{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1362,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1362,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"c93a3ed20ee6","filters":{"topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety"}},"results":[{"id":"W2281090488","doi":"10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089","title":"Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":861,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Automation; Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Data science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02216887487897287,"gpt":0.3721118092001512,"spread":0.3499429343211784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007515586,0.0003082815,0.003359802,0.0003585519,0.00007162496,0.00003111667,0.0006395401,0.00029215,0.0004731958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128623,0.0001704245,0.000931353,0.0006248376,0.000148958,0.0002290993,0.00007305747,0.0009620948,0.00008170043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005486638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004587616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000239543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002068489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911838,0.002482525,0.004595836,0.00008331531,0.001441797,0.0002127638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723327,0.002089106,0.02454551,0.0003729967,0.0004405788,0.0002191753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006241417,0.00007590807,0.0001561752,0.8733403,0.001963046,0.000003131641,0.002383387,4.614976e-8,3.88145e-8,0.0006164255,0.02047043,0.1009849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004603679,0.0003812085,0.0002254701,0.922169,0.005883598,0.0003888987,0.0004611835,0.00005725017,5.020351e-7,0.00006768115,0.06959591,0.0003089097],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002290444,0.9946435,0.0001709592,0.0002477399,0.001903088,0.001107332,0.0000293724,0.00002794141,0.001641014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009531325,0.9984419,0.0001630207,0.0009290322,0.0001567557,0.00004895558,0.00001394378,0.00002391576,0.0001272114],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.100676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002894033","doi":"10.1518/155534308x284417","title":"Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":672,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Workload; Computer science; Cognitive ergonomics; Situation awareness; Automation; Cognition; Empirical research; Knowledge management; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive science; Psychology; Data science; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02626231158913042,"gpt":0.3443212428714839,"spread":0.3180589312823534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003994859,0.0001928782,0.0003404083,0.0006684166,0.0001154494,0.00006104862,0.00005611507,0.0001186148,0.0004440957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007881269,0.0001897313,0.00006302432,0.0003156001,0.00004614139,0.0004015337,0.00003103787,0.0003596299,0.00001303226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005997411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005433633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002730102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002082996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998508,0.00004897067,0.0007343218,0.0002019883,0.0003025253,0.0002041844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979028,0.001295133,0.000305087,0.00005564016,0.0003293297,0.0001120136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003830971,0.0007537004,0.2520425,0.000184867,0.00107731,0.002696522,0.05121936,0.01329653,0.002592789,0.001702988,0.001828683,0.6687737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004933283,0.0002332402,0.8882194,0.003277779,0.00006583241,0.004125684,0.002889785,0.09498972,0.0001642837,0.0001907982,0.0005098597,0.0004003131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745799,0.0004323943,0.1236089,0.0000393593,0.0007090879,0.0001317341,0.00001095874,0.00004296847,0.0004446798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996258,0.0001176077,0.003346111,0.00008671062,0.0001266664,0.000005618898,0.000006861825,0.00002097824,0.0000314879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6683734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7737017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018292842","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009","title":"A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":636,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence; Canadian Automobile Association","keywords":"Moderation; Phone; Distraction; Poison control; Distracted driving; Mobile phone; Human multitasking; Speed limit; Legislation; Headway; Human factors and ergonomics; Applied psychology; Engineering; Psychology; Simulation; Transport engineering; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Telecommunications; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08398898694774522,"gpt":0.4026119876639207,"spread":0.3186230007161755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004169201,0.0004001643,0.003873878,0.002109937,0.0001149344,0.00001673599,0.0005842255,0.0002624768,0.0118847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004316377,0.00025423,0.0152378,0.004323089,0.00005903245,0.00011985,0.00008218424,0.0003078935,0.0002511506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000840899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004639175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008742826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002955337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955937,0.00142105,0.001670725,0.0005157882,0.0006129064,0.0001858243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994821,0.0005523994,0.003097729,0.00129819,0.0001866817,0.00004403223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001824936,0.0007180393,0.001866041,0.0007103584,0.9282945,0.000002698759,0.0009251061,0.0002563139,0.000003935956,0.0001529397,0.001255099,0.06579673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001671841,0.00007127498,0.01660455,0.0002600826,0.9340022,0.000001920254,0.00002458668,0.00008838587,0.00005940288,0.000006595636,0.04848892,0.0002248723],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006866605,0.9877634,0.0004014091,0.000012062,0.0006130669,0.0009503357,0.000005689517,0.00003603141,0.003351411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1599706,0.8196192,0.00002318494,0.00002467986,0.00003271541,0.0002040224,0.0002033598,0.0000232075,0.01989895],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1681441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983561474","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013","title":"An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":517,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Distraction; Task (project management); Cognition; Poison control; Telematics; Driving simulator; Visual search; Intersection (aeronautics); Human factors and ergonomics; Transport engineering; Engineering; Simulation; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02137023259595652,"gpt":0.4345922505148442,"spread":0.4132220179188877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002987905,0.0001461796,0.0002373246,0.000469456,0.0001594252,0.00006420666,0.00007130389,0.00008213104,0.004263823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001118884,0.0001457996,0.0002001275,0.0003469309,0.00003200741,0.0004352412,0.00001320588,0.0001606452,0.00005840621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009610422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001636248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002477082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008026876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985487,0.0002096818,0.0004579488,0.0003226196,0.0003112169,0.0001497672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.00008339038,0.0004678596,0.0001895773,0.0001196887,0.00005701958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246082,0.001329349,0.9677366,0.00000221125,0.000490296,0.000005233002,0.000363597,0.0002682006,0.0004815511,0.0008409838,0.0000685292,0.02828884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006492258,0.0006618813,0.9939701,0.00005858631,0.001022435,0.00000450444,0.0006839125,0.002405981,0.000366722,0.00002140227,0.00002180633,0.0001334351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910249,0.000007774857,0.001969392,0.00002857677,0.0001930824,0.0002134934,0.000001847491,0.00004608162,0.006514902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986221,0.00001067106,0.00003876204,0.0000369308,0.0000885031,0.00004616655,0.0003412145,0.00001009756,0.0008055062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02815541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163520596","doi":"10.1518/0018720024494829","title":"Ecological Interface Design: Progress and Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":452,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Variety (cybernetics); Interface (matter); Computer science; Novelty; Fidelity; Process (computing); Control (management); Systems engineering; Information system; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Engineering management; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2048874243386351,"gpt":0.3888449518656584,"spread":0.1839575275270232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166453,0.0007547837,0.001672865,0.0001179526,0.001269841,0.0002225192,0.001081005,0.0006446599,0.001205711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003662116,0.0003626551,0.001311746,0.0000936947,0.000751248,0.0001896503,0.0003615488,0.001834234,0.00001785787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000306631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005225998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001105141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000138734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996237,0.00121122,0.001446567,0.0003954425,0.0002623584,0.0004473627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958631,0.000887079,0.002330472,0.0006008435,0.000107867,0.000210636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003123798,0.004094242,0.005716825,0.01317069,0.02218727,0.00002883295,0.3573407,0.00005460106,0.00002546528,0.01939905,0.1864316,0.3912383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006059253,0.0004562055,0.01668045,0.001436848,0.001308934,0.0001959459,0.006169135,0.000008620937,0.000003085151,0.0002407776,0.9722377,0.0006563594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0820918,0.9150954,0.00002299098,0.0001260495,0.001564729,0.0006594955,0.00003000424,0.00004334107,0.000366119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0771474,0.920898,0.00002565422,0.00005211602,0.000364102,0.00001226305,0.00000586279,0.0000774132,0.001417185],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7858061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075606589","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.005","title":"A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":448,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Typing; Poison control; Computer science; Headway; Text messaging; Distracted driving; Simulation; Speech recognition; Medicine; Medical emergency; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09977650002868796,"gpt":0.4564166699183464,"spread":0.3566401698896584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001555589,0.0003842362,0.004862865,0.002385469,0.0001058535,0.00003591323,0.0006173453,0.0002697878,0.01154821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003421944,0.0002459511,0.01891002,0.004289055,0.0000378305,0.00008377833,0.0001090707,0.0003388821,0.0001304351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008726061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003120702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001078794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001127728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937353,0.002794492,0.002128934,0.0005563896,0.0005875369,0.0001973252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923641,0.001560674,0.004430935,0.00142419,0.0001735332,0.00004658446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000354347,0.000211651,0.001179251,0.0004646529,0.8583309,7.375683e-7,0.000324602,0.0001523124,0.000001295382,0.001285506,0.000261227,0.1377843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009442317,0.00004086462,0.006934556,0.000579483,0.9486522,7.268238e-7,0.00002927844,0.0001379887,0.000005068643,0.00004396465,0.04329439,0.0001870507],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009346794,0.9867716,0.005462932,0.00003428998,0.0007590983,0.001182131,0.000002950116,0.00005922207,0.004793132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4345986,0.5373817,0.00008824478,0.00008531528,0.0001508259,0.0005664167,0.0004370896,0.00007845774,0.0266134],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4493899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934625602","doi":"10.1109/tvt.2019.2908425","title":"Driver Activity Recognition for Intelligent Vehicles: A Deep Learning Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Convolutional neural network; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Transfer of learning; Distraction; Binary classification; Mobile phone; Distracted driving; Computer vision; Pattern recognition (psychology); Support vector machine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02625567819256382,"gpt":0.3027488113791426,"spread":0.2764931331865788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002423892,0.0002467753,0.0003090488,0.0007188134,0.0002736021,0.00002906009,0.0002168849,0.000570898,0.002615334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001430704,0.000257712,0.0002599093,0.0004315885,0.0001070039,0.0001486958,0.000002427022,0.0009097158,0.003167908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002049425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001808607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001400366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983453,0.0001572448,0.0003345607,0.0006059574,0.0001695733,0.0003873764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989836,0.0001550852,0.0001630888,0.0004639926,0.0001664676,0.00006780084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00111255,0.002212203,0.0003551461,0.000112163,0.0007477219,0.00001100632,0.002591054,0.01773407,0.01709,0.003444127,0.0003300996,0.9542599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01816838,0.008027976,0.005265906,0.0004205496,0.0009587448,0.0009864923,0.02558402,0.3413496,0.3424146,0.007293884,0.2449676,0.004562339],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4081834,0.00001825946,0.5864609,0.0002916996,0.0009248178,0.0006976171,0.00001238322,0.0006209057,0.002790026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933356,0.00002154676,0.001741764,0.0001770402,0.00004087966,0.0007345774,0.00002022422,0.00005141658,0.00387696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795538447","doi":"10.1145/3173574.3174003","title":"Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Pedestrian; Situation awareness; Gesture; Gaze; Schema crosswalk; Modalities; Nonverbal communication; Wheelchair; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Transport engineering; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07437192028025248,"gpt":0.4142177868236257,"spread":0.3398458665433732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002484609,0.00008911476,0.0001206969,0.0001503714,0.000133895,0.00004738129,0.000126706,0.00006911883,0.005854545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005207327,0.00008440932,0.00002481445,0.0001088281,0.0000836331,0.000162677,0.00006697646,0.0002052862,0.0007298248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000769839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001606016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002099782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991051,0.0001662225,0.0003339964,0.0001908693,0.00005512688,0.0001486604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993417,0.0001336685,0.00009579425,0.0003118833,0.00006595554,0.00005104157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007486519,0.001095927,0.3435558,0.00005127912,0.0001803906,0.00002007477,0.07897963,0.00002007005,0.003148745,0.0837935,0.01413705,0.4742689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002898122,0.0003627437,0.7716003,0.000138285,0.00001441399,0.0001340955,0.02447363,0.0267632,0.0008573241,0.0006393497,0.1716631,0.000455375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8159569,0.00001915058,0.0007141677,0.001151378,0.0008652333,0.0001162542,0.000001148101,0.000129961,0.1810458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996233,0.000005324709,0.0002337084,0.0006427593,0.00009041718,0.00002823363,0.000007208062,0.00001042154,0.002748854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4738135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801188116","doi":"10.1155/2018/5382192","title":"Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles: Results from a Large Cross-National Questionnaire Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Per capita; Technology acceptance model; Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer-assisted web interviewing; Computer science; Usability; Marketing; Medicine; Business; Environmental health; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02194797941102168,"gpt":0.3935481741947734,"spread":0.3716001947837517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004587624,0.0001130297,0.0002332167,0.0001712224,0.0001027231,0.0000182281,0.0001622477,0.00007238497,0.0007430057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001093692,0.0001072881,0.0001138047,0.0001986886,0.00007566489,0.0006318164,0.000001950048,0.0001966014,0.000044861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006647316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007114644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002954388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003103047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997939,0.0001024665,0.001157844,0.0001851356,0.0004907282,0.0001248261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969291,0.0001146382,0.001189573,0.0001472826,0.001556253,0.00006314333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01960905,0.0069621,0.5462075,0.00005347123,0.001142044,0.0001463728,0.355255,0.01247037,0.009917349,0.0142233,0.003625664,0.03038782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005495427,0.0004703923,0.9848962,0.00009542765,0.00003412612,0.000004042329,0.00566434,0.00004052174,0.0004822131,0.0008224317,0.001899814,0.00009500329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909228,0.00004592206,0.005913545,0.0001211596,0.001699085,0.0001603429,0.000205407,0.00002538114,0.0009063311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980589,0.000008186711,0.00112376,0.00008622064,0.0003963297,0.000005956852,0.00005049635,0.00001310036,0.0002570715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4386888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8135391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134026309","doi":"10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8","title":"Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"AI and Ethics","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":311,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Social acceptance; Liability; Business; Speculation; Public relations; Marketing; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2744034006745851,"gpt":0.4896083591822357,"spread":0.2152049585076505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004768124,0.0002262159,0.001153693,0.0001018577,0.0001163328,0.00004817083,0.0001100525,0.0005583394,0.003222116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001981162,0.0001972515,0.0002019791,0.0001783499,0.0001662044,0.00009990609,0.00006779165,0.001284978,0.0001204598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003587526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002026077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001616791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008208559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.0007939919,0.0006550674,0.0003651967,0.0001541702,0.0001485768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982689,0.0005779847,0.0003871773,0.000332752,0.0003500027,0.00008317324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010339,0.00002873921,0.000004431849,0.03390476,0.0001147303,0.000004516053,0.001629773,9.454821e-9,1.501732e-7,0.00757756,0.009396541,0.9473377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009961476,0.00002881504,0.0001673792,0.0207832,0.0002356626,0.0001502742,0.0003819506,0.000003308287,1.289069e-8,0.00004527961,0.9779374,0.0001670853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009316164,0.9927462,0.00008652989,0.00239328,0.0004657948,0.0003447319,0.00003387344,0.00004056162,0.003879728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008390289,0.9937845,0.00006819155,0.004468603,0.00008241861,0.00005947116,0.0001238594,0.00002256272,0.001306517],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072551431","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.042","title":"Using near infrared spectroscopy and heart rate variability to detect mental overload","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Brain Research","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Direction Générale de l’Armement; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science","keywords":"Workload; Task (project management); Heart rate variability; Psychology; Prefrontal cortex; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Heart rate; Engineering; Neuroscience; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1479755370660784,"gpt":0.4788079715415655,"spread":0.330832434475487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987952,0.0001480754,0.0001925224,0.0002070661,0.0004888002,0.0003259213,0.000181816,0.0001198561,0.02467051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003977694,0.0001415288,0.00006196258,0.000344787,0.0002028795,0.0002596707,0.0001658454,0.0005355101,0.002209511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002394898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006899266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003273051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005539509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968825,0.00133541,0.0003275589,0.0004645914,0.0003908626,0.0005990999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984406,0.0005436928,0.0000391022,0.0004379594,0.0002143431,0.0003242775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004729702,0.0003486568,0.1124764,0.00002689034,0.00006966385,0.00002876275,0.009996265,0.000006772958,0.5600912,0.001311468,0.3078237,0.007347185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006959408,0.0002794595,0.9817346,0.00001875506,0.000004279552,0.00004181451,0.0007346828,0.0008441751,0.00270403,0.0007043681,0.01204113,0.0001968045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876986,0.00001275921,0.0001861322,0.004268619,0.0004029433,0.001015048,0.00002457938,0.00008800325,0.00630339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892777,8.589324e-7,0.003693046,0.0008376082,0.00007625896,0.0001421779,0.00001205495,0.00002523965,0.005935094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003369003","doi":"10.1145/3313831.3376242","title":"Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Horizon 2020; RMIT University; University of Auckland; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; European Commission; University of Chicago","keywords":"Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Data science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1106246221921953,"gpt":0.4066010531512254,"spread":0.2959764309590301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006116101,0.00007399954,0.00009294874,0.00003636566,0.00008093229,0.00005186912,0.00008340834,0.00005484325,0.02552589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001232882,0.00006348447,0.00007509698,0.00005604265,0.00001187615,0.0001291641,0.00001122921,0.00008032385,0.00230328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001465879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005432855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000168902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001781255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994016,0.00003682535,0.0002180486,0.0001825977,0.00005819035,0.0001027142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996523,0.00005790826,0.00005251107,0.0001093567,0.00006521719,0.00006265684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006816052,0.00007073129,0.00007228822,0.0000094484,0.00004703204,0.000001371174,0.006931841,0.00001232352,0.001997237,0.4273603,0.4872177,0.07621153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001889153,0.0005515611,0.007998425,0.00001076925,0.00001890881,0.000007005707,0.002853255,0.0268923,0.001124203,0.001338228,0.957028,0.0002882155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01766778,0.00000695916,0.7841501,0.006937354,0.001267805,0.0003639077,0.000006303454,0.0003825939,0.1892172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723202,3.397184e-7,0.003406037,0.009958245,0.0007037006,0.00006349802,0.00005013369,0.00001342674,0.01348443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092724257","doi":"10.1518/001872000779656651","title":"There Is More to Monitoring a Nuclear Power Plant than Meets the Eye","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Nuclear power plant; Control room; Cognition; Process (computing); Human–computer interaction; Context (archaeology); Interface (matter); Control (management); Focus (optics); ALARM; Cognitive load; Salient; User interface; Nuclear power; Adaptation (eye); Situation awareness; Field (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03277294315134185,"gpt":0.3168132635206747,"spread":0.2840403203693329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006197822,0.0003787777,0.0003946983,0.00005402728,0.002108657,0.000236493,0.00109439,0.0001797269,0.005792794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001246782,0.0001787412,0.000703187,0.0001142657,0.0002635277,0.000210436,0.0001453792,0.0009282736,0.00006298153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000192129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002646442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002285975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003091344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980101,0.0002710776,0.0007316541,0.0002405329,0.0003383933,0.0004082603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982767,0.0001993137,0.0005667008,0.0006809971,0.00008607114,0.0001902704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004390005,0.0004182058,0.1933909,0.00002392783,0.002048064,0.000004163146,0.6586336,0.0002064131,0.004277823,0.004492162,0.1356147,0.0004510318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005241408,0.0001554142,0.8421935,0.00006642779,0.0001161041,0.00002184977,0.0351171,0.00001352153,0.0002656745,0.0001551862,0.121094,0.0002770419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944075,0.0001333282,0.000003076103,0.001244313,0.001247903,0.0002540458,0.00005403228,0.00003806472,0.002617727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993564,0.00008691628,0.0000102346,0.0009174419,0.0003766145,0.000002694204,0.00000261142,0.00005769604,0.004981818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044879289","doi":"10.1007/s00464-012-2268-6","title":"Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surgical Endoscopy","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Workload; Medicine; Eye tracking; Task (project management); Correlation; Audiology; Physical therapy; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0374329968106339,"gpt":0.4080655506735271,"spread":0.3706325538628932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005179309,0.0001190803,0.0002584738,0.0001181865,0.00007995364,0.00001504145,0.00005385122,0.0001599714,0.01294479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003530021,0.0001070369,0.00007890079,0.000150272,0.00007734838,0.0001627033,0.00002958646,0.000270489,0.0002634422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003296546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000191571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005955254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002062314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998691,0.0002477265,0.0004318666,0.000171223,0.000199594,0.0002586114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986923,0.0007241065,0.0001752589,0.0001939437,0.00005468654,0.0001597576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000906451,0.0002077226,0.9411259,0.00001454377,0.00009719518,0.000006080517,0.0007349126,0.000006829606,0.0000271518,0.04678893,0.002242478,0.008657599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002757668,0.00007043426,0.9011743,0.00004622558,0.00003364803,0.00002235691,0.0002340235,0.0001797168,0.00006492907,0.0002324259,0.09503475,0.0001495336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8148124,0.0003594064,0.001535702,0.0002349175,0.001452399,0.0001733622,0.00002011057,0.00008948658,0.1813222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970111,0.00003805544,0.0003131212,0.00005372701,0.0002001191,0.00002309717,0.00003484135,0.00001209442,0.002313878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1821987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162920521","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199","title":"Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nanyang Technological University; National Research Foundation Singapore","keywords":"Autonomy; Control (management); Key (lock); Engineering; Computer science; Knowledge management; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1678386770511578,"gpt":0.4871111802937806,"spread":0.3192725032426227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006974603,0.0002431555,0.00039888,0.0004571603,0.0008704714,0.0001359591,0.0002639015,0.0002080993,0.002968458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003711906,0.0002478157,0.00007080015,0.001892683,0.0004250691,0.0003084148,0.00003086621,0.0006659993,0.0001541658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001387003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003623173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003533115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970852,0.0004971394,0.0006466208,0.0007453287,0.0005614061,0.0004643804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997359,0.0002188218,0.00019522,0.0005569944,0.001592653,0.00007727551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001358131,0.00135418,0.009731944,0.00118809,0.0008019592,0.0004890619,0.06223631,0.00009127176,0.01485269,0.6159815,0.288177,0.004960207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003945143,0.0010776,0.1305465,0.003255497,0.0002011727,0.00001834018,0.6205773,0.0003642797,0.01382181,0.003732575,0.221129,0.001330839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725592,0.02024907,0.0001664211,0.07241935,0.0005810763,0.002360906,0.0002553154,0.009344343,0.02206435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928188,0.003815192,0.0002481183,0.0001784961,0.00003662226,0.0004846744,0.0002142296,0.00003390576,0.00216998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784830018","doi":"10.1177/0018720817748145","title":"Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence; Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Phone; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Psychology; Medicine; Communication; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1221549491712973,"gpt":0.3998420654069962,"spread":0.2776871162356989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778553,0.0007934867,0.005648976,0.0002544202,0.001087709,0.000137623,0.0007008702,0.0002123853,0.0007677623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003047713,0.0002639439,0.00269851,0.0003301818,0.0004079921,0.0003173671,0.0001767101,0.0007776032,0.000001964253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002537242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005726392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002825013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006920598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955374,0.001388126,0.002017933,0.0003946943,0.0003550352,0.0003068387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993202,0.0007332591,0.00493461,0.0008067544,0.000193813,0.0001295643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558626,0.001015916,0.0007855574,0.2083565,0.6649747,0.000004333599,0.1203373,0.00002676901,0.0000811552,0.0002021061,0.00397552,0.00008421103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000749002,0.001190009,0.001204493,0.02534616,0.9385114,0.00005257419,0.02703855,0.00002112217,0.0001433651,0.000006236568,0.00461805,0.001119003],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.449924,0.548724,0.000002849993,0.000008843497,0.000324177,0.0009193121,0.00004987487,0.00001797037,0.00002894992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4716126,0.5273282,0.00001312,0.0001184247,0.00009510513,0.00003312304,0.00002982722,0.00007302208,0.0006965672],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2735367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031317277","doi":"10.1177/0018720813510735","title":"Failure to Detect Critical Auditory Alerts in the Cockpit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"ALARM; Cockpit; False alarm; Aeronautics; Inattentional blindness; Aviation; Warning system; Psychology; Computer science; Audiology; Engineering; Perception; Medicine; Telecommunications; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03207274748897186,"gpt":0.322848692567154,"spread":0.2907759450781821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009473394,0.0003236179,0.0003864802,0.00009117289,0.001204013,0.0002499063,0.001043596,0.0001999888,0.002491906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006427,0.0001551138,0.0005275268,0.0001378679,0.0003462725,0.0002956001,0.0001496646,0.001135962,0.0000636686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000213801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003909266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003070552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003222097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976344,0.0005846866,0.0008262336,0.0002153342,0.0003203295,0.0004190608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977957,0.0008679368,0.0004485432,0.0005682238,0.0001490762,0.0001705296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008542366,0.0003474189,0.07899818,0.00004036257,0.0005142356,0.000003125032,0.2115421,0.0001399949,0.006216712,0.006542899,0.6952038,0.0003657532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005179594,0.0001808661,0.9429479,0.00004568485,0.00007447227,0.0000338194,0.02908547,0.00001448301,0.0001854515,0.001488495,0.02516896,0.0002564493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953544,0.00005858519,0.00008246688,0.001733936,0.001688792,0.0003528351,0.00001219898,0.00002081307,0.0006959565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972348,0.00001423478,0.00002794351,0.001382408,0.0005282119,0.00001108483,0.000002533169,0.00003181435,0.0007670347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308044468","doi":"10.1561/2300000078","title":"Social Interactions for Autonomous Driving: A Review and Perspectives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Foundations and Trends in Robotics","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Process (computing); Social relation; Human interaction; Computer science; Human behavior; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2082339637601713,"gpt":0.4974960088086899,"spread":0.2892620450485186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000218668,0.0002528735,0.0008314517,0.0006108736,0.0005170811,0.00008958216,0.0001115279,0.0001067247,0.009214648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007609889,0.0002527672,0.0002456572,0.0004295835,0.00008855738,0.0001146893,0.00007378453,0.0004589049,0.00002651747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002271608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006046465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000144428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001237186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984796,0.0002111899,0.0006223714,0.0004231866,0.00007488919,0.0001887746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988976,0.00046208,0.0003399396,0.000202492,0.00004655016,0.00005133381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001707594,0.0001510093,0.000002830594,0.001694949,0.0001882235,0.000001690122,0.001764668,0.000002435293,1.753333e-9,0.08511138,0.009235298,0.9018458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002016939,0.00003961776,0.0001614953,0.0007863629,0.0007728939,0.00008117245,0.0006561594,0.00005999421,3.41294e-10,0.0001751836,0.9968393,0.0002260961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[3.044599e-7,0.9765522,0.0008842755,0.00157029,0.0007223637,0.0004959605,0.0001026499,0.00006795373,0.01960394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005694765,0.9814602,0.000650585,0.00008942152,0.0001579749,0.0008703459,0.0006328124,0.00004022686,0.01604147],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.987604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142530516","doi":"10.1177/0018720809338842","title":"Trust and Reliance on an Automated Combat Identification System","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Identification (biology); Computer science; Automation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Imperfect; Response bias; Computer security; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03523478497936647,"gpt":0.3345553924361179,"spread":0.2993206074567514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008451176,0.0002856014,0.0003608498,0.00007872818,0.001470129,0.0002177732,0.0004929766,0.000173825,0.0001277668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000187892,0.0001627515,0.0002816799,0.00009633966,0.0002087746,0.0003145732,0.0000419617,0.0005824341,0.000009322885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002447072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002250072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006159882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001930443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981156,0.000346559,0.0008200247,0.0002285815,0.0002254245,0.0002637883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979888,0.0001381889,0.001082827,0.0005155355,0.000117034,0.0001576516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001124569,0.002381005,0.2408906,0.0002546135,0.002344306,0.000008402802,0.3573399,0.001269394,0.07678276,0.1548396,0.160737,0.00202784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006959821,0.0002961348,0.9837341,0.0000698496,0.00009725666,0.00003167185,0.01227794,0.0005591213,0.0004771982,0.000248307,0.001306564,0.0002058253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977694,0.00008538255,0.00003106619,0.0001767943,0.001066653,0.000202159,0.00002031003,0.0001212405,0.0005269952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985998,0.00003783803,0.000009686218,0.000273705,0.000177183,0.000001354688,0.00001101679,0.0000244099,0.0008650156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7428436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047958607","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.006","title":"Cognitive failures as predictors of driving errors, lapses, and violations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Impulsivity; Cognition; Poison control; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Sample (material); Alexithymia; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02265730762539594,"gpt":0.3621113891208974,"spread":0.3394540814955015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002240551,0.000113907,0.0002484514,0.0005337616,0.0001864942,0.00001927679,0.00007862561,0.00008288984,0.009240289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001176264,0.0001162239,0.0002558123,0.0005583378,0.00006097365,0.0002996374,0.0000338931,0.0001078514,0.0001318306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002617577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002044804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002954288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002402527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.0002361846,0.0004936882,0.0002583396,0.0002191191,0.0001267425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999083,0.0001456537,0.0003587634,0.0001820565,0.0001680315,0.00006253235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002264279,0.0001343923,0.9918364,0.000001054541,0.001673806,0.000003484843,0.002831804,0.00003504582,0.0001121036,0.001136543,0.0009671495,0.001245586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004099593,0.00005970647,0.9951807,0.00002972665,0.001093817,0.00001371121,0.001505617,0.0002939345,0.0001523033,0.0003028052,0.0008530456,0.0001047055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985663,0.0001397444,0.007965732,0.0001234626,0.0001843016,0.0001744006,0.000001270838,0.00006699251,0.00568111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935864,0.00006956702,0.00009425275,0.00003355871,0.00005951447,0.00003422186,0.0001784282,0.000009081725,0.005934992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009108459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991803919","doi":"10.1518/001872008x312305","title":"Evaluation of Ecological Interface Design for Nuclear Process Control: Situation Awareness Effects","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Situation awareness; Interface (matter); Process (computing); Control room; Nuclear power plant; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Control (management); Nuclear power; User interface; Operator (biology); Scope (computer science); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09467359578539986,"gpt":0.3680502822026045,"spread":0.2733766864172046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267119,0.0002380334,0.0004330037,0.00005895849,0.001217022,0.00004134702,0.000455368,0.0001861454,0.0003562933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001807806,0.000133356,0.0004600153,0.00007100036,0.0002946867,0.0002170165,0.000044088,0.0003709621,0.000002521234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002440852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009317526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002697024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001392708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976863,0.0007913606,0.000744886,0.0001730117,0.0003910312,0.0002134365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970241,0.0007661914,0.001265834,0.0002629913,0.0006043157,0.00007662086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002869589,0.003751787,0.1791616,0.0004634179,0.007232187,0.000001744168,0.6356194,0.05125023,0.06548387,0.008137464,0.04476604,0.001262641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004600997,0.0008782903,0.971382,0.00007638054,0.0008984112,0.00003055205,0.01051696,0.00417447,0.004422022,0.002331946,0.0003713119,0.0003166401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952138,0.00008420234,0.002984479,0.00005914805,0.000831264,0.0007004627,0.00001359272,0.00002093426,0.00009211239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996053,0.00001748854,0.00002994637,0.00008624406,0.0001228656,0.000009304412,0.000004565921,0.00002884499,0.00009546107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7922204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070177757","doi":"10.1145/2696454.2696492","title":"OPTIMo","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Supervisor; Computer science; Inference; Robot; Moment (physics); Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic logic; Range (aeronautics); Human–robot interaction; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1161729420709032,"gpt":0.4385319933323678,"spread":0.3223590512614646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009660669,0.00002990351,0.00003654678,0.00003037764,0.00001502288,0.00001028926,0.00004470035,0.00002619077,0.0657183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001478338,0.0000247292,0.00001814536,0.00003533205,0.000009245097,0.00004449324,0.000007181079,0.00004052654,0.02997458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001376053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008294944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004113271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008694356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996995,0.00003057185,0.00008282722,0.00006809114,0.00005429949,0.00006472955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997439,0.00001458475,0.00001622487,0.0001185392,0.0000400953,0.00006659207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800142,0.00004961648,0.0009374744,3.683238e-7,0.00001393392,0.000004158584,0.002283406,0.000006725658,0.00001093281,0.2109184,0.7783798,0.007377206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004135731,0.00003125195,0.0092534,7.817109e-7,0.00000165328,0.00001843193,0.00173509,0.0002317582,0.00002671508,0.0004263454,0.9878063,0.00005474743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.015753,0.000008510644,0.003922126,0.0009371629,0.001288392,0.00003017071,5.150219e-7,0.0001653963,0.9778947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7442384,1.597654e-7,0.0005359642,0.0009139826,0.00006740892,0.00000686761,0.000002494498,0.000003751835,0.254231],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7284854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773835648","doi":"10.1109/smc.2017.8122757","title":"Trust in autonomous vehicles: The case of Tesla Autopilot and Summon","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autopilot; Automation; Computer science; Business; Aeronautics; Computer security; Engineering; Control engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04364019963798791,"gpt":0.3845519078061354,"spread":0.3409117081681474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002244677,0.00006041976,0.0001024483,0.0000502335,0.0001708266,0.0000443988,0.0001287288,0.00004923428,0.003049074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005034249,0.00004104387,0.00002521254,0.0000206668,0.0001173998,0.00008788014,0.00003604185,0.0001083217,0.0001137659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001419388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001112827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002647249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001207857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994714,0.00006280279,0.000211784,0.0001241901,0.00003330682,0.00009648554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993057,0.0001046857,0.000118137,0.0004213061,0.00002273187,0.0000274166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001602179,0.0004227363,0.102792,0.00003511468,0.00009264119,0.0007922466,0.02082087,0.000009944511,0.0004820188,0.6888919,0.02121361,0.1642867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001344706,0.00009707767,0.9596525,0.00001655388,0.00001071518,0.0005941571,0.004564743,0.003121643,0.0002692584,0.001205179,0.02899366,0.0001297933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399906,0.00002076374,0.00002848451,0.001363051,0.0002622181,0.00009349846,0.000003654799,0.00002678663,0.258211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810241,0.000003064817,0.00004505775,0.0002472391,0.0000311028,0.00001271792,7.109405e-7,0.000005361178,0.01863058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123440107","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.004","title":"The emotional side of cognitive distraction: Implications for road safety","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distraction; Recall; Arousal; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Emotional valence; Surprise; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Poison control; Driving simulator; Task (project management); Social psychology; Simulation; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04151389527655606,"gpt":0.4230572690451707,"spread":0.3815433737686146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007753085,0.0001068089,0.000187877,0.0001785888,0.00041863,0.00003526733,0.0001316095,0.0000724369,0.003681172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001880251,0.00008879777,0.0005582577,0.0004635214,0.00004777983,0.0003472059,0.00002158046,0.00009412819,0.0001662722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002026255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985828,0.00021645,0.0006446315,0.0001885134,0.0001598659,0.0002077301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981535,0.0006262364,0.0005467252,0.0002810065,0.0003273956,0.00006513194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004175854,0.001110906,0.684589,0.000003822089,0.006696364,1.150302e-7,0.002062158,0.0001169165,0.0002797038,0.1254457,0.005125237,0.1741526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038311,0.00002951518,0.9908862,0.00001226054,0.001201852,0.000004015806,0.001103401,0.0001211109,0.00006662885,0.001440298,0.004663074,0.0000886007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4487978,0.0005432695,0.5104302,0.003573782,0.001699564,0.001275603,0.0000350281,0.0001335823,0.0335112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911788,0.00003114371,0.0001110855,0.00004851825,0.0002338377,0.0002367177,0.0006489891,0.000009203836,0.007501721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.542381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198415016","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.015","title":"Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Meta-analysis; Distraction; Mobile phone; Odds; Poison control; Applied psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Event (particle physics); Mobile device; Random digit dialing; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Logistic regression; World Wide Web; Cognitive psychology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1174501226338825,"gpt":0.4728164439675435,"spread":0.355366321333661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008456332,0.0009061809,0.01323803,0.002307295,0.0002193536,0.0001565336,0.0004685427,0.0004332762,0.005280291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003791452,0.000628944,0.005695507,0.005815078,0.00008162846,0.0003124837,0.0001351366,0.0009145603,0.0003800041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001302928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002451961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009189487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828553,0.01024509,0.00401156,0.00124229,0.001165514,0.0004802787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916762,0.002019326,0.003854823,0.001248656,0.0009702203,0.0002307983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001681017,0.0005193824,0.0002499332,0.04865087,0.9475516,0.00005511141,0.0009070667,0.00006479744,2.147664e-8,0.0001377227,0.000663368,0.001183282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003319733,0.00006124011,0.0002501453,0.01959584,0.9764166,0.00001653738,0.0004565645,0.00007410042,2.625901e-8,0.0001006195,0.002103867,0.0005925254],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001906685,0.9948431,0.001765307,0.0001119289,0.0001395832,0.002685713,0.00001826443,0.00009285335,0.000324227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04411187,0.9458034,0.00005435933,0.0001174703,0.00002665394,0.001603428,0.0009671166,0.00006114746,0.007254523],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04903963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140725864","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.006","title":"Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Mobile phone; Hands free; Mobile device; SAFER; Mobile phone tracking; Internet privacy; Poison control; GSM services; Computer science; Computer security; Human–computer interaction; Mobile technology; Telecommunications; Medical emergency; Medicine; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2370968251424572,"gpt":0.530157039297292,"spread":0.2930602141548348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361238,0.0005752788,0.002586636,0.002241951,0.0004769572,0.0002360784,0.002048342,0.0008755731,0.04482342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000754446,0.0004312797,0.001779967,0.001457625,0.0002457023,0.0003224333,0.0002724784,0.005074883,0.008350965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001071203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005809072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003109511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909999,0.002303733,0.002872651,0.0005712542,0.002245038,0.001007416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934196,0.001510964,0.001524244,0.001433144,0.001538833,0.0005731953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005617423,0.0004468816,0.000003079856,0.0007728863,0.0006714669,0.000277626,0.00136844,2.48428e-7,8.373742e-7,0.0005168464,0.401868,0.593512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003193255,0.0006967662,0.0001793995,0.008464577,0.0002201171,0.001855608,0.0003243653,0.000002847709,0.000003043303,0.000447852,0.9842424,0.0003697543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001538537,0.9018964,0.0001204021,0.002336241,0.001859422,0.0006285035,0.00009954474,0.00004099759,0.09300308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009915404,0.9313083,0.0001288437,0.000294442,0.002151782,0.0000334542,0.00002693707,0.00009608406,0.06586098],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5931422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011493139","doi":"10.1177/1071181312561483","title":"Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cruise control; Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Focus (optics); Human–machine system; Human–computer interaction; Control (management); Automation; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05136252691955629,"gpt":0.3279819495375023,"spread":0.276619422617946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000744117,0.0002773862,0.0003240894,0.00006367971,0.001405584,0.0001127618,0.0002318826,0.000206458,0.0001393136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009151069,0.0002144146,0.0001982859,0.0001150489,0.0002898661,0.0005967024,0.0002287346,0.0003117974,0.000005313414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008380911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001036403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000199306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005836785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985371,0.00003617401,0.0005049573,0.0002892872,0.000141829,0.0004906103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989395,0.0001526622,0.000477389,0.0001150548,0.0001593925,0.0001560189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002648627,0.0002806565,0.6902032,0.0001219925,0.0004169254,4.437573e-8,0.2039513,0.00001716655,0.02359367,0.03653805,0.04474533,0.0001051837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004962124,0.0000925811,0.9213745,0.0001190813,0.0001068784,0.000006636134,0.06860127,0.0005281967,0.003705073,0.0003994449,0.004131013,0.0004391205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996284,0.0002173333,0.00001654974,0.0001269412,0.0004423845,0.0002428196,0.00001910289,0.0002903308,0.002360532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982757,0.00003063285,0.0004335449,0.0000638857,0.0001881962,0.00001375154,0.000006111681,0.00003532471,0.0009528625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2311713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077076237","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.002","title":"Communication and team situation awareness in the OR: Implications for augmentative information display","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Carleton University","funders":"Canadian Patient Safety Institute","keywords":"Teamwork; Computer science; Information flow; Quality (philosophy); Augmentative and alternative communication; Patient safety; Construct (python library); Knowledge management; Psychology; Health care","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03787372171361084,"gpt":0.42556907580012,"spread":0.3876953540865092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323984,0.00007406733,0.0001334627,0.0002552162,0.0001594489,0.00008872795,0.0002500429,0.0001060361,0.0001958517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003802221,0.00004423424,0.000044545,0.0002055589,0.0001309102,0.001023889,0.00002109261,0.0003617116,0.00002222675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003396304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008483999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001224197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004935644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.00007566464,0.001026095,0.00002694978,0.0001929813,0.0001045059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980053,0.0007308084,0.0007633642,0.0001860827,0.0002489641,0.00006552643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007013689,0.000945876,0.006137015,0.0002022841,0.0001972677,8.281631e-7,0.399015,0.00003057793,0.000429946,0.1537447,0.1333804,0.3052146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005667177,0.000744495,0.3507325,0.0001276757,0.00009382403,0.0007291483,0.09175985,0.01305976,0.0000484327,0.0067898,0.5299691,0.0002782641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7491506,0.00002707972,0.2207433,0.01773195,0.001622226,0.001067662,0.0001153156,0.00003352024,0.009508287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930177,0.00003482296,0.005241201,0.001408632,0.00007943895,0.00005484357,0.0001128214,0.00000363589,0.00004692213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2144438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927275098","doi":"10.1609/aimag.v40i1.2842","title":"No AI Is an Island: The Case for Teaming Intelligence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AI Magazine","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ames Research Center; School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; McGill University","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Counterintuitive; Computer science; Collective intelligence; Artificial intelligence, situated approach; Applications of artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Intelligent decision support system; Intelligent agent; Intelligence cycle; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Psychology; Military intelligence; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03014411124090115,"gpt":0.3762520100143326,"spread":0.3461078987734314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002354063,0.0001003751,0.0001101283,0.00005335579,0.0001123862,0.00005002851,0.0001561469,0.00006174695,0.03671603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003403864,0.00007195468,0.00006524907,0.00007491399,0.00002836319,0.0001678251,0.00002225505,0.0001749556,0.02101453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001886923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001277058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007793507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001945836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992318,0.0000642845,0.0002304358,0.000226561,0.00006710424,0.0001798696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991463,0.0001608989,0.00006976126,0.0004399411,0.0001370298,0.0000460435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002664805,0.0002598215,0.001175955,0.0000449283,0.0001171287,0.0001112685,0.01509465,0.00004651021,0.0008379074,0.04613969,0.8608744,0.07503121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003766911,0.0002273675,0.001255708,0.00001081244,0.00001431145,0.0004920146,0.0008993367,0.01123337,0.0001402717,0.0007908236,0.984414,0.0001452266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3090234,0.0001293124,0.08141844,0.02575197,0.01108285,0.002250037,0.0002200044,0.0005068404,0.5696171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8680345,0.000002280121,0.0001439636,0.01475526,0.0002628629,0.00005030409,0.00002021429,0.00001789135,0.1167127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5590111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912065207","doi":"10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792","title":"Human–Vehicle Cooperation in Automated Driving: A Multidisciplinary Review and Appraisal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Automation; SAFER; Multidisciplinary approach; Workload; Human–robot interaction; Computer science; Unintended consequences; Key (lock); Human–machine system; Risk analysis (engineering); Situation awareness; Knowledge management; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Robot; Computer security; Business; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08072899178077947,"gpt":0.4990356235899193,"spread":0.4183066318091399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008550326,0.0005310765,0.001719501,0.001457047,0.0001171896,0.0002673529,0.0007341222,0.0003463189,0.00242109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007664878,0.0004714626,0.0005980418,0.0002439949,0.00006443512,0.0009814006,0.000214985,0.001385466,0.0004927636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005589689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001212333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000399546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003162128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950603,0.0007403493,0.002833391,0.0005471717,0.0005456842,0.0002730812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956602,0.0004243156,0.002712718,0.0003441829,0.0007366377,0.0001219366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110183,0.002032605,0.0002623191,0.01024952,0.003489365,0.000739962,0.003468544,0.0001759225,0.00007237402,0.003761792,0.09886575,0.8767708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001999787,0.0005775525,0.00216558,0.05277596,0.0008510538,0.003905407,0.0001487493,0.002162399,0.000002072947,0.00003322163,0.9346155,0.0007627293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001853872,0.9742333,0.0006558343,0.0005022806,0.0182406,0.001183067,0.0000320551,0.0002378684,0.003061125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01221587,0.9817231,0.0003646745,0.000460911,0.002624299,0.00009929307,0.0003641287,0.000138897,0.002008843],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569836025","doi":"10.1145/3003715.3005465","title":"Autonomous Driving in the Real World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autopilot; Automation; Computer science; Self driving; Computer security; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Transport engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0327200527865394,"gpt":0.3729250700411455,"spread":0.3402050172546061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002336495,0.00004676171,0.00005291782,0.00009215276,0.00003703533,0.00001570471,0.0001230589,0.00002401733,0.04720115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592156,0.00002249666,0.00002912892,0.00009178593,0.00002023733,0.00006533725,0.00001013391,0.00006413808,0.004353223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003690436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008112144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001986655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994336,0.0001145557,0.0001632475,0.0001082208,0.0000613512,0.0001190773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994807,0.0002489286,0.00003261214,0.000207921,0.00001141774,0.00001839267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001897303,0.0001228705,0.06234207,0.000001063633,0.0000176493,0.00001693819,0.007164028,8.21657e-7,0.0002697463,0.7297037,0.119527,0.08081514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003239192,0.00001218946,0.6886438,0.000008052962,0.000001302373,0.000005453446,0.0006301662,0.00002270585,0.00002178677,0.0006199983,0.3096548,0.00005583378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.112186,0.000001685308,0.0007264821,0.006547755,0.0005168347,0.00006718253,5.504781e-7,0.00009296043,0.8798605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8414857,0.000001348751,0.00004008898,0.0009861563,0.00007602771,0.00002133924,4.642537e-7,0.000004026483,0.1573848],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7292997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032349706","doi":"10.1518/0018720054679515","title":"Effects of Voice Technology on Test Track Driving Performance: Implications for Driver Distraction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"Transport Canada; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Distraction; Task (project management); Interface (matter); Phone; Driving simulator; Computer science; Track (disk drive); Cognition; Human–computer interaction; Simulation; Engineering; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02277300555706485,"gpt":0.3140733631821755,"spread":0.2913003576251107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003637367,0.0002404443,0.0003308395,0.0001089523,0.001114149,0.00004455146,0.0004768612,0.0002016913,0.000109396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007006971,0.0001433114,0.0004400726,0.0001124198,0.0002790119,0.0002373801,0.00005568141,0.0006007036,0.000005776893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002226629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002851808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001220058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002985079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986842,0.0000772238,0.0006964942,0.0001719785,0.0001239447,0.0002461094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974373,0.0008592741,0.001114186,0.0003587672,0.0001574976,0.00007295241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000193817,0.001803993,0.7503681,0.0002093077,0.001188324,1.876706e-7,0.04377199,0.0008463607,0.1578943,0.01334834,0.02721941,0.003155888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008051305,0.0003186132,0.9817665,0.00005953168,0.0001573574,0.00001122598,0.00197465,0.00006065772,0.008124815,0.0002785999,0.006284909,0.0001580506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981382,0.00004604586,0.0001876509,0.0004573614,0.0005659285,0.0003404136,0.0000242824,0.00003067667,0.0002094045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988075,0.00006257635,0.00003848593,0.0001027878,0.0002464015,0.000009543465,0.00000640427,0.00002859156,0.0006977263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2313984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8569249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182999971","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-374518-7.00001-8","title":"Human Factors in Aviation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Aeronautics; Engineering; Air traffic control; Aviation engineering; Commercial aviation; Operations research; Civil aviation; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03144468411487376,"gpt":0.3371195981186813,"spread":0.3056749140038075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001997586,0.0003380796,0.0003926585,0.0004199949,0.0001220245,0.00003998363,0.0002187927,0.0007377476,0.03908718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001200943,0.0003349277,0.0002024615,0.00001077932,0.00008115883,0.00004738376,0.00003807274,0.001229641,0.003338953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003202937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005630352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005247497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984221,0.00005152055,0.0006473574,0.0004250341,0.000224306,0.0002297216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988676,0.00005478243,0.0003669729,0.0005479722,0.00007268344,0.00008999349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001769126,0.00004609698,0.000392027,0.00003331859,0.0001255419,0.00003698461,0.00678885,1.877067e-7,0.0003388143,0.2578128,0.001128262,0.7332794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003485293,0.00003292826,0.008620321,0.00008662789,0.00002306877,0.000006638537,0.00004563686,5.603274e-7,0.00002953187,0.01002971,0.980445,0.0003314923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00294615,0.00003312136,0.000003543861,0.00004947628,0.002373671,0.0003917298,0.00002513741,0.0001430409,0.9940341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06096581,0.000001751657,0.00002395741,0.000282079,0.0003406687,0.00003993745,0.0001045915,0.00007556081,0.9381657],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965576908","doi":"10.3141/1843-01","title":"Driver Distraction: Evaluation with Event Detection Paradigm","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Michigan; Ford Motor Company","keywords":"Distraction; Heading (navigation); Phone; Driving simulator; Distracted driving; Computer science; Task (project management); Control (management); Simulation; Applied psychology; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1171936401350322,"gpt":0.4603821690314111,"spread":0.343188528896379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007622494,0.0002750584,0.000379258,0.00103178,0.0009454503,0.0001522757,0.0005644254,0.000232534,0.008229327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002205265,0.0001996035,0.0003718201,0.001993527,0.000494619,0.0008448979,0.000002361146,0.002430333,0.0002139452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005859211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006577105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002743392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02990531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887249,0.003794653,0.001486255,0.0005004223,0.004713403,0.0007803014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929892,0.0009217372,0.0007303536,0.0006083106,0.004374264,0.0003761174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01907229,0.005117618,0.5435086,0.0005897222,0.002978252,0.0006798002,0.04637026,0.01812537,0.01397328,0.1536456,0.04150482,0.1544344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002876515,0.0008719894,0.9095119,0.000170507,0.0001142566,0.000008531778,0.005113061,0.0001648978,0.001578887,0.003292356,0.07606754,0.0002295825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977102,0.0001487047,0.01338422,0.002077827,0.002046099,0.001531448,0.00002712635,0.00004854306,0.003634051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967986,0.0001173474,0.0003603577,0.00005112071,0.0002072653,0.000246947,0.00001948257,0.00005530473,0.002143601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3660033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280545668","doi":"10.3758/s13423-022-02117-w","title":"Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Bern","keywords":"Peripheral vision; Vision science; Distraction; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Computer vision","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06979638048889483,"gpt":0.4454571569159053,"spread":0.3756607764270105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004407861,0.001175542,0.00856772,0.000632122,0.0001846979,0.00008458502,0.001492466,0.0002727432,0.3528272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003275105,0.0009905836,0.002313562,0.001211116,0.00007263507,0.00007309705,0.0002043578,0.001788813,0.03155281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001308063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001929967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001598317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005575126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857348,0.005605159,0.005879605,0.001576442,0.0004807716,0.0007232673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992882,0.0009071775,0.003203908,0.002700893,0.00006210008,0.0002439607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003871479,0.0001260096,1.697895e-7,0.545096,0.000151784,0.00002128146,0.00003653696,4.178141e-8,1.349515e-9,0.0004952227,0.3039451,0.1501239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001611499,0.00003170221,0.000001357332,0.4761233,0.00116773,0.0001381677,0.00001208311,3.971715e-7,2.465702e-10,0.000003653888,0.5219159,0.0004445543],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[2.199625e-8,0.8702814,0.000005460921,0.001751472,0.003105515,0.009463852,0.00006592194,0.0002143335,0.115112],"genre_scores_gemma":[1.069608e-7,0.9431773,0.00007012381,0.009166772,0.0002387871,0.01187793,0.000449575,0.0002079642,0.03481146],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058033010","doi":"10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00029-4","title":"Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Transport Canada","keywords":"Distraction; Distracted driving; Poison control; Applied psychology; Engineering; Cognition; Driving simulator; Human factors and ergonomics; Active listening; Computer security; Simulation; Psychology; Transport engineering; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Medicine; Medical emergency","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394940008577974,"gpt":0.5122548202597926,"spread":0.3727608194019952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002643647,0.000103894,0.0002369278,0.0003618134,0.0002961298,0.00006273597,0.0004719239,0.0001003607,0.04972641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001024922,0.00006283337,0.0003359787,0.0005167198,0.0001703142,0.0003747712,0.00005046187,0.001249559,0.0004911546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002922259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000609677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000265096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005531059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972248,0.0005953839,0.0008184651,0.000135248,0.0009222435,0.0003038524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956036,0.002392661,0.0005881773,0.0003372956,0.000973573,0.0001046999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004913544,0.00183558,0.02180542,0.00002500926,0.0009519732,0.0002213019,0.02083126,0.005298716,0.006130209,0.005399375,0.4666064,0.4659812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001125115,0.0007542609,0.9612064,0.0002571787,0.00001583593,0.0006774582,0.003397126,0.00251633,0.00006499323,0.001447272,0.02841293,0.0001250677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852785,0.000679505,0.004335838,0.001852401,0.001229737,0.0002310546,0.00001347356,0.0000178133,0.1063617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972584,0.0001979235,0.0001862761,0.00002685322,0.0003730213,0.000002412731,5.534056e-7,0.0000142574,0.001940342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.939401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975063250","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.014","title":"Texting while driving: Is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mobile device; Text entry; Distraction; Mobile phone; Distracted driving; Phone; Task (project management); Computer science; Text messaging; Speech recognition; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Telecommunications; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0252573198396524,"gpt":0.3416178975027476,"spread":0.3163605776630952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00114797,0.0003537271,0.0005719294,0.0008871891,0.0004068609,0.0002878263,0.0004419967,0.0002558401,0.05595602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001463175,0.0003606719,0.0009908695,0.001067216,0.0000505887,0.0004268698,0.00008748728,0.0003728398,0.003554273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001527284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003412589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005174504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004758938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963693,0.0007598462,0.001053515,0.0007988674,0.0005215075,0.0004969854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975042,0.0002809578,0.0008707153,0.0009448816,0.0002155282,0.0001837215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000960186,0.0007181385,0.8544453,0.000009576287,0.002256849,0.000007953624,0.002012157,0.0006486395,0.0005396042,0.00177972,0.02653488,0.1109511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00273537,0.0001825086,0.9035446,0.0001976324,0.003185372,0.00001274103,0.002255786,0.03181029,0.003537037,0.001201105,0.05042729,0.0009102327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638471,0.0001237634,0.07401614,0.0013422,0.001088082,0.0004305056,0.000002081187,0.0003491665,0.05880098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574511,0.00002360376,0.0003200678,0.0005557165,0.000398957,0.00007521886,0.0002571238,0.00003915139,0.04087906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1100409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102836856","doi":"10.1518/hfes.46.4.674.56817","title":"Age Differences in Visual Search for Traffic Signs During a Simulated Conversation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distraction; Visual search; Conversation; Task (project management); Clutter; Psychology; Sign (mathematics); Audiology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication; Medicine; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06030890231323385,"gpt":0.3423226655077946,"spread":0.2820137631945607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005581422,0.0002448916,0.0003755935,0.0001098267,0.0008738362,0.0001168418,0.0003846568,0.0001650146,0.0002642825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001892665,0.0001438105,0.0004338003,0.0001078939,0.0002331402,0.0002062807,0.00006066858,0.000597802,0.000002945611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003525229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004833712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001644445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001657767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984046,0.0002020652,0.0007069207,0.0001808975,0.0001961922,0.0003093858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988031,0.0003004242,0.0005123639,0.0001997247,0.00008964357,0.00009477619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007736994,0.001072364,0.2659836,0.0001313798,0.001265627,0.000004797263,0.6687399,0.02104082,0.03609477,0.003871392,0.0009102721,0.0001114838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003135914,0.0003136836,0.9610938,0.00006517307,0.00007828329,0.000008290448,0.03285073,0.000259694,0.001509788,0.0003290995,0.0001088484,0.0002467273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987375,0.00003196066,0.00009233896,0.0001234504,0.0005947879,0.0003389971,0.00001457142,0.00002358767,0.00004286951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994006,0.00001946385,0.000007833581,0.00006658412,0.000142632,0.000002326845,0.000009664412,0.00002636976,0.0003245719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6951102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.672093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009031626","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.014","title":"The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Poison control; Session (web analytics); Driving simulator; Simulation; Task (project management); Aeronautics; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Pedestrian; Applied psychology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Psychology; Engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science; Medicine; Medical emergency","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007152309681404566,"gpt":0.3523953670113235,"spread":0.3452430573299189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204608,0.0001067471,0.0001645275,0.0002934504,0.0002197743,0.00003968285,0.0001528044,0.00005413984,0.0006647442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016777,0.00007428903,0.0001830649,0.0006364128,0.00003020037,0.0002953405,0.00001712094,0.0001605642,0.0001641191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006423755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001150439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005504353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986444,0.0002194932,0.0004112833,0.0002024536,0.0003396477,0.0001827202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978099,0.001100791,0.0005381203,0.0003667473,0.0001429572,0.00004151476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001654995,0.0009894144,0.7476029,0.00001641846,0.009813106,0.00002881428,0.008385187,0.001244368,0.0008621745,0.01553318,0.002643333,0.2112261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005569437,0.0003514856,0.9895192,0.00006474818,0.001160089,0.000006698875,0.001558517,0.0004087187,0.001606182,0.00002675215,0.004629348,0.0001113024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572888,0.00006460791,0.01739212,0.0001648782,0.0003891394,0.0002238134,3.011546e-8,0.00004475917,0.02443187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922594,0.0000466519,0.0001251422,0.00009866514,0.00005583531,0.0000231054,0.00001030165,0.000009197446,0.007371641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2419163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7278484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137723194","doi":"10.1518/001872000779656471","title":"Putting It All Together: Improving Display Integration in Ecological Displays","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Abstraction; Hierarchy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Space (punctuation); Task (project management); Fault (geology); Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Information integration; Distributed computing; Real-time computing; Systems engineering; Data mining; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03757497459164957,"gpt":0.3213122441390133,"spread":0.2837372695473637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082938,0.0003187669,0.0004022778,0.00006873445,0.0008977117,0.0001609477,0.0005982411,0.0002347364,0.003327294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004178898,0.0001690928,0.000604305,0.00009949705,0.0002299232,0.0003243134,0.00009344402,0.001083882,0.0000163557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003084299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002773729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002843152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004665412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977794,0.0004100924,0.0009989785,0.0002331044,0.0002076859,0.000370738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983371,0.000394339,0.0007459866,0.0003450471,0.00006130394,0.0001162077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005142569,0.001652795,0.4896952,0.00006964211,0.001274386,0.000008937895,0.4206311,0.001493514,0.02205731,0.01444856,0.0380412,0.01011308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001091839,0.0002185455,0.9735281,0.00007193279,0.0001276435,0.00003196015,0.01587118,0.0004448761,0.0002633499,0.001125395,0.006910997,0.0003141342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973348,0.0000560082,0.00007088948,0.0003391303,0.0007045541,0.0002089718,0.00001359423,0.00002326028,0.001248764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970195,0.00005364376,0.0000431365,0.000528076,0.0002153989,0.000003608624,0.00001095326,0.00002926381,0.002096456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.483833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147337000","doi":"10.1093/ije/dys180","title":"Cell phone use and traffic crash risk: a culpability analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Crash; Phone; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medicine; Odds ratio; Occupational safety and health; Human factors and ergonomics; Distraction; Demography; Odds; Computer security; Medical emergency; Psychology; Logistic regression; Criminology; Computer science; Internal medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07829355459924428,"gpt":0.424325277134542,"spread":0.3460317225352977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003752111,0.0001357746,0.0005033216,0.0005374391,0.00005503079,0.00002006143,0.000255785,0.000148188,0.006948758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211432,0.0001114709,0.0003696446,0.0001603302,0.0001399549,0.0004270704,0.00004234505,0.0004451078,0.0001872883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001034131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002181604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001172534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003066397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966292,0.001549358,0.001192191,0.0001805506,0.0001756987,0.0002729576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940222,0.003850794,0.001253998,0.000190042,0.0004597449,0.0002232577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000257658,0.0004629429,0.9623297,0.000002593867,0.002059101,0.00001321459,0.002107193,0.0009669812,0.00005903918,0.003036862,0.02167678,0.007027876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007235761,0.00006304669,0.9524271,0.000005495284,0.0002835634,0.0002225386,0.0002894883,0.0008428902,0.00001575575,0.0004037185,0.04461954,0.0001032784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805145,0.0006056675,0.01217193,0.001437789,0.003521953,0.00005092136,0.00003483514,0.00002017016,0.001642195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950091,0.0001896855,0.002301038,0.001173829,0.0006645535,0.000003947512,0.00001455632,0.000008976299,0.0006343595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02294276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007199021","doi":"10.3141/1779-04","title":"Model for Situation Awareness and Driving: Application to Analysis and Research for Intelligent Transportation Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"Transport Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Aviation; Intelligent transportation system; Context (archaeology); Perception; Situation awareness; Systems engineering; Human–computer interaction; Transport engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1950363031300633,"gpt":0.4987282336847111,"spread":0.3036919305546478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009798476,0.000287981,0.0006195334,0.00311629,0.001376082,0.0002818325,0.0006433019,0.0002986864,0.0001243926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003177158,0.0002466001,0.0003883288,0.003403762,0.0004050148,0.0005965465,0.000005899518,0.001179132,0.00001294316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003015188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003510636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006354392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07525983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927737,0.001153561,0.001855805,0.0007863428,0.002486047,0.0009445819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880228,0.002819031,0.0005089779,0.0005424306,0.007549684,0.0005570772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01197756,0.001226874,0.6588714,0.001013239,0.00225415,0.00002942492,0.07629444,0.0838341,0.008387873,0.08684216,0.01378995,0.05547883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002063858,0.0008732049,0.8856348,0.0002081716,0.0003418781,0.000001176764,0.01084883,0.07158374,0.000278029,0.005006367,0.02283751,0.0003223751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5970324,0.0001198388,0.3965411,0.002938214,0.0003172744,0.002847158,0.0001282587,0.00002887024,0.000046976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924615,0.0004899867,0.002776974,0.00005338893,0.0002267522,0.001764548,0.0001716258,0.00006751732,0.001987718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3954291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285495920","doi":"10.1080/10447318.2022.2093863","title":"A Situation Awareness Perspective on Human-AI Interaction: Tensions and Opportunities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Knowledge management; Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Management science; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1421170300286056,"gpt":0.4598871427270815,"spread":0.3177701126984759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005765599,0.0002776717,0.0003471879,0.001390195,0.0007250745,0.0002835937,0.0004796299,0.00007913314,0.01021938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004024706,0.000282596,0.0002794998,0.0001183303,0.00008474666,0.001041066,0.0001992965,0.001130212,0.00008340053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001132565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008326847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000226886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003720701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969199,0.0005109747,0.001062278,0.0003943287,0.0009002738,0.0002122836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966865,0.0002955181,0.001168861,0.000242369,0.001475121,0.0001316947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004263216,0.005364627,0.002003795,0.00003106595,0.004196282,0.002044376,0.07868712,0.01173802,0.008503099,0.5516124,0.2533883,0.07816768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01477863,0.01128826,0.07919057,0.0009791893,0.0004987721,0.02627507,0.1758561,0.01662847,0.001889684,0.02096547,0.6492102,0.002439578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145687,0.00009854116,0.009356814,0.0156613,0.03008312,0.0003530465,0.00005710578,0.0001732497,0.02964816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916202,0.00001565526,0.0001036214,0.003557113,0.002042902,0.00004550693,0.00007163761,0.00003737754,0.002505939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5306469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037208234","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.012","title":"Physiological responses to simulated and on-road driving","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Université de Moncton","funders":"Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Lakehead University","keywords":"Psychology; Transport engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07826911843362395,"gpt":0.41931393090146,"spread":0.3410448124678361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002112334,0.0001378015,0.0002460119,0.0003923848,0.00004641618,0.00001735385,0.0003804666,0.0001091464,0.005277973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002303863,0.0001088781,0.000118808,0.00008270738,0.00008154556,0.000101381,0.00004777439,0.0002863455,0.0005744154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001896647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001885367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001491985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986249,0.0002453657,0.0005477052,0.0002184948,0.0001971715,0.0001664008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.00021554,0.000335052,0.0001569308,0.0003627187,0.0001373021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07509845,0.006002274,0.01736576,0.00001527141,0.004763747,0.001600336,0.03802015,0.0008819799,0.4748345,0.07684983,0.1083458,0.1962219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00154456,0.002228318,0.9787073,0.00005309756,0.00001359013,0.000266317,0.0004676831,0.00008634513,0.0004239222,0.003772675,0.01225291,0.0001833348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835491,0.00001877006,0.0003857021,0.001085662,0.004901201,0.00007197522,0.00000709856,0.00002915041,0.009951399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952899,0.00001774658,0.000374209,0.003031189,0.0005378351,0.000003649285,0.000002505179,0.00001226851,0.0007306975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988526419","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.012","title":"Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Distraction; Workload; Session (web analytics); Task (project management); Duration (music); Reliability (semiconductor); Occlusion; Computer science; Human multitasking; Psychology; Simulation; Cognitive psychology; Engineering; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02530503870467419,"gpt":0.3355397391215247,"spread":0.3102347004168505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000175693,0.00009125067,0.0001295746,0.00005828669,0.00005965207,0.00001971171,0.00005032426,0.00008810535,0.0004989878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002292591,0.00009583566,0.00003744475,0.00004627502,0.00007207267,0.00009379364,0.00001621438,0.0001152833,0.0002324974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009950482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002453035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001673389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001065871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992516,0.00002319486,0.0003631574,0.0002018829,0.00006459415,0.00009559193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995428,0.00004446207,0.0001749528,0.0001552266,0.00003638864,0.00004614766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003437428,0.001346012,0.002689107,0.00006739813,0.0003020781,0.000002385505,0.01727498,0.0008404101,0.07472908,0.7256962,0.0007625963,0.1728523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004086688,0.0003905447,0.9135533,0.00002505031,0.00007952481,0.00006938488,0.0083538,0.0002756638,0.0266434,0.01594138,0.03000488,0.0005763554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667525,0.0000108303,0.006255871,0.0001338112,0.0004457126,0.0001646617,0.000006460974,0.00005900877,0.0261712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994415,0.000009030978,0.000191831,0.0001062478,0.00006817522,0.00002919243,0.0000264143,0.00001002428,0.0001175974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5463566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144525870","doi":"10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.007","title":"Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interacting with Computers","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Automation; Reliability (semiconductor); Perception; Cognition; Psychology; Commission; Computer science; Applied psychology; Engineering; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02012690926048363,"gpt":0.3119475962860507,"spread":0.2918206870255671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001505726,0.00008545811,0.0001569801,0.0001786021,0.00003068559,0.00002311953,0.0001030301,0.00002895786,0.0001164032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000126228,0.0000712681,0.00001767622,0.00009833044,0.00003732428,0.0001161663,0.0000251103,0.0001180123,0.00003590077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006238479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003894726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008108748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005161105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991856,0.00007303892,0.000321795,0.00019554,0.0001159995,0.0001080486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992949,0.000280255,0.0002174892,0.0001493153,0.00002504591,0.00003296575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001231896,0.0008688902,0.1843939,0.0009154654,0.0007944708,0.0003784404,0.1047642,0.0008013127,0.0002588943,0.05263004,0.01437028,0.6385921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00254393,0.0002190933,0.9126942,0.004154823,0.00003242699,0.0001977297,0.01650489,0.04595561,0.0000796564,0.00001602874,0.01728285,0.0003188008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582759,0.00003468887,0.0139495,0.0007243947,0.001597557,0.0002024189,0.000001297394,0.00009680047,0.0251175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943584,0.000004124495,0.004899848,0.0001161683,0.0000542477,0.00002168505,0.00000244565,0.000007115351,0.0005359436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2906229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182733235","doi":"10.1037/rev0000021","title":"A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Response bias; Assertion; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Detection theory; Observer (physics); Social psychology; Computer science; Detector","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3154405963276423,"gpt":0.5370851240964145,"spread":0.2216445277687722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363614,0.0001073823,0.0003089861,0.00003081081,0.00003040995,0.000008772829,0.0001775687,0.00009521052,0.0004106172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006115819,0.00006878575,0.0001318636,0.0002269604,0.0001387559,0.0001165664,0.00003085586,0.0001962722,0.0001220228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004816999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001298635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000571016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009374753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978248,0.0009860984,0.0004891012,0.0003119721,0.0002069698,0.0001810222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979325,0.001196275,0.0001491248,0.000412435,0.0002382392,0.00007140674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006177393,0.002626459,0.01040284,0.003028172,0.00004904905,0.00005433566,0.003017028,0.00002604135,0.0006256934,0.1742517,0.050068,0.7552329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001493606,0.0004295469,0.9329122,0.007993022,0.00006690039,0.0002020984,0.0001459096,0.001572032,0.00004422876,0.01154729,0.04321459,0.0003785956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4773016,0.1567729,0.1230848,0.07671112,0.008683663,0.008565108,0.0001155207,0.0004212112,0.1483441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944232,0.001037451,0.0002987984,0.003703852,0.0000532767,0.0001814185,0.000002155018,0.000006528598,0.0002933352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7321649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290960195","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103867","title":"Distracted worker: Using pupil size and blink rate to detect cognitive load during manufacturing tasks","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Cognitive load; Cognition; Task (project management); Pupil size; Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Human factors and ergonomics; Automotive industry; Psychology; Poison control; Simulation; Pupil; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02014100567581118,"gpt":0.2973449799592452,"spread":0.2772039742834341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002715022,0.0002008687,0.0002218089,0.0001124047,0.0005364162,0.00008311122,0.000137698,0.00007103691,0.003425781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000295995,0.0002439954,0.00005582666,0.0001158164,0.0000382502,0.00007403405,0.0001956673,0.0004212327,0.000253607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003547159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003795839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006671048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002975375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986459,0.00008559767,0.0003762159,0.0004551106,0.0001083681,0.000328791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991255,0.0003037268,0.0001775535,0.0002268375,0.00002687728,0.0001395135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05081872,0.001452939,0.003233105,0.000285969,0.003670534,0.0005153143,0.0769541,0.04123182,0.2684094,0.01078463,0.005232733,0.5374107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008683276,0.000191958,0.8823358,0.00005937782,0.0002195953,0.0003008402,0.0163194,0.001259716,0.04052864,0.0008078077,0.04740307,0.001890556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890695,0.00001764405,0.0006770914,0.00008127977,0.0006369261,0.0004039934,0.00006435512,0.0001550458,0.008894176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976134,0.000004966857,0.000436179,0.0005380186,0.0001360926,0.0001597774,0.00002142984,0.00004365676,0.001046509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984361845","doi":"10.1145/971478.971506","title":"A pneumatic tactile alerting system for the driving environment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Tactile display; Tactile sensor; Computer vision; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Robot","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03306808268805677,"gpt":0.3300131611510478,"spread":0.296945078462991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002409279,0.0000760561,0.00009023453,0.00003352257,0.0002401006,0.0000351827,0.0001077068,0.0000363588,0.01466266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002374261,0.00005022488,0.00007536554,0.00003400962,0.00001475959,0.00005921365,0.00001606726,0.00006943338,0.002006991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007296934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000389739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003777479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001331351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992747,0.00005443583,0.0002703794,0.0001422923,0.00009106947,0.000167107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991249,0.000467062,0.0001059837,0.000255258,0.000012282,0.00003449723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003516104,0.001051913,0.02542435,0.000335116,0.001602464,0.00004827066,0.05153208,0.003187479,0.006245927,0.3370345,0.2184748,0.3547115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187771,0.000088163,0.05006587,0.00008262827,0.00006439118,0.0002238615,0.03312876,0.07091669,0.0002341503,0.00008770261,0.8436269,0.0002930811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1469577,0.00007931748,0.3167435,0.00343727,0.002858831,0.001200011,0.000003578895,0.0005459182,0.5281739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694235,0.000003375736,0.0002320795,0.000279587,0.0001202848,0.0002506569,0.000002139577,0.00001279313,0.02967558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029047082","doi":"10.1080/14039220412331298929","title":"Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: a qualitative cognitive model based on field observations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Generalizability theory; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Workload; Operator (biology); Field (mathematics); Exploit; Work (physics); Human–computer interaction; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Engineering; Developmental psychology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06277646202854784,"gpt":0.4243526730976808,"spread":0.361576211069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008741666,0.0001378702,0.0001768491,0.0002590427,0.0001270792,0.00005538167,0.0003170705,0.00007330691,0.001072725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003853558,0.0001391974,0.00003524501,0.0004040515,0.0008595566,0.0001784034,0.0000551044,0.0002964731,0.000331495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004402538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007371411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003935085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000993079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985318,0.0001610339,0.0003764827,0.0004190672,0.0001927719,0.0003187964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988855,0.0006766996,0.00006163793,0.0002491841,0.00003595831,0.0000910153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003674116,0.0003416442,0.0005761675,0.000002284848,0.000003524077,0.000004946493,0.03886028,0.1072873,0.0002892402,0.8517426,0.000005905285,0.0005186936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002939976,0.0003773564,0.06728419,0.0003460083,0.000009625124,0.000001406421,0.02416588,0.7622197,0.001303694,0.1407164,0.00005205456,0.0005837056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529953,0.00001084361,0.03302536,0.001794136,0.0002075654,0.0002519557,0.00001152622,0.00003572445,0.01166756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926522,0.000006247325,0.006392325,0.0006908315,0.00001961531,0.00008037993,0.000006380154,0.00001100735,0.0001410181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7110263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}