{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2130,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2130,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"985836f594cd","filters":{"topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2137292845","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":477,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Treaty; Political science; Adjudication; Commonwealth; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Underpinning; European union; Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Alec Stone Sweet","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jud Mathews","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965710544822144,"gpt":0.3097506573993833,"spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975975,0.0003692223,0.0006742844,0.00176831,0.005293201,0.008331846,0.0009071672,0.002489516,0.006278253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01043311,0.0002599781,0.0005608118,0.002009091,0.03079399,0.007445046,0.007227596,0.005400493,0.0004187751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004343926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00248119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001895621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002078103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895425,0.005434073,0.0003141983,0.002185408,0.001515973,0.001007813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954143,0.002336708,0.0004342295,0.001077899,0.0005238208,0.0002131107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003387501,0.000002881762,0.0001415641,0.00001201104,0.000004026496,0.00001686917,0.0008541393,0.000231293,0.00006723857,0.9935977,0.0004769234,0.004592044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001197597,0.00001007922,0.0005776041,0.00005661249,0.000009790847,0.00003543159,0.000591437,0.0002858749,0.0001985453,0.9679168,0.03029814,0.00000764952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05940796,0.00543063,0.04635397,0.02007449,0.0002869725,0.00006279498,0.00006297004,0.0001377674,0.8681824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772126,0.001184904,0.005640891,0.003323942,0.0003010652,0.000090509,0.00003901611,0.00007189094,0.01213516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009975975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05275857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018150336","doi":"10.2307/3505128","title":"10.2307/3505128","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Comparative law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01279271402842843,"gpt":0.227505879036954,"spread":0.2147131650085256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008129788,0.001496946,0.00111656,0.002332618,0.001746938,0.004980502,0.001858653,0.002590328,0.9857358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002313295,0.0007822835,0.0007314696,0.00269643,0.001798813,0.005760118,0.00416011,0.001637569,0.9861003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00118296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001453538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004430134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004884634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994639,0.00004899944,0.00004002121,0.0001358441,0.0002289118,0.0000824543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980649,0.0004504819,0.00007504538,0.0003689223,0.0004533021,0.0005872545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000124513,0.0001279358,0.0003971346,0.0003637371,0.00001178524,0.0001445605,0.00008815636,0.0001216903,0.001051689,0.006478977,0.6198017,0.3712882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002051976,0.00002485417,0.000710231,0.0001630509,0.000004780266,0.0001549497,0.0001210158,0.00008443581,0.0001558251,0.001213404,0.9973339,0.00001304564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002434959,0.0003105424,0.0003019578,0.0003007321,0.0003267191,0.00004275253,0.0009057352,0.0005718835,0.9969962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009962581,0.0003251435,0.0003965336,0.0003750123,0.00008753349,0.00003038782,0.00114659,0.0003230486,0.9963195],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01426417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02034611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152896665","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00068.x","title":"Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Impartiality; Coercion (linguistics); Accountability; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sentence; Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Gregory A. Huber","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sanford C. Gordon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04572646034996888,"gpt":0.3791096180838859,"spread":0.3333831577339171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005823313,0.0002167052,0.000434856,0.002156114,0.003528178,0.006523302,0.0008204405,0.002422206,0.005982406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05798284,0.0002789922,0.0002529542,0.001632217,0.01850041,0.00907405,0.003022327,0.00344171,0.0005222788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003449128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003553152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007645954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00784018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918555,0.0043694,0.0002793962,0.0007233085,0.001335866,0.001436514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665738,0.01671509,0.009149023,0.00263941,0.00213507,0.00278751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003536109,0.0002425201,0.1523073,0.0001979512,0.00007208094,0.001026487,0.0242058,0.000515773,0.0004448395,0.5809581,0.03236981,0.2073057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007453478,0.0001612325,0.1195135,0.0009845017,0.00009804122,0.00177485,0.02314856,0.001983209,0.0006371873,0.7847602,0.06675514,0.0001090732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.475867,0.02000078,0.00902971,0.2742702,0.001264399,0.00006082984,0.000271473,0.00009154642,0.2191441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937758,0.00139449,0.000243384,0.002654975,0.0004102553,0.0000115478,0.00001563364,0.00001247558,0.001481416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007645954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594935521","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Tushnet","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lorraine Weinrib","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey Goldsworthy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michel Rosenfeld","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mayo Moran","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mattias Kumm","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Schneiderman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Neil Walker","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kim Lane Scheppele","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Oren Gross","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02604646980348289,"gpt":0.241720970917017,"spread":0.2156745011135341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004780385,0.0003292802,0.0004087069,0.002217416,0.005230152,0.01027831,0.00114196,0.002249193,0.005956914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008860955,0.0003476204,0.0003601647,0.002765551,0.036725,0.01664081,0.006947584,0.007117266,0.0008046742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007934526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002854696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002479614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929332,0.003663793,0.0001940571,0.000748028,0.001899989,0.0005610243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971855,0.001477042,0.0001460621,0.0007803583,0.0002406649,0.0001702898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001205187,0.000002097557,0.00002061579,0.000007345075,5.235941e-7,0.00001037299,0.001834254,0.00002568673,0.00001939539,0.9925741,0.001380527,0.004123813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000699354,0.00001395807,0.0002323444,0.0001403942,0.000002306133,0.0001092682,0.003688173,0.000166091,0.00007470078,0.6870363,0.3085236,0.000005911874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154594,0.01485557,0.01545301,0.02845816,0.001571722,0.00004816916,0.00006016944,0.00006766761,0.9240261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7708619,0.01715398,0.01095448,0.01058525,0.002005381,0.000318554,0.0001639658,0.0002279592,0.1877286],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01027831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05756927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235004248","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246","title":"The Constitution of Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislature; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02473041508855164,"gpt":0.2278451893607231,"spread":0.2031147742721714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003899768,0.0003883738,0.0004793054,0.0014557,0.004917216,0.009205329,0.0007765168,0.003637998,0.007204305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006380465,0.0003990149,0.000275521,0.001214008,0.02910826,0.007513575,0.003207079,0.00610877,0.001761694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006431706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008961623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006078153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996204,0.001528323,0.0001571343,0.0006070453,0.001006142,0.0004974178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982759,0.000988122,0.0001093829,0.000273318,0.0002437529,0.0001096352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.112929e-7,0.000001155727,0.00001043659,0.000004055186,3.421203e-7,0.000004269501,0.0002785219,0.00002655803,0.00001273587,0.9965197,0.001979286,0.001162377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005331952,0.000005849585,0.0001144519,0.0001161106,0.000001741752,0.00002722839,0.0003931406,0.000100725,0.00006263184,0.656012,0.3431548,0.000005955329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002824069,0.01227706,0.009794338,0.01843268,0.0008031621,0.00005698705,0.0001322486,0.0000544291,0.9556251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5527553,0.01986275,0.01341768,0.01590572,0.001936674,0.00058822,0.0003548458,0.0001898574,0.394989],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009205329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04666555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580510701","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269808.001.0001","title":"The Ultimate Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Impartiality; Supreme court; Politics; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Rule of law; Judicial restraint; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Democracy; Judicial activism","authors":[{"name":"David M. Beatty","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02692789577543347,"gpt":0.2406180879926685,"spread":0.213690192217235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801037,0.0004138529,0.0005339879,0.0009738712,0.004285731,0.009238593,0.001158188,0.003169799,0.005628101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008279628,0.0003150507,0.0003483843,0.0007144943,0.02898639,0.006648056,0.00264127,0.006097921,0.002590138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005976052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004091183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003538599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929594,0.00254793,0.0002559619,0.0009470357,0.0027592,0.0005306077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970994,0.001700999,0.0001518885,0.0004652186,0.0004759631,0.0001065723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.558676e-7,0.000001727702,0.00001170871,0.000008909411,6.6732e-7,0.000006045849,0.0003589301,0.00002574856,0.00001705956,0.9929823,0.004468129,0.002117964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004378611,0.000008620644,0.00006602435,0.0001181523,0.000002325647,0.00003501548,0.0003428668,0.0001020992,0.00008269369,0.6554518,0.343782,0.000004068393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001606599,0.01207425,0.01045514,0.01559669,0.001120697,0.0000442161,0.00005121069,0.00005024385,0.9590009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.443747,0.0238975,0.01675104,0.02463312,0.005231334,0.0005598357,0.0001874235,0.0002324952,0.4847602],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009238593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03076679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151138624","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030532","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Human rights; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Politics; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Tamir Moustafa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02079864840949626,"gpt":0.3339173211579476,"spread":0.3131186727484513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914091,0.0001426583,0.0004426615,0.002146855,0.00633209,0.01048621,0.0009486584,0.004232482,0.003831116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01096111,0.0002970137,0.0002427901,0.002393523,0.04862424,0.008503509,0.004476012,0.00403736,0.0003311921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005006411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005237179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007305485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009642596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938104,0.003592062,0.0002380462,0.0007206576,0.0008440035,0.0007949803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924878,0.005130215,0.00102697,0.0004266457,0.000457861,0.0004705342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002437189,0.000005277281,0.0002522417,0.00001290606,0.000001515711,0.00002132356,0.0021741,0.0000900403,0.000036364,0.9949509,0.0004256634,0.002027264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001759084,0.00001460161,0.001954472,0.0001749258,0.000005247306,0.00006233765,0.003400841,0.0002264114,0.00009490266,0.9479857,0.04605131,0.00001156045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2140393,0.04820176,0.009624911,0.07595475,0.0003893677,0.00004902947,0.0001169507,0.00004067273,0.6515831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859239,0.004257416,0.000750886,0.00234494,0.0002893798,0.0000292698,0.00002164911,0.000007721232,0.006374876],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01048621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03632426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Dieter Grimm","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0136201582477239,"gpt":0.2739484023916838,"spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409101,0.0005900906,0.0004957653,0.003577804,0.01677979,0.0107823,0.001908242,0.004414001,0.005571964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008601036,0.0004380239,0.0004353161,0.004675545,0.02277567,0.002728342,0.002981602,0.004924246,0.0003865687],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1684818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1003674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919487,0.001106241,0.0002065825,0.001049048,0.0031714,0.002517874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973846,0.0007582803,0.00009561057,0.0001416826,0.001151794,0.0004680457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007529062,0.000004511826,0.0001690383,0.00001768781,0.000003312856,0.00004391402,0.003048945,0.0001583626,0.00006488988,0.9807992,0.01126958,0.00441291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004100498,0.00001552057,0.008405839,0.000338881,0.00003620209,0.0001495207,0.00590871,0.001130604,0.0003621372,0.1973288,0.7861211,0.0001617239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05204508,0.04223282,0.004247187,0.0835989,0.001538254,0.0001054321,0.000625021,0.0001308888,0.8154764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855869,0.01015095,0.00359931,0.0170802,0.0003346513,0.00007251685,0.000227622,0.00007685091,0.08287111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623432494","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Demise; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03140422771101241,"gpt":0.2402606746938814,"spread":0.208856446982869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002066761,0.0001824378,0.0001908228,0.000806573,0.002264216,0.004750709,0.0005378256,0.001420619,0.003077521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003337399,0.0001635958,0.0001811336,0.0007822984,0.01679794,0.002537708,0.001363463,0.00300981,0.0004450881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004163213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003520584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003865535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976068,0.001178565,0.00008106686,0.0003330633,0.0006178878,0.0001825604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974476,0.001710273,0.0001498533,0.0002810787,0.0003473938,0.00006374707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.543172e-7,0.000002400447,0.00002911734,0.00001069516,5.101706e-7,0.00001213941,0.0004524805,0.00008052486,0.00004825264,0.9936669,0.002992622,0.002703539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008634485,0.00001641346,0.0006178588,0.0003172341,0.000003733101,0.00008014674,0.0009057453,0.0006789981,0.0003223867,0.5745441,0.422497,0.00000785153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01196214,0.02398691,0.007615972,0.0216256,0.0009655785,0.00002655864,0.00004016297,0.0000319352,0.9337451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8281295,0.01603154,0.001892142,0.008198062,0.002909996,0.00008760889,0.00007420238,0.00005350232,0.1426235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004750709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03020632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255305783","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511920806","title":"The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Legislature; Law and economics; Appeal; Political science; Constitutional theory; Novelty; Relevance (law); Law; Democracy; Public administration; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Gardbaum","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04322599364376026,"gpt":0.2420361117750007,"spread":0.1988101181312405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003631515,0.0002388676,0.0004604057,0.001616573,0.004309578,0.009535776,0.001182636,0.002623735,0.003723764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007028475,0.000296548,0.0005072878,0.002194482,0.03289865,0.009076726,0.00431643,0.00499117,0.0007142233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008403551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01221361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934753,0.002648546,0.0001969872,0.0008497245,0.001908504,0.0009209992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977469,0.001060486,0.0001665168,0.0005074931,0.0003389061,0.0001797502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[3.869108e-7,7.845774e-7,0.00001426039,0.000002107196,3.489023e-7,0.000003834818,0.0002016906,0.00003492702,0.000007487936,0.9986412,0.0004631765,0.0006296941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003788744,0.000004111094,0.000121132,0.00003942912,0.000002334028,0.00002387311,0.0002821195,0.0002297534,0.00004262902,0.9233487,0.07589802,0.00000411553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01195637,0.003944775,0.02528433,0.01700565,0.0003070255,0.00004434538,0.00005323517,0.00005455704,0.9413497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8234178,0.00561453,0.01046514,0.005103516,0.0006837539,0.0002832412,0.0001131567,0.0001022787,0.1542166],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07503778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107815919","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00152.x","title":"The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Hegemony; Political science; Political economy; Power (physics); Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1032304059670524,"gpt":0.383277427597812,"spread":0.2800470216307596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004879514,0.0001807926,0.0003138898,0.001521378,0.00560801,0.005584197,0.000878237,0.00195673,0.003598761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01193448,0.00020462,0.0003828596,0.001172495,0.0437747,0.006991128,0.005642243,0.004834317,0.0001780186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005790919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003847097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004543751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006602092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966935,0.001560719,0.00008344554,0.0002809763,0.0004168384,0.0009646423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907359,0.006351158,0.0009453067,0.001022318,0.0004872038,0.0004580281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695987,0.00002689477,0.0007144263,0.00001158541,0.000001547401,0.00008484419,0.007142336,0.0001370365,0.00006694059,0.9861473,0.0003009084,0.005349122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008611885,0.00007096141,0.007537188,0.0001057355,0.00001283798,0.0001976696,0.01428164,0.001193497,0.0009111555,0.9264935,0.04907893,0.00003083215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5169313,0.00287333,0.009283224,0.02645215,0.0001147771,0.00009817108,0.00004647882,0.00004950207,0.444151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956267,0.000422591,0.0007615257,0.0004316551,0.00004721413,0.00002182492,0.000009874841,0.00001082277,0.002667853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005790919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04201627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822634312","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.001.0001","title":"Sceptical Essays on Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Skepticism; Government (linguistics); Law; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Articulation (sociology); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06184330119593007,"gpt":0.3428695796346789,"spread":0.2810262784387488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090601,0.0005657497,0.0002825392,0.001999226,0.003457626,0.00427278,0.0006544066,0.001837685,0.01593276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003299495,0.0001699343,0.0002163408,0.001611843,0.01253642,0.003498516,0.001494092,0.003688978,0.002156859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004853878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001876032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006526688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006978944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990281,0.0004471209,0.00002449487,0.00006966056,0.0003509804,0.00007962909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979275,0.001512859,0.00007327359,0.00009448177,0.0003060935,0.00008570636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004484829,0.00000985699,0.00003112086,0.00006034178,9.992245e-7,0.00004482309,0.002116298,0.00006804087,0.00003783511,0.8514289,0.1395566,0.006640591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003745128,0.000004434189,0.0001096374,0.000374657,9.900583e-7,0.00003668646,0.001254875,0.00006201644,0.0000393794,0.09709867,0.9010125,0.00000239265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00203101,0.03086916,0.001502927,0.05136029,0.006261633,0.00002308442,0.00009879697,0.00002806946,0.9078251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.139696,0.03866298,0.001163498,0.03190426,0.01196414,0.0001138803,0.0002197025,0.0001174594,0.776158],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01593276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553021964","doi":"","title":"Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional theory; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Separation of powers; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Joel I. Colón‐Ríos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02047383838055766,"gpt":0.295831323279422,"spread":0.2753574848988644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006627433,0.000348437,0.0005233303,0.001419796,0.005197799,0.009615635,0.001312134,0.00242638,0.00411227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01529444,0.0002977815,0.0003602022,0.0019209,0.03871413,0.01393312,0.004570927,0.007617038,0.0007908873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005890689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004432984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002681827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002787673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934664,0.003357238,0.0002046677,0.0006074797,0.001866536,0.0004976027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899273,0.007588374,0.0004099754,0.0009502507,0.0008342822,0.000289885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001026358,0.000001734532,0.00002478653,0.000006458497,8.22551e-7,0.000008444565,0.0006097929,0.00004452675,0.00001964778,0.9964504,0.001160085,0.001672212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004304408,0.000003502812,0.0000752308,0.00002920097,0.000001992879,0.00001391952,0.0003001064,0.0001898458,0.00006415523,0.9566362,0.0426787,0.000002720619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01690604,0.01018257,0.03682168,0.06875202,0.001362236,0.00005957425,0.00005561214,0.00007689985,0.8657834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696571,0.006238728,0.008245624,0.007691042,0.002348961,0.0002198926,0.00008950954,0.0002124235,0.1052967],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04274011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804520237","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Constitutional law","authors":[{"name":"Vicki C. Jackson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1225758233818418,"gpt":0.3666246077349982,"spread":0.2440487843531564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01888716,0.0004984993,0.0007939439,0.002109032,0.00612891,0.01090934,0.001586501,0.005943489,0.006376932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02572972,0.0005270705,0.0007890603,0.002030792,0.04549856,0.017133,0.004870187,0.01406901,0.0007978459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01097766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007318766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008365306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004367704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843147,0.006615813,0.0007487559,0.003637944,0.00379757,0.0008852033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870908,0.008080865,0.0005403595,0.002291019,0.001668138,0.0003288687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.762358e-7,9.167227e-7,0.0000102597,0.000003684316,7.08279e-7,0.000004891849,0.0001658831,0.00003759942,0.00001348337,0.9980292,0.0006316846,0.001100788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007498834,0.000009253256,0.00006499297,0.00005211769,0.000004033629,0.0000234408,0.0001379676,0.0002434938,0.0000727775,0.91501,0.08436567,0.000008704958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01746339,0.02382275,0.1455042,0.1692389,0.003551506,0.0001781209,0.0003803323,0.0002607043,0.6396003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799909,0.0134966,0.04992598,0.04706091,0.007291151,0.0006125991,0.0003168057,0.0002441343,0.08114285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09988606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253485966","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316106327","title":"Human Dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Expression (computer science); German; Philosophy; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Aharon Barak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05664718749141537,"gpt":0.261945596665269,"spread":0.2052984091738536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078176,0.0004774882,0.0005092737,0.001220514,0.003534453,0.006627823,0.0010969,0.003054542,0.01913848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004659151,0.0001889114,0.0003672188,0.001047932,0.01447405,0.004859677,0.005052612,0.003240046,0.005234932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003703336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005616624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003776995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004042746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974611,0.00053652,0.000129189,0.0003882924,0.001138629,0.0003462872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998813,0.0004300546,0.0001127038,0.0002295361,0.0002567992,0.0001578141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004850805,0.00001152025,0.0001509053,0.00009130304,0.000003612658,0.00008345646,0.002629584,0.00008664231,0.0002219649,0.9476178,0.0142927,0.0348057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004660967,0.00002280466,0.0004747161,0.0005576684,0.000005422235,0.0003188066,0.001051128,0.00004956908,0.0002384331,0.2129494,0.784316,0.00001135068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003159085,0.01233525,0.003467033,0.008038531,0.0006782365,0.00006521811,0.000122962,0.00004719857,0.9720865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3385214,0.02894591,0.007900242,0.01372359,0.001617912,0.0003842327,0.0005162075,0.0001552161,0.6082354],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01913848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06402463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Peverill Squire","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0261224248769182,"gpt":0.3540305868266478,"spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01234585,0.001497469,0.001383504,0.02259369,0.001784288,0.008731869,0.001995326,0.001831907,0.1589707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08008074,0.0007826695,0.001266874,0.0156798,0.0007629596,0.00749808,0.004193378,0.003020181,0.148811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004209062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005639873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01606312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0163316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908513,0.001003459,0.001304973,0.0005622405,0.00569533,0.0005826727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9009447,0.007955426,0.005487342,0.00540264,0.07519992,0.005010097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004661133,0.00003277503,0.001602004,0.0002275331,0.00001150365,0.00001975099,0.000041062,0.00005574242,0.00006262509,0.0019785,0.9415606,0.05436118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001767791,0.00003221596,0.005083825,0.0004107179,0.000009854141,0.00004348535,0.00005072156,0.00009381351,0.0001084431,0.0009382609,0.9931919,0.00001914499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006900785,0.0153022,0.007321571,0.0787647,0.04566295,0.001289263,0.2781711,0.008840247,0.5577472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365301,0.01753343,0.01935366,0.02110386,0.02982946,0.002899719,0.3254946,0.006784121,0.5433481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5318101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555250870","doi":"","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Public sphere; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01625766061043491,"gpt":0.3098850748993388,"spread":0.2936274142889039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006291801,0.0001476853,0.0003988116,0.002021377,0.005966157,0.01252742,0.0008008734,0.001957555,0.005556066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01052425,0.00017547,0.0002089646,0.001770153,0.05035926,0.01116082,0.00476073,0.003663705,0.0002535163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003085739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003156698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005526572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943624,0.003209072,0.0001430694,0.0008274365,0.000810517,0.0006475024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948348,0.003046521,0.0005547476,0.0008818652,0.0004000693,0.0002820904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002235553,0.000001974147,0.00007073223,0.000005707542,9.612244e-7,0.00001295086,0.003404577,0.00003172676,0.00005187267,0.9946991,0.0001992482,0.001518946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001472441,0.00002103497,0.002503159,0.0001222122,0.000006455976,0.0001201445,0.01140726,0.0003428867,0.0002959454,0.8744985,0.1106544,0.00001333811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2140237,0.00741622,0.008005058,0.02669645,0.000195629,0.0000221904,0.00003459504,0.0000275704,0.7435786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930995,0.0006348862,0.0003112486,0.000470224,0.0001066313,0.00000984418,0.000007035734,0.00001271525,0.005347889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01252742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04494435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135872986","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906","title":"The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02547038781262859,"gpt":0.3504284304177738,"spread":0.3249580426051453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007230788,0.0001215399,0.0003812916,0.001309518,0.005273574,0.007018671,0.0006415686,0.002147318,0.002645357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01696292,0.0002697331,0.0002117912,0.001854318,0.0175433,0.005160289,0.003336265,0.004484466,0.0002254552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004050483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002630254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002638952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005016414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897063,0.00600881,0.0002368058,0.001111537,0.001796136,0.00114043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811849,0.01221026,0.002620565,0.001556828,0.001558106,0.0008693752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001455405,0.00001097584,0.00226789,0.00003258444,0.00000544495,0.000107264,0.009644431,0.0001729673,0.0003812084,0.9727864,0.00146249,0.01311375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005129677,0.00009531363,0.03679195,0.0003849471,0.00002435582,0.0005909256,0.02944739,0.002222414,0.001234776,0.7006639,0.2284249,0.00006780407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5245413,0.0133549,0.01855299,0.03947384,0.0002358458,0.0000572015,0.00004948395,0.00005748236,0.4036769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953299,0.0009033444,0.0005015075,0.0008850539,0.0001198894,0.00001047137,0.000008326206,0.000009184262,0.002232461],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007230788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03824049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141053676","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x","title":"Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Concurrence; Majority opinion; Political science; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Power (physics); Law; Dissenting opinion; Empirical research; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Cliff Carrubba","is_ca":false},{"name":"Barry Friedman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew D. Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Georg Vanberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08020318407841402,"gpt":0.3343116820694302,"spread":0.2541084979910161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005857092,0.0002261502,0.0007131202,0.001204556,0.001275321,0.007022907,0.0008806075,0.001897579,0.009566924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0439649,0.0003952179,0.0002539788,0.0009646603,0.002846849,0.005495705,0.0009931007,0.001246766,0.00193453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001670419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001644126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003223932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00389646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941063,0.002738915,0.0002512311,0.001099117,0.001010785,0.0007937222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949456,0.03540108,0.006260857,0.002157438,0.003704291,0.003020302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007413366,0.0007254835,0.2575856,0.0004685882,0.0005264783,0.00153501,0.01119381,0.007377118,0.02308379,0.4504351,0.0196218,0.226706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002503104,0.0003955381,0.2145465,0.0003078234,0.0003804839,0.0009220783,0.009311134,0.03951052,0.01098674,0.6693345,0.05387961,0.0001747832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7680557,0.001931743,0.03264028,0.0133386,0.0002638509,0.0001026085,0.0003232016,0.0002554115,0.1830885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953388,0.000185861,0.0009418564,0.0003870061,0.0001775407,0.00001574668,0.00003322451,0.00004237998,0.002877612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009566924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03200459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111831069","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071338","title":"The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Rule of law; Injustice; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Rayner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364610590709913,"gpt":0.3370556872032805,"spread":0.3005946281322892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002851257,0.0003519709,0.0003110609,0.0008861143,0.003973068,0.0086441,0.0009348174,0.004857934,0.006105621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006121008,0.0004742997,0.000238928,0.001380944,0.02722637,0.01237731,0.002925457,0.005264611,0.0008499697],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005705069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007133688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01077813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01181697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978713,0.0009902581,0.00009671403,0.0002026831,0.0004946871,0.0003442873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981179,0.001207143,0.0001885358,0.0001486038,0.0001701918,0.0001675893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003407815,0.000003987584,0.00004429072,0.00001865251,0.000001197291,0.00003807322,0.002241971,0.00007710588,0.00003269648,0.9685386,0.02602967,0.002970193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007936042,0.00000651966,0.0003562266,0.0002323547,0.000002528731,0.0001068695,0.003354342,0.0001111773,0.00008598974,0.4797578,0.5159653,0.00001293021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01001415,0.1686051,0.01484394,0.326311,0.003894992,0.00005963388,0.0002421369,0.0001062184,0.4759228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554874,0.06499322,0.006070077,0.03181558,0.004517334,0.0001677492,0.0002096607,0.0001808061,0.1365581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0413934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Byers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05830837734920551,"gpt":0.3040873362336409,"spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006916909,0.0004812812,0.0008257105,0.0008028834,0.006002423,0.00975341,0.001581649,0.007102442,0.02648468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01321041,0.0003818996,0.0004090912,0.0008677564,0.03427047,0.01761302,0.006786714,0.01109762,0.008606479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002665344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003428038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003850826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005857508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933047,0.002106928,0.0004675335,0.001648941,0.001622445,0.0008494413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923971,0.002686056,0.000417546,0.002390873,0.001191431,0.000917038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001477696,0.00001181315,0.0003626751,0.0000363838,0.000005553746,0.0001398212,0.00206417,0.00002848627,0.0001573642,0.9199992,0.05050322,0.02667643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007752806,0.00001431215,0.000296151,0.0001494356,0.000004930226,0.0004159799,0.0006947953,0.00005481796,0.00008558579,0.09756603,0.9006963,0.0000139528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007303651,0.02034104,0.01155876,0.1414969,0.009663717,0.00007569551,0.0002637856,0.000198335,0.8090981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2867854,0.01742644,0.00844147,0.08206616,0.02052504,0.0003302399,0.0002542823,0.0007092801,0.5834616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02648468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08860004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85233168","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1254","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or \"Much Ado About Metaphors\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Peter W. Hogg","is_ca":true},{"name":"Allison A. Bushell Thornton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wade K. Wright","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03852778018458422,"gpt":0.3175306271996178,"spread":0.2790028470150336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008742107,0.0009333743,0.0008306974,0.003883023,0.009143186,0.01315357,0.002466949,0.008002661,0.005567672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01575006,0.0003071428,0.0006148577,0.003768614,0.06245298,0.02377428,0.00555517,0.01217446,0.0007308157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005516827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01174632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008285538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849682,0.01095369,0.0001934445,0.0008797811,0.002183765,0.0008211556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905975,0.007110104,0.0006095899,0.0005527032,0.0008345323,0.0002955006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005888699,0.000003481991,0.00002516484,0.00003051734,0.000001130502,0.00003507603,0.01495964,0.00003073411,0.00003011423,0.9780946,0.004762027,0.002021593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002350587,0.00001806608,0.0001878726,0.0003650826,0.000007077835,0.0002423417,0.03277147,0.0004237865,0.0002053427,0.5394379,0.4262916,0.00002595874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03193267,0.04913289,0.0467775,0.348567,0.007358746,0.00006334234,0.0001641475,0.0002297441,0.5157738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217612,0.009605314,0.005975085,0.03254491,0.004360547,0.0001467229,0.00008780821,0.0002731171,0.02524532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01315357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08580184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848768895","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.003.0001","title":"The Global Model of Constitutional Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Autonomy; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; International human rights law; Right to property; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Kai Möller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04306736430680592,"gpt":0.2405462042838313,"spread":0.1974788399770254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005035862,0.000402077,0.0005908498,0.0015848,0.003022611,0.01069772,0.001081863,0.003062207,0.007147268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006154812,0.000265597,0.0004491917,0.001934172,0.03039528,0.01073519,0.004063127,0.005849406,0.0010878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005467781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004410285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002139805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001694804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924601,0.00371622,0.0002056897,0.001085492,0.001745978,0.0007864871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957752,0.002601685,0.0002228005,0.000793619,0.0004119033,0.0001948696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[4.012264e-7,6.712925e-7,0.00001061351,0.000004711465,6.304814e-7,0.000005854305,0.000281463,0.00006273441,0.00000958391,0.9979412,0.0005166029,0.001165478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004364936,0.000005451093,0.00008500605,0.00004915158,0.000003007665,0.00003160951,0.0003548231,0.000237343,0.00004114688,0.9094052,0.08977968,0.000003336626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00793631,0.00560468,0.03943879,0.01789985,0.000362293,0.0000665421,0.00008032353,0.0000795123,0.9285317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.833025,0.00962934,0.02286248,0.009135544,0.001497051,0.000515316,0.0001976668,0.0002036969,0.1229339],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01069772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03967178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581033623","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107565272","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Doctrine; Politics; Treaty; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Grant Huscroft","is_ca":true},{"name":"Grégoire Webber","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bradley W. Miller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02485090460507253,"gpt":0.2305543231805704,"spread":0.2057034185754979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006084678,0.0005295363,0.0006032055,0.001501133,0.004485443,0.009816865,0.001438628,0.003381473,0.00548592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01202185,0.0003864335,0.0006663409,0.001458987,0.03375453,0.009559552,0.00278168,0.006838533,0.001633855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005737815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00603263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005661693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002599456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939767,0.002180108,0.0002622949,0.000978209,0.002053331,0.0005493255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952827,0.003114905,0.0002316777,0.000573703,0.0006557161,0.0001412257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.090247e-7,0.000001485155,0.000009056107,0.000005355403,6.652761e-7,0.000004596016,0.000125756,0.00004417997,0.000008251886,0.9973132,0.001281929,0.001204916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003868822,0.000002885098,0.00003174075,0.00002759453,0.000001600451,0.00001243651,0.00005275246,0.0001281911,0.00002456811,0.9603207,0.03939101,0.0000026357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00455878,0.01913848,0.02317478,0.0197837,0.001232626,0.0000605756,0.00007389313,0.00007539431,0.9319018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6590285,0.01882804,0.02224371,0.01365954,0.004813138,0.0005551176,0.0001553198,0.0002438257,0.2804728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009816865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04163092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Courtney Jung","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evan Rosevear","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03941342542345785,"gpt":0.3452246130410009,"spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007762611,0.0001900158,0.0005196066,0.006165856,0.002260307,0.004141389,0.0006164334,0.0005877354,0.01345884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03851671,0.0002114629,0.0003607731,0.0122432,0.004250147,0.005376455,0.003522711,0.001677664,0.0009350454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002884305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902425,0.004145828,0.001263732,0.001718929,0.001739507,0.0008894834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646446,0.01995339,0.006775907,0.005749373,0.002188691,0.000688064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001007817,0.00006575273,0.08328871,0.0003750194,0.00007072197,0.0001983749,0.01500071,0.001823119,0.0005388678,0.7948362,0.01546105,0.08824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004577296,0.00004764267,0.2164548,0.0007251447,0.00005250869,0.0002271254,0.008874738,0.002040089,0.0008506149,0.2655396,0.505056,0.00008584215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065334,0.004480116,0.02092754,0.007210681,0.000339868,0.0002226067,0.02809651,0.0002161416,0.2319732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694633,0.001015301,0.006469371,0.0003864315,0.0001026567,0.0002060319,0.01540367,0.00007201759,0.006881204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04502434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561034820","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493904","title":"European and US Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Georg Nolte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Georg Nolte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Roger Errera","is_ca":false},{"name":"Frederick Schauer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lorraine Weinrib","is_ca":false},{"name":"Winfried Brugger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Giovanni Bognetti","is_ca":false},{"name":"James Q. Whitman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eyāl Benveniśtî","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hugh Corder","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dieter Grimm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Frank I. Michelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Heike Krieger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michel Rosenfeld","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey Jowell","is_ca":false},{"name":"L. Solyom","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lech Garlicki","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jed Rubenfeld","is_ca":false},{"name":"Armin von Bogdandy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yasuaki Onuma","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0259652732040752,"gpt":0.2236831641834604,"spread":0.1977178909793852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257049,0.0002225182,0.0002337158,0.001208818,0.003145698,0.005997955,0.0004418403,0.001541441,0.009248654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004143036,0.00009922423,0.0003194819,0.002565495,0.008457747,0.003703517,0.002344816,0.002425761,0.000633464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005502585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002231969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007594861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009850601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976313,0.001035072,0.00008356772,0.0003136862,0.0004755689,0.0004607064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.0005318678,0.00007518589,0.0001606369,0.0001737451,0.0001028754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002114399,0.00000293628,0.00004747539,0.00000796424,9.023682e-7,0.00001265137,0.0007099037,0.00002802264,0.00001584283,0.99097,0.004135665,0.004066596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006149681,0.00001138619,0.001157537,0.0002353933,0.000006645979,0.0001122281,0.001792759,0.0001403888,0.0001130328,0.2830496,0.7133692,0.000005691681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007672155,0.01239081,0.0008152878,0.006434795,0.0002998087,0.00000454945,0.00003764359,0.00001327251,0.9723316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7303037,0.0168162,0.0017911,0.009039581,0.0008492487,0.00008509053,0.0002049924,0.0000849428,0.2408251],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009248654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0399242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170984522","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.0004","title":"Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Legitimacy; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Political science; Judicial independence; Democracy; Accountability; Empowerment; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Solomon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02558972547113847,"gpt":0.3237462511243716,"spread":0.2981565256532331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008220661,0.0001194738,0.0003960755,0.00194506,0.007402439,0.01254865,0.0008596063,0.003657804,0.003122984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02148133,0.0003495997,0.0001937757,0.002551399,0.02487005,0.005120988,0.00352239,0.004327321,0.0003042836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006360122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005983383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006085275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01197268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871177,0.008578982,0.0004105677,0.0006944335,0.001700502,0.001497801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791823,0.01518421,0.001940963,0.0006020052,0.001715001,0.001375555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009311387,0.00001270266,0.0007737876,0.00002941127,0.000002655852,0.00008757669,0.008432254,0.0001297742,0.0000592042,0.9818,0.004044642,0.004618706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007004532,0.00006255477,0.006847081,0.0004064502,0.00001407144,0.0001871002,0.013296,0.0006060406,0.0002358304,0.7885375,0.1897039,0.00003348731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.166722,0.04569747,0.004766042,0.0936273,0.0008736853,0.00005293807,0.00005211188,0.0000428165,0.6881657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726337,0.004593399,0.0005185487,0.003695607,0.0005522575,0.00003734377,0.00001106852,0.00001294743,0.01794511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04614615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760112576162902,"gpt":0.292893257251816,"spread":0.2752921314901869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01033963,0.000302635,0.0005840331,0.001729514,0.004778366,0.01552109,0.001394513,0.005187904,0.009167557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254264,0.0004194793,0.0005035167,0.001332385,0.02208352,0.01129098,0.005839294,0.01044977,0.00122083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007374547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006244256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004156463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004846263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896525,0.003797993,0.0006687327,0.001959934,0.002663854,0.001257081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937179,0.003010446,0.00049703,0.001482514,0.0008949125,0.0003970446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002481985,0.000003491222,0.00002356962,0.000008089976,0.000001299263,0.00001730569,0.000288369,0.00004540843,0.00005588683,0.9930011,0.003512613,0.00304048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002700574,0.00001812142,0.0003985356,0.0001533966,0.000007425749,0.00006836183,0.0003682539,0.0002950638,0.0002429447,0.5167427,0.4816574,0.00002081673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845717,0.02242402,0.01365239,0.08234651,0.004123433,0.00006591559,0.0001191751,0.0001488017,0.8586626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7260042,0.01225514,0.008172647,0.03112308,0.008721947,0.0002964958,0.0002555064,0.0002394328,0.2129315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05468184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04843481092712054,"gpt":0.3361267847735683,"spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02312349,0.0006004479,0.001519997,0.001868133,0.008141726,0.01147292,0.00297503,0.01995178,0.00952886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382914,0.001233753,0.00113983,0.001305707,0.0427915,0.0116598,0.005823354,0.02230318,0.001540804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004772033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01048592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00981673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980406,0.006882017,0.001355784,0.003705914,0.003992352,0.00365785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778978,0.01452496,0.0009910779,0.003976083,0.001885739,0.0007242947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005947543,0.000007147234,0.00003307957,0.000006458201,0.000003771813,0.0000107893,0.0002389353,0.00006458549,0.00006761792,0.9978493,0.001042649,0.0006696799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002545513,0.000009294594,0.0001217401,0.00003585609,0.00001437841,0.00002101931,0.0001673028,0.0001633152,0.0002007677,0.9858354,0.01339287,0.00001247362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04777814,0.002386468,0.02967737,0.0885353,0.001531444,0.0001304786,0.0003305441,0.000118531,0.8295118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478219,0.0007807733,0.005912617,0.0154483,0.001427293,0.0002349838,0.0001055131,0.00009657344,0.02817211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02312349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1222901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255463919","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511226","title":"Judging Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Administration (probate law); Politics; Reputation; Separation of powers; Federalism; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alexei Trochev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03243524586203801,"gpt":0.227954172184835,"spread":0.195518926322797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304725,0.0002174998,0.0002988957,0.001060894,0.004262477,0.005348469,0.000422753,0.001126791,0.006816814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003489657,0.0001251429,0.000207202,0.0008005572,0.004897478,0.001984107,0.00149673,0.001713252,0.001343597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003281117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002786861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006903923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0159994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.0007183033,0.0000522288,0.0002178268,0.0004561877,0.0001883993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.0005007513,0.00006394193,0.00005966658,0.0002202023,0.00007189665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238091,0.00001032713,0.00166533,0.00008264167,0.000005919743,0.0002073706,0.01830856,0.0003007416,0.0004283892,0.913097,0.02510528,0.04077603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006790409,0.0000420154,0.005890688,0.0003452209,0.0000139162,0.0001771026,0.01485263,0.0003483327,0.0006589363,0.1069287,0.8707215,0.0000141119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0336184,0.004120101,0.00174517,0.006451797,0.0007397057,0.00002398964,0.00005630788,0.00003874973,0.9532058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004482,0.003661987,0.00177451,0.00153767,0.0003858242,0.00003109079,0.0001108712,0.0000559088,0.1919939],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006903923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02380627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lori Hausegger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stacia L. Haynie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08489844829569734,"gpt":0.3009401245616682,"spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425812,0.0002612434,0.0003612773,0.002478892,0.01950374,0.006741499,0.001258907,0.001590116,0.003926723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295353,0.000375456,0.0002550122,0.003284506,0.008456227,0.001510462,0.002472497,0.002095671,0.0003111363],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03136226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03947964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8066214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821133,0.007071231,0.0004102906,0.001349611,0.004399463,0.004656101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747949,0.01092455,0.004277792,0.001074533,0.005072325,0.003855857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007589536,0.0004150806,0.3587587,0.0002784148,0.0002893283,0.001672406,0.2051324,0.00716909,0.006312017,0.2266638,0.02237978,0.1701701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002202226,0.00019802,0.7554179,0.0005136552,0.0002281569,0.0003099565,0.09727357,0.007214282,0.003211842,0.03514092,0.09998159,0.0002899109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909386,0.001059765,0.0008928109,0.005039274,0.00004719957,0.0001170156,0.0001042196,0.00001330553,0.1017877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963526,0.0002766503,0.0003287356,0.0002680573,0.00001049703,0.00001603203,0.00002680051,0.000003727052,0.002717086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Albert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02980027920861484,"gpt":0.313601402395157,"spread":0.2838011231865422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01394083,0.0005289362,0.0007572317,0.001499085,0.006118856,0.006524437,0.002244183,0.003236085,0.01674069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02321925,0.0005135598,0.0008829117,0.001632945,0.02059455,0.00685955,0.005463641,0.006243158,0.003470755],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003388463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002196084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003795258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9766128,0.009113403,0.00180845,0.004710265,0.005788882,0.001966081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980848,0.009142908,0.001134274,0.006246203,0.0023269,0.0003017357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002109223,0.000003028378,0.00002561456,0.00000785479,0.000001560239,0.00001001904,0.0001848714,0.00002109017,0.00005468025,0.9976386,0.0005643948,0.001486319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000264781,0.00002407346,0.0003032039,0.00006326472,0.00001340732,0.0000958173,0.0002278885,0.0003851169,0.0007626396,0.8198817,0.1781993,0.00001723538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603678,0.001516737,0.03909775,0.005624676,0.001134155,0.0001562143,0.0002936537,0.0001968187,0.9359432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497191,0.00120404,0.01701773,0.003777382,0.001365349,0.0005894962,0.000341896,0.000160734,0.1258242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07372701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237008288","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001","title":"The Machinery of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0216619106111287,"gpt":0.2606703484134206,"spread":0.2390084378022919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001201867,0.0003095882,0.0002951043,0.001072041,0.00230564,0.006899083,0.0006306812,0.001228131,0.008721626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002475431,0.0002294706,0.0002713794,0.00116464,0.01835485,0.005015146,0.001687017,0.002212371,0.00284888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00654908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004919772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006459948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00387814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984488,0.0007412828,0.00004449597,0.0002466885,0.0003879407,0.0001307332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983761,0.000791888,0.00008812838,0.0004755564,0.000210353,0.00005800771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.872366e-7,6.904348e-7,0.000009639637,0.000003189112,1.89151e-7,0.000002467257,0.0000988856,0.00006507366,0.000009032753,0.9967374,0.00194042,0.001132329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002971674,0.000004042613,0.00008057954,0.00004235711,0.0000010868,0.00001059412,0.000159308,0.0003890707,0.00004536587,0.7589541,0.2403084,0.000002154414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002464999,0.004167375,0.01394023,0.01248536,0.0003398374,0.00003305285,0.00008072591,0.0001173738,0.9663712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4912746,0.01086272,0.01187768,0.005344459,0.001467928,0.0004353283,0.0003101902,0.0002497657,0.4781774],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008721626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04751706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915046536","doi":"","title":"The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"David S. Law","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mila Versteeg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03870910728818699,"gpt":0.3228733625618576,"spread":0.2841642552736706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008117964,0.00017506,0.0003553668,0.005791062,0.002117658,0.004240906,0.0005247566,0.0008070993,0.005942819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02859403,0.0001895006,0.0003703054,0.005436931,0.00398898,0.002425138,0.002525446,0.002381022,0.0008250771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005877741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003602035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03698259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04334902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909562,0.003243989,0.0003353683,0.001501134,0.003253079,0.0007101363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769668,0.01080937,0.00278754,0.002783434,0.005449023,0.001203922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009944326,0.00003949925,0.02751012,0.0002622607,0.000107079,0.0002830532,0.008488104,0.0009256689,0.000805199,0.6730261,0.06891612,0.2195374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002203537,0.00006425046,0.1158519,0.0006739134,0.00005745407,0.0002367955,0.004189047,0.0005136918,0.0009619953,0.02696412,0.8504056,0.0000590832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2311943,0.02506107,0.003019273,0.05671158,0.001263593,0.00004381254,0.001712561,0.000172837,0.680821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686794,0.006886248,0.001469598,0.006869961,0.000456393,0.00003057561,0.000904059,0.00009490378,0.0146089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03698259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07353467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235474944","doi":"10.3138/9781442674639","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Political science; Election law; Agency (philosophy); Law; Variety (cybernetics); General election; Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"André Blais","is_ca":false},{"name":"Louis Massicotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antoine Yoshinaka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02030945964630773,"gpt":0.264268891581997,"spread":0.2439594319356893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003861721,0.0003327476,0.0004043739,0.001085068,0.002399078,0.005536401,0.00115493,0.001378429,0.002632744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01096097,0.000342199,0.0003270622,0.001547098,0.01134936,0.005843107,0.001634903,0.003311821,0.0006261125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003855525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003344672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01153371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01387096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997444,0.001393764,0.0001317068,0.0002259037,0.0005614216,0.0002431233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956564,0.003150932,0.0002932867,0.0004057424,0.0003713801,0.0001223241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002858532,0.000006946686,0.00014824,0.00001094004,0.000001168859,0.00001416616,0.0005640875,0.0005487246,0.00001941093,0.9927946,0.001689293,0.004199388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001052771,0.000009140584,0.0007452079,0.00008604052,0.000003043427,0.0000327271,0.0005443013,0.002234676,0.0001337289,0.9390842,0.05710633,0.000009996587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02983277,0.009189519,0.06074056,0.01500483,0.000446263,0.000143437,0.000117207,0.0001282393,0.8843971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913168,0.004894471,0.01969584,0.002564924,0.0003625254,0.0003265868,0.0001806383,0.00008811358,0.08057],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01153371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02797395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171772895","doi":"10.1017/9781316823330","title":"Proportionality and Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Niels Petersen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04191028808983042,"gpt":0.2613865396820902,"spread":0.2194762515922598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825586,0.000235423,0.0002488151,0.00115367,0.003191325,0.005043062,0.0007044637,0.001493858,0.006314275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005532254,0.0001437148,0.0002501038,0.001087199,0.01786554,0.00410619,0.003026082,0.003382294,0.0006530751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003382703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002254966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001270195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001440177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962512,0.002043202,0.00007454221,0.0004655432,0.0007399425,0.0004256453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977654,0.001565875,0.000159396,0.0002086374,0.0001947283,0.0001059332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001473039,0.000004553577,0.00002938944,0.00000783395,7.15596e-7,0.000008517073,0.0008434722,0.00003385463,0.00004307691,0.9937988,0.001369909,0.003858474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009834191,0.0000131628,0.0004890574,0.0001119018,0.00000390969,0.00004773855,0.0009979493,0.0001870038,0.0002840216,0.8314573,0.1663939,0.000004219303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009631804,0.004970197,0.004168971,0.007790567,0.0002140613,0.00002290039,0.00001321498,0.000012726,0.9731755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8300235,0.005479215,0.003012646,0.00438604,0.001070168,0.0001230657,0.00004718999,0.00005333754,0.1558048],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006314275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02454329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271865752","doi":"","title":"Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Constitutional theory; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237620147723794,"gpt":0.3005861337771629,"spread":0.268209932299925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07504313,0.0005074784,0.001806234,0.004977164,0.01332606,0.01598337,0.004498792,0.02324621,0.003874106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1789319,0.0007666682,0.001075423,0.006078049,0.052118,0.0085691,0.00538044,0.02434742,0.00081997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04352964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05545517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1370762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07989378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8929415,0.04648666,0.003385098,0.00840937,0.04309399,0.005683377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80058,0.1474337,0.004376953,0.007380487,0.03728843,0.002940483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001310305,0.000007891768,0.0001357921,0.00011983,0.000008925726,0.00005049212,0.001703596,0.000254637,0.0000188243,0.9375002,0.04827913,0.01190754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000945779,0.00001941778,0.0008295283,0.000914224,0.0000355782,0.0001731939,0.001363605,0.001513945,0.0001760767,0.4980086,0.4967954,0.0000759142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004532396,0.06882356,0.006969775,0.7556877,0.004334829,0.00008613859,0.0001092255,0.0001158275,0.1593406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5804439,0.04345196,0.006430977,0.3027503,0.02422347,0.0004137413,0.000130259,0.0002623395,0.04189311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1370762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3968707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082442523","doi":"10.1177/0010414010369075","title":"Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence From Russia and Ukraine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Ukrainian; Competition (biology); Judicial independence; Democracy; Political economy; Plaintiff; Political science; Economics; Obstacle; Law; Law and economics; Economic system","authors":[{"name":"Maria Popova","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1477026269988071,"gpt":0.4486556983909936,"spread":0.3009530713921865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002388219,0.0001181655,0.0005302426,0.001478003,0.001490088,0.001649456,0.0005054115,0.0004083089,0.001901713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008204252,0.0001913921,0.0002601688,0.001939712,0.001885267,0.0006321616,0.001397232,0.0006258591,0.0002494208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001114508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001259129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0263397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04087396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998033,0.0008296901,0.0001512662,0.0002692112,0.0004397669,0.0002771341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900232,0.004694573,0.003482182,0.0003816698,0.000863882,0.0005544786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004842437,0.0002407301,0.9501128,0.0001744264,0.0002590651,0.0006736213,0.01398787,0.0005013362,0.001104441,0.01084928,0.0008616424,0.02075056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001825094,0.00009533381,0.9890223,0.00004071041,0.00006358558,0.0001923261,0.006835169,0.0002791713,0.0003685585,0.0006680207,0.002407853,0.0000087479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963562,0.0002366049,0.00007411255,0.0001307338,0.000002250706,0.000002153952,0.00004977437,8.443384e-7,0.003147302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.00011154,0.0000216298,0.00002513105,0.0000046607,0.000001017423,0.00006062111,8.518346e-7,0.0001430467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0263397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05237281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David L. Weiden","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05646041653789657,"gpt":0.3829438105350005,"spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554308,0.00008164481,0.0003274675,0.002673531,0.005034926,0.002391339,0.0003955635,0.0004829224,0.002627386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983314,0.0001971245,0.000184759,0.002350757,0.003375953,0.0005156324,0.001501089,0.001646524,0.0001916749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01123608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7449914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.0002886854,0.0000513091,0.0001500153,0.0007474275,0.0008305396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912537,0.001509235,0.002379057,0.0001306713,0.001953275,0.002774089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536933,0.0001238533,0.9645479,0.00001827919,0.00005836641,0.0001825289,0.01567169,0.0002872901,0.0003819512,0.007262366,0.001572867,0.009827453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004494628,0.00001177282,0.9925967,0.00001338325,0.000007537429,0.00002381391,0.005568297,0.0001857533,0.0000555322,0.0003403779,0.001185633,0.000006566988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916788,0.0001445222,0.00004732029,0.00067117,0.000005970847,0.000007214481,0.00003848235,0.000001333105,0.007405118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.00008005688,0.00002406473,0.00006934044,0.000007456214,0.000002841608,0.00003296466,0.000001380516,0.0009174441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2550086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5130208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873251","doi":"10.1177/0020715212439311","title":"Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and southern United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Mobilization; Irish; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Movement (music); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gianluca De Fazio","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06464432359784192,"gpt":0.3618229870292625,"spread":0.2971786634314206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001861844,0.00010229,0.0001886828,0.002561001,0.003896531,0.005458635,0.0005716335,0.0006130829,0.003732491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004513403,0.0001297185,0.0001520239,0.001355428,0.009628491,0.001741456,0.005203234,0.0008446774,0.0001997869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01043692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004989882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05943521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1572598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977927,0.0008257082,0.00005649045,0.0001436536,0.0002696729,0.0009117784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973891,0.0006686832,0.0006223257,0.00008001934,0.0002206074,0.001019364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003353677,0.000660997,0.2513224,0.0001069224,0.00005888486,0.001473121,0.2877608,0.001112626,0.001404616,0.3715247,0.004442856,0.07979669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006447519,0.0002207686,0.4372617,0.0002550432,0.00002153629,0.0002404223,0.4953014,0.001305269,0.0003020595,0.02465909,0.04030897,0.0000593701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374645,0.0001252317,0.0001426081,0.00105024,0.000008928595,0.00001715583,0.00001301815,0.000003074786,0.06117522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989445,0.0000301717,0.00003586852,0.00004303792,0.000002063825,0.000008295921,0.000006251838,0.000001249483,0.0009285854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05943521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1181785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136775099","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040485","title":"The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Realm; Legislature; Framing (construction); Supreme court; Sociology; Humanities; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"J. Scott Matthews","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03089683373900302,"gpt":0.3176381630610328,"spread":0.2867413293220298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001713082,0.0001130186,0.0003190119,0.002257633,0.008765973,0.004159405,0.001029012,0.0008633721,0.008131409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008502237,0.0001944663,0.0002166448,0.003822121,0.003973398,0.000622533,0.001568249,0.001613821,0.0001753449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0772519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09731087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971737,0.0002260142,0.00005101561,0.0001744555,0.001127168,0.001247705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923239,0.001601728,0.001225938,0.0001705122,0.00284882,0.0018292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027357,0.0001328654,0.5665053,0.0002293565,0.0001258828,0.0007163404,0.03302132,0.001509449,0.0009197835,0.2866629,0.03278,0.0771232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005359771,0.00003586358,0.8456635,0.0002439172,0.00009845294,0.00009760761,0.04246571,0.002271503,0.000531921,0.0101731,0.09828491,0.00007979412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.814721,0.002217773,0.0004519841,0.02795399,0.00008552887,0.00005093597,0.001255267,0.0000189724,0.1532445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965305,0.00036282,0.00006455096,0.0003250465,0.000008954175,0.000003887675,0.00008160652,0.000002788456,0.002619912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0772519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5605044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247912287","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0013","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Legitimacy; Demise; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02708724111975972,"gpt":0.2368793584136711,"spread":0.2097921172939114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001455,0.0001797249,0.0001830979,0.0008498625,0.002433743,0.005007173,0.0005082532,0.001376582,0.003438069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003534511,0.0001679944,0.0002022916,0.0008179846,0.01713186,0.002747132,0.001333712,0.003129696,0.000564802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00459654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003921663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004103761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004358867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977581,0.001038922,0.00007624189,0.0003077854,0.0006285745,0.000190342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975041,0.001599158,0.0001490873,0.0002935856,0.0003895736,0.00006459092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.829909e-7,0.000002363895,0.00002678011,0.00001072384,5.018178e-7,0.00001158303,0.0003685737,0.00008321023,0.000046928,0.9922805,0.004135387,0.003032521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008142832,0.00001540344,0.0005688601,0.000288856,0.000003723753,0.00007099489,0.0006803577,0.0006415518,0.0002931665,0.5501486,0.4472725,0.000007711139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008642344,0.02514464,0.006825407,0.02308075,0.001157757,0.00002814449,0.00004148094,0.00003605284,0.9350434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.767106,0.01988579,0.001931286,0.009660703,0.003963894,0.000107107,0.00008877063,0.00006565735,0.1971907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005007173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03335041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129502429","doi":"10.1177/0032329205275193","title":"Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Empowerment; Politics; Political science; Gay rights; Social movement; Human rights; Public policy; Public administration; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Miriam Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0286432225155902,"gpt":0.2951094067377347,"spread":0.2664661842221445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003202115,0.0002754576,0.000416432,0.003151527,0.03999108,0.009871161,0.001610774,0.002321993,0.00581132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008842924,0.0003068542,0.0003551102,0.004241172,0.02144363,0.001840709,0.0058159,0.003755649,0.0001346133],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.173066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3093695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934215,0.001003542,0.0000829589,0.0002674651,0.001518114,0.003706442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948654,0.001631247,0.0005861818,0.00009141445,0.001182211,0.001643554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001103228,0.0002655991,0.07194055,0.00017303,0.00004780659,0.001629136,0.1794061,0.001952623,0.0007937928,0.6752692,0.02029031,0.04812152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034686,0.00007280996,0.2022375,0.0005638438,0.00009314045,0.0002571764,0.5022396,0.001809195,0.001069481,0.03066926,0.26071,0.0001745919],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.779703,0.004482007,0.0004543135,0.0496147,0.0001201312,0.00009305152,0.0001562902,0.00001880988,0.1653577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899436,0.001365536,0.0001423698,0.00147059,0.0000171644,0.00001655788,0.00002941477,0.000005761371,0.007009014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.173066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125655638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1150","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Charter; Deference; Legislature; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Compromise; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rosalind Dixon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02033790141869781,"gpt":0.2464905909848397,"spread":0.2261526895661419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007795611,0.000344131,0.0004243026,0.002232543,0.02717838,0.01164799,0.001774668,0.007197947,0.003519483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089642,0.0002654451,0.000306765,0.0028744,0.03156,0.004341005,0.005514185,0.00712886,0.0001924265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08971684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1405773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9282832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9535884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873931,0.003251647,0.0001769222,0.000915924,0.004440832,0.003821509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893862,0.004552875,0.0008341543,0.0003516793,0.002951631,0.001923488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008335836,0.000005231753,0.0005224018,0.00001706555,0.000002900401,0.00008161905,0.008927359,0.0001558022,0.00004059036,0.9774245,0.007803415,0.005010757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000396304,0.00003262744,0.009049959,0.0004837928,0.0000439969,0.0002105496,0.02315979,0.001123729,0.0003939487,0.5440546,0.4212697,0.0001377108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09060434,0.01561109,0.00566592,0.1751478,0.000748479,0.00006957645,0.0001816963,0.00007222838,0.7118989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651511,0.00159338,0.0008780168,0.01163993,0.0001501605,0.00003165427,0.00003027841,0.00001681675,0.02050867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08971684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6509444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03748678777768234,"gpt":0.3369695124857261,"spread":0.2994827247080438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489664,0.0001936614,0.0003912695,0.00171335,0.003420218,0.005997577,0.0007642071,0.001494532,0.007077403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007984811,0.0001712047,0.0002660423,0.001482878,0.03983758,0.01109642,0.003767377,0.004016385,0.0004029599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001775607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001914607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002129186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969665,0.001684027,0.00009974951,0.0005457762,0.0004476312,0.0002563472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938736,0.004038628,0.0004120333,0.0008268992,0.0005896774,0.0002591061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001414525,0.000001197311,0.00003266761,0.00000394425,6.208204e-7,0.000006948713,0.0003282753,0.00002903925,0.00002154467,0.9988839,0.0001498726,0.000540659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004404686,0.000005593101,0.0001713551,0.00002851659,0.000002820731,0.00001869358,0.0004008066,0.0001427285,0.0001035798,0.9795296,0.01958882,0.000003099787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1132393,0.007336881,0.05054964,0.04260153,0.0004929988,0.00003489115,0.0000728285,0.000055264,0.7856166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990647,0.0006154716,0.001132729,0.0007218889,0.0001770564,0.00001396178,0.00001291557,0.00002002913,0.006658958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007077403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02805555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Kristen Rundle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01150232003121091,"gpt":0.2558543895657031,"spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411863,0.0001520931,0.000238997,0.0009726314,0.01030506,0.009118496,0.0007799025,0.002360551,0.001133241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003701604,0.0002573026,0.0001375326,0.000751836,0.09362506,0.004334925,0.002854333,0.003132889,0.0001162811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02321815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01383814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2060446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.277725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985514,0.0007023994,0.00003743346,0.0001048684,0.0002575954,0.0003462645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978928,0.001107513,0.0002882482,0.0001598047,0.0002482484,0.0003034591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001026401,0.000007588078,0.00091593,0.00001461137,0.000001984131,0.0002515022,0.07095198,0.00006806559,0.0001557085,0.9230484,0.001279083,0.00329486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004844166,0.00005910653,0.0146625,0.0003608177,0.00002534065,0.0007067763,0.1919544,0.0006849312,0.0008458807,0.6110049,0.1795945,0.0000524425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790433,0.0162623,0.003325137,0.09101899,0.0002028354,0.00001841315,0.00003256385,0.00004635258,0.3100501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994949,0.001101037,0.0001436572,0.0005535005,0.00002566809,0.00000258902,0.000002553438,0.000004084774,0.003217964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2060446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4096906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166019106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905250102","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential election; Notice; Reputation; Law; Politics; Compendium; Election law; Democracy; History","authors":[{"name":"Heather MacIvor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01943668079320318,"gpt":0.2857009979528216,"spread":0.2662643171596185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004731408,0.0006596561,0.0006418895,0.001365411,0.004710963,0.01113018,0.00194566,0.004527217,0.004794808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01032467,0.0007826937,0.0004242961,0.003271956,0.02208225,0.008655754,0.002125619,0.004835017,0.0007396265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01328856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00983779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06634044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08596489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972584,0.001602922,0.00007671202,0.0001290088,0.0004810485,0.0004519852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945591,0.004222516,0.0004117507,0.000192897,0.0003924581,0.0002212602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006097764,0.00001065636,0.0001621741,0.0000372576,0.000003200369,0.00002954179,0.001606326,0.0007297842,0.0000233434,0.9784453,0.01428232,0.00466409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001920997,0.00001176008,0.001372284,0.0002356645,0.000009485602,0.0000343757,0.002718412,0.001415579,0.00008623855,0.9043466,0.0897335,0.00001680532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02853019,0.1299149,0.03628586,0.1517842,0.001324864,0.000136862,0.0002939628,0.0001573063,0.6515719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8610722,0.05698,0.01108408,0.00640029,0.001437597,0.0002575717,0.0002488702,0.00008806708,0.06243138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512087007","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511551116","title":"Common Law Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Common law; Political law; Legal history; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Sources of law; Sociology; Chinese law","authors":[{"name":"Douglas E. Edlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02847807435068315,"gpt":0.2447391090112745,"spread":0.2162610346605914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005150978,0.0009168333,0.0009253099,0.003188426,0.005140011,0.008469824,0.002543459,0.004432298,0.01709975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007994984,0.0003945352,0.0009889648,0.002912119,0.02766186,0.009953978,0.004712383,0.004902194,0.004270002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008696754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006880695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005476222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004013271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993437,0.002342979,0.000313251,0.00126583,0.002087282,0.0005536429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965132,0.001894272,0.0002290724,0.00062796,0.0005417325,0.0001939132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[2.641761e-7,9.02711e-7,0.00001248403,0.000006571519,8.891761e-7,0.000005135897,0.00009514437,0.00004228667,0.000002471069,0.9976268,0.001389797,0.0008171053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002272711,0.000002703999,0.00003927744,0.00006428413,0.000002374604,0.00004276272,0.000157889,0.0001808529,0.00001710275,0.9233755,0.07611221,0.000002709862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001944435,0.008298582,0.06574026,0.01686841,0.0005253985,0.0001337347,0.000178592,0.00008155341,0.9062291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302488,0.02245203,0.05104753,0.02057556,0.002845569,0.001226114,0.0007949728,0.0002730325,0.2705364],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01709975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06309962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645411594","doi":"10.1515/9780773572553","title":"Constitutional Origins, Structure, and Change in Federal Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"John Kincaid","is_ca":false},{"name":"G. Alan Tarr","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02274033423511265,"gpt":0.245430637308551,"spread":0.2226903030734383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003174473,0.0001011588,0.0002565007,0.001880144,0.005802383,0.007047733,0.0006221588,0.00110274,0.002165388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006622199,0.000215857,0.0001871869,0.003376746,0.02184274,0.00327309,0.00188067,0.002401161,0.0001368902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01151424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01717783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968215,0.001853414,0.0001069406,0.0003581765,0.0004123954,0.000447543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982993,0.001084583,0.0001632965,0.0002441483,0.0001395543,0.00006909083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001292582,0.000002139593,0.00009992899,0.000004950881,6.885411e-7,0.00001021452,0.002479872,0.0001171553,0.00002010789,0.994307,0.0004781743,0.002478553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110346,0.00002083601,0.005638444,0.0001959948,0.000009716589,0.00008055002,0.008036878,0.0005522915,0.0002746348,0.6984986,0.2866617,0.00001929785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1167112,0.01869968,0.006188585,0.01088332,0.0002372406,0.00004102273,0.00009145202,0.00004738219,0.8471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816946,0.003123355,0.0009988146,0.0003843386,0.00007371269,0.00003452361,0.00003874552,0.00001543919,0.01363651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01151424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07520074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","authors":[{"name":"John Szmer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan W. Johnson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tammy A. Sarver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02161224787635746,"gpt":0.2842204796590145,"spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238426,0.0001188411,0.0002998527,0.001347468,0.0049547,0.0038073,0.001041177,0.0007602263,0.005829671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02190181,0.0001233416,0.0002184719,0.001469652,0.002690185,0.0008213131,0.001517158,0.001260751,0.0002932889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02964988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03978512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.0004067744,0.00006681529,0.0002675746,0.00113763,0.001097634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828206,0.003582682,0.003120906,0.0002940768,0.005268835,0.004912811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001662404,0.0002005456,0.9304794,0.00004580921,0.0001015082,0.0007544563,0.01130859,0.001909076,0.0006535638,0.008222391,0.01135724,0.0348011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001549822,0.00003835166,0.9766058,0.00007110848,0.00003146299,0.00007341819,0.01131817,0.0009214674,0.0003343007,0.001054259,0.009505421,0.00003085665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750744,0.0004505525,0.00008063138,0.00400761,0.00001927392,0.00002199333,0.0002414229,0.000005461067,0.02009864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986134,0.0001413184,0.00002583518,0.0001167045,0.000007561186,0.000002190454,0.0000599035,0.000002382382,0.001030721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03368515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2151259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}