{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":243,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":243,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f6f72c20d045","filters":{"topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2149697221","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.x","title":"What is Epistemological Violence in the Empirical Social Sciences?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":321,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Action (physics); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Teo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3171261742368541,"gpt":0.4915967713661442,"spread":0.1744705971292901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003358365,0.0001524559,0.0002999627,0.0000450021,0.003640047,0.0001423475,0.00055321,0.0004287279,0.00023685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008413665,0.0001127084,0.0001126434,0.0004000509,0.007658302,0.0001627259,0.00007256025,0.0007664489,0.00002888963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001901767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009223739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006354153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004463065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971947,0.001213255,0.0002395315,0.0004827953,0.0003461954,0.0005234947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992216,0.0004866168,0.00009190932,0.00009876858,0.00005166099,0.00004941632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007012132,0.0002844899,0.4449844,0.00001282808,0.00002932948,0.00002546994,0.3333508,1.249555e-8,0.00002116151,0.1857696,0.02859791,0.006853795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003095212,0.00005255049,0.8303439,0.000005542839,0.00001056906,0.00001611763,0.04237223,0.000002049587,6.231003e-7,0.07045339,0.05627469,0.0001587942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7133178,0.0002474168,0.000006698949,0.251142,0.001037492,0.0001353913,0.000006884984,0.00002526233,0.0340811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726642,0.0001986126,0.00004180537,0.02610015,0.0007916747,0.00002905234,0.000001794579,0.00000329604,0.0001693663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3853595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256029971","doi":"10.1093/0195159438.001.0001","title":"Ecological Thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Sociology; Rationality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Individualism; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lorraine Code","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03856550013039527,"gpt":0.3106831225241387,"spread":0.2721176223937434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005032317,0.0001245832,0.0002391118,0.00003406356,0.0009571999,0.000030905,0.0002663203,0.0006091354,0.001338317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006175903,0.0001030584,0.0001031616,0.00002815641,0.000619558,0.00002203152,0.00008548152,0.0002604068,0.0005195772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001591039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003891861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002307701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006240545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990316,0.00009076212,0.0001485644,0.0002263501,0.000242032,0.0002607038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.0002805643,0.00007288685,0.0001022782,0.00004052862,0.00003572139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.523307e-7,0.000007303797,0.00008895986,0.000003402679,0.00001355608,0.00001535064,0.0009259582,8.932316e-8,4.537225e-9,0.4392053,0.5595605,0.0001790424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002515026,0.00001224048,0.0003386057,0.000006404368,0.00001379618,5.259496e-7,0.0002324743,5.907344e-8,5.964946e-8,0.2481435,0.7511247,0.000102497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003047864,0.0004048708,0.00002583318,0.00202267,0.0006220633,0.0001220092,0.000002936328,0.0001682712,0.9966283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006490887,0.00006390924,0.0002396357,0.0007819288,0.0007946201,0.000007256172,0.00001537751,0.000007214986,0.997441],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1915642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198451730","doi":"10.1017/s1326011100016239","title":"Reshaping The University: Responsibility, Indigenous Epistemes, and The Logic of the Gift","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Project commissioning; Publishing; Media studies; Traditional knowledge; Environmental ethics; Social science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Marguerite Le Caze","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04872962027484336,"gpt":0.3082755933778174,"spread":0.2595459731029741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004038027,0.00009593589,0.0001999549,0.00005618762,0.004460386,0.00002546435,0.0008783914,0.00007946484,0.00001782215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003892548,0.00004224193,0.000127721,0.0003662273,0.003899487,0.00009042619,0.00007200098,0.000380459,0.000003270369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001919312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00204803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971266,0.001870631,0.0003360984,0.00009843612,0.000326113,0.0002421287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980159,0.000707587,0.0006455028,0.0003163285,0.000268126,0.00004655637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002991836,0.0001042272,0.03501238,0.00002003695,0.0001565767,0.000007977686,0.9440638,0.0000157982,0.00003109875,0.01493292,0.003910451,0.001445544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007501203,0.0002325699,0.4330292,0.0001052357,0.0002754393,0.0007577152,0.4919935,3.197923e-7,0.0002800033,0.03647324,0.03592606,0.000176562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952931,0.00237783,0.000007680968,0.04026442,0.0006394748,0.00046507,0.000003028493,0.000004875902,0.003306653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914771,0.0007711401,0.00004128319,0.0004027027,0.0002051897,0.000001313583,2.655174e-7,0.000004314325,0.00709673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4520703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953405341","doi":"10.1177/2043820619850013","title":"Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Reflexivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Operationalization; Set (abstract data type); Queer; Intersectionality; Humanism; Social science; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Dragos Simandan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02675871229693273,"gpt":0.3101905286055193,"spread":0.2834318163085865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001604984,0.00006657044,0.0002092317,0.00008769964,0.0003784426,0.00001462618,0.0001475166,0.00006231136,0.0000362541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001052243,0.00004930158,0.00008411666,0.0002425825,0.00135971,0.0000447289,0.00006178985,0.00008866614,0.00000658411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007469719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001465258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001042369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006891878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988579,0.0005451179,0.0001934983,0.0001490732,0.0001011101,0.000153262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999032,0.0006869611,0.00008261317,0.0001215783,0.00005865662,0.00001823463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471056,0.00002672263,0.7137821,0.00003426222,0.0000426068,6.034268e-7,0.03318857,4.891578e-7,0.00001664964,0.2522828,0.00004319906,0.0005572521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000607408,0.00002052467,0.9279525,0.00005760616,0.00002259697,3.251413e-7,0.00556962,0.000002587475,0.00002123319,0.06457012,0.001082212,0.00009330199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8635545,0.002831202,0.000001909493,0.0006646067,0.0001056527,0.0002120536,0.000006281932,0.00001738045,0.1326064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.000199473,0.00002247668,0.00008109893,0.0000696817,0.00001247041,0.000007520871,0.000002723544,0.0001081537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2141703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897134189","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003","title":"Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Karen Newbigging","is_ca":false},{"name":"Julie Ridley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02249451221594102,"gpt":0.3596603036483341,"spread":0.3371657914323931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005374517,0.0001052025,0.0003030733,0.0001305977,0.002161469,0.0000122807,0.0004072347,0.00006593182,0.00002143833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005254145,0.00007212543,0.00001891098,0.001124265,0.01104637,0.0001414817,0.00008421212,0.0001867226,0.000002243604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002582262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000580248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978554,0.0003601836,0.0004074444,0.000313427,0.0005313696,0.0005322379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992861,0.0002109441,0.0002197978,0.0001030773,0.00008788142,0.00009223515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001766614,0.00003321773,0.04291614,0.00003623984,0.000003318301,0.000001458661,0.8780139,3.578581e-8,0.000488384,0.07048199,0.0001396025,0.007868033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001202993,0.0004504954,0.1129539,0.0005453476,0.00002624932,0.000009346139,0.7756377,0.00006149273,0.0002280433,0.1014746,0.007173626,0.0002362166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086123,0.001587832,0.000002310099,0.03740614,0.00045842,0.0004356545,0.000002343268,0.0000168059,0.05147822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990658,0.0001179696,0.00001363228,0.0003090834,0.0003806987,0.000009714694,7.258061e-7,0.000002786513,0.00009960943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1023762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783933814","doi":"10.7202/1042804ar","title":"Présentation","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Baptiste Godrie","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marie Dos Santos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5652362922584853,"gpt":0.593909311535109,"spread":0.02867301927662369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001753505,0.0002154551,0.0003532552,0.0000174259,0.00508381,0.0001435402,0.0007011541,0.0006908167,0.00173932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001501847,0.0002206802,0.0002474244,0.00004070897,0.00605377,0.0004419959,0.0002878069,0.0005053241,0.000906549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001823719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002800512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008389715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002488968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997614,0.0008940425,0.0002577213,0.0004047042,0.0002182196,0.0006112692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826,0.0006430087,0.0004068482,0.0004894495,0.0001080441,0.00009265689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015746,0.0001437944,0.05407624,0.00006808872,0.0003595826,0.00004244911,0.05515531,0.000003248942,0.0000206728,0.6055537,0.2435851,0.04097157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006138979,0.0001309607,0.1588641,0.00005009932,0.000127048,0.000002893674,0.06441566,0.000007935964,0.00003936132,0.6422988,0.1330182,0.0004311382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02071697,0.009413446,0.0001039837,0.4264895,0.0450302,0.0002447641,0.00002821183,0.0001045833,0.4978684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8851371,0.009302259,0.0004280574,0.001693214,0.001837644,0.00003567685,0.00001041033,0.00001458292,0.101541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516495875","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3032","title":"Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Adversarial system; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Phyllis Rooney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02219804767307742,"gpt":0.3097081608687018,"spread":0.2875101131956244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003358948,0.00006307241,0.00008522545,0.00002793349,0.0006023225,0.00002985067,0.00009244215,0.0001085994,0.0002137506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001912233,0.0000549602,0.00002320305,0.00006640628,0.0004678192,0.0002182464,0.00004292656,0.0001382953,0.00008873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007434058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005060146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001905684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007145294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.00002813612,0.0001171033,0.00008988824,0.0001192949,0.0001801684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997045,0.00007503408,0.00005068121,0.00006843833,0.00004114242,0.00006015535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260062,0.00002375916,0.03318501,0.00001159466,0.00002841532,0.000006585819,0.02499849,9.838869e-7,0.0000585924,0.9340138,0.001829612,0.005780561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002519644,0.000419409,0.3021093,0.00001686443,0.00007161731,0.00003476831,0.01997364,0.00003293604,0.0003358203,0.2216002,0.4521714,0.0007143212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2864736,0.00006798219,0.00002385979,0.003772479,0.001279245,0.0001457763,0.000004217031,0.00006921995,0.7081637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974054,0.00004684164,0.0003625379,0.0005809492,0.0003614483,0.000008926004,0.00000440974,0.000001938394,0.001227623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7124135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4632639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605641722","doi":"10.1002/tht3.71","title":"The Epistemology of Prejudice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Introspection; Culpability; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Endre Begby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03207046417620459,"gpt":0.3061811326339837,"spread":0.2741106684577791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323989,0.00007824498,0.0002603257,0.0000527419,0.0005575935,0.00001790602,0.0004644823,0.00008408081,0.00008343265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004486481,0.00004920957,0.0001391609,0.0001792324,0.001132439,0.0001419622,0.00005059603,0.0002007689,0.00004165199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002634162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001377058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008968586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985126,0.0004569017,0.0004575175,0.00007282291,0.0002810339,0.0002191872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998078,0.0007518312,0.0005482108,0.0001409306,0.0004070062,0.00007399741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001293817,0.0001365396,0.007608858,0.00004032952,0.0003866595,0.00002670709,0.02048803,0.000003431606,0.0002343597,0.9341642,0.0301317,0.006649804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004901679,0.0004134739,0.009942397,0.00006098892,0.00007046961,0.00007434505,0.005075487,0.000002411034,0.0002818328,0.8731627,0.1102905,0.0001351435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1066988,0.01728304,0.0002334544,0.1538344,0.002876754,0.0004353728,0.000003517933,0.00002464659,0.7186099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962843,0.0006635537,0.0003048032,0.0002444923,0.0007778202,0.000004050269,8.211391e-8,0.000005275544,0.001715638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4288614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193596756","doi":"10.1057/s41296-021-00515-8","title":"The politics of care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Interdependence; State (computer science); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Virtue; Critical theory; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Deva Woodly","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel H. Brown","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mara Marin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shatema Threadcraft","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Paul Harris","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jasmine Syedullah","is_ca":false},{"name":"Miriam Ticktin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04952495453145241,"gpt":0.342475117835215,"spread":0.2929501633037626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006541067,0.00007287673,0.0001687632,0.00001342383,0.000959828,0.00001998512,0.0002031885,0.00009080974,0.00004927082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00150237,0.00005440655,0.0001049409,0.00009307903,0.002237277,0.00003973763,0.00008984097,0.0001185162,0.00002193721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004164356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007608747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008717487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005639748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981551,0.0009212096,0.0002108429,0.0001362105,0.0001742411,0.0004023911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972318,0.002118118,0.00004048652,0.0002437033,0.0002279411,0.0001379873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001318186,0.00001682532,0.002189085,0.0000193034,0.00003686827,0.00002154604,0.008081474,1.511225e-8,0.0000040675,0.9876939,0.001607148,0.0003165954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001092776,0.00002666052,0.0009546524,0.00001392311,0.0000106732,0.000002096688,0.1692437,1.334521e-7,0.0006443564,0.5839196,0.2450069,0.00006802724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006272088,0.01996677,0.00005935088,0.008931494,0.0004926521,0.00008011777,0.00002311188,0.00003395221,0.9641405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768928,0.00005525822,0.00003013197,0.0008178935,0.000214625,0.000005989657,0.000003700075,0.000005703206,0.02197392],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8243342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791597713","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.1.4","title":"Bias, Structure, and Injustice: A Reply to Haslanger","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Individualism; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Inequality; Social psychology; Social structure; Positive economics; Sociology; Methodological individualism; Causal structure; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robin Zheng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04948259298386225,"gpt":0.3266421463037063,"spread":0.277159553319844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004302375,0.0002079175,0.0002788384,0.0001149371,0.001280203,0.0001120034,0.0002892492,0.0001484614,0.0001680483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001945254,0.000198532,0.00005211386,0.0003268097,0.00130489,0.0001023791,0.00004703305,0.0001562212,0.0002633431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000402751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009550824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003781497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006271556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982664,0.0001799285,0.000283469,0.0005083673,0.0002977775,0.0004640355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989533,0.0001920059,0.0001026365,0.0003494216,0.0001360228,0.0002666242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003517073,0.0001299937,0.01822883,0.0001084792,0.000189498,0.00007221736,0.553736,6.223111e-8,0.0001543137,0.3284622,0.07836931,0.02019739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007700931,0.004016619,0.02045115,0.0001120502,0.0001172893,0.0000363574,0.03117453,0.000003153934,0.0001641547,0.2285697,0.7136653,0.0009195886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3687862,0.0005940296,0.0001193841,0.04610595,0.002762564,0.000813903,0.0001838952,0.0003697714,0.5802643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869956,0.000006925115,0.0008573526,0.00805812,0.002399409,0.00002258859,0.000004866442,0.00001778578,0.001637288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.635296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778540840","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.1","title":"Credibility Excess and the Social Imaginary in Cases of Sexual Assault","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Testimonial; Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Yap","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06193525029687203,"gpt":0.3674782163589973,"spread":0.3055429660621253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001757516,0.0001482672,0.0003913103,0.00004045441,0.002491171,0.0001006646,0.00055532,0.00015307,0.00001623193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003592782,0.0001162026,0.0000599141,0.00006674721,0.007313484,0.0001877207,0.00007782219,0.0002450896,0.000005688457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002818569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003451129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002406473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982963,0.0004428646,0.0003338263,0.0003376273,0.0003026685,0.0002866794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985796,0.0005556621,0.0003040447,0.0004213844,0.00008635577,0.00005294783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001006075,0.0003372438,0.1692577,0.0002291316,0.0001115267,0.0001694547,0.385734,8.08943e-8,0.0000210249,0.4334671,0.00175021,0.007916315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003236596,0.0007459746,0.3277731,0.00005399814,0.00009055262,0.00002383008,0.06789543,0.00001119699,0.00001397197,0.5982057,0.001553026,0.0003965481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6841178,0.0005058614,0.000003578409,0.03005597,0.0005594986,0.0003642671,0.00005180175,0.00003138153,0.2843098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989948,0.00001291249,0.00002694922,0.0001523525,0.0005091613,0.00003355915,0.000002154605,0.000006916479,0.0002612449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3178386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911749519","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.003","title":"Expanding current understandings of epistemic injustice and dementia: Learning from stigma theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aging Studies","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Injustice; Dementia; Stigma (botany); Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Disease; Medicine; Psychiatry; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jessica Young","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher Lind","is_ca":false},{"name":"J. B. Orange","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marie Y. Savundranayagam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0619228785081067,"gpt":0.3670322682729441,"spread":0.3051093897648374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192627,0.0001051242,0.0004089524,0.0001086848,0.0005605843,0.00002188394,0.000124959,0.00004047373,0.00001594022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006287222,0.00008580484,0.00007533272,0.0001079882,0.0005709627,0.0001617782,0.000111898,0.0002735368,0.00000217192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008952992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006006885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005199331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004887122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986896,0.0003274045,0.0003844458,0.0001254683,0.0002779968,0.0001950694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977481,0.001397354,0.0005667415,0.00005395336,0.0001913214,0.00004257303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001065461,0.0000477865,0.6200041,0.0003944782,0.002038047,0.00001987612,0.3350391,0.00003897469,0.0003783079,0.03419394,0.0005448615,0.007194012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001040234,0.0002784421,0.03818542,0.001565888,0.000831689,0.00001353031,0.885026,0.000007783091,0.0003377469,0.07036557,0.002088237,0.0002593948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441305,0.1506063,0.0006720097,0.001443513,0.001243647,0.00007695027,0.000001393135,0.00001197051,0.001813649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979994,0.01936442,0.0002125207,0.00002625776,0.0001687515,7.009737e-7,1.608442e-7,0.000005524084,0.0002276517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4311618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248469592","doi":"10.1177/1368431004046702","title":"Ideology, Science and Social Relations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Epistemology; Sociology; German; Consciousness; Class consciousness; Politics; Class (philosophy); Social science; Sociology of knowledge; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dorothy E. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02987761668479067,"gpt":0.3096555904062114,"spread":0.2797779737214208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008778043,0.0000647452,0.0001413443,0.0001005154,0.003350263,0.00004251002,0.000277657,0.00003381864,0.00004371258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007371661,0.00005959932,0.00005957121,0.0002429505,0.005118444,0.000207933,0.00007825884,0.0002411203,0.00003654096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001130719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004217282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005478709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001267753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982426,0.0008880329,0.0002387976,0.00009986342,0.0003089341,0.0002217994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992296,0.0001224698,0.0002347263,0.00003337348,0.0003178974,0.00006199766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002864978,0.0000221677,0.0002943937,0.000001877668,0.0000256933,0.00004482039,0.1429092,7.226348e-7,0.00007751718,0.8518296,0.0008704989,0.003894859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001642163,0.0002631818,0.2055174,0.00002534463,0.0001059892,0.00008397373,0.1657098,1.042637e-7,0.00005361364,0.4983577,0.1279354,0.0003052975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2800846,0.0005685248,0.0008481864,0.02986186,0.0009117002,0.00007720707,0.000002576461,0.0000330114,0.6876124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975187,0.00002886465,0.0002796775,0.0005340488,0.0007631494,2.168828e-7,1.022595e-7,0.000006630361,0.0008685893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7174342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008510327","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12659","title":"Microaggression: Conceptual and scientific issues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Taxonomy (biology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Conceptual framework; Sociology; Philosophy; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Emma McClure","is_ca":true},{"name":"Regina Rini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251173769488461,"gpt":0.343160254494713,"spread":0.218042877545867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002132052,0.00008943849,0.0001709412,0.00002234357,0.001243432,0.00007779254,0.0001904176,0.00005590179,0.00009691012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001030504,0.00008306465,0.00003425825,0.0001742864,0.002356764,0.00008813132,0.000108909,0.0001045069,0.0001298926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001042307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004589164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003862332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002670983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990482,0.0001453948,0.0001196848,0.0002885617,0.0001924526,0.0002056774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995645,0.00008401167,0.0000495514,0.00008974154,0.00005772492,0.0001545118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000424975,0.00004589477,0.01036733,0.00003189094,0.00005356449,0.00002835808,0.1583639,6.68585e-7,0.0002529399,0.7423737,0.08704319,0.001396076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003705839,0.00007864935,0.002138758,0.00002916787,0.00002009818,0.000001967275,0.01157108,0.00001782932,0.0002420438,0.05493732,0.9303581,0.0002344341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1350128,0.02875381,0.0000687499,0.5816495,0.001823326,0.0004051393,0.00002975925,0.0003413457,0.2519156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970809,0.0001038399,0.0001884065,0.001156573,0.0007043479,0.000005621783,0.000002875204,0.000004679616,0.0007528059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920408511","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6231","title":"“Me Too”: Epistemic Injustice and the Struggle for Recognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California State University, Bakersfield; Elon University","keywords":"Injustice; Testimonial; Harassment; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Polyphony; Social injustice; Denial; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Law; Politics; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Debra L. Jackson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04399958618482935,"gpt":0.3133152287249841,"spread":0.2693156425401548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173771,0.000170392,0.0002713718,0.00004681559,0.002207692,0.00009925364,0.0002669684,0.0001553665,0.00004263828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002694104,0.0001330763,0.0001007283,0.0001585533,0.003540565,0.0001203693,0.00002521835,0.0001358212,0.0001224322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003672074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008544255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001506351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002922034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984607,0.0002947282,0.0003090672,0.000360629,0.0001984281,0.0003764891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983144,0.0009998617,0.0001644667,0.0002382741,0.0001886569,0.00009429325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001363243,0.000108169,0.0006585833,0.000170652,0.0001870218,0.00000505678,0.3041747,2.217473e-8,0.00003026,0.6483696,0.01930432,0.02562834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202726,0.001358698,0.0005211227,0.00006552983,0.0001670298,0.00001491718,0.04488886,0.00001987907,0.00003592849,0.9037174,0.04666256,0.0003453456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09462671,0.001608391,0.001010859,0.08332194,0.003640205,0.002532314,0.0003117562,0.0003293595,0.8126184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938225,0.00002401323,0.0004736207,0.001707272,0.002274329,0.0001873914,0.00001428979,0.00001470634,0.001481892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938639466","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6233","title":"Misrecognition and Epistemic Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social recognition; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Injustice; Psychology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"José Medina","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03323296586622123,"gpt":0.3149035364513555,"spread":0.2816705705851343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005119729,0.0001660228,0.0002140153,0.00007759176,0.001459278,0.00007311052,0.0001881673,0.0001722135,0.0001395189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104449,0.0001736131,0.00005471095,0.0001951241,0.002121472,0.0001363857,0.00002315835,0.0001452014,0.0004754038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003937953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000767177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001504832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003136724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.0002094392,0.000258389,0.0003797474,0.0002207288,0.0003755768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991668,0.0002291373,0.0001128479,0.0001962267,0.0001369063,0.0001581015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002529491,0.0002172992,0.009436092,0.0001906535,0.0001592867,0.00004815021,0.2999021,1.256492e-8,0.0001394624,0.6398389,0.008612157,0.04120285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001139446,0.003023597,0.01090261,0.0002021432,0.0001880519,0.00005942062,0.06085214,0.000009362442,0.0001148342,0.8057553,0.1168539,0.0008992171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09516629,0.0005260198,0.0001144371,0.01314241,0.001284501,0.0003041763,0.00003531448,0.0002169241,0.8892099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951845,0.0000383027,0.0003413211,0.001156482,0.001953671,0.00002836608,0.000006969673,0.00001340439,0.001276932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9000183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W940248834","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2015.1.1","title":"Care, Concern, and Advocacy: Is There a Place for Epistemic Responsibility?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lorraine Code","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07213712963233938,"gpt":0.3453203615522402,"spread":0.2731832319199008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021837,0.0002552758,0.0004102799,0.00006631462,0.000883802,0.00008781717,0.0003300403,0.0002576832,0.00002132893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002517139,0.0002504462,0.0001228508,0.0001674661,0.001329138,0.0001345699,0.00003754599,0.0001729609,0.00006215086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001541014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006846633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003855391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004172559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978601,0.0003454091,0.0003709245,0.0006078181,0.0003285535,0.0004871571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982122,0.0006310935,0.0001665041,0.0004050299,0.0002750582,0.0003101129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001129341,0.0000986167,0.01497423,0.000257003,0.0001261824,0.00002827107,0.7975549,2.334298e-7,0.00000815627,0.164031,0.01784938,0.003942706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00249822,0.002769779,0.001652069,0.0001178696,0.0001012325,0.00001773782,0.2984386,0.000008509593,0.00003782263,0.380753,0.3129535,0.000651681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2869943,0.01581052,0.0001617167,0.05282124,0.001958901,0.00236697,0.0004164237,0.0004133154,0.6390566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994563,0.00003089886,0.0004489727,0.001136278,0.0006650792,0.0001491486,0.00001256091,0.00002471057,0.002969329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7075687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943736465","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6235","title":"Epistemic Injustice and Recognition Theory: A New Conversation —Afterword","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Conversation; Relation (database); Injustice; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Virtue; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Miranda Fricker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04306507283733958,"gpt":0.3032520624061114,"spread":0.2601869895687718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924486,0.0001853151,0.0002302273,0.0001008745,0.000907523,0.00009184767,0.0001816674,0.0001936238,0.0002215754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000159403,0.0001936417,0.00005918655,0.0002398471,0.001487571,0.0002066241,0.00002341501,0.0001518423,0.000529684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005972537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001524497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003599209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003821933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983498,0.0003767723,0.0002847412,0.0004094038,0.0002298919,0.0003494311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989486,0.0003578801,0.0001617101,0.0002087723,0.0001256721,0.0001973211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006170988,0.000101967,0.003011792,0.0001057336,0.0001550517,0.0000220868,0.5744784,1.216514e-8,0.00007609699,0.3348315,0.006723274,0.07987694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006999252,0.001269095,0.002207177,0.0001022608,0.0001161423,0.00001641724,0.04205745,0.000003527023,0.00004783307,0.9388428,0.01427714,0.0003602629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2404817,0.000898605,0.002011617,0.03865908,0.003252953,0.001046377,0.00007835668,0.0005308205,0.7130405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941608,0.00003051665,0.0004905171,0.001367886,0.00222975,0.00002334078,0.0000145244,0.00001529201,0.001667327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7536792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807730028","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0209-5","title":"Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre on Substance Use; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Biobank; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Steel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sina Fazelpour","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kinley Gillette","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bianca Crewe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael Burgess","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1022000821683426,"gpt":0.362259284729877,"spread":0.2600592025615344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954283,0.00007520504,0.0001256987,0.00007945339,0.007090861,0.00004196327,0.0006167623,0.00003119919,0.000008492469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000908111,0.00006027579,0.00005816315,0.0002661112,0.0131251,0.0001707743,0.0002974051,0.000200367,0.000008466723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003134021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001123751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001362018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001747061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989146,0.0002442953,0.0001943712,0.0002069065,0.0001903506,0.0002494505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987567,0.0002908418,0.0001811108,0.0001236125,0.0004807228,0.0001670259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001426789,0.0001155972,0.04760405,0.00004508751,0.0000772312,0.000006639785,0.2860639,0.000001718411,0.007998646,0.6345802,0.005037485,0.01832677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001930111,0.001648222,0.2753457,0.0001911115,0.00005384237,0.0001234818,0.03111884,0.00005057593,0.001959762,0.6217252,0.06523628,0.0006169099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5722308,0.0006441695,0.006421293,0.08546259,0.002102901,0.0004935904,0.00006303161,0.00006954101,0.3325121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980288,0.00007504412,0.0007850191,0.0005082741,0.0004311263,7.897335e-7,2.123972e-7,0.000003957067,0.0001667341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4257981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982458085","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12680","title":"Glued to the Image: A Critical Phenomenology of Racialization through Works of Art","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Racialization; Exhibition; Art; Phenomenology (philosophy); Sculpture; Exposition (narrative); Painting; Visual arts; Art history; Fine art; Aesthetics; White (mutation); Sociology; Literature; Race (biology); Gender studies; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02059162017057101,"gpt":0.3397031602930438,"spread":0.3191115401224727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007198118,0.00006427598,0.0002698941,0.00004476123,0.0001636095,0.00001989613,0.0001470253,0.00007453423,0.0000669566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004072392,0.00004642363,0.00006368585,0.0001137964,0.000717675,0.000101313,0.00004202576,0.0001296789,0.00001381251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001015846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006739267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005842727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002272464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990208,0.0001601552,0.0003723065,0.0000769117,0.0002074966,0.0001624039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990754,0.0002674,0.0001378736,0.00009374143,0.0003776225,0.00004800935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001913098,0.0003201007,0.002367185,0.0001098357,0.00008653696,0.00002354959,0.09801588,0.00003003918,0.000808695,0.8794565,0.01554899,0.003041374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001638099,0.002938403,0.00407513,0.0005944592,0.0002861131,0.0001989119,0.08767538,0.00006413585,0.001280935,0.2459525,0.6548982,0.0003976904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6480206,0.004441111,0.01263689,0.2304293,0.002378394,0.0004610699,0.00001289439,0.00001226096,0.1016075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966354,0.0004972277,0.001463124,0.0006799251,0.00009105296,0.000001041749,2.377772e-7,0.000004631831,0.0006272989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6393492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2644303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044690955","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.29","title":"How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Natural (archaeology); Politics; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Race (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0443798572572404,"gpt":0.2844933370229579,"spread":0.2401134797657175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000483164,0.0002043481,0.0004348324,0.0002271757,0.0008958026,0.0001941566,0.0007064676,0.0001673898,0.00009488528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093409,0.0001935274,0.0002052386,0.0004952881,0.0005421133,0.0002872153,0.0000368759,0.0005962237,0.00005102675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001743015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001321678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008654211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01241049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981962,0.0001923257,0.0003639581,0.0002581344,0.000400754,0.0005886179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973779,0.0000829093,0.0002494853,0.0001430084,0.0003710729,0.001775592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004829368,0.00008970264,0.1272353,0.0001953048,0.001203348,0.004583206,0.2298165,0.00009635968,0.0007182733,0.5257398,0.09631922,0.01352013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001381166,0.0009969975,0.01781488,0.000288619,0.0001688548,0.0001374545,0.006386576,0.00001328495,0.0001356279,0.119184,0.8524628,0.001029778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04800211,0.003198915,0.0001790613,0.8351525,0.002482136,0.0002962624,0.00003629463,0.00003596749,0.1106167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826018,0.00002205464,0.0005405695,0.0118866,0.004533827,0.000002906313,0.000001596878,0.00002089575,0.0003897902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7891817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133761609","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2021.1.8482","title":"Mansplaining as Epistemic Injustice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Injustice; Epistemology; Sociology; Subversion; Power (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Nicole Dular","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03020234509120006,"gpt":0.3200057454402463,"spread":0.2898034003490462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006237361,0.0002466886,0.0003686765,0.00007616209,0.001669788,0.0001231774,0.0003915591,0.0002517354,0.0004606379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002555862,0.0002794528,0.0001755175,0.0004302694,0.000800248,0.0001549465,0.0000466995,0.0003308047,0.00123748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001947971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003054088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974702,0.0004441148,0.0004231125,0.0005850912,0.0004569746,0.0006205345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985009,0.0004728517,0.0001583173,0.000446063,0.0001893296,0.0002324869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005778836,0.0001463826,0.003673406,0.0001113958,0.0001249857,0.0007622876,0.1206237,4.445054e-7,0.00007584289,0.8687168,0.002602362,0.003104592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086693,0.0008737883,0.002682448,0.0003019332,0.0002247364,0.000245034,0.1651812,0.000005155464,0.0002435762,0.6037849,0.2242991,0.001071516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02894546,0.0010646,0.00007776377,0.02014399,0.00157788,0.0001697928,0.00002628335,0.0002437344,0.9477505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863467,0.00006639001,0.0004742217,0.002449702,0.001217433,0.00004181986,0.00002216686,0.00002503121,0.009356545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998502847","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2002.tb00621.x","title":"A Break from the Past: Impacts and Implications of the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Canada Research Chairs Initiatives*","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Library science; Public administration; Humanities; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Claire Polster","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1448155801251116,"gpt":0.3442265190688403,"spread":0.1994109389437288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004507605,0.0002260237,0.0006376441,0.00005117713,0.002426657,0.00001257468,0.0006950481,0.0003198676,0.00007033686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007904597,0.0001490229,0.0000980644,0.0006893603,0.01064329,0.00007086524,0.0001035474,0.0006449962,5.929035e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002669946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009157802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995483,0.002312823,0.0006735882,0.0003795537,0.0001117984,0.001039263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990247,0.007581132,0.0005702305,0.0004583687,0.0008785329,0.000264758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001305867,0.00001215944,0.1253984,0.001953185,0.0004876639,0.000004232,0.06583027,0.000002734533,0.000005841272,0.5908957,0.2059297,0.009467124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006473332,0.00008726479,0.6962361,0.001563529,0.0003067534,0.00001583742,0.09137473,0.00004797749,0.000001735073,0.06494958,0.1444745,0.0002946218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3126294,0.1918806,0.000003672149,0.4901911,0.0006989621,0.00135671,0.001354155,0.000003114758,0.001882349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367439,0.0502243,0.00002446887,0.01196896,0.0002966801,0.0002418288,0.00005748258,0.00001293157,0.0004294213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6241145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ingo Brigandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05882964602861137,"gpt":0.3322949212887322,"spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956511,0.00008276718,0.0001959965,0.0001830832,0.002264022,0.00006775768,0.0004632824,0.00008648417,0.00003533098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001467209,0.00006232496,0.0001050098,0.0004425023,0.005358377,0.0002682789,0.00001766028,0.0002966257,0.00001191078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001363308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985697,0.0004737908,0.0002921287,0.0001038702,0.0003137353,0.0002467583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998005,0.0002253815,0.0004224388,0.0001134431,0.0009115855,0.0003222034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001392564,0.00001491137,0.0206473,0.000004521578,0.0001216742,0.00001949452,0.2204532,0.00001704531,0.00000669221,0.7491956,0.009326039,0.0001795335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782614,0.00007854808,0.01099637,0.0000156371,0.00005724242,0.000006705474,0.03644233,2.809549e-7,0.00002454265,0.942164,0.009963288,0.00007277413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842041,0.001162436,0.00001502883,0.02292542,0.001577134,0.0001464977,0.0001303841,0.000005840922,0.08983309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988721,0.000009813338,0.00003535921,0.0002024628,0.0006609469,0.000002238887,0.000001134843,0.000004657131,0.0002112866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1929684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941579257","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6229","title":"Recognizing Settler Ignorance in the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Denial; Narrative; Commission; Colonialism; Sociology; Identity (music); White (mutation); Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anna Cook","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05609920696402785,"gpt":0.3193539080545917,"spread":0.2632547010905638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218489,0.0001188581,0.0001506852,0.00008994802,0.001833639,0.0001016051,0.0002417673,0.0001509432,0.00004358695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001359466,0.00009839407,0.00003008995,0.0002647204,0.0008328351,0.0001147909,0.000007888037,0.0001890973,0.00007813406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002090713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03354666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4951018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.000365796,0.0002152084,0.0002684607,0.000198733,0.0003367324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.0002811119,0.00007834677,0.0001874098,0.00007034243,0.0001171264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791266,0.00007118639,0.05171859,0.00004356733,0.00003250972,0.00004281716,0.6552802,5.933949e-8,0.00000746813,0.2516918,0.00914132,0.03189132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001057737,0.001333427,0.1410168,0.000221629,0.00003921855,0.00002416795,0.09496031,0.00002782259,0.00001967082,0.4645282,0.2960838,0.0006871896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08911905,0.0003008368,0.000006537452,0.04233562,0.0009051895,0.0003342043,0.00002749849,0.000041402,0.8669297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973704,0.00001155729,0.00009471756,0.001484897,0.0007166327,0.00002483656,0.000005882686,0.00000676444,0.0002842896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W973494626","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2015.1.4","title":"Female Under-Representation Among Philosophy Majors: 
A Map of the Hypotheses and a Survey of the Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Taxonomy (biology); Empirical evidence; Psychology; Epistemology; Biology; Ecology; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Tom Dougherty","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sam Baron","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kristie Miller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.178110005044002,"gpt":0.3458800403669925,"spread":0.1677700353229905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001438103,0.0001848763,0.0003576161,0.00005183465,0.0005461809,0.00003785572,0.0007057743,0.0001461689,0.00001143342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007113187,0.0001224592,0.0001380163,0.0004585383,0.003399443,0.0001915893,0.0001202533,0.0001782918,0.000009185655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004403098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002568611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004501288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003246484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970211,0.001287462,0.000464326,0.0003455564,0.0006227325,0.0002588591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997426,0.001100141,0.0004955188,0.0005925468,0.0002839727,0.000101866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001552138,0.0001477138,0.8215298,0.0001319862,0.0001203465,0.000002390401,0.1133903,0.000002954262,0.00004183687,0.06324978,0.0009220826,0.0003056068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004113017,0.0003962536,0.7519554,0.0003584896,0.00007384411,0.000003241959,0.02407676,0.000005341108,0.0001747137,0.2221698,0.0001704632,0.0002044666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492595,0.001266512,0.0000156779,0.01198524,0.0009300383,0.0006913114,0.00007492636,0.00003268447,0.03574413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999,0.00001283791,0.00003586765,0.0002039419,0.0001845399,0.00002901129,0.000001556313,0.00001250069,0.0005197488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.15892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917972466","doi":"10.5406/pluralist.14.1.0091","title":"Theorizing a Spectrum of Aggression: Microaggressions, Creepiness, and Sexual Assault","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pluralist","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Aggression; Download; Sexual assault; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Emma McClure","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01562029949714372,"gpt":0.2928248062508026,"spread":0.2772045067536589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007698714,0.00008806803,0.0001803251,0.00002344492,0.0006210001,0.00002131208,0.0002371779,0.00008293955,0.000174991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001510052,0.00005412219,0.00003036433,0.0001288291,0.000764593,0.00006129279,0.0001267468,0.0001403738,0.00003327013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001430949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005546896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008484102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999022,0.0002561301,0.0001513205,0.0001597378,0.0001953979,0.0002153889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.0003221442,0.0001386068,0.0002027436,0.00003883883,0.00003864044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003311887,0.0001586946,0.356285,0.0002298549,0.0002853583,0.00003115068,0.1569424,0.00000583342,0.007032446,0.4428988,0.0222106,0.01358875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002987397,0.0005863013,0.3059299,0.001869183,0.0002833543,0.0001327061,0.2799217,0.00009954988,0.005794741,0.1032429,0.2976445,0.001507775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397249,0.005462678,0.000008044532,0.0237967,0.0005427759,0.0002299663,0.0000137058,0.00004045886,0.03018073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930491,0.0003390611,0.00005067899,0.0002148015,0.0001277335,0.000004687985,0.000002199381,0.000005407107,0.006206328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3396558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4776293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319979439","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2022.58","title":"Standpoint Theory and the Psy Sciences: Can Marginalization and Critical Engagement Lead to an Epistemic Advantage?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Experiential knowledge; Experiential learning; Identification (biology); Problematization; Sociology; Critical theory; Domain (mathematical analysis); Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Phoebe Friesen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jordan Goldstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04869451198984613,"gpt":0.3703550190026564,"spread":0.3216605070128103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00482311,0.00007046495,0.0001144116,0.00004030026,0.003698988,0.00006164862,0.0001549907,0.00001948768,0.0001182284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005459994,0.00005327335,0.00001448107,0.0001614112,0.001645707,0.00006309216,0.0001801557,0.0001139391,0.000001664606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004858585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000779304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003635566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00120164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972849,0.001898591,0.0001197609,0.0002383665,0.0002502231,0.0002081936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990255,0.0007517202,0.00003012477,0.0001001851,0.00002900292,0.00006344941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001003639,0.00002150224,0.005794222,0.00001233831,0.000009180217,0.000005460498,0.103865,0.000006943428,0.00001568827,0.8880669,0.0002829596,0.001819432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001048677,0.000670358,0.01499078,0.00002345025,0.00008384581,0.00002755462,0.6448731,0.0001934624,0.00003153358,0.3032951,0.03441465,0.0003475029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.798326,0.007262148,0.009839754,0.1135434,0.001298172,0.0016646,0.00008493423,0.000153461,0.06782749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972394,0.0001139022,0.0002956094,0.001633694,0.00003941535,0.00007406896,0.000001938732,0.000004012848,0.0005980362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5847718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221117774","doi":"10.1017/epi.2022.5","title":"Rape Myths, Catastrophe, and Credibility","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Injustice; Seriousness; Credibility; Criminology; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Emily C. R. Tilton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02393261396081536,"gpt":0.3009516185223205,"spread":0.2770190045615051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128133,0.00007137615,0.0001385836,0.00002698522,0.002156974,0.00001809542,0.0001680314,0.00003081257,0.0005517125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001251741,0.00007541215,0.00003596872,0.0001409216,0.0005637914,0.00004883084,0.0002152972,0.0001567369,0.00002072288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007750102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008980613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007076754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005239527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986916,0.0004476975,0.0001410321,0.000246826,0.0002267542,0.00024606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995465,0.0001397377,0.00005211373,0.0001665859,0.00002380347,0.00007123213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001986719,0.0003703876,0.2966388,0.0001136579,0.0002031183,0.0001573965,0.1580101,0.00001941298,0.00009535273,0.3355901,0.1943762,0.01422686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000274045,0.0001121885,0.05187504,0.000002307394,0.00001647371,0.00001123338,0.03752207,0.00000872746,0.000007573099,0.005796195,0.9042081,0.0001660128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4009603,0.006907545,0.0001136349,0.03662547,0.002691416,0.0006796026,0.0001444705,0.0002951298,0.5515824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880024,0.00004847499,0.0001506343,0.000392411,0.0001190846,0.00004817225,0.000006565389,0.00000463162,0.01122761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7098319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557837902","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.2","title":"Unhappy Confessions: The Temptation of Admitting to White Privilege","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White privilege; White (mutation); Racism; Privilege (computing); Temptation; Unconscious mind; Sociology; Confession (law); Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Claire A. Lockard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03641984818267956,"gpt":0.3204743789857431,"spread":0.2840545308030635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009015487,0.0001497511,0.0002417276,0.00007284835,0.0008873092,0.00002559243,0.0004277577,0.0001163002,0.0001150721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002912017,0.00008888443,0.0001014319,0.0002728596,0.0007306451,0.0001090462,0.00003511406,0.00009511737,0.0001860496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000413563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001494478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005198706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000169992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998273,0.0003354916,0.0004101,0.0002983838,0.0003466021,0.0003364311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984784,0.0006804208,0.000230538,0.0003426611,0.0001460686,0.0001219189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001209618,0.000146421,0.03248313,0.00005601038,0.0001042345,0.000009646194,0.2581118,2.705683e-7,0.0007555866,0.6782318,0.008310621,0.02166951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00226612,0.003460122,0.07527631,0.001568681,0.000174302,0.00001237935,0.1832607,0.000003928626,0.001089501,0.376456,0.3550892,0.001342876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353128,0.000316143,0.001517462,0.1867408,0.002099075,0.001335831,0.0001202805,0.0002347441,0.6723229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996223,0.00001020465,0.0002554648,0.0009203142,0.0005219679,0.0000746744,0.000001536845,0.00001198926,0.001980849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6824555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921060243","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6228","title":"“Knower” as an Ethical Concept: From Epistemic Agency to Mutual Recognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Analogy; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Typology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Congdon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05409952914026296,"gpt":0.3527705449508716,"spread":0.2986710158106086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008059187,0.0003186155,0.0004253661,0.0001098612,0.001675415,0.0001283486,0.0006362385,0.0007058487,0.001402207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003007672,0.0003403904,0.0001452473,0.0003669201,0.00209864,0.0001925836,0.0000483309,0.000569886,0.006824613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001124903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002573602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001493889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001482131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965743,0.000791147,0.0005333055,0.0008699226,0.000569206,0.0006620961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980932,0.0004069049,0.0001724985,0.0005222374,0.0002862996,0.0005188124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005455654,0.0003713101,0.001197996,0.00002146202,0.0001535676,0.0001167576,0.789274,4.784058e-8,0.0002385372,0.1564771,0.01315088,0.03845276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008244357,0.006718404,0.002932975,0.0001518439,0.00009207191,0.00001545095,0.03359554,0.000003371528,0.000354551,0.892479,0.06188942,0.0009429535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4021204,0.0001725838,0.000222195,0.03696363,0.003325123,0.0006917347,0.0003370209,0.0004316969,0.5557356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853116,0.000008231611,0.0007613326,0.007306507,0.005266668,0.00007664003,0.0001027906,0.00003132953,0.001134917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7556785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905327797","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2018.1506996","title":"Epistemic injustice in a settler nation: Canada’s history of erasing, silencing, marginalizing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Indigenous; Sociology; Commission; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Agency (philosophy); Environmental ethics; Indigenous rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Social science; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christine M. Koggel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08684756613985069,"gpt":0.3630202834259912,"spread":0.2761727172861406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003040576,0.00007937508,0.000241024,0.00004572692,0.0001970198,0.000006879065,0.0002454852,0.0002053347,0.00005095065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002792364,0.00007775489,0.00005257449,0.0001936331,0.0007868785,0.0001068516,0.00003405338,0.0005446105,0.000001846302],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003221225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3231298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8902948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981083,0.0004605399,0.0004764424,0.00009337461,0.0006528118,0.0002085307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980193,0.0004471828,0.0005354687,0.00007698125,0.0008463261,0.00007474649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003691405,0.0001662202,0.2010678,0.0003791926,0.000236717,0.0003214724,0.2756795,0.00004180087,0.0001322955,0.2717762,0.2472242,0.002605401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001273732,0.0005062293,0.1440169,0.001095626,0.0001915692,0.0002803861,0.1018938,0.00003585115,0.00007601765,0.02814572,0.722005,0.0004791991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4522283,0.01861733,0.0005246791,0.1126429,0.01533564,0.0002253483,0.00002666104,0.00002150725,0.4003776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968513,0.0001779722,0.0004800311,0.001229756,0.0003922,3.585679e-7,1.78101e-7,0.000003016721,0.0008652438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.567165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122220415","doi":"10.1177/0886109920985265","title":"Epistemic Injustice and Indigenous Women: Toward Centering Indigeneity in Social Work","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Affilia","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Injustice; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Gender studies; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Marjorie Johnstone","is_ca":true},{"name":"Eunjung Lee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03590221667084616,"gpt":0.3129775331333207,"spread":0.2770753164624746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005763916,0.0001017341,0.0002163218,0.00004652801,0.001101048,0.00004154501,0.0001229272,0.0001476953,0.00006953307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001861103,0.0001156927,0.00003070662,0.0004694402,0.0003067773,0.00007085106,0.0001352679,0.0001830797,0.00002386088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001983341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002072096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002951844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002495083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986591,0.000253043,0.0001822364,0.0002657124,0.0001523763,0.0004875636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996234,0.0001216064,0.00005406339,0.00008323185,0.00004304468,0.00007462855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003893472,0.00007776458,0.2890563,0.00006468645,0.00004180659,0.0001390791,0.7005938,9.514115e-7,0.00004539052,0.003059979,0.0003801084,0.006501148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005133388,0.00004420601,0.6898361,0.00004331529,0.00001947524,0.00000941082,0.2862406,5.723365e-7,0.0001204465,0.004037685,0.01880226,0.0003326166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826404,0.001148904,0.000008245073,0.002351091,0.0004144041,0.0001051032,0.000005492866,0.00003980057,0.01328656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974219,0.0002745184,0.0000874906,0.0002919877,0.0001697678,0.00002365335,0.000002979076,0.000006740588,0.00172092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4143532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8468485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091779379","doi":"10.1177/0191453720961523","title":"Epistemic injustice in workplace hierarchies: Power, knowledge and status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Conceptualization; Hierarchy; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Testimonial; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chi Kwok","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05988944543227058,"gpt":0.3486612960860808,"spread":0.2887718506538102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004454135,0.0001943978,0.0003826463,0.00007351932,0.001096775,0.00005059298,0.0002187374,0.0001971528,0.00005976798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007676143,0.0002228479,0.00007987668,0.0004639417,0.001358478,0.0001605453,0.000152599,0.0004228255,0.00007069834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001051438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001863765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002363424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004713673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978932,0.0005098186,0.0003167321,0.0004117044,0.000230592,0.0006379465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989036,0.0006175731,0.00005979863,0.00008375746,0.0000867552,0.0002485022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008781732,0.00008330134,0.004991205,0.0001550337,0.00003287474,0.00003871631,0.3574972,1.389464e-7,0.00001997906,0.6337418,0.002337302,0.001014653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001664966,0.0002790722,0.02386511,0.0001178578,0.0001004744,0.000003269237,0.09948054,0.00001108381,0.00001567184,0.7733642,0.1002607,0.0008371333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1164291,0.01191736,0.00004920699,0.1930676,0.0007577578,0.0005030514,0.00005611817,0.000216527,0.6770033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950446,0.0004803147,0.0001038336,0.002994095,0.0009198926,0.00003175779,0.000003079837,0.00001866307,0.0004037302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710638876","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716524","title":"Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fallacy; Rationality; Philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Reading (process); Social epistemology; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Kukla","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laura Ruetsche","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06499314415635483,"gpt":0.2860263510570169,"spread":0.2210332069006621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005418767,0.0001271019,0.0002942329,0.0002139075,0.0008255227,0.00004721977,0.000253365,0.0002088991,0.000318016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003947299,0.000121789,0.00009379157,0.000137598,0.001079785,0.0001069908,0.00001489988,0.0003592819,0.00001376776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003247082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002636278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03498835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987545,0.0002131267,0.0003062591,0.0001522955,0.0001763239,0.0003975051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987491,0.0001488204,0.0002145706,0.0001053406,0.0001745718,0.0006075454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006016948,0.0001002888,0.05718434,0.0001037135,0.0007604249,0.003395787,0.1440484,0.00000753787,0.00002609369,0.5894704,0.1966544,0.008188397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001108974,0.0005746247,0.006913502,0.0000966686,0.000141457,0.00065688,0.01239276,0.000008099631,0.00002942635,0.09879303,0.8787953,0.0004892432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1369399,0.08091031,0.00002551747,0.209177,0.004485636,0.0002968166,0.00005373544,0.00002843603,0.5680827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947668,0.0005817533,0.00008912893,0.002597823,0.0007195542,0.0000014151,5.202862e-7,0.000009241186,0.001233776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402345120","doi":"10.1093/aesthj/ayae038","title":"Adorning Bodies: Meaning, Evolution, and Beauty in Humans and Animals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal of Aesthetics","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Beauty; Aesthetics; Art; Communication; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Julia Minarik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02155389624122095,"gpt":0.2957608005446564,"spread":0.2742069043034354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00189799,0.0000525283,0.0001379987,0.00004005257,0.0008305528,0.0002370199,0.0001051691,0.00005071101,0.000005713615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001881161,0.00004638507,0.00002977216,0.00008088532,0.0006578889,0.00008406131,0.00003801068,0.000269677,0.000001277977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004315785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008619696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004349825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003923277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991949,0.0001913745,0.000216043,0.00008171247,0.0001495034,0.0001664632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.0001377385,0.0000688842,0.00003410036,0.00006050727,0.00004367634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006284565,0.00009418687,0.1172243,0.000166578,0.0002063771,0.002271806,0.5258113,0.00003122586,0.00004212217,0.2414967,0.01972947,0.09286308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009301088,0.0006722535,0.2513222,0.002794838,0.0002163356,0.007201156,0.1603674,0.00009069253,0.00001210909,0.3510911,0.2248215,0.0004803421],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625596,0.1181152,0.00008542088,0.006301036,0.0003095071,0.00007058132,0.000002677589,0.0000170666,0.01253892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898179,0.009474901,0.0001350551,0.00006113917,0.0001146381,7.077246e-7,6.283773e-8,0.000005079496,0.0003904797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6388025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965920520","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7289","title":"Multicultural Literacy, Epistemic Injustice, and White Ignorance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Multiculturalism; Ignorance; White (mutation); Literacy; Sociology; Multicultural education; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Amandine Catala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0135397082167625,"gpt":0.2875920823891289,"spread":0.2740523741723664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000358547,0.0002645882,0.0003885828,0.00007493842,0.0007459162,0.0001562195,0.0003182079,0.0002036814,0.0001257674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004981648,0.0002452801,0.0001029036,0.0002369748,0.0007568841,0.0003199344,0.00004095275,0.0002624035,0.0006034353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005555366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006446255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001229458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001038619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980239,0.0002238105,0.0003740032,0.0005502734,0.0003168649,0.0005111939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893,0.0002519722,0.0001750722,0.0003286162,0.0001275964,0.000186696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003029318,0.0002535534,0.1500995,0.0005939743,0.0001976109,0.00008186357,0.6540598,0.000001528952,0.000264412,0.1798329,0.003400557,0.01091137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006970363,0.005006975,0.1669076,0.001311658,0.0004277275,0.0001955345,0.2432322,0.0001643255,0.00007203523,0.1727619,0.3986775,0.004272141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5775585,0.00137871,0.00002046105,0.01208677,0.001849918,0.0007415523,0.0000630346,0.0002425672,0.4060585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915348,0.00004125155,0.0006668002,0.0008735487,0.000586477,0.00003744584,0.00001207779,0.00001780959,0.006229736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4139764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900938292","doi":"10.7202/1070738ar","title":"Indigenous Course Requirements: A Liberal-Democratic Justification","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Democracy; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Elite; Liberalism; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicolas Tanchuk","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marc I. Kruse","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin McDonough","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1666328525068661,"gpt":0.4195150759954845,"spread":0.2528822234886183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004521777,0.0001204365,0.0001786782,0.00005780232,0.0004425784,0.00003612672,0.0002485604,0.0001680482,0.000061999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006245754,0.0001295319,0.00004038946,0.0004912318,0.0004987887,0.0002401036,0.00003506204,0.0002426197,0.0001719737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001553101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006228314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007265156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005813455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984401,0.0003175949,0.0003447547,0.0003399188,0.0002693234,0.0002883503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993221,0.0001311927,0.0001181838,0.0001612182,0.0001110067,0.0001563146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120267,0.002014427,0.04189317,0.0001632206,0.00007374719,0.00001209348,0.6921821,0.00002566227,0.0002645804,0.1985043,0.03652472,0.02822175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005974174,0.0002395346,0.0678141,0.00009322915,0.00009934357,0.000003565717,0.04721047,0.00007335962,0.00007898748,0.8713768,0.01183986,0.0005733802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4109944,0.00185738,0.0001766415,0.5420372,0.002826461,0.001001466,0.000004222519,0.0001856849,0.04091655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908695,0.0002318617,0.0002570997,0.006104246,0.002004558,0.000134609,0.00002763179,0.00001053675,0.0003599296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6728725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396761829","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2024.3","title":"Knowing Better: Motivated Ignorance and Willful Ignorance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Karyn L. Freedman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02077775519003422,"gpt":0.3044609686766371,"spread":0.2836832134866029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002954107,0.00009443037,0.0001344439,0.0000386969,0.000531062,0.00007687909,0.0001010411,0.00008025794,0.00005649964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009154758,0.00008819586,0.00003297429,0.0002294015,0.0003624237,0.0001507416,0.00003996712,0.0001247108,0.00008350538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002359957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004766559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003203651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004014865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991376,0.0001061868,0.0001208533,0.0002576018,0.000132526,0.0002452222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.0001771932,0.00002025576,0.00009307932,0.00002911288,0.00005236338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000452139,0.00009750368,0.4354481,0.00067239,0.0004480036,0.0004489715,0.1806286,0.00001410091,0.001218896,0.08595524,0.03226599,0.262757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003343879,0.00008733355,0.08304692,0.0003426219,0.00006875257,0.00001190214,0.006721837,0.0003010136,0.0006675281,0.02136195,0.8865165,0.0005392158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8423075,0.02772471,0.0009861493,0.01073936,0.001787795,0.0002850976,0.00001971408,0.0004774217,0.1156722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961883,0.000463769,0.0002537927,0.0003797125,0.0002054748,0.00001426137,0.000002095438,0.000008705737,0.002483912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4084553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981648679","doi":"10.1332/239788219x15682725266696","title":"Epistemic injustice, face-to-face encounters and caring institutions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Care and Caring","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Credibility; Scholarship; Injustice; Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Sophie Bourgault","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02240351926197376,"gpt":0.3362395371537752,"spread":0.3138360178918015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000238562,0.00006793428,0.000138802,0.0001171899,0.0001997909,0.00007746139,0.0001907698,0.00005092533,0.000008061763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001098783,0.00006451576,0.00004512964,0.00005449515,0.0001201322,0.0001995659,0.0001054501,0.0001424377,0.000005536725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001237886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001262175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003252589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006020524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992728,0.00003601272,0.0001909234,0.0001052263,0.0002757843,0.0001192788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994093,0.00009268996,0.0001036909,0.00004343966,0.0002715918,0.00007935624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000195941,0.00002889449,0.5346127,0.0001140595,0.0006217905,0.0001299338,0.3724484,0.001206726,0.0009637194,0.05164211,0.0005044613,0.03753122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001865649,0.0005547679,0.14562,0.001264799,0.0002352199,0.0004347292,0.7126589,0.00005402106,0.0004954114,0.002023964,0.1341921,0.0006004166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484518,0.002336694,0.0003510247,0.001723349,0.001836986,0.00007062435,0.000005962122,0.000007930124,0.04521563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984066,0.0005967731,0.0001297548,0.0002405986,0.0002177886,0.000001214368,6.827104e-7,0.000003313239,0.0004033061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3889927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2630876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391457892","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.2.13959","title":"Gender as a Self-Conferred Identity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Gender identity; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Michael C. Rea","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0428729049359365,"gpt":0.32217902601333,"spread":0.2793061210773935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050212,0.0002265158,0.0003164218,0.0001245346,0.004123339,0.0001160449,0.0007651426,0.0001105075,0.001573587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004646084,0.0002664766,0.0002027899,0.0004641509,0.0004862068,0.0002601276,0.0001329356,0.0004089342,0.0006001964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002185758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004347233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004237061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001626626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970312,0.0006461277,0.000366797,0.000540287,0.0008310443,0.0005845163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989855,0.0001588935,0.0001789568,0.0004110152,0.00007373742,0.0001918671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807286,0.0003585634,0.002917175,0.00003113185,0.0001675351,0.0001524465,0.2081005,8.546825e-7,0.000008619326,0.7807381,0.006950779,0.0005062044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006361114,0.0008542607,0.002124158,0.000005639636,0.00007546335,0.00003817187,0.07549963,0.000004844384,0.000004415682,0.587174,0.3330931,0.0004902334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03979688,0.0004799918,0.00004525299,0.007463716,0.002769988,0.0004632985,0.00006644802,0.000496126,0.9484183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941369,0.00001173666,0.0001526,0.00209586,0.0007801924,0.0002228658,0.00001715325,0.00002349113,0.002559144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322621084","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.43","title":"Defensiveness and Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Ignorance; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Social criticism; Psychoanalysis; Identity formation; Sociology; Aesthetics; Self-concept; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Yap","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03145618888437331,"gpt":0.3525112228458553,"spread":0.3210550339614821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627037,0.0000435339,0.0001791323,0.00004693279,0.0004880361,0.00002684522,0.0001731616,0.00004016116,0.000002856555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334446,0.00003075915,0.00009141423,0.0005502074,0.0003205189,0.0001328695,0.00006958427,0.0001795356,0.00001159634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001461451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006465307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007620121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000885963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987606,0.0004314769,0.0001804033,0.00005958085,0.0004264746,0.0001414456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985657,0.0004852067,0.0006521781,0.00005230818,0.0001980716,0.00004656582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006218817,0.00004941862,0.8964782,0.000009294407,0.000262963,0.00001891134,0.008098426,0.00001610503,0.0001565111,0.08388633,0.008127464,0.002834193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001127454,0.00004315825,0.7103795,0.000009519355,0.00003949224,0.000003894182,0.001574842,0.000003267127,0.000008835725,0.2844917,0.003287456,0.00004555212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8095326,0.00006642716,0.00001043994,0.1879824,0.0004856388,0.00003717245,0.00000168202,0.00001378867,0.001869815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.0003455806,0.00002143841,0.0008378859,0.0004873953,7.682847e-7,1.155692e-7,0.000002950873,0.00032919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2006054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3753628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959395712","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003","title":"Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Relativism; Negotiation; Social epistemology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Maya J. Goldenberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4039532988622369,"gpt":0.4129952576931509,"spread":0.009041958830914076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219156,0.0001007061,0.0003354391,0.000121087,0.0005817558,0.00002339314,0.0003504803,0.0000906476,0.00005653101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002997174,0.00008810578,0.000102996,0.0001677718,0.0004607211,0.0001655506,0.0000135439,0.0002062093,0.000002905385],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006998139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01943883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7783297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9203765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981839,0.0004021695,0.0004030454,0.0001035327,0.0005726216,0.0003347071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.0002787846,0.0004263919,0.00008397664,0.0009106427,0.0006412555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003528597,0.00006080526,0.2044223,0.0001129451,0.0009180171,0.001054572,0.2022217,0.0001428179,0.00005693184,0.3496253,0.2346082,0.006423526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004584903,0.002170623,0.06503222,0.0009496025,0.0007378375,0.0001266006,0.08924054,0.00004202297,0.0001577443,0.68292,0.1528801,0.001157746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.422075,0.01904654,0.00005847654,0.205606,0.008341411,0.0005482368,0.00012358,0.00001721894,0.3441836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975647,0.00001726542,0.0001129529,0.0006318671,0.001282054,0.000001051694,4.684242e-7,0.000006656895,0.0003829301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5754898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360835005","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.3/4.14291","title":"Perfect Storm for Epistemic Injustice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; Injustice; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Geography; Meteorology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Heather Stewart","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emily Cichocki","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carolyn McLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04016765139183416,"gpt":0.3161316983133149,"spread":0.2759640469214808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00132522,0.0002203826,0.000341753,0.000114392,0.004806357,0.00005496652,0.0006063035,0.0001032691,0.0003142741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001181415,0.0002521833,0.0002328642,0.0003105266,0.0005868752,0.00009750837,0.00006795227,0.0003226753,0.00007917194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002759218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002749212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002283244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002304904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976324,0.0004285314,0.0003674589,0.0005113009,0.0004632535,0.0005970365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985737,0.0006482293,0.0001952673,0.0003477875,0.00008665529,0.0001484015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004138352,0.0003441278,0.003427109,0.0001702067,0.0001615144,0.00003864682,0.2167359,0.000005034746,0.00004493559,0.7487231,0.02538694,0.004548592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001254587,0.003886069,0.001048186,0.00002366346,0.0001600808,0.00003357373,0.1280251,0.00002029054,0.00001131276,0.238613,0.6261892,0.0007349299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08482719,0.002250776,0.0005742985,0.05388512,0.008530651,0.002817563,0.0008736533,0.000786763,0.845454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923795,0.000007769218,0.0002662249,0.001376388,0.001158644,0.0007841822,0.00003489808,0.00002958433,0.003962757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800210791","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.054","title":"Epistemic tensions between people living with asthma and healthcare professionals in clinical encounters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Guelph","keywords":"Conceptualization; Health care; Feeling; Scholarship; Qualitative research; Perspective (graphical); Interpersonal communication; Medicine; Asthma; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jennie Haw","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shannon Cunningham","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kieran C. O’Doherty","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06370081396362803,"gpt":0.4393895380404902,"spread":0.3756887240768622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00677826,0.0001137913,0.0003857629,0.000122792,0.002831639,0.00001758935,0.0002986404,0.0001369342,0.00004492929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847364,0.00007997674,0.00002460968,0.001102668,0.01135696,0.0001764333,0.000107177,0.0002907598,0.000007176251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001215859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003234453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02088966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974924,0.0004562911,0.0003790252,0.0004432343,0.0006678965,0.0005611609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984018,0.0008266169,0.0001566724,0.0001103763,0.0002796612,0.0002249376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008442294,0.00001645068,0.7957972,0.000009759888,0.000004600273,0.000002468034,0.1957053,3.607675e-9,0.000006606531,0.004754202,0.0006645374,0.003030489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442775,0.0002656803,0.8742702,0.0002734122,0.000008569288,0.000002064065,0.1227463,0.000001267876,9.315507e-7,0.001130555,0.0009578986,0.00009883413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118174,0.0002016129,0.0000212686,0.07167402,0.0006242502,0.0002543986,0.000002259216,0.00003561916,0.01536912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966758,0.00005374819,0.00003492728,0.001418671,0.001370717,0.00001252037,6.797957e-7,0.000005088966,0.0004278521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08485834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367678619","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000239","title":"The Pretendian Problem","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Embodied cognition; Public relations; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Sociology; Task (project management); Public administration; Management; Epistemology; Computer science; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Jessica Kolopenuk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03634204345539059,"gpt":0.3366025379513342,"spread":0.3002604944959436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00376751,0.00004503018,0.0000790275,0.0001476004,0.003410743,0.0001558688,0.0007025599,0.00003725222,0.00003121152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002522434,0.00002960819,0.00004513349,0.0008834073,0.005525028,0.0001480337,0.00002085171,0.0001506922,0.0000827646],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002855878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006371178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03061582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2233136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980727,0.0000951585,0.0001769082,0.00008809566,0.0003433408,0.001223801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978293,0.0003282046,0.00005291186,0.000088083,0.0002374285,0.00146409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.028275e-7,8.72563e-7,0.005747515,0.000001030878,0.000003433722,0.00004825808,0.003927368,6.129744e-7,0.000003802726,0.9840826,0.005093073,0.001090767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001071504,0.0001058038,0.4339659,0.00002742262,0.00001195315,0.00005761727,0.03517356,0.000009882088,0.00005487429,0.2163518,0.3139929,0.0001411054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.225193,0.0005431907,0.00003481951,0.2250771,0.003655825,0.0002262496,0.00001231157,0.00003856364,0.5452189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970118,0.00001667311,0.0000552954,0.0003606733,0.0002268661,0.000001274607,5.157901e-8,0.000002104734,0.002325254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7718188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401988818","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04731-8","title":"Affective injustice, sanism and psychiatry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ethica (Canada); McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Injustice; Philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy of mind; Forensic psychiatry; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Zoey Lavallee","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anne‐Marie Gagné‐Julien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01382975753072978,"gpt":0.3312893061468732,"spread":0.3174595486161434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003825692,0.00005828241,0.00007964566,0.00003624653,0.0003552559,0.00004366987,0.00005996059,0.00006842496,0.00008325707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000193237,0.00004977769,0.00002659336,0.0001083686,0.0003856832,0.00006368256,0.00003157452,0.00009137116,0.0001260479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008355412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002552799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001117802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994298,0.0001108893,0.00005570045,0.0001672193,0.00008263717,0.0001537387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995043,0.0003696475,0.000009568594,0.0000605595,0.0000119392,0.00004402431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001411689,0.00003332489,0.01099932,0.000130431,0.0001277874,0.00003160451,0.07195122,1.798231e-7,0.0000308644,0.8698634,0.01685221,0.02996553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001941895,0.0001781015,0.05159694,0.0003468129,0.0002385887,0.0000257968,0.1742025,0.00004865959,0.000113288,0.325037,0.4474436,0.0005744803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1496893,0.02146915,0.0002309347,0.02020773,0.00427459,0.0002502486,0.00001366782,0.0003364647,0.8035279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951326,0.0002942265,0.0002388235,0.0001425126,0.0002829775,0.00001233824,2.088421e-7,0.000005202699,0.003891163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598316045","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.3.1","title":"Hermeneutical Injustice and the Problem of Authority","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Disadvantaged; Epistemology; Sociology; Disadvantage; Power (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Komarine Romdenh‐Romluc","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0374496109155104,"gpt":0.3323520858899027,"spread":0.2949024749743923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129128,0.0001268513,0.0003032198,0.00002220891,0.002897515,0.0001134919,0.0005444443,0.0001337016,0.00001848553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001439987,0.00009162056,0.00008031177,0.0000444047,0.006569183,0.0001116191,0.00007285123,0.0001948229,0.00001743215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001471106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008458223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004690159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002790522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986646,0.000297928,0.000271533,0.0002484328,0.0002504801,0.0002670493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987233,0.0004136741,0.0002581222,0.0004367482,0.00007692022,0.00009126008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001491325,0.00004936887,0.003581908,0.00005973037,0.00004883923,0.000005983937,0.06586828,1.6219e-8,0.000003519046,0.9261387,0.0002870975,0.003807416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001484747,0.0004575166,0.02249512,0.00006450884,0.0001426236,0.000007925473,0.01864233,0.000006236004,0.00001519645,0.9411646,0.01529064,0.0002285302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04273494,0.0003093929,0.00001781186,0.04178138,0.0003818045,0.0004172186,0.00002110897,0.00004383169,0.9142925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982154,0.00003234714,0.0003413659,0.0002258144,0.0004051618,0.00003051592,6.918488e-7,0.000006490291,0.000742259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206272718","doi":"10.1002/pra2.515","title":"At the Margins of Epistemology: Amplifying Alternative Ways of Knowing in Library and Information Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Social epistemology; Injustice; Feminism; Equity (law); Field (mathematics); Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Beth Patin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tami Oliphant","is_ca":true},{"name":"Danielle Allard","is_ca":true},{"name":"LaVerne Gray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Ivy Clarke","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jasmina Tacheva","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kayla Lar‐Son","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02196414247421311,"gpt":0.2720352516272821,"spread":0.2500711091530691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525782,0.00005272704,0.0001473487,0.0004382866,0.000839895,0.00005145796,0.0003965221,0.0001045468,0.000001147407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004442213,0.00003830293,0.00002088668,0.002561955,0.002556173,0.006500598,0.000420234,0.0001021491,3.906658e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001111387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003128987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000206047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001055404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989026,0.000009161819,0.0003757735,0.00009156553,0.0004209383,0.000200006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978484,0.0002172903,0.000777719,0.00006231719,0.001078785,0.00001548745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007354294,0.000005656166,0.1533194,0.00006064207,0.000007798574,1.200535e-8,0.01731613,0.00000151883,0.001331935,0.8256319,0.00009357814,0.002224108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00146559,0.0001844885,0.2853411,0.0002153936,0.00005526062,0.00001605662,0.1636044,0.0006508792,0.3512006,0.124382,0.0725736,0.0003105408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.899832,0.00008645767,0.00002598786,0.04220795,0.0001633611,0.0003950774,0.00001554644,0.000020783,0.05725288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990232,0.0002029293,0.0002609548,0.0004250462,0.000006029026,0.00001730152,7.938202e-7,9.859396e-7,0.00006277909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7012499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600342101","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01561.x","title":"Gender Perception as a Habit of Moral Perception: Implications for Philosophical Methodology and Introductory Curriculum","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Curriculum; Perception; Sociology; Hierarchy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn J. Norlock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1745418310768208,"gpt":0.4121947403106557,"spread":0.2376529092338349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001913107,0.0001219118,0.0004174293,0.0001249574,0.0007552136,0.00001165364,0.0001671877,0.0002415489,0.00008491879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005357775,0.000112199,0.0002360629,0.0001514703,0.001028817,0.0002788404,0.00004621351,0.0002511565,0.000005557702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001267002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002564922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005350049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.000520822,0.0004628446,0.0001413049,0.0002137117,0.0002834583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986111,0.0002712375,0.0004408247,0.00007789461,0.0004619674,0.0001369955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000128716,0.0003112955,0.04603155,0.00006761112,0.0001990682,6.052504e-7,0.06647659,4.584891e-7,0.00128383,0.8798377,0.003152435,0.002510147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004545327,0.0002122449,0.3299406,0.000007775751,0.0001761652,0.00004137157,0.0133305,6.138962e-7,0.000005017082,0.6523651,0.003331512,0.0001345025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.753256,0.002110581,0.001971203,0.2083117,0.002258609,0.0005880758,0.0000369405,0.00003506431,0.03143187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857382,0.0001745699,0.005562865,0.0004480935,0.008004884,0.00001335803,0.000002664004,0.00001043192,0.00004499052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2839091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5808568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}