{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1323,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1323,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"d8b39b6224b4","filters":{"topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W1965689506","doi":"10.1126/science.1132491","title":"The Psychological Consequences of Money","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1341,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05722545639759832,"gpt":0.403431282558534,"spread":0.3462058261609356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008657355,0.00003475076,0.00005449475,0.00001962449,0.001180129,0.00006392167,0.0004865442,0.00001608827,0.00002540592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009610907,0.00002242922,0.00002165269,0.0002837534,0.0112733,0.0001387565,0.00005651898,0.00003223077,0.00002104511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005384443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008033492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002235224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992658,0.00002970478,0.0001182285,0.0001410108,0.0002290963,0.0002161334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999674,0.00007235223,0.00005923829,0.000106988,0.00005593187,0.00003151924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005780685,0.00006742556,0.06617987,4.657269e-7,0.000001070205,0.000001233364,0.002188064,0.000004205509,0.1362495,0.7906125,0.0007169041,0.003972985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003925507,0.000292031,0.3692561,0.00001982402,0.00001068949,0.000004569363,0.0395523,0.00002269352,0.2569299,0.2782624,0.05475793,0.0004989639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8706342,0.0003657856,0.000001757494,0.00134306,0.0002515064,0.00006819121,0.000001107599,0.00001568753,0.1273187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991028,0.00007127685,0.0002695221,0.00003510481,0.00003026968,0.000006590871,5.367786e-8,9.234288e-7,0.0004834852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5123501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006722299","doi":"10.1002/smj.359","title":"A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Empirical research; Transaction cost; Extant taxon; Empirical evidence; Asset specificity; Economics; Foundation (evidence); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1581985347717702,"gpt":0.4083934887742108,"spread":0.2501949540024406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323928,0.00009443755,0.0002187213,0.00004941503,0.0005450038,0.000112176,0.0002269003,0.00003701162,0.0001560001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006693797,0.00007138992,0.0001823311,0.00007595727,0.0001188279,0.0001045573,0.00001297749,0.0000988605,0.000002561287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003842155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001635557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001593809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001396477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988656,0.0001837335,0.0004560369,0.0001206205,0.0001466945,0.0002273066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993963,0.00004618875,0.0003217997,0.0001232491,0.00004826607,0.00006425171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008491314,0.000153722,0.002451612,0.0006675945,0.0002185132,0.000001952871,0.001924894,0.000110129,0.00002697208,0.9942533,0.0001204673,0.00006234458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004650704,0.0006699096,0.002039254,0.00168919,0.001364914,0.00006087574,0.4490406,0.0009093424,0.000532073,0.5308692,0.007221918,0.000952029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1960908,0.0001100555,0.001088244,0.0008483467,0.00166835,0.002649663,0.00001104715,0.00001737881,0.797516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970224,0.0003518506,0.001210735,0.00007093188,0.00003769117,0.0001045708,4.963518e-7,0.000007821106,0.001193534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8009315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4191784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169593491","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322","title":"Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":839,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; CONTEST; Rivalry; Incentive; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Industrial organization; Set (abstract data type); Competition (biology); Marketing; Business; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09206989126865556,"gpt":0.3864339005795512,"spread":0.2943640093108956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361301,0.00007026806,0.0001145844,0.0005777072,0.0004088131,0.00009921348,0.0002982357,0.00001816119,0.00004242716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002369792,0.00006896591,0.00001411125,0.003263661,0.001197349,0.0007936453,0.000209323,0.00004208265,0.000005345001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002301011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002550332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003788162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005981982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.00005086585,0.000193857,0.0003671071,0.0002185361,0.00026284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.00001093024,0.0000701981,0.0001297536,0.00005142552,0.00005277846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006637302,0.0001122666,0.8182613,0.000002282669,0.00001439814,0.000002850119,0.02606804,0.00001319499,0.0001016082,0.1517859,0.00001122245,0.003620376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000194859,0.00005277151,0.9484311,0.000007583238,0.0000348959,5.311241e-8,0.04278612,0.00047576,0.0001135397,0.007282031,0.0004593419,0.000161974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013627,0.00001847746,0.00007933179,0.0001952313,0.00004067936,0.00025363,8.259079e-7,0.00002849713,0.09802062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968334,0.00003759747,0.002728503,0.0001511013,0.000006251486,0.00003298325,0.000001315145,0.000002127212,0.0002067245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1445038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5726593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494559574","doi":"10.1257/jep.30.3.141","title":"Mindful Economics: The Production, Consumption, and Value of Beliefs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Wishful thinking; Perspective (graphical); Faith; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Production (economics); Ideology; Denial; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02907658312623609,"gpt":0.3156470844145224,"spread":0.2865705012882863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428659,0.00008821119,0.0002084407,0.00005635263,0.0003707926,0.00002448376,0.0003028954,0.00003110748,0.0001192342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001265194,0.00004591464,0.00007531594,0.00002018624,0.00172768,0.0003604973,0.00006348222,0.00007495311,0.0000174628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003998529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001476963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003665944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007345525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991618,0.0001697103,0.0003718479,0.0001112961,0.00004510413,0.0001402431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988107,0.0003635987,0.0005375311,0.0001544818,0.00008676226,0.00004693196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003839955,0.0001956302,0.09149512,0.000009728773,0.000705144,8.407241e-7,0.3754729,0.0001269386,0.01029523,0.5088549,0.004074362,0.008385245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002195772,0.0006882836,0.1499996,0.0002380586,0.0003913219,0.0002061501,0.6988571,0.00001520807,0.03107811,0.09984991,0.01577272,0.0007077852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806961,0.002886893,0.000008501679,0.01394017,0.0004136292,0.0001489978,0.000007466907,0.000004207838,0.001894053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916044,0.007368794,0.00006678535,0.00002926669,0.000419337,0.000003132125,2.72384e-8,0.000007269768,0.0005009801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4090049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6365708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123465296","doi":"10.1257/jep.30.3.249","title":"Can War Foster Cooperation?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":747,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Spanish Civil War; Social psychology; Civic engagement; Political economy; Criminology; Development economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03270258940282497,"gpt":0.3316890268910374,"spread":0.2989864374882124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006768476,0.00007106776,0.0001491772,0.00004628152,0.0003381199,0.0000253077,0.0002797212,0.00002593313,0.0004261985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004571474,0.0000393336,0.00007313902,0.00002151789,0.0004666753,0.0003321643,0.00004320127,0.00006151338,0.00007445498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008049962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001819106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004196653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002742646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993573,0.0001286946,0.0002337981,0.00007368976,0.00005433878,0.0001521525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993915,0.0001589751,0.0002125059,0.00009832677,0.00007749872,0.00006119207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000342961,0.0002090434,0.01548782,0.000001964632,0.0004379845,0.000007685217,0.7101576,0.0000441708,0.03311837,0.2038897,0.02222043,0.01408219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002549969,0.0006466283,0.006101618,0.00007461865,0.0001429996,0.00006543997,0.9013223,0.000006200958,0.01106435,0.02835717,0.04907231,0.0005963625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446525,0.001230453,0.00004163038,0.03209872,0.000444494,0.000100229,0.00000777763,0.000009134814,0.02141508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965487,0.001568138,0.00009273795,0.0001084029,0.00044605,0.000001718946,3.782259e-8,0.000007086536,0.001227114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1911647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354546","doi":"10.1177/0001839213500032","title":"Keeping up Appearances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Prosocial behavior; Reputation; Impression management; Repertoire; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06331496867873718,"gpt":0.3928850514864522,"spread":0.329570082807715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005744408,0.0001276956,0.0001600497,0.00008678203,0.001622981,0.0005236202,0.0005828168,0.0000378256,0.0004306991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005476804,0.0001238553,0.00005096854,0.0004768939,0.003822197,0.001958774,0.00001842604,0.00009637022,0.001029543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001768445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004720337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002913575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001003718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983185,0.0000685681,0.0002252336,0.0004142016,0.0003993641,0.0005741116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992393,0.00005867329,0.0001054699,0.0001801462,0.0001772965,0.0002391121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466766,0.0002284466,0.02930271,0.000008086111,0.00002299044,0.000008440664,0.4556042,5.676738e-7,0.09135935,0.3449168,0.001603583,0.0769301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004577475,0.001598688,0.0348546,0.00004695977,0.00001144782,0.000004063863,0.9111995,0.00006333378,0.0220517,0.02263068,0.006215476,0.0008658464],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7588636,0.00007824317,0.00004071534,0.001796171,0.0006756129,0.0003956516,0.000002356049,0.00008199774,0.2380657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997194,0.000006004967,0.0008219755,0.0002350521,0.0001002279,0.00009877138,5.012358e-7,0.000005574715,0.001537922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4555952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136838186","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633","title":"The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":557,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Dishonesty; Deception; Cheating; Social psychology; Psychology; Work (physics); Engineering","retraction":{"nature":"Expression of concern","openalex_flagged":false},"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06535257717907263,"gpt":0.3850504471887782,"spread":0.3196978700097056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0275583,0.00007275483,0.0002769117,0.0001034591,0.0008959893,0.00002527126,0.0006436626,0.00005256995,0.00005618163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006213666,0.00004955655,0.000140129,0.0003814395,0.001620255,0.0001573172,0.0001911155,0.0004281058,0.000002822808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002226404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005281857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004190108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003411624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956063,0.002412683,0.000571274,0.0001051056,0.0008639377,0.0004407059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923073,0.006008054,0.0004958221,0.000165059,0.0009337175,0.00009004299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002592735,0.0007492632,0.7392273,0.00007496387,0.0002390151,0.00007776693,0.206109,0.00001193583,0.004412142,0.01757962,0.01524246,0.01368377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180219,0.0005618155,0.7228211,0.0004107631,0.00003052581,0.00009098189,0.2546317,0.000009997479,0.004344398,0.003832952,0.01184287,0.0002426649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848564,0.00162129,0.000003058524,0.001212966,0.0001933273,0.0001432014,0.000002612921,0.000005062177,0.01196207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944945,0.004051851,0.0002360513,0.00000645471,0.0001481582,0.000004067731,8.259366e-8,0.000009397571,0.001049434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0485227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154521588","doi":"10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4","title":"A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Social dilemma; Interpretation (philosophy); Social psychology; Heuristic; Dilemma; Social choice theory; Identity (music); Social heuristics; Social identity theory; Psychology; Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Social group; Artificial intelligence; Social change; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2866024452925895,"gpt":0.5185205759269307,"spread":0.2319181306343412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003396003,0.0004209625,0.004601215,0.0001046808,0.0004256082,0.00001178725,0.0005088196,0.0005586361,0.0002220838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002430917,0.0003878837,0.0009185483,0.0005856522,0.002218948,0.0001011522,0.0001888732,0.0005089715,0.000009484759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003249674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004275665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003731025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001712606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953068,0.001455664,0.001806399,0.0006503388,0.0003552702,0.0004254713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977837,0.0002975847,0.001557364,0.0001810407,0.0001298341,0.00005053802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001055687,0.0001997859,0.00007387355,0.2533539,0.00009982061,0.000006146861,0.006897729,4.025331e-9,1.629493e-7,0.05464724,0.0002614786,0.6844493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000334025,0.00004237873,0.00009004644,0.3988067,0.0008141196,0.000008142279,0.001167387,8.311964e-9,2.146911e-8,0.002736534,0.5955475,0.0004531942],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004858353,0.9937564,0.00000969642,0.000534548,0.0001903565,0.002397628,0.00009444297,0.00001604303,0.002952358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000246917,0.9976034,0.0002655225,0.001155536,0.0001721772,0.0004884402,0.00003359709,0.00002564995,0.000008773522],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6839961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029747413","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1747","title":"The Dark Side of Competition for Status","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":490,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Cheating; Ranking (information retrieval); Incentive; Rivalry; Competition (biology); Rank (graph theory); Social psychology; Great Rift; Microeconomics; Identity (music); Work (physics); Wage; Organizational behavior; Psychology; Economics; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Labour economics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02778716940414855,"gpt":0.3300162207596121,"spread":0.3022290513554635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006318018,0.00003971582,0.000051763,0.00003777575,0.001197345,0.0001304089,0.0003628122,0.000007135757,0.00002255401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003641525,0.00003056617,0.00002341867,0.0001973645,0.001364719,0.0002962445,0.0001408468,0.00001522876,0.00003415628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001240689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002255036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004165001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999229,0.00001452037,0.000115832,0.0001402408,0.0002105322,0.0002898579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.00006057736,0.00006400987,0.0001305721,0.00006199687,0.0000441805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002684203,0.00002773334,0.004043231,0.000005804674,0.000005086566,8.185791e-8,0.002325229,0.000008579654,0.002068486,0.9715518,0.001208788,0.01875254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068435,0.0002941085,0.2095276,0.00005959677,0.00004859549,1.420418e-7,0.2312953,0.0004123525,0.01721017,0.2407965,0.2986641,0.000623211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5120975,0.00008879828,0.0002361156,0.002134773,0.0004747151,0.001163644,0.000003509413,0.00003012276,0.4837708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964173,0.0001328398,0.001609091,0.00007358586,0.00001446799,0.0001365635,4.557665e-7,0.000002172479,0.001613565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7307552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9209132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147117158","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002","title":"Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Altruism (biology); Reputation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Reciprocal altruism; Psychology; Competition (biology); Dictator game; Microeconomics; Economics; Commons; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02665922486516201,"gpt":0.3099276991202252,"spread":0.2832684742550631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002155377,0.00009089235,0.0001344344,0.00002319493,0.001586013,0.00004096927,0.0001488693,0.00004784983,0.00003593622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000957813,0.00006216815,0.00004622484,0.00006857701,0.001560934,0.00007731924,0.0001059441,0.0001295641,0.000001403547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001471656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005383819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06463802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993457,0.00007007553,0.0001599942,0.0001410828,0.0001264928,0.0001566888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996538,0.00002522775,0.00009757178,0.0001308965,0.00004264723,0.00004983711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003456308,0.0001073262,0.2495186,0.000002702276,0.000007445315,8.451564e-7,0.0259151,0.000001320103,0.001100814,0.7231188,0.00006402675,0.000159521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004275106,0.00004222223,0.9714312,0.00002176877,0.00005933281,0.000002465613,0.02268358,2.426365e-7,0.0004068324,0.004043413,0.000770289,0.0001111435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935002,0.0003448243,0.000002694422,0.001634323,0.0001833356,0.0003738754,0.00002252919,0.00001896722,0.00391919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994469,0.00002961922,0.00002660957,0.00007569473,0.00004942978,0.00004338935,0.000001916494,0.000006264022,0.0003201592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096292805","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1120.1544","title":"The Behavioralist Visits the Factory: Increasing Productivity Using Simple Framing Manipulations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sustenance; Incentive; Conditionality; Framing effect; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1036080054162632,"gpt":0.3901782374385681,"spread":0.2865702320223049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003431894,0.0001046863,0.00007921898,0.00006108219,0.009139846,0.0005262362,0.0006968745,0.00001831593,0.00001725247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001032031,0.00007155417,0.00003749685,0.0006083492,0.001462162,0.001200207,0.0005581805,0.00009025708,0.0000211464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005035124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003575243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004015435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009581631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983173,0.0001416493,0.0001568879,0.0002594504,0.0004870048,0.000637683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993129,0.00008460999,0.0001108988,0.0003566065,0.00004343227,0.00009155266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000530031,0.0001295813,0.8041582,0.00000463559,0.00001402404,0.000001031989,0.01854611,0.0001070038,0.003426009,0.1636909,0.0001250659,0.009792172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001195136,0.00001473605,0.896021,0.00001599586,0.00008364875,0.000001704971,0.06774288,0.0003959211,0.001421287,0.001585363,0.03218991,0.0004080306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984004,0.0001550648,0.0001596033,0.0006963731,0.0006407354,0.0005211639,0.000001647608,0.0000529886,0.01376847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988935,0.00001797535,0.0005508343,0.00006185882,0.0001487977,0.00002837821,5.955916e-7,0.000007413793,0.0002906668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1621055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395905685","doi":"10.1111/jeea.12152","title":"NORMS MAKE PREFERENCES SOCIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":389,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universiteit Maastricht; European Commission","keywords":"Stylized fact; Ultimatum game; Prosocial behavior; Dictator game; Dictator; Public good; Microeconomics; Robustness (evolution); Selfishness; Economics; Social preferences; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Public goods game; Altruism (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Positive economics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05981172821834749,"gpt":0.3085850628450391,"spread":0.2487733346266916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003487572,0.00007416599,0.000172426,0.00003665783,0.0003702629,0.0001147864,0.0004366896,0.00004083495,0.00002450053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002538842,0.00005740783,0.000148619,0.0000424022,0.00007791038,0.0002925047,0.0001025034,0.0001586557,0.0001735621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002463072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001979819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006778202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998535,0.0006183972,0.0004026011,0.00007706468,0.000191186,0.0001757217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984898,0.00005454058,0.001203452,0.00006436079,0.0001128596,0.00007496277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005271325,0.0001381095,0.7590316,0.000002785278,0.0002718558,0.000004375871,0.08809543,0.000207772,0.000199893,0.005622507,0.1278529,0.0185201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002920577,0.000232265,0.5685695,0.00004330959,0.0002163634,0.000008786761,0.06061654,0.00002428736,0.0006078954,0.01435589,0.3517653,0.0006392995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474239,0.00006042111,0.000002500733,0.003384303,0.002085847,0.00006561567,0.000005115596,0.00001079382,0.2469615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942648,0.00003969227,0.00006347083,0.0001243942,0.001623481,6.084871e-7,4.16634e-7,0.00001106811,0.003872026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2468409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6440849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096991995","doi":"10.1257/aer.20171175","title":"From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Mainstream; Victory; Preference; Economics; Positive economics; Public good; Outcome (game theory); Political economy; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07505025608584882,"gpt":0.3517531864111646,"spread":0.2767029303253158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001953901,0.000107093,0.0004571587,0.00001045301,0.0001985059,0.00001879356,0.0003956077,0.00001570833,0.0004930634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004006496,0.00008465926,0.0001408936,0.0001148559,0.0005986707,0.00008361487,0.0001049893,0.00005946846,0.0005919037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002130352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008299656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009643554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990546,0.0001021057,0.0003538592,0.0002386854,0.0000657135,0.0001850008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993937,0.0000603502,0.0002770638,0.0001465587,0.00001372205,0.0001086335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004744063,0.0001147054,0.01652907,0.0001034117,0.0001385201,0.00000192492,0.09721737,0.00000663334,0.002353759,0.01873772,0.1453114,0.719438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003684178,0.0003001985,0.01479262,0.0005378992,0.0001932101,3.62048e-7,0.05006594,0.00001515792,0.0008088973,0.000596918,0.9316001,0.0007203001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8074661,0.01146044,0.00001930593,0.1251847,0.0002760881,0.001174008,0.0001230266,0.00006202824,0.0542342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701222,0.02037846,0.0003126339,0.008653672,0.0003700531,0.00005943694,0.000006705745,0.00001430623,0.00008250085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144137943","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02378.x","title":"Fairness in Children's Resource Allocation Depends on the Recipient","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":375,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Resource allocation; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05279356707324047,"gpt":0.3954978390109594,"spread":0.3427042719377189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001726702,0.00008317058,0.00008785026,0.00006255852,0.0007707477,0.0001048476,0.0008018026,0.00005017063,0.00009237429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002510803,0.00005329126,0.00003022365,0.0007605936,0.001092753,0.000155514,0.00005367662,0.0001558651,0.00008982446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002406939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001926483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002114639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008856291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985835,0.00008528014,0.0001545413,0.0004256521,0.0003661111,0.0003849084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995313,0.00007295055,0.0000541033,0.0002293324,0.00002391014,0.0000883546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006042108,0.001107915,0.1496398,1.91597e-7,0.000002142675,0.000004006793,0.009079206,0.00005529797,0.007235834,0.7382408,0.001346467,0.09322794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001398566,0.0002070173,0.9877748,0.000007547879,0.000001108022,0.000001141086,0.001672738,0.000006956596,0.0008846855,0.007818555,0.001351269,0.0001343467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8572703,0.00002516196,0.000005905328,0.01372104,0.00009494485,0.0002329943,5.523306e-7,0.00003645665,0.1286126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973931,0.0000310012,0.00007772969,0.002294806,0.00005061793,0.00002208706,4.520849e-7,0.000001708288,0.0001284409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5928046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145380374","doi":"10.1007/s00199-007-0212-0","title":"Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Earnings; Dilemma; Public good; Public finance; Welfare; Social dilemma; Economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02275601570147592,"gpt":0.3388194224529517,"spread":0.3160634067514757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001828431,0.0001407931,0.0001964833,0.0001046355,0.0004434535,0.00007679939,0.0001268246,0.00007546708,0.0006531745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008168402,0.000165087,0.00004815795,0.00003424174,0.0003375215,0.0002631685,0.0001139408,0.0000878331,0.0000656917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001808575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005579992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002384355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003192218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988061,0.0000869405,0.0003489312,0.0002862112,0.00007452598,0.0003973399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.00008117229,0.0001122637,0.00009834173,0.000008841439,0.00008640513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001781594,0.0001134333,0.01325257,0.000003843737,0.0000330313,0.0000049928,0.07254376,0.000005588625,0.0008491076,0.9037655,0.0006814724,0.008568542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006202942,0.000479786,0.05984805,0.00007362208,0.00006387016,0.000006385807,0.4355232,0.00005476989,0.02144774,0.08110344,0.3932863,0.001909831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8802727,0.0002565131,0.00003314338,0.0002566809,0.000551035,0.0003454762,0.000005862401,0.00003840662,0.1182402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985059,0.000125392,0.00007348815,0.0002009703,0.0002780932,0.00005941914,0.000004252717,0.00001309068,0.000739331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8226621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072895574","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2908","title":"Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Retributive justice; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02276741416241558,"gpt":0.3335386243858938,"spread":0.3107712102234783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002264659,0.00009917084,0.0001329202,0.0001037907,0.0007647329,0.0001409198,0.00007673248,0.00008793345,0.001448233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001699754,0.0001100737,0.000009382961,0.0003898117,0.0001911517,0.0004141129,0.00003887854,0.00007412879,0.00002260357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006272102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002451474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008272742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990731,0.00003092255,0.000255879,0.0002860875,0.0001931073,0.0001609239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999578,0.00006524585,0.00005172218,0.00006219737,0.0001690741,0.00007376546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002484823,0.0001595228,0.969153,0.000007460033,0.000002362902,0.0000056864,0.005479501,0.000002742834,0.00209652,0.008221471,0.0001243669,0.01472248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000807569,0.00008322157,0.985253,0.0001176513,0.00002535561,0.000008682332,0.002665122,0.000004928504,0.00140849,0.008042404,0.001255608,0.0003279508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996466,0.0003391666,0.00001617208,0.00006905364,0.00002486151,0.0002511297,0.000009242297,0.00005378657,0.002770634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982715,0.0006832364,0.0004400091,0.0000390379,0.00003613437,0.00003603878,0.00005666823,0.00001323605,0.0004241412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01609998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526929508","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.x","title":"Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1593704642482241,"gpt":0.2634155631892495,"spread":0.1040450989410254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003592429,0.00018806,0.0004081105,0.0002556025,0.0005906438,0.00008442841,0.001002635,0.000129173,0.0003955528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007005685,0.0001532671,0.0002401475,0.0001546097,0.000372167,0.0001628238,0.00003925957,0.0003253915,0.00002538316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002156918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001341704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5370719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981051,0.0001427716,0.000831454,0.00023037,0.000006590635,0.0006837163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971138,0.0006990328,0.0004960627,0.0004361767,0.0001927099,0.00106222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006741711,0.00002373151,0.04099941,0.000005338762,0.00007092134,0.00002620463,0.01804992,0.0005027225,0.00003052621,0.9301208,0.007100268,0.003002734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001500518,0.003109393,0.04137226,0.0003031235,0.0002371921,0.000127322,0.09324848,0.00007084678,0.01113461,0.2099912,0.6370504,0.001854635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337399,0.0001559428,0.00001325474,0.0583677,0.001405637,0.0004050251,0.00006844234,0.000003232229,0.005840863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902873,0.00007162799,0.0001381995,0.008569029,0.0005556639,0.00001303477,0.000001190256,0.00002163265,0.0003422954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7201296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6250052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063414602","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_13","title":"Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Loyalty; Value (mathematics); Equity theory; Transaction cost; Promotion (chess); Database transaction; Equity (law); Perception; Marketing; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03068111652009625,"gpt":0.3873318985018485,"spread":0.3566507819817523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000944198,0.00006480478,0.0002133987,0.00005405299,0.0001549056,0.00001432657,0.0001522999,0.00005272024,0.00007209309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001598515,0.00004477843,0.00005816847,0.00008571432,0.0009731643,0.0001179841,0.00001637972,0.0001364177,0.000003994137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003976417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008674427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001709392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001828826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990229,0.0003529482,0.0002947942,0.00008293668,0.0001064263,0.0001399865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999266,0.0001873242,0.0003051955,0.00008668093,0.0001069383,0.00004788432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002006268,0.0003969196,0.6029342,0.000006999732,0.0003653061,0.00002387435,0.05306792,0.000003272457,0.006898469,0.3278092,0.003410042,0.004883239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006519419,0.001320671,0.4848469,0.0001231351,0.0004280416,0.0005180612,0.1667813,0.000003155913,0.006828606,0.1487011,0.1831961,0.0007335608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628391,0.004056045,0.00006707716,0.00146775,0.0005920127,0.00009493816,0.000002530157,0.000001896973,0.03087865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983815,0.001024905,0.0002087774,0.0002623402,0.0000316796,0.000002630197,4.173104e-8,0.000004609419,0.00008354697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.179786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3585664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121763541","doi":"10.1257/aer.20151211","title":"Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Voting; Joins; Composition (language); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Social psychology; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05431795187416083,"gpt":0.3773323199515434,"spread":0.3230143680773826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610318,0.00009055475,0.000342577,0.00001867146,0.00143193,0.0001866986,0.0007377928,0.00001170313,0.0004040122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001601653,0.00005421232,0.0001199787,0.00002528724,0.003819279,0.0002417831,0.000160558,0.00005158524,0.0004656548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001384369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005791266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005011036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991357,0.000118504,0.00029588,0.000207646,0.0000639877,0.0001782525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985759,0.00005663061,0.0006551332,0.0006430928,0.00002434695,0.00004490545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001179222,0.0001483074,0.7237234,0.0004026219,0.0001896795,0.000001549783,0.008950292,0.000002706586,0.0008352915,0.03400955,0.05944722,0.1722776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003572309,0.00007636566,0.3445165,0.001001969,0.0002639132,0.00000327075,0.01091183,0.00001345079,0.001692594,0.002684242,0.63767,0.0008087016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8559826,0.009088022,0.000002507437,0.01944644,0.001234768,0.00074399,0.00003766723,0.00002324471,0.1134408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817243,0.01683319,0.0001063549,0.0007737372,0.00006668051,0.00004112454,0.000003292925,0.000007779557,0.0004435474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995374774","doi":"10.1257/aer.20191780","title":"Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; League; Adversarial system; Homogeneous; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02442534627455494,"gpt":0.3622983718176935,"spread":0.3378730255431385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000152688,0.00008639867,0.0003849413,0.00001801202,0.0000831062,0.0000177705,0.00006357796,0.00001799452,0.0003007528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008316297,0.00008592491,0.00005032943,0.00006958704,0.0002011794,0.00009238967,0.00003862495,0.00004362863,0.00003399319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001864818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001744361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002374108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001581797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992947,0.0001168959,0.0002505871,0.0001911926,0.00004166392,0.0001049391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994454,0.0001278568,0.0002185331,0.0001186739,0.00004044317,0.00004907459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002299284,0.0003705941,0.006833445,0.0002884563,0.0004319987,0.00002286526,0.05082626,0.000009721036,0.01102924,0.2521314,0.02071659,0.6571095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002155683,0.003366428,0.00260822,0.004002777,0.0003977419,0.000009872467,0.1911402,0.00004777054,0.1657389,0.0006673725,0.6283169,0.001548203],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968433,0.08669273,0.0000165804,0.01029431,0.000857842,0.001182373,0.00005408617,0.00003453551,0.2040242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043442,0.09363092,0.0004007301,0.001314791,0.00006057051,0.00005083619,0.000004805868,0.000006558761,0.0001865705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6555613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3588957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169924644","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0513","title":"When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Battle; Economics; Balance (ability); Work (physics); Microeconomics; Stability (learning theory); Industrial organization; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.037290135906944,"gpt":0.3419431753096086,"spread":0.3046530394026646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562525,0.00008254283,0.0001343172,0.0001177372,0.0008784247,0.0001172027,0.0005231979,0.00003140678,0.0004704032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004814671,0.00007866557,0.00001203928,0.001396251,0.0008795469,0.0005515359,0.0001927723,0.00006029781,0.00002852396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003042005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001532291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003280744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987279,0.00003178349,0.0002300757,0.0003001651,0.0004894215,0.0002206624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998975,0.00003366825,0.0001684781,0.0001981547,0.000530861,0.00009388589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002255371,0.0003351886,0.880877,0.000001414569,0.0000040686,4.744896e-7,0.05620687,0.000003361395,0.04785956,0.01429941,0.0001210494,0.0002893157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000527219,0.0002084265,0.8901291,0.000005709968,0.00002267943,0.000001560754,0.06777319,0.00001428647,0.03992183,0.00042329,0.0007225694,0.00025018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933739,0.00001629973,0.00003543624,0.0003127223,0.0007400582,0.0003723132,0.000001837572,0.00004715511,0.005100292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985551,0.00001026958,0.0009368883,0.00002306726,0.00008050205,0.000008718401,6.422949e-7,0.000007276597,0.0003774856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01387612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6756221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125715612","doi":"10.3386/w17579","title":"Laws and Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5311018754944059,"gpt":0.5772342071228249,"spread":0.04613233162841901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002824899,0.000125409,0.0002991608,0.0003071258,0.0003390725,0.0000837542,0.0004919199,0.0002711063,0.0004394153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002069581,0.0001384523,0.00008234716,0.00004824948,0.001296389,0.0001481729,0.0009984719,0.0004944541,0.0001459509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009828755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009297997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02569648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005278425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983569,0.0001666768,0.0003513273,0.0004203356,0.0003852816,0.0003194688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988623,0.0003252361,0.000153975,0.0001761892,0.000364836,0.0001175054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001904357,0.00006193624,0.004828321,0.0000218716,0.00004905984,5.685384e-7,0.004101918,0.00001030999,0.00006474296,0.9871092,0.003180942,0.000552099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002096723,0.00003750228,0.001126075,0.00003103238,0.000005197488,3.720607e-7,0.001704943,0.00002356627,0.0005393386,0.9934019,0.002751893,0.000168439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1987277,0.0008073904,3.897042e-7,0.001010517,0.0003469039,0.0004555773,0.00004392077,0.00001637186,0.7985913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994946,0.001354339,0.0004065724,0.00001979051,0.0003215493,0.0001139822,0.00003272039,0.00001547213,0.002789564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143947714","doi":"10.1037/a0036673","title":"Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Express trust; Norm (philosophy); Goodwill; Duty; Disposition; Flourishing; Dictator game; Epistemology; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05623317264616638,"gpt":0.4034714311614707,"spread":0.3472382585153043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009060021,0.00007608291,0.0003640213,0.00006133228,0.0002325407,0.000007879373,0.0001334281,0.0001196125,0.000200292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005022219,0.00007318245,0.0001501657,0.00006837673,0.0009001817,0.0001259418,0.00002857042,0.0001142232,0.000002860603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003115115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003627937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000342395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988445,0.0002827396,0.0004174923,0.0001158154,0.0001938679,0.0001455915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990937,0.00008575578,0.0005893474,0.00005733073,0.0001279181,0.0000459484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007882112,0.0002614239,0.6173464,0.0000419753,0.0001202978,0.000003119082,0.3449074,6.117072e-7,0.01537742,0.01472143,0.00542639,0.00100525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001299968,0.0003879321,0.9331152,0.00002856445,0.00005717053,0.00001200643,0.05417231,0.000001041724,0.0006818052,0.006875632,0.003217306,0.0001510211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835318,0.000215168,0.0000315848,0.006315333,0.0002592709,0.0000570215,0.00000915484,0.000002671231,0.009578005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988503,0.0001121952,0.0002245689,0.0003918202,0.0002378784,0.000001501361,7.575074e-7,0.000005477189,0.0001754593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3157688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3316757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023912427","doi":"10.1023/b:puch.0000024169.08329.eb","title":"Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Public finance; Dictator; Social preferences; Economics; Equity (law); Dictator game; Extension (predicate logic); Microeconomics; Test (biology); Generosity; Positive economics; Econometrics; Public economics; Political science; Inequality; Computer science; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1051325119547833,"gpt":0.3713126555822274,"spread":0.2661801436274441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002424351,0.0001111315,0.0001276966,0.0000518511,0.0006894013,0.000325959,0.0002049377,0.00005586409,0.00006714199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001223743,0.0001130958,0.00002708997,0.00009703851,0.0002128879,0.001059117,0.00009708179,0.00007716692,0.00001482098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002429165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008431583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01550853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01209551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999075,0.00003241805,0.0001438033,0.0002836875,0.0001545498,0.0003105749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995856,0.00004682738,0.00003712043,0.000115701,0.00003815383,0.0001765975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002442971,0.002383794,0.4783033,0.00002290048,0.00009144039,0.000005889911,0.2213167,0.0007699318,0.05303546,0.2325391,0.0002009992,0.01130606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01263787,0.002185859,0.01237231,0.0003063232,0.0001457071,0.00002208545,0.7201997,0.009065829,0.07075847,0.03529496,0.1308472,0.006163651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618473,0.0005925383,0.00002861184,0.001248571,0.0001473201,0.0001526468,0.000005553296,0.0001174111,0.03586004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987408,0.00003423071,0.0005912415,0.0002124781,0.0002593712,0.00004356264,0.00000214541,0.00001267003,0.0001034784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.498883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117867051","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifn002","title":"Pro-social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CESifo Economic Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Perspective (graphical); Exploit; Action (physics); Altruism (biology); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Social psychology; Public economics; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07789718648076656,"gpt":0.330642715630857,"spread":0.2527455291500905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003688445,0.0001143068,0.0003550972,0.00003728937,0.001866317,0.00001978086,0.0001604582,0.00005047977,0.00001881782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000208149,0.00009354592,0.00007609236,0.00004604341,0.002351554,0.0002264173,0.0001706205,0.00005414322,0.00001613666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001872373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005027709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001360991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999167,0.0000976269,0.0002849015,0.0001945939,0.00007072043,0.0001851921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994267,0.0002064403,0.0002281371,0.00005893065,0.00006097807,0.00001877949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001464941,0.00005028548,0.1339003,0.00005926307,0.0003953244,0.000001138114,0.7958419,0.000002552053,0.0001557798,0.06632064,0.001938734,0.001187523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004335484,0.00008673281,0.3271709,0.00003650154,0.0001940882,0.00000314532,0.644165,0.00002924645,0.002179187,0.008006642,0.01311229,0.0006806898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843256,0.002335971,1.537573e-7,0.001981105,0.0002467397,0.0002667816,0.00001161448,0.00002632059,0.01080569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966503,0.002425863,0.00002710821,0.0001166652,0.0003373716,0.00005396838,0.000001768264,0.000007993697,0.0003789045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1932706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136324144","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.001","title":"How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Public good; Value (mathematics); Advertising; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02038306606962339,"gpt":0.3048038959986589,"spread":0.2844208299290355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008894132,0.0001171552,0.000217509,0.0001505025,0.000380766,0.0001188679,0.0003156545,0.0001140253,0.0003556744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007444117,0.00009448972,0.00009124498,0.0001878421,0.0002165376,0.0006517012,0.00003868998,0.0001363601,0.00001208607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007857491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004995285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006077165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988623,0.00006843861,0.0005489994,0.0001259672,0.0001910828,0.0002032191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985803,0.00006572866,0.0007484333,0.0001286864,0.0003989227,0.00007797211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003451267,0.0008859166,0.6476139,0.000006948612,0.0001194745,0.000005316269,0.05733669,0.00002226304,0.2672782,0.01097902,0.009544602,0.006173117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001733239,0.0003088138,0.2732588,0.00003210482,0.000558856,0.00003956541,0.06038905,0.000007914002,0.6560711,0.0003858918,0.00668167,0.0005330236],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953447,0.0001385331,0.0003273962,0.002668811,0.0006486687,0.0002742873,0.00002527276,0.00001567875,0.0005566624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987876,0.00009943951,0.0002057807,0.0000699517,0.0001772363,0.000003105286,0.00001419319,0.00002540273,0.0006172289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3887929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3894385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032887269","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1494","title":"Committing Altruism under the Cloak of Self-Interest: The Exchange Fiction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Prosocial behavior; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Compassion; Social exchange theory; Appeal; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1332924340684903,"gpt":0.4162112716150567,"spread":0.2829188375465664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007799012,0.0001266166,0.0002721724,0.00005411098,0.0009989506,0.00003936159,0.0005152574,0.0001220854,0.0006516314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002048065,0.00008517287,0.0002405542,0.0001502346,0.000810507,0.0001733743,0.00008980274,0.00031556,0.00001912618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000256918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001808423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002569632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009379762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983839,0.0004473393,0.0005345866,0.0001269803,0.0002321635,0.0002749802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.0001489772,0.0006725978,0.0001275471,0.0000841482,0.00005529505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025022,0.003146905,0.007652728,0.00001032528,0.0006931421,0.00002178509,0.5989721,0.0000044358,0.1068012,0.06830588,0.206769,0.007372178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004151586,0.00184145,0.02552382,0.00005651779,0.0002095741,0.0001309305,0.7396855,0.00002819508,0.02249473,0.003662833,0.201543,0.0006718973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252503,0.005095784,0.00001294685,0.01412101,0.00217998,0.0002145445,0.000003021667,0.00001832743,0.05310411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969866,0.0004436657,0.00009555265,0.001260398,0.001006795,0.00001067349,2.68061e-7,0.00001396875,0.0001820465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1407134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944513151","doi":"10.1111/ele.12507","title":"Cheaters must prosper: reconciling theoretical and empirical perspectives on cheating in mutualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Division of Integrative Organismal Systems; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mutualism (biology); Cheating; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09775052186608461,"gpt":0.4344527519093773,"spread":0.3367022300432926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238738,0.0003397477,0.001239294,0.0001981577,0.0002880286,0.00006473556,0.0002549764,0.0004131539,0.00009901022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003356914,0.0003120383,0.0001621071,0.0001582852,0.001965174,0.00009456443,0.0001570624,0.0006386927,0.00006470877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002146508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002012779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005564998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974939,0.0006303365,0.0004752757,0.0006956438,0.0001452987,0.0005595876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989662,0.0005296351,0.0001654187,0.0001670512,0.00002704405,0.0001446827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009225651,0.0008298677,0.04765679,0.001712136,0.0006269877,0.0006564328,0.5516896,0.000004387435,0.00001502493,0.06931494,0.007793265,0.3196083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002050187,0.0007831955,0.001499535,0.004635824,0.0007839745,0.00007825459,0.1308446,0.00001459269,0.000004346723,0.0009923227,0.8551847,0.003128495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1575886,0.8233074,2.643993e-7,0.006583333,0.000851099,0.001475478,0.00001497129,0.00008484809,0.01009404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01496147,0.9828343,0.000228218,0.001214882,0.0003884986,0.0002481662,0.00001067892,0.00004831288,0.00006546763],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8473914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023252096","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2007.11.002","title":"Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02573525417271327,"gpt":0.28723643934145,"spread":0.2615011851687367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003893535,0.0001635566,0.000283984,0.0001157627,0.0004202323,0.0002570696,0.0001598107,0.0000976684,0.00007177842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002373572,0.0001376574,0.00002619634,0.0000827395,0.0001574728,0.0007327982,0.00004985284,0.0001585183,0.00000397031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003820894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005970285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005541717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989172,0.00009136482,0.0004293556,0.0002131878,0.0001307817,0.0002181146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.00004719723,0.0004524811,0.0000892239,0.00007765644,0.0001647964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002958983,0.0001696979,0.9772748,0.000001540455,0.00005011311,0.00000369598,0.01831941,0.000004779693,0.001585317,0.000386784,0.00007846596,0.002095758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001832059,0.000952679,0.9773692,0.00003800638,0.000450062,0.00003478454,0.01417417,0.000002496395,0.004163541,0.0002841372,0.0003249517,0.0003739504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998873,0.0002357822,0.00002294791,0.0002687757,0.0001692495,0.0002683465,0.000006324519,0.00003331327,0.0001222901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977951,0.0004302619,0.001525623,0.00006289969,0.0001413925,0.00000508225,0.000005745582,0.0000191329,0.00001477636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004145243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5613507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042961264","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1922345117","title":"Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Goodwill; Negotiation; Collective action; Skepticism; Action (physics); Investment (military); Social psychology; Business; Psychology; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1677916052446591,"gpt":0.397061171640045,"spread":0.229269566395386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008036962,0.00005552961,0.0001143753,0.00004236033,0.0007830486,0.00003131391,0.0004048836,0.00004043206,0.000005353473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004366963,0.00004469713,0.00003560371,0.0003838882,0.001490514,0.0003913089,0.0002491251,0.0001071521,8.653532e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001709748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004164785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001626062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001375845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990961,0.00001441108,0.0001954633,0.0001502149,0.0004454052,0.00009842551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.00009848495,0.0003354344,0.000003961641,0.0001331149,0.00003670161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005064504,0.0001399716,0.2090638,0.00007061179,0.00007196234,7.893514e-9,0.07980794,0.00005520783,0.5018489,0.2039315,0.003315252,0.001644148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000812187,0.000235187,0.1141999,0.0002608818,0.00006401453,0.000001486932,0.2101835,0.001567398,0.6244566,0.04395989,0.003802079,0.0004568053],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067096,0.0001765184,9.811015e-8,0.01056712,0.00001200119,0.0001970416,0.00000619554,0.00001094521,0.08232056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981707,0.0001924662,0.000994581,0.0004944918,0.00003602065,0.000008947386,3.731551e-8,0.000001934444,0.0001008393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151329766","doi":"10.1037/a0031047","title":"Paying it forward: Generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Generosity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Affect (linguistics); Impulse (physics); Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09514420861119968,"gpt":0.4299798813367787,"spread":0.334835672725579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827778,0.000162577,0.0004731262,0.00008590164,0.0004718779,0.00002917406,0.0003240895,0.0001243371,0.0001101593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006571623,0.000117518,0.0002169248,0.0001047489,0.001231412,0.0003777978,0.00009865832,0.000236061,0.000004800521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001231081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003906459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000319997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004204925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980729,0.0005225385,0.0006435312,0.0001494896,0.0002187554,0.0003928412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988748,0.0001000408,0.0005938419,0.0001577952,0.00008869797,0.0001847834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001695582,0.00107684,0.1143704,0.000006975234,0.0004103775,0.000007397274,0.1044224,0.00000933338,0.7109931,0.04714728,0.01805117,0.001809209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02907092,0.001777541,0.03979537,0.00008759684,0.0004463332,0.0004491502,0.08716168,0.00003538409,0.7819361,0.004334666,0.0535127,0.001392563],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725106,0.01333295,0.00003159117,0.002680052,0.001539572,0.0001966447,0.000003167936,0.00000714624,0.00969828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920261,0.001260181,0.003755772,0.001888853,0.0007801457,0.00001423377,7.495456e-7,0.00001468681,0.0002592893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.074575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4792244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066158317","doi":"10.1038/nclimate2024","title":"Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Climate Change","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universität Hamburg; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Climate change; Endowment; Intertemporal choice; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04472592373157338,"gpt":0.3480828820918154,"spread":0.303356958360242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004328189,0.00009027321,0.0001045916,0.00004395743,0.0003030196,0.000170345,0.000154932,0.0001170113,0.0001590027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003309538,0.00006625082,0.00002477885,0.00009718154,0.0001652392,0.0004320307,0.000107886,0.0002515368,0.0000500444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007487945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005925267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008162596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005540798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991806,0.00006869583,0.0001376513,0.0001695239,0.0001234627,0.0003201189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997488,0.00006100878,0.00005316911,0.00007685599,0.00002870699,0.00003150143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000174971,0.0001735862,0.4739682,0.00004968917,0.00001399112,0.00001035844,0.2245019,4.261244e-7,0.00452636,0.2846226,0.002733941,0.009381504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001211862,0.0001476163,0.7360923,0.0002336743,0.00003887503,0.00001048212,0.2242171,0.000248097,0.001044087,0.006790813,0.02886462,0.001100498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975632,0.0015444,1.49477e-7,0.009918754,0.000378499,0.0003999576,0.00001835397,0.00002175171,0.01208611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954472,0.002007242,0.00007723468,0.001763106,0.0004548439,0.000215846,0.00001212471,0.000007465211,0.00001493916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2778318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3091896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253810207","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4757-5055-3_15","title":"Rent-seeking for pure public goods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Public good; Extension (predicate logic); Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Public economics; Rent-seeking; Financial economics; Political science; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1147731652492366,"gpt":0.3545148797971157,"spread":0.2397417145478792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002721709,0.0002401195,0.000339574,0.00009551059,0.0006655972,0.0001740513,0.0003388887,0.0003447139,0.002738792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000291231,0.0002497647,0.0002374768,0.0000213706,0.0003091516,0.0001847409,0.0001361071,0.0001538038,0.0001849479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004911543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001334398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000388179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006408668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987279,0.00001051567,0.0002794418,0.0003864149,0.0001879458,0.0004078341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993528,0.00006843664,0.0001717704,0.0002003609,0.00007572499,0.0001309826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002768332,0.00001157926,0.0002092251,0.000004508142,0.00003614469,0.000001625896,0.0008259671,2.908724e-8,0.00001333527,0.9787323,0.01396874,0.006193768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269344,0.00003737583,0.00000364415,0.00002128917,0.00002710621,4.6675e-7,0.001166597,0.000001109021,0.00001050779,0.05021026,0.9480872,0.0003075659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006717766,0.0008344193,0.00006403615,0.002356082,0.0007309224,0.000632948,0.00003356552,0.0001480396,0.9951328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0114304,0.0009940837,0.0005342867,0.0003049758,0.0007513927,0.00007692559,0.00003989922,0.00005705146,0.985811],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079729086","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.001","title":"Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Sowing; Workforce; Labour economics; Economics; Tree planting; Agricultural economics; Business; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Agroforestry; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1169760867892088,"gpt":0.3320611405103499,"spread":0.2150850537211411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002096487,0.0001777926,0.0002883889,0.00004219713,0.0006433238,0.0001034402,0.000127991,0.00007982706,0.0002980065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002348796,0.0001914218,0.0000504043,0.0000267205,0.0006271241,0.0005747796,0.0002054888,0.0000963162,0.00004518143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007635086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0178206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003557034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987854,0.00004759465,0.0002415029,0.0005347585,0.00006679889,0.0003238964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.00008426366,0.0000995717,0.0001971071,0.0000131162,0.0001569072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001982347,0.00008247991,0.941102,0.000002305852,0.00001955431,0.00001124652,0.03575823,0.000001047082,0.002990905,0.0001525999,0.0005936073,0.01926621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004146446,0.00007606036,0.9708378,0.00005882636,0.00005532996,0.00001388096,0.01358994,0.00001553861,0.003904211,0.00009006364,0.01041148,0.0005321888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920303,0.005853585,0.000003039861,0.0006605995,0.0004009233,0.0003644483,0.0000335148,0.00004866521,0.000604983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944634,0.002442956,0.000864057,0.00004645631,0.0002184677,0.0001874737,0.000001987768,0.00001723631,0.001757898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02973584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800738283","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1194","title":"Optimal Distinctiveness in the Console Video Game Industry: An Exemplar-Based Model of Proto-Category Evolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Categorization; Salient; Conformity; Explanatory power; Product category; Video game; Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Marketing; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Communication; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05247311315937631,"gpt":0.3535937267825023,"spread":0.301120613623126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198162,0.00007037117,0.00009115594,0.00009844072,0.0006270627,0.00008701678,0.0005354835,0.00007036288,0.00005903967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003592044,0.00006062723,0.000009263152,0.001529617,0.002206591,0.0007244277,0.00006836761,0.00008782429,0.00001168245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003368509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008141909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008116939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006957767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989095,0.0001095886,0.0001767804,0.0002558037,0.0003373177,0.0002109859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.0000265571,0.0001197867,0.0001880174,0.0004339731,0.00005211322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003541704,0.0005238443,0.5951576,0.000007856945,0.000002432023,7.639785e-7,0.08674482,0.007601666,0.2005978,0.109004,0.00005855778,0.0002651507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001616137,0.0006559489,0.3082883,0.00007348551,0.0000339789,0.000002612399,0.1301287,0.09955921,0.4524994,0.005741925,0.0004178707,0.0009825142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873162,0.000004671333,0.009190909,0.0004298898,0.00007700632,0.0004624938,0.000005128835,0.00002600045,0.002487727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990679,6.23125e-7,0.0007505221,0.00007863044,0.00003556307,0.00002934189,0.000002221547,0.000006271243,0.00002889509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2868694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488941809","doi":"10.1257/aer.20141222","title":"Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Eli Lilly and Company; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Power (physics); Social psychology; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04427259914443659,"gpt":0.3637281272025663,"spread":0.3194555280581297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004584295,0.000162614,0.0005656471,0.00002243788,0.001190241,0.0002531237,0.000465904,0.00002755908,0.000168186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000250489,0.0001655012,0.00008254489,0.00003692144,0.0009926261,0.00038164,0.0002436292,0.00009855605,0.0001692556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002060947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000930254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02030648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007702901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988834,0.0000751002,0.0002955715,0.0003732032,0.00005162162,0.0003210783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986801,0.0001035717,0.0005809626,0.0004578993,0.00002475116,0.0001527163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003239208,0.00002936536,0.3625613,0.0001818093,0.00005795143,0.000004677161,0.003489025,6.059864e-7,0.00003799861,0.007777156,0.03172089,0.594136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003356117,0.0001614263,0.07033247,0.001024464,0.0001395747,0.00001582107,0.00646739,0.00001751555,0.0000206536,0.001401868,0.919201,0.000882237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6595623,0.09724364,0.000003258168,0.03513416,0.0006854718,0.001208763,0.00003320087,0.0001124219,0.2060167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849651,0.1454713,0.0007863335,0.003440985,0.0002424244,0.00009275039,0.000002014128,0.00002453226,0.0002886435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098364304","doi":"10.1177/1470594x10387260","title":"Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Normative; Trustworthiness; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Norm of reciprocity; Salient; Dictator game; Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Express trust; Political science; Public relations; Social capital; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1392373395137573,"gpt":0.3246506788342495,"spread":0.1854133393204922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000304802,0.0003198608,0.0004855551,0.0001270736,0.001418494,0.0001246941,0.0005692504,0.0002360108,0.0006409569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003512622,0.0004131164,0.0002905708,0.00010151,0.0007896957,0.0004865902,0.0002534084,0.000243955,0.0004046285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006619538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002301474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00827922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003743274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978087,0.00005414877,0.0006128208,0.0005330063,0.0001224972,0.0008688478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998938,0.0000657909,0.0003127633,0.0003039131,0.0001013957,0.0002781283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002360482,0.0001382503,0.01746825,0.00001473107,0.0000861347,0.00000475506,0.08124661,6.527824e-7,0.00002372193,0.9001291,0.0004282739,0.0004359519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001845863,0.0001872935,0.009418087,0.00003626877,0.0002603961,0.00000924661,0.02186322,0.0002725994,0.01033174,0.9256126,0.02781202,0.002350656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6734851,0.00004532799,0.000003375028,0.003531921,0.0006356417,0.0002152574,0.0002319171,0.00009777367,0.3217537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99051,0.0001330766,0.0008056973,0.005423969,0.002025242,0.00004527428,0.000008283328,0.00006053197,0.0009879387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3207658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120698475","doi":"10.1007/s10683-007-9190-0","title":"Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Matching (statistics); Field (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Field experiment; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06033923894835337,"gpt":0.340417903184208,"spread":0.2800786642358546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001579529,0.0002381371,0.0003187757,0.00006736696,0.0008396247,0.0001184729,0.0002244447,0.0001049201,0.0001165548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002791089,0.0002858121,0.00004307189,0.00005039347,0.0003298279,0.0008285103,0.0004186331,0.0001464645,0.00005212657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003509327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006619055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008143277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001020643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986148,0.00006265142,0.0002874916,0.000570783,0.00009674145,0.0003674872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992449,0.0001484388,0.00009125638,0.0002047788,0.00002101825,0.0002895887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003265197,0.0004659144,0.04937064,0.00001303467,0.000158841,0.00005713437,0.777401,0.00000751206,0.151006,0.01719668,0.0008974383,0.003099341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002379018,0.0009995733,0.01425342,0.0002459783,0.0000355622,0.0000171013,0.2581917,0.00009825823,0.7055191,0.002056777,0.01359102,0.00261245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824616,0.01341341,0.000002674061,0.001195272,0.0006789393,0.0003610878,0.0000216874,0.00006835031,0.001796959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935917,0.003384579,0.001588103,0.0009460404,0.000230317,0.00008810075,0.00000333587,0.00002548923,0.0001423801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5545132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046783920","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003","title":"Social interactions and the salience of social identity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Ultimatum game; Social identity approach; Cognitive psychology; Social group","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05358302992155926,"gpt":0.4654357365300902,"spread":0.4118527066085309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009435087,0.0000521524,0.0002330812,0.00005784036,0.0003802553,0.00003168851,0.0002722277,0.00005857899,0.0002272307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004836556,0.00004289483,0.0001114634,0.00002953857,0.001639068,0.0003732117,0.00005098099,0.0002569416,0.00001214823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005425532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006072357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002908835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003277952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992822,0.00009975545,0.000378371,0.00007870058,0.00004468906,0.0001162264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992115,0.000113225,0.0005495795,0.00005020206,0.00004335849,0.00003206123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002392578,0.0001052292,0.01868918,0.000001949747,0.00009895927,0.000001682071,0.04154425,5.372607e-7,0.007451108,0.9218446,0.00749685,0.002526399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01062413,0.0003375649,0.3741603,0.00001445069,0.0002641723,0.0002476914,0.06057226,0.00002076787,0.001080553,0.395004,0.1570671,0.0006069968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528983,0.00003899869,0.00001051439,0.01066405,0.002082931,0.00005357738,0.000002635883,0.000002610433,0.03424641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988436,0.00007552603,0.0001083025,0.0002232575,0.000639849,0.000002232507,9.552902e-8,0.000003609944,0.0001035298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5268406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6039216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921545035","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000186","title":"Signaling when no one is watching: A reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Reputation; Selfishness; Psychology; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Heuristics; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1388681549962381,"gpt":0.4165606696254239,"spread":0.2776925146291859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009387103,0.00007625059,0.0003216175,0.0000781482,0.0001591369,0.0000368576,0.00008225348,0.00009469692,0.0001625438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395625,0.00008320114,0.0000650244,0.00004780631,0.000248194,0.000234666,0.00002947051,0.0002456041,0.000002606949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001372798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005234025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004729392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989442,0.0001695268,0.0004303283,0.0001410299,0.0001723788,0.0001425089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992878,0.00009720029,0.0003936769,0.00004054004,0.0001375499,0.00004326442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008144184,0.001284439,0.2619702,0.0001154965,0.0002440926,0.00001340105,0.6804366,0.000004384515,0.04300447,0.007067552,0.0009394428,0.004105575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007272933,0.001983822,0.6241952,0.0003701476,0.0002982704,0.00004746358,0.3034871,0.00005781331,0.001233284,0.04685345,0.01328403,0.000916459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893311,0.0002235622,0.00002177903,0.006585977,0.0003475719,0.0001090379,0.00001118147,0.00000287675,0.003366861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980012,0.0002633939,0.0007469534,0.0006808524,0.00018603,0.000001481674,0.000001263188,0.000005030948,0.0001137677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3769494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3392844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072912727","doi":"10.1007/s00199-005-0633-6","title":"Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: evidence from trust game experiments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated game; Bridging (networking); Inference; Game theory; Computer science; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Best response; Strategy; Normal-form game; Sequential game; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08386268713124677,"gpt":0.3775452311842629,"spread":0.2936825440530161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004557269,0.0002292334,0.000316806,0.00006947192,0.0003778652,0.0003216749,0.0004727294,0.0001294622,0.004583328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005502575,0.0002655879,0.0001233036,0.0000366055,0.0004414827,0.00189521,0.0001774415,0.0001725804,0.001912829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001310693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002087286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0196287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004598036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983138,0.0002148621,0.0004467969,0.0005407274,0.0000888568,0.0003949582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988332,0.0003860296,0.0002141354,0.0004070091,0.000017151,0.0001425001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006895557,0.0005153191,0.09049545,0.000008395673,0.0008787492,0.00002205126,0.4472885,0.003217559,0.07619034,0.338826,0.002759919,0.03910813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002591316,0.0001873708,0.04959767,0.0004306464,0.0002189833,0.000002401393,0.5746883,0.0006002289,0.134105,0.1550304,0.07971674,0.002830963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955525,0.002682035,0.00003834328,0.0003648574,0.0008894532,0.0002322994,0.00005974105,0.0002039409,0.04000431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961357,0.0007997801,0.000553129,0.0001630254,0.0009490036,0.00008689424,0.00001276918,0.00002987033,0.001269891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1837956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099522484","doi":"10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.0228a.x","title":"The Supply of Information by a Concerned Expert","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sobel operator; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Economics; Decision maker; Revealed preference; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Management science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0181244914067537,"gpt":0.3079245688536715,"spread":0.2898000774469178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007025042,0.00005519383,0.00009162818,0.00001448202,0.001005431,0.0001443184,0.0003645862,0.00002565049,0.0001010395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002296693,0.00003418665,0.00006164921,0.00001851658,0.0004571406,0.0004892636,0.00004235826,0.0001022022,0.0001056984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006600001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002366759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003111944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006330771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993847,0.00004752696,0.0002923954,0.0000377978,0.00006316412,0.0001744215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.00007128534,0.0002522301,0.00008870022,0.00002194879,0.00004631072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002302871,0.0000739891,0.006945994,0.000002770118,0.0002694829,0.000001223814,0.4276309,0.001021953,0.003149989,0.4234428,0.09707979,0.04015078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002845498,0.0002331988,0.001754232,0.00003715407,0.00002972659,0.00003946031,0.2830692,0.00004312789,0.01777186,0.05671455,0.6370492,0.0004127695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616543,0.001331504,0.00002570153,0.01181622,0.0008199034,0.0001555487,0.00001147206,0.00001075245,0.02417462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997396,0.001975843,0.00005132796,0.0002311244,0.000161825,0.000007545164,7.357293e-7,0.000003392612,0.0001722273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5399694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7733067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023829253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0","title":"Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Negotiation; Variance (accounting); Public finance; Group (periodic table); Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Economics; Experimental economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02547907683659091,"gpt":0.3252164372820591,"spread":0.2997373604454682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002042259,0.00007166001,0.0001489405,0.00002318925,0.0006625915,0.00003519046,0.000115712,0.00005911734,0.00002374805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001765845,0.00006097863,0.00004186427,0.0001195248,0.0002355621,0.0001079055,0.00003374376,0.00009481327,6.435321e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009994108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002605873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01477833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03258348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.00004123709,0.0001475306,0.0001200262,0.0001003695,0.0001978679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997873,0.0000433384,0.00007513382,0.00004094594,0.0000242644,0.00002902222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001329643,0.0001171682,0.3103407,0.00001247029,0.00001805174,0.000002159297,0.1660328,8.631902e-7,0.0009133487,0.5007484,0.000451199,0.02134957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006966036,0.0001073104,0.8416332,0.00003155211,0.00002035875,2.195583e-7,0.1289324,0.000001923582,0.0001488535,0.01683046,0.01135974,0.0002373562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544628,0.0003556083,1.869867e-7,0.01867788,0.0000427465,0.0002124714,0.000010504,0.00001628443,0.02622148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994398,0.00006445577,0.00002374636,0.0002510681,0.0001429187,0.00001131873,0.000001757808,0.000003981445,0.00006091019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109357873","doi":"10.3386/w21695","title":"Overconfidence And Preferences For Competition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Competition (biology); Overconfidence effect; Trait; Economics; Demographic economics; Compensation (psychology); Graduation (instrument); Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6309883140900789,"gpt":0.6065572024868817,"spread":0.02443111160319722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009261437,0.0001257458,0.0003660989,0.0003081052,0.0003452474,0.00009941959,0.0003217461,0.0002616123,0.0001873514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00195212,0.0001392042,0.00007486215,0.0000612532,0.001050335,0.0002439147,0.0001535562,0.0002564742,0.00003211334],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003513471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007309425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01933545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01022508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974321,0.0001470158,0.0004201743,0.0003885538,0.001313949,0.0002982765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949872,0.0009846401,0.0002456919,0.0001108045,0.003553153,0.0001184375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004154642,0.00004955769,0.002007322,0.00009051091,0.00006943457,2.808496e-7,0.001392588,0.000007329212,0.00006115163,0.89591,0.09912626,0.001244025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003537957,0.0001821686,0.0004368445,0.0001217591,0.00001501418,0.000001728883,0.003433769,0.0000225535,0.0001618874,0.8186262,0.1764053,0.0002390186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01089277,0.002044456,0.000001292648,0.0006653522,0.000601314,0.0009349688,0.0002737693,0.00001398629,0.9845721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827156,0.006023827,0.0003703464,0.00001066086,0.001100458,0.0003426007,0.0001979034,0.00002173979,0.009216868],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155014708","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7644","title":"Beyond Equilibrium: Predicting Human Behavior in Normal-Form Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Best response; Game theory; Outcome (game theory); Extensive-form game; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08053815555827337,"gpt":0.359902836620469,"spread":0.2793646810621956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008202161,0.0002075384,0.0002814195,0.0001456297,0.0004755743,0.0001942441,0.001088586,0.0001546348,0.0003614884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003183116,0.0001839437,0.0001167347,0.0003638644,0.001149,0.0005343843,0.0003275062,0.0005555942,0.00005123376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002251746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005473426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980844,0.00001507482,0.0006297556,0.0003903563,0.0003818288,0.000498595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.00006276008,0.0003594497,0.0001722244,0.0002859177,0.0001089522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002770267,0.0002248006,0.0912633,0.00000958559,0.000004866856,5.078243e-7,0.01225363,0.000001066855,0.3504376,0.5391585,0.00003780135,0.006580575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006181723,0.0002224223,0.01136935,0.0001144722,0.00002942072,0.000001677637,0.02469712,0.000225885,0.8679291,0.09477656,0.0001480786,0.0004240765],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847578,0.000009722206,8.915305e-7,0.0009504143,0.0005716145,0.000510361,0.000007212139,0.0000539834,0.113138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988967,0.00001853092,0.0002034319,0.00006508498,0.0001548992,0.0001062001,7.168038e-7,0.00001733711,0.0005370855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5174915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146904012","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.031","title":"Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"World Agroforestry Centre; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Prosocial behavior; Payment; Public economics; Tanzania; Distrust; Premise; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08386047576948277,"gpt":0.334920429353972,"spread":0.2510599535844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468556,0.0001422408,0.0002730848,0.00003492301,0.0002705358,0.00007115246,0.0001779193,0.0001784862,0.0004272018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114646,0.0001469539,0.00003528848,0.00003682932,0.0004749295,0.0004567556,0.0002783158,0.0001324964,0.0000204712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000433158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006125194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008278942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989361,0.00008831822,0.0002889857,0.0003414743,0.00003904841,0.0003060583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994691,0.0001987128,0.0001039932,0.00008974578,0.00001276205,0.0001256901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005325216,0.000173186,0.9735196,9.58126e-7,0.000008092652,0.000006404579,0.02032067,7.808672e-8,0.0003039939,0.003554607,0.00003587424,0.00202334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004865798,0.000239851,0.9722819,0.00001865672,0.00001423039,5.001732e-7,0.02022485,0.00001175584,0.002558738,0.003758348,0.0001330028,0.0002716246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925117,0.0005019089,8.486934e-7,0.0002518971,0.0002576904,0.0004497792,0.00001049509,0.000029036,0.005986684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.001149081,0.0008861071,0.0002831708,0.00006041334,0.0001619768,0.000001632589,0.00000758417,0.00006068058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005926004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885400418","doi":"10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103739","title":"Prosocial Motivation and Incentives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Microeconomics; Public good; Public goods game; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0382263458726654,"gpt":0.3523679655261146,"spread":0.3141416196534492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003690267,0.00005863903,0.0001894183,0.00001800057,0.0001789737,0.00001207491,0.00008681441,0.00003034862,0.00005177702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001641069,0.00006212237,0.0000363493,0.00004228602,0.000580124,0.0002903411,0.00006596027,0.00002684132,0.0000204435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005633426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002961264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003313313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994728,0.00003918125,0.0002233188,0.000128188,0.00002421759,0.0001122987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996058,0.00004165655,0.000156474,0.00006590475,0.00009247073,0.00003764098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003591021,0.0002069763,0.1008871,0.001069125,0.0001015397,4.104786e-7,0.07080901,1.150612e-7,0.0001590489,0.6804773,0.01066429,0.1355891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009499155,0.00074748,0.04840409,0.003584771,0.0001381878,0.000001505876,0.04397224,0.000009472945,0.005073347,0.02535853,0.8707405,0.001019982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110677,0.01279515,0.000001282785,0.001440064,0.0002395573,0.0003833771,0.00003415646,0.00001387722,0.07402479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784302,0.1202027,0.0002969924,0.0005958991,0.0002292982,0.00001376141,0.000003629006,0.000006149296,0.0002212891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8600762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2533277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145330028","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1826","title":"Rewarding Volunteers: A Field Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Spillover effect; Donation; Population; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02615208978005712,"gpt":0.3391635432648235,"spread":0.3130114534847663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001308321,0.00008934546,0.0001012356,0.0001337466,0.001168697,0.0002129187,0.0006340979,0.00002023634,0.0001478429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007707906,0.00009266674,0.00003996873,0.0003850866,0.0006170705,0.0004269432,0.0003901463,0.00004659739,0.0002149641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001841427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001383876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985752,0.00003614725,0.0001422379,0.0003748172,0.0004275735,0.000444068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995268,0.00003242555,0.00004111958,0.000259531,0.0000268944,0.0001132285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001011139,0.0001126709,0.01263785,0.00001143335,0.00001625934,0.000004856194,0.02296516,0.00003208555,0.005559329,0.9180467,0.006020107,0.0345835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122696,0.0004233047,0.008320827,0.0001335313,0.00005495833,0.000001051019,0.1421272,0.001304764,0.06296191,0.009436135,0.772731,0.00138261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2205137,0.00005562,0.0009879686,0.001856466,0.0007567953,0.0002790897,2.268479e-7,0.0001218755,0.7754282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926633,0.00004047812,0.002885698,0.000696454,0.00008251039,0.00005047445,1.814108e-7,0.000005193685,0.003575729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984934625","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.001","title":"Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Signalling; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01492723749165696,"gpt":0.2989537776204332,"spread":0.2840265401287763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001632651,0.0001598596,0.0005289967,0.0001365803,0.0002196793,0.00003855435,0.000332652,0.0002179757,0.00009042128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002853305,0.0001285083,0.0001807183,0.000118981,0.006226231,0.0001216313,0.0001721027,0.0002990661,0.000001249629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006667645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008169433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003570482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978154,0.0007344392,0.0006434215,0.0002224221,0.0002079126,0.0003763949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.0007477342,0.0005044136,0.000104744,0.0001640482,0.0001342046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002925702,0.00009210318,0.001124968,0.00000508043,0.0000405242,0.00001821664,0.001327107,0.0005538677,0.01943726,0.9766095,0.00002593338,0.0004728924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005802986,0.0004430074,0.0001858465,0.0001036325,0.0000945291,0.00004007624,0.004418711,0.000597489,0.01792036,0.975137,0.0002887615,0.0001902955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783183,0.002130212,0.003091959,0.00129124,0.0001189594,0.0001283911,0.00001063931,0.00001265685,0.01489761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984409,0.0002253612,0.000924837,0.0000842502,0.0002900317,0.000002249399,0.000001424746,0.00001524267,0.00001573233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02012253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125977041","doi":"10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.127","title":"Feeling Duped: Emotional, Motivational, and Cognitive Aspects of Being Exploited by Others","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of General Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Counterfactual thinking; Social psychology; Cognition; Skepticism; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05421102154077315,"gpt":0.4125447989502861,"spread":0.3583337774095129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006937003,0.00008520653,0.0002873619,0.00005808585,0.0001016282,0.00000341712,0.00008627769,0.00005427829,0.0001450339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001289769,0.00008715848,0.00005748943,0.0001517256,0.0003891189,0.00007823345,0.00002693858,0.00005657135,0.000004705425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003211447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002335521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008060711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990411,0.00009244771,0.0003847898,0.0001937004,0.0001220852,0.0001659087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994285,0.0001156112,0.0002254563,0.00006829313,0.0001192065,0.00004292842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001746245,0.001454557,0.3663063,0.002591629,0.0006884354,0.00001355616,0.01738645,0.000002832849,0.2404139,0.24238,0.03452876,0.09405889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01288753,0.003283911,0.5747348,0.03789408,0.001309814,0.00007679499,0.06011948,0.00002961846,0.1195405,0.05315868,0.1323274,0.004637415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8971476,0.05874047,0.0001829805,0.001323911,0.0001484426,0.0002779154,0.00001543453,0.00001149049,0.04215176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516073,0.04563249,0.0007621002,0.001779158,0.00007513573,0.00000815326,0.00001686985,0.000009649988,0.0001091715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2084285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.355422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}