{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":328,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":328,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e1ffe4229abe","filters":{"topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation"}},"results":[{"id":"W1992057186","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001","title":"Freedom of Speech","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Speech recognition; Computer science; Communication; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03067834838376472,"gpt":0.2577964082807872,"spread":0.2271180598970225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000383851,0.0001702705,0.0003013182,0.0002347674,0.0002704247,0.00002639485,0.000618041,0.0005691801,0.000158873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004361759,0.0001986434,0.0001880905,0.00002554249,0.0007081814,0.0001115836,0.0001703244,0.0002857847,0.000002401901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002416459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004768734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006533902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985606,0.00009638631,0.0001945234,0.0002503168,0.0006318554,0.0002662947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987823,0.0001516207,0.0003365047,0.0003239442,0.0002394696,0.0001661124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007288245,0.00001373616,0.000004676396,0.00004731174,0.00003677427,0.00004070796,0.001602738,0.00000328586,0.00001982579,0.8681541,0.1205371,0.009466853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333337,0.00002653782,0.000004785573,0.0001401133,0.00005433619,5.12124e-7,0.0004737285,0.000007530316,0.0001112615,0.001354456,0.9972956,0.0001977845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004159551,0.00005241644,0.0004091327,0.00002323169,0.000430562,0.0003083247,0.00005147556,0.00010039,0.9985829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001871169,0.0001643626,0.00107955,0.00002266567,0.0003514161,1.725026e-7,0.00002345536,0.00001615283,0.9981551],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8100443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232208315","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/7617.001.0001","title":"Access Denied","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Politics; Political science; Internet access; Filter (signal processing); Dozen; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1090733099831984,"gpt":0.3435436664179385,"spread":0.23447035643474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004057085,0.0002119902,0.0002563256,0.00005971752,0.0008923229,0.0002721286,0.00152689,0.0003819944,0.0001769362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001039617,0.0001488269,0.0001620909,0.00001357052,0.0007539185,0.0001245361,0.0002677372,0.0003989883,0.0001389223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001150475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005089358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001780538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005933482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981234,0.0002705365,0.0002619335,0.0002674722,0.0007599729,0.0003166557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998658,0.0002853829,0.0002638698,0.0005476397,0.0001204856,0.0001246302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002048841,0.000008018571,0.000001052729,0.00001574372,0.00003592293,0.000009274943,0.008078002,0.000003315167,0.000007811125,0.2266579,0.7605814,0.004581114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001649504,0.000007316792,0.000007482798,0.0000946615,0.0000410138,0.000001874015,0.00004732882,0.00000711033,0.0001070556,0.0141847,0.9851348,0.0002016433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002683371,0.0009142456,0.00005347321,0.0002093177,0.0007642668,0.000592319,0.00001304798,0.0001924944,0.997234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001118997,0.0003143782,0.00003607613,0.0004529149,0.001251742,0.00005714752,0.00001310643,0.00003402712,0.9967216],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2245535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6863116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524809068","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199246380.001.0001","title":"Privacy and Freedom Of Expression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Freedom of thought; Political science; Charter; Convention; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Common law; Relation (database); Criminal law; Sociology; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02709678569880137,"gpt":0.2975480979770844,"spread":0.270451312278283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002673988,0.0001106424,0.0002199786,0.000100045,0.0001448771,0.00003270584,0.000194234,0.0003324646,0.002547066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001673437,0.00009087705,0.00005691454,0.0000458797,0.000334763,0.0001392435,0.00009085886,0.0001188293,0.00003598674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004089765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000236366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003512561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001471556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989644,0.00006125069,0.0002239581,0.0001832787,0.0004344603,0.0001326659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992653,0.0001392099,0.0001973883,0.0001953321,0.00009441949,0.000108347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001126345,0.00002143345,0.00005417442,0.00003538524,0.000005704069,0.000001889355,0.002614844,8.413114e-7,0.0003819155,0.1113295,0.8810494,0.004493665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001792717,0.00001827454,0.00003393223,0.0002508008,0.000008684862,3.812879e-7,0.0003075338,0.000007629293,0.0001131561,0.02426844,0.9746904,0.0001214677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001110588,0.0004147822,0.0003470897,0.0002637482,0.0002568211,0.0001990079,0.000004663741,0.00005886629,0.9983439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001401069,0.0009132843,0.001928502,0.00005461986,0.0003530171,0.000003599755,0.00001418056,0.00001179175,0.99532],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09364102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099194940","doi":"10.1386/jdmp_00028_1","title":"Global platform governance and the internet-governance impossibility theorem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilemma; Impossibility; Accountability; Corporate governance; The Internet; Democracy; Political science; Internet governance; Corollary; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Management; Mathematics; Monetary policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02131207718299075,"gpt":0.29647977946758,"spread":0.2751677022845893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497894,0.00009258577,0.0002112355,0.00001034815,0.00008970495,0.000294166,0.0003905888,0.00005799213,0.00003788565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006613854,0.00005438116,0.0001215632,0.0002430097,0.000690872,0.001091919,0.00008635777,0.0001525152,0.00001220531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001352999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003102262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004126106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001760777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986681,0.00005617302,0.0003683905,0.0001019902,0.0006188689,0.0001864335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998651,0.0003522351,0.0005158635,0.00008716666,0.0001134603,0.000280319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000662359,0.00004312977,0.008655672,0.000009849304,0.00002852492,0.00001143938,0.02441943,0.000003880175,0.00001063411,0.8888029,0.01419572,0.06315648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009846461,0.0005193481,0.1805104,0.000359251,0.00006513272,0.000105799,0.01151995,0.0006681422,0.0002048629,0.6147248,0.1808809,0.0005950012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7872896,0.0014787,0.0002875591,0.0845855,0.0006542652,0.0002039612,0.00008045998,0.00002969267,0.1253902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968077,0.000304317,0.00006974173,0.001336366,0.001376935,7.027422e-7,4.65636e-7,0.000004124241,0.00009965994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2740781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7917879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622161176","doi":"10.1057/9780333977705","title":"Human Rights and the Internet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Human rights; Computer science; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01683711883630451,"gpt":0.2695674874696443,"spread":0.2527303686333398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005707875,0.000261121,0.0003647571,0.0001130705,0.0007673814,0.0002042472,0.0004522201,0.0003484743,0.001848607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002353202,0.0001680583,0.0001584797,0.00001976487,0.001525497,7.974639e-7,0.0000929957,0.0003121112,0.0002259322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007615204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000951273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003371621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004223435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998248,0.0002890762,0.00032078,0.0003371361,0.0005075703,0.0002974343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990488,0.0001880584,0.0001992265,0.0003515779,0.00005640478,0.0001559492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002735902,1.720955e-7,0.000003645451,0.000009220055,0.00002820873,0.000006937446,0.005540336,6.585048e-8,0.000002058613,0.9788043,0.01378016,0.001797539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005758207,0.00001538275,0.00002483709,0.0001029773,0.00003210727,0.000002079453,0.00005974636,0.000005216968,0.000006776044,0.7711313,0.2278547,0.0001890571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002243972,0.0005673959,0.00000705325,0.0001356881,0.0002966184,0.0005623272,0.00001393264,0.00009697715,0.9980956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.640463,0.00001882766,0.00002182111,0.0001990657,0.0005290969,0.00002135831,0.00001893384,0.00001639393,0.3587115],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600954881","doi":"","title":"Law of Defamation and the Internet","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Jurisdiction; Praise; Political science; Choice of law; Pace; Common law; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0199913921235014,"gpt":0.2786443451491888,"spread":0.2586529530256874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004931594,0.00005544578,0.0001283725,0.00002664018,0.00008061031,0.0000401419,0.0001192693,0.0001362265,0.0009847982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007315762,0.0000328861,0.00004255275,0.00002443924,0.0007421258,0.00007730681,0.00003132323,0.00007253544,0.00003385087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002475683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000662142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002969398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003839097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993818,0.00009148011,0.0001527367,0.00007650152,0.000237753,0.00005971448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994695,0.0002129011,0.0001380605,0.00009047484,0.00006232697,0.00002672384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000993657,0.000002200142,0.000001910381,0.000005997489,0.000004170198,9.659764e-8,0.001922074,1.691634e-7,5.813527e-7,0.8527923,0.1441719,0.001088676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706058,0.000005845536,0.000004657905,0.00006109221,0.00001125282,2.876009e-7,0.000375728,0.00004087856,0.000007514567,0.1568645,0.8423126,0.00004497677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001922252,0.000212692,0.0003355943,0.0008083475,0.000146097,0.0001800633,0.000001228768,0.0000222271,0.9982745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01247323,0.0003060744,0.0001200852,0.0003488896,0.0001361704,0.00000388835,0.000008638568,0.00000428441,0.9865987],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6981407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608159919","doi":"","title":"The law of freedom of information","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Confidentiality; Statute; Secrecy; Political science; Statutory law; Law; European union; Enforcement; Human rights; Intellectual property; Business; Public administration; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01654012026481989,"gpt":0.2227937931010653,"spread":0.2062536728362455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003412077,0.0001012562,0.0001877335,0.00007100875,0.0004232838,0.00003084589,0.0004782943,0.0002636253,0.00002163233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005241281,0.00008937604,0.000125234,0.00001864673,0.0009068538,0.000252417,0.0000863021,0.000150753,6.56367e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003925942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000850598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003860591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989722,0.0001349871,0.00022284,0.00008047415,0.0004483027,0.0001412019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867,0.0001829082,0.0005382063,0.0002615516,0.0002865335,0.00006077716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003626348,0.000004659835,8.564657e-7,0.0000333775,0.00002155989,3.712773e-7,0.001811143,0.00001382398,0.000003296268,0.9464743,0.05055324,0.001047097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002482941,0.00002180122,0.000001706206,0.00007780889,0.00003460602,1.092736e-7,0.001034208,0.0000145341,0.00006516164,0.002698642,0.9957159,0.00008723593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000133137,0.00004392998,0.0002523265,0.00002590922,0.0002818541,0.0002753133,0.00005005999,0.00002396332,0.9990333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005477352,0.0002597942,0.000274178,0.00002125079,0.00003703589,4.307346e-7,0.00001689376,0.000005185342,0.9988375],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3644649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388150022","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199284740.001.0001","title":"The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral rights; Political science; Law; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Convention; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Statutory interpretation; Reservation of rights; Statutory law; Statute; Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy); Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665599648856085,"gpt":0.2745355629759617,"spread":0.2578795664874008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003628307,0.00006719071,0.0001033519,0.00003374756,0.0005215401,0.00004617344,0.0001225811,0.0001734012,0.0002457793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002811089,0.00003744535,0.00004467913,0.00002692652,0.000552503,0.00006483523,0.00001987082,0.00009394043,0.00001543825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000331638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001505704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002196565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004212586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992923,0.00004445233,0.0001454005,0.00009152056,0.0003175314,0.0001088422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995618,0.0001315542,0.000112292,0.00009097516,0.00005560687,0.00004778401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002348681,0.000002006506,0.00001427723,0.000003236334,0.000002739464,1.397475e-7,0.000391459,3.527864e-7,8.13999e-7,0.432102,0.5662662,0.001214448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005287497,0.000009904461,0.00008830069,0.00002278211,0.00000706658,8.907654e-8,0.0001921488,0.00002265871,0.000005894295,0.08125715,0.9182844,0.00005672092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000143562,0.0001692914,0.00001224184,0.0004073674,0.0002833635,0.0001200529,0.000002568695,0.00002079153,0.9988407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004512111,0.00005657574,0.0001305372,0.00001892707,0.0001613374,0.000001899293,0.000006702476,0.000003679093,0.9951082],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3520182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4011318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096190646","doi":"","title":"A Critical Analysis of Attempts to Regulate Native Advertising and Influencer Marketing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Native advertising; Advertising; Reputation; Purchasing; Commercialism; Online advertising; Business; Advertising campaign; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.241795979127171,"gpt":0.5913884844356229,"spread":0.3495925053084519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245758,0.0001424542,0.0006029023,0.0006592824,0.0003715276,0.000711336,0.000933176,0.00008393801,0.004763458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006994684,0.0001325084,0.0001436723,0.002474503,0.0003114828,0.001991832,0.0005265915,0.0001706959,0.000003513238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005592768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001076034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002162281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002723138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971957,0.0007211936,0.0006571027,0.0003279262,0.0008456664,0.0002524629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997282,0.001147935,0.0004312469,0.0001589343,0.0005499448,0.0004299255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008746063,0.0001540497,0.7681468,0.0001826612,0.0008440842,0.00002564473,0.02290636,0.001425743,0.1367537,0.001890558,0.02910187,0.03769393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002345327,0.000009128145,0.986846,0.0005178503,0.0002839004,4.116486e-7,0.001708179,0.001053184,0.003660182,0.001878267,0.003556584,0.0002517532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777777,0.002506047,0.0008435452,0.003077228,0.0001426736,0.0002827357,0.00002119806,0.00002506251,0.01532388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974104,0.000804627,0.0006884749,0.0009063256,0.00009351349,0.000007544292,0.000001594326,0.00001160071,0.00007587631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2186992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556158956","doi":"","title":"Emanations, Snoop Dogs and Reasonable Expectation of Privacy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Normative; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Currency; Business; Internet privacy; Economics; Computer science; Monetary economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01149535134287358,"gpt":0.3051623204821579,"spread":0.2936669691392843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003049659,0.00004904843,0.00007851754,0.0001221342,0.0003573452,0.00003460525,0.0001084318,0.00005552662,0.0000502143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003746745,0.00004493584,0.00003265419,0.0001879422,0.0000828851,0.0003309106,0.00001251457,0.0002998716,0.00000476194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002690321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006961451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006943379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003972944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986355,0.00007645805,0.0002069571,0.00007996933,0.0003259686,0.0006751613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.00009127024,0.0001739609,0.00005903776,0.0001394612,0.00007093904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003346906,0.00003966741,0.004147147,0.000003383502,0.00001739523,6.753078e-7,0.00599784,0.000003590246,0.001246353,0.9609654,0.0004739142,0.02707117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001361972,0.0002427025,0.02195187,0.00006872639,0.00003307118,0.00005765071,0.07882757,0.00008010788,0.001166798,0.8731746,0.02278776,0.0002471859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.923777,0.003104393,0.03029925,0.002240132,0.0002266321,0.0001696448,5.42344e-7,0.00003706136,0.04014538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948789,0.002310802,0.0005302678,0.00002813168,0.0001645561,9.82239e-7,0.000001285752,0.000004668235,0.002080362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0877908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2748446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124006722","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1439","title":"Justified Limits on Free Expression: The Collapse of the General Approach to Limits on Charter Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Expression (computer science); Adjudication; Law and economics; Harm; Individualism; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Deference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0577417576987805,"gpt":0.2809014847058253,"spread":0.2231597270070448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007158678,0.000170103,0.0001973753,0.00006000176,0.002204699,0.0002062779,0.001054172,0.0001511425,0.0004830758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002087784,0.00008500661,0.0001748329,0.000247386,0.0002389795,0.0001857638,0.00006302883,0.0004335757,0.0001094311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006774483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000295781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004814825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973241,0.0005779216,0.0003507969,0.0002325209,0.001156784,0.0003578617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985644,0.0001877888,0.0002691042,0.000564568,0.0001598668,0.0002542437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009418202,0.0003866362,0.00001882335,0.000005504886,0.00001783849,0.000004133813,0.008364022,0.0007562406,0.003685778,0.7619952,0.2237748,0.0008968048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007739126,0.001409894,0.004138598,0.001835568,0.0002009007,0.0001322203,0.008603641,0.003682069,0.07033841,0.1566864,0.743506,0.001727167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02153354,0.00008059503,0.00008866795,0.009646916,0.001252169,0.0003754243,0.00001122809,0.00002834958,0.9669831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877641,0.00003309295,0.0007081407,0.002162421,0.001181334,0.00001780144,9.137598e-7,0.00001365103,0.008118563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388122178","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199217502.001.0001","title":"Media Law &amp; Human Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Convention; Political science; Supreme court; Common law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04243513829357341,"gpt":0.3298824534969407,"spread":0.2874473152033673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315572,0.0001386757,0.0002112791,0.00007187476,0.0008424119,0.0001078316,0.000301981,0.0004489607,0.01048891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003231871,0.0001112591,0.0001091333,0.00003960702,0.0003213177,0.0001392741,0.00002260489,0.0001942956,0.002262345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001243587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001224247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1496464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986519,0.0000797051,0.0002045799,0.0002146868,0.0006464467,0.000202702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992757,0.0001277576,0.0001129713,0.0002343005,0.00008589264,0.0001633851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.774472e-7,0.000005891152,5.113607e-8,0.000001093828,0.00000172284,8.387419e-7,0.0005308833,3.90875e-8,0.00000271041,0.5246019,0.474721,0.0001333467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057481,0.000004157343,0.000002329296,0.00003461453,0.000005583839,8.709543e-8,0.00001121492,7.610719e-8,0.000003969739,0.3628016,0.6369722,0.0001066717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004850918,0.0000841134,0.00002428893,0.0004187436,0.000380678,0.0001549728,0.000002929924,0.0002215025,0.9987079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002994851,0.00001305626,0.0007689461,0.0006739168,0.001453184,0.000002843025,0.0001349918,0.00000883234,0.9966447],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1622513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979939751","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0002","title":"Putting the Community in Communication: Dissolving the Conflict Between Freedom of Expression and Copyright","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Context (archaeology); Freedom of expression; Compromise; Law; Law and economics; Balance (ability); Public domain; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02088374370708177,"gpt":0.2580742430135937,"spread":0.237190499306512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566694,0.00004501097,0.0001116871,0.00001230378,0.002335368,0.00003790661,0.0005351402,0.0000518486,0.0001659079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005492868,0.00003074167,0.00004111492,0.00003548433,0.0008339672,0.0004173565,0.0001342951,0.0002408861,3.096254e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002658618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3486376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3442487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998536,0.0009473327,0.0001573834,0.00003898501,0.000225459,0.00009485363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987425,0.0006516274,0.0002789667,0.0001874789,0.0001038552,0.00003554155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000173381,0.0004034054,0.1393496,0.00005748985,0.00007694453,0.00000651392,0.3870985,0.0005339243,0.008541428,0.4280663,0.02543356,0.01025895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002612127,0.0001005722,0.4472377,0.0008705981,0.00007894131,0.000006718582,0.3439224,0.0004287077,0.0007239638,0.01497325,0.188813,0.0002319368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7161204,0.002669022,0.000538074,0.003816525,0.00009857229,0.0002192224,0.00000897785,0.00001564777,0.2765136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983693,0.0002696287,0.0011532,0.00001227525,0.00004864155,4.505059e-8,0.000001654268,0.000001774843,0.0001435162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036747559","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00435.x","title":"Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Control (management); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Business; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04344142266758387,"gpt":0.3153778832916118,"spread":0.2719364606240279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000369541,0.00005074721,0.00007262887,0.00004372989,0.0003526036,0.0001423857,0.0001200557,0.00005333505,0.0001074032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007385782,0.00003928169,0.00001903668,0.0001407903,0.000116607,0.0005820562,0.000007748423,0.00004318117,0.000001272713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005008319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007883891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3011676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7350246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.00005291473,0.0002197574,0.00006209874,0.0002605453,0.0001121931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990016,0.0004422425,0.0001777701,0.00009731409,0.0002085736,0.00007255261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000567395,0.00002819597,0.0009015637,0.000007150218,0.00002361134,8.416494e-8,0.001688388,0.00007852995,0.00009067373,0.9527109,0.02580074,0.0186134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008756047,0.00003373533,0.01088631,0.000007467021,0.00001748431,2.920802e-7,0.002905536,0.013544,0.0001230339,0.001116655,0.9704071,0.00008282501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1913113,0.0001262215,0.1440691,0.6465608,0.0009229893,0.001544551,0.0005085783,0.00009360955,0.0148628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976318,0.000008589622,0.001225149,0.0006952665,0.0002416182,0.00003231765,0.000113494,0.000002093564,0.00004963103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.703486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W902691666","doi":"","title":"Intermediary Liability for Harmful Speech: Lessons from Abroad","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & technology","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Liability; The Internet; European union; Jurisdiction; Child pornography; Law; Political science; Business; International trade; Finance; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02852172687545256,"gpt":0.3515939636442862,"spread":0.3230722367688337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285558,0.00009772673,0.0003026392,0.0001502586,0.0002459862,0.00005324766,0.0005619783,0.000306828,0.0004511904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001978582,0.00008338606,0.0001507513,0.0001396679,0.0007185338,0.0002753965,0.00006578113,0.0003050158,0.0001038288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008709403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001068271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002214668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007084644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998721,0.0001553331,0.0004358184,0.0001574369,0.0002793572,0.0002510387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984438,0.0004348753,0.0004025972,0.0002382131,0.0003637548,0.0001167764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001728828,0.0002123567,0.00214639,0.00001570348,0.0000595368,0.00001258576,0.002144631,0.00000664014,0.01194147,0.846355,0.03513458,0.1017982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005356814,0.0001293804,0.0002668007,0.00005676583,0.00002110445,0.000006213711,0.0006464502,0.00005300231,0.006790021,0.2082628,0.78315,0.00008176846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6010795,0.0003854197,0.1271436,0.1364628,0.008137188,0.001092463,0.000100131,0.0006252892,0.1249737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851025,0.00006802821,0.01344259,0.0005196163,0.0005851444,0.000008096122,0.000002765779,0.00001027043,0.0002609743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7480155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4940219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987081262","doi":"10.7202/045697ar","title":"The Medium is not the Message: Reconciling Reputation and Free Expression in Cases of Internet Defamation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; The Internet; Common law; Political science; Damages; Privilege (computing); Statement (logic); Sociology; History; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06868534347314391,"gpt":0.3010099317483342,"spread":0.2323245882751903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075772,0.00006015955,0.00008760551,0.00003937519,0.001490483,0.00007000635,0.000239495,0.00006464526,0.0001337597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008936657,0.00003348499,0.00003662633,0.00008864926,0.0002377356,0.0004261012,0.00005435276,0.0001784252,0.000002629677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004098394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001458453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003538065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01879415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998715,0.0003585987,0.0003444884,0.00009256036,0.0003564394,0.0001329527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989449,0.0004204731,0.0003076266,0.0001336,0.0001380196,0.00005542725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001254439,0.0002777719,0.007712191,0.00008561827,0.00007888558,0.00008126166,0.2405441,0.00007606715,0.01221518,0.5928897,0.02316926,0.1216156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043391,0.00047606,0.02845319,0.001754545,0.00008497627,0.0002806764,0.1221609,0.002275111,0.3141137,0.154964,0.3703803,0.0007173867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6773623,0.001139987,0.0008824221,0.009637075,0.002460678,0.00064345,0.00002118625,0.00005578897,0.3077971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987323,0.0003231447,0.00057513,0.0001671811,0.0000713599,0.000004790107,5.056027e-7,0.000004496116,0.0001211426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4379256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214827179","doi":"","title":"What’s In a Name? Privacy and Citizenship in the Voluntary Disclosure of Subscriber Information in Online Child Exploitation Investigations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discretion; Charter; Constitutionality; Business; Internet privacy; Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Personally identifiable information; Service provider; Law; Service (business); Political science; Supreme court","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06429071838210455,"gpt":0.3246011559447048,"spread":0.2603104375626002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006549202,0.00005592178,0.00008606462,0.0001878697,0.00006209729,0.00004245027,0.0001187402,0.00006348611,0.00004568111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004945953,0.00004508306,0.00001383645,0.000409369,0.0001426227,0.001164387,0.0000207424,0.0001312894,0.00000375185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003240317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000471768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006571317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0220092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991386,0.0002292563,0.000237282,0.00007203346,0.0002093633,0.0001134639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962,0.0001065554,0.0001011777,0.0001027735,0.00003758907,0.00003188762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268196,0.00007198763,0.1112144,0.00002007275,0.000001463261,0.000001026742,0.866903,0.0000255496,0.00002968386,0.01997182,0.0006551613,0.001083216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005093049,0.00002254668,0.6972835,0.0002392498,0.000002729068,6.101121e-7,0.2859297,0.0003252931,0.00005134396,0.01496881,0.0005918455,0.00007504864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844933,0.0001222663,0.00002482284,0.007621311,0.00008461366,0.0002940099,0.000002076418,0.00001080218,0.007346787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998697,0.0001659407,0.000669233,0.0003420757,0.00001858447,0.00002107842,0.00002389569,0.000002509279,0.00005968266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5860691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124593119","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3290","title":"Law, Metaphor, and the Encrypted Machine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Normative; Encryption; Law; Legal writing; Determinative; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Legal research; Computer security; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01782555501198229,"gpt":0.288923049804268,"spread":0.2710974947922857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00167908,0.00007640402,0.0001285687,0.00002400528,0.00192448,0.0003206413,0.000230247,0.00006481769,0.001014231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001532608,0.00004450197,0.00006570197,0.00008948222,0.001440691,0.0003015184,0.00004228797,0.000206566,0.00007417567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002097953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000302379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0465091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2088515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987006,0.0004099644,0.0001875463,0.0001011232,0.0003923782,0.0002084247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993008,0.0001535119,0.0001262393,0.0001177833,0.0001413004,0.0001603478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005442079,0.00001303966,0.00002808117,8.816466e-7,0.00001488752,0.000002685032,0.002961807,4.712578e-7,0.0001538933,0.9932449,0.002170062,0.001354898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002060305,0.00006587776,0.000138438,0.00003620112,0.00004422266,0.00006383973,0.001743654,0.0003870556,0.0004177337,0.6156088,0.3792859,0.0001480575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001327646,0.0007921622,0.0006387026,0.00658147,0.0005361454,0.00009467416,0.000001792381,0.00003159567,0.9899958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951769,0.0002449628,0.001294313,0.001634928,0.0007442882,0.000002316052,6.7928e-7,0.000006390768,0.0008952128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494975207","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-207-7.ch004","title":"Legal Challenges of Online Reputation Systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Reputation; Reputation system; Internet privacy; Business; Online business; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05558395699940289,"gpt":0.3018714865052638,"spread":0.2462875295058609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002741632,0.0001827703,0.0003351849,0.00006238977,0.0001083313,0.00003929435,0.0002423238,0.0004550206,0.00006538188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006417432,0.0001756367,0.0001344523,0.00001094255,0.0002238914,0.00008621369,0.00004526244,0.0001305097,0.00006791351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002717331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003548368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002309641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985306,0.000061651,0.0004047899,0.0002631635,0.0005631879,0.0001765852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998856,0.00003768501,0.0004701282,0.0002609236,0.0002586079,0.0001166252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001985995,0.00001292862,0.000001121843,0.0000475958,0.00002424696,0.000006743513,0.0008567557,0.000002232135,0.000007621014,0.989273,0.001781716,0.00796614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003088346,0.0001230772,0.00004655532,0.0008602449,0.00006868721,0.000006178314,0.001215727,0.00001461634,0.00001704025,0.5949935,0.4019649,0.0003806786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005789067,0.002336857,0.00008511022,0.0001305613,0.001074113,0.0003059091,0.00009533332,0.0001032694,0.9958109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7173116,0.0004315379,0.0005450288,0.0001041296,0.001266656,0.00001426876,0.00001856779,0.00004213644,0.2802661],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7172537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7162255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135809726","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1668735","title":"Judicial Ghostwriting: Authorship on the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02238725323710084,"gpt":0.3009640141195207,"spread":0.2785767608824198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006520924,0.00009676016,0.00009752539,0.00007042178,0.001521341,0.000195238,0.0004717256,0.0001433096,0.0006242152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001242177,0.00006547963,0.0001002359,0.0001739965,0.0002218037,0.0001819288,0.00002136389,0.00309349,0.0001909446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002281249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00174564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000470835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009030429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972046,0.0003013902,0.0001975532,0.000131612,0.0006398953,0.001524972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992105,0.0002378619,0.0001443222,0.0001515787,0.0001177349,0.0001379615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000241201,0.00003116042,0.0003649222,3.578362e-7,0.00001122533,9.260143e-7,0.00132931,0.000001160204,0.001181778,0.9808936,0.01131067,0.004850783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003254072,0.000132409,0.0007538873,0.00001699934,0.00001300955,0.00003125051,0.01056901,0.00004066348,0.0002429696,0.8375192,0.1501951,0.0001600499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6690878,0.0001967105,0.0005263136,0.0750842,0.00174928,0.0002388019,0.00000142812,0.0001032325,0.2530122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931813,0.0002847484,0.00003633675,0.0006499966,0.002189885,0.000004248735,0.000001024943,0.00001150188,0.003640912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3240936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232910616","doi":"","title":"Journalistic Purposes and Private Sector Data Protection Legislation: Blogs, Tweets, and Information Maps","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Statute; Privilege (computing); Internet privacy; Legislation; Public relations; Journalism; Law; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02188104464624394,"gpt":0.2758145386022487,"spread":0.2539334939560048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771329,0.00009543608,0.0001034431,0.0001417822,0.0009260642,0.0004768879,0.0002357462,0.000116526,0.00005597849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005500545,0.00008193403,0.00001834659,0.0001476054,0.0001528701,0.003561032,0.00006685759,0.001226936,0.00001071783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007587353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004087968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004329689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984392,0.0001310694,0.0002657986,0.000127118,0.0003653068,0.0006715147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992646,0.00004723079,0.0002715782,0.000165091,0.0001225922,0.0001288817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103105,0.00004507981,0.003995896,0.00002143417,0.00007266896,0.000001518784,0.003722305,0.000007829338,0.003514441,0.842711,0.001420711,0.1443841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001729473,0.0002597514,0.009822324,0.00007353644,0.00008082036,0.0007338173,0.00541858,0.001332957,0.00009771631,0.4806292,0.499397,0.0004249157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297096,0.002319531,0.03403807,0.018926,0.002280483,0.001099299,0.00003214241,0.0001800912,0.01141482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953524,0.003066159,0.0004371583,0.0001079033,0.0007016707,0.000004662402,0.00002102099,0.000007042859,0.0003019611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4979762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.712263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921843199","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200019799","title":"Migration of European Judicial Ideas Concerning Jurisdiction Over Google on Withdrawal of Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to be forgotten; Jurisdiction; Legitimacy; Political science; Order (exchange); Position (finance); Economic Justice; Phenomenon; European court of justice; European union; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; European Union law; Data Protection Act 1998; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01215211981394637,"gpt":0.2840514299627629,"spread":0.2718993101488165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000800333,0.00005624238,0.00009783272,0.00008965947,0.0003226792,0.00004104658,0.0001032626,0.00004566832,0.0002742568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001051158,0.00003979797,0.00005932455,0.00008521752,0.000182749,0.001049045,0.00001279935,0.0000828528,0.00005160673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005872715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005340465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009170373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004840239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987458,0.0002290006,0.0003780952,0.00004932641,0.0004825444,0.0001152347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990672,0.00005778755,0.0005469995,0.00006969427,0.000186469,0.00007184924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005359962,0.0001347034,0.006302182,0.00002799913,0.0000503236,0.000004723021,0.04138306,0.0001508785,0.03990017,0.801752,0.03246941,0.07728858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007028413,0.001198431,0.1670175,0.001974775,0.00009254045,0.00003289525,0.005160927,0.0004655368,0.02584038,0.03374755,0.7567862,0.0006547904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.811263,0.00002060295,0.00397574,0.0006388756,0.0005365023,0.00008341726,0.000007603103,0.00002426091,0.18345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991632,0.00004488731,0.000125802,0.0001262332,0.0004421001,5.490212e-7,0.00000278361,0.000004108806,0.00009031378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.300292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229036864","doi":"","title":"Electronic petitions: a proposal to enhance democratic participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Commons; Democracy; Citizen journalism; Opposition (politics); Public administration; Politics; Political science; Participatory democracy; Democratic system; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0144444427672413,"gpt":0.3326871675730396,"spread":0.3182427248057983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600818,0.00008941565,0.0001469214,0.00007279521,0.0003472843,0.00007021931,0.0001701152,0.00003439091,0.008603926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002130142,0.00008537565,0.0000455554,0.0003289047,0.00005674135,0.0003534141,0.000008949069,0.00008133554,0.003333982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2492217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6826206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986733,0.0002050675,0.0002365618,0.0001871368,0.0002164875,0.0004814898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998983,0.00003129597,0.0000559682,0.0001832181,0.0000938399,0.0006526393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001155549,0.00002679327,0.0004977987,0.0001896674,0.00001189346,0.000002230519,0.0008105452,0.000002731716,0.0001062615,0.01287147,0.9071795,0.07829992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006322343,0.00006773302,0.001020479,0.001680816,0.00003568914,0.000001043285,0.0005183428,0.00003059981,0.00007026635,0.006606193,0.9896595,0.0002460697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07799837,0.1050132,0.001278615,0.5701315,0.00135692,0.01640721,0.00005113269,0.0003659214,0.2273971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8807202,0.02756415,0.00193468,0.07950683,0.0003717669,0.002489365,0.00009781299,0.00002754097,0.007287652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8027219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605290233","doi":"","title":"A Platform for Discipline: Social Media Speech and the Workplace","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Argument (complex analysis); Social media; Scope (computer science); Labour law; Adjudication; Balance (ability); Political science; Common law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0700095632698975,"gpt":0.3443209887335303,"spread":0.2743114254636329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001102707,0.00003849236,0.00007231081,0.00001479248,0.0003961145,0.0000861314,0.00009659784,0.00005345583,0.00006319798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008209943,0.00002107099,0.00002800825,0.00007711671,0.0003207494,0.0001477552,0.00003365342,0.00003685955,0.00001498926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001904752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006283285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000176593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003014237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994648,0.00003319147,0.00008106615,0.00007270055,0.0002291129,0.0001191579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.0005115833,0.00003433131,0.00004368336,0.00006295232,0.00007689314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001835079,0.00001053994,0.00005939695,0.000001881515,0.000003471742,1.464391e-7,0.06242722,5.564276e-7,0.000004905708,0.7084609,0.2172634,0.01158403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005976598,0.00002112838,0.0003976017,0.00001197381,0.00002028078,8.159487e-7,0.1459832,0.001237155,0.0000718688,0.4674134,0.3786776,0.0001883296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07792322,0.0002326412,0.005077228,0.07649826,0.001430217,0.001023493,0.000008257414,0.0001780261,0.8376287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819474,0.00001750273,0.003242981,0.000437075,0.001194889,0.00003875511,0.000005123101,0.000005671059,0.01311066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9040241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3046633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972232630","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3389","title":"Internet Intermediary Liability in Defamation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Intermediary; Liability; The Internet; Business; Complaint; Law; Profit (economics); Law and economics; Internet privacy; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02020266368439918,"gpt":0.2856283662043851,"spread":0.2654257025199859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001464801,0.00007585618,0.0001321072,0.00008023219,0.0001417709,0.0001654973,0.000252919,0.000108056,0.002195059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002246013,0.00006721787,0.00006880018,0.0001133708,0.0001219816,0.0006631869,0.00004081481,0.0003197556,0.0004583048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006818188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01779094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1071003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986122,0.0003339912,0.0003072379,0.0001371369,0.0003803078,0.000229084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993845,0.000128078,0.0001418051,0.0001243299,0.00008653603,0.0001347035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005648822,0.0001217689,0.04203201,0.00001523292,0.000006909793,0.00001021724,0.008259758,0.00006053415,0.0005046193,0.9394327,0.003233138,0.006266659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004257135,0.0003240987,0.08408167,0.001058188,0.0000225645,0.00005768886,0.01673921,0.004520884,0.001474682,0.7617738,0.1248017,0.0008884221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1913833,0.00006001743,0.0004213595,0.00113505,0.001206867,0.0001483802,8.36332e-7,0.00003066788,0.8056135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972823,0.00003635115,0.000579589,0.0002868115,0.0002266402,0.000003162343,0.000002701874,0.000006389198,0.001576115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.805899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045693014","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.231112","title":"COPYRIGHT ORIGINALITY AND JUDICIAL ORIGINALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Originality; Paraphrase; Copyright law; Outcome (game theory); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Philosophy; Economics; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01073020491758403,"gpt":0.248677690112529,"spread":0.237947485194945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004440327,0.00005513262,0.0001226652,0.00001149393,0.001044308,0.00006396015,0.0001782601,0.00006883751,0.008959621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000277714,0.00005432909,0.00005243406,0.00001727463,0.0005041665,0.00110823,0.00003052047,0.00009328336,0.00002686454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001911426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008227249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4354966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.146732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991766,0.0001784848,0.0001009971,0.00009009295,0.0003030673,0.0001507717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.00004667336,0.000141048,0.00007344427,0.0002228265,0.0002129527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008364965,0.00009507622,0.005384692,0.0000122611,0.00003666221,0.00001345311,0.0109828,0.000001854916,0.0004453864,0.9351128,0.04171203,0.006119336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752897,0.00007516951,0.01981065,0.00004234413,0.00003295783,0.000008827774,0.01734181,0.00005663001,0.00005418493,0.01578304,0.9457571,0.0001619992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2170715,0.0003329387,0.001088029,0.00207855,0.0004721506,0.0001419255,0.000004419587,0.00003220868,0.7787783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959256,0.0002850736,0.002218643,0.00006787699,0.0001878479,3.88208e-8,6.738217e-7,0.000001941557,0.001312285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906025335","doi":"10.5040/9781509920846","title":"A Crisis of Democratic Accountability : Public Libel Law and the Checking Function of the Press","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Accountability; Political science; Legislature; Law; Representation (politics); Politics; Public interest; Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Public law; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04245129050876597,"gpt":0.2684233909279832,"spread":0.2259721004192173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004282384,0.0001758394,0.0003732462,0.00006806139,0.0007741355,0.001263953,0.0008411423,0.0004083755,0.00009586509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001484937,0.0001029601,0.0001932899,0.0000758832,0.002245553,0.00127805,0.0003572579,0.0004421234,0.000001496831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009285031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005763236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003384373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004218418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997271,0.0006500831,0.0005348308,0.0003011246,0.001004629,0.0002383155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707,0.0006662665,0.000867671,0.0006390971,0.0006773573,0.00007964551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005803148,0.00002024574,0.00003819373,0.0001520844,0.00005307889,6.175528e-8,0.01103932,2.420646e-7,0.0000497421,0.6181131,0.3686509,0.001824952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007519912,0.00002693652,0.0001594383,0.0003979178,0.0001481965,6.484727e-7,0.002004347,0.0000665298,0.0002052569,0.1756966,0.8203425,0.0001996286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009890167,0.0002056494,0.00008370048,0.002043796,0.0009307019,0.0006949452,0.00002179186,0.00005619421,0.9949742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6718349,0.00002311959,0.0001128194,0.001827636,0.001088018,0.00008563457,0.00001774286,0.00004262932,0.3249675],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6708459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596211977","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of People's Attitudes Towards Freedom of Expression in a Changing Media Environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MADOC (University of Mannheim)","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Relevance (law); Civil liberties; Expression (computer science); Democracy; Political science; Normative; Freedom of the press; Social psychology; Individualism; Psychology; Sociology; Human rights; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02107046944360638,"gpt":0.2388781736463334,"spread":0.217807704202727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008053081,0.00005840127,0.0001557981,0.0001403769,0.0002021863,0.000003981481,0.0003027304,0.00006724727,0.0002132888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001227131,0.00005361926,0.0000618725,0.0002315262,0.0003551083,0.0002813043,0.0001520363,0.00006639858,0.000008141705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004556674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002818693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001170697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009535971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990219,0.0001370442,0.0001260945,0.00009127026,0.0004142769,0.0002094033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993129,0.0002094065,0.00020956,0.0001720084,0.00003511011,0.00006097792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006186625,0.001181361,0.1641501,0.0003417802,0.00007413549,0.000006729683,0.6278748,0.0007908495,0.04638844,0.09921457,0.008491891,0.05086671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001707854,0.00009541468,0.7201399,0.0006183514,0.00004718742,6.049785e-7,0.2063186,0.0004442158,0.006855612,0.001686711,0.06173876,0.0003468377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800783,0.001190869,0.001548619,0.001018716,0.0002539192,0.0002350149,0.00001029974,0.0000176857,0.01564658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968008,0.0007829553,0.001825891,0.000004853806,0.0000365192,3.850866e-7,0.000001867537,0.000003190121,0.0005435309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5559898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2335363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390542626","doi":"10.1080/14680777.2023.2284107","title":"Platformed misogyny in Depp v Heard: #justiceforjohnny and networked defamation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Media Studies","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06746722502664927,"gpt":0.3910683838210073,"spread":0.3236011587943581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007484218,0.0001057327,0.0001945411,0.0001314243,0.0003080508,0.0001083035,0.00008015069,0.00009313122,0.00004270381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001298284,0.00008767281,0.00003103893,0.0003339032,0.0003692126,0.0002063004,0.0000534769,0.0001288189,0.00005671629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009460896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008914875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001623364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002813512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989224,0.00005516395,0.0002437394,0.0002109217,0.0003065465,0.0002612328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986917,0.00105482,0.00004030247,0.0000775271,0.0000453684,0.00009026977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001122199,0.00008525218,0.01165972,0.000449811,0.0001306785,0.00009682793,0.6022301,0.00004074963,0.0001578614,0.1131865,0.2006866,0.0711636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001316545,0.0001160126,0.02182185,0.001769851,0.0001177675,0.00001017053,0.2694536,0.004409793,0.00009542629,0.03751689,0.6626776,0.0006945167],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7553937,0.06675563,0.0002067931,0.01280251,0.009280066,0.0009976586,0.00002218827,0.0006388319,0.1539026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994178,0.003884562,0.0004349111,0.0001922586,0.0005476507,0.00004854606,0.000007223621,0.00000902823,0.0006978517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4619909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3575194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379134727","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4464300","title":"Weaponizing Privacy and Copyright Law for Censorship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Censorship; Privacy laws of the United States; Journalism; Internet privacy; The Internet; Business; Political science; Information privacy; Public relations; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03199122670154732,"gpt":0.3265038156213679,"spread":0.2945125889198206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002655433,0.00006521646,0.00009121886,0.00007535344,0.001051131,0.0001338321,0.0001561632,0.00006875608,0.00003237591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002847998,0.00005589808,0.00005315948,0.0001792776,0.0001076825,0.000271865,0.00002062151,0.0004001877,0.00003957971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000220565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005833568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981242,0.0001075515,0.0001411927,0.0001146169,0.0002315131,0.001280896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999501,0.0001868552,0.00007947841,0.00006291797,0.00006909376,0.0001006673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002294441,0.000007163708,0.0001131356,0.000003390991,0.00001234851,6.407139e-7,0.001959278,0.00000241931,0.0004466691,0.9914955,0.002144992,0.003791475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005550182,0.00008048028,0.0001359733,0.00002300929,0.00001044562,0.00001331644,0.007434702,0.0001424897,0.0001551974,0.8020219,0.1893169,0.0001105856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8237935,0.005423353,0.01081215,0.0500669,0.002327302,0.001253286,0.00001072507,0.0007225426,0.1055902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913649,0.001714066,0.0001947187,0.0001618894,0.0005113471,0.0000073272,0.000002780704,0.00001118465,0.006031805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1894736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8084558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269678920","doi":"","title":"Reforming Reporting of Privacy Cases: A Proposal for Improving Accountability of Asia-Pacific Privacy Commissioners","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Seriousness; Business; Accountability; Publishing; Private sector; Position (finance); Privacy policy; Enforcement; Information privacy; Political science; Public administration; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.028715663496743,"gpt":0.3401008478975421,"spread":0.3113851844007991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008248445,0.000119177,0.0003126933,0.0001267738,0.0005939036,0.00004241524,0.000354315,0.0001170504,0.00001492968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006257491,0.00009563002,0.0001996577,0.0002532827,0.0002010492,0.0005808821,0.00005640397,0.0006160334,5.805339e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001228433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009371796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001115316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967102,0.0001083107,0.001338878,0.0001917297,0.0005432811,0.001107602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963979,0.0001129971,0.002713873,0.000231806,0.000434383,0.0001090315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009441375,0.0008736579,0.01313962,0.0004816309,0.0001783115,0.00000901696,0.05676929,0.0002462424,0.1188925,0.6707253,0.0001273836,0.1376129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003275167,0.001197937,0.000815194,0.0004907205,0.0001035008,0.0003435505,0.2113554,0.0001515755,0.02461648,0.7533761,0.003793231,0.0004811303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790682,0.0004861348,0.01471175,0.002158219,0.0002535411,0.000681084,0.000003284314,0.00004233629,0.002595421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994431,0.0001086394,0.005040039,0.000006983829,0.0001657691,0.000009050284,0.000002550488,0.00001367747,0.000222268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1545861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106177724","doi":"10.1017/s1574019620000243","title":"Deliberation in Constitutional Amendment: Reappraising Ireland’s Deliberative Mini-Publics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Constitutional Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional amendment; Law; Politics; Accountability; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07545236461129742,"gpt":0.3314819531908413,"spread":0.2560295885795438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238168,0.0001653214,0.0002640511,0.00004687142,0.0006462989,0.0001478349,0.0002254251,0.00004970085,0.0008010182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001059417,0.0001573336,0.00009876215,0.0004038722,0.002649018,0.0007059854,0.00006366385,0.0002260686,0.0007081896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005886788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000669254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001006928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973076,0.0009255386,0.0005878426,0.0003519567,0.0005783223,0.0002487465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990281,0.0001673531,0.0001833828,0.0001227408,0.0002464637,0.000251998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001008189,0.00003741551,0.00005817853,0.00007607572,0.000008040193,0.00002891484,0.0003901543,0.00007223884,0.00006366585,0.9774976,0.02001011,0.001747471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004521289,0.00001857712,0.00007845731,0.001317807,0.00001751586,0.000009419885,0.00006965577,0.00006507545,0.00001356525,0.0007162639,0.9970388,0.0002026886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001719252,0.01008942,0.01367806,0.02751979,0.0003545437,0.0006233774,0.00004644041,0.0001371323,0.9473793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459435,0.007760613,0.003955059,0.04092373,0.0007334333,0.00003066526,0.0003455209,0.0000126824,0.0002947948],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337212112","doi":"10.1017/mag.2015.78","title":"On the product","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Mathematical Gazette","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1072766118710533,"gpt":0.3373669889401168,"spread":0.2300903770690635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078389,0.00005722343,0.00007191042,0.00001214769,0.0003038998,0.00008170108,0.0003416499,0.00002501476,0.0006566657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003157305,0.00002354147,0.00003645709,0.0001275679,0.0003145001,0.00005219244,0.0000377033,0.0001143365,0.002750408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002327318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004292737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002582878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000952182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988374,0.0002768088,0.0001119891,0.00008731752,0.0005245085,0.0001620283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998829,0.0006767345,0.00004156269,0.0003162962,0.00005237506,0.00008403861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005424535,0.00002483066,0.000001339205,0.00000157225,0.000002274845,3.457617e-7,0.006198915,0.000004631263,0.00002430751,0.8071371,0.1861853,0.0004140561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009558727,0.00001862067,0.00002166616,0.00002750068,0.000006662552,9.733077e-7,0.002463402,0.0003401212,0.0001955333,0.8989214,0.09784755,0.00006093668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03546201,0.00003148182,0.0008993159,0.1396666,0.0002172998,0.000370695,5.457338e-7,0.00009445854,0.8232576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812036,0.000002602231,0.0003214543,0.003014597,0.0003467553,0.00003068853,3.22447e-7,0.000007355883,0.01507264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586364969","doi":"","title":"Social Media: The law simply stated","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Social media; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02462131506623352,"gpt":0.2900374452072537,"spread":0.2654161301410202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005553768,0.0001115652,0.0001393726,0.00002055006,0.00153892,0.0003814266,0.0004078309,0.0001417061,0.004654704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003579417,0.00007816553,0.0000804345,0.0002195171,0.0006531545,0.0006336618,0.00006324577,0.0002412741,0.003167263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006289477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008583631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02792744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03340567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.0003272191,0.0002230942,0.0001901583,0.000592699,0.0003781721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.0003434656,0.00010073,0.0001999834,0.0001746925,0.0002102208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005268096,0.00002495138,0.00007299196,0.000002302205,0.000007722468,0.000001203438,0.006093333,0.00000262901,0.0003347445,0.7621263,0.2304028,0.000925711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004351958,0.00001426054,0.001811505,0.0000127927,0.00001056288,4.179491e-7,0.007930916,0.00003628101,0.0002685714,0.09132694,0.8979568,0.0001956868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1306366,0.0001721282,0.00007379768,0.04853198,0.001312705,0.0007205301,0.00001649744,0.0004259518,0.8181098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905158,0.00002435961,0.0001664029,0.005133848,0.001005802,0.00005667916,0.00001329261,0.00001337353,0.003070471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8598792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000221256","doi":"10.7202/1066336ar","title":"Is “Truthtelling” Decontextualized Online Still Reasonable? Restoring Context to Defamation Analysis in the Digital Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Harm; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04838881685359261,"gpt":0.3310091419049802,"spread":0.2826203250513876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467921,0.0001184739,0.0002550895,0.0002306882,0.001000738,0.0004799337,0.000404107,0.00009197919,0.000594852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004882329,0.00008667357,0.0001863551,0.0008098279,0.00006069181,0.0006075965,0.00003400096,0.0002629244,0.0001646879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001708112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001708969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003557619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05468383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980137,0.0002856279,0.0004393317,0.0002005535,0.0007479162,0.0003128195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998908,0.0003226663,0.0002114299,0.0002279925,0.0001566514,0.0001732057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005907058,0.0007514381,0.03899615,0.00003073766,0.0004726117,0.0001403311,0.07841825,0.004179504,0.0003821049,0.7796772,0.007123736,0.0892373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009366706,0.00007401365,0.007495762,0.0001152874,0.00006999195,0.000007801063,0.02084349,0.0005714436,0.00006731171,0.00238331,0.9671925,0.0002424659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6791543,0.000134332,0.0004763528,0.002955794,0.0006111855,0.0004269091,0.00006332388,0.00004624737,0.3161315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970955,0.00004303232,0.0004234031,0.001284124,0.0001783897,0.000003994495,0.00001279228,0.000009089171,0.0009497387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W324341807","doi":"","title":"Anonymity in Social Media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Social media; Internet privacy; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015126685980591,"gpt":0.2836146352480126,"spread":0.2684879492674215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001818354,0.00005813525,0.00009284019,0.0000969778,0.0004477024,0.00009207009,0.0001991177,0.00008954052,0.0006571494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003460707,0.00005136514,0.00005235275,0.0002043623,0.00009196223,0.0004260388,0.00001483945,0.0008465374,0.0002194641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006161499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001317008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001183461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0222407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978958,0.0002137581,0.0001706454,0.00008567154,0.0003382813,0.001295877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996368,0.00009120717,0.00008231602,0.00004234655,0.00007273754,0.00007458479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001351126,0.0000659101,0.003477527,0.000001119284,0.00001013332,0.000001574683,0.008894403,0.000002122124,0.0003757513,0.9203611,0.009093464,0.05770336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005217041,0.00001992652,0.01102077,0.000007396451,0.000002809997,0.000006215832,0.0243096,0.00002153715,0.00001476279,0.956601,0.007367119,0.0001071299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8829415,0.0007104633,0.0007806793,0.01082524,0.0006463704,0.0002100742,5.434416e-7,0.00005811148,0.103827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970206,0.0006577504,0.00005438323,0.0001077572,0.0008282249,0.000005422424,8.101319e-7,0.000005276312,0.00131975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1140791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004361344","doi":"10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.201","title":"A Little Like Reading: Preference, <i>Facebook</i>, and Overwhelmed Interpretations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; Reading (process); Witch; Reign; Art; Midnight; History; Art history; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Politics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01253013910272105,"gpt":0.265014821291412,"spread":0.2524846821886909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003547472,0.00008774742,0.0001802076,0.0001344338,0.0002554971,0.0000838394,0.0003701786,0.00009013109,0.0005595636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001966083,0.00007237787,0.00008654907,0.000459575,0.0002206731,0.0004632035,0.00009659107,0.0001082905,0.00003324481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001119517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001296172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003349479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001861054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985934,0.0002527151,0.0003406486,0.0001656571,0.000469257,0.000178326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978777,0.0004458932,0.000720877,0.0003557772,0.0005192193,0.00008049123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004076323,0.001021755,0.07792762,0.0001246774,0.0004349959,1.152426e-7,0.3277665,0.0002816108,0.06856737,0.06354139,0.3555038,0.1047895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003629621,0.0002948275,0.3530174,0.0006253074,0.000499045,0.000003107838,0.06812696,0.05287696,0.01122693,0.08802777,0.4200025,0.001669651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3008115,0.0005942965,0.01735541,0.07296756,0.0006580551,0.003810119,0.0002318218,0.0004397598,0.6031315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765925,0.00006992709,0.002542351,0.000362376,0.00003415817,0.0002131042,0.00001772925,0.000009624199,0.02015818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6757811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6126829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324369439","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006207","title":"Electronic Miscommunication and the Defamatory Sense","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Tort; Electronic communication; The Internet; Interpersonal communication; Electronic media; Convention; Sociology; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Media studies; Computer science; Liability; History; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01093298048095184,"gpt":0.2533101150509549,"spread":0.2423771345700031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002062616,0.00009871723,0.0002214557,0.00002953336,0.001217577,0.0001564514,0.0002029289,0.0001348858,0.0002461742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001293,0.00008492942,0.0001544578,0.0001060933,0.001223837,0.0002812425,0.000008139495,0.0003890933,0.000002483896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003762698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1533906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7444214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987653,0.0003163326,0.0002771126,0.0001118768,0.00009550871,0.0004338617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985319,0.0002947676,0.0001645713,0.0001710597,0.0001378407,0.0006998594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001329127,0.000004048326,0.00006115783,0.00001028884,0.0000412821,0.000008154532,0.08178994,0.000008791016,0.00000974117,0.9108873,0.002880133,0.004285877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002319895,0.00007037056,0.001019482,0.000149626,0.0001027754,0.0002291441,0.05663937,0.0002806219,0.000006331298,0.08617119,0.8527105,0.000300654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752032,0.004798343,0.00002269893,0.0158599,0.0002136396,0.0002070845,0.00001088651,0.00001054922,0.1036737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886056,0.003611374,0.0001296469,0.005138449,0.0001803548,0.000003414965,0.000002806771,0.00001097049,0.002317371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357841533","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.149","title":"Marginalia and Authorship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marginalia; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03516331691161456,"gpt":0.2534757742151733,"spread":0.2183124573035587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002912551,0.0001616884,0.0001978719,0.0001192377,0.0004952248,0.00007255784,0.000339884,0.0004697004,0.0001395765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003873655,0.0001549458,0.00007930737,0.000009035908,0.0005219293,0.0001471736,0.000168336,0.0002074316,0.000003898562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002011191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002921711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001936679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001554999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.0001747009,0.0000965951,0.0002853143,0.0003381468,0.0002507124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991815,0.0001261679,0.0001539871,0.0002126277,0.00008769236,0.0002380335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000388371,0.000003289072,0.000008979537,0.00002378249,0.00001663208,0.00002017129,0.001338558,3.338977e-8,0.000006069808,0.8760906,0.1166022,0.005850777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002828141,0.00001591006,0.00001856806,0.0001740742,0.00003955696,6.423101e-7,0.0001537755,0.000001820346,0.000007163194,0.008795943,0.9902998,0.0002098902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004955356,0.00006638984,0.0001858513,0.0001990134,0.0002998385,0.0002367246,0.00004107563,0.0001259701,0.9987956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003467327,0.0003310661,0.0001659075,0.00004213035,0.0002557259,5.185705e-7,0.00000828788,0.0000142435,0.9988354],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8736976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6318507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207680127","doi":"","title":"Back to Basics: A Critical Look at the Irwin Toy Framework for Freedom of Expression","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03393418598229079,"gpt":0.326006466673195,"spread":0.2920722806909042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002309472,0.0001054994,0.000161147,0.00006283371,0.000678759,0.00004428205,0.0004610364,0.0001480307,0.001587703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001491284,0.000071235,0.0001536978,0.000159077,0.0002588659,0.0002027961,0.00007084268,0.0006196795,0.0001307679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003575057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008205904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001952273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001595423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976108,0.0002287547,0.0003020424,0.000167424,0.0004283613,0.00126263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987442,0.0005304652,0.0001369029,0.0002090989,0.0002069219,0.0001724116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002429502,0.00007941668,0.0003321838,0.000006596709,0.00001735282,3.279879e-7,0.00739064,0.000007204407,0.001425965,0.9807112,0.006998449,0.002787738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004468133,0.0004356739,0.0001693843,0.0001544761,0.00002642888,0.00001151335,0.01707612,0.00002814298,0.003254697,0.9470298,0.03119867,0.0001682674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08441614,0.003532583,0.7904614,0.01953671,0.00267433,0.001517034,0.00002396446,0.00007074796,0.09776705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748748,0.0004952214,0.01749606,0.0005052445,0.0009827774,0.00002965549,0.000001421394,0.00002415875,0.00559068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306036967","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Charity and Tax Law and Regulation on Not-for-Profit News Organizations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Profit (economics); Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01274293912517606,"gpt":0.3039933003811829,"spread":0.2912503612560069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082815,0.00004715205,0.00006314412,0.00002733825,0.0007625765,0.00005463873,0.00007475604,0.00004653959,0.00001917828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003767873,0.00002398117,0.00002788849,0.00008857457,0.0001731278,0.0001905482,0.000009909474,0.0001311555,0.000001701702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001741095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005832803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008334113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005060812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.00008499232,0.0001225038,0.00007080678,0.0001470577,0.0004012941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994271,0.00018338,0.0001307489,0.00006319839,0.0001444872,0.0000510347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003707049,0.000002900355,0.004389063,6.66746e-7,0.00001377468,1.535969e-8,0.000396582,0.000002392832,0.003619013,0.9806606,0.0002804564,0.01059743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001088905,0.000431912,0.03178079,0.00004671587,0.00001715278,0.00001162924,0.002162029,0.0001057571,0.000893506,0.9613724,0.001965981,0.0001232633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749795,0.0004677403,0.007385826,0.01110313,0.0001223734,0.0002876539,0.00000891433,0.00001896837,0.005625846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962669,0.002184603,0.00002697231,0.00003900963,0.0001287435,0.000001759441,5.93053e-7,0.000004446034,0.001346974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02739173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5865199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558800772","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00666.x","title":"Libel Cases and Public Debate – Some Reflections on whether Europe Should be Concerned about SLAPPs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Community & International Environmental Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Free speech; Political science; Free flow; Law; Public order; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11355079620339,"gpt":0.369347309830994,"spread":0.255796513627604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001167148,0.0001297831,0.0001684676,0.00005098526,0.0006412747,0.00008091448,0.0005542018,0.00003931795,0.001479542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005585577,0.0001170164,0.0000837447,0.00007028253,0.000834921,0.000412164,0.0002648154,0.0005188957,0.0001391605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004594955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001819246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008074966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007810157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976143,0.001328522,0.000326302,0.000144004,0.0004436788,0.0001432355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.0003795423,0.0002162724,0.0003541043,0.00003969459,0.0001307468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002947976,0.0008572076,0.0004739815,0.0001838389,0.00007729138,0.0000154167,0.001843961,0.000002345735,0.02112591,0.9552211,0.006347177,0.01382234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000220798,0.00007140433,0.002069907,0.0006108246,0.00001606716,0.00001400917,0.0003540385,0.000005678714,0.0001662358,0.0002209781,0.9961162,0.0001338184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.117621,0.002985425,0.00000862893,0.008288904,0.0005818383,0.0003159874,0.00009987648,0.00006641279,0.870032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583994,0.03155912,0.0002109083,0.007864424,0.0001750244,0.000006814048,0.00009121728,0.00002378956,0.001669369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900111068","doi":"","title":"Right to a Fair and Public Hearing (Article 6)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03665226728741788,"gpt":0.3087048786131717,"spread":0.2720526113257538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006926143,0.00009358008,0.0001126277,0.000061839,0.0009627918,0.00036136,0.0005132405,0.00004049332,0.0000569452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004805939,0.0000792025,0.00001080908,0.0002365822,0.0002225667,0.0006626401,0.0006007286,0.00008107466,0.00003852317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001024542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002388094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003743121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02975615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987739,0.000161951,0.000145825,0.0003516244,0.0002111345,0.0003555036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990603,0.0001480378,0.00004522405,0.0003990871,0.00003264803,0.0003147491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003052063,0.0002985673,0.3647271,0.0002899048,0.0001284309,0.00002340533,0.2678449,0.00007291072,0.01590029,0.04762061,0.03705252,0.2657362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009487691,0.0001918965,0.1926991,0.0006309571,0.00004405119,0.0000106857,0.02548241,0.1786282,0.0002519463,0.008543944,0.591797,0.0007711051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733959,0.000131577,0.001918736,0.002215198,0.0002059004,0.0001501514,0.00002394214,0.0001232353,0.02183531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960293,0.00007631579,0.002312841,0.0007113966,0.0005950108,0.000004810781,0.00003988267,0.000008680134,0.0002218004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5547445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168417086","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.75","title":"Confidential Information and the Right to Freedom of Speech","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Confidentiality; Right to privacy; Democracy; Law; Liability; Public interest; Journalism; Human rights; The Right to Privacy; Freedom of information; Fundamental rights; Internet privacy; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0287685809896676,"gpt":0.330201297624364,"spread":0.3014327166346963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006591197,0.00003724493,0.0001459886,0.00008984761,0.00009803446,0.00002462644,0.0001575741,0.0001096645,0.0001961533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001083816,0.00002586011,0.0000431763,0.00001053247,0.001032328,0.0002145516,0.0000560455,0.0001224067,0.000004108618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001404688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001260449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001457934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003740661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991255,0.0002780955,0.0003065579,0.00004201183,0.0001773071,0.00007053532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985479,0.0004146883,0.0002506592,0.00003654778,0.0007095753,0.00004064753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002316924,0.00001196625,0.0004834202,0.000002531993,0.00007317945,0.00001320778,0.02230709,0.000008397475,0.0005861357,0.965643,0.002231152,0.008408157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005827153,0.0002024868,0.01562359,0.00005726525,0.00009773469,0.0006917354,0.01591956,0.00008461918,0.003245469,0.765779,0.192322,0.0001493469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545365,0.0004468679,0.002067077,0.03483817,0.001595811,0.00004617585,0.000003584529,0.00000314901,0.006462654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971972,0.0004907561,0.0007466739,0.001157925,0.0003011383,8.578119e-7,0.000002154192,0.000001002795,0.0001023411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1998641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3803657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979789279","doi":"10.1108/17473610210813619","title":"Legal considerations for online advertising to children","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; European union; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Mainstream; The Internet; Business; Online advertising; Work (physics); Political science; Data Protection Directive; Data Protection Act 1998; FTC Fair Information Practice; Advertising; General Data Protection Regulation; Internet privacy; Public relations; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Information privacy law; European Union law; Law; International trade; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03213871491614863,"gpt":0.3017152167305268,"spread":0.2695765018143782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005691015,0.0001567146,0.000211764,0.0002791545,0.001149928,0.0002719991,0.0001065489,0.000109431,0.000212257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002640613,0.0001567078,0.0001085109,0.0002001969,0.000222411,0.0003938249,0.00003275536,0.000076624,0.000009714028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006782713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001220553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005244559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001986238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998586,0.0001776556,0.0002979511,0.0003343916,0.0002299433,0.0003740304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982048,0.001086814,0.00008552224,0.0001728319,0.000178167,0.0002718542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004062851,0.0004703703,0.01527512,0.0001325762,0.0004561738,0.00001742153,0.02520301,0.0000579085,0.01370562,0.2661426,0.5767072,0.09776913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004977724,0.0004212362,0.01929169,0.0002524889,0.0001938717,0.00003710963,0.002918134,0.004061803,0.000724359,0.01303727,0.9530013,0.001083003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795595,0.003068812,0.007777424,0.02652873,0.002765705,0.006546969,0.0005198739,0.0004752263,0.07275771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618093,0.0002250537,0.02827669,0.001790214,0.000152104,0.0001312681,0.00003127157,0.00002897698,0.007555111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3762941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132857163","doi":"10.29173/alr276","title":"Crookes v. Newton: The Supreme Court of Canada Brings Libel Law into the Internet Age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Scope (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02391516443799217,"gpt":0.2876645276148928,"spread":0.2637493631769006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009692832,0.00009570869,0.0002077656,0.000004592053,0.0003286412,0.00004540578,0.0005281435,0.00003878656,0.0006833997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003176515,0.00005005886,0.0000824948,0.000125555,0.0004186158,0.0002338087,0.00008496197,0.0001057287,0.00004205704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005197921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.0002914599,0.0002782385,0.0001019536,0.0003894756,0.0002515065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998797,0.0005586935,0.0001508494,0.0003254424,0.00006097306,0.0001070509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001433487,0.00001156376,0.0001554739,0.0001321663,0.00001097829,2.856652e-7,0.004427443,1.812895e-7,0.00001169191,0.7800843,0.2142667,0.0008978134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004335973,0.000005257153,0.0001577114,0.0007591751,0.00002874476,9.001232e-7,0.0002026955,0.000002558166,0.00009662286,0.000621827,0.9980106,0.0000705347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004377951,0.09327856,0.000007995731,0.07567275,0.0008114552,0.0007134666,0.000001589543,0.00001834182,0.8251179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503721,0.007777628,0.00004009622,0.02012749,0.0002496537,0.00003149434,0.000004611279,0.0000115097,0.02138544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7482747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041536915","doi":"10.7202/1029209ar","title":"“Third Parties” and Democracy 2.0","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Parliament; Democracy; Political science; Campaign finance; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06332487778188535,"gpt":0.321419525430219,"spread":0.2580946476483337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008921515,0.00004714539,0.00007570054,0.00002499558,0.00254156,0.0001171048,0.00009070077,0.00005149224,0.0001137949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002567777,0.00003817705,0.00002597061,0.00005883553,0.0001594615,0.0004281496,0.00002476186,0.000128167,0.00006815814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004378729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001610538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009871041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003744218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991471,0.0001439524,0.0001379394,0.00006790038,0.0003340499,0.0001691034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.00004099207,0.00007673561,0.00005351145,0.0001239079,0.0003543593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002873697,0.00003164699,0.0008114364,0.000002057166,0.000007984726,0.00002003045,0.002474006,0.00001059122,0.00005534467,0.9422035,0.04632659,0.008028096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000318266,0.00002763289,0.0001711883,0.00001354796,0.000004329719,0.00002611512,0.002209199,0.00002714305,0.00007470768,0.03744862,0.9596176,0.00006166713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01703706,0.0002150288,0.00008653346,0.007329462,0.0007628707,0.00005130586,0.00000200114,0.0000428713,0.9744729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970714,0.00008079045,0.001000318,0.0004910112,0.0003179505,8.619621e-7,3.08612e-7,0.000004048586,0.001033243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035370257","doi":"10.22230/src.2020v11n1a355","title":"Have You Seen This? Why Political Pundits Share Scholarly Research on Social Media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Lien; Trustworthiness; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4172359414879337,"gpt":0.4940607915397163,"spread":0.07682485005178258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504613,0.000137019,0.000203614,0.0004273762,0.006308801,0.004348924,0.001640638,0.0004565571,0.0006474411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0258738,0.0001264453,0.00006933127,0.001112097,0.001763607,0.004642109,0.0008720406,0.004268925,0.0006123938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002941337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004845259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001590578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009058759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864922,0.008057418,0.00032778,0.0004649651,0.003706582,0.0009511219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256,0.003002274,0.00006776947,0.0006219344,0.002895861,0.0008521046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002487687,0.0001995736,0.001538437,0.00003986316,0.00002114577,0.000006878126,0.05369186,4.629808e-7,0.001349788,0.7738566,0.1587888,0.01025783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001598109,0.0003728889,0.03421926,0.0003352548,0.00001183735,0.000001383334,0.1020444,0.0002275781,0.000730077,0.07808488,0.7819195,0.0004548148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1146901,0.00189025,0.0000391204,0.5064048,0.000161207,0.001159372,0.0000788516,0.0002461812,0.3753301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956539,0.0008000717,0.0003337321,0.001391036,0.0007456238,0.00007252023,0.00009103064,0.00002283968,0.0008892535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972278806","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3385","title":"Where Do We Go from Here? Reflections on the LCO’s Consultation and Conference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Reputation; Position (finance); Political science; Liability; The Internet; Law enforcement; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0539951404141292,"gpt":0.328992952257272,"spread":0.2749978118431428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004525951,0.00007933503,0.00009763874,0.00002655607,0.00106263,0.0004665433,0.00015959,0.00009037519,0.002412502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001344101,0.00005352609,0.00003840924,0.00008373555,0.0001716385,0.0003037627,0.00001852944,0.0002973131,0.0003466293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004586156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007287087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01151099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09818151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988813,0.0003042892,0.000165916,0.0001353457,0.0003561637,0.0001569778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990448,0.0004170379,0.0001497426,0.0001194816,0.0001541562,0.0001147679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002165712,0.00002424485,0.000281658,0.000002320112,0.00001224937,0.000001594678,0.005411332,0.00001603024,0.001666898,0.9846597,0.004710015,0.00319229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001434452,0.000156583,0.001269367,0.000622701,0.00003122716,0.00001943709,0.04605746,0.0003192462,0.0004236313,0.5956789,0.3536886,0.000298481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02735608,0.0007711101,0.0003115001,0.01915787,0.0006878123,0.0001726441,0.000009091289,0.0000337379,0.9515002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951131,0.001285298,0.000414246,0.000323426,0.0002344005,0.000003942792,0.000001209813,0.000006275696,0.002618144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177317599","doi":"","title":"But Names Won't Necessarily Hurt Me: Considering the Effect of Disparaging Statements on Reputation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Statement (logic); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Harm; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0102788554130363,"gpt":0.3172440082804593,"spread":0.306965152867423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002413282,0.00009466161,0.0001352774,0.00007346536,0.0005873326,0.0001998502,0.0002060013,0.00004636352,0.0001192525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004719346,0.0000599033,0.00007027604,0.000136026,0.0001212805,0.0006566447,0.00002053529,0.0005710702,0.00004752581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004035147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001005564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003268072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979215,0.0003654603,0.0002697549,0.000115278,0.0005031028,0.0008249148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991007,0.000349862,0.0002904887,0.0001088322,0.0000897426,0.00006041865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005439572,0.0002048885,0.07338125,0.00008524819,0.0006923087,0.000007018586,0.02637155,0.004984405,0.01591352,0.4479626,0.008895302,0.420958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005796722,0.003046594,0.01194279,0.0007031377,0.0001830114,0.00008302587,0.1208642,0.004771327,0.01257476,0.8289627,0.01014194,0.0009297683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855831,0.0005354905,0.00300109,0.003053303,0.0003117603,0.0003323006,7.494561e-7,0.00002983244,0.007152365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980676,0.0004610379,0.00002620044,0.00007423408,0.0001243712,0.00001232318,0.000001506514,0.000008521035,0.001224217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4517347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}