{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1528,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1528,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"39743aa4764f","filters":{"topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics"}},"results":[{"id":"W3125589405","doi":"10.1257/aer.102.5.1927","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Adjusted gross income; Disadvantaged; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Family income; Gross income; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03700051456106048,"gpt":0.3364415166801979,"spread":0.2994410021191375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203153,0.000201321,0.0005146892,0.00002384624,0.0005306061,0.00006011545,0.001023532,0.00003705712,0.00009630931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003821722,0.0001134544,0.0003079987,0.0002629472,0.0008510976,0.0002731015,0.0001164475,0.0002207567,0.0002751922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002423922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03330104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009919427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978524,0.0006747503,0.0005305818,0.0002382971,0.0002083328,0.000495575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997107,0.001265747,0.0006857985,0.0007339865,0.00003650877,0.0001709197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002592896,0.00007138454,0.9238541,0.00005532178,0.0002598352,3.404222e-7,0.004104298,0.00005742343,0.000009881381,0.005101572,0.00483356,0.06162636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008271624,0.0001166643,0.9503061,0.0007058806,0.00005574298,3.526884e-7,0.002005982,0.00002039049,6.104928e-7,0.0002088418,0.04632769,0.0001689815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9003246,0.08271383,0.00001769726,0.003693927,0.0004912238,0.0007149296,0.0000918177,0.00002757034,0.01192437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242304,0.2740917,0.00003651522,0.001160119,0.0003508802,0.0000294845,0.000004449053,0.00001325469,0.00008321769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1913779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114199029","doi":"10.1257/jep.21.2.27","title":"Marriage and Divorce: Changes and their Driving Forces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":796,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Cohabitation; Fertility; Demographic economics; Economics; Falling (accident); Marriage market; Birth control; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Population; Family planning; Geography; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01658257215021227,"gpt":0.2736859750628229,"spread":0.2571034029126107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075322,0.00008179782,0.0001543498,0.00007846001,0.0003900934,0.00006699059,0.0001689485,0.00004364591,0.00002439732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005537756,0.00005356392,0.00003294508,0.00003679395,0.0004185119,0.0001950229,0.00004269166,0.0001257674,8.983711e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001127339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005412961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002762735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006509362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999435,0.00008742425,0.0001481465,0.00008038901,0.00005650397,0.0001925145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.0003638338,0.0001872712,0.00006707034,0.00004465178,0.00009216178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006785872,0.00002858522,0.08418538,0.000007533887,0.0001682485,0.000004188918,0.850314,0.00002527747,0.001410925,0.05413986,0.0001715297,0.009476681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002438212,0.00008425111,0.1629994,0.0000154971,0.00002329176,0.0000293957,0.8229137,0.0001205827,0.00003301101,0.01216917,0.001267515,0.0001003673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856092,0.003958562,0.0004288389,0.001373241,0.000226782,0.00006185104,0.000002290874,0.00000690361,0.008332384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919498,0.007046761,0.00008523332,0.00006334535,0.0005464868,2.21936e-7,5.498798e-8,0.000006442389,0.0003016872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07881404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3632376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994570475","doi":"10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x","title":"The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Population Research and Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":644,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Imperfect; Economics; Empirical evidence; Developed country; Developing country; Demographic economics; Public economics; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2911103288434083,"gpt":0.562643414175933,"spread":0.2715330853325247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300462,0.0002994424,0.001743792,0.0003573614,0.0004802635,0.00008976815,0.0008057975,0.0003779288,0.0000179979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007637162,0.0001440761,0.0006253736,0.005112762,0.0006977449,0.00008283812,0.0001379967,0.001013084,0.000003606528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005017201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002395894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02677337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00105569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991668,0.004698772,0.001447621,0.0002934849,0.001250616,0.0006414935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959008,0.001717303,0.0007457149,0.0007627388,0.0007072346,0.0001662222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003525225,0.00009284046,0.002993616,0.2842855,0.0001075283,9.60344e-7,0.001405609,2.398072e-7,3.720679e-8,0.03341686,0.006258164,0.6714033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008069762,0.00004931338,0.008072305,0.2821926,0.00004859458,6.615101e-7,0.00005646578,2.442825e-7,6.342133e-9,0.0007810686,0.7086235,0.00009453888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002295887,0.9920112,1.468688e-7,0.001176042,0.00007753497,0.003585276,0.0002722285,0.000007026776,0.002640962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002116649,0.9986598,0.000002433059,0.0003685376,0.0001946946,0.00008299585,0.00006829259,0.00001754639,0.0003940341],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7023654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075002587","doi":"10.1086/498585","title":"Who Marries Whom and Why","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":612,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Legalization; Matching (statistics); Spillover effect; Transferable utility; Economics; Econometrics; Function (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Demographic economics; Demography; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01254319556052265,"gpt":0.2624701592155886,"spread":0.249926963655066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003652967,0.00006734291,0.0001842665,0.00006360513,0.0002131669,0.0001839121,0.0001164351,0.00007533644,0.00008089609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007242025,0.00006066681,0.00006800683,0.00004963527,0.0004686,0.0002781097,0.00001842829,0.0001316882,0.000006375244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000913871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002620789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009349288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004514555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999124,0.00006397322,0.0002908903,0.00007261842,0.0001079632,0.0003405378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.0001348888,0.00009811063,0.00005388865,0.0001243098,0.0002557388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002865624,0.00001803565,0.09902061,0.000005113429,0.000008597291,0.000007167527,0.0004891879,0.00000174693,0.000002272463,0.8980186,0.002352301,0.00007352126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185006,0.00005718697,0.2145929,0.0000130111,0.0000226726,0.00001963842,0.007267782,0.00004364482,0.000007386408,0.4653434,0.3121978,0.000116014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6805312,0.0002149787,0.0007136405,0.008627981,0.0002539137,0.00004053201,0.000005630055,0.000008145093,0.309604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955561,0.00002055168,0.0004657623,0.001866755,0.001087256,4.612864e-7,3.925466e-7,0.000005586017,0.0009971657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4326752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2473921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163787203","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.10.004","title":"What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":568,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Unearned income; Economics; Developing country; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Point (geometry); Public economics; Economic growth; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05551329499319924,"gpt":0.2751437054639612,"spread":0.2196304104707619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006579965,0.0001415741,0.0003056094,0.0001204189,0.0004146004,0.0001911578,0.0004810379,0.0001152924,0.0001113365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001163995,0.0001417886,0.0001085359,0.00009895462,0.0001425967,0.001783155,0.00005578429,0.0001600713,0.00004924186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006207547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003090468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000716081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986008,0.00006662615,0.0006872817,0.0001705069,0.0001820056,0.000292823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987091,0.0002310848,0.0005233247,0.0001332301,0.0001897692,0.0002134926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004268809,0.0001042772,0.8202795,0.00001093095,0.0001751589,0.00009042154,0.1611528,0.0004541959,0.00009266019,0.0004385546,0.000739188,0.01641959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008346841,0.00007742565,0.7671207,0.0003098824,0.00004399004,0.00006779456,0.03621399,0.0002718605,0.0005603034,0.001400944,0.192462,0.0006364419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942751,0.001128941,0.0004495863,0.000537931,0.0026637,0.00008401528,0.000002079989,0.00001504186,0.0008436406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566152,0.01607549,0.02422912,0.0004078268,0.0006940976,0.00000284578,0.000002786435,0.00001672829,0.001955873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1917228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132118604","doi":"10.1257/aer.20161329","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit: Reply","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":449,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04162224576709179,"gpt":0.3508961612993184,"spread":0.3092739155322266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002287949,0.0002164336,0.000601493,0.00002123455,0.001624285,0.0002172713,0.002194281,0.00003529958,0.0000561409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001120135,0.00012439,0.0003577346,0.000111201,0.00159066,0.0002894878,0.0002121091,0.0002391036,0.0001681276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003056798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0914253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003280702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978771,0.000535513,0.0005896704,0.0003792858,0.0002234809,0.0003950136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955393,0.001027469,0.001433451,0.001811762,0.00005528774,0.0001327429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000598689,0.00006313311,0.8452117,0.00008356993,0.0004105484,0.000002621895,0.003306943,0.00007785451,0.00001432887,0.004795707,0.009128785,0.1368449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001102524,0.0001522775,0.9547255,0.001143093,0.00004970477,3.566756e-7,0.001079145,0.00003492009,6.383004e-7,0.0005160075,0.04201751,0.0001706108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273874,0.033397,0.00001252878,0.01404698,0.0005813971,0.0009284127,0.0001391975,0.00003179949,0.02347528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7048445,0.2930792,0.00003400335,0.001580015,0.0002589923,0.00002868281,0.000003275976,0.00001402121,0.0001572869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2596821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169974677","doi":"10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00036.x","title":"Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children? Trends in Selected Industrialized Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Developed country; Multivariate analysis; Demography; Population; Demographic economics; Developing country; Consistency (knowledge bases); Investment (military); Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06124117440261633,"gpt":0.3197459815087538,"spread":0.2585048071061374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006426263,0.0001118077,0.0002805523,0.0001636949,0.0001636183,0.00004450664,0.00007442993,0.00008914147,0.00003352204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002237626,0.0001083226,0.00001359874,0.0009886336,0.00003067486,0.0001342106,0.00002015656,0.0001019114,0.00000915441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001997571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00229521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007328866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998781,0.0001522846,0.0004268663,0.0001903538,0.0002324573,0.0002170694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996123,0.00001525295,0.0001943177,0.00005608987,0.00005282845,0.00006917126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001716859,0.00002042705,0.9872206,0.00004421216,0.000004194127,7.853624e-7,0.001598692,0.0000133697,2.238268e-7,0.0003852831,0.00003473314,0.01067573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006323647,0.000002276127,0.9954508,0.0009691641,0.0000057778,6.32668e-7,0.000268505,0.000005289363,3.754478e-7,0.0001368065,0.002386585,0.0001414371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931282,0.005608095,0.000012573,0.0004369372,0.00005727093,0.0003246645,0.000002558822,0.00003880139,0.0003909457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901848,0.008111696,0.0006315897,0.0006577281,0.00002965374,0.00002579402,0.000197046,0.000007877026,0.0001537896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4417265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009979255","doi":"10.1257/pol.3.3.175","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-being of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Mental health; Test (biology); Child health; Psychology; Physical health; Health benefits; Medicine; Psychiatry; Pediatrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01636990549031538,"gpt":0.2585437550202206,"spread":0.2421738495299053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00098647,0.0003489371,0.0006224952,0.0004846101,0.001605974,0.0002057559,0.001540876,0.0001269525,0.0007311159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001343031,0.000323324,0.0003583914,0.0002126234,0.001003685,0.0006429853,0.0001189777,0.0005831791,0.0003607764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001713489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002295564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9151688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7204874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972845,0.0002280487,0.000806375,0.0004963133,0.0001228366,0.001061944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971418,0.000293362,0.0009687864,0.0006543592,0.00004442118,0.0008972129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004382759,0.00006360529,0.8020819,0.000003327869,0.0006590342,0.000005887716,0.07078616,0.005751232,0.000004868649,0.0948194,0.001646314,0.02413443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004166852,0.0001345771,0.9738252,0.0001386064,0.000103688,0.00008303035,0.01605217,0.0002765721,0.00003010697,0.005982756,0.002379096,0.0005775738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132648,0.000651659,0.00001208409,0.003901199,0.0007661738,0.0002917717,0.0002563542,0.00002707223,0.08082896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873931,0.008496595,0.0001911537,0.001643889,0.002083923,0.00001097155,0.000007716183,0.00005211248,0.0001205477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1946814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119055680","doi":"10.1086/587760","title":"Child‐Care Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Natural experiment; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Day care; Medicine; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004662708707808862,"gpt":0.2117838050491326,"spread":0.2071210963413237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000173785,0.000127484,0.0003177,0.00006125397,0.0003062207,0.00004017087,0.0003022297,0.0000554697,0.00001297993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004972681,0.00008701474,0.00006171923,0.0001385498,0.0004079154,0.0001662597,0.00002534093,0.0001935641,2.164474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003719233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002222078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4722823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5137284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990429,0.00008408016,0.0003516979,0.0001161382,0.0001869178,0.0002182347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990003,0.00009099907,0.0004361052,0.00013889,0.0002080604,0.0001256382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002804797,0.00003693283,0.8894939,0.000004371373,0.0003143862,0.00001393732,0.09820765,0.0005410514,0.00001814725,0.01050819,0.0002654802,0.0003154835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002882824,0.00008180468,0.9166777,0.00002810312,0.00004965153,0.00006884266,0.07775395,0.00005600298,0.0001090848,0.0002034987,0.00189577,0.0001927605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928175,0.003170067,0.000002416633,0.002239095,0.000343643,0.0001416788,0.000213461,0.000003723276,0.001068478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950635,0.003189002,0.0004268923,0.0006924226,0.0005404406,0.00000141462,0.000004547761,0.00001467983,0.00006703647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04144608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5312318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172493141","doi":"10.1257/pol.5.1.179","title":"Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Economic rent; Domestic violence; Control (management); Poison control; Demographic economics; Medicine; Injury prevention; Environmental health; Psychology; Business; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008034727721411937,"gpt":0.2453025236658316,"spread":0.2372677959444197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065543,0.0001360375,0.0003045607,0.0002071014,0.0003597566,0.0003326077,0.0002916282,0.00004831841,0.00004935149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007546078,0.0001130577,0.00006336944,0.00006159054,0.001312439,0.001162671,0.00002717596,0.0001714107,0.0000454152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003080554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007897381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01000002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001229658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987982,0.0001279075,0.0005078078,0.0001200227,0.00005402861,0.0003920429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998944,0.0001918571,0.0004367104,0.0001280836,0.00003370582,0.0002656324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004009412,0.00002664431,0.2569777,0.00001695732,0.0002900697,7.434003e-7,0.02627191,0.001089556,0.00005563665,0.2201647,0.0004377314,0.4946283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003216354,0.0004664008,0.8112587,0.00004159153,0.00009663971,0.0001931864,0.09183645,0.01251504,0.000006730987,0.06323481,0.01640152,0.0007326373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881829,0.000112947,0.000280449,0.00797138,0.000156087,0.0002331728,0.00004466607,0.0000136868,0.003004707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914634,0.006958149,0.0000800499,0.001173225,0.0002879597,0.00001048258,0.000001348614,0.00000918458,0.00001622357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.554281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976958742","doi":"10.1086/600076","title":"Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Pareto principle; Resource allocation; Randomized experiment; Pareto optimal; Distribution (mathematics); Pareto efficiency; Public good; Variation (astronomy); Demographic economics; Sample (material); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Finance; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04119652994875091,"gpt":0.3045562922925564,"spread":0.2633597623438055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002035748,0.0000883469,0.0003259393,0.00004121135,0.0001878297,0.000102282,0.0004778274,0.000063183,0.00004391099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006595952,0.00004737919,0.0002076077,0.00009946759,0.0004419849,0.0001299197,0.0000196681,0.0001832715,0.000003246201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001137719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004326348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002164877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004662057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983307,0.0004185938,0.0006138136,0.00009889881,0.0002997734,0.0002382042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976558,0.001416196,0.0004249846,0.0001838259,0.0001308935,0.0001883173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001101596,0.0001013641,0.0006948069,0.000002794042,0.00009763653,0.000001731844,0.08048328,0.0009634239,0.0001299066,0.91504,0.001196597,0.0001868315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04344664,0.0005866379,0.03452173,0.0006436846,0.0007927598,0.00001873892,0.2428393,0.01040472,0.002679636,0.6536986,0.009707849,0.0006597966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381052,0.001327881,0.002640931,0.04829728,0.0002860703,0.0002688607,0.000003477169,0.00000770208,0.009062571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952043,0.00004959656,0.0004689033,0.003532009,0.0005947028,0.000001846139,1.522877e-7,0.000004231406,0.0001442354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2613415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3272661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010315612","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.1.438","title":"Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation, and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Clothing; Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Identification (biology); Household income; Demographic economics; Private good; Engel curve; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Public good; Microeconomics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00966670968582522,"gpt":0.275175782116559,"spread":0.2655090724307338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845112,0.000110329,0.0003008333,0.00009975811,0.0001403791,0.00008772175,0.0002317744,0.00003181952,0.00002327036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001022055,0.0001171813,0.00002480441,0.0004997017,0.0001733678,0.0003559557,0.00002753309,0.00007671136,0.0001060632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000329808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009759544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02537518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01226703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987332,0.0001976742,0.0004113554,0.0003740892,0.00007347229,0.0002102155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.00005275261,0.0002181278,0.000263073,0.00003479309,0.0001193753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003207903,0.00007428584,0.8730691,0.00005673369,0.00001227414,1.43818e-7,0.009072558,0.0005058343,0.000004768508,0.002238605,0.001644693,0.1133178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009866776,0.00002247961,0.9931059,0.00009934606,0.000007570594,6.877571e-7,0.001793693,0.0007915385,5.013848e-7,0.0009714143,0.002952904,0.0001552697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890393,0.001907723,0.0003083543,0.003417546,0.00003952249,0.001844975,0.00001424371,0.00003613473,0.003392206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783481,0.01765178,0.0005946334,0.002845098,0.00005918138,0.0003687574,0.00001684947,0.00001378265,0.0001018191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1200368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1647816935","doi":"10.1007/s10680-010-9222-x","title":"Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Fertility; Unemployment; Economics; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Birth rate; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Economic growth; Family planning; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01568403262547614,"gpt":0.2597061288419976,"spread":0.2440220962165214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003780595,0.0001606467,0.0002262398,0.0003116835,0.0004986654,0.0001728808,0.0004347126,0.00005245244,0.00008672744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001232367,0.0001343656,0.0001078246,0.001316362,0.0003634741,0.0003046653,0.00005495799,0.0007525643,0.000007609296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002589769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005151335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008133722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00305827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964843,0.002079078,0.0006259514,0.0002063923,0.0002755234,0.000328746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982389,0.0002112523,0.0005665073,0.0002762406,0.0004824908,0.0002246431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003377993,0.00007008854,0.9883931,0.00002260279,0.00001851765,0.0001426273,0.00302001,0.00005003302,0.000280216,0.005235435,0.001836006,0.0008975838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003609164,0.00004385433,0.9591048,0.00007204314,0.00003026921,0.00004090943,0.002855028,0.00007526646,6.260793e-7,0.0008188427,0.03645993,0.0001375051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863147,0.0006779904,0.00007824475,0.004566969,0.0008485917,0.0001565649,0.00003520738,0.00003176325,0.007289961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962825,0.001762037,0.0005266313,0.000301776,0.000487713,9.915349e-7,0.000007002277,0.00003540217,0.0005959098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03462393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943275","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdq003","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Australian National University; Yale University","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2062888121133496,"gpt":0.3660701327956535,"spread":0.1597813206823039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177735,0.00005899039,0.0002229565,0.00001323565,0.0002025406,0.000004713018,0.000123177,0.00001880204,0.00003386877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001409175,0.00004151721,0.00003699939,0.00003400585,0.0004875067,0.00005936626,0.00004626314,0.0000375711,0.00001805596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004303215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004430273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000488647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009676407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.0001441632,0.0002471773,0.00009388915,0.00003844694,0.00009623175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994907,0.0001527336,0.0001386276,0.0001543924,0.00004031753,0.00002326651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006516692,0.00006840874,0.2159704,0.003883095,0.0004847865,3.092077e-7,0.09098721,0.000003495818,0.000006856291,0.6710752,0.005743638,0.01177008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005758418,0.000101229,0.7919374,0.003791726,0.0007873203,0.000003230624,0.08726551,0.00004651031,0.00002186871,0.06769358,0.04711191,0.0006638865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226992,0.3630373,0.000038177,0.001514611,0.0003850249,0.0004570312,0.00001752361,0.00003164008,0.01181953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4436494,0.555854,0.00008142492,0.0003134364,0.00003169404,0.00001246142,5.342026e-7,0.000002396544,0.00005460374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1796239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096988944","doi":"10.1023/a:1026256917489","title":"Gender Equality and Long-Run Growth","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Growth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Demographic economics; Economic geography; Economic system; Development economics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03898554146015071,"gpt":0.2881048281102577,"spread":0.249119286650107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001860533,0.000117086,0.0002697626,0.0001069991,0.0002349236,0.0001055638,0.0002112562,0.0001126392,0.000131052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002193028,0.00011124,0.0001139207,0.0000759528,0.000178018,0.0004057283,0.00002075447,0.0001978159,0.00002113419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002113815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004646779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002503482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003806003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986936,0.000244254,0.0004590474,0.0001503605,0.0001535743,0.000299127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990226,0.0001285788,0.0003540541,0.00009483376,0.0001458266,0.000254116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009652296,0.00003996048,0.6050504,0.0000148998,0.00006294851,0.000009274367,0.004678906,0.00001057926,0.00001727341,0.3889493,0.001074841,0.00008195232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001757356,0.0001562713,0.7201031,0.00002107537,0.000110792,0.000107049,0.01661841,0.00006313147,0.00008005091,0.2516523,0.008812129,0.0005183045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384857,0.000489469,0.001089244,0.0004149228,0.0009906695,0.00007019816,0.000005154152,0.00001008041,0.05844451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971539,0.001131341,0.0006732243,0.0003124355,0.0003322073,6.550585e-7,4.660383e-7,0.00001166586,0.0003840829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.137297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4536235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065062315","doi":"10.1257/jep.20.3.27","title":"Changes in Labor Force Participation in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Social force; Political science; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02634585502382737,"gpt":0.3100674629939389,"spread":0.2837216079701115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001721724,0.00005792268,0.0001079192,0.0001517424,0.0001044829,0.00004249572,0.0002631963,0.00003132385,0.00001541989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005063163,0.00003629611,0.00002665281,0.0002126331,0.0001577554,0.0001443048,0.000009685044,0.0001417724,0.000002364782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002786898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009369788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008073078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1175862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990967,0.0003818348,0.0002023359,0.00005497053,0.00008694286,0.0001771962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.0003102425,0.0001763578,0.00007514915,0.00005714793,0.0000188282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008418884,0.0001724732,0.1782156,0.00000312066,0.00002371849,0.000005211068,0.699742,0.03052117,0.0001212431,0.09043726,0.0005053236,0.0001687143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000276391,0.00004545436,0.4663612,0.000007862413,0.00001003451,0.000001617837,0.5088856,0.001493538,0.000006764877,0.02199738,0.0008623118,0.00005188838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990456,0.000425289,0.0000358204,0.007038123,0.0001031531,0.00009357157,0.000004108979,0.000005379196,0.001838486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979372,0.001473717,0.0000201441,0.000188385,0.0002468104,0.00000244702,0.000001077725,0.000005512077,0.0001247052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2881456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125868487","doi":"10.1111/1468-0297.00657","title":"A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Chen; Cournot competition; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04605241700625577,"gpt":0.3094129373854106,"spread":0.2633605203791548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001502341,0.00008395506,0.0001652319,0.00006538123,0.0005219355,0.00009376551,0.0005456175,0.00007241443,0.0001369831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005074601,0.00006324364,0.0001161005,0.00006562546,0.0001861207,0.0001727323,0.00004456289,0.0002248807,0.00006282815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002695545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005289662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000131402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004272365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990044,0.00008888054,0.0003413607,0.0001030322,0.0001730309,0.0002893121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992775,0.0001575701,0.0002373956,0.0001745616,0.0000623182,0.0000907107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004171831,0.0002012865,0.1037787,0.000009048169,0.0002801645,0.00003003436,0.08150373,0.4924535,0.0008797623,0.1956392,0.02892245,0.09588499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001475605,0.0000982748,0.06175986,0.0001004454,0.00009124666,0.0001200523,0.04455481,0.3460436,0.000005256797,0.5261233,0.01914807,0.0004794449],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.942288,0.000217215,0.01517797,0.0004809287,0.0006791296,0.00006915379,0.000007585393,0.00001211066,0.04106785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994877,0.002112885,0.001535668,0.0003374363,0.0004283405,9.17013e-7,2.256677e-7,0.00001049535,0.0006969996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3304842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4014359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907409907","doi":"10.1093/wbro/lkz005","title":"What Explains Uneven Female Labor Force Participation Levels and Trends in Developing Countries?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Research Observer","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Zinc Association; Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Latin Americans; Economics; Shock (circulatory); Fertility; Demographic economics; Sex segregation; Developing country; Socioeconomic status; Labour economics; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1620433601857993,"gpt":0.4181338667332136,"spread":0.2560905065474143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004281813,0.0001176809,0.0001752899,0.0002868143,0.0005144516,0.0004184758,0.0004238422,0.00007956608,0.000269106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001538046,0.00009326596,0.00003181342,0.001979416,0.0003469009,0.0008932881,0.0001724314,0.0003197233,0.00007140071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002998722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00155869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08825161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997049,0.0007999951,0.0002306072,0.0003053674,0.0008242737,0.0007906993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998576,0.0006978966,0.00005089858,0.0003171731,0.0002511269,0.0001068397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007135264,0.00005828779,0.596822,0.00006120984,0.00003318211,0.000009729678,0.08545338,0.0001734925,0.0001121335,0.3107354,0.001589877,0.004879959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004228084,0.00002592984,0.9019279,0.0000976813,0.000004369313,1.568159e-7,0.01944618,0.0004471314,0.00004691759,0.002730808,0.07468613,0.0001639896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809815,0.0005040328,0.00001242859,0.01369028,0.0003408571,0.0003807142,0.000008962551,0.00004349489,0.004037743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507186,0.001011202,0.00009303141,0.0005948672,0.0001056051,0.00005047695,0.000008837477,0.00002122557,0.04739613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3080046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9283854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998959009","doi":"10.3386/w11832","title":"Universal Childcare, Maternal Labor Supply, and Family Well-Being","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1163704705886907,"gpt":0.4427837384710452,"spread":0.3264132678823545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004747268,0.000211205,0.000414034,0.0007651235,0.000497542,0.0001724589,0.0006321486,0.0005408342,0.0005744839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003848677,0.0002374975,0.0001180543,0.0002372449,0.0007503489,0.0002709856,0.0002076806,0.0007226833,0.0001027702],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002307383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007532611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03091427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959837,0.0002848624,0.0005056817,0.000535793,0.002091721,0.000598199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969559,0.0005397419,0.00023096,0.0002042096,0.001847685,0.0002215582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004325151,0.000072751,0.1721092,0.0001245033,0.0002466277,0.00001514043,0.002687208,0.0001952523,0.00004677375,0.7858708,0.03511031,0.003478184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000967524,0.000106434,0.4217671,0.0002204272,0.00004481972,0.00001707488,0.007079753,0.0003384015,0.00001818627,0.1439843,0.4247962,0.0006598762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1728095,0.001013347,0.000002036219,0.0008432421,0.0006597608,0.000356864,0.0002305926,0.00002301987,0.8240616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324779,0.02518361,0.0003364105,0.00006541795,0.002739113,0.00001837689,0.0003020226,0.00004650935,0.03883065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7852309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526387647","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x","title":"Domestic violence and women's autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Jealousy; Endogeneity; Autonomy; Bargaining power; Economics; Poison control; Demographic economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1013641400484464,"gpt":0.2182067258472883,"spread":0.1168425857988419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002663631,0.0001841739,0.000398219,0.0004997409,0.0002797152,0.0001284676,0.0003741829,0.0001591917,0.00008518823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005643279,0.0002248545,0.00003803707,0.0001279938,0.000599685,0.0006751257,0.00002216025,0.0002316084,0.000003311181],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003367789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008629143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.183183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982338,0.0001784068,0.0005425482,0.0002801325,0.000003908739,0.0007612008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975077,0.0004527889,0.0003192815,0.0001595176,0.0001342356,0.001426512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277001,0.000002552093,0.1343863,0.00003558273,0.00002720679,0.0001037409,0.07080589,0.00004645834,4.886118e-7,0.7925267,0.00000442607,0.002027991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006321096,0.0002231118,0.1139178,0.001143548,0.00003017779,0.0002334071,0.0441566,0.000215045,0.00000397482,0.8294594,0.009317134,0.0006676621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960538,0.001688425,0.0001382855,0.0006632229,0.0005909763,0.0001823625,0.00001701045,0.000004663536,0.0006613223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907207,0.007209897,0.0007324367,0.001065549,0.0001405587,0.00001219612,4.537776e-7,0.00001895032,0.00009927015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023324556","doi":"10.3386/w11998","title":"Short, Medium, and Long Term Consequences of Poor Infant Health: An Analysis using Siblings and Twins","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3190577689452673,"gpt":0.5274265649931608,"spread":0.2083687960478935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008329147,0.0001706794,0.0007442486,0.001758971,0.0004218616,0.0001200772,0.0003327958,0.0003596893,0.00004012734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005483597,0.0001770767,0.0001214697,0.0006104661,0.001908467,0.0002594519,0.0001060933,0.0003755283,4.414611e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009474793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08728323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06761588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961556,0.0003756226,0.0008517195,0.0005206983,0.001670776,0.0004255924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968031,0.000694916,0.000441621,0.0001755854,0.001655122,0.0002296699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001764853,0.00008437313,0.9699242,0.0002676587,0.0005098337,0.000004081309,0.002557253,0.000619263,0.0001514733,0.02432586,0.0003639164,0.001174433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004755259,0.00025495,0.9421617,0.0002460207,0.0003246852,0.00001735651,0.008492329,0.004886212,0.00005555049,0.04144786,0.001014414,0.0006233648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687552,0.002696327,0.00002332877,0.0004884662,0.0001954553,0.0004691122,0.0003436039,0.00001062261,0.02701791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924887,0.005991257,0.0003384624,0.00001674611,0.0003673808,0.000009269206,0.0003560124,0.00001570135,0.0004164545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02776247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980965456","doi":"10.1086/703115","title":"Reserving Time for Daddy: The Consequences of Fathers’ Quotas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Compensation (psychology); Framing (construction); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Family Leave; Financial compensation; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02616575359693014,"gpt":0.2806644461882839,"spread":0.2544986925913538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699527,0.0000785625,0.0002643373,0.00006176138,0.0001465203,0.00006595371,0.0005701123,0.00008312412,0.0001125834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002050174,0.00005842056,0.0001397549,0.0001077066,0.0002270344,0.0002545372,0.00002844065,0.0001214692,0.00001604233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009967385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006968417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001871211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000346129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.0000940498,0.0004489427,0.00009037189,0.0001130418,0.0002047778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983013,0.0004887892,0.0006525401,0.0001662925,0.0003222019,0.00006882416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003657902,0.0002343073,0.423022,0.0001286558,0.0008072691,0.000006132694,0.09577014,0.007089458,0.01314116,0.449111,0.007069969,0.003254081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004315369,0.001261835,0.09090426,0.000248953,0.0003356144,0.00003697832,0.2527235,0.005028364,0.001293188,0.1478573,0.4950222,0.0009724399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901821,0.000252745,0.00004786783,0.002993067,0.0007557392,0.0001905604,0.00006021481,0.000004612002,0.005513095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953516,0.0008590499,0.001488981,0.0004322894,0.0003308693,0.000001583269,0.000001257344,0.00001299361,0.001521404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4879523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2382321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262544","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.011","title":"Trying to Find the Quickest Way: Employed Mothers’ Constructions of Time for Food","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Scarcity; Provisioning; Snowball sampling; Grounded theory; Wage; Feeling; Time allocation; Metropolitan area; Psychology; Order (exchange); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Business; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Labour economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02901207267136346,"gpt":0.3339907688801135,"spread":0.30497869620875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005470983,0.00004842204,0.00009982554,0.0001295682,0.0002748666,0.00003438224,0.00008426203,0.00005602839,0.00003038234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008066407,0.00003946417,0.00006414785,0.0001877788,0.0001018255,0.0001108073,0.000004072203,0.00006927225,0.000001009557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005684234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000206583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003444889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001284734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993577,0.00003723928,0.0002769936,0.00005720551,0.0001610353,0.0001097983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990862,0.0001118186,0.0002036463,0.000052858,0.0004427596,0.0001026877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003120982,0.02649066,0.3190797,0.0002668572,0.0001985584,0.000002635966,0.2496352,0.00002006684,0.08960774,0.03164938,0.03236754,0.2503695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185352,0.0006199576,0.6790722,0.000118834,0.0002420541,0.00005470999,0.2815543,0.000004309165,0.0005513463,0.002200118,0.03423179,0.0001649964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952376,0.0001343047,0.001479478,0.001792104,0.0007869335,0.0003478353,0.00003052036,0.000004234683,0.0001869233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935563,0.00009224495,0.005345229,0.0001870255,0.0004630766,0.00002150433,0.000003660347,0.000005693735,0.0003252585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3599925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2114079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129152249","doi":"","title":"Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender discrimination; Economics; Human capital; Inequality; Investment (military); Stigma (botany); Per capita; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06807607560565652,"gpt":0.3744138772859288,"spread":0.3063378016802723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01180035,0.0003267837,0.0006558663,0.000813462,0.00123489,0.000894654,0.001010052,0.0002678174,0.00006262007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008444618,0.0003031955,0.00008653248,0.0007457995,0.01768374,0.002381661,0.0009019969,0.0006420059,0.00001003909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008375628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004975097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01987867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001872762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942846,0.0003247303,0.0009468939,0.001273874,0.0005532797,0.002616662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917583,0.002143346,0.0002231511,0.0004619529,0.0007462191,0.004667027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005413547,0.00009194455,0.08850931,0.00004057014,0.00001294034,0.000001530281,0.0007031918,0.0000149006,0.0004631454,0.909593,0.000003861472,0.0005114469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006303455,0.0002246022,0.4522075,0.00007660106,0.00002442956,0.000007048969,0.006015861,0.00102404,0.0004031587,0.5389998,0.00009942983,0.0002871502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886523,0.001019139,0.00007469766,0.005636565,0.000208842,0.0004495707,0.0002543555,0.0000140442,0.003690434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845212,0.01256028,0.001971938,0.0005351963,0.0003178443,0.000009782006,0.000007250258,0.00001840397,0.00005809225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3705932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131648638","doi":"10.1086/668282","title":"Status, Caste, and the Time Allocation of Women in Rural India","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Autonomy; Hierarchy; Work (physics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Time allocation; Economics; Developing country; Survey data collection; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02609257733920461,"gpt":0.2483841291170669,"spread":0.2222915517778623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626254,0.00006251496,0.0001177524,0.00002629911,0.0001154232,0.00002700963,0.00005155794,0.00004023686,0.0000455938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001046798,0.00004335297,0.000008608084,0.00004183274,0.0001290386,0.000292583,0.00003162528,0.00003526005,0.00001620011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000231712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005221811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008372476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000931902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993915,0.00004499652,0.0001309043,0.00006436535,0.00004531579,0.0003229435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997845,0.0000260886,0.00005586667,0.00003105381,0.00001122098,0.00009131605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001226533,0.00001066667,0.3856686,0.000007398416,0.00001402055,6.733448e-8,0.6000258,1.525534e-7,0.000009381858,0.007416629,0.00006042567,0.00677452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095685,0.000006075491,0.8831639,0.000007014142,0.00000267218,4.73497e-7,0.1046721,0.00002562571,0.000005396578,0.0001299384,0.01138323,0.00009399852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994058,0.0005831688,2.081903e-7,0.0001823506,0.0001392085,0.0001811066,0.000002841317,0.000006063527,0.004847083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980699,0.0006371948,0.00006139703,0.0000893584,0.00009392548,0.00003918039,0.00001218813,0.000002783878,0.0009940531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4974953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1767883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098091184","doi":"10.3386/w15284","title":"The Rug Rat Race","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Race (biology); Demography; Biology; Sociology; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2799173165428289,"gpt":0.5202729776746507,"spread":0.2403556611318219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01606817,0.0001544973,0.0003193168,0.0003249313,0.001171747,0.0002181803,0.001087182,0.0004576811,0.0001941902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029579,0.000130233,0.0001852906,0.0002756467,0.0008676175,0.000133266,0.0001094285,0.0008138378,0.0001783593],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002726793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01587683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006052225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007405699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951012,0.0005125788,0.0005499011,0.0003915748,0.002844124,0.000600592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944475,0.002188816,0.0002773585,0.0003243366,0.002619036,0.0001429137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463172,0.00003518539,0.0009456425,0.00001793661,0.00006554056,0.000001801425,0.0006985646,0.0001098258,0.00000602733,0.6491562,0.3454154,0.003533333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269448,0.00002966784,0.001783165,0.00002359833,0.000006464218,0.000001654149,0.00162053,0.00008365133,0.0000032388,0.3199323,0.6762544,0.0001343706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001647296,0.002189339,0.000003133857,0.00404586,0.001481846,0.0004903077,0.00004406596,0.00001863757,0.9900795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.476149,0.07208295,0.0001999789,0.0001157282,0.006503103,0.0001071976,0.0003805532,0.00006374565,0.4443977],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5456818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032594490","doi":"10.1006/redy.2002.0190","title":"Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Incentive; Labour economics; Matching (statistics); Inequality; Wage; Investment (military); Wage inequality; Demographic economics; Population; Microeconomics; Demography; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02729938663854981,"gpt":0.2966074947763076,"spread":0.2693081081377578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002931526,0.0001560208,0.0005440102,0.00003124475,0.0002876699,0.00006741782,0.0003983643,0.00008147491,0.0001359947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001974725,0.0001204698,0.0001616856,0.0000866426,0.000521399,0.0001924489,0.0001034368,0.0001065074,0.000009262859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003568835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006050914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006505302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001764006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.0003244153,0.00057299,0.0002753813,0.0001080751,0.000343847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987652,0.0004108902,0.0003218065,0.000333523,0.00006797741,0.0001005549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007025561,0.000171741,0.02104694,0.005015838,0.0002241019,7.601609e-7,0.03459604,0.00005716087,0.000001283581,0.8968698,0.002154085,0.03979196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007708995,0.0002966955,0.0378745,0.004639366,0.0006038201,0.000007654006,0.05867133,0.1680877,9.846235e-7,0.4389557,0.280925,0.002228288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344702,0.04352279,0.002155781,0.004092494,0.0005109175,0.001709403,0.0002857888,0.00004227515,0.01321036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961181,0.2004681,0.0004702716,0.002302437,0.00007477244,0.00008900063,0.00001891411,0.0000187382,0.0004396704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4579141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4912616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141214233","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x","title":"Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Welfare reform; Discretion; Sanctions; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Political science; Bureaucracy; Population; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Geography; Gender studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008628040850171454,"gpt":0.3284888459888436,"spread":0.3198608051386722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001814439,0.0000560778,0.0001708719,0.00007422923,0.0004531725,0.00005708708,0.0003206031,0.00001312203,0.00001910905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002343414,0.00003288367,0.00004779975,0.0006414609,0.007238232,0.0002942122,0.00002714479,0.00009827776,6.202441e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002926099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006067865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02213893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008982555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998472,0.00009464045,0.0003005825,0.00008884766,0.0006484364,0.0003955273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990022,0.00005789118,0.0002562783,0.0000860369,0.0003123968,0.0002852452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009335063,0.00001333771,0.004086032,0.000001757042,0.000004677097,9.711293e-7,0.007446725,0.000006892146,0.00006507392,0.9854681,0.000001118943,0.002895989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009234657,0.0003582767,0.4772726,0.00001988097,0.00003951644,0.00002595691,0.4447796,0.00002665564,0.0001110485,0.07617678,0.0001684879,0.00009770035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695879,0.00002768814,0.003242113,0.02427467,0.0001122851,0.00007697184,0.000003844786,0.000003591408,0.002670991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983826,0.00005889057,0.001130626,0.0003432135,0.00006852228,8.522802e-7,1.58731e-7,0.000002383401,0.00001278186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139476074","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00081","title":"In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Microdata (statistics); Humanities; Welfare economics; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Demography; Art; Census; Population; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05644429305961114,"gpt":0.2094560267646122,"spread":0.1530117337050011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001549394,0.0002935438,0.0008117857,0.0007046789,0.0002274499,0.00007607345,0.0008555625,0.0003369575,0.0006801138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003286141,0.0003197666,0.0002038635,0.000626079,0.001482362,0.0004326841,0.0000526297,0.0005396829,0.000005705918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003282945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1840051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970314,0.0003351944,0.001370582,0.0003137638,0.000009444734,0.000939624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964798,0.0002297656,0.0009917939,0.0003489212,0.0002350929,0.001714616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006894273,0.00003371973,0.790095,0.00008530447,0.0002184868,0.0001150579,0.0529948,0.002076545,0.000008529229,0.1522838,0.0001465942,0.001873281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001158969,0.0004605826,0.8584235,0.001466131,0.00007397303,0.0003574124,0.02375836,0.0001236807,0.00001052047,0.09796499,0.01555433,0.0006475681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720221,0.001335755,0.000008242028,0.01940674,0.004495153,0.0003594421,0.0003426859,0.000001921905,0.002028019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923235,0.001715475,0.00006641416,0.0010925,0.0002724739,0.000009115919,0.000001607096,0.00003149764,0.004487398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492385259","doi":"10.1787/880242325663","title":"Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD social employment and migration working papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Torino; York University","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Macro; Demographic economics; Developing country; Development economics; Demography; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05432567056255388,"gpt":0.3451275265958075,"spread":0.2908018560332536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008991643,0.0002466615,0.00046185,0.0001503901,0.0008046844,0.0001222173,0.0001234107,0.0004677037,0.00009841662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005670126,0.0002490706,0.0001345452,0.0001728515,0.0004053291,0.0000712239,0.00004820669,0.0001887112,0.000001482883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004826587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004519523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06257821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979603,0.000163249,0.0004433282,0.0003633396,0.0007417283,0.0003280789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992077,0.00008153539,0.0003784933,0.0001028806,0.0001211114,0.0001082264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002208215,0.00006040207,0.5986768,0.00005992882,0.00007133694,0.000002075096,0.03432074,7.022532e-7,0.00007481001,0.0003595634,0.001334955,0.3650166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002466245,0.0000302049,0.6796135,0.00008222833,0.000151072,5.676493e-7,0.00628673,0.00001164871,0.000009355827,0.00008584208,0.3131459,0.0003364037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8556304,0.002229189,0.00000314298,0.0006867145,0.0008943771,0.0002598155,0.00004110183,0.00007105935,0.1401842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708352,0.01014326,0.00005902266,0.00007523035,0.0006431815,0.00001802993,0.00006258722,0.00002389221,0.01813961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3646802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172144121","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00119.x","title":"Further Evidence on the Role of Gender in Financial Performance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Small Business Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Psychology; Control (management); Finance; Social psychology; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03605043225771286,"gpt":0.2532636495971501,"spread":0.2172132173394372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112935,0.00008960137,0.0001522639,0.0001544115,0.0001101955,0.00003191099,0.0004443875,0.00004598381,0.00002480277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001041044,0.0000623985,0.00005685805,0.000584089,0.0001012799,0.0001968769,0.00005107013,0.0001448643,0.000007140077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001511426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001765688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002427885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003906331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988295,0.00006038264,0.000334359,0.00009364476,0.0004730935,0.0002090151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992459,0.00004779808,0.0002798037,0.0001426515,0.0002483607,0.00003547499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000564586,0.001487434,0.368695,0.0004834144,0.0001958471,0.000184318,0.08756419,0.1300252,0.0004759478,0.3244641,0.0003105038,0.08554958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003953149,0.00004739039,0.9773958,0.0003382177,0.00002654186,0.000001422468,0.009499849,0.00005718018,0.00003012709,0.009687598,0.002424372,0.0000961915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877589,0.0003678767,0.0007707037,0.001804966,0.0003635639,0.0001688397,4.731835e-7,0.000004339842,0.008760285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965127,0.002373169,0.0005643441,0.0002892112,0.0001351034,0.000003427435,1.097846e-7,0.000006706285,0.0001152084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6087008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2544537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634426192","doi":"10.9783/9780812202472","title":"Western Welfare in Decline","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03048584446456634,"gpt":0.2361285067881885,"spread":0.2056426623236221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002929243,0.000252639,0.0004707104,0.0002040567,0.0002976044,0.00002696523,0.0009084525,0.0006064077,0.0002890156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001623602,0.000340326,0.0001641339,0.00003060329,0.000481955,0.0001086689,0.0003289654,0.0004240353,0.00003230966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002626552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009884588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04271257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982887,0.0001565755,0.0002300851,0.0003511335,0.0005208107,0.0004526983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989547,0.00007793393,0.0002756824,0.0003517084,0.0001524442,0.000187542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002634251,0.0006895541,0.02883197,0.001101391,0.0005528533,0.0008899327,0.3479401,0.0001314258,0.00002978892,0.5428858,0.05585209,0.02083165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005528061,0.00002608663,0.002511021,0.00009980421,0.000095157,7.628685e-7,0.003666645,0.00002056584,6.142572e-7,0.0006119079,0.9920607,0.0003539806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00239205,0.0004017084,0.00007713106,0.00008838153,0.0003093308,0.0003895544,0.000150711,0.00007193901,0.9961192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02504238,0.0006186385,0.0002566574,0.00004732767,0.0001612101,2.700543e-7,0.00004097835,0.00002912908,0.9738034],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026245338","doi":"10.1086/342997","title":"Before and After TANF: The Economic Well‐Being of Women Leaving Welfare","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Welfare reform","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01434634407275403,"gpt":0.2616583699167805,"spread":0.2473120258440265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007629711,0.0001147144,0.0003070174,0.00001660729,0.0006119736,0.00004139898,0.0002621116,0.00008735609,0.0008657464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002325462,0.00009165151,0.00008405217,0.0002412947,0.0001281906,0.0001338946,0.00007391528,0.0001173391,0.00006202074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002857182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000485784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008603045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988463,0.0001909497,0.0002573213,0.0001699642,0.0001653205,0.0003701594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00002953729,0.0001371421,0.0001374114,0.00006318665,0.00008363985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006791965,0.0000577833,0.05345059,0.007025022,0.0001419924,0.000005672483,0.6937165,0.000002609671,0.000005092233,0.1177095,0.0007295368,0.1271489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003171684,0.00003832161,0.112375,0.0009463853,0.0002125626,0.000001938829,0.08138223,0.0001216799,3.634752e-7,0.007083495,0.7970462,0.0004746803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8799263,0.05073928,0.000004294081,0.03275364,0.0003153907,0.0006585032,0.00001468882,0.00005113985,0.03553675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419656,0.0532201,0.00003064688,0.00412411,0.0002929819,0.00004295022,0.000001892544,0.00001462459,0.0003070568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9479316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028884096","doi":"10.1007/s11205-006-9002-5","title":"When Twenty-Four Hours is not Enough: Time Poverty of Working Parents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Indicators Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Goods and services; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Time-use survey; Basic needs; Measuring poverty; Order (exchange); Social exclusion; Quality of Life Research; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Sociology; Public health; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0981956230707363,"gpt":0.3707359405124512,"spread":0.2725403174417149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002819547,0.0001590648,0.0003074567,0.0004878509,0.00164221,0.0001469345,0.0008703656,0.0003903164,0.0005041566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002149057,0.0001651531,0.0001725844,0.001641854,0.00103292,0.0001475387,0.0002077539,0.0006057596,0.0002190713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008136478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009291632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008693569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948148,0.0008274999,0.0003738018,0.000401871,0.00246292,0.001119178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988259,0.0002665351,0.0001791117,0.0002347919,0.0002922167,0.0002014525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005442538,0.0003825863,0.7975922,0.00002877187,0.00009648326,0.00001421634,0.08059499,0.000002423754,0.0005621526,0.02203304,0.09198235,0.006656401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001443898,0.0001542702,0.7179815,0.0001027644,0.00005942935,6.032366e-7,0.06132539,0.00006819786,0.0007770057,0.03764398,0.1795364,0.000906508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.89815,0.0001356891,0.00002209261,0.00248849,0.0002892997,0.0003843431,0.00008232003,0.00006901561,0.0983787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907675,0.0001077125,0.0001281635,0.0002231346,0.0009803147,0.00001861286,0.00002492711,0.00003218196,0.007717459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989315198","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021461","title":"Explaining gender segregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Patriarchy; Preference; Empowerment; Inequality; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Sociology; Gender studies; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05076224290548897,"gpt":0.2899035940690802,"spread":0.2391413511635913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839687,0.00005677633,0.000172727,0.00005285643,0.0004274387,0.00004504852,0.0001858378,0.000183087,0.000457221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075344,0.0000699372,0.00009597713,0.00008595482,0.0003679653,0.0002098828,0.00001444203,0.0002956628,0.00002388722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008792358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000698074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001121849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001336001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988291,0.0003125087,0.0002887961,0.00008870901,0.0002161588,0.0002647854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.000130715,0.0002333024,0.00004230676,0.0002381882,0.0001034618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013238,0.0003609428,0.2632833,0.00003064323,0.0003147038,0.00125291,0.4336562,0.0002864458,0.0005065063,0.1205125,0.0697168,0.1100589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00272108,0.0003223304,0.535593,0.0001260589,0.0001135934,0.002319435,0.2891033,0.0005250009,0.000008440717,0.118211,0.05029004,0.000666693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966194,0.003771354,0.000958766,0.0005891029,0.0009590386,0.00004707514,0.000003822571,0.00001876749,0.02745812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931977,0.004040148,0.0009967982,0.0005634634,0.0006197012,9.666605e-7,0.000001339405,0.000008093594,0.0005718103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2723098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.500625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973718554","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00169-4","title":"The retirement-consumption puzzle: a marital bargaining approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Wife; Demographic economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Permanent income hypothesis; Panel data; Marital status; Labour economics; Sample (material); Life-cycle hypothesis; Demography; Econometrics; Population; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0645038979635905,"gpt":0.2791512958189237,"spread":0.2146473978553332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569262,0.00009213125,0.0001613052,0.00009133447,0.000790078,0.0004889764,0.0003834217,0.000103247,0.00004186146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005965384,0.00007505585,0.0001209052,0.0001171279,0.0001974568,0.0005676032,0.00002417144,0.0002566456,0.000009328664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003180376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005313875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002277721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003395455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.0002868028,0.0004761037,0.0001131008,0.000165979,0.0003637925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988375,0.0001620648,0.0004656119,0.000149107,0.0001941471,0.0001915598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006290244,0.00006847657,0.208947,0.000004141245,0.00008518247,0.00000165647,0.003491548,0.0001019551,0.000005233278,0.7817375,0.001175303,0.004375685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202713,0.0001618927,0.08137027,0.00001937283,0.00008997427,0.00008908559,0.1207132,0.002998411,0.000008216637,0.06031865,0.7315912,0.0006125454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322071,0.0006584617,0.00268979,0.001389306,0.001478578,0.0001348459,0.000003885692,0.00001564018,0.1614224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931284,0.002566876,0.002950143,0.0001640907,0.0003489936,0.000002554222,0.000001634688,0.00001262402,0.0008247246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7304159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547959588","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00502.x","title":"Sexual orientation, work, and income in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Orientation (vector space); Work (physics); Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0828284863006427,"gpt":0.1937987420387786,"spread":0.1109702557381359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005728166,0.0001664212,0.0003814216,0.0004285823,0.0003389097,0.00005816104,0.0003495298,0.0001204039,0.00008364983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002028632,0.0002166181,0.00004205315,0.0002421632,0.0002667593,0.0003679346,0.0000115887,0.0002893101,0.000002187376],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006288965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02543914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983432,0.00009488608,0.0006146444,0.0002401471,0.000004869182,0.000702253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974182,0.0001395805,0.0003059904,0.0001713676,0.0001622327,0.001802658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001123732,0.000002914702,0.9053438,0.000006499361,0.00002403748,0.0002784034,0.01102463,0.001590076,3.202542e-7,0.0807603,0.0003865337,0.0005712709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001208809,0.0001361941,0.8997869,0.0000492287,0.00002414612,0.000308393,0.03579213,0.000341981,0.000002334755,0.03233353,0.02930421,0.0007121415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954144,0.0001965921,0.000009857243,0.001711044,0.001353766,0.0001427788,0.00006199275,0.000002566593,0.001106988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981533,0.0002457567,0.0001621179,0.0006303128,0.0003059836,0.000004292019,0.000005422945,0.00002152441,0.0004713165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04842677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150561875","doi":"10.1016/s0167-6296(03)00058-4","title":"Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Alcohol consumption; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Elasticity (physics); Yield (engineering); Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Alcohol","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03252074238762775,"gpt":0.2807905799428115,"spread":0.2482698375551838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004316991,0.00008734686,0.00032027,0.000071218,0.0002768706,0.00003460856,0.0001691118,0.0000421177,0.00001545085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005741258,0.00007432017,0.00004385306,0.0001284417,0.00004516761,0.0001315025,0.00001909317,0.0002509271,4.426214e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001411514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007533506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5556315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8265891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998247,0.0004132862,0.0007268672,0.00009686709,0.0001670841,0.0003489065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980803,0.0007099374,0.0008194685,0.0001049769,0.0001453591,0.0001399622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003051109,0.00008021065,0.622878,0.0001829542,0.00008728997,0.00001669104,0.1851263,0.166051,0.00001052516,0.01761669,0.001441218,0.006478605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012899,0.0002910408,0.4294501,0.0005664265,0.00004612824,0.00007108818,0.4646864,0.04610662,0.00005701576,0.01616962,0.04058565,0.0006799985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891852,0.0003334087,0.003731884,0.003760261,0.0008644461,0.0001443208,0.00001151884,0.000002313289,0.001966661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921609,0.0002343833,0.005207423,0.002246259,0.0001130661,7.517726e-7,1.524933e-7,0.00000900582,0.00002806412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2795601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125431006","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.1998.9820","title":"Collective labour supply: heterogeneity and non-participation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Economic and Social Research Council; Concordia University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Labour supply; Labour economics; Economics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0346828244854395,"gpt":0.3416700732317586,"spread":0.3069872487463191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003760671,0.0002166761,0.0003489076,0.00006657562,0.001421321,0.000368413,0.000298318,0.0004734916,0.0007261905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008341431,0.0002090613,0.00008787603,0.000123758,0.0003270938,0.0001707122,0.00008996116,0.0002071011,0.0007228517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002735732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001338303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009563374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03381184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985219,0.0001382325,0.0001859665,0.000409003,0.000318932,0.000425997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989885,0.00007481988,0.0001912172,0.0003039864,0.0002506887,0.0001908061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005843151,0.0002674924,0.1253566,0.0002369827,0.0004841039,0.000009309003,0.08243798,0.00008023236,0.0001510738,0.00638152,0.782384,0.002152218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008399562,0.0001394942,0.3634567,0.00007430313,0.000129792,8.349438e-7,0.00657681,0.00053437,0.0001278071,0.001504817,0.6256227,0.0009924087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3747462,0.0003860628,0.0007167712,0.0002678239,0.002502431,0.0005451776,0.0002954277,0.00003196708,0.6205081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4806339,0.001530547,0.0002356571,0.0001945034,0.0004664963,0.00004184515,0.00007042441,0.00001718516,0.5168095],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152754212","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.11.3701","title":"Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive Margins","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Opportunity cost; Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Population; Demography; Microeconomics; Sociology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02096587960366559,"gpt":0.2873018761135149,"spread":0.2663359965098493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006973548,0.000107921,0.0003462272,0.00001748694,0.000336852,0.00003729419,0.0001873362,0.00002138033,0.00006956894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002365543,0.00008240542,0.00009453562,0.0001047169,0.001062203,0.00009213764,0.00002515288,0.0001027175,0.00008553249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007804059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001032972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004818102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006839675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988748,0.0003481561,0.0002409845,0.0002452374,0.00005873654,0.0002320742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991494,0.0002119049,0.0001409736,0.0002842531,0.0001064592,0.000106995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712911,0.00007216794,0.1004666,0.0005933234,0.0002776944,0.000005335517,0.04318066,0.00003780302,0.00002549808,0.1235963,0.02040667,0.7113208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001345604,0.0000573969,0.6792671,0.0002383339,0.0001394811,0.000004549998,0.03406623,0.0003566919,4.127434e-7,0.001821109,0.2836315,0.000282625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995309,0.02366448,0.001145017,0.04225711,0.0004507348,0.001007225,0.00004238493,0.00007256948,0.03182952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090042,0.07380822,0.0001279634,0.01681805,0.00006801988,0.00002711556,0.000005352241,0.000008842459,0.0001322197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7110382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126473761","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.931580","title":"Labor Unions, Operating Flexibility, and the Cost of Equity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Labour economics; Equity (law); Business; Pay Equity; Economics; Political science; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02220604049225221,"gpt":0.3298315457485803,"spread":0.307625505256328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006244462,0.00008026239,0.0001569976,0.00003356501,0.0008131832,0.00009278716,0.0003085416,0.00006360869,0.000009439419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003140091,0.0000548459,0.00005635055,0.0002370535,0.0003280944,0.0001461074,0.00004236797,0.0008141698,0.000001224359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003355637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002270488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006811473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006573339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978851,0.0003626295,0.0002347988,0.000115025,0.0003114592,0.001090978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994194,0.0001121152,0.0001181467,0.0001191771,0.000158076,0.00007306784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001853584,0.000030361,0.007651174,0.0000014144,0.00002132536,3.096365e-7,0.004290386,0.00004105836,0.00008306402,0.9704373,0.00002032172,0.01740474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001410777,0.0001854554,0.0269025,0.00001576974,0.00004022655,0.00002800689,0.06300477,0.0004754495,0.00001024141,0.9065809,0.001204356,0.0001416088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732132,0.004825429,0.002853631,0.007453163,0.0001793955,0.0002699423,0.000005280972,0.00002184515,0.01117813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889239,0.009707361,0.00009634213,0.0004249161,0.0001904766,0.000001134711,8.548288e-7,0.00000429464,0.0006507188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06385648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.625443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894713174","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6","title":"Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: a review of the theoretical literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Fertility; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Population; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06009120244544467,"gpt":0.3301604575159813,"spread":0.2700692550705366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004705376,0.0005593458,0.004200947,0.00008971126,0.0001635511,0.00004775273,0.002950858,0.0004505624,0.0002579613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002139319,0.0003469221,0.003207915,0.0007026417,0.0007328699,0.0001174408,0.0008251615,0.0006116166,0.00001728354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003817919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002995731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001217181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005972253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939527,0.002083961,0.002603347,0.0006390666,0.0002798597,0.000441081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943339,0.0005771393,0.00233276,0.002242839,0.0002992892,0.0002140631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001871421,0.00006387821,0.0000557687,0.4094037,0.0003394144,6.300426e-7,0.0005484995,0.000003241666,8.674885e-8,0.5658796,0.003930849,0.0197724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005277923,0.00001331222,0.00001261945,0.3059946,0.001053497,0.00000745066,0.00006204531,7.033843e-7,9.323261e-7,0.003335099,0.68918,0.0002869748],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001293164,0.9852018,0.000002654143,0.0009055336,0.001064703,0.002538529,0.001552329,0.00001265683,0.008592451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001171208,0.9948292,0.0001411186,0.004298653,0.0002343701,0.00008512018,0.00003421444,0.00007483555,0.0001853091],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6852491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047913789","doi":"10.1086/506486","title":"The Relationship between Women's Education and Marriage Outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Census; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Marital status; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Marriage market; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Population; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02122722865320377,"gpt":0.2847991915728035,"spread":0.2635719629195998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001074056,0.00006295872,0.000138064,0.00006093209,0.0004594311,0.0001703599,0.000168184,0.00006845576,0.000006539392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830014,0.00004869486,0.00004203805,0.00008559004,0.0001121064,0.0002588632,0.00001372048,0.0001366578,0.00000376678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002339617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004913256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001487919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006719009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992507,0.0000867907,0.000350698,0.00006357744,0.00007740463,0.0001708642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986136,0.0007516543,0.0003483577,0.00008646642,0.0001121195,0.00008779432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002459257,0.00001398116,0.8764114,0.000001545082,0.00001094541,1.707051e-7,0.002034092,0.00001673174,5.135502e-7,0.1202833,0.0002994657,0.000925316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351939,0.00001388172,0.8630409,0.000002904389,0.00001143477,0.000001018272,0.01062734,0.000003573293,3.056302e-7,0.09432101,0.03179031,0.00005214558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911173,0.000287666,0.00002953485,0.003553214,0.0007503542,0.00005784367,0.00001016112,0.000005449526,0.004188496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959722,0.0003891515,0.0003941221,0.0001804874,0.0007169445,0.000001843004,0.000001376805,0.000007167553,0.002336724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03149085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3533619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007100734","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.012","title":"Estimation of collective household models with Engel curves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Bargaining power; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Price index; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1703286526948699,"gpt":0.2689301205782906,"spread":0.09860146788342072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558923,0.00006893079,0.0002488546,0.0006112183,0.0001667684,0.0000161154,0.0001834137,0.0000607144,0.00001882071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030541,0.00005958219,0.00007234376,0.001563288,0.0001413036,0.0005207825,0.00001068048,0.0001302155,7.447712e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002196454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007295845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006146174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007191058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.0000550253,0.0003552771,0.00007377587,0.0002999065,0.0001426059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986871,0.0002272324,0.0005585069,0.00007739195,0.000347623,0.0001021184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216518,0.001243076,0.3727311,0.0002771396,0.0005581039,0.00008152556,0.08000336,0.4971193,0.00002118379,0.02835966,0.015097,0.004286851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00629559,0.003851162,0.8059447,0.0006296829,0.0004696357,0.000288062,0.04026248,0.08315089,0.0002419668,0.05205667,0.00538364,0.001425479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551436,0.001549019,0.02263192,0.0001220153,0.0002136225,0.0001070388,0.00002040053,0.000007803832,0.02020453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897193,0.004465985,0.005096442,0.00008154974,0.00007216925,8.744744e-7,7.014103e-7,0.000008065093,0.0005548649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4332136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2429691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603273427","doi":"10.3386/w11279","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; William T. Grant Foundation","keywords":"Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2592858500279867,"gpt":0.5275383290836124,"spread":0.2682524790556257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01135013,0.0001886178,0.0004018225,0.0005316763,0.0006821826,0.00008103439,0.001014212,0.0003761656,0.0001629004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001141769,0.0001423115,0.000357153,0.000272499,0.000775817,0.00009472155,0.0001440203,0.0007926699,0.00006851432],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00463343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01066667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0261175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003391193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951537,0.0003997814,0.0007285657,0.0003569126,0.002823629,0.0005373569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956614,0.001482717,0.000440306,0.0003651411,0.00191299,0.0001374338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395031,0.0003995888,0.02632743,0.00007085774,0.0007934673,0.000001625875,0.001381187,0.005082314,0.0000273482,0.9142601,0.04569488,0.005821622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009552818,0.0007565276,0.6513998,0.0002824858,0.00002831257,0.000002805273,0.003455559,0.0004898708,0.00001206004,0.1824056,0.1596476,0.0005640346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513929,0.000921479,9.360663e-7,0.0008851559,0.000407523,0.0005576224,0.0002362408,0.000009286341,0.9318424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748958,0.01333173,0.00002704637,0.00001625058,0.001302569,0.00003948597,0.0001357093,0.00002687014,0.01022455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235932404","doi":"10.3917/pope.203.0447","title":"Family Policies in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population (English Edition)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Developed country; Divergence (linguistics); Developing country; Welfare; Demographic economics; Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04265769083477622,"gpt":0.2865380233561922,"spread":0.243880332521416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004598088,0.0001485038,0.0002082669,0.0001735726,0.0004403494,0.0001479245,0.0002069387,0.0002835886,0.002521475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005319981,0.0001627019,0.00006695615,0.0007060834,0.0001615303,0.0006558836,0.00002051669,0.0001950751,0.0001382553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002334793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000698609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002571242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981785,0.000211071,0.0004045955,0.0002535799,0.000585078,0.00036722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990929,0.0001219511,0.0001565515,0.000183682,0.0003240156,0.0001209353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009265234,0.00008513782,0.8151483,0.00001089924,0.00001471517,0.000002929868,0.0552709,0.0001067776,0.000002694573,0.07366724,0.055407,0.0002741645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000965973,0.00002200846,0.7879689,0.00003382968,0.00001689454,2.111665e-7,0.02932806,0.000756165,0.000002747114,0.006610858,0.173975,0.0003193349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454652,0.0002691282,0.0001233135,0.001666894,0.005571688,0.0004052258,0.0001417905,0.0002114696,0.04614529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993855,0.0006765155,0.00006543857,0.001035804,0.002487439,0.00003296736,0.0001008423,0.00001595435,0.001730027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.118568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913222727","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2020.1790533","title":"What Drives Female Labour Force Participation? Comparable Micro-level Evidence from Eight Developing and Emerging Economies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development, UK Government; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Emerging markets; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1425809585623813,"gpt":0.3533964882710734,"spread":0.2108155297086921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014723,0.0001469695,0.0003460488,0.00004592661,0.001124712,0.000157273,0.000307361,0.00003407123,0.00001479255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003540042,0.0001050296,0.00003535378,0.0001858732,0.0002339384,0.000890066,0.0001639913,0.0001376809,0.000009018498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001306666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003829629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000505201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006965495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985793,0.000196966,0.0005230737,0.0001348998,0.000287443,0.0002782668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.0006697149,0.0003838954,0.00006594102,0.0003247499,0.0001040667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004270844,0.0000140064,0.2314713,0.00004610156,0.0004869794,0.000004033076,0.7646024,0.0002885283,0.0004876172,0.0005325228,0.0005887991,0.001434954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000345251,0.00003604403,0.4928768,0.0005226874,0.00008784562,0.000001685554,0.4972104,0.00006015292,0.001547448,0.001641856,0.005416863,0.0002529802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635889,0.02015903,0.001751967,0.01378927,0.0005318435,0.0001157103,0.00000228901,0.00001199891,0.00004899782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362628,0.05022299,0.01199006,0.0009636642,0.0001921125,0.000004040793,6.457645e-7,0.000008261671,0.000355398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.267392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8650486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481206788","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.11.004","title":"Suicide and property rights in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Wife; Property (philosophy); Domestic violence; Demographic economics; State (computer science); Political science; Suicide prevention; Socioeconomics; Poison control; Economics; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01674611423997879,"gpt":0.2384540294850512,"spread":0.2217079152450724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175214,0.00007130187,0.0001807312,0.0001301037,0.0001407703,0.00006031997,0.0001545097,0.00006986726,0.00001295203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005258802,0.00005222229,0.00002285454,0.00006281397,0.00006110867,0.0002201556,0.00002444791,0.0001217455,0.00000631385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004521238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001418898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002271726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991965,0.00005948536,0.0003954538,0.00008577679,0.00007877217,0.0001840441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995163,0.00005477835,0.0002128912,0.00004675098,0.00005536094,0.0001139397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002253394,0.00007233863,0.922191,0.00001125592,0.00004113844,0.000007627924,0.02609557,0.00009062565,0.00001594109,0.03512966,0.0002364358,0.01608589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005805074,0.00003223054,0.8299273,0.00003438376,0.00000517661,0.00000764464,0.001787572,0.0001183128,0.00003231316,0.007687705,0.1596283,0.0001585613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819436,0.00004732452,0.0001125398,0.0002448775,0.0003341475,0.0000603526,3.758276e-7,0.000003710186,0.01725304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992937,0.0003090349,0.005955497,0.0002103736,0.0001192652,8.705319e-7,5.540959e-7,0.000004458684,0.0004629176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1593919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902196616","doi":"10.4054/demres.2020.43.28","title":"Explaining the MENA paradox: Rising educational attainment yet stagnant female labor force participation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Educational attainment; Phenomenon; Closing (real estate); Demographic economics; Economics; Gender gap; Labour economics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1347310410096363,"gpt":0.4190330460344966,"spread":0.2843020050248604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003706374,0.000114868,0.0001374953,0.0001462038,0.001687378,0.0002591625,0.0005129215,0.00009083305,0.00008808203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008699426,0.0000903409,0.00007759675,0.002034583,0.0005663979,0.0002013931,0.0001076162,0.0004402889,0.00003495007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009628278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005371304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007188401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006526345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960107,0.001023383,0.0002800895,0.0003675618,0.001531907,0.0007864062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978971,0.001078947,0.00007284038,0.0002581415,0.000373129,0.0003198664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004879956,0.0001496702,0.6444407,0.00004142009,0.00006878007,0.000006559264,0.1612118,0.0002772785,0.0004187988,0.1834473,0.006448813,0.003440001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005935746,0.000232555,0.699761,0.00006229201,0.00003182699,6.971521e-7,0.2121243,0.008329475,0.0000629212,0.01948487,0.05893114,0.0003852942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536743,0.0006079011,0.0005360637,0.04062115,0.0002095983,0.0005838599,0.00001577488,0.00006972404,0.003681602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996993,0.0007965785,0.0002935212,0.000936774,0.0004006464,0.0001606989,0.00001962659,0.00002269201,0.0003764335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1639625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532209844","doi":"10.1177/0020715216674252","title":"Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare service use across 31 developed economies: A welfare state perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Disadvantaged; Welfare state; Economics; Welfare; Social inequality; Social Welfare; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09101223177950038,"gpt":0.4030762212119772,"spread":0.3120639894324768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009162881,0.0001261218,0.0004077827,0.0001356558,0.0001184996,0.00003097884,0.0005289928,0.0001038628,0.00006401836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003119338,0.00009810094,0.0001034585,0.00009122807,0.0003273572,0.0005257865,0.00008613883,0.0002192129,0.000005251437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007097456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004436065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01332278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998083,0.0005579992,0.0006683122,0.0001649376,0.0002752455,0.0002505267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996141,0.0006951555,0.0007563672,0.00007558212,0.00225872,0.00007316803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001462158,0.00006227866,0.5894114,0.000002348959,0.0002036726,0.00001190632,0.378425,0.0002404487,0.00007495868,0.0312297,0.00003518566,0.0001569624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032404,0.00006027717,0.7104758,0.00005806876,0.000004394724,0.000004376612,0.2807392,0.00001927286,0.00002596847,0.006616597,0.0008623531,0.0001012619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896501,0.00006776059,0.001783088,0.006833089,0.0007302578,0.00009552858,0.000238293,0.000006739614,0.000595121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998956,0.0001547225,0.000275001,0.000352453,0.0001779333,0.000003942096,0.000005359639,0.000006092231,0.00006854979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1210644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7434423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}