{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":310,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":9,"predictions_cover":310,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3ec04f66859f","filters":{"topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods"}},"results":[{"id":"W2067652191","doi":"10.1188/14.onf.545-547","title":"The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oncology nursing forum","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3763,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Qualitative research; Medicine; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5618799333509763,"gpt":0.6581985558682605,"spread":0.09631862251728418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02324498,0.00004482408,0.0001548114,0.0001218014,0.0006572162,0.00002739134,0.0001431363,0.0001168389,0.00001279699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008671167,0.00003334175,0.00003771637,0.0005133774,0.001980159,0.0001331804,0.00001479713,0.0002167261,0.000006365898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004289215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002026677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005713238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981268,0.01765777,0.0002546395,0.0001291347,0.0003032817,0.000387113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829212,0.01659644,0.0001065743,0.000118497,0.0002152585,0.00004205847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007166831,0.0000522349,0.0002622413,0.000001090488,0.000002591774,1.629895e-7,0.1853004,0.00000681718,0.00009682902,0.5580203,0.003110321,0.2530753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003478714,0.0003571649,0.002479746,0.00004548821,0.000002793764,1.220703e-7,0.1980468,0.0003565915,0.00008032258,0.2397749,0.5584579,0.00005027871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5060721,0.0007547648,0.04710508,0.2335352,0.002720628,0.001393921,0.000007754089,0.00006348775,0.208347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799763,0.00003209305,0.01714804,0.00009205929,0.0001057124,0.00002198817,0.000001609563,0.000007801611,0.002614405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5553476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973065356","doi":"10.1177/1609406919874596","title":"Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council","keywords":"Zoom; Data collection; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Context (archaeology); Interview; Qualitative property; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Multimedia; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9208258371883167,"gpt":0.7542458929981097,"spread":0.1665799441902069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04668453,0.0001240323,0.0004320733,0.0003209832,0.0002401101,0.000102762,0.0004781314,0.00007405061,0.0001731067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136091,0.0001063742,0.00008428929,0.0002528953,0.001067517,0.0008521483,0.0001508524,0.0001976982,5.025814e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001323982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004329417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000702112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007600353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836423,0.01434491,0.000783354,0.0002679298,0.0007108467,0.0002506013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982015,0.01519719,0.0007439811,0.0001372016,0.001742432,0.0001641996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002396161,0.00004391651,0.0002840692,0.0000309969,0.0002313902,7.867526e-7,0.951677,0.000004541681,0.004492839,0.03232171,0.00006487657,0.0106083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006880302,0.0003296943,0.0003159589,0.0001272198,0.00003827556,0.000004527571,0.9634143,0.001608857,0.0007055672,0.03107229,0.001571934,0.0001233156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5939814,0.0005386115,0.403207,0.0009791048,0.0005401468,0.0002374645,0.00003789182,0.000003951318,0.0004744665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4497777,0.00009809795,0.5497448,0.00003674631,0.0001145547,0.000009984185,0.000002521302,0.000007945166,0.0002076143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1465379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157937764","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x","title":"Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Phenomenon; Focus group; Triangulation; Qualitative research; Identification (biology); Focus (optics); Qualitative property; Psychology; Process (computing); Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Data science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine; Social science; Machine learning; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1568865355813682,"gpt":0.482583915867999,"spread":0.3256973802866308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244829,0.0001113288,0.0003338321,0.0001531471,0.0005053631,0.00005531958,0.0005375064,0.00004820055,0.00001338737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001059453,0.00009822343,0.00004632293,0.0003961077,0.0003369215,0.0009741158,0.00009085717,0.0002741673,0.000002211438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009456473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008663175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000299079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004296975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997964,0.0006266117,0.0004620331,0.0001992342,0.0004676436,0.0002805298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985373,0.0004797502,0.0003926544,0.0001942599,0.0001731275,0.0002229069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009349562,0.00009107954,0.0003495391,0.000007918483,0.0000220265,0.00002740106,0.1568711,0.00001966508,0.001619671,0.00301627,0.001015752,0.8368661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00400667,0.003898281,0.03456799,0.005675799,0.0003054167,0.0007197023,0.495545,0.0001442081,0.01454277,0.09641407,0.3422355,0.001944588],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691876,0.005710941,0.1154392,0.004564286,0.001464005,0.0001821044,0.00001087817,0.00002061688,0.003420337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657572,0.0004088965,0.1331677,0.0001714356,0.0003905475,0.000001092828,0.000001101781,0.00001246958,0.00008946691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4005435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107045659","doi":"10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103","title":"Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":965,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8262844622074722,"gpt":0.7560266830774748,"spread":0.07025777912999742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07043567,0.0002522022,0.001313439,0.000570599,0.0003243819,0.0001410318,0.0008684145,0.0009065329,0.0006986131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957721,0.0001993901,0.0002552242,0.001311014,0.001765728,0.00006514226,0.0001936569,0.004094613,0.0005199471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004391112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004637843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04085431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01529895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8996888,0.09773688,0.0007045082,0.0002717364,0.001045543,0.0005524965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733654,0.02570506,0.0001963733,0.0003849974,0.000237023,0.0001110944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007008519,0.00004166713,8.367467e-7,0.0007882908,0.00002097945,0.00001228966,0.270078,3.718089e-8,1.200431e-9,0.3260641,0.02154471,0.3814421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005141589,0.0001029868,0.000001152031,0.008891119,0.00001041114,5.604533e-7,0.2061089,5.231883e-7,3.552529e-8,0.01227055,0.7723742,0.000188118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000687803,0.8292165,0.00003327888,0.004939954,0.000236521,0.0008148277,0.00001916816,0.00003148988,0.1647013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002027112,0.9712005,0.001553911,0.0001764993,0.000580647,0.0002161859,0.00002874811,0.00003141491,0.02619181],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7508295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024682157","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212","title":"Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":618,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Zoom; Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Computer science; Teleconference; Multimedia; Phone; Qualitative property; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7835566246234399,"gpt":0.7143031370830593,"spread":0.06925348754038063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08013193,0.0002392817,0.0004957087,0.0001350535,0.002934691,0.000367234,0.001534918,0.0001185761,0.0002824703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02085015,0.0001782523,0.0002290722,0.001879429,0.004135475,0.000746914,0.0005019404,0.001062986,0.000188948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002805176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005193659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007353049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.937005,0.0590023,0.0011134,0.0005883025,0.001524017,0.0007670038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717327,0.02500305,0.000556407,0.001051607,0.00131646,0.0003397773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002688396,0.00002970273,0.000009138628,0.00002361634,0.00006375017,0.00001452917,0.6283275,0.000001403075,0.0003246846,0.3681942,0.001741352,0.001243237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001372848,0.0001595736,0.00002750921,0.00007423019,0.00001671881,0.000002978303,0.7777557,0.00003432598,0.0001074423,0.1325826,0.08890476,0.0001967655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08832394,0.004284377,0.1680157,0.2276992,0.0005272748,0.00218927,0.00006352468,0.0004891367,0.5084076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750035,0.0002626345,0.02099941,0.0007888289,0.0003837738,0.0002310779,0.00002452331,0.00004066659,0.002265534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124276993","doi":"10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165","title":"Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Teacher","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":597,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Publication; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2564004922215638,"gpt":0.5615465850613159,"spread":0.3051460928397521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04609946,0.0001181948,0.0002644779,0.0001924763,0.0003427856,0.00005168645,0.0005930471,0.0004227363,0.009948778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08498004,0.00009829381,0.00006990503,0.000686802,0.001346974,0.0001407309,0.0001363625,0.001079806,0.000282985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003262861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001801291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01610784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005445876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863564,0.009015145,0.0004529,0.0003660802,0.003148465,0.0006609574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975049,0.001126891,0.00006522403,0.000249053,0.0002590733,0.0007947893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002675006,0.000801812,0.01904399,0.00003088595,0.00001596807,0.00002076166,0.03550372,3.873262e-7,0.00003602714,0.2510819,0.05575858,0.6376792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005436821,0.00008261373,0.001482403,0.0002454034,0.000005579699,0.000002517326,0.01015268,0.005931801,0.000008630138,0.04942469,0.9318902,0.000229756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3092216,0.0005877605,0.01698863,0.0326065,0.001706712,0.000391452,5.392303e-7,0.0001028343,0.6383939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467231,0.0001547514,0.01776601,0.002306814,0.007263231,0.00009322636,0.000006588441,0.0000563503,0.02562994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8761317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248042616","doi":"10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067","title":"Netnography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; The Internet; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Social media; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0481467446247528,"gpt":0.3701220706080331,"spread":0.3219753259832803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009769064,0.00009792097,0.0001430329,0.00003908055,0.0001273948,0.00008560488,0.0007350731,0.0001164651,0.0002887394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002384452,0.00007343855,0.0001151037,0.0001381201,0.0009223403,0.0001225174,0.0001898945,0.0001681542,0.00001031927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002760279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001028837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008824169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003226691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999027,0.0001870656,0.0001805891,0.0001026483,0.0004113549,0.00009130585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998932,0.0003403914,0.0002341538,0.0002805378,0.0001578417,0.00005505728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002650191,0.00003005662,0.0001074291,0.000006533071,0.00009490115,3.521764e-8,0.01806637,1.44151e-7,2.94924e-7,0.08803793,0.8864383,0.00721541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001037803,0.000009019381,0.00005852156,0.00003543037,0.00001176686,1.717054e-7,0.01038049,0.000008232895,1.762957e-7,0.01186054,0.9774491,0.00008276678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004734677,0.002570043,0.00009840733,0.002319637,0.0001873292,0.0001357901,0.0001375868,0.00005133984,0.9944525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005207041,0.02658715,0.003563656,0.0002522479,0.0002827016,0.00001581128,0.0001718237,0.00007169586,0.9638479],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09101087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3398401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929139003","doi":"10.1177/1525822x19838237","title":"A Team-based Approach to Open Coding: Considerations for Creating Intercoder Consensus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Field Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":461,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Central Michigan University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Dependability; Iterative and incremental development; Focus group; Data science; Qualitative property; Variety (cybernetics); Axial coding; Knowledge management; Management science; Grounded theory; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3053669391051511,"gpt":0.5467882379020462,"spread":0.2414212987968952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882225,0.0001167358,0.0003103317,0.00007624881,0.0004828721,0.0002332444,0.0002708926,0.0001224551,0.0004930339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259735,0.0001075229,0.0001017894,0.0001995181,0.00007454105,0.00007726923,0.00009186569,0.0001500018,0.00001447264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004937853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002474683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001167199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000146586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966488,0.002286743,0.0002758723,0.0003437599,0.0001364627,0.0003083273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843611,0.01497158,0.00008887966,0.000240404,0.0001973216,0.0001407026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009214224,0.0001051939,0.0003995406,0.00005543129,0.00003851796,3.894824e-7,0.03752773,0.0001181137,0.00376609,0.918435,0.01759411,0.02186771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002777365,0.000994364,0.0002149367,0.0001598875,0.00009621025,0.000002817093,0.07621298,0.01627056,0.03595652,0.1715272,0.6947513,0.00103591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001143408,0.00001696133,0.6626844,0.003537304,0.0003137106,0.001247078,0.000008131803,0.00003587312,0.3310131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08468441,6.039528e-7,0.9041332,0.004125906,0.0001116413,0.0002264387,0.000002612742,0.00001351898,0.00670167],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7469078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098958409","doi":"10.1177/1049732304273916","title":"What About Focus Group Interaction Data?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.78521742435664,"gpt":0.7287189550196569,"spread":0.0564984693369831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1008966,0.0001715214,0.0003765601,0.0004199655,0.002280209,0.000528455,0.0009514511,0.0001338607,0.0009283734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932691,0.0001590918,0.00006881895,0.001346417,0.001333576,0.003417821,0.0003035704,0.001125395,0.0008314797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001067222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008556713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01927765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03524306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9511706,0.04386346,0.0007084602,0.0007781128,0.002067912,0.001411464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860459,0.01158094,0.0002220227,0.0007219697,0.0008087953,0.0006203718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005414532,0.0001128104,0.000009397736,0.00003768795,0.00001363922,0.000001001668,0.3815432,5.504319e-7,0.00001269953,0.2380659,0.02348705,0.356662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002108438,0.0002231698,0.000132015,0.0001052977,0.000001186913,3.149219e-7,0.4211105,0.00009517182,0.0000138519,0.01636039,0.5616368,0.0001104797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04269623,0.04462574,0.06077697,0.7216277,0.004661037,0.005225932,0.0003304042,0.0005768838,0.1194791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.766867,0.02893391,0.1589656,0.00643851,0.00692915,0.0005905791,0.0004531858,0.0001666951,0.0306553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7241708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208012737","doi":"10.1177/16094069211053522","title":"Zoom Interviews: Benefits and Concessions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Movember Foundation","keywords":"Zoom; Interview; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Service provider; Participant observation; Qualitative property; Data collection; Public relations; Control (management); Service (business); Psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Management; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6958955976060798,"gpt":0.6838784631155861,"spread":0.01201713449049369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02281165,0.0001284277,0.0003771165,0.0001871949,0.000197818,0.0001425184,0.0003945072,0.00007935945,0.0005369143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01220167,0.0001070752,0.0001991139,0.0002852234,0.000556803,0.0004609773,0.0001166245,0.0003093272,0.000005267478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003344254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001238249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001030679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793611,0.01879156,0.0007485634,0.0001857731,0.0007192694,0.0001937751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892221,0.007248065,0.0006190561,0.00008936618,0.002619584,0.0002017934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003864637,0.0000670685,0.000141798,0.000005934822,0.0002046358,0.00003550324,0.2746963,0.000003581424,0.001339479,0.3730037,0.0006278573,0.3498355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009138772,0.0001670711,0.0008672448,0.0003767475,0.0000548493,0.00006733082,0.4221538,0.00002509833,0.004934671,0.1522212,0.4179605,0.0002576294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05167058,0.02509527,0.8608248,0.03171977,0.006850583,0.0001290897,0.00005621956,0.00002515283,0.02362856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04066619,0.002464802,0.9532104,0.001130381,0.0007145584,0.000004904256,0.000003408522,0.00001531282,0.001790029],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4173327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970365581","doi":"10.1108/13522750610640530","title":"Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Market Research An International Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Originality; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Data collection; Psychology; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Qualitative property; Market research; Outcome (game theory); Marketing; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Business; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7358778416591036,"gpt":0.6828760694498885,"spread":0.05300177220921509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2512909,0.0001946042,0.0004300203,0.0008740895,0.000652993,0.0003674657,0.0009289584,0.0001586155,0.002907046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02595664,0.0001527787,0.0001344896,0.0005804938,0.001584725,0.001450075,0.0001539731,0.0007819046,0.000005465777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005197438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008044013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006597153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01364777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8287911,0.165504,0.000946879,0.000460265,0.003709336,0.0005884358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777598,0.01474771,0.0005054022,0.0002257581,0.0064098,0.0003514803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001665431,0.0003913967,0.00113115,0.00001800782,0.0001907431,0.00002206312,0.2153103,0.000007549861,0.00149439,0.2662359,0.001640103,0.511893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417864,0.001182784,0.02424591,0.00008186745,0.0000378179,0.00004293185,0.2859533,0.001068519,0.0003951391,0.6762658,0.009062785,0.0002452801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7420269,0.001526018,0.1781606,0.003320931,0.001022686,0.0008097498,0.00007653934,0.00003821943,0.07301842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7341872,0.0004531839,0.2626306,0.00006318246,0.001246867,0.00005831234,0.00001913395,0.0000296353,0.0013118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5116477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4244514128753006,"gpt":0.6660440278786938,"spread":0.2415926150033932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1512379,0.0001163703,0.0002432953,0.0007122922,0.0009061605,0.00008712774,0.0003491827,0.0001458069,0.0003623182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01603854,0.0001113387,0.00007337406,0.002559366,0.001482195,0.0002721296,0.0000946478,0.001214926,0.0002714679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004895473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002521773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01271733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709051,0.02526862,0.0004445366,0.0004100194,0.00164542,0.001326289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792014,0.01974565,0.00006757901,0.0001497983,0.0005818573,0.0002536584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005169028,0.00005306108,0.001252111,0.000008259426,0.000005830789,0.0000188516,0.4884046,9.625981e-7,0.0002981256,0.4588947,0.0002189959,0.05079281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295767,0.0002616373,0.00527251,0.00003471083,8.883337e-7,2.06354e-7,0.7708715,0.00000937456,0.0003791419,0.1639163,0.05876565,0.0001585183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5449904,0.0007815948,0.01674657,0.005031564,0.0001490572,0.0005404454,0.000002855404,0.0001002934,0.4316573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831396,0.00008228755,0.007312472,0.00003567312,0.0002396328,0.00003233569,0.000002171477,0.00002017328,0.009135689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4381492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111704829","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016","title":"Focus group research and “the patient's view”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Qualitative research; Construct (python library); Focus (optics); Health care; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249006758769288,"gpt":0.492466976493754,"spread":0.3675663006168253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02676332,0.00009658443,0.0002349791,0.000152681,0.00503861,0.0001122905,0.0004779015,0.00006370599,0.0001580792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002278965,0.00005694434,0.00003505388,0.002501278,0.0348667,0.0002676618,0.00009706994,0.0002909341,0.000007890945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001592367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001649891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03068204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002766137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949664,0.001700962,0.0002684534,0.0003480883,0.002008501,0.0007075871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979459,0.001247471,0.00009152535,0.0001319295,0.0004358224,0.0001473672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002093372,0.00002170403,0.0004087971,0.00000235427,0.000001397392,0.000001640231,0.0938656,2.178536e-8,0.0003175722,0.8247381,0.003955718,0.07666621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203462,0.0002490004,0.005005277,0.00003149189,0.000008633817,9.254313e-7,0.07199404,0.00001276352,0.0000617551,0.5790117,0.3422661,0.0001548664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2783372,0.003205799,0.001115174,0.07314471,0.0009441898,0.0008629342,0.000002989738,0.00007817111,0.6423089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967895,0.00007854316,0.0002153179,0.0003202349,0.001493186,0.00003370321,7.897103e-7,0.000006401246,0.001062309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7184524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967049484","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002","title":"Conducting a Research Interview","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Active listening; Confidentiality; Interview; Qualitative research; Informed consent; Focus group; Presentation (obstetrics); Semi-structured interview; Protocol (science); Medical education; Telephone interview; Psychology; Reading (process); Data collection; Process (computing); Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5073153066952594,"gpt":0.6080585469585754,"spread":0.100743240263316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08999674,0.00003522225,0.0001140442,0.0001993321,0.0007149538,0.0001352921,0.0002518646,0.00003266522,0.0001913561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01144614,0.00002290014,0.00003397297,0.0005084162,0.001603309,0.0007664749,0.00003495834,0.0003025327,0.000003649038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003426836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002817324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001818918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007890647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949794,0.002593701,0.0002720412,0.00006591213,0.001811673,0.0002772652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972082,0.002042555,0.0001661845,0.0000269741,0.0002099988,0.0003460865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001593057,0.00003475477,0.01655361,0.000009364708,0.000005782286,0.000002871423,0.05838775,3.078681e-7,0.00005567483,0.0462001,0.00642452,0.8723237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003342706,0.00007628579,0.006943173,0.0002423493,0.00001060682,0.00007447328,0.3473156,0.000539718,0.00009254413,0.007098436,0.6371661,0.0001063965],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5676836,0.1075068,0.01590598,0.2812386,0.005006139,0.0001227458,6.404819e-7,0.0000209012,0.02251465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914439,0.002963911,0.003450386,0.0004456051,0.001611874,5.771391e-7,3.538259e-8,0.000001873175,0.00008188813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959998900","doi":"10.1177/160940690900800101","title":"The Use of Videoconferencing as a Medium for the Qualitative Interview","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Experiential learning; Qualitative property; Ethnography; Psychology; Data collection; Face-to-face; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8240242543576962,"gpt":0.705833949228755,"spread":0.1181903051289412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08801335,0.0001981979,0.0005090704,0.0001972033,0.0005294301,0.0002413586,0.001298651,0.00008678815,0.00007796066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05795,0.0001081237,0.0005792928,0.0003455036,0.001162814,0.0006185045,0.00006183515,0.0003992721,0.000002558111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002044127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005424736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005095159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000163962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9602962,0.03634616,0.001544634,0.000194709,0.001285586,0.0003326902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8941475,0.09900979,0.001885567,0.0001895259,0.004643681,0.0001239858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003095813,0.00004697059,0.000001858799,0.000005257523,0.0003515246,0.000001434178,0.4193639,0.00001227153,0.0006140113,0.3732968,0.001064237,0.2049322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004950669,0.000637877,0.0001325341,0.0001546767,0.00007082769,0.000005482304,0.3860612,0.00009227292,0.001822644,0.3304313,0.2799716,0.0001244529],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003025427,0.002391622,0.9226025,0.06842671,0.002016258,0.000433227,0.00003353459,0.00001025434,0.001060476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11707,0.001430964,0.8759304,0.002514511,0.001050147,0.00004439844,0.000002974512,0.00002564508,0.001930972],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2789074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113866902","doi":"10.1177/1049732303259842","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; The Internet; Autonomy; Harm; Economic Justice; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Internet research; Public relations; Psychology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.937739584532181,"gpt":0.7846211578711447,"spread":0.1531184266610363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2686574,0.0001723515,0.0004674215,0.001441296,0.002149611,0.0001897933,0.000914363,0.0003966079,0.0003746543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01456298,0.0001573273,0.0000785404,0.003221313,0.005848081,0.0001836553,0.0002718344,0.007988679,0.0005839396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002733174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002696031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2573316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1009283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.81703,0.1753336,0.0007801901,0.0004952658,0.004111363,0.002249557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540235,0.04336854,0.00009267224,0.0004610645,0.001458822,0.0005953537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001071304,0.0001639306,0.00005380827,0.00005419323,0.000004656192,0.000006027364,0.4748898,0.000005140143,0.000002837115,0.51892,0.002352488,0.003439924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005544907,0.001339784,0.0007841635,0.0003625378,2.304453e-7,2.04144e-7,0.6337432,0.000006991852,0.00003818686,0.2904013,0.07265185,0.0001170641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5256313,0.001004087,0.002095188,0.3299152,0.0003370107,0.002219442,0.0000472178,0.0001152459,0.1386353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888693,0.0004540108,0.005284961,0.0019621,0.0002067919,0.0002124582,0.00001429105,0.00003265781,0.002963436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.463238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3204082631","doi":"10.1177/16094069211047823","title":"Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Netnography; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Pandemic; Participatory action research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Research ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social media; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8355572675998658,"gpt":0.7688195838625806,"spread":0.06673768373728517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1943448,0.0001940707,0.000411415,0.00017652,0.00242518,0.0002816367,0.0006029296,0.0002356873,0.000614439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3502666,0.0001255031,0.0003172896,0.000606015,0.001615855,0.0002974801,0.0001839988,0.002164525,0.000002245046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003663335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001213782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007860782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008606553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.854684,0.1418641,0.001325111,0.0003493446,0.001373823,0.0004035736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6329016,0.3589606,0.0010824,0.0002809591,0.006448104,0.0003263875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009116594,0.00003578401,0.00009501085,0.00001264217,0.0002511495,0.000004939066,0.5546274,0.00002244459,0.00379292,0.4264528,0.0009493845,0.01366436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004345121,0.0001143286,0.00005330706,0.00004082124,0.00003131595,0.00004986101,0.4682704,0.00004941644,0.001115369,0.492547,0.03718179,0.0001118899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01653272,0.0017762,0.7896223,0.1894751,0.001232333,0.0003910427,0.00006714096,0.00001703368,0.0008860822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06776226,0.0006302061,0.921546,0.007469998,0.001195271,0.0001512898,0.000003318903,0.00003201515,0.001209652],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2217824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7126574550515453,"gpt":0.634758587860571,"spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366878,0.0001789341,0.0003265202,0.0006222053,0.0005747258,0.0003031202,0.0002929059,0.00009200845,0.000106128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006617971,0.0001455409,0.00005044692,0.002553198,0.0004240603,0.001083477,0.0001081336,0.0005577023,0.0001716444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004720297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001306211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01296177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01598427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754547,0.02104577,0.000293442,0.0004374181,0.001313642,0.001455043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859338,0.01249938,0.00006835147,0.0002433596,0.0005478175,0.0007072905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004900396,0.0002142538,0.002407335,0.00002484072,0.00003366292,0.00000563691,0.8511137,0.00003438818,0.001609476,0.1303671,0.002014347,0.01168512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004050762,0.001194419,0.00473883,0.0002532853,0.000008757544,4.63137e-7,0.9241933,0.00003688989,0.001019456,0.006051491,0.06172177,0.0003762142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5651675,0.0004026006,0.410184,0.01946224,0.0001959634,0.002454445,0.00001375711,0.0000731487,0.002046369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968732,0.00003026186,0.1010139,0.00008725392,0.0001774601,0.0006426121,0.000001595654,0.00003015363,0.001143585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3317057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487766404","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2013v38n1a2631","title":"Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; Anthropology; Computer science; Social media; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2533710882545106,"gpt":0.4981581199792234,"spread":0.2447870317247128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007694693,0.00005101336,0.0001189079,0.0007235769,0.001132633,0.0001704233,0.0007726214,0.00007683987,0.0003514224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008682934,0.00004767725,0.00008498209,0.001078145,0.00092533,0.000429073,0.00001702436,0.0006159619,0.00001673829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008838294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1888969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3864966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955509,0.003462051,0.0003018164,0.00005454791,0.0003153639,0.0003152612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968581,0.0008417372,0.000170777,0.0002973251,0.001325224,0.0005068938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009261344,0.00008203031,0.03237717,0.00001388364,0.00008769144,0.000007165667,0.1871343,0.00003263369,0.0003892907,0.287716,0.03112515,0.4610254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002017725,0.000109841,0.05622451,0.0001431486,0.000009456113,0.000003726327,0.07829013,0.00003268614,0.00001927947,0.06076872,0.8040696,0.0001270696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616824,0.01381009,0.001357716,0.04380205,0.0003447381,0.0003567334,0.000006250687,0.00001459895,0.07862543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713116,0.0007298556,0.02746754,0.0001603666,0.0001183953,0.000003885359,0.000002644732,0.000007224268,0.0001985447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8711412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262732958","doi":"","title":"Focusing on the Focus Group","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Focus (optics); Physics; Optics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3926256555392251,"gpt":0.4667390368788032,"spread":0.07411338133957812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008804709,0.000931999,0.001064811,0.001330174,0.003635922,0.000395,0.002525417,0.001413044,0.004615539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008615555,0.0007610474,0.0006847416,0.000837359,0.003895734,0.0004197984,0.0007088302,0.00529949,0.001061076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00155317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008719694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01127544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06776601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987851,0.003762955,0.0006938097,0.00152929,0.003977723,0.002185256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916207,0.004372349,0.0005070033,0.001292248,0.001318746,0.0008889632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003831872,0.0002438171,0.0001136332,0.00005100203,0.0002759775,0.000373017,0.003356039,0.00001296678,0.00001896551,0.9068127,0.07036124,0.01799743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009520437,0.0006065497,0.0008194444,0.0005732776,0.0001209381,0.000006276381,0.005809625,0.000009838371,0.00001311655,0.0227224,0.9674109,0.0009555886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00815343,0.0006184549,0.0002894893,0.05159299,0.0009199225,0.002885133,0.00172477,0.0003918869,0.9334239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01488989,0.002419993,0.003097825,0.0002510806,0.004570242,0.000006336672,0.0002401018,0.0001715797,0.974353],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225736902","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090063","title":"An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Data collection; Face-to-face; Qualitative property; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Multimedia; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8823424053717918,"gpt":0.7646091000864593,"spread":0.1177333052853324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108964,0.0002823421,0.0008616712,0.0009568691,0.0007382804,0.0001216566,0.002645181,0.00008941417,0.0006496364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282507,0.0002642063,0.0004346915,0.0007970991,0.000766742,0.001123144,0.000366063,0.0007927605,0.000001750264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007465992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006848638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001074236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001841403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9072176,0.08840908,0.001848209,0.0005638052,0.001607099,0.0003541633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538376,0.03918944,0.00202111,0.0004644954,0.004254364,0.0002329924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009114445,0.0005651531,0.000002855863,0.0000227428,0.0004336743,0.000004191771,0.5502086,0.0001165689,0.002765143,0.3780621,0.0009360393,0.06597146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009299477,0.00308385,0.00001524008,0.0001257367,0.0001014916,0.00001927032,0.6116365,0.001949714,0.003034172,0.299067,0.07977014,0.0002669129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001228155,0.0003124786,0.9816712,0.007920098,0.004230585,0.0004744562,0.0006416948,0.00002204792,0.003499287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09385561,0.00007511062,0.9042332,0.0006760688,0.0005885409,0.0001344566,0.00005297681,0.00003621126,0.0003478782],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09262746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366450241","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.024.007","title":"Richard A. Krueger and Mary Anne Casey. (2009). <i>Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research</i> (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 205 pages, plus preface, acknowledgements, references, and indices.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAGE; Psychology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Library science; Gerontology; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1941600388254136,"gpt":0.4936611830970598,"spread":0.2995011442716462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02578051,0.0002042431,0.0003853199,0.0004486959,0.001077095,0.0004945752,0.0002194527,0.0002146992,0.0002840165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005268101,0.0001799043,0.00006363603,0.0005861354,0.0006147248,0.0005728286,0.00002279487,0.0005168231,0.000007874624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006421467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003958883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003523844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09069684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949156,0.002246515,0.0006404837,0.0003764506,0.001046808,0.0007741559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995626,0.0007833024,0.0004334686,0.0001638594,0.001983189,0.001010182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000128405,0.00008053198,0.0003396072,0.00003816886,0.0000692561,0.00002603345,0.008677612,0.00000443073,0.00003935711,0.003395675,0.1530487,0.8341522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002340312,0.001412144,0.009409009,0.0001669804,0.0002386535,0.00002984167,0.01131582,0.0003709398,0.00003271008,0.02310292,0.9512413,0.0003394423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4127546,0.329577,0.0339631,0.06405917,0.005958704,0.04025992,0.000715394,0.0002339972,0.1124781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7794095,0.006320129,0.2056273,0.0007771636,0.003240994,0.0007553368,0.000126207,0.00008474042,0.003658557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8338128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9258956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204405986","doi":"","title":"The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations, 5(3)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Action research; Sociology; Management science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3526624125502763,"gpt":0.5210688473540591,"spread":0.1684064348037828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005344971,0.00005367621,0.0001316108,0.00004209675,0.0002773812,0.00006983551,0.0000302277,0.00007129494,0.0003497099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01309161,0.00003458616,0.00002431697,0.0001509682,0.001790022,0.0002663907,0.00002788601,0.0001187406,0.000002569846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002250133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002085784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001709105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003752727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941124,0.005206905,0.0002366241,0.0001314424,0.0001444255,0.0001682336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783987,0.02129139,0.00005598226,0.0001037678,0.00008785921,0.00006230313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002024398,0.00005986162,0.0008477094,9.566377e-7,0.00000565238,0.000002228718,0.003778506,1.661402e-7,0.00003414953,0.9752125,0.001222448,0.01881564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001027049,0.00004672226,0.00225307,0.000003226833,0.000006972038,0.00001223173,0.01071287,0.00003668237,0.0000392344,0.8822137,0.1045187,0.00005395511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2776085,0.004215089,0.1529492,0.4834828,0.001430966,0.001475969,0.000005323696,0.0000888302,0.0787433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4887372,0.001488966,0.5072293,0.00149219,0.000162977,0.00003753668,6.821853e-7,0.000006698286,0.0008444524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4819906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3405017553896106,"gpt":0.5363866975708118,"spread":0.1958849421812012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366309,0.0001681683,0.0002240571,0.000102283,0.0007014501,0.0002229671,0.000323015,0.0004297486,0.0005537914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006400545,0.0001540899,0.0001313228,0.0003400298,0.000915069,0.0005527601,0.00006428198,0.0009326066,0.0001025488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001936894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976367,0.0005428318,0.0003124926,0.0002073751,0.0008137673,0.0004868119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959547,0.00305286,0.000162321,0.0002399776,0.0003525794,0.0002375477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316049,0.0003905643,0.006873551,0.0000516758,0.00002729145,0.00001369406,0.601705,6.431623e-7,0.0003907229,0.1510546,0.01687083,0.2225899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000418669,0.00006546074,0.008622694,0.00003846256,0.0000409501,0.000001588771,0.04578221,0.000003865546,0.0005202973,0.0006800249,0.9435522,0.000273577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8008624,0.0004247886,0.0009138927,0.1649311,0.001020689,0.0008517563,0.0001856725,0.000295694,0.03051399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7631865,0.001362377,0.1286378,0.016536,0.001542907,0.0001485709,0.00008777228,0.00005568079,0.08844245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783812639","doi":"10.1177/1609406917750781","title":"Two Approaches to Focus Group Data Collection for Qualitative Health Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Focus (optics); Health care; Psychology; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9661504552524623,"gpt":0.7756787073041846,"spread":0.1904717479482777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2685646,0.00022397,0.0006437373,0.001101477,0.001081264,0.00026345,0.002110199,0.0001041699,0.0001349488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04454053,0.0001968644,0.0002162975,0.001383189,0.001561276,0.0009098801,0.0003406339,0.0005538811,0.00001958427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00110021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003217728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002739575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9146003,0.08041432,0.001462201,0.0005907068,0.00222614,0.0007063875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608436,0.0315681,0.001088564,0.0003863567,0.005630373,0.0004830495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005878558,0.0001416477,0.000005382744,0.000009238785,0.0002405361,0.000001235786,0.5054549,0.000001494992,0.0002240057,0.344798,0.01168727,0.1368484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009841197,0.001765875,0.00004254093,0.000102175,0.00001558972,0.000004895315,0.4801544,0.0001744333,0.0005947128,0.3059516,0.2100224,0.0001872977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001852773,0.0006220727,0.9359381,0.05183076,0.002561542,0.0007984231,0.0001729362,0.00002291162,0.006200512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03430881,0.0000609363,0.9607652,0.000656906,0.002971679,0.00006748727,0.00002763992,0.0000365864,0.001104683],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.224024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071719641","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2013.879108","title":"Feminist research in online spaces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Place & Culture","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Guelph","funders":"Mount Allison University","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexivity; Subjectivity; The Internet; Research ethics; Popularity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878658713910475,"gpt":0.5184388865815213,"spread":0.2305730151904737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006969614,0.0001002709,0.0001614101,0.00008758335,0.0004755991,0.0001146499,0.0002906018,0.0001699562,0.0001426784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008730909,0.00007883716,0.00004491855,0.0006698238,0.0003908595,0.00008181909,0.00005714853,0.0004865528,0.00008102444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001012016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009986391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001207238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006217196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956347,0.002834797,0.0001520461,0.0002944221,0.0005925213,0.0004915374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999051,0.0004920574,0.00003973152,0.0001695969,0.0001150368,0.0001325532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004307825,0.0001984213,0.007530978,0.00004326176,0.00001460581,0.000009277112,0.4939427,0.00002412451,0.0006185989,0.4182711,0.06821041,0.01109346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001973895,0.00004431058,0.001722182,0.00001628169,0.000002035589,4.910763e-7,0.1661432,0.00003229205,0.00004011307,0.01224105,0.8194472,0.0001134298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.202568,0.001419802,0.0007796282,0.01027998,0.0005971437,0.0004717096,0.00003533094,0.0001166039,0.7837318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559172,0.0001041888,0.01465668,0.0005318651,0.001150298,0.00001838866,0.00001569124,0.00001517246,0.02759055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7561413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3657971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968916202","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.00361","title":"Media activism and Internet use by people with HIV/AIDS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Dissent; Public sphere; Sociology; Representation (politics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Promotion (chess); Public relations; Media studies; Public health; Gender studies; Political science; Medicine; Law; Politics; Nursing; Family medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05424946014409231,"gpt":0.3861964765168986,"spread":0.3319470163728063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003943976,0.0001126762,0.0004334906,0.000045191,0.0003996759,0.000009710005,0.0001057051,0.0001500013,0.00009602131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000696025,0.00008911586,0.00003292159,0.0001313001,0.002208098,0.0001400999,0.00001848104,0.0002014621,0.00000336253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006358245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004589066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001440165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961056,0.002847063,0.0002519852,0.0002426186,0.000163931,0.0003887838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979288,0.001527429,0.0002174734,0.0001052359,0.00008570702,0.0001353535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480676,0.00006452454,0.0531215,0.00004913474,0.00003431241,6.342086e-7,0.6095169,2.510793e-7,0.00002166192,0.326853,0.003614089,0.006689128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002081252,0.001195145,0.06274107,0.00008905215,0.00003445753,0.000006066967,0.6096391,0.000007043468,0.000327151,0.03722227,0.2860055,0.0006519201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878305,0.001432657,0.005780013,0.003194873,0.0002946533,0.0002096585,0.00001935184,0.0000274746,0.001210795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921848,0.0002399611,0.00622127,0.0004945361,0.00002837626,0.00002026503,0.000008335302,0.00001149225,0.0007909311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2896307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8135828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157320760","doi":"10.1177/104973202129119991","title":"Seeking Emirati Women’s Voices: The Use of Focus Groups with an Arab Population","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Population; Psychology; Medical education; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Demography; Computer science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7126386587382332,"gpt":0.6014154610589906,"spread":0.1112231976792426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04202028,0.000166161,0.0004065494,0.0002988402,0.002243602,0.0001875304,0.000410079,0.0001012098,0.0003327398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004273089,0.0001090452,0.0000528877,0.001854051,0.001575776,0.0008682833,0.00005499856,0.0006879156,0.00002496504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007389029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05178864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01826381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9520685,0.04364172,0.0006355263,0.0004433784,0.002075027,0.001135823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865228,0.01129596,0.0003615618,0.0004236895,0.0009857272,0.0004102445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057087,0.0001453477,0.0007881348,0.00008319486,0.00002123338,0.000001232567,0.7812509,0.00001252063,0.00001277426,0.1847411,0.000646869,0.03219102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005660604,0.003002551,0.006241958,0.0001622507,0.000003918562,6.944101e-7,0.9075519,0.001270619,0.00001387889,0.03976953,0.04115744,0.0002591492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606367,0.001014815,0.01302618,0.02030956,0.0001247724,0.001855679,0.00006305772,0.00008466451,0.002884601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812626,0.0002177623,0.01591763,0.0004408512,0.0001872572,0.0002451284,0.000009154214,0.00003144255,0.001688148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1449716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541083764","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900102","title":"Contrasting Internet and Face-to-Face Focus Groups for Children with Chronic Health Conditions: Outcomes and Participant Experiences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; McGill University; Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; SickKids Foundation; University of British Columbia; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; The Internet; Psychology; Asynchronous communication; Face-to-face; Qualitative research; Cerebral palsy; Medical education; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3756489991506828,"gpt":0.6100456326258258,"spread":0.234396633475143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01761749,0.0001836616,0.0005246214,0.0002208425,0.0002819247,0.000187385,0.0003342541,0.00006028099,0.00004886811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005907712,0.0001327576,0.00009257835,0.000140643,0.0008758376,0.0004315865,0.00006032984,0.000308883,7.123622e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002816525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007256649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007673603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943466,0.003807541,0.00073945,0.0002577844,0.0005164124,0.0003322118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916639,0.006525269,0.0007679337,0.00007220851,0.00064934,0.0003213326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585642,0.00006838247,0.004019903,0.00001099889,0.0004921778,0.00000207983,0.7848155,0.000006038406,0.00103976,0.131332,0.0001520679,0.07790256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003765997,0.003067449,0.06945118,0.0003115658,0.0001120818,0.0000795426,0.8504512,0.0002501493,0.002975284,0.06169587,0.007240512,0.0005991228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5247884,0.0006501071,0.4655586,0.008067037,0.0005120388,0.0003289793,0.0000393457,0.00001031769,0.0000452291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6771378,0.00003757635,0.3221207,0.0003260518,0.0002263136,0.00005880226,0.000002264117,0.00001143396,0.00007904363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1523494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.707251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519196938","doi":"10.1177/147078530404600303","title":"Comparison of the Quality of Qualitative Data Obtained through Telephone, Postal and Email Surveys","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Market Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Data quality; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Marketing; Information quality; Business; Telephone interview; Telephone survey; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Advertising; Information system; Sociology; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6620896328828171,"gpt":0.6899098371780265,"spread":0.02782020429520937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08481438,0.00007953202,0.0003515529,0.0001559147,0.0001873211,0.00005585873,0.001598004,0.00006692891,0.0001725806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01996968,0.00005428703,0.0001014839,0.0004303103,0.001720389,0.0004574014,0.0004765543,0.0004721031,8.14448e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001576593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007368664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01101394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003265998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736333,0.02170778,0.001019968,0.0001813656,0.003218161,0.0002393621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873963,0.008216395,0.0007631693,0.0002582348,0.003288567,0.0000773494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002159299,0.0015471,0.1079816,0.0001430733,0.000991586,0.00001618371,0.5688213,0.00003776663,0.007803313,0.2696328,0.007649967,0.03321602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002813919,0.0005691122,0.4443835,0.0004227439,0.00002236332,0.000009875708,0.3717798,0.0000490864,0.005041339,0.1655124,0.009179029,0.0002168199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673905,0.0006652101,0.006944552,0.009579081,0.0004752489,0.0001893089,0.0002094141,0.000002915216,0.01454371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909245,0.0001884531,0.008348212,0.00002044124,0.0001520708,9.879313e-7,0.000004082756,0.000006131067,0.0003551369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3364019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239598263","doi":"10.7202/1085324ar","title":"Analyse des données des entretiens de groupe","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches qualitatives","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5201156997509795,"gpt":0.5163541847683157,"spread":0.00376151498266375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02910191,0.0005399925,0.0008250311,0.0002563834,0.000794115,0.0002483906,0.0006348796,0.0005891638,0.0004909721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01676652,0.0005078162,0.0005536148,0.002179808,0.005997668,0.001270493,0.00005241315,0.0007387189,0.0002031441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002104715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005838736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001517941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9587457,0.03781205,0.0008742968,0.0006222163,0.000594026,0.001351675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838527,0.01418494,0.0004244738,0.000327888,0.0005926206,0.0006173917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006319757,0.0003342786,0.0006797753,0.0001108267,0.0001299059,0.00001688091,0.4903528,0.000009435113,0.0008248235,0.2846511,0.0004457038,0.2223813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037449,0.0009541111,0.01521672,0.0004477802,0.0001643028,0.000005169532,0.2475659,0.00006190936,0.001212406,0.7107443,0.02268671,0.0005661418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6837999,0.1142427,0.1244512,0.02257779,0.0006861024,0.0003968436,0.00005428446,0.00020148,0.05358966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2960146,0.01120371,0.6591191,0.001247314,0.0009537223,0.00001837011,0.000008438408,0.00005142327,0.03138331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134336309","doi":"10.2196/jmir.2829","title":"The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Bruyère; Public Health Ontario; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Calgary; Trillium Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; The Internet; Focus group; Protocol (science); Social media; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4362597985811125,"gpt":0.6028910685183995,"spread":0.166631269937287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03533847,0.00007895189,0.000408668,0.0001479084,0.0001965929,0.00005223729,0.0007222368,0.0001519531,0.0002731073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01088226,0.00004523014,0.00013459,0.0002887052,0.001438254,0.0001096314,0.0001568535,0.0007895787,0.00000253847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006396737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007445004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00210365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921466,0.00386382,0.001041208,0.0001360611,0.002373352,0.0004389572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918171,0.006000035,0.0005529618,0.0001243899,0.001044162,0.0004613317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003031412,0.0004860309,0.001086344,0.00009453686,0.0002197256,0.000005385885,0.02521943,4.356176e-7,0.0001809121,0.1237616,0.01447643,0.834166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00844711,0.01510167,0.02429242,0.003727498,0.0000676347,0.00003922524,0.2111714,0.002942899,0.001663427,0.3172298,0.414911,0.0004059433],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6832567,0.007711039,0.002735035,0.3036509,0.0004851488,0.001099636,0.00002012839,0.000005449144,0.001035888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907803,0.005244727,0.002004266,0.00007298261,0.0002060288,0.00002895981,0.000001418334,0.0000108646,0.00165047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8337601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020225838","doi":"10.1177/0886109903257550","title":"Focus-Group Methodology in Research with Incarcerated Women: Race, Power, and Collective Experience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Affilia","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Focus group; Gender studies; Sociology; Race (biology); Individualism; Human sexuality; Power (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3222868700090743,"gpt":0.5151489567032572,"spread":0.1928620866941829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01469715,0.0001207674,0.000289982,0.0002491432,0.0005649088,0.00006476138,0.0001624749,0.00012638,0.0004159346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004554501,0.0001003962,0.00001710511,0.00211435,0.001513892,0.0001944825,0.00004481497,0.000350949,0.000008610338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003605278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003268045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001904679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004537873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851938,0.01309576,0.0001910957,0.0004228973,0.0004104967,0.0006859641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995907,0.003477494,0.00005125222,0.0001598408,0.0002294149,0.0001750037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002724283,0.0001151199,0.007925048,0.000006243118,0.00001927452,0.0000332836,0.7326567,0.000001633015,0.001619743,0.2531042,0.000667813,0.003578467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001652651,0.00146402,0.01783562,0.00003546637,0.000003663109,0.000006234991,0.8258236,0.00001943014,0.002206011,0.07918506,0.0713447,0.000423544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256984,0.0004985195,0.002083128,0.0004875025,0.00008883604,0.0004114791,0.000002277585,0.00002878366,0.07070107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957736,0.00007196228,0.03674341,0.0000832111,0.00001885496,0.0002041547,4.474864e-7,0.00001386645,0.005128107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1739192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5577999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593386902","doi":"10.1177/160940691201100404","title":"Qualitative Research in the Digital Era: Obstacles and Opportunities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; The Internet; Qualitative research; Cloud computing; Process (computing); Computer science; Software; Data science; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9045321294077043,"gpt":0.7473714466525677,"spread":0.1571606827551366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1682961,0.0001494879,0.000336749,0.0006332528,0.000308191,0.0003300049,0.0007416733,0.00008649554,0.00006948054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279616,0.0001016196,0.0001384267,0.000423234,0.001923185,0.001479669,0.0001004435,0.0007859152,0.000005333126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002236646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002432132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003518359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003918142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9184823,0.07793513,0.0009152802,0.0001652305,0.001980842,0.0005211935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517003,0.04595169,0.0004796449,0.0001096075,0.001562351,0.0001963826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005573999,0.0000875766,0.0001262625,0.00000427342,0.00006012076,0.000009634778,0.5239491,2.704128e-7,0.00004191453,0.3712385,0.0003102277,0.1041164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002861838,0.0001162661,0.001171175,0.00005745199,0.000007158867,0.00001541952,0.7297339,0.000002460893,0.00005445942,0.1597448,0.1087092,0.0001014451],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5525221,0.01806388,0.2004963,0.0993747,0.003916009,0.0007167361,0.0001418523,0.00003047484,0.124738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547273,0.0006483952,0.1426928,0.0004728482,0.0008756818,0.00001650113,0.000003135816,0.00001457921,0.0005486795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3022052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135150818","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1212","title":"New Emerging Technologies in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4722096159575111,"gpt":0.6799356263671988,"spread":0.2077260104096877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1305381,0.0002012166,0.0004293973,0.0004091013,0.001037795,0.0001015313,0.0007159674,0.000168403,0.0001256868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04212926,0.0001424715,0.0001199434,0.002305122,0.002264805,0.0002951984,0.000183303,0.0008575697,0.0001102973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002850886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004494309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0164879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003860228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9593306,0.03675026,0.0008645464,0.0005869726,0.001542433,0.0009251918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783987,0.01986092,0.0003583688,0.0006446426,0.0006126213,0.0001247045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001976259,0.00001815715,0.00006863321,0.000006525936,0.000014026,0.00001236803,0.5263126,0.000001670444,0.0000794121,0.4534757,0.002015729,0.01797536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190246,0.00007579706,0.0001154616,0.00003228507,0.000003030073,0.000002130434,0.5254955,0.000007451882,0.0001701745,0.3864628,0.08739267,0.0001236459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2081358,0.001771212,0.1529037,0.1257137,0.0008662738,0.001791444,0.000008828539,0.000777468,0.5080316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388548,0.00009499423,0.03846505,0.00009429848,0.0002745573,0.0001372371,0.000005031452,0.00003472875,0.02203934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.730719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501915192","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05843.x","title":"Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Thematic analysis; Data collection; Inclusion (mineral); Population; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Social psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2569110454893016,"gpt":0.4668566484340169,"spread":0.2099456029447153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003324044,0.00007639989,0.0001975488,0.00008447673,0.0004237732,0.00004479369,0.0002862528,0.00003216198,0.00005549372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005991554,0.00005772927,0.00003628595,0.0002280551,0.0001066426,0.00122479,0.00001726574,0.0002305768,8.834652e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001173459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006465382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001673406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983252,0.0007112608,0.0003411744,0.0001231935,0.0003057885,0.0001933603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989352,0.0001472235,0.0004637043,0.0001647234,0.0001980946,0.00009107558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001824365,0.0001241204,0.001375357,0.00001517887,0.00003444021,0.00001761976,0.1168821,0.0003522353,0.002162419,0.00836335,0.0002788965,0.8702118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005518061,0.004104341,0.02419461,0.008867868,0.0005289654,0.0002858509,0.7704036,0.005190004,0.007714297,0.1010124,0.07040461,0.001775405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6379136,0.002307021,0.335856,0.0009155062,0.00153235,0.000173487,0.000003453549,0.00003235053,0.02126615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5195724,0.00003083631,0.4798877,0.00004696654,0.0003273374,4.037702e-7,0.000001462522,0.00000901348,0.0001238381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3259364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098829995","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600204","title":"Ethical Issues in Qualitative E-Learning Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Anonymity; Confusion; The Internet; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8073852356067956,"gpt":0.7902294656579059,"spread":0.01715576994888979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4515677,0.0001924826,0.0005804818,0.001594224,0.0003510166,0.0001545215,0.001014243,0.0003603248,0.0003627306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09796917,0.000170959,0.0002628673,0.001316394,0.001792638,0.0005186298,0.000130887,0.003524349,0.00002632583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008070215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004523228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002202624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007040049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8099172,0.1821009,0.002306792,0.0004366532,0.004267835,0.0009706654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247324,0.06853051,0.0008033567,0.0001205809,0.005519678,0.0002935134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000307826,0.00009397652,0.0001498335,0.000005559896,0.00009114084,0.00006789131,0.5905856,0.00000988437,0.001207795,0.3605853,0.0003705677,0.04652461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005468434,0.0002785059,0.0006585412,0.0001250956,0.000005650933,0.000005993174,0.6265153,0.00001175385,0.001405439,0.233917,0.1363793,0.0001505931],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1002492,0.002114652,0.8035166,0.04349718,0.002622842,0.0002961155,0.000007802912,0.00003492666,0.04766062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2894461,0.0003134726,0.7062953,0.0004196668,0.001163491,0.000006694425,0.000002249027,0.00002703172,0.002326088],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3535986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794181429","doi":"10.1002/asi.24012","title":"Information triangulation: A complex and agentic everyday information practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"BC Children's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Agency (philosophy); Information seeking; Everyday life; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Information system; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Information retrieval; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04018633151143401,"gpt":0.397711326558347,"spread":0.3575249950469129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01225135,0.00006579235,0.000135549,0.0007264315,0.001336106,0.0004644993,0.000290943,0.0001271863,0.00000851429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02965997,0.00004834519,0.00003656853,0.001765915,0.0006988951,0.02085221,0.00007311946,0.0001342324,0.00001225531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003641827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004217327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000292068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009292332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980953,0.0001451796,0.000637711,0.00003659812,0.0008869161,0.0001983038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915634,0.0004303802,0.001950617,0.00009256378,0.005904744,0.00005831179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000904353,0.00001711071,0.00254377,0.0000259747,0.00004254364,2.800079e-8,0.06871206,0.000006559432,0.0001363795,0.6490803,0.007376002,0.2719688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000764347,0.0001676218,0.01318058,0.0000147434,0.0000328788,0.00001030334,0.02797594,0.0005034051,0.000235037,0.009681752,0.9473543,0.00007913468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3781049,0.0001881893,0.1465731,0.3502703,0.007084934,0.003959139,0.0001053385,0.0002639185,0.1134502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889454,0.00006297571,0.008732545,0.002050347,0.000116202,0.000008624969,0.000002796521,0.000001552817,0.00007956349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129617985","doi":"10.1093/fampra/19.3.278","title":"Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Primary care; State (computer science); Primary health care; Group (periodic table); Family medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6494114730576235,"gpt":0.6145495947469699,"spread":0.03486187831065357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09243917,0.0003201885,0.001351065,0.000438087,0.001176034,0.0002192522,0.002227412,0.0002563527,0.0001028662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654666,0.0001593277,0.0004257584,0.004583947,0.00198178,0.0006687143,0.0009261445,0.003956724,0.0001796143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001316377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001620559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005971835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007160313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8781394,0.1162033,0.001217728,0.0006306411,0.002745133,0.001063801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440655,0.05274632,0.0008315594,0.001074255,0.001151376,0.0001310667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006421994,0.0001145826,6.102328e-7,0.004715372,0.00004901925,0.0000212892,0.07603943,2.253275e-7,0.000001362972,0.003503218,0.01141567,0.904075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001869989,0.0001205261,0.000009094585,0.008882076,0.00007845667,0.00000282768,0.07996289,6.795336e-7,2.327928e-7,0.0007768229,0.9098012,0.0001782214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008620223,0.8545215,0.00005178716,0.0008897594,0.0004798115,0.002560106,0.00004794278,0.00001788538,0.1414226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000005294425,0.9837446,0.00384281,0.000309703,0.000232155,0.0004010013,0.00001195736,0.00005694653,0.01139548],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552965278","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2016.1251613","title":"Chasing the rainbow: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth and pride semiotics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Health & Sexuality","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Queer; Pride; Transgender; Lesbian; Gender studies; Feeling; Symbol (formal); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3008511063715429,"gpt":0.4910253303752061,"spread":0.1901742240036632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007739071,0.0002031278,0.0003376497,0.00002734327,0.001501343,0.0001083078,0.0001671443,0.000162065,0.00002776736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006755641,0.0001041042,0.00004094314,0.0002235724,0.001105528,0.00020602,0.00004515525,0.0002514704,0.000003261711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001206028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000235907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002438896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001956379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995061,0.003119032,0.000404467,0.0004402234,0.0003952736,0.0005799546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984511,0.0006143944,0.000188988,0.0002451558,0.0001252286,0.0003751562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125302,0.00005098967,0.002587803,0.0001415398,0.00003271829,9.273895e-7,0.8695398,1.490903e-7,0.0003136632,0.04073373,0.00271544,0.08385198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117891,0.0002280352,0.01416411,0.0001374211,0.00004556322,0.000005492227,0.334511,0.000006041048,0.00009410854,0.01312087,0.636078,0.0004914068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6502614,0.02086793,0.05063995,0.2664769,0.001510252,0.002469603,0.0004411856,0.0003818898,0.006950891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817279,0.001858979,0.004193568,0.006304565,0.0007028053,0.00001580878,0.000007065423,0.00002799865,0.005161332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6333626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143893491","doi":"10.7202/1006367ar","title":"Pour en finir avec l'ethnographie du virtuel !","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologie et Sociétés","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4413369752467305,"gpt":0.6104656921101468,"spread":0.1691287168634162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005938052,0.0004709279,0.0006668945,0.0001452641,0.001275142,0.00006602224,0.0008306419,0.0007961878,0.07676064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002452925,0.0004448621,0.0005743392,0.0009126288,0.009883271,0.0006031918,0.0002959908,0.0008201534,0.0008553977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003920359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01362963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009264067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906936,0.006392372,0.0006108606,0.0007012085,0.0004949768,0.001107024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954196,0.003355006,0.0002387612,0.0004604435,0.0002309941,0.0002952478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564468,0.0007944845,0.004824005,0.00005378838,0.0002278341,0.0001105607,0.1709389,7.876498e-7,0.00007093854,0.5258462,0.1053685,0.1917184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000916342,0.0008273966,0.013323,0.00009032836,0.0001898034,0.000008746651,0.3801605,0.00007512426,0.0009517033,0.2875148,0.3149439,0.0009983265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06696643,0.01168654,0.02595966,0.2299112,0.05462922,0.0007388525,0.000149899,0.0005302864,0.6094279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853964,0.03407656,0.06042134,0.003642775,0.001683775,0.00007402386,0.00001453326,0.0001053261,0.04601764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7869976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081363283","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0237875","title":"Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Scrutiny; Harm; Data collection; Research ethics; Informed consent; Social research; Engineering ethics; Social media; Psychology; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9439772789083111,"gpt":0.6428719519843116,"spread":0.3011053269239995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01103904,0.000228033,0.001442203,0.0001553001,0.0006626025,0.0006521321,0.0009584909,0.0001740981,0.00003130638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006589953,0.0001449302,0.0000777622,0.002749114,0.0006572053,0.0009474229,0.0003861453,0.001970867,0.00002100604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002514004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002151625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001814115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001872549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896591,0.00729348,0.0005856164,0.0006026993,0.001408548,0.0004505412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995269,0.003668163,0.000207414,0.000536835,0.0002201432,0.00009842798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001979529,0.0003038839,0.000006554644,0.250417,0.000364128,0.00004410913,0.0219132,1.934538e-7,7.360489e-7,0.006038484,0.0002272448,0.7206647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004816573,0.0000877656,4.391869e-7,0.7239957,0.000278948,0.00000114938,0.007788213,0.00001297836,5.440345e-7,0.0002389395,0.2673059,0.0002412182],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002523977,0.9931391,0.00008495745,0.002293997,0.00003670375,0.002401727,0.00001997166,0.00003771918,0.001960611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003920351,0.9938037,0.005252831,0.00003636317,0.000437834,0.0002857409,0.00002992725,0.00003359674,0.0001161192],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7204235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8562546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2883405865","doi":"10.1177/1609406918788203","title":"Ethical, Practical, and Methodological Considerations for Unobtrusive Qualitative Research About Personal Narratives Shared on the Internet","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Popularity; The Internet; Ethical issues; Narrative; Diligence; Due diligence; Psychology; Informed consent; Research ethics; Internet research; Internet privacy; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9160692370572425,"gpt":0.7703199511312407,"spread":0.1457492859260018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2028706,0.0002662569,0.0006177432,0.0004695307,0.001299744,0.0005183916,0.000576086,0.0003310335,0.001275189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2785402,0.0001718066,0.0003129877,0.0004401239,0.007810379,0.0004776623,0.0001580547,0.001948488,0.0000160901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000313098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009307466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001898817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001354939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8531577,0.1431601,0.001065962,0.0004365251,0.001712665,0.0004669933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6989594,0.2894471,0.0009941151,0.0001552432,0.01017113,0.0002730425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005086416,0.00007683899,0.000003232749,0.000004681547,0.0002985417,0.00000595459,0.483637,2.18258e-7,0.0008657399,0.5016402,0.01080817,0.002150761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004324163,0.001187766,0.00005851683,0.00009501144,0.00001883331,0.00001500917,0.4531253,0.00005466014,0.001275246,0.4966537,0.04695153,0.0001319926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03198739,0.0003192892,0.6766323,0.281494,0.001432096,0.0006887108,0.000121691,0.00002047016,0.007304007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1322703,0.00009043547,0.8612159,0.004088166,0.001425858,0.00009691079,0.000003504309,0.0000243516,0.0007845469],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2774059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2006735264","doi":"10.1783/147118906775275299","title":"Focus group research in family planning and reproductive health care","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Coalition for Research in Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Reproductive health; Focus group; Medicine; Family planning; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Health care; Family medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Research methodology; Population; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1938298022445352,"gpt":0.5106844083266685,"spread":0.3168546060821333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01831929,0.000294185,0.0009335458,0.0008426876,0.001834638,0.0001450378,0.0002478469,0.000183944,0.000001167921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092768,0.000255386,0.0001000938,0.001083041,0.0008718696,0.0004667738,0.0001084366,0.001580409,8.666358e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001078826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001279498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01926919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005478777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903669,0.005128486,0.001176752,0.001084158,0.00118013,0.00106357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996182,0.0008594254,0.0009048207,0.0003759678,0.001279269,0.0003984669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165536,0.0001518452,0.05509152,0.000668511,0.00006417074,0.0002064571,0.8265432,0.0002531333,0.0003292042,0.005148959,0.01486532,0.09586117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008968062,0.001586734,0.260504,0.001027852,0.000008695049,0.00004006249,0.6771664,0.000002490034,0.00003348121,0.00289703,0.05555882,0.0002775641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5774914,0.4046015,0.0003935435,0.01145339,0.0009390188,0.0007238615,0.00003266988,0.00003590946,0.004328727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824076,0.00159448,0.01221883,0.0004704312,0.003090641,0.00001760541,0.00001305058,0.00004360825,0.0001437108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4049162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210542627","doi":"10.1177/16094069211042227","title":"A Scoping Review of Virtual Focus Group Methods Used in Rehabilitation Sciences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Asynchronous communication; Computer science; Protocol (science); Telemedicine; Medical education; Medicine; Health care","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6864819796126935,"gpt":0.726030991036444,"spread":0.03954901142375045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2150037,0.0005303405,0.004669617,0.001785843,0.0001882724,0.0001349614,0.001818351,0.0003596669,0.0004439962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09745573,0.0004345257,0.001947409,0.002696315,0.002019771,0.0008102828,0.0002395951,0.001043726,0.000003382794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008667167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003502592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003985711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001690195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8300709,0.1616452,0.004949381,0.0006102045,0.002261895,0.0004625114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9053014,0.08543327,0.005955025,0.0002748467,0.002837689,0.0001977744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590576,0.0001691996,0.000002440259,0.01807889,0.0003482643,0.00001793665,0.04814556,0.0000013577,0.00000778812,0.1094854,0.00009246095,0.8236347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000438323,0.0006421282,0.000001812785,0.6253242,0.0003680552,0.00002489556,0.0399996,0.000002834474,0.00002022641,0.01706714,0.3156369,0.0004737995],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002327957,0.715643,0.2798428,0.0008469716,0.001713509,0.0007928001,0.00003056008,0.000008985514,0.00111908],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.876498e-7,0.5240633,0.4754997,0.00007050591,0.0002436042,0.00004841219,0.000007613337,0.00002411462,0.00004213373],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8231609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998162533","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-8-53","title":"The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto; University Health Network; York University; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University Health Network","keywords":"Respondent; Citizen journalism; Data collection; Computer science; Photo elicitation; Infographic; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Preference elicitation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Thematic analysis; Management science; Knowledge management; Data science; Data mining; Preference; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7473274238471572,"gpt":0.6773810916793676,"spread":0.06994633216778967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1963276,0.00007976833,0.000414473,0.0002360145,0.0004262823,0.00001105735,0.0002641579,0.0001469077,0.00001264114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1019633,0.00005395707,0.00004397312,0.0007176884,0.005770031,0.00009045326,0.0001375093,0.0004298456,1.417108e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000415864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005651072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003549476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009044226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.858409,0.1389505,0.0005624876,0.0003291029,0.001210073,0.0005387556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.856562,0.1427325,0.000105196,0.0001479072,0.0002301302,0.0002223042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001676052,0.0002187317,0.3280642,0.0004806191,0.00001933544,0.000009521923,0.05438697,0.00000308395,0.002510151,0.3559996,0.000002364937,0.2581378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636564,0.0009243025,0.8918201,0.0003145031,0.000008847202,0.000003133526,0.05970454,0.002715467,0.0007818592,0.04260113,0.000251598,0.0001108737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681477,0.002186014,0.1288408,0.0001359099,0.00008078538,0.0003254968,6.262155e-7,0.000005603988,0.0002770168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719847,0.003067043,0.02481049,0.000009385954,0.00002736718,0.00009069384,6.358936e-7,0.000005787191,0.000003909003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5637559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800827494","doi":"10.1177/2050157918764215","title":"Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mobile Media & Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Data science; Mobile device; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1757776907488593,"gpt":0.5298227091944333,"spread":0.354045018445574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509539,0.000107728,0.0001626957,0.0001814966,0.001733567,0.0001106029,0.0003392456,0.0001070338,0.0002415111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001616873,0.0001089461,0.00003338906,0.001086599,0.001164492,0.0004699559,0.0001208171,0.0002080536,0.00004825033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001043234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008415853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002823638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995786,0.003222729,0.0003460632,0.0002171114,0.0002172289,0.000210913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969964,0.001558602,0.0001593592,0.0006295256,0.0005614891,0.00009462163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001228227,0.0001392867,0.0004257483,0.00000799098,0.00002427533,1.146159e-7,0.271073,0.000003437183,0.003299562,0.2809182,0.003448135,0.440648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000173403,0.0001510699,0.0005526746,0.00002156306,0.00001770779,6.479031e-7,0.06718237,0.0001313112,0.001243088,0.04003171,0.8903241,0.0001703262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.217266,0.02022648,0.5831102,0.007878281,0.002195511,0.004087751,0.00005017444,0.001113738,0.1640719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4326836,0.003562253,0.5605446,0.0003130297,0.0003450852,0.001532057,0.00006506069,0.00002075738,0.0009335642],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.886876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390727249","doi":"10.1177/16094069231224610","title":"Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research: Strategies and Ethical Considerations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Qualitative research; Narrative; Data collection; Internet privacy; Online forum; Qualitative property; Public relations; Psychology; Ethical issues; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8360600166292907,"gpt":0.7621853258437825,"spread":0.07387469078550823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503872,0.0001653511,0.000402126,0.00100457,0.0002660358,0.0006707259,0.0002743143,0.000177263,0.0001662077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01574649,0.0001262953,0.0001039453,0.0006095679,0.002093637,0.0008032402,0.00006194219,0.001790757,0.000003100161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00110972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001217842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001872265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9507359,0.0461622,0.0009610044,0.0003021851,0.001504537,0.0003341546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459189,0.05098952,0.0002581815,0.00007971019,0.002578034,0.0001756769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007915528,0.00003336635,0.000009515645,0.00001401668,0.0001267648,0.00008940258,0.442894,0.00002646377,0.0004311464,0.5459495,0.00007568724,0.01027102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707115,0.0002174456,0.000117653,0.0003323539,0.00001168486,0.00002566197,0.5340339,0.0001079845,0.0001246942,0.4595051,0.005150268,0.0001025325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1906788,0.006780096,0.7006972,0.08922662,0.001284745,0.0003635661,0.00008004701,0.00004995871,0.01083899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4907109,0.0002685208,0.5083625,0.00022371,0.0002917647,0.000007257968,0.000002361775,0.00001501569,0.0001179689],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3000321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152167487","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.038","title":"Designing for Diffusion of a Biomedical Intervention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Dissemination; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Social marketing; Information Dissemination; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1683511955329445,"gpt":0.5267239449878588,"spread":0.3583727494549143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136317,0.000230495,0.002455224,0.0005118511,0.0001155797,0.000006323206,0.0004099807,0.0001021848,0.0002230665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002906232,0.0001456988,0.000946425,0.0007200965,0.002214887,0.0001210071,0.00004543601,0.0003539576,0.000001642066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001737186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002778808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002585456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001088632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928126,0.004463757,0.001566039,0.000157147,0.0006890196,0.0003114816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915424,0.003056824,0.004544694,0.0001167146,0.0004752038,0.0002641753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291619,0.0001608097,0.000006560193,0.001960313,0.0002823922,0.000002108578,0.01016869,6.617231e-9,0.00001193065,0.001091078,0.0002577725,0.9860255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004945186,0.002613621,0.00001018606,0.0246557,0.001940347,0.00001206187,0.01500744,3.128476e-7,0.00000227255,0.0007969792,0.9543293,0.0001373029],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002911975,0.755926,0.2425536,0.000130482,0.000735988,0.0004030495,0.00001019491,0.000003996103,0.0002075235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000449534,0.9655771,0.0318361,0.00001367289,0.001697825,0.00002168243,0.00001173678,0.00002875168,0.000363544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8160844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939959248","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900101","title":"Public Selves, Inequality, and Interruptions: The Creation of Meaning in Focus Groups with Teens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4936390232766967,"gpt":0.5955661037556637,"spread":0.1019270804789669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366382,0.0001422085,0.0003638844,0.0004657512,0.0001537993,0.0001268832,0.0005567708,0.00008904422,0.00009581086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01173189,0.00009127209,0.0001091974,0.0004883766,0.001223099,0.000688436,0.00008072517,0.0006365159,6.606197e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000234617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001283638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004064855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850501,0.01273702,0.0009477449,0.0001734921,0.0008813647,0.0002103045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880038,0.008891582,0.001059453,0.0001228899,0.001815913,0.0001063059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115779,0.00009405606,0.00350187,0.000006651173,0.000135795,0.00000416133,0.2892421,0.000003460031,0.003007659,0.6236054,0.00001892536,0.0802683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001690524,0.0005502394,0.02010404,0.00023226,0.00005814517,0.00005097555,0.3691621,0.0001356807,0.002087238,0.5918659,0.01376824,0.0002947147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4288405,0.000428699,0.5351768,0.02132259,0.0009322514,0.0002543679,0.00001990105,0.00001290887,0.01301198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.696975,0.0000724929,0.3025744,0.0000907418,0.0002051049,0.000007628438,0.000001267727,0.000009492619,0.00006388613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2681345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}