{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2130,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2130,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"985836f594cd","filters":{"topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2137292845","doi":"","title":"Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":477,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionalism; Treaty; Political science; Adjudication; Commonwealth; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Underpinning; European union; Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965710544822144,"gpt":0.3097506573993833,"spread":0.2700935519511619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000171421,0.00004328545,0.00006754397,0.000007164106,0.001387609,0.00001090794,0.00003957458,0.00002950365,0.0001763485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001345246,0.0000371212,0.00002134372,0.0001094956,0.00188287,0.0001052843,0.00002729859,0.00002768058,0.00003178346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003938294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01110615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002456452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993842,0.00002773489,0.00009000857,0.0001082763,0.0002612795,0.000128545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997633,0.00002699009,0.00002116265,0.00002698299,0.00009269302,0.00006893639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000183313,0.00001004592,0.1880939,4.672733e-7,0.000006147798,0.000006165836,0.0001748001,5.237021e-7,0.000001823779,0.8103101,0.001156087,0.0002380966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001814218,0.000007608598,0.5934633,0.000007662145,0.000007695759,0.00004455089,0.0008543409,0.000003067816,0.00000570439,0.196659,0.208627,0.000138685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2790807,0.0004544413,0.0007263678,0.00516016,0.0001889173,0.0000965046,0.00001143411,0.0000813524,0.7142001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983257,0.0001778619,0.0003201344,0.0005217483,0.0001849007,0.000005101943,0.000001853847,5.214893e-7,0.0004621685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.719245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018150336","doi":"10.2307/3505128","title":"10.2307/3505128","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01279271402842843,"gpt":0.227505879036954,"spread":0.2147131650085256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001208496,0.00004743642,0.00007184711,0.00001777336,0.0004873687,0.00002491625,0.0001153586,0.0000266226,0.9873939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000518553,0.0000449382,0.00003101837,0.0001772369,0.0001708591,0.0000577046,0.00001723069,0.00003032368,0.9757244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003261206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006425982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00197231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002425826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994407,0.00002904488,0.00006540816,0.00009784514,0.0001890843,0.0001778632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997875,0.00003319685,0.00000841983,0.00005127944,0.00003635095,0.00008323407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000213761,0.00002812889,0.000002536421,4.126828e-7,0.00001274405,0.000003259005,0.0002567311,0.00001047057,0.000004129031,0.002419758,0.1769361,0.8203043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003949921,0.00001915275,0.0001352247,0.000004441169,0.000005035832,2.359085e-7,0.00001531131,9.430445e-7,0.000001855793,0.0004468864,0.9992625,0.0000688951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007766159,0.00009912316,2.555058e-7,0.002241326,0.000004522657,0.00008007386,0.000004728651,0.00007609106,0.9967173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007284291,0.000002575143,0.00001842605,0.0001535817,0.0003056117,0.000008791327,0.00000122804,0.000002470885,0.992223],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3748495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152896665","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00068.x","title":"Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Impartiality; Coercion (linguistics); Accountability; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sentence; Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04572646034996888,"gpt":0.3791096180838859,"spread":0.3333831577339171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577426,0.00007769584,0.0002167581,0.00006723173,0.001081455,0.0000990288,0.0003394708,0.00002224828,0.00003943687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001574257,0.00006121714,0.00006746922,0.0004165031,0.01079688,0.0004064346,0.00005792121,0.0001166624,0.000006834542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003228216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01088409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007969085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982352,0.00003659484,0.0002659523,0.0001744487,0.0006881228,0.000599745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982453,0.0003777416,0.0001456406,0.00006736362,0.0006340437,0.0005299087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006505247,0.00006664017,0.00119686,0.000003639872,0.000009296406,0.000002084821,0.004999711,0.00000271282,0.00007257075,0.9897304,0.0001884272,0.003662586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001827181,0.001591909,0.08178722,0.0001474963,0.0003316346,0.00009232924,0.1500506,0.00001617263,0.0004063555,0.6967338,0.06647256,0.0005428175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867028,0.0001358657,0.0041035,0.0917513,0.0004867668,0.0001824292,0.0000218798,0.000012388,0.01660307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929469,0.00004134361,0.002580217,0.003909586,0.0004990666,0.000002011838,7.285161e-8,0.000002057523,0.00001872969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2929966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594935521","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683","title":"The Migration of Constitutional Ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Comparative politics; Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02604646980348289,"gpt":0.241720970917017,"spread":0.2156745011135341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003497163,0.0001264615,0.0001819001,0.00006154754,0.001594282,0.00002492331,0.0003495461,0.0001988308,0.000001915224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006683188,0.0001162889,0.0001474843,0.00002239643,0.007240555,0.00005401669,0.0001145367,0.0001967897,0.00000700122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003371693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001558852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005322822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001017138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988954,0.00007770274,0.0001571875,0.0001709934,0.0004874612,0.0002112476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989055,0.0003036656,0.0001983298,0.0001274323,0.0003895907,0.00007547552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003601304,0.000005079469,0.00001275493,0.000005736471,0.00007110223,0.00001410832,0.0001129861,6.599893e-7,0.000002239412,0.87464,0.1246413,0.000457986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001205219,0.00001002507,0.00005726918,0.00005899205,0.00008008495,9.027581e-7,0.00039271,8.834001e-7,0.00001655967,0.0006693248,0.9984679,0.0001248855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006553841,0.0007355642,0.0004784742,0.0001121271,0.0003991857,0.0002508022,0.0001253758,0.00003854949,0.9977944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007040231,0.0005958939,0.00001536791,0.0000447499,0.0003467339,5.366913e-7,0.00002032659,0.000003404808,0.9919327],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8739707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235004248","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246","title":"The Constitution of Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Political science; Legislature; Rule of law; Common law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02473041508855164,"gpt":0.2278451893607231,"spread":0.2031147742721714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001855979,0.0001233539,0.0001967698,0.00002956415,0.001910895,0.00002844976,0.0003663047,0.000180276,7.416721e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002159754,0.0001124361,0.0001408971,0.00001239046,0.005670093,0.00004934552,0.0001347605,0.0001749557,0.000005241905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002883298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000847341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02857752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001393977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990704,0.00009010779,0.0001302152,0.0001645603,0.0003432007,0.0002015088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992036,0.0001815528,0.0001740846,0.0001456348,0.0002441494,0.00005099968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001576679,0.000004523652,0.000001899268,0.000006351951,0.00004663496,0.00001255753,0.00005677622,8.335657e-7,0.000001223663,0.8262815,0.1733766,0.0001953594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001192908,0.000008670631,0.00001070523,0.0000584138,0.00009300144,4.831138e-7,0.000120569,4.019826e-7,0.00001577079,0.000625961,0.9988239,0.0001228218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001204858,0.0004441281,0.00006154687,0.00006115741,0.0003571183,0.0002455318,0.000137603,0.00004802499,0.9986328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007954546,0.0001741237,0.000006494827,0.00003027052,0.0002662208,5.80936e-7,0.00001509013,0.000003519659,0.9915491],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580510701","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269808.001.0001","title":"The Ultimate Rule of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Impartiality; Supreme court; Politics; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Rule of law; Judicial restraint; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Democracy; Judicial activism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02692789577543347,"gpt":0.2406180879926685,"spread":0.213690192217235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001415438,0.000113287,0.0001816867,0.00002125453,0.001731202,0.00002559945,0.0004558522,0.0001538591,0.000008224548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001276705,0.00009778004,0.0001333949,0.000009750278,0.002589035,0.00004613346,0.000179715,0.0001592761,8.767024e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004134557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001195766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008599991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004374664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.00004819465,0.0001003411,0.0001425008,0.0003249075,0.00020708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999415,0.0001138664,0.0001426898,0.0001312075,0.0001423772,0.00005486155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002399834,0.00000558101,0.000001514995,0.000008540661,0.00007459875,0.000009347635,0.001234545,0.000003771644,5.804898e-7,0.9962888,0.001368605,0.0009801317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001326634,0.00001033485,0.000005546887,0.00006680394,0.00006400274,1.912903e-7,0.0002979863,2.303755e-7,0.00001187548,0.05420474,0.9451014,0.0001041962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001835844,0.0002518622,0.00002087448,0.00008981807,0.0002057416,0.0001919694,0.00006909543,0.00004193489,0.9991103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002625605,0.0007553491,0.00002890228,0.00003210693,0.0001330908,5.295263e-7,0.000004915439,0.000005356168,0.9964141],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151138624","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030532","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Human rights; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Politics; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02079864840949626,"gpt":0.3339173211579476,"spread":0.3131186727484513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002107249,0.00006017023,0.0002178526,0.00001769887,0.001380791,0.00003024966,0.0001441726,0.00003462853,0.000007927297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002403942,0.00005039082,0.00002626032,0.0002106417,0.005274906,0.0003005027,0.00007609712,0.00005816763,0.000001925397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002015132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001217229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01463209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003907883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.0001029273,0.0001626182,0.0001731606,0.0003664789,0.0002112894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.00008639402,0.00006205636,0.00004037797,0.0001389926,0.00006733269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001024351,0.000008958489,0.0001390927,0.00006398159,0.000001404448,4.452618e-7,0.003618678,5.409628e-9,0.000004309706,0.9911817,0.00008449748,0.004895928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009639008,0.00003759557,0.003399222,0.0006718291,0.00001628492,6.787395e-7,0.002354163,7.333094e-7,0.000006649988,0.1813218,0.811967,0.0001275719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003989146,0.01693965,0.00000807132,0.008510096,0.0001282184,0.0001554186,0.000007341694,0.00001171148,0.9702504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850951,0.0113797,0.00004205291,0.003318844,0.0001037922,0.000004225449,3.521101e-7,0.000001199733,0.00005477622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0136201582477239,"gpt":0.2739484023916838,"spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007879758,0.00003518433,0.00007255057,0.00002224336,0.001167013,0.00001065292,0.00009080361,0.0000404438,0.0004011196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000319716,0.00003981912,0.00002528323,0.00003091228,0.002030393,0.0003019892,0.00001791728,0.00007348517,0.000002160539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007100809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999412,0.00003263143,0.00008758798,0.00006371002,0.000211609,0.0001924418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.00003030655,0.00005328671,0.0000214794,0.0001252614,0.0002131523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001449571,0.00001402574,0.06914519,8.990863e-7,0.000008630541,0.00006251569,0.001775138,0.000001240551,0.00000591359,0.9281664,0.000133045,0.000672503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002786601,0.00001632757,0.4676302,0.00003139851,0.00001036259,0.00002347744,0.007277226,0.000001529214,0.000003233128,0.0153955,0.5092402,0.00009189017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2247663,0.001097228,0.0003364394,0.002033074,0.0002012523,0.0000829918,0.00001296183,0.000006907116,0.7714628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992357,0.0002978562,0.0002287505,0.00005785925,0.00007640358,1.321435e-8,5.653644e-7,4.399626e-7,0.0001023947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623432494","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Demise; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03140422771101241,"gpt":0.2402606746938814,"spread":0.208856446982869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001138783,0.0001018542,0.0001564593,0.00003818408,0.001353096,0.0000187656,0.0002863313,0.000158615,0.000008462362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002486243,0.00009428398,0.0001033601,0.000008275941,0.001174393,0.00003282753,0.00008141634,0.000112248,4.404377e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001173907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002648717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001962183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00122394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999257,0.00003157865,0.0001128595,0.000117443,0.000316796,0.0001643247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993718,0.00008975749,0.0001627359,0.0001111514,0.0002137807,0.00005082034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001129566,0.000002866466,0.000003438435,0.000002361287,0.00004386256,0.000003920861,0.0004277629,0.000001046519,3.43393e-7,0.9904753,0.00107042,0.007957387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006234778,0.00001572491,0.00001500829,0.00003880534,0.0000717119,1.305476e-7,0.0002252549,6.133033e-7,0.000003931373,0.1061662,0.8933112,0.00008905342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001080204,0.0002498102,0.00005780221,0.0001816337,0.0001625426,0.0001637862,0.00003359964,0.00003212795,0.9991079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006042656,0.002707039,0.0000154489,0.00004832703,0.0002450614,1.401873e-7,0.000004710571,0.000004997908,0.9909316],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8922408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255305783","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511920806","title":"The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Legislature; Law and economics; Appeal; Political science; Constitutional theory; Novelty; Relevance (law); Law; Democracy; Public administration; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04322599364376026,"gpt":0.2420361117750007,"spread":0.1988101181312405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001974734,0.0001669794,0.0002793998,0.00004685084,0.00177352,0.00003828308,0.0006317562,0.0002159366,0.00000296885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004814718,0.0001498698,0.0001644399,0.00001689208,0.003609124,0.00007505614,0.0002497885,0.0002696194,0.00001336229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003682137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01886233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004827747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987807,0.00009142314,0.0001771619,0.0002048194,0.0004723928,0.0002735201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0002442149,0.000241856,0.0002101515,0.0003262089,0.0001725734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001073765,0.000003270272,0.000001034803,0.000005134772,0.00005366528,0.000002226705,0.0001396773,0.00001242698,8.282035e-7,0.5950686,0.4043989,0.0003035091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001762544,0.000008305271,0.000005004748,0.00006907625,0.00008648059,4.527584e-7,0.0002495194,0.00004341209,0.000004167812,0.002704285,0.9964933,0.0001597517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001804268,0.0006265499,0.0006481569,0.0004572161,0.0002985469,0.0003963717,0.0001955455,0.00005070442,0.9973089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002051392,0.0009593086,0.0000487418,0.0000940181,0.0002793981,9.594197e-7,0.00001445307,0.000006335599,0.9965454],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5923643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107815919","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00152.x","title":"The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Hegemony; Political science; Political economy; Power (physics); Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1032304059670524,"gpt":0.383277427597812,"spread":0.2800470216307596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306644,0.0001715643,0.000283468,0.00001332176,0.006122368,0.00007384389,0.0003259283,0.0001803804,0.001129509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001691875,0.0001487222,0.0002063575,0.0003617081,0.02719156,0.0002730888,0.00006315161,0.0001924199,0.0001500264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006244361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001529891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03611664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009563343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975579,0.0002687039,0.0004711044,0.0002871223,0.000845405,0.0005697084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988452,0.0004450588,0.0001190539,0.0001327742,0.0003356648,0.0001222416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003825107,0.0001049538,0.0005603565,0.00000151311,0.0001068415,0.000004807803,0.002449697,0.00001459572,0.00001537709,0.9915929,0.004698995,0.0004116792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002305663,0.00001106603,0.001324287,0.00002067676,0.00005277682,0.000001426872,0.003425688,0.000001577916,0.00001707211,0.4449369,0.5498467,0.0001312656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02956243,0.00184184,0.002376374,0.06701119,0.003286091,0.0005984191,0.0007674875,0.0001928427,0.8943633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934295,0.0004432029,0.0001648145,0.001830511,0.003806118,0.0000481245,0.00005720932,0.000005697421,0.0002147526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822634312","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246687.001.0001","title":"Sceptical Essays on Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Skepticism; Government (linguistics); Law; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Articulation (sociology); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06184330119593007,"gpt":0.3428695796346789,"spread":0.2810262784387488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001544156,0.000148555,0.0002202417,0.00005184525,0.002138174,0.00004252234,0.0002016808,0.000254095,0.004395631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002138971,0.0001154003,0.0001157988,0.00005312419,0.001192107,0.00003405116,0.00004008388,0.0002225407,0.002313776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002616871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002656133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00589354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03396966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987527,0.00003695045,0.0001441577,0.0002345153,0.0005741511,0.0002575929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995939,0.00009208388,0.00004150869,0.00009210837,0.00007877777,0.0001016786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017229,0.0000209587,0.000008538152,7.663808e-7,0.00001933365,0.00001456794,0.00009742815,8.527422e-8,1.031827e-7,0.7709918,0.2285848,0.0002599188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003207415,0.00001825333,0.00001743531,0.00002791835,0.00001195954,1.64183e-7,0.00002248701,2.576754e-8,2.558441e-7,0.4526132,0.5471592,0.00009697749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002385079,0.00006492691,0.00001260837,0.0009318063,0.0003653039,0.0001393427,0.000006043619,0.0001107867,0.9983453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01437827,0.00004323605,0.00001346806,0.0003838367,0.002555823,0.000007630505,0.00001399522,0.000005651924,0.9825981],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3185744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553021964","doi":"","title":"Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional theory; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Separation of powers; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02047383838055766,"gpt":0.295831323279422,"spread":0.2753574848988644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009492763,0.0001795247,0.0003959344,0.0000537739,0.0009064556,0.00003585065,0.0001623841,0.0001795374,0.0006171913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003222104,0.0001167001,0.000120122,0.00006573266,0.01407542,0.0001404903,0.00009367568,0.0001895075,0.00006001836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001682904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003431583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001469131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985418,0.000173281,0.0003306598,0.0001758694,0.0005506135,0.0002277204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987493,0.0005609792,0.0002140812,0.0001099086,0.000274932,0.00009079877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002313821,0.00001685495,0.0001459952,0.00000984499,0.00009421464,9.037676e-7,0.0005288515,6.391982e-7,5.557807e-7,0.9675615,0.03134281,0.000274704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003888965,0.000007907469,0.000129348,0.0001351489,0.0001500858,0.000005926129,0.0004648073,7.035832e-7,0.000001088232,0.3908946,0.6076714,0.0001501598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002210954,0.008176411,0.0003979247,0.003668925,0.0007063328,0.0005408695,0.00003672166,0.00003840142,0.9864123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3910769,0.003069347,0.000189106,0.0008675897,0.0009641218,0.00006256437,0.00003221037,0.00001070257,0.6037275],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.576667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804520237","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Constitutional law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1225758233818418,"gpt":0.3666246077349982,"spread":0.2440487843531564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005130031,0.00003175268,0.00007892825,0.00001203536,0.0001296857,0.000008111203,0.00006873426,0.00002861657,0.0001033458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001067391,0.00002723724,0.00001772928,0.0001219705,0.003145729,0.0001645956,0.00001795963,0.00003166263,0.00001392361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005789119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004113092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03401187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08294802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999324,0.00005865248,0.0001327364,0.00007811841,0.0003119209,0.00009460052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996892,0.00002072049,0.00002652296,0.00003518527,0.0001583543,0.0000699742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000746501,0.0000745881,0.05739136,5.67298e-7,0.000002465473,0.000004238615,0.0006706439,0.00001063196,0.00001302281,0.9416302,0.00007928567,0.0001154864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000371069,0.00004065672,0.04962947,0.00001171248,0.000004813823,7.999544e-7,0.005447634,0.000003742442,0.00005714807,0.8058169,0.1384963,0.000119712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404296,0.00006164503,0.0002259517,0.0009543047,0.0001237358,0.00009168922,0.000006153155,0.00002114267,0.8580858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.000003579955,0.0002681773,0.0001878714,0.00008456522,0.000005527076,0.000007470605,3.964354e-7,0.0001111317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8589017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253485966","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316106327","title":"Human Dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Expression (computer science); German; Philosophy; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05664718749141537,"gpt":0.261945596665269,"spread":0.2052984091738536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475011,0.0001972441,0.0002975943,0.00007791739,0.001490374,0.00004823833,0.0004992897,0.000302232,0.000005718953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003822293,0.0002356805,0.0001486647,0.00001695342,0.001534707,0.00008438364,0.0003128559,0.0003258083,0.00004286298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008579358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00142442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01091377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004443973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986391,0.0001243927,0.0001105814,0.0003015399,0.0005211893,0.0003031967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990488,0.0000405501,0.0001285659,0.0001858297,0.0003643134,0.0002319585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005663511,0.000006337049,0.000003489561,0.000005078366,0.00004460087,0.00005078036,0.0001925601,1.12964e-7,7.063351e-7,0.6000531,0.3994989,0.0001387228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002009835,0.00001780274,0.00002755188,0.00005421584,0.0001176185,5.717058e-7,0.0004192425,1.425203e-7,0.000002460943,0.0006350341,0.9982496,0.0002748015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008231736,0.0002216555,0.00001506595,0.00004539075,0.000345133,0.0002745382,0.0001698403,0.0001685845,0.9986775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002959938,0.00005087235,0.00000713628,0.000063749,0.0007368998,7.066817e-7,0.00003300443,0.00001066229,0.996137],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.599418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0261224248769182,"gpt":0.3540305868266478,"spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002241352,0.0001440544,0.0001880536,0.00009324207,0.003817707,0.0003915677,0.0005305218,0.00006465418,0.00004297726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002008806,0.0001419286,0.00009111359,0.00008320124,0.001848402,0.0003528566,0.00005349065,0.0001216956,0.0004098555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001623954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008034342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2090224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01362951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983533,0.0000732527,0.0002089424,0.0002102404,0.0003819182,0.0007723169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990456,0.00003454497,0.0001470539,0.0003474687,0.000156196,0.0002691801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000380891,0.00002432796,0.003944184,0.00000281893,0.00002980999,0.00001154631,0.01214952,3.628164e-7,0.00000422054,0.9690707,0.001157178,0.01360155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000234318,0.00005901042,0.03955384,0.00001560094,0.00001127841,0.00000130603,0.002885723,0.000007408582,0.00000644437,0.7555082,0.2015126,0.000204289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3267083,0.0001598456,0.0004438795,0.05731882,0.0008587749,0.0002978228,0.0002380437,0.0001865601,0.6137879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938285,0.00009063538,0.00005004613,0.001307084,0.001658482,0.00001456368,0.000003434835,0.00001016028,0.003037121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6671202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555250870","doi":"","title":"The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; Public sphere; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Judicial review; Law; Sociology; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01625766061043491,"gpt":0.3098850748993388,"spread":0.2936274142889039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003243686,0.00004341775,0.00007617535,0.00001159326,0.001395226,0.00003562427,0.00008824634,0.00002556939,0.00001671038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000274323,0.00002475667,0.00002809356,0.0001575328,0.002936746,0.00003322073,0.00002830779,0.00004072789,0.000004171267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002363153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002931916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05631116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01952061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994026,0.00007749045,0.0001031097,0.00005971705,0.0002304017,0.0001266149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994361,0.000334474,0.00006114721,0.00005153815,0.0000911954,0.0000255629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007540402,0.000003797805,0.0008197753,5.984241e-7,0.000008166893,2.117258e-7,0.001844533,0.00001350754,0.000005406877,0.9883375,0.00871591,0.0002430705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002458755,0.000002594257,0.003098751,0.00001034927,0.00002048373,6.056299e-7,0.003576877,0.000005875405,0.00002349123,0.6054354,0.3875408,0.00003888083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02705872,0.01283349,0.002180791,0.1845833,0.0005777162,0.0003954967,0.000005964665,0.00004914145,0.7723154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940793,0.0005225781,0.00003378914,0.0002767257,0.0005569526,0.000003665139,0.00000124913,0.000001417195,0.004524335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135872986","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906","title":"The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02547038781262859,"gpt":0.3504284304177738,"spread":0.3249580426051453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00261457,0.00007676009,0.0003172714,0.00002786134,0.001110087,0.000009172967,0.0004088323,0.00003146409,0.00001314032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009419806,0.00004087814,0.00008664272,0.0004837174,0.02648658,0.0001366834,0.0001401357,0.00007236996,0.000001918134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008600593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009202383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02065176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000216125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975587,0.0002444773,0.000469697,0.0001392411,0.0009954629,0.0005924237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974712,0.001112332,0.0001492673,0.0001483741,0.0008925141,0.0002262712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004826048,0.00002368963,0.0007275406,0.00007354501,0.000005679799,4.264638e-7,0.0005624877,5.757186e-8,0.000004696451,0.9980273,0.0002140202,0.0003557898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005075497,0.0001592096,0.04918292,0.001846986,0.0001780166,0.00001644929,0.006426206,0.00002979295,0.0005884086,0.881411,0.05941969,0.0002338135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2070661,0.1449873,0.0004995851,0.2005073,0.0009450676,0.002179233,0.000293691,0.00005087441,0.4434708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804108,0.01857577,0.00003420873,0.0008165152,0.00009883461,0.00000589017,2.641198e-7,0.000001754737,0.00005602199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141053676","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00557.x","title":"Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Concurrence; Majority opinion; Political science; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Power (physics); Law; Dissenting opinion; Empirical research; Supreme Court Decisions; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08020318407841402,"gpt":0.3343116820694302,"spread":0.2541084979910161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832717,0.00006064031,0.0002419677,0.00005796894,0.0005502538,0.0000241563,0.0006467075,0.00001237697,0.00006475565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001545946,0.00003515232,0.0001020723,0.0004943492,0.01873428,0.0002059558,0.00006038203,0.0001201982,0.000006014882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001076484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009142862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02038133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002171806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0001289161,0.0003304147,0.00008849314,0.0008214365,0.0005121723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983032,0.0003281173,0.0002604942,0.00008402191,0.0006824457,0.0003416631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002036719,0.00004144274,0.01006544,3.511285e-7,0.00001422936,0.00000216857,0.002928492,2.529759e-7,0.0001624069,0.9851172,0.00007752605,0.001570136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003628396,0.0009504684,0.7957311,0.00008284987,0.00005809787,0.00003201019,0.09441985,0.000008190419,0.0008602835,0.1007602,0.006564097,0.000169986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526599,0.0002093707,0.001039352,0.02698701,0.0006578311,0.0001609064,0.00001427578,0.00001024439,0.118261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.00003580546,0.0002430238,0.0007927499,0.0002044443,0.000001170733,3.01652e-8,0.000001455155,0.0000286794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.884357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111831069","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071338","title":"The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Rule of law; Injustice; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Democracy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364610590709913,"gpt":0.3370556872032805,"spread":0.3005946281322892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230452,0.00003621287,0.0001117865,0.00009972773,0.0006000831,0.00001638073,0.0003951887,0.00002807592,0.00005555356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001964164,0.00002582274,0.00004948388,0.0005059039,0.007907966,0.0001756295,0.00001362787,0.00009158727,0.000003110086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003169526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004387997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4772972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5802374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985127,0.00004838969,0.0003796073,0.00005650306,0.000480075,0.0005226813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986914,0.0001483495,0.00011563,0.00004921974,0.0004488931,0.0005464629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003732028,0.000007806119,0.0226376,9.000707e-7,0.000002186121,0.00000648761,0.000533498,0.000001049262,0.0001600272,0.9764059,0.00003453257,0.0002063455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537054,0.00007435175,0.701844,0.00007174764,0.0000127024,0.000008955359,0.003580332,0.000003096914,0.001138943,0.2771079,0.01590738,0.0000969654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7631443,0.0003414518,0.0001143244,0.003235972,0.0006047409,0.00006552156,0.000008862332,0.000001294742,0.2324835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997683,0.00001044013,0.0000270363,0.00006693024,0.0000954867,1.512298e-7,3.16561e-8,4.905053e-7,0.00003116586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.699298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05830837734920551,"gpt":0.3040873362336409,"spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002481905,0.0000676788,0.0001369522,0.00002960042,0.003730649,0.00003466468,0.0001989564,0.00004573832,0.0007221478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003333927,0.00005308775,0.00007580893,0.0001379678,0.0004001469,0.0003500047,0.00001708123,0.0001343527,0.00004837288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005906918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009594271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1158149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990306,0.00007381669,0.0002058214,0.00009013432,0.0003837153,0.0002158975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995007,0.00002972972,0.0001024063,0.00006731011,0.00009449592,0.00020538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005079421,0.00008453405,0.0001269831,6.016762e-7,0.00002304476,0.0000320363,0.00148811,0.000005640516,0.00001536247,0.9964476,0.0006416489,0.001129331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002131053,0.00004183602,0.0004768693,0.00002188571,0.00001459324,0.00001403108,0.0002633643,0.000002406572,0.00004580147,0.05795266,0.9408754,0.00007810769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0300748,0.0003884801,0.00002325915,0.0007073171,0.0003618562,0.00006513112,0.000009514417,0.0000268191,0.9683428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975228,0.000341202,0.0003417045,0.0002551878,0.0006089493,8.463004e-7,2.824548e-7,0.000002992867,0.0009260414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85233168","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1254","title":"Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or \"Much Ado About Metaphors\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Phenomenon; Legislature; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03852778018458422,"gpt":0.3175306271996178,"spread":0.2790028470150336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197808,0.0001500646,0.0002673614,0.00006687827,0.002808722,0.0001873041,0.0003069051,0.000116372,0.001073541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002156639,0.0001099044,0.0001738928,0.0002780852,0.0005861752,0.0003217908,0.00005224522,0.0003648473,0.0002513844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001326794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04632348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3681264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980276,0.0001428414,0.0003840713,0.0001893854,0.000665075,0.0005910581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990036,0.0001608574,0.000164551,0.0001024353,0.0002611853,0.0003073683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006304855,0.00005548685,0.001551843,0.000002874917,0.00008236458,0.0001586335,0.001559156,6.178357e-7,0.000053208,0.9855116,0.002725724,0.008235458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006255638,0.0001103544,0.008050713,0.0001485312,0.0001181388,0.000147209,0.004302658,0.000001392384,0.00013441,0.2224246,0.7635208,0.0004156769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003432365,0.002750796,0.001037477,0.002516992,0.001055494,0.0001389276,0.00001372798,0.00005888473,0.9889953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930289,0.001443682,0.0004319188,0.001363247,0.002732177,0.00000331657,0.000002872403,0.000009350585,0.0009844868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848768895","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.003.0001","title":"The Global Model of Constitutional Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Autonomy; Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; International human rights law; Right to property; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04306736430680592,"gpt":0.2405462042838313,"spread":0.1974788399770254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001393078,0.0001397339,0.0001847308,0.00002021947,0.001859632,0.00001689269,0.0003797037,0.0001951209,0.0000198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009465185,0.0001168907,0.0001552043,0.000007123539,0.005852904,0.0000694454,0.0001875659,0.0001384192,0.00000160578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002480561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005114097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001378572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001845127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990579,0.00002667069,0.0001209319,0.0001461938,0.0004223705,0.0002259337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993411,0.00007922765,0.000154808,0.0001242031,0.000203447,0.00009715671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003638097,0.000005745188,0.00001421985,0.000002782529,0.0001087982,0.00000299257,0.0001681507,0.00001598147,2.420538e-7,0.9978091,0.0007029313,0.001132731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008956447,0.000004798581,0.000003378241,0.00002601849,0.00009040328,4.337495e-7,0.00005518144,0.000007566947,0.000001452582,0.1869438,0.8126671,0.0001102609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001659901,0.0005245701,0.0004767827,0.00007439405,0.0002395441,0.000179827,0.0002959232,0.00003335894,0.998159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05729127,0.001090219,0.00008945954,0.00002538075,0.0002536986,6.034921e-7,0.000007254944,0.00000329045,0.9412388],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8119642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581033623","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107565272","title":"Proportionality and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Doctrine; Politics; Treaty; Constitutional law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02485090460507253,"gpt":0.2305543231805704,"spread":0.2057034185754979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003797097,0.000100805,0.0002542682,0.00001976298,0.0007998619,0.00001569622,0.0002331183,0.0001254979,0.000001887051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003266669,0.00008193963,0.0001026814,0.000007147135,0.006221741,0.00003465126,0.0001830041,0.0001456772,0.000001908352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008824463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003528323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002253972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991569,0.0001428178,0.0001110795,0.0001630661,0.000302619,0.0001235076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.0001694584,0.000169064,0.0001182041,0.0001853794,0.0000526574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005305793,0.000004217263,0.00000610926,0.00001967559,0.00006580496,0.000003434828,0.0003798963,1.296426e-7,3.849198e-7,0.9845362,0.01477233,0.0001587653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003452846,0.000006050134,0.00006043689,0.0000444604,0.0001147422,5.235719e-7,0.0001218432,7.90099e-7,0.000005259871,0.002484479,0.9967207,0.00009538133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001142694,0.0002765399,0.00004218324,0.0002371365,0.000110938,0.0002818941,0.00007655803,0.0000252497,0.9988352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01814029,0.0001144039,0.000009633669,0.0001287703,0.0002040733,8.576576e-7,0.000008092766,0.000003632413,0.9813902],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03941342542345785,"gpt":0.3452246130410009,"spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740737,0.00004571549,0.0001973158,0.00003350855,0.0007696967,0.00002613932,0.0001114854,0.000007943747,0.00001518571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007206736,0.00003064804,0.00003603267,0.00007925805,0.004739489,0.0001112312,0.00001563204,0.00009693639,0.00001124261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008536808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001751875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01225918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.0002573668,0.0001647814,0.00004551025,0.000165138,0.0000935872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.0003017951,0.0001967537,0.00001649441,0.0001065613,0.00002783708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002576372,0.000009133253,0.0006618655,1.233521e-7,0.0000214328,3.859709e-7,0.003807845,0.00004686852,0.000006435471,0.9949467,0.0003274168,0.0001460839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002849039,0.00008967412,0.01468852,0.00001097933,0.0000136254,0.000009248432,0.00438176,0.00002465037,0.00001377292,0.7669936,0.2134085,0.00008069008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075987,0.00006160005,0.0001561118,0.006339338,0.0001051138,0.00004076098,0.000003516927,0.000003266023,0.1856917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.00001143155,0.00006393178,0.0004175063,0.0003663409,0.000001306668,1.667738e-7,5.659885e-7,0.00001332372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.227953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561034820","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493904","title":"European and US Constitutionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0259652732040752,"gpt":0.2236831641834604,"spread":0.1977178909793852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002011859,0.0001818853,0.0002202469,0.00007415822,0.001277794,0.00005408533,0.0002693724,0.000154691,0.000006139392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003081853,0.0002164934,0.00009223089,0.00001211151,0.002899885,0.00008572741,0.0002628392,0.0002474841,0.00003313009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003184598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007323149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00250264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001532897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998894,0.000147113,0.0001081349,0.0003038732,0.0003049614,0.0002419396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.00007505743,0.0001003281,0.0001166943,0.0001503344,0.0001670331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102634,0.000005164839,0.00001090736,0.000006493651,0.00006098447,0.000118914,0.0001611284,4.643732e-7,7.90688e-7,0.8882024,0.110444,0.0009784388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002146597,0.00000747512,0.0002040536,0.00007520854,0.0001062744,0.00000491201,0.000129549,5.402767e-7,0.000001103722,0.0000680576,0.9989413,0.0002468767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009570971,0.0008108328,0.00004611685,0.0001234749,0.0002645775,0.0002117823,0.0001976174,0.0001156418,0.9981343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005034933,0.0007839635,0.00003249572,0.0002239144,0.0009247157,3.292773e-7,0.00002537505,0.00000904604,0.9929652],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8884973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170984522","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.0004","title":"Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Legitimacy; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Political science; Judicial independence; Democracy; Accountability; Empowerment; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02558972547113847,"gpt":0.3237462511243716,"spread":0.2981565256532331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004020645,0.00004575803,0.00007642207,0.0000808874,0.0004192842,0.00002006541,0.00005191023,0.00002801632,0.00002980279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001161622,0.00004546878,0.00001366708,0.0001343514,0.0004830026,0.00004765438,0.00002576614,0.0000675097,0.00001220795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007575314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008786831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01283573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05958842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999372,0.00002426303,0.00009873958,0.00008364764,0.0001374133,0.0002839019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996893,0.0001405501,0.00001760723,0.00003795963,0.00002981054,0.00008472407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001286912,0.00001043064,0.04531973,9.898766e-7,0.000003076398,0.000009412186,0.001728777,1.434773e-7,7.779262e-7,0.9509556,0.001104258,0.0008655626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007857678,0.000004881183,0.1519247,0.00001256191,0.000004944339,5.306499e-7,0.003040306,5.621242e-7,0.0000111491,0.3674921,0.4773556,0.00007407732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1554345,0.0009228202,0.0000247613,0.01139549,0.0002775127,0.00007222494,0.000003379889,0.00003240638,0.8318369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926992,0.00006067042,0.0001518272,0.0003877656,0.0004231758,0.000001226764,6.549006e-7,0.000002049242,0.006273413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8372647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760112576162902,"gpt":0.292893257251816,"spread":0.2752921314901869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654429,0.0000587238,0.0001678304,0.000006216686,0.001400406,0.0000305024,0.0001089697,0.00002422191,0.00001643213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002729433,0.00003110844,0.00006123274,0.0002007935,0.002391792,0.00006350349,0.00002980461,0.00004492969,0.000006417164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001858276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02817572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0240802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991999,0.0001333009,0.00023191,0.00007324533,0.0002214107,0.0001402897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994503,0.0002197535,0.0001166569,0.00007839115,0.0001075352,0.00002737798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002574264,0.00000409264,0.0001200063,0.00002987684,0.000008143571,1.761609e-7,0.00005644809,8.364359e-7,3.666145e-7,0.9899053,0.007431523,0.002440671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009756926,0.000002864462,0.0001349344,0.0002877993,0.00004712815,7.190589e-7,0.00005074725,6.936963e-7,0.000002415905,0.3233731,0.6759724,0.00002962499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002399348,0.4100663,0.0006894033,0.04526621,0.000330801,0.0007901968,0.000007448469,0.00003000094,0.5425797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346155,0.1615079,0.00004547202,0.00242324,0.0006134269,0.00002371126,0.000005595345,0.000002821185,0.0007623523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04843481092712054,"gpt":0.3361267847735683,"spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118099,0.00006839691,0.0001471508,0.00006182015,0.0008188651,0.00003875712,0.0002467397,0.00003892999,0.0002043877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007194545,0.00004202504,0.0001261388,0.0002301512,0.001027039,0.0001345911,0.0000389321,0.0001710738,0.0001042279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003319771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001533609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998699,0.00009984944,0.0002697428,0.00006806988,0.0005438799,0.0003194347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0002832963,0.00007213616,0.00005600862,0.0003039819,0.0002978272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171729,0.00003502745,0.001134058,7.837704e-7,0.00002755688,0.00002930148,0.0002743232,0.000005478988,0.00001628948,0.9958051,0.002569523,0.00008538874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008444618,0.0000311623,0.001715566,0.00002479317,0.00001749578,0.00004365218,0.0003250339,2.590102e-7,0.00001062246,0.6465161,0.3511825,0.00004843251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01399421,0.0002928148,0.0006508737,0.2303885,0.0008421276,0.00007862045,0.000004762268,0.00001124262,0.7537369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.00003302389,0.0001201599,0.00678092,0.00560363,0.000001558376,1.516355e-7,0.000002325452,0.00009779579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255463919","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511226","title":"Judging Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Administration (probate law); Politics; Reputation; Separation of powers; Federalism; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03243524586203801,"gpt":0.227954172184835,"spread":0.195518926322797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001045238,0.0002049952,0.0002947176,0.000102667,0.001873089,0.00003362808,0.0004493712,0.000284077,0.000004215644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002733292,0.0002463397,0.0001904376,0.00002056091,0.001538247,0.00008667534,0.0002333165,0.0003269681,0.00004502678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006095021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005864366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001046682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00008597681,0.0001134864,0.0003219497,0.0004376981,0.0003439196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993219,0.0000805937,0.0001256391,0.0001681474,0.0001446705,0.0001590205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112636,0.00000487621,0.000007713787,0.000006027137,0.00005974403,0.0001853572,0.0003238226,3.219163e-7,5.897039e-7,0.7515534,0.2474257,0.0004211185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552425,0.000008594729,0.00005009088,0.00008170863,0.00008168599,0.000003038147,0.0002473881,8.104309e-7,0.000003939967,0.00006884085,0.9990143,0.000284382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059702,0.0004344064,0.00006420494,0.00008156065,0.000447872,0.0002389578,0.0000884288,0.0001806723,0.9984042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001942365,0.001053492,0.00002347972,0.0001055173,0.0007240947,6.802263e-7,0.00001897159,0.00001227483,0.9961191],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08489844829569734,"gpt":0.3009401245616682,"spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003442438,0.00008564354,0.000284852,0.000001542665,0.001647874,0.00008415353,0.0001720582,0.00004197406,0.00001476912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026757,0.00003761558,0.0001317804,0.0002919181,0.003098201,0.00006624604,0.00004326664,0.0001425173,0.000002293722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003504977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2296982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3496517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984355,0.0006500182,0.0002286486,0.0001309894,0.0003458718,0.0002089715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987692,0.0009033558,0.00009913161,0.0001199066,0.00006185169,0.00004656478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000492358,0.000004863008,0.001525091,0.00002289623,0.00002309709,5.677631e-7,0.01652252,0.000001422,1.473799e-7,0.9783902,0.0006305682,0.002873713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007578956,0.000009068026,0.006544541,0.0008653017,0.0001552406,0.000002496988,0.009012249,0.0000151839,3.125228e-7,0.07122771,0.9112747,0.000135325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03745482,0.7764859,0.00005084846,0.09518,0.0003224091,0.003877238,0.00003928743,0.0000231363,0.08656635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8225597,0.1719606,0.00003270837,0.005383639,0.00003409567,0.00001453113,3.288636e-7,0.000002200825,0.00001217042],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02980027920861484,"gpt":0.313601402395157,"spread":0.2838011231865422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004157409,0.00007568069,0.0001439742,0.00008012642,0.001135578,0.00008177513,0.0003157467,0.00005263244,0.000242855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446846,0.00007167378,0.00008482316,0.000171269,0.001113542,0.0003494499,0.000004927334,0.0001557288,0.00005152053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002971263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003715339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05301742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1794064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.00005102969,0.0002426294,0.00008551738,0.0003857865,0.0003190851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988968,0.00004168036,0.0001257773,0.00005475694,0.0003030391,0.0005779457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004697079,0.00001109644,0.001415663,4.431812e-7,0.00001325587,0.0001543794,0.0009010402,0.0000199449,0.00002795727,0.9936681,0.002244805,0.001538641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002020197,0.00009278779,0.01042025,0.0001045951,0.0000240373,0.00005496512,0.00050344,6.847218e-7,0.00003798953,0.1214943,0.8669136,0.0001512815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547384,0.004031122,0.0005459233,0.02012533,0.001922168,0.0001368885,0.00002387979,0.00001613201,0.9077247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967264,0.0001220698,0.0002687534,0.00209566,0.0006221942,5.569795e-7,4.236044e-7,0.000001582906,0.000162356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9312525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237008288","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197509616.001.0001","title":"The Machinery of Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0216619106111287,"gpt":0.2606703484134206,"spread":0.2390084378022919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000137056,0.00005451425,0.0001067624,0.000002109487,0.0004969893,0.00001211796,0.0001725947,0.00004779207,0.0001513219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009541106,0.00003202399,0.00007414525,0.00002408172,0.0006724526,0.0000111944,0.0000728461,0.00007877673,0.00005873945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001189115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003671206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005676851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.00002098204,0.0001060761,0.00007100743,0.000580733,0.000080576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996623,0.0001718499,0.00006836645,0.00004418677,0.00002479702,0.00002852904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000245565,0.000001871479,0.00002084837,0.000001287906,0.00002871597,5.446553e-7,0.0001738362,7.685694e-8,2.603711e-7,0.7787939,0.2178729,0.003103289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001390374,0.000006438759,0.00003846412,0.000008955471,0.00001222244,2.249766e-8,0.0002753912,2.088301e-7,9.127996e-7,0.1257048,0.8739018,0.00003677745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[8.875966e-7,0.001321293,0.00001440875,0.00673197,0.0002571758,0.000083791,0.00002668177,0.00001270534,0.9915511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00483673,0.001843099,0.00001037555,0.0003422702,0.0005766851,0.000003827756,0.000001281303,0.000002487631,0.9923832],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6560289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.382249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915046536","doi":"","title":"The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03870910728818699,"gpt":0.3228733625618576,"spread":0.2841642552736706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005244293,0.00002994185,0.0000390747,0.000009434678,0.001580675,0.00001350784,0.0001341314,0.00001857853,0.00001346961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005328124,0.00001412513,0.00002505664,0.0002703173,0.001966695,0.00009665953,0.00004513837,0.00004266654,0.0000127863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002043626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001019558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01836525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994524,0.00007966731,0.00009755589,0.00003228461,0.0001882168,0.0001499251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994233,0.0003337446,0.00004948893,0.00005202206,0.0001147071,0.00002668871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001862745,0.000006365397,0.1178182,2.996394e-7,0.000007150705,1.615832e-8,0.001760693,0.000126731,0.00001241494,0.8797078,0.0002382047,0.0003202757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007864455,0.000006456585,0.2324411,0.00002328961,0.00001757552,3.645237e-7,0.01665963,0.00001199997,0.000223202,0.03166166,0.7188035,0.00007264371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868133,0.0003250422,0.00006573604,0.003128868,0.0002603312,0.00007904547,0.00000151283,0.00001778662,0.1093083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.0002995339,0.00001614725,0.0003853492,0.00007447529,0.000003562398,3.884409e-7,4.920955e-7,0.0001616077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235474944","doi":"10.3138/9781442674639","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Political science; Election law; Agency (philosophy); Law; Variety (cybernetics); General election; Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02030945964630773,"gpt":0.264268891581997,"spread":0.2439594319356893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005633963,0.0000946961,0.000160822,0.00003452776,0.0006925093,0.00005179884,0.0003026762,0.0001291952,0.0001186107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004814037,0.00004965826,0.00009654182,0.0001690323,0.00106894,0.00009780354,0.00006093159,0.0002459239,0.00001284444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001788763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009040974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009943475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06075293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989632,0.0001505942,0.0001843345,0.0001194745,0.000413988,0.0001684042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993371,0.0003283907,0.0001248997,0.00009651011,0.00009888683,0.00001415927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001693512,0.000008060595,0.0004997943,0.000003277332,0.00001493397,2.669368e-7,0.001311237,0.000004256367,0.000001605719,0.9637902,0.03286232,0.001502399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002750405,0.000003400845,0.001277587,0.00005432235,0.00001520986,3.019593e-7,0.001009446,4.25185e-7,0.000008831819,0.4084112,0.5891278,0.00006402844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005549908,0.001320216,0.00001583737,0.002679541,0.0005262151,0.0002126474,0.000005658049,0.0000151922,0.9946697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06378742,0.001296404,0.00002151828,0.0005732314,0.0004759785,0.00001875876,0.000002334159,0.000006890568,0.9338174],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5562655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171772895","doi":"10.1017/9781316823330","title":"Proportionality and Judicial Activism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04191028808983042,"gpt":0.2613865396820902,"spread":0.2194762515922598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002270196,0.0001835167,0.0002968072,0.00005605899,0.002643447,0.00008502023,0.0003586726,0.0002817776,0.00000345635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007595692,0.0002119693,0.0001090566,0.000005949685,0.002830229,0.0001359329,0.0003182953,0.0002901606,0.000007556672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003370907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009682517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003351865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987959,0.00008182852,0.0001036536,0.0003509417,0.0004150191,0.0002526165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991535,0.00006444311,0.0002368946,0.000194767,0.0001977399,0.0001526332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065601,0.000008223014,0.00003013835,0.00001314458,0.00008389659,0.00007117804,0.0001727587,2.928913e-8,0.000001231256,0.9056131,0.09232765,0.001647959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001855586,0.00001248884,0.0007163737,0.00007755606,0.0001260261,0.000001613807,0.0001227589,3.78566e-7,0.000004076468,0.0008665026,0.9976431,0.000243573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002661261,0.000227285,0.00003263888,0.0001950803,0.0003681619,0.0003362232,0.0001651645,0.00008137383,0.998328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01269066,0.0003518983,0.00001140267,0.00004960738,0.0008134595,0.000001152094,0.00001936648,0.000008252328,0.9860542],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271865752","doi":"","title":"Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Constitutional theory; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237620147723794,"gpt":0.3005861337771629,"spread":0.268209932299925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034714,0.00007869428,0.0001771929,0.00002908189,0.00192764,0.00001531921,0.0001286007,0.00004251501,0.00004902075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004349489,0.00006760135,0.00005847741,0.0001626506,0.0003488219,0.0001381787,0.00002761235,0.0005980908,0.00003943706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000281205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002346863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005402284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003262542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.0001066363,0.0001621987,0.0001044871,0.0002800045,0.001133152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00004887463,0.00005791123,0.00003039334,0.0001454901,0.00008679161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003329726,0.0000182547,0.0007461719,0.000005485806,0.00003694875,0.000008416223,0.0003245882,1.331569e-7,0.000004832513,0.9960726,0.0006412448,0.002137981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002363405,0.0001245405,0.001577418,0.00009595879,0.0001300636,0.0004427646,0.001464456,5.850819e-7,0.00000294218,0.9155332,0.0801864,0.0002052774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06180369,0.8184388,0.0002598175,0.03017972,0.0005181524,0.0002964447,0.000004314691,0.00006420652,0.08843483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5689776,0.4293668,0.000004428299,0.0007908484,0.0004873029,0.000002189113,2.590325e-7,0.000002206684,0.0003684155],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5071739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082442523","doi":"10.1177/0010414010369075","title":"Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence From Russia and Ukraine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Ukrainian; Competition (biology); Judicial independence; Democracy; Political economy; Plaintiff; Political science; Economics; Obstacle; Law; Law and economics; Economic system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1477026269988071,"gpt":0.4486556983909936,"spread":0.3009530713921865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004045529,0.0002144103,0.0004674907,0.00006030888,0.001613846,0.0001137905,0.0002357665,0.0001159875,0.0001747852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002277714,0.0001851675,0.00005418071,0.0002209566,0.003768085,0.0003522201,0.0002575381,0.0003724435,0.0002221266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001588053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002500784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02826366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02440799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974871,0.0002490118,0.0002866782,0.0004644337,0.0006816582,0.0008311486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971997,0.001372814,0.00004290091,0.0001403301,0.0004716502,0.0007725831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004653942,0.00007824076,0.0101534,0.000002564681,0.00006203439,0.00000825768,0.008457979,2.015615e-7,0.0003482153,0.9804559,0.0002119649,0.0001747061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002649848,0.0002661086,0.1744815,0.0001104042,0.00006716211,0.000003846182,0.0442121,0.00001181286,0.0005535969,0.7705528,0.009089136,0.0003866131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223128,0.0009425544,0.0001109235,0.01968878,0.0006074002,0.0003116308,0.00005270807,0.00009266343,0.05588056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958401,0.00005485085,0.0004270785,0.001977173,0.001576168,0.00005400899,0.000004637349,0.000005632841,0.00006032532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2099032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05646041653789657,"gpt":0.3829438105350005,"spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001083,0.00006636819,0.0001071094,0.00004269738,0.001448264,0.00004032865,0.0001828453,0.00006584942,0.00009241257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034989,0.00003989546,0.00001617966,0.0002273747,0.006925977,0.00004682103,0.00008374635,0.0003467574,0.000003241867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008211037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980073,0.0003969352,0.0001412113,0.000142167,0.0006880434,0.0006243216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.001248811,0.00002730008,0.00011713,0.0003764027,0.0002406169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983309,0.00001267305,0.01756161,0.000003234894,0.00001317838,0.000001842336,0.001065843,1.40575e-7,0.00008504857,0.9792608,0.001839882,0.00014775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001420328,0.00007720481,0.4570455,0.00001022773,0.00001275998,0.000002847761,0.003957063,0.000007801617,0.0001224993,0.5170532,0.02149906,0.00006978132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437982,0.00002605022,0.000003363424,0.05306702,0.0001939294,0.0001698718,0.00006906086,0.000005562827,0.002666948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986952,0.00001256754,0.000003480799,0.0004516602,0.0002125253,0.00001055697,0.000004555848,0.000003016733,0.0006064537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4622076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873251","doi":"10.1177/0020715212439311","title":"Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and southern United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Mobilization; Irish; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Movement (music); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06464432359784192,"gpt":0.3618229870292625,"spread":0.2971786634314206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003728164,0.00007981175,0.0001972751,0.0001039709,0.0002158511,0.00002694178,0.0001093061,0.00006726552,0.00006004767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003756376,0.00006518605,0.0000305814,0.00004477785,0.001014797,0.0001870108,0.00004247621,0.0002118393,0.000001455197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009763234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001478196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001956026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006237289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990514,0.0002554664,0.0002407605,0.00006237799,0.0002302618,0.000159729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992087,0.0001551833,0.0002087763,0.00001317421,0.0003381559,0.00007594278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001219977,0.00009064985,0.5525629,0.000001538482,0.0002856532,0.00001426924,0.1029338,0.0001113331,0.00006921239,0.3427615,0.000187923,0.0008591924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001785732,0.0001926098,0.5549138,0.00002735131,0.00004660355,0.00003046831,0.1768024,0.00005464061,0.0000256101,0.2209667,0.04487306,0.0002810782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937845,0.0007433513,0.00004040949,0.003263137,0.000261864,0.00004906961,0.00003975828,0.000003394174,0.001814506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.0001617432,0.00001682772,0.0004901008,0.0005274168,0.000001050973,0.00001254986,0.000002011429,0.00003361086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1217948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3739062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136775099","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040485","title":"The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Realm; Legislature; Framing (construction); Supreme court; Sociology; Humanities; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03089683373900302,"gpt":0.3176381630610328,"spread":0.2867413293220298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116056,0.00004979492,0.0001243644,0.00009339934,0.0009959961,0.00005636078,0.0004564241,0.00002170486,0.00008549418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003163627,0.00003706827,0.00004702969,0.0003370215,0.003116263,0.0001727266,0.00001350875,0.0001014468,0.00000213725],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002659298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05780692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980801,0.00004034828,0.0003230272,0.00007995021,0.0004431481,0.001033374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977947,0.0005041849,0.00006488786,0.00005953935,0.0003665155,0.001210212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001601155,0.000003806186,0.01148425,6.931701e-7,0.000002608195,0.000004370637,0.0001873023,0.00000412179,0.000006214525,0.9867429,0.0004637558,0.001098421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004103212,0.0001104642,0.351033,0.00004782174,0.0000262944,0.00002795469,0.03334884,0.00007626529,0.0002831011,0.3379082,0.2764938,0.0002339871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5287133,0.0002890237,0.0004003007,0.258304,0.00195215,0.00043775,0.0001875273,0.000004652716,0.2097113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.00000372137,0.0001567427,0.001183052,0.0003473874,0.000002209618,1.979309e-7,0.000001583565,0.0001276024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247912287","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0013","title":"The Judicialization of Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Legitimacy; Demise; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02708724111975972,"gpt":0.2368793584136711,"spread":0.2097921172939114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001200526,0.00009998224,0.0001627039,0.00003721025,0.001496231,0.00002877733,0.0003694055,0.0001717785,0.00001223721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000438905,0.00008907308,0.00009522311,0.00001557208,0.001614048,0.00004759436,0.0001453042,0.0001209063,0.000001103817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002137239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007712293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006164557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001188896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991525,0.00007619123,0.0001160913,0.000119016,0.000336623,0.000199519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.0001577642,0.000179495,0.0001215627,0.00029521,0.00005742609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005089982,0.000003628458,0.000007835792,0.000005766183,0.0000554274,0.000001579012,0.0006626427,8.008332e-7,2.960778e-7,0.971548,0.02627887,0.001430115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564183,0.00001050051,0.00001756082,0.00004018058,0.00006956721,8.6894e-8,0.0005549543,0.000001408961,0.000003527243,0.04431765,0.9548268,0.00009208215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002645207,0.0002270907,0.00007950857,0.0001161414,0.0002798423,0.0002517416,0.00003839619,0.0000327791,0.998948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001782086,0.001538537,0.00001319849,0.00003054452,0.0003056404,7.039044e-7,0.000007795684,0.000005551917,0.996316],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.928548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129502429","doi":"10.1177/0032329205275193","title":"Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Empowerment; Politics; Political science; Gay rights; Social movement; Human rights; Public policy; Public administration; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0286432225155902,"gpt":0.2951094067377347,"spread":0.2664661842221445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002263093,0.0001076482,0.0001612434,0.00002337083,0.001324703,0.0000882394,0.00006732016,0.00006455606,0.000009994216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009111408,0.0001164641,0.00002329218,0.0001480829,0.0007730279,0.0001398605,0.0001218993,0.0001177478,6.334705e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009968774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002118905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9241796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987974,0.000043619,0.0001635992,0.0001837566,0.0003108349,0.0005007795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996204,0.00006558362,0.00004729566,0.00003294303,0.00006102637,0.0001727353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001356807,0.00002966052,0.1923828,0.00000890039,0.00004641476,0.000002090871,0.02645186,2.020458e-7,0.00001589934,0.7754066,0.00317417,0.002480029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001267683,0.00002354423,0.4622639,0.00003474838,0.00003888785,0.000003751192,0.06507953,0.00005361316,0.0000230982,0.1217352,0.3488991,0.0005769726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512891,0.0009830354,0.000003555436,0.03367084,0.00008145389,0.0001243841,0.00005739441,0.00001767873,0.01377259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940715,0.001119044,0.00004418001,0.00369416,0.0009597959,0.000004228577,0.000003083926,0.000006151247,0.00009784284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6536714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125655638","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1150","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Charter; Deference; Legislature; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Compromise; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02033790141869781,"gpt":0.2464905909848397,"spread":0.2261526895661419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003886255,0.00005237759,0.0000933534,0.000006875915,0.002232812,0.00005812532,0.0001430554,0.00002482619,0.00002543915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007244572,0.00003451249,0.00002681562,0.00004637366,0.0004330211,0.00007783491,0.00001446047,0.0001154174,0.000001213268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004613396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000358768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8341687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991865,0.00006241093,0.0001385027,0.00006008048,0.0003389051,0.0002136463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995689,0.0000922607,0.00007306292,0.00004105317,0.0001273116,0.00009735638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008357633,0.000008384687,0.001075457,3.493746e-7,0.00001299701,0.000005240554,0.0004784677,9.782191e-7,0.00003349125,0.9936348,0.00212538,0.002616094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670131,0.00007758647,0.05371272,0.00004364135,0.00002728235,0.00003153474,0.002658657,0.000005395546,0.00006304835,0.8258762,0.1170828,0.0001540543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01589598,0.002117098,0.00004408909,0.02113055,0.0003653469,0.00006349273,0.000008826448,0.000006821131,0.9603678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983295,0.00080518,0.00002706506,0.0004203404,0.000254229,6.441271e-7,2.205728e-7,0.000001148158,0.0001616471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132852309","doi":"10.1017/s2045381712000032","title":"Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional theory; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03748678777768234,"gpt":0.3369695124857261,"spread":0.2994827247080438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173514,0.0002579437,0.0003250816,0.00008704134,0.001335218,0.0001245214,0.0002331792,0.0002113807,0.0003118242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004465233,0.000262467,0.00008485473,0.0004804419,0.007366082,0.001295092,0.0001271482,0.000209717,0.0001276725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005724864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00119537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00638268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973646,0.0002891558,0.0004207122,0.0004041825,0.0007386131,0.0007827841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988788,0.0001175702,0.000101149,0.0001775875,0.0001970028,0.0005278671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002086222,0.0001611528,0.2436106,0.000002392474,0.00002238446,0.00001501228,0.0006718455,0.000005766691,0.000009521669,0.7547701,0.0005054722,0.0002049138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118712,0.00002927938,0.3205347,0.00008560385,0.00005241204,0.0001037954,0.002409258,0.000003829689,0.000007818008,0.1438689,0.531117,0.0006686554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.450705,0.005948007,0.0007363046,0.005372511,0.002542963,0.0005882853,0.0004134706,0.0002036934,0.5334898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967999,0.0001588217,0.0004336737,0.001961781,0.0004885157,0.00004258645,0.00004102306,0.000003632507,0.0000700857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6109012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01150232003121091,"gpt":0.2558543895657031,"spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001087823,0.00003986163,0.0001077383,0.000002664143,0.003083399,0.0000286312,0.0002352005,0.00003085887,0.00003721215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002982116,0.00002539569,0.00006296058,0.00001638801,0.004135294,0.0003577777,0.00003372334,0.00007851305,2.598351e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008596563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007498213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2390629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4699548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992917,0.00023414,0.00009050441,0.00006058728,0.0002180948,0.0001049897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.0000976696,0.0001122086,0.00007700538,0.0001369971,0.0000588518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001319687,0.00002738412,0.0001786979,6.480837e-7,0.00001849002,0.000003945509,0.005651711,5.856572e-7,0.0000095248,0.9880636,0.00005712724,0.005856364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002684857,0.0003830977,0.1123258,0.00005853206,0.0001938034,0.00002806436,0.1708713,0.00002018563,0.00005932025,0.3910917,0.322048,0.0002352164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3527997,0.004043577,0.00003385173,0.004607987,0.0001681591,0.0001213168,0.000006435201,0.000009550024,0.6382095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.0007111055,0.00004123383,0.0001238638,0.00006915459,1.467202e-8,7.734371e-8,4.981093e-7,0.00009458807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6461598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166019106","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905250102","title":"Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential election; Notice; Reputation; Law; Politics; Compendium; Election law; Democracy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01943668079320318,"gpt":0.2857009979528216,"spread":0.2662643171596185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586566,0.00003856978,0.00007972764,0.00009368663,0.000947593,0.00009569922,0.0005588039,0.00002402893,0.00003463378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003485267,0.00002156338,0.00004636996,0.0006068966,0.004275478,0.0003853836,0.00002050347,0.0001682624,0.000002935946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005174024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004384658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2734028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6671572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987389,0.00008374133,0.0001939177,0.0000591796,0.0004249351,0.0004992582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991196,0.0001965351,0.0000754883,0.00005360631,0.0002326982,0.0003220181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.245853e-7,0.000003849413,0.01427997,3.870478e-7,0.000001263822,0.000001295647,0.001479527,0.00002251411,0.00004966388,0.9821708,0.0001283386,0.00186168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007374316,0.00001892812,0.8132176,0.00005891555,0.000009201355,0.000016849,0.005871753,0.00002459825,0.0004201687,0.1514767,0.02874471,0.00006679452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111668,0.0002830091,0.00002839947,0.04755956,0.0004097851,0.00005294779,0.000003531612,0.000001591404,0.04049436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989018,0.000009511049,0.00004293513,0.0006290523,0.0003588339,4.889154e-7,1.4538e-8,9.129664e-7,0.00005642356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512087007","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511551116","title":"Common Law Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Constitutionalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Common law; Political law; Legal history; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Constitutional theory; Democracy; Sources of law; Sociology; Chinese law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02847807435068315,"gpt":0.2447391090112745,"spread":0.2162610346605914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004227769,0.0002005303,0.0003017639,0.00007710664,0.001478915,0.00003955444,0.0004965875,0.0003522623,0.00000821394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001435418,0.0002347388,0.0001813902,0.00001741046,0.002873161,0.00007347111,0.0002573016,0.000368429,0.00004021931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005101348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01102928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001159849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.0001636941,0.0001232376,0.0002831323,0.0004230411,0.0003490664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991248,0.0002472922,0.0001205596,0.0001910002,0.0001582631,0.000158062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004802774,0.000008756861,0.000002599569,0.000008798429,0.00008771406,0.0001456274,0.000280237,1.488267e-7,5.364832e-7,0.8990673,0.09946658,0.0008836241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001543943,0.00001306106,0.00001156222,0.00007437074,0.0001274656,0.000001075608,0.0004995507,1.325911e-7,0.000009492063,0.003595334,0.9952456,0.0002679197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002667024,0.0004620333,0.0001228362,0.00003580281,0.00045155,0.0002700828,0.0001209088,0.0001602598,0.9983498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003749987,0.0001594095,0.00001252524,0.0003440105,0.000587639,4.357975e-7,0.00002423167,0.0000118937,0.9951099],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645411594","doi":"10.1515/9780773572553","title":"Constitutional Origins, Structure, and Change in Federal Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02274033423511265,"gpt":0.245430637308551,"spread":0.2226903030734383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001212882,0.0002947176,0.0004033553,0.0001357307,0.001936733,0.0000633284,0.0002654522,0.0004036603,0.00006251799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002116033,0.0003314439,0.00008263368,0.0000315286,0.003563789,0.0002465101,0.0002447317,0.0003895542,0.000006466024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001216769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005645185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04416209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983876,0.00009132768,0.0001769544,0.0004247228,0.0005155714,0.0004038055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993224,0.0001104585,0.0001409307,0.0001123737,0.0001652158,0.0001486293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004922762,0.000009598319,0.0002982621,0.00002110613,0.00006841983,0.00009701332,0.0007025453,0.000001806332,1.193422e-7,0.9956806,0.002312686,0.00075857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004685725,0.00001563148,0.0004327437,0.0001423268,0.00004838106,0.000001660717,0.0001609297,5.819313e-7,0.000003456157,0.004802217,0.9935562,0.0003672772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009232925,0.00004854609,0.000005554705,0.0005978489,0.0003437701,0.0005132439,0.001351148,0.00009263201,0.9969549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07641725,0.002905222,0.0001353443,0.0009119057,0.001445719,0.000006861084,0.0001134973,0.00001760683,0.9180466],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02161224787635746,"gpt":0.2842204796590145,"spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001435961,0.00009170808,0.0002283393,3.487317e-7,0.001116244,0.00001484518,0.0002785345,0.00002828528,0.0001832857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008810321,0.00003673635,0.0001962266,0.0001659564,0.0006773934,0.00004269091,0.00004685564,0.0001173654,0.00001672074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001177487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000273137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4285983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7422621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.00007992024,0.0002491379,0.0001062699,0.000516994,0.0002562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.0005133798,0.0001103019,0.0001481641,0.0001039163,0.00004195624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001463269,0.00001757386,0.02498475,0.0001587078,0.0001040794,0.000001020125,0.001295192,8.253412e-7,0.000009928426,0.8172389,0.1554034,0.0007841767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003368275,0.000003457797,0.009093205,0.0005061303,0.00004500411,2.12428e-7,0.001789356,9.389215e-8,0.00002307362,0.003894339,0.9845282,0.00008317218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03571822,0.1163332,0.000008959295,0.4323972,0.001260718,0.001394941,0.00004247007,0.00005606339,0.4127882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7552775,0.07865217,0.00004063769,0.1647955,0.0002550725,0.00002519237,0.000001061246,0.000007126004,0.0009457594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8585358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}