{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":730,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":10,"predictions_cover":730,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"cb1f36296aa9","filters":{"topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration"}},"results":[{"id":"W2158544761","doi":"","title":"Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Multidisciplinary approach; Teamwork; Discipline; Interdisciplinarity; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Management science; Sociology; Multidisciplinary team; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Nursing; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1912437988958332,"gpt":0.4602940907124329,"spread":0.2690502918165998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01604308,0.0002175022,0.0005105064,0.001497635,0.0006777478,0.0003997365,0.0003844437,0.000140331,0.000002979137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001051554,0.0001864309,0.00004828818,0.002411994,0.0008375419,0.001214444,0.001092781,0.0004712412,0.000002084242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003203948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006390963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003902477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993906,0.002336071,0.0009235883,0.0009308654,0.001221444,0.0006820895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953586,0.002822978,0.00026282,0.0004567652,0.0007830235,0.0003157924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001951126,0.0018081,0.6431935,0.003061326,0.00002980984,0.00001118863,0.01503114,0.00005564444,0.0005409486,0.06734183,0.0002574922,0.2667179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757761,0.0002051458,0.7337433,0.0003985944,0.000003187042,0.00001798476,0.005166425,0.0003615514,0.0001390711,0.2593424,0.0000313762,0.0001152187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813485,0.00700816,0.000194102,0.008273388,0.00009118689,0.001883465,0.00004384393,0.00002090359,0.001136415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978694,0.0005113167,0.0003258139,0.00002288985,0.0001074827,0.0009846904,0.00001277076,0.00001412505,0.0001515386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511560192","doi":"10.5751/es-02671-130246","title":"Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":531,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Arizona State University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Transdisciplinarity; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental resource management; Social science; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2061803537059972,"gpt":0.4705365254810008,"spread":0.2643561717750036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005708811,0.0001034638,0.0002442563,0.0001090725,0.00245872,0.0001011633,0.0004868108,0.0002446871,0.0004979569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000989494,0.00007248693,0.0001132022,0.0008672284,0.001334443,0.0003061133,0.001528945,0.0006000192,0.0004328674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008890331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001667038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003454116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005866875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969551,0.0008610613,0.0003839483,0.000524706,0.000788184,0.0004870156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968614,0.001906978,0.00006539903,0.0003314726,0.000673414,0.0001613627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002787765,0.0002890292,0.1572827,0.0000103437,0.00007027388,0.0006002178,0.05422919,0.00001170635,0.003786881,0.02359064,0.7575614,0.00228878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008502719,0.001638262,0.773049,0.00001050503,0.000005433516,0.0008043495,0.06651115,0.001931473,0.0007859516,0.1433865,0.01070833,0.0003187282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706921,0.000125228,0.0001413675,0.01466164,0.00027641,0.0001768012,0.000006845948,0.00003443021,0.01388517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822916,0.00005919292,0.0005728376,0.0002968354,0.0002292547,0.00002414033,0.000005589795,0.00000654456,0.01651398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161611987","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014","title":"Systems Thinking to Improve the Public's Health","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health; Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Rubric; Public health; Systems thinking; Systems science; Set (abstract data type); Conceptual framework; Management science; Engineering ethics; Population health; Foundation (evidence); Translational science; Translational research; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1115389723270157,"gpt":0.4459588353217285,"spread":0.3344198629947128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01240166,0.0001030267,0.0004902784,0.0004097387,0.0004446838,0.00008974648,0.001048046,0.00001160403,0.0001032599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003307223,0.00004646415,0.00009443908,0.001865709,0.0005715078,0.0003368564,0.0001514679,0.0002891971,0.00004863987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006557212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006598435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003618043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945919,0.001306518,0.0009818583,0.0001892961,0.002607881,0.0003225682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952378,0.000934911,0.001236694,0.0003412409,0.001858837,0.0003905311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000562893,0.0002300997,0.01040878,0.00001052964,0.0002696286,0.0002713903,0.07402992,0.0001545048,0.001568542,0.006347461,0.4702631,0.4358832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002727536,0.04668395,0.08984307,0.0007064724,0.00004061214,0.002946278,0.4458146,0.001115231,0.000189798,0.01257227,0.3969028,0.000457359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5308908,0.001511829,0.1503374,0.3112077,0.002400407,0.0006268764,0.000008576313,0.00001157728,0.003004802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951474,0.00004665581,0.0003633432,0.00121574,0.0009534345,0.00000685625,5.183797e-7,0.000006903612,0.002259155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4642566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4298193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143630684","doi":"10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950","title":"Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical and investigative medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":372,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Teamwork; Multidisciplinary approach; Discipline; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5649359550689699,"gpt":0.6151835000747852,"spread":0.0502475450058153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02634069,0.000554198,0.002901567,0.001695619,0.0006183467,0.0002497954,0.0005914657,0.0004960936,0.00003221893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003645901,0.0003577669,0.0001085944,0.002345291,0.01867043,0.0007384768,0.002053844,0.001732218,0.000002590163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001437122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003496724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006593322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004897126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891229,0.003405794,0.003628488,0.001581419,0.001574677,0.0006867677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993383,0.002666004,0.001020965,0.0005874736,0.0009193411,0.001423177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169452,0.0003424834,0.005483142,0.01537084,0.00007335397,0.00001064545,0.01722187,1.008163e-7,0.000005937528,0.03214173,0.0008249211,0.928408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001853433,0.007239119,0.02189328,0.04512243,0.0001118312,0.00006175615,0.07011955,0.000296373,0.000005245994,0.7099855,0.1426964,0.0006151194],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03274279,0.9403608,0.00008595754,0.02299625,0.0003203388,0.002486672,0.00009130249,0.00001480361,0.000901095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04759654,0.95021,0.0005747997,0.0001089105,0.000594751,0.0001434764,0.00008538477,0.0000304618,0.0006556858],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179962732","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvv025","title":"Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Centre for International Forestry Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Rubric; Credibility; Quality (philosophy); Management science; Context (archaeology); Stakeholder; Relevance (law); Reflexivity; Computer science; Social research; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8503872670441657,"gpt":0.7265575859595685,"spread":0.1238296810845971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2999274,0.0001243713,0.0002904405,0.001710319,0.0007824944,0.001612285,0.0006679793,0.0001512836,0.0002096571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04896587,0.0001004353,0.00004256472,0.005504282,0.0006016941,0.001796205,0.0006050107,0.001101708,0.0004937937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008547036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003011416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002420694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004301441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9584221,0.02191933,0.0009882898,0.0009655116,0.01666651,0.001038277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790679,0.008033611,0.000103722,0.0007246934,0.01158392,0.0004861286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002421295,0.0006686146,0.07886837,0.00005867202,0.00002594234,0.00008387581,0.1006754,0.0008950139,0.00549141,0.05920481,0.02681553,0.724791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002343459,0.0007972139,0.1906366,0.0001288581,0.000002895808,0.000009834468,0.2691721,0.1101891,0.0005617866,0.4247655,0.001192708,0.0001999738],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957235,0.001575383,0.0003648256,0.008760936,0.0001146705,0.001072845,0.000007686631,0.00001706529,0.03085157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983426,0.00001357983,0.0002990629,0.00001615816,0.0001157233,0.0002565834,0.00002012183,0.00001366095,0.0009224582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7245911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018595075","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006","title":"Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Futures","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of East Anglia","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Discipline; Reductionism; Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Management science; Social science; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05339150076321893,"gpt":0.4205861169883104,"spread":0.3671946162250915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065625,0.0001019535,0.0001146933,0.0001119435,0.001070368,0.0003970143,0.0004320175,0.00005608238,0.0003542513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009039805,0.00005135789,0.00005832107,0.0005552541,0.0001383364,0.0001780001,0.0001606187,0.0002598394,0.0002481611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002771332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009670855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001777381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002609432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983593,0.0002875385,0.0002070782,0.000307816,0.0006256019,0.0002126671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981119,0.001165847,0.00006044729,0.0003790745,0.0001968516,0.00008586315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008651257,0.001220435,0.01904762,0.00002847126,0.0001101326,0.00004656024,0.1557252,0.002312406,0.001495225,0.3424388,0.1396749,0.3370351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007030581,0.001218039,0.4656058,0.0001051272,0.00001877621,0.0000148027,0.03986314,0.001143005,0.001311438,0.4234097,0.06622335,0.0003838179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602318,0.0006204434,0.001222012,0.0105193,0.0003448827,0.0002227553,0.00002323838,0.00002971848,0.02678584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973518,0.00003321821,0.00009144546,0.000101629,0.0003734303,0.00001931898,7.512172e-7,0.000005870497,0.002022518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4465581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8232515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282496784","doi":"10.5751/es-02082-120208","title":"Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Morse code; Graduate students; Sociology; Ecology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Pedagogy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2357469775070146,"gpt":0.5093288295940287,"spread":0.273581852087014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01232567,0.0001079677,0.0002078166,0.0001666705,0.0018929,0.0002747833,0.0002216322,0.0001316669,0.00003173338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001344806,0.00008528438,0.00003449335,0.0005606688,0.0005977495,0.0002763717,0.001719714,0.0003901219,0.00001745725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009507931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001758523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007635022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005573874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977388,0.0002860146,0.0003450692,0.0005292281,0.0005976139,0.0005032607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971977,0.001706734,0.00005226554,0.0001617517,0.0004905117,0.000391019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003889498,0.00007389711,0.5739461,0.00004649667,0.0001297324,0.00007450057,0.2823869,0.00001360326,0.004413567,0.01207522,0.09965271,0.02679828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003098084,0.0004248972,0.5950624,0.00001469655,0.000003373603,0.00003521974,0.3929909,0.0003149645,0.0007581316,0.008905401,0.001044219,0.0001358774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854805,0.0001321131,0.0006207641,0.01148723,0.0002283686,0.0002802891,0.000004584608,0.00001569763,0.001750388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970403,0.00004696984,0.001189582,0.0004480719,0.0001248412,0.00001715632,0.000001793756,0.000006476697,0.001124753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1197531309","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017","title":"Climate change and transdisciplinary science: Problematizing the integration imperative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Knowledge integration; Epistemology; Climate change; Coproduction; Context (archaeology); Science studies; Adaptation (eye); Politics; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge management; Social science; Political science; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1649941760744629,"gpt":0.4425389718353869,"spread":0.2775447957609239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008277115,0.000156942,0.0001440172,0.0005545304,0.002321687,0.001205843,0.001246694,0.00003318341,0.00005113185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006111685,0.00008603893,0.00003598811,0.003149378,0.005090193,0.003845412,0.0009827875,0.0001731737,0.0002099444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005047834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004542638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003149979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006983229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951436,0.0001487994,0.0003608381,0.0006596973,0.003017821,0.000669223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987614,0.0001070363,0.0001301185,0.000460096,0.0001117909,0.0004295179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001839103,0.0002360187,0.006372691,0.000004944642,0.000004588646,0.00001358936,0.3943579,0.00009522863,0.3105773,0.06983785,0.0006016952,0.2177143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284874,0.002209102,0.3150055,0.00008656512,0.00001510548,0.0002006542,0.4510353,0.05024194,0.06485149,0.1130755,0.001185381,0.0008087011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781614,0.00009200302,0.0001587818,0.01160763,0.0001552101,0.0006424519,0.00002494053,0.00001858698,0.009138992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,0.00002682799,0.0002905403,0.0002478124,0.0002427457,0.00009287245,0.00000215132,0.000006306685,0.0002820826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3086328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024979441","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802","title":"Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: a critical review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Discipline; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ideology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5179311334149813,"gpt":0.6533157314774267,"spread":0.1353845980624454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01026874,0.0004023368,0.001915061,0.001616545,0.0004695391,0.0003868015,0.002525144,0.0001338239,0.0001001015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395978,0.0002901231,0.0002511535,0.01700345,0.001723893,0.00135172,0.0007169251,0.0007498009,0.0004381809],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001681771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03150208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008618261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003720228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919434,0.001042637,0.002109438,0.00161194,0.002668966,0.000623678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939836,0.001945485,0.0004461256,0.001118653,0.002202486,0.0003036616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000443274,0.0002653528,0.00003997654,0.008197594,0.000004671608,0.000005179115,0.002752957,2.022139e-7,1.012808e-7,0.005029443,0.01529409,0.968406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004848941,0.0001019227,0.00007533585,0.05373688,0.00005140098,0.0000315404,0.02331629,0.00001376721,3.692636e-7,0.01106893,0.9112051,0.000350025],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002046855,0.9763696,0.00001572482,0.01048166,0.004420673,0.001805634,0.00001470136,0.00001727875,0.00685433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000298988,0.9961999,0.0002784942,0.0002831442,0.0004835095,0.00116789,0.000009966049,0.00001543046,0.001262645],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.968056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075097099","doi":"10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5","title":"‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Discipline; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Adaptation (eye); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Psychology; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.241513488474217,"gpt":0.5702779697153282,"spread":0.3287644812411112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006687032,0.00008801444,0.000118693,0.001397217,0.0003121917,0.0004125176,0.0005961385,0.00008792252,0.001721969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005717046,0.00007435853,0.00003976924,0.002841158,0.000169064,0.001122884,0.0003582789,0.0003204329,0.0008620829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005561762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001583094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007524811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001062089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969677,0.0003558521,0.0003985132,0.0003861493,0.00144987,0.0004419634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976487,0.0006638818,0.00006760174,0.0004423082,0.001045732,0.0001317555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007738853,0.0008612584,0.01708291,0.00001734937,0.00001037536,0.00006093666,0.01614993,0.00009932385,0.002901676,0.7055029,0.2258202,0.03071928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001976938,0.0001891242,0.459163,0.00003264671,0.00000114429,0.000003974985,0.2419564,0.00005002651,0.0003310515,0.2487906,0.04915811,0.0001262639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6531133,0.0001442182,0.0002547357,0.005307502,0.0009647277,0.0001659561,0.000001909297,0.00001716401,0.3400305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005648,0.000001706881,0.0001721004,0.00004367697,0.0003989668,0.00001253013,0.00001125578,0.000006952362,0.09878804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4567122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171618024","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020","title":"Measuring Collaboration and Transdisciplinary Integration in Team Science","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Community Based Research Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Internal consistency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychological intervention; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Psychometrics; Computer science; Structural equation modeling; Clinical psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08881732403252522,"gpt":0.4187884609500573,"spread":0.3299711369175321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006535561,0.0001015036,0.0003774009,0.001208229,0.0002509618,0.00004970839,0.0004115901,0.00001671179,0.00004616144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002410872,0.00006391839,0.00003655574,0.004048775,0.002036518,0.001214898,0.00006732912,0.0002341883,0.000004524229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001514139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005243298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001124428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001530606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964125,0.0003971709,0.0008247833,0.000241282,0.001924192,0.0002000708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968289,0.0003762206,0.0005860423,0.0001614293,0.001875025,0.0001723795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003073937,0.0005055676,0.1002531,0.00001279617,0.00005051258,0.0003784775,0.2478793,0.0003724509,0.1589981,0.001817488,0.004967174,0.4816911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002654265,0.01082085,0.6301395,0.0006113842,0.00002617812,0.0007698893,0.3266595,0.003210576,0.008783421,0.01568404,0.0003803703,0.0002600433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848871,0.0002598935,0.007923219,0.004279169,0.0002092449,0.0001519789,0.000001545892,0.000003246346,0.002284663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985381,0.00007517244,0.0008519566,0.00003719061,0.0001668643,0.000003577024,5.840448e-7,0.000004572715,0.000321918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5298864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7503634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191720934","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.003","title":"Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Citation; Bibliometrics; Citation impact; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Focus (optics); Citation analysis; Percentile; Data science; Percentile rank; Library science; Information retrieval; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625741757646505,"gpt":0.461230812010258,"spread":0.2986566362456075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005143026,0.000129941,0.0003511144,0.002696105,0.0001399593,0.000564661,0.001146486,0.00009929523,0.0001592671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01392897,0.00008007385,0.0002072168,0.006532171,0.00009178272,0.001492325,0.0005768408,0.0003836702,0.0001820861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002511939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004533368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.659744e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001676263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946781,0.00009176932,0.001204393,0.0001357718,0.003602813,0.000287128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924446,0.0005814467,0.001507576,0.0003328017,0.004641754,0.000491819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001680066,0.0002486687,0.08089256,0.00001386591,0.0001025426,0.0005347956,0.007694155,0.002152574,0.0001840762,0.0008710309,0.776254,0.1293717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005329125,0.006081738,0.1872246,0.0002061332,0.0000591458,0.001232117,0.3126979,0.007620133,0.001597444,0.03228666,0.4448856,0.0007794421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9072387,0.0003756068,0.004229239,0.01081091,0.00209565,0.0001747164,0.0000201748,0.00001826995,0.07503673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938337,0.000009749548,0.0009988385,0.0003847626,0.0004355559,0.000001539587,0.000001674148,0.000008486495,0.004325695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3313684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131453475","doi":"10.25011/cim.v31i1.3140","title":"Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 3. Discipline, inter-discipline distance, and selection of discipline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical and investigative medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Transdisciplinarity; Teamwork; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Multidisciplinary approach; Selection (genetic algorithm); Knowledge management; Management science; Epistemology; Data science; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4700063315005071,"gpt":0.5796374763682748,"spread":0.1096311448677676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014694,0.001159975,0.005200744,0.003096583,0.001435351,0.0003071023,0.001091323,0.0008409143,0.00003377629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004547283,0.0007745724,0.0002947458,0.005432542,0.02562896,0.001219649,0.0049116,0.003191131,0.000007136098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003170792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002501649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000617018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01373791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9829589,0.004593535,0.006111643,0.003002935,0.002156338,0.001176639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989673,0.004117477,0.002020554,0.0009186802,0.001469474,0.001800843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000417938,0.001378636,0.02885377,0.01487687,0.0001849941,0.00002448842,0.01967612,0.000002343273,0.000009670179,0.01900069,0.002935307,0.9126392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005499594,0.009510116,0.1096043,0.07088612,0.0003251802,0.0005769211,0.02904423,0.006415796,0.000005049302,0.5874763,0.1785821,0.002074301],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03879211,0.9090127,0.0005472303,0.04613815,0.0006567301,0.003759416,0.0004019994,0.00006340721,0.0006282874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07306349,0.9220661,0.0009075714,0.0001185032,0.001367601,0.0002786405,0.0002942041,0.00009143113,0.001812484],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9105649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574836281","doi":"10.5751/es-07580-200222","title":"Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Situated; Sustainability; Sociology; Transdisciplinarity; Community of practice; Engineering ethics; Element (criminal law); Core (optical fiber); Public relations; Knowledge management; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3209727226146412,"gpt":0.5374029371295427,"spread":0.2164302145149015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01200055,0.00005129398,0.0001561737,0.0000703927,0.0005641722,0.00006501082,0.0003149725,0.0001112135,0.00002655007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449847,0.00003925005,0.00006775527,0.000345044,0.000566183,0.0003937668,0.0002195171,0.0002396903,0.00001057511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003676365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002563587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009824699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002678364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981585,0.0006712861,0.0002585401,0.0001441036,0.0005366757,0.0002308513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923573,0.005499837,0.00007007459,0.0002216831,0.001761389,0.00008974714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001639718,0.0006178048,0.01083599,0.00005383489,0.0001382357,0.000006420448,0.667944,0.0002003892,0.000718086,0.04558902,0.2691197,0.003136829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008382667,0.001746067,0.009675942,0.000006930011,0.000008086634,0.00001126788,0.8567522,0.004160436,0.0004111435,0.1112789,0.01503716,0.00007360831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975809,0.0002017908,0.001045981,0.009831832,0.0001982001,0.0003193915,0.00002490441,0.000009397096,0.01255951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947172,0.00003103923,0.002922445,0.00008567783,0.00008244168,0.00005072166,0.000006499633,0.000003988444,0.002099995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2540826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4339214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050980825","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0705190104","title":"Our share of the planetary pie","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Science and engineering; Stem cell; Business; Biology; Engineering ethics; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2029368468632224,"gpt":0.440202534905272,"spread":0.2372656880420496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006714649,0.000176698,0.0003491216,0.0005926958,0.0003923751,0.0001157277,0.005837995,0.0003891085,0.00009479791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003264899,0.00008326774,0.0002550472,0.003097256,0.001123232,0.0006289492,0.000857588,0.001045924,0.00001318786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005405253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002330759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006057683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.629374e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885786,0.00004127613,0.0009671461,0.0004782172,0.009628606,0.0003061643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954788,0.0006441768,0.001730661,0.00004000606,0.002069714,0.00003663921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002564318,0.00001767045,0.002132454,0.00006079185,0.00001748987,4.765129e-8,0.0001459395,0.00003088961,0.003669469,0.002270572,0.9913391,0.0002899366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005011946,0.0004393233,0.1176589,0.001196432,0.00006683057,0.00006789151,0.004130447,0.002320991,0.1219588,0.4586576,0.2923888,0.0006128597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04409468,0.0002139499,0.000001167733,0.9161943,0.0002178432,0.0005730023,0.0005071207,0.000008971919,0.03818899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287764,0.000008695325,0.0002663013,0.06203756,0.001394918,0.00001168529,0.000002263214,0.000009073307,0.007493106],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8846817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104890123","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.052","title":"Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; Université de Montréal; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Behavioural sciences; Sociology; Legitimacy; Social science; Perception; Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Conformity; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3592990173254391,"gpt":0.5965230792685166,"spread":0.2372240619430774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04967746,0.00009593327,0.0003068533,0.001389564,0.006974201,0.0001016526,0.002577954,0.00006987627,0.0003226188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007107818,0.00005229604,0.00006756432,0.02463166,0.0365652,0.0005838377,0.0005052605,0.000428825,0.00003723559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004780601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003794314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004387765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003106849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984711,0.001206761,0.0008234108,0.0006412182,0.01172902,0.0008885877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974239,0.00048779,0.0002607224,0.000259196,0.001421716,0.0001466221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001809877,0.0006253737,0.1482082,0.00003540945,0.000004900521,0.00002311836,0.3691243,0.000009012905,0.07851186,0.06277142,0.2550117,0.08549368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028459,0.001173619,0.8041158,0.0001296913,0.00000157079,0.00002480354,0.1504713,0.001099001,0.0002717779,0.03140104,0.01011324,0.0001696941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142607,0.0000498527,0.0001203007,0.07025532,0.0006727971,0.0003276554,0.000005772967,0.000009553486,0.01429805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998094,0.000007981961,0.00002918895,0.0003093244,0.0005792662,0.00001111035,9.365289e-7,0.000003235447,0.0009649616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006367391","doi":"10.2307/3341603","title":"Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1376355157776867,"gpt":0.4135488328022969,"spread":0.2759133170246102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530489,0.00007839398,0.0001890529,0.0003939953,0.001203954,0.001884916,0.001031086,0.00008633631,0.001848454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000726173,0.00004524884,0.00006017042,0.0005324071,0.002745129,0.002767966,0.00006270038,0.0003419621,0.0001606994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002146661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001439982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003894952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05224644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979817,0.0003051334,0.0003953156,0.0001750768,0.0007189671,0.0004238335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997508,0.0004511873,0.0002117091,0.0002455345,0.001046181,0.000537339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006980783,0.00001980731,0.003453539,0.000002903731,0.00005789887,0.0002464616,0.1835969,0.00006460724,0.000814768,0.01279818,0.7312386,0.0676365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009216623,0.001599715,0.01306617,0.0001295746,0.00003140256,0.001060463,0.535386,0.003311183,0.0003345034,0.2373057,0.2065231,0.0003304815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6130808,0.002724637,0.00001735184,0.3760969,0.001021149,0.00007874813,0.000004191887,0.000001487792,0.006974697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991579,0.001466849,0.00003821999,0.004090445,0.0002872697,0.000001077482,2.201387e-7,0.000003961361,0.00253299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5247155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622108267","doi":"10.5539/jel.v6n4p66","title":"Why Teach Science with an Interdisciplinary Approach: History, Trends, and Conceptual Frameworks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Conceptual framework; Science education; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08147796828735311,"gpt":0.4404936429772348,"spread":0.3590156746898817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003391622,0.00008668931,0.0001714285,0.0005435555,0.00184369,0.001302101,0.0005612641,0.00006449727,0.0001453473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001219201,0.00005568969,0.00002556144,0.0002137488,0.001319384,0.002315138,0.0002244303,0.0008131253,0.000001825403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008299949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008839505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002587067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982488,0.0002200521,0.0003036128,0.0002504444,0.0008187938,0.0001583376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997767,0.000137912,0.0006507803,0.0002720847,0.0009004571,0.0002717537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008456689,0.0005535046,0.05828078,0.0000101436,0.00002762425,0.00001221293,0.1092457,0.0001990841,0.001055465,0.005064326,0.04157504,0.7831304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001091043,0.005082796,0.4496434,0.0001981698,0.00003405677,0.0007297412,0.3995267,0.01086335,0.00005335629,0.003989553,0.1284161,0.0003717676],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714912,0.0005021734,0.003273775,0.005906278,0.0005107909,0.00004671328,3.430841e-7,0.000004922034,0.01826387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916046,0.000006309659,0.003282835,0.0001467866,0.0003343294,0.000002223862,8.848176e-7,0.000005398555,0.004616589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7827587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013284542","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.004","title":"Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: The decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Excellence; Cognitive dissonance; Snowball sampling; Legitimacy; Sociology; Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Social science; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1872267089456838,"gpt":0.5167537600745599,"spread":0.329527051128876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02057064,0.0001778722,0.0004557171,0.0006972702,0.003319093,0.0003214475,0.001991286,0.00006875883,0.0003539847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154301,0.00009223756,0.00004288928,0.004248942,0.02061616,0.001907906,0.000709846,0.0002937905,0.000006136193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008785789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000448839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009472249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008944662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993738,0.0005924882,0.0007811977,0.0006609617,0.003704648,0.000522683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955407,0.002491352,0.0008541297,0.0002408107,0.0007821661,0.00009078551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006439392,0.00007873074,0.005659024,0.00002042617,0.00001079475,0.000004557516,0.8960043,0.000003082167,0.005936106,0.06389301,0.006647306,0.02109879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311259,0.001729471,0.02506321,0.00008371565,0.00001547695,0.000004346223,0.9419242,0.001023227,0.0003187674,0.02632762,0.002036326,0.000162366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166489,0.0002385872,0.00004409127,0.02225965,0.0008247314,0.0002920751,0.000001261395,0.00001540223,0.05967534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986222,0.00001076255,0.00001995357,0.000184478,0.0008166166,0.00005587061,8.563935e-7,0.000004969929,0.0002843319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0819733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239388337","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v3i2.28850","title":"Equity in Author Order: A Feminist Laboratory’s Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Currency; Equity (law); Sociology; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1178495508239065,"gpt":0.4655997445514812,"spread":0.3477501937275747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01918828,0.000290715,0.0004536817,0.0007237695,0.002256036,0.002445328,0.007851045,0.0002325711,0.0001199426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144419,0.000223562,0.00009904779,0.002983026,0.002587045,0.001416777,0.003197572,0.0005218095,0.0004294278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002071093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009142963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001885276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001157332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941745,0.0003050477,0.0008220033,0.001358279,0.002460748,0.0008794059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942001,0.0005609576,0.0005823539,0.003652552,0.0006834355,0.0003205829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003724879,0.0006764496,0.01344709,0.00003406591,0.0000134503,0.0002260224,0.005800722,0.00003722149,0.02879247,0.8538342,0.008964589,0.0878012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001721463,0.0006976165,0.02062916,0.0001348024,0.00002366,0.00009091904,0.05289852,0.01172111,0.04940058,0.8338857,0.02721701,0.001579514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2727534,0.000195382,0.04067961,0.0035973,0.001282598,0.00129729,0.000273375,0.0003112021,0.6796098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901409,0.000002868615,0.001538249,0.0001310813,0.00008772336,0.0001489186,0.000007937958,0.00001774631,0.007924561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7173875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977083612","doi":"10.1177/0306312703336004","title":"Preparing the Next Generation of Scientists","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Graduate students; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4044870703197594,"gpt":0.5144934664428937,"spread":0.1100063961231343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007339636,0.00004886079,0.0001385776,0.000129778,0.00190739,0.0001470325,0.0007106217,0.00001471774,0.00001935635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00572919,0.000028017,0.00004835667,0.002921173,0.004967028,0.0005983032,0.0002793164,0.00004430503,0.000009632786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005430758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002952859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006973908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002101023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970831,0.000138288,0.0003404005,0.0002420893,0.001998405,0.0001976624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973817,0.0002486006,0.0002150947,0.000203914,0.001922375,0.00002824586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004258226,0.0001308788,0.005722124,0.00001762525,0.00004119777,9.230417e-7,0.06496714,0.0002643314,0.5175686,0.3422948,0.03631933,0.0326304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006925273,0.0007071531,0.04085414,0.00004765288,0.00002594488,0.000004839284,0.356898,0.004843454,0.4263953,0.1584344,0.01071015,0.0003864291],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778837,0.0004261976,0.0002750075,0.0007102319,0.0005462588,0.0001402103,0.000002532241,0.000003728924,0.02001211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991123,0.00001149636,0.000240067,0.00001591351,0.00006136151,0.00000695178,8.953992e-8,0.000001261259,0.0005505576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2919309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089834504","doi":"10.1007/s10734-008-9147-z","title":"Facilitating interdisciplinary work: using quality assessment to create common ground","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Common ground; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Perception; Work (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3574209058193805,"gpt":0.5611031016555118,"spread":0.2036821958361313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005678,0.0001661908,0.0002647188,0.0003614986,0.0008736074,0.0003223528,0.0005023921,0.00007037487,0.0009053128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001932824,0.000137905,0.00009243572,0.001687263,0.00009382063,0.0007406411,0.0005201295,0.0001944888,0.0004850815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004783537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005850421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001349977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008332462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963819,0.0006523947,0.000750103,0.0005475946,0.001323184,0.0003448256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974325,0.0006761049,0.0002147726,0.0006660786,0.0007660936,0.0002444041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00140717,0.003014323,0.5077193,0.00007423072,0.0001148338,0.00004208141,0.07248731,0.003651726,0.01907379,0.02561652,0.2303995,0.1363992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001871063,0.0001998114,0.9628916,0.00005433298,0.000006277091,0.00001129861,0.01473422,0.0004068951,0.0001209051,0.01585138,0.005274326,0.0002617977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681903,0.00006057096,0.003356971,0.004648474,0.001466933,0.0003686505,0.00001191377,0.00004154716,0.02185471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607934,7.286834e-7,0.005744561,0.0002435687,0.0003706076,0.00007672266,0.00002938229,0.00001267116,0.03272836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4551723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288954491","doi":"","title":"Creating Interdisciplinarity: Grounded Definitions from the College and University Faculty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of intellectual culture","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Conceptualization; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Typology; Engineering ethics; Liberal arts education; Work (physics); Pedagogy; Social science; Higher education; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1749790398083151,"gpt":0.3416575927051616,"spread":0.1666785528968465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007334766,0.0001288513,0.0002130772,0.000101115,0.0005621429,0.00005415818,0.0004427767,0.000097963,0.001524489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00380983,0.00008164676,0.0001013552,0.0005511147,0.000511791,0.0002835794,0.0002020804,0.0002769058,0.00008294478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000410396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003038078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000635265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001677878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980991,0.000487901,0.0002936587,0.0003378929,0.000613827,0.0001676291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975398,0.001275133,0.0001460457,0.0003141024,0.0006310613,0.0000939271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000261419,0.00009046654,0.0003290733,0.000003914038,0.0000450359,0.00001222211,0.1102751,0.000007169407,0.001307121,0.05649609,0.8306761,0.0004962996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004866016,0.0003148058,0.001094213,0.00003877134,0.00002848656,0.00001912978,0.2252298,0.0003991507,0.0003069696,0.03163054,0.7402653,0.000186309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4371304,0.0019629,0.006436041,0.001843456,0.0008023363,0.0004665349,0.0007614861,0.0000556067,0.5505412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948353,0.00001887854,0.0008818193,0.00008555096,0.00004434926,0.000002785913,0.00003033706,0.000006228294,0.05057708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5112226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135017631","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01363","title":"Potential for Chemistry in Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary Teaching Activities in Higher Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Royal Society of Chemistry; Royal Society; Medical Research Council; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Curriculum; Multidisciplinary approach; Engineering ethics; Inclusion (mineral); Chemistry; Higher education; Chemistry education; Sociology; Engineering; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04276542484789549,"gpt":0.4257973088550875,"spread":0.3830318840071921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685976,0.0001658395,0.0003760936,0.0003805624,0.0001135359,0.0002326474,0.0003563395,0.0001573169,0.0001810807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005611915,0.0001426477,0.0001474753,0.0005446476,0.00009584572,0.001012848,0.0002124356,0.0005464799,0.000001842526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003227018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001917099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002432828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001963334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974365,0.0001921928,0.001056674,0.0003777164,0.0006722935,0.0002646313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981077,0.0004709232,0.0003945091,0.0002383448,0.0006206271,0.0001679112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002396484,0.004996374,0.006012764,0.0002676154,0.0000388515,0.00004532302,0.02074456,0.0002695899,0.8386215,0.001348414,0.01095393,0.1143046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00576226,0.0008249439,0.09210607,0.001889078,0.0000964436,0.001140092,0.2501443,0.005768892,0.2207348,0.4168068,0.003583264,0.001143012],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977009,0.000703665,0.0002305591,0.01810749,0.0009844346,0.0001957768,0.00000721504,0.000004440819,0.002757422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936681,0.00001216291,0.002005089,0.00004791357,0.0008323322,0.00004866869,0.00002554326,0.00001501402,0.003345209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6178867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5817006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788899678","doi":"10.1186/s13012-018-0711-3","title":"Training scholars in dissemination and implementation research for cancer prevention and control: a mentored approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implementation Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Workforce; Medical education; Medicine; Baseline (sea); Health services research; Nursing research; Health informatics; Cancer prevention; Focus group; Program evaluation; Public health; Nursing; Cancer","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3918555710657191,"gpt":0.6692440374427165,"spread":0.2773884663769974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0187426,0.00009442928,0.0001425095,0.001049198,0.001017202,0.001131868,0.0003200012,0.00003130148,0.000127174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009137231,0.00008078916,0.00001899109,0.002460537,0.0006081056,0.002483761,0.0001424113,0.00009515958,0.000003380251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002126772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004651704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009570282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003979248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960779,0.000343561,0.0005527014,0.0006772015,0.001847056,0.0005016063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972286,0.0005553389,0.0001761944,0.0001797886,0.00172327,0.0001367897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000294442,0.0000530113,0.04383187,0.00001437842,0.000009031155,4.496783e-7,0.03440404,0.000005376862,0.1155617,0.01043552,0.001243776,0.7941464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005139573,0.001704343,0.5626777,0.00005065853,0.00001454301,0.000007551709,0.3203823,0.02785248,0.02648793,0.05166849,0.003692131,0.0003223507],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738697,0.00005747267,0.02159355,0.00206012,0.0001247502,0.001729669,0.00006280447,0.00001091395,0.0004910231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996564,0.00001174207,0.002375359,0.00004563987,0.0000998004,0.0006717439,0.00002147046,0.000006233386,0.0002040064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.793824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284712838","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680","title":"Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Alberta; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Francis Crick Institute; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Serbian; Organizational culture; Portuguese; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; German; Political science; Knowledge management; Biology; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4860726049485319,"gpt":0.5759858040320265,"spread":0.08991319908349454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045012,0.00007587394,0.0001425169,0.0004595587,0.001305844,0.0002760827,0.0006696425,0.00006142814,0.0003500723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02019441,0.00005944526,0.00003468273,0.001342979,0.0001302172,0.0003124616,0.001416735,0.0005035977,0.00008056856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001592095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002079812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006066472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001165038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957908,0.001965409,0.0002848142,0.0005832707,0.0008590407,0.000516628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928719,0.004538702,0.00006252144,0.0003896319,0.001937284,0.0002000071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005413165,0.000458363,0.002360166,0.00001789698,0.0001553337,0.0000205523,0.03787457,0.00003285771,0.2853347,0.03790318,0.5639557,0.06647361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003692106,0.004395255,0.0003240326,0.00000386262,0.000004175381,0.000008776116,0.05487749,0.0004592992,0.001283895,0.02239135,0.915764,0.0001186761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6062945,0.000602842,0.003283026,0.3514957,0.0009511446,0.004172425,0.001250856,0.00007740877,0.03187219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754726,0.00001413446,0.004786341,0.000570213,0.0002368566,0.001517059,0.00005549264,0.0000155823,0.01733176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3691781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167488899","doi":"10.1258/1355819041403222","title":"Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Engineering ethics; Discipline; Sociology; Productivity; Work (physics); Creatures; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1606464446332836,"gpt":0.5504509129896693,"spread":0.3898044683563857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05931423,0.0002773593,0.0009911979,0.005781298,0.00198827,0.001308764,0.00168815,0.000166792,0.00004835174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007418056,0.000196699,0.00009400901,0.005045408,0.0008918281,0.001989739,0.002252469,0.002144007,0.00003804082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00142748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004874406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01250338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07411298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837421,0.004762428,0.002598793,0.0007314172,0.006132886,0.002032414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902717,0.002146475,0.000914861,0.0006954034,0.004605678,0.0013659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006804802,0.00199454,0.09884931,0.009578083,0.0002233206,0.0007440895,0.6178916,0.0003756792,0.0009645254,0.03338461,0.007950744,0.2212387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002892964,0.007312055,0.2716319,0.005415536,0.000002309597,0.0003417626,0.3234981,0.0007857413,0.0001657575,0.3738433,0.01381772,0.0002928057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8414885,0.01414166,0.0000321218,0.1423543,0.0001621997,0.0007623476,0.00003400867,0.00001337219,0.00101142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896411,0.007622412,0.000483305,0.0008293798,0.0007094387,0.00002360408,0.000005222033,0.00002570279,0.0006597833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3404587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024126375","doi":"10.1080/03075070802373008","title":"Adventures in transdisciplinary learning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Higher Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Adventure; Cross disciplinary; Higher education; Sociology; Narrative; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Work (physics); Political science; Social science; Engineering; Computer science; Data science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4022820495313654,"gpt":0.5409744527340831,"spread":0.1386924032027176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009945778,0.0001015921,0.0001986275,0.0005142345,0.000251368,0.00002983617,0.0002776254,0.00004901367,0.0003052309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901157,0.00007902642,0.00004177861,0.001621483,0.0001793276,0.0003788191,0.00011335,0.0002394279,0.0001195604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002334436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001170585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003618621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980111,0.0003028802,0.0004537153,0.0003450075,0.0006509089,0.0002363873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989815,0.0003801487,0.00007960825,0.0002131755,0.0003034431,0.00004211092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004759511,0.001137906,0.6655555,0.00004806695,0.00003638414,0.00009840573,0.2240495,0.00327093,0.0004400236,0.008638054,0.08099526,0.01525404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003623811,0.0001851193,0.8685017,0.00007211007,0.00000203214,0.000009274006,0.07781049,0.00008965301,0.00007198574,0.03689906,0.01583527,0.0001609346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647503,0.003726507,0.000006519367,0.006171932,0.001686684,0.0002035851,8.841816e-7,0.00001646649,0.02343705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657297,0.0001876045,0.0001112788,0.00005911761,0.0002648677,0.0001284267,0.00000486382,0.000006437906,0.03350775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2029462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3342065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161840337","doi":"10.29173/cmplct20399","title":"The Complexity of Transdisciplinary Literature Reviews","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Key (lock); Sociology; Process (computing); Transdisciplinarity; Management science; Ecology; Computer science; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2276216574621659,"gpt":0.4657991412900617,"spread":0.2381774838278958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002523101,0.0001265393,0.0003110806,0.0002776639,0.000402579,0.0008122058,0.001448773,0.00005387283,0.00025887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006129766,0.00007639297,0.0001558579,0.0004190713,0.0008286812,0.00173254,0.0001530682,0.0002904721,0.00002871895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006023576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002406869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003196448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001391781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967908,0.0005608544,0.001152261,0.0001906426,0.001148621,0.0001568605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936917,0.000376244,0.0008682819,0.0003454331,0.004537231,0.0001810913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001323769,0.002015075,0.009741084,0.00006867292,0.0001878213,0.000003899376,0.02122779,0.00005579977,0.008749009,0.5968345,0.07169648,0.288096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888567,0.0003855097,0.2021603,0.0001409412,0.000008550648,0.0001244455,0.005023022,0.00170545,0.0004811821,0.7774164,0.01215227,0.0001130811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733269,0.001421599,0.003268196,0.01789498,0.001220298,0.0003374159,0.00003017975,0.000005248391,0.002495149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956477,0.0003858914,0.002582584,0.0002072614,0.000559114,0.00001298908,0.00002606873,0.000005197368,0.0005732159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.287983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.783212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076788825","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00903.x","title":"Interdisciplinary research: framing and reframing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Area","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Framing (construction); Reflexivity; Negotiation; Underpinning; Discipline; Sociology; Responsible Research and Innovation; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2588953838719276,"gpt":0.517971017766878,"spread":0.2590756338949504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004544715,0.00009508165,0.0001563304,0.0004906261,0.0007421632,0.0005930649,0.0005091357,0.0000702261,0.0002014157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001403855,0.00006878479,0.00003992354,0.001232423,0.0001690731,0.0006271357,0.0007196047,0.0003461517,0.0002803033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000520077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000687221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004053565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000656882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970123,0.0003142966,0.0003379087,0.0004646576,0.001451105,0.0004197733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977971,0.0008752262,0.00005482689,0.0004910956,0.0006033994,0.0001783539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004485636,0.0001875179,0.004100123,0.000006762257,0.00001595938,0.000254113,0.01530583,0.00002956468,0.01636792,0.02960951,0.1363196,0.7973545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004531924,0.001693321,0.0959452,0.00009324219,0.000003615552,0.00005956841,0.03372673,0.01066747,0.001961235,0.8396826,0.01542905,0.0002847073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8830372,0.0003105269,0.001810994,0.01637446,0.000151099,0.0002017502,0.00000569145,0.00004432337,0.09806395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934407,0.000007759219,0.0004777797,0.0001286533,0.0001513361,0.000007545756,0.000003483667,0.000005447078,0.005777238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8100731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5718938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902188873","doi":"10.5751/es-10608-230438","title":"Harnessing local knowledge for scientific knowledge production: challenges and pitfalls within evidence-based sustainability studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Lunds Universitet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Sustainability; Knowledge production; Production (economics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Sustainability science; Business; Computer science; Sustainability organizations; Ecology; Sociology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2260028756026254,"gpt":0.4706037770425165,"spread":0.2446009014398911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009665363,0.000132135,0.0002786411,0.00008950738,0.002140208,0.0002340238,0.0002098249,0.0001217711,0.00001374016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005175333,0.00009541912,0.00007874858,0.0004559075,0.00419026,0.0006103234,0.0002780511,0.0001383597,0.00001707774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008327803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.662606e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00109783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978213,0.0004572294,0.0003457271,0.0008068925,0.0002400811,0.0003287532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933046,0.002019049,0.0001184474,0.0002755141,0.004179456,0.000102902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00148756,0.001246948,0.02130735,0.00163737,0.0003489236,0.000006840766,0.4509398,0.00007068379,0.001623941,0.03629046,0.1713105,0.3137296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001770944,0.004040021,0.186333,0.0002615521,0.0000705862,0.00002179548,0.4709223,0.03429061,0.005278247,0.2720539,0.0242913,0.000665769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523765,0.02481291,0.001662687,0.01817209,0.001813004,0.0007863095,0.00000400863,0.00003851706,0.000333975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937979,0.0001788107,0.0005458221,0.0000470559,0.000446701,0.0001217271,0.000001197369,0.000005647143,0.004855148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3130638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619915069","doi":"10.1093/biosci/bix051","title":"Society Is Ready for a New Kind of Science—Is Academia?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioScience","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University; Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment; Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute; Raincoast Conservation Foundation; University of Oxford; University of Queensland; Nature Conservancy; University of Washington; University of Florida; Smithsonian Institution; Environmental Defense Fund; University of Victoria; University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; University of Hawai'i; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; University of Cambridge; Stanford Bio-X; Yale University; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.357269636984372,"gpt":0.5544877398165651,"spread":0.197218102832193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005052818,0.0001012306,0.0001900099,0.0001711474,0.002196813,0.001023849,0.004080806,0.0001204395,0.0001694348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003623292,0.00006978313,0.0001262551,0.001155609,0.003148863,0.001849677,0.0007387042,0.0001512309,0.0001058836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005966385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001715093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004932446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002802547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958891,0.00002056251,0.000389685,0.000698915,0.002524311,0.0004774746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967594,0.0002108635,0.0004153756,0.001152058,0.00118957,0.0002727379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001080676,0.00006900555,0.008073682,0.00001083594,0.00000618181,9.173758e-7,0.007942543,0.000002638493,0.305115,0.01308592,0.6116797,0.05390546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00110699,0.001016613,0.08851195,0.00006551084,0.00001114909,0.000006331176,0.005699649,0.02399324,0.600329,0.09077214,0.1880397,0.0004477278],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987657,0.0001209573,0.01513895,0.06026687,0.001629774,0.000982539,0.0002766707,0.00003099415,0.02278758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745516,0.000009518278,0.004858461,0.0006158374,0.0001717666,0.00001064394,4.920451e-7,0.000004083066,0.01977764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4236401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948169423","doi":"10.1007/s40037-019-0513-6","title":"Actor-network theory and ethnography: Sociomaterial approaches to researching medical education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Health Authority; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Accreditation; Ethnography; Actor–network theory; Engineering ethics; Curriculum; The Internet; Perspective (graphical); Pedagogy; Epistemology; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1196479754242482,"gpt":0.4674026354254826,"spread":0.3477546600012344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01112592,0.0001712211,0.0002515423,0.0005420552,0.0004298722,0.0004053112,0.0007638353,0.0002268601,0.00427918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02056905,0.0001256214,0.00007795939,0.001205098,0.000327797,0.0003981219,0.0002780289,0.0005162957,0.0005450589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002269555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004573207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003003106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001104357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927127,0.001614395,0.0004246518,0.0008006218,0.004023219,0.0004244421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963568,0.001567674,0.0001129753,0.0005274849,0.0004711185,0.0009639853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001879656,0.001639544,0.00833462,0.00003462445,0.00005671377,0.000002346887,0.07666027,0.00001781553,0.0001911717,0.5957371,0.06584076,0.2496054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000928121,0.001447722,0.06693605,0.0005427913,0.00001550765,0.00002804992,0.480819,0.00231213,0.0001581759,0.4341587,0.01206745,0.0005862712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159233,0.0004170879,0.001271649,0.06681357,0.001674406,0.0006504671,0.000003752185,0.00004215968,0.01320358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940521,0.00004282732,0.0004616709,0.001256345,0.001861072,0.0001483019,0.00002030777,0.00001728037,0.002140159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4041587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213344111","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-42267-1","title":"1002222.pdf","year":2016,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Field (mathematics); State (computer science); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Pure mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1909542818359924,"gpt":0.388818642982668,"spread":0.1978643611466756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01226205,0.0005361135,0.0009523699,0.001741922,0.002430693,0.0004240347,0.007046474,0.0006344244,0.02853722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001221324,0.0003681486,0.0006765994,0.001817726,0.005288323,0.001212363,0.004854992,0.001988221,0.1161854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001266658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003379741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009029543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004130384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841425,0.003625265,0.0008389459,0.001518276,0.008233353,0.001641665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849345,0.005933517,0.0005908801,0.002926381,0.004947334,0.000667398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002608266,0.0002891829,0.0003579672,0.0002239483,0.000442921,0.0005325981,0.04957082,0.00001137444,0.0007480544,0.007071768,0.9065439,0.0315992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001145968,0.001119487,0.0009360819,0.0009289837,0.00005871095,0.000009662384,0.0644675,0.0002278042,0.0003337924,0.0219289,0.9084003,0.0004427983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1191932,0.006995862,0.01149101,0.1351808,0.00534228,0.01211578,0.001402402,0.0002813745,0.7079973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1156199,0.003406419,0.0002238073,0.00007708759,0.001874229,0.00001112576,0.0001168941,0.00009706818,0.8785735],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1705762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039275415","doi":"10.1186/1472-6963-8-110","title":"It's all about relationships: A qualitative study of health researchers' perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Health Services Research","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Operationalization; Nursing research; Qualitative research; Facilitator; Health services research; Theme (computing); Medicine; Sociology; Public health; Psychology; Social science; Nursing; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7799752209629408,"gpt":0.6766676535157268,"spread":0.103307567447214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2310934,0.0003816525,0.001688721,0.005302062,0.006110324,0.0002845429,0.003346862,0.0002161034,0.0002933002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006111122,0.0003158578,0.000221174,0.01328744,0.002020858,0.001404067,0.003848615,0.00370713,0.0002143181],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001995406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007320497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8479329,0.1192854,0.006145475,0.002582276,0.02006438,0.003989598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531757,0.02468682,0.001876074,0.002667932,0.01603154,0.001561922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00140745,0.002542329,0.009266395,0.0011425,0.0000779004,0.00001494168,0.9735012,0.00009883578,0.00005952132,0.001270944,0.008220064,0.002397936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001409621,0.01152006,0.03060225,0.0007574518,0.000001346119,0.00001615064,0.9478635,0.001490668,0.00003861316,0.005479065,0.0006407286,0.0001805009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568762,0.0073041,0.0003429509,0.02687845,0.0001520444,0.00536565,0.0001307073,0.00004986893,0.002900007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950187,0.0005754759,0.001375841,0.0001470548,0.0001978814,0.0003442053,0.00004641313,0.00006026609,0.00223423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2249823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238016979","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000000759","title":"Evaluating Academic Scientists Collaborating in Team-Based Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Center for Research Resources; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine; Feinberg School of Medicine; U.S. Public Health Service; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Weill Cornell Medical College; Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; University of South Carolina; University of Cincinnati; University of Pittsburgh; University of Miami; York University; Northwestern University; School of Medicine, Duke University; National Institutes of Health; Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science; National Cancer Institute; Carnegie Mellon University; Medical School, University of Michigan; Vanderbilt University; University of Washington; School of Medicine, New York University; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8065942262259496,"gpt":0.678372197907538,"spread":0.1282220283184116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1007664,0.0002021412,0.0004666121,0.002116114,0.0004053351,0.0001016441,0.001937032,0.0003760121,0.0003985424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09969703,0.0001422861,0.0000297617,0.01173023,0.0008854063,0.0007207673,0.0005135107,0.002874503,0.0005983693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005855898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002624826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007694609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001912487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840512,0.002676407,0.001613166,0.0009782508,0.009637651,0.001043316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898724,0.004485144,0.0003269068,0.0007128904,0.003933259,0.0006694185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008515606,0.00003274089,0.08306522,0.00002597374,0.000009383764,0.00007968677,0.02648936,0.003076086,0.04606713,0.006060997,0.8077635,0.02647835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01114049,0.004318682,0.01028016,0.001835379,0.00002015452,0.00004876789,0.1700463,0.5012348,0.00677207,0.2444835,0.04901775,0.0008019128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421761,0.00155287,0.0009285428,0.02928029,0.0009725854,0.0008981533,0.000007838896,0.00005260464,0.02413099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882223,0.00001562116,0.0004018544,0.0005419777,0.001069266,0.0001056785,0.00001564477,0.00001873177,0.009608944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7587457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047903452","doi":"10.5751/es-06583-190304","title":"The role played by social-ecological resilience as a method of integration in interdisciplinary research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Ecology; Ecological resilience; Psychological resilience; Social ecology; Sociology; Ecological systems theory; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Ecosystem; Biology; Environmental science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05505802923991841,"gpt":0.4796215114368381,"spread":0.4245634821969197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01805247,0.00008416469,0.0002261689,0.00007985827,0.001271373,0.0001187258,0.0005538777,0.0002318737,0.00006158562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002595464,0.00004987386,0.00008566575,0.0008376547,0.0008818532,0.0001909813,0.001015703,0.0005331713,0.0000289983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007516999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001399526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008182846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955438,0.00258534,0.000464796,0.0003826592,0.0006548207,0.0003686027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923987,0.006733812,0.0001224187,0.0002150166,0.0004689973,0.00006108512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001459072,0.00069955,0.02512471,0.00001236874,0.00005617597,0.000006823313,0.06199528,0.00005077285,0.03980767,0.1693051,0.3250079,0.3764746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005075286,0.001414857,0.1810496,0.000007371541,0.000003078896,0.000006542249,0.09301143,0.02704184,0.002650425,0.6901715,0.004025374,0.0001104168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565706,0.0001189416,0.003259019,0.02040054,0.0001418002,0.0003467489,0.000008941886,0.00001116535,0.01914225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974081,0.00002646759,0.0005492745,0.0001431354,0.00005438304,0.00006854502,0.00000435816,0.000003518804,0.001742223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5208664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976078995","doi":"10.1007/s11024-009-9120-8","title":"Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists’ Perceptions of Social Science Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modalities; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Boundary-work; Ambivalence; Engineering ethics; Perception; Inclusion (mineral); Interdisciplinarity; Social science; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3595953813315722,"gpt":0.6222775558607055,"spread":0.2626821745291333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06911416,0.00006825081,0.0001916347,0.001631621,0.002285246,0.0007850595,0.001597975,0.00007331151,0.0001854388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006699095,0.00004219451,0.00004264266,0.01333101,0.003709679,0.0003678595,0.0003957241,0.0007273339,0.00007460514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001231698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001469549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008602558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005496519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898316,0.001979338,0.0006139369,0.0005303214,0.006229139,0.0008156862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953861,0.002225539,0.00007276343,0.0004893804,0.001635028,0.0001912276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005003135,0.0007854064,0.01303334,0.00001392189,0.000003179684,0.00002889138,0.05169853,8.5918e-7,0.00559312,0.02568289,0.5010154,0.4016441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000480252,0.003437806,0.8625238,0.00007102347,9.553246e-7,0.00001209101,0.05823571,0.0006498265,0.00007225831,0.03737928,0.03703156,0.0001054107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.880323,0.0001471534,0.0001106492,0.1054167,0.0001332146,0.0003414112,0.000009006615,0.000005157659,0.01351369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971831,0.00001022492,0.000230684,0.0003977324,0.0002164802,0.00001279675,0.000002738702,0.000002486866,0.001943699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899472872","doi":"10.5751/es-10505-230420","title":"Finding an academic space: reflexivity among sustainability researchers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sustainability; Space (punctuation); Environmental resource management; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Social science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1739067214573304,"gpt":0.5277852577105054,"spread":0.353878536253175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047061,0.00009330855,0.0001738765,0.00007182599,0.001200909,0.0001499512,0.0004361075,0.0003261742,0.0003955079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003320565,0.0000722827,0.00007303957,0.0006844127,0.001797149,0.0007837488,0.0004177543,0.0005978259,0.00006477154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002064069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003825235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001977398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000786203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997313,0.000838834,0.0002699221,0.0005226074,0.0005597656,0.0004958583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974615,0.0008667775,0.0000873281,0.0003794083,0.0009652278,0.0002397514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002344401,0.0000776552,0.9107069,0.00001077282,0.00002646257,0.000008531957,0.02018685,0.000007120975,0.0007185006,0.009680429,0.05269639,0.005645976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002313416,0.0006602831,0.8557034,0.000001942729,0.000002781321,0.000002275892,0.02977246,0.003963476,0.0003284209,0.1067173,0.002521119,0.00009518597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887714,0.000022838,0.0003158372,0.006511452,0.0001739672,0.0002389953,0.000006194392,0.00002954959,0.003929784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918773,0.00001365584,0.0002380642,0.0001764508,0.0002952164,0.00002093352,0.000003545953,0.000005125348,0.007369672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09703689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9236542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097732819","doi":"10.25011/cim.v35i5.18698","title":"Attributes of Interdisciplinary Research Teams: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical and investigative medicine","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Identification (biology); Strengths and weaknesses; Psychology; Thematic analysis; Principal (computer security); Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6953892153415133,"gpt":0.6044120088357106,"spread":0.09097720650580277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01729763,0.0003707827,0.003647498,0.000422342,0.0002583038,0.00003232043,0.001714847,0.0003675352,0.0002375266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02575275,0.0001488875,0.0006405056,0.004798841,0.02634598,0.0002752484,0.003342445,0.002038023,0.00003892063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000406463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007864715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003875427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007684693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9848948,0.007747859,0.003736852,0.0007107534,0.002514531,0.0003952668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820468,0.009496385,0.001761095,0.00130706,0.004954479,0.0004341811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000379454,0.0001642854,0.000498489,0.08866148,0.0002014543,0.000007681307,0.00153355,1.930719e-8,0.000005345169,0.005262459,0.1759305,0.7276968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001764238,0.0008358519,0.0004838091,0.2901247,0.0002182358,0.0000168655,0.0009041867,0.000001892442,0.000003866455,0.0388404,0.6682814,0.0001122925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001174475,0.9794397,0.000004263425,0.01689277,0.0007357087,0.001420612,0.0001774151,0.000005471078,0.001206627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004473853,0.9964827,0.00005428227,0.0002811665,0.0009084459,0.00006949976,0.00007461377,0.00001761366,0.001664334],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7275845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379793961","doi":"10.1098/rsos.230235","title":"How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Scale (ratio); Discipline; Data science; Corporate governance; Big data; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Open science; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Engineering; Political science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.120470156555669,"gpt":0.4887310973133514,"spread":0.3682609407576825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0287838,0.000197974,0.0003128773,0.0004244822,0.005970229,0.01366347,0.006411526,0.00008843081,0.00009598077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01948164,0.0001508104,0.0001580318,0.02551945,0.001356763,0.003388848,0.004985379,0.0002141385,0.0006885325],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004650549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008218318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002838572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007096075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909135,0.0001124132,0.0005492104,0.001651343,0.005332857,0.001440708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907773,0.0009766421,0.0001912769,0.001202761,0.006006248,0.000845778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006188444,0.00009081951,0.0007687674,0.000003358898,0.000005225631,0.000001781865,0.004893643,0.0003879272,0.01325389,0.01129962,0.9661072,0.003125835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008759042,0.0007317147,0.006304487,0.00002198142,0.000009060758,0.000004561905,0.1027242,0.2150942,0.007684212,0.007010015,0.6591007,0.0004389204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.309972,0.00003544299,0.2757171,0.3230914,0.006343863,0.009731211,0.001076661,0.0004128766,0.07361939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7096436,0.000004486868,0.0634895,0.001735272,0.0005215145,0.0008127115,0.00001658457,0.00002453892,0.2237518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3996716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2681873822","doi":"10.22329/celt.v10i0.4745","title":"Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research and Education in Canada: A Review and Suggested Framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Icon; Higher education; Discipline; Experiential learning; Flexibility (engineering); Sociology; Work (physics); Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering; Management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2027927371851135,"gpt":0.5445424277055718,"spread":0.3417496905204583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007844135,0.0004799076,0.001819992,0.001279959,0.003081608,0.001103533,0.0005541087,0.0003414816,0.00003276864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005985921,0.000365028,0.00006901856,0.000896253,0.000363251,0.000361552,0.001070698,0.004334071,0.000005274809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004686695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004780841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007577537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1357071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922933,0.003632479,0.001030464,0.001340108,0.001094372,0.0006093025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929358,0.005235656,0.0004789353,0.0005958691,0.0003706577,0.0003830804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457125,0.00006297386,0.0004406757,0.005548032,0.00003609358,0.00004770281,0.001693331,5.952433e-7,2.349572e-7,0.0008221518,0.003694351,0.9875893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007714966,0.001907042,0.004263073,0.1912552,0.0003501638,0.0005221082,0.01770141,0.0005884678,2.335231e-7,0.02362534,0.7575914,0.001424164],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005964726,0.97987,0.00001422424,0.001911437,0.0001604898,0.001354748,0.00002615773,0.00002328867,0.01067494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02113523,0.9705104,0.0001110038,0.00003193182,0.0001215267,0.0002154015,0.00004553641,0.00004824731,0.00778069],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9861651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654993868","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-3-20","title":"Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Silence; Engineering ethics; Relation (database); Sociology; Management science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8656772611912865,"gpt":0.7384364678476388,"spread":0.1272407933436477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6282901,0.0002811622,0.0006771772,0.001151789,0.00444612,0.001115858,0.006858575,0.0005087756,0.006743735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5191066,0.0001243231,0.0003090047,0.00798434,0.007489621,0.0003701776,0.006888118,0.005501517,0.001817664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002968262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005420517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001007888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004159654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5554106,0.4202341,0.00199535,0.001897976,0.01706148,0.003400527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2549095,0.7316008,0.0003283774,0.004412793,0.007260927,0.001487548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007321816,0.0002706303,0.0007109204,0.00003917594,0.00009587875,0.0001241728,0.00710817,0.00008510725,0.01287179,0.4114633,0.3244608,0.2420378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473964,0.000630924,0.002130536,0.0000604506,0.000006085008,0.0001878723,0.09007993,0.002356747,0.004449787,0.7506115,0.1488686,0.0001435692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04655911,0.002928986,0.7329842,0.1518832,0.002019275,0.001695599,0.000008149458,0.00006064159,0.06186081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5371273,0.0003056591,0.4018707,0.002305775,0.002575647,0.001406802,0.00001047984,0.0001300552,0.05426757],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4905682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756106382","doi":"10.1007/s00267-017-0939-8","title":"Barriers and Solutions to Conducting Large International, Interdisciplinary Research Projects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Work (physics); Teamwork; Foundation (evidence); Nature Conservation; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2918011401452525,"gpt":0.5004312561854825,"spread":0.20863011604023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004459965,0.0001195298,0.000123913,0.000439346,0.0033157,0.001228538,0.001331394,0.00003715506,0.0009315108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004015166,0.000101361,0.00004422627,0.0001620337,0.0002981343,0.0008516615,0.01033931,0.0002007926,0.0009818895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001680613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000465869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007784252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966971,0.0002062042,0.000303414,0.0006425953,0.001637645,0.0005130474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985595,0.0001062364,0.00009985238,0.0009107718,0.0000450706,0.0002785631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001198296,0.0009679706,0.1353426,0.0000565784,0.000539826,0.0008305621,0.03234077,0.0002487177,0.01771501,0.07381269,0.4605536,0.2763934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002124155,0.001094343,0.3307985,0.0001335018,0.00002353904,0.00002659709,0.3805865,0.006011053,0.001493903,0.03539324,0.2416097,0.0007049643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847137,0.00005157356,0.001289663,0.02276532,0.0007739899,0.0009961849,0.00007287077,0.00002270158,0.08931396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793563,0.00001949469,0.0005328077,0.00009850383,0.0001408195,0.0001402329,0.000008566414,0.00001137674,0.01969183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3482457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379259466","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306","title":"Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Multidisciplinary approach; Health care; Medicine; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.386536878623366,"gpt":0.5961987551244012,"spread":0.2096618765010352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1137345,0.0002423577,0.000889583,0.002667005,0.004704989,0.001710689,0.001468632,0.000169695,0.00006369957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07031689,0.0001767884,0.000249438,0.006773613,0.003589862,0.001752085,0.003014413,0.002953608,0.001014084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003940352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001867523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008125741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001363077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786738,0.0128808,0.001026927,0.001063999,0.004222034,0.002132458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242961,0.06519856,0.0002797868,0.0008874863,0.00843134,0.0009066916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009167943,0.0001047427,0.01236678,0.00002403665,0.0002601092,0.0006512909,0.003190897,0.0004797918,0.002479208,0.002910075,0.9388173,0.02954784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009507074,0.008924552,0.01210883,0.00004636769,0.00001572363,0.004819993,0.2067804,0.002711429,0.0001082848,0.05081489,0.7124261,0.0002926604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7296708,0.001245706,0.002782648,0.1993321,0.001033918,0.002168217,0.000117257,0.0001319483,0.06351743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825988,0.0008874282,0.001315792,0.0002429029,0.002393514,0.0003137049,0.00001956938,0.00004608891,0.01218223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2529279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241095640","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.22","title":"Interdisciplinary Learning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Atlantic Philanthropies","keywords":"Discipline; Experiential learning; Quality (philosophy); Cognition; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014085618954982,"gpt":0.357138648785729,"spread":0.2557300868902309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008703684,0.000360807,0.0005139895,0.0005045828,0.001632097,0.0006734821,0.002532159,0.000422096,0.0004010256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001237783,0.000335176,0.0003643067,0.00001263163,0.000441253,0.0004639574,0.004694157,0.0009837846,0.00006462634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002031417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002511281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005103717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001710848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967965,0.0001345397,0.000371087,0.000848704,0.001458219,0.0003908893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966899,0.000297246,0.0006560633,0.001342625,0.0007560563,0.000258117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000926978,0.00001862003,0.00002266414,0.00002537814,0.0001715609,0.0009882433,0.001192139,0.00005185374,0.00003280155,0.8385779,0.07587484,0.08211699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003178009,0.0002628468,0.00002106788,0.0001133901,0.00003934554,0.00001197144,0.0004688712,0.0003758459,0.00002941664,0.02208906,0.9759241,0.0003462288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001135777,0.00004396971,0.0006618939,0.0002119144,0.0004172978,0.0003252859,0.00008692309,0.00008765474,0.9980515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008058562,0.000027864,0.00007620273,0.00001100493,0.0002750871,9.752117e-7,0.00003260361,0.0000365295,0.9914812],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9000493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897655871","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361","title":"Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: implications for aging and technology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fraser Institute; Simon Fraser University; Public Health Ontario; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Translational research; Inclusion (mineral); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2814462657361282,"gpt":0.58037158116779,"spread":0.2989253154316617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01205967,0.0004006321,0.001341374,0.002091164,0.001889129,0.0003067658,0.0006129698,0.0009236456,0.00001585905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02708164,0.0003027235,0.0001673675,0.004383022,0.009778005,0.0003277932,0.0009678571,0.0008488707,0.00001612417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002566148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004188981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002891789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001696033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941315,0.001294924,0.001397581,0.001951755,0.0005943201,0.000629927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777215,0.01813822,0.0004597256,0.001044576,0.002472899,0.0001630763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004256003,0.0001020933,0.009134454,0.001962284,0.00004632095,3.42398e-7,0.0005218158,1.186155e-7,0.000006326707,0.04976996,0.0004150192,0.9379987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008463144,0.00538278,0.02657169,0.003857149,0.0002834206,0.00009550117,0.0322888,0.0004617908,0.000003209365,0.7024799,0.2269189,0.0008104998],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02219725,0.9359629,0.001081542,0.03592609,0.0001300625,0.003803234,0.000443238,0.0001839312,0.0002718194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0995007,0.8357667,0.05023073,0.00003406437,0.0003701711,0.01284415,0.0003147203,0.0001796776,0.0007590378],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593116518","doi":"10.1007/s10755-017-9393-z","title":"Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary Programs on Student Learning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovative Higher Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Critical thinking; Psychology; Higher education; Cognition; Mathematics education; Literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2042427642998215,"gpt":0.5414735342194861,"spread":0.3372307699196646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002181967,0.000143398,0.0001927385,0.00026945,0.001058596,0.0007825366,0.001236379,0.00005199436,0.0003290947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789017,0.00007628596,0.00007116779,0.001037525,0.0003005395,0.0006217477,0.0006709478,0.0003229956,0.0001307695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001726073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004567944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003297952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001314932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976129,0.0003137205,0.0004950207,0.0003496962,0.001011632,0.0002170145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955958,0.0003374645,0.0008022938,0.0009129479,0.002301641,0.00004990376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003023934,0.001007917,0.7364327,0.000004436705,0.00009759309,0.000002125503,0.01141384,0.0001967437,0.002908089,0.02049348,0.01803853,0.2091022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587359,0.001373041,0.9779584,0.00006096386,0.000002581269,0.000001150946,0.008356578,0.0000618895,0.0003969803,0.01043206,0.001109321,0.00008824887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9312189,0.00002420986,0.00007156291,0.003062636,0.0008006244,0.0003619815,0.000002785525,0.00001400474,0.06444327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817557,6.61637e-7,0.00004974009,0.00002516626,0.0003724091,0.000106105,0.00001434999,0.00001072206,0.0176651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2415258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8141972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274276081","doi":"10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060118","title":"A Difficult Journey: Transitioning from STEM to SoTL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Engineering; History; Art; Communication; Philosophy; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1480200870725382,"gpt":0.4651096825415522,"spread":0.3170895954690139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01321281,0.00009302564,0.0001470501,0.0002458568,0.001444459,0.001061343,0.0007075763,0.00004447179,0.00006652338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005980741,0.00005632157,0.00012154,0.000147554,0.00003411868,0.001079597,0.0001154762,0.001330922,0.00002131552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000826716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001972026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001401493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969314,0.0009322339,0.0004564924,0.0001461388,0.001298258,0.0002355093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960821,0.002466979,0.0002690174,0.0001081459,0.0008808755,0.0001929376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002102685,0.0002428134,0.09710177,0.000006960654,0.0006659101,0.00001211864,0.06417981,0.01096678,0.05515979,0.01343877,0.004520335,0.7516022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004872509,0.001714117,0.3593639,0.001162419,0.0002070291,0.0008858097,0.2717248,0.02445041,0.007046602,0.03391061,0.2936548,0.001006953],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252371,0.000446943,0.06230766,0.01031242,0.001206137,0.0001013977,0.00001593757,0.00001080588,0.0003615744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946291,0.000007721783,0.002336327,0.000178005,0.0011622,0.000006624638,0.000003856053,0.000009926229,0.00166621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7505953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127795719","doi":"10.1007/s11625-020-00901-y","title":"Evaluating transdisciplinary research practices: insights from social network analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Government of Northwest Territories; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Global Institute for Water Security; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Social network analysis; Sustainability; Interim; Management science; Knowledge management; Diversity (politics); Data science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Engineering; Social science; Social capital","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3410629086830521,"gpt":0.610708107938462,"spread":0.2696451992554099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039928,0.0001862339,0.000461864,0.001013785,0.005747928,0.002640574,0.002480167,0.0001277157,0.0007184216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06172095,0.0001475947,0.0002752978,0.04648974,0.002656717,0.002833757,0.001767562,0.0007499506,0.000105544],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001174523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01034721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001545777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003569615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815742,0.004650503,0.0009378219,0.002097838,0.009478935,0.001260724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639702,0.006843321,0.0005221579,0.001938884,0.02628648,0.00043896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00371932,0.003382059,0.1842123,0.0001539063,0.0008682042,0.00154288,0.3904818,0.09276176,0.03353992,0.1385311,0.0176326,0.1331741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002132712,0.0002241331,0.141626,0.000005372903,0.00005473193,0.000001608815,0.1804769,0.05400819,0.0005796751,0.6214717,0.00114397,0.0001944123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721688,0.000245413,0.003021055,0.01700217,0.0002763367,0.0005165268,0.00001755519,0.00003951232,0.006712606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951783,0.000001896985,0.001824746,0.00006472218,0.000521523,0.00007174432,0.00001922247,0.000007806751,0.002310063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4829405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}