{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":823,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":823,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0b21075c1b65","filters":{"topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges"}},"results":[{"id":"W2127657715","doi":"10.1002/mrdd.1016","title":"Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the united states, canada, england and wales, and australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Population; Mental health; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1545078684838164,"gpt":0.39621148804929,"spread":0.2417036195654736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00292701,0.0002063884,0.0003173056,0.0001543982,0.000681354,0.0001474213,0.0001422831,0.00006743862,0.0002744072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009128741,0.0001388718,0.00001332932,0.0005785497,0.001464813,0.000427227,0.0001075994,0.0002312387,0.000001639005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003715076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1872503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8244423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967363,0.001012995,0.0006071298,0.0004075941,0.0008185967,0.0004173816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986437,0.00087968,0.00009929072,0.00009680564,0.0001104502,0.0001700686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002658585,0.00009764483,0.6931737,0.0004948071,0.00003073789,0.000001774812,0.2537794,7.612837e-8,0.00001912731,0.001528368,0.001211772,0.04939676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007868396,0.0001726339,0.2904244,0.0006832192,0.000005244708,0.00005204852,0.594436,0.000014547,0.00002028667,0.0001441457,0.1130006,0.0002599476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931606,0.001980294,0.00000118844,0.002698362,0.00003555773,0.001518118,0.00008703028,0.00001039165,0.0005084603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486693,0.04986526,0.0002579041,0.0001582479,0.00002588262,0.000103542,0.0003453112,0.000009328493,0.000565221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.637192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8181618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283832495","doi":"10.1177/0170840615622067","title":"Contestation about Collaboration: Discursive Boundary Work among Professions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Ottawa; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Centrality; Boundary-work; Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.061601877283827,"gpt":0.4017044983827305,"spread":0.3401026210989035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003529733,0.00008729626,0.0001315064,0.00007277243,0.001415722,0.00006603579,0.00008631715,0.00007960689,0.0002549939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002659838,0.00006048294,0.00001188273,0.001565668,0.0004428783,0.0004704029,0.00003184564,0.0000499099,0.0001057134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002260922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003736848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001327995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001749677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988521,0.0002257987,0.0002504101,0.0001785934,0.00030711,0.0001860282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996895,0.0002506654,0.0001650325,0.0001048142,0.002517682,0.0000668053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001306472,0.00008031537,0.3663388,0.00003540888,0.00009546963,0.000003351369,0.2193459,6.315666e-7,0.0002020575,0.3152339,0.0741823,0.02446879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006664157,0.0000455466,0.2162628,0.0004851868,0.00002128018,3.074254e-7,0.4515281,3.157011e-7,0.0005402357,0.004425443,0.3256688,0.0003555045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4689214,0.00193659,0.00619142,0.5116723,0.002701463,0.001012562,0.00002786686,0.0005920215,0.006944358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892172,0.002199653,0.0001064411,0.0004700824,0.0003043901,0.00003218746,0.00001235983,0.00001469424,0.007642998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5202958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2085951864","doi":"10.1071/ah020033","title":"Policy change and private health insurance: did the cheapest policy do the trick?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Health Review","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Population health; Business; Group insurance; Health policy; Self-insurance; Health economics; General insurance; Adverse selection; Public economics; Insurance policy; Population; Actuarial science; Private sector; Casualty insurance; Income protection insurance; Economics; Health care; Economic growth; Environmental health; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3444708474401706,"gpt":0.4797848379445939,"spread":0.1353139905044233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004097589,0.000204397,0.0004877521,0.0001101406,0.001777619,0.00009078161,0.0004695732,0.00009626841,0.0001936631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005527282,0.0001217277,0.00007992462,0.00215514,0.0003653688,0.0001784826,0.00004701394,0.0004865998,0.0001228668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008126532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01509799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002741869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958795,0.001531813,0.0007878018,0.0003211697,0.0005100218,0.0009696385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982291,0.0001852337,0.0004956478,0.0004857933,0.0001092243,0.0004949316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001065984,0.00003337688,0.001024103,0.002383269,0.00000678081,7.57718e-7,0.01091582,9.368339e-9,4.885365e-8,0.193212,0.03681406,0.7556087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001220961,0.00007915366,0.02527435,0.001400131,0.000002194388,0.000007761693,0.0008022143,4.344688e-7,9.411876e-8,0.0005548277,0.971644,0.0001127496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001220056,0.170923,6.54866e-7,0.8242221,0.0001540245,0.001917426,0.00002396512,0.00006463981,0.001474106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2299496,0.6174445,0.00001964519,0.1500844,0.001204024,0.0001448533,0.000003002341,0.00001282694,0.00113721],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162608329","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.316","title":"Quality of Life Indicators for Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities: Extending Current Practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Intellectual and developmental disabilities","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Quality of life (healthcare); Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Best practice; Intellectual disability; Psychology; Process management; Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Medicine; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2384932219420809,"gpt":0.4597137711193668,"spread":0.2212205491772858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002336384,0.0006080705,0.001852757,0.0004474238,0.0006642681,0.0001838977,0.0004741398,0.0004064497,0.002336564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09284619,0.0004589121,0.0002676755,0.0008736652,0.002757964,0.0004642302,0.0002163561,0.0005471978,0.0001255078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005998566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003147987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003228828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003467308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947668,0.00110135,0.001880946,0.0007415506,0.0008247959,0.0006845851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438752,0.05444556,0.0006037608,0.0002461176,0.0004312205,0.0003981434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004684721,0.0002123741,0.0001444651,0.01245369,0.0002329423,4.979147e-8,0.1954265,1.20654e-8,2.660883e-8,0.02659082,0.00461785,0.7602744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001428612,0.0001234397,0.000002488888,0.001842099,0.0000530663,0.000002853799,0.3357535,1.433676e-7,8.472317e-7,0.0004514139,0.6612225,0.0004048484],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00331297,0.9814711,0.000242215,0.0005896526,0.0005009242,0.003164279,0.0003209131,0.0001289056,0.01026907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00338306,0.9920592,0.001514157,0.0001055016,0.0002402998,0.001109501,0.0001336945,0.00006111772,0.001393457],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034791017","doi":"10.1177/0261018304039679","title":"Pro-Market, Non-Market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Services Delivery","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Deskilling; Social Welfare; Welfare state; Business; Public sector; Social work; Market economy; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Work (physics); Economic growth; Political science; Economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04196273239169863,"gpt":0.4066722572554525,"spread":0.3647095248637539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007380342,0.000117285,0.000194873,0.0001169399,0.0009880976,0.00005178575,0.0002674011,0.0004693773,0.0003406976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006894262,0.0001038643,0.00006409553,0.001231367,0.0007021329,0.000203947,0.00006990434,0.0004493622,0.00001227399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002790422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008892228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005593691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006598677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982156,0.0002692943,0.0003059697,0.0001872389,0.0005648581,0.0004570533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990726,0.0002167718,0.00006613317,0.00006662073,0.0004886859,0.0000892057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002057978,0.0001365584,0.0008677341,0.0001195955,0.000009127669,0.000005137095,0.04897392,5.353087e-8,0.00001776896,0.9452717,0.001005574,0.003572271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102855,0.0001280279,0.4897307,0.0002803555,0.00004105322,0.000004433643,0.0935322,0.00004072574,0.0001333232,0.2923793,0.1207543,0.0008726285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2748324,0.0001999615,0.000008355838,0.6763263,0.0003336431,0.0004422654,0.0000731184,0.00006354057,0.04772046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838138,0.00007791212,0.00003450116,0.009168448,0.006741096,0.00003128419,0.000008924801,0.00001561384,0.0001083812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7089815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8456025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657933800","doi":"10.4337/9781843769699","title":"Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil service; Service (business); Political science; Business; Public administration; Marketing; Public service","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04100404126509158,"gpt":0.3089250651734791,"spread":0.2679210239083875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003098355,0.0003940073,0.0007197658,0.000589015,0.0004893742,0.002481383,0.00108576,0.0008648153,0.000102023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005492846,0.0004341078,0.00009703593,0.0003965626,0.000461434,0.0008023531,0.0001372069,0.001480808,0.0001000477],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003891139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0148595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03205601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2896953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995778,0.000401811,0.0007970795,0.0006369887,0.001498147,0.0008880334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972402,0.0003146483,0.000639864,0.0004916724,0.001003011,0.0003105794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001926573,0.00003141577,0.0001563803,0.0007659903,0.00006683781,0.00008473296,0.0561788,0.00001177973,5.10209e-7,0.7572428,0.17155,0.0138915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002378001,0.00002929989,0.00006744433,0.0008671383,0.000009638678,0.00000257615,0.006867399,0.000003157229,7.18801e-7,0.005006375,0.9864658,0.0004426911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002860672,0.001036577,0.00001591474,0.03740989,0.00254021,0.0006837167,0.00006763871,0.0004610091,0.957499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05347577,0.0003386441,0.00009055792,0.009710212,0.004868963,0.0001422049,0.000191014,0.0001607593,0.9310219],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8149158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142027585","doi":"10.1017/s0144686x0600479x","title":"Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ageing and Society","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research Council; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Cash; Voucher; Business; Autonomy; Payment; Service (business); Economic growth; Finance; Economics; Accounting; Political science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.057972166328596,"gpt":0.3870208749737665,"spread":0.3290487086451706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000703368,0.0000477562,0.00009847785,0.00001909959,0.0003618898,0.00003540315,0.0000852529,0.00005367666,0.000001124495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004171556,0.00003955936,0.0000403163,0.0002196073,0.0001536493,0.00004099779,0.00001130178,0.0001113305,3.014779e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006358215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007646126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002055171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03866718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992169,0.0001895934,0.0001886592,0.00009676431,0.0001411304,0.0001669224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996344,0.000106743,0.00006112512,0.00006141009,0.0001271474,0.000009120979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002483745,0.0000258632,0.2198245,0.0002190886,0.000003398988,0.000003109665,0.7052603,0.000008270355,0.000002161379,0.05952635,0.001771676,0.01335276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001845592,0.00002391397,0.1560896,0.00009649241,0.000003258087,1.884748e-7,0.7111136,0.00003496078,0.000001325788,0.0003523898,0.1320397,0.0000600072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765552,0.004041987,0.00007738626,0.009186583,0.00006027673,0.0003750622,0.00001171557,0.00003233515,0.009659509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990471,0.000160505,0.0004152107,0.0002369808,0.00008483665,0.00001570185,0.00000636861,0.00000401947,0.00002927087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1302681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W615858239","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781861346261.001.0001","title":"Working futures?Disabled people, policy and social inclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Inclusion (mineral); Disabled people; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Gender studies; Applied psychology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09173346583957616,"gpt":0.393837597992908,"spread":0.3021041321533318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007025653,0.0003703258,0.0005167425,0.0004800335,0.003074306,0.0001944228,0.0005049844,0.001049533,0.00004226499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001931658,0.0003911145,0.0001193048,0.00008614574,0.0004010516,0.0000754861,0.0008746325,0.000738117,0.00001217032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009796977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003778037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01606501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07884553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970812,0.0003179747,0.0004967237,0.0004755186,0.0008329183,0.0007957037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.0001864931,0.0003734773,0.0002509885,0.0001896722,0.0002503427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001196584,0.000009251978,0.00000435201,0.00007892663,0.00002238976,0.000001317158,0.06749146,6.902947e-8,0.000001771399,0.7767389,0.01755049,0.1380891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002638079,0.00001382412,0.00004227628,0.000111722,0.0000162915,0.00000153208,0.0004896586,0.000002118449,0.000003331551,0.03431695,0.9643868,0.0003516528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009624974,0.0007395643,0.000003940173,0.03837128,0.0003131767,0.0005188285,0.00002953148,0.0002336338,0.9596938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03846026,0.001294216,0.00005328353,0.005439631,0.0303602,0.00005436763,0.00003483519,0.00007776837,0.9242254],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340063028","doi":"10.1111/hsc.12347","title":"Availability of caregiver-friendly workplace policies (CFWPs): an international scoping review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health & Social Care in the Community","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Social science; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1605705894032046,"gpt":0.4912652780413733,"spread":0.3306946886381687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008221675,0.0001063193,0.0003094554,0.00006576505,0.001420968,0.00002427809,0.001057075,0.0001193272,0.0001231352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001199384,0.00007688795,0.00006836321,0.0004822953,0.0005288596,0.0002486065,0.0001070871,0.0005208009,0.00000604746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007875477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001547685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02167987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2164386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98981,0.008561788,0.000584365,0.0001305287,0.0005606516,0.0003525873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975923,0.0009217754,0.0003392728,0.0004564066,0.0005983336,0.00009190982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000442342,0.0002420467,0.01061342,0.004271716,0.000009781873,0.00000117519,0.6896745,1.054525e-7,0.000002942066,0.07899824,0.002418576,0.2137233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007792563,0.0004321302,0.03703651,0.02310499,0.000009463926,0.00000214325,0.814228,3.194198e-7,0.00001171439,0.003182908,0.1208447,0.0003678392],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383278,0.01341451,0.00002945107,0.4216276,0.0007421764,0.001687588,0.0001030382,0.0001127852,0.02395514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754224,0.01826726,0.0000444184,0.005944787,0.0002244899,0.0000439127,0.00001454899,0.000007772247,0.00003034822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4370947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997357529","doi":"10.1080/0968759042000235299","title":"‘I have got my life back’: users' experience of direct payments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Flexibility (engineering); Direct Payments; Control (management); Work (physics); Freedom of choice; Vocational education; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Economics; Management; Engineering; World Wide Web; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07725792964348902,"gpt":0.3864705731400145,"spread":0.3092126434965256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714576,0.0001124201,0.0002145313,0.000006244905,0.0003396513,0.00002776992,0.0002609627,0.0001577768,0.0004788194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004458616,0.0001080386,0.0001992175,0.0003028763,0.001249743,0.0002066302,0.00004967487,0.0001452712,0.00003250357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003857512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003493662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003884885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003489064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998305,0.0001450022,0.0003753275,0.0003120313,0.000521551,0.0003410361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990672,0.0001320206,0.0001127182,0.0003039501,0.0001868382,0.0001972231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001734528,0.0009191833,0.3112225,0.0001634712,0.00004925218,3.265134e-7,0.6595901,0.000008638018,0.000200822,0.0208613,0.001931509,0.005035627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000924962,0.00009352284,0.1253083,0.0000775536,0.00001169946,1.494486e-7,0.7697962,0.00001251194,0.001528973,0.003151063,0.09867826,0.0004168365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683022,0.0001207679,0.0000397371,0.0209068,0.0002213518,0.0002825271,0.00001874464,0.00006913146,0.0100387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976957,0.0002835182,0.0004319325,0.001241989,0.000123435,0.00002656839,0.000005784746,0.000007879941,0.0001831965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1859142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5872809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059879492","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00660.x","title":"Self-help groups as mutual support: What do carers value?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health & Social Care in the Community","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mutual aid; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Value (mathematics); Empathy; Peer support; Social psychology; Support group; Psychology; Experiential knowledge; Public relations; Nursing; Medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06441973241609526,"gpt":0.4016167991179061,"spread":0.3371970667018108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007432448,0.0001954229,0.0003335878,0.0001175061,0.005297281,0.0002906629,0.0009916245,0.0003296984,0.0001029338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002105726,0.0001822335,0.0001141265,0.0008966915,0.0003764009,0.0003894814,0.0001142734,0.001734137,0.00007216119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001556803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002127111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07435534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2498023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874187,0.01007387,0.0006001787,0.0001910314,0.0009032732,0.0008129263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979752,0.0007926266,0.0002610713,0.0004515096,0.0003753727,0.0001442039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001753372,0.0001850101,0.001561567,0.0001858604,0.000005440228,0.000007376894,0.6864675,5.633327e-7,2.472772e-7,0.2599429,0.006328808,0.0452971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002514116,0.0001356134,0.005093348,0.00003999731,0.000003739661,0.000001926444,0.6821383,6.58667e-7,0.000001092823,0.009656178,0.3025343,0.0001434788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.707036,0.005895475,0.000004838454,0.2157197,0.001378092,0.001198589,0.00003452698,0.000348951,0.06838382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981494,0.00302516,0.00007509749,0.01423712,0.0009279396,0.00006283114,0.00009872533,0.00002208226,0.00005706765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2962055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090747598","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00610.x","title":"Service integration and co‐ordination: a framework of approaches for the delivery of co‐ordinated care to children with disabilities and their families","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Child Care Health and Development","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thames Valley Children's Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Service (business); Service delivery framework; Ordination; Process management; Agency (philosophy); Service design; Service system; Plan (archaeology); Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1071482129516069,"gpt":0.3719853380414824,"spread":0.2648371250898756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004337111,0.0002480861,0.0007311741,0.0001359764,0.0007207232,0.00004091991,0.0001238584,0.0002077804,0.000001467353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007642133,0.0001513171,0.00003525888,0.0003263917,0.0002299381,0.00005462215,0.0000362883,0.000188652,1.372772e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001667595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001572719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009536486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985127,0.0001640837,0.0005546678,0.0003153315,0.000218917,0.0002343163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985064,0.0004579345,0.0003094137,0.0001388538,0.0004475178,0.0001398405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008514217,0.00001038258,0.0006001863,0.009086526,0.00003751472,1.46708e-8,0.1206826,1.744818e-7,1.047232e-9,0.002438361,0.00005982802,0.8670759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001695763,0.0001536629,0.002107903,0.005410115,0.00002348362,0.000002281134,0.4151432,8.100369e-7,0.000001927511,0.00003317015,0.5767499,0.0002039853],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004862248,0.988903,0.0004339348,0.002637554,0.00004975241,0.002608986,0.0002041491,0.0000234594,0.0002768977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06610859,0.9312862,0.001194285,0.0004251068,0.00008478457,0.0003294729,0.0005432496,0.00001983566,0.00000850411],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8668719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025090415","doi":"10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1031","title":"Giving citizens a voice in healthcare policy in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Health care; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06344326451428038,"gpt":0.3968456272888599,"spread":0.3334023627745795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171412,0.00004715199,0.00009548658,0.0001191715,0.0000941708,0.00001074274,0.0000800254,0.0000546045,0.00005428668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009682684,0.00005331351,0.000008730238,0.0007817598,0.00002145239,0.00004286211,0.000006808067,0.0001509958,0.000008315652],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001366318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008966863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987104,0.0003506665,0.0002395468,0.0001152534,0.0002367992,0.000347334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999621,0.00009823361,0.00004551409,0.00008446363,0.00005399815,0.00009681386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002983748,0.00001899731,0.3243873,0.00005543102,0.000001621801,0.0000527397,0.01214028,0.000004407196,0.000003650556,0.6394377,0.006778502,0.01711635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002494773,0.000009624075,0.1802436,0.00007437045,2.040474e-7,0.000001682006,0.0373888,0.000009216964,0.000008161573,0.00418265,0.7776831,0.0001491698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3977375,0.0001977133,0.000001952806,0.5392814,0.0002434113,0.0002491517,0.000004262251,0.00001710364,0.0622675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928528,0.0001101239,0.00005681312,0.006211215,0.0001424617,0.0000197403,6.26644e-7,0.00000457866,0.0006016483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7709046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055094216","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00549.x","title":"Models of Disability, Work and Welfare in Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Obligation; Government (linguistics); Realm; Public relations; Social model of disability; Medical model of disability; Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1528130466150654,"gpt":0.4610055109120021,"spread":0.3081924642969367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006761855,0.00004181086,0.00007782152,0.00003854237,0.0001918433,0.00001768803,0.00002859289,0.0001146562,0.00001207204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000820501,0.00004534772,0.00001157445,0.0002748265,0.0003481049,0.0001159495,0.00000757328,0.00006766478,1.950883e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004844804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000967928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001920282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02489461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993979,0.00006029441,0.0001912874,0.00008701169,0.0001203687,0.0001431286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997931,0.00003522507,0.0000528077,0.00002719487,0.0000369769,0.00005474574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771942,0.00002868146,0.006997305,0.00001930379,0.000001141371,3.935825e-7,0.008921574,5.131174e-8,0.000005543123,0.9665412,0.00001248457,0.0174546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004576462,0.0001223315,0.7175258,0.00003151698,0.000004926856,5.18174e-7,0.04797715,0.000003872767,0.000111181,0.2153021,0.01824733,0.0002156023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.895139,0.00001469038,0.00002057002,0.1000687,0.00002781373,0.00009043045,0.000004475926,0.000009568,0.004624771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.00002811545,0.00003772888,0.00009495181,0.0003205514,0.000001850033,0.000002978916,0.000002025417,0.000118554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098785661","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778949","title":"Public-Private Partnership? Shifting Paradigms of Economic Governance in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; General partnership; Public administration; Enthusiasm; Civil society; Political science; Politics; Public policy; Meaning (existential); Economics; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1444750583389626,"gpt":0.35208750787886,"spread":0.2076124495398974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003658917,0.00006000182,0.000159249,0.0002062093,0.0002425588,0.00008982981,0.0004638543,0.00006040137,0.0005385326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00245769,0.00005911211,0.00003692727,0.0004481065,0.001152031,0.000477735,0.00000647564,0.0002708492,0.000008324587],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003126655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02832567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5414755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979827,0.0001272773,0.0004528225,0.0001220665,0.0003226557,0.000992481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980675,0.0001145696,0.000179847,0.00009753038,0.0001915648,0.001348979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.220213e-7,0.000004480379,0.125292,0.000001756524,8.897952e-7,0.00001000047,0.001570661,0.000001474846,0.000003999665,0.8727689,0.00003512534,0.0003101075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002829219,0.0000777765,0.6903012,0.00009024849,0.000002489218,0.00001923556,0.005025896,0.000008984034,0.0002667659,0.06901412,0.2347229,0.0001874085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8766769,0.00006236918,0.000009891316,0.02497979,0.0003647898,0.00004634402,0.000001693205,0.0000019696,0.09785631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990453,0.000006422408,0.0001906755,0.0005577552,0.00006348415,5.242006e-7,6.152729e-8,0.00000285559,0.0001329063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8037549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026938752","doi":"10.1017/s0144686x02008759","title":"Elderly people's accounts of home care rationing: missing voices in long-term care policy debates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ageing and Society","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Rationing; Intervention (counseling); Negotiation; Long-term care; Identity (music); Nursing; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Health care; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03034223005244869,"gpt":0.338467641598577,"spread":0.3081254115461283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001974959,0.00007968119,0.000144954,0.00005041153,0.0005033727,0.00008726252,0.00009374517,0.0001385667,0.00002967474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007725071,0.00008185583,0.00005095655,0.0003813911,0.0001099424,0.0001960708,0.00001880939,0.0001301407,0.000001537397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001321219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001352168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004054133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01586775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991208,0.00007935656,0.0001978427,0.0001592967,0.0002132045,0.0002295311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999494,0.00008909695,0.00008722179,0.00008021137,0.0001881958,0.00006131479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[7.85362e-7,0.00001330301,0.1530145,0.000237281,0.000007586602,0.000002594119,0.7075074,0.000001800888,0.00003539594,0.0009618546,0.00007029641,0.1381473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000445031,0.00004488165,0.4765615,0.0002988286,0.000008285147,7.559516e-7,0.5193369,0.00006726033,0.00008787405,0.0002146988,0.002705532,0.0002285188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860166,0.005029349,0.00001652322,0.006411782,0.00007559547,0.00009696747,0.000003656422,0.00003801955,0.002311525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960124,0.00334472,0.00008598289,0.0002610223,0.0001787083,0.000004535643,0.000007229267,0.000007197908,0.00009820433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.323547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8854577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028973163","doi":"10.1002/1099-1751(200007/09)15:3<189::aid-hpm590>3.0.co;2-q","title":"Decentralizing rural health services: a case study in China","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Health Planning and Management","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"China; Health services; Business; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental health; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0613240718515048,"gpt":0.4352612506358945,"spread":0.3739371787843898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003835589,0.0000623606,0.0001426754,0.0001561836,0.0003642344,0.00007641775,0.0002463989,0.00001573814,0.00004294822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005602466,0.00004653032,0.00001926816,0.0001321524,0.00002697318,0.0001237326,0.00002638871,0.0001711247,0.000001738468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002227765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001447997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01034559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005568469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998291,0.0003849023,0.0005497116,0.00007331601,0.0004759925,0.0002250356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00004773437,0.000286419,0.00005601613,0.00006267066,0.00009197128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009993975,0.0002976163,0.02463144,0.00012841,0.0001186637,0.001679597,0.3564927,0.000277097,1.207734e-7,0.007136841,0.001211048,0.6079265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001394365,0.0003119239,0.07431781,0.00099596,0.000005773505,0.0005619763,0.754664,0.0001305838,9.77513e-8,0.0006079444,0.1669114,0.00009814785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805441,0.001774341,0.00003408398,0.1160823,0.0003332227,0.0002693589,9.981771e-7,0.00001063996,0.0009508803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900877,0.004594482,0.0001203085,0.004908965,0.0001473619,0.000003508942,8.654393e-7,0.000003972382,0.0001327803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6078284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109500762","doi":"10.2304/ciec.2007.8.3.192","title":"Childcare Market Management: How the United Kingdom Government Has Reshaped its Role in Developing Early Childhood Education and Care","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; University of East London","keywords":"Private sector; Workforce; Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Consolidation (business); Context (archaeology); Early childhood education; Economic growth; Public sector; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Market economy; Economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04923141527455948,"gpt":0.3151173570029471,"spread":0.2658859417283876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001654277,0.0002684248,0.0002818688,0.0003706725,0.0006046034,0.0003392795,0.0004966457,0.0002281253,0.00002628418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000222163,0.0002489228,0.00004539748,0.001305079,0.0001757385,0.0005502697,0.0001511189,0.0004972031,0.000007997583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003852944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002961812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006472625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971761,0.0004594448,0.0005285054,0.0005082337,0.0007792606,0.0005484161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989682,0.0001597492,0.0002252491,0.000331184,0.0001719452,0.0001436893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005130651,0.0003408176,0.1777125,0.00008685017,0.0000630168,0.00004265219,0.6599724,5.400078e-7,0.000003275632,0.0755053,0.001249931,0.08497138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000604376,0.00004314569,0.6812155,0.0003956145,0.000003987008,0.000001002198,0.1371526,0.00000112215,0.00002136252,0.0004455345,0.1798903,0.000225471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942679,0.008951087,0.00001124629,0.05084239,0.0003487999,0.001383666,0.00001401661,0.0000950003,0.04408596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962466,0.0008939885,0.0002133034,0.001494683,0.000339504,0.00006324689,0.00003572428,0.00003418763,0.0006787464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554310238","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v29i3.932","title":"‘Not disabled enough’: Episodic disabilities and the Ontario Disability Support Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Employability; Legitimacy; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07978720744091468,"gpt":0.3965036647058005,"spread":0.3167164572648858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004070492,0.00036865,0.0007750822,0.00001902094,0.001825773,0.0002144101,0.0004314022,0.000175998,0.0002646666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001557847,0.0002521261,0.000229356,0.0003795398,0.01205254,0.0004499612,0.00005144863,0.0004562639,0.00003017606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001120634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02064339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5724213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954451,0.00120104,0.0009360617,0.0007764326,0.0007824548,0.0008589583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963492,0.002109359,0.0001759207,0.0008005964,0.0003214616,0.0002434424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000274576,0.0009967635,0.08524449,0.00009255465,0.00008434473,8.512149e-7,0.3976015,1.181307e-7,7.094504e-7,0.2339696,0.0006601006,0.2810744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001768832,0.001507196,0.2304478,0.00003735126,0.00006846645,0.000002127998,0.5375137,0.000006437726,0.00000334886,0.1060598,0.1220568,0.000528226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7337699,0.0002424088,0.000002818848,0.2562883,0.0003682802,0.001785139,0.0000155828,0.0003003513,0.007227177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966702,0.0002043132,0.0001171471,0.001388636,0.0003278786,0.0003722142,0.00001285523,0.00001230435,0.0008944594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5517778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077574363","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01151.x","title":"‘Futureless persons’: shifting life expectancies and the vicissitudes of progressive illness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03826903279179069,"gpt":0.3766217724591038,"spread":0.3383527396673131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003391468,0.0001320071,0.0006002162,0.00007802818,0.001529283,0.000009574842,0.0002649927,0.000242968,0.00003447128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007742166,0.00009334589,0.00005385728,0.0002802473,0.003750289,0.000086924,0.00003014938,0.0002905263,7.333412e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005713216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000952593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005825951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002905851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970019,0.001392959,0.0006153765,0.0002294455,0.0003079873,0.0004523421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979973,0.0006725263,0.0006714143,0.0001650687,0.0003775461,0.0001161313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007847193,0.00005063044,0.002354477,0.000138501,0.00002486156,6.893581e-7,0.4487538,4.2859e-7,0.00000669519,0.5066541,0.0002137136,0.04172358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001478027,0.0002177868,0.04234541,0.0001631274,0.00001290882,0.00000188205,0.9303872,0.000007761575,0.00004096351,0.01754742,0.00755671,0.0002408209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7555261,0.01922618,0.00005301254,0.22365,0.0003094976,0.0004557821,0.000006481823,0.00004278731,0.0007301787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947897,0.0009515937,0.0001186106,0.003859123,0.0002199618,0.00002756415,0.000003443949,0.00000719904,0.00002276074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4891067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034473648","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.00266","title":"Accountability and Joined‐up Government","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; General partnership; Commission; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Work (physics); Public relations; Politics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1998906068762274,"gpt":0.3949692370728189,"spread":0.1950786301965915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001574758,0.00006395622,0.0001128093,0.00003887549,0.0001887572,0.0001586407,0.0001100707,0.00008834705,0.001176616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003758991,0.00005953564,0.00003462094,0.0001660954,0.00014056,0.0006678772,0.000006579832,0.0001658088,0.000008086231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001622226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001198262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008725955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985399,0.0001803853,0.0004154248,0.00008755794,0.0005967179,0.0001800606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990408,0.00005739261,0.0003080548,0.0000737877,0.0002933986,0.000226506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005783721,0.0006853495,0.08534531,0.0001034664,0.0001003305,0.00004340649,0.02234701,1.823001e-7,0.0004309062,0.4801951,0.06301347,0.3476776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004504367,0.0004202728,0.02232685,0.0000244171,0.00001114583,0.00005351581,0.03352141,0.000006843134,0.0002094214,0.0009885894,0.941846,0.0001411354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6898983,0.0000749567,0.0001202177,0.305344,0.0004538652,0.00008866542,0.000004883552,0.00001257929,0.00400257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966272,0.0002090909,0.0002102249,0.0002136898,0.0003627344,0.000001334392,7.047826e-7,0.000003492452,0.002371502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338022298","doi":"10.5334/ijic.2460","title":"Cross-sector Service Provision in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Integrated Care","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation; Western University; Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Service (business); Service provider; Health care; Business; Inclusion (mineral); Service design; Marketing; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07824489771538268,"gpt":0.4471578916657751,"spread":0.3689129939503924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000827669,0.00009587902,0.0002124033,0.0001855198,0.0001294619,0.00008026461,0.0003667543,0.0001021128,0.0002046505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003167538,0.00006523902,0.00004935121,0.0002341924,0.00008019433,0.0003783094,0.0000236359,0.0002290698,0.000005895917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002188992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001817272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01060816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980683,0.0003396553,0.0006322767,0.0001423829,0.0006404644,0.0001769571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952906,0.00006347022,0.0004258709,0.00005644841,0.00402366,0.0001399074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924635,0.00007555775,0.03144783,0.0008220985,0.00004165764,0.00005099859,0.07519802,4.583524e-7,0.0002089604,0.01185058,0.001229966,0.8788814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001702963,0.000417272,0.007953383,0.008557265,0.00000556934,0.00003902671,0.1563095,0.000002772714,0.0001302557,0.0004179174,0.8242073,0.0002567693],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7287675,0.03110649,0.00007548164,0.2365421,0.001537743,0.0003152642,0.0000933253,0.00003569759,0.001526409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976541,0.01645783,0.00009986709,0.006364609,0.000424641,0.000003175526,0.00001916238,0.000009912696,0.00007976399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5919604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583147916","doi":"","title":"Canadian Social Policy: Issues and Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Political science; Social citizenship; Workfare; Welfare state; Immigration policy; Public policy; Social work; Welfare reform; Social change; Legislation; Economic growth; Public administration; Welfare; Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043678186925254,"gpt":0.4077943394052663,"spread":0.3034265207127409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003621198,0.0001094479,0.0001588609,0.0002481384,0.0006910213,0.00006280292,0.000105854,0.0004462185,0.001710415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000663699,0.0001111702,0.00002965985,0.00008852925,0.0002563212,0.00008256213,0.00001529708,0.0002156173,0.0001077862],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001286525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005778332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6435494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9551969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990511,0.0000740979,0.0001101218,0.0001561452,0.0002264382,0.0003820764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.00002255092,0.00004690756,0.00005898499,0.0001872808,0.0003174386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.66892e-7,0.000002090697,0.00002551728,0.0000085561,0.000007929292,5.978357e-7,0.05062555,8.967635e-11,2.806475e-8,0.7962269,0.1389635,0.01413908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002308184,0.000004739179,0.0002994797,0.000008016107,0.000003096785,2.433589e-7,0.03508596,2.029199e-8,7.285926e-8,0.01114897,0.9533023,0.0001239851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002095186,0.002264744,2.597417e-7,0.306106,0.00009928999,0.00008878125,0.00001445722,0.00004338738,0.6913621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02423807,0.002415102,0.00002605678,0.001574826,0.007669982,0.000004347047,0.00001013799,0.00001546583,0.964046],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8143389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936030995","doi":"10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905","title":"Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Money & Management","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Business; Production (economics); Public sector; Public relations; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Process management; Political science; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07239188372886102,"gpt":0.361811856275913,"spread":0.289419972547052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004619482,0.0001140427,0.0001672937,0.000217308,0.0007173528,0.0003579108,0.0005201198,0.00005596413,0.0001595522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005726525,0.00007316807,0.000031674,0.0005965257,0.0001155127,0.0003471996,0.00008655642,0.0002098418,0.00001044347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007390292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005254963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001761433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980004,0.0004502526,0.0003487327,0.0002532309,0.0006074426,0.0003399128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991377,0.0001535995,0.0001891661,0.0003493152,0.00009272442,0.0000774673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005399507,0.0001331241,0.291974,0.0003110251,0.00006718798,0.000002396625,0.05978388,0.00002437896,0.00005041098,0.5635663,0.0004225006,0.08365934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000445558,0.00003203267,0.1912033,0.0001544024,0.00001205429,9.705155e-7,0.628252,0.0005590323,0.00002852144,0.007871006,0.1712104,0.000230802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.795504,0.0002616983,0.00001459058,0.1367628,0.0001688398,0.0004584975,5.169696e-7,0.00004147082,0.06678759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978884,0.0003330553,0.000108671,0.0008001966,0.00005534321,0.00003398248,0.000007044122,0.000007924476,0.0007653636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5684682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.551737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1995397155","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00668.x","title":"Towards socio‐spatial inclusion? Disabled people, neoliberalism and the contemporary labour market","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Area","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accommodation; Conceptualization; Disabled people; Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Neoliberalism (international relations); Social security; Social exclusion; Labour economics; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Political economy; Social science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02785187116656845,"gpt":0.3067518521072335,"spread":0.278899980940665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001690957,0.00008999535,0.0002055499,0.0000310758,0.001111348,0.00007001469,0.0001691002,0.0001063088,0.0004490235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001906105,0.00006038389,0.00004643405,0.0001938925,0.0005519002,0.0001220776,0.000188785,0.000129882,0.000008126223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004320346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002709247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09562555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04505478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984697,0.0005708106,0.0002395036,0.0001539802,0.0003548505,0.0002112111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992308,0.0003531762,0.00009553002,0.000121419,0.0001359579,0.00006313356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001727486,0.00002512454,0.002979047,0.00001263261,0.0000093064,0.000002622528,0.02893418,1.139821e-7,0.000001215051,0.942279,0.02058762,0.004996357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00752919,0.0000203286,0.0759332,0.00003189866,0.00001004544,0.000001809854,0.01258951,0.0001870361,0.000006685616,0.4900637,0.413373,0.0002535893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2071983,0.0007075939,0.00007017318,0.5118792,0.0002949466,0.0003946176,0.00001604473,0.00009688851,0.2793423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863408,0.0003738084,0.00003447868,0.005338302,0.0004176266,0.0000320931,0.00001035351,0.000008277622,0.007444278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946269302","doi":"10.1080/10875549.2019.1616242","title":"“Human Again”: The (Unrealized) Promise of Basic Income in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Conditionality; Social assistance; Bureaucracy; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Social security; Social policy; Test (biology); Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05059046057247085,"gpt":0.3456089401587902,"spread":0.2950184795863194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001828521,0.00004760131,0.0001769185,0.00009202483,0.00007116064,0.00001534124,0.0002394448,0.00006614491,0.0006642953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009400077,0.00002971688,0.00006300805,0.0001897636,0.00005155752,0.0001548098,0.00001728305,0.0003235397,0.000008084866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000273969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007099989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01832597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4295536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988012,0.0001901337,0.0004161401,0.00005323655,0.0004030155,0.0001363131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991948,0.00007428655,0.0003696989,0.000101668,0.0002066979,0.00005285776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001164064,0.0003008238,0.7050125,0.00007678958,0.00005490773,0.00002367983,0.0718554,0.000007922372,0.00110567,0.2066875,0.007607291,0.0071511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001291346,0.0003019791,0.6127077,0.0002169491,0.000007178055,0.000005137567,0.01057203,0.000004550719,0.00006922776,0.008126105,0.3665894,0.0001083423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510245,0.00006232205,0.000001668144,0.02160432,0.00028845,0.0001209534,6.54652e-7,0.000002760726,0.02689433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965004,0.00003531213,0.00002987007,0.000796791,0.0000870585,6.828047e-7,1.99058e-7,0.00000348702,0.002546208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4112276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144335675","doi":"10.7870/cjcmh-2009-0014","title":"Deinstitutionalization of People With Developmental Disabilities: A Review of the Literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Political science; Economic growth; Gerontology; Public administration; Psychology; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1152357274043297,"gpt":0.4151102638288636,"spread":0.2998745364245338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002627309,0.0001487643,0.0009532128,0.0001924422,0.0009259749,0.00001665516,0.0006446399,0.0001208429,0.00008995593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004311121,0.00009857997,0.0001869114,0.001093732,0.0003361009,0.0001262074,0.00001644751,0.0008032843,6.551941e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001676341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03299474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01235497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3542771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957543,0.002434775,0.001078887,0.00004902493,0.000459096,0.0002238966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997366,0.0001788445,0.001327779,0.0001940447,0.000575371,0.0003579453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006308322,0.0001313463,0.0001186039,0.1670046,0.00009114876,0.000001280918,0.1349895,1.633016e-7,8.661175e-9,0.04055892,0.00784171,0.6492564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006271736,0.00009516761,0.0000433064,0.1983684,0.00002033086,0.0000667025,0.01295039,1.200966e-8,5.885397e-8,0.00008183389,0.7882482,0.00006291308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001974657,0.9869583,0.000002350413,0.01037642,0.0002085238,0.0006370505,0.0001777047,0.000002166811,0.001440043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005393181,0.9930949,0.00007745229,0.00121747,0.00005354888,0.000003503246,0.00008875408,0.000008332943,0.00006285644],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7804065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1147826881","doi":"10.1057/9781137384935","title":"The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Healthcare policy; Corporate governance; Health care; Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Political science; Healthcare system; Key (lock); Sociology; Health policy; Health care reform; Management; Economics; Law; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04519280403479976,"gpt":0.3434506614281977,"spread":0.2982578573933979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001272228,0.0003069409,0.0004335202,0.0001420065,0.0005299161,0.000100536,0.0006809846,0.0004704193,0.00004458084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005467023,0.0002504452,0.000116098,0.00007627689,0.0009873587,9.789525e-7,0.0001782783,0.0004530268,0.00002121742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006837933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003968226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02580419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969912,0.0002514201,0.0006605677,0.0003996706,0.001183075,0.0005140792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971469,0.0003955327,0.0006945232,0.000419281,0.00102785,0.0003158985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002515868,2.521189e-7,0.0000738331,0.00006046086,0.00005392767,0.000005228003,0.004256485,2.006608e-8,0.000002171733,0.9100626,0.0009167322,0.08454314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002036196,0.00004806611,0.0001188918,0.0002561052,0.000007599373,0.000003121706,0.0008944954,0.000001652488,0.000009100519,0.6267993,0.3714772,0.0001808531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003367951,0.01313875,0.00001065567,0.02654772,0.0009104389,0.0005835202,0.0002716902,0.00006150464,0.958442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447381,0.01412318,0.00007583371,0.0008597207,0.001965414,0.00003913934,0.00004368293,0.00004555977,0.03810932],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084101100","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.042","title":"Exploring limits to market-based reform: Managed competition and rehabilitation home care services in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Managed care; Health care; Rehabilitation; Politics; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Political science; Physical therapy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08353049279499972,"gpt":0.3546169065438404,"spread":0.2710864137488407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002286145,0.00008349749,0.0001515138,0.0003353714,0.0008293254,0.00003786794,0.0001955981,0.00005360667,0.0001223646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001612559,0.00007685404,0.00001388372,0.001198854,0.0006358112,0.000623908,0.00001856152,0.0001613945,0.000005168208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001886163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07891446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8315508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982787,0.0001197363,0.0002472312,0.0002799398,0.000730611,0.0003438109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993185,0.00008738116,0.0000641755,0.00008286281,0.0002783833,0.0001687006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003641762,0.00002995261,0.03480475,0.00008813531,0.000001160685,0.000001858716,0.797338,0.000002178853,0.0001814604,0.05484786,0.00006179793,0.1126064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005030842,0.0001385815,0.606217,0.0002530442,0.000003051887,1.166412e-7,0.3204495,0.00001662671,0.00001433267,0.0004016872,0.07186648,0.0001364523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452469,0.00004288724,0.000008566888,0.1164084,0.0002353715,0.000254734,7.017373e-7,0.00004532857,0.03775712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975198,0.00003409002,0.000172483,0.001765395,0.0003366158,0.00004172095,0.000003408497,0.000004436195,0.0001220331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7526363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998805559","doi":"10.1177/104420730301300402","title":"Disability Policy in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Medical model of disability; Social model of disability; Policy development; Disability studies; Foundation (evidence); Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.119909678651575,"gpt":0.4539506103979847,"spread":0.3340409317464097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002730688,0.0001304877,0.0004457992,0.00008150374,0.0002701963,0.00001931873,0.0002257074,0.00006140734,0.00004013328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599011,0.000108672,0.00009287752,0.00100387,0.001051706,0.0001978876,0.00003165768,0.0003080906,0.000001679288],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01494372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01147782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9180458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969718,0.0009052226,0.0008792121,0.0001546793,0.0006268644,0.0004622102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980937,0.0007738655,0.0003036556,0.0002063707,0.0004038921,0.0002185094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001814938,0.0001787022,0.7637315,0.00009177624,0.000052822,0.000004173735,0.01596039,0.00001678229,0.000001965673,0.2106512,0.001405669,0.007886856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005815236,0.00008771581,0.5101033,0.00007161969,0.000009748552,0.000005837212,0.2464926,0.000001350071,0.00002880834,0.05198852,0.1903891,0.0002399885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7664742,0.0006575214,7.936e-7,0.2265277,0.000313297,0.00012182,0.000006652509,0.000006742222,0.00589125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966569,0.001239067,0.00005059398,0.001246104,0.0007265419,0.00000476741,1.281771e-7,0.000006014857,0.0000699135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2536282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169884127","doi":"10.1177/0261018311410529","title":"Making ‘care’ accessible: Personal assistance for disabled people and the politics of language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Transformative learning; Sociology; Disabled people; Disability studies; Public relations; Health care; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1511005744271678,"gpt":0.4770818836987734,"spread":0.3259813092716056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004196638,0.00006528131,0.0001668896,0.00003503923,0.0008884883,0.00004173428,0.0001450453,0.0001050655,0.00006958823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093161,0.00005208674,0.00005932477,0.0002369742,0.001159328,0.00008548983,0.00003192485,0.00009829334,0.000001273335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006973279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000313619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002141971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00228126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.0001593195,0.0001813955,0.0001125987,0.0002006849,0.0003374055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.0004001544,0.00004541464,0.00005302578,0.0002464231,0.00007250594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002012403,0.00001583483,0.0002669416,0.00009199492,0.000004396624,2.3454e-7,0.1771724,7.298372e-10,0.000002864041,0.8178228,0.0001715135,0.004430855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001619881,0.00006754876,0.02843443,0.00007672475,0.00005348304,9.945836e-7,0.6633579,0.00003444836,0.0000816796,0.2819051,0.02406202,0.0003057539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3803523,0.001603303,0.001198236,0.4330862,0.0004468976,0.0008550197,0.0002241218,0.0001323807,0.1821015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965588,0.0000302215,0.0002696002,0.001553315,0.001329055,0.00002943517,0.000001757014,0.000008379672,0.0002194442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6162065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6833624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972817143","doi":"10.1017/s000842391200100x","title":"Autism, Neurodiversity and the Welfare State: The Challenges of Accommodating Neurological Difference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychological intervention; Humanities; Autism; Civil society; Psychology; Psychiatry; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07908705485498611,"gpt":0.3256633955174013,"spread":0.2465763406624152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003840144,0.00005540005,0.0001250469,0.00007793555,0.001201823,0.00006231678,0.0006267026,0.00003830366,0.00004102436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002428609,0.00002936901,0.0000312091,0.0002838754,0.00480634,0.0002789371,0.00004992219,0.0003051165,0.00000108458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007086119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009546173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01504097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02762697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981694,0.0004086611,0.0002166482,0.00008072691,0.0004113865,0.0007132172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980755,0.0004565307,0.0001271993,0.0001053261,0.000223211,0.001012266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003181871,0.000004587204,0.009163144,0.000002908041,0.000001229643,0.000002406365,0.005264206,1.4755e-7,0.000002384972,0.9795085,0.00000966007,0.006037657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001273214,0.00004458231,0.972225,0.000009389543,0.000004994996,0.00002069893,0.01145389,0.00001568975,0.000005204068,0.0120365,0.004012414,0.00004434444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6703163,0.0004272688,0.00000908628,0.326876,0.0002411276,0.00005198056,0.000003778798,0.000002325025,0.002072127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983585,0.00008877719,0.00002118283,0.001419125,0.0001014086,4.266204e-7,2.354445e-8,0.000001532725,0.000008974978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.967472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140502023","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00242.x","title":"A Five‐Country Comparative Review of Accommodation Support Policies for Older People With Intellectual Disability","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Intellectual disability; Welfare; Policy development; Political science; Covenant; Social policy; Social Welfare; Economic growth; Disabled people; Identification (biology); Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08596001706992251,"gpt":0.4592282717914907,"spread":0.3732682547215682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00377069,0.000144925,0.0005008366,0.0001613413,0.0001920999,0.00005645382,0.0002080018,0.0001206665,0.0005930722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2164044,0.0001121014,0.00007605438,0.0006307098,0.001225432,0.0008481345,0.00003250832,0.0005264445,0.000002037732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001354614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002476951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01640451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976402,0.0006670561,0.0008676099,0.0001465657,0.00041423,0.0002643377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9036435,0.09360441,0.0007850577,0.0002110697,0.001593892,0.0001620512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007895944,0.0004770754,0.0008575131,0.001699927,0.00005932724,3.32215e-7,0.9113362,0.000001569807,0.00003071154,0.07137652,0.006676065,0.006695178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340188,0.000778582,0.001037125,0.0008950232,0.0000466057,0.00006285928,0.7754076,0.00001036199,0.00009478592,0.002473527,0.2185908,0.0001687183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805761,0.001512173,0.0001613224,0.1014704,0.0002653757,0.0007612581,0.00005039415,0.00001323644,0.01518977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878742,0.009517113,0.0005212231,0.001424739,0.0004418346,0.0000248264,0.000005612277,0.000008615685,0.0001818509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2126337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9154101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150097023","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2013.19497","title":"Organizing Healthcare Delivery Systems for Persons with Ongoing Care Needs and Their Families: A Best Practices Framework","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Best practice; Healthcare delivery; Health care; Nursing; Health care delivery; Business; Population; Quality (philosophy); Medicine; Public relations; Environmental health; Economic growth; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07080394692642943,"gpt":0.3550432284402357,"spread":0.2842392815138062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006857546,0.000334069,0.0004779033,0.0003107642,0.002012552,0.0004947854,0.0002733503,0.0004681485,0.0000205624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002318904,0.0002813693,0.00005981552,0.0008309906,0.0002246823,0.0007622707,0.00001693862,0.0005889301,0.00003063616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000391664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001591412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0937614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07111362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968706,0.0005882473,0.0005493365,0.0005509678,0.000463742,0.0009770858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955664,0.001047345,0.0006034668,0.0003780623,0.001816936,0.0005877762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004982375,0.00005238474,0.007793678,0.002736112,0.00005246257,0.000004341126,0.7345495,5.895687e-7,0.00001730073,0.06875592,0.0006619459,0.1853259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002650554,0.001469414,0.0004433313,0.0008029707,0.00001072626,0.0000113542,0.9079077,0.00005191985,0.00000232496,0.0003007564,0.08842109,0.0003133496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045543,0.0250768,0.00100971,0.2627489,0.001010512,0.003988636,0.0001298366,0.0004682465,0.001013103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924982,0.001856284,0.001377815,0.002551266,0.0009238941,0.0005310379,0.00002870521,0.00006735659,0.0001653996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.287944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104657853","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-52.5.348","title":"Identifying Good Group Homes: Qualitative Indicators Using a Quality of Life Framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual and developmental disabilities","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Qualitative research; Quality of life (healthcare); Intellectual disability; Psychology; Audit; Quality (philosophy); Participant observation; Gerontology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Psychiatry; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1921667851470511,"gpt":0.4402992236640676,"spread":0.2481324385170165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050903,0.00013678,0.0003063507,0.0001514815,0.0004518816,0.00005770947,0.0001456147,0.0001449253,0.0008753274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609874,0.0001283042,0.00005190096,0.0004757277,0.001231422,0.0001908322,0.000083198,0.0001732481,0.00002960474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001489805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00128414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001257428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975824,0.0008413579,0.000605244,0.0002483995,0.0004441593,0.0002784642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939038,0.005621679,0.0001221106,0.00008336532,0.0001025105,0.0001665311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002551511,0.00005278793,0.008661383,0.0001481838,0.00002577561,2.907071e-8,0.6326796,5.228978e-8,0.00004067396,0.352385,0.00008145963,0.005899526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001263793,0.00004765944,0.00296613,0.0001124731,0.000002887635,3.499828e-7,0.9484988,0.000006086578,0.0001019677,0.04169789,0.006246813,0.000192582],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831489,0.0002152942,0.004187065,0.0008081872,0.000199382,0.0001515556,0.0000104093,0.00005590808,0.01122329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944174,0.0001253327,0.004789045,0.0003049819,0.00007913587,0.00001269465,0.000005429686,0.000009758907,0.0002562062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3158192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980996533","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.011","title":"Managing under managed community care: the experiences of clients, providers and managers in Ontario’s competitive home care sector","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Health Sciences Centre; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Managed care; Competition (biology); Business; Government (linguistics); Stakeholder; Quality (philosophy); Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Public relations; Marketing; Health care; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08056239213683025,"gpt":0.3936918625897783,"spread":0.313129470452948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007174847,0.0001052312,0.0002018635,0.0002111131,0.001017477,0.00003815394,0.0002476225,0.00006810853,0.00001771912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005023177,0.00009080581,0.00002639646,0.0005081918,0.0005153805,0.0001345244,0.00006715116,0.0004496503,0.000001818906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001524071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001783617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8256308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9639381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980941,0.0007228528,0.0003163101,0.0001571054,0.0002877837,0.0004218416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992877,0.0001234189,0.0001552935,0.000204185,0.0000999764,0.000129384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006303375,0.00001758073,0.001699757,0.0001833626,0.000003805342,0.000001062164,0.7841461,0.00001314051,1.834886e-7,0.2095611,0.00001414379,0.004353452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003678439,0.00007170184,0.0530071,0.0001173796,0.00000125582,4.441007e-7,0.9334064,4.436559e-7,0.000002788713,0.002422418,0.0105217,0.00008059176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815756,0.0007544603,0.000012395,0.1032139,0.0001834623,0.0006299173,0.000003536014,0.00003638846,0.01359031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924314,0.0005597647,0.00005953266,0.006749882,0.00005315303,0.00004789029,0.000006230681,0.000008351313,0.00008378569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2071387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7825711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065872946","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2000.17348","title":"Home Care: It's Time for a Canadian Model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; General partnership; Legislation; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1680416371625747,"gpt":0.4253153560554017,"spread":0.257273718892827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002003622,0.001026535,0.002604549,0.001048157,0.00253898,0.0002498814,0.001249961,0.001456203,0.0007861227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004130267,0.001022492,0.0007726819,0.001726601,0.0001030457,0.0002043225,0.0001127993,0.00097442,0.002076778],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00732432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01618902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06151948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992047,0.0007996366,0.00172335,0.001597958,0.001032338,0.002799683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941755,0.0009474314,0.0005591738,0.001039819,0.0005310455,0.00274702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210408,0.00005465325,0.000001088623,0.002215109,0.00005418792,0.00001056769,0.01773483,0.000002450521,3.131e-8,0.004776674,0.5429587,0.4321396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004372573,0.0003959023,0.000001640457,0.00004721535,0.0001290483,0.000008405601,0.001114758,0.00009818513,4.124653e-8,0.00007855749,0.9966155,0.001073495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007099981,0.4027324,0.00002086914,0.5804875,0.0006139235,0.004247739,0.001154451,0.0002974756,0.01037463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001636182,0.5151054,0.0002519348,0.4764682,0.0001299936,0.001314551,0.0005313396,0.0001554387,0.006026733],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095763635","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00616.x","title":"A critical policy analysis of an emerging agenda for home care in one Canadian province","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health & Social Care in the Community","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Equity (law); Health care; Thematic analysis; Public policy; Politics; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Qualitative research; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1591660485814829,"gpt":0.4782676163668916,"spread":0.3191015677854087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00361119,0.00009840339,0.0003583446,0.0006032183,0.002086106,0.00004049977,0.000540364,0.000173413,0.00001205698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006292951,0.0001033844,0.0000872138,0.002298488,0.0002595006,0.0001124984,0.00002999722,0.0006381897,3.744454e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00225838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005816182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941997,0.004233466,0.0004897954,0.0001262622,0.0003385628,0.000612191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983488,0.0006199696,0.0001209791,0.0002790261,0.0005007383,0.0001304737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002570834,0.0001660992,0.008000337,0.000462749,0.00001393791,0.000002531463,0.695545,0.00000861497,6.565284e-7,0.2409009,0.0001463237,0.05472708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002765219,0.0001681206,0.176945,0.00005133722,0.00002206642,1.152158e-7,0.7958733,0.00002140891,0.000001309517,0.005480651,0.02100682,0.0001532456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8548027,0.001007062,0.000009573286,0.1381023,0.00009603729,0.000724509,0.0003393889,0.00002913688,0.004889359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956574,0.00006755727,0.0001200347,0.0036435,0.0002478992,0.00006148294,0.0001867174,0.000009787787,0.000005651066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2354203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143868845","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8462.2013.12032.x","title":"Development and Principles of the National Disability Insurance Scheme","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Economic Review","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Disability insurance; Commission; Actuarial science; Productivity; Scheme (mathematics); Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Finance; Social security; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2086208584057092,"gpt":0.3975573523990376,"spread":0.1889364939933284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007176434,0.00004265879,0.0001110652,0.000005222172,0.0001108161,0.00001187864,0.0001235401,0.00002827661,0.0005003095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001091731,0.00003137016,0.00002226104,0.00004842151,0.0002223412,0.0001093662,0.00002103404,0.00004696005,0.00006754528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001946827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001510301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007495445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.00006990886,0.0003110659,0.00009786127,0.00008433175,0.00009055674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996702,0.0000320678,0.0001255942,0.00007470163,0.00005794974,0.00003944944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.624338e-7,0.00004235313,0.4106166,0.001829716,0.00002470929,3.081578e-8,0.001852622,3.603321e-7,0.00001507717,0.4231495,0.005934787,0.1565336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002101456,9.306104e-7,0.3308544,0.0002093009,4.325994e-7,1.528354e-7,0.0001432438,3.384371e-7,0.00002266604,0.0002207184,0.6684948,0.00003195864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969918,0.001426318,1.062121e-7,0.09293977,0.00008532253,0.0004350223,0.000004169633,0.000008461282,0.008108981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909658,0.006552746,0.0004987631,0.00076205,0.00003816173,0.00003953595,8.492306e-7,0.000002058216,0.001140029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.66256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5478038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156970605","doi":"10.1002/nml.21187","title":"Social Return on Investment of an Innovative Employment Option for Persons with Developmental Disabilities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Management and Leadership","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Business; Return on investment; Quality (philosophy); Social capital; Process (computing); Labour economics; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4239691558215007,"gpt":0.3949027867445722,"spread":0.02906636907692844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007654935,0.0001051425,0.000126118,0.0001022263,0.0002670452,0.00003655469,0.00008850621,0.00006413517,0.00001267404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004207867,0.00009104029,0.00001491584,0.0002698737,0.0003267993,0.0001672776,0.00001580116,0.00007171214,0.000002429219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001959828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001051823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007049694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006865146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988853,0.0001085778,0.0001751884,0.0002090218,0.0003821247,0.0002397748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995587,0.00004473806,0.00008004079,0.00005855564,0.0001742809,0.00008372221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003154775,0.0001610526,0.004646013,0.0002112928,0.00007206205,0.000001088103,0.2515864,5.629792e-7,0.000004799726,0.7249605,0.002405887,0.01563487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035166,0.0006729445,0.003729065,0.00005854347,0.00001334973,2.508994e-7,0.9356323,0.00001215437,0.0001133231,0.002350709,0.056203,0.0001791857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253796,0.00005010687,0.0001727951,0.03673201,0.0001044636,0.001343911,0.000009299839,0.00007222107,0.03613553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925181,0.000005848251,0.001985061,0.001316221,0.0001369974,0.0001459495,0.00002722831,0.00001030063,0.003854306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7226098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3712515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979423479","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2019.1672111","title":"Social insurance literacy: a scoping review on how to define and measure it","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Försäkringskassan","keywords":"Health literacy; Dignity; Public relations; Literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Actuarial science; Business; Health care; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1738322262910381,"gpt":0.4864085650450802,"spread":0.3125763387540421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00297669,0.00025778,0.001119616,0.0000757497,0.0004518318,0.0001163891,0.0001262554,0.0003302233,0.00002149803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004384506,0.0002149075,0.0001783221,0.000565029,0.0005765847,0.0002183351,0.00003903981,0.0003175989,0.00002179047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002216875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003571274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004885798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007933747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966347,0.001455471,0.0005911911,0.0006155415,0.0004424199,0.0002607242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997015,0.002049833,0.0002422999,0.000254224,0.0003010731,0.0001375773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004856524,0.00004372706,0.0001078093,0.1806429,0.000007668843,8.162362e-8,0.005355797,6.462705e-9,1.172911e-8,0.006624802,0.0005423222,0.80667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007456193,0.0001199052,0.0004570369,0.2036473,0.00004267517,3.900686e-7,0.0007611167,1.048366e-7,4.981102e-9,0.0002569816,0.7944212,0.0002187304],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001984692,0.8239033,0.000003063323,0.1721396,0.0001540025,0.003056867,0.000040069,0.00003879053,0.0004658854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002858237,0.9952604,0.0001221498,0.001094474,0.0002250221,0.0003025883,0.00003095789,0.00001746081,0.0000887732],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8763674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025897052","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00434.x","title":"Impacts on practitioners of using research-based carer assessment tools: experiences from the UK, Canada and Sweden, with insights from Australia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health & Social Care in the Community","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Mandate; Psychological intervention; Agency (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Focus group; Health care; Social care; Nursing; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4331077102500774,"gpt":0.5218259507531413,"spread":0.08871824050306387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003218294,0.0001057187,0.0001999531,0.00004404792,0.003601021,0.00009741758,0.0003828433,0.0001036837,0.00004202879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006191476,0.00006811002,0.00001939934,0.0005607963,0.000715701,0.0001080104,0.00002649887,0.001219006,2.183848e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001386491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007322529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849061,0.01333615,0.0002927946,0.0001267423,0.001000317,0.0003378807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958503,0.003102553,0.0002175017,0.0002995031,0.0004266617,0.0001034428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005690188,0.00009159858,0.01967983,0.00004319836,0.00001319416,0.000004988588,0.9554415,0.000008025982,0.000007044419,0.02235006,0.001023851,0.001279848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002140729,0.0001220631,0.08844293,0.000114112,0.000002709201,1.319327e-7,0.9013962,0.000001339953,0.00001962285,0.0009719915,0.008640639,0.00007423085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720803,0.000395802,0.000002804294,0.0257573,0.0001516009,0.0004446617,0.00006689836,0.000007855805,0.001092746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965141,0.00008540953,0.0001113039,0.003111134,0.00009162987,0.00004146849,0.0000364521,0.000006489946,0.000001958646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06876311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114712646","doi":"10.3138/ijih.v1i1.28930","title":"Governed by Contracts: The Development of Indigenous Primary Health Services in Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Community health; Health care; Business; Economic growth; Primary care; Primary health care; Public administration; Political science; Medicine; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03482656409726749,"gpt":0.3481160020673075,"spread":0.3132894379700401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950373,0.00010863,0.0003076097,0.0001348956,0.0003078316,0.00004160122,0.0004615854,0.00005979499,0.00002054535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002593277,0.00008714404,0.00002539246,0.0001755363,0.00005344916,0.0001650251,0.00002180679,0.0003114447,0.000001343953],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005127485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04463648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970744,0.0001671137,0.001159655,0.0001156875,0.001082188,0.0004009558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978938,0.0001020114,0.001262369,0.00006724922,0.0003613362,0.0003132541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002063161,0.0003628703,0.08666034,0.0001844821,0.0001955341,0.00004359235,0.7558382,0.0000527365,0.00004392154,0.001911559,0.002118187,0.1523823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003172935,0.0004427619,0.5839057,0.0008779874,0.00000474977,0.00008924393,0.05445042,4.995345e-7,0.0001554871,0.001320335,0.3553152,0.0002646548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9311448,0.001864888,0.00004334831,0.06606594,0.0004737195,0.0002822049,0.00003492852,0.000003904956,0.00008624981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912581,0.002102179,0.0006198243,0.00566134,0.0001893773,0.000001657595,0.00001183847,0.000007653469,0.0001479869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7013878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057182687","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.028","title":"Managing competition in the countryside: Non-profit and for-profit perceptions of long-term care in rural Ontario","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Rural area; Health care; Managed care; Profit margin; Business; Qualitative research; Profit (economics); Service delivery framework; Rural health; Public relations; Economic growth; Public economics; Economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Service (business)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524948981152416,"gpt":0.380727422568412,"spread":0.3454779327568879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001785463,0.00006585424,0.0001477999,0.0001615187,0.0006461639,0.00002596511,0.000220983,0.00006068743,0.00005649047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005510476,0.00005124071,0.00001693787,0.0008442054,0.00149528,0.0001800969,0.0000147833,0.0001465227,6.28398e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004348822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004179434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09002271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7335014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986847,0.00007030664,0.0002522016,0.0001540367,0.0005480945,0.0002906535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995382,0.00007058676,0.00008285508,0.00006533605,0.0002090325,0.00003395584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005424375,0.000004118552,0.7130461,0.00003197684,4.525849e-7,0.000001448552,0.1994895,3.576225e-7,0.0001750542,0.07869837,0.00003676995,0.008510475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003308744,0.00003465405,0.8229116,0.00009326052,0.000003042087,3.928494e-7,0.1740082,0.000006155227,0.000004260079,0.002412136,0.0001457218,0.00004961903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589389,0.0001043527,0.00005624141,0.02782787,0.0001509494,0.0004176582,0.000002534369,0.000008893662,0.0124926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991389,0.00005817073,0.00001173881,0.0003693204,0.0002972757,0.00002910226,0.0000128624,0.000002680036,0.00007994554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6434788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9160369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068399282","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.020","title":"Access and authorisation in a Glocal e-Health Policy context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Health Sciences Centre; South Health Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Telehealth; Business; Health policy; Public relations; Knowledge management; Computer security; Health care; Political science; Computer science; Telemedicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09149512097243997,"gpt":0.5077353627731513,"spread":0.4162402418007114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002749122,0.00004948662,0.0001349125,0.0003669588,0.00006402973,0.0001053193,0.000455874,0.0001172479,0.00006724374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001598837,0.00004282383,0.00002556224,0.0002204691,0.0001431816,0.0006421635,0.00005208138,0.0003246375,0.000004326674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005214045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003023194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002267451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005545988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972525,0.00007392811,0.0008412439,0.00003013312,0.001656003,0.000146198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877,0.0001013213,0.0004193235,0.00003147821,0.0004156063,0.0002622764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658125,0.00005491112,0.001019488,0.00001917097,0.0000156979,0.00001400774,0.03949636,0.00001362603,1.457138e-7,0.5486663,0.0004717869,0.410212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008287646,0.000440101,0.01498538,0.002432511,0.000006269509,0.0003487513,0.1621176,0.001608004,0.00003875502,0.1124177,0.6969639,0.0003532746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2008089,0.000200003,0.01068239,0.7844468,0.0009637679,0.0000912283,0.000003170005,0.00001227134,0.002791436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853553,0.003094118,0.0005135784,0.0103996,0.000622249,9.419862e-7,0.000001669872,0.000002466924,0.00001005021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5363017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541991097","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2016.1249632","title":"Occupying disability: critical approaches to community, justice and decolonizing disability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disability studies; Sociology; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3692764514756142,"gpt":0.4300801632628226,"spread":0.06080371178720839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006644116,0.0002504284,0.0003829336,0.000007517052,0.00256926,0.0001543343,0.0004640168,0.0003113422,0.000170992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006686795,0.0002008177,0.0002100812,0.0004673956,0.007113296,0.0005947067,0.0003981151,0.0005296352,0.00002620868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001209046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001495109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001835034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01678358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955872,0.001816133,0.0005795371,0.0006401159,0.0005838286,0.0007932255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992407,0.005945747,0.0000674452,0.0008194594,0.000181969,0.0005784098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004257512,0.001525892,0.6099371,0.0007806433,0.00003524384,3.010794e-7,0.09406871,4.580461e-7,0.0000780698,0.1595911,0.0006477024,0.1332922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006464685,0.0001866769,0.4807683,0.0001680692,0.0001168914,0.000001740281,0.447606,0.00006608568,0.00007654118,0.04028264,0.0292197,0.0008608825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7851376,0.00006574547,0.0007381385,0.2117713,0.0002551111,0.000527276,0.00004637256,0.0002153753,0.001243098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958168,0.00008279645,0.001914392,0.001672839,0.0003504653,0.0001053942,0.000004838396,0.00002030662,0.00003215855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3535373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570478617","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12111","title":"A Proposed Framework for an Integrated Process of Improving Quality of Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Process management; Conceptual framework; Process (computing); Conceptual model; Congruence (geometry); Service (business); Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Quality of life (healthcare); Computer science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Operations management; Business; Management science; Sociology; Social psychology; Marketing; Economics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.315961062954997,"gpt":0.526256635762253,"spread":0.210295572807256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00695238,0.00008372311,0.0003468913,0.0002037397,0.00006946811,0.0000351293,0.0001715679,0.0001501759,0.00002653104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6706403,0.0000679478,0.00005023172,0.0004666736,0.000574038,0.000757168,0.00001487264,0.0003183928,2.319167e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003364691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004605238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002120438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972291,0.001146529,0.0009650447,0.00009466591,0.0003872765,0.0001774087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9485877,0.0471866,0.001124988,0.0001187445,0.002747352,0.0002346724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001944558,0.0003553987,0.00039688,0.000399831,0.00002579017,1.353868e-7,0.7787803,0.000006211424,0.0000555032,0.2038358,0.0001128836,0.01408662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003373994,0.001042192,0.00004656707,0.0001207732,0.000008495448,0.00000318285,0.9251474,0.00002493591,0.0002071119,0.06699646,0.005993493,0.00007198186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725236,0.000439271,0.001857914,0.02215175,0.0001592546,0.0002738769,0.00001479343,0.000007632819,0.002571856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996092,0.0002091901,0.003009473,0.0003217291,0.0003171341,0.000004566443,6.47222e-7,0.000006684482,0.00003862118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6636879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6961773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079148252","doi":"10.1258/135763306777889091","title":"Equity of access to health care. Evidence from NHS Direct in the UK","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Equity (law); Helpline; Medicine; Health care; Population; Socioeconomic status; Confidence interval; Telephone survey; Telemedicine; Service (business); Logistic regression; Family medicine; Geography; Business; Environmental health; Political science; Economic growth; Advertising; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1369073683132193,"gpt":0.4686503384528875,"spread":0.3317429701396681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995587,0.00006637003,0.0002760681,0.0001501595,0.0001262219,0.00003234024,0.0003584627,0.00004777231,0.00004885714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005272503,0.00004217323,0.00003389654,0.0005077897,0.00007812653,0.0001474072,0.00004072908,0.0002120038,3.680411e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001025592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004793276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01615129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06238872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982556,0.0002553747,0.000560793,0.00009261446,0.0006343265,0.0002013133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866,0.0003900909,0.0003327398,0.00009545787,0.00042527,0.00009639605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088509,0.00008999436,0.420988,0.0001888249,0.00002096163,0.00005650807,0.1282755,0.000007455882,0.0001498348,0.002042513,0.07230602,0.3757656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008057487,0.001052255,0.7012383,0.001645423,0.00002107957,0.000008710724,0.1394215,0.000001750971,0.0002790364,0.001282558,0.1540898,0.000153824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8238047,0.01205522,0.00004749902,0.1607978,0.000204121,0.0001974167,0.000007038802,0.000004877912,0.00288122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939652,0.002106169,0.0001524338,0.002962222,0.0007935814,0.000002067429,0.000001494394,0.000003202152,0.0000136446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3756118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069965742","doi":"10.1108/09534810610648861","title":"Implementing organizational change in health and social services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Business; Organizational change; Public relations; Health services; Knowledge management; Control (management); Service delivery framework; Health care; Service (business); Process management; Nursing; Marketing; Sociology; Management; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06782666736718018,"gpt":0.3606024845974893,"spread":0.2927758172303091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001355341,0.00009437036,0.0001676373,0.000368217,0.0004924061,0.00007783922,0.0001515568,0.00005420428,0.0002840626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001414059,0.00009876619,0.00001942619,0.0008799954,0.00003971487,0.0003594313,0.00008776231,0.0001024711,0.000004996579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002531719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001160648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005358313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004414147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998213,0.0001444876,0.000572418,0.0001269318,0.0006301632,0.0003129911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989339,0.0000298338,0.0004727852,0.00003785229,0.0004535345,0.0000721171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000935769,0.0001408381,0.1629494,0.0004162727,0.00002662567,0.00001688985,0.02975848,7.214863e-7,0.000004992037,0.7985023,0.0006341419,0.007539917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001470803,0.000107812,0.373374,0.0002706138,0.00001608926,0.00001306124,0.05502896,0.00004939581,0.000008726622,0.01161025,0.5577293,0.0003209502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3379001,0.004209121,0.0008127543,0.6460966,0.00122197,0.001646265,0.00004574048,0.0001136691,0.00795385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907137,0.0009646094,0.0007405856,0.005122657,0.00220582,0.000007508285,0.0000630141,0.00001827242,0.0001638325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4027568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556232922","doi":"10.1108/jhom-06-2016-0123","title":"The institutional logic of integrated care: an ethnography of patient transitions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Public Health Ontario; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; Women's College Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Public relations; General partnership; Originality; Health care; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Institutional logic; Nursing; Integrated care; Qualitative research; Business; Medicine; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05440668721938115,"gpt":0.3729169703181123,"spread":0.3185102830987312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008176839,0.00003871294,0.0001067861,0.0001065826,0.001217629,0.0000345047,0.0001418997,0.00003037326,0.00001757561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001046497,0.00002744732,0.00001894923,0.0002177735,0.000194239,0.0001530422,0.00001410068,0.00006856073,1.81459e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007609211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003533703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001629974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008457644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989973,0.0001563852,0.0004451177,0.00004819721,0.00026918,0.00008382169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982721,0.00001556634,0.000693279,0.00009649874,0.0008599982,0.00006255911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001594329,0.0001243531,0.002338768,0.0002053844,0.00003365928,0.000002013416,0.02468501,0.00001666006,0.00001032943,0.7854452,0.0003479007,0.1867748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451129,0.001142846,0.1063155,0.0003571264,0.00004921751,0.000009113521,0.3455732,0.000020876,0.0001788301,0.006089514,0.5386266,0.0001859953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5796302,0.005147323,0.01749955,0.3898386,0.001790787,0.001045218,0.00002876399,0.00003158665,0.004987942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914,0.007506312,0.0005819989,0.0004649855,0.00002692647,7.642744e-7,0.000004537453,0.000002674212,0.0000117978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7793556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9365144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}