000680091,0.0002310377,0.00007088545,0.0006097998,0.000009049796,0.0001768442,0.00007425341,0.0001278113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01209827,0.00004157077,0.00002894051,0.0007439721,0.0004148138,0.00001243716,0.0001316903,0.0005097708,0.0000113627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001314885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001675968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003873802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007136582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997929,0.0003713525,0.0006472822,0.0001563934,0.0006588346,0.0002371471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961367,0.001953696,0.000479952,0.0004407423,0.0008251422,0.0001637407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002577958,0.0009767649,0.4954146,0.00366111,0.0001178389,0.000001850371,0.005627162,0.00002224608,0.0006358282,0.2115751,0.2518642,0.02984548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001636327,0.0007017164,0.7106751,0.000692759,0.00001321124,0.00005136352,0.0004082977,0.00006328276,0.002186182,0.003698191,0.2797566,0.0001169292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08626507,0.001592127,0.0004687526,0.9098597,0.0001711844,0.0007792804,0.000003446073,0.00002570524,0.0008347976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752489,0.006841293,0.001521949,0.008889263,0.00009073026,0.00000354708,0.00001071373,0.00002441878,0.00736917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122908200","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62296-5","title":"Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":923,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Women's College Hospital","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Prostate Cancer Foundation; National Institutes of Health; Yale University; Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers; Foundation for Cardiovascular Research","keywords":"Dissemination; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Research ethics; Data collection; Data sharing; Medicine; Open science; Health care; Protocol (science); Medical education; Public relations; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7023569472091428,"gpt":0.6254450606686832,"spread":0.07691188654045955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03185001,0.00008311004,0.0003481623,0.00009846249,0.0004507008,0.0001580474,0.0003918352,0.0001716359,0.00004416349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04327929,0.00005193157,0.00002998272,0.0003523639,0.0006586569,0.00007853691,0.0004929791,0.002881816,0.00003723937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005737232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001905001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005034739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003224352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967713,0.001089258,0.0002507793,0.0003112156,0.001035354,0.0005420698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800606,0.01833106,0.00005600844,0.001022816,0.0003455801,0.0001839328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00415482,0.0003852496,0.2773499,0.005681897,0.0002328266,0.00008905157,0.006378463,0.0001239818,0.1455993,0.3654033,0.03880977,0.1557914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009843438,0.001545913,0.2747329,0.01658712,0.0001518388,0.0004009392,0.003524024,0.0326791,0.03060925,0.5983682,0.03087251,0.000684766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8957059,0.0004935501,0.00008772787,0.03070395,0.00008109492,0.0002030014,0.000001237981,0.00004666088,0.07267684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912628,0.0005145058,0.003472316,0.001067409,0.00245636,0.00001125869,0.000002066175,0.00002410721,0.001189156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2329649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983973208","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00266.x","title":"Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":701,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Human research; Informed consent; Psychology; Participant observation; Institutional review board; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8173813325809884,"gpt":0.6894667605983835,"spread":0.1279145719826049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08608113,0.0003490801,0.002986086,0.002657959,0.0007434829,0.00003587627,0.0009844904,0.00137167,0.000172959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05294266,0.0001994857,0.0005144838,0.003169385,0.003692047,0.0001273502,0.0005312877,0.03994879,0.000008949878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005888611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002274175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006279385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867609,0.004952535,0.002725493,0.0003597545,0.004605335,0.0005959647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8905308,0.1050798,0.0009889419,0.0008688567,0.002043021,0.0004884867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001110923,0.001880952,0.003181011,0.1339259,0.02047691,0.01131375,0.1212128,0.00001423998,0.00008165363,0.2167675,0.0196456,0.4703888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002450503,0.002500026,0.0004124694,0.1771875,0.0106763,0.004752963,0.003577936,0.00001274213,0.000006012332,0.04934524,0.7486584,0.0004198434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004027887,0.9483786,0.00004463681,0.04531901,0.0001976113,0.0005663311,0.000004956541,0.000009434555,0.005076663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003394811,0.9937629,0.0002005348,0.001033947,0.0007377662,0.0000072711,0.00002988328,0.00005840777,0.0007745437],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7290128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109575571","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70576-9","title":"Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Lancet Oncology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":539,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Cancer Centre; Hospital for Sick Children; University of British Columbia; Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Sick Kids Foundation","keywords":"Clinical trial; Medicine; Protocol (science); Systematic review; Alternative medicine; Meta-analysis; Placebo; Family medicine; Patient participation; MEDLINE; Internal medicine; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8673190754124493,"gpt":0.7341545071881482,"spread":0.1331645682243011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09075666,0.0002691824,0.02944777,0.0003588461,0.000021147,0.000004400918,0.0003599406,0.0007455957,0.0003123621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3134471,0.0001251358,0.003356876,0.001459682,0.0003445318,0.00001336742,0.0001627561,0.001525261,0.000002339451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001811004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002154413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007410283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002214019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670895,0.01982802,0.0112894,0.0005261277,0.0009242857,0.000342612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8927435,0.09817652,0.006709184,0.001456313,0.0006232576,0.0002911968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007299815,0.0001149475,0.001433146,0.9139848,0.07381599,0.00001281762,0.00008982957,0.000001439581,1.082945e-7,0.0001525437,0.0001918841,0.01012944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004945765,0.0006625715,0.0002330753,0.1761833,0.7972177,0.000002915266,0.00003047869,0.00000334595,0.000001352785,0.0001766931,0.02487383,0.0001202669],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004730143,0.9918666,0.000009356502,0.001741007,0.00009470941,0.005506854,0.0001344879,0.000007224168,0.0001666702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007403511,0.9968411,0.0001255309,0.0008350737,0.0000760603,0.001216598,0.00004708385,0.00001960469,0.00009865208],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7378016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042880226","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737","title":"The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":526,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council","keywords":"Research integrity; Trustworthiness; Transparency (behavior); Engineering ethics; Rigour; Open science; Inclusion (mineral); Research ethics; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Internet privacy; Epistemology; Social science; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Medicine; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9674769716565851,"gpt":0.7107831266067378,"spread":0.2566938450498473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01647146,0.0001196718,0.0003222275,0.00009077093,0.0006557094,0.0001599311,0.0007225318,0.0005409379,0.00004724915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.227367,0.00007505978,0.0001193002,0.0004165728,0.00141872,0.0000775674,0.001528258,0.005890616,0.00007336479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001495418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009268632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003808234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996133,0.0009924222,0.0005007403,0.0006190717,0.0007843226,0.0009704219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270487,0.06964844,0.00008783054,0.0007511093,0.001933288,0.0005306446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004457734,0.0006570991,0.1698821,0.003777449,0.0007725319,0.0001310454,0.003165301,0.000003429677,0.4371296,0.2592431,0.003180979,0.1175996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008535598,0.01288731,0.0516739,0.003453722,0.000164007,0.00004844954,0.01858404,0.04115333,0.1364886,0.494328,0.2315667,0.001116334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6831501,0.001269328,0.001883411,0.2928768,0.0002052119,0.002132427,0.00001885462,0.0001546394,0.01830924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907908,0.0007240887,0.005578002,0.0008910313,0.0009048879,0.0001777978,0.00001569886,0.00003841121,0.0008792358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3076408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884940558","doi":"10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3","title":"A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":492,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Concordia University","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Human Genome Research Institute; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Indigenous; Transparency (behavior); Dissemination; Research ethics; Inclusion (mineral); Genomics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Biotechnology; Political science; Sociology; Genome; Biology; Genetics; Social science; Engineering; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7712936807935736,"gpt":0.6974048528611734,"spread":0.07388882793240026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01898178,0.000473454,0.002043618,0.0007811349,0.002201086,0.0001841437,0.00573071,0.01144509,0.00006236949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03627188,0.0003522268,0.0006061968,0.001470724,0.003898639,0.00004441961,0.00281947,0.09207632,0.0002175781],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008574217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00821677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01759651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926497,0.002887647,0.001212281,0.000580005,0.001701238,0.0009691777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7663227,0.2139602,0.0005104999,0.01312779,0.005590557,0.000488272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003076615,0.001187019,0.00008935125,0.05828306,0.002135391,0.00001889692,0.008005423,1.245904e-7,0.000001639817,0.7267265,0.005820026,0.1974249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002650579,0.0007772822,0.00001118785,0.05312376,0.0006322425,0.00007959552,0.0007019636,0.000004680193,0.000001281239,0.02597421,0.9181198,0.0003088738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001254651,0.9859644,0.0006704915,0.005554365,0.0001617982,0.004581099,0.0001322676,0.0001271584,0.002795874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007192612,0.8905927,0.1032432,0.001030592,0.0006382478,0.001976166,0.0008839124,0.0002123928,0.0007035076],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9122998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169675868","doi":"10.1038/gim.2012.23","title":"Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genetics in Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":444,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Data collection; Medical research; Data science; Medicine; Psychology; Bioinformatics; Computer science; Biology; Pathology; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7132476222375959,"gpt":0.6293337098033011,"spread":0.0839139124342948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07184041,0.0002037211,0.0005336054,0.001914793,0.0002314869,0.00005096113,0.0008419881,0.0003950932,0.00003462891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04324298,0.0001795622,0.0000154319,0.001007946,0.002891342,0.000141266,0.004326681,0.006530761,0.00002265468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003188171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003438691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003633637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925797,0.001135104,0.001038216,0.001066574,0.002640072,0.001540364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789081,0.01817821,0.00006599698,0.001743557,0.0003578766,0.0007462815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118498,0.0002789846,0.9049841,0.001030444,0.00003967136,0.0004218138,0.0188596,0.000001894007,0.03357048,0.001778266,0.002639569,0.03527671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005293341,0.0007491785,0.9484813,0.002738909,0.00001844685,0.00009858997,0.006571071,0.002870071,0.0004478612,0.03088219,0.001649351,0.0001996638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.961795,0.01702219,0.000008834358,0.01583476,0.0001586577,0.0008661038,0.00002141248,0.00001566413,0.004277335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541976,0.04094918,0.003414803,0.0003013754,0.0005153858,0.00002282664,0.00009839066,0.00004746999,0.0004528952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04349725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975971094","doi":"10.1001/jama.2014.1361","title":"Prevalence, Characteristics, and Publication of Discontinued Randomized Trials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAMA","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":430,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; Université de Sherbrooke; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Discontinuation; Randomized controlled trial; Epidemiology; Odds ratio; Clinical trial; Internal medicine; Family medicine; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2915289398840311,"gpt":0.5227577883020447,"spread":0.2312288484180136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03197107,0.0000572501,0.000836463,0.00006854831,0.00001930662,0.00003440596,0.00008669501,0.0001812798,0.0002061669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5221168,0.00003774928,0.000118,0.00006903368,0.0003404304,0.00006165855,0.00005515663,0.000409427,0.00001510373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008166166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007406122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001158154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001627118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976723,0.0008205079,0.0008102721,0.0001743815,0.0004132357,0.0001093412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339687,0.06324186,0.0006370321,0.0006114714,0.001342693,0.0001982163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1437771,0.0005838212,0.08644894,0.005395703,0.0004528925,0.000003118159,0.0008792987,3.940928e-8,0.01561763,0.3442079,0.00664333,0.3959902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.4267466,0.0005276061,0.480308,0.001431387,0.0006060434,0.000006924498,0.00004137307,0.001644123,0.006707912,0.07383198,0.007945194,0.0002028628],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236202,0.0002665194,0.002373814,0.0486161,0.0002252794,0.00171533,0.00003115205,0.00004057972,0.02311097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894375,0.0009005517,0.001184118,0.0004263157,0.0003536541,0.00004053276,0.00001708059,0.000008101278,0.007632156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4901457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009899617","doi":"10.1056/nejmsa031697","title":"Impracticability of Informed Consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New England Journal of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":429,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Health Sciences Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"Canadian Stroke Network","keywords":"Informed consent; Medicine; Confidence interval; Stroke (engine); Government (linguistics); Family medicine; Clinical trial; Ethics committee; Emergency medicine; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3069639441457525,"gpt":0.5179739361458809,"spread":0.2110099920001285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01178569,0.00008475531,0.000453193,0.000101653,0.00004945261,0.000004448093,0.0004366116,0.0001742131,0.00008984311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08837915,0.00003716003,0.0001064434,0.0003384904,0.0008780996,0.00003688907,0.00003365855,0.002536435,5.474108e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002193585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01173145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06037359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5215748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996929,0.0002413882,0.001073384,0.00008100751,0.001429971,0.0002452088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828576,0.0149854,0.0006407682,0.0005550395,0.0006573549,0.0003038699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005585177,0.0005830253,0.8914073,0.001407,0.0004769317,0.0007700733,0.01365577,0.001306984,0.001862956,0.03936281,0.01862717,0.02495479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07933448,0.004989573,0.761557,0.007563467,0.0003755379,0.002163213,0.003591529,0.00001452398,0.0008352182,0.1054453,0.03400341,0.0001267405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798344,0.0006105987,0.00003212641,0.2087817,0.0004387011,0.0002725808,0.000003652018,0.000001218182,0.01002503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955701,0.0007676912,0.0003721052,0.001809249,0.001268294,5.943335e-7,7.317607e-7,0.00000543464,0.0002058145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4612012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128251606","doi":"10.1177/1740774514558307","title":"Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: An empirical analysis of recently closed trials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Trials","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":387,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Accrual; Clinical trial; Medicine; Placebo; Sample size determination; Randomized controlled trial; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine; Accounting; Pathology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.891537863837492,"gpt":0.7465437281129513,"spread":0.1449941357245407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3246425,0.0003472408,0.007248066,0.0007707733,0.0002303583,0.0001186839,0.0005153968,0.001854925,0.0008797914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7760038,0.0002483941,0.002324508,0.001772244,0.001229611,0.000148756,0.0002485628,0.002986158,0.00002436419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005831374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007899248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001277271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003422554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9505555,0.03481382,0.01065935,0.00146584,0.001917537,0.0005879328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5170389,0.4708009,0.004798692,0.003213318,0.002185265,0.001962917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.4622098,0.01793992,0.3074745,0.001061149,0.02286366,0.00005553738,0.0005008884,0.0000291543,0.007337197,0.02317346,0.00283726,0.1545175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.4143423,0.05294071,0.3533142,0.0008151627,0.03022445,0.000008026571,0.0003282554,0.001406566,0.004215653,0.1294293,0.01179192,0.00118339],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881576,0.0001157038,0.0008466761,0.003990897,0.0009882691,0.004389782,0.00004985941,0.0001123483,0.001348893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922218,0.0006446588,0.001450324,0.0009168437,0.003838613,0.0001960536,0.00009322396,0.00004899604,0.0005894921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4513613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061514304","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004","title":"Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":362,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Research ethics; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Public relations; Promotion (chess); Public health; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.937878412475349,"gpt":0.7598154999093707,"spread":0.1780629125659783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04219561,0.00009628676,0.0003735955,0.0001858474,0.001445235,0.00002428658,0.000234265,0.0003783679,0.0004064309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2278884,0.0000715999,0.00008656702,0.001332929,0.009230283,0.0001079674,0.0000791089,0.003314948,0.00005235535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005371492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005106094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001274722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001926727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946244,0.0002228342,0.0005177608,0.0004955116,0.003428685,0.000710841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868913,0.00877464,0.00008439521,0.0003814147,0.003298366,0.0005699351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009749005,0.0002246247,0.0004162705,0.001782598,0.00002062388,0.00003262489,0.006665272,7.60948e-7,0.02135891,0.9285453,0.03493753,0.005918031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002763852,0.001456079,0.003943999,0.00504491,0.0001183109,0.00002817798,0.001690907,0.00001596079,0.002600753,0.9606543,0.0215203,0.0001624999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04117712,0.002139267,0.0007438404,0.930925,0.0006396733,0.00205539,0.000004246455,0.00009792543,0.02221754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665166,0.002900046,0.0003927905,0.02803509,0.001480714,0.0002093802,0.000004065469,0.00001398687,0.0004473626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9253395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007833428","doi":"10.1186/s11568-014-0003-1","title":"Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HUGO Journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics","funders":"University of Tasmania; McGill University; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale; University of Oxford; Genomic Health","keywords":"Data sharing; Big data; Declaration; Preamble; Data access; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Data science; Computer science; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7358001278927336,"gpt":0.6248880885366593,"spread":0.1109120393560743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366454,0.00005540696,0.0002426654,0.00006095484,0.0002134489,0.00003043074,0.0005334463,0.0001430698,0.00009274501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0179278,0.00003440458,0.00004132221,0.000074064,0.0001848996,0.00004168789,0.0003793124,0.002058972,0.00000903885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003352104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004576973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001915452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000165703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986281,0.0001368069,0.0005002297,0.0001628999,0.0003449938,0.0002269942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891874,0.009244749,0.0002532212,0.0009122209,0.0001907331,0.000211683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003106621,0.0001988615,0.02441534,0.0008731966,0.0004312059,0.00001301806,0.002348157,0.0000277569,0.007953669,0.9028658,0.006512091,0.05125433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001066407,0.0006363467,0.03957629,0.0006819119,0.0000375622,0.0002142747,0.0001186855,0.00279371,0.0001454137,0.9523507,0.00233437,0.00004436891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8208905,0.003496424,0.01816818,0.1551195,0.0003919444,0.0005248542,0.00001633918,0.00001858402,0.001373622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596956,0.001791675,0.03532601,0.001488886,0.00047945,0.000002032509,0.000004651792,0.0000247219,0.001187001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1536306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014681107","doi":"10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x","title":"Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Reviews Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Accountability; Data sharing; Biology; Genomics; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Genetics; Genome; Gene; Law; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6172163766394221,"gpt":0.6458589270338311,"spread":0.02864255039440899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001478652,0.0007055087,0.003297769,0.0005084823,0.0001638461,0.0002292636,0.00265697,0.00209554,0.00006622198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01984375,0.0004859653,0.0003709605,0.00136674,0.0001910949,0.00006453178,0.002340584,0.009129328,0.0004706672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004117395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001568947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007814981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001211579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943645,0.0007434431,0.001530107,0.001902474,0.0009719654,0.0004875197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899082,0.004969932,0.0005960665,0.003290845,0.0004507244,0.0007842164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002838996,0.0001414133,0.00001387145,0.02349204,0.0002810578,0.0001150651,0.0006663351,6.736425e-8,6.9289e-7,0.0004293357,0.004824508,0.9700072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002087841,0.0004608328,0.00009643029,0.03060653,0.001142247,0.00006897187,0.00005854347,0.000002832882,6.930912e-7,0.0002411246,0.9667185,0.0003944915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002100229,0.9914204,0.00003193368,0.0007914184,0.0002926938,0.006400184,0.0003100347,0.00005525918,0.0006769993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001624677,0.9919472,0.004904799,0.000909064,0.001070758,0.0002044237,0.0006052851,0.0001210339,0.0002212169],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788491752","doi":"10.1056/nejme078110","title":"Clinical Trial Registration — Looking Back and Moving Ahead","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"New England Journal of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Medicine; Clinical trial; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Artificial intelligence; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Internal medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3474201330300559,"gpt":0.5840274982791467,"spread":0.2366073652490908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05643709,0.0003588583,0.002059609,0.0004801067,0.00008200028,0.00004592903,0.0003887391,0.002648048,0.0003422923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2680073,0.0002404882,0.000307515,0.0002349698,0.0008056902,0.0001118809,0.0001100732,0.01612232,0.00001297152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004407468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001740006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002674944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887866,0.0005359637,0.003988023,0.0005106831,0.005711533,0.0004671435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.906302,0.08510814,0.002857454,0.0007069925,0.003396358,0.001629104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06242586,0.0001243913,0.0003515855,0.0004604318,0.0002460005,0.0008714987,0.000186883,4.286697e-7,0.00002493376,0.00008161425,0.821053,0.1141734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.3001982,0.01264949,0.0002227899,0.0058515,0.0005442871,0.0002836974,0.00007302715,0.000008089939,0.000004770931,0.002736575,0.6772829,0.0001446792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.009537145,0.00404573,0.001401826,0.01333866,0.9613792,0.0006492321,0.000005608012,0.00001855545,0.009624073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002531905,0.01894435,0.00225901,0.0004575825,0.9678254,7.545405e-7,0.00003851714,0.00006176005,0.007880692],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2377724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986316914","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2010.02.009","title":"Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Parasitology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Centre for Global Health Research; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Community engagement; Public engagement; Public relations; Public health; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7489237713292977,"gpt":0.7254316842226366,"spread":0.02349208710666106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02940711,0.00013519,0.0005679367,0.0005488757,0.0002272391,0.00001608244,0.000590511,0.0009147095,0.0002918406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03611848,0.0001263279,0.00008730731,0.001355836,0.0008761752,0.00002793508,0.0003554844,0.01538961,0.00003507155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004491872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001098993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003349951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08312006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946931,0.002376849,0.0006920206,0.0004138911,0.0007543834,0.00106977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978571,0.01966848,0.00007218427,0.001098429,0.0002860248,0.0003038765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007691948,0.001218549,0.4545355,0.000200238,0.00002623366,0.0000627579,0.00133303,0.000002095359,0.00003336996,0.4414025,0.001583048,0.09883351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001515321,0.001127895,0.573526,0.0001369443,0.00000354342,0.00001858052,0.0004091588,0.00007565032,0.00004267662,0.420849,0.002229075,0.00006620624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.910916,0.000146824,0.000810854,0.0661872,0.0007685925,0.0006139296,0.00002637383,0.00004823254,0.02048193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651009,0.0001218235,0.03266351,0.001308078,0.000195201,0.0002269687,0.00003236984,0.00001664202,0.0003344924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1189905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971365970","doi":"10.1200/jco.2003.12.044","title":"Enrollment of Older Patients in Cancer Treatment Trials in Canada: Why is Age a Barrier?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Clinical trial; Cancer; Population; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6696214308388551,"gpt":0.6668644700075376,"spread":0.00275696083131749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0292969,0.0001503326,0.003571964,0.0002265625,0.00001348363,0.000003483206,0.0001964344,0.0006291046,0.0009075642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1397379,0.00009839197,0.0005573543,0.0002604195,0.0001937027,0.00004269863,0.00004084931,0.002302141,0.000002296037],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003005317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03375842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2889955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.892655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873959,0.003267264,0.007485206,0.0002640054,0.001210005,0.0003775625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297261,0.06528377,0.00300851,0.0003442659,0.0009456572,0.0006917295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003403303,0.004178,0.9481055,0.00005985807,0.0003070467,0.001005389,0.0002684266,0.00002508588,0.00002727613,0.0001783518,0.003413175,0.03902861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03887816,0.01452208,0.893788,0.000618201,0.0001955459,0.00001031637,0.0002675355,0.00001628876,0.0005826443,0.002781744,0.04822982,0.0001096278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984323,0.0005089761,0.000006818455,0.01111255,0.001224056,0.0005304664,0.0000181045,9.612492e-7,0.002275082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850562,0.006907677,0.0007132262,0.006708999,0.0002171311,0.00001905261,9.665971e-7,0.00001452599,0.0003621847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6036595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155615201","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1001346","title":"The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Ottawa Hospital; Foothills Medical Centre; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs; University College London; Newcastle University; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Cluster (spacecraft); Statement (logic); Research ethics; Research design; Family medicine; Medicine; Political science; Internal medicine; Computer science; Law; Social science; Sociology; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7854377780345059,"gpt":0.6153998635677166,"spread":0.1700379144667893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1868131,0.0001533976,0.001326869,0.00005908157,0.0001512497,0.000009631656,0.0002117683,0.00033317,0.0005340661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4972575,0.00005171518,0.0001326824,0.0001309728,0.002592969,0.00002342199,0.00009742797,0.002616404,0.00002588139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004004839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001903576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002637709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004591634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868777,0.008422987,0.001839587,0.000235329,0.002177583,0.0004468519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3563832,0.6412172,0.0005390769,0.0008456454,0.0006113058,0.000403606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2932131,0.001170959,0.0008042742,0.001087624,0.003483613,0.00002093189,0.008661773,0.000005183063,0.02044935,0.4541328,0.2107293,0.006241065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.700251,0.007241862,0.001094345,0.006119758,0.004179435,0.00004134094,0.004336106,0.002884613,0.05009952,0.1818233,0.04146409,0.0004645996],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07923963,0.004481037,0.003195702,0.8982021,0.0006110593,0.006401822,0.000003974072,0.00003266154,0.007832068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767917,0.004640998,0.001075483,0.01456512,0.000857236,0.0002201429,0.000003249033,0.00002578882,0.001820222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037238721","doi":"10.1183/09031936.00165006","title":"Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Respiratory Journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Biology; Bioinformatics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5726181427634501,"gpt":0.5686833884853271,"spread":0.003934754278123065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02089715,0.0001069502,0.0002336203,0.0003247712,0.0002005024,0.00008600953,0.0002312148,0.0004849586,0.00009214996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270362,0.00006859782,0.000139307,0.0002608005,0.0005898044,0.00006796834,0.0001206253,0.01101886,0.00000366555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000443534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001149957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006240297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009050333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975203,0.0004668358,0.0007972216,0.000206077,0.0006754476,0.000334141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903308,0.008517244,0.0001773776,0.0003485635,0.0003599679,0.0002660912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00456754,0.0008378662,0.1186604,0.0003235628,0.0003347046,0.004952296,0.001688237,0.00003959575,0.03225051,0.08005019,0.02942819,0.7268669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003566514,0.002103814,0.6993182,0.000681958,0.00006239703,0.0002359931,0.0001953366,0.00006051901,0.0007574927,0.001278944,0.2915666,0.0001722641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798238,0.0008557531,0.003727809,0.009317577,0.0002494256,0.0002262137,0.000005028311,0.00001756931,0.005776848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855047,0.0001039085,0.001793416,0.01061807,0.0008119626,9.812487e-7,7.137214e-7,0.00004166863,0.001124513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7266946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498556839","doi":"10.1126/science.289.5482.1142","title":"Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Identification (biology); Research ethics; Informed consent; Biorepository; Community standards; Engineering ethics; Common Rule; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Biobank; Biology; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Bioinformatics; Ecology; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.851481308828018,"gpt":0.7227688307906839,"spread":0.1287124780373341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04718051,0.00004043306,0.0001040371,0.0004027624,0.0004610688,0.00005371306,0.0006316876,0.0001100128,0.001476079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02714141,0.00003165484,0.00001724883,0.002534472,0.006772667,0.0001047607,0.0002371905,0.004115236,0.0003356015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001542253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001456439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007272791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003992349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960358,0.0002762439,0.0002246839,0.0002209742,0.002650733,0.0005916057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916347,0.007012431,0.00001169506,0.0006142003,0.0004521194,0.0002748249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005601525,0.001627169,0.09797417,0.000640823,0.000008832109,0.0004250798,0.02626768,0.00001447304,0.0524636,0.02407917,0.0004773799,0.7954615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005114116,0.005319879,0.4230044,0.006419873,0.000007092326,0.0002716554,0.04177697,0.01472033,0.02382428,0.3642339,0.1146464,0.0006610937],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351309,0.00006199898,0.000006892647,0.007369257,0.00003711296,0.0002732268,4.511141e-7,0.00002348942,0.05709665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940749,0.000154077,0.001426161,0.0002434174,0.00005966352,0.00002513223,5.06094e-7,0.000004807218,0.004011358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003159632","doi":"10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201690","title":"The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Duty; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Genetic testing; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Biology; Computer science; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3769899813354856,"gpt":0.5857689218293676,"spread":0.208778940493882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01868762,0.0001155192,0.0002254864,0.0002432877,0.000290644,0.00007945113,0.001223531,0.0001023392,0.0001018006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01221121,0.00007784948,0.0001473455,0.0002900734,0.0009904951,0.0000322916,0.0003922689,0.003657604,0.00003444407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006770112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002988592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001316385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934419,0.001794298,0.001398631,0.0002902346,0.002721272,0.0003536775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924343,0.002293912,0.0003184919,0.0006646782,0.003963486,0.0003251416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01582097,0.007971104,0.03161057,0.0004571672,0.001343426,0.007946047,0.04733625,0.005517028,0.5131001,0.1385879,0.1547123,0.07559718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004335896,0.01607934,0.8842458,0.000829445,0.00009330404,0.0003102531,0.01186165,0.0002983564,0.01118085,0.03798073,0.03244037,0.000343978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955816,0.001046974,0.000285372,0.01719424,0.0002742867,0.000194435,0.00001224263,0.000007253591,0.02516926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871471,0.001313533,0.00746769,0.0001200073,0.001659656,8.395459e-7,0.000002424087,0.00003912308,0.002249647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022496558","doi":"10.1136/bmj.b866","title":"Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":279,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; McMaster Children's Hospital; McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Observational study; Informed consent; MEDLINE; Medical record; Data extraction; Medicine; Selection bias; Family medicine; Cochrane Library; Publication bias; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Law; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9245477151258165,"gpt":0.7111100545967439,"spread":0.2134376605290725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01787139,0.0002910089,0.004035508,0.0002571061,0.00005876235,0.00002077359,0.0001764853,0.0007649528,0.00006231327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4237148,0.0001932627,0.0002782818,0.0007022851,0.0002132489,0.00005434202,0.000148219,0.00230531,0.00003239483],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006103442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008338887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003179878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006194146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993356,0.0009737443,0.003077644,0.0003897855,0.001912411,0.000290392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9338722,0.06329323,0.001114598,0.0004555678,0.000948891,0.0003154888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006093213,0.00004029802,0.00007464553,0.9713498,0.0002526513,0.00006482472,0.00001832785,2.870145e-8,8.412266e-9,0.0003327187,0.003897417,0.02396324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002537999,0.0001112771,0.00003775089,0.95623,0.001412471,0.0004720657,0.00002935058,0.0000347711,1.208775e-8,0.0006286125,0.04063107,0.0001588219],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008101701,0.9884418,0.00000503375,0.006056016,0.0001168213,0.004897038,0.000003915015,0.00002471037,0.0004465383],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.82532e-7,0.9938235,0.001162133,0.003304366,0.0003087431,0.000342988,0.00003417977,0.00002428579,0.0009991921],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4058434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587319655","doi":"10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6","title":"The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":276,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University; McGill University","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Research ethics; Stakeholder; Normative; Vulnerability assessment; Harm; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Psychological resilience; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9560629307251761,"gpt":0.7983703746638118,"spread":0.1576925560613643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2130552,0.0001265838,0.001026681,0.002194667,0.001201585,0.000185394,0.0007283159,0.0005216478,0.000003761215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3169491,0.00008418197,0.00007306251,0.001707158,0.006684565,0.0001243095,0.0006618639,0.005855765,9.547331e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003091175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005884327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.345382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1358867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805462,0.01093852,0.002153739,0.0006461868,0.004251175,0.001464193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8874477,0.1000691,0.0005042203,0.003157314,0.007748589,0.001073046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008109713,0.0003803282,0.4641863,0.005849359,0.0002369327,0.00001894074,0.03087243,0.00006603987,0.0004899189,0.4794055,0.0006091522,0.01707421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001991933,0.002466258,0.9166916,0.003584989,0.0000160044,0.000008214905,0.03214162,0.009360497,0.0001645103,0.03005264,0.003385122,0.0001366344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8505239,0.009925827,0.000003930452,0.1354179,0.00004542227,0.001435732,0.00004590037,0.000006274169,0.002595135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676583,0.03084426,0.00004761546,0.0001872034,0.0002283815,0.00008234623,0.000004283962,0.00001563226,0.0009319663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4525054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2116300523","doi":"10.1017/s1049096512000819","title":"Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"George Washington University; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Meta-ethics; Neglect; Political science; Information ethics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Field (mathematics); Task (project management); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Management; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7529986131586558,"gpt":0.681530787637176,"spread":0.07146782552147979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05247838,0.0002073853,0.0003817611,0.0005647311,0.001168471,0.0002070067,0.000612977,0.000686122,0.0002214229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2066976,0.0001677823,0.00009055119,0.0009710788,0.0225946,0.0004192849,0.0008569692,0.006988593,0.0003284162],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001061891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005721851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004732975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871027,0.0007271026,0.0006277533,0.0007082073,0.00548449,0.005349687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197861,0.06661867,0.00005597087,0.001699332,0.003923734,0.007916199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414177,0.000207045,0.0371131,0.0001999656,0.000006220996,0.00001223826,0.001750836,3.879484e-8,0.0008165358,0.959631,0.0001364657,0.00009244774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018635,0.0006803374,0.1909828,0.0002561837,0.00003344574,0.0001669485,0.005461569,0.0001068103,0.009058241,0.777889,0.01457735,0.0002854191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8439092,0.0002437841,0.00004200238,0.05584984,0.0003055205,0.000366583,0.00002337708,0.00008242959,0.09917728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823675,0.0001217833,0.002558938,0.005127726,0.001146094,0.00002159881,0.000002350144,0.00003109379,0.008622974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1817419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120841701","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.0060073","title":"Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ontario Genomics; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia; University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Genetics; Ontario Genomics; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Genomics Institute; National Institutes of Health; Genome Alberta","keywords":"Biology; Statement (logic); Research ethics; Genome; Engineering ethics; Computational biology; MEDLINE; Genetics; Biotechnology; Gene; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9590869121845906,"gpt":0.7257237591152245,"spread":0.2333631530693662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0383897,0.0001391018,0.0004150032,0.0006325558,0.001240395,0.00001961539,0.0004730258,0.001055081,0.0004927726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1138889,0.0001179223,0.0001102492,0.0007503588,0.003609186,0.00002355006,0.0005150395,0.00965144,0.0007802548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003839539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003062065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001860952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002853023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925839,0.002983437,0.0008338369,0.0008049169,0.001431679,0.001362255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8922917,0.09969997,0.00007783875,0.0009647698,0.006504261,0.0004614786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004039606,0.004903358,0.01251352,0.002023085,0.001105505,0.0003563423,0.01024649,0.000005323096,0.3065028,0.4048087,0.2502012,0.003294102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002400459,0.004789475,0.00135455,0.0002085566,0.00002160366,0.00004770132,0.00200961,0.0001320967,0.003631822,0.1720754,0.8131369,0.0001917628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2227045,0.0007242655,0.0004017035,0.7549924,0.0003597194,0.00355068,0.0007011633,0.0001322578,0.01643336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288422,0.007686749,0.02347495,0.003649188,0.001028508,0.001157405,0.001100517,0.00009793099,0.03296247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7513431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2156294597","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.050873","title":"Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Relative risk; Absolute risk reduction; Psychological intervention; MEDLINE; Number needed to treat; Number needed to harm; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5370472688111964,"gpt":0.6168074228390681,"spread":0.07976015402787173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04610961,0.00009736053,0.001466379,0.0004135956,0.00006524056,0.00001617655,0.0002205489,0.0006214886,0.001213506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3491646,0.00006492273,0.0003466672,0.0002286591,0.0005382654,0.00005322352,0.00004311069,0.002792465,0.000006793113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004592895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003352668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004841777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07286395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917469,0.001238687,0.002080748,0.0001598983,0.004474137,0.0002996468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9467725,0.0497863,0.0007750666,0.0001465275,0.001437207,0.001082446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04449731,0.002077987,0.8457217,0.002202741,0.00206008,0.000947038,0.003644471,0.00002812704,0.00008933439,0.02015135,0.04342697,0.03515291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.7948546,0.00158614,0.1006564,0.0565934,0.000651631,0.0002143756,0.004819339,0.004421991,0.0005435303,0.03289934,0.002356873,0.0004023515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7518619,0.00974146,0.0003774214,0.235372,0.0006247152,0.0006866228,0.00001039071,0.000008178647,0.001317247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924756,0.005556473,0.0001980415,0.001027962,0.0003046019,0.00001335961,0.000002322799,0.000008068444,0.0004135152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7503573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923395494","doi":"10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434","title":"Genomic Research Through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; BC Cancer Agency; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Udall Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Genome Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Relevance (law); Sovereignty; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Biology; Law; Business; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7534817016616504,"gpt":0.6396894316628827,"spread":0.1137922699987677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006767192,0.0004261628,0.00238642,0.0002408095,0.000638656,0.0000843633,0.0009909734,0.0006637172,0.00007559707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001103876,0.0002905944,0.0005517859,0.0004442315,0.001150941,0.00007906054,0.0007021565,0.003347706,0.00009207644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005593602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002793741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004314292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008633713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947267,0.0008481065,0.001773501,0.000811343,0.001177038,0.000663333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919361,0.004374491,0.0006256008,0.001880443,0.0009825905,0.0002007564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001777958,0.0003619782,0.00003280633,0.6012951,0.0008880286,0.00003037266,0.01136147,8.021702e-7,0.00001109651,0.1340915,0.001178818,0.2507302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001975981,0.00110306,0.00001634363,0.06993332,0.001268459,0.00005696764,0.002559362,0.000001069976,7.066678e-7,0.01300267,0.9115705,0.0002898895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002049038,0.9915722,0.00003505045,0.0002422891,0.0001194426,0.003750907,0.0002074816,0.00001266657,0.003855063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001187288,0.9972431,0.0005903157,0.0004151444,0.0004195607,0.00009286631,0.0002099989,0.0001368743,0.0007734257],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086509129","doi":"10.1038/nm0604-570","title":"When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Research ethics; Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6185728007688692,"gpt":0.6397764944377331,"spread":0.02120369366886388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01362067,0.0001888261,0.0005725648,0.0009644259,0.0001382104,0.00001574415,0.0003684422,0.001581713,0.0004076338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1018338,0.0001420557,0.00005429362,0.002240875,0.0003888448,0.00008545801,0.0002005789,0.01181763,0.000264132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006504643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005711275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001933577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002649168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942721,0.0002360999,0.0006528666,0.0007147844,0.003322996,0.0008011429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919489,0.004568075,0.00008854194,0.0009022222,0.001885072,0.0006072166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00701344,0.00251518,0.6078981,0.002163176,0.0002431752,0.003778934,0.01336078,0.001481908,0.0190141,0.2704347,0.05025262,0.02184395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006978851,0.00190803,0.8646639,0.009155,0.00004104789,0.00003824426,0.0009877312,0.00007559279,0.002513662,0.10392,0.00951216,0.0002058392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7776109,0.003611566,0.00005477467,0.2016799,0.0003169499,0.001028088,0.00000555967,0.00007682464,0.01561541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886452,0.0008174576,0.001990976,0.004183506,0.0008089571,0.00005001662,0.00004235727,0.00004709136,0.003414445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2567658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493763979","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.016","title":"A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Systematic review; Intensive care medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9168235833639129,"gpt":0.7435214878758624,"spread":0.1733020954880505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4865039,0.0007507053,0.06515634,0.0003486294,0.00006136738,0.00001157682,0.001486006,0.003643312,0.0004223935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9511475,0.0003506468,0.01483943,0.0003501511,0.0007862651,0.000103157,0.0003312398,0.006616374,0.00004858863],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002840627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006349168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000516185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001414734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8474353,0.0842969,0.06375261,0.001292587,0.001918784,0.001303788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1546424,0.7863019,0.05315302,0.0020498,0.002721956,0.001130969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004168336,0.0004325086,0.00007760384,0.8749424,0.00461225,0.00003879843,0.000003155444,2.844573e-8,1.238156e-7,0.00215857,0.03556063,0.08175711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00171911,0.001963611,0.000007360542,0.5884064,0.01179988,0.0002944814,0.000008703559,6.308908e-7,2.270118e-7,0.004980129,0.3906615,0.000157913],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[9.663348e-7,0.9594595,0.001359296,0.02335589,0.00150195,0.01381078,0.0003102367,0.00001310087,0.0001882511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001155339,0.9822062,0.008193743,0.002271847,0.001976562,0.0008478991,0.00007576343,0.0001066584,0.004320221],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144441836","doi":"10.1136/bmj.38414.422650.8f","title":"Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Cohort; Protocol (science); Computer science; Medicine; Pathology; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7415623777316231,"gpt":0.7069903222243618,"spread":0.03457205550726139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02817132,0.0001579718,0.002595935,0.0001658368,0.00002763286,0.00002585309,0.000209887,0.0003884524,0.00006410944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03918492,0.00009170342,0.0002171065,0.0003635841,0.0004996607,0.000043885,0.0001554949,0.001584873,0.000001316428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001517407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001880767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002237514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003542299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927217,0.001223921,0.003984679,0.0004271192,0.001479045,0.0001635437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902722,0.006201783,0.001733555,0.001112701,0.0006043704,0.0000754365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01824928,0.01485626,0.1211227,0.06581765,0.001965169,0.00006325559,0.002253568,0.000004337173,9.096832e-7,0.007344504,0.01351127,0.7548111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07824257,0.005163865,0.009163154,0.06676157,0.002967312,0.00004022996,0.001027587,0.0000588917,0.000002383964,0.00230081,0.833905,0.0003666394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002733121,0.6653989,0.00001373179,0.001608539,0.0001618648,0.3292258,0.000007119297,0.00001207637,0.003298708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003447,0.8856919,0.0003697237,0.0000315484,0.0003423044,0.1092018,0.00005061142,0.00002660471,0.0008385635],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9763674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773899110","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018647","title":"Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"Medical Research Council; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; World Health Organization","keywords":"Medicine; Data sharing; Reuse; Clinical trial; Health services research; Public health; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9873138910785388,"gpt":0.7979712998394476,"spread":0.1893425912390913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08043437,0.00007581943,0.0007151495,0.00002811672,0.0002082115,0.0003728289,0.002556195,0.0002090476,0.0002392806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.513136,0.00005765915,0.00003241776,0.00002802061,0.0004781841,0.0003155091,0.01958537,0.0007866398,0.00001189768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000437072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004485537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006445923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001436835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968054,0.0006069943,0.001397259,0.0005578338,0.0004612348,0.0001712933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465092,0.04254964,0.001315014,0.008757299,0.0003332419,0.0005355634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001220283,0.0003260651,0.9525173,0.0001705442,0.0006813747,0.00002680104,0.0006719895,1.021485e-7,0.00007682374,0.006520359,0.007699537,0.03008885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005161792,0.0003632744,0.9518414,0.00170972,0.0006323308,0.000004653052,0.0005142793,0.001525286,0.0001020815,0.02813471,0.009877108,0.0001334353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9183342,0.0002110972,0.00002959193,0.07094104,0.0002536511,0.00478484,0.0007090454,0.00001286011,0.004723667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967439,0.002082686,0.02704924,0.0006517716,0.0005271344,0.0001788844,0.0003371251,0.00002538125,0.001708755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4327016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115827170","doi":"10.1001/archinternmed.2007.124","title":"Better Outcomes for Patients Treated at Hospitals That Participate in Clinical Trials","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Internal Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Duke Clinical Research Institute; Bristol-Myers Squibb; University of Alberta; Sanofi; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Interquartile range; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Acute coronary syndrome; Guideline; Clinical trial; Emergency medicine; Myocardial infarction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6035031863410777,"gpt":0.6159237149560711,"spread":0.01242052861499343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006614921,0.0002235576,0.001845171,0.0002931292,0.00004554732,0.000002589625,0.0003452429,0.0002061919,0.000233925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1111204,0.0001358592,0.0005420592,0.0001055926,0.001495985,0.00004647557,0.0002179896,0.000953922,0.0000199547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000420703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008794996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002164797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001062848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948645,0.0006417202,0.002691111,0.0004670655,0.0008879128,0.0004476789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9267105,0.07147998,0.0006273931,0.0005622556,0.0002127048,0.0004072025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004146931,0.0006101115,0.982499,0.000162753,0.0002681059,0.00007619929,0.0008859771,2.340382e-7,0.0003859082,0.0001372907,0.001216216,0.009611298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01487736,0.005262169,0.9703865,0.001557896,0.0001162609,0.000007264373,0.00004702914,0.0001163732,0.002093251,0.004935955,0.0004884699,0.0001114484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985642,0.0001276184,0.0001732533,0.009401798,0.0004106736,0.00111532,0.00003119444,0.0000208098,0.003077294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910628,0.0009589377,0.001012139,0.002450322,0.0002875865,0.00008563264,0.0000364939,0.00003371432,0.00407235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1045055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.896367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171135010","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15025-8","title":"Does informed consent to research require comprehension?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration of Helsinki; Informed consent; Duty; Medical ethics; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Law; Alternative medicine; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7689052038407623,"gpt":0.6502797873088817,"spread":0.1186254165318806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008516696,0.00007968272,0.0003260756,0.00007770717,0.0002146003,0.0000421627,0.000403447,0.0001470029,0.0006990118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07152782,0.00003403609,0.0000501983,0.0004070744,0.0005405716,0.00003400183,0.0002232379,0.001970778,0.001079905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008855964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001012651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007115663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007863446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997138,0.000413914,0.0002797752,0.0002294191,0.001349865,0.0005890589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692961,0.02830135,0.00002860323,0.001417666,0.0006700975,0.0002861721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001692714,0.0002347788,0.0307404,0.001019512,0.0001079765,0.0001244487,0.002274927,0.000009541808,0.006538025,0.5345743,0.4205846,0.002098819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001825919,0.000451818,0.01665703,0.0006269312,0.000009936427,0.00002120745,0.0009928603,0.00001425359,0.003677098,0.1276186,0.8479987,0.0001056795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.491845,0.0001555479,0.00005108492,0.2793607,0.0004702661,0.001155674,0.00001564093,0.00009032507,0.2268558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522226,0.0009240442,0.002109926,0.01096071,0.0006618578,0.00004676481,0.000003831777,0.00001851872,0.03305174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4603776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027177214","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00686.x","title":"The Ethical Analysis of Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Informed consent; Institutional review board; Confidentiality; Research ethics; Balance (ability); Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Task (project management); Actuarial science; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7203642937941083,"gpt":0.6826195619799805,"spread":0.03774473181412774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1469609,0.0004846429,0.005508569,0.0005726229,0.0005832205,0.00002368351,0.002273711,0.004611129,0.0005245803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2023635,0.0001808073,0.00236986,0.002360991,0.007704555,0.0000348405,0.0002524519,0.08422329,0.00002488855],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001923273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005834362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004978445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001411545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9773961,0.00876887,0.00500374,0.0003101679,0.007955515,0.0005655853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.531806,0.4565518,0.004504796,0.002249158,0.004306915,0.0005813366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001514576,0.0003462433,0.00002650025,0.0268208,0.03218473,0.0003324814,0.01150477,0.00004449107,0.00000124015,0.1582617,0.004928477,0.7640339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005760461,0.00102936,0.00001808139,0.0373854,0.07638168,0.000316442,0.0002837196,0.00001357992,6.345506e-7,0.01774872,0.8661151,0.0001312593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001420052,0.9498634,0.00009781706,0.04121701,0.0004855202,0.0004143188,0.0000278508,0.000009866279,0.007870044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002686608,0.9939068,0.0001368865,0.003202476,0.001659137,0.000003759665,0.00001291951,0.0000686294,0.0007407487],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076160163","doi":"10.1177/1740774507087704","title":"Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Trials","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada); Health Canada; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Risk analysis (engineering); Clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Informed consent; Process (computing); Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9468991071094657,"gpt":0.7278013918630317,"spread":0.219097715246434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5653369,0.0002334954,0.009461583,0.0001451642,0.0001781726,0.00002439501,0.0006868995,0.0008168729,0.00466055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9740935,0.0001145428,0.004247778,0.0005061829,0.002723915,0.00003836969,0.0002309728,0.002506241,0.0005932798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003529556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001951743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002122665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004435869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8889698,0.0799332,0.02463301,0.001517492,0.003984903,0.0009615946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0344504,0.957649,0.002303935,0.002247014,0.00157714,0.001772493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.6298826,0.0008175463,0.00312326,0.0001793177,0.003126637,0.0001583964,0.0008651421,0.00001342101,0.003377517,0.02994947,0.3115691,0.01693753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.6898704,0.002568768,0.001829567,0.0007669757,0.001667519,0.00004361242,0.0004397287,0.00004185398,0.01111238,0.06488031,0.2263283,0.0004506442],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6730308,0.006854626,0.003459989,0.2398675,0.01240405,0.02647367,0.0002155844,0.0002161365,0.03747758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483272,0.02197558,0.004944913,0.009479155,0.006440334,0.0002748693,0.000012747,0.00006274001,0.008482456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8777158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926884931","doi":"10.1002/14651858.mr000009.pub4","title":"Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Psychology; Physical therapy; Internal medicine; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6897922773928103,"gpt":0.6098178690979534,"spread":0.07997440829485691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1257116,0.001459466,0.09926063,0.001438979,0.0001047779,0.00006466544,0.001449273,0.000732885,0.0003862879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6944994,0.0008124548,0.01327659,0.00135974,0.0005343822,0.0002037018,0.0007545935,0.001855858,0.0002160251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003121972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006706507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005107856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009152455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9090078,0.04107193,0.04327684,0.001448606,0.004130988,0.001063815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7190654,0.2395818,0.02867946,0.006930481,0.004516684,0.00122621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008243,0.001875556,0.0005772744,0.9815444,0.003076379,0.00002802791,0.000439798,0.000003217951,3.396894e-7,0.000102858,0.0009837142,0.003125409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1246605,0.0002890406,0.0001138179,0.8573913,0.01486855,0.000002576939,0.00002981746,0.00006820621,0.00000269084,0.00002917951,0.00205421,0.0004901338],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006841552,0.9211503,0.0001752449,0.0001148692,0.0005279599,0.07540435,0.001763005,0.00002536495,0.0001547552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007701102,0.9809159,0.0008222953,0.00015342,0.0000654824,0.01547042,0.001315969,0.0001408997,0.0003454856],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5687877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601964757","doi":"10.1136/bmj.321.7263.756","title":"For and against: Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial FOR AGAINST","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Randomized controlled trial; Clinical equipoise; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Surgery; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4191630790130044,"gpt":0.5686019327008087,"spread":0.1494388536878043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01935614,0.0001455838,0.0007244864,0.00002043602,0.0003447118,0.00004195423,0.0003175662,0.0002807275,0.00002594346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04669878,0.00005955685,0.0005126839,0.00009530988,0.001105444,0.00002396374,0.0001285803,0.0008238568,0.000001183801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002461048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005468093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000140215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004292924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970957,0.0005465717,0.00113276,0.0003344092,0.0005755259,0.0003150431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275476,0.07086198,0.0003295948,0.0007945079,0.0003276214,0.0001386354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.9680158,0.0002050494,0.001158732,0.0001909826,0.0004551669,0.000001394208,0.0005221737,0.00005752994,0.0001485471,0.006872738,0.005016763,0.01735507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9429873,0.00108268,0.001528166,0.0002295376,0.000305698,0.000001661529,0.0002085551,0.02297608,0.0001292963,0.02146096,0.008977367,0.0001127226],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8645947,0.0002639062,0.0001014555,0.1138267,0.0002645695,0.01797519,0.00003515808,0.00001408755,0.002924173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766268,0.0006662636,0.000422633,0.01495832,0.0009059296,0.001203603,0.00000480985,0.00002633408,0.005185337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1120321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9613313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077701181","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2012.96","title":"Toward a roadmap in global biobanking for health","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"Medical Research Council; Tartu Ülikool; Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Wellcome Trust; Vetenskapsrådet; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biobank; Harmonization; Business; Interoperability; Sustainability; Health care; Public relations; Public health; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Bioinformatics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5770389168016551,"gpt":0.5899003059719939,"spread":0.01286138917033885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102287,0.00009718796,0.0003067384,0.0001056162,0.00006247591,0.00002338403,0.0002718817,0.00004781226,0.00003884345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001928577,0.0000817027,0.0001473297,0.0001329476,0.0001017384,0.00003920323,0.0001017204,0.0008835017,0.00002082922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000192227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003099533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002039801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001324326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975843,0.0003653895,0.0009107072,0.0001112668,0.0005901675,0.0004381861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983381,0.0003771421,0.000332324,0.0002134964,0.0003249264,0.0004140071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001337027,0.002653605,0.7998215,0.00197671,0.0003492742,0.0008355906,0.01037783,0.0001032274,0.004705849,0.01829027,0.02083974,0.1387094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00799955,0.009778435,0.9235598,0.00179897,0.0000799105,0.0006144649,0.0007135349,0.00004803686,0.0007199898,0.009928882,0.04446096,0.000297498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731627,0.007237016,0.003416397,0.006573283,0.0005326882,0.0003169602,0.000007077668,0.00001131745,0.00874253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825956,0.0005437958,0.01391818,0.001445788,0.001269205,4.697096e-7,0.000001602952,0.00002902611,0.0001963889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1384119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3838424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047639980","doi":"10.1126/science.1240156","title":"Ethics and Genomic Incidental Findings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Obligation; Psychology; Medicine; Computational biology; Biology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4577082593189641,"gpt":0.5933573266688204,"spread":0.1356490673498563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006176565,0.00003799701,0.0000705405,0.00007511642,0.0002530372,0.00007875117,0.0002225559,0.0001162155,0.0002319191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02505964,0.00002946409,0.00001361536,0.0002605981,0.002244006,0.0001522344,0.0003233319,0.001688996,0.000468696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006532343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007276887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001203233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000299174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985022,0.00002118887,0.0001143397,0.0002482823,0.0008865267,0.000227494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966053,0.002593637,0.00001561275,0.0002265403,0.0003026511,0.0002562798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001333104,0.00005200902,0.3036141,0.0001218646,0.000004452775,0.00001763097,0.003211655,3.920548e-7,0.6596785,0.02766898,0.0003453913,0.005271686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002302796,0.0001455158,0.9480762,0.00006723663,0.000002997547,0.00003531424,0.0003781045,0.0002924492,0.007506466,0.04278076,0.0004266384,0.00005807227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836357,0.00006660996,0.00002140411,0.01017278,0.00008890115,0.0001412537,3.418711e-7,0.00001466807,0.005858335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936045,0.0001456056,0.001971858,0.002103495,0.00003712647,0.000004759542,1.741323e-7,0.000003670089,0.002128823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.652172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117903034","doi":"10.1186/1472-6939-4-1","title":"DNA databanks and consent: A suggested policy option involving an authorization model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; GlaxoSmithKline; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Informed consent; Autonomy; Philosophy of medicine; Legislature; Discretion; Research ethics; Authorization; Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Computer security; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6577253187772188,"gpt":0.6092377289471101,"spread":0.0484875898301087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01906282,0.0001666678,0.0003322115,0.0001867572,0.0002338209,0.0000541336,0.0001981328,0.002376023,0.0001235734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6477547,0.0001471986,0.00005256219,0.0004000071,0.001040992,0.0001573989,0.0001567555,0.006265758,0.00002156715],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001220629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03310738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001839319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007409341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937556,0.001196177,0.0006060756,0.0005545577,0.003464377,0.0004231927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8412568,0.1508421,0.0003015855,0.001743912,0.002288189,0.003567439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008977934,0.0002088792,0.002962858,0.002306472,0.00001597679,0.00002467122,0.001119188,0.00004090356,0.0009955228,0.991735,0.0000814026,0.0004192781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007530602,0.001078291,0.006822078,0.007192624,0.0001922685,0.0003477487,0.001373583,0.3560564,0.001034626,0.616444,0.00116424,0.0007636254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3734105,0.001218846,0.5578007,0.05098483,0.0005367396,0.001253432,0.0000481967,0.0004321017,0.01431474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435157,0.01420896,0.02995239,0.009936141,0.0004330662,0.00002449952,0.0002030158,0.0000558291,0.001670468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6286919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408281124","doi":"","title":"Privacy and security in the era of digital health: what should translational researchers know and do about it?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Analytics; Big data; Data science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4946831118531796,"gpt":0.530540196711396,"spread":0.03585708485821637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006882077,0.00006831357,0.0001892842,0.00006621575,0.00004133794,0.00009001802,0.000149928,0.0001446302,0.00002013675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105388,0.00003696057,0.00003275162,0.0001630139,0.0006437804,0.0003223652,0.0000799891,0.001036958,0.000001392523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003681548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002435497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002866815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001361149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980015,0.0001795028,0.0003195983,0.0002388978,0.0009065507,0.0003540078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891051,0.01019695,0.00004481682,0.0002661381,0.0001404202,0.000246584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003497447,0.0001520557,0.07876277,0.0003007147,0.00002256963,0.000007656114,0.003429987,4.122876e-8,0.000008287551,0.006414399,0.0004711822,0.9100806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002205742,0.0001388198,0.8997613,0.0005614571,0.000004963543,0.000009984326,0.0006593856,0.00001172271,0.00004165243,0.08789326,0.008648701,0.00006298492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5096987,0.005659577,0.00001578063,0.4822135,0.00003028739,0.0009626967,0.00002183325,0.000006973109,0.001390694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834394,0.01498798,0.00004192013,0.001072803,0.00006320139,0.0001444606,0.000002941144,0.000008386594,0.000238861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973831497","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2014.03.006","title":"Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: A systematic review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Generalizability theory; MEDLINE; Medicine; Inclusion (mineral); Distrust; Gerontology; Systematic review; Population; Psychology; Nursing; Environmental health; Psychological intervention","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8499458771488422,"gpt":0.6521400178495463,"spread":0.1978058592992958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01131722,0.0002563409,0.004236366,0.000628725,0.00006141082,0.000009590408,0.0001963335,0.0004388468,0.000001932138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02297751,0.0001818414,0.0001465562,0.0002214255,0.0008832205,0.00003778984,0.0004128065,0.001414992,9.126401e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002829789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003810661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003189092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005280203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945859,0.002346257,0.001607622,0.0006319582,0.0004721635,0.0003561562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652337,0.03332709,0.0004834771,0.0005369723,0.0002573015,0.0001614448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004090268,0.00003608498,0.000009358371,0.71178,0.00020266,0.00001122936,0.002118036,1.114126e-8,5.811747e-7,0.0074187,0.000006850208,0.2783756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005402997,0.003575005,0.0002559308,0.963654,0.001368343,0.00009457335,0.004250329,0.000003225361,2.331331e-7,0.01989466,0.006165394,0.0001980467],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003317146,0.9939145,0.00001621758,0.001015083,0.00004160067,0.00352532,0.00000473613,0.00000581371,0.001144955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007715151,0.9974552,0.001104783,0.00002728755,0.00002919182,0.0004381545,0.000005407062,0.00001959319,0.0001488006],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2781776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115883395","doi":"10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001509","title":"Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Health care; Data science; Information privacy; Computer science; Big data; Political science; Law; Data mining; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1374027271057757,"gpt":0.5133070202361707,"spread":0.375904293130395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02503247,0.0002620643,0.001231212,0.0002221434,0.0001440396,0.00009408037,0.001866108,0.001228499,0.00009141365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3626872,0.000154257,0.0001945877,0.0006047611,0.001045987,0.0005030946,0.001558466,0.0107994,0.00001487951],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006052542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002572802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002071391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843902,0.0004223847,0.002307707,0.0001857591,0.01216244,0.000531487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453431,0.03276462,0.01288926,0.001785101,0.005501245,0.001716672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001304955,0.0003255091,0.001813434,0.000622358,0.0005522734,0.000006045663,0.001485273,3.528195e-7,0.000001927333,0.00003605622,0.9546775,0.04034872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001152039,0.0006350102,0.0006481127,0.001534106,0.0004610974,0.00004257466,0.001818254,0.0002924755,0.000001389848,0.0007839495,0.9924777,0.0001533621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.005150613,0.02251931,0.001565465,0.1214761,0.8453823,0.001372781,0.0005646848,0.00006425475,0.001904482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009001912,0.3563278,0.006264119,0.001574764,0.6338429,0.000006811062,0.0002449768,0.00006292555,0.0007754721],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3376547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076005227","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2014.197","title":"International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Medical Research Council; Innovative Medicines Initiative; Vetenskapsrådet; Government of Canada; National Health and Medical Research Council; European Commission; Fondation du cancer du sein du Québec; Génome Québec; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Charter; Data sharing; Negotiation; Exploit; Stakeholder; Sample (material); Knowledge management; Obstacle; Computer science; Business; Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer security; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6006405991025711,"gpt":0.5440547932812717,"spread":0.05658580582129935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005408655,0.00006201184,0.0001769785,0.00009643499,0.00003905667,0.00002815394,0.0006431651,0.00002739231,0.00006839017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002489479,0.00004995194,0.00004805745,0.00002413114,0.0001558093,0.00003593927,0.000528555,0.0004214227,0.000003974855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001087774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003371229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.629465e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002051146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.00007502854,0.0006163568,0.0001593517,0.0004176919,0.000107131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980868,0.0005470341,0.000296636,0.0004537936,0.0004972158,0.0001185924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001662343,0.001627068,0.3091631,0.00223043,0.002075918,0.0003794672,0.004866642,0.000121919,0.4602248,0.08033536,0.01370508,0.1236079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009658691,0.008186776,0.534634,0.001883258,0.0003381651,0.000309983,0.0002960777,0.006997277,0.01292752,0.009125687,0.415293,0.0003495851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749468,0.0003152966,0.004084226,0.002023365,0.0002705396,0.0001293042,0.0000210821,0.00000494269,0.01820447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812073,0.000545011,0.01595768,0.0001533875,0.001045567,1.49733e-7,0.00001109905,0.00002622174,0.001053619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4472973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2980319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108086764","doi":"10.1186/1471-2407-6-34","title":"Understanding the attitudes of the elderly towards enrolment into cancer clinical trials","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Cancer","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Clinical trial; Referral; Cancer; Family medicine; Geriatric oncology; Surgical oncology; Population; Accrual; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.880292108887154,"gpt":0.6881005721360686,"spread":0.1921915367510855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01652275,0.000133515,0.0006027477,0.00003655644,0.0001646363,0.00003054471,0.0004250482,0.0003016886,0.0008181678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01218044,0.00006322959,0.0004836898,0.0002726069,0.0008291744,0.00003104701,0.0002065724,0.001298272,0.00000691131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006060582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002692419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007660138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03657511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959173,0.0008929672,0.001242762,0.0003334598,0.001320583,0.0002929441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846107,0.01389434,0.0003847372,0.0007085302,0.0003016418,0.00009999273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001045223,0.0004408127,0.9161311,0.0006887047,0.000393982,0.00000353725,0.0003457675,0.0003577338,0.001200913,0.04127897,0.02085872,0.01725448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005718148,0.0007521536,0.8661566,0.002192659,0.0006123054,0.000002879843,0.0006570676,0.0003100573,0.004247665,0.1020049,0.0170646,0.0002809642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8180462,0.01561182,0.009156482,0.1212005,0.006001563,0.004229484,0.0001012011,0.00009987874,0.02555288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894357,0.00255363,0.0003064882,0.001040821,0.001558319,0.0001605134,0.000001265058,0.00002283672,0.004920384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1713895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064863415","doi":"10.1177/0969733007071355","title":"Consent and Assent to Participate in Research from People with Dementia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nursing Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Informed consent; Dementia; Dissent; Psychology; Research ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Disease","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9405705337244336,"gpt":0.7520224994204991,"spread":0.1885480343039344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01716713,0.0003146213,0.001563301,0.0005021077,0.0001905301,0.0001225809,0.0002823677,0.002050599,0.00004619776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02757371,0.0002404502,0.0001160243,0.001014689,0.0009281894,0.0000268759,0.00018945,0.01777797,0.00009284396],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005802721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006836958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002703555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02527296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920947,0.001979917,0.000935538,0.0009622803,0.003148006,0.0008795695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9329123,0.06460331,0.0001367454,0.000907983,0.0009297504,0.0005099076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006332413,0.002336563,0.006643809,0.1071484,0.0007563952,0.001033515,0.01021981,0.000009612605,0.000006497332,0.01479888,0.01396728,0.842446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001004035,0.0009033627,0.002833601,0.3469015,0.00107678,0.00003622973,0.0003556843,0.00002112679,0.000005220056,0.01274672,0.6336702,0.0004456006],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007100523,0.9753072,0.00009941974,0.01851103,0.0002086747,0.00170234,0.00003275956,0.00003660912,0.003391887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009887507,0.9943089,0.002803907,0.0003455069,0.0002508987,0.0001635091,0.00009140528,0.0000941583,0.0009529286],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8420004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012542655","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.017","title":"Ethical Approaches to Adolescent Participation in Sexual Health Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Adolescent Health","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"University of Toronto; York University","keywords":"Reproductive health; Psychology; Adolescent health; Sexual behavior; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Population; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9132051171873125,"gpt":0.6908254419393781,"spread":0.2223796752479343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1161,0.000176558,0.0008398414,0.001141093,0.0001933954,0.00003917111,0.0003611029,0.0005688746,0.00002335138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01625845,0.0001463598,0.0001230758,0.001273739,0.000250527,0.00007549547,0.0001771435,0.01573537,0.00004914071],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002785601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006885173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002433942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002731426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875032,0.001993585,0.003111806,0.0005029034,0.005057915,0.001830549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912972,0.003604451,0.0005799542,0.0005260021,0.001165759,0.002826662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01283816,0.0148559,0.5218688,0.01015523,0.00009422514,0.0004900054,0.01390912,0.0003121835,0.0005194797,0.01675034,0.05335794,0.3548487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002831161,0.007780364,0.9723189,0.005472907,0.000006771132,0.0001005665,0.004011999,0.0001447729,0.0002163328,0.001516096,0.005456826,0.0001432616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5234926,0.001113736,0.006524773,0.4667545,0.0004773973,0.001371998,0.000002847314,0.00001875736,0.000243385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670671,0.0008250973,0.005170381,0.02542054,0.001337748,0.000004109545,0.000003007792,0.0000367253,0.0001352876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4504502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885437164","doi":"10.1007/s00439-018-1919-7","title":"International data-sharing norms: from the OECD to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Human Genetics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"WYNG Foundation","keywords":"Data sharing; Custodians; Data Protection Act 1998; Context (archaeology); General Data Protection Regulation; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8950110305189641,"gpt":0.6596948222824267,"spread":0.2353162082365374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005527405,0.0002737693,0.0005591811,0.00008758515,0.0003710862,0.0002697371,0.006756237,0.0005226416,0.000803081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004511598,0.0001504237,0.0001219048,0.0001694422,0.0002583609,0.00007675642,0.007619947,0.002292828,0.0008528214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000183685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004754283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002239211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001381497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957438,0.0002540388,0.0009199415,0.00124121,0.001550479,0.0002905105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889916,0.001466797,0.0003640555,0.008629088,0.0004109612,0.0001374819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002799932,0.0000909312,0.00009152208,0.001924476,0.0006364997,0.000006502571,0.0001914362,0.000007798477,0.00001803399,0.0007988699,0.06730844,0.9288975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509246,0.00008988111,0.0004361345,0.003247539,0.0004815169,0.00001029982,0.00001103649,0.001702689,0.000002975718,0.002005027,0.9917057,0.0001562861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001402126,0.9828609,0.002523144,0.004274663,0.001764262,0.003988015,0.001556472,0.00006933277,0.002823064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003484404,0.9677659,0.003590012,0.0004667608,0.01268295,0.0001162711,0.01068613,0.0000870221,0.004570151],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}