{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":499,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":499,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0beb32b0fc10","filters":{"topic":"Land Rights and Reforms"}},"results":[{"id":"W1985817076","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.015","title":"Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":769,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Poverty; Agriculture; Rural area; Reproduction; Rural poverty; Economic growth; Development economics; Agricultural productivity; Geography; Business; Economics; Political science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666084125220062,"gpt":0.2059632579645616,"spread":0.1893024167123609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004133396,0.00009098709,0.00008016582,0.000009466551,0.0003789177,0.00008280156,0.0002033118,0.0000521069,0.00007177876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000484304,0.00001122652,0.00002369281,0.0001617409,0.00003147913,0.00004374386,0.00006587066,0.0002281809,0.0000245696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001770426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009503816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001115241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01264577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993122,0.00003374666,0.0001714169,0.0001169498,0.0001709112,0.0001947892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998169,0.00006246153,0.0000452646,0.00003587607,0.00001050995,0.00002897552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001838242,0.00005916745,0.09390671,0.000004563787,0.00001785329,0.000006958307,0.02407919,0.000004278596,0.0001935538,0.0006514406,0.002060925,0.878997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008381567,0.00001036293,0.3655672,0.00002026636,0.000001952471,0.000005801242,0.0006071781,0.0000156054,0.00006621004,0.0003633924,0.6331788,0.00007937877],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611255,0.0002998826,9.316728e-7,0.03582448,0.00009010205,0.0001830308,0.000001853969,0.00002192542,0.002452326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911556,0.00007064943,0.0001896029,0.003850578,0.0002490555,0.000009946828,0.00001015599,5.411135e-7,0.004463905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7056635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169773128","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.6.1667","title":"The Size Distribution of Farms and International Productivity Differences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":557,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agricultural productivity; Aggregate (composite); Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01159124972962968,"gpt":0.2201405566845765,"spread":0.2085493069549469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001935923,0.00004319489,0.0001350201,4.773743e-7,0.00007280301,0.00001413339,0.0001089283,0.000006539318,0.00002643913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003577453,0.00000627369,0.00003410121,0.00002316667,0.0001905872,0.0000352547,0.00002587152,0.00002330814,0.000004728834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007903418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002188078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002151592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001797627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996641,0.00003030055,0.0001223392,0.00009753491,0.00002457032,0.00006111728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996787,0.0001233207,0.0001354635,0.00003188922,0.00001004425,0.00002054126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001635017,0.000005445699,0.008493101,0.000009800146,0.000006559384,9.11269e-9,0.000002485623,3.757469e-8,0.00007619052,0.0005506736,0.0001592616,0.9906948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001808533,0.00006417574,0.4965916,0.00004684708,0.000005416642,0.000002115577,0.00001334031,0.00001568711,0.00002786891,0.0006249684,0.5025471,0.00004278074],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849424,0.001595649,0.000001553769,0.01277202,0.0001150684,0.00009660346,0.00001612529,0.000005827373,0.0004547278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412079,0.0582387,0.000003213197,0.00008264563,0.000106485,0.000004915436,0.000009590231,1.566056e-7,0.0003464108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.990652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07022263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109022455","doi":"10.1257/aer.20130853","title":"Delinking Land Rights from Land Use: Certification and Migration in Mexico","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":444,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Land consolidation; Consolidation (business); Property rights; Land use; Land tenure; Business; Agricultural economics; Land law; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Finance; Agriculture; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04195706438601969,"gpt":0.2442677507026736,"spread":0.2023106863166539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001411788,0.00007346873,0.0002070065,0.00000600606,0.00004132944,0.00004147812,0.0000647886,0.00002229785,0.00003539309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007142555,0.00001543649,0.00002535934,0.00005642203,0.00004423648,0.0001570571,0.00001500944,0.00003963786,0.00004212367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003096282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005989113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02617165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03914961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994457,0.00004079097,0.0002078593,0.0001768686,0.00003450129,0.00009423272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997152,0.00004528044,0.000118494,0.00004309063,0.0000111186,0.00006681456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008788008,0.00001780212,0.4939964,0.00001307141,0.000009509187,0.000001311524,0.00006918686,0.000006366161,0.00008355278,0.00004263008,0.0008239024,0.5049275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001128184,0.00006129976,0.3701653,0.0002075961,0.00001271981,0.000003947569,0.00001984408,0.0003182402,0.00003400788,0.000982367,0.6279389,0.0001429928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910361,0.0045181,0.000001821398,0.004080478,0.00005565628,0.0001443686,0.00001437507,0.00001279506,0.0001363453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611136,0.03768539,0.00007895104,0.0006635108,0.0001354291,0.00001103479,0.0001668576,7.060493e-7,0.0001444782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.627115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077538804","doi":"10.1016/s0305-750x(03)00046-9","title":"The Gender Asset Gap: Land in Latin America","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Equity (law); Privilege (computing); Land tenure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Asset (computer security); Land reform; Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); State (computer science); Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Political science; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0321101476224952,"gpt":0.2180012996926547,"spread":0.1858911520701595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001653291,0.00007022714,0.00007127613,0.000007599756,0.0002543589,0.00004042656,0.00009726094,0.00002024031,0.0002404053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006760106,0.000009462517,0.000020057,0.0002446908,0.00002398765,0.00002221206,0.00002003821,0.00006604668,0.00007084316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002541521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001500903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005278136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006123007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.00002992162,0.0001429171,0.0001170686,0.000122749,0.0002072737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998302,0.00005756571,0.00003136486,0.00002734479,0.00001128567,0.00004221349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001891497,0.0001414521,0.3137815,0.000004483197,0.00002474783,0.00001986188,0.0006915347,0.00001257654,0.001009263,0.002816595,0.008394512,0.6730846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004545789,0.000004875842,0.3354453,0.000002728723,3.913994e-7,7.674615e-7,0.00004293993,0.000002379923,0.0002050429,0.0005280471,0.6636667,0.00005544124],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9196557,0.0003308531,0.00000861435,0.004060074,0.0005153719,0.0003096756,0.000003590409,0.00005471397,0.07506139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634806,0.0001021897,0.0005789078,0.0003782141,0.00005967064,0.00001862991,0.00001653856,6.382891e-7,0.03536463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3416781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125702173","doi":"10.3982/ecta16598","title":"Misallocation, Selection, and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis With Panel Data From China","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"University of British Columbia; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Banca d'Italia; Ohio State University; Canada Research Chairs; Duke University; European Environment Agency; Cornell University; National Bureau of Economic Research; McMaster University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National University of Singapore; Bank of Canada; Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance; McGill University; Universitat de Barcelona; International Myeloma Foundation","keywords":"Productivity; Agriculture; Panel data; Economics; China; Selection (genetic algorithm); Capital (architecture); Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Econometrics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05136371950104268,"gpt":0.2306271864871826,"spread":0.1792634669861399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001671469,0.00006691843,0.0001419775,0.00006953209,0.0004432683,0.00005187171,0.0001957576,0.00001446496,0.0009725055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001921875,0.00001373964,0.00002118391,0.002360997,0.00002720008,0.0001734633,0.0001315292,0.00007256668,0.000004881747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000198809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008218824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002544509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002725322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999299,0.00003677736,0.00009857844,0.0003747006,0.00008881287,0.0001021404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999703,0.00007333775,0.00007763037,0.00008073602,0.00002035058,0.00004496846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001632309,0.0006437161,0.8719195,0.000005962934,0.001701344,0.000004635109,0.0009710789,0.000687376,0.001059748,0.0005409081,0.002232401,0.1200701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007592531,0.0002352086,0.8970906,4.409261e-7,0.00008514091,0.000002908968,0.0002593523,0.00227955,0.00001892545,0.000297327,0.09954938,0.0001052839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961621,0.0001871707,0.00003630671,0.002892788,0.00003430785,0.00009838312,0.0003248796,0.0000247207,0.0002393545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978725,0.00004408259,0.0002068837,0.000027244,0.00007514169,0.00001233355,0.0007265424,5.291369e-7,0.001034722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1199648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123249232","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.00150","title":"Property rights, labour markets, and efficiency in a transition economy: the case of rural China","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Inefficiency; Political science; Welfare economics; Economy; Economics; Humanities; Market economy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03853952542125814,"gpt":0.1461881036430199,"spread":0.1076485782217617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000405619,0.0001468461,0.0003192342,0.00008335845,0.0002255492,0.00006687627,0.0002320253,0.0001074028,0.0004324807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001276245,0.00003623611,0.0001050413,0.00009998753,0.0001716999,0.0002561038,0.000007869365,0.0001980629,0.00000191123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008575773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3938266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989474,0.00005428381,0.0004988574,0.000133399,0.000001421525,0.0003646358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990585,0.00006025216,0.0002538001,0.00007012802,0.00004682443,0.0005104219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004346343,0.0003197371,0.02274673,0.0002857735,0.0004503743,0.005993241,0.03102138,0.0023646,0.0004916724,0.4610921,0.001620269,0.4731795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004795981,0.003843144,0.08340561,0.0007726895,0.0001735202,0.05124609,0.01104129,0.02858561,0.0007023609,0.5465214,0.2664644,0.002447915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919206,0.000267076,4.348837e-7,0.00663582,0.0001961797,0.0001818087,0.00009013332,0.000001785173,0.0007061687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.0002077275,0.00000934917,0.0001668463,0.0002314748,0.000003621705,0.000003882916,0.000001959735,0.0004987846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5946813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626119688","doi":"10.1111/conl.12383","title":"Incorporating Land Tenure Security into Conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Land tenure; Context (archaeology); Psychological intervention; Work (physics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Security of tenure; Geography; Economics; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01921628286885757,"gpt":0.2213523987427957,"spread":0.2021361158739381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001750068,0.00009201336,0.000101655,0.000006717232,0.001069636,0.0002234214,0.0001805626,0.00007138176,0.00005444528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000563993,0.0000201529,0.00004265768,0.00005064945,0.0001221114,0.0003705803,0.00004868563,0.00008865971,0.00002400147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001658204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007625987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003525367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004291994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.00002561267,0.0001581118,0.0001699262,0.0001279582,0.0001256263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.00004635933,0.0002215657,0.00009354267,0.00006432485,0.00005008293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839073,0.00002356824,0.8593025,0.00001241471,0.00001281906,0.00001078522,0.0001654379,0.000001611844,0.1187346,0.0006348403,0.01049868,0.01058433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002269944,0.00003328701,0.8918363,0.00002887917,0.000006842833,0.000005211928,0.00004093066,0.0005838214,0.001321209,0.003986476,0.1017616,0.0001684173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.839784,0.00000645845,0.00001444881,0.1595783,0.000197178,0.0001028899,0.000007145401,0.00004339318,0.0002661383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903072,0.00000842228,0.0001390141,0.008792432,0.0003507342,0.000007777039,0.0001075028,7.370294e-7,0.0002862453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1507859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8226884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158770205","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x","title":"Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro‐Poor Land Policies and Land Governance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mainstream; Corporate governance; Land use; Terrain; Political science; Land management; Land reform; Land tenure; Land development; Geography; Economics; Law; Agriculture; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04980213356877724,"gpt":0.2526564474880001,"spread":0.2028543139192228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001076535,0.0000857997,0.0001701392,0.00001055306,0.0001440815,0.0001030206,0.00006724244,0.00004555174,0.00000939131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000116474,0.0000165489,0.00003702286,0.00006744971,0.00006444778,0.000343159,0.00001227516,0.00008501219,5.965712e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006541023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008758288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003798681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005252597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995009,0.00001806429,0.0001697854,0.00007795973,0.0001169198,0.0001163398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995954,0.00004613927,0.0001915593,0.00001719456,0.00004613511,0.0001035906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003905482,0.0005452894,0.6279173,0.00005297969,0.0001483356,0.0002375703,0.00403113,7.085966e-7,0.01195078,0.002709866,0.0142141,0.3378014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004295093,0.0007410296,0.9461247,0.00007851735,0.00001378759,0.0001796758,0.0003506142,0.000007652045,0.00008304782,0.001565457,0.05032086,0.0001051628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611356,0.002307964,7.256087e-7,0.03578532,0.0000961067,0.0001117315,0.00006559068,0.000006726978,0.0004902924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968327,0.001513942,0.00002173982,0.0005016672,0.0006805877,0.000001018761,0.000007040067,4.142155e-7,0.0004409391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3376963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1108173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589009716","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2017.1288615","title":"Elite capture and state neglect: new evidence on South Africa’s land reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of African Political Economy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Land reform; Elite; State (computer science); Incarnation; Neglect; Headline; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Economics; Business; Archaeology; Politics; Law; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03241699976364114,"gpt":0.2530605793560553,"spread":0.2206435795924142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001788843,0.0001611428,0.0004156183,0.000008886256,0.0002211182,0.00008493826,0.0003317452,0.0000595512,0.0001686583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092214,0.00003268232,0.0001133392,0.00004315838,0.0001948185,0.0001869608,0.0000969789,0.0001259078,0.00002574892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004747843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003629931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001022792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009535238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.00002676526,0.0003067472,0.000270859,0.0001040459,0.0003994583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990775,0.00009423467,0.0002066152,0.0001832707,0.00004635036,0.0003920489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001611246,0.0002490421,0.007588017,0.005402839,0.0001806915,0.00004124532,0.001049279,1.581198e-7,0.0003572102,0.2390017,0.004254264,0.7417144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002299398,0.0004727831,0.04441353,0.006252064,0.00005983596,0.0000156276,0.0001068558,0.000006625387,0.0001327023,0.03214413,0.9157749,0.0003909949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08809566,0.06394178,0.000006013862,0.141112,0.0002814934,0.001540679,0.0003338499,0.0001040451,0.7045845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766152,0.01778385,0.00003784545,0.001737602,0.0002978405,0.000008185998,0.000007662643,0.000001797717,0.003510019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.184669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110748259","doi":"10.1038/s41893-020-00648-5","title":"Influence of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Sustainability","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Psychological intervention; Land tenure; Sustainable development; Environmental security; Government (linguistics); Land use; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Psychology; Ecology; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007406287310100216,"gpt":0.2530687529585459,"spread":0.2456624656484457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008508787,0.00008330469,0.000134506,0.00000488657,0.0001492965,0.00001274712,0.00008393321,0.0001345749,0.00004955966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005415288,0.00001614506,0.00009251838,0.00006758711,0.0001047133,0.00006155162,0.00006163734,0.0002386869,9.496164e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002483319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002903693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008422187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007383681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994219,0.00002861382,0.0001393779,0.0001845347,0.0001113129,0.000114287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997771,0.00004152953,0.00004970524,0.00003894501,0.00002420343,0.00006848147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003316683,0.0001651416,0.9870911,0.000130194,0.00001831953,0.000007340232,0.000386144,0.00003874653,0.002917534,0.001157652,0.00004439902,0.008010236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001150656,0.0002629974,0.9893184,0.00001244959,0.000007560247,7.876321e-7,0.0004424752,0.000005217893,0.0004505505,0.004523791,0.004790451,0.00007019716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934455,0.00004225043,1.449098e-7,0.006103665,0.00001315196,0.0001702294,0.00002030877,0.00001724971,0.0001874895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994301,0.00000920544,0.00000267751,0.0002631514,0.00004154892,0.000002394305,0.00002353571,4.333075e-7,0.0002269664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007940038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1148283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092571744","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080","title":"Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Land tenure; Environmental security; Conceptual framework; Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Archaeology; Law; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02986265825325374,"gpt":0.2490030362544705,"spread":0.2191403780012168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003848218,0.0001001478,0.0001503695,0.00000418202,0.0001591066,0.00007039691,0.0001050586,0.0001234206,0.0001372784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006881165,0.00001685643,0.00006686735,0.0001528494,0.00004790987,0.00007879424,0.00003426722,0.0001008007,0.00002289955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001208239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001145149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005157149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002282716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993451,0.00001447169,0.0001012543,0.0001716294,0.00007777427,0.0002898219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996205,0.00008418399,0.00003545059,0.00003045339,0.00002402445,0.0002054193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001776303,0.001132753,0.6765551,0.0003017432,0.0004723303,0.0000946752,0.06950176,0.00003741341,0.007269293,0.08547395,0.06259649,0.09478819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003808543,0.0003557275,0.03301843,0.00001051304,0.000004661848,0.00000356754,0.0002248994,0.00009508634,0.00009772288,0.00978246,0.9558526,0.0001734409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798701,0.00004116393,0.00001394987,0.01925437,0.00007179374,0.0001856289,0.0003202463,0.00007004276,0.0001726829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916455,0.00007296084,0.00008062838,0.004342462,0.002404305,0.00002031074,0.0000510145,0.000001090425,0.001381797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1503103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123468508","doi":"10.1257/mac.20150222","title":"Land Reform and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Agricultural economics; Land reform; Agriculture; Agricultural land; Context (archaeology); Land use; Transferability; Distribution (mathematics); Agricultural productivity; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economic growth; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02647379605466664,"gpt":0.2335963220661569,"spread":0.2071225260114902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001992735,0.0001536801,0.0004138947,0.0000224858,0.0002240813,0.0001923997,0.0003630146,0.00002571088,0.0000929733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000573131,0.0000350622,0.00006465954,0.000147074,0.0002585129,0.0004308005,0.0001497849,0.0001764115,0.00002566314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008858954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003313984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001573695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005058913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990191,0.00002695053,0.0002635489,0.0004136699,0.00003482043,0.0002418864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992374,0.0000456896,0.0003546146,0.0001020849,0.00001831354,0.0002418535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009724835,0.0001041623,0.5437074,0.00001433762,0.003600332,0.00005302179,0.001202593,0.0005932177,0.002595908,0.000491159,0.0006693067,0.4459961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592789,0.004351684,0.5034299,0.00002183084,0.001180484,0.0009085631,0.0099475,0.01903393,0.0005557348,0.0009809037,0.4563096,0.001687129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827089,0.00007874857,0.00003369625,0.01651025,0.00004678814,0.00008415701,0.0002269816,0.00001696052,0.0002935218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966887,0.0007050329,0.001225108,0.0007510795,0.0004490853,0.000001501833,0.00007965297,0.000002427782,0.00009740533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4556402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2822993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033615651","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjr056","title":"Incentives and the De Soto Effect","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Economics; Moral hazard; Incentive; Welfare; Margin (machine learning); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Property rights; Distribution (mathematics); Monetary economics; Market economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007228566503821534,"gpt":0.1843129641262719,"spread":0.1770843976224504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009508304,0.00004673307,0.0001044893,0.000002640908,0.0001495169,0.00004801946,0.0001413337,0.00002601438,0.00001774157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004558725,0.000004932157,0.00006866969,0.00001504809,0.0001087366,0.0001397006,0.000008244439,0.00008898119,0.000003986324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008845929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002653977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002563813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004376478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996276,0.00007713265,0.0001276394,0.00002580341,0.00002101754,0.0001208321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994959,0.0002958823,0.000128515,0.0000206441,0.00001069167,0.00004832682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007076759,0.00008633952,0.02013731,0.000007339742,0.0001882091,0.000001769776,0.01013407,0.00001148747,0.001927037,0.01007332,0.0006962271,0.9560292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005678885,0.006058184,0.5247738,0.00007496831,0.0003045601,0.001256067,0.01063259,0.00112349,0.002274921,0.104572,0.3426249,0.0006256375],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965345,0.0003561264,0.000002273702,0.002250989,0.0006543029,0.00004765972,8.749602e-7,0.000001493829,0.0001517412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973683,0.0002522193,0.000007397893,0.00008951022,0.002206432,6.195929e-7,2.184683e-7,2.962333e-7,0.00007494701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1149978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150954041","doi":"10.1080/01436590701637375","title":"Eliminating market distortions, perpetuating rural inequality: an evaluation of market-assisted land reform in Guatemala","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Third World Quarterly","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Land reform; Politics; Economics; Agrarian reform; Poverty; Agrarian society; Commodity; Development economics; Economic growth; Land tenure; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law; Geography; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995590156524508,"gpt":0.2790264888129356,"spread":0.2490705872476905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004574879,0.0001469047,0.0002367687,0.00006117419,0.0001856248,0.00004054875,0.0001710702,0.00007992653,0.0005014983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002626824,0.0000359442,0.00007563768,0.000467313,0.00005039228,0.0002907476,0.00001551768,0.0001477445,0.000004798088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001737245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001538796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003409715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07565865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981048,0.0002243318,0.0006191594,0.0002103234,0.0005218164,0.0003195505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992837,0.0001226759,0.0002591592,0.00009418133,0.0001528945,0.00008733266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001376519,0.0002270103,0.06903047,0.00002762552,0.00001279902,0.000004405701,0.001342255,0.000001257731,0.006400738,0.0001424285,0.00007305748,0.9226003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973866,0.0003593966,0.9913484,0.0001235175,0.00002322087,0.000005530112,0.004387758,0.00170086,0.0001537682,0.0007381509,0.0005752833,0.0001867283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983329,0.00004480136,0.000004221783,0.0004518108,0.0001338776,0.0002520194,0.00001523083,0.00004061381,0.01572844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975695,0.000004852198,0.0001079311,0.00003197337,0.0001873076,0.00001099109,0.0000985185,0.000001584247,0.001987362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9412082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575044500","doi":"10.3386/w23039","title":"Misallocation, Selection and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Panel Data from China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Productivity; China; Panel data; Econometrics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Macroeconomics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3997001799019236,"gpt":0.4594554873561897,"spread":0.0597553074542661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00128619,0.0001185969,0.0002936945,0.00008906552,0.000351944,0.0001780851,0.0006149607,0.0001571674,0.0001318851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000135031,0.00002824755,0.00004677738,0.0001375617,0.0002192251,0.0002332478,0.000484753,0.0003380443,0.000008016225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008656703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001697315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02365886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03438303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984774,0.0001048075,0.0002043821,0.0006709197,0.0003893893,0.0001531101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988331,0.0002696869,0.0002413126,0.0001916409,0.0004070702,0.00005725184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003385701,0.002521867,0.552783,0.0005583068,0.02362915,0.00001342747,0.003185042,0.01681682,0.02610252,0.1779747,0.01449182,0.1785377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000202515,0.0002073642,0.7137573,0.0000565091,0.0001338241,0.000002209884,0.00009323906,0.0235475,0.000285429,0.2584108,0.003055991,0.0002472417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902491,0.0001760795,0.000009887051,0.005475282,0.0000665304,0.0003693514,0.0007725331,0.00001130933,0.002869908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993484,0.0003030558,0.0002790267,0.00000242397,0.0003828241,0.0000197738,0.004364179,0.000001154728,0.001163619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1782904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585042058","doi":"10.3386/w25780","title":"Land Reform and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Data science; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3160178309542457,"gpt":0.4467094687940369,"spread":0.1306916378397912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571468,0.0001212055,0.0003464434,0.0001119938,0.0001211215,0.00009171056,0.0005353306,0.0001557827,0.00009754944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003762731,0.00002452938,0.0000559101,0.0002161987,0.0002206457,0.0001585678,0.0008127163,0.0003599502,0.00001542147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001569122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008106794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01176588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985166,0.00007417791,0.0002150706,0.0006210259,0.0003787548,0.0001943771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990172,0.0002652896,0.0001491255,0.0001862248,0.0003262439,0.00005595011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00402515,0.00197341,0.5894522,0.00152448,0.02070557,0.00002912289,0.001820755,0.007822334,0.01664868,0.2707958,0.009393373,0.07580918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00130881,0.001775449,0.5172849,0.0003224531,0.0004822226,0.00002820327,0.001024383,0.0213355,0.001427561,0.4140116,0.03964157,0.001357344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794413,0.0002928624,0.000001545578,0.005034602,0.0000721981,0.0005154429,0.000974916,0.000009225006,0.0136579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935713,0.0003576446,0.0002767558,0.000008172357,0.0002291213,0.00001334861,0.002740017,0.000001270011,0.002802404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1432158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125631965","doi":"10.1186/2193-1801-3-85","title":"Identifying and measuring land-use and proximity conflicts: methods and identification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SpringerPlus","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montpellier; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; AgroParisTech; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Computer science; Identification (biology); Data science; Data collection; Multidisciplinary approach; Data mining; Management science; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05640333996367031,"gpt":0.2784739458061947,"spread":0.2220706058425244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005573189,0.00008573042,0.0001194773,0.00001041924,0.0002655163,0.0002491135,0.00005021116,0.00006142509,0.000005445878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005251145,0.00001939777,0.00001662366,0.00005335981,0.000069714,0.000267179,0.00008064688,0.00007001398,0.000001472889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005605019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001014538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003909273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002581639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993606,0.00005987884,0.0001280651,0.000234036,0.00008092108,0.0001365356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.00008421838,0.00005701767,0.00004055993,0.00002813743,0.0000863905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001674518,0.0000193768,0.09629862,0.00006139594,0.00002020422,0.000001389485,0.0005481361,3.346421e-7,0.2294658,0.001579125,0.000004609716,0.6719842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001630302,0.00003732593,0.9650226,0.00003222864,0.00001562529,0.00001717387,0.0000454362,0.0003730053,0.008175857,0.002583088,0.0233895,0.0001450932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988012,0.0002796091,0.0002288129,0.0003334025,0.00009398968,0.0001102093,0.000002146,0.00004119256,0.000109409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980844,0.0003624028,0.0009929558,0.0000447472,0.0001112672,0.000004516892,0.00000279806,8.751313e-7,0.0003959822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.868724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2402208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027281108","doi":"10.1017/s0022216x04007783","title":"Chicken Thieves, Witches, and Judges: Vigilante Justice and Customary Law in Guatemala","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Latin American Studies","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556170215977907,"gpt":0.2578068873027987,"spread":0.2322451851430196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001995585,0.0001035887,0.0003283777,0.00001519808,0.0001548061,0.0000248846,0.00006860556,0.00002585683,0.000002932285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002744779,0.00001955213,0.00003467347,0.0001518069,0.0003826385,0.000110613,0.00005933532,0.000145348,8.72993e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002196747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007238314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003979914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001376155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.00002687931,0.000265887,0.0001033768,0.0001321781,0.0001454404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995098,0.0001154759,0.0002373012,0.00001942474,0.00005352313,0.00006452522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009370678,0.0009202642,0.4374142,0.0005125763,0.001194901,0.001123089,0.03042657,0.0001280183,0.03653235,0.007831984,0.001704072,0.4812749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001064154,0.001740914,0.9381281,0.0003833517,0.0001611228,0.0003157424,0.03115811,0.000005553247,0.0002800919,0.005152296,0.02126894,0.0003416545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916831,0.002492918,3.535255e-7,0.005123036,0.00006044457,0.00004788876,0.000003629458,0.000006191278,0.0005824316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990748,0.008210907,0.0003005875,0.0004330107,0.0001890082,7.927983e-7,8.161838e-7,7.59094e-7,0.0001161149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5007138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1409847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955799830","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dbf","title":"The contrasting effects of farm size on farm incomes and food production","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Economics; Food security; Production (economics); Agricultural productivity; Productivity; Food processing; Poverty; Business; Geography; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01096824330931505,"gpt":0.2187397475298611,"spread":0.2077715042205461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003176134,0.00006137697,0.00007184099,0.000005885854,0.000291841,0.00002491886,0.0001052152,0.00002724841,0.00001179522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004510716,0.00001052905,0.000027897,0.00005215064,0.0002193786,0.00002357766,0.00006885558,0.0001477105,0.0000138078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002896943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001033985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004124166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005908926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.00008260863,0.00007973827,0.0001669188,0.0003203316,0.0002207578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.0006665701,0.00002826125,0.00004528943,0.000002569417,0.00004096784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002738753,0.00004127722,0.02349504,0.00001040478,0.00001244567,9.02502e-7,0.00005704343,0.000001651097,0.8054478,0.00003741599,0.00001702828,0.1708516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002547762,0.001103807,0.8979108,0.00003539971,0.000002482538,0.000002874164,0.0003315411,0.00001447415,0.08435032,0.0001909936,0.0157143,0.00008819969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944347,0.00009875923,1.221446e-7,0.004912596,0.0001087176,0.0003494183,0.000003248051,0.000005596882,0.00008686124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987679,0.0002029003,0.000002661119,0.0001217668,0.0001050786,0.000009102343,0.000002750975,7.388651e-7,0.0007870663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8744158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2244635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1673245817","doi":"","title":"Despotic dominion : Property rights in British settler societies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0111549012834885,"gpt":0.1868881786303076,"spread":0.1757332773468191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008448694,0.00005928011,0.00008695728,0.000003402201,0.0001360558,0.00005841569,0.00009158858,0.00007134575,0.001250331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001619288,0.000007362731,0.00004742369,0.00008766546,0.00004044773,0.0001316738,0.00002062343,0.00006139855,0.00009159843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003020145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002304954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04859514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.00001458126,0.0001158421,0.0001369865,0.00009334033,0.0001810253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998913,0.00001646504,0.00001637497,0.00001820007,0.00001500382,0.00004268414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002121912,0.0003618592,0.006656353,0.000009068724,0.00001414925,0.00001897566,0.0002445227,0.00001075309,0.008977987,0.0005911059,0.03226633,0.9508277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209772,0.00007619885,0.1496049,0.00002450679,0.000002460642,0.00002150203,0.00009041403,0.0001238422,0.001255672,0.002505329,0.8459058,0.0001683677],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840316,0.00005132521,4.092038e-7,0.007105565,0.00007428706,0.0001142186,0.000004257187,0.00004671144,0.00857159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320518,0.00006039457,0.00008634441,0.0003236209,0.0003077481,0.000004648055,0.0000125255,2.317074e-7,0.06715273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003799357","doi":"10.1111/1468-0130.00267","title":"Land Tenure and Legal Pluralism in the Peace Process","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peace &amp Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Land tenure; Normative; Process (computing); Armed conflict; Pluralism (philosophy); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Social conflict; Conflict resolution; Politics; Legal research; Legal realism; Epistemology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03987490332516888,"gpt":0.2452264816224411,"spread":0.2053515782972722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000203963,0.00009185681,0.00009227671,0.000006515698,0.0001575062,0.00006608434,0.0001017802,0.00006399328,0.00007013686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001104005,0.00001325931,0.0000246344,0.0001579673,0.00004094144,0.000117725,0.00001291545,0.0001118194,0.00001152587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005613127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002528254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008419232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008309217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.00004568334,0.00007559978,0.0001552462,0.0001247488,0.0002012898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998468,0.00003024862,0.00002863843,0.00003669766,0.00001582906,0.00004185584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002066159,0.001496645,0.6117334,0.0003110468,0.00008312563,0.0004229536,0.08096684,0.000005323255,0.01177318,0.0126394,0.02142692,0.2589346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001540838,0.00005592041,0.1360438,0.00001753086,0.000003986378,0.00006717498,0.0008900276,0.000003514722,0.00005646976,0.0002552608,0.8623307,0.000121528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877729,0.001076307,1.401526e-7,0.00923174,0.00007525955,0.0001916265,0.00001011114,0.00001800453,0.001623941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951119,0.000589765,0.000006205296,0.0005719166,0.0002912783,0.0000259536,0.00002048259,6.590508e-7,0.003381824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4636738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796261499","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.047","title":"Contested commons: Agricultural modernization, tenure ambiguities and intra-familial land grabbing in Ghana","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"Nordiska Afrikainstitutet","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Land grabbing; Commons; Agricultural land; Modernization theory; Agriculture; Corporate governance; Business; Government (linguistics); Land law; Food security; Economic growth; Land management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02257254631366394,"gpt":0.2271314471557647,"spread":0.2045589008421007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006435037,0.0001236716,0.0001593434,0.00002230113,0.0002333718,0.0001290135,0.00008173333,0.00009763525,0.00001688101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003630433,0.00002342943,0.00002678213,0.0002351446,0.0001148491,0.0001937996,0.00004525745,0.00008401545,0.000006647874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008045465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01677944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05930867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992973,0.00003638208,0.0001644956,0.000168312,0.00008750297,0.0002460271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997322,0.0000481076,0.00004498334,0.00003586006,0.00005826174,0.00008060964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006704189,0.0001373583,0.9710227,0.00001937787,0.00003155785,0.00001338054,0.002290435,0.000005215893,0.00454575,0.002338282,0.0007556769,0.0187732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000487594,0.0001327057,0.99216,0.00003824277,0.000006178334,0.00002489624,0.0002697475,0.0002249085,0.000265733,0.0009183644,0.005294162,0.0001774616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968712,0.00005319785,0.000002710587,0.002439639,0.00007907142,0.0001222385,0.00005124089,0.00004584317,0.0003349003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970216,0.0001055427,0.00002291498,0.0003216382,0.0008728888,0.000004595431,0.00008142091,0.000001063212,0.001568297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04252924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070804466","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.002","title":"Land regularization on agricultural frontiers: The case of Northwestern Petén, Guatemala","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Florida","keywords":"Frontier; Property rights; Land tenure; Land titling; Agriculture; Regularization (linguistics); Food security; Business; Agricultural land; De facto; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Agricultural economics; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01525084552344896,"gpt":0.2218486122004308,"spread":0.2065977666769818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006007066,0.0001003264,0.0001180208,0.00001107811,0.0001966249,0.00006235015,0.000113657,0.000066948,0.00002382512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000820468,0.00001331898,0.00006743352,0.0001678815,0.00003795994,0.0001328693,0.00002589332,0.00006414366,0.00001345196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001328957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000521409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006474811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01828862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994428,0.00003366246,0.0001478328,0.0001255205,0.00008337689,0.0001667654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999738,0.00003098696,0.00007875904,0.00005995151,0.0000374529,0.00005485688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002429837,0.0009744273,0.6619389,0.00005281633,0.0002198673,0.000237081,0.003996393,0.0007339356,0.007231939,0.00694359,0.008360245,0.3090678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005099555,0.0002359173,0.9021303,0.00003294848,0.00002860585,0.0003528209,0.0002194364,0.0002645856,0.001300026,0.0003886148,0.09430126,0.0002355488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943186,0.00003107732,0.000002734074,0.005061876,0.0000653113,0.00012232,0.00005649688,0.00002272752,0.0003188335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912447,0.00008232149,0.00003773607,0.0002613213,0.0008937516,0.000003512185,0.00006933846,7.731556e-7,0.007406565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3088323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988541320","doi":"10.1002/ldr.1056","title":"Some notes on the economic assessment of land degradation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Degradation and Development","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Land degradation; Desertification; Valuation (finance); Natural resource economics; Environmental degradation; Land management; Business; Sustainable land management; Land use; Sustainable development; Contingent valuation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Economics; Environmental science; Willingness to pay; Finance; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02208341372472383,"gpt":0.2321949666676227,"spread":0.2101115529428989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001773772,0.00007937803,0.00009028886,0.00000993934,0.0002084575,0.00004360136,0.00006780039,0.00004928442,0.0001552573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006101994,0.00001336771,0.00001897058,0.00003048463,0.00002888524,0.00006975856,0.00002001334,0.0000740403,0.00001081846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001270775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002664521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001999975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002090856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995148,0.00001424446,0.0001562245,0.0001210924,0.0001024521,0.00009122523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997185,0.0001140016,0.00007345472,0.0000359787,0.00001695939,0.00004105876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004053285,0.000147237,0.4624192,0.00001628813,0.00005570524,0.000001214043,0.0002095246,0.00001881636,0.01815094,0.02883887,0.000566057,0.4895357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881982,0.00006285409,0.9080411,0.000009279351,0.000003557852,0.000002715243,0.00003202732,0.0002411952,0.00704858,0.0009608362,0.08329789,0.0001118295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997067,0.00001053066,0.00001083312,0.002163668,0.000189312,0.0001115957,0.00001122355,0.00001381013,0.0004220625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998467,0.00008838716,0.0004097283,0.0001706245,0.0001242264,0.00000887077,0.0001327103,5.811798e-7,0.0005978523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4894238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1699959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607770810","doi":"","title":"Land-value taxation around the world","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell eBooks","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mesopotamia; Feudalism; Geography; History; Ancient history; Cartography; Archaeology; Law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01471187995890467,"gpt":0.2011984466772755,"spread":0.1864865667183709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001449622,0.0002683898,0.0002421191,0.0000152796,0.0004035138,0.0001334277,0.0003924038,0.000253117,0.00125696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002321096,0.00003547783,0.0002090729,0.00004080801,0.0001546206,0.0000287496,0.00004951649,0.0003405058,0.0006517771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004941173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003896293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002510223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003048217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988348,0.00004048382,0.0002479831,0.0003098388,0.0002836846,0.0002831405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994206,0.0001025659,0.0002560653,0.0001146578,0.00002650001,0.0000795522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001209896,0.00007918546,0.0001401561,0.00004987332,0.0001770559,0.00004748195,0.0002647018,0.00002743991,0.0003455158,0.02329109,0.4741605,0.501296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008126668,0.00006238854,0.0005223592,0.00006066464,0.00003381261,0.000007841525,0.000006812574,0.00001609656,0.00006813932,0.02265863,0.9762415,0.0002404796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003029859,0.0001290713,2.226021e-7,0.0006099478,0.0002898439,0.0003873634,0.00005658394,0.00008191619,0.9954152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002288608,0.0001370135,0.000004284119,0.0005810255,0.002911424,0.00001299318,0.000248429,0.000002946071,0.9938133],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.502081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395095590","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjae010","title":"Land Security and Mobility Frictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Labor mobility; Productivity; China; Economics; Social security; Agricultural productivity; Agricultural land; Panel data; Sorting; Labour economics; Agricultural economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Geography; Econometrics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01170678932691496,"gpt":0.1985533210597311,"spread":0.1868465317328161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002460054,0.00004219073,0.00007797165,0.000005299738,0.0001097552,0.0000994806,0.00008181133,0.0000280658,0.0000549381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001044698,0.000005963083,0.00006085882,0.00002987761,0.00003915777,0.0001301486,0.000005560426,0.0001031189,0.000005965874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001006079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000607533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005656097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003627944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996992,0.00001543486,0.0001500674,0.00005152056,0.00001818565,0.0000656126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998035,0.00007456193,0.0000460439,0.00002010479,0.00001505333,0.00004077417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001030605,0.0002393545,0.007117137,0.00003966763,0.0002971069,0.00002725962,0.008460517,0.00004870434,0.001829834,0.01315584,0.002029739,0.9666518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320503,0.002678241,0.08251947,0.00006882335,0.00009913422,0.001109565,0.003534707,0.003393339,0.0001743847,0.4320757,0.473713,0.0003016406],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952418,0.0003921925,0.000001550742,0.003749114,0.0003237906,0.00002918696,0.00001211252,0.000005717411,0.0002445745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989858,0.0003956656,0.000005291011,0.00003356106,0.0004500964,3.251551e-7,8.042393e-7,2.78795e-7,0.0001281534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09592937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802852682","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12275","title":"Tenure Security and Farm Efficiency Analysis Correcting for Biases from Observed and Unobserved Variables: Evidence from Benin","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Selection bias; Propensity score matching; Productivity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Econometrics; Matching (statistics); Sample (material); Economics; Agriculture; Variables; Statistics; Agricultural economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Geography; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480078885787022,"gpt":0.2246843438749842,"spread":0.176676455296282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002798209,0.000172205,0.0004450839,0.00001885042,0.0003381034,0.0002151758,0.0001825039,0.0001312753,0.00005085288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001349322,0.00003573678,0.0001998203,0.0002045807,0.00009015973,0.0003071236,0.00006510454,0.0001268965,8.059599e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003756138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001169597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007300236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989339,0.00003780626,0.0004850464,0.0002638187,0.00007547397,0.000203994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982542,0.0007960065,0.0005368895,0.00004173754,0.0002165262,0.0001546658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00127553,0.0005481803,0.6279985,0.00005611513,0.004515073,0.00001956092,0.01029552,0.001196204,0.2146522,0.0002015955,0.001175215,0.1380664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004596011,0.0007049183,0.9866393,0.0001427656,0.0005615965,0.00002981505,0.002446563,0.001825787,0.004618946,0.001203847,0.001074343,0.0002925462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977586,0.0006854387,0.00001300972,0.0008674049,0.0003525156,0.0001215484,0.000180028,0.00001054672,0.00001096647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970756,0.0009527878,0.0005441834,0.000073253,0.001230579,0.000001569957,0.00005679188,9.491194e-7,0.00006425808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3586408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4073703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295883415","doi":"10.1257/aer.20210059","title":"Factor Market Failures and the Adoption of Irrigation in Rwanda","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Irrigation; Inefficiency; Leverage (statistics); Economics; Context (archaeology); Agricultural economics; Regression discontinuity design; Geography; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01050308812482241,"gpt":0.2118763426320932,"spread":0.2013732545072708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002515263,0.00004093633,0.0001783928,0.000003717466,0.00006810652,0.000005842551,0.00007887426,0.000004994237,0.0006931353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004023854,0.000006774334,0.00004205089,0.00006097252,0.0001194445,0.00003387693,0.00003587625,0.00004357793,0.000002652274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001868752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004364982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001380495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005701004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995747,0.00008914406,0.0001618145,0.00008538628,0.00003200009,0.00005694705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997517,0.00006044145,0.0001435905,0.00002766019,0.000003155954,0.00001344667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002259341,0.00001011234,0.002480749,0.00003624599,0.000006863801,1.956154e-7,0.00004711299,0.000002408052,0.00005216202,0.0009106892,0.0005250663,0.9959058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000207662,0.0001226286,0.2002072,0.00007149678,0.000009280616,0.000006656823,0.0002621505,0.00008911399,0.000007737626,0.0007082341,0.7982279,0.00007994585],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701594,0.009431078,3.191555e-7,0.01762915,0.0000795325,0.0004696484,0.0000502122,0.000007927521,0.002172787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601442,0.03906524,0.000009134496,0.0004350674,0.00002622117,0.0000281948,0.00001502788,3.080436e-7,0.0002766363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7589344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138635841","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00368.x","title":"Illegal Evictions? Overwriting Possession and Orality with Law's Violence in<scp>C</scp>ambodia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Orality; Endogamy; Expropriation; Kinship; Barter; Law; Property law; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Market economy; Ethnic group","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03438736004293071,"gpt":0.2372561143050462,"spread":0.2028687542621155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003539266,0.00009294403,0.0001667737,0.00001782618,0.0002460314,0.0000443942,0.00008490987,0.00007685805,0.00002093356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001686194,0.00001671417,0.00004529784,0.0001516768,0.00005302618,0.000672549,0.0000389866,0.0001804738,0.000001864239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001953645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005744409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008216193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999271,0.00003370178,0.0002020894,0.00008225081,0.0001747805,0.0002362243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999483,0.0000896896,0.0001863758,0.00002388232,0.00005729816,0.0001597478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009474388,0.0006645711,0.8708916,0.0000645238,0.00005916255,0.0001043644,0.00459217,0.000001291153,0.01505678,0.005241263,0.0005916753,0.1026378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003304613,0.0003844379,0.958524,0.0003510774,0.00001497564,0.0002766237,0.001521552,0.000004243144,0.0005235744,0.0005697994,0.03742966,0.00006956798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997364,0.0006467754,8.545052e-7,0.001009846,0.0002019195,0.00007555029,0.000009071072,0.000006952891,0.0006850612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978322,0.0006893766,0.00006693863,0.0002161735,0.00112405,0.000001706362,0.000003771052,6.078438e-7,0.00006513207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1025682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1892299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163972100","doi":"10.1017/9781782045588","title":"Africa's Land Rush","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Land grabbing; Geography; Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Food security; Land tenure; Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Agriculture; Economic growth; Political science; Economy; Agricultural economics; Economics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02729956241227202,"gpt":0.1921368071277488,"spread":0.1648372447154768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008183863,0.0001455029,0.0001884637,0.00000459687,0.00007922161,0.00004226888,0.0001857935,0.0002797222,0.002344482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000195536,0.00001376157,0.00009131478,0.00003251405,0.00003438443,0.00003098313,0.00005500359,0.000126529,0.0006458993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003014838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002781411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009480217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007757595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993237,0.000006248808,0.0001131106,0.00018291,0.0001996915,0.0001743275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997212,0.00002167636,0.0000493642,0.00003632159,0.00004891372,0.0001224996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005061284,0.00001708724,0.00003237545,0.00000451978,0.00001636191,0.00001055021,0.0000231174,5.345537e-8,0.00002774251,0.001069468,0.9336036,0.06519006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004386495,0.00008548926,0.0001477965,0.00001337669,0.000008625389,0.000004633416,0.000004294081,0.000001102229,0.000004013839,0.0313928,0.9681364,0.0001576226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001577301,0.0002561415,9.692879e-8,0.0004901458,0.000234123,0.00009358085,0.00005651946,0.00007806736,0.9986336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001995071,0.0001389501,0.000008870931,0.00007289721,0.001240013,0.00000218504,0.0002727713,6.308151e-7,0.9980642],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943162517","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.031","title":"Powers of exclusion and counter-exclusion: The political ecology of ethno-territorial customary land boundary conflicts in Ghana","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Boundary (topology); Land tenure; Redress; Maritime boundary; Dilemma; Land use; Politics; Statutory law; Expropriation; Stakeholder; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography; Ecology; International law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415027292094239,"gpt":0.2468127732729329,"spread":0.2326625003519905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001415679,0.00009947451,0.0002340857,0.00002626904,0.00008603452,0.00002168443,0.0001442659,0.0001555696,0.00007170279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002167339,0.00001885782,0.000049748,0.0001275879,0.0001658968,0.00007781859,0.0001241084,0.0001148465,0.000003837158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002096897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002997654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02405203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01040648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00006107453,0.0002174401,0.0001480346,0.0001380713,0.0002591017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995769,0.0001745898,0.00007477925,0.0000657199,0.00003253073,0.00007552302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002892929,0.0002068516,0.9797059,0.00004843267,0.00002813802,0.00001068207,0.0009672152,0.000001450989,0.01068786,0.004107175,0.0002042777,0.003742715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00104841,0.0004826911,0.9479111,0.00005696997,0.00001041608,0.00002425606,0.0002366554,0.00006008227,0.0009371709,0.001087587,0.04800523,0.0001394188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943013,0.00005187619,1.111391e-7,0.004430088,0.0003641321,0.0001631148,0.00006549144,0.000007794036,0.0006160612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984254,0.00007807494,0.000005210348,0.0004146947,0.0005389747,0.000001574821,0.00002224372,0.000001006688,0.000512809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04780096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582850234","doi":"10.1111/joac.12201","title":"Revisiting the World Bank's land law reform agenda in Africa: The promise and perils of customary practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Land law; Customary land; Corporate governance; Law reform; Land reform; Land tenure; Political science; Politics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.102967310466809,"gpt":0.2831852808399442,"spread":0.1802179703731351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009348557,0.0000742769,0.0001686915,0.0000114502,0.00049426,0.0001618192,0.0003542135,0.0000401099,0.00004079478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004509451,0.000009631342,0.00006661553,0.00007334654,0.0001405034,0.0004239433,0.00007995302,0.0001958394,7.562972e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001492161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006788016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001082917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006090785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993345,0.00005693099,0.0002339426,0.00007333313,0.0001599578,0.0001413723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998722,0.0001020691,0.001011592,0.0000730112,0.00005084299,0.00004049387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006895933,0.0002585976,0.08932706,0.0001951293,0.0002437388,0.0003442071,0.01368401,5.418609e-7,0.01302846,0.005103488,0.001966792,0.8751584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002889278,0.0001598507,0.5900857,0.0002083157,0.00003069827,0.0001036481,0.0009505405,0.000007723277,0.0002494995,0.0005941972,0.4072354,0.00008548258],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9079957,0.00163176,2.578221e-8,0.07603007,0.0001890899,0.0001980029,0.00001207575,0.000002993102,0.01394026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969507,0.0008791558,0.00001315519,0.0001515176,0.001282562,0.000002489623,9.230425e-7,5.467947e-7,0.0007189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3801498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979527353","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.018","title":"A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Property rights; Collective action; Institutionalisation; Economic system; Common-pool resource; Business; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Microeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04647320081193174,"gpt":0.2871947888119448,"spread":0.2407215880000131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001953939,0.00006711805,0.0001052947,0.00001362673,0.0002615188,0.0000204274,0.00005274694,0.0001188598,0.00004487292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003382077,0.00001739745,0.00004134965,0.00008401695,0.00006179357,0.0001413538,0.00004686163,0.00004680868,0.000001312732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001519935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000153786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001427876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001396823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00001446345,0.0001699044,0.00009489512,0.0000348826,0.0001880668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.000125851,0.0001027015,0.00001863127,0.00002119891,0.00006185384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001582221,0.00020722,0.01355269,0.00002448549,0.00005592786,8.548029e-8,0.0001749162,0.002287165,0.00004701349,0.8166199,0.00002783494,0.1668446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003974283,0.0004408398,0.8999193,0.00001297134,0.00002289713,0.000006619392,0.0008135317,0.01418583,0.00007642809,0.07155173,0.01241078,0.0001616864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961759,0.00001118502,0.00125723,0.0007115398,0.00009360469,0.0003014361,0.00003082376,0.00001288807,0.001405429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967442,0.0001268564,0.002309862,0.0002424236,0.0001915388,0.00002444694,0.00007888653,5.310514e-7,0.0002812982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2011418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769907579","doi":"10.3386/w24034","title":"The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Agricultural productivity; Resource productivity; Resource (disambiguation); Agricultural land; Agricultural economics; Resource allocation; Business; Economics; Geography; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economic growth; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09861070742614397,"gpt":0.3767788189674556,"spread":0.2781681115413116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532904,0.00009688195,0.0001761332,0.00002222201,0.0004224323,0.00008653375,0.0003894383,0.0001584702,0.000008386094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003805914,0.00001767296,0.00006476063,0.00002791725,0.0003013998,0.0000523225,0.0002764495,0.0003170142,0.000003546895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007057388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004821126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005169595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004753056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988649,0.0001454352,0.0001890938,0.0002781315,0.0003668117,0.0001556675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981958,0.001199237,0.0002145518,0.0001000227,0.0002473616,0.00004299956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001739483,0.0009654792,0.02710663,0.001665512,0.00087379,0.000004976287,0.0006121378,0.0004086227,0.06286934,0.2530175,0.03741019,0.6133264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002458307,0.0003161916,0.7927136,0.0002305728,0.000008095554,0.000003360186,0.00003389395,0.0000936406,0.007299458,0.1803969,0.01849998,0.000158512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757414,0.0002639852,1.87003e-8,0.007020318,0.0001828934,0.0005038019,0.00002800823,0.000004730374,0.01625487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947677,0.0005065487,0.000003436438,0.00000344562,0.0004850749,0.00002922161,0.0001056457,7.156157e-7,0.004098201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.765607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.324905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001604623","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2014.932173","title":"The promise of land: undoing a century of dispossession in South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Dynamics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Trillium Foundation; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Land reform; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007327706518015541,"gpt":0.1985690989930747,"spread":0.1912413924750592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001373659,0.00004020657,0.00009146503,0.000003312713,0.0001370132,0.000008077462,0.00009835626,0.00005234713,0.000003327895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001080875,0.000006024956,0.00004813128,0.0001060135,0.00006325241,0.00001953991,0.00002820435,0.00004933235,4.485022e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001073782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004358832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001159594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001481361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996027,0.00002994517,0.0001199143,0.00005706197,0.00008607721,0.0001043056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999817,0.00005009348,0.00008254439,0.00001722622,0.00001857906,0.00001451405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852363,0.0004102346,0.2430735,0.00009520568,0.00003826291,0.000001729923,0.01769103,0.00003003363,0.01216244,0.05916304,0.00004469426,0.6670046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007699113,0.0003238898,0.9398733,0.0001133547,0.00001978961,5.615167e-7,0.006121647,0.008683661,0.000171643,0.02585377,0.01778728,0.0002812288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985629,0.00002604808,0.000003589902,0.0002826422,0.00007031159,0.00006614529,0.00001657061,0.000005453517,0.0009662868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996206,0.00002927756,0.000006817888,0.000003379523,0.00007187658,0.000001327163,0.000009918445,3.359513e-7,0.0002565093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6967997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1053808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362471988","doi":"10.1257/mac.20170229","title":"Land Misallocation and Productivity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Total factor productivity; Economics; Productivity; Renting; Capital (architecture); Agricultural productivity; Poverty; Agriculture; Inequality; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Labour economics; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009359327781130931,"gpt":0.2082277616578034,"spread":0.1988684338766725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002594404,0.00009111413,0.0001650168,0.00001962472,0.0002351256,0.0001135793,0.0001119742,0.0000248445,0.00006037915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005585948,0.00002229851,0.0000476711,0.00006043395,0.0001339933,0.000180684,0.00004264309,0.0001029535,0.0002286138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005661162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001526401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003731794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007382602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993727,0.00001913048,0.0001852235,0.0001819086,0.00002269932,0.0002182891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.00005143692,0.0001671716,0.00003647129,0.00001037786,0.0001160213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002580737,0.00001489532,0.1240275,0.000002403622,0.00003779052,0.000004530979,0.00009579004,0.000134042,0.001695447,0.000148003,0.001180438,0.8726333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002233577,0.0002322789,0.636896,0.000005623804,0.00001066663,0.00028801,0.0004813963,0.001058678,0.0002994992,0.004125118,0.3561045,0.0002749347],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923206,0.00002154961,0.000001460629,0.006902869,0.0002921749,0.00006283261,0.00001832499,0.00004122139,0.0003389889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969515,0.001178134,0.00003468602,0.0001486199,0.0007585541,0.000002710711,0.00001536687,0.000001440454,0.000908958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121091211","doi":"10.1080/09692290601081426","title":"‘Free market’, export-led development strategy and its impact on rural livelihoods, poverty and inequality: The Philippine experience seen from a Southeast Asian perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Political Economy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Poverty; Livelihood; Economics; Development economics; Agrarian structure; Agriculture; Inequality; Globalization; Economic growth; Market economy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01413108931956935,"gpt":0.2662698979730984,"spread":0.252138808653529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001416869,0.0001326334,0.0002236917,0.000008268152,0.00007819645,0.00004046286,0.0001896388,0.00003787837,0.0009500994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003561352,0.00002691324,0.00007522719,0.00003413838,0.00006764213,0.000105483,0.0000796754,0.00007413453,0.000004216669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006066155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002186048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000751028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006034653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991679,0.00003973001,0.000312322,0.0001819707,0.0001225644,0.000175582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995639,0.00009808419,0.00009889135,0.00004823068,0.00009123037,0.00009969206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001655903,0.000495818,0.01821878,0.0003069981,0.0003428723,0.00001134528,0.0005774507,4.325555e-7,0.0003795886,0.9122266,0.001313087,0.0659614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004899999,0.0002494194,0.8883326,0.001400693,0.0000275528,0.00003492214,0.002588464,0.0001437826,0.0002775497,0.03872246,0.06738115,0.0003514084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8522323,0.006447359,0.000003007307,0.03711935,0.00008306528,0.0004941798,0.0005624138,0.00001963971,0.1030387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973126,0.0009022538,0.00001246498,0.0010583,0.0002645432,0.0000154333,0.00005678007,9.178865e-7,0.0003766764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063149090","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00088.x","title":"Restructuring and Redundancy: The Impacts and Illogic of Neoliberal Agricultural Reforms in Jamaica","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Agriculture; Economics; Development economics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Economic policy; Food sovereignty; Business; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Political science; Food security; Geography; Politics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011042472390425,"gpt":0.2079024775925613,"spread":0.1877920528686571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002013882,0.00009396901,0.0001924389,0.00001991439,0.0001016735,0.00004139802,0.0001226606,0.00007531518,0.000007638918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001213416,0.00001274596,0.00005654667,0.0001529379,0.00009553432,0.0002537523,0.00004371965,0.0001710077,2.253104e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002276424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007342491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004861592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007951937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993278,0.00002096129,0.0002635986,0.00008109929,0.0001376701,0.0001688968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995952,0.00002563092,0.0002259352,0.00002563185,0.00003871633,0.0000888346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009050321,0.0004900897,0.0666471,0.0002696161,0.0002660854,0.0004671158,0.03791372,0.00003346711,0.3561657,0.007058062,0.0003942529,0.5293897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757904,0.0004468506,0.9870257,0.0001108169,0.000008205176,0.0004624559,0.0006800527,6.522932e-7,0.00118503,0.008338849,0.001185499,0.00008014144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896269,0.0008723212,5.794621e-8,0.009144559,0.0001138349,0.00009275343,0.000006687584,0.000003107058,0.0001397734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979435,0.001434591,0.00004366015,0.0001183918,0.0004081909,8.049395e-7,0.000002390631,4.476098e-7,0.00004807957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9203786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07820003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143050676","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00129.x","title":"Migrant Land Rights Reception and ‘Clearing To Claim’ in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Deforestation Example From Southern Zambia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Resources Forum","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Clearing; Deforestation (computer science); Land law; Human rights; Land tenure; Geography; Development economics; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Economic growth; Political science; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Sociology; Agriculture; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01170464032730317,"gpt":0.1956554437286073,"spread":0.1839508034013041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001125097,0.0001309712,0.0001517177,0.00002804622,0.0002504989,0.00009047145,0.0001215779,0.0001184566,0.0000644557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007065289,0.00002926354,0.00004713572,0.0001852934,0.00003124754,0.0001395799,0.00005186838,0.0001659929,0.00005503391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003435028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001615601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01893146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.184575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989935,0.00003052559,0.0001888634,0.000281367,0.0001859366,0.0003198352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997196,0.00006064436,0.00005337337,0.00004285047,0.00002144493,0.0001020685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006021615,0.0001192513,0.05338806,0.000007864215,0.00002775766,0.00001218414,0.009646809,0.00006597213,0.08282034,0.00004029404,0.002016636,0.8512527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004964926,0.0001396563,0.3505126,0.00006351279,0.000007574831,0.00000411638,0.0004186538,0.0005980753,0.001000344,0.001419424,0.6450957,0.000243791],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969332,0.0006952845,0.000001154055,0.001872065,0.00007257773,0.0001983951,0.00003381241,0.00004303953,0.0001504286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983114,0.00007686788,0.00008068784,0.0001210897,0.0002524136,0.000006843726,0.00008258397,0.000001436603,0.001066697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751444547","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjy023","title":"Moral Hazard: Experimental Evidence from Tenancy Contracts*","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Sharecropping; Landlord; Leasehold estate; Moral hazard; Incentive; Productivity; Payment; Economics; Renting; Piece work; Agricultural productivity; Agriculture; Microeconomics; Business; Agricultural economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03434605314916471,"gpt":0.2299212034003071,"spread":0.1955751502511424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001779576,0.00008162454,0.0001541138,0.000005063048,0.0001527172,0.00008593396,0.0003156245,0.00004468672,0.0002412809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000245892,0.00001254833,0.0001049944,0.00002481178,0.0001170072,0.0003140023,0.000008950044,0.00009484375,0.00004461775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002451291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001072137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000301936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994395,0.00002356654,0.0002826306,0.00007121629,0.00004383666,0.000139275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995553,0.00008404446,0.0001979168,0.00004515599,0.00004517648,0.00007233196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007819508,0.0003824272,0.007349067,0.000003223976,0.000344951,0.00003989183,0.008858358,0.00003026981,0.2006461,0.001821616,0.00659119,0.773151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003678371,0.03378539,0.3777507,0.0006513473,0.0002385364,0.001028941,0.01737572,0.003225229,0.164515,0.1978424,0.1980424,0.001865907],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964606,0.0004449068,0.000002004032,0.002061599,0.0006833802,0.00004525773,0.000009537001,0.000005647821,0.000287101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997503,0.0001833044,0.00006051405,0.0001500785,0.001942309,5.459986e-7,0.000001215725,7.025955e-7,0.0001583317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2641856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161889263","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024009","title":"Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and its land claimants: a pre- and post-land claim conservation and development history","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; National park; Tourism; Politics; Political science; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Law; Archaeology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04352875620628231,"gpt":0.2161552059268351,"spread":0.1726264497205528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002867168,0.0001105955,0.0001069109,0.00002007889,0.0002839877,0.00002609013,0.00007245006,0.00006957351,0.0002194879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004103948,0.00002962657,0.00001367968,0.0000251029,0.000290276,0.0001713541,0.00006922104,0.0001530767,0.00000934021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007235978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006154936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002743638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.00007020158,0.0001249323,0.0002755951,0.0002448262,0.0002810179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997407,0.00004408039,0.00002297876,0.00003043211,0.000005246043,0.0001565659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002761127,0.0001670922,0.5756723,0.00004082921,0.00005291184,0.00003754695,0.003969813,7.620287e-8,0.3024876,0.00002126488,0.001309743,0.1159647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002795119,0.000172297,0.9174448,0.00001409575,0.000003697937,0.00001450586,0.0001397719,0.00001493039,0.001354503,0.00002099944,0.08041652,0.0001244001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961681,0.001209259,0.000001234454,0.002215304,0.00003569598,0.0002483646,0.00001573665,0.00001010659,0.00009618192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966722,0.001358773,0.00008219562,0.0006046449,0.00004502735,0.00001791166,0.00004090675,0.000001759488,0.001176644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3417725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2403238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053704570","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00515.x","title":"Land Tenure and the “Evidence Landscape” in Developing Countries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Land tenure; Geography; Economic geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01203974985749455,"gpt":0.2293967726951691,"spread":0.2173570228376745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004505838,0.00004985498,0.0001447941,0.000009150534,0.00008937864,0.00001508264,0.0001116317,0.00002668446,0.000004895529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000415318,0.000008153894,0.00007101511,0.0003756452,0.000218512,0.00005176597,0.00002740767,0.00004089113,2.584545e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004246284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006524542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006659261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005382336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994211,0.00007211943,0.0001576751,0.00006902569,0.0001698235,0.0001102308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.0002636936,0.0003367574,0.00003022677,0.00007511369,0.000009126678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002456767,0.00000763678,0.9963841,0.000002753207,0.00001689543,5.510832e-8,0.00007388076,0.00001223179,0.00004938053,0.0004096683,0.0005910114,0.002427767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120919,0.00002643477,0.9860006,0.00003345522,0.000006198229,2.439823e-7,0.0001812908,0.000007467819,0.0002149374,0.001046198,0.0123229,0.00003937344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.956088,0.0003020485,2.380241e-7,0.04326596,0.00002678738,0.0000794865,0.000009375167,0.000004139407,0.0002239731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997034,0.002181987,0.000009700191,0.0005254777,0.00003111126,0.000002282014,0.000002044603,3.144811e-7,0.0002130513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04274049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089019981","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12725","title":"Bridewealth Marriage in the 21st Century: A Case Study from Rural Mozambique","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles; Institute for Population Research, Ohio State University","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Wife; Population; Child marriage; Kinship; Sociology; Fertility; Autonomy; Polygyny; Geography; Gender studies; Demography; Agriculture; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01883905449264843,"gpt":0.2169397997855669,"spread":0.1981007452929184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000853739,0.0001138556,0.0002633251,0.000008010577,0.0002262678,0.0001211015,0.0003040456,0.0000475716,0.00003775048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003024567,0.00001518142,0.0001125005,0.0001599776,0.00006752043,0.000117391,0.00005950428,0.0003274557,0.000002638857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008920457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005859453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001540772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988121,0.0003514183,0.000349545,0.00009906929,0.0002283744,0.0001595398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999328,0.000290409,0.0002015892,0.00004647913,0.0000323004,0.0001012935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008314815,0.002679437,0.1081237,0.00006773025,0.001021115,0.04876634,0.1558202,0.00003604717,0.01827919,0.00278822,0.009649599,0.6444536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00941818,0.002832233,0.3701932,0.0000921598,0.000195121,0.002874193,0.5421615,0.0001481943,0.00004340841,0.0047047,0.0669243,0.0004128017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859537,0.0009077624,5.881282e-7,0.01232809,0.0001771811,0.0002659766,0.00001783947,0.000004534013,0.0003442468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944246,0.001696173,0.00000488714,0.002945977,0.0008981446,0.000002221297,0.00000230883,8.473393e-7,0.00002481195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6440408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8857779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087412260","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-30-12-1913","title":"Econometric analysis of the causes of forest land use changes in Hainan, China","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afforestation; Investment (military); China; Natural resource economics; Natural forest; Natural resource; Econometric model; Forest management; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Agroforestry; Population; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Economics; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05523098734489274,"gpt":0.2680816352338271,"spread":0.2128506478889343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007554761,0.00006229794,0.0002460109,0.0004347336,0.0001475314,0.00004377771,0.0004111916,0.00006744575,0.000796141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001070788,0.00001196279,0.0001446968,0.002704672,0.0002185601,0.0001023288,0.00001511209,0.0002107966,0.000001225695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006473793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1477306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989852,0.00009200544,0.0002702223,0.00008529683,0.0002569139,0.0003104037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992671,0.0001506373,0.0001114149,0.00006998578,0.0001723122,0.0002285668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001431253,0.00002044483,0.9894795,0.000009744269,0.00006236487,0.00001785778,0.0001255162,0.000386185,0.00003467951,0.0001039329,0.000100861,0.009644548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009458512,0.00020673,0.9833974,0.00006571854,0.00001981668,0.000007174177,0.00006288118,0.00004513533,0.00009974424,0.0003098179,0.01565005,0.00004097795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973941,0.000297745,3.481371e-8,0.001709195,0.00004021655,0.00007829488,0.00006622833,5.138417e-7,0.0004136381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977984,0.0005810932,0.000002796326,0.00001471304,0.00007926019,8.839709e-7,0.000005738741,6.761343e-7,0.001516452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8139972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8717185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977655512","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.09.007","title":"Moral hazard and Marshallian inefficiency: Evidence from Tunisia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Desjardins","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Inefficiency; Economics; Moral hazard; Landlord; Microeconomics; Comparative statics; Profit (economics); Production (economics); Econometrics; Incentive","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02123284739015841,"gpt":0.1888400632832266,"spread":0.1676072158930682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001466085,0.00007880796,0.0001462183,0.00001119977,0.00009245027,0.00007113132,0.0001379916,0.00004867541,0.00007547667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002719739,0.00001657593,0.00003696616,0.00003534591,0.00002918198,0.0001988685,0.00002848916,0.00006824824,0.000005891688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004059697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003218901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005566356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004242363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994127,0.000007339384,0.0003242124,0.00008242093,0.00005630075,0.000117014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996986,0.00003900512,0.000150868,0.00001712319,0.00002939606,0.00006502615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006941972,0.0001276197,0.3126369,0.000009777638,0.00007000919,0.00003315998,0.0002788988,0.0002520178,0.008787602,0.0006147829,0.001200927,0.6759189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001776248,0.00008828826,0.9118723,0.00005777678,0.000007533748,0.00003498196,0.00005674609,0.0001250488,0.001963484,0.006367448,0.07908833,0.0001604393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979131,0.000340296,0.000004332019,0.001218199,0.00018442,0.00003170915,0.000003595918,0.00000549797,0.0002988166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962772,0.0009146921,0.001988226,0.00005943019,0.0002995198,3.945171e-7,0.00000559023,6.089474e-7,0.0004543123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6757585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08264166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132232908","doi":"10.1111/j.1931-0846.2008.tb00305.x","title":"Mozambique, Neoliberal Land Reform, and the Limpopo National Park*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geographical Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Minnesota","keywords":"State (computer science); Land reform; Land law; National park; Investment (military); Political science; Neoliberalism (international relations); Space (punctuation); Land use; Land tenure; Geography; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics; Ecology; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01681015508731518,"gpt":0.2208137032406029,"spread":0.2040035481532877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003870707,0.000101923,0.0002209043,0.000005739265,0.0003592983,0.00002014895,0.0001432202,0.00006392523,0.0001674106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002591635,0.00001256738,0.000153695,0.0002664125,0.0003226991,0.00006297634,0.00005382171,0.0001419226,0.00001548028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006174794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006606605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006408255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002277898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991411,0.00006453832,0.0001991563,0.0001622592,0.0002522134,0.0001807427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996748,0.00008250888,0.0000526124,0.00004014308,0.00005678087,0.00009312863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003118496,0.0004357449,0.05761182,0.000797845,0.0002604554,0.00006439068,0.0002279435,5.599514e-7,0.000156387,0.065281,0.02561603,0.849236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000314915,0.00006356407,0.1475145,0.0001949651,0.00001764522,0.0001624921,0.00000267016,0.0000101848,0.000002387392,0.01067556,0.840915,0.0001261227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828885,0.1064252,5.674216e-7,0.0996874,0.0001416855,0.0007840873,0.00004224859,0.00009527123,0.009935047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3631606,0.6242831,0.00002501486,0.01029097,0.0003542271,0.00004437802,0.00006854485,9.417415e-7,0.001772216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2763468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121292970","doi":"10.1139/x00-123","title":"Econometric analysis of the causes of forest land use changes in Hainan, China","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Afforestation; China; Investment (military); Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Natural forest; Resource (disambiguation); Econometric model; Agroforestry; Forest management; Geography; Population; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Economics; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05523098734489274,"gpt":0.2680816352338271,"spread":0.2128506478889343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007554761,0.00006229794,0.0002460109,0.0004347336,0.0001475314,0.00004377771,0.0004111916,0.00006744575,0.000796141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001070788,0.00001196279,0.0001446968,0.002704672,0.0002185601,0.0001023288,0.00001511209,0.0002107966,0.000001225695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006473793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1477306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989852,0.00009200544,0.0002702223,0.00008529683,0.0002569139,0.0003104037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992671,0.0001506373,0.0001114149,0.00006998578,0.0001723122,0.0002285668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001431253,0.00002044483,0.9894795,0.000009744269,0.00006236487,0.00001785778,0.0001255162,0.000386185,0.00003467951,0.0001039329,0.000100861,0.009644548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009458512,0.00020673,0.9833974,0.00006571854,0.00001981668,0.000007174177,0.00006288118,0.00004513533,0.00009974424,0.0003098179,0.01565005,0.00004097795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973941,0.000297745,3.481371e-8,0.001709195,0.00004021655,0.00007829488,0.00006622833,5.138417e-7,0.0004136381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977984,0.0005810932,0.000002796326,0.00001471304,0.00007926019,8.839709e-7,0.000005738741,6.761343e-7,0.001516452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8139972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8717185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996295434","doi":"10.1080/0376835x.2010.498942","title":"From land rights to environmental entitlements: Community discontent in the ‘successful’ Dwesa-Cwebe land claim in South Africa","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development Southern Africa","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Settlement (finance); Property rights; Empowerment; Natural resource; Land tenure; Land law; Land use; Land rights; Economic growth; Business; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Economics; Agriculture; Law; Payment; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02007187118715295,"gpt":0.1968437520847212,"spread":0.1767718808975682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000410289,0.0002006941,0.0001959199,0.00002963448,0.0004177823,0.00009851577,0.0006134133,0.0001082262,0.0009448435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006610784,0.00004154973,0.0000515791,0.0001920018,0.00005756856,0.00007189017,0.0001660979,0.0004283852,0.0003664463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004236168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000936632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003304301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05470942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985901,0.000132702,0.0003166021,0.0002541465,0.0003228945,0.0003835899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995962,0.00008735984,0.00007349056,0.0001333301,0.000007324769,0.0001022501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001055393,0.001403509,0.6867417,0.000006668636,0.00005553457,0.00003925934,0.2865142,0.000003697518,0.00980504,0.0000291215,0.0003378041,0.01495793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006378635,0.00008093214,0.5954621,0.000034066,0.000007816217,0.000001262562,0.01812983,0.000007395468,0.0002921733,0.001202525,0.3837682,0.0003757622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969912,0.00002042551,0.000001569141,0.0006341352,0.0001393766,0.0003302701,0.0002143779,0.00002031131,0.001648381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977102,0.000002695357,0.0001017382,0.00009490379,0.0001214132,0.00004896032,0.0001927728,0.000001984251,0.00172539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3834304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092585033","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v4n6p32","title":"Investments in Land Conservation in the Ethiopian Highlands: A Household Plot-level Analysis of the Roles of Poverty, Tenure Security, and Market Incentives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Land tenure; Investment (military); Poverty; Land titling; Leverage (statistics); Productivity; Economics; Panel data; Land degradation; Business; Natural resource economics; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Land use; Economic growth; Geography; Agriculture; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02262768156304051,"gpt":0.2123808058211734,"spread":0.1897531242581329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002911956,0.00003995224,0.0001216329,0.00003151505,0.00001878208,0.00001537429,0.0001319151,0.00003344116,0.000003062326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009981373,0.00000872416,0.0000416629,0.00008068516,0.00004855356,0.000131361,0.0000353961,0.00006302666,1.794966e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001077036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006278388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002669602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00417143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996005,0.00002594682,0.0002264142,0.00004207614,0.00005393972,0.0000511601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996179,0.00006506488,0.0002590824,0.0000181201,0.00003014156,0.00000963197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004747304,0.00008033387,0.9938041,0.000002122947,0.00007496266,5.493764e-7,0.0008583584,0.0000648556,0.00007558733,0.00272844,0.00004322288,0.002220013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002172072,0.00002312153,0.9928971,0.0000328951,0.00001454714,0.0000065215,0.000149923,0.0006060525,0.00005942541,0.002615469,0.003350699,0.0000270713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965381,0.0002619906,1.76934e-7,0.002920528,0.00008708336,0.00003231071,0.00007964304,2.020267e-7,0.00007996474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957014,0.003955502,0.00001044113,0.0002552329,0.00004977721,4.887776e-7,0.00000304477,2.759664e-7,0.00002388491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00390447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2327756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034074531","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12247","title":"Land rental markets and labor productivity: Evidence from rural China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nonfarm payrolls; Renting; Productivity; Labour economics; China; Economics; Multinomial logistic regression; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Business; Economic growth; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904535448551576,"gpt":0.1522789251912964,"spread":0.1332335707057807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001842728,0.0002759563,0.0005211142,0.00003077424,0.0003065779,0.0002385826,0.000420521,0.0001328362,0.0005423173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008268199,0.00007843492,0.0001701575,0.0001215673,0.000121616,0.0008242612,0.00003850063,0.000285938,0.00001899974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003123415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001465086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0816917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7919741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984963,0.00004456114,0.0005354852,0.0003520578,0.00001932056,0.0005522746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997427,0.00009628002,0.0004010597,0.00006472564,0.00008835435,0.001922512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000645027,0.00006540845,0.8387719,0.0001036657,0.0007990935,0.0004125608,0.009101743,0.0004759555,0.01263332,0.001459631,0.01074006,0.1247916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003112216,0.0004275361,0.9733171,0.00009571181,0.00004475227,0.0002934816,0.0009835787,0.00004658601,0.0002610589,0.000733415,0.02310522,0.0003803463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546702,0.000766893,1.034452e-7,0.04315529,0.0006735024,0.0001800564,0.0004302299,0.00000986032,0.0001138885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963659,0.0003915881,0.00003817388,0.000428829,0.002424445,0.000002836035,0.00005928953,0.000003052979,0.0002858933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7102824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9244234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}