{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":826,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":826,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"5ad315189429","filters":{"topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2117702238","doi":"10.1017/s0020818305050010","title":"Power in International Politics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Organization","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1736,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; York University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"International relations; Power (physics); Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Discipline; Constitution; International relations theory; Privilege (computing); Global governance; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Social science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007276817411874606,"gpt":0.306265869099078,"spread":0.2989890516872035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002568516,0.00008635309,0.00006972733,0.000389371,0.0001499084,0.0001332214,0.0004377311,0.0001016484,0.007789113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008966737,0.00009903107,0.0000335543,0.0004031668,0.00007777215,0.0006837216,0.00005456582,0.0001189158,0.0007066497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007952516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001582787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002909564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002267901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.00004168375,0.0002979097,0.0001739249,0.0005698605,0.00019706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.00006399387,0.00009465039,0.00008748992,0.000599848,0.00006809371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003006038,0.00008645563,0.03416932,3.061391e-7,0.00001750152,0.00000327509,0.00332501,0.0004095437,0.00006987596,0.9591963,0.001788627,0.0009308161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006191303,0.00001052327,0.06462557,0.00002148072,0.000004081028,0.00001082769,0.001083982,0.001296714,0.0002869077,0.02220135,0.9096128,0.0002266676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09251593,0.00001626551,0.002721163,0.02049059,0.001060828,0.0001315113,0.00002339593,0.00009901464,0.8829413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830464,0.00006472217,0.00111037,0.00112259,0.001215552,0.000005129705,0.00009895886,0.00001834287,0.01331791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238788511","doi":"10.1017/s175297191000031x","title":"International practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":987,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; International relations theory; Political science; Action (physics); International security; Cold war; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09703802717751957,"gpt":0.4035272148980631,"spread":0.3064891877205436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009919376,0.00008421989,0.00006268315,0.0002091869,0.0002131675,0.00008931619,0.0007850553,0.00007915751,0.02254542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001691095,0.00008373965,0.00008654419,0.0001011641,0.000225522,0.0006980631,0.00007695191,0.0001370601,0.0009607294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001555129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001020787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005663931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004820296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987585,0.0001321379,0.0002087284,0.0001818053,0.0005430678,0.0001757395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989242,0.000222933,0.000303527,0.0001185206,0.0003507716,0.00008003238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000628815,0.00008379373,0.002686269,3.906209e-7,0.00009787844,0.000008387649,0.005429656,0.000001361895,0.00002918456,0.9832044,0.001475802,0.006920017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001339738,0.000009173512,0.003082159,0.00000721557,0.00000682874,0.000005190482,0.001632762,0.00004213034,0.00008069452,0.4349709,0.5599413,0.00008764838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005112241,0.00002357868,0.002252558,0.001249088,0.001804805,0.00008500008,0.00001875113,0.00009255038,0.9893614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455531,0.000147528,0.002182313,0.0006323464,0.001210968,0.00002161846,0.00001905229,0.00001201258,0.0502211],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135402777","doi":"10.1017/s0020818308080090","title":"The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Organization","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":732,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Politics; Sociology; Rationality; Agency (philosophy); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02943581408890122,"gpt":0.3449725215047572,"spread":0.315536707415856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008864707,0.00004325192,0.00008073548,0.00007316421,0.0002374935,0.00001101404,0.0003109734,0.00005239264,0.0002948625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006664474,0.0000349231,0.00003509991,0.0002913902,0.0006044144,0.0003164484,0.00005243409,0.00008131348,0.000006071442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005816324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001947754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000837813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005700803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987557,0.0003002257,0.0003288315,0.0000451951,0.0005056868,0.00006435817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952147,0.001816162,0.000487081,0.0001117876,0.002352762,0.00001753288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002602205,0.0001070931,0.00658454,0.000002715086,0.00005889839,4.390877e-7,0.02095697,0.00003254369,0.0000634216,0.9719002,0.0001377775,0.0001293824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006600264,0.0001404501,0.03723114,0.00007727573,0.00008935056,0.00005297105,0.07662702,0.000443881,0.005834738,0.8090997,0.06953867,0.0002047486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699498,0.0001307039,0.01227776,0.005921835,0.0003859658,0.0002669098,0.0000673917,0.00003087524,0.7109687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983814,0.0004844366,0.000407275,0.00009999306,0.00007159286,0.000001636637,0.00002105839,0.000005525544,0.0005270556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7284316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7978479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068983527","doi":"10.1162/0162288054894652","title":"Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Security","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":502,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soft power; Cold war; Sovereignty; Hard power; China; Political science; Balance (ability); Power (physics); Political economy; Intervention (counseling); State (computer science); Great power; Development economics; Economics; Law; Politics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539517584796133,"gpt":0.339057679710799,"spread":0.3236625038628376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000597527,0.00004282089,0.00005521335,0.00008662932,0.00007953802,0.00003488084,0.0004050108,0.00003888086,0.0004520736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003005465,0.0000347026,0.00005116146,0.0001239369,0.0001018518,0.0001942071,0.0000264144,0.0001135267,0.0000383926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001575366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006526897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003117661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.00006290733,0.0001858082,0.00007992123,0.000455325,0.0001111212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995921,0.0001572369,0.00006579004,0.00006790976,0.0001008634,0.00001606806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004808989,0.00006848447,0.01162871,9.311775e-7,0.000007311022,0.000002580033,0.01577901,0.00004990279,0.00002792515,0.9700456,0.0006176946,0.001767006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003042344,0.00001072465,0.08664509,0.00002296834,0.000003949687,0.000002993907,0.00134957,0.001243825,0.00007768687,0.1867672,0.7234797,0.00009198568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3080693,0.00004095791,0.0002368397,0.004569429,0.0001144421,0.0000930585,0.00001329878,0.00001111014,0.6868516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980984,0.00002783822,0.0001849172,0.0006604279,0.0004779785,0.000007529451,0.0000141235,0.000002650521,0.0005261466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4949889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256518160","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676185","title":"International Security in Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":349,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Diplomacy; Security community; Cold war; Power (physics); Political science; International relations; Resizing; Security studies; International security; Great power; Political economy; International relations theory; Collective security; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics; European union","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01532832137906706,"gpt":0.2747951580223696,"spread":0.2594668366433026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003529767,0.0001439297,0.000151399,0.0002916252,0.0002282844,0.00007900926,0.0006734493,0.000513586,0.00003159322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000276202,0.0001889261,0.0001102196,0.00002070379,0.0003292263,0.0002897018,0.0001828314,0.0009026597,0.00003645961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000852588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008093672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003270008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000174614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987731,0.0001120309,0.0001501212,0.0002693359,0.0004748536,0.0002205526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988923,0.0002347158,0.0002051016,0.0001887097,0.0003708989,0.0001082885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003024186,0.00002022445,0.000005210684,0.000003899008,0.00004479614,0.00009759853,0.0008067313,8.402578e-7,0.000001137537,0.9231549,0.07550136,0.0003330751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002678587,0.000006967554,0.00001770882,0.00003942604,0.0000392584,0.000003750483,0.0003359597,0.00003462634,0.000003270067,0.0004727399,0.9985957,0.000182796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003907275,0.00001540445,0.00004076189,0.0001930329,0.0005014314,0.0002425374,0.0001636094,0.00005196314,0.9987522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002370535,0.0001621339,0.0001400295,0.0001539836,0.0006652894,0.000001005501,0.00007404257,0.00001466128,0.9964183],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7704185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191740185","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491382","title":"Taming the Sovereigns","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":273,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Sovereignty; Diplomacy; International relations; Territoriality; International law; State (computer science); Political economy; Cold war; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02503247130658635,"gpt":0.2470704454358862,"spread":0.2220379741292998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000188417,0.0001516701,0.000139058,0.0001012048,0.001030934,0.00007058227,0.0006137436,0.0002200921,0.00001883363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003605727,0.0001436986,0.0001831342,0.00001731652,0.0006134874,0.0000915895,0.0001564496,0.0003973905,0.00003402281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001786257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002283405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002057207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002498908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00007758155,0.0001067944,0.0002131283,0.0004243191,0.0002568995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992041,0.0001369885,0.0001549199,0.0002419812,0.0001682977,0.00009369289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006206963,0.000003903308,4.430195e-7,0.000006180069,0.00004879132,0.00002054426,0.001160521,0.000009732987,2.556083e-7,0.9428657,0.05561352,0.0002642077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001739024,0.000007341584,0.000008609733,0.00006774734,0.00006870614,0.000001458113,0.0004714936,0.000009449579,0.000004148706,0.001561416,0.9974592,0.0001665505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001300488,0.00005212628,0.0004768392,0.00006219922,0.0001544398,0.0002882471,0.0001255095,0.00007027487,0.9987574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003607593,0.00005563879,0.000033062,0.0001591012,0.0005857926,7.440563e-7,0.00003090495,0.00001728821,0.9955099],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7929217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1207937357","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107444409.002","title":"Status and World Order","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Political science; Order (exchange); Democracy; Political economy; China; Power (physics); Voting; International trade; Economic system; Development economics; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0240623632598004,"gpt":0.2476195222076562,"spread":0.2235571589478558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001026699,0.0001392105,0.0001539286,0.0002085957,0.0003983328,0.00005596582,0.0001828925,0.0001793113,0.00003865601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000250027,0.0001662607,0.00006543589,0.000009697084,0.0004296635,0.00005319081,0.0001170072,0.000226226,0.00002495136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001849189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000168724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001652156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001470434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992002,0.00003158385,0.00009046282,0.0002187914,0.0002413921,0.0002175516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999291,0.00008697922,0.0001101995,0.0001443347,0.0002014718,0.0001660225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101936,0.000001441128,0.000009537031,0.000006488066,0.00003892367,0.000009365481,0.0001712787,6.075558e-7,2.848334e-7,0.9817497,0.01673568,0.001266497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001710425,0.00000961899,0.00004557061,0.00003878507,0.00005145061,5.49762e-7,0.00004579377,0.00001608789,0.000001299604,0.0008423899,0.9985976,0.0001798169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003941784,0.00005913983,0.0002792818,0.00003601542,0.00008830709,0.0001633392,0.00008329641,0.00005281814,0.9991984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005282799,0.0001659445,0.00008337482,0.0001076255,0.0002389833,2.598825e-7,0.00001996408,0.00001649441,0.9940845],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6779913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782108850","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-61003-0","title":"Foreign Policy Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02097707257023298,"gpt":0.3578159880440435,"spread":0.3368389154738106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003225946,0.0001225848,0.0002041271,0.0009933851,0.000367866,0.00008927059,0.0003335688,0.0003346316,0.01499723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002018642,0.0001123662,0.0003684835,0.0005417638,0.0003465433,0.00008563572,0.00004254044,0.0001234006,0.001927921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006315449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002897981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001946999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.00003837388,0.000200508,0.0001990707,0.0005023849,0.00024229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916,0.000103362,0.0001301606,0.0001978615,0.0002975365,0.0001110784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.594113e-7,0.000003720279,0.00002614766,7.884012e-7,0.0003228908,5.950536e-7,0.0003290921,0.000001640492,1.271555e-8,0.7772142,0.2218453,0.0002548834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001735788,0.00000586306,0.00003430551,0.000003017247,0.000132967,8.346299e-8,0.00003792286,0.00002156458,1.440076e-7,0.4710693,0.5286039,0.00007359286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001490146,0.00002553966,0.001408597,0.0003015121,0.00003487572,0.0001133417,0.0000451185,0.00006677413,0.9980028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005468177,0.0000723167,0.0003556083,0.000536577,0.003920737,0.000006807577,0.0001311462,0.00001467217,0.989494],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3067585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740336102","doi":"10.1177/1354066117720794","title":"Norm structure, diffusion, and evolution: A conceptual approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Conceptual framework; International relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0236598838957502,"gpt":0.2986003316180973,"spread":0.2749404477223472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007685584,0.0000867124,0.0001051131,0.0001983657,0.001295925,0.00029282,0.000620701,0.00003938751,0.000479279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001683615,0.00007730047,0.00009097247,0.00005246357,0.0006020128,0.0007771676,0.0001016139,0.0002681038,0.00005282159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001588654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001603888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007013787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002429402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998639,0.0001723171,0.0003952899,0.0001121958,0.0005525944,0.0001285969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982281,0.0000990285,0.0006749149,0.0001474935,0.0007143294,0.0001361087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001506188,0.00003359888,0.02541623,5.884015e-7,0.00006281734,0.00001181388,0.002697305,0.0001065909,0.0000399861,0.967155,0.003490093,0.0009708779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001190374,0.00007591123,0.733036,0.00006282004,0.00004602044,0.0001316903,0.002693274,0.001079221,0.000004857682,0.03692186,0.2245634,0.0001946214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1017682,0.0001376976,0.01455576,0.002030668,0.0006018906,0.00007143483,0.00003029331,0.00001580702,0.8807883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843267,0.00006438454,0.003765548,0.00007668011,0.00121498,5.454253e-7,0.000007219546,0.00001166354,0.01053226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W632649837","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107449350","title":"Theory of Unipolar Politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Competitor analysis; China; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Great power; Development economics; Economic history; Law; Economics; History; Management; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02155854244410809,"gpt":0.2427921441749057,"spread":0.2212336017307976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306409,0.0001309042,0.0002097073,0.000188721,0.0002986178,0.00001802949,0.0004954532,0.0003265688,0.00001380444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007329014,0.0001580338,0.0001694317,0.00001333693,0.0007226448,0.00005361799,0.000115448,0.0002417235,0.00001477523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003859631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007613841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006249159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006507906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989591,0.0001886508,0.0001394966,0.0001671245,0.0003306815,0.000214938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989106,0.0002421698,0.0002178077,0.0002356226,0.0002769342,0.0001168712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008809174,0.000005986928,0.00000244547,0.00002152533,0.0000635904,0.000006223895,0.0004183058,0.000001104356,0.000001088941,0.9523346,0.04691288,0.00022342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000143647,0.00001727847,0.00001331722,0.00006590827,0.00009381944,6.617846e-7,0.0001954346,0.000008794096,0.0000209414,0.005554123,0.9937378,0.0001483427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005208606,0.00004956368,0.0009823543,0.00001139685,0.0001069342,0.0001603702,0.0002482507,0.00004084857,0.9983482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005928434,0.00003880714,0.00005160021,0.00005930972,0.0003645838,2.043144e-7,0.00004021867,0.00001623315,0.9935006],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.644443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299920209","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491788","title":"Perfect Deterrence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Deterrence theory; Cold war; Deterrence (psychology); Politics; Political science; Game theory; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Computer security; Criminology; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02294984520008047,"gpt":0.2497337975891311,"spread":0.2267839523890506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001222819,0.0001650157,0.0001720437,0.0001672935,0.0005561606,0.00006544832,0.0005431636,0.0003262489,0.00007630462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002184627,0.0002042916,0.0001779982,0.00001550588,0.0004273101,0.000106716,0.00008095776,0.0003286066,0.0001211996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005977082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008203216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00120091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001866541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989009,0.00009398907,0.0001085979,0.0002706173,0.0003587391,0.0002671364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.00009539327,0.0001053471,0.0002147654,0.0001212851,0.0001426126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001312387,0.000004393286,0.000001832707,0.000004592791,0.00002877852,0.00003794548,0.0002764483,0.000001614828,4.379902e-7,0.8341112,0.1642656,0.001253965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001356021,0.00001633184,0.00001708313,0.00006127528,0.00005572089,0.00000212852,0.00005413709,0.00002226379,0.000004519713,0.0001766792,0.9992379,0.0002163398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007344302,0.00005332125,0.00007715182,0.00001343369,0.0001200359,0.0002240811,0.0001128657,0.0000966042,0.9992291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032943,0.0001711545,0.00003308292,0.00007244979,0.0004350993,7.010913e-7,0.00004549068,0.0000166523,0.9959311],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8330768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745559600","doi":"10.1017/s0020818318000267","title":"The Distribution of Identity and the Future of International Order: China's Hegemonic Prospects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Organization","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; Lehigh University; Princeton University","keywords":"Hegemony; Ideology; Identity (music); China; Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Power (physics); Democracy; Political economy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Gender studies; Development economics; Law; Politics; Economics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003717881512057056,"gpt":0.2785301943944738,"spread":0.2748123128824168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000661136,0.00006694384,0.00008116981,0.0000553826,0.0004806333,0.0001089188,0.0004863172,0.00006160218,0.000223122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001226581,0.00004392307,0.00003622666,0.0004718575,0.0008929128,0.0004142965,0.0001008105,0.00007882617,0.00001267171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001215129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004402134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004647475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988009,0.00008079551,0.0002995107,0.000112756,0.0006096105,0.00009645728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975531,0.0001296365,0.0003082606,0.0001085168,0.001876043,0.00002441934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038235,0.00002391746,0.01729014,0.00000153733,0.00005520389,1.297718e-7,0.001793071,0.000009624241,0.00004184097,0.978942,0.0004514264,0.001352881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002006138,0.00007059785,0.5854635,0.00005621817,0.00005730474,0.0000152065,0.00255571,0.003162855,0.001621654,0.2868872,0.117899,0.0002045099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7476969,0.0007654038,0.03771676,0.04857323,0.006045905,0.001042194,0.0002242333,0.00009267563,0.1578426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966252,0.0008865352,0.00009874281,0.00005498514,0.001121153,0.000004761906,0.00008222451,0.000007492881,0.001118851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6920547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3696691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254755127","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139108812","title":"Special Responsibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Subject (documents); Political science; Phenomenon; Political economy; Law and economics; International relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03202530887600533,"gpt":0.2588404562330632,"spread":0.2268151473570579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002940082,0.0001653787,0.0001891189,0.0002115855,0.0005708949,0.00005730168,0.0004421572,0.0003908857,0.00009738022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007906577,0.0002047383,0.0001857314,0.00001422767,0.0006151807,0.0001580199,0.0001484507,0.0003334775,0.000115997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001009439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001092013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007021393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002938314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987355,0.0001507973,0.0001301599,0.0002205375,0.0004303052,0.00033269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999033,0.000187351,0.0001411301,0.0002367597,0.000224505,0.0001772654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002573764,0.000004570453,0.00000178087,0.000005402256,0.00002631205,0.00001152924,0.0006607714,1.388045e-7,1.888801e-7,0.6028889,0.3961126,0.0002621055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001420336,0.00001072761,0.00003225498,0.0000357921,0.00006431888,0.000001292363,0.0003675176,0.000001129138,0.000003396699,0.0004522845,0.9986756,0.0002136471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003628256,0.0000499686,0.00002968247,0.00002389042,0.0006902654,0.0002527712,0.0002588244,0.0000791425,0.9985791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002774908,0.00005204398,0.0000414653,0.0000552452,0.010788,5.771353e-7,0.00004726849,0.00001900553,0.9887189],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.602563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8348986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046432215","doi":"10.1080/09557570701574154","title":"The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; International relations; Shadow (psychology); Sociology; Critical theory; Epistemology; Politics; Pace; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04149100600849792,"gpt":0.3597469546847054,"spread":0.3182559486762074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007955314,0.0001711318,0.0003158882,0.0001538362,0.000452183,0.0000343658,0.001842179,0.0000490909,0.000393703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006661931,0.00008491283,0.0002347004,0.0004567314,0.001473209,0.0001306217,0.0002671408,0.0002195228,0.0000199368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007822086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001294888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005972256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003785681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964272,0.0006552557,0.001167554,0.0002334068,0.001338825,0.0001777835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913971,0.005446154,0.001162618,0.0004449449,0.001486368,0.00006278913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002360986,0.0001757797,0.001826756,0.00002870206,0.0003325971,1.758969e-7,0.003064222,0.00009550453,0.00002770308,0.9867128,0.001980834,0.005518831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003797315,0.0006032528,0.3100038,0.003107455,0.0006117468,0.0000190506,0.08139963,0.008244595,0.0004849709,0.2100497,0.3808854,0.0007930785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09344216,0.008777827,0.0588061,0.1197774,0.002328285,0.007547682,0.0009297799,0.00005597713,0.7083348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940925,0.004052669,0.0001792215,0.0005831291,0.0002411756,0.00009726437,0.00003535892,0.00001222944,0.000706472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7975435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752080778","doi":"10.1177/1354066117725156","title":"Diplomacy, agency, and the logic of improvisation and virtuosity in practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Habitus; Sociology; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Diplomacy; Politics; Practice theory; Rationality; Bricolage; Norm (philosophy); Social science; Law; Political science; Cultural capital","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0226831741708635,"gpt":0.3518253225059663,"spread":0.3291421483351027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003057258,0.00005061541,0.00009029263,0.0001141043,0.0004396172,0.0001345337,0.0003188289,0.00002172978,0.00004597364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00672463,0.00003719005,0.00004938308,0.00004494034,0.0005428267,0.0007865165,0.00008024748,0.0001931323,0.000006866182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005768828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008826976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002639357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005353343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998756,0.0003849414,0.0003886739,0.00006762626,0.0003301185,0.00007264301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982101,0.0005420907,0.0006465507,0.00009353977,0.0004628116,0.00004491823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007120644,0.00002854234,0.01556587,8.318777e-7,0.00004147529,0.000008594065,0.004151932,0.00004621567,0.00003152885,0.9774138,0.0001333968,0.002506629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001967679,0.00006578588,0.8712286,0.00007590783,0.0000553786,0.00005102045,0.001379986,0.001235465,0.000009933619,0.1052952,0.01855502,0.00008000994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1428663,0.000174813,0.002307897,0.01208984,0.0001772631,0.0001091018,0.000007650608,0.000004191445,0.842263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969666,0.0005501492,0.001211953,0.0001293908,0.0001924785,7.159184e-7,0.000001080748,0.000004815153,0.0009427966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8050496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809189153","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00700.x","title":"Comparing Caveats: Understanding the Sources of National Restrictions upon NATO’s Mission in Afghanistan1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"North Atlantic Treaty; Alliance; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Political economy; Treaty; Foreign policy; Public administration; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2168762594264054,"gpt":0.3852760174130075,"spread":0.1683997579866021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650389,0.00009587193,0.0001334904,0.000276723,0.0004777504,0.00003952166,0.0003597666,0.00005393098,0.0001369734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000256906,0.00007636633,0.00007919708,0.0002974228,0.0002766197,0.0002517818,0.00003386805,0.0001415231,0.00001715791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007762709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001128019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002889899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004146005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998453,0.000104053,0.0003843963,0.0001564056,0.0007228595,0.0001793178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989635,0.0003382957,0.0001952372,0.00007381239,0.0003931006,0.00003606873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002723816,0.00006573561,0.01577992,0.000002686726,0.0001024278,0.000002594305,0.05263895,0.00006405058,0.00001299178,0.9306584,0.0004586308,0.0001863796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007042121,0.0001511078,0.05313526,0.0001877961,0.00002076626,0.000007727787,0.1903249,0.001187098,0.00006035721,0.7432823,0.01069316,0.0002452491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2448159,0.0004406674,0.001482581,0.001333736,0.0006650052,0.0002184678,0.00002056247,0.00003916128,0.7509839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985104,0.0001507762,0.0001419446,0.00006227346,0.0001906823,0.00001540241,0.000004123064,0.000006856064,0.0009175053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7536945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4368683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322212198","doi":"10.1177/1354066115603781","title":"Status insecurity and temporality in world politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Northwestern University","keywords":"Temporality; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Social status; Politics; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06269741367577039,"gpt":0.3580925526542632,"spread":0.2953951389784928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945071,0.00006430915,0.00009202356,0.0005070197,0.0001134948,0.0000847107,0.0002023665,0.00002143693,0.0001691986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001903135,0.0000627811,0.00005071077,0.000252605,0.0001584918,0.000490467,0.0000444534,0.0002686659,0.00006693395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003600309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003611521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003541405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003694411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983912,0.0003854886,0.0004852494,0.00007888125,0.0005048334,0.0001543659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986303,0.0001625429,0.0002843516,0.00005795971,0.0006327989,0.0002320889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001382955,0.00005610543,0.1341519,5.535679e-7,0.00002139219,0.00003167734,0.005385988,0.000245485,0.000001962297,0.8539465,0.005662,0.000482618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009492689,0.00005217846,0.3165529,0.00005549588,0.00001062997,0.00002131646,0.001946481,0.0004057717,0.000002250745,0.07866384,0.601229,0.0001108131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1871495,0.0001640126,0.0007178386,0.003209651,0.000349165,0.00005120963,0.00001589969,0.0000119391,0.8083308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896109,0.0000653438,0.001761858,0.0001615379,0.0004694402,4.656342e-7,0.000006051049,0.000008360726,0.007916119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2560139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088642894","doi":"10.1111/ips.12026_4","title":"“Things of Networks”: Situating ANT in International Relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Sociology","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Rationality; International relations theory; Dichotomy; Subjectivity; International relations; Strict constructionism; Social constructionism; Actor–network theory; Social science; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01865909970067182,"gpt":0.3467523011284869,"spread":0.3280932014278151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004657169,0.00009902324,0.0001595257,0.0002574217,0.0001327295,0.0000372668,0.0004581628,0.0002244463,0.005785662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001825116,0.0001016539,0.0001078814,0.0001338028,0.0007286573,0.0004922105,0.00009435423,0.0003010743,0.0003279111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005005548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001338581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007247885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000898222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.000148502,0.0005251004,0.0001983208,0.000377921,0.0004227074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983755,0.0008151897,0.0001516688,0.00008802315,0.0004483832,0.0001212351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004663936,0.00006766977,0.03146676,7.519143e-7,0.00003788904,0.000001690098,0.002086865,0.0002639417,0.00004148149,0.9646837,0.0007208322,0.0006237844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004837153,0.00003010443,0.08557925,0.00003208101,0.000007486147,0.00000438973,0.003892716,0.0222622,0.00001579348,0.873508,0.01400529,0.0001789113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1560022,0.00002521243,0.004265331,0.01939633,0.0008237826,0.0002037487,0.00001662037,0.00003987321,0.8192269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992618,0.00001307878,0.001137279,0.001301834,0.000749132,0.000043522,0.00005011493,0.000009922484,0.004077169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8366157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152046566","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2011.549021","title":"Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-Western Relations over the Past Millennium","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Politics; Diplomacy; Habitus; International relations; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06649321659128425,"gpt":0.3503872928325463,"spread":0.283894076241262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004101809,0.0001010235,0.0001376023,0.0001139838,0.0006670025,0.00003465694,0.0002289111,0.0000759239,0.0002173223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001731177,0.00007123659,0.00007538058,0.0003023906,0.0004066813,0.0002278797,0.00009032215,0.0001734967,0.000190047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001269812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005180118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002691069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01056602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989533,0.0001410098,0.000229924,0.0001592822,0.0002644158,0.0002520705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994498,0.0002004447,0.00008970012,0.0001485265,0.00007343513,0.00003806897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006036536,0.00004500614,0.1154903,0.000003729984,0.0000616532,0.000003009332,0.1251231,0.000001000198,1.91471e-7,0.755865,0.00330758,0.00009340427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002354045,0.00002330488,0.7695823,0.00004679288,0.00003051644,7.439777e-7,0.02329032,0.00001353783,0.000002953213,0.141324,0.06529501,0.0001551564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3352779,0.002094809,0.00001659766,0.004203668,0.0002537071,0.0002949606,0.00002183671,0.0000492475,0.6577872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944912,0.0005694705,0.00006047481,0.0002469498,0.0002369068,0.00003568126,0.00000190038,0.000007588976,0.004349798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6592132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5896085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501487673","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107444409.012","title":"Setting Status in Stone: The Negotiation of International Institutional Privileges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Negotiation; Competition (biology); Politics; Premise; Social status; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Legal status; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01734860065750438,"gpt":0.2454746850831626,"spread":0.2281260844256583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003143768,0.0001235643,0.0001421281,0.0002365122,0.0002879464,0.00003189745,0.0004288284,0.0001965979,0.00002182151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001074755,0.0001244365,0.0001066159,0.00001447321,0.0005159313,0.0001077754,0.0001338655,0.0002812146,0.000007149101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004829351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000352885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002036491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000143103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988958,0.00006840401,0.0002058669,0.000184132,0.0004737809,0.0001719673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990504,0.000176229,0.0002958328,0.0001454168,0.0002783148,0.00005380247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001898515,0.000005542791,0.0001400727,0.000007585615,0.00004491565,0.000005502986,0.0007020209,0.0001038928,0.000003089814,0.9961177,0.001715153,0.001135563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002743622,0.00000962397,0.001320742,0.000103656,0.00002805696,0.000001152676,0.0001831496,0.0002897307,0.0000106717,0.0006681923,0.9969792,0.0001314555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005915454,0.00003620632,0.0008220971,0.0001228561,0.0002401705,0.0002366355,0.0001806056,0.00002137324,0.9977485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2181658,0.0001203408,0.00007358466,0.00005196446,0.0002599626,7.967133e-7,0.00006269016,0.000009358221,0.7812555],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5074373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590023871","doi":"10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00144.x","title":"The Territorial Trap of the Territorial Trap: Global Transformation and the Problem of the State’s Two Territories1","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Political Sociology","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Transformation (genetics); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Geography; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Meteorology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01254684180625386,"gpt":0.3329197206090929,"spread":0.320372878802839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117151,0.0001160988,0.0001627015,0.00002050863,0.0006368189,0.00004597492,0.0007652937,0.0001523789,0.00003617376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004575198,0.00005343406,0.0002274755,0.00009798785,0.004170242,0.0002078684,0.0000930735,0.0002691327,0.000002815665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002848632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002316532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009670138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007401819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997677,0.0006228497,0.0005127699,0.0001100977,0.0006547814,0.0004224861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0009989521,0.0002200612,0.0001444102,0.0002439119,0.00008050141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009156412,0.00004217813,0.007378951,0.000002679892,0.00007960341,3.164852e-8,0.008180107,0.0000049928,0.00002033165,0.9831485,0.0004535963,0.0005974544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342241,0.00003087736,0.02867031,0.00001580969,0.00004167102,0.000005367667,0.002160821,0.00008333941,0.0001379742,0.8716221,0.09580439,0.00008509048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6082922,0.0002634541,0.0004807883,0.1013082,0.02301176,0.001400052,0.0007342522,0.00003806708,0.2644713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926556,0.0000184672,0.00003723393,0.0002838636,0.006614747,0.00003806993,0.000006365575,0.000005816114,0.0003398258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3843634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155714298","doi":"10.1017/s0043887100009382","title":"The Evolving Arms Control Agenda: Implications of the Role of NGOS in Banning Antipersonnel Landmines","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Treaty; Political science; Arms control; State (computer science); Principle of legality; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Control (management); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01247591622854393,"gpt":0.2977759546292174,"spread":0.2853000384006735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002092591,0.00004091295,0.00006961577,0.0000545823,0.0003016812,0.00001745257,0.0002282741,0.00002370305,0.0001384964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000147083,0.00002666768,0.0000576518,0.0002500189,0.000234124,0.00004810139,0.00001093025,0.00007069229,0.000005106884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004912854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001051466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002690317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00194408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993787,0.00005916499,0.0001891946,0.00005316769,0.0001437611,0.000176025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993793,0.0003109628,0.00007699908,0.0001264791,0.00008319636,0.00002301252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001411411,0.00001520887,0.07954197,0.000001065716,0.000008000286,4.125846e-8,0.00449701,0.00007288653,0.00009373636,0.9147726,0.0001709983,0.0008250759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003985804,0.00001102336,0.5675997,0.00006681507,0.00002659987,9.844749e-7,0.005935654,0.001733636,0.0004501416,0.252523,0.1711398,0.0001140654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.323044,0.0003421825,0.00001587322,0.003761279,0.00004356841,0.0001696322,0.00005040142,0.000008157998,0.6725649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918905,0.000027056,0.00004037838,0.0001450541,0.0001243859,0.000007854829,0.000001000288,0.00000396554,0.007759755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6688465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4066973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132640946","doi":"10.1177/0305829812442465","title":"Towards a Radical Concept of Praxis: Imperial ‘common sense’ Versus the Post-modern Prince","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Dialectic; Mainstream; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; International relations; Structure and agency; Critical theory; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03952905542972387,"gpt":0.3783249795347363,"spread":0.3387959241050125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001027146,0.0001152361,0.0002426127,0.0001265672,0.0002968679,0.00003235667,0.0004228687,0.00007193344,0.0001589942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00157975,0.00007502749,0.0002244671,0.00011279,0.000690089,0.000322589,0.0001233738,0.0002320482,0.000009231777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002965081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002002435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000288709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008814836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99799,0.0001671162,0.0005584584,0.00007877078,0.0009660656,0.0002395564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975595,0.0005281938,0.000547272,0.00008397318,0.001190207,0.00009086787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001424687,0.0004138933,0.006346968,0.00001248052,0.002610003,0.00001840535,0.1189297,0.0001392544,0.0005771186,0.8192013,0.03491589,0.01541031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003891798,0.000717062,0.03369264,0.0002161737,0.0002353893,0.000151247,0.03720096,0.00008573828,0.00220824,0.005869732,0.9153234,0.0004076445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.715361,0.07280823,0.0004137876,0.01406612,0.009260971,0.000323028,0.0000848506,0.00002321725,0.1876588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871848,0.008932634,0.0004141401,0.0001861283,0.002860185,0.000004454316,0.000002244011,0.00000838201,0.0004070921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8804075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3059532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1918534647","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00612.x","title":"Framing, Public Diplomacy, and Anti-Americanism in Central Asia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Anti-Americanism; Framing (construction); Public diplomacy; Diplomacy; Political science; Attribution; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); Public opinion; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02333520360289835,"gpt":0.3578209484128627,"spread":0.3344857448099643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002738005,0.00009959358,0.0001293999,0.0001879289,0.0002643933,0.0001375577,0.0002586606,0.00006673035,0.0002199288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003206782,0.00009616461,0.000044737,0.0001503318,0.0004476776,0.000361277,0.00003511717,0.0002286413,0.00003727403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001125781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000817183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001245182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003094906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988391,0.00004366295,0.0002319535,0.000200414,0.0003902679,0.0002945618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993792,0.0001568729,0.00009081884,0.00007659307,0.000208163,0.00008834189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001325808,0.00005176558,0.0765914,0.000001475339,0.00006278903,0.000007943383,0.01120933,5.749699e-7,0.0001414799,0.9017721,0.0005019864,0.009657795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004998173,0.00007023627,0.6464822,0.00002028178,0.000007928134,0.000009177264,0.01516777,0.0001766878,0.00001503731,0.1149583,0.2223478,0.0002447815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7591982,0.0002077121,0.0001192933,0.005563009,0.0008694388,0.0001276943,0.00001544623,0.00004499956,0.2338542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975504,0.0002637057,0.0003480247,0.0002039552,0.0005638555,0.00002295872,0.00000643904,0.000008038924,0.001032631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3921479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072474219","doi":"10.1177/1354066106061332","title":"The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009373258577177971,"gpt":0.2790182613299294,"spread":0.2696450027527514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660185,0.00008085681,0.00008810872,0.0001608469,0.001026797,0.0001925405,0.0004556052,0.00002400096,0.0002330424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009449581,0.00006128922,0.000100148,0.0001511275,0.0004583379,0.00019304,0.0000483951,0.0004320427,0.000149872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001025834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008856872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002971751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001672525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979552,0.0008511419,0.0004760463,0.00007460472,0.0004924521,0.0001505231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980495,0.0009363112,0.0002270479,0.0001070578,0.0005701648,0.0001099203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342845,0.00005001393,0.001511058,5.478308e-7,0.00004400226,0.0000127151,0.004986242,0.0001318732,0.00001989455,0.9778855,0.01497237,0.0003515447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005828798,0.0001758638,0.04071698,0.00008320067,0.00004713822,0.0001065228,0.003447103,0.0006065005,0.00001704181,0.2468468,0.7072184,0.0001515444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1694868,0.0001148209,0.006408228,0.02336831,0.000289215,0.0001167522,0.00001485794,0.00001970561,0.8001813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935881,0.00008953674,0.0006296316,0.0006505338,0.0006135206,0.000001250509,0.00000568824,0.00001204799,0.00440971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7897398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251608345","doi":"10.3998/mpub.591457","title":"Defacing Power","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Michigan Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Foreign policy; International relations; Sociology; Politics; Discipline; Identity (music); Political science; Epistemology; Media studies; Humanities; Law; Aesthetics; Social science; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01566120357579154,"gpt":0.2369686080228897,"spread":0.2213074044470982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001386846,0.00009942863,0.0001516932,0.0001204682,0.0003238616,0.00001650325,0.0004222299,0.0003830139,0.0004487334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002583694,0.000127047,0.0001381075,0.000006772979,0.000479222,0.00005058511,0.00009234081,0.0003654515,0.00003315033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006170614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005069557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001954043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004200061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992849,0.00003177876,0.00009531843,0.0001509456,0.0002866955,0.0001504165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993373,0.00006830581,0.0001826247,0.0001593742,0.0001744664,0.00007790067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008048658,0.00000569168,0.000002285565,0.000006440589,0.00004275761,0.000005854591,0.01530156,0.000001254262,0.0000213331,0.9789919,0.005259613,0.000353295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001230829,0.00001058225,0.00001267614,0.00005247094,0.00003840683,5.738491e-7,0.0005265252,0.000002936569,0.00003020207,0.03144554,0.9676341,0.000122831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006767861,0.00003229374,0.0001101682,0.0000189538,0.0001213232,0.0001384179,0.00007834302,0.00003451555,0.9987892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0130918,0.00002192784,0.0003126655,0.0000287868,0.0001087542,6.237704e-8,0.00001530035,0.00001077991,0.9864099],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5180826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973463496","doi":"10.1177/03058298050330031401","title":"Competing Realist Conceptions of Power","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Epistemology; Power (physics); Politics; Variation (astronomy); International relations; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Sociology; International relations theory; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04796629659862912,"gpt":0.3958321801839871,"spread":0.347865883585358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006827131,0.0000725196,0.0001842013,0.0002076914,0.0002182231,0.00002139538,0.0003059155,0.00004020509,0.0004770779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008115251,0.00006150713,0.0001580557,0.0001132606,0.0003574436,0.0002269299,0.00004754694,0.0001293228,0.00001786128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009870419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001035204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001398662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985917,0.000064807,0.0005577859,0.00006627206,0.0005954759,0.0001239382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975111,0.0002726067,0.0005306311,0.00005004879,0.001584962,0.00005061719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004924609,0.0001382682,0.00465971,0.000004327798,0.000589108,0.000005290415,0.02426141,0.000645976,0.0003371535,0.9128087,0.0538611,0.002639746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005276859,0.00008512807,0.005473282,0.0001392095,0.00003069078,0.00002236131,0.0280507,0.00003889809,0.0002734266,0.002147495,0.9631015,0.0001095962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056712,0.02780833,0.0008160904,0.01273167,0.001381433,0.0001123577,0.00004877743,0.00001787849,0.8514122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746552,0.01999178,0.002695968,0.0001993156,0.0009808331,0.000001679805,0.000001586455,0.000005596654,0.001468043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5223669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022784591","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00341","title":"Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism, and External Conflict","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Realism; Liberalism; Situational ethics; International relations; International relations theory; Positive economics; Social psychology; International conflict; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06378526826679953,"gpt":0.4421662575861964,"spread":0.3783809893193968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005449096,0.00009814171,0.0001653919,0.0002747718,0.0001253045,0.00003863429,0.0001384747,0.0001546606,0.0004652702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006801097,0.00009519333,0.0000494895,0.0002405048,0.0005532427,0.000102183,0.00001652697,0.0001962903,0.00008200742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001156537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001252536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003555873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003057449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983847,0.0003080011,0.0002815821,0.0002312868,0.0001677273,0.0006267393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993007,0.0002026099,0.00004244541,0.0001375548,0.0000486886,0.0002680309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006999267,0.00003867427,0.00750355,0.000001427903,0.000003954061,0.00000783124,0.0009558543,2.786237e-7,0.000006240045,0.9902945,0.0006458246,0.0005348967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003432435,0.00002275639,0.02205266,0.00001017027,0.000002711888,0.00001953494,0.0001801084,0.000006154342,0.000005075603,0.7769985,0.2002747,0.00008446295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03255576,0.0002048277,0.0003882101,0.005510923,0.0000782428,0.000134594,0.000008352653,0.0000238794,0.9610952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843674,0.0001269569,0.0006056216,0.01033805,0.0003563246,0.00002059405,0.000001974907,0.00001079355,0.004172292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.537544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031779032","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704900370","title":"Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Politics; Dynamics (music); Normative; Political science; International relations; Corporate governance; Global politics; Sociology; Global governance; Position (finance); Foreign policy; Political economy; Social science; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01030773473857084,"gpt":0.3128343495808352,"spread":0.3025266148422643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000113119,0.00008518117,0.00007414535,0.00009721996,0.0004787089,0.0000839139,0.0001387471,0.00006954053,0.00009103253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216302,0.00008581008,0.00005836153,0.0001856811,0.0002665153,0.0001459285,0.00001500159,0.00008867042,0.00006938911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002126668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002834449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001365114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003541942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.00003343229,0.0001258468,0.0001636678,0.0003581238,0.0002750206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994632,0.00004763114,0.00005354148,0.0001152236,0.0002227701,0.00009764659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003272112,0.0000931809,0.0001892023,0.000001779375,0.00001252157,0.00000155494,0.0257397,0.0002472367,7.299639e-7,0.9735875,0.00007511329,0.00004826415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213604,0.0000538438,0.0008002224,0.00001476214,0.000008349687,0.000001109362,0.06374513,0.0002407011,0.00001584181,0.928004,0.006785334,0.0001171059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02580587,0.00005934685,0.007049162,0.002792354,0.0001297792,0.000174156,0.0001009793,0.00008257782,0.9638058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939278,0.00008041556,0.0005340769,0.0003249591,0.0003703915,0.000008620787,0.00002131895,0.00001097142,0.004721394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5561163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094439961","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139096836","title":"International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); International relations theory; Epistemology; Subject (documents); International relations; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Regional science; Computer science; Politics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02387692361419631,"gpt":0.2529408936227276,"spread":0.2290639700085313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004260534,0.0001415597,0.0001246225,0.0002386728,0.0005531576,0.00006039661,0.0002837093,0.0003219281,0.00008142824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004197869,0.0001713795,0.0001077783,0.00001464797,0.0004334872,0.0003728945,0.00006225982,0.000299284,0.00004540681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005377071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000333535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001917725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000667447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989637,0.000148853,0.0001466793,0.0001748694,0.0003714191,0.0001944965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991677,0.0002205504,0.0001506666,0.0001162957,0.0002057709,0.0001390561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000330746,0.000007530858,0.000004531256,0.000005778268,0.00007413846,0.000002704647,0.001655539,0.000001137719,8.863603e-7,0.912811,0.0842894,0.001114294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002266415,0.000006415576,0.00009214753,0.00004280847,0.00008704131,0.000004468118,0.000401611,0.00002350011,0.000001414049,0.002237006,0.9967033,0.000173677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004130232,0.00008801652,0.00182347,0.0001597301,0.0002101905,0.0002434907,0.0001862548,0.0000679028,0.9971796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004561175,0.0001933988,0.00008230974,0.00009152614,0.0005593923,0.000001442568,0.0002175281,0.00001473854,0.9942785],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6988654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944496711","doi":"10.4000/communiquer.3875","title":"Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communiquer Revue de communication sociale et publique","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06951265344848921,"gpt":0.401198364193487,"spread":0.3316857107449978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002438822,0.0001028388,0.0001054151,0.0001979684,0.00242496,0.0004471869,0.001092768,0.0001164459,0.0005962551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004785382,0.00009711058,0.00006384815,0.0004694029,0.00118924,0.0007277569,0.00033473,0.0005522232,0.00003009573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002788408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005050673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001132075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0213661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978759,0.00135479,0.0002744496,0.0001210499,0.0001641014,0.0002097143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976873,0.0008164055,0.000216526,0.0005389047,0.0006678111,0.00007301622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004476837,0.00002908158,0.001718363,0.000001228617,0.00002838636,1.145907e-7,0.03898211,0.000003214077,0.00001267117,0.9551991,0.002928372,0.001092889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153564,0.00000975625,0.004225811,0.00003860075,0.000005766844,0.000003231017,0.011587,0.0003487253,0.000005983615,0.5465388,0.4370204,0.000100637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02251695,0.0001979487,0.001585842,0.1379117,0.00007991731,0.0002484276,0.000009488571,0.00009351789,0.8373562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536325,0.0004145545,0.005478284,0.002382937,0.0003164209,0.0001032386,0.00006072488,0.00001671269,0.03759458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981975967","doi":"10.1177/0010836705055068","title":"Middle Power Leadership on the Human Security Agenda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cooperation and Conflict","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Middle power; Human rights; Diplomacy; Political science; Hegemony; National security; Constitution; Middle East; International security; Public administration; Power (physics); Human security; Security studies; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1723415634701466,"gpt":0.3530245171715595,"spread":0.1806829537014129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002537602,0.00004581408,0.0000370978,0.00002826041,0.0007522223,0.0001218554,0.00007445204,0.00004362109,0.001858354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008484082,0.00003317131,0.00002103435,0.000064701,0.0001284917,0.0001006877,0.000007449783,0.00008339369,0.0001750662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002933202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003486314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009859412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002755137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995332,0.00006623907,0.00008132053,0.00008351346,0.0001334793,0.0001022261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997464,0.00005501198,0.00002226138,0.00006562764,0.00007514078,0.0000355308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001542481,0.00001316032,0.00005771593,3.441365e-7,0.000004255658,1.463978e-7,0.01196306,0.000006288454,0.00005349293,0.9826941,0.00470573,0.0005000954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001304891,0.00002589312,0.001013181,0.000007098321,0.000003017528,4.838188e-7,0.002354658,0.0002811049,0.0001844751,0.001805068,0.9941248,0.00006974173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2033574,0.00008672963,0.00003838714,0.01398095,0.00003576759,0.0001220196,0.000003634997,0.00002532379,0.7823498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676573,0.00002425275,0.00000567606,0.006678754,0.0002207062,0.000008506731,0.000005126369,0.000003163371,0.02539657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100177189","doi":"10.1177/1354066110377674","title":"Exceptionalism in American foreign policy: Is it exceptional?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Normative; Foreign policy; American exceptionalism; International relations; Politics; Political science; Foreign relations; Westphalian sovereignty; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Sovereignty","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02281282723456229,"gpt":0.351352931387141,"spread":0.3285401041525787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001864241,0.000130312,0.0001584645,0.001101468,0.0002762797,0.0001263133,0.0006726771,0.00005062456,0.005551757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001892854,0.0001299013,0.0002194271,0.0005910586,0.0004398347,0.0006559817,0.00005535476,0.0006884088,0.0008453977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003026687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005743442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002935553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000281803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975619,0.0002751982,0.0007909681,0.0001607275,0.0009692168,0.0002419371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977888,0.0003055648,0.0006456688,0.0001365085,0.0009385424,0.0001848979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001905535,0.00009904928,0.0184292,5.229771e-7,0.00005026394,0.000026465,0.004076598,0.0002774147,0.0002009238,0.9489858,0.02522279,0.002611913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007168112,0.00006389527,0.2552807,0.00004829245,0.00001388024,0.00007569744,0.002078779,0.0003304733,0.00001143729,0.07302323,0.6681732,0.0001836641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09464595,0.00001467959,0.003107233,0.02245053,0.0004942832,0.0000884015,0.00003899381,0.00002033651,0.8791396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727364,0.00009726727,0.00447275,0.001530315,0.002721308,0.000002985102,0.00001791932,0.00002350227,0.01839751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162669982","doi":"10.1177/1354066113495477","title":"In the beginning: The International Relations enlightenment and the ends of International Relations theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; International relations; Enlightenment; Opposition (politics); Realism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Post-realism; Normative; Assertion; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01363807527519739,"gpt":0.2816712152616104,"spread":0.268033139986413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006490955,0.000195701,0.0002059502,0.0005635704,0.0007699254,0.0003792586,0.002012199,0.0000762033,0.005862549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003658304,0.0001136886,0.0002972693,0.00046832,0.001064509,0.0012254,0.0001984601,0.0008476601,0.0005065007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003071173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002477574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002594121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007131948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952497,0.001404899,0.001304045,0.0002078824,0.001590571,0.0002429276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994205,0.003060155,0.001128908,0.0002881632,0.001228444,0.00008931768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006015573,0.0001123312,0.006653249,7.300854e-7,0.0002752092,0.00001073423,0.01663595,0.001149651,0.00003051166,0.925536,0.04826633,0.001269193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002868731,0.00008111871,0.1466267,0.0001471468,0.0001463963,0.0002155895,0.01767547,0.004715019,0.00001430688,0.1948315,0.6324099,0.0002680281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02716668,0.0003757219,0.004856207,0.1318623,0.001558656,0.0004616705,0.0000375307,0.00001872293,0.8336625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559106,0.0002685768,0.001170678,0.001306565,0.001108646,0.00003218871,0.00002475147,0.00002372248,0.04015426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080572979","doi":"10.1093/isp/ekaa008","title":"Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Perspectives","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Camosun College","funders":"Universidad San Francisco de Quito","keywords":"Existentialism; Conversation; Similarity (geometry); Set (abstract data type); International relations; Affect (linguistics); East Asia; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0770688885509495,"gpt":0.3771170149774091,"spread":0.3000481264264596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001521242,0.0001353339,0.0001431922,0.00007805906,0.0008650669,0.0001363521,0.0004613682,0.00004150168,0.0008801421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001133869,0.0001006887,0.0001236695,0.0002500328,0.0005753649,0.0002260295,0.0001532074,0.0002403072,0.0001437254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004281435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007260381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007289244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008506321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984878,0.00008519646,0.0002322872,0.000291363,0.0007093049,0.0001940087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985119,0.0007690159,0.0001233406,0.0000888171,0.0004298135,0.0000771539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002483856,0.00002884486,0.009137018,7.919347e-7,0.0003698463,0.000002390971,0.0645629,0.00008687846,0.00003798881,0.9221693,0.00288912,0.0006900764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005618036,0.00003469186,0.3616323,0.0000601649,0.00004889703,9.886522e-7,0.1537727,0.001541249,0.00003265418,0.1789936,0.3029633,0.0003575875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1715571,0.004850478,0.001198588,0.08440302,0.0007772787,0.0002720075,0.0001152406,0.0001395526,0.7366867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833782,0.00100038,0.000307644,0.00110307,0.003346371,0.00004097827,0.00001352942,0.0000112181,0.01079863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316291473","doi":"10.5509/2009824657","title":"East Asia Responds to the Rise of China: Patterns and Variations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; East Asia; Geography; Economic geography; Political science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0121094375157634,"gpt":0.2831682116692408,"spread":0.2710587741534775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003488706,0.00004540676,0.0000565816,0.00007788695,0.0002909036,0.00003625734,0.000122991,0.00003562645,0.0001608159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001640069,0.00003397571,0.00003083992,0.0002128551,0.00006383103,0.00007798131,0.00001372638,0.00005588949,0.00003113121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002988952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004634097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002723996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001482843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994158,0.00006528877,0.0001123488,0.00008850312,0.0002011091,0.0001169747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996814,0.00004673173,0.0000475985,0.0001066157,0.00005857126,0.0000590548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007097227,0.00001937167,0.001160752,5.762105e-7,0.000005725319,3.628531e-7,0.02579923,0.00002156214,0.00001513342,0.968457,0.0009206011,0.003592525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003681385,0.0002126314,0.5122569,0.00004932062,0.00003955508,0.000004450577,0.2398929,0.001038688,0.00004308385,0.141291,0.1045234,0.0002798885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007952628,0.00003276637,0.002940156,0.007055399,0.00005774713,0.0001394335,0.00004232734,0.00001752276,0.981762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952117,0.00001998057,0.0002093321,0.00001501279,0.0001372703,0.00000554634,0.000002276675,0.000002825132,0.004396065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2237425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951234863","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107281837","title":"The Return of the Public in Global Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Global governance; Political science; Politics; Globalization; Dimension (graph theory); International relations; Public sphere; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01530803164850104,"gpt":0.2356574620664966,"spread":0.2203494304179955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003156056,0.000098846,0.0001266224,0.00002256347,0.0004764654,0.00004547476,0.001070624,0.0002012445,0.000002193292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001549116,0.0000745802,0.0001437691,0.0000364493,0.000770924,0.00006303976,0.0002241819,0.0002596805,0.000003543803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009162949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008675145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001624185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001029197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989183,0.0001702866,0.0001353935,0.0001459853,0.0004269315,0.0002030886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999031,0.0001597892,0.0002924485,0.0002889386,0.0001800812,0.00004775699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995689,0.000003155262,0.00007321309,0.000004484229,0.0000171575,0.000002119323,0.00008492176,7.145447e-7,1.402693e-7,0.9175725,0.08171483,0.0005187521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001382936,0.000004942343,0.0007866291,0.00005651649,0.00001468637,6.55479e-7,0.00006853854,0.00002867889,0.000001808964,0.001251545,0.9975694,0.00007833723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001660478,0.00009092518,0.00002486904,0.0003122983,0.0002224254,0.0002176184,0.0001496453,0.00001201725,0.9988042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04701721,0.00009108151,0.000004304765,0.00005315783,0.000146568,5.157824e-7,0.000003596145,0.000005208282,0.9526784],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.916321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3664635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987275399","doi":"10.1177/0010836710377487","title":"The materials of practice: Nuclear warheads, rhetorical commonplaces and committee meetings in Russian–Atlantic relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cooperation and Conflict","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Materialism; Sociology; Realism; Periodization; Practice theory; Social constructivism; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01487662422927535,"gpt":0.3208356110803314,"spread":0.3059589868510561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000724116,0.00004758951,0.00007672363,0.00004177725,0.0006898154,0.0001626896,0.00007217547,0.00007639297,0.0001148409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007654815,0.00003586037,0.000009781164,0.00009633131,0.000261163,0.000182869,0.00002241825,0.0001264177,0.000009398393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001469871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005249963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001480452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001122168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993804,0.0001274946,0.0001978128,0.00007912429,0.0001238898,0.00009134468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.0004353993,0.00008157254,0.00006756356,0.0000895548,0.00003996077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001289847,0.00001480714,0.002157235,0.000001245302,0.000004786202,2.898683e-7,0.005072555,0.000001168103,0.001120111,0.9907979,0.0004466762,0.0003702741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005116602,0.00005082165,0.03402104,0.00002451167,0.00001912392,0.000008881246,0.002488308,0.0007773846,0.0001992128,0.0052977,0.9564673,0.0001340588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8651056,0.00009155832,0.00001811892,0.01557398,0.0001220943,0.0001819076,0.000003997437,0.00001470648,0.1188881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980377,0.0004126164,0.0001412336,0.0001982493,0.00007075581,0.000006188206,0.000004346206,0.000004239631,0.001124678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5305572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088683451","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaa043","title":"The Gray Area of Institutional Change: How the Security Council Transforms Its Practices on the Fly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Charter; Casual; Gray (unit); Public relations; Interdependence; Public administration; Management; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2543423410713169,"gpt":0.3861711955925963,"spread":0.1318288545212794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002193155,0.0001105423,0.0001851137,0.00001092852,0.001526384,0.0001180165,0.0005411963,0.00005476019,0.0000138076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006898897,0.00004558723,0.0001951131,0.0003357271,0.0007704795,0.0004153239,0.00004964332,0.0003407178,0.000006578093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004279031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000572538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001935303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001581601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976402,0.0002190141,0.0003027945,0.00008623823,0.001559845,0.0001918963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965612,0.000835328,0.0007970877,0.00007524166,0.001662295,0.000068881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001148329,0.00005243374,0.0006224344,0.00000921703,0.0003111499,0.000004615667,0.04749749,0.00001320642,0.000001999793,0.9309478,0.01991897,0.0005058079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004025573,0.0003320272,0.004082146,0.00008881868,0.000121618,0.00001830913,0.06115036,0.0001914353,0.00002703145,0.1553863,0.7780802,0.000119224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3068557,0.01254316,0.00002825679,0.5797709,0.0007519475,0.0005734956,0.0002522936,0.00001515404,0.09920917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991062,0.006277995,0.000004801161,0.001700338,0.0008994363,0.00000864893,4.122873e-7,0.000002360717,0.00004397851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905747802","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000505","title":"The changing practices of frontline diplomacy: New directions for inquiry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Scholarship; Political science; Privilege (computing); Politics; International relations; Public administration; Foreign policy; State (computer science); Public relations; Criticism; Sociology; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1373370738337274,"gpt":0.5160918980999303,"spread":0.3787548242662029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009706507,0.00005623556,0.0001513562,0.00007178988,0.0004317107,0.00001336525,0.0002531107,0.00001868477,0.00007045559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007373552,0.00003779627,0.0001163063,0.0001865193,0.0003907086,0.0001458021,0.00006221599,0.00003423373,0.000008656803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000714885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001223563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001848223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002428802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.00004697397,0.0003313241,0.00008620934,0.0003136246,0.000110405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708,0.0008370121,0.0006677276,0.0000783108,0.001314888,0.00002208097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001348874,0.00002455241,0.0002687161,0.0001407612,0.0003483339,4.996626e-8,0.003919346,4.447339e-7,0.000009120925,0.9365804,0.02955285,0.029142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009202008,0.00003802146,0.0003713486,0.001257684,0.00004587665,4.721603e-7,0.002358004,0.00002084129,0.00008260964,0.01860108,0.977089,0.00004298503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001762861,0.6056943,0.003679771,0.03735033,0.002788713,0.001118264,0.00006688089,0.00004438508,0.3474945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1025029,0.8757837,0.00317688,0.0005208195,0.003880268,0.00009447157,0.0000105644,0.00001070909,0.01401966],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006689265","doi":"10.1093/cjip/poz018","title":"China’s Rise and Balance of Power Politics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of International Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Dominance (genetics); Existentialism; Political economy; Politics; Cold war; Political science; Balance (ability); Grand strategy; Great power; Power (physics); State (computer science); Post–Cold War era; Foreign policy; Development economics; Economy; Economic system; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005607184173872654,"gpt":0.3082688052112828,"spread":0.3026616210374101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934674,0.0000873661,0.0001614063,0.0001572481,0.0001113298,0.00004402681,0.0004482575,0.00005267914,0.0003550338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006916893,0.00005391706,0.0001140003,0.0001121153,0.0002693901,0.0002330235,0.00005607647,0.000198769,0.00001669597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001073686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001918799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003858114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000685969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987065,0.00007087693,0.0004021179,0.00005950617,0.0005976908,0.0001633221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986001,0.0002057287,0.000398897,0.000103339,0.0006033876,0.00008850144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001085876,0.00003897769,0.03515781,0.000003825869,0.00007096558,0.000001818831,0.003341613,0.00007675617,0.0000681727,0.9607919,0.0003844241,0.00005281837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007351727,0.0001144437,0.4603597,0.00008496013,0.00002731946,0.00009479649,0.001353149,0.0007855095,0.00006757861,0.508494,0.0277517,0.0001316904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7838274,0.0002240906,0.00009589437,0.004583429,0.0005470664,0.00005872038,0.00003105093,0.000003555844,0.2106288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993009,0.0001916933,0.000226957,0.0002278874,0.0006985874,4.010745e-7,0.00000120669,0.000008062736,0.005636199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.452298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3887371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158340652","doi":"10.1017/9781108966610","title":"International Norms, Moral Psychology, and Neuroscience","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral psychology; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Sociology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04186438575020272,"gpt":0.2969816335043601,"spread":0.2551172477541574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001351286,0.0001356871,0.0001451073,0.0001692054,0.0004120479,0.0001111254,0.0005284083,0.0002433661,0.00001719239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006222993,0.0001669453,0.00008742111,0.00002133042,0.0007809947,0.0001546039,0.0002558273,0.0003087122,0.000006432794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002145275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004311867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003942976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001207552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989083,0.00006774113,0.000110999,0.0003610398,0.0003466548,0.0002052193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999298,0.00004926102,0.000122574,0.0001709318,0.000226023,0.0001332356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007881594,0.000007337625,0.00001838274,0.000003238824,0.00001668828,0.00007696994,0.000126019,9.603231e-7,0.000007981261,0.8751953,0.1238442,0.0006950131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881338,0.00001143075,0.0003623776,0.00002919302,0.0000263444,0.000009913847,0.00005350158,0.00003648689,0.000003476503,0.0002312403,0.9988884,0.0001595113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006058098,0.00007994485,0.0001850882,0.0001882853,0.00051323,0.0001289105,0.0002094612,0.00004602637,0.9985884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001591994,0.0006698362,0.00008762836,0.0004447021,0.0003760522,5.152312e-7,0.00006567124,0.00001097637,0.9967526],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6807834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159722726","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-26624-4_5","title":"The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs on pioneers in science and practice","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); International relations theory; Epistemology; International relations; Theory of change; Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Artificial intelligence; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05505444299599573,"gpt":0.3692208926306837,"spread":0.314166449634688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006876923,0.0001071379,0.0001104049,0.0004865371,0.0004222361,0.00009491026,0.0004776782,0.0001344781,0.0002035526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003228653,0.00007893544,0.00003377707,0.0002103841,0.001560661,0.0009044687,0.00009563348,0.0003206698,0.00005985431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004189117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005069108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003461726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003821799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981208,0.00008891364,0.0003192342,0.0002623252,0.0009883454,0.0002204012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962717,0.002767935,0.0003235468,0.0001623257,0.0004163767,0.00005816629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004723774,0.00001306869,0.00006636204,0.000001571946,0.000007512109,0.000002710392,0.003797241,0.000003417526,0.000004684254,0.9578621,0.00007105318,0.03812298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001189829,0.00002315006,0.0005772428,0.0001989989,0.000005740188,0.000001982143,0.0005520485,0.00001130885,0.000002362786,0.4046572,0.5937578,0.00009310341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006875699,0.0002450758,0.00004051464,0.01011701,0.0002126465,0.0002992841,0.00001075838,0.000008442636,0.9889975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4236751,0.006150036,0.001127138,0.001246748,0.0005361318,0.00007770518,0.00000243501,0.00002829884,0.5671564],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5936868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332196041","doi":"10.5509/2007802229","title":"Introduction: Understanding East Asian Cross-Regionalism: An Analytical Framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); East Asia; Political science; Economic geography; Regional science; Geography; Politics; China; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0568758686546556,"gpt":0.3643525810816493,"spread":0.3074767124269936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001043511,0.0001006335,0.0001024321,0.0001741503,0.0008208508,0.0002000372,0.0001911128,0.0001821185,0.001954808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003352121,0.00010158,0.00008460235,0.0004783253,0.0006209795,0.0003888517,0.00001893299,0.0002353278,0.0002296413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005009807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001058796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006707199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001588714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985238,0.00005770762,0.0002282905,0.0002657001,0.0005373026,0.0003872516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992816,0.00009224068,0.00007327192,0.0001879567,0.000127439,0.0002374433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001936561,0.00003788938,0.002111539,0.000001244688,0.00001686634,0.000005792755,0.01024547,0.00002368351,0.000001248235,0.985034,0.002123181,0.0003796942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001174784,0.00003464428,0.001858539,0.00001197974,0.00001239093,0.000009559349,0.4492268,0.0002698728,0.00000272418,0.4734413,0.07482402,0.0001907075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005959857,0.00001537446,0.08838505,0.005048675,0.0004772886,0.00008537631,0.000006331759,0.00008867942,0.9052972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875005,0.000005791533,0.001349739,0.00002650851,0.004428466,0.00000258211,0.00001865856,0.00001275665,0.00665501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052519721","doi":"10.1017/s1752971914000013","title":"Symposium ‘Theories of Territory beyond Westphalia’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Shell","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Sovereign state; Bounded function; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006492843382313073,"gpt":0.3000157417607655,"spread":0.2935228983784524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083932,0.00007217816,0.00009024123,0.0001505917,0.0001464841,0.00003681615,0.0004115287,0.0000690971,0.001204242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004748373,0.00006998583,0.00008774326,0.00006945288,0.0004159534,0.0002150147,0.00004408157,0.00008002843,0.0001098587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008265465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000737588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002210349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003793988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988899,0.000191364,0.0002195197,0.0001231298,0.0004407104,0.0001353504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990353,0.0004352382,0.000123671,0.0001149055,0.0002372157,0.00005364635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002351348,0.00003676276,0.001516185,0.000001954619,0.00003741458,4.578086e-7,0.00199058,0.0000274968,0.0002532649,0.9929589,0.0004611746,0.002692276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001212538,0.0000168997,0.0009460804,0.00001367068,0.000005989193,0.0000011275,0.0004323814,0.00005871684,0.0004016916,0.7899628,0.2079748,0.00006452636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01362943,0.00002421051,0.005907793,0.001271864,0.0009149684,0.0000649601,0.00003103681,0.00003814535,0.9781176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96946,0.00002715181,0.0003903442,0.0003563908,0.0009542379,0.00001009752,0.00001467264,0.000009093834,0.02877798],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036651087","doi":"10.1080/09512740500338895","title":"Japan's changing conception of the ASEAN Regional Forum: from an optimistic liberal to a pessimistic realist perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Enthusiasm; Political science; Diplomacy; Government (linguistics); Pessimism; Politics; Political economy; Bureaucracy; East Asia; International trade; Public administration; China; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04245626857097726,"gpt":0.3703703622593725,"spread":0.3279140936883953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005753961,0.00008193147,0.0001454452,0.00003429148,0.0004694741,0.00003289103,0.0003603137,0.00003214513,0.0004259153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003424104,0.00004923531,0.0001143305,0.0003096856,0.0002391423,0.0001069439,0.00003668278,0.0001004132,0.00005351339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000205193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001059566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001336506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000360372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988486,0.0002573532,0.0002097019,0.0001480724,0.0003508471,0.0001854491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.0001357978,0.0001297527,0.0002623188,0.0001921924,0.00006882875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006427854,0.00002574479,0.00004803189,0.00001437236,0.00001715489,1.532317e-7,0.01610183,0.0001207742,0.0000107179,0.9708241,0.006871829,0.005958908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005249088,0.0001473471,0.005789257,0.005381314,0.0004473639,0.00001221232,0.08057987,0.004118476,0.00002726069,0.2474129,0.6548852,0.0006739292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01023197,0.01938336,0.002528281,0.1282865,0.0002861317,0.002165793,0.0002534354,0.0000765353,0.836788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891375,0.002883687,0.0003567052,0.002327427,0.0006459746,0.00004257117,0.0000196144,0.000008959275,0.004577511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4663474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917538588","doi":"10.1093/isr/viz012","title":"Ruling from the Shadows: The Nature and Functions of Informal International Rules in World Politics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; International relations; Sociology; Mindset; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03132840061130349,"gpt":0.3690335716508982,"spread":0.3377051710395947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005866904,0.00009285717,0.0001672105,0.00008326228,0.0002067209,0.00004851869,0.0005060658,0.00004611674,0.000710867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009747462,0.000055312,0.0000899256,0.0001995167,0.0002565538,0.0002358908,0.0001861591,0.0002865161,0.00007450887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001209132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006589975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009620977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001382858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987687,0.00007230721,0.0003881816,0.0001282351,0.000507357,0.0001352175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983854,0.0009108298,0.0001908036,0.0001213704,0.0003691768,0.00002241065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005574852,0.00001900812,0.03178785,0.00002708965,0.0002267557,5.37611e-7,0.00237608,0.00002125656,9.702774e-7,0.952774,0.005163504,0.007597317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001806809,0.000006814176,0.06395777,0.0008610528,0.00002814304,0.000001517686,0.002879177,0.000119919,0.000001229351,0.01891407,0.9129673,0.00008234687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06054717,0.1410579,0.00002935289,0.05724474,0.002190392,0.0007731541,0.0002870646,0.00002407692,0.7378461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644862,0.1205278,0.0001499919,0.005050061,0.0007445602,0.00005085791,0.00005885346,0.000007915347,0.008923685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7783495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617895551","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqw046","title":"Diplomatic Practices, Domestic Fields, and the International System: Explaining France’s Shift on Nuclear Nonproliferation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Treaty; Nuclear weapon; Political science; Politics; Position (finance); Disarmament; International relations; Norm (philosophy); State (computer science); Foreign policy; Law; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03807161402781128,"gpt":0.3833600045273047,"spread":0.3452883904994934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036365,0.0001487625,0.0001970233,0.0001036615,0.002394338,0.0009507377,0.0008544147,0.00007852535,0.00009001431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002338463,0.0001096633,0.00008607307,0.00003628209,0.0006202198,0.0007640007,0.00008940259,0.0002166912,0.0001518108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004928846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001237283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000551759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982604,0.0001218417,0.0003621542,0.000265739,0.0007928803,0.0001969296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977257,0.0008394672,0.0008003931,0.0002643556,0.0003117052,0.00005837606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020054,0.00003028115,0.0008996247,0.000009554358,0.0003032646,0.00001155394,0.0242328,0.00002118756,0.000001648036,0.9688088,0.001337028,0.004242244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01366667,0.0009117146,0.07340927,0.001771477,0.0003661718,0.0001244998,0.1182888,0.0337083,0.000009881501,0.3651594,0.3910968,0.001486999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1621385,0.0005036133,0.000604519,0.1009429,0.005085457,0.0007268016,0.00003833293,0.0001571114,0.7298028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948709,0.0003324775,0.0002066148,0.000924887,0.001555349,0.0000869103,0.000005714126,0.00001348023,0.002003666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8327324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594805314","doi":"","title":"Administering the summit : administration of the core executive in developed countries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Presidential system; Prime minister; Administration (probate law); Political science; Public administration; Politics; Economic history; Law; Geography; History; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04744545551035678,"gpt":0.3383526212525487,"spread":0.2909071657421919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003342362,0.0001052151,0.0001304865,0.00006428894,0.0002932966,0.00004817713,0.000414764,0.0001838563,0.001059874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001082353,0.00006255072,0.00007873982,0.0001206782,0.0004816939,0.00007578243,0.00003949329,0.0001970413,0.00003626885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002642293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002878522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004706894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01080119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989396,0.00005458868,0.0003083365,0.0001191658,0.000438318,0.0001399317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992601,0.0002479905,0.0001940667,0.0001459132,0.0001306756,0.00002126497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001936323,0.000006784439,0.0002485877,0.000004882742,0.00001337868,0.00000118571,0.003442668,0.000003206,1.350938e-7,0.9847668,0.01122199,0.000271012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007516016,0.00001761828,0.002269856,0.0001227086,0.00001349842,9.262057e-7,0.00103391,0.0000113382,0.00001323009,0.08085769,0.9154838,0.0001002953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009545124,0.00005505127,0.000009204156,0.0007820193,0.00009564804,0.0003419503,0.00004723652,0.000009537952,0.9977049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2340855,0.0001181931,0.00002206632,0.0002028432,0.0001252329,0.00001448572,0.00001487778,0.000007101683,0.7654097],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987872759","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcs002","title":"China's rise and middle power democracies: Canada and Australia compared","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"China; Middle power; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; Ancient history; History; Politics; Foreign policy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02389081832117301,"gpt":0.2944757870278648,"spread":0.2705849687066918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003274785,0.00009364766,0.00009796023,0.0001012453,0.0004396831,0.00005220903,0.0002671233,0.00006835839,0.0006845731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004184831,0.00007807046,0.00005087481,0.0001698369,0.0003313907,0.0003597729,0.00008015396,0.0001473388,0.00002092817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001995981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1330688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988611,0.00008234844,0.0002529843,0.000116239,0.0004901501,0.0001971264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992665,0.000139707,0.0001725883,0.0001430374,0.0001667891,0.0001113693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009035864,0.00004144245,0.1780443,0.000002421157,0.00006659865,3.011932e-7,0.003514482,0.0000671411,0.00002656407,0.8105263,0.007558207,0.0001432389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002160375,0.00000908671,0.8394876,0.00004364087,0.00002596529,0.0000111372,0.002916035,0.0002340713,0.00004246128,0.01928844,0.137592,0.0001335986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6190651,0.000167795,0.00007052803,0.004905091,0.0005781858,0.0001563538,0.00009426513,0.00001221541,0.3749504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488932,0.00001831075,0.0003161191,0.00001696647,0.0001176292,0.000007821966,0.000007534742,0.000006939984,0.0506154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7912378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}