{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":776,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":776,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"882aa78cefde","filters":{"topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems"}},"results":[{"id":"W2141263345","doi":"10.1007/s003550000067","title":"Core in a simple coalition formation game","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Separable space; Class (philosophy); Stochastic game; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08584522714990465,"gpt":0.2764701962144451,"spread":0.1906249690645405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002936563,0.00006454172,0.000161344,0.00007520558,0.0001300346,0.00003230451,0.00004756807,0.00007923103,0.0001419137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000462074,0.00007759159,0.00003389076,0.000138697,0.00002111736,0.0002115584,0.0000136053,0.00007580464,0.00006188303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004087842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002152595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005282908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002550757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994406,0.00001105706,0.0002522231,0.0001292808,0.00001750655,0.0001493785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997692,0.00002041341,0.0001189794,0.00005546861,0.00001116801,0.00002479135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001396863,0.00003470811,0.2866435,0.00006679949,0.000007240553,0.000002409558,0.003298367,0.000005957108,0.00001118937,0.7077962,0.0003956781,0.001723992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001147529,0.00005178842,0.5556663,0.00002381574,0.000003932992,0.000008496998,0.002405518,0.0006688267,0.000005932523,0.1880344,0.2517084,0.0002751815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984583,0.0002351939,0.0001987686,0.0009637349,0.00009188719,0.0001075578,0.00004588443,0.00002739596,0.01374653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.00002979232,0.000004094962,0.0001510786,0.0001981716,0.00001288492,0.00004459332,0.000007297071,0.0002324345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3164093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075784261","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1889(01)00053-7","title":"Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost allocation; Reduction (mathematics); Economics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Total cost; Function (biology); Cost reduction; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539574700020116,"gpt":0.1947426009255512,"spread":0.17934685392535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001074328,0.0001051665,0.0004769605,0.0002117932,0.00005437863,0.00003742968,0.0001118495,0.00008148956,0.0001447385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005026976,0.0001149327,0.0001498388,0.00004183265,0.00007150991,0.000229999,0.00001052508,0.0000974339,0.00005910787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002124566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001372572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003461977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006442729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.00003661546,0.001037234,0.0001430898,0.00002336574,0.0001352614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.00004529943,0.001453868,0.0001331046,0.00004645005,0.00007067958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002088951,0.000225997,0.007249917,0.00006996244,0.0005262029,0.000002653669,0.0005822752,0.02527595,0.001065226,0.9551311,0.0007548427,0.008907009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002753471,0.0003404382,0.004140135,0.00007069466,0.00006103728,0.0002187297,0.0002085163,0.9704502,0.00005014581,0.02002825,0.001451007,0.0002273533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839182,0.002011136,0.005592156,0.001593713,0.0009883185,0.0002455373,0.000127506,0.000008358311,0.005515025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984826,0.0002175308,0.00008626923,0.00004997721,0.0002491043,0.000002728409,0.000002864549,0.0000121497,0.0008967407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4686818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124038879","doi":"10.1145/3355902","title":"The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Patras; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660050170527125,"gpt":0.20568765792482,"spread":0.1890871562195488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003834059,0.00009034488,0.0002014186,0.00007691816,0.0001987259,0.00006285073,0.0001527799,0.00005535099,0.00005040133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009375008,0.00008930906,0.00006691911,0.00007178434,0.00004051144,0.0001260495,0.000005813526,0.00007927219,0.0001206325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003163979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008214345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009722428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002033828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.00001682434,0.0003713927,0.0002104271,0.00001284145,0.00012657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.0001460527,0.000227212,0.0002515346,0.00002118982,0.0000310886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008744132,0.00009706034,0.004027463,0.00006763876,0.0001254125,1.942826e-7,0.0005083102,0.05506663,0.000009428224,0.8475131,0.00001631435,0.09248097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002348797,0.0005122735,0.03875622,0.00006389368,0.00002535284,0.00002057784,0.001821725,0.1216095,0.0004690255,0.7845451,0.04917464,0.0006528335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957339,0.0002332319,0.03611337,0.001176996,0.0006579748,0.000221884,0.00005802058,0.00002100916,0.004178506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988785,0.000199395,0.0002591154,0.00003750792,0.00001563365,0.00001105372,0.000005513172,0.00001319278,0.000580037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09182814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3641918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116188555","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2014.03.004","title":"School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Diversity (politics); Pareto optimal; Type (biology); Computer science; Pareto principle; Mathematical optimization; Selection (genetic algorithm); Upper and lower bounds; Control (management); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0242208678987575,"gpt":0.2358945501793012,"spread":0.2116736822805438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006551881,0.0003318215,0.001427075,0.0003936661,0.0002037481,0.0003158974,0.000635442,0.0001792271,0.002020154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00203645,0.000304375,0.0004220913,0.00008810471,0.0003943895,0.0006565438,0.0000434409,0.0005292324,0.00104518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003862344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000174938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000363648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002914252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970981,0.000236196,0.001744003,0.0003817127,0.00005852503,0.0004814885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942955,0.002176055,0.002621135,0.0004919064,0.0000893051,0.0003260423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003638975,0.0001320399,0.03395423,0.00005106053,0.001254141,0.000007885439,0.0002930535,0.001021974,0.00006334919,0.956398,0.001671797,0.001513572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1116191,0.004276902,0.02922917,0.0005727636,0.0004680815,0.0006154448,0.001524757,0.002897929,0.0001809735,0.4049088,0.4412734,0.002432624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847888,0.001454796,0.008404341,0.0005002209,0.004478575,0.000328509,0.00005320519,0.00005091887,0.09994061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938461,0.00003007241,0.0003109143,0.0003620646,0.001956688,0.00001092665,0.00000264952,0.00005741992,0.003423151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5514891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1238745702","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-057","title":"Budgeted social choice: from consensus to personalized decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Variety (cybernetics); Greedy algorithm; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09434534845328871,"gpt":0.2736683390445787,"spread":0.1793229905912899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005280281,0.0001255059,0.0003324816,0.0001300502,0.0001591863,0.00004389304,0.0001993011,0.0001052304,0.004748486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002809786,0.0001360753,0.0001085998,0.0001601041,0.00003987495,0.00004436409,0.00005480211,0.00008826756,0.003221415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004670012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007412861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008848011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007125169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988759,0.00002724609,0.0004606503,0.0003496629,0.00003202139,0.0002545759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993329,0.0002044466,0.0001779462,0.0001908865,0.00002586331,0.00006795665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003184186,0.0001151941,0.09230764,0.00001345751,0.0001251329,0.00001089555,0.01170064,0.000002765884,0.0002527651,0.8810653,0.007394382,0.006693381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003206939,0.0001881764,0.4548131,0.0001294804,0.00002562364,0.000009214602,0.002100114,0.001167917,0.000533731,0.4255269,0.1110162,0.001282498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.892182,0.000129212,0.007334101,0.0001190918,0.0006131277,0.000150099,0.00008728212,0.00008902108,0.09929606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902257,0.000001013384,0.006909988,0.0005497266,0.0001846418,0.000009636457,0.000003603995,0.00002105609,0.002094642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4555384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557733319","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_7","title":"Utility in Social Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Axiom; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Preference; Social Welfare; Social preferences; Mathematics; Welfare; Welfare economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07093094075075075,"gpt":0.2400761991133104,"spread":0.1691452583625596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005556789,0.0002118548,0.0006001034,0.000208793,0.00006050432,0.00003205182,0.0002055723,0.000414408,0.007333141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002815189,0.0002594491,0.0001765136,0.00002984847,0.00006134884,0.00006155886,0.00004692334,0.0003472226,0.003480881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001262577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002506074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004706024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002512415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986421,0.00000598568,0.0006888114,0.0004237201,0.00002470809,0.0002146222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993314,0.00004472094,0.0003361153,0.0002385007,0.00001185861,0.00003745021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004184414,0.00001399329,0.001707702,0.00004815933,0.00001850582,0.00000294663,0.0001360302,0.000001210929,9.763395e-8,0.9972802,0.0005272637,0.0002597533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002596404,0.00001018246,0.002969869,0.00003768262,0.000002004892,8.168655e-7,0.000005794671,0.000009178403,9.644726e-7,0.6914993,0.3049641,0.0002404486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007619502,0.0004438578,0.00008502985,0.0001278078,0.0004048235,0.0001710002,0.00009963231,0.00005090133,0.997855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4483288,0.00001258429,0.00001787218,0.00009667435,0.0003287248,0.000002861972,0.00001277328,0.00002727072,0.5511724],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4475669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017492304","doi":"10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x","title":"A minimax procedure for electing committees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Approval voting; Mathematical economics; Rendering (computer graphics); Computer science; Operations research; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06914424310011429,"gpt":0.2690698077407422,"spread":0.1999255646406279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358961,0.0001123702,0.0002423431,0.0001762784,0.0001761128,0.0001227574,0.0002376274,0.00008964541,0.00008210738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001653601,0.0001295317,0.00009264426,0.0002920023,0.0000260839,0.0002122044,0.00002779523,0.0001191084,0.0001509676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001661377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001013824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001880746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987634,0.000008626253,0.0004636481,0.0002926512,0.00002538372,0.0004462356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989412,0.0004263007,0.0002798364,0.0002077001,0.0000531474,0.00009185296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001971672,0.0001135897,0.377647,0.0001735956,0.00005753888,6.649668e-7,0.0007992307,0.00000184509,0.0001008878,0.6143423,0.004210851,0.002532704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008452492,0.00007888287,0.0614612,0.00002364283,0.000004690608,0.00001373674,0.0002858241,0.0005656561,0.0003084146,0.02212401,0.9139335,0.0003552469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772103,0.0009097807,0.01401823,0.002257019,0.0007741773,0.000533423,0.00004641393,0.0001888539,0.1040618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950078,0.000002416824,0.0005138735,0.0004836253,0.0005952278,0.00004082503,0.00001058038,0.0000257453,0.003319913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121806521","doi":"10.1257/aer.91.5.1478","title":"Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Voting; Delegation; Private information retrieval; Obfuscation; Quality (philosophy); Information transmission; Exaggeration; Information sharing; Business; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Management; Psychology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03881908141071992,"gpt":0.2786429088437875,"spread":0.2398238274330676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461814,0.0001514313,0.0008925908,0.0001137092,0.000031348,0.00003441697,0.0002116096,0.00002694087,0.0002499426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005259384,0.0001708928,0.00007216782,0.0001187965,0.0001769925,0.0001312634,0.00005919535,0.0001255613,0.001135684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008379795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000645524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001684944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000530594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985595,0.00006639102,0.0007983173,0.0003298202,0.000009399698,0.0002365334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989586,0.0001110681,0.0005016351,0.0003457914,0.000004004429,0.00007887668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001155123,0.00003946909,0.8173652,0.0003728697,0.00003701411,0.00001079178,0.0002738831,0.000007058125,0.000001337725,0.1262731,0.001111937,0.05449578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004395482,0.0001162925,0.1524472,0.001144133,0.000008155779,0.00008810392,0.0001081587,0.0003016212,0.000002703574,0.00640797,0.83851,0.000426115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8684981,0.06933317,0.00002425621,0.001734065,0.0001943693,0.000340987,0.00001844368,0.00003351768,0.05982305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314678,0.06581437,0.00003916079,0.002141981,0.00004645027,0.00002846648,0.000005060317,0.00001800649,0.0004387034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.837398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123497234","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.2.624","title":"Inferring Strategic Voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Econometrics; Disapproval voting; Estimator; Bullet voting; Ranked voting system; Approval voting; First-past-the-post voting; Anti-plurality voting; Microeconomics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05022006673664293,"gpt":0.2521699391207547,"spread":0.2019498723841118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008489178,0.0001905672,0.0008320354,0.00008628524,0.00007139851,0.00009253907,0.000312973,0.00002785911,0.002449058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005915389,0.0002093448,0.0001754437,0.0001285544,0.0001130533,0.0002837571,0.00005293514,0.0001363103,0.02702916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001198104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001899568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00141039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001560945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981831,0.00004658361,0.0009863414,0.0004134677,0.00001410928,0.0003563627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985161,0.00007655238,0.0008800479,0.0004000431,0.00001241277,0.0001148233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001310321,0.00003025061,0.0501088,0.0008571185,0.0001039021,0.000001604011,0.00009453984,0.0000778215,0.00001014018,0.9175805,0.003036958,0.02809705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001791995,0.0007552677,0.08524186,0.007461701,0.0001214837,0.0002351565,0.001539523,0.01724357,0.00006558809,0.1990879,0.6809592,0.0054968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.57271,0.05674981,0.0003947714,0.001707983,0.0007166086,0.001041804,0.00002589006,0.0001935083,0.3664596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906038,0.006483156,0.0002481837,0.001542573,0.0001589086,0.0001013926,0.00000593592,0.00003271707,0.0008233287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7184926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295870642","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.003","title":"Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social choice theory; Maximization; Social welfare function; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Probabilistic logic; Social Welfare; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Welfare; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2206779366908321,"gpt":0.3080420153050835,"spread":0.08736407861425138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001356774,0.000145201,0.0003006422,0.0001165259,0.0002057166,0.0001030564,0.0002696148,0.0001064291,0.0005144987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005531057,0.0001700107,0.0001119536,0.0003548049,0.0001198874,0.0002301931,0.00005427877,0.0001716284,0.009844102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008108933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003160827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005783389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008364506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984944,0.00005090908,0.0006992652,0.0003799017,0.0000523079,0.0003232344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.00009068112,0.0002028891,0.0002487309,0.00007101676,0.0001275879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003424596,0.0001126999,0.001889516,0.00001540995,0.0000286609,0.000002982816,0.002523348,0.0003810175,0.00001397755,0.9826269,0.001213312,0.01115799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001362774,0.0003310186,0.001500884,0.00004551521,0.00002030745,0.00001882234,0.005783486,0.01609632,0.0007341877,0.6054857,0.3689836,0.0008637847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6147351,0.003530668,0.255878,0.003189006,0.0057774,0.0006894582,0.0001530311,0.000416628,0.1156306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970292,0.000005862305,0.0003713965,0.0001727806,0.000670924,0.00002794609,0.000008466373,0.0000191055,0.001694341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3822941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254058566","doi":"10.1023/a:1011252808608","title":"Fallback Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Majority rule; Settlement (finance); Bargaining problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Condorcet method; Computer science; Voting; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03578837384875595,"gpt":0.2307198922452339,"spread":0.194931518396478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007334893,0.00008102532,0.0001712766,0.0001274745,0.0001121884,0.00007528271,0.00007464797,0.00006994379,0.000305282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000161904,0.00008622334,0.00003962052,0.000156109,0.00001605035,0.0002082781,0.00002713904,0.00006554667,0.0007568962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002075561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001729718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002751837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009444841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992129,0.00001700606,0.0003572324,0.0002416347,0.00003086251,0.000140412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995213,0.0001153179,0.0001400074,0.0001519374,0.00001286465,0.00005864523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004826439,0.00003766174,0.1617286,0.0000049832,0.000009402745,0.00000359995,0.0005512857,0.00002270272,0.00007265261,0.782527,0.0005876892,0.05440609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001423065,0.0001413908,0.3739456,0.00005810111,0.00000459288,0.00004568686,0.0002833405,0.009033482,0.00002397336,0.4679945,0.1466837,0.0003625884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.883628,0.001564274,0.07442498,0.0001061317,0.0004617126,0.0001099249,0.000006260917,0.00005893529,0.03963979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980294,0.0002034949,0.0007388593,0.0002239776,0.0001167847,0.000004215555,0.000007558347,0.00001073273,0.0006649729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3145326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006131948","doi":"10.1007/s00199-005-0058-2","title":"Price discrimination and efficient matching","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sorting; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); sort; Function (biology); Schedule; Revenue; Incentive; Private information retrieval; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01082531954868441,"gpt":0.191941477651572,"spread":0.1811161581028876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001504894,0.0001109512,0.0002170597,0.0001165751,0.0001128731,0.00007553503,0.0001096577,0.00005370322,0.0002654739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002148527,0.0001277114,0.00005005026,0.00002871293,0.00005857567,0.0001079002,0.00004154151,0.00007286741,0.0009401212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009689627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005794399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001581083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009753918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990586,0.00003802284,0.0004070691,0.0002953264,0.000009535794,0.0001914522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994093,0.0001268378,0.0002362705,0.0001883491,0.00000385096,0.00003543733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001075573,0.00001992977,0.002563902,0.00001853307,0.000009097977,5.864065e-7,0.0004891995,0.001352798,0.00003867759,0.9951193,0.00008281225,0.0002944467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003498835,0.00001772213,0.02621162,0.00001750305,0.000004199387,0.00001279111,0.0003210808,0.002209358,0.0001037459,0.965445,0.005070533,0.0002364959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775374,0.0008205543,0.007550831,0.0001029223,0.0004884361,0.0001125384,0.00003351145,0.00005400597,0.1132998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959263,0.000006994732,0.0001478953,0.00004783518,0.0002164435,0.00001009731,0.00000781671,0.00001962653,0.003617023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1183888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063156741","doi":"10.1111/0034-6527.00278","title":"Voting on Majority Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Majority rule; Political science; Library science; Classics; Economic history; Economics; History; Law; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09021665150497513,"gpt":0.3015812920012613,"spread":0.2113646404962862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003367427,0.0001407031,0.0007697336,0.00004557955,0.0001241125,0.000009512611,0.0002219765,0.00002555049,0.0001927509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000756582,0.0001063881,0.0001829824,0.00005103873,0.0001153279,0.0000504034,0.00003977581,0.00009143479,0.001640432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007679722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009429545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001598199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003034258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986742,0.00009601863,0.0008087251,0.0002268354,0.00001541789,0.000178845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985717,0.0003829655,0.000642008,0.0003639954,0.00001759457,0.00002176121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002042966,0.00001356771,0.002252335,0.001440653,0.0001398341,1.806991e-7,0.0001590876,0.00001009342,4.173412e-7,0.9939015,0.001664379,0.0004158924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00100986,0.0002865037,0.004690934,0.0142285,0.0001304357,0.00003041115,0.001283912,0.000104945,0.0003727662,0.4375814,0.5392655,0.001014875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1220509,0.7107474,0.00002799625,0.001129974,0.001230109,0.0004653819,0.00005552065,0.00003010686,0.1642627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100943,0.08808468,0.00008190383,0.0005710192,0.0001152083,0.00003215714,0.000001095759,0.00001557192,0.001004037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7880434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143362857","doi":"10.1109/aamas.2004.74","title":"Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Coalition Formation under Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Certainty; Core (optical fiber); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference; Machine learning; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03862522706976329,"gpt":0.2371829084291786,"spread":0.1985576813594153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006282176,0.00007175288,0.0001389522,0.00007877993,0.0001374643,0.00004530471,0.00005883846,0.00005163856,0.0001635605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020169,0.00007756978,0.00006590999,0.0000648764,0.00001245718,0.0002271837,0.0000096147,0.00005319291,0.0002216173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007193575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001577567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002088078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992966,0.000008239664,0.0003745954,0.0001359632,0.00001776662,0.0001668523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996282,0.00002965303,0.0001892018,0.00009883432,0.00002049929,0.00003365477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008942297,0.000007452985,0.0001196725,0.00002430046,0.000006852872,4.438869e-8,0.0002326132,0.3209686,0.00001406816,0.6784881,0.00005517535,0.00007414459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002494923,0.0003176873,0.0004527621,0.00006238759,0.000006795111,0.000006392702,0.00153385,0.1794717,0.0007995593,0.7805085,0.03395633,0.0003890829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02446596,0.00003461396,0.9429088,0.00046135,0.0001742586,0.0002652664,0.000004044264,0.00006585699,0.03161991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957705,0.000005735254,0.0005720384,0.0002318034,0.00007240978,0.00003972283,0.000061818,0.000009414375,0.003236621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3163204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007779524","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1","title":"Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06625046255528268,"gpt":0.2471342989240128,"spread":0.1808838363687301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678893,0.0001102334,0.0002162513,0.00004731477,0.0008001579,0.00007526392,0.00005221376,0.0001084388,0.00006360745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113754,0.0001257576,0.00006189314,0.00006362535,0.00007642596,0.00009570875,0.00002026747,0.00008903274,0.000007335083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004148473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001174715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007502208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004919006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990952,0.00003653986,0.0002829061,0.0002722903,0.0000269154,0.0002861179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996018,0.00009294528,0.0001457897,0.00007734365,0.00002116023,0.00006093527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006458869,0.00004943738,0.01473919,0.00009520972,0.00003812598,1.487491e-7,0.0005234576,0.00004096262,0.00002131866,0.9837015,0.0004630961,0.0003211368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002308728,0.0001933537,0.04738034,0.00003305446,0.00002292973,0.00000583362,0.002093397,0.0008278114,0.00002981122,0.1639527,0.7826708,0.0004812641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772338,0.01166089,0.01123689,0.008340298,0.0008286004,0.003379195,0.002942885,0.0001938761,0.08418357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.00001363812,0.00004642154,0.0000767007,0.0001705263,0.0001311012,0.00003541679,0.00001489229,0.0007418424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8197488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W99643971","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-058","title":"Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Voting; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Heuristics; Preference elicitation; Minimax; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1556875919876477,"gpt":0.2465336033867478,"spread":0.09084601139910015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008730423,0.00005431943,0.0001186081,0.000115704,0.0000327103,0.00002410178,0.00004631853,0.00003690555,0.0001372158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005544217,0.0000601153,0.00001308001,0.00008802152,0.00001521261,0.0002058378,0.00001684453,0.00004573406,0.00008596475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002514935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001963783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002954839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004352234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993899,0.00001704744,0.0003285344,0.0001521686,0.00001177256,0.0001006132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997554,0.00001573288,0.0001400081,0.00006302817,0.000006787519,0.00001898051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001098929,0.00003987937,0.2867031,0.0000425624,0.000003495386,3.181061e-7,0.001900035,0.00001516625,0.00006782413,0.7106389,0.000009590583,0.0005681625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002825665,0.0003066323,0.7660255,0.0002377818,0.000003412797,0.00001325707,0.002952547,0.07920711,0.002947765,0.1440143,0.0007633451,0.0007027366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070618,0.00002028698,0.008512798,0.00001912054,0.00003838159,0.002741587,0.000002794221,0.00003072905,0.08157253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957704,5.66985e-7,0.0032439,0.00003082014,0.00001875226,0.000716856,0.000002557782,0.000006474848,0.0002097052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5666246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2451431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011679113","doi":"10.1007/s10100-009-0116-0","title":"Cooperative interval games: a survey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Game theory; Interval data; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Operations research; State (computer science); Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1847136818476922,"gpt":0.347960214390777,"spread":0.1632465325430848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130844,0.0001009641,0.0002993841,0.0003506079,0.0002469963,0.0003383694,0.000479268,0.00002453302,0.0003943477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001743206,0.00009254036,0.0001014287,0.0004312007,0.0001064996,0.0003550596,0.00003811822,0.0005729496,0.000686696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007377242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003207921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001751268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968994,0.001502678,0.0009062704,0.000184521,0.0001095134,0.0003975817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988326,0.0001159145,0.0001254907,0.0002142397,0.0005150711,0.0001967218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009901313,0.002215925,0.04123645,0.00006235875,0.0005249671,0.0009350756,0.0266365,0.03402976,0.004331162,0.8208354,0.04975951,0.01844274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003919956,0.00537287,0.9055448,0.0004411548,0.00001105383,0.000456695,0.002199552,0.01030529,0.001025216,0.002798454,0.06713524,0.0007897363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541813,0.001123802,0.008971607,0.001103895,0.0005067892,0.0001911311,0.00006335528,0.0000122577,0.03384588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966291,0.0001120908,0.0003112312,0.0001031956,0.0003274823,5.363971e-7,0.00000767548,0.00001571132,0.002492995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8643084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097909533","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2009.07.004","title":"Two-sided matching with interdependent values","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Interdependence; Stability (learning theory); Mechanism (biology); Complete information; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Machine learning; Law; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01813848267765415,"gpt":0.2380659692204766,"spread":0.2199274865428225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245699,0.0001525998,0.0005174991,0.0002518398,0.00007062508,0.00009897672,0.0003604469,0.00004389033,0.0003818235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005993911,0.0001368312,0.0001862675,0.00003538029,0.00004486,0.0003844252,0.00002245116,0.00024864,0.0004044352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000170219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002631075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001053412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003515297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984819,0.0001074845,0.0009892458,0.0001800693,0.00002477515,0.0002165686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981639,0.0001794279,0.001303497,0.0002338252,0.0000213308,0.00009796729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001954697,0.00005386247,0.00198262,0.000007308376,0.000133467,0.00002693314,0.001548976,0.001897124,0.00009603517,0.9921976,0.0001702579,0.001690351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001273687,0.0003470723,0.003518522,0.0001376383,0.00001576349,0.0003940254,0.001074381,0.00007451385,0.0002556542,0.9919899,0.0006981214,0.0002207601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129921,0.0008741185,0.007744667,0.0003026073,0.0008061161,0.00007369619,0.000008862042,0.00001978375,0.07717802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973867,0.00002193911,0.0007094644,0.0002748703,0.0005550722,5.806199e-7,6.950204e-7,0.00002010977,0.001030567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08439457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5579816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964891449","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.006","title":"Von Neumann–Morgenstern stable sets in matching problems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Distributive lattice; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Independent set; Lattice (music); Stable marriage problem; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Graph; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02079798471369585,"gpt":0.2148062574683351,"spread":0.1940082727546393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00441785,0.0001629594,0.0005998366,0.000412682,0.00005633593,0.0000921258,0.0003232972,0.00009610749,0.0003995363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003363149,0.0001758476,0.0001784077,0.00006762295,0.00004241787,0.000473793,0.00004042765,0.0002797413,0.0004623095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002642202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003411865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002554521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001021237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978042,0.00009299187,0.001547964,0.0002139473,0.00002415008,0.0003168099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998171,0.0001596355,0.001370498,0.0002202008,0.00001697139,0.00006167222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237825,0.0001061683,0.07500006,0.0000631135,0.0000567552,0.0000218853,0.0009120975,0.02227452,0.0001882506,0.9004112,0.0004908569,0.0004026537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011618,0.00007625564,0.01415981,0.0001232587,0.000006378159,0.0001144744,0.0003079488,0.0004801446,0.0001179015,0.9750856,0.008257055,0.0002596274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658558,0.001840894,0.0009720735,0.0001266551,0.001327019,0.000116547,0.00002557756,0.00001333749,0.02972211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967026,0.00003627903,0.0001535858,0.00006202563,0.0003678264,0.000002812011,0.000002179731,0.00003236259,0.00264032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07467427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7170857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138689521","doi":"10.1257/mic.5.2.99","title":"Preference Signaling in Matching Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Air Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Welfare; Mechanism (biology); Value (mathematics); Matching (statistics); Preference; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Market economy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02185219763630557,"gpt":0.2065421662644691,"spread":0.1846899686281636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001664536,0.0003224582,0.0009100679,0.0005346893,0.0001591665,0.0004683353,0.0006657199,0.00008959717,0.001914802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000491978,0.000400134,0.0002148388,0.0001116676,0.0001916617,0.000922438,0.0001003162,0.000585841,0.007045733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008049664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007576903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00177014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008526412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968292,0.00008802292,0.001768012,0.0005593693,0.00001742439,0.0007379915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975783,0.0002035224,0.00156732,0.0003906122,0.00002054285,0.0002396632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000202975,0.0003394651,0.719135,0.0001044437,0.0005994825,0.0000429934,0.006128617,0.01448774,0.003680942,0.208554,0.004598934,0.04212544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004996135,0.0005168029,0.2411449,0.0003643318,0.00002967822,0.001516062,0.01080924,0.009320913,0.001286212,0.6757725,0.05023246,0.004010723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819851,0.0004432052,0.000763551,0.0005652081,0.0009048542,0.0002764333,0.00003615542,0.00003866609,0.01498683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959388,0.0002627324,0.002134673,0.0005703648,0.0003490125,0.0000319353,0.000004416595,0.0000666594,0.0006413819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4779901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05340575176902274,"gpt":0.2324110641399203,"spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004361071,0.00005400279,0.0003438818,0.00006257903,0.00007160327,0.000007750262,0.0001439728,0.00004460107,0.00006842588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001531328,0.00003919626,0.0001357698,0.00005415898,0.0007982055,0.00003710956,0.00005168676,0.0001333475,0.00000184627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003097726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001718886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001162986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.923804e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990505,0.000116657,0.0005929299,0.00005234237,0.00007873203,0.0001088519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989023,0.0002474135,0.0005128256,0.0001269917,0.000148819,0.0000616867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003633841,0.00005809537,0.005480016,0.00003208711,0.00005953627,4.727296e-7,0.0004675737,0.00001884248,0.00001044981,0.9938034,0.00002828416,0.000004945801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524436,0.00007973659,0.001791241,0.00003016481,0.00003432866,0.00001415768,0.0001921311,0.0001019105,0.0005201707,0.9960893,0.0003540088,0.00004042915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612594,0.001223262,0.004833709,0.000817976,0.0003434241,0.00009734861,0.00004187268,0.000002260358,0.03138079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999509,0.00004555641,0.0003359843,0.00005126505,0.00003527452,1.508157e-7,5.179376e-8,0.00000338272,0.00001930922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03824967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2941021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968974820","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9121-2","title":"Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bankruptcy; Dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Soviet union; Political science; Geography; Economics; Economy; Business; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05737976568253775,"gpt":0.2287052475246966,"spread":0.1713254818421588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006871136,0.00009993658,0.0001735936,0.0001196741,0.0005255104,0.00006054624,0.0001253044,0.0000736784,0.00009302425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001994869,0.00008393724,0.00006310292,0.0002024174,0.00003742253,0.0002369183,0.00003542018,0.0001107257,0.0003408851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002973725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000603211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001845403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005058227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990688,0.00003212457,0.0004354047,0.0002539399,0.00005162668,0.0001581147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.0001442024,0.0001257496,0.0002504866,0.00002674952,0.00005780973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740556,0.000106691,0.1045401,0.00001494961,0.0000359326,0.000006116936,0.005316376,0.007295749,0.0000467493,0.8688224,0.00164649,0.01211103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001077682,0.00009071741,0.1251245,0.0000355796,0.000009700085,0.0001121685,0.0004421245,0.7211161,0.00001596209,0.1366349,0.01496491,0.0003756339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8298036,0.001345073,0.1645211,0.0003614463,0.0004700164,0.0001653721,0.00001623868,0.00004761016,0.003269542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985238,0.0002161203,0.0004810272,0.0002821231,0.0001481101,0.00001127577,0.00001218831,0.00001305666,0.0003123056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7321874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019408419","doi":"10.1287/moor.1070.0294","title":"Truncation Strategies in Matching Markets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Matching (statistics); Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Advice (programming); Complete information; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1842064859521359,"gpt":0.3546812017191083,"spread":0.1704747157669724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037935,0.00006142841,0.0002185885,0.0004344115,0.0001686278,0.00006113377,0.0002038188,0.00005242649,0.0002141837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542491,0.00006625259,0.00003325423,0.0003865466,0.00009985852,0.000271571,0.00003981368,0.0001712512,0.0002686796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004907611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005317876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003035961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009227308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.00006936048,0.000582643,0.0001500738,0.00008255481,0.000185757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993698,0.0001825084,0.00005451085,0.0002766375,0.00008895342,0.00002758834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003768701,0.0001624731,0.001401811,0.000109268,0.000007527106,0.000002078248,0.009105158,0.002486461,0.0005056038,0.9861266,0.00006281285,0.00002643378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000947787,0.0001349265,0.02917628,0.0002902265,0.000002034378,0.00004736791,0.01474353,0.09093818,0.001631636,0.8610438,0.0006581206,0.0003861203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9418572,0.000168671,0.006096594,0.0001309557,0.00004115732,0.0002346481,0.00001247661,0.00001163893,0.05144671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922307,0.00004762511,0.00564478,0.000003266073,0.00002376108,0.00004100996,0.000005394962,0.00001148307,0.001991949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3453423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124372635","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.007","title":"Incomplete information and singleton cores in matching markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; European Regional Development Fund; Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Singleton; Matching (statistics); Complete information; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian probability; Bayesian game; Information asymmetry; Mechanism design; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Economics; Stochastic game; Computer science; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Repeated game; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01157620871886893,"gpt":0.1946603238093871,"spread":0.1830841150905181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225528,0.00009023519,0.0003315536,0.000371275,0.00004112445,0.00008656873,0.0001274628,0.00005618474,0.0001303102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000584707,0.00009688189,0.00006470963,0.00003577042,0.00004169422,0.0007436386,0.00002765939,0.0001424115,0.00008853442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001306505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001646877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001237104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002430884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986378,0.00005661333,0.001073575,0.00007958851,0.00001385944,0.0001385451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986355,0.0001965576,0.001029776,0.00009332445,0.00001084362,0.0000340337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001049052,0.00001874955,0.04748017,0.00003064131,0.00001918952,0.000003491039,0.0005540692,0.0008476624,0.00003016687,0.9487626,0.0001968436,0.00195151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008947833,0.00004621921,0.08271929,0.00007251027,0.000003511233,0.0001024068,0.0003501477,0.0005570779,0.00003258689,0.9050745,0.009996427,0.0001505436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784051,0.0007903527,0.001079773,0.0001113069,0.00048897,0.00005734406,0.0000181083,0.000005746308,0.01904331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993263,0.00003284266,0.0002148297,0.00007628047,0.0001828368,8.504911e-7,0.00000217884,0.000008234859,0.0001556212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0436881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3950728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1139032161304582,"gpt":0.3617299188316292,"spread":0.247826702701171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000421269,0.00005275265,0.0002087837,0.00008133191,0.00008886987,0.0000128286,0.00003785867,0.00006137414,0.0003026641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008142253,0.0000625442,0.00003488665,0.0001634272,0.00003171607,0.00009494033,0.00001286887,0.00005934949,0.00001038841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002738344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001398423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001211289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.0000464811,0.0004652565,0.0001511065,0.00002959808,0.00008460477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00002604316,0.000326683,0.00005509043,0.00001417214,0.00001709684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003804461,0.00010051,0.7572579,0.00005118283,0.00001261542,1.710445e-7,0.003382859,0.00003119683,0.00005389437,0.2329317,0.0001140884,0.006059997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006167844,0.0000516544,0.9571946,0.00001738113,0.000007204992,6.519974e-7,0.002026319,0.003255343,0.0002181266,0.02637296,0.01007313,0.0001658439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691514,0.001020406,0.009523164,0.002009184,0.0002751224,0.0003245286,0.00003696818,0.00002700764,0.01763217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991669,0.00001133547,0.0004120591,0.00001683925,0.00007325394,0.0000161713,0.00001775947,0.000005536067,0.0002801631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2065587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3313959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085950285","doi":"10.1007/s10058-007-0028-1","title":"On complexity of lobbying in multiple referenda","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Democracy; Economics; Direct democracy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2375478318523562,"gpt":0.3042732677913916,"spread":0.06672543593903535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005358698,0.0001203766,0.0008315625,0.0001956112,0.00001852471,0.000004469955,0.0002221079,0.00005598647,0.0003737193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003237577,0.0001349309,0.0001316316,0.00009948324,0.00007963754,0.00007010106,0.00002281512,0.00009508231,0.0003431172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001212824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001720958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000146606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002833297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980528,0.00006563518,0.001421618,0.0002442641,0.00001659305,0.0001990388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982753,0.0004607544,0.0008692252,0.000341078,0.00001234029,0.00004132927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006119804,0.00009651479,0.01052773,0.002965588,0.00003224609,0.000001365638,0.00009346268,0.000235337,0.0000410468,0.9826946,0.0004075808,0.002843339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006317082,0.001323687,0.09113917,0.04100586,0.00005380803,0.00002945702,0.0002249752,0.008046212,0.009514104,0.8026566,0.03752472,0.002164348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.67325,0.1072615,0.04026296,0.0002935946,0.001485034,0.002539933,0.0002759279,0.00006322988,0.1745679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957914,0.00272315,0.001211735,0.0001141453,0.00002801765,0.000006019921,0.000004914263,0.00001411919,0.0001065393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3225414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125965656","doi":"10.1111/joie.12058","title":"Bilateral Bargaining with Externalities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Microeconomics; Division (mathematics); Externality; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Value (mathematics); Division of labour; Economic surplus; Foreclosure; Mathematical economics; Welfare; Computer science; Mathematics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06255559830554105,"gpt":0.2041967837499633,"spread":0.1416411854444223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296574,0.0001375012,0.0005673898,0.0002242049,0.00006499064,0.0001360517,0.0002704675,0.0001327706,0.0001448471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001969226,0.0001257122,0.000132634,0.00006532906,0.00005693275,0.0003765289,0.00002385273,0.0003236393,0.00007537124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000442576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000368416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000319382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984714,0.00004695884,0.001091692,0.000149002,0.00002294116,0.0002179906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980307,0.0001373995,0.001504173,0.0001746565,0.00004124411,0.0001117746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004434701,0.00006211693,0.1486836,0.00001171706,0.0002612369,0.00001009161,0.0008980812,0.004854954,0.00001754155,0.8396428,0.0006803469,0.004434143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01982197,0.005048585,0.00674337,0.0008610235,0.0001018551,0.001538216,0.002053696,0.006758015,0.001789832,0.5379015,0.4153402,0.002041741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770758,0.0001015934,0.001625994,0.0002544216,0.001338502,0.00005885698,0.00001412704,0.00001006463,0.01952062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967986,0.00001987619,0.0004441007,0.0001544778,0.002001918,0.000001112228,9.497564e-7,0.00002360614,0.0005553707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4146598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57159709","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7873","title":"Complexity of and Algorithms for Borda Manipulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Bin packing problem; Approximation algorithm; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Bin","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4144343008130673,"gpt":0.3119633961306065,"spread":0.1024709046824607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007509189,0.0001020573,0.0002814784,0.00008162884,0.00007778143,0.00002406539,0.0003067435,0.0000581601,0.00008368985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002588246,0.00009064114,0.00007375405,0.0001340385,0.0003006049,0.0001161306,0.00005509976,0.00007568058,0.00001735353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001215566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007545798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001442006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007182665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989894,0.000004753213,0.000592273,0.0002310051,0.00004029195,0.000142245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990175,0.00004231502,0.0006253756,0.0001093353,0.0001740429,0.00003141155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006990207,0.00006142333,0.003307982,0.00008765963,0.00001214075,1.393674e-8,0.001398365,0.000001806642,0.00117476,0.990598,0.00001051432,0.003277415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003070457,0.0001668384,0.003582401,0.00008322438,0.00000582607,9.120742e-7,0.0004950122,0.01372156,0.09339381,0.888364,0.00005160484,0.0001040824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517703,0.00006788433,0.01276948,0.0003417823,0.0003591641,0.0006421864,0.00007162474,0.00002594581,0.03395161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979008,0.00001248055,0.001850357,0.0000220733,0.00003349576,0.00001560034,6.338734e-7,0.000008793417,0.0001557717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.102234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3696238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657709721","doi":"10.1029/2003wr002596","title":"Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flathead; Status quo; Conflict resolution; Conflict analysis; Compromise; Operations research; Drainage basin; Politics; Conflict management; Decision maker; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Fishery; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1098090322574266,"gpt":0.3146804596086147,"spread":0.2048714273511881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739038,0.00009595839,0.0003722434,0.0006486366,0.0002138519,0.00006810181,0.0005341483,0.00008234975,0.0003862616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001219979,0.00006192334,0.0002355427,0.0009952871,0.0003980858,0.00006205464,0.0002077544,0.0002823096,0.0005852078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009454638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001015181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004063124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001054337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983522,0.0001577189,0.0004665888,0.000309368,0.0001533451,0.0005607862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990017,0.00008941634,0.0001083067,0.0006440929,0.0000735625,0.00008288169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769412,0.000323399,0.5649902,0.0001633244,0.002245458,0.00001154789,0.1663838,0.01217511,0.003341305,0.2494721,0.0002343845,0.0004823704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00165229,0.00024165,0.2895302,0.00009090919,0.00009977955,0.00000358605,0.001637283,0.001326439,0.01859122,0.05861823,0.6277353,0.0004730361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789202,0.0005099406,0.00005829194,0.0003231081,0.00007808564,0.0001818756,0.00007276656,0.0000149746,0.01984071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938897,0.00002469781,0.00002070174,0.0000286881,0.00005213187,0.00001200776,0.000006656512,0.0000150129,0.00595038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.627501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967607367","doi":"10.1086/319550","title":"Competitive Fair Division","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Proxy bid; Pareto principle; Vickrey auction; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Monotonic function; Common value auction; Set (abstract data type); Auction theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Operations management; Arithmetic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02947629944512819,"gpt":0.2426873438941583,"spread":0.2132110444490301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008935495,0.0001040781,0.0004478912,0.0001860533,0.00005262671,0.0000598347,0.0002100272,0.00007071845,0.0007575199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001725193,0.0001036023,0.0002024724,0.00007422805,0.00007936578,0.0002911032,0.00003198089,0.0002112758,0.0007634561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002290236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002176581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001466611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.00003239421,0.0009050525,0.000134787,0.00002348963,0.0003412416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.0001772433,0.0004819998,0.0001385008,0.00006362381,0.0002429636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001288675,0.00006263204,0.02046148,0.000009806414,0.00003412887,0.00002118085,0.00006232525,0.00000690329,0.00000284428,0.9789745,0.0002449797,0.0001063777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006793853,0.0002237017,0.0192542,0.00004835261,0.000006090932,0.0002165909,0.0003537058,0.0001555433,0.00005753775,0.6544081,0.3244283,0.0001684544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1983155,0.0002944284,0.005659983,0.002726426,0.0006172148,0.00006418201,0.00001561717,0.00001290568,0.7922937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975631,0.000006210706,0.0002054269,0.0007561393,0.000531139,0.000001106225,8.552052e-7,0.00001239107,0.0009235809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7992476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971335524","doi":"10.1006/jeth.2001.2829","title":"Strategy-Proof Probabilistic Decision Schemes for One-Dimensional Single-Peaked Preferences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Class (philosophy); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Characterization (materials science); Probability distribution; Line (geometry); Mathematical economics; Expected value; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1075204630837921,"gpt":0.2496006682829871,"spread":0.142080205199195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921018,0.000186938,0.0006495524,0.0002556223,0.0001103238,0.0001068663,0.0003913021,0.0001260855,0.001591568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005897079,0.0001828308,0.0002865532,0.00005349976,0.0001039572,0.000389633,0.0000345652,0.0001896776,0.0002815682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001826659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003218155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002515891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004249841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978886,0.00006702932,0.001438463,0.0002857797,0.00003958158,0.0002805011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971878,0.000896679,0.001465598,0.0002572643,0.00007266408,0.0001200167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003382091,0.0003613973,0.001144425,0.00007624002,0.0002328307,0.000002667083,0.0003177339,0.003058623,0.0001807257,0.9775958,0.001219145,0.01547217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001341539,0.000619141,0.0003723999,0.0001512002,0.0000263793,0.00005332008,0.0001231168,0.00346836,0.0004224333,0.9845664,0.008581039,0.0002746986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788818,0.003118962,0.006269342,0.0001374439,0.00132363,0.0003154583,0.00007739607,0.00001721963,0.009858738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962529,0.00002296883,0.001777415,0.00005759659,0.0005004473,0.000009723709,0.000002239669,0.00002837568,0.001348331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01737109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968470372","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdz041","title":"(Il)legal Assignments in School Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Set (abstract data type); Blocking (statistics); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Mathematics education; Block (permutation group theory); Computer science; Lattice (music); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Political science; Law; Combinatorics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05750148617069437,"gpt":0.2990657811864957,"spread":0.2415642950158014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002333994,0.0001399478,0.0009000121,0.00007521071,0.00003590205,0.00001222623,0.0003417539,0.00003058458,0.0005628515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003394933,0.0001114295,0.000142723,0.00008643316,0.00006573395,0.0001381751,0.0001100842,0.0001168833,0.004527406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001700327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001246211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001755277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00006464413,0.0009758507,0.0002588187,0.00001901956,0.0001999013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986004,0.0002905982,0.0006114187,0.0004583802,0.00001243116,0.00002678712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001887288,0.00007805665,0.3574528,0.009154955,0.0006358992,0.000001077375,0.0004981107,0.0001266049,0.00001449476,0.6217223,0.008901327,0.001395602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002657164,0.0003043732,0.1287501,0.02048202,0.00008652208,0.00001669781,0.001241966,0.0003513995,0.0001207957,0.06345525,0.7813595,0.001174211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4963957,0.4277529,0.000003390835,0.001341902,0.001183966,0.0008089613,0.00004362815,0.00001567824,0.07245388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202415,0.07539009,0.0000185052,0.0005700653,0.0001243514,0.00004994335,0.000001513036,0.00001498988,0.003589089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7724582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157469891","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x08004671","title":"Game theory and the development of resource management policy: the case of international fisheries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Relevance (law); Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Positive political theory; Resource management (computing); Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01992498816374112,"gpt":0.1788725680931198,"spread":0.1589475799293787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001776287,0.00013177,0.000270579,0.00009540098,0.0002063975,0.0000192847,0.0001863403,0.00004013683,0.00005779671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001797386,0.00009901189,0.00003543858,0.00002990823,0.0004869379,0.00007052632,0.0002335942,0.00006312691,0.00001847498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006227843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001873778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001421619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006866969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988502,0.0000479297,0.0007219589,0.0002189486,0.00002346333,0.0001375584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999182,0.0001749842,0.0004019901,0.0002036075,0.000003386033,0.00003396967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002229457,0.00006344867,0.03817227,0.00006392247,0.0004294687,0.000008752551,0.03403303,0.0001480162,0.000001754393,0.9137465,0.00006176619,0.01304818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005195646,0.00005530114,0.162714,0.00006960273,0.00002914506,0.0004460024,0.01357689,0.0004933476,0.001028241,0.06694007,0.7486824,0.0007693546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827436,0.0006638989,0.00134648,0.0003586416,0.00007932248,0.0002374551,0.00001206317,0.000006132539,0.01455247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951331,0.0008061269,0.002109563,0.0001010099,0.00003131505,0.00003160789,0.000007005128,0.00001168251,0.001768612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4037587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990199392","doi":"10.5555/1070432.1070517","title":"A group-strategyproof mechanism for Steiner forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Steiner tree problem; Combinatorics; Group (periodic table); Connection (principal bundle); Game tree; Computer science; Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical optimization; Tree (set theory); Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Sequential game","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04042950146546177,"gpt":0.229505074404459,"spread":0.1890755729389972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005745186,0.0001073456,0.0002294181,0.00008499217,0.00006885613,0.00005160747,0.0001464584,0.00007835001,0.0003636388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004658054,0.0001079678,0.0001059167,0.00006855368,0.00001424998,0.0001639486,0.00001693017,0.00005086757,0.0008024551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003180277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004219631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003918396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990655,0.000006898919,0.0004004191,0.0002606156,0.00001587886,0.0002507424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995279,0.00004233866,0.0001434326,0.0002072004,0.00002159499,0.00005752751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001129717,0.0000387914,0.001017796,0.00002069614,0.00001705972,2.215996e-7,0.00007491679,0.00001950559,0.00007095112,0.9974667,0.0006311929,0.0006308155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009648511,0.0001685453,0.0007550872,0.00001102783,0.000004288734,0.000005515075,0.00006631183,0.009571769,0.0009931582,0.9382309,0.0489423,0.0002862622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5392027,0.0004375043,0.2950019,0.001518073,0.0007834748,0.0009921419,0.0001384229,0.000254571,0.1616712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788268,0.000002962501,0.003349157,0.0003339347,0.000336772,0.0000817898,0.000009043222,0.00002202756,0.01703749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4396241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026409515","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.023","title":"On weighted balls-into-bins games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ball (mathematics); Bin; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01958480343885642,"gpt":0.2151943354991477,"spread":0.1956095320602913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149196,0.0001553418,0.0003034305,0.0002296653,0.0004678285,0.00009090456,0.0008202942,0.00005884379,0.0004386024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001339624,0.0001428304,0.00008390838,0.0005575635,0.002476445,0.0001849248,0.0001627829,0.000175699,0.002441353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006576441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002698447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009766718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.286834e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984069,0.00004142764,0.0003938655,0.0006009608,0.0001162115,0.0004406577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989151,0.0002082244,0.000117526,0.0005246789,0.00004274508,0.0001916794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001208116,0.00006289381,0.0006952264,0.000004963012,0.000004188243,0.000009994237,0.0005861034,0.0000331622,0.00002844446,0.9978495,0.0001313343,0.0005821049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000286178,0.0002776544,0.003558865,0.00002648307,0.000001215229,0.00004107272,0.000005743813,0.05583495,0.0007640112,0.9377236,0.00121277,0.0002674799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7582046,0.00007011581,0.1762836,0.0004701493,0.0009145418,0.0001231829,0.00000616617,0.000127058,0.06380059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943957,0.000007224802,0.00463574,0.0005857257,0.0001754681,0.00000452337,8.912408e-7,0.0000121369,0.0001825908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2361911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980153177","doi":"10.1007/s11127-019-00723-2","title":"The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Truncation (statistics); Ranked voting system; Voting; Turnout; Condorcet method; Spoilt vote; Public finance; Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Group voting ticket; Law; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.031795294941642,"gpt":0.2340985627719292,"spread":0.2023032678302872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347941,0.00007071876,0.0001712319,0.0001131478,0.00008679925,0.00008138196,0.0002006302,0.00004921418,0.000100711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009846359,0.00006412493,0.00002996048,0.0003086114,0.000111826,0.0002776544,0.0000256922,0.0001077829,0.00007820736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003679316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002591765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007205941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003703438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991183,0.00005468585,0.0004039705,0.000216525,0.00003164189,0.0001748614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987028,0.0007329864,0.0002730561,0.0002200626,0.00003853395,0.0000325549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003427345,0.0000182949,0.6599694,0.00006841311,0.00001101594,2.913932e-8,0.0001483826,0.000004643062,0.0001393343,0.3393885,0.00003443857,0.0002141476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004924697,0.00005206477,0.905958,0.00003799382,0.00000350142,0.000005020702,0.00008256808,0.0006685337,0.00009604992,0.01577627,0.07669101,0.0001365189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774624,0.002136219,0.0000525644,0.001594602,0.0003338782,0.0002503464,0.00001736813,0.00001831995,0.01813434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964955,0.0001822071,0.00001403477,0.00005815901,0.00004389788,0.0000263669,0.00000157415,0.000006358493,0.003171917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3236122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2614939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567893196","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.23","title":"Social Evaluation under Risk and Uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Ex-ante; Mathematical economics; Observer (physics); Social choice theory; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05173221233126422,"gpt":0.2232564723761207,"spread":0.1715242600448564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000886776,0.0002142575,0.0004204239,0.0001638598,0.0003013364,0.00004577603,0.0002360407,0.0003791411,0.0000766463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002508676,0.0002443823,0.0001351334,0.000009627181,0.0001651032,0.00008416432,0.0001384111,0.000246394,0.00001052368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004122319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007341756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009092453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001538744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989201,0.00009926711,0.0002496149,0.0004499512,0.00006439791,0.0002166914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989126,0.00009504457,0.0006201951,0.0002466045,0.00005993998,0.0000655906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004464575,0.000005848359,0.00007388098,0.00004434574,0.0001273596,0.000002558856,0.0003411964,0.00001257327,4.176833e-7,0.9923696,0.003878608,0.003098955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007572472,0.00002645949,0.0001346941,0.00005020512,0.00007869865,0.000001683793,0.00004045296,0.0002007791,0.000001203396,0.11418,0.8842459,0.0002826872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00216264,0.0002271652,0.0008529233,0.00002370639,0.0002417749,0.0003582871,0.0005686666,0.00005274365,0.9955121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04959827,0.0001017394,0.00001401778,0.00001751816,0.0002543001,0.00000161439,0.00003201332,0.00002727475,0.9499533],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089003244","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3666","title":"Preference Elicitation for Participatory Budgeting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory budgeting; Preference elicitation; Knapsack problem; Preference; Voting; Social choice theory; Value (mathematics); Citizen journalism; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2382820150244095,"gpt":0.2774736249671446,"spread":0.03919160994273505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363717,0.00006111207,0.0001092366,0.00008052414,0.0002098991,0.00009230304,0.0003213129,0.00001307157,0.00003432052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002170293,0.00006947955,0.00002921296,0.0003625825,0.0000899298,0.0002320871,0.00007122705,0.00003067934,0.0003610986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002796525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003576988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004779266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.206377e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991,0.000007427514,0.0002590646,0.0003530609,0.00004432677,0.000236146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995955,0.00003027385,0.0001447124,0.0001401241,0.00001765647,0.0000717557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007029166,0.00001229565,0.008543307,0.00009062346,0.000005886455,3.608533e-7,0.001060705,0.0003459161,0.0001492481,0.9880555,0.0002549133,0.00147426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002272447,0.0005809704,0.1507457,0.000143588,0.00003483875,9.811389e-7,0.004095201,0.3419472,0.003421417,0.2772591,0.2181537,0.001344888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6320903,0.0001605194,0.2362464,0.002196043,0.0006631913,0.0009267078,0.00002078074,0.0001662446,0.1275298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970766,0.00000349425,0.001710202,0.000655763,0.00005523118,0.00006023912,0.000001172838,0.000005759168,0.0004315851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7107963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4641312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124268924","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01512.x","title":"Viewpoint: Decision‐making in committees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Voting; Information aggregation; Process (computing); Perfect information; Imperfect; Focus (optics); Quality (philosophy); Decision-making; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Business; Political science; Decision support system; Economics; Engineering; Data mining; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1358675593200694,"gpt":0.1974223866401813,"spread":0.06155482732011194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328397,0.0002891565,0.00104997,0.00155653,0.00014006,0.0001754519,0.0007883599,0.0002266872,0.0004743871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005368814,0.0003841468,0.0002881975,0.0002456029,0.00009260861,0.000538338,0.00001435369,0.0004879399,0.0001614466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001717656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004800959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0275367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8448878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996747,0.00005092703,0.001970931,0.0004015809,0.000001525716,0.0008280879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997108,0.0002307148,0.001188227,0.0004666582,0.00007028634,0.0009361025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004309093,0.000016561,0.02265562,0.00001468761,0.00003625273,0.0001267887,0.001385977,0.003519725,0.000001392382,0.966499,0.000367397,0.005333509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007321786,0.0002744087,0.01762755,0.0003237996,0.000006568498,0.0003841847,0.0002538975,0.00124062,0.000009317896,0.9532517,0.02545328,0.0004424595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849127,0.00154407,0.0003588653,0.00272648,0.001672598,0.0001960981,0.0001065606,0.00000729445,0.008475343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963626,0.00008905784,0.0008293662,0.001995468,0.0004657068,0.000004512612,0.000003423582,0.00003774299,0.0002121233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992540444","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.003","title":"Trading water along a river","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Distribution (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Welfare; Process (computing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management; Computer network; Market economy; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06191056375167327,"gpt":0.2639435744076436,"spread":0.2020330106559703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00188406,0.00007081618,0.0002013072,0.00004990943,0.0004285372,0.0001158533,0.0002521516,0.00006859225,0.001628563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295199,0.00005211143,0.00007558299,0.0001209198,0.0004635428,0.000145687,0.00003441904,0.0001201722,0.001478142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001007614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004345875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003668949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000680354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.00001335257,0.0002864207,0.0001977591,0.00004906617,0.0002800881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997422,0.00007161278,0.000069569,0.00006922816,0.000006155525,0.00004126543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.859368e-7,0.00002599376,0.002468532,0.00001203898,0.000003833764,5.948286e-7,0.003988972,1.897936e-7,0.0003377179,0.9929211,0.0001108347,0.0001296076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007713467,0.00001566474,0.001422264,0.000004953994,0.000001745733,0.000003828367,0.0001821812,0.001254837,0.000435824,0.9927703,0.003709705,0.0001215523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717477,0.000008533058,0.001001247,0.0007391566,0.0003082897,0.00006696847,0.000005607706,0.00003796086,0.1260845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982902,1.821727e-7,0.0008272748,0.00008388972,0.0002253232,0.00000702536,4.875124e-7,0.000005224351,0.0005604377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1265424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110681344","doi":"10.1007/s00182-010-0237-7","title":"Noncooperative formation of coalitions in hedonic games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Economics; Point (geometry); Repeated game; Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01982951449112412,"gpt":0.257316331565879,"spread":0.2374868170747549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002178079,0.00007069807,0.0002503578,0.0004210055,0.00001341992,0.00002878831,0.0003379264,0.00005728131,0.0003641304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004797233,0.00006973484,0.0001105674,0.00009274326,0.0000809023,0.0004208536,0.00002551606,0.0002642987,0.00006150161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005402296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003114074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001600795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002498495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988067,0.00006413583,0.0008935104,0.00007527881,0.00006908308,0.00009135154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985785,0.0002062105,0.0008668501,0.0000984041,0.0002164631,0.00003359246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227935,0.0001212241,0.004434952,0.000009114648,0.00005428049,0.000007932336,0.002712178,0.0002411865,0.002013143,0.9891514,0.00005055031,0.001081244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002113262,0.0002284324,0.0176706,0.0002401188,0.000009428038,0.0003273289,0.001335446,0.001139073,0.008679259,0.9599789,0.0080536,0.0002244894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729828,0.000243399,0.009635931,0.0003957523,0.001528057,0.00006214083,0.00005529325,0.00000493276,0.01509175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990347,0.00003940427,0.0002753403,0.00007405025,0.0002212046,0.000002334103,0.000003557474,0.000007625506,0.0003417872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02917244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3986973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318808822","doi":"10.1061/40976(316)262","title":"Bargaining over the Caspian Sea — The Largest Lake on the Earth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Voting; Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Majority rule; Political science; Economics; Economy; Computer science; Operations research; Microeconomics; International trade; Engineering; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011133517738455,"gpt":0.1704867836512753,"spread":0.1503754484738907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005509984,0.0001903769,0.000202983,0.00005023644,0.001019375,0.00008848118,0.0003206399,0.00004199674,0.001321923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007728513,0.00008734515,0.00008702414,0.00005632768,0.0005732095,0.00007207647,0.0001425853,0.0002711173,0.0008984555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001418026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.764459e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001068717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001619399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988974,0.00009769039,0.0002956277,0.0002919749,0.00007546518,0.0003418312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992843,0.0001379934,0.0001160329,0.0004026344,0.000001307039,0.00005773065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006924005,0.000103028,0.9680874,0.000008797033,0.0001402746,0.00005209141,0.01164165,0.0003088944,0.0001271869,0.01500822,0.004036039,0.0004171693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003257241,0.00004385475,0.2325888,0.00001620838,0.000006248308,0.00005239815,0.0002584189,0.0002532709,0.0004230801,0.0008891225,0.7649426,0.0002002564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779209,0.001208389,0.000002460837,0.001279721,0.0001991028,0.0002286019,0.00009225084,0.00002011218,0.01904841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728305,0.0001324126,0.000002058026,0.001470387,0.0001825365,0.0000275943,0.00001153864,0.0000238129,0.02531911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1341350525014695,"gpt":0.2865264764115325,"spread":0.1523914239100631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007731176,0.0003419494,0.0009737738,0.0001395652,0.0002643233,0.00003097673,0.0002200714,0.0002661663,0.0001384697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004294205,0.000363927,0.0001640506,0.00002849026,0.0002007118,0.0000795517,0.0001764757,0.0002864149,0.00005202466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006365042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000527403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008897968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001403055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.00001021716,0.0007266094,0.000556101,0.00002987235,0.0003082202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986618,0.0004710847,0.0004855459,0.0002868331,0.00005073091,0.00004405134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147955,0.00001480725,0.007274039,0.0008413531,0.0002730241,0.00000307792,0.001767369,8.869225e-7,1.567793e-7,0.9868094,0.001522819,0.001478252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006384106,0.0001100769,0.001418052,0.0004539808,0.00002950388,0.000004378492,0.0008088239,0.000007347287,0.000001072736,0.2461998,0.7498083,0.0005202236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002621002,0.04263039,0.00005181899,0.0006242563,0.002232769,0.0008739026,0.0004832666,0.00007639972,0.9504062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6914055,0.00238247,0.0002408558,0.0002531695,0.001073192,0.0001443812,0.00002651337,0.0001182111,0.3043557],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964436851","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011853","title":"Group Fairness for the Allocation of Indivisible Goods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Group (periodic table); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Fairness measure; Public good; Function (biology); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1021758135876272,"gpt":0.2747536511323003,"spread":0.1725778375446731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001472265,0.0001282537,0.0003053155,0.00009114571,0.0001027832,0.00006620518,0.0008567871,0.00007919571,0.0001377669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542534,0.00009230182,0.00014038,0.0003050134,0.0001542033,0.0001556116,0.00008219358,0.000133071,0.0001414075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002390244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001723188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008369196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006723172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987469,0.000007001045,0.0006909078,0.0002792205,0.00007825245,0.0001977477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985231,0.0002033847,0.0008293018,0.0002340237,0.0001850359,0.00002512899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006543544,0.00006757846,0.005036468,0.0001184861,0.00002493043,4.872237e-9,0.0008611195,0.00005558979,0.005804931,0.9844006,0.00003319177,0.003531715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756695,0.000325951,0.002601917,0.0002402319,0.0000156545,8.886179e-7,0.001983175,0.01708156,0.1846774,0.7919696,0.0008111693,0.0002168411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626175,0.0001331722,0.0102305,0.001449085,0.001110716,0.001328414,0.0000515515,0.00002917189,0.02304986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998968,0.00002156286,0.000138952,0.0000545465,0.00006017282,0.00004719228,0.000001007191,0.00001350853,0.0006950515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.192431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3763959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095409339","doi":"10.1145/1855118.1855133","title":"The story of set disjointness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGACT News","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Media studies; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0365966246474522,"gpt":0.2410202351192273,"spread":0.2044236104717751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001442476,0.00008489689,0.0002180658,0.00004656234,0.0001683317,0.00003341041,0.0005321504,0.00007084302,0.0001552454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001210265,0.00006841229,0.00009041687,0.00009300816,0.0001029837,0.00008653582,0.0000761037,0.0002950469,0.0004419363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001001052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001157648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001332697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001230469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992473,0.00003956475,0.0003475672,0.0001655754,0.00002381056,0.0001762378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982963,0.0005147078,0.0003133954,0.0008141925,0.00001707941,0.00004433826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003104681,0.00005324164,0.08672617,0.00004020804,0.00005920786,0.000001485393,0.001896132,0.000008534506,0.002909191,0.8947768,0.007160728,0.006337276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005323118,0.00008524207,0.06878293,0.00001884988,0.000007173437,0.000008782574,0.0008478172,0.00009630274,0.002587291,0.1558908,0.7708134,0.0003291373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811453,0.0003221184,0.00008412789,0.0009881833,0.001577341,0.0001104539,0.00003548987,0.00002466176,0.01571237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967306,0.00002124073,0.00007007421,0.00006131839,0.000183569,0.000008968446,0.000002790062,0.00001415848,0.002907332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7636526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5680345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545756310","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7620","title":"Coalitional Structure Generation in Skill Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"Ministry of Education, Science and Technology; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Bounded function; Partition (number theory); Graph; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Representation (politics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Function (biology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08195544025917015,"gpt":0.2679893737776672,"spread":0.186033933518497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006561009,0.0001336404,0.0002404728,0.0001419593,0.00008653966,0.00009714059,0.000470301,0.0001208257,0.000705012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890778,0.0001173538,0.0000710337,0.0002609444,0.0001635662,0.0001786597,0.00005428733,0.0003593236,0.0001268917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000239607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002108678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008459044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001172508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987719,0.000006608462,0.000628259,0.0003188996,0.00007461086,0.0001997292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.00003374615,0.0004135292,0.0001494247,0.0001374072,0.0000397682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633767,0.00005211432,0.004372313,0.00001656469,0.000004840262,8.37087e-8,0.0007216127,0.00003738156,0.04596391,0.9475725,0.00006838008,0.001173915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003419961,0.00005035296,0.003030542,0.00005073911,0.000002219694,0.000003623187,0.0002905998,0.01437588,0.1908839,0.790668,0.0004283616,0.0001816436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837269,0.00001648032,0.0001861709,0.0009997714,0.0007456513,0.0002064788,0.00005523358,0.00001699138,0.01404631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989763,0.000006282265,0.0002730413,0.0001161031,0.000211662,0.00001253888,0.000003101807,0.00001056999,0.0003904346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1569046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7719387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052020474","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2014.07.005","title":"Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Australian Research Council; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Heuristic; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1840062627102795,"gpt":0.2990024360764078,"spread":0.1149961733661283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328955,0.00006585804,0.0002162395,0.00004570629,0.0001008621,0.00002230765,0.00009463635,0.00003730147,0.00001298391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003073254,0.00005915071,0.00003676223,0.00006131053,0.0002374239,0.00006384213,0.00002827287,0.00004051861,0.000005809832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004742635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002387437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003016874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005124876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992353,0.00002450271,0.0004547439,0.0001605018,0.00002131397,0.0001036804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990667,0.00044523,0.0003092031,0.0001203026,0.00003858872,0.00002002703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001391719,0.00001390362,0.004887562,0.00006103236,0.00001056871,2.096954e-8,0.0005349107,0.0001583029,0.0001497855,0.9668338,0.000003225263,0.02733296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003892695,0.0001052049,0.01344084,0.00003859117,0.00000862055,0.000001531078,0.000435993,0.4019779,0.006588459,0.5765177,0.0007397468,0.0001065044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5915862,0.000480056,0.4068998,0.0002297677,0.0001588128,0.0001948129,0.00004152276,0.00000819912,0.0004007476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979415,0.00001892827,0.001915609,0.00001639799,0.00006700368,0.000005900632,0.000002247039,0.000006502873,0.00002588874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4063553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015123404","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.002","title":"A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost sharing; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Spanning tree; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Steiner tree problem; Point (geometry); Fixed point; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Tree (set theory); Fixed cost; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011134267664863,"gpt":0.2579126111951641,"spread":0.1567991844286778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451153,0.0001929903,0.000429008,0.0001534767,0.0001670757,0.000123149,0.0001382386,0.0001257502,0.0001700902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002864536,0.0002288505,0.00007575017,0.00003659059,0.00006757738,0.0003212061,0.00008791148,0.00009924088,0.00005998776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009138962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002390099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001187181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002025712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.000009640074,0.0005400589,0.0005456281,0.00001139726,0.0003883801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992039,0.00005007958,0.0003277164,0.0002415635,0.00001379613,0.0001629383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005091287,0.0001514597,0.7892206,0.0002518579,0.0001498527,0.000007667648,0.01611249,0.00005020901,0.000562947,0.1242051,0.002636502,0.06614218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009652747,0.001060459,0.7989103,0.0004758727,0.0002908937,0.0001981099,0.004910011,0.03203953,0.001014112,0.03431657,0.1144143,0.002717119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913492,0.001259688,0.003235837,0.0001148744,0.0004536766,0.001131465,0.0002092011,0.00004632905,0.002199797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919244,0.0000930333,0.001662839,0.00005295375,0.0001417832,0.0003003777,0.00001913737,0.00003983474,0.005765642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122357416","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.3.298","title":"Fidelity Networks and Long-Run Trends in HIV/AIDS Gender Gaps","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Matching (statistics); Fidelity; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Virology; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02998159220021788,"gpt":0.2531464451447613,"spread":0.2231648529445434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001263889,0.0002307956,0.001085251,0.0001895698,0.00004603807,0.00006888687,0.0002472849,0.0000532782,0.002059877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045057,0.0002501312,0.0001525885,0.0002439465,0.0001798758,0.0002739079,0.00007334416,0.0001859662,0.001976944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001019179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008667585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000556597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977899,0.00009637475,0.001138206,0.0005633067,0.00001478075,0.0003974504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.00008947767,0.0006723723,0.0005076375,0.000009783565,0.0001351245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007826747,0.00006668634,0.6424029,0.0006437042,0.0001191143,0.000004134551,0.0001897729,0.000419073,7.186673e-7,0.100655,0.01537283,0.2401183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009953175,0.0002013708,0.8278853,0.0009487612,0.00004136924,0.0000650832,0.0002031256,0.009662103,0.000001339389,0.01219672,0.1463702,0.001429254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6459492,0.2595716,0.001758515,0.001773974,0.00070659,0.001046896,0.00007134837,0.000113986,0.08900788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629807,0.0334856,0.0002109264,0.001594137,0.0001272806,0.0001005714,0.00002126302,0.0000306896,0.001448788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3170316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099084709","doi":"10.1007/s001820400177","title":"Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictator; Object (grammar); Resource (disambiguation); Simple (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Sequence (biology); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03026549573551538,"gpt":0.2509415769103459,"spread":0.2206760811748305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002764463,0.0001008022,0.0002540342,0.0002599465,0.00003599497,0.00007076464,0.0005057654,0.00006795293,0.00003861735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004589941,0.0001019674,0.0002010975,0.00006107118,0.00005700973,0.0002407224,0.00002865233,0.0001466263,0.0001018124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003821338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001423615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002887857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.00003839211,0.0007925032,0.0001418522,0.00007975919,0.0001441458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984698,0.0001666646,0.0009760458,0.000132447,0.0002009617,0.00005409837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002952853,0.0001372435,0.0004673321,0.00001455303,0.0001925402,0.0000047114,0.001724882,0.006877006,0.000318227,0.9883326,0.0000936713,0.001541981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001887461,0.0002175976,0.0006826972,0.0001212375,0.00001026342,0.0001058316,0.0001849372,0.0001371647,0.001674674,0.9554955,0.03933479,0.0001478784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7486746,0.001269574,0.2376645,0.002611996,0.002164467,0.0003451781,0.00006607044,0.00005909632,0.007144462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977034,0.00003756384,0.0008232983,0.0002876565,0.0005818137,0.000009345225,0.000003378003,0.00002819452,0.0005253615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2490288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4158111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}