{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1665,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":8,"predictions_cover":1665,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4d07a9226108","filters":{"topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management"}},"results":[{"id":"W1511351087","doi":"","title":"Open innovation : researching a new paradigm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3318,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open innovation; Intellectual property; Business; Corporation; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Innovation management; Industrial organization; User innovation; Value capture; Marketing; Value creation; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07817541071430598,"gpt":0.3451593041154756,"spread":0.2669838934011697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005294097,0.000381531,0.0005286843,0.003356225,0.0003735584,0.003225887,0.002420077,0.0003260841,0.0002646329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006946261,0.0004288043,0.00009512527,0.00166288,0.0001461673,0.0008491438,0.009437354,0.001916984,0.0002462452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008199366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006511352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002391299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002160894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996195,0.00008212538,0.001111466,0.001152047,0.0004873978,0.000971955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997785,0.0001339969,0.0004739444,0.001168752,0.0004089979,0.00002925932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001073885,0.000196769,0.005529384,0.000367192,0.00005888265,0.00002920513,0.00006138359,0.001111888,0.00001979644,0.6167973,0.01294155,0.3627792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001424093,0.00001733035,0.005866125,0.0004796518,0.00001164413,0.000001022836,0.0003359241,0.02087724,0.00001389263,0.2576457,0.7125728,0.0007545906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03407407,0.00002858363,0.00003714468,0.003413134,0.0007149761,0.001872797,0.000006907661,0.00009666369,0.9597557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333481,0.0002690932,0.001674275,0.002595419,0.005891494,0.0006870623,0.001218732,0.0002440351,0.05407178],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9056839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485916023","doi":"10.2307/25148626","title":"<i>Review:</i> The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions For Future Research1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2772,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extension (predicate logic); Knowledge management; Information resource; Resource (disambiguation); Information system; Management science; Computer science; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05028181355189763,"gpt":0.2985493162325732,"spread":0.2482675026806755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00405883,0.0001414825,0.000208374,0.0002471381,0.0006519905,0.000444607,0.0001859789,0.00004513603,0.00001246967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002747024,0.00009595347,0.00004336396,0.0008837664,0.0001098281,0.000776334,0.00004100551,0.0002043239,0.0001189273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003325327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003029597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007427257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004163564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986245,0.00006832747,0.0004176527,0.0002139937,0.0003856561,0.0002898376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983052,0.00009851938,0.0001501149,0.000371257,0.001054002,0.00002093331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002806677,0.00004767907,0.00001368064,0.02692739,0.00001668225,0.000001689388,0.000224963,0.000002716027,0.0000136132,0.2928165,0.6018229,0.07808422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005277407,0.00004997976,0.000158425,0.005458268,0.00004028196,0.000001956149,0.001295242,0.000348945,6.535165e-7,0.000853711,0.9911432,0.0001215771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001484297,0.4630701,0.002892655,0.441029,0.001097482,0.01291652,0.00003697732,0.0003523421,0.07712066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3071547,0.1231128,0.001177129,0.5461105,0.01041869,0.006767586,0.002174943,0.0002392181,0.002844393],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3893204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079921132","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::aid-smj93>3.0.co;2-m","title":"Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2040,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Alliance; Semiconductor industry; Industrial organization; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Business; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Manufacturing engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03400943301932961,"gpt":0.2583846724998223,"spread":0.2243752394804927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006975831,0.0001928489,0.0002505672,0.0004752454,0.0002597746,0.0005147538,0.0002767796,0.00005618181,0.0009109859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008333284,0.0001381725,0.00004555529,0.001399741,0.0001362769,0.0006961202,0.00007052821,0.0002795537,0.000002915903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002988772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001651529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007898931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002041555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985442,0.00004463707,0.0005042435,0.0002588961,0.0004181777,0.000229811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999329,0.00002083221,0.0003286977,0.0002011959,0.0001039265,0.00001634053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005221715,0.00002934735,0.01165564,0.00007388076,0.0002462695,0.00002484995,0.0002892016,0.0001747465,0.00001557471,0.9829406,0.00005673468,0.004440942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002504578,0.00006395009,0.4334975,0.0001108609,0.001382233,0.00004160056,0.04132275,0.02812986,0.000006021521,0.487024,0.00527135,0.0006453514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.79425,0.0001335487,0.000002938193,0.000355132,0.0001102588,0.0001801665,0.00000477993,0.00001116926,0.204952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982849,0.00007248184,0.0001408366,0.0004571929,0.0002413825,0.000005499862,0.00003334905,0.000009412547,0.0007549766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4959166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097700858","doi":"10.2307/30036518","title":"Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1629,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Business; Knowledge management; Marketing; Industrial organization; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01554805943673493,"gpt":0.2281030259471261,"spread":0.2125549665103912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003495682,0.0001533449,0.0001100619,0.000379515,0.0003007781,0.0003488786,0.0001707197,0.00004943572,0.0007245039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001386405,0.0001579922,0.00004271005,0.000776954,0.00003223447,0.0009188321,0.00002176357,0.0001100489,0.001160629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009862975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002481693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005155416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001267837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99893,0.00001719044,0.0002807478,0.0003256682,0.0002355784,0.0002108287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991253,0.000007623469,0.00009770212,0.0001760274,0.0005722256,0.00002114782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001181894,0.0002287929,0.02771105,0.00004781632,0.0000286653,0.000005210619,0.001295288,0.00002022305,0.0004611373,0.9648836,0.001330603,0.003975816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006337252,0.001012858,0.223306,0.0005670435,0.0002605831,0.0000403693,0.1216213,0.04098134,0.0004692237,0.05177444,0.5505951,0.003034563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.558784,0.00001788066,0.04670905,0.001048428,0.001733018,0.0004925413,0.000003729172,0.00039588,0.3908154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952517,1.650146e-7,0.0007740597,0.002320048,0.0006217437,0.00002468372,0.00008169906,0.00002139293,0.0009045776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029511935","doi":"10.1002/smj.482","title":"Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1548,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Minnesota","keywords":"Exploit; Structural holes; Bridge (graph theory); Industrial organization; Business; Position (finance); Network structure; Focus (optics); Computer science; Distributed computing; Finance; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760336039151544,"gpt":0.214410801144019,"spread":0.1968074407525035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005174187,0.0002841574,0.000218575,0.0002443057,0.0008175301,0.001176807,0.0002920214,0.00005758917,0.001039536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003517182,0.0002605596,0.00006750268,0.0004128979,0.0000871506,0.0009104857,0.0002478519,0.0003127441,0.0001652052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009407131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001235061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002319742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006877107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982145,0.00001568222,0.0005416876,0.0003333381,0.000385081,0.0005096525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992438,0.00001503913,0.0003357949,0.0002158599,0.0001571492,0.00003237385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004500406,0.0000253075,0.00656311,0.0001549108,0.0001101591,0.0000288068,0.00004680276,0.0002114185,0.00000478425,0.9778976,0.001486162,0.01342596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004035928,0.00007987372,0.02919717,0.0006143627,0.0004349848,0.00008345066,0.009119232,0.04945894,0.00001429729,0.8368813,0.06850154,0.001578939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4152046,0.0003346067,0.00003958694,0.001062199,0.0007805155,0.0001938832,0.000001924517,0.00008501008,0.5822976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855605,0.0001009434,0.001726509,0.002317962,0.008943737,0.00001164547,0.000058832,0.00002634131,0.001253524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957314097","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011","title":"The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1429,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic geography; Geography; Regional science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02766543804143724,"gpt":0.20197737869357,"spread":0.1743119406521327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005230128,0.0002840204,0.0002928435,0.001442967,0.000464143,0.0002292981,0.0006422122,0.0002248587,0.000006962041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002812001,0.0002627381,0.00009010919,0.000680707,0.0001900023,0.000275344,0.0002890317,0.0003009161,0.000003357529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000283197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005721612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998361,0.00001534268,0.00060273,0.0003066202,0.0004749773,0.000239342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958062,0.00003977457,0.001353582,0.0004556493,0.002339571,0.000005280961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005695793,0.0000169666,0.00002561659,0.0002295386,0.00009750613,0.00000496561,0.000007174222,0.000005660072,0.000002294437,0.8533373,0.1415129,0.004703115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004377202,0.00001276854,0.0000868325,0.0001712915,0.00009583083,6.028208e-7,0.00008331343,0.0001845369,0.000002618205,0.00595054,0.992707,0.0002669858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005787373,0.00006628007,0.0002896205,0.0001293183,0.0004872496,0.0006050979,0.000006575663,0.0001209941,0.998237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001742374,0.00003741883,0.0000370864,0.0006060778,0.0009516276,0.000003284549,0.0003710908,0.00002957621,0.9962215],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.851194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790148163","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004","title":"Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information and Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften","keywords":"Digital transformation; Institutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Institutionalisation; Legitimacy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Institutional change; Public relations; Business; Political science; Computer science; Public administration; Social science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009055807636557665,"gpt":0.2116712265438551,"spread":0.2026154189072975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001424073,0.00008855115,0.00005786517,0.0004824222,0.000387755,0.0008452009,0.00004689247,0.00004427739,0.0001176834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295223,0.00008649847,0.00000467478,0.001374043,0.00008884411,0.01091968,0.00003990716,0.00004197591,0.0002767219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003497746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002012224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009913299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007925565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994238,0.000002315359,0.0002658002,0.00008697505,0.0001395978,0.00008153396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982834,0.000002964668,0.0001249758,0.00006202113,0.001518808,0.00000781508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008302201,0.00001371902,0.003319374,0.00002845015,0.000004408321,6.264118e-8,0.0009216722,0.000001286639,0.0000187668,0.9716264,0.0002117123,0.02384586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003960951,0.0001436515,0.1406438,0.00007231404,0.00006294874,0.00003560146,0.03054153,0.04864506,0.0005706534,0.05839031,0.7158431,0.001090124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3356789,0.000007173262,0.04717284,0.002254589,0.0003872296,0.0003697511,0.000006457486,0.0002961656,0.6138269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956418,0.000002659784,0.0001237113,0.003241903,0.0004291587,0.000003200242,0.0004743659,0.00000599025,0.00007719605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098934250","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0426","title":"Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Conceptualization; Ambiguity; Construct (python library); Dimension (graph theory); Unpacking; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Balance (ability); Industrial organization; Yield (engineering); Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006817154551700177,"gpt":0.2094174826503284,"spread":0.2026003280986282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004492305,0.0001187204,0.0001061099,0.0003893949,0.0007092395,0.0007910994,0.0002116751,0.00002805982,0.000123962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001483782,0.0001144764,0.000007532044,0.004511661,0.0001502415,0.001115866,0.0001807001,0.00005351117,0.0002263815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004638174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004879056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004981389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002585217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998883,0.000005748745,0.0001974738,0.0003216516,0.0003748352,0.000217271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998687,0.0000210405,0.0001360356,0.0001607335,0.0009774445,0.00001769477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000121028,0.00003409263,0.01528098,0.00002760212,0.000002047557,0.000003003591,0.00005618334,0.000003238064,0.05094455,0.9310601,0.0006801476,0.001906888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00319559,0.00009741015,0.7742268,0.0004477496,0.0002217929,0.00002320117,0.001914125,0.02683925,0.04820436,0.09727684,0.04495578,0.002597049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7989017,0.0001297693,0.03010232,0.004606424,0.001689964,0.0006947197,0.000001040015,0.0007888423,0.1630853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929891,0.000004956117,0.0005336165,0.005878007,0.0002645272,0.000001062449,0.00001699077,0.00001282618,0.000298891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8337832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059804181","doi":"10.1002/smj.807","title":"Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; York University; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Odds; Business; Knowledge management; Marketing; Cognition; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Logistic regression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02459553961193425,"gpt":0.2436104092640269,"spread":0.2190148696520927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00157954,0.0002086279,0.0002451162,0.0007965367,0.0003834939,0.0004983979,0.0003261675,0.00004378737,0.00010279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000186457,0.0001436134,0.0000668124,0.001651431,0.0001358519,0.0003695679,0.0001388535,0.0002330747,0.0000437841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002820527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001576169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000825642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009075255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985474,0.00003011648,0.0006225946,0.0002140021,0.0003136321,0.000272212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987196,0.00002136883,0.0005765264,0.0002080218,0.0004639974,0.00001046171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001005974,0.0001020548,0.0001950366,0.0001056772,0.00007972072,0.000003846212,0.0001008983,0.000009328617,0.00001071055,0.9851769,0.0004855627,0.01362971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003499819,0.00003715,0.003722783,0.0001197723,0.0001425569,0.0000141543,0.004373534,0.001166659,0.00001210286,0.9802962,0.006377205,0.0002380763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04552213,0.0005804697,0.0001404514,0.001717657,0.0003693032,0.0003854312,5.905792e-7,0.00004782814,0.9512361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955845,0.0001337821,0.0002189549,0.00137885,0.0008290761,0.000007444804,0.000009084552,0.00001246853,0.001825781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083867378","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009","title":"Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"Michigan State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"New product development; Business; Supply chain; Product design; Product (mathematics); Process management; Supplier relationship management; Design review (U.S. government); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Product lifecycle; Product management; Marketing; Supply chain management; Industrial organization; Operations management; Computer science; Product testing; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01877495408604141,"gpt":0.2501787888907944,"spread":0.231403834804753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225165,0.0002437786,0.0002412436,0.0009080342,0.0004668793,0.000730307,0.000282881,0.00002780644,0.00007007768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001339412,0.0002078401,0.00004210948,0.0009678894,0.00004064493,0.001691709,0.0001554452,0.0001873554,0.00006884131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001653735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001281065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000303074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006399359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998189,0.00001669802,0.0008030519,0.0003085471,0.0004389507,0.0002437449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986898,0.000008086588,0.0003542494,0.0001930369,0.000725805,0.00002906977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001500575,0.0007999173,0.0008396145,0.0009397201,0.0004029086,0.00006710857,0.004880184,0.0214475,0.001385074,0.6505114,0.01134595,0.3072305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03407818,0.0007940296,0.02565855,0.005368814,0.002169362,0.0002784112,0.0507377,0.02929582,0.05139105,0.1753971,0.618145,0.006685968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.116832,0.001011285,0.737899,0.03854194,0.002754118,0.005542619,9.896107e-7,0.0002836865,0.09713431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233013,0.00002240143,0.07193264,0.0009803443,0.001087077,0.00004869159,0.00001719346,0.00003153486,0.00257876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8475475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154374169","doi":"10.1177/014920630102700610","title":"The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1025,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Competitive advantage; Shareholder value; Marketing; Business; Resource-based view; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Value proposition; Core (optical fiber); Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Set (abstract data type); Process management; Computer science; Shareholder; Corporate governance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008618122701752936,"gpt":0.2238151748160859,"spread":0.215197052114333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005675407,0.0001704688,0.0002443451,0.0004622865,0.0002197786,0.000219165,0.0004243813,0.00002874602,0.0001070019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001395251,0.0001059545,0.00009659099,0.0007201454,0.0001007824,0.0001996485,0.0002064466,0.0002147146,0.000008231908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005456208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001579064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004426638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003529043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99825,0.0001333275,0.0007256643,0.0001514959,0.0004775229,0.0002619681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983402,0.0003482239,0.0008507446,0.000240853,0.0002074592,0.00001249264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003008134,0.0007464201,0.1163074,0.001214298,0.0004155878,0.0003464443,0.0001854396,0.0006750239,0.00006822319,0.4270189,0.01651567,0.4334984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001702718,0.00002965289,0.03664478,0.0005030085,0.00009364864,0.000002674422,0.009333459,0.01081795,0.00001482292,0.001040384,0.9396629,0.0001540056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03112653,0.001406043,0.0004502525,0.008628153,0.0002790042,0.0006261259,7.369641e-7,0.00002159439,0.9574615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996089,0.0002020196,0.0003034364,0.002464678,0.0002170617,0.00001305802,0.000002426398,0.00002069604,0.0006875753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146375164","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008","title":"Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Leadership Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":912,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Transactional leadership; Transformational leadership; Strategic leadership; Knowledge management; Ambidexterity; Business; Exploratory research; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1600650948895448,"gpt":0.233672232755908,"spread":0.07360713786636319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004245707,0.0001470741,0.000123072,0.00009045452,0.0005144335,0.0001296387,0.0001905231,0.00004251386,0.00003213618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001577827,0.00009941626,0.00005468064,0.0001725628,0.0002036839,0.0006758799,0.00001680419,0.0001080287,0.00004478645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001640352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008836662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001261797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003889453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990831,0.00002769601,0.0002795001,0.0001837194,0.0001994186,0.0002265496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994209,0.0001136285,0.0002041291,0.0002046859,0.00005003306,0.000006615441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001548085,0.0001287763,0.0006098858,0.0004099266,0.00009169141,0.000001778104,0.0360555,0.0001494059,0.004092043,0.9210486,0.0007485997,0.03650896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001172327,0.000151327,0.001399493,0.00004788603,0.00008530666,0.00000505256,0.7963468,0.09579269,0.0001813876,0.1029797,0.001496779,0.0003412848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042655,0.002053365,0.01726812,0.08897229,0.0009319682,0.00466791,0.00001637771,0.0003981823,0.0814263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967216,0.000003449686,0.000103671,0.001942079,0.0005561505,0.00008588877,0.00002625133,0.00002065777,0.0005402479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4054078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052495896","doi":"10.1108/13673270210417664","title":"Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":891,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Knowledge value chain; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Computer science; Organizational learning; Conceptual framework; Business; Conceptual model; Process management; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940304148992048,"gpt":0.2845775252730982,"spread":0.2651744837831777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418398,0.0004307554,0.0005063256,0.001454387,0.0004400031,0.0005131979,0.0006006747,0.0001117628,0.0001440659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001908887,0.0003701636,0.0001835973,0.001440022,0.0001368761,0.003180185,0.0003482631,0.0005669899,0.0004696955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001159218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004137257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001989033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977754,0.0001132173,0.0008935939,0.0004581554,0.0003134469,0.000446179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977428,0.0002390778,0.0004821531,0.0004398513,0.001026788,0.00006934487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000720934,0.00101811,0.0001539396,0.0003030837,0.0003300225,0.00003166707,0.001329852,0.000006419832,0.00002084562,0.7720627,0.005270424,0.2194008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003591198,0.0004841153,0.004003826,0.001135066,0.001564727,0.00006986594,0.0178583,0.0100255,0.00006186762,0.1434575,0.8165199,0.001228132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003176271,0.004620736,0.02835993,0.00449679,0.001721698,0.001258825,0.000002232589,0.0001555921,0.9562079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885632,0.000841731,0.003663142,0.002340281,0.002432203,0.00009523207,0.000005566701,0.00007302453,0.00198564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772037565","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x","title":"Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":883,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Institute of Management Research, College of Business Administration Seoul National University","keywords":"Public sector; Corporate governance; Business; Private sector; Manufacturing sector; Public policy; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Finance; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02174305448829722,"gpt":0.2652456320699659,"spread":0.2435025775816687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001228981,0.00009983993,0.0001220968,0.0005928792,0.0001012101,0.0003813754,0.0001694293,0.00006980827,0.00005193806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001305654,0.0001042264,0.000008959868,0.0007072317,0.0001022582,0.0006649685,0.0003886309,0.0003532421,0.00001444531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005731656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002055757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001137449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003022102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989009,0.00001163761,0.0003307843,0.0003119934,0.0001207524,0.0003238843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.00004484693,0.0001100362,0.0002119146,0.0001507971,0.00001154154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013648,0.00008345746,0.2995806,0.0001915407,0.00000700923,0.00000475617,0.00007555682,0.000004543594,0.0002436076,0.4399042,0.00007020825,0.2598144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001516075,0.0000139165,0.3316711,0.00007806919,0.000002303161,0.000002044026,0.002142802,0.02469799,0.0000217532,0.008251953,0.6312746,0.0003273301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6965585,0.0000129999,4.145863e-7,0.001760668,0.0001268533,0.0002200829,7.874469e-7,0.00001480686,0.3013048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998139,0.0001837414,0.00007404746,0.0005614435,0.0003834735,0.00004685386,0.00001418016,0.00001508866,0.0005821463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6312044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.425023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053977786","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007","title":"Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":838,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Argument (complex analysis); Contingency theory; Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Competitive advantage; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Marketing; Management; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0736025620627517,"gpt":0.313926988992787,"spread":0.2403244269300353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002192415,0.00007078122,0.000158835,0.0004627636,0.0002671603,0.0002398412,0.0001586464,0.00002561344,0.00003380829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005333168,0.00004920645,0.00002754287,0.0009619551,0.00009953207,0.001479842,0.0001663093,0.0002331482,0.00001628248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003864743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003725999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002704203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004814686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.00003436237,0.0003997097,0.00008618963,0.0005357646,0.000147032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943036,0.00009546401,0.0003243692,0.00009716196,0.005171617,0.000007753214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005077154,0.000366089,0.009782635,0.00055563,0.0001239277,0.00001568232,0.004191144,0.002937746,0.01758102,0.8375653,0.004870758,0.1215023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005078244,0.0001750678,0.1237354,0.001858545,0.0001543463,0.00007147466,0.2424044,0.3394178,0.00907563,0.1054967,0.1717086,0.000823907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852935,0.0008236335,0.0107207,0.03996687,0.0005823401,0.0006150538,9.615671e-7,0.00003151864,0.1619654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997723,0.00004232578,0.0005293568,0.0002970576,0.001297013,0.000003976362,0.000001854572,0.000008796453,0.00009665686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7320687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2312794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054383752","doi":"10.1002/smj.577","title":"The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legitimation; Alliance; Perspective (graphical); Business; Corporate governance; Function (biology); Institutional theory; Outcome (game theory); Industrial organization; Political science; Economics; Management; Microeconomics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05165823115616942,"gpt":0.2747889208836902,"spread":0.2231306897275208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009549226,0.000246738,0.0001908189,0.0003514515,0.001024219,0.001174011,0.0006414242,0.0000438182,0.0003133584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005569445,0.0001788543,0.0001261575,0.0007758317,0.0002472868,0.0007816436,0.0001286712,0.0002670651,0.0001418017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001213581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006348739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001438644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002133797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980037,0.00002894776,0.000639068,0.0002863732,0.0006185782,0.0004233689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984593,0.00001617618,0.0005469365,0.0002909971,0.0006677558,0.00001886074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005119731,0.0001963687,0.0002459314,0.0000768626,0.0000903554,0.00005665953,0.0000139557,0.0001393111,0.0000213061,0.9982963,0.0004747333,0.0003369986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008654714,0.00003015574,0.0004942215,0.00004748322,0.00007301763,0.00001176412,0.01596858,0.002823323,0.000005369951,0.9675181,0.01193226,0.0002302436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01941579,0.000218707,0.0001602367,0.000957961,0.0008352407,0.000324292,0.000001617954,0.00006479464,0.9780214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943348,0.00006221096,0.0003458277,0.0003525766,0.002021308,0.00002070576,0.00002341053,0.00001922237,0.002819963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049269714","doi":"10.5465/amr.2010.48463331","title":"BEYOND DUALISM: STABILITY AND CHANGE AS A DUALITY.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":772,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Interdependence; Stability (learning theory); Duality (order theory); Epistemology; Reliability (semiconductor); Positive economics; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05681967107542472,"gpt":0.3073593680479973,"spread":0.2505396969725726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002144405,0.0002602834,0.0004455803,0.0002703279,0.0001220532,0.00009265519,0.0003860201,0.00008722494,0.001296882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009664112,0.0002332232,0.000100626,0.0008381823,0.0001378535,0.0008069925,0.0007344514,0.0003363056,0.0004305608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000112956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005105492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001696012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99813,0.00002474368,0.0006699619,0.0004541561,0.0004186167,0.0003025665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991233,0.00002624057,0.000426119,0.0003139498,0.00008805951,0.00002227242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006313086,0.00008265853,0.0009141364,0.01277368,0.00005044328,0.00000244543,0.00002709214,3.014681e-9,0.0000358861,0.9121699,0.01148819,0.06244927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000414096,0.000006895489,0.007590079,0.0007178375,0.0002628593,0.000001618562,0.00009751338,0.00001924473,0.00004861761,0.03506811,0.9554756,0.0002975829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02357985,0.01157734,0.00001363049,0.03929941,0.000530062,0.003045553,0.000003947444,0.0002027973,0.9217474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8535863,0.02380578,0.0008333395,0.1176275,0.001352273,0.0004960829,0.00005386767,0.00006331164,0.002181503],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122839451","doi":"10.5465/amj.2006.22798187","title":"Uncertainty, Opportunism, and Governance: The Effects of Volatility and Ambiguity on Formal and Relational Contracting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":743,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Ambiguity; Corporate governance; Volatility (finance); Business; Schema (genetic algorithms); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01772594076190161,"gpt":0.2409183912247464,"spread":0.2231924504628448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001295742,0.0001404165,0.000185749,0.0001373122,0.0003139634,0.00009876957,0.0001207636,0.00005435858,0.000018639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008044359,0.00010458,0.00003636128,0.0001751583,0.0001479164,0.0005692134,0.0002583103,0.0002760055,0.000001275919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001821879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004122222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002382412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004097332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988058,0.00002263806,0.0004560076,0.0001644857,0.0003582604,0.0001928006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990557,0.0001322474,0.0006640251,0.00006606924,0.00006951252,0.00001245146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007186383,0.00005659149,0.01769772,0.0005471898,0.00007068187,0.000003729678,0.00002323618,0.00001140609,0.00005337448,0.9468977,0.001369866,0.03319666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002272638,0.00003913331,0.88389,0.000294174,0.0001924273,0.00000919166,0.0003286266,0.006227018,0.00006133961,0.08065839,0.0258281,0.0001989323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551832,0.0004301842,0.0002279588,0.004293623,0.000196925,0.0004933454,0.000001928806,0.00001940774,0.1391535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977565,0.0002102655,0.0001306152,0.0010705,0.0002818857,0.000004832656,0.000002454129,0.000008556727,0.000534414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8662393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4264647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012892181","doi":"10.1002/smj.213","title":"A resource‐based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":742,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Resource (disambiguation); Resource-based view; Industrial organization; Business; Perspective (graphical); Competitive advantage; Manufacturing; Computer science; Knowledge management; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05895194603887616,"gpt":0.2437455859016592,"spread":0.184793639862783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270434,0.0002502742,0.0002596937,0.0006193715,0.0005692913,0.0006108331,0.0004104272,0.00004384088,0.0005980438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001300494,0.0001791456,0.0000931771,0.0004167486,0.0001056098,0.0003364185,0.000197931,0.0003258392,0.0001690586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003820785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005158794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006990792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006363516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982371,0.00004222462,0.0006320025,0.0002624366,0.0004557262,0.0003705413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991175,0.00006217004,0.0004019571,0.0003088558,0.00007928132,0.00003023178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001156626,0.00006531036,0.0007011854,0.000795853,0.00008741208,0.00002347399,0.00007634665,0.0005480689,0.00000266476,0.9837826,0.0006520708,0.01314932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0228387,0.0002807925,0.03272333,0.002414349,0.00110819,0.00009571093,0.01969918,0.07863749,0.0006904568,0.6093195,0.229565,0.002627282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1853034,0.000135813,0.0001094415,0.001928984,0.0001742592,0.0004968832,4.457931e-7,0.00004800804,0.8118028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943049,0.00005398035,0.0002618967,0.001634334,0.0003952004,0.00002639542,0.000003600045,0.00002367981,0.003296024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8090015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7305345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654083282","doi":"10.1111/1467-6486.00342","title":"Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration*","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":734,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Position (finance); Knowledge sharing; Business; Organizational learning; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00804725004503073,"gpt":0.2429529014565389,"spread":0.2349056514115082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007261604,0.0001345037,0.0002213945,0.0004025496,0.0002427542,0.0001160634,0.0001937441,0.00002301297,0.00003063396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007453036,0.00009143979,0.00003394272,0.001357384,0.0001299352,0.0004385395,0.0002274262,0.000083247,0.00002033899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003995443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001689193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.998636e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006169414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988962,0.00003478902,0.0005233353,0.0001126544,0.0003194796,0.0001134839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971716,0.0001135791,0.0006094173,0.0001122633,0.001985773,0.000007326288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001933454,0.0001431873,0.01949008,0.0009687024,0.0005711809,0.000007578832,0.001032468,0.00004829773,0.00005975067,0.955771,0.02127669,0.0006116756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004593609,0.0001347565,0.1080107,0.0008754272,0.001055812,0.00001711281,0.03316117,0.0001471557,0.0006483634,0.05788133,0.7929058,0.0005687875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.693946,0.01342962,0.001940801,0.007474774,0.003915394,0.001505759,0.000001883683,0.0000792383,0.2777065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968134,0.0003388579,0.0003685763,0.001025341,0.0002864744,0.000006159295,0.000001471446,0.00001493085,0.001144802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3728806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046473816","doi":"10.1002/smj.342","title":"Organizational learning and strategic renewal","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":717,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational learning; Corporation; Phenomenon; Business; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Management; Process management; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02510336237597138,"gpt":0.2337904871009602,"spread":0.2086871247249888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008808276,0.0002504242,0.0001798654,0.0005302563,0.0006637332,0.001199886,0.0001874191,0.00005675777,0.002051533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002005706,0.0002326256,0.00005304829,0.0008696913,0.00005852628,0.0002421345,0.0001118499,0.0003327853,0.000338723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004604745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002903252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003206373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007931074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984063,0.00003758743,0.0004348267,0.0003074703,0.0004145507,0.0003992854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992686,0.00001190953,0.0002991157,0.0001214896,0.0002665234,0.00003236913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001006954,0.0000566507,0.002322343,0.0001088781,0.0000761448,0.00007213827,0.00001284098,0.000003204525,0.00003670514,0.9971889,0.00005099319,0.00006114131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009041852,0.00001833054,0.00002385416,0.00003268502,0.00006889817,0.00004216949,0.006033087,0.0005387798,0.000005739544,0.9861097,0.005938646,0.0002839685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02054699,0.0001097005,0.00002875381,0.0003193914,0.0006075358,0.0001778955,2.217982e-7,0.000104943,0.9781046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910244,0.00009885684,0.0007103177,0.0006535808,0.0007069377,0.000007067111,0.00001719063,0.000033841,0.006747839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2125237007","doi":"10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x","title":"The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"New product development; Process (computing); Front and back ends; Fuzzy logic; Product (mathematics); Discretion; Process management; Computer science; Business; Function (biology); Knowledge management; Marketing; Boundary (topology); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02812126059626747,"gpt":0.2636073879519882,"spread":0.2354861273557207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003182742,0.0002696173,0.0003377259,0.0009427269,0.0003595787,0.0002806881,0.000590782,0.00003624828,0.00002394903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004940106,0.0001765612,0.00009759019,0.002286229,0.0001353236,0.0006165598,0.0002472418,0.0002010239,0.00002003458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001862416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002165351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004153143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001712997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966387,0.00001102281,0.001934491,0.0003200808,0.0007424828,0.0003532314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994885,0.00002867986,0.001817873,0.0003827103,0.002872158,0.00001353913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001750383,0.0002573757,0.00008037331,0.0002566498,0.0002031099,0.000001987844,0.0001505939,0.0009023089,0.0006128563,0.8660179,0.007239514,0.1241023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003489872,0.00008120279,0.001915584,0.0002909867,0.0002137726,0.000005873416,0.00117624,0.000786809,0.004173426,0.5519791,0.4353736,0.0005135498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1708825,0.001119533,0.4908221,0.1126816,0.006784565,0.01010448,0.00001215742,0.0002711382,0.2073219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949473,0.00002364815,0.04413797,0.001567008,0.001829449,0.0000845437,0.00005046688,0.00003357888,0.002800291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7785906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7199956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053944595","doi":"10.1177/0092070305281090","title":"Creating a Firm-Level Dynamic Capability through Capitalizing on Market Orientation and Innovativeness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":702,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Market orientation; Business; Entrepreneurial orientation; Transformational leadership; Dynamic capabilities; Context (archaeology); Industrial organization; Resource (disambiguation); Orientation (vector space); Marketing; Entrepreneurship; Economics; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02929158162764216,"gpt":0.2952023032184349,"spread":0.2659107215907927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01184258,0.0001278509,0.0001897391,0.0003285413,0.0004587502,0.0001514231,0.0005970422,0.00004122605,0.00003991493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003739308,0.00008961047,0.00005612005,0.00164211,0.0003835063,0.001549111,0.0003201353,0.0002882972,0.000002674618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001311952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004549668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007561692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002601437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998144,0.00007959285,0.0006468164,0.0002166164,0.0006925772,0.0002204408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978238,0.0002777453,0.001315762,0.0001206245,0.0004518863,0.00001012859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00263776,0.0009083331,0.3037435,0.002978025,0.0002088217,0.000005302902,0.004940785,0.001412436,0.07409658,0.396783,0.006819807,0.2054657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001062949,0.00002605368,0.9562863,0.001247368,0.00005883951,0.000014278,0.003211811,0.02190203,0.002265746,0.006187784,0.007446743,0.0002901552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386607,0.0000557194,0.0001592957,0.003647955,0.0002767622,0.0001541709,8.337565e-7,0.0000105887,0.05703394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954466,0.000008561734,0.002470736,0.001539598,0.0002671588,0.000001629896,1.508541e-7,0.000008206972,0.0002573227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6525428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.447657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87975348","doi":"","title":"Innovation: Location Matters","year":2001,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"MIT Sloan management review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":625,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Frontier; Subsidy; Innovation management; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Open innovation; Economics; Industrial organization; Marketing; Political science; Market economy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02604596307648664,"gpt":0.2609812264494757,"spread":0.234935263372989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232546,0.000784391,0.0007979584,0.001585053,0.0005037248,0.0009136276,0.0009895343,0.0001261301,0.006667822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009472284,0.0008110637,0.000223522,0.01167157,0.0001109957,0.001277082,0.0009071651,0.0003333822,0.05223031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002497445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002545578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000257478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008252034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951226,0.00007312126,0.001930009,0.001053556,0.0009463588,0.0008744018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962595,0.00001924932,0.001168838,0.001304376,0.001215289,0.00003275083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146128,0.0002147543,0.0005534659,0.02657742,0.0003880496,0.00007940951,0.000009892522,0.000002389994,0.000001307112,0.4026543,0.4768073,0.09269708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008620416,0.00001521498,0.001077149,0.01057466,0.001660194,0.000002524326,0.0001406124,0.000304639,0.000001159353,0.001774614,0.9827104,0.0008767613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003653874,0.1404956,0.003485279,0.07038418,0.004418509,0.00391983,0.000003543711,0.000441925,0.7768146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02389481,0.2723496,0.001210013,0.5211378,0.007776862,0.0008894011,0.002243618,0.0003190143,0.1701788],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6066357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100087827","doi":"10.1002/smj.240","title":"Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource‐based view of strategic management","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":617,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Conversation; Strategic management; Resource (disambiguation); Competitive advantage; Field (mathematics); Economics; Process (computing); Macro; Theory of the firm; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Management; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05437914211905256,"gpt":0.2524473299276253,"spread":0.1980681878085727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868073,0.000437376,0.0004012929,0.0009592265,0.0007140276,0.001005928,0.001067278,0.00007635204,0.002434491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009027348,0.0003259343,0.0002313093,0.002051506,0.00009585062,0.0003135212,0.0003601639,0.0003921913,0.001215872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001241849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001160066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008149927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002037823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965772,0.00007282668,0.001040202,0.0004777247,0.001086783,0.0007452655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980811,0.00002590965,0.000718904,0.0006599351,0.0004566569,0.00005745333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006479238,0.0002865263,0.00009024781,0.000449564,0.0002228559,0.000112106,0.00002343249,0.0001763207,0.00001326411,0.9854905,0.01059883,0.002471569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004973012,0.0001901755,0.0004362125,0.0006691464,0.0007604193,0.00002109819,0.01305615,0.01847652,0.00003087924,0.3009891,0.6592638,0.001133484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005674432,0.0002597771,0.0005926279,0.005568483,0.001189351,0.00130216,0.000004176377,0.0001190379,0.9852899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873062,0.0001085934,0.0004812462,0.00524693,0.001775584,0.00008713629,0.00003869572,0.00004535913,0.004910194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982213224","doi":"10.1002/smj.387","title":"R&amp;D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":605,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Control (management); Industrial organization; Database transaction; Business; Knowledge management; Empirical research; Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Economics; Management; Mathematics; Engineering; Database; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04291487735788804,"gpt":0.2368889674497577,"spread":0.1939740900918696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009837691,0.0002022593,0.0002170347,0.0006691814,0.0004952451,0.000384464,0.0003651208,0.00006243464,0.0001984787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002227912,0.0001300354,0.00003776752,0.001828939,0.0002659469,0.0002136647,0.0003327257,0.000228953,0.00009553107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004409568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003571052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000198377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003030243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986533,0.00001923129,0.0005977802,0.000207388,0.0002830237,0.0002392864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.00001099621,0.000649485,0.0001898217,0.0003733293,0.00001362937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000324066,0.00006911429,0.0004079005,0.0001538246,0.00009127369,0.000005358411,0.00008881689,0.00001280012,0.00007172112,0.9974614,0.0000668145,0.001538592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003236055,0.000006546227,0.0007513557,0.00007518531,0.00008961239,0.00001481386,0.002541167,0.00006836994,0.0001266187,0.9884555,0.00441734,0.0002174619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2486717,0.0001498602,0.003778026,0.001045414,0.0004903503,0.0005734737,7.060801e-7,0.0001180902,0.7451724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953396,0.00004886842,0.003736947,0.0002488276,0.0002211582,0.000006415022,0.00001848083,0.00001785106,0.0003618827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7466679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5302688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149570223","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0688","title":"Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Cohesion (chemistry); Bridging (networking); Organizational learning; Boundary spanning; Organizational network analysis; Context (archaeology); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04517712081325926,"gpt":0.2291855003249409,"spread":0.1840083795116816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093891,0.0001526365,0.0001594104,0.000139666,0.001081952,0.0001399471,0.0008110479,0.00003863611,0.000160984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006092049,0.00008466227,0.00001566021,0.008941832,0.000754168,0.0004634366,0.0003301255,0.0001314017,0.00005396264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002484074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001356399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000187219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003285306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00005588807,0.0004010297,0.0002433879,0.0003667345,0.0002621863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970307,0.0001835151,0.0002199533,0.0003464429,0.002205965,0.00001338764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005487279,0.00003079475,0.1690321,0.00003926703,0.0000147369,9.627575e-8,0.001525375,0.0003551597,0.0001121172,0.8264498,0.001702848,0.0007321691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004932801,0.00003161828,0.9787083,0.0002477307,0.0001279521,0.000001092323,0.001732864,0.003646297,0.001114447,0.005023243,0.00852876,0.000344387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737045,0.0002159303,0.009189666,0.001716103,0.0005795072,0.001040417,0.000004856042,0.0001023882,0.1134467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998552,0.00001224975,0.0000300659,0.0005821391,0.000582179,0.000005120105,0.000008378345,0.00002125958,0.0002065685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8321609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095185380","doi":"10.1002/smj.524","title":"How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":565,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01976528615228547,"gpt":0.2135799015047403,"spread":0.1938146153524549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007467591,0.0004159642,0.0003271106,0.000799729,0.0007066892,0.003185386,0.0004072929,0.0001630937,0.0002869478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005231179,0.0003723197,0.00009821405,0.0008793154,0.0001200562,0.001045262,0.0003239517,0.0007917697,0.0001480984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009510384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001938649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002489563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003070919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976586,0.00002286566,0.0005833217,0.0004374163,0.0006193931,0.0006784716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988316,0.00001113593,0.0005322616,0.0003189819,0.0002641891,0.00004180396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003143333,0.0001446367,0.014968,0.0005030659,0.0001054432,0.0001566201,0.00001251319,0.00002811744,0.00002400386,0.9776874,0.003087393,0.003251358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008223483,0.0001620331,0.09670005,0.0007748272,0.000670199,0.0002229563,0.0170346,0.02403743,0.00002048828,0.6135367,0.235891,0.002726186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2499727,0.0001729847,0.00008363943,0.002309788,0.0008329204,0.0003477281,0.000001713089,0.0001228919,0.7461557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785662,0.00007071671,0.0003412809,0.001029806,0.002102681,0.00002166553,0.00003221487,0.00004342846,0.01779201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060314889","doi":"10.1509/jmkg.68.4.47.42722","title":"Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":558,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"New product development; Nomological network; Business; Customer knowledge; Knowledge management; Product management; Process (computing); Process management; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Variance (accounting); Customer advocacy; Computer science; Service (business)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01795292358843404,"gpt":0.2539810884231724,"spread":0.2360281648347383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002422041,0.0001573877,0.0001843909,0.0005338124,0.0001764448,0.0001965696,0.0001619653,0.00002610194,0.0000684225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003124682,0.0001169679,0.00005251936,0.0004716606,0.00001784267,0.0006216972,0.0001108196,0.0001910472,0.000196282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001116976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009228605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003967093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000317387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989499,0.00001513851,0.0004386371,0.0001336445,0.000246856,0.0002157749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991053,0.00003179819,0.0004593891,0.00008743373,0.0002940877,0.00002194527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002471163,0.0007388244,0.1772625,0.001520712,0.0003808951,0.00006127338,0.0009977132,0.0003540121,0.001372587,0.008095024,0.02342161,0.7833237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003585434,0.00006417178,0.7517777,0.001670007,0.00006881565,0.00005171847,0.0004197676,0.0002710404,0.0007835727,0.0001918271,0.2406106,0.0005053276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8094559,0.0001613742,0.00003062026,0.0002933262,0.0004753442,0.0000934722,5.410178e-8,0.00001932359,0.1894706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962853,0.0000246811,0.0005558092,0.0003148972,0.00147606,8.130633e-7,9.861307e-7,0.00001805348,0.001323351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7828184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4769812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939701833","doi":"10.1108/14601060810911156","title":"Measuring innovation culture in organizations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":554,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational culture; Originality; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Creativity; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Innovation management; Exploratory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Business; Market orientation; Computer science; Management; Psychology; Economics; Service (business)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04396529242587766,"gpt":0.2203231939532401,"spread":0.1763579015273624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002272985,0.0001923543,0.0002026756,0.00381073,0.0002149922,0.0001490352,0.0003881433,0.00002377884,0.0001314198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003400141,0.0001817006,0.00003127576,0.01525756,0.00004272655,0.001079587,0.0001978209,0.0002546645,0.0003773863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002518627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001760578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001992348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974328,0.0000460533,0.001591749,0.0001928591,0.0005162586,0.000220336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953171,0.000006403088,0.001220677,0.0002076507,0.00324148,0.000006661484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003812916,0.0002240781,0.01062825,0.0001343151,0.000068853,0.0003373581,0.0002972879,0.0003462833,0.0006542937,0.9475696,0.03071727,0.008984252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004583626,0.00006811328,0.1328496,0.0003843218,0.00006686685,0.00005947818,0.002356746,0.000560668,0.0002703578,0.004581106,0.8535308,0.0006882763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1270432,0.00004027652,0.02437706,0.001414189,0.001079804,0.0003671301,5.396989e-7,0.00009833857,0.8455794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989801,0.00002612319,0.003105117,0.003622305,0.0009576532,0.000002948302,0.00003928865,0.00004450675,0.002401096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7409537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498872969","doi":"10.1002/smj.276","title":"Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a study of the home appliance industry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":530,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Modularity (biology); Modular design; Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Product (mathematics); Process management; New product development; Business; Conceptual model; Computer science; Process (computing); Structural equation modeling; Marketing; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Economics; Management; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07970961551970089,"gpt":0.2568552454495471,"spread":0.1771456299298462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008778825,0.0002878549,0.0002777456,0.0003502914,0.0005710472,0.0006148611,0.0006666001,0.0001057583,0.0006708042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004070107,0.0002119357,0.00007809119,0.00114712,0.0001215854,0.0004414697,0.0006013576,0.0007481884,0.00006498861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004872997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009584001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001850699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000303223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978748,0.000036985,0.0006586729,0.0003646018,0.0006683302,0.0003966329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.00000829889,0.0005163337,0.0004844346,0.0002109608,0.00002621267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004510597,0.00149729,0.06460884,0.00102161,0.0002723537,0.00004859745,0.0002223458,0.0001312243,0.00001855897,0.9290261,0.0005497754,0.002558239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009512965,0.0004313613,0.06629009,0.0005160646,0.0007358185,0.00006713174,0.07411969,0.06576449,0.00001160331,0.7781422,0.002924359,0.001484272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5606045,0.00005593969,0.000002055732,0.0002184207,0.0003675245,0.0004721021,4.620251e-7,0.00002907726,0.43825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996111,0.00004987902,0.00003977811,0.0003927938,0.0004909,0.0000268853,0.000001409137,0.00002171328,0.002865621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4355066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018311467","doi":"10.1016/s0263-2373(99)00084-5","title":"From market driven to market driving","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":521,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Industrial organization; Market share; Competitive advantage; Market share analysis; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Order (exchange); Market microstructure; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01046205352219818,"gpt":0.2091506534412634,"spread":0.1986885999190652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454902,0.0003279287,0.0002300943,0.000699354,0.0005106741,0.00154713,0.0009093141,0.00002529981,0.05395511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000362413,0.0003167756,0.0001439281,0.0008770913,0.00003003585,0.0007174897,0.0005659614,0.000290637,0.01831463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007843607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004811161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009463631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009845301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976891,0.00009649302,0.0006315592,0.0004665108,0.0005583021,0.0005580257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990883,0.00001939165,0.0002266673,0.000470076,0.0001344293,0.00006106438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009735564,0.0001383265,0.002989498,0.00004828825,0.0002021265,0.0006322095,0.0001021738,0.00004748991,0.00002042842,0.01914055,0.8107442,0.1658374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008768073,0.00001219918,0.03765052,0.0001573514,0.00009082109,0.000005133035,0.0004876356,0.00147201,0.000001260397,0.00341809,0.955409,0.0004191367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154947,0.0000203181,0.0006633628,0.002205472,0.00110007,0.0003462009,0.000001682629,0.0002277963,0.9799404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7273332,0.00007636876,0.004447085,0.01814406,0.009612962,0.00001307061,0.0000287766,0.000161468,0.240183],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7397574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585189676","doi":"10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.09","title":"How a Firm’s Competitive Environment and Digital Strategic Posture Influence Digital Business Strategy1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":516,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Business environment; Competitive advantage; Industrial organization; Marketing; Class (philosophy); Business administration; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009037511607996035,"gpt":0.1716937400898467,"spread":0.1626562284818506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005346415,0.000276985,0.0001941186,0.000166075,0.0001537445,0.005264926,0.0001919248,0.00006786852,0.000164526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001082604,0.0002432178,0.00003966333,0.0003247129,0.0001179742,0.003688363,0.0000606809,0.0001235014,0.00118863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002804582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001116035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005111761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001435403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988132,0.000004267566,0.0002362708,0.0003738612,0.0002512589,0.0003212113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.00001522605,0.0001540999,0.0002194835,0.0002363031,0.00002489614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009465896,0.001198644,0.05874059,0.001113206,0.0002956656,0.0001336347,0.001332461,0.00001766212,0.002635567,0.7863386,0.009460906,0.1386383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003889023,0.000430075,0.6694399,0.0002788129,0.0001140826,0.00002594507,0.0605691,0.002812462,0.0000181407,0.03987996,0.2199819,0.00256059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8144127,0.00005450505,0.0001128669,0.00255937,0.0001188184,0.0004894856,0.00001483423,0.0001323492,0.1821051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960304,0.000001730373,0.00002544937,0.0006551908,0.0003079325,0.00004296974,0.0001289029,0.00002447607,0.002782878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7464587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394964827","doi":"10.2307/20721419","title":"The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":513,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01353229113937657,"gpt":0.225278005406328,"spread":0.2117457142669515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005126925,0.00006903591,0.00009513121,0.0001253576,0.0001984567,0.0001255439,0.00009445283,0.00003372195,0.00001616241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001081586,0.00005001897,0.0000159593,0.0002096156,0.0001924093,0.0003115347,0.00001901183,0.00007328794,0.000008798004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003140082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004883053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000882873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002341904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993806,0.00001271428,0.0002985529,0.00009012307,0.0001278677,0.000090076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993628,0.00008030907,0.0002559553,0.0001279501,0.0001676942,0.000005326619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004187863,0.0000397552,0.006925245,0.0004679595,0.00002910579,0.000001036297,0.00193224,0.000001299074,0.0158726,0.9599472,0.001187052,0.01355464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007432466,0.0005720064,0.2003869,0.001129684,0.0006397484,0.0000232605,0.1124537,0.08004153,0.005130198,0.2929056,0.2976961,0.001588905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429213,0.00005117001,0.0002744803,0.001091797,0.0001770338,0.0001718017,0.000001283052,0.00001810516,0.05529307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993682,0.000003777471,0.00009108214,0.0001226829,0.00006922317,0.000006706195,0.000004879616,0.000004736751,0.0003287375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6670416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2039714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322984844","doi":"10.1177/0149206315610635","title":"An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing on Firm Growth and Suggestions for the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":494,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Conceptualization; Extant taxon; Resource-based view; Resource (disambiguation); Exploit; Construct (python library); Dynamic capabilities; Knowledge management; Sociology; Management; Computer science; Economics; Competitive advantage; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02542184040425719,"gpt":0.2982815299831835,"spread":0.2728596895789263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991256,0.000132675,0.0001809372,0.0004266041,0.0001609491,0.0001724016,0.0003097526,0.00003023552,0.0000139683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004395457,0.00008675809,0.00008135976,0.0003561975,0.00004276482,0.0002672701,0.00008129969,0.0001254457,0.000002411841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004236419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001984164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003445974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005323333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988536,0.00002590097,0.0004207336,0.0001294943,0.0004196696,0.0001506036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986903,0.00008087655,0.0005547395,0.0002171654,0.0004365909,0.00002034505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001544266,0.0002654864,0.00180403,0.0002666443,0.0001205196,0.000006637538,0.00005200498,0.0007569374,0.00001525812,0.9656214,0.01501231,0.01592432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006300246,0.0005862413,0.03360051,0.0003509978,0.0007412444,0.000003152668,0.01349788,0.03212283,0.00007099309,0.02808547,0.8842199,0.0004205767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07727703,0.0009795246,0.160572,0.08737744,0.005820583,0.003905528,0.00001358908,0.000163169,0.6638912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921712,0.00001923509,0.003650515,0.002554508,0.001412341,0.00001949249,0.000006886016,0.00001842232,0.0001474337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3537892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094842277","doi":"10.1002/smj.588","title":"Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":470,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Alliance; Transaction cost; Business; Sample (material); Industrial organization; Equity (law); Marketing; Statistical hypothesis testing; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05599229203229825,"gpt":0.2813981529408053,"spread":0.2254058609085071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00239433,0.000211143,0.0001850306,0.0002417692,0.0003869548,0.0003878935,0.000338649,0.0000491401,0.0002542436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000078464,0.000135004,0.0001078984,0.0008290914,0.0001070745,0.0003327572,0.0001634918,0.0003061113,0.00003148301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004866985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001173361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001217542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001365864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984843,0.00001545421,0.0005523278,0.0001953746,0.0003123814,0.0004402116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989884,0.00002181771,0.0004949784,0.0002452034,0.0002262802,0.00002335077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002018256,0.0001100108,0.02212781,0.0002402004,0.0003363953,0.00008751627,0.00004171914,0.0004361251,0.00001774967,0.9675377,0.00232322,0.006539728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01022876,0.0006242502,0.293657,0.001211872,0.001048533,0.000264097,0.02790638,0.2395695,0.00005716161,0.3896573,0.03311027,0.002664881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2989518,0.0001943317,0.0002212063,0.000231591,0.0003217459,0.0002541938,1.926683e-7,0.00003603713,0.6997889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971082,0.0002471089,0.00006875386,0.000325599,0.0008635707,0.000004499608,0.000006938977,0.00001707914,0.001358304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6984306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5505301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329455117","doi":"10.4324/9781351159203-17","title":"“Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Economy","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":466,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economic geography; Industrial organization; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01368341409468913,"gpt":0.1993867256931662,"spread":0.1857033115984771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002239071,0.0001610721,0.0001687608,0.000209813,0.0001736236,0.0001890271,0.0002032581,0.00011109,0.00002717961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002405074,0.0001237482,0.00001176338,0.00002502131,0.00005713873,0.0003851325,0.0002766,0.0001437747,0.0000249685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002580468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001110432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001263461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004677859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993874,0.000001514276,0.000256664,0.0002096067,0.00005457845,0.0000902322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993256,0.000007030312,0.0003708346,0.0002060357,0.00008848591,0.000002022867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003132561,0.000009186158,0.001299602,0.0004588425,0.00002440828,0.000002455015,0.000353517,7.957785e-7,0.000002452574,0.9365579,0.0002298878,0.06105785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003304597,0.000003926129,0.002160723,0.0002276076,0.00002214231,0.000001181551,0.0008856476,0.00001136188,0.0001699965,0.08141473,0.9145278,0.0002444776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00478396,0.0001513724,0.00004698537,0.0004533971,0.00007141694,0.0004568456,3.621867e-7,0.00005199461,0.9939837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327852,0.0001201514,0.0007249484,0.0003276867,0.0001987054,0.00003006282,0.00007833367,0.00003874957,0.06569624],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5046306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031102515","doi":"10.1177/1350507604048270","title":"From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Learning","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":462,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational learning; Empirical research; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Knowledge management; Management; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04467179361197784,"gpt":0.308136425470902,"spread":0.2634646318589242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001885478,0.0002530347,0.0002324638,0.001265271,0.001256078,0.0008815882,0.000478059,0.00006430704,0.0009440568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006360192,0.0002749299,0.00006831614,0.003753924,0.00005008212,0.0006412192,0.0009451564,0.0006478244,0.01037891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002523543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001962867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002852255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003984764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973795,0.00007490546,0.0004628324,0.0006520018,0.0008194287,0.0006113795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988431,0.00005201485,0.0001553484,0.000321196,0.0005939612,0.00003436434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002073811,0.0001394901,0.006559881,0.0002538101,0.0001056074,0.00005129784,0.0006253697,0.01833969,0.0001936436,0.9580736,0.003605096,0.01203184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008389203,0.00002744187,0.00321225,0.0005426085,0.00006647012,4.906527e-7,0.006980509,0.00112558,0.00002388909,0.02450938,0.9621873,0.0004851035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02148477,0.0001604602,0.02274035,0.007353148,0.0007995694,0.001087507,7.588246e-7,0.0009337571,0.9454397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788215,0.00004064631,0.004060863,0.002865953,0.002122959,0.0001073918,0.0001902057,0.00008716727,0.0117033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492815943","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00983.x","title":"Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":453,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Framing (construction); Incentive; Categorization; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1075713865328492,"gpt":0.4248579460503392,"spread":0.31728655951749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009492,0.00009479138,0.0001625487,0.001006053,0.0002331401,0.0001362994,0.0001333376,0.00002110283,0.000007164107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003945977,0.00006132336,0.00002274778,0.0009066521,0.0001337233,0.0002394696,0.0002664928,0.0003025011,0.000008218596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001588779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005003028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004221909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004857534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990308,0.00002609912,0.0003247493,0.000127868,0.0003358748,0.0001545771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999126,0.00004797084,0.0001969079,0.0001024142,0.0005180108,0.000008724889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002815061,0.000322946,0.008494675,0.0007838022,0.0003857611,0.00003914957,0.0007644324,0.00002082201,0.0001182083,0.8509077,0.01499145,0.1228895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005534574,0.0005990785,0.1989024,0.001489759,0.0004420838,0.00001632017,0.2038139,0.0002357664,0.0001777455,0.09008553,0.4981718,0.0005310529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7869233,0.001514559,0.00003104902,0.03504955,0.001260616,0.001129521,0.000001013194,0.00001966513,0.1740707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975224,0.0003701807,0.0003312397,0.0006022413,0.0009065479,0.00002592184,4.921056e-7,0.000007587212,0.0002334232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7608222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2500694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143471827","doi":"10.1002/smj.638","title":"Alliance or acquisition? a dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":452,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Complementarity (molecular biology); Resource Acquisition Is Initialization; Perspective (graphical); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Industrial organization; Corporate governance; Affect (linguistics); Resource-based view; Similarity (geometry); Resource dependence theory; Sample (material); Marketing; Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Economics; Resource allocation; Competitive advantage; Computer science; Management; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.036371001049119,"gpt":0.2965501631896765,"spread":0.2601791621405575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510839,0.000295378,0.0002095576,0.0008852116,0.0006793694,0.0009166496,0.0005246691,0.00006250278,0.001622395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002151248,0.0002462027,0.0001205581,0.001352671,0.00008433346,0.0004425277,0.0001827183,0.000423324,0.00115147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003667122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000215103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009372877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005459028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978426,0.00002172696,0.0005816239,0.0003871646,0.0006124462,0.0005544446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987268,0.00003734458,0.0004264515,0.0003088125,0.0004615333,0.00003902722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002563617,0.0004031834,0.00008702381,0.00008088625,0.0001383018,0.0003481308,0.00007568268,0.000008790246,0.000007505062,0.9913111,0.006273952,0.001009138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003526391,0.0001694426,0.001036209,0.0003083338,0.0001512382,0.00003701225,0.0515904,0.000797793,0.00001453365,0.8455285,0.09622395,0.0006161833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005734881,0.00005002608,0.0007744832,0.00352637,0.0008493039,0.0004457554,0.00000103849,0.0001584656,0.9884596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737029,0.00002450578,0.0003403181,0.006874461,0.001593267,0.00001768781,0.00001784808,0.00003683081,0.01739215],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083318486","doi":"10.1177/0149206310362102","title":"Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":440,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Construct (python library); Portfolio; Business; Knowledge management; Proactivity; Process management; Computer science; Management; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02914409499140713,"gpt":0.2265381204725114,"spread":0.1973940254811043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397056,0.0001961319,0.0002477934,0.0003126333,0.0001634914,0.0001553695,0.0005565886,0.00004796582,0.00007750465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000396478,0.0001436826,0.00009829883,0.0005983903,0.000133478,0.0007210693,0.000377627,0.0002518156,0.00001648517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005378687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001577099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007212111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006754379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978251,0.0000323879,0.0007768684,0.0002281209,0.0009250859,0.0002124363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997815,0.00001017819,0.0009591582,0.0003888872,0.0007991726,0.00002759385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006550221,0.0001805883,0.01566308,0.001301403,0.0002874671,0.00001569215,0.0001251829,0.00002531541,0.002249406,0.9524959,0.00322522,0.02436526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007534386,0.000180593,0.5369245,0.001222171,0.001736998,0.00004458985,0.007052667,0.004045458,0.004884381,0.1047564,0.3303142,0.001303678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967558,0.0001546644,0.000203248,0.004727483,0.002832297,0.0011144,0.00000127903,0.00003828633,0.09417259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963182,0.00004429723,0.001394516,0.001518,0.0003908083,0.00001183039,0.000001226139,0.00001801824,0.0003030786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5859205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142333951","doi":"10.1287/isre.1070.0133","title":"IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":425,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Michigan; University of Southern California","keywords":"Business; Relational view; Knowledge management; Leverage (statistics); Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Asset (computer security); Channel (broadcasting); Business value; Information sharing; Survey data collection; Industrial organization; Marketing; Computer science; Telecommunications; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1370104906458488,"gpt":0.3442281408655277,"spread":0.2072176502196789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005842775,0.00008145208,0.00009670135,0.001325448,0.0001725781,0.000389826,0.0001221876,0.00007165375,0.00002887289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002037265,0.00007845387,0.00001556029,0.001104915,0.00007351939,0.002089233,0.0001301147,0.000206093,0.001020567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001377082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002025868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003624631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006433798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984441,0.00002469279,0.0005583311,0.0001213726,0.0005825119,0.0002690289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988975,0.0001104716,0.0001271479,0.0001652374,0.0006874969,0.00001214866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002538363,0.00001480881,0.0187807,0.0003710386,0.000004680126,3.448503e-7,0.0008783793,0.0000250528,0.00001162827,0.9731537,0.003189086,0.003545239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006890015,0.00001037902,0.02695479,0.00011139,0.000002634174,0.00000201228,0.02048614,0.05498,0.00003200071,0.005927937,0.8906127,0.0001909888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1108032,0.00007210517,0.005676259,0.001531598,0.0003105727,0.001131656,0.000002308129,0.00008840155,0.8803838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817,0.000002609227,0.00003687825,0.0004151554,0.0003040369,0.0000848364,0.00004752526,0.000005970221,0.0009330038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326958296","doi":"10.1177/1094428112474693","title":"A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Partial least squares regression; Path analysis (statistics); Simple (philosophy); Structural equation modeling; Path (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Management science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1335857627017374,"gpt":0.4506450462742926,"spread":0.3170592835725553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004378626,0.0001263895,0.0001838452,0.0006314756,0.0003599217,0.0003735199,0.0003058601,0.00007964775,0.002871551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005584549,0.0001203583,0.00003565367,0.002027863,0.0001554355,0.0008555991,0.0003873978,0.0002367989,0.0005729006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000619153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005351362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001389832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007064429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977491,0.0002924801,0.0004443165,0.0002798564,0.0008788549,0.0003554199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947414,0.0004054355,0.00008562725,0.0002322906,0.004510723,0.00002446163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006893522,0.0002091317,0.001030004,0.0002212004,0.00001436069,0.00000103534,0.0001184352,0.0001306212,0.003250354,0.9697251,0.001186347,0.02410646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006710145,0.00004575546,0.02035291,0.0001662249,0.00002761555,0.000001242599,0.001932963,0.841902,0.002098923,0.1229168,0.009485554,0.0003990404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04664667,0.0001811589,0.48179,0.005072328,0.000641933,0.001180205,0.000006250835,0.0002097364,0.4642718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778028,0.000006304228,0.02033554,0.0003432856,0.0008035993,0.00005640373,0.00009487647,0.00003610593,0.0005211175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017315591","doi":"10.1177/0149206310371691","title":"Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and Capabilities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":415,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Knowledge management; Macro; Computer science; Dynamic capabilities; Component (thermodynamics); Organizational structure; Management science; Process management; Business; Data science; Management; Engineering; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03326246222281412,"gpt":0.292237689786823,"spread":0.2589752275640088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001776376,0.0001458967,0.0001842289,0.001280976,0.0003491885,0.0003979307,0.0002728716,0.00004856724,0.0004363752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002164256,0.0001235868,0.00004888828,0.0007827823,0.0001424972,0.0004636445,0.0002970486,0.0003757426,0.0001159424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008037978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003363607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001054491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003571075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983828,0.00002275456,0.0004419395,0.0001919898,0.000715913,0.0002445912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980617,0.00009931041,0.0002773142,0.0001710117,0.001372414,0.0000182992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007171414,0.0002146772,0.003242368,0.0001992205,0.00009894861,0.00002195636,0.000267509,0.00001133562,0.00009439927,0.957367,0.03561518,0.002795692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004508447,0.0002097433,0.06449708,0.0002602468,0.0001752986,0.00001978942,0.02396364,0.001597165,0.0002871522,0.433619,0.4701838,0.0006785736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2408242,0.00002892524,0.0001821929,0.00287924,0.00175495,0.0003985396,0.00000194824,0.00003106468,0.7538989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833667,0.0000166603,0.0008190431,0.001109546,0.001389374,0.00001135734,0.000004414086,0.00002352955,0.01325939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5039723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240055638","doi":"10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001","title":"The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":414,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Business; Marketing research; Function (biology); Marketing management; Empirical research; Focus (optics); Industrial organization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06162612886330731,"gpt":0.3007141292759433,"spread":0.239088000412636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145867,0.00009866012,0.0001468587,0.0003291425,0.0009541648,0.0001268954,0.0001342882,0.00002874451,0.00004409393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003515995,0.00006273518,0.0000392556,0.0003114424,0.0002059111,0.0005115715,0.0001451335,0.0003079491,0.00000647645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006915229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007559143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001265661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001375113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986858,0.0001645933,0.0004883033,0.00009910707,0.0003492738,0.000212898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976094,0.00114651,0.0003114577,0.00009404426,0.0008263002,0.00001222988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006714096,0.0004244419,0.8129394,0.001192884,0.0006687121,0.00003414895,0.005940289,0.0002116871,0.0002643253,0.06124449,0.02680449,0.08356103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007870767,0.0001134859,0.941765,0.0005367141,0.00001467813,0.00002384149,0.004167256,0.00233987,0.0000361536,0.0003120994,0.04973599,0.0001678777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.907234,0.000176108,0.000009448812,0.0004256041,0.00009191137,0.0001079916,2.276818e-7,0.00000595212,0.09194878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971942,0.0002153921,0.000310764,0.00005571903,0.0002639019,0.00000327244,7.355164e-7,0.00001007002,0.001945954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1288256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.733876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031737038","doi":"10.1002/smj.316","title":"An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":403,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economic rent; Competitor analysis; Industrial organization; Sustainability; Dilemma; Business; Procurement; Resource (disambiguation); Resource-based view; Value (mathematics); Competitive advantage; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02521529113102458,"gpt":0.2953583450741974,"spread":0.2701430539431728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003033185,0.0003586916,0.0003844816,0.0009046335,0.0004313794,0.0007613268,0.0006561231,0.00007834504,0.001445448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004468402,0.0003271109,0.0001539088,0.001512604,0.0001039168,0.001296351,0.00009453994,0.0003129669,0.00005663812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001882221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001384599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003011843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002065754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972397,0.000127751,0.0008428905,0.0004660205,0.000672078,0.000651536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997548,0.00001078715,0.0005927646,0.0006767707,0.001109413,0.0000622705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005465051,0.0007305412,0.001909213,0.001167458,0.00006883716,0.0001002174,0.00002038868,0.0001104168,0.0000207114,0.9901865,0.0001407323,0.005490383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002383756,0.0002120585,0.0008522106,0.00008449801,0.0001957368,0.000009426682,0.02807989,0.005679823,0.00008376018,0.9132906,0.04846215,0.0006660554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349891,0.00009387411,0.00224675,0.0003566288,0.0005977828,0.0006603783,0.000001334423,0.0001157101,0.9624286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995355,0.00002057324,0.001869372,0.001109349,0.0003735555,0.00002619723,0.00003150931,0.00004074639,0.0011737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9618561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173394018","doi":"10.1509/jmkg.70.4.37","title":"Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multifirm, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":383,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Market orientation; Marketing; Business; Market oriented; Orientation (vector space); Market analysis; Nonmarket forces; Organizational culture; Public relations; Economics; Factor market; Political science; Market economy; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01808600989479802,"gpt":0.2558898596253474,"spread":0.2378038497305494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003848153,0.0001376497,0.0003430769,0.001106113,0.000173739,0.000239169,0.000156379,0.00004111661,0.0003332286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004147918,0.0001161702,0.0002671413,0.002201598,0.00003169972,0.001301194,0.00003679465,0.0001219352,0.000004489892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006619768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001078505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001459286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001276557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981062,0.00006298758,0.00109002,0.0001192554,0.0004494281,0.0001721407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971165,0.0001658005,0.001511881,0.00009783074,0.001099901,0.000008064352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00451438,0.001382606,0.7443056,0.003072339,0.00476373,0.00009240989,0.002208522,0.005596631,0.003542164,0.1551649,0.03553307,0.03982364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002248528,0.00002851306,0.8926672,0.0003541075,0.002576042,0.00001040335,0.009634138,0.07186307,0.0001148055,0.0005173175,0.0196048,0.0003810455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6580592,0.00005206696,0.003325095,0.0004116838,0.0003095329,0.0001281886,0.000001287919,0.0000229052,0.33769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974902,0.000004696434,0.001298888,0.0001424366,0.0006729559,0.000002589357,0.0000244603,0.0000102933,0.0003535006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.339431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4737283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804930862","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014","title":"Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":379,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte","keywords":"Knowledge management; Structural equation modeling; Competitor analysis; Organizational learning; Organizational performance; Partial least squares regression; Business; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Competitive advantage; Computer science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06142633298689011,"gpt":0.3121155938880735,"spread":0.2506892609011834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002280955,0.00008711989,0.0001649845,0.0004925454,0.0001917563,0.0001847515,0.0003480121,0.00004047315,0.00007746826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001550254,0.00005433048,0.00001713082,0.002976836,0.0001863305,0.0006562888,0.0003005713,0.0002312292,0.00002288153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004099493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003469661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001619359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002455545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986199,0.00003022427,0.0003773044,0.00009916556,0.0006975606,0.0001759108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864154,0.00006718931,0.0002747454,0.0001313812,0.01309441,0.00001686862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001232819,0.00124206,0.6684613,0.00676413,0.0002893897,0.00001753611,0.003459234,0.0002782439,0.002989965,0.1981658,0.03204177,0.08505776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003370285,0.0001212271,0.4803939,0.0004913465,0.00009529552,0.00005228765,0.01242351,0.006597108,0.00243407,0.05932986,0.4342616,0.0004294403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.898151,0.001923456,0.00009756847,0.001830544,0.0004242579,0.0002690192,0.000001274377,0.0000136449,0.09728918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985437,0.00004809671,0.00006742419,0.00005780001,0.0009666834,0.000002387103,0.00000393395,0.00001187737,0.0002980959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4022199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2215533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973318019","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x","title":"Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":370,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic capabilities; Public sector; Identification (biology); Business; Control (management); Process management; Knowledge management; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0474383392261043,"gpt":0.2981984025550377,"spread":0.2507600633289334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005100481,0.0001819642,0.0002676452,0.001452606,0.0002795546,0.0004157677,0.0003613732,0.00002415672,0.00001827697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001329979,0.0001269272,0.00007540201,0.0009641583,0.000106686,0.0009257152,0.0003894632,0.0002045209,0.00001769625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001023415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003984599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007276185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002551134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982691,0.00002297902,0.000704766,0.0001762082,0.0004799897,0.0003469141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998937,0.00009650838,0.0004888233,0.0001735548,0.0002958222,0.000008355983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006212676,0.00019999,0.02384676,0.001978779,0.0005968885,0.0004147713,0.002902595,0.00001055125,0.00001629068,0.9119118,0.00517238,0.05288707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003041164,0.00006309365,0.1293623,0.0007151801,0.0004262332,0.00004100961,0.4264486,0.0005134345,0.000007740799,0.1128142,0.3258764,0.0006907239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5584882,0.01248831,0.004032367,0.02197378,0.003851426,0.001115825,4.547568e-7,0.0001059085,0.3979437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954442,0.0008054735,0.0002955111,0.002355491,0.0004481846,0.000007007597,9.611683e-7,0.00001491961,0.0006282411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121734177","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1070.0308","title":"Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge flow; Context (archaeology); Economic geography; Knowledge space; Geographical distance; Space (punctuation); Friendship; Knowledge management; Interpersonal ties; Strong ties; Location; Marketing; Geography; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008493541457838634,"gpt":0.2254282451002244,"spread":0.2169347036423858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181596,0.00008262409,0.00006176381,0.0005615301,0.0004776569,0.0004413291,0.0002110825,0.00002464809,0.0001334618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002004165,0.00007778976,0.000008336974,0.006245443,0.0002162055,0.0008819863,0.0002481836,0.00004611534,0.0002499467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002207013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002118029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006983923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002677239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991704,0.000001833294,0.000162595,0.0002405249,0.0001895763,0.0002350474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990221,0.00001203593,0.00007585318,0.0001363927,0.0007392124,0.00001443719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002719444,0.00005403677,0.1746626,0.0000271732,0.000003354447,0.000001724516,0.00006976983,0.0000319412,0.0008238211,0.7976423,0.001698761,0.0249818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007986144,0.00001122588,0.7565706,0.00003929613,0.00003235919,0.00000444986,0.001071687,0.06999036,0.0008817388,0.002283323,0.1676558,0.0006606162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.081737,0.00009688922,0.1204128,0.0005349143,0.001823703,0.0002945961,2.349827e-7,0.0003813516,0.7947185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973025,0.000004773151,0.0004556455,0.001310299,0.0005543039,7.294237e-7,0.000007308749,0.00001130706,0.0003531303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4255747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}