{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":283,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":283,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"59494f77e226","filters":{"topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes"}},"results":[{"id":"W1996358874","doi":"10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9","title":"Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":321,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Jury; Racial bias; Legal psychology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Meta-analysis; In-group favoritism; White (mutation); Racism; Criminology; Social group; Law; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Tara L. Mitchell","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ryann M. Haw","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey E. Pfeifer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christian A. Meissner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3653564970084659,"gpt":0.5213447118406104,"spread":0.1559882148321445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848703,0.001067591,0.005994462,0.005730556,0.0004180284,0.001717035,0.002000591,0.001340463,0.002333606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06798854,0.0007445485,0.006033731,0.006208316,0.0007864959,0.00128641,0.001021455,0.0009405916,0.0002579405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002149712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004257191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00371731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01186468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892308,0.006389466,0.002054933,0.0006065748,0.001632465,0.00008570773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9528531,0.038674,0.004914327,0.0008448892,0.002408699,0.0003050406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001105494,0.00006759077,0.003322673,0.6126086,0.06071227,0.00008996942,0.0003559566,0.0003745601,0.0002558539,0.0005931258,0.004851089,0.3156628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305564,0.001202978,0.02306612,0.5690272,0.3490189,0.000865493,0.0006006082,0.0005695991,0.001025051,0.002424736,0.05078104,0.0001126617],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006784752,0.9987679,0.0001300886,0.0001277365,0.00004677711,0.00004512196,0.00006933744,0.000003756932,0.0001308081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02462982,0.9735806,0.001005086,0.0003045523,0.00007438577,0.0001706762,0.0001647078,0.000006414286,0.00006377873],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.981513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09776986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155797509","doi":"10.1080/0269993024400002","title":"Why wasn't O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition & Emotion","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Wishful thinking; Verdict; Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Inference; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Law; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05046037245431292,"gpt":0.3458812731433102,"spread":0.2954209006889973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003251165,0.0001438327,0.0002105501,0.0004643137,0.0009533364,0.002250088,0.0003723634,0.001086772,0.001694399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03500441,0.0001816228,0.0002842677,0.0003781367,0.002538218,0.003551662,0.00132407,0.001416635,0.0001417633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006978146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006055982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002312088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002164093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984471,0.0009627208,0.00007095589,0.0001395464,0.0002435949,0.0001360279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875514,0.01011206,0.001296702,0.0003965223,0.0004297412,0.0002136203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009945363,0.0002265818,0.1174355,0.0003263518,0.000405852,0.00116148,0.03394745,0.06081522,0.006125972,0.6299016,0.005136857,0.1435225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007610868,0.0001265872,0.04566267,0.0001254959,0.0001189677,0.0003051083,0.01055133,0.123008,0.001493031,0.8154346,0.003003348,0.00009467146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9328325,0.0004525625,0.04437509,0.006498171,0.00005091227,0.00001535433,0.00003179421,0.00003976976,0.01570389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982502,0.00005857545,0.001413784,0.0001182591,0.00001039321,0.000002890623,0.000008084502,0.000004288327,0.0001336194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003251165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01719403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149727989","doi":"10.1177/0093854809344173","title":"The Effects of Victim Gender, Defendant Gender, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Sentence; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Poison control; Law; Medical emergency; Medicine; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Pozzulo","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julie Dempsey","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laura B. Allen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06150790034977005,"gpt":0.3810259112391698,"spread":0.3195180108893998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007770232,0.0003351319,0.0004874922,0.0007809183,0.0004926283,0.0009337345,0.0002368811,0.0004681473,0.005545882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0412057,0.0002984736,0.0003787375,0.0002457445,0.0004938238,0.0005120758,0.000667214,0.0005132256,0.0004081614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003630226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005392508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005348672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002261257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957013,0.002652682,0.0004557032,0.0002675931,0.0006387348,0.0002840148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535062,0.03302941,0.008002058,0.001185169,0.001675871,0.002601329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02554168,0.002784895,0.8012881,0.0003517036,0.0005491349,0.002043691,0.0115833,0.00127366,0.06339087,0.001620746,0.001325678,0.08824669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002497398,0.006224215,0.9799746,0.00007592628,0.0002064231,0.0007598463,0.002729928,0.001492523,0.006079999,0.000871611,0.001275738,0.00005953449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998199,0.0001195856,0.0002110355,0.00005643154,0.00001698367,0.00003149355,0.00002435955,0.000004011689,0.001337065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977247,0.0001430658,0.0008027741,0.00003333733,0.00002256134,0.00005145189,0.00004437728,0.000004487998,0.001173221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007770232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04109335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010509409","doi":"10.1007/s10979-010-9232-6","title":"After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Legal psychology; Social psychology; Jurisdiction; Sample (material); Eyewitness testimony; Function (biology); Law","authors":[{"name":"Sarah L. Desmarais","is_ca":false},{"name":"J. Don Read","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1318525415664124,"gpt":0.4401069547092262,"spread":0.3082544131428138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02540055,0.001104467,0.005739804,0.01028654,0.000435799,0.002880652,0.002004151,0.001587118,0.002148697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09489585,0.001113705,0.004122083,0.009841953,0.0009350392,0.002988136,0.001190299,0.0016348,0.0004102538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002391036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006518864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01891171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905428,0.004412258,0.00250951,0.0008713098,0.00153046,0.0001336552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289045,0.05379588,0.008069253,0.001658388,0.00699306,0.0005788433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005080748,0.00003827765,0.004578394,0.5002795,0.03134619,0.0001498675,0.0007756271,0.0003287006,0.0004311779,0.001055053,0.007298663,0.4532105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003335757,0.0007152705,0.0229314,0.7051695,0.1439935,0.0008004066,0.001148452,0.0003096771,0.000979544,0.003213173,0.1203005,0.0001050131],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003688211,0.9989232,0.0001252406,0.0003252734,0.00004143413,0.00001908373,0.00007748877,0.000002558719,0.0001168967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008830307,0.9898137,0.0005861082,0.0004325371,0.00008631215,0.00007435381,0.0001203373,0.000003412325,0.0000528559],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02540055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1343325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051342016","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01903.x","title":"Replications and Limitations of a Two‐Factor Model of Child Witness Credibility","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Honesty; Credibility; Psychology; Verdict; Social psychology; Recreation; Cognition; Perception; Developmental psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"David F. Ross","is_ca":false},{"name":"Frank H. Jurden","is_ca":false},{"name":"R. C. L. Lindsay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jennifer M. Keeney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1657162332397874,"gpt":0.4375798531237976,"spread":0.2718636198840102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1789562,0.002361709,0.00242411,0.001462918,0.002708494,0.003277522,0.005910901,0.002778859,0.005651167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3711594,0.001706312,0.003661946,0.001528721,0.005289815,0.005673862,0.003989843,0.004836611,0.001022906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003575949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01126761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00587019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9360514,0.046965,0.003419715,0.006080821,0.006417258,0.001065788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4284671,0.4480464,0.01758505,0.07906803,0.02333289,0.003500564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03744619,0.01760398,0.5589244,0.004373229,0.006536456,0.00376235,0.04018403,0.04778725,0.02032193,0.09454148,0.006758071,0.1617607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01339443,0.01964399,0.3654439,0.001561011,0.004719084,0.003406372,0.00736482,0.3588969,0.01568579,0.1879868,0.02039967,0.001497285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538011,0.0007101223,0.1296574,0.001579668,0.0005466763,0.005182272,0.0006502221,0.0002698849,0.007602686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925754,0.0002310322,0.0653998,0.000513229,0.0001259447,0.006443359,0.0005295989,0.00006905806,0.0009340015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8210437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9464223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861935076","doi":"10.1002/tht3.163","title":"Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Glasgow; European Commission","keywords":"Causation; Impossibility; Sensitivity (control systems); Causality (physics); Rest (music); Counterexample; Statistical evidence; Epistemology; Modal; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blome‐Tillmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2065072938505597,"gpt":0.4250768947946362,"spread":0.2185696009440765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05288052,0.0005546047,0.001973874,0.004767232,0.004791962,0.01380385,0.002933412,0.008928979,0.004578888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1502392,0.001268577,0.000978951,0.003182573,0.04730869,0.02258836,0.007847033,0.01001661,0.0002862446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008775732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008978561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004583405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9508871,0.02941879,0.002544477,0.004652306,0.01053071,0.001966582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8394582,0.1413255,0.006701046,0.005657716,0.00503727,0.001820133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008957438,0.000007773619,0.0002549361,0.00003015781,0.00001286791,0.00004517847,0.000399714,0.0005846545,0.00002893631,0.9960725,0.0002678445,0.002286642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008862918,0.000003545193,0.0001100981,0.00001924554,0.000004398309,0.0000115342,0.00007486883,0.0006962246,0.0000326636,0.9982536,0.0007770133,0.000007843691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1777608,0.02147011,0.3926109,0.1822002,0.001507658,0.0002881619,0.0003158168,0.0002882026,0.2235582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781885,0.001588449,0.01498857,0.002989738,0.0004843291,0.00008556535,0.00002099222,0.00002411319,0.001629731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05288052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2796623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054647540","doi":"10.1023/a:1010659703309","title":"Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury instructions; Jury; Legal psychology; Psychology; Deliberation; Comprehension; Set (abstract data type); Hearsay; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"V. Gordon Rose","is_ca":true},{"name":"James R. P. Ogloff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3358301573386193,"gpt":0.5286683274996828,"spread":0.1928381701610635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04803678,0.001337817,0.0006536919,0.002280928,0.00135222,0.00137865,0.001769686,0.001992093,0.003460127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1280565,0.0005539337,0.0008016862,0.002026319,0.001900516,0.001514013,0.001993148,0.001514729,0.001165444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001334902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003146426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005123398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01468372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9640716,0.02854634,0.001579356,0.0009325495,0.004497395,0.0003727381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9065148,0.07329746,0.003234769,0.007862383,0.008298528,0.0007920527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00231601,0.004744343,0.03760322,0.002621116,0.0001953197,0.000650055,0.02910964,0.002668422,0.03659276,0.008282821,0.0106497,0.8645665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003946345,0.03472236,0.418217,0.005398088,0.001091586,0.01035082,0.03453869,0.08004536,0.1967986,0.04549773,0.166211,0.003182487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3627018,0.002563137,0.5931379,0.002677577,0.0004298647,0.01891762,0.001346728,0.001683733,0.01654164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2548677,0.001339843,0.7281939,0.0004279088,0.00004674564,0.01087131,0.0004331868,0.0001263804,0.003692972],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04803678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2540457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019577695","doi":"10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.301","title":"MOCK JUROR RATINGS OF GUILT IN CANADA: MODERN RACISM AND ETHNIC HERITAGE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Jury; Social psychology; Ethnic group; Criminology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey E. Pfeifer","is_ca":true},{"name":"James R. P. Ogloff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09372123689097184,"gpt":0.4054508314848601,"spread":0.3117295945938883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500182,0.0002168548,0.0003296734,0.0009782405,0.00358546,0.001371649,0.0004096672,0.0005303354,0.003899365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883896,0.0001703027,0.0002665112,0.0006854345,0.001655633,0.0003663255,0.001179585,0.0006198768,0.0002722776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006733324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00681631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7164713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8904002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980435,0.0004313141,0.00008803149,0.0001368503,0.001043468,0.0002567761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905791,0.001702177,0.00223056,0.000487613,0.003810981,0.001189558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002184649,0.0004303125,0.8739979,0.0001589045,0.0001882551,0.0007654695,0.0578036,0.000515261,0.01182494,0.001464205,0.004752043,0.04591449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003320954,0.0001396985,0.9831644,0.0000403322,0.00002642605,0.0001603682,0.01172168,0.0003341035,0.001193224,0.0001736425,0.00296224,0.00005064459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962412,0.000082723,0.00007749467,0.0001248508,0.00001204956,0.00002253828,0.00005416133,0.000003121999,0.003381823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980332,0.00008244463,0.0001824393,0.00006469783,0.000007733291,0.00001124813,0.0001123273,0.000002918189,0.001502928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2835287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5703969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1811161961","doi":"10.29173/cjs608","title":"The Concept of Truth Regime","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lorna Weir","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06536626347085536,"gpt":0.3321888740369131,"spread":0.2668226105660577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005072468,0.0005214322,0.0006194994,0.001985906,0.003153981,0.006386456,0.001504047,0.004707436,0.03802238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01228287,0.0003877289,0.0008340243,0.00157075,0.01770233,0.0146858,0.002295428,0.006131141,0.00552858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004426003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002267248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001185646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953791,0.001828614,0.0002265661,0.0008885703,0.001170154,0.0005069755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954864,0.002672352,0.0003728635,0.0006207559,0.0006534685,0.0001941047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002298867,7.789473e-7,0.000006907343,0.00001031566,0.000001215166,0.000003517135,0.00007886609,0.00002893797,0.00001098406,0.9970465,0.001726083,0.001083523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004134703,0.000006526899,0.00008882166,0.0000387293,0.000003576091,0.00002702122,0.00009115409,0.0002367487,0.00008565463,0.9699124,0.02949972,0.000005604757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004673069,0.01267083,0.07574707,0.05451088,0.003617531,0.00008892835,0.0004408644,0.0001952462,0.8480556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287232,0.0079822,0.02461131,0.009946915,0.003939711,0.0004597008,0.000366662,0.000294442,0.1236759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03802238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1271975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085593820","doi":"10.2307/3505142","title":"10.2307/3505142","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Divergence (linguistics); Political philosophy; Pragmatic theory of truth; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law; Linguistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01575453196466163,"gpt":0.2741954704201217,"spread":0.2584409384554601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009289189,0.001596674,0.001155218,0.002514344,0.001699986,0.004660811,0.001836128,0.002711601,0.9844095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002550218,0.0008003783,0.000748805,0.002863363,0.001816138,0.005780781,0.004012627,0.001696906,0.9833519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001464553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004477833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004582022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994094,0.00005469181,0.00004718552,0.000149193,0.000250678,0.0000888815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978143,0.0005536815,0.00008347033,0.0003694711,0.0005349562,0.0006441677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627196,0.0001572482,0.0004763746,0.0004253336,0.00001430874,0.0001816573,0.0000905072,0.0001640824,0.00131031,0.006880338,0.5937601,0.396377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002667292,0.00003585381,0.0008686877,0.0001957687,0.000006111593,0.0002111289,0.0001293749,0.0001273596,0.0002093255,0.001454973,0.9967195,0.00001510129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003174764,0.0003385719,0.000374286,0.0003153911,0.0003499575,0.00004893189,0.0009090406,0.0005120873,0.9968342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001206196,0.000392175,0.0005418778,0.0004278281,0.0001046375,0.0000389762,0.001338664,0.0003343092,0.9956152],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01559049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02223796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088262227","doi":"10.1007/s10979-008-9153-9","title":"The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Racial bias; Adjudication; Legal psychology; Social psychology; Race (biology); Criminology; Presentation (obstetrics); White (mutation); Racism; Law; Political science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Regina A. Schuller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Veronica Kazoleas","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kerry Kawakami","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1335946366866975,"gpt":0.4274311957215495,"spread":0.293836559034852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01260201,0.0002928522,0.0002836488,0.0005195321,0.001344716,0.001076297,0.0003282893,0.0007775194,0.002441057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1126534,0.0001737526,0.0002329392,0.0001695438,0.001430372,0.0009959703,0.001325123,0.001024742,0.0004460219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003346175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003504411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009918356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826214,0.01316833,0.0004188784,0.00054565,0.002891991,0.0003537426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9295262,0.05703843,0.007561203,0.002719166,0.001704991,0.001450017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007621409,0.00815106,0.08372015,0.0007627134,0.0003616354,0.001065449,0.02200911,0.002425422,0.1126014,0.014162,0.002630058,0.7444896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001598342,0.04897527,0.6536987,0.0015185,0.0006818975,0.004070956,0.01895092,0.0207044,0.1570943,0.06051486,0.03173975,0.0004521408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825305,0.0004317394,0.004798352,0.0005292727,0.00007863489,0.0002582217,0.000008452846,0.00002313485,0.01134172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947848,0.0001400371,0.004045491,0.0002658366,0.00004095796,0.0001012237,0.00000816906,0.00000718373,0.0006063273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01260201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06664658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156286101","doi":"10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01621.x","title":"The CSI Effect and the Canadian and the Australian Jury*<sup>,†</sup>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janne A. Holmgren","is_ca":true},{"name":"Judith Fordham","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028269856380566,"gpt":0.3289497797943741,"spread":0.3086670812305685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01512843,0.0002281022,0.0006148741,0.00345697,0.01120913,0.00291715,0.001564391,0.001117871,0.009356956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0817791,0.0003882124,0.0005301658,0.004323693,0.009185831,0.001711343,0.006236969,0.002548337,0.0004032082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03322038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06258461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8780914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9376774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831539,0.005858965,0.0006793232,0.001189595,0.007011613,0.002106549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453951,0.02241178,0.006399297,0.00263316,0.01623316,0.00692749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002378379,0.0003564978,0.5397898,0.0009532872,0.0003515842,0.0007878121,0.2030943,0.0003428546,0.001432584,0.07800078,0.02485231,0.1476598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004702697,0.0001664569,0.9031347,0.000298856,0.0001751615,0.0001171073,0.06223044,0.0002036039,0.0004945964,0.002482227,0.03055301,0.00009687519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8553192,0.002479333,0.0005098668,0.01617302,0.0002880454,0.000127373,0.0003470111,0.00001872847,0.1247375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895219,0.0008395003,0.000286764,0.001578602,0.00004817643,0.0000589902,0.00007431346,0.00001140215,0.007580345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1219086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.245253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442723594","doi":"10.29173/alr1270","title":"Judicial Assessment of the Credibility of Child Witnesses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Credibility; Honesty; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Perception; Law; Legal psychology; Social psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karuna Ramakrishnan","is_ca":false},{"name":"R. C. L. Lindsay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kang Lee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02985742953325707,"gpt":0.3916696831742126,"spread":0.3618122536409555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03713287,0.0002082054,0.0006523743,0.00457644,0.002015135,0.003129095,0.001468715,0.001551562,0.001755265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2413489,0.0003482921,0.0003062031,0.001902505,0.003490401,0.001389949,0.002100072,0.001574234,0.0002581235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004661199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00799599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08011357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1227336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9681833,0.01389121,0.002056258,0.001213066,0.01362112,0.001035136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7819372,0.135989,0.03287753,0.004352826,0.04207631,0.002767139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009360347,0.0001624537,0.5206473,0.001961004,0.0004522213,0.004957795,0.1667358,0.001210772,0.008127642,0.04717576,0.01188641,0.2357468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007135794,0.0005502775,0.8142754,0.003724691,0.0003384825,0.004548926,0.06245251,0.001620672,0.01032953,0.01477114,0.08705936,0.0002576923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909144,0.03053417,0.003845416,0.005744106,0.0002416998,0.0002697841,0.0003654581,0.00002880804,0.06805611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893156,0.006150153,0.002428173,0.0002886692,0.00009356071,0.00002630581,0.00009410864,0.000006549183,0.001596881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08011357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1963798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093433824","doi":"10.1007/s10979-006-9068-2","title":"The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Sexual assault; Forensic science; Plaintiff; Legal psychology; Forensic psychology; Verdict; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medicine; Law; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Gwen Jenkins","is_ca":true},{"name":"Regina A. Schuller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07711302596334052,"gpt":0.438531856417094,"spread":0.3614188304537534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009754722,0.00044204,0.0004129109,0.0008071081,0.00199255,0.002666099,0.0004427107,0.001668708,0.002487252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1038714,0.0003156195,0.0004476929,0.0002079533,0.002279718,0.0008387779,0.00257295,0.001588008,0.0003007149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009021453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008581884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008482396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002116778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908136,0.005876422,0.000603846,0.0002243314,0.002165681,0.0003162941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531463,0.02878837,0.0116508,0.001171258,0.002810981,0.002432339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02268256,0.005625955,0.4419499,0.002385946,0.001094519,0.009264451,0.2424328,0.002595674,0.1096625,0.005712319,0.009174454,0.147419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008489917,0.01884472,0.7709875,0.0009596013,0.0007173349,0.006571307,0.1627161,0.004258855,0.01589355,0.005314359,0.01235214,0.0005355144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996687,0.0001766755,0.0001387764,0.0004049997,0.00003508751,0.00005046654,0.00001178016,0.000004096283,0.002491192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987085,0.0001457915,0.0004245144,0.0002639134,0.00003674428,0.00004392178,0.00002109029,0.000002711544,0.0003527136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009754722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05158848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121676623","doi":"10.1348/135532507x206867","title":"The effect of a judicial declaration of competence on the perceived credibility of children and defendants","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Declaration; Credibility; Witness; Competence (human resources); Psychology; Plaintiff; Social psychology; Perception; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Deborah A. Connolly","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nathalie Gagnon","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jennifer A. A. Lavoie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0768228039220244,"gpt":0.3916183657462203,"spread":0.3147955618241959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01075266,0.0002552528,0.000313386,0.0005337193,0.0007911175,0.001632301,0.000345984,0.0007795915,0.002747601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115898,0.0002720285,0.0003083657,0.0001974829,0.00212396,0.001033192,0.001381095,0.001723964,0.000142424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007268082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006710348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001338164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001604258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898641,0.006396533,0.0005694999,0.0005581257,0.002281409,0.000330356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413573,0.1125265,0.03442314,0.003147027,0.004210657,0.004335336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006686615,0.002885568,0.6735108,0.001614748,0.0006060689,0.004214103,0.1535076,0.001277282,0.05065931,0.01095996,0.00192043,0.09215751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002983588,0.003837597,0.9379668,0.000693778,0.0002580593,0.003020565,0.03131454,0.001287937,0.01273136,0.002548411,0.005877468,0.0001651041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969547,0.0001965815,0.0002376949,0.0001096768,0.00001058692,0.00001519336,0.000008632206,0.000003042765,0.002463947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993018,0.0001013584,0.0003660739,0.00005066755,0.000008665972,0.00001152523,0.00001046091,0.000002180538,0.0001472905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05686617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277017378","doi":"","title":"Admissibility Compared: The Reception of Incriminating Expert Evidence (I.E., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Federal Rules of Evidence; Digital evidence; Forensic science; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Digital forensics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Gary Edmond","is_ca":false},{"name":"Simon A. Cole","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrew Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06183119103312358,"gpt":0.3077140182746072,"spread":0.2458828272414836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075187,0.0002491971,0.0006969081,0.002857596,0.01643057,0.01316466,0.002230143,0.002604503,0.001539871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09813202,0.0005323284,0.0002474918,0.002241585,0.03101375,0.003373479,0.01205114,0.005143216,0.0001597414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0179703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01194051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1662402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2197842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9645609,0.01950019,0.001217155,0.002250084,0.009411261,0.00306046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9070795,0.06177788,0.008158551,0.00459327,0.01487811,0.003512581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003537548,0.0001279047,0.05208196,0.0001770555,0.00010042,0.002937562,0.7524,0.0008455672,0.004169643,0.1370782,0.002011226,0.04771671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008900278,0.00069438,0.2415667,0.0006408232,0.0003054017,0.001468572,0.6391219,0.00242357,0.007194703,0.0604948,0.04566795,0.0003320989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383682,0.0004539787,0.001056236,0.003008594,0.00005898458,0.00004577704,0.00001133166,0.00001088284,0.05698609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982979,0.00006744019,0.0002317329,0.0003445227,0.00001103203,0.000009127882,0.000003294783,0.000004988609,0.001030037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1662402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3305452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050115964","doi":"10.1163/157181809x458544","title":"The Competency of Children to Testify: Psychological Research Informing Canadian Law Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Competence (human resources); Law; Psychology; Cross-examination; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist","authors":[{"name":"Kang Lee","is_ca":true},{"name":"Victoria Talwar","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04585516864985725,"gpt":0.42416054779884,"spread":0.3783053791489828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02844188,0.0002095246,0.0005598192,0.004567998,0.01836306,0.007280902,0.001973263,0.002423395,0.00648613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1056624,0.0004895059,0.0003405723,0.005866192,0.01903779,0.004489184,0.004862193,0.005539371,0.0001976884],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1112417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1475016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850572,0.004560071,0.0005968713,0.001057739,0.005709498,0.003018619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.878867,0.06544621,0.01537438,0.003741148,0.028596,0.007975277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001046059,0.0003389874,0.2043261,0.0002513827,0.00003681297,0.0004825307,0.6272749,0.0003003459,0.0004542048,0.1231612,0.009678385,0.03359064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004104292,0.00009131632,0.3584403,0.0006828918,0.00004933372,0.0001190845,0.558071,0.0006709153,0.0004336235,0.01267199,0.06859937,0.0001291371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956209,0.001634343,0.0005234371,0.02812557,0.00007435466,0.000179252,0.000234835,0.000006042952,0.07360132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951175,0.0008935363,0.0003328326,0.001696248,0.00001686064,0.00005818634,0.00004919174,0.000003743487,0.001831949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.807119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794420646","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2017.0035.r1","title":"The Role of Defendant Race and Racially Charged Media in Canadian Mock Juror Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Race (biology); Psychology; Verdict; Jury; Social psychology; Racial profiling; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Laura McManus","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susan Yamamoto","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06947264793910002,"gpt":0.3450419761909217,"spread":0.2755693282518217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004619689,0.000412137,0.0003518615,0.001896642,0.00549869,0.00331921,0.0006404988,0.0007959044,0.004145549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06638944,0.0003289949,0.0003386969,0.0008550492,0.001705918,0.0006768862,0.001555504,0.0007867028,0.0003312856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007657355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01287014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5811957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7564343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952564,0.001473837,0.0002148937,0.0003640319,0.002187291,0.0005035113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751221,0.01168721,0.005564238,0.0007143001,0.005391559,0.001520577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004863125,0.0008258655,0.7187892,0.0005189644,0.0004421429,0.001230159,0.08674304,0.001190156,0.02526154,0.004022553,0.004647929,0.1514653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000893751,0.0002474817,0.9661285,0.0001837191,0.0001601745,0.0001584718,0.02217241,0.001153431,0.002455938,0.001006614,0.006110634,0.0001331727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892238,0.0002899919,0.0002331682,0.0003824808,0.00003455455,0.00008639821,0.00006651525,0.000008756795,0.009674411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978823,0.0002069715,0.000547381,0.0001141469,0.00001967752,0.00002824632,0.00006545463,0.000006048015,0.001129754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4188043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8425414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215262007","doi":"10.1177/0739986315620374","title":"The Influence of Defendant Immigration Status, Country of Origin, and Ethnicity on Juror Decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Immigration; Ethnic group; Psychology; Outgroup; In-group favoritism; Criminology; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Race (biology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Social identity theory; Social group; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Laura P. Minero","is_ca":false},{"name":"Russ K. E. Espinoza","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170325499859595,"gpt":0.4206576316466464,"spread":0.3036250816606869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002302612,0.0001548698,0.000209148,0.0003967588,0.0009732553,0.001024237,0.0001235056,0.0002918914,0.002641427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015277,0.00009571938,0.000200547,0.0001588371,0.0005402865,0.0002849795,0.0005892341,0.0004326958,0.0003394045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002840184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005382716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002564618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00964961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.000929961,0.00009946941,0.00008773852,0.0002774015,0.0001377883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909337,0.004086254,0.002820118,0.0003001234,0.0007806994,0.001079133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008813135,0.0003734283,0.9726195,0.00002580667,0.00008245897,0.0003718419,0.004155104,0.0001112584,0.003283818,0.0002376974,0.0002253713,0.01763237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001420843,0.0002670362,0.992771,0.00002692837,0.00004003341,0.000228369,0.005073925,0.0002830186,0.0005899891,0.0001642873,0.0005295522,0.00001157714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987004,0.00003581119,0.00002849712,0.00003709084,0.000003616664,0.000004475505,0.000004460268,4.554161e-7,0.001185194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995684,0.00004815964,0.00006332892,0.00003024885,0.000005076637,0.000004385267,0.00001225705,8.113948e-7,0.0002672711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002641427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01217753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889056253","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2017-0047.r2","title":"The Influence of Witness Intoxication, Witness Race, and Defendant Race on Mock Juror Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Eyewitness testimony; Verdict; Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Indigenous; Race (biology); Criminology; White (mutation); Social psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Logan Ewanation","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07620801820199738,"gpt":0.3588550105829719,"spread":0.2826469923809746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003406262,0.0002063711,0.0002026414,0.000447508,0.00202874,0.00163418,0.000304149,0.0004611619,0.002954433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03349132,0.0001704461,0.000254642,0.0002701078,0.00131933,0.0004503701,0.001042356,0.0005758944,0.0001743831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002083875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004091255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2094218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4385011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977241,0.001031026,0.0001283371,0.0001998427,0.0006180619,0.0002985926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857099,0.008276829,0.003163607,0.0005429325,0.001383509,0.0009231912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003047488,0.0007108645,0.8140719,0.000234232,0.0002655644,0.001026106,0.08735598,0.0008294738,0.01898525,0.001518626,0.001257605,0.0706969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003132039,0.0003427312,0.9678121,0.00009769218,0.00007380651,0.0001287281,0.02715206,0.0008295943,0.001523518,0.0006269026,0.001334972,0.00004661751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980701,0.00007365723,0.00008968518,0.00007440717,0.000005440565,0.00001829917,0.00001026498,0.000001539863,0.001656668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990969,0.00008484635,0.0002144036,0.00003274177,0.000003792962,0.00001109016,0.00001934607,0.000001423748,0.0005355177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2094218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4164057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143933647","doi":"10.1177/0093854810373587","title":"Factors Affecting Juror Decisions in Historic Child Sexual Abuse Cases Involving Continuous Memories","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sentence; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Law; Medical emergency; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Pozzulo","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julie Dempsey","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charmagne Crescini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09227811425558172,"gpt":0.3722633094961321,"spread":0.2799851952405503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005404583,0.0002106815,0.0002894055,0.0006863654,0.001207465,0.001603506,0.000300368,0.0006796236,0.001936577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06054675,0.0002386532,0.0002411489,0.0003956862,0.0008224859,0.0005939549,0.0009123203,0.0006211234,0.0002606632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007168025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008436856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002454904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005585906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945485,0.003255118,0.0006710961,0.0002782624,0.0008328295,0.0004141936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735054,0.01307726,0.01016415,0.0006140725,0.00153502,0.001104059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004781879,0.0006227043,0.8485833,0.0003310212,0.0002325057,0.00229924,0.03076439,0.001570381,0.0142524,0.0008256409,0.001694521,0.09404203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001000307,0.001558646,0.9553538,0.0001470506,0.00009144792,0.001485053,0.03388441,0.001508033,0.002625661,0.0008497493,0.002294877,0.0001013969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990941,0.0001868553,0.0001626986,0.0001050969,0.000008702505,0.00001864606,0.00001160636,0.000002373743,0.0004097777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994496,0.000120791,0.0002520112,0.00003128571,0.00001082467,0.00001362262,0.00002046574,0.000001231136,0.0001001447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005404583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02858245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810768571","doi":"10.23907/2017.044","title":"A Brief History of the Expert Witness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Forensic Pathology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Witness; Expert opinion; Law; Forensic psychology; Admissible evidence; Political science; History; Criminology; Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Christopher M. Milroy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07606509712946034,"gpt":0.3701755410477138,"spread":0.2941104439182534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004446773,0.0005467547,0.0004575872,0.003618,0.004357487,0.005363851,0.001409272,0.00570722,0.02175447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01247355,0.0005702372,0.0003676414,0.004305725,0.005415687,0.008485227,0.003658353,0.007444817,0.01279297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004088965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004166929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005988345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006977091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957496,0.001859428,0.0005496306,0.000669704,0.0008643621,0.0003072531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918482,0.005764383,0.0004019201,0.0003099822,0.001027743,0.0006477754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006943581,0.00009580598,0.00145511,0.002138954,0.0000107889,0.001339622,0.006131778,0.0002692408,0.0005113369,0.2825169,0.2232705,0.4821905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001011782,0.00001577696,0.0002929811,0.0009697691,0.000001533069,0.0005629195,0.0003526532,0.00001692041,0.0000671376,0.009596677,0.9881143,0.000008355173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002291746,0.6183811,0.006359112,0.07487366,0.0103852,0.0001178741,0.0004216206,0.00008026482,0.2870893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04279315,0.7696089,0.007067596,0.0337006,0.01662519,0.0002829932,0.0005513482,0.0001725091,0.1291977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07277596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139693827","doi":"10.25916/sut.26268931","title":"Current identification procedure practices: a survey of Ontario police officers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Criminal justice; Presentation (obstetrics); Queen (butterfly); Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer L Beaudry","is_ca":true},{"name":"R. C. L. Lindsay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1052837545602181,"gpt":0.403444767337341,"spread":0.2981610127771229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733884,0.0002047982,0.0002557413,0.001500075,0.002649842,0.001122929,0.0005799319,0.0005187723,0.002082939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007337334,0.0005739704,0.000192926,0.002247532,0.001196897,0.0008536141,0.000749459,0.0005584674,0.0005450483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005884371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006701247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6447194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7951052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979309,0.000293546,0.0002006458,0.0001310877,0.001052753,0.0003911471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920458,0.0009645015,0.003117068,0.0002824617,0.002467003,0.001123069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009927037,0.0001506095,0.9391402,0.00008799917,0.00001937714,0.0003175152,0.03979198,0.00004171544,0.0009886335,0.00007198549,0.001244266,0.0180465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003460725,0.00008413717,0.9767702,0.00003093186,0.000005083842,0.00007538326,0.02073015,0.00005326437,0.00007978858,0.00001483459,0.002142786,0.000009912227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981938,0.000138023,0.000035314,0.0002306818,0.000003910531,0.00002612316,0.0001213061,0.000002620454,0.001248206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738,0.0007831167,0.00009830262,0.0001252056,0.000007098547,0.00003317133,0.0001795739,0.000003427576,0.001390102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7147458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131748994","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.12832","title":"Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Lakeridge Health","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Forensic science; Witness; Conviction; Verdict; Forensic psychology; Psychology; Law; Sexual assault; Cross-examination; Criminology; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Eastwood","is_ca":true},{"name":"J. E. Caldwell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2328730072914567,"gpt":0.4838248592125194,"spread":0.2509518519210627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009769266,0.0003748197,0.0002754085,0.0003332009,0.000983268,0.0009340215,0.0005458356,0.001393809,0.002244042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06496862,0.0002529769,0.0001994661,0.00009311085,0.0005567823,0.0008367355,0.001090636,0.00110448,0.0004000154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002410895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001294742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004229713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009062216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950823,0.003512441,0.000321089,0.0002334932,0.0005987542,0.0002519031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793043,0.01412835,0.003595451,0.001104623,0.001056672,0.0008106945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003502698,0.01027286,0.1548617,0.001568421,0.000307483,0.002620499,0.1043416,0.00181848,0.0789734,0.004060365,0.005226524,0.632446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002621428,0.0452702,0.5832753,0.003985373,0.001719376,0.009005991,0.1264038,0.01613188,0.1028351,0.01051867,0.09752491,0.0007078638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941719,0.0001928365,0.002503202,0.0005499783,0.00004304725,0.0001587423,0.00000703882,0.00001711862,0.002356026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865868,0.0003932401,0.01114105,0.0004701194,0.0000465347,0.0001907921,0.00002385505,0.000005318102,0.001142301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009769266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05166543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215796305","doi":"10.29173/mlj894","title":"Revisiting Representativeness in the Manitoban Criminal Jury","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Jury; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Jochelson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michelle Bertrand","is_ca":true},{"name":"RCL Lindsay","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew M. Smith","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael Ventola","is_ca":false},{"name":"Natalie Kalmet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06620044348418722,"gpt":0.3729017499821353,"spread":0.3067013064979481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.197396,0.0005122181,0.001978818,0.004110083,0.02709244,0.01647673,0.006454955,0.01747855,0.003996387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3095955,0.001568601,0.001595852,0.002555895,0.02536867,0.009626754,0.01279454,0.02157348,0.0006498394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02380509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07778773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07785905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1603028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8769942,0.06276804,0.01071898,0.009957758,0.02830664,0.01125439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83323,0.1113241,0.01285822,0.006285019,0.02910543,0.007197311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002439974,0.0002207553,0.03021,0.0004596011,0.0002459324,0.004450688,0.1075922,0.001381712,0.0007505961,0.7406356,0.04424162,0.06956732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000343103,0.0005627844,0.05466601,0.004946607,0.0003839881,0.001996216,0.1202258,0.007128765,0.00266688,0.5439746,0.2625507,0.0005546095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3071319,0.01723974,0.03536057,0.467917,0.00707501,0.001526893,0.0002300464,0.0001168966,0.163402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122413,0.002457929,0.01272196,0.05409833,0.001935694,0.000827611,0.00006078655,0.00005168106,0.01560475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905940450","doi":"10.1002/bsl.996","title":"Talking about a Black Man: The Influence of Defendant and Character Witness Race on Jurors' Use of Character Evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Society for Personality and Social Psychology","keywords":"Witness; Character (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Race (biology); White (mutation); Affect (linguistics); Law; Communication; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jennifer S. Hunt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2255442337461657,"gpt":0.3892782737957272,"spread":0.1637340400495614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005506874,0.0002805449,0.000362068,0.0006503044,0.001437703,0.00167428,0.0002174161,0.0006050738,0.004020121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05445287,0.000346268,0.0002296177,0.0001851159,0.0009412393,0.0006816094,0.001124261,0.0008385357,0.0004771868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003074885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003843218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001276265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002852296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945484,0.003880899,0.0002876962,0.0003970854,0.0006394559,0.0002463846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585183,0.02921006,0.007861737,0.001165092,0.001722279,0.001522561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01138018,0.001913257,0.5261923,0.0006539014,0.0006104871,0.001631663,0.1635175,0.0004894252,0.1752708,0.001575234,0.002102898,0.1146623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001815164,0.001795781,0.941632,0.0001770794,0.0002811845,0.0008046952,0.04096191,0.001096923,0.008632108,0.0009307881,0.003386219,0.0001197295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981863,0.00008008719,0.0001659529,0.00009171093,0.00001381261,0.00001817492,0.000007960446,0.000003489508,0.001432487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987754,0.0001085815,0.000407516,0.0001113704,0.00002419402,0.00003337314,0.00001477854,0.000007276788,0.0005174608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005506874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02912349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018650203","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaa007","title":"Statistical Evidence, Normalcy, and the Gatecrasher Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Luck; Statistical evidence; Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Empirical evidence; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blome‐Tillmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1009168470561775,"gpt":0.3762227647994362,"spread":0.2753059177432586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03358655,0.0003238919,0.001177809,0.001504471,0.001803237,0.005253521,0.001587184,0.003631089,0.003473616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09070398,0.0003989036,0.0006352654,0.001010462,0.02376437,0.009616802,0.003773653,0.006568959,0.000403339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002876974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00233869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001107984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007501242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98361,0.01046567,0.0007881969,0.001494792,0.003141558,0.0004998313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8806553,0.1009342,0.006171125,0.005303648,0.005677736,0.001257952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002793359,0.00001471852,0.0002748688,0.00002704266,0.00001484305,0.00007340022,0.0002735654,0.0006945083,0.00009347258,0.9935418,0.00164771,0.00331606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001321567,0.000004570454,0.0001018026,0.00001399263,0.000003829527,0.00001877036,0.00005314249,0.001355061,0.00007836391,0.9971235,0.001227388,0.000006375989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2047701,0.006862307,0.2100503,0.4462996,0.001603438,0.0001014495,0.0002258737,0.000196661,0.1298903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795876,0.0006818103,0.01236937,0.004405423,0.0004985736,0.00004002518,0.00001466957,0.00002923095,0.002373308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03358655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1776248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085748981","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2020.1793819","title":"Jury decision-making: the impact of engagement and perceived threat on verdict decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Psychology; Conviction; Conservatism; Social psychology; Perception; Politics; Biology and political orientation; Relevance (law); Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Diane Sivasubramaniam","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mallory McGuinness","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darcy J. Coulter","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bianca Klettke","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Nolan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Regina A. Schuller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06431032613786801,"gpt":0.423674804267659,"spread":0.359364478129791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009196948,0.000258975,0.000397351,0.0006604003,0.0007419912,0.002762273,0.000321802,0.0007046739,0.003263347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07280732,0.0002025838,0.0002834263,0.0002636462,0.0007664188,0.0008403306,0.001318422,0.001332664,0.0004261634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000389374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006249231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005786656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001001173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919298,0.005354466,0.0005130918,0.0005009882,0.001211371,0.0004904188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9269487,0.05217481,0.01501007,0.001504179,0.001603215,0.002758916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00799417,0.004434056,0.8286191,0.0003012902,0.0004404291,0.0006420574,0.02985978,0.001728836,0.02289371,0.002398426,0.000740626,0.09994767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001681585,0.00262847,0.9761905,0.0001004084,0.00009259411,0.0002918616,0.009670665,0.003587255,0.002310819,0.003496114,0.001384553,0.00007863428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980707,0.00004207946,0.0003654698,0.00006516842,0.00000493794,0.0000260602,0.00001143789,0.000003409378,0.00141074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991822,0.0000329368,0.0004252592,0.00003282517,0.0000101871,0.00003071274,0.00002254806,0.000002464554,0.0002607157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009196948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0486387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252726277","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643903","title":"The Test of Truth: An Experimental Investigation of the Norm of Assertion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Test (biology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Geology","authors":[{"name":"John Turri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02702883302544206,"gpt":0.3357206537624517,"spread":0.3086918207370097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03072233,0.0008393276,0.00105869,0.0008663508,0.002015743,0.005228103,0.002592065,0.002809299,0.01615818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3371121,0.0008855779,0.0004996129,0.0007071998,0.006845622,0.007664979,0.003600223,0.004745826,0.0007864509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001049397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001887086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008178962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004738995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736536,0.01717644,0.001449268,0.003167575,0.004090937,0.0004622144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5743704,0.3762124,0.02314375,0.01901091,0.004872811,0.002389669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05385387,0.02057762,0.04000794,0.00313824,0.0008381935,0.000766658,0.1055645,0.008340491,0.1043463,0.521189,0.005916366,0.1354608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01776755,0.0355547,0.06531307,0.0009007792,0.001131231,0.001285287,0.02159803,0.10105,0.03656325,0.6993443,0.01881567,0.0006761622],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474846,0.0002822089,0.02069943,0.00216061,0.0006739428,0.0005747937,0.0001328561,0.00006569489,0.02792579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876562,0.0001206464,0.009204483,0.0004324148,0.0001765711,0.0006223733,0.0000715546,0.00007018059,0.001645417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03072233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1624772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550511362","doi":"10.1080/1068316x.2016.1258473","title":"Attributions in the courtroom: the influence of race, incentive, and witness type on jurors’ perceptions of secondary confessions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Crime and Law","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Verdict; Incentive; Attribution; Psychology; Witness; Social psychology; Duty; Race (biology); Perception; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susan Yamamoto","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0427089870762819,"gpt":0.4069202867636826,"spread":0.3642112996874007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008380568,0.0003043007,0.0003573181,0.0009589919,0.001565782,0.002743052,0.0002793883,0.0006738745,0.002927702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05505342,0.0003091249,0.0003520071,0.0003545241,0.001441513,0.001299017,0.001884718,0.001031145,0.000245308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006716033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005960217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003027802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911991,0.005659951,0.0005411656,0.0005634809,0.001647337,0.0003889775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619997,0.01853115,0.01292107,0.001823189,0.002821468,0.001903578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004188444,0.001474126,0.685172,0.0004998229,0.0005652604,0.00121711,0.1544506,0.00104954,0.04946211,0.004943269,0.001593266,0.09538445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006895258,0.0005701444,0.9476228,0.0001419202,0.00008594317,0.0003029588,0.04329259,0.00129232,0.002568953,0.002060989,0.001893038,0.00009944438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969168,0.00008536387,0.000491405,0.0001407402,0.00001721858,0.00002148852,0.00001156018,0.000004951999,0.002310494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999249,0.00005810568,0.0003051863,0.00004790737,0.00001621915,0.00001297692,0.00001296042,0.000002869164,0.0002946564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008380568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04432118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032126517","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00516.x","title":"The Influence of Identification Decision and DNA Evidence on Juror Decision Making<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Witness; Reliability (semiconductor); Identification (biology); Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Dna testing; Perception; Computer science; Law; Genetics; Data mining; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Pozzulo","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julie M.T. Lemieux","is_ca":true},{"name":"Angela K. Wilson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charmagne Crescini","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alberta Girardi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04487340792176357,"gpt":0.4337711459297325,"spread":0.3888977380079689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01992528,0.0003659738,0.0003735391,0.0007511818,0.0007881622,0.002150294,0.0003427565,0.000809708,0.003683213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2288457,0.0003004805,0.000449753,0.0002922971,0.0009444877,0.0009290742,0.0009945186,0.0009487099,0.0005399112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006091401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009412815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008978577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783862,0.01505193,0.001681286,0.0008121853,0.003576998,0.0004913859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6489506,0.3069187,0.02897641,0.004165795,0.008292268,0.00269619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02794071,0.002306229,0.4534645,0.001438947,0.001103676,0.002492586,0.01856613,0.00824072,0.1198189,0.005905108,0.002480544,0.356242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008159051,0.01068215,0.869845,0.0008736104,0.000940496,0.002668674,0.01568677,0.02155939,0.05814148,0.009832013,0.008475479,0.0004789981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925191,0.0003845831,0.002634261,0.0003328889,0.00004165783,0.00006820227,0.00002445432,0.00001566516,0.003979114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950148,0.000184379,0.004117052,0.0001010803,0.000034977,0.00004498779,0.00003182855,0.000009081454,0.0004618054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01992528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1053762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809255349","doi":"10.1177/0093854818776998","title":"What Makes Race Salient? Juror Decision-Making in Same-Race Versus Cross-Race Identification Scenarios and the Influence of Expert Testimony","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Verdict; Psychology; Race (biology); Salience (neuroscience); Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Convict; Criminology; White (mutation); Perception; Eyewitness identification; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Cognitive psychology","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Logan Ewanation","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05595039035116318,"gpt":0.4222295531914381,"spread":0.366279162840275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005138697,0.0002042436,0.0002760094,0.0004567824,0.0009133353,0.002115182,0.0001858304,0.0005882664,0.003094145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03541613,0.0001754323,0.000295683,0.0001808719,0.0007592085,0.0008210005,0.001110628,0.0006004337,0.0002061654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005587834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006231471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002526583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005211147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944099,0.004182286,0.0002060396,0.000291767,0.0006060052,0.0003041057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804315,0.0138991,0.003870807,0.0004553899,0.0005529359,0.0007902491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009226848,0.00207384,0.5985212,0.0009325268,0.0007987621,0.002687696,0.0582258,0.006414841,0.1245057,0.007828149,0.002575887,0.1862089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001263629,0.001637442,0.9370172,0.0003370732,0.0002565218,0.0005742197,0.032872,0.008126424,0.009647975,0.005476294,0.003813225,0.000115228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958248,0.00008895623,0.000384465,0.0001611023,0.000008485863,0.00002194423,0.00001020474,0.000002195058,0.003497806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991246,0.00007922621,0.00045389,0.00004947378,0.000006459817,0.00001187529,0.00001268719,0.000001963894,0.0002598555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005138697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02717632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553642309","doi":"10.1080/23311908.2016.1264657","title":"Jurors’ perceptions of scientific testimony: The role of gender and testimony complexity in trials involving DNA evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogent Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Relevance (law); Verdict; Perception; Scientific evidence; Eyewitness testimony; Jury; Social psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laura McManus","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kendra J. McLaughlin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susan Yamamoto","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hannah J. Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4132805861461013,"gpt":0.4897991249662288,"spread":0.07651853882012755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009615612,0.0002500751,0.0003297463,0.0008460068,0.001129755,0.002564696,0.0002910505,0.0006693524,0.002748737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07233468,0.0002654258,0.0002732182,0.0002937532,0.001961396,0.001275553,0.001765425,0.0006708416,0.0002222542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007107554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006697103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001298976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002493852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915624,0.005498725,0.0005449324,0.0004720681,0.001543303,0.0003786387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469046,0.03640513,0.01090124,0.001375819,0.002461433,0.001951723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005214439,0.0007879348,0.6452258,0.0005810637,0.0004597631,0.001373007,0.210442,0.0009740206,0.04042741,0.003038521,0.0009926794,0.09048337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080432,0.001233649,0.8939221,0.0001760824,0.0001167251,0.0008456645,0.09355909,0.001392382,0.003113483,0.002826896,0.002587764,0.0001181275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.0001213021,0.0003245212,0.0001056272,0.000007703273,0.00001476174,0.000006404523,0.000001755306,0.001388594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995058,0.0000569551,0.000195609,0.00004291483,0.000009530079,0.00001045863,0.000008366754,0.000001640312,0.0001687183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05085284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464094058","doi":"10.1177/0146167216651853","title":"Stacking the Jury","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Psychology; Social psychology; Stacking; Law; Political science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Mike Morrison","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amanda DeVaul-Fetters","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bertram Gawronski","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08068521715389461,"gpt":0.4090171480341999,"spread":0.3283319308803053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008917354,0.0009262303,0.002009929,0.002860667,0.005657027,0.003679094,0.001465114,0.002445532,0.05509885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04647431,0.000621865,0.001219546,0.001072707,0.001247608,0.00309681,0.005898957,0.002763645,0.0151064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001373963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005357469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001916102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004607077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910568,0.002900976,0.0009825248,0.00131465,0.00262843,0.001116648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849501,0.005276592,0.001228632,0.002953841,0.003295153,0.002295691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002291942,0.000602233,0.02542453,0.0005795751,0.0002934918,0.00161274,0.003504083,0.003431949,0.007037994,0.05067856,0.08422979,0.8203131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004463773,0.005046598,0.09109545,0.002006411,0.0008294882,0.005336622,0.01255753,0.02174908,0.02240318,0.2063524,0.6314731,0.0007038254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3697678,0.009219204,0.2455663,0.0272091,0.01283701,0.005864239,0.002114879,0.00363342,0.323788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.717665,0.002941785,0.1438226,0.004940609,0.00220349,0.001445734,0.001834574,0.0004798353,0.1246663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05509885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.184324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513751157","doi":"10.1348/135532510x498185","title":"He‐said–she‐said: Contrast effects in credibility assessments and possible threats to fundamental principles of criminal law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Vignette; Plaintiff; Psychology; Compromise; Social psychology; Law; Impeachment; Adjudication; Criminology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Deborah A. Connolly","is_ca":true},{"name":"Heidi M. Gordon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.132842129719106,"gpt":0.4501197221297871,"spread":0.317277592410681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055584,0.0004860221,0.0005601347,0.0009493058,0.0009793413,0.003289595,0.0008373014,0.001683872,0.01806874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08510149,0.000665761,0.0004886034,0.0004638607,0.002298348,0.004197492,0.002779409,0.001962756,0.0006080336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008246247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003604155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001045206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001259744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947644,0.002683069,0.0003168695,0.001024671,0.0009899117,0.0002209453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8910093,0.09496154,0.008023518,0.002718614,0.00160676,0.001680332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1728678,0.009677892,0.2829064,0.009203519,0.001891345,0.002690523,0.08945713,0.002729806,0.237291,0.065129,0.005008624,0.121147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006610535,0.01151727,0.8951159,0.001254063,0.00180988,0.00183502,0.009927091,0.008587155,0.02062245,0.03407181,0.008185088,0.0004637627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812446,0.0005826611,0.001048933,0.0003318293,0.0001134307,0.0001348158,0.000126008,0.00003573206,0.0163819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997261,0.0001107184,0.001574032,0.0001449051,0.00004447794,0.00008896167,0.00007817131,0.00003359126,0.0006640378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01806874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0604459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002573560","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2018-0057","title":"Social Identity in the Canadian Courtroom: Effects of Juror and Defendant Race","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Race (biology); Psychology; White (mutation); Criminology; Indigenous; Identity (music); Social psychology; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn M. Maeder","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susan Yamamoto","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08680718064480779,"gpt":0.3628542244436055,"spread":0.2760470437987977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003715397,0.0003179492,0.0004876388,0.001997676,0.01117099,0.002605791,0.00133746,0.0008183573,0.007489742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02283759,0.0002743592,0.0004981129,0.001251302,0.003240015,0.0007501617,0.002592808,0.001161896,0.0005061062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01931546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02361749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8860589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9572829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944023,0.0008097168,0.0001723168,0.0004793412,0.002981012,0.00115532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905685,0.001561329,0.002269585,0.0003548447,0.002659017,0.00258673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001270159,0.0006010603,0.9073215,0.00007801722,0.0001729645,0.0004991596,0.04202743,0.0002854293,0.002717672,0.002322567,0.00390802,0.03879622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002614103,0.00009237455,0.9783189,0.00004272002,0.00003250767,0.00005283656,0.01838308,0.0002606453,0.0002425689,0.000313436,0.002199756,0.00003499405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911664,0.0001452726,0.00008350612,0.000515977,0.00002938503,0.00007267963,0.00007461201,0.000003766449,0.007908449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973809,0.0001191297,0.0001198521,0.0001303096,0.00001059691,0.00003063663,0.00007905334,0.000003875904,0.002125582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1139411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2292243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752777279","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i3.419","title":"Blinded by the White: A Comparative Analysis of Jury Challenges on Racial Grounds","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Indigenous; Jury selection; White (mutation); Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Criminology; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Criminal justice; Adversarial system; Psychology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Thalia Anthony","is_ca":false},{"name":"Craig Longman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1735331867249572,"gpt":0.484891853234574,"spread":0.3113586665096167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03385654,0.0001869333,0.0008371107,0.002780308,0.00552176,0.004280968,0.001101479,0.001936618,0.004195282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1358364,0.00024088,0.0006652263,0.002021701,0.003337105,0.002101126,0.004482904,0.001562792,0.0004196037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003532395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005897548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01038972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04079125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9656836,0.01815628,0.002691591,0.001430144,0.008958636,0.003079671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9192098,0.0564804,0.01074374,0.002121995,0.008201582,0.003242455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00513484,0.001100557,0.3881468,0.002236492,0.001980468,0.003749855,0.2626229,0.001525277,0.004488414,0.06247775,0.01878083,0.2477557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000168492,0.00213469,0.7687075,0.001613711,0.0005740063,0.001033684,0.1721003,0.001035047,0.001541487,0.01067547,0.04021139,0.0002043008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969441,0.005113147,0.0006347863,0.002778644,0.0002112862,0.0001535774,0.0000790111,0.000006905954,0.02158152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959039,0.001202753,0.0002654249,0.0009369521,0.0001161674,0.0001149887,0.00005243166,0.000005352397,0.001402133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03385654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1790527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911482230","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2017.08.004","title":"What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Justice","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Judgement; Objectivity (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Computer science; Subjectivism; Bayes' theorem; Actuarial science; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Bayesian probability; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey Stewart Morrison","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1020365269573311,"gpt":0.4294392459813529,"spread":0.3274027190240217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08244543,0.0008602848,0.002370982,0.003487225,0.001268032,0.009642897,0.002582724,0.007948286,0.006454038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4663301,0.0006076664,0.001163948,0.001735907,0.008825041,0.01152858,0.001962326,0.008172562,0.002861708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001960535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004061193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001046426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006673975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.946727,0.0407102,0.003292205,0.001747191,0.006932884,0.0005904683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6868881,0.2796169,0.007518965,0.006530547,0.01660546,0.002840029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007013273,0.0001934742,0.01767516,0.001882714,0.0004088639,0.0007427461,0.00187761,0.002539263,0.0006072538,0.3721316,0.146467,0.4547729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002372513,0.0004377596,0.0106095,0.004135271,0.0003183007,0.005187751,0.004051602,0.0135373,0.001250182,0.8410341,0.118937,0.0002641109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01502068,0.04584315,0.1219382,0.7717756,0.01187937,0.0001498723,0.0002531885,0.0004118621,0.03272804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7064078,0.02149654,0.1086678,0.1072297,0.0409278,0.0007286915,0.0002426491,0.0004075211,0.01389144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08244543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4360183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989236958","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgq001","title":"Recent trends in evidence law in China and the new evidence scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interdependence; Status quo; China; Modernization theory; Empirical evidence; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Law; Political science; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nan Zhang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07071523477077973,"gpt":0.3721160392842198,"spread":0.3014008045134401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008014094,0.0002689922,0.0006804038,0.005239117,0.002744371,0.006046405,0.001274972,0.002250559,0.004194123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082184,0.0003444139,0.0004714689,0.006832291,0.01092107,0.007168495,0.002701302,0.002704118,0.000182593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01406769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01592959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01972297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969059,0.0008857945,0.000284542,0.0005714368,0.001053693,0.0002987013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864656,0.008080989,0.001755052,0.0006585427,0.002131764,0.0009079758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000689443,0.00006257123,0.01528288,0.001168272,0.00004482763,0.0005144076,0.005896999,0.001785627,0.0006106633,0.8190051,0.007412855,0.1481469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008172676,0.0002683249,0.1025716,0.00149302,0.0001012796,0.0006696761,0.006333794,0.00861306,0.00132548,0.4229335,0.4554259,0.0001827562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172034,0.2863814,0.02544905,0.2477146,0.001929634,0.0001535769,0.0004231312,0.0001749773,0.1205702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231129,0.05293254,0.006014255,0.007616123,0.002437257,0.00008073953,0.0001472976,0.00003067188,0.00762827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01592959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1091161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029409435","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.011","title":"Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Conviction; Psychology; Test (biology); Sexual assault; Poison control; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Law","authors":[{"name":"Regina A. Schuller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alison Ryan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel A. Krauss","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gwen Jenkins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04488702809208202,"gpt":0.3729014428529243,"spread":0.3280144147608423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096715,0.0002654456,0.0005405379,0.001455053,0.002105933,0.002419216,0.0007614651,0.002144305,0.004136236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.179446,0.0005914183,0.0003875376,0.0004062213,0.001202297,0.0009968821,0.002311243,0.001666486,0.0004712422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001353129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002756791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004692694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877344,0.009346045,0.0009676145,0.0003499333,0.001063734,0.0005381966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139414,0.06968085,0.008532513,0.00192922,0.003738272,0.002177621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01426608,0.002600018,0.650194,0.001033365,0.0006345037,0.02267223,0.1210132,0.003761301,0.01855423,0.006825442,0.00766466,0.150781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001804489,0.002923423,0.9117816,0.0006254644,0.0002923762,0.01237657,0.04380384,0.006843773,0.00744283,0.00822261,0.005264412,0.0002425472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973351,0.0002865819,0.0001895006,0.000367337,0.00002518466,0.00003442738,0.00001453958,0.000006331311,0.001740927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991128,0.0001213009,0.0002921265,0.0001069006,0.00001478538,0.0000182754,0.00001693874,0.000002830078,0.000314093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0580005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418860106","doi":"","title":"Lay Adjudication in Europe: The Rise and Fall of the Traditional Jury","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jury; Law; Political science; Geography; History","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Jackson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nikolai Kovalev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02401222675378692,"gpt":0.231237696176125,"spread":0.2072254694223381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04536412,0.0002356635,0.0008307731,0.004129879,0.005020268,0.009874161,0.001709044,0.003969723,0.002947222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0527752,0.0004560352,0.0006502198,0.005384905,0.01260194,0.004784559,0.007270411,0.003780375,0.0005652291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004584131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005343033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009184377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008692168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9673588,0.01477462,0.00361288,0.004011536,0.007204743,0.003037321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955319,0.0232698,0.00763215,0.003299744,0.008077911,0.002401247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006272851,0.0001560693,0.1054197,0.001942991,0.0002284062,0.002499097,0.08106782,0.00163202,0.002152047,0.391079,0.0221822,0.3910134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009309255,0.0004248203,0.393402,0.005106084,0.0001086284,0.002319674,0.0737069,0.0007385584,0.002990413,0.04582086,0.4750402,0.000248813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7108098,0.1133787,0.01824147,0.05382766,0.002085235,0.0001209855,0.0004078782,0.0001191629,0.1010092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692262,0.01236182,0.002760214,0.008879296,0.0005858714,0.00004499855,0.0001595526,0.0000661227,0.005915941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04536412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2399113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906867826","doi":"10.1007/s11896-018-9311-z","title":"The Influence of Familiarity Recency and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Judgement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal psychology; Judgement; Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lauren E. Thompson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Chelsea L. Sheahan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Emily Pica","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joanna Pozzulo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04462723732052665,"gpt":0.4203936348206344,"spread":0.3757663975001077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248749,0.0002386461,0.0004269406,0.0004380356,0.0004920238,0.00148814,0.0003780835,0.0008944154,0.007290506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04998307,0.0002347819,0.0003523036,0.0002664817,0.0005910232,0.000815065,0.0005973394,0.0008679235,0.0006511891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004956937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006293938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003363491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005105851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986362,0.0005359026,0.0001458568,0.0002397763,0.0002560487,0.0001862061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273655,0.05992619,0.006085645,0.0020005,0.002248442,0.002373658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04105011,0.0025896,0.8149945,0.000174891,0.0004859328,0.001999046,0.006185905,0.001376955,0.09474393,0.000550769,0.0006500122,0.03519832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000594548,0.0009010718,0.9937987,0.00001573834,0.00009763004,0.0003156728,0.0006190549,0.001021466,0.002805223,0.0001779649,0.0001642919,0.00002370404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00006222106,0.00005825457,0.0000197899,0.0000095117,0.000004230726,0.0000146272,0.000002339459,0.0007873218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994561,0.00002551717,0.00005997242,0.00001250095,0.00001305622,0.000003467987,0.00001586944,0.000004704984,0.0004087051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007290506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02438921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086171972","doi":"10.1111/1467-9930.00139","title":"The Underrepresentation of Indigenous Peoples on Canadian Jury Panels","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Policy","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Jury selection; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Commission; Politics; Common law; Administration (probate law); Jury trial","authors":[{"name":"Mark A. Israel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05565020373300195,"gpt":0.3921816795303701,"spread":0.3365314757973681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05269719,0.0003488818,0.0007239887,0.005329487,0.01540811,0.004625556,0.002384855,0.002157434,0.005613139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1223546,0.0006118463,0.0004449569,0.003959736,0.006340703,0.001444958,0.006189918,0.002071477,0.0008823949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01060277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02119823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3298109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6666208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9442961,0.02049521,0.002945851,0.003130981,0.0236317,0.00550025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9310456,0.02783999,0.009668396,0.006681004,0.02136881,0.003396244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009279487,0.0002260451,0.3478349,0.001321092,0.0004962733,0.002717607,0.1725701,0.0007319208,0.006448023,0.03767072,0.05762904,0.3714264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001479851,0.0004109737,0.6955896,0.002435758,0.0005494226,0.002006219,0.1020309,0.002033917,0.01232312,0.01319007,0.1689063,0.0003758851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810465,0.006038245,0.006203513,0.01807397,0.0008645101,0.0008742012,0.0007160674,0.00006417284,0.08611879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766688,0.002942854,0.002475019,0.006187603,0.0002937805,0.0003260064,0.0002796136,0.00001642284,0.01080988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6701891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6557824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804938249","doi":"10.1177/1365712718782990","title":"Gender discrimination and juries in the 20th century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Politics; Franchise; Law; Inequality; Sociology; Jury selection","authors":[{"name":"Andrew L‐T Choo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jill Hunter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1937705289059404,"gpt":0.4461225939343225,"spread":0.2523520650283821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0222613,0.0002478099,0.0008358016,0.002230889,0.01895908,0.008458899,0.001050588,0.003673668,0.006122094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03004732,0.0004108311,0.0002846965,0.001481912,0.0356281,0.004505822,0.007871432,0.004862853,0.000614965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01266846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009681342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03241889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05300139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823642,0.007173874,0.001104837,0.001567362,0.00402467,0.003765203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878597,0.005532342,0.002216768,0.0004986923,0.002151397,0.001741102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001909171,0.0001140629,0.01032673,0.000158918,0.00002032428,0.0007116708,0.3652595,0.0001150477,0.000577294,0.5845543,0.005864219,0.03210693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005727954,0.0002984798,0.04499429,0.001265566,0.0000157359,0.0008314798,0.149436,0.0001183802,0.001001962,0.1017305,0.7001339,0.0001165681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6132562,0.03189575,0.001685467,0.06298696,0.001245929,0.00004545196,0.00008687503,0.00001566944,0.2887817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707111,0.004047664,0.0002708545,0.006448144,0.0003865976,0.00003471451,0.00002247266,0.00001820895,0.01806024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03241889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1177304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1733669877","doi":"10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-2-9-62","title":"Selection of Jurors and Lay Assessors in Comparative Perspective: Eurasian Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russian Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Adjudication; Legislation; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Listing (finance); Independence (probability theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Choice of law; Sociology; Conflict of laws; Business; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nikolai Kovalev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09771499217999599,"gpt":0.4211400219479053,"spread":0.3234250297679093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03643797,0.0003853123,0.0006922847,0.00436966,0.00562227,0.007453405,0.001190593,0.002011888,0.007874788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04750739,0.0002873396,0.0002767517,0.004320286,0.009526404,0.005026957,0.004357489,0.001544286,0.0007190511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003267752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005196544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005687597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9688318,0.02381321,0.001556585,0.001311286,0.002574921,0.001912111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975578,0.01653522,0.002982569,0.0007649366,0.003218235,0.0009210377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005122453,0.0001615354,0.04227363,0.001372922,0.00008752542,0.002123402,0.2050376,0.0008998325,0.001081739,0.5326355,0.005390499,0.2084237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001031214,0.0007082665,0.1681659,0.008078286,0.0001161246,0.002965583,0.3332624,0.001260231,0.001928485,0.1199807,0.3632591,0.0001718406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5683828,0.07510702,0.01972388,0.01844691,0.001462034,0.0002076833,0.0001611887,0.00002162706,0.3164869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790338,0.007404596,0.003536482,0.001241691,0.0003933141,0.00008324162,0.00004691241,0.00001618929,0.008243825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03643797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1927047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905402715","doi":"10.29173/alr1258","title":"The Origins, Early History and Evolution of the English Criminal Trial Jury","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Adversarial system; Expansive; Distrust; Criminal trial; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Institution; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Sanjeev Anand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04866074385107201,"gpt":0.314241143032203,"spread":0.265580399181131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761685,0.0001371332,0.0003116909,0.001780187,0.004649303,0.005145478,0.0006261282,0.001207861,0.003580729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01281232,0.0003775163,0.0001137369,0.001330122,0.01084838,0.002173826,0.002436241,0.001996866,0.000582677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009931448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008133086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07105905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1108471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958708,0.002090795,0.0002717937,0.0003469477,0.0008122592,0.0006074595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945031,0.003203152,0.0004480125,0.0001498446,0.001312378,0.0003834419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001148906,0.00005264239,0.007606981,0.0003946402,0.00001310239,0.00110827,0.09390766,0.000401517,0.0008519134,0.8087557,0.01016055,0.07663213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000179821,0.00007627984,0.03269037,0.001115023,0.00001542341,0.0003728563,0.02502056,0.0003326391,0.0008302583,0.02989072,0.9095646,0.00007340155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3623418,0.1023995,0.01195451,0.06014038,0.001937511,0.0001560805,0.000221401,0.00005238899,0.4607964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202782,0.02015349,0.001921735,0.002636923,0.0005014057,0.00004836117,0.00004117151,0.00005189009,0.05436695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07105905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1412909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067126333","doi":"10.7202/039835ar","title":"The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact-Finding","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inference; Epistemology; Plaintiff; Causal inference; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Russell Brown","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03163596699700405,"gpt":0.372955400710208,"spread":0.3413194337132039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05298441,0.0007061425,0.001530692,0.004476915,0.005966638,0.009078077,0.003596148,0.008776271,0.003851291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1220215,0.000928675,0.001693951,0.00234376,0.0669281,0.02693815,0.007185221,0.009081917,0.000336457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005426341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00702762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00633814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004509347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9554602,0.03117289,0.001751094,0.004190707,0.005932357,0.001492813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7864114,0.1937879,0.007955257,0.007151335,0.003879768,0.0008143933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001924817,0.00001358998,0.0008273196,0.00006935904,0.00002211909,0.0001648818,0.002973021,0.0004203772,0.00004878301,0.9894133,0.0008154454,0.00521257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001649706,0.000008505699,0.0003559463,0.00009953292,0.00001804,0.0001209332,0.0006439159,0.001112006,0.000156656,0.9909357,0.006515945,0.00001627749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07519246,0.01951959,0.4259412,0.2972866,0.001762716,0.0002827753,0.0002636998,0.0001499962,0.179601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930343,0.004136332,0.04753083,0.01262845,0.001294921,0.0002530932,0.0001044205,0.00005189171,0.003656999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05298441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2802116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125006201","doi":"","title":"The Role of Innocence Commissions: Error Discovery, Systemic Reform or Both?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04378339745405326,"gpt":0.3756166703946833,"spread":0.33183327294063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07523925,0.0003929167,0.001077844,0.003387075,0.005578994,0.01940795,0.002808088,0.006030823,0.00335986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1602916,0.0005830636,0.0006904333,0.003463155,0.04051965,0.01987952,0.009086433,0.007065304,0.0006386948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01247635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02595897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009732735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009374054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9245661,0.0364088,0.003532631,0.008126247,0.01790891,0.009457255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8305258,0.09036298,0.02382288,0.02907142,0.01912365,0.007093234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002922196,0.00004105302,0.005067837,0.0001192787,0.00003034697,0.0001037841,0.005780365,0.0007661808,0.0001321883,0.9338322,0.00464299,0.04945453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166594,0.0001357163,0.01124648,0.000900731,0.00009308013,0.0002419801,0.01021959,0.002533683,0.001173257,0.8524459,0.1207529,0.0001400268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1760781,0.02308738,0.09752315,0.3627191,0.002198966,0.0007038822,0.0001619332,0.0004085437,0.337119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647433,0.001983834,0.01201255,0.01056237,0.0008224063,0.0001892738,0.00003142324,0.00004875122,0.009606168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07523925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3979079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592768569","doi":"","title":"Jury Trials for Violent Hate Crimes in Russia: Is Russian Justice Only for Ethnic Russians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Hung jury; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Jury selection; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology; Advertising; Business","authors":[{"name":"Nikolai Kovalev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3751959791712456,"gpt":0.4795894323707514,"spread":0.1043934531995058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02463308,0.000131529,0.0006899866,0.001071551,0.003762802,0.003663933,0.0006609515,0.00300102,0.003217327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1118778,0.0002423835,0.0002822167,0.000677496,0.002814645,0.001948466,0.001637913,0.001659031,0.0007066907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004216374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00445132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01682797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806491,0.0131202,0.001467014,0.0009239831,0.002375793,0.001463926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603406,0.02520772,0.008412158,0.001166756,0.002752219,0.002120534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002804711,0.0007550509,0.4187236,0.001296766,0.0005276169,0.003058217,0.06969118,0.002166576,0.006761829,0.07396016,0.0270404,0.3932137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000508349,0.001684627,0.7614304,0.001536226,0.0004777346,0.001330387,0.08817382,0.00383026,0.004819977,0.05012086,0.08582775,0.0002595982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417905,0.004720093,0.001879724,0.0222597,0.0004387878,0.0001425521,0.00007847452,0.00002396889,0.02866615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961338,0.00086385,0.0005471816,0.0009805867,0.0001766459,0.00004532012,0.00001849443,0.000004960081,0.001229027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02463308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1302738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288879","doi":"","title":"Does No Mean \"No\" Mean Reasonable Doubt? Assessing the Impact of Ewanchuk on Determinations of Consent","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Rakhi Ruparelia","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04219273539417691,"gpt":0.3722720652405301,"spread":0.3300793298463532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3516897,0.0007021938,0.001446629,0.00538286,0.02180169,0.00936899,0.004382307,0.005807136,0.004767003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7487701,0.001360144,0.001732197,0.004634817,0.02756852,0.007651704,0.009447131,0.01004707,0.0003442534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07714843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1612359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5764626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7609323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.632279,0.2493992,0.01214537,0.005876513,0.08145115,0.01884881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1870264,0.755136,0.01819813,0.0101456,0.02463629,0.004857558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00986019,0.001248704,0.2025883,0.002021923,0.0008440744,0.001519843,0.1146514,0.004993967,0.001747556,0.4118725,0.01593775,0.2327137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001778911,0.004862179,0.5263433,0.004389978,0.003126586,0.00117935,0.1052705,0.02215984,0.008405849,0.2463894,0.07457354,0.001520624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150778,0.00561999,0.006815654,0.06455389,0.0007841946,0.002237044,0.0003543818,0.00004307965,0.104514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889873,0.000830667,0.003932197,0.003485289,0.00006078029,0.0004472686,0.00003450424,0.00001762619,0.002204299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4235374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8520635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}