{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2661,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":7,"predictions_cover":2661,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"def581dc3356","filters":{"topic":"Forest Management and Policy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2519343095","doi":"10.1126/science.aaf8957","title":"Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1472,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Environment Research Council; Seventh Framework Programme; European Commission; Seoul National University; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment; National Research Foundation of Korea; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Korea Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Productivity; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01275370519265195,"gpt":0.2438711528540443,"spread":0.2311174476613923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000515857,0.00006246373,0.00004872685,0.00005170084,0.0001782253,0.00002438991,0.0003691944,0.00001820025,0.000517189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002444342,0.0000428355,0.00001667803,0.0009412959,0.001056836,0.0007625878,0.0003716142,0.00002988331,0.003971975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003783484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001993968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005517494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001566391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990015,0.00002512858,0.00007097077,0.0003280875,0.0002878843,0.0002864026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996521,0.00003164394,0.00003313524,0.000208711,0.000005459032,0.00006895287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008493863,0.00002049281,0.9931445,5.736823e-7,3.188119e-7,0.00000331559,0.0000959799,0.00004163765,0.0004674294,0.001691148,0.001149295,0.003376786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001605652,0.00002549935,0.9948326,0.000007494218,0.000001578783,0.000001520458,0.000005153357,0.00005368441,0.0003326877,0.003419684,0.001083824,0.00007572147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764712,0.000003910469,0.00008116211,0.001760144,0.00009968102,0.0001350957,0.00001023125,0.00001703726,0.02142149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979576,0.000001460799,0.000193432,0.00005365517,0.00001187829,0.000002643387,3.578506e-7,9.204736e-7,0.00177809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02148632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765587043","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2","title":"Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Generalitat de Catalunya; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Intact forest landscape; Forest restoration; Biomass (ecology); Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Provisioning; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01353596305106766,"gpt":0.1885453837306245,"spread":0.1750094206795569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002662875,0.00006440166,0.00008914287,0.00002284062,0.0009954035,0.0001142204,0.0001787127,0.00003802916,0.00008117912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001034072,0.00004816063,0.00002352287,0.00003385875,0.0001960479,0.0004322648,0.0004702134,0.00003077021,0.0001520187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000161446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002545786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007235805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005732687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995552,0.00003488996,0.00008199373,0.0001345576,0.0001157045,0.00007769572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995726,0.0000280301,0.0001868391,0.000173148,0.00001114899,0.00002819058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007626311,0.000006659157,0.9954354,0.00007476741,0.00001196357,7.424863e-7,0.0004449258,0.000009872505,0.0000188443,0.0005397392,0.002715898,0.0006649772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00105758,0.00003788249,0.9693967,0.00003010791,0.00006172054,0.00000208417,0.0003644837,0.004491879,0.00004129949,0.0001315175,0.0242942,0.00009052419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994855,0.00001857837,0.000007801807,0.002683374,0.0000729469,0.0002091014,0.00003225854,0.00001223107,0.002108671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00005284094,0.00002568369,0.0001752005,0.000009960856,0.000001160929,0.00001013437,7.180089e-7,0.0002046307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02603863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788004014","doi":"10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x","title":"The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Medical Research Council","keywords":"Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Reforestation; Sustainability; Ecoforestry; Ecosystem services; Indigenous; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental degradation; Agroforestry; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Intact forest landscape; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009284083292821058,"gpt":0.2828697362419229,"spread":0.2735856529491018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006660013,0.000248156,0.000509305,0.00009012305,0.0002579367,0.00001529605,0.0006056285,0.000922174,0.001657744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001389637,0.0001594707,0.0002993011,0.0003356504,0.0004003662,0.00009511691,0.0003014611,0.0006204216,0.004947494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007117858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000652739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001219772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002980492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983444,0.0002781292,0.0004498032,0.0003324042,0.000263618,0.0003316253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987754,0.0002696921,0.0005004698,0.0003916565,0.00001611611,0.00004665893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742303,0.00009839742,0.01058998,0.00181159,0.0002401121,0.000002457646,0.00003594333,0.00007642632,5.233014e-7,0.05160576,0.8727527,0.06276869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000704275,0.00008559407,0.01167651,0.0002779558,0.0001763204,0.00001228785,0.000001526926,0.0002016138,4.803921e-8,0.001049288,0.9863082,0.0001402064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006308052,0.9784275,0.00001455939,0.00009428572,0.002341191,0.0008879586,0.00003157513,0.00003330108,0.01753881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009167718,0.9826726,0.0000591842,0.00004171096,0.0009062032,0.0001147483,0.0001550259,0.00002871612,0.006854143],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1135555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801549624","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1700294115","title":"Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":888,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; China; Restoration ecology; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Carbon fibers; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental protection; Geography; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Biology; Computer science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03325012484823049,"gpt":0.2996206608525434,"spread":0.2663705360043129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009115122,0.00006917555,0.000090318,0.0001476179,0.00006940879,0.00001101347,0.0004104347,0.00006453954,0.00007503725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006521848,0.00004813354,0.00002354709,0.0007902856,0.0005308541,0.0002916466,0.0001159151,0.00008280107,0.00001337653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001065254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001778728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003501742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009110993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983684,0.00001192622,0.0002231915,0.000200041,0.001078778,0.0001176084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996009,0.00008950254,0.0002334646,0.000006822749,0.00004498565,0.00002428135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001052274,0.0003279784,0.1694015,0.00004729283,0.000008780187,1.587399e-8,0.001300503,0.001689257,0.7737275,0.03850428,0.01445433,0.0004333528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001232344,0.0002254384,0.85629,0.00004376899,0.000002525683,1.506568e-7,0.000008663215,0.002692025,0.1183407,0.02212761,0.00009417003,0.00005171807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535038,0.000002298148,2.549611e-7,0.00174934,0.00002923384,0.0003082322,0.000003423132,0.000005099824,0.04439833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.000003126635,0.000819512,0.000265583,0.00009029247,0.00001531256,2.502661e-7,0.000001916995,0.0002416553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6868886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1962829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493310487","doi":"10.5751/es-01808-1102r02","title":"Social Networks in Natural Resource Management: What Is There to Learn from a Structural Perspective?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":661,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Natural resource management; Natural resource; Ecosystem management; Environmental resource management; Natural (archaeology); Resource management (computing); Knowledge management; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Ecosystem; Economics; Biology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003780740653452957,"gpt":0.2207973319736444,"spread":0.2170165913201914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009212543,0.0001022972,0.0001051614,0.00001295922,0.0002393275,0.00005517645,0.0001273209,0.0001018506,0.001340179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001144439,0.00009549472,0.00006048345,0.0001481908,0.0001707484,0.0001774553,0.0002391897,0.0001731134,0.0001206025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001318267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000128968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001354951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001537526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992546,0.0000424459,0.000089838,0.0002648444,0.00007683333,0.0002714241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998425,0.00002548953,0.00002735087,0.00007630539,0.000001987771,0.00002639088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631439,0.00005431819,0.5504673,0.000008574432,0.00009878849,0.00002399862,0.02530626,0.002627345,0.00001491452,0.01585379,0.3966767,0.008804882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003771738,0.00001689249,0.9598017,0.000002975929,0.00001083824,3.837937e-7,0.002965909,0.002966336,0.000001008338,0.004745454,0.02898613,0.0001251586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968017,0.0003201219,0.000004329868,0.003716768,0.00009017362,0.0001672548,0.000001557165,0.00002091098,0.02766189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862491,0.000077768,0.0001820845,0.002878228,0.0001602697,0.000009318946,0.000008671222,0.000007148155,0.01042742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4093344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400730941","doi":"10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x","title":"The enduring world forest carbon sink","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":592,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Carbon sink; Sink (geography); Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Geography; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004531242029880744,"gpt":0.2287677856855834,"spread":0.2242365436557026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009870462,0.00006180355,0.00003025826,0.00002426412,0.00009652037,0.00009341464,0.0001881532,0.0001158439,0.0005017639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001155651,0.00003751091,0.00003081707,0.0002879605,0.00005563673,0.00006353076,0.0001238732,0.0006927836,0.0008635326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005078968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002479213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001810112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994928,0.000008869264,0.00004901599,0.0001244386,0.0001566719,0.0001682624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999777,0.00004039651,0.000007870458,0.0001474259,8.159155e-7,0.00002650839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001150188,0.00001380151,0.05576187,0.00003431975,0.00003231499,0.00006540859,0.0003893788,0.0006191157,0.0003617911,0.08083834,0.8171498,0.04472233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002505284,0.000004645025,0.02150203,0.00001078455,0.000005689256,9.550109e-7,0.00000293034,0.002818438,0.00006495963,0.001867482,0.9736404,0.00005667519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2228937,0.001661925,6.874682e-7,0.005920534,0.0008067537,0.0001068784,0.000001087257,0.0001099468,0.7684985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8905324,0.0000285789,0.00001950975,0.000405043,0.0002069274,0.000005123034,0.000001466245,0.000008157903,0.1087928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129132239","doi":"10.1093/jof/104.2.65","title":"Planted Forests and Biodiversity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":576,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005913293034221194,"gpt":0.1957527098483639,"spread":0.1898394168141427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009918337,0.00005563884,0.00007555517,0.00004217557,0.00005356816,0.00001985791,0.0001603811,0.00003072416,0.0005291261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001266956,0.00004376176,0.00003728763,0.00007337586,0.0000948093,0.0001908553,0.0001160812,0.00007671989,0.0001614957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002561294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003545184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003290173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001322425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995371,0.000009212182,0.0001309323,0.00005334976,0.0001565873,0.0001127942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997334,0.00001424474,0.0001193799,0.00007762328,0.000004200202,0.00005110389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002081279,0.0000193763,0.8116163,0.000003327521,0.000004894303,0.00004362273,0.00001936044,0.0002059535,0.00006615941,0.0001560698,0.1874952,0.0003489458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003572085,0.00007178651,0.9680892,0.000007946835,0.0000163023,0.00007400664,0.000007079964,0.0001368873,0.00009590547,0.002506886,0.02857611,0.00006072113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861732,0.00003734048,0.00001695462,0.0004041162,0.00007020992,0.00002711052,0.000002850809,0.000005162687,0.01326312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984079,0.00001467239,0.0003715402,0.00007847955,0.00008501658,1.135241e-7,0.000001411356,0.000002012507,0.001038828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.579356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345545404","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12669","title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":565,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Hakai Institute","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Intact forest landscape; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Forest restoration; Sustainability; Ecoforestry; Ecosystem; Functional ecology; Forest management; Total human ecosystem; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Ecosystem ecology; Business; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02414968882755854,"gpt":0.2648636624551888,"spread":0.2407139736276303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001971916,0.0001626731,0.000416997,0.0003764899,0.0001806156,0.00003024018,0.0004914156,0.0001976252,0.0005679755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003216938,0.0001171411,0.00006519414,0.0002345534,0.0001988846,0.0001656601,0.0004069413,0.0001819929,0.0006410848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004364351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003500263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001100094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05094746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982322,0.00007895384,0.0005389678,0.0003054006,0.0002291134,0.0006153825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998649,0.0006286767,0.0003637174,0.0001877323,0.00002878012,0.0001421051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009631845,0.0001897433,0.9493578,0.0002355743,0.00008328746,0.00004682277,0.0007925614,0.0006683382,0.001728549,0.007367983,0.03593194,0.002634226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007617426,0.001220496,0.7483564,0.00005688878,0.00006550144,0.0000678632,0.0007879731,0.0006690133,0.0002536661,0.01531881,0.2251609,0.000425075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877049,0.00001056323,0.00002367744,0.00105895,0.0002257443,0.0007654594,0.0000205802,0.00001000917,0.01018012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989452,0.00006284162,0.0003153313,0.000244465,0.0001328639,0.00006080699,0.000003032497,0.00001189722,0.0002235864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2010014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9663703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063292842","doi":"10.1890/080116","title":"The role of plantations in managing the world's forests in the Anthropocene","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":564,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecoforestry; Ecosystem services; Tree planting; Anthropocene; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Variety (cybernetics); Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Business; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Intact forest landscape; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006258588198346451,"gpt":0.2427937595589678,"spread":0.2365351713606214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408278,0.0002137816,0.0004620192,0.0001118758,0.0002519166,0.00002111716,0.000801793,0.00009118522,0.0001074675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001686233,0.00009221099,0.00009517811,0.0002883275,0.001462614,0.00005261462,0.0002581625,0.0004328194,0.00004704004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001404796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007989101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001910605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004129168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998113,0.0006986891,0.000437301,0.0002413716,0.0001627827,0.0003467913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988325,0.0005161698,0.000213686,0.000420515,3.18238e-7,0.00001685217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004077868,0.0001293599,0.1137672,0.00009166196,0.00005924343,0.0000151634,0.001232769,0.001643897,1.073858e-8,0.007116319,0.005830698,0.8700729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004254657,0.00002646372,0.09697863,0.0001383162,0.0001007902,0.000004074137,0.0003064557,0.0005234464,8.170801e-8,0.02130384,0.8800678,0.000124643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001086426,0.9731164,0.00001329596,0.002668671,0.0002563533,0.001924425,0.000006817736,0.000004043795,0.02092354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0123078,0.9862563,0.00006405743,0.0001978868,0.00002465084,0.0002375824,0.00001021552,0.00001060403,0.0008908993],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119292227","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x","title":"Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the<scp>U</scp>nited<scp>S</scp>tates and<scp>C</scp>anada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":495,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center; Division of Environmental Biology; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Space Agency; U.S. Forest Service; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Cycling; Ecology; Biology; Productivity; Environmental science; Carbon cycle; Bark beetle; Vegetation (pathology); Bark (sound); Geography; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02265111385568452,"gpt":0.2368902968948335,"spread":0.214239183039149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019942,0.000359918,0.0003830564,0.0001162756,0.0001096026,0.00002585773,0.0006129293,0.000224489,0.000009217267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006740351,0.0002636272,0.00008529956,0.0006026932,0.0005875442,0.0001244902,0.0003412628,0.0001845393,0.0001049975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008023125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01716879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004796521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978753,0.000239958,0.0003147566,0.0005500459,0.0002208273,0.0007990676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982247,0.001091934,0.0002202465,0.0003290776,0.000007710056,0.0001263838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005520538,0.0001776326,0.9858199,0.0001186547,0.0000360062,0.00004519408,0.003365062,0.00000655843,0.0003520412,0.003866305,0.004895642,0.001311499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007344854,0.0008379301,0.9641159,0.00008091368,0.0000644789,0.00001058962,0.0005512176,0.0003416123,0.0009170324,0.005104349,0.02716681,0.00007465443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596394,0.001479359,0.000002778301,0.00005759487,0.0004257516,0.0006624797,0.00005557821,0.0000460748,0.03763096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979575,0.0005577772,0.00005072602,0.0007938989,0.0001987412,0.00007883619,0.00004224818,0.00001656273,0.0003036725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03831811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149491702","doi":"10.5751/es-01793-110207","title":"What You Know is Who You Know? Communication Patterns Among Resource Users as a Prerequisite for Co-management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":460,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Need to know; Business; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Resource management (computing); Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006677476951347338,"gpt":0.242457264822129,"spread":0.2357797878707817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003313266,0.0001338715,0.0001344564,0.00001758274,0.000432746,0.00008782275,0.000252577,0.0001340724,0.0009496293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004109408,0.0001338315,0.0001065835,0.00008346591,0.0003323848,0.0003628152,0.0002890321,0.0001061273,0.0002061258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000862675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002509706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003934485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004177763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999084,0.00005816498,0.0001680798,0.000282606,0.0001017193,0.000305458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994376,0.00006605312,0.0001143325,0.0003280917,0.000004287994,0.00004963493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001200699,0.00007146734,0.6333299,0.00003472658,0.00005951953,9.571098e-7,0.00427468,0.0001012388,0.000007778646,0.001527049,0.35871,0.001870673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000483974,0.00006365749,0.621833,0.00001781692,0.00004068814,5.207446e-7,0.001024945,0.001019744,0.00002173982,0.0009264436,0.3744299,0.0001375261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605305,0.000188566,0.00005527143,0.002155671,0.00007073084,0.000591376,0.00001254617,0.00004343867,0.0363519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004467,0.002229474,0.0004331895,0.003158366,0.00006894633,0.0001420452,0.0001268041,0.00001986043,0.09337463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06008381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114001914","doi":"10.22230/jem.2004v4n1a254","title":"Adaptation to climate change in forest management","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":430,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Disturbance (geology); Adaptation (eye); Ecoforestry; Forest ecology; Adaptive management; Psychological resilience; Sustainable forest management; Ecosystem; Business; Forest restoration; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0187881372627222,"gpt":0.2414652015790328,"spread":0.2226770643163106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005094431,0.0001149423,0.0001599199,0.0002601258,0.00004932576,0.00004958252,0.000165736,0.00002198627,0.0001142197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002041143,0.00009843663,0.00004331192,0.0002651988,0.00001317857,0.0003092016,0.0002455265,0.00005287746,0.0002643655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001835258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001033133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006850624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004086917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989283,0.00001888652,0.0003827176,0.0001483474,0.0002659865,0.0002557817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995928,0.000004700833,0.0001666247,0.0001241826,0.000005433291,0.0001062369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004487386,0.0009495374,0.1937268,0.00206497,0.0003452789,0.002063214,0.0100897,0.2118443,0.00004484621,0.2503099,0.01958535,0.3085274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004593655,0.0007579215,0.5538723,0.001125036,0.0001297239,0.00004888613,0.001012489,0.004057257,0.000006504536,0.003155808,0.4307076,0.0005327208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402973,0.0001597185,0.0008590018,0.002119169,0.0005316945,0.001294766,0.00000235397,0.00001579604,0.05472018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950303,0.001323808,0.002577689,0.0004829894,0.00009490986,0.00004278823,0.000001012595,0.00001101241,0.0004355226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4111223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4014129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954640172","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00257.x","title":"A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Resources Canada; Vancouver Island University","funders":"Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Skogforsk; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Forest management; Logging; Sustainability; Temperate rainforest; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Wood production; Ecoforestry; Sustainable forest management; Temperate forest; Forest ecology; Ecosystem services; Business; Estate; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Forest restoration; Ecosystem; Forestry; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01902424081252552,"gpt":0.2587653300292608,"spread":0.2397410892167353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005415461,0.0001395481,0.00009991619,0.00002613732,0.0002624974,0.00007093787,0.0002919624,0.00004994631,0.00009495402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001539545,0.0001101912,0.00007838569,0.0002725578,0.0001558153,0.0004384156,0.0001599848,0.0000614284,0.00008564227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003729375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000111783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003129317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006411882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988125,0.00006349027,0.0001961584,0.0002429873,0.00022933,0.000455555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993973,0.00004119347,0.00007811569,0.0003612403,0.00001359735,0.0001085587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004429119,0.00003586759,0.6894196,0.00003688783,0.00001088279,2.569428e-7,0.0005226062,0.0009734325,0.00004277195,0.01093473,0.2975816,0.0003971112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002959535,0.00003919521,0.8347614,0.00000443618,0.000030984,8.844905e-7,0.0001505393,0.002222501,0.00002340337,0.002686668,0.1595992,0.0001848239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8216629,0.00002081092,0.01046069,0.1655079,0.0001683486,0.001402149,0.00003152969,0.00005640207,0.0006893041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701123,0.00000117987,0.003515836,0.02426127,0.000373678,0.0003617439,0.0001196531,0.00001307672,0.00124127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1484494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4730612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388627415","doi":"10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z","title":"Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Guelph; Concordia University; Lakehead University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004157114052043569,"gpt":0.2576987728365147,"spread":0.2535416587844711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009643358,0.00008275221,0.00006948181,0.00001724187,0.00005277258,0.00001375958,0.0003477346,0.0002191445,0.000267732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002172162,0.00005016425,0.000065837,0.0007884961,0.00009620209,0.00004817434,0.0003017539,0.000587282,0.00008161889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001004809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001240363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006085428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006587854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992382,0.00002858198,0.00008840369,0.0001329983,0.0003355118,0.0001762874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997128,0.000007452345,0.00004611025,0.0002034978,0.00000595144,0.00002418238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001524088,0.00003827211,0.8175866,0.00001544095,0.00003250053,0.00001256043,0.0000612071,0.004875485,0.001530245,0.007641825,0.1648124,0.0033782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155008,0.0000137307,0.9520548,0.000007592198,0.00001290894,0.000001327034,0.00001313456,0.02649631,0.0000522508,0.0007701917,0.0203543,0.00006843443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348859,0.00002296873,0.000001199008,0.001326659,0.0007765542,0.0001393243,0.00001214692,0.00004768556,0.06278758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946089,0.000004554672,0.00006725801,0.0003125676,0.00005193667,0.000003502939,0.00001826403,0.000004954493,0.004928041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1444581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2931478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185181394","doi":"10.1111/conl.12829","title":"For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let's diversify planted forests!","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Agroforestry; Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Diversity (politics); Geography; Business; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01937218794836123,"gpt":0.2344306922431708,"spread":0.2150585042948095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001210474,0.00004630708,0.00004728399,0.00001199718,0.0001181068,0.00001600451,0.00008329527,0.00001537315,0.0003763874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008868671,0.00003675451,0.00002435122,0.0001126113,0.0002013322,0.0001082826,0.00009259363,0.00002744773,0.00002452458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004852654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004160963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004817744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995738,0.00001893405,0.00009304377,0.00011741,0.0001130611,0.0000837086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995667,0.0002384557,0.0000494682,0.0001188187,0.000009554817,0.00001699916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003047218,0.00001294834,0.7704159,0.00002011768,0.00001644893,0.000001466418,0.0002004184,0.001097126,0.008837983,0.001687421,0.2163707,0.00130901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003316955,0.00001045084,0.8702812,0.000007120564,0.00001783595,0.00000162565,0.00003963185,0.008576094,0.0005803174,0.0001538349,0.119942,0.00005815674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9548696,0.00002207196,0.004056742,0.04010266,0.00009638477,0.0001709171,0.00001497724,0.00001053095,0.0006560968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837487,0.00001537464,0.0009468066,0.01299772,0.00003120423,0.00001734595,0.00002908262,0.000004219308,0.002209544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09986531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4121178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081751416","doi":"10.1139/x08-001","title":"Impacts of a regional drought on the productivity, dieback, and biomass of western Canadian aspen forests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":398,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Water content; Productivity; Climate change; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07261089201418547,"gpt":0.3083079408695236,"spread":0.2356970488553381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143874,0.0001177545,0.0001998801,0.0005908622,0.0003101446,0.00003357659,0.0006134599,0.00006219074,0.0005080318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003631944,0.00008200366,0.00006926749,0.0006551539,0.001539869,0.0002377706,0.00007462635,0.0003347339,0.00006111016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003307827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7558507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980872,0.0001702004,0.0002965211,0.000159241,0.0006693642,0.0006174825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983394,0.000176273,0.0001605686,0.000317798,0.00009641596,0.0009095247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208739,0.0000186157,0.9538219,0.00001969061,0.00002696104,0.0001476993,0.0008843043,0.00005315161,0.00007870263,0.001424994,0.04311633,0.0003755735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261434,0.000424502,0.9669971,0.00007460371,0.000006140388,0.0001415597,0.00004177922,0.00001924683,0.0002644463,0.001382915,0.03034,0.00008148827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982329,0.0001372494,6.490129e-7,0.00789684,0.00004884181,0.0002583492,0.00001644048,0.000001006514,0.009311595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984121,0.00004606481,0.0000239881,0.00008451484,0.0001024162,0.000003025203,0.000001839221,0.00001410949,0.001311948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2298052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5673712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620357847","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12945","title":"Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: A meta‐analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université Laval; Royal Alberta Museum; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Logging; Biodiversity; Salvage logging; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Ecosystem; Biology; Forest ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02659221893901622,"gpt":0.2641752097883129,"spread":0.2375829908492967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004125413,0.0000802158,0.0004187124,0.0001834732,0.0001470352,0.00002197626,0.000442221,0.00004963853,0.004730826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002026167,0.00006108942,0.0003258646,0.00009115278,0.0001771961,0.0001090414,0.0002028103,0.0001071588,0.0004543158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005028755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006283797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001792692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002894966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993514,0.00001648767,0.0002101987,0.00009245216,0.0001603331,0.0001691168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989247,0.00005001357,0.0007008975,0.0002469592,0.00000558944,0.00007178814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008033258,0.0006440579,0.777034,0.0000493552,0.09422777,0.0002238876,0.00150987,0.02791534,0.004403101,0.004594424,0.08658449,0.002010342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041419,0.0004982671,0.9384832,0.00000157267,0.04450024,0.0000062034,0.00006133453,0.000178292,0.001510382,0.001948831,0.01156677,0.0002034893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9400805,0.000009208289,0.00001364557,0.001096457,0.00006803306,0.00005991668,0.000003368145,0.000003101036,0.05866581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989785,0.00002514549,0.0003198171,0.0004800202,0.00002682335,5.961806e-7,5.52401e-7,0.00000242778,0.000166126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1614491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122737105","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00083.x","title":"Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; Canada Research Chairs; Arcadia Fund","keywords":"Rigour; Openness to experience; Political science; Identification (biology); Science policy; Public relations; Management science; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Ecology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1303081201323294,"gpt":0.5113446688958423,"spread":0.3810365487635129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01168992,0.00007576129,0.0001380737,0.000528469,0.0003545179,0.00003243635,0.0001098887,0.00007240084,0.0000445739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001953112,0.00007501568,0.000006177967,0.00106798,0.00150232,0.0004471719,0.0003585193,0.0001269599,0.000003199469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002273075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004393471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002753434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001840472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982731,0.0007966048,0.0001633714,0.0003081209,0.00008896712,0.0003698236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993792,0.0004246737,0.0000376248,0.00008396267,0.00002652148,0.00004808783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006905754,0.00003733513,0.8098906,0.00006355764,0.000004715186,0.000001573971,0.01635365,0.000007477469,0.01105307,0.05784206,0.0002541316,0.1044228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002532486,0.0001007523,0.900902,0.00001022037,0.000003283844,0.000002098679,0.001026431,0.003638793,0.0006254766,0.09078324,0.002574082,0.00008040429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817142,0.000848102,0.009213227,0.0007671957,0.0001318356,0.000525923,0.00000117635,0.00001348142,0.006784798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4195104,0.0003500658,0.5792881,0.00004751551,0.00002371149,0.00006738763,2.173885e-7,0.00000479351,0.0007077772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5700749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980684978","doi":"10.1126/science.aay7976","title":"Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":343,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Office of the Royal Society; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Sight Research UK; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Research Foundation; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Environmental science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01490497968320427,"gpt":0.2402243759293696,"spread":0.2253193962461653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005690928,0.0001785057,0.0001022027,0.00004748525,0.0003457591,0.0002096397,0.001429516,0.0001103958,0.002492129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004783466,0.0001190631,0.00005828122,0.0006479802,0.0008860062,0.0002318021,0.0004750109,0.0003771888,0.02373634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006002543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003380716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002808909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002974801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976844,0.00006157121,0.0001405673,0.0004698542,0.001197707,0.0004459081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.00003484702,0.0001166917,0.0007466595,0.000007062947,0.00003593463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001912573,0.000007746042,0.0004501657,0.000003331871,0.000001650918,0.000009457531,0.00002175143,0.0002350054,0.00001434038,0.000779993,0.9977655,0.0007091767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005364744,0.00006113711,0.002431449,0.00001180416,0.000007847359,0.000001370943,0.000002581824,0.0009315609,0.00001183523,0.0009151764,0.9954175,0.0001541086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001512945,0.000004594063,0.00001947264,0.8319322,0.0008996632,0.0003289689,0.00001010351,0.00002775256,0.1652643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008595483,0.000005368382,0.00007043389,0.9700776,0.0005630983,0.00001494366,0.00001950254,0.000008659017,0.02064494],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213747621","doi":"10.1007/s40725-021-00151-w","title":"Forest Carbon Management: a Review of Silvicultural Practices and Management Strategies Across Boreal, Temperate and Tropical Forests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Forestry Reports","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":331,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Forest management; Agroforestry; Soil carbon; Temperate rainforest; Sustainable forest management; Forest ecology; Forest restoration; Afforestation; Carbon sink; Forestry; Ecosystem; Ecology; Soil water; Geography; Soil science; Carbon dioxide; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0433364023149025,"gpt":0.373955213598636,"spread":0.3306188112837335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004923709,0.0007993872,0.00171144,0.00009469267,0.0001759963,0.0002678468,0.0003511499,0.0002042496,0.0001381093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007719573,0.0006081241,0.0003510126,0.0005787217,0.000522948,0.0004726461,0.001603352,0.0004247219,0.0000147929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001120781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004199767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002082334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003000592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956086,0.0001748962,0.001593749,0.001222705,0.0007131812,0.0006869007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996289,0.00005967607,0.002446096,0.0009245689,0.00002889415,0.0002518223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000744799,0.0001839828,0.02841387,0.3385484,0.0004734643,0.001287871,0.00009411725,0.00000663244,5.423798e-8,0.001762674,0.01023629,0.6189852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001545319,0.00005556074,0.01194722,0.06617992,0.00158712,0.0005056581,0.00005768501,0.00001642156,1.428235e-7,0.0001676759,0.9187384,0.0005896642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005062385,0.9793674,0.00000182488,0.00004671057,0.0003907934,0.002221362,0.00002340961,0.00005381412,0.01283226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001046521,0.996726,0.0001484543,0.00002736372,0.0001209659,0.0003979755,0.0003959821,0.0000557836,0.001080941],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985655691","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8","title":"Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Climate change; Agroforestry; Deforestation (computer science); Forest management; Reforestation; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Environmental science; Effects of global warming; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Global warming; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03293705246881706,"gpt":0.1947414751658284,"spread":0.1618044226970113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005550452,0.00005704093,0.00004414716,0.00002839465,0.000247081,0.00004527436,0.00004367964,0.00003521457,0.0008666023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003793293,0.00005710592,0.000009597363,0.00006749824,0.0001135033,0.0005833523,0.0001627428,0.00002494904,0.001961505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000155712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.575472e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009198479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005882262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999639,0.00001439797,0.00004314501,0.000124835,0.00007172002,0.0001069489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998543,0.00001169831,0.00003420632,0.00004865137,0.000004935551,0.00004618592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009458851,0.000007081599,0.964375,0.00001105232,0.000002595626,7.749931e-7,0.0004411162,2.773423e-7,0.00002798884,0.0001704947,0.03132209,0.003632103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002190975,0.00002381163,0.9809101,0.000002555796,0.00001195972,9.061069e-7,0.00006374378,0.000474618,0.00001235482,0.0001091505,0.01809682,0.00007482778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943329,0.00001382786,0.000004487112,0.003791341,0.00003049151,0.000199073,0.00003067528,0.00002632091,0.001570851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968403,0.0003197901,0.0001325676,0.00242253,0.00001329134,0.000005055841,0.00006313711,8.704643e-7,0.0002024683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01653519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711183357","doi":"10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1","title":"Contributions of a global network of tree diversity experiments to sustainable forest plantations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AMBIO","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Agroforestry; Abiotic component; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Carbon sequestration; Geography; Ecology; Business; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01606127657541122,"gpt":0.2692669135668048,"spread":0.2532056369913935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009677654,0.00004633066,0.00007892107,0.000008042384,0.00008177591,0.000004750453,0.0001501744,0.00001905784,0.0001928012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002605439,0.0000457407,0.00002544256,0.0002764282,0.0000779551,0.00009223537,0.0005074355,0.00001429303,0.0001816289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001544353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001106171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01034253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001140235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994936,0.00001249497,0.00009041093,0.00007908621,0.0001430247,0.0001813894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997252,0.000007651711,0.00004313403,0.0001175177,0.00001758226,0.00008888508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003649136,0.0000621347,0.7957069,0.000003219004,0.00001196134,0.000002676024,0.0004413491,0.003499039,0.00002988771,0.02376309,0.1763675,0.000075731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00108412,0.0003143369,0.9536697,0.0000104188,0.0000440596,9.372767e-7,0.0006568843,0.0002659191,0.0005534484,0.008520299,0.0347259,0.0001539764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239201,0.00001236242,0.0002610907,0.0001985155,0.0000457917,0.0001924901,0.00003323876,0.00001064565,0.07532575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970053,9.900943e-7,0.0002658576,0.00007965395,0.00001662211,0.000004873531,0.00001205888,0.000001566295,0.002613035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1579628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035679993","doi":"10.1139/x01-140","title":"Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Scots pine; Pulpwood; Carbon stock; Carbon fibers; Greenhouse gas; Picea abies; Felling; Forestry; Agroforestry; Carbon dioxide; Botany; Mathematics; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Pinus <genus>; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0443507997482953,"gpt":0.3221459321450391,"spread":0.2777951323967438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196205,0.00008451512,0.0001038001,0.0004526398,0.0002440605,0.0001522149,0.0004167769,0.00005289108,0.003930972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002325791,0.00007840272,0.00003493555,0.001180572,0.0001037335,0.0003018618,0.00003353305,0.0003183087,0.001003247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005460326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003950923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1066314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5748702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983622,0.00009522816,0.0002351601,0.0001408516,0.0005904151,0.0005761905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987223,0.0000411153,0.00005666781,0.0001945512,0.0001350328,0.0008503022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002022743,0.00001209926,0.894161,0.00000465696,0.00001126828,0.000103061,0.001095354,0.004084327,0.0001237704,0.0009510332,0.0969322,0.002500989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003771572,0.000574399,0.7064365,0.00004984583,0.000009546775,0.00006921136,0.0002095442,0.001633938,0.0001824535,0.004060844,0.2861949,0.0002016249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351198,0.0000213445,0.00001305886,0.007310824,0.00008812229,0.0001694575,0.000002112617,0.00000310511,0.1572721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873948,0.0000254948,0.0001852653,0.0002345977,0.0001834492,0.000005401622,0.000002120785,0.00001248248,0.01195647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4682387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117843969","doi":"10.1139/x06-108","title":"Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Bayesian network; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Process (computing); Influence diagram; Management science; Operations research; Decision tree; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Environmental resource management; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04419425602060646,"gpt":0.3032468153849311,"spread":0.2590525593643246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001296589,0.000102329,0.0001326507,0.0007054802,0.0002059073,0.00008917994,0.0004851376,0.00006010708,0.00161172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001856718,0.00009659653,0.00005795268,0.0009896631,0.0003295125,0.0002433571,0.00008464743,0.0004245634,0.0001417699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008924658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001170913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.149032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5823898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981485,0.0001263866,0.0003106927,0.0001505949,0.0004672677,0.0007965792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.00003846476,0.00007469179,0.0001754904,0.00002851012,0.0003938864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002447659,0.00002764218,0.7280455,0.000006629564,0.00001289702,0.001173561,0.0001014408,0.2171125,0.000003973429,0.01091157,0.0393748,0.003204975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006960407,0.0001989616,0.896638,0.000119686,0.00001189029,0.00004851203,0.0001249627,0.03261235,0.000005334649,0.01016017,0.05916594,0.0002181087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7530114,0.0002560302,0.001076909,0.0005082196,0.0001639754,0.0003220982,0.00000235572,0.0000035899,0.2446554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949219,0.0000172438,0.001234789,0.00005114055,0.0001991715,0.000002817794,0.000001553365,0.00001538519,0.003555987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4333579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141329490","doi":"10.1111/conl.12156","title":"From Management to Stewardship: Viewing Forests As Complex Adaptive Systems in an Uncertain World","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Université TÉLUQ; Okanagan College; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Ecoforestry; Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Incentive; Stewardship (theology); Forest ecology; Pace; Business; Adaptive capacity; Forest management; Ecosystem management; Climate change; Ecosystem; Forest restoration; Ecology; Agroforestry; Politics; Geography; Political science; Economics; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04265102930437285,"gpt":0.2722124128549434,"spread":0.2295613835505705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002966272,0.0001410215,0.0001406247,0.0001472596,0.00007422154,0.00008774897,0.0002887848,0.00002145945,0.0006346767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001438663,0.0001460288,0.0000258161,0.0004466362,0.00005595177,0.0003091233,0.0001464536,0.00005637754,0.001452141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002055812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007313883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987559,0.0001473714,0.0002386503,0.0003292765,0.0002654073,0.0002634367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994541,0.00006424494,0.00007209733,0.0003071036,0.000004558302,0.00009793451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009275616,0.00006941937,0.5875782,0.00003717755,0.00003255081,0.00002852119,0.002617575,0.09151185,0.002218775,0.009014533,0.3003946,0.006404093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004781314,0.00005426077,0.6896431,0.00007481475,0.00001334056,2.453699e-7,0.0001302639,0.06408689,0.00001180373,0.0004623026,0.244778,0.0002669017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762714,0.000003820229,0.002378002,0.009674963,0.0001697923,0.0005736533,0.000004211207,0.00005503267,0.01086915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699209,6.607346e-7,0.00187342,0.0263971,0.00009821712,0.00008462698,0.00005454293,0.00001535289,0.001555205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1020649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135080304","doi":"10.1139/x06-257","title":"Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; US-UK Fulbright Commission; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Environmental science; Slash (logging); Forest management; Biomass (ecology); Forestry; Fossil fuel; Agroforestry; Greenhouse gas; Biofuel; Agronomy; Ecology; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04557017408388083,"gpt":0.3343178070093146,"spread":0.2887476329254338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003282505,0.0001028344,0.0002058702,0.001786974,0.0001565437,0.00007509354,0.0003865188,0.00006438234,0.0005618877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002843957,0.00008708923,0.00008005457,0.002482153,0.0005817792,0.0002721645,0.00007002392,0.0003217477,0.00002175441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003710848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09654292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.714852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982257,0.00009861404,0.0003845761,0.0001625205,0.0006026691,0.0005258456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986897,0.000130007,0.0003247295,0.0002138716,0.00009645496,0.0005453024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005548455,0.00002447224,0.9876989,0.00002105904,0.0003035169,0.0002494486,0.0003327564,0.002251584,0.00004692426,0.004204511,0.00122643,0.003584895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690629,0.0001772888,0.9666387,0.00003405888,0.0002346347,0.00001263575,0.0003089445,0.001372729,0.00004850407,0.0004743817,0.03033704,0.00009196776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528964,0.0001715615,0.00005410293,0.0002842355,0.00006533675,0.0001586085,0.000004127744,0.000002400029,0.04636327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981658,0.0000963237,0.0003133715,0.00002271655,0.00004365724,0.000001650267,0.000006703025,0.00000800515,0.001341806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048992878","doi":"10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00014-8","title":"Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity conservation; Forest management; Business; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009720542733109992,"gpt":0.2167355376693894,"spread":0.2070149949362795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005473293,0.0001781221,0.000218567,0.000406071,0.0001200198,0.00003299059,0.0003581273,0.0000484746,0.00094282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000170526,0.0001660478,0.0001376812,0.0002924949,0.0001545511,0.0002859125,0.0000958143,0.0001209281,0.0002188628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006013302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000508125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006656425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003778132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986091,0.00006734541,0.0004112316,0.0001923926,0.0003591525,0.0003607796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993448,0.00003922144,0.0003085072,0.0001788645,9.486302e-7,0.0001276693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001107897,0.0005458252,0.963157,0.00004152096,0.0001007059,0.00009764183,0.0005552796,0.004075263,0.0005052049,0.00198039,0.01805194,0.01077841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002858297,0.000436837,0.7379575,0.00003822738,0.0001138859,0.00001780867,0.00100425,0.00008144428,0.0005155514,0.001770786,0.2548097,0.0003957454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.949877,0.00007987299,0.0003886273,0.0004250496,0.0001288305,0.0005880439,0.00001231427,0.000009220062,0.04849105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935852,0.00008813765,0.003863881,0.0004116581,0.00003562226,0.000009640396,0.000004564617,0.00001252994,0.001988726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2367578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216157563","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biab067","title":"Navigating Ecological Transformation: Resist–Accept–Direct as a Path to a New Resource Management Paradigm","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioScience","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center; The Wildlife Society","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Natural resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Ecosystem management; Paradigm shift; Face (sociological concept); Resource management (computing); Natural (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management science; Ecology; Ecosystem; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01450715974788293,"gpt":0.2653690671306851,"spread":0.2508619073828022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003237223,0.0001397771,0.0001175631,0.00002267682,0.0002868374,0.0001437054,0.0004768455,0.00004030412,0.004287658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000546913,0.0001240982,0.00006110832,0.001098751,0.00012394,0.0002651302,0.0003445491,0.0001015657,0.003953473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001273401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001904115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002607979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000937557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983417,0.00005699235,0.0002174193,0.0004710522,0.0004812847,0.0004314929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993308,0.00003219497,0.00004711203,0.0003247229,0.000003421257,0.0002618006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090676,0.0006007942,0.009835704,0.0001268656,0.00003982177,0.0008937086,0.01398028,0.004383307,0.005426786,0.05058194,0.3606632,0.5533586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003251684,0.0001546674,0.04022841,0.00006799618,0.00001727536,0.0000219523,0.0003454147,0.0005272292,0.001156689,0.001133037,0.9556606,0.0003615927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3757132,0.00004080034,0.0004798869,0.0103987,0.0001498745,0.000448893,0.00000392842,0.0001280467,0.6126367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495791,0.00004790792,0.009430591,0.007014543,0.00009643798,0.00004380296,0.000009220319,0.00001274656,0.0337657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5949973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1454784531","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.005","title":"Global progress toward sustainable forest management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Sustainable forest management; Business; Forest management; Goods and services; Forest ecology; Ecoforestry; Population; Natural resource economics; Intact forest landscape; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009792374530431266,"gpt":0.2397640621952568,"spread":0.2299716876648255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004445639,0.0002679393,0.0002092298,0.00009831944,0.0002056657,0.00008943518,0.0004308739,0.00009460017,0.0005462046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008215192,0.0002490025,0.00005516743,0.0004138168,0.0004234367,0.0003130476,0.001829223,0.00007114204,0.001729004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003384146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006749798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002394824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001148603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980169,0.00005233075,0.000252904,0.0005309684,0.0003030763,0.0008438024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992391,0.000009585418,0.00008854059,0.0003725239,0.00001285006,0.0002773262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006141239,0.0001255146,0.5245442,0.0001290304,0.00008664126,0.000369179,0.000110803,0.001932769,8.785673e-9,0.2853878,0.1839369,0.003315719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001013453,0.0001999558,0.4979373,0.000006748103,0.00008567859,0.000008925921,0.000350872,0.0007024301,1.459464e-7,0.02730559,0.4721568,0.0002321648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3698917,0.000151822,0.0003686229,0.002609381,0.0004496874,0.001937415,0.000005031779,0.0002090881,0.6243773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357839,0.0001702662,0.002055964,0.0008883258,0.00006274312,0.0003685899,0.0000324161,0.00001882524,0.06061899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5658922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031758409","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00500.x","title":"Neoliberalism and the Politics of Alternatives: Community Forestry in British Columbia and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Community forestry; Political science; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Public administration; Politics; Government (linguistics); Forestry; Geography; Forest management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007754591595008733,"gpt":0.237040323811757,"spread":0.2292857322167483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008408088,0.0000489676,0.0001725468,0.00002687747,0.0001299248,0.00003309593,0.0002559317,0.00001764889,0.00002178359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001110482,0.00003895774,0.00006877742,0.0005106998,0.003299054,0.00005784975,0.0001684074,0.0001047533,2.314558e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001148289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003357031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1137479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988554,0.0005232156,0.0002230546,0.00005516043,0.0002080447,0.0001351626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987719,0.0004734376,0.0005574616,0.0001582322,0.00002431448,0.00001467692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417542,0.00003421081,0.9892539,0.000005873882,0.00005021144,4.267963e-8,0.001579771,0.0007957481,0.000001550329,0.0009287652,0.006881514,0.0004542667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008349849,0.00002941156,0.9765273,0.00001485464,0.0000209397,1.745284e-7,0.001680953,0.0005065339,0.00001034493,0.0195577,0.0007756032,0.00004125049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929938,0.00004757698,6.559295e-7,0.004849538,0.00001081809,0.0001728558,0.00003336945,0.000003177957,0.001888163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973851,0.0004693098,0.00002104076,0.001188111,0.000005640602,0.000004558215,0.000007234132,0.00000406906,0.0009149156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7466032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088006907","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006","title":"How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Victoria","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Greenhouse gas; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Opportunity cost; Carbon offset; Marginal cost; Natural resource economics; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Economics; Ecology; Waste management; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02115826171079651,"gpt":0.2452662813195273,"spread":0.2241080196087308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004929643,0.0003667382,0.0006859308,0.0006468449,0.0002454743,0.0001096634,0.001043379,0.00009299937,0.0007463302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006186014,0.0003065507,0.0006077952,0.00315043,0.002211937,0.0005197122,0.0007456942,0.0001362728,0.0001343102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001013579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004318511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01760869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001944382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996539,0.00005257933,0.0003666604,0.0007915435,0.001416884,0.0008333072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983945,0.00002340921,0.000370457,0.0008640955,0.000003811305,0.0003436536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007284211,0.001570176,0.7437327,0.00003118009,0.01454654,0.00006985797,0.005239442,0.1168111,0.1067458,0.008233986,0.0004246758,0.002521725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000987783,0.0003520449,0.9395694,0.000006525818,0.0304479,0.000009857841,0.000600397,0.004396162,0.01435272,0.002145842,0.005977561,0.001153826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713988,0.0001000936,0.000009304149,0.003558076,0.0000508974,0.0003696059,0.00004711263,0.00003857556,0.02442751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958743,0.00003412728,0.0002199291,0.0005745973,0.00005972793,0.00003808075,0.00001445492,0.00002269219,0.003162032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1958367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000081274","doi":"10.1029/2010jg001471","title":"Recent rates of forest harvest and conversion in North America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Reforestation; Deforestation (computer science); Afforestation; Environmental science; Geography; Clearing; Biomass (ecology); Hectare; Agroforestry; Forest inventory; Forestry; Agriculture; Environmental protection; Forest management; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04164313139250285,"gpt":0.3043007599015914,"spread":0.2626576285090885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003570212,0.00007828946,0.0001862903,0.00002355307,0.0000468645,0.0000172476,0.0002764911,0.00002611311,0.002032079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002050182,0.00005806626,0.00004639865,0.0005391976,0.0005764934,0.0003077617,0.0002600892,0.0002786982,0.0002008316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005702482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002360194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004012635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001531453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986695,0.0001306021,0.000263319,0.0001148186,0.0005374897,0.0002842406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993764,0.0001628667,0.0001350189,0.00012092,0.00004897049,0.0001558294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003368772,0.0003150137,0.9557191,0.00002206156,0.0000167579,0.00004659475,0.0007259389,0.00007013813,0.0003053547,0.0001905914,0.008210119,0.03404152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003934343,0.0008285731,0.9725484,0.00002462608,0.000004766205,0.000001554907,0.000157115,0.0004703618,0.0003242506,0.0009956608,0.02419058,0.00006068548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915645,0.0001079251,0.000004317234,0.0001854028,0.00002662315,0.00009755865,0.000001073567,0.000001786864,0.008010806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972208,0.001247017,0.0006555181,0.00003321421,0.00004268447,0.000001655392,6.324965e-7,0.000006906961,0.0007916075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03398084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121150268","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x","title":"Improving biodiversity monitoring","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austral Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Measurement of biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Monitoring and evaluation; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental monitoring; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03590127104878894,"gpt":0.2262740746345095,"spread":0.1903728035857205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005310601,0.00005044135,0.0000461078,0.00001861419,0.00007175123,0.000004434238,0.0001437974,0.00004235974,0.01345102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006790119,0.00004962696,0.00002094324,0.00005924792,0.0001757924,0.0001157807,0.0001827121,0.00005426073,0.009796825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004582826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001714127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002090678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001068285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995704,0.00001069227,0.0000530821,0.0001174598,0.00003935695,0.0002090155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998356,0.000006013385,0.00002576641,0.00008701317,0.000001090972,0.0000445176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004276023,0.00001726998,0.9911027,0.00000135767,0.000003631528,0.00001183879,0.0001801246,0.000007144825,0.0002557388,0.0001815168,0.006200162,0.002034248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001057393,0.00006894616,0.9949772,3.268845e-7,0.000008454511,0.000001458902,0.00002085602,0.00002301845,0.0007158199,0.000138866,0.003868554,0.00007081161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585192,6.801815e-7,0.000007014693,0.00005376241,0.0002553186,0.00004989231,7.253198e-7,0.00003153803,0.04108187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945015,0.00000167033,0.0006662022,0.00007055039,0.00003440572,0.000002151465,7.152927e-7,0.000001787211,0.004721006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03636086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171228183","doi":"10.1038/s41558-021-01062-1","title":"Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Climate Change","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Liber Ero Foundation; Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Climate change; Biome; Productivity; Reforestation; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Carbon sink; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05341021507583515,"gpt":0.2638369024144895,"spread":0.2104266873386543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004527908,0.0002065594,0.000173023,0.0001226897,0.0007577443,0.00007181484,0.0002757117,0.0004151952,0.002123071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002422839,0.0002097449,0.0001088174,0.0009790643,0.00009688865,0.0003486972,0.0006678582,0.000972593,0.006286292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002161139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008623998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006925602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001761951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981507,0.0001223688,0.000139804,0.0005737055,0.0003571203,0.0006562999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990976,0.00006342832,0.00009436205,0.0005305514,0.00003526466,0.0001787852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773879,0.0002425007,0.8405339,0.0001216507,0.0000216965,0.0001048434,0.0007517807,0.000266967,0.0006710951,0.006275007,0.1499222,0.001020578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003359683,0.00003273422,0.7121666,0.000050763,0.00005441757,0.000004175423,0.00009644404,0.0002086565,0.0005996024,0.0001689359,0.2858934,0.0003882548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947205,0.001045001,0.00001447037,0.05783717,0.001674126,0.0008649087,0.0009031498,0.0003552686,0.04258544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917471,0.000170171,0.0008046048,0.005826783,0.0004011905,0.00003681842,0.0002704535,0.00001831159,0.0007245386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1359712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942903851","doi":"10.1007/s13595-019-0827-x","title":"Forest adaptation to climate change—is non-management an option?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Forest restoration; Adaptation (eye); Business; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Ecosystem; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04855647128014864,"gpt":0.3202506013468175,"spread":0.2716941300666689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357399,0.0001470447,0.0001350926,0.0002314695,0.0001728115,0.00007728686,0.0008279377,0.00002940569,0.0007786481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001342727,0.0001349302,0.00005259815,0.001148856,0.0002990712,0.001522562,0.0005116155,0.00004637798,0.005316667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000321583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008082388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007869545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004006226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979688,0.00001335475,0.0002321759,0.0004826072,0.0007294301,0.0005736349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990492,0.00001175625,0.0001190204,0.0005652044,0.0000332076,0.0002216017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001340535,0.000428418,0.6556229,0.000143488,0.00001989767,0.000009418854,0.009169786,0.1514738,0.001565945,0.09644541,0.009838145,0.07514874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001905671,0.0005660185,0.9095632,0.00005851738,0.000009124855,8.532749e-7,0.0002006086,0.07417592,0.0004869671,0.003272511,0.01117784,0.0002978478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567292,0.000005007838,0.0001748752,0.001172185,0.0001752068,0.0007106871,0.000007504969,0.00002851712,0.04099679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994478,0.00006661884,0.001815107,0.002326173,0.00004353858,0.00004692945,0.000005425458,0.00001122867,0.001206944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2539403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143915124","doi":"10.5194/bg-11-3515-2014","title":"Quantifying the biophysical climate change mitigation potential of Canada's forest sector","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biogeosciences","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Government of Canada; Australian Government; Strong","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Bioenergy; Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Forest management; Climate change mitigation; Climate change; Forest product; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Renewable energy; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02167617978753549,"gpt":0.2323591882949066,"spread":0.2106830085073712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026928,0.00006881741,0.00006604892,0.00002057237,0.0002434285,0.00002983868,0.0003183747,0.00001644607,0.000272695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002390783,0.000042618,0.00003100436,0.0002954603,0.0003643616,0.0001463019,0.0001326565,0.00002892214,0.00006087322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002262988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001189898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4159809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4237831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991061,0.00003528617,0.0001077016,0.0001550725,0.0003466709,0.0002491341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997051,0.00002822518,0.00007965434,0.0001380022,0.000004122925,0.00004485542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001527097,0.00008469339,0.9322529,0.00003725529,0.000006970473,0.000002057279,0.0005915574,0.0003925989,0.01675233,0.02866178,0.01007889,0.01112368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008018567,0.00007786659,0.9469874,0.000009993125,0.000008974643,7.863077e-7,0.00005414751,0.03452802,0.001009482,0.0002933574,0.01683509,0.0001146898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992733,0.000006261671,0.00002640072,0.001332335,0.0002934715,0.000118315,0.00001086475,0.00001108678,0.005468234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993581,0.000008005517,0.00007969801,0.0002730234,0.000132155,0.00000853062,0.000003152509,0.000003002655,0.00013431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03413542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5879081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123404750","doi":"10.1023/b:land.0000030666.55372.ae","title":"Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Landscape ecology; Normative; Futures contract; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Landscape assessment; Landscape epidemiology; Environmental planning; Geography; Landscape design; Environmental science; Political science; Business; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01265474755284023,"gpt":0.246341060173578,"spread":0.2336863126207378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001925832,0.0001503182,0.0002191666,0.000136432,0.00009611937,0.00001602406,0.0002429989,0.0001445911,0.01167604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003340157,0.0001378326,0.0000422192,0.0003311071,0.0001132715,0.0001848424,0.000253145,0.0001726693,0.004610851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001660926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002324241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005012649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01496435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998831,0.00006742097,0.0002304006,0.0002684715,0.00009863427,0.0005041281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999603,0.00005383027,0.00008204736,0.0001836303,0.000003930003,0.0000735861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002694115,0.0001154317,0.9437176,0.000005602221,0.0000112341,0.00006657034,0.0009712906,0.04924642,0.0000897489,0.0008110132,0.004704902,0.0002332561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002658765,0.0002544796,0.9697058,0.000008330375,0.00002112413,0.00004389419,0.0001587914,0.01180825,0.00004750443,0.002690789,0.01225805,0.0003442726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223652,0.0000140306,0.00002088208,0.0007742377,0.0002823356,0.0002174868,0.000002157122,0.00003647422,0.07628721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970333,0.00001868621,0.0007269583,0.00110403,0.00008246539,0.00001993164,0.00001334648,0.0000132987,0.0009880125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0752992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163346473","doi":"10.1186/s13705-021-00281-w","title":"Sustainable forest biomass: a review of current residue harvesting guidelines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Energy Sustainability and Society","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Environmental resource management; Certified wood; Environmental planning; Sustainable forest management; Bioproducts; Ecosystem services; Forest management; Context (archaeology); Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Environmental science; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04245542045434389,"gpt":0.3510595846472665,"spread":0.3086041641929226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001749728,0.0004957325,0.001578357,0.00004603388,0.0002740617,0.00006489162,0.0004402438,0.000241928,0.0004841962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001538707,0.0004098003,0.001007018,0.001076425,0.0005898746,0.0002622523,0.001403529,0.0002748995,0.000006293676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006860092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000455235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00596379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001173595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966735,0.0003794587,0.001130521,0.0007527828,0.0004119649,0.0006518135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980706,0.0002236522,0.0005462096,0.0007585201,0.0002393026,0.0001617035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.404578e-7,0.00007513734,0.0001645057,0.3054633,0.00007361064,0.00001217994,0.0001419553,0.0000116201,8.930301e-9,0.01681367,0.1092853,0.5679579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007808122,0.00002746765,0.00001531033,0.0211491,0.0003887683,0.000005219018,0.0002629513,0.0000387969,1.630681e-7,0.001157422,0.9765052,0.0003715599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001002126,0.9959943,0.00008496517,0.000334867,0.00007328033,0.0006338281,0.00001144278,0.00004064241,0.00281662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000005110964,0.9768797,0.0003125515,0.000226523,0.0001325414,0.000168671,0.0001466283,0.00003639129,0.02209185],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150146080","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.abf8650","title":"Time and space catch up with restoration programs that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Cover (algebra); Forest cover; Space (punctuation); Service (business); Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Economics; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Marketing; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01195244097402711,"gpt":0.2390449445709545,"spread":0.2270925035969274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513738,0.0001120674,0.0000944835,0.00003182858,0.0003061342,0.0001598624,0.0002535587,0.00002025529,0.0002108078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001103489,0.00008522487,0.00001140405,0.001076077,0.0003748595,0.001619527,0.0001389371,0.00005320026,0.0003667632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006895345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000364735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001410279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005242503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987031,0.0000249567,0.00008438426,0.0004144201,0.000472341,0.0003007558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999563,0.00001450358,0.00006735618,0.0002360654,0.00001184457,0.0001072753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001515211,0.0003759706,0.5799084,0.0004455335,0.00003485785,0.0001611253,0.02334079,0.01816769,0.05945652,0.003409484,0.00546422,0.3090839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001524209,0.000767921,0.1140282,0.0003669343,0.0000771722,0.0001780149,0.006159673,0.02423296,0.03007365,0.001118522,0.8198456,0.001627199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867219,0.000160341,0.00001797861,0.002109811,0.0001107071,0.0002149943,0.000002616694,0.00005193095,0.01060969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940481,0.00003020882,0.001499142,0.0002448793,0.00003252851,0.0000165892,0.000006934397,0.000007366288,0.00411422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8143814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4714122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984551881","doi":"10.1139/er-2013-0039","title":"Canadian boreal forests and climate change mitigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change mitigation; Climate change; Carbon sequestration; Taiga; Biomass (ecology); Fossil fuel; Bioenergy; Global warming; Primary production; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Environmental protection; Renewable energy; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0138068999857923,"gpt":0.224941084026145,"spread":0.2111341840403527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001443737,0.0001450501,0.0001300105,0.00003437944,0.0001293085,0.00003897274,0.0001186136,0.00004082887,0.006277816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005992544,0.0001238492,0.00004074871,0.00006370147,0.0001143961,0.0004342621,0.0001262944,0.00006161256,0.02624751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002069438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001266804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0724827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05432064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990724,0.00004078395,0.0001787547,0.0002295799,0.0001198289,0.0003586055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994674,0.000006825583,0.00005940545,0.0001932305,9.172634e-8,0.0002730319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[6.711884e-7,0.00001336947,0.6916078,0.000008598858,0.000002040523,0.00000200887,0.0001929085,2.76904e-7,0.00007772191,0.00007424026,0.02872401,0.2792963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006759023,0.00002003467,0.6417917,0.00001058997,0.00000670203,0.000002237364,0.000005516826,0.0001790587,0.000009069504,0.0001088997,0.3576909,0.0001076946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091516,0.001711975,0.000001461751,0.001369647,0.00007540619,0.001525226,0.000009828772,0.00002072682,0.08613415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879645,0.007787277,0.0002727798,0.001750361,0.00007332343,0.0002815769,0.00005969238,0.0000157126,0.001794746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3289669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174242269","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-24084-x","title":"Commercial afforestation can deliver effective climate change mitigation under multiple decarbonisation pathways","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Afforestation; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change mitigation; Climate change; Tree planting; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02642637711329373,"gpt":0.2803230196599284,"spread":0.2538966425466347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764648,0.0001214722,0.00009433838,0.00004990021,0.0004631536,0.00005271496,0.0003739311,0.0001632768,0.0002115267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009781362,0.0001288853,0.00005709521,0.0004089339,0.0001524718,0.0002806881,0.0004836636,0.0003538539,0.0002580639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001063019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007089899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0343295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990056,0.000226797,0.0001557788,0.0001987324,0.0002058459,0.0002073101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987571,0.00022786,0.00009768398,0.0008155673,0.000040927,0.00006083485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793251,0.000573551,0.6468255,0.00003754654,0.00007393205,0.000006327295,0.008369085,0.001182021,0.004232195,0.194431,0.01277622,0.1314546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004203882,0.00002276967,0.9677426,0.00001982048,0.00004150667,0.000002108144,0.0001211439,0.01084633,0.0005413481,0.001877598,0.01817666,0.0001877483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482304,0.0007039429,0.0002422535,0.01245804,0.0003386228,0.001182769,0.0001517038,0.0001813324,0.03651095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931767,0.0004419523,0.002817584,0.002063743,0.00006723325,0.0002076972,0.001133118,0.00001659791,0.00007539013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3209171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081522450","doi":"10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x","title":"Using portfolio theory to guide reforestation and restoration under climate change scenarios","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climatic Change","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Reforestation; Climate change; Modern portfolio theory; Portfolio; Asset (computer security); Adaptation (eye); Futures contract; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Economics; Business; Ecology; Agroforestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1213701026053858,"gpt":0.3203659980930254,"spread":0.1989958954876395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003662723,0.0001371761,0.0001255163,0.0001036982,0.0002568321,0.00002792145,0.0001038732,0.00004837601,0.000938862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003117379,0.0001246284,0.00002575498,0.00027032,0.0001123642,0.0004949154,0.0002162963,0.00005071198,0.0008293874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003333611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007517238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002918823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989923,0.0000566226,0.0002139414,0.0002054348,0.000217765,0.0003139607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995181,0.0000267319,0.00009715617,0.0002384765,0.000007176462,0.0001123772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003834626,0.0005770595,0.5844579,0.0008002279,0.00008664442,0.0002216177,0.1587959,0.002002115,0.003816711,0.07567028,0.0463586,0.1268294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001229355,0.0004103971,0.9054951,0.0002605998,0.0001320566,0.0001066139,0.001378731,0.05109228,0.00007173265,0.007792783,0.03093427,0.001096057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829167,0.00005683831,0.00054973,0.0007446859,0.0001371373,0.0008126381,0.000008178157,0.00006319472,0.01471095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903331,0.0003221438,0.003854025,0.003671557,0.0002897193,0.0001399328,0.00003416735,0.00003342496,0.001321911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3210372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473899290","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpw024","title":"Challenges facing gap-based silviculture and possible solutions for mesic northern forests in North America","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Microsite; Understory; Silviculture; Ecology; Species richness; Canopy; Disturbance (geology); Diversity (politics); Vegetation (pathology); Agroforestry; Geography; Tree (set theory); Environmental resource management; Forest management; Windthrow; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08124186923677244,"gpt":0.3580830256474131,"spread":0.2768411564106406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008948452,0.0001537328,0.0001780237,0.0003839033,0.0001792004,0.00009468471,0.00079019,0.00007930303,0.0002357224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003367743,0.0001030107,0.00009794293,0.0002627004,0.0004003853,0.0009016193,0.000230067,0.0002602816,0.00007307236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002830897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007540465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003510196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03254396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977587,0.0001192826,0.0003878997,0.0002733248,0.0008947253,0.0005660635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.0003052987,0.0001896031,0.0002026127,0.0001995366,0.0002108946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002989039,0.000163985,0.9634659,0.00001707746,0.00003721382,0.00005000579,0.0004278113,0.007255662,0.00008666478,0.001928373,0.000913444,0.02535493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001426638,0.0006725077,0.9744177,0.0001198855,0.000008006098,0.00002761605,0.0001072515,0.002884822,0.00004026449,0.006011474,0.01412343,0.0001604042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921467,0.0001249854,0.0004709867,0.004647227,0.0001287943,0.0002691104,0.00003392849,0.00001068561,0.002167525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981586,0.0003655014,0.0005583905,0.00005164612,0.0002865317,0.00003492431,0.00001415643,0.00001865014,0.0005115847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03219294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322417051","doi":"10.1080/08941920050121927","title":"Factors Influencing Forest Values and Attitudes of Two Stakeholder Groups: The Case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society & Natural Resources","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foothills; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Stakeholder; Geography; Socioeconomic status; Environmental resource management; Context (archaeology); Sustainable management; Forestry; Business; Agroforestry; Sustainability; Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Environmental science; Population; Cartography; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01604355380736602,"gpt":0.2318515055435219,"spread":0.2158079517361559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001536553,0.0001705373,0.0001596249,0.000008031439,0.0003320852,0.0000292299,0.0003844344,0.00004661472,0.0002010014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003122665,0.00008763372,0.0001445605,0.0002258174,0.0006107289,0.0001539799,0.0002175326,0.0001873105,0.000001566258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008530362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002505678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7210657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7888665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989416,0.00004430106,0.000221117,0.0001947566,0.0003285336,0.0002696837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992912,0.0002259417,0.0001273574,0.0002952193,0.000009160263,0.00005116638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001368962,0.00003084049,0.8602642,0.00006725584,0.0001158836,0.000004240613,0.02502003,0.09938955,0.0001694442,0.00045377,0.01239886,0.002072195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004801239,0.00004222685,0.9396929,0.0000625285,0.0001078758,0.00001574053,0.002464625,0.05167746,0.0002276545,0.001578881,0.003336644,0.000313334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968349,0.0002815438,5.080988e-7,0.0003121772,0.00003002346,0.0002189419,0.00001536652,0.000007359836,0.002299221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947909,0.00002859346,0.00004931968,0.0003825097,0.00002458168,0.000004023703,0.000002075327,0.0000118757,0.004706185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07942867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3573599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294147616","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582","title":"How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Environmental Change","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Southern Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Ohio State University; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Carbon sink; Sink (geography); Forest management; Natural resource economics; Business; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Forestry; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00994452043924325,"gpt":0.2005427917972695,"spread":0.1905982713580262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001413142,0.0002609895,0.0001527655,0.00001795602,0.0004641052,0.00005153659,0.0006683888,0.00004952231,0.0004564682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002039911,0.0001719903,0.0001114514,0.0003274948,0.000470501,0.0001328905,0.002230092,0.000142488,0.00004972254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005536513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001862332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001029238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001777161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982672,0.0001035207,0.0001510796,0.0003571454,0.0006920012,0.0004290605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992541,0.00001118525,0.0001346818,0.0005172105,6.685933e-7,0.00008215319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005422724,0.000119847,0.9806514,0.00001385523,0.00004248938,0.00001022264,0.0002265252,0.001137074,0.000007252079,0.00751402,0.005475586,0.004747539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004702622,0.000154082,0.8213548,0.000005239883,0.00006503566,0.00002341368,0.0005592398,0.0005583651,0.000006479405,0.001330139,0.1752763,0.0001966006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477053,0.0004948258,0.00000152561,0.004790841,0.0003293286,0.0007630757,0.0002869558,0.00002230936,0.04560578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947729,0.0001603807,0.00002052888,0.00183379,0.0001773111,0.0001365391,0.00002577508,0.00001448977,0.002858334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1698007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.701356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337737576","doi":"10.1002/fee.1247","title":"Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Emerging Frontiers; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Corporate governance; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Network governance; Scale (ratio); Natural resource; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Political science; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004254245486874739,"gpt":0.2045672575767667,"spread":0.200313012089892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009806097,0.000163395,0.0005191464,0.0000251342,0.0001227211,0.000007639414,0.0002028713,0.0001153885,0.000404726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000325139,0.00008896525,0.00004831405,0.0000996389,0.0002248303,0.00005926448,0.0003605258,0.0001811633,0.00002461105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007965008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004773896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001013574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001091789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.0002869921,0.0003133708,0.0002304416,0.00008449527,0.0002672859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991867,0.0003163753,0.0002946849,0.0001833599,3.600693e-7,0.00001852892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006162981,0.00006627076,0.6234962,0.0004062676,0.0001005954,0.00000313755,0.001801876,0.0009197792,5.453113e-8,0.00435476,0.005059887,0.3637295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008170352,0.00002488038,0.02945112,0.0003644212,0.00007247311,0.000002517128,0.0001575871,0.00191447,4.459358e-8,0.002512392,0.9645462,0.000136852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008686932,0.9876392,0.00004042925,0.0005079375,0.0002185835,0.0007524521,0.00001061064,0.000004060428,0.002139827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01383164,0.9854573,0.0001207722,0.00008953398,0.0000333811,0.0000837839,0.000005908249,0.00001112772,0.0003665471],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4431466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291709938","doi":"10.5751/es-03715-150433","title":"Institutional Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation in U.S. National Parks and Forests","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change adaptation; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01242467028550717,"gpt":0.2469215239924885,"spread":0.2344968537069813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002132508,0.00004086849,0.00003923445,0.00001347846,0.0001593052,0.000008285872,0.00003243676,0.00006489603,0.0006951829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003356143,0.00003994086,0.00001151037,0.00006037323,0.0001691419,0.0001316098,0.00007884065,0.00008053115,0.00006392865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002301923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007925379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009178779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006687946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996521,0.000009119089,0.00005300392,0.0001097235,0.00005737303,0.0001186732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998703,0.0000202749,0.00001294916,0.00002514258,0.000002462726,0.00006885558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005196033,0.000007110231,0.9731995,0.000003487388,0.000002686444,7.303782e-7,0.003142405,0.0001358435,0.00004255939,0.01804459,0.004072307,0.001343616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001828618,0.00001797275,0.9808841,9.52376e-7,0.000001500452,0.000001349933,0.00005329907,0.006321158,0.00000156418,0.001357274,0.01113081,0.00004719845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914472,0.000003981414,0.000005170468,0.001260367,0.0001002229,0.0001153312,0.000004710679,0.000006626542,0.007056387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968787,0.00003880827,0.0006045869,0.002278579,0.00004478009,0.00003741564,0.00000691428,0.000001713656,0.0001085136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01668731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7611766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275894462","doi":"10.5751/es-02655-130243","title":"Exploring the Role of Private Wildlife Ranching as a Conservation Tool in South Africa: Stakeholder Perspectives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Birmingham","keywords":"Wildlife; Stakeholder; Wildlife conservation; Nature Conservation; Wildlife management; Geography; North American Model of Wildlife Conservation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Business; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Economics; Public relations; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04752864566014461,"gpt":0.2191774714412554,"spread":0.1716488257811108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001929188,0.00004928683,0.00007049733,0.00000852325,0.0001674078,0.000004038838,0.00006350111,0.00002684558,0.0001553754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002804813,0.00003778572,0.00003008393,0.000102161,0.0002825065,0.000160713,0.00007667318,0.000084675,0.00002561542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002804739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005440956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009985892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003075777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995912,0.00003740986,0.00008552014,0.0001063133,0.00005829419,0.0001212159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998252,0.00005421602,0.00003846611,0.00006984973,0.000002085109,0.00001013066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008139501,0.00002838435,0.7748584,0.000002898193,0.00001312382,9.226678e-7,0.2195054,0.0001813889,0.000178963,0.004183495,0.0008798609,0.0001589914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002489951,0.00002718695,0.9847273,0.000002219071,0.000004442099,9.46819e-7,0.007864424,0.0006055442,0.00003504615,0.001141284,0.005290291,0.00005237604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951795,0.00004723766,0.000004063575,0.0004322515,0.00002092354,0.0001133532,6.37804e-7,0.000008444198,0.004193577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988654,0.0001496672,0.0001490259,0.0003391004,0.00001607329,0.00002030251,4.915382e-7,0.000002926379,0.0004570198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.211641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1701252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107248147","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00078-3","title":"Mosaic of reform: forest policy in post-1978 China","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"China; Afforestation; Devolution (biology); Business; Logging; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009839809078686394,"gpt":0.2115374940400853,"spread":0.2016976849613989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001415035,0.0002027776,0.0002473405,0.0003114188,0.00008489587,0.0000363778,0.0003958799,0.0001042382,0.0009018273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007748044,0.0001963858,0.0000735253,0.0003210482,0.0002891533,0.0004312915,0.000445946,0.0001164981,0.0006987621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003454197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001722105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06171864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02083052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987624,0.00001784864,0.0003792161,0.0002767544,0.00006591715,0.0004979006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992447,0.0000214938,0.0001393614,0.000443207,0.000002566302,0.0001486125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008775866,0.0003499156,0.5129066,0.00009825548,0.00004838752,0.000008273829,0.003553578,0.01847543,0.00003966878,0.4295584,0.01293826,0.02193547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00144147,0.00039404,0.7751465,0.00002405776,0.0000161113,0.00002216006,0.00006171338,0.03287697,0.00003125378,0.04005177,0.1493858,0.0005481153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7968313,0.00003388968,9.824033e-7,0.002855805,0.00003695501,0.0001639074,0.00004082006,0.00001742937,0.2000189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991713,0.000850743,0.0001285243,0.0007916449,0.0002432202,0.00001397661,0.00002394592,0.00002036588,0.006214506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3895067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163917379","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0810076106","title":"Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Northern Research Station; Wisconsin Historical Society; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Clearing; Carbon sequestration; Reforestation; Logging; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Land use; Greenhouse gas; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Ecosystem; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Secondary forest; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02745322318294245,"gpt":0.2810303802317907,"spread":0.2535771570488483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007602001,0.00006551834,0.00009212684,0.00005580931,0.0001197961,0.0000151353,0.0004214056,0.0000473956,0.00001567925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002319368,0.00004554865,0.00006156932,0.0003299705,0.000263051,0.0002871584,0.00004958712,0.00005384439,0.000001314513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009322575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006550955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000399003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.162805e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988324,0.000003241851,0.0002330483,0.000161475,0.0006439284,0.0001259094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.00002800512,0.0002517182,0.000005568618,0.00004066773,0.00002419919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001432513,0.0002480066,0.1272927,0.00009205889,0.00001732573,2.013568e-8,0.0003610488,0.004888462,0.5742725,0.170216,0.1178225,0.004646202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000652748,0.0004003363,0.6740162,0.00006192558,0.00004767208,0.000004779054,0.00002633073,0.03714445,0.04254161,0.2344349,0.01039363,0.0002754068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674682,0.0000205233,0.000003647976,0.009028517,0.00003126859,0.0002727085,0.000002519001,0.0000116996,0.02316094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954824,0.000004218534,0.001612305,0.0002742344,0.0001402078,0.000006718234,1.585043e-7,0.000001838444,0.002477941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5467235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.185742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}