{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1738,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1738,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"953b2cc6a65a","filters":{"topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition"}},"results":[{"id":"W1974991592","doi":"10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5","title":"Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1876,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Word (group theory); Crowdsourcing; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Linguistics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2074451318612571,"gpt":0.5283622746603649,"spread":0.3209171427991078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007616743,0.000261475,0.0004208743,0.0003314559,0.0004147461,0.0002871913,0.0005523858,0.0003227493,0.006503504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001626821,0.0002225026,0.0002267028,0.0005293091,0.0003052031,0.0002567377,0.0001515513,0.0006870313,0.0002844815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007053392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00101056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002894389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993359,0.003728801,0.000475631,0.0007455293,0.000562189,0.001128848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995378,0.001803824,0.0001087146,0.0007386946,0.001647816,0.0003229516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002514504,0.0002524689,0.001425075,0.00005315222,0.0000768622,0.00005611209,0.007394535,2.449917e-7,0.1142517,0.004184676,0.02150461,0.8505491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014182,0.003277736,0.1567021,0.0002236476,0.0006810927,0.0001911811,0.04388869,0.0002739367,0.2455367,0.02014469,0.5117981,0.003100124],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416031,0.001294585,0.02880891,0.0002170107,0.001673625,0.003630536,0.00005763825,0.0002375227,0.02247714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3966759,0.0000758351,0.4978444,0.0005335434,0.003771676,0.02570343,0.0002644492,0.0003073359,0.07482344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.847449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025341897","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.5","title":"Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1654,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Linguistics; Mandarin Chinese; Maxim; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Cognition; Implicature; Expression (computer science); Pragmatics; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03818693921093026,"gpt":0.3505508482829727,"spread":0.3123639090720424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000255067,0.0002228696,0.0005092987,0.0001788394,0.00004201494,0.00001952418,0.0001363694,0.0003132881,0.002183806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009230441,0.0001212674,0.0001015986,0.0001142156,0.0002144246,0.00007039727,0.0001055254,0.0005507359,0.00007213102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002122835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007882562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006800813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985334,0.0002398744,0.0003498795,0.0003429089,0.0002016772,0.0003322301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987362,0.0006153069,0.0002250322,0.0002983586,0.00006892624,0.00005615386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004541165,0.001223518,0.01001783,0.001300752,0.001642065,0.00006900099,0.1310824,2.765209e-7,0.00001733142,0.1097206,0.0503345,0.6900505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05531221,0.0008946767,0.1209115,0.01612156,0.0031218,0.00008852406,0.6906082,0.00003378239,0.0003965143,0.05403208,0.0554988,0.002980342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1035246,0.007180956,0.00009805299,0.00004343304,0.00077073,0.0006634823,0.0003185893,0.00001832892,0.8873819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8318504,0.01485492,0.00002234439,0.0001276358,0.0001624897,0.0001521548,0.0003988752,0.00003321782,0.152398],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7349839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083303100","doi":"10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163","title":"Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":618,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Semantic memory; Cognitive psychology; Noun; Perception; Meaning (existential); Feature (linguistics); Semantic feature; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04144008352114465,"gpt":0.3517284570000586,"spread":0.3102883734789139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000440104,0.0001555964,0.0002684972,0.00006690015,0.000196803,0.00002495652,0.0001499606,0.0001120029,0.0001251788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002095006,0.00007881382,0.00009013747,0.0001149536,0.0004195812,0.00007526985,0.00002739663,0.0003484002,2.109294e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001301583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001314037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005327334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000687257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985827,0.0005395288,0.0004118778,0.000166429,0.0001406201,0.0001588723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991152,0.00008491342,0.0005476957,0.0001549645,0.00005410653,0.00004314708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001309762,0.00003352701,0.02253131,0.00000813083,0.000327506,0.000002251561,0.02824917,0.000008814314,0.9457127,0.002335421,0.00007945899,0.000580675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005620007,0.000896294,0.7246718,0.00009312931,0.0003697873,0.0009595608,0.06375945,0.00008722884,0.1983681,0.004604205,0.0002101754,0.0003602843],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891363,0.007558426,0.0002082117,0.0001365381,0.0005903661,0.0001498664,0.000005891936,0.000002846597,0.002211581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992376,0.00006155905,0.0002507347,0.0003156438,0.00006941133,0.000001363591,7.963897e-7,0.00001645052,0.00004645829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7473447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3213934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013183177","doi":"10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.2","title":"Introducing positive psychology to SLA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":510,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Positive psychology; Psychology; Humanistic psychology; Second-language acquisition; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Humanism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01569713904794154,"gpt":0.362425796902531,"spread":0.3467286578545895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00142853,0.0001834401,0.0003324391,0.0002264217,0.0002701746,0.00002834863,0.00009468358,0.00008820106,0.0004729925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009219887,0.000164099,0.00004288221,0.00009371847,0.00008330655,0.00006026136,0.0001009335,0.0008358954,0.0001008024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002737948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003174194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001888341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979272,0.0008386548,0.0002416665,0.0005227792,0.00008796738,0.0003817135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999175,0.0004643124,0.00007789335,0.0001901115,0.00002779908,0.00006488462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009663617,0.00007564853,0.008728244,0.0000515866,0.0002206513,0.0001189557,0.4569676,0.00001464515,0.002634818,0.008771368,0.00127125,0.5210486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005066282,0.001814848,0.08448549,0.0006138748,0.0001800923,0.0004519469,0.8134347,0.0001281203,0.0004903044,0.002644517,0.08910616,0.001583637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8527001,0.003804321,0.001255526,0.0003267475,0.0007108595,0.0001238294,0.000002507321,0.00008987016,0.1409862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913763,0.00001856472,0.001018148,0.00223522,0.0005679728,0.00003518836,0.00001093266,0.00002653297,0.004711096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.519465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6691763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098062982","doi":"10.1177/1470593104044089","title":"Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Theory","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":463,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Typology; Rhetoric; Ambiguity; Metaphor; Visual rhetoric; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Semiotics; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01030207097603754,"gpt":0.300874452830212,"spread":0.2905723818541744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003679956,0.0001865223,0.0003468365,0.0003190119,0.00005505549,0.00001191837,0.0001708358,0.000187529,0.00203753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008111268,0.0001785897,0.0001257883,0.0004208634,0.0001115895,0.00007330537,0.00006460277,0.0002555238,0.0001288417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007519877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008628021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003107212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008759435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970105,0.001594029,0.0004445632,0.0003663182,0.000170209,0.0004143833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998547,0.0009319328,0.0001762919,0.0002210382,0.00004165907,0.00008203361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01783747,0.002675584,0.01550078,0.0002537322,0.0008627689,0.0005760589,0.03615759,0.00004767099,0.03923604,0.3820867,0.001614362,0.5031512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01663726,0.001732148,0.3639427,0.0007403733,0.0006928819,0.0004078086,0.03892744,0.00005131006,0.01611269,0.5560645,0.002785978,0.001904923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.890865,0.002023213,0.001441705,0.00006698749,0.0008420681,0.0001639118,0.000002907034,0.00006942402,0.1045247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971172,0.00001789721,0.0005250779,0.0003045579,0.000242381,0.00001389099,0.00001151201,0.00003656986,0.001730872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5012463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137640092","doi":"10.1177/1461445606061881","title":"Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":454,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Psycholinguistics; Linguistics; Applied linguistics; Computational linguistics; Theoretical linguistics; Epistemology; Reliability (semiconductor); Sociology; Cognitive linguistics; Discourse analysis; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Cognition; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02384623515356431,"gpt":0.3394994545847498,"spread":0.3156532194311855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001387159,0.00016076,0.0002295974,0.00005164889,0.0001735499,0.00002899837,0.00006306352,0.00006454572,0.0004589013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003519381,0.0001167186,0.0000505946,0.00009163228,0.0002049522,0.00007367259,0.00005375484,0.0001300896,0.0000680368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001965112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006184528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006876201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001066758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990733,0.0001121607,0.0001525251,0.0002815277,0.0001211778,0.0002593296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995866,0.0001169939,0.00006034782,0.0001600792,0.00004601828,0.00002999453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000281003,0.0003413826,0.04523388,0.0001542518,0.00147979,0.0002297317,0.04613534,0.000008037777,0.002190107,0.7676915,0.03841357,0.0978414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003871056,0.0003136005,0.2864284,0.0002553505,0.001003956,0.0001608532,0.2771658,0.00001889622,0.001280049,0.4158984,0.01212467,0.001478978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325958,0.01927233,0.000285426,0.0003419702,0.0009081482,0.0001414665,0.00003059852,0.00005680569,0.04636746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941367,0.00006545545,0.0001044589,0.000150669,0.0006579267,0.00001314634,0.00001416316,0.00001812604,0.004839388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3517931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5024648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072657665","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.002","title":"A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychologia","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":428,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fusiform gyrus; Psychology; Neural substrate; Perception; Color vision; Cognitive psychology; Object (grammar); Temporal cortex; Property (philosophy); Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition; Neuroscience; Cognition; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334848403792992,"gpt":0.3362699514151534,"spread":0.3027851110358542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006008055,0.0002086091,0.0002377477,0.000121336,0.0001845008,0.00006435432,0.0001784359,0.0001660746,0.0002219552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007766466,0.0001879411,0.000096488,0.0001841985,0.000117359,0.00009677563,0.00002884611,0.0002893918,0.00008385129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001232276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005221822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003964694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005189641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998363,0.0001309209,0.000328478,0.0005254733,0.0001109857,0.0005411928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990381,0.0003604477,0.0001082481,0.0003149628,0.00005914752,0.0001190678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003437813,0.001044689,0.09964425,0.0001361481,0.0002229593,0.001435791,0.02330162,0.000005066387,0.1825274,0.00932297,0.00928665,0.6696346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001538074,0.0005477139,0.9926965,0.00001510456,0.00005412219,0.0002968193,0.00147654,0.00006040564,0.0002871212,0.0004509697,0.002316041,0.0002605784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619834,0.0004520171,0.001164495,0.0001200841,0.001632842,0.0004691893,0.00001614572,0.0001860056,0.03397577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956784,0.00001408459,0.0003995949,0.002400578,0.0003163885,0.00004987637,0.00001733099,0.00004336507,0.001080362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7664014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051534348","doi":"10.1006/jmla.2000.2728","title":"Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Memory and Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sentence; Priming (agriculture); Thematic map; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Sentence processing; Thematic structure; Modal verb; Cognition; Thematic analysis; Verb; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0147938078628794,"gpt":0.309760964357627,"spread":0.2949671564947476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005164304,0.00008823774,0.0001833186,0.00007943947,0.00006319307,0.00002848831,0.00005087528,0.00006505902,0.0007942663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001192846,0.00006298025,0.0000455246,0.00007082372,0.00004405977,0.0001584395,0.00001254059,0.0001999393,0.00001257796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009315479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002885288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001817315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999297,0.000117426,0.0002537367,0.00009125238,0.0001264333,0.000114168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994533,0.0001173916,0.0002231161,0.00008329272,0.00005318047,0.00006968866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003980015,0.0002636958,0.002159758,0.0000939325,0.0002705029,0.000978508,0.2007569,0.000001629253,0.06621866,0.004842636,0.001052486,0.7229633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007735282,0.001124169,0.02785472,0.0008263206,0.0006030495,0.009341895,0.9250656,0.0002532941,0.01776837,0.005761584,0.003013422,0.0006522838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720189,0.01050843,0.0007558449,0.00009753517,0.0001742016,0.00006527938,0.000001540817,0.00001037503,0.01636789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975729,0.0001059345,0.0006115292,0.0002894618,0.0003299011,0.000001946443,0.000002717185,0.000008400404,0.001077189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8696659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617374652","doi":"10.1017/9781316339732","title":"The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Applied linguistics; Cognitive linguistics; Quantitative linguistics; Media linguistics; Linguistics; Language and Communication Technologies; Context (archaeology); Sociocultural linguistics; Cognitive science; Clinical linguistics; Computational linguistics; Contrastive linguistics; Grammar; Cognitive grammar; Theoretical linguistics; Computer science; Cognition; Language technology; Psychology; Language education; Philosophy; History; Comprehension approach","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02706499200043694,"gpt":0.2602060447247236,"spread":0.2331410527242867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002929599,0.0004677123,0.0006245183,0.0001558944,0.0007527962,0.00008636214,0.001064397,0.0006157854,0.00001306916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003145673,0.0004301745,0.0004142754,0.00001260755,0.00116728,0.00003273776,0.0003600064,0.0007824667,0.00009043713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001510982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004203267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004851457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001438857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979205,0.0002495266,0.0003424474,0.0006157341,0.000378683,0.0004930911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996148,0.0007565077,0.0008992841,0.00114439,0.0008789604,0.0001728588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006801853,0.00005666144,0.000005492398,0.000113523,0.0009933201,0.0009051608,0.0005328257,5.249966e-8,0.000009837093,0.5012827,0.4878612,0.007559043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001595087,0.0001512042,0.0001016261,0.0008467045,0.001352065,0.00002732223,0.0005961089,0.000003801479,0.0004319788,0.00002611964,0.994357,0.0005110209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001135938,0.002805633,0.0004534217,0.000003621228,0.002276744,0.0007590192,0.001643703,0.0000936193,0.9918506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003596476,0.0003405239,0.00001634428,0.0000607006,0.0009684336,0.000005735093,0.0003182376,0.00007177319,0.9946218],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5064957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947217330","doi":"10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.553","title":"Metaphor and Material Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Anthropologist","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Sociology; Linguistics; Anthropology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01936874160396004,"gpt":0.3357873493599369,"spread":0.3164186077559769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009560718,0.0001617818,0.0002633686,0.00005596768,0.0001410512,0.00004106656,0.0001152377,0.00006674638,0.006549973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002882105,0.0001226272,0.00005680547,0.0002250117,0.0110558,0.00005537235,0.00003722769,0.000112754,0.0003096622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001512194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008335818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03213701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009889859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989433,0.0001379918,0.0001629973,0.0003444581,0.00009483286,0.0003163963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994931,0.00002746953,0.0001110225,0.0002493567,0.00003186756,0.00008715986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00123692,0.0009345245,0.02310937,0.00002274259,0.0006735164,0.001361614,0.00895856,2.599583e-7,0.004089349,0.1785472,0.1579925,0.6230734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002019821,0.00254096,0.03116685,0.00001765326,0.0003673314,0.001445128,0.463651,0.00000759865,0.004238588,0.002679306,0.490699,0.001166772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685825,0.002700621,0.0008404411,0.004633738,0.001908974,0.000251676,0.0001030513,0.0003012666,0.1206777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936832,0.001243045,0.0004692288,0.001168845,0.0003381559,0.00002800926,0.00004629379,0.00001550069,0.003007727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6219066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211162222","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511486760","title":"Mental Spaces in Grammar","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":339,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Meaning (existential); Cognitive grammar; Grammar; Linguistics; Space (punctuation); Range (aeronautics); Sociology; Psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01855866660457635,"gpt":0.2354557068812536,"spread":0.2168970402766772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001203433,0.0003421769,0.000389367,0.0003246657,0.00009343773,0.00003630024,0.0004209489,0.0005105894,0.0001004471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004526962,0.0004041002,0.0002018532,0.00002111554,0.0001762492,0.00007707148,0.0001611029,0.000567282,0.0001761235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003882168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006531553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006120047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.0001595693,0.0001867921,0.0005664931,0.0002257245,0.0003983708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991429,0.00005211834,0.000173292,0.0004524241,0.00005124112,0.0001280459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003451095,0.0001026484,0.00002014402,0.00006284736,0.000262587,0.001482561,0.001835103,2.011151e-7,0.00004273275,0.4388381,0.5426232,0.01438481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00143273,0.00005552973,0.0001939479,0.0000957483,0.0001692954,0.00003016521,0.0008643875,0.00000238274,0.000102564,0.00001060292,0.9966029,0.0004397423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002777713,0.0006239332,0.00003781175,0.00001800162,0.0007399032,0.00049619,0.0003405345,0.0001250944,0.9948408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002590818,0.00007190037,0.00003370049,0.0001410814,0.0004085481,0.000002996404,0.0003380971,0.00004540337,0.9963675],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4539797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244655630","doi":"10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4","title":"Spatial representations activated during real‐time comprehension of verbs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":305,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Verb; Horizontal and vertical; Comprehension; Psychology; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Schema (genetic algorithms); Spatial relation; Cognition; Linguistics; Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02721207186884599,"gpt":0.3323342316354528,"spread":0.3051221597666068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003061528,0.0001023778,0.0001448386,0.0001984577,0.0002513372,0.00002243856,0.0001443194,0.00004769526,0.001795325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004973527,0.00009608969,0.00004913685,0.0008118242,0.0006216205,0.0002230844,0.00003957584,0.0001006008,0.0003539268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002602459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007975415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002478186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007382019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.0001825422,0.000201153,0.0004169457,0.0003191919,0.0002765956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998943,0.0001850152,0.0001308455,0.000215778,0.0004387023,0.00008661366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102147,0.0001807101,0.002088741,0.00000787246,0.00002251438,0.00002178626,0.003222619,0.000001481322,0.987545,0.002060767,0.00003106544,0.004707216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129928,0.00009542052,0.3143149,0.00005946464,0.00004202648,0.00002883901,0.003370906,0.0000332774,0.679962,0.0007791035,0.00002361939,0.0001605524],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8381649,0.0000275359,0.0006329093,0.00000972817,0.0002879824,0.0002007049,0.00001923023,0.00004394666,0.160613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987173,0.000007885748,0.0001364821,0.00003872737,0.00003341177,0.00001912078,0.000014064,0.000009182049,0.001023818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3122261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099191804","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldh006","title":"The cultural diversity of healing: meaning, metaphor and mechanism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Medical Bulletin","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Metaphor; Meaning (existential); Diversity (politics); Biomedicine; Mechanism (biology); Interpersonal communication; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognition; Sociology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Neuroscience; Linguistics; Bioinformatics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03599286899970466,"gpt":0.3200078485567989,"spread":0.2840149795570943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235646,0.0002919065,0.001178968,0.0000496767,0.0004107146,0.00006963536,0.0005588796,0.0006228727,0.005721372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006789073,0.0002174859,0.0004591834,0.000148256,0.0004257975,0.00001636437,0.0004428343,0.0007343668,0.0002405198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004565355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002683426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000172019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970694,0.0005807163,0.000659601,0.0005144336,0.0007606826,0.0004151891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985527,0.000417541,0.0003565168,0.0002866301,0.00009669291,0.0002898914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007984252,0.00007851658,4.748424e-7,0.001832323,0.0003423619,0.0004348692,0.0004199508,1.409139e-9,3.279385e-8,0.01210207,0.0172142,0.9675672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005735059,0.00007060952,0.000006206825,0.007259037,0.0008413066,0.001322832,0.0005534136,7.963854e-8,4.496244e-7,0.001897754,0.9872257,0.0002491781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003234168,0.989958,0.00006760834,0.000355781,0.0009112539,0.0006244135,0.00008419919,0.00005750376,0.007908898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002114907,0.9963258,0.00009506574,0.0002835721,0.0003193377,0.00009364998,0.0000977279,0.00003391533,0.002539427],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067550291","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001","title":"Evidentiality in language and cognition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Evidentiality; Morpheme; Psychology; Linguistics; Comprehension; Language acquisition; Semantics (computer science); Cognition; Relation (database); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967537629625228,"gpt":0.3071807503621138,"spread":0.2875053740658616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002787732,0.0001186648,0.0001356121,0.000157866,0.0000583506,0.00004476031,0.00004161722,0.0001205016,0.001343127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004369133,0.0001235433,0.00004150254,0.0001945088,0.00006304556,0.0001787868,0.000016746,0.0001306951,0.000406389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001762587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007992556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004463831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006037972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989567,0.0001725581,0.0002362638,0.0002889191,0.0001325409,0.0002129676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996346,0.00007234305,0.00007421189,0.0001209722,0.00006109137,0.00003680845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001961436,0.004517958,0.0412999,0.000610775,0.0003286357,0.001749945,0.02564882,0.00000307303,0.1895578,0.03932306,0.01720547,0.6777931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006893558,0.0002063522,0.8632876,0.0002707525,0.0004175008,0.0001844592,0.01184499,0.00005550948,0.02374547,0.09126134,0.001040449,0.0007920177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991016,0.001127282,0.0008368861,0.00007462697,0.0002823714,0.0002652766,0.00004063977,0.00009204417,0.0981793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979709,0.00002002071,0.00005721216,0.0002876969,0.0003085311,0.00008863025,0.0005156591,0.00001566484,0.0007356705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8219877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139589919","doi":"10.1037/a0029708","title":"Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Moderation; Psychology; Mediation; Social psychology; Moderated mediation; Metaphor; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03441218134071282,"gpt":0.3532012792097938,"spread":0.318789097869081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001598446,0.0001026487,0.0003531823,0.00008257997,0.0001859434,0.00001129515,0.00005587041,0.0001970978,0.0001169196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006516904,0.00007521779,0.0001095715,0.00009826694,0.0003305257,0.0001299055,0.00001908954,0.000226929,7.263441e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001791013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001737169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006118546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001910631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983173,0.0007347341,0.0004356513,0.000120386,0.0002408158,0.0001510896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989711,0.0002755541,0.0004722312,0.00004986277,0.00017823,0.00005299735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003542292,0.003446754,0.1277502,0.0006539703,0.003052493,0.0000109045,0.4741875,6.69598e-7,0.01935202,0.2710132,0.01579889,0.08119108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001787017,0.0003435121,0.9766876,0.000008595744,0.0003426293,0.00009546975,0.006670717,0.000004992623,0.0002935085,0.01256156,0.001095331,0.0001090749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907818,0.00321808,0.0005757881,0.003417868,0.0006653478,0.000112536,0.00001580568,0.000003611971,0.001209173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.0001572812,0.00007647958,0.0006295173,0.0008257561,0.000004882059,0.000005783991,0.000006316298,0.00003858354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3067292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030448677","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x","title":"It's Fascinating Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Psychology; Utterance; Comprehension; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Linguistics; Tone (literature); Autism spectrum disorder; Salient; Interpretation (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Autism; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2267353468197932,"gpt":0.5142793276688692,"spread":0.287543980849076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002667104,0.0001204154,0.0001454984,0.0006287852,0.0009676295,0.0000494484,0.0005882354,0.00009048133,0.001803403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009244077,0.0000948367,0.00006198754,0.004608974,0.001686881,0.0002181768,0.00009948691,0.000773426,0.0009716989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003971294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006508842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002557477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970655,0.0003838637,0.00029908,0.0008399442,0.0006633145,0.0007483347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988672,0.0002655647,0.00005126742,0.0004316423,0.0002262245,0.000158137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007346518,0.004264303,0.03811993,0.000009007457,0.000008337185,0.0001542216,0.01480816,0.00000516396,0.002881509,0.02910157,0.03168684,0.8788875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009921474,0.0003753192,0.9116775,0.00008078785,0.000006044922,0.000330145,0.004661889,0.0000788483,0.0003242482,0.0111582,0.06988034,0.0004345507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7034616,0.0009315817,0.0003196882,0.0003750143,0.003646134,0.0002163063,0.000002881987,0.0001064885,0.2909403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980024,0.0002944693,0.0002568543,0.0001519774,0.0002155596,0.0001351117,0.000002251448,0.000006368521,0.0009350756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.878453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158575718","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010","title":"Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Evocation; Psychology; Cognitive science; Communication; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02051926718210489,"gpt":0.2901025089167687,"spread":0.2695832417346638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003310331,0.00009081034,0.0001072138,0.0002138221,0.0000664633,0.00001385941,0.00002305837,0.0001059479,0.0002990393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008538701,0.0000889766,0.000024289,0.0003212152,0.0000834149,0.0001098101,0.00001382748,0.0000899177,0.00005620818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001469523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001033758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000196611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003724241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993126,0.00005605729,0.0001791207,0.0002039198,0.0001046294,0.0001436818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.0001571869,0.00008481519,0.00007280837,0.0001535434,0.00005820358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006289661,0.0006659739,0.01431483,0.0001462168,0.0001670569,0.000008757876,0.008638406,9.439834e-8,0.04407261,0.002020774,0.008720588,0.9206157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002788289,0.0003622391,0.9734451,0.00006155469,0.0002454188,0.0000964467,0.00608186,0.00004821627,0.01129354,0.004104644,0.001173603,0.0002990533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503853,0.005307414,0.007498973,0.00002162901,0.0004459695,0.0001724747,0.00001969434,0.00003851061,0.03610998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982566,0.00005993165,0.00006707371,0.00008475073,0.0001746693,0.00001638961,0.0002166661,0.00001025918,0.001113676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3628361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143432970","doi":"10.1177/1461445606064836","title":"Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":247,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Rhetorical question; Psycholinguistics; Linguistics; Computer science; Computational linguistics; Theoretical linguistics; Text linguistics; Applied linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01953278886269491,"gpt":0.3567823270066214,"spread":0.3372495381439266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008455955,0.00009114781,0.0001704085,0.00004678834,0.00007689781,0.000004094887,0.0000794509,0.00004358388,0.000403864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001473193,0.00006555056,0.0000631492,0.0001328025,0.0002049579,0.00002700213,0.00002363093,0.00006930419,0.00004879507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001089391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007203862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004035084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004061318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993797,0.00006576721,0.0001563094,0.0001616662,0.000103373,0.000133181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00008650638,0.00007254067,0.0001995585,0.00007828286,0.00001525945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004192229,0.0002351321,0.002177748,0.00002722109,0.0003383722,0.000005518198,0.005485882,0.000001570272,0.0006032683,0.9475425,0.01170932,0.03183158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001286316,0.0001312241,0.06467032,0.00003532648,0.0006278161,0.00001886222,0.1389329,0.000001253681,0.00253282,0.7681983,0.02309789,0.000466983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7154225,0.04112219,0.009608353,0.0006397497,0.001268101,0.0007174531,0.0003262092,0.0001522189,0.2307432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947894,0.00003147998,0.0001000169,0.00004932118,0.0003977721,0.00009119561,0.00002956467,0.000009560531,0.004501715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2793669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4422028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252218513","doi":"","title":"Literal and Metaphorical Sense Identification through Concrete and Abstract Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Ministry of Defense; Atomic Energy of Canada Limited","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Computer science; Metaphor; Natural language processing; Adjective; Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Noun; Inference; Word (group theory); Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04653668823200464,"gpt":0.2967097163552999,"spread":0.2501730281232952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001989149,0.0001043403,0.0001485785,0.00003569096,0.00006210803,0.0000390416,0.00003978564,0.00009519564,0.002131835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002924649,0.00008975135,0.00003589557,0.00005839726,0.0001152067,0.0001603477,0.00001776182,0.00011596,0.0001711038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006379934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005142475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001647737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007953138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991997,0.00007989929,0.0001987898,0.0002720479,0.00008789268,0.000161693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.00006465699,0.00007522087,0.0001813314,0.00004926143,0.00006376496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001044603,0.0001697966,0.005138151,0.000101496,0.0006227684,0.000479579,0.1815644,6.881382e-9,0.1758946,0.3032414,0.01319673,0.3185464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005778348,0.0006369948,0.668413,0.00007141392,0.000721084,0.001048465,0.02217828,0.00005523743,0.03908144,0.2300556,0.03076704,0.001193034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.891738,0.001006876,0.0002687928,0.00008796332,0.0002947145,0.0001400837,0.00001948479,0.00004401807,0.1064001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974171,0.00006958964,0.0005405477,0.0004439165,0.00009084762,0.00002268261,0.0000174042,0.00001215714,0.001385738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6632749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016224775","doi":"10.1177/135910530000500305","title":"Levels of Narrative Analysis in Health Psychology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Narrative network; Narrative criticism; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Narrative psychology; Narrative history; Health psychology; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Public health; Literature; History; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07040086026052239,"gpt":0.463111615702725,"spread":0.3927107554422026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244123,0.0002497221,0.001605665,0.001565981,0.00009771852,0.000006841626,0.0004163785,0.0002927642,0.0160147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005832441,0.0002176625,0.0003986203,0.001782409,0.0001983773,0.0001178793,0.00001102583,0.0008457063,0.000113564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001141962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002733243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002059436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002993896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925636,0.003006635,0.002902872,0.0004544255,0.0003180707,0.0007544204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966558,0.0001750169,0.002156246,0.0005416861,0.0002078984,0.0002633219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004450862,0.005598768,0.03864955,0.0002259486,0.003488918,0.0004476125,0.1166385,0.0001643418,0.0003366985,0.001726131,0.09234943,0.7359233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006474437,0.004739884,0.9425327,0.0001147159,0.000132818,0.0008544077,0.003305659,0.000007918571,0.00000967917,0.004899811,0.03665343,0.000274528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032902,0.008157086,0.004114151,0.06043667,0.002159064,0.0004424714,0.00006164066,0.00002455981,0.02131413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510768,0.0011121,0.001078335,0.04566503,0.0002357901,0.00001096284,0.00001023462,0.00002671885,0.0007840408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042689703","doi":"10.1006/brln.2001.2518","title":"The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Homonymy and Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":240,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Polysemy; Mental lexicon; Ambiguity; Psychology; Linguistics; Lexicon; Metonymy; Phenomenon; Extension (predicate logic); Priming (agriculture); Lexical decision task; Sentence; Cognition; Metaphor; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02198711098422337,"gpt":0.3026352196576227,"spread":0.2806481086733994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003551511,0.0000786587,0.00009823788,0.00003478405,0.0001149253,0.00004745975,0.00009249956,0.00005351059,0.0001958518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000388142,0.00004331699,0.00002548473,0.0001057057,0.0001637226,0.00004292305,0.00002209248,0.0001201905,0.000007165941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003982167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003480041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002669978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002394177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992989,0.0001622402,0.0001319241,0.0001415134,0.0001052507,0.0001601372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996545,0.0001391382,0.00004486841,0.0001289001,0.000006657146,0.00002595128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006425037,0.0001901965,0.0017075,0.00003368944,0.00002747898,0.0000769185,0.1456279,1.648312e-8,0.003313713,0.007812059,0.004464017,0.8366823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009737129,0.0009563407,0.3638854,0.0002954409,0.0001927915,0.001194058,0.5652108,0.0008419068,0.003846292,0.00709757,0.04566042,0.001081878],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9515268,0.01577089,0.0000133089,0.002336992,0.00005526689,0.000157884,0.000008584615,0.00001389457,0.03011639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965848,0.00006183061,0.00001927785,0.001394509,0.00007314404,0.00001542999,0.000004564855,0.00000690847,0.001839571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.214444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100313834","doi":"10.1037/a0013012","title":"Making sense of word senses: The comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University","keywords":"Polysemy; Metonymy; Psychology; Comprehension; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Dominance (genetics); Metaphor; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06382603266129483,"gpt":0.3660253253070006,"spread":0.3021992926457058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005238005,0.0002037721,0.0004255276,0.0002611577,0.0002186315,0.000008522514,0.00007947037,0.0001828745,0.0004113082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006742311,0.0001539569,0.0002055343,0.0001802753,0.0003955456,0.0001163703,0.00003002833,0.0006054516,0.00001930971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001703773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001781759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009304565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.405698e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976961,0.0008463963,0.0006771076,0.0002446636,0.0003162657,0.0002194835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982684,0.0003496316,0.0009479347,0.0001911906,0.0001769788,0.00006582458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01081515,0.001853435,0.002010543,0.00003881976,0.0005718562,0.001452054,0.02719407,0.00004244419,0.9205215,0.0004583053,0.001128381,0.03391344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02444313,0.01492307,0.165778,0.001605621,0.0009876986,0.06314587,0.1546931,0.0001004411,0.5698703,0.001665281,0.001577829,0.001209644],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813413,0.002324755,0.0001913045,0.0001033952,0.0007656512,0.0001458037,0.000005044617,0.00001596052,0.01510676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983404,0.0001577191,0.0001829889,0.0008489471,0.0002383253,0.000004388071,0.000008326117,0.00002426662,0.0001946513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3506512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081914924","doi":"10.3758/mc.36.6.1103","title":"The multidetermined nature of idiom processing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02259265657714885,"gpt":0.2990688245481898,"spread":0.276476167971041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000235337,0.0001229485,0.0001454821,0.00007080873,0.0003111546,0.00001513759,0.0001229516,0.000169953,0.0002732856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001111671,0.00008838185,0.00008908546,0.0001982463,0.0001658906,0.0001107107,0.00001667357,0.0002601139,0.0001380701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001168419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003166509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002257438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001916079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989614,0.0001385196,0.0002543322,0.0002205738,0.0002147335,0.0002104286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992366,0.000117939,0.0001703687,0.0002128107,0.0002231087,0.00003917802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001125721,0.0007213149,0.0008392601,0.0001680829,0.000223382,0.0003468939,0.01834347,0.000001560933,0.09208591,0.0006039536,0.006764145,0.8787763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01711892,0.001379569,0.3742386,0.0009319373,0.001401117,0.002785384,0.03925837,0.000721801,0.5212722,0.0177604,0.02070734,0.002424347],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449919,0.001944065,0.0003685976,0.0001034601,0.0006395771,0.000274749,0.00001676438,0.00008593481,0.05157495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967991,0.00004480939,0.0001201735,0.0003478213,0.0002979224,0.00006507932,0.000060645,0.00001983493,0.002244635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.876352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3604107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060636280","doi":"10.3758/pbr.15.2.426","title":"Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Arrow of time; Psychology; Compatibility (geochemistry); Cognitive psychology; Metaphor; Space time; Time perception; Spacetime; Space (punctuation); Arrow; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Communication; Linguistics; Computer science; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03757452066884073,"gpt":0.2935082837919257,"spread":0.2559337631230849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008247826,0.0003434353,0.0008256953,0.00005834623,0.0001568262,0.00002082568,0.0003998563,0.0001101225,0.0176322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001007094,0.0002448075,0.0003166205,0.0001809577,0.0003801366,0.00006997115,0.00005393337,0.0002621966,0.0126702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004081996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002735886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002319814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009602898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970499,0.001055739,0.0007291758,0.00060196,0.0002019517,0.0003612924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976988,0.0004631311,0.0003955945,0.001219046,0.00008705116,0.000136325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003684062,0.001486131,0.0006149547,0.0009856405,0.0003463636,0.00002635544,0.002556094,0.000002394361,0.001442467,0.0001062616,0.9487843,0.04328065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497151,0.0004261389,0.008471597,0.001328361,0.0003601715,0.0001947656,0.00007114447,0.00006046954,0.0001580617,0.00004247515,0.9869088,0.000480885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8543967,0.1275905,0.00004751152,0.005399069,0.001272785,0.00335126,0.0001672418,0.0001967181,0.007578225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7276749,0.1396927,0.00833076,0.04802223,0.002602767,0.001674961,0.002313278,0.0005684773,0.06911986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1267218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655623669","doi":"","title":"Language and the creative mind","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"CSLI eBooks","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Linguistics; Cognition; Grammar; Creativity; Gesture; Cognitive science; Construction grammar; Cognitive grammar; Metaphor; Cognitive linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01695979959912311,"gpt":0.2753200162215542,"spread":0.2583602166224311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002199708,0.0002733326,0.0003739188,0.00008240349,0.0001006622,0.00006347406,0.0001915365,0.0003570569,0.00524174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002741612,0.000168523,0.0001365514,0.00001239187,0.0004982098,0.00001906595,0.00006308754,0.0004277577,0.001898665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002769189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006084699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002112171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004057155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988465,0.0001878527,0.0002135497,0.0003653723,0.0001511463,0.0002356075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989975,0.0002450564,0.0001709707,0.0004618181,0.0000570035,0.00006762873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003373277,0.00003855672,0.000004803,0.00007684685,0.0009789292,0.0002454807,0.1674898,9.587151e-9,0.00007154918,0.1733723,0.2704609,0.3869235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006153681,0.0001967919,0.0003394168,0.0002663777,0.001145681,0.0001892145,0.02370999,0.000002843183,0.0002953368,0.06316753,0.9035524,0.000980715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003889807,0.004025234,0.00002361011,0.00004538785,0.0004612034,0.000695867,0.00006073754,0.00003779222,0.9907604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00792423,0.00001419278,0.00002793064,0.0006924006,0.0007565827,0.0001866393,0.0000889335,0.00005149256,0.9902576],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6330915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391169929","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p324","title":"A Contrastive Study on the Thematic Structure Functions of English and Arabic Short Stories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arabic; Contrastive analysis; Linguistics; Thematic map; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0147771403304979,"gpt":0.2831156747042695,"spread":0.2683385343737715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006371446,0.0001743772,0.0003387514,0.0002885482,0.00007667714,0.0000816062,0.0001633583,0.00005326447,0.001052091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001344921,0.0001004429,0.0001345338,0.0004066704,0.0001018742,0.0001426909,0.00002271278,0.0006038391,0.000004023344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003044858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003417772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001869687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001828707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986339,0.0002778403,0.000420699,0.0001791743,0.0003126182,0.0001757326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.0008055812,0.0001515567,0.0002343702,0.0005647131,0.00006629214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003445666,0.0005111812,0.002665206,0.0000818167,0.001558334,0.0003851447,0.9651285,0.000006229853,0.00062225,0.008885963,0.008245572,0.01156524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001054735,0.0009732919,0.01400025,0.0004054142,0.0008511828,0.00004112199,0.9763361,0.000004823104,0.0005761658,0.0007297403,0.004801789,0.0002253699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675947,0.00582653,0.00006285385,0.00004224386,0.004069792,0.000314861,0.00007082112,0.00003847774,0.0219797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966117,0.000009563835,0.00001819585,0.00008577001,0.002004782,0.00001224674,0.000004135617,0.00002403617,0.001229538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02901701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088436222","doi":"10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001","title":"How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurolinguistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Psychology; Comprehension; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Linguistics; GRASP; Computer science; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01699830392753117,"gpt":0.2679124909098134,"spread":0.2509141869822823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000298652,0.0001218704,0.0002311565,0.00009380985,0.00008031283,0.00006082018,0.0002832775,0.00007545543,0.00003470431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007061263,0.00008247622,0.0001357312,0.0001488775,0.00007117249,0.0000314797,0.00003078637,0.0003637899,0.000006452735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005386798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002017236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006812229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987926,0.0001345872,0.0004497108,0.0001128483,0.0003127485,0.0001974772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985973,0.000187636,0.000567232,0.000177208,0.0004291847,0.00004143948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003995493,0.002614151,0.2046571,0.000288909,0.002500998,0.02616493,0.02131998,0.0008822953,0.01529071,0.5852296,0.04199726,0.09505862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007992656,0.002247849,0.7300301,0.0004237028,0.001959825,0.03202529,0.002725098,0.000145727,0.002420409,0.1609346,0.057809,0.001285843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723103,0.0009280383,0.007131515,0.0006361126,0.002423964,0.0001122482,0.00001296383,0.0000178434,0.016427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956715,0.00002824755,0.001550476,0.00034448,0.002218437,7.229967e-7,0.000002943113,0.00002098491,0.0001622171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.525373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102568844","doi":"10.1515/langcog.2010.010","title":"Abstract motion is no longer abstract","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Motion (physics); Dynamics (music); State (computer science); Computer science; Cognition; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Philosophy; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01288300697923237,"gpt":0.2825645456037695,"spread":0.2696815386245371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002033373,0.0001768795,0.0001486403,0.00009992775,0.0001124248,0.00007696799,0.00007478199,0.0002353224,0.02521709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004542195,0.0001607991,0.00008066244,0.0000965764,0.00006376447,0.0002213192,0.00001616759,0.0003795621,0.003447813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005546149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008707387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002286055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001117268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989635,0.00002455312,0.0002154922,0.0003531158,0.000173881,0.0002694328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.00005798897,0.0001034691,0.0002430351,0.0001116413,0.000104497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002191235,0.0005275813,0.0008183279,0.00009480857,0.0001435677,0.0003380741,0.017405,3.35858e-8,0.2838149,0.00125332,0.005162788,0.6902224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005773087,0.0003043696,0.8767937,0.0001643286,0.0005804308,0.0004676089,0.02577621,0.00002933225,0.0711075,0.007656301,0.009683619,0.001663503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8088136,0.0003148036,0.00009271695,0.00007855807,0.0007956813,0.0001759693,0.00006964985,0.0001146207,0.1895444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950179,0.00002631718,0.00009739264,0.00127287,0.00085906,0.0000480408,0.0003128496,0.00002740176,0.002338193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8759754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155499572","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.007","title":"Not all ambiguous words are created equal: An EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"N400; Polysemy; Psychology; Linguistics; Metonymy; Literal and figurative language; Lexical decision task; Metaphor; Meaning (existential); Event-related potential; Lateralization of brain function; Synesthesia; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Mental lexicon; Priming (agriculture); Communication; Perception; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03317277827801338,"gpt":0.3122233894750427,"spread":0.2790506111970293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003519548,0.0001346851,0.0001928857,0.000103066,0.00004570342,0.00002375223,0.00006141434,0.0001309527,0.0003932184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006358463,0.0001165659,0.00003126012,0.0001154605,0.0001118328,0.0001581291,0.00002490911,0.0001056525,0.0000185351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006634292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006206293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001740237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001570059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990331,0.0002171558,0.0001807261,0.0002058564,0.0001114039,0.0002517684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.00007212252,0.0001152936,0.0002096524,0.00002316038,0.0001780867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004408396,0.0005646426,0.07248657,0.0002386527,0.0003506736,0.0001429097,0.3816218,2.269013e-7,0.2736018,0.007948995,0.0046164,0.2579865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002034891,0.000328174,0.9446423,0.00006857517,0.0001551036,0.0001100972,0.03938273,0.00002628564,0.01128373,0.0004478981,0.001097129,0.0004230713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991908,0.003777315,0.0001043147,0.0002570131,0.000130143,0.0001537651,0.00004642221,0.00006945207,0.003553638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995847,0.00001287071,0.0001561873,0.00230054,0.0001592815,0.00001664172,0.0001108411,0.00002223378,0.001374391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.475342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067057664","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.003","title":"Comprehension of insincere communication in neurodegenerative disease: Lies, sarcasm, and theory of mind","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cortex","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Aging; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Larry L. Hillblom Foundation","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Comprehension; Theory of mind; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Cognition; Irony; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04999954595439279,"gpt":0.2876555480294083,"spread":0.2376560020750155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001234866,0.00006590055,0.0001386873,0.00006976672,0.00002015763,0.000002092734,0.00008504344,0.00004237108,0.0004164822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002478708,0.0000586136,0.00002362518,0.00009001745,0.0001633762,0.0000449665,0.00004255123,0.00007372139,0.000007183655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004582784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001476197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008290745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999249,0.0002985571,0.0001888629,0.000133451,0.00005978745,0.00007035612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.00009525364,0.0001123421,0.0003071611,0.00005913218,0.00003216973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004439048,0.00271827,0.1819339,0.0002610362,0.0002124163,0.00008255991,0.1599282,0.000002343191,0.05522257,0.1865119,0.0008398627,0.4078479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006083862,0.0000960977,0.9852859,0.00005689907,0.000041376,0.000003084241,0.002925746,0.00002807522,0.002511145,0.00823059,0.0001381107,0.0000745724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846334,0.004278502,0.00008704195,0.000011971,0.0000725006,0.0001379607,0.00002259661,0.000005387682,0.01075064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994025,0.000140816,0.000171867,0.00005830754,0.000009008385,0.00000777018,0.00003509453,0.000007342891,0.0001672878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.803352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4560188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968422660","doi":"10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y","title":"ANGST: Affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"German; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Arousal; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1183788676704029,"gpt":0.5231030567677374,"spread":0.4047241890973345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00938779,0.0003524845,0.0005114708,0.0002359263,0.0006799704,0.0001936665,0.0006649167,0.0003199793,0.0006399651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002084315,0.0002364219,0.0004281479,0.0004248565,0.0003675717,0.0001879327,0.0001998202,0.0007107732,0.00007171126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001992888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006247592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009279546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003182839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924732,0.004483449,0.0003746129,0.0009594646,0.0005932837,0.001116008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895778,0.008285307,0.0001590143,0.0009762919,0.0007580303,0.0002435215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001300896,0.001119362,0.004635456,0.00005455876,0.0004218902,0.00001775207,0.04439863,4.466184e-7,0.06851888,0.002403913,0.006610444,0.8705178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01376496,0.004545403,0.5516186,0.0001878683,0.001277073,0.00002305795,0.03360972,0.0003230081,0.2882357,0.03539122,0.06931114,0.00171218],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7985059,0.0003356008,0.1879186,0.0002029646,0.001786356,0.006691558,0.000490469,0.000154769,0.00391382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167628,0.00001876975,0.05626746,0.0003139326,0.002486645,0.02001125,0.0005314787,0.0001729394,0.003434689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515860461","doi":"10.18653/v1/s16-2003","title":"Metaphor as a Medium for Emotion: An Empirical Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Metaphor; Literal (mathematical logic); Emotionality; Statement (logic); Meaning (existential); Domain (mathematical analysis); Literal and figurative language; Empirical research; Psychology; Composition (language); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596706768826435,"gpt":0.3884607846801564,"spread":0.3324937169918921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004520593,0.0001311038,0.0001917878,0.00008466593,0.00007457101,0.00002217913,0.0001550918,0.00009570899,0.01435348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009065428,0.00007231197,0.0001007397,0.0001144624,0.00003780517,0.0001291369,0.00002003034,0.00005041723,0.001496215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000169242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002566841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008121083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001441285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987394,0.0002030068,0.0002205836,0.0003966897,0.0001782889,0.0002619922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999162,0.0001671369,0.00004730704,0.0003836555,0.0001090866,0.0001307744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003444779,0.01840948,0.06950937,0.00004010453,0.002422986,0.0003050131,0.0771727,9.218e-8,0.00997998,0.04012452,0.2405887,0.5380023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032242,0.02042782,0.5164375,0.00004172208,0.00160826,0.0002863672,0.1628039,0.00001936171,0.01013542,0.0675078,0.1865279,0.001961915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331132,0.00006018789,0.01310907,0.001885315,0.001161166,0.0008591,0.00001759202,0.0001943288,0.04960007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655955,0.000001657013,0.0003873114,0.001365198,0.0005659612,0.000286219,0.00001204331,0.00002279269,0.03176334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5360404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594077383","doi":"10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8812","title":"Multimodal Metaphor in Ten Dutch TV Commercials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Journal of Semiotics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Focus (optics); Multimodality; Interpretation (philosophy); Conceptual metaphor; Linguistics; Gesture; Psychology; Phenomenon; Analogy; Cognitive science; Cognitive dissonance; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03785416789466523,"gpt":0.3315187527651354,"spread":0.2936645848704701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004081731,0.000165322,0.0004445276,0.0006026881,0.0000543448,0.00006241295,0.000366173,0.000178904,0.0009411137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006320982,0.0001346986,0.0001862227,0.0005105734,0.0000723956,0.0002627918,0.00003927624,0.0006151164,0.00008421805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009663989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000823648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001037723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001685975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997714,0.0002335554,0.0009668045,0.0001561452,0.0004022524,0.0005272153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981991,0.0004509509,0.0005044129,0.0002335071,0.0003770697,0.0002349561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008527046,0.003823184,0.223582,0.00007324303,0.001240743,0.002319235,0.0227431,0.00002060572,0.00445543,0.02003294,0.03249728,0.6883596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007217275,0.0005303303,0.9165393,0.00012652,0.0003644427,0.001646824,0.01891088,0.0000740861,0.002704643,0.008321163,0.04284197,0.0007226098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646237,0.001917714,0.005290315,0.002112397,0.001932814,0.0001572381,0.00001050187,0.00002250081,0.0239328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952497,0.00006941948,0.002279902,0.00112919,0.00070626,0.00000123475,0.00000674318,0.00002602658,0.0005315514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6929573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984587708","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp3303_1","title":"Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Irony; Insult; Politeness; Psychology; Criticism; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Neuroscience; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03872768548491306,"gpt":0.3414480452229244,"spread":0.3027203597380114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001671783,0.0001890697,0.0002099155,0.00005918127,0.0001732941,0.00004906457,0.0001969551,0.0000627822,0.0006583254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001779405,0.00009104455,0.00005842681,0.0002546365,0.0003422505,0.0001612375,0.0000527896,0.0001705249,0.00004609566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002158651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004642576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004019174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006040066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988718,0.00008740283,0.0002607979,0.0002877009,0.0001765575,0.0003157665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991764,0.0001756199,0.0002300072,0.0002528517,0.00008928177,0.00007578807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002469936,0.004494987,0.4347541,0.002466297,0.002365235,0.00009139604,0.302535,0.0001526973,0.01309358,0.006074483,0.007221075,0.2265041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01112395,0.002448708,0.7558467,0.001959739,0.001388034,0.0003246796,0.1517887,0.00209583,0.01748766,0.05236718,0.0006712592,0.002497582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985139,0.006524445,0.00002580253,0.0002641539,0.0001141068,0.0002430755,0.00005829299,0.00004454181,0.007586597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990256,0.0001942753,0.00004546304,0.0001009593,0.000115625,0.00004618883,0.00001951966,0.00002297307,0.0004294281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3210926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7208201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997233319","doi":"10.1075/ml.5.2.04pai","title":"Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Mental Lexicon","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental lexicon; Mental representation; Lexicon; Cognition; Coding (social sciences); Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Psychology; Cognitive linguistics; Linguistics; Computer science; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01522384661390774,"gpt":0.2913894423444541,"spread":0.2761655957305464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001484893,0.0001730974,0.0001657954,0.00003633393,0.0004094951,0.00007947615,0.0002072188,0.00009151795,0.00285255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003193954,0.00009164019,0.00009038774,0.00007024543,0.0006509394,0.0000938692,0.0001054109,0.0003996209,0.0003828868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001799206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001252296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001350709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009027863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986018,0.0004853837,0.0001925842,0.0002523592,0.0001873404,0.0002805355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991742,0.0003164156,0.00009344365,0.0003463968,0.0000130407,0.0000564453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001352988,0.0001258574,0.0002569796,0.000006550067,0.0001613174,0.00001212373,0.03244673,3.563727e-8,0.06816389,0.8683231,0.00215131,0.02699905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03520573,0.001002904,0.0266946,0.0001261469,0.001017538,0.002517323,0.1742001,0.0002036549,0.1814756,0.5167682,0.05890157,0.00188674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9033462,0.0005238925,0.00003557581,0.001788749,0.002140566,0.0004926383,0.00003552544,0.0000636541,0.09157315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918734,0.00002873214,0.00001957058,0.001867434,0.0004504204,0.00006188825,0.00003554099,0.00002343169,0.005639582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.351555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038270171","doi":"10.3758/bf03200475","title":"Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analogy; Connotation; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Analogical reasoning; Emotionality; Cognitive psychology; Politics; Referendum; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028956550605169,"gpt":0.2879116578851685,"spread":0.2676220923791168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004021906,0.000113616,0.0001620486,0.0001590121,0.00008255384,0.00002428797,0.00008995444,0.0000941207,0.0003066399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003777696,0.00008737687,0.00003513423,0.0004000645,0.0001942775,0.0002287477,0.00002367145,0.0001755364,0.00005384418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001441616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001228789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003029322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002379731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988379,0.0002683717,0.0002917598,0.0002550409,0.0001402999,0.0002066247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991772,0.0002778373,0.0001493955,0.0001833913,0.0001775181,0.00003464467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003075094,0.002812884,0.3190936,0.000755381,0.0007979808,0.001579526,0.1198478,0.0005629842,0.1724501,0.02100112,0.008269193,0.3497544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009186247,0.00009417158,0.9875441,0.0001130505,0.00009205269,0.0001589669,0.004249365,0.00003657097,0.0005435877,0.005801058,0.0002932845,0.0001552021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99389,0.000310817,0.000101866,0.0001987102,0.0001679879,0.0002632474,0.00002056162,0.00002902955,0.005017717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998179,0.00009281267,0.00003857823,0.001140505,0.00006993845,0.00003826502,0.00005014041,0.000009356982,0.0003814416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6684505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3563125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748118162","doi":"10.1515/cog-2017-0074","title":"Internet memes as multimodal constructions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Linguistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Computer science; Popularity; Metonymy; Linguistics; Subject (documents); Frame (networking); The Internet; Macro; Space (punctuation); Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Psychology; Metaphor; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04251905188800018,"gpt":0.3546460883047488,"spread":0.3121270364167486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001337136,0.0001804191,0.0002018246,0.00007871813,0.0003817795,0.0001492771,0.000254706,0.0001442632,0.004011915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009158405,0.0001775468,0.0001002226,0.00003633286,0.0003846841,0.00003512792,0.00009351654,0.000266454,0.003374968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001724438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004248303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002900126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004920284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989182,0.00007765261,0.0002244327,0.0003491132,0.0001429135,0.0002876431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982221,0.0002275253,0.0002151426,0.0003440724,0.000875979,0.0001151785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007116757,0.0009259647,0.02981044,0.0000774482,0.001407604,0.001431803,0.01547534,3.247688e-7,0.0003015259,0.784099,0.01063236,0.1551265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02535531,0.00221351,0.324949,0.001460561,0.004748535,0.000954428,0.07099304,0.001139183,0.04303299,0.1864347,0.333611,0.005107735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1550253,0.0003247619,0.002604477,0.00004316588,0.007379635,0.0002722753,0.0002328987,0.0001217199,0.8339957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840319,0.00001669968,0.0003651181,0.0003724699,0.002117608,0.0000455298,0.00008400741,0.00002941309,0.01293723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8290066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103905381","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x","title":"Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Language Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psycholinguistics; Salience (neuroscience); Schematic; Linguistics; Computer science; Function (biology); Meaning (existential); Second-language acquisition; Language acquisition; Cognition; Interpretation (philosophy); Range (aeronautics); Natural language processing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006939146306049415,"gpt":0.2544373422852247,"spread":0.2474981959791753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000580577,0.000140981,0.0001675526,0.000107084,0.0002538924,0.0001056411,0.0001338329,0.00008654789,0.00355925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000342802,0.00008223543,0.00005955348,0.0001289036,0.00006228453,0.0001879778,0.00002528689,0.000318872,0.00003374635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002248522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001405305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003567711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000296462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.0001761521,0.0002613108,0.0002053865,0.0002133728,0.0002126297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994023,0.00004046862,0.0001519428,0.0002552569,0.00007239906,0.00007761693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004222423,0.0001071049,0.0002250418,0.00001492907,0.0001338966,0.00008507859,0.1734586,0.000008113347,0.03350333,0.00141187,0.02448776,0.7661421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008731232,0.004863441,0.4185946,0.000222691,0.001366113,0.01507156,0.3724,0.0004395249,0.01990835,0.08135051,0.07534342,0.001708563],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774877,0.005642226,0.003553448,0.005928657,0.0008468279,0.000222384,0.00002317513,0.00002193852,0.006273666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786879,0.00004063844,0.0001369072,0.002135112,0.01753218,0.000007084491,0.00001298725,0.00001270165,0.001434437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022219501","doi":"10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1407","title":"Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Psychology; Categorization; Cognitive psychology; Semantics (computer science); Neural correlates of consciousness; Semantic memory; Cognitive science; Communication; Neuroscience; Cognition; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02535641605542285,"gpt":0.3206209531917321,"spread":0.2952645371363093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009108628,0.00009751248,0.0002231046,0.0003546317,0.00003890643,0.00001743272,0.0001704364,0.00005900833,0.00006297159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008278998,0.00008102976,0.0000724362,0.0006698017,0.0002176496,0.0002769525,0.00001858293,0.0002479632,0.000006725622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001431818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000468012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002136481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009061447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985834,0.0001566747,0.0005434586,0.0001593386,0.0003247762,0.0002323913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984469,0.0004601153,0.00053945,0.00006695594,0.0004139877,0.00007258007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002185687,0.0008560456,0.5335252,0.00006182988,0.00003539042,0.002708225,0.01539622,0.00009888137,0.3836089,0.005059413,0.00006503589,0.05639918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001609226,0.0007652111,0.9677075,0.0001326704,0.00005931601,0.0006032606,0.003912166,0.0002287652,0.02415448,0.0006742805,0.00001998947,0.0001331584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805921,0.0002203705,0.01524156,0.00003338972,0.001712833,0.0001096712,0.000004120409,0.0000057877,0.002080131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994321,0.00001951151,0.00001687477,0.000343186,0.00008486133,0.000001091864,0.000001305084,0.000008563649,0.00009244298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4341823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3304298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074576931","doi":"10.7202/1012742ar","title":"Growing a Project-Based Translation Pedagogy: A Fractal Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Experiential learning; Sociology; Transformational leadership; Social constructivism; Epistemology; Discipline; Education theory; Pedagogy; Cognitive science; Psychology; Higher education; Computer science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07174180269788683,"gpt":0.3615107842584578,"spread":0.289768981560571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782298,0.000252746,0.0003526442,0.0003386935,0.0002827415,0.00009592496,0.0001657573,0.0001219861,0.001546936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009176652,0.00019745,0.0005005838,0.0003709528,0.000115357,0.0009466829,0.000005045159,0.0005709985,0.0001171647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009873464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008826505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001737583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002217758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978065,0.0006598844,0.0003494492,0.0002503067,0.0003478568,0.0005860028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.0001388337,0.0001839898,0.0001855683,0.0001675465,0.0001944987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001651774,0.003164933,0.006190429,0.00009686069,0.007685753,0.0004386478,0.1057486,0.0000133521,0.02687854,0.03979765,0.003604371,0.804729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02607058,0.004277303,0.2632,0.000363811,0.03883138,0.02105627,0.1869165,0.0003108615,0.03038257,0.07172294,0.3510919,0.005775923],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8151439,0.1289322,0.04009816,0.0008534582,0.002328638,0.0004850814,0.00002641666,0.0001472715,0.01198482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940517,0.0003356997,0.003398072,0.000432988,0.00124455,0.00005069718,0.00001267365,0.00005349375,0.0004201357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7989531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410504132","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316226414","title":"Using Figurative Language","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Embodied cognition; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Irony; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05125448494226689,"gpt":0.2815019276103746,"spread":0.2302474426681077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001531313,0.0003859889,0.000458708,0.0002259735,0.0001387013,0.00003880381,0.0004325883,0.0005621628,0.00008585155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001666622,0.0004318534,0.000221337,0.00002334096,0.0002007837,0.00008749282,0.0001804727,0.0005734754,0.0001756194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004561989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003321824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006386883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006438665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983199,0.0002473837,0.0001813441,0.0005763455,0.0002976338,0.0003773976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985937,0.00006876907,0.0002692979,0.0006113816,0.0002473433,0.0002095413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002863187,0.00004715402,0.000001232872,0.00007622471,0.0005491637,0.002844062,0.0049471,8.933036e-7,0.0001650456,0.3243256,0.66436,0.00239717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001415343,0.00008563389,0.00001235768,0.0001485971,0.0007166885,0.00008128773,0.004415767,0.00002096906,0.0002702415,0.00002388878,0.9921263,0.0006829609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001270647,0.0008091093,0.0006264946,0.000002934813,0.0008247981,0.0004580537,0.0007803345,0.000189082,0.9950386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001212851,0.000006941665,0.00009713339,0.0001115885,0.0005393573,0.00000160122,0.0003916132,0.00006326148,0.9975756],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3277662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161259460","doi":"10.1177/0022022106292079","title":"Cultural Display Rules Drive Eye Gaze During Thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Gaze; Eye contact; Psychology; Eye tracking; Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Optometry; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0200932097321705,"gpt":0.3837779755830641,"spread":0.3636847658508937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004750441,0.0003750659,0.0005871892,0.0001958583,0.0003840822,0.0003734815,0.0005366835,0.0003885519,0.00132898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009680392,0.0002478858,0.0005036864,0.0002358287,0.0005668887,0.001106937,0.00005351,0.0008496416,0.0004688615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008653361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001875471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008497774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002795594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970936,0.0002431099,0.001102048,0.0004314375,0.0004452454,0.0006845194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977083,0.0000779783,0.0009500592,0.000282629,0.0008289683,0.000152033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007381245,0.003092279,0.2603692,0.0002017196,0.002389546,0.006793431,0.04843356,0.0001656544,0.5138193,0.05399241,0.08444562,0.01891612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00592029,0.0004472066,0.9540945,0.0001157574,0.000185807,0.004758966,0.002692974,0.000004432218,0.002582226,0.01533029,0.0132762,0.0005914104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557941,0.002072755,0.000137177,0.000810948,0.003799309,0.0001437907,0.0000251957,0.000066124,0.03715059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909347,0.00007230155,0.0004919166,0.0007329293,0.002918696,0.000009581054,0.00004156733,0.00003718718,0.004761128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6937253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136228328","doi":"10.1017/s0305000909009520","title":"Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Language","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Irony; Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Literal (mathematical logic); Pragmatics; Linguistics; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00822495703151748,"gpt":0.2795753206738133,"spread":0.2713503636422958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004752229,0.000128209,0.0002861263,0.000119718,0.00006131107,0.00001753829,0.000154192,0.00006826952,0.0003593182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001375979,0.0001015942,0.00008950943,0.0001247843,0.00003363682,0.00005951468,0.00002408334,0.0002167124,0.00001220506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002938246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002974848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000211661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001537907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988374,0.00007175464,0.0004973788,0.0001556727,0.0002456735,0.0001921751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992757,0.00003727441,0.0002821449,0.0001788576,0.00008119729,0.0001447628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001075033,0.001800638,0.01863641,0.00007114646,0.0004183906,0.0003915634,0.1881599,0.000003850311,0.0188984,0.002584618,0.004296124,0.7636639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001306929,0.0003339761,0.9882171,0.0001047974,0.00007177266,0.0004533062,0.003188188,3.745874e-7,0.004286113,0.000209249,0.001648333,0.0001798484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842342,0.001429932,0.0002321752,0.0003269897,0.000213958,0.0001222837,0.00001180007,0.00001220284,0.01341644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965255,0.000005791604,0.002274005,0.0007318626,0.0003645006,9.740965e-7,0.000006282271,0.00000912728,0.00008194576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4142889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163444493","doi":"10.1177/0018726707084916","title":"The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch's letters to stockholders of General Electric","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Relations","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Transformational leadership; Charisma; SAINT; Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Management; Social psychology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02411353446369576,"gpt":0.3171659742290355,"spread":0.2930524397653398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000414577,0.0001359894,0.0001614069,0.0003393175,0.0003126444,0.00002366212,0.0001214286,0.00007007814,0.00013837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002049866,0.0001142593,0.00008661849,0.0004034841,0.0000998167,0.00008974434,0.00001185432,0.0002885141,0.0000713156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005378012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001741266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005959973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003189851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987763,0.0001418717,0.000374488,0.000196769,0.0002072732,0.0003032682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993585,0.0002462041,0.00009601014,0.0001864521,0.00004770927,0.00006514243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006571656,0.001016989,0.01399499,0.00005851821,0.0009093047,0.00004421805,0.2200565,0.003725555,0.032309,0.6392469,0.01266918,0.07531162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002797716,0.000420584,0.9631163,0.00004642851,0.0001968993,0.00003342065,0.01211387,0.0002281405,0.001487942,0.01376887,0.005296487,0.0004933573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690921,0.0004075105,0.004366842,0.0009129609,0.00009512306,0.0004504387,0.00001103158,0.0000250299,0.02463891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969827,0.000005363459,0.0001051585,0.0008136126,0.00008682081,0.00005102493,0.00005706718,0.00001699753,0.001881263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.465936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052742452","doi":"10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00174.x","title":"People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Linguistics Compass","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; McGill University","keywords":"Comprehension; Syntax; Sentence; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02225915954089189,"gpt":0.3259492210790454,"spread":0.3036900615381535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002371461,0.000251508,0.0004467799,0.000172343,0.0001481027,0.0001038207,0.000166197,0.0001418308,0.0002752119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004440057,0.0002181885,0.00006896049,0.0002433396,0.00006729909,0.00003130174,0.00007017814,0.0002040098,0.00007581044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002291551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003977824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002060568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001082599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986593,0.0001454061,0.0003307539,0.0003718433,0.0001464726,0.0003462964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988034,0.0003071132,0.0001255373,0.0004090391,0.0001390119,0.0002159184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008683208,0.001634792,0.009305731,0.0002347217,0.0003642272,0.0004318345,0.8115727,0.000004710599,0.003793106,0.1125249,0.004960879,0.05430406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01048534,0.004771906,0.2138616,0.001016194,0.0009673527,0.0004273122,0.6778882,0.0002615585,0.01653495,0.04439663,0.02661528,0.002773632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540757,0.005169098,0.0001885269,0.00007347444,0.0004644105,0.0002876964,0.00009513241,0.00006967061,0.0395763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964517,0.00004605728,0.000263446,0.0006962486,0.0004154395,0.000005789129,0.00006873703,0.00002763781,0.002024886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2045559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8897467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322741677","doi":"10.1177/1086026611434274","title":"Reflections on <i>Images of Organization</i> and Its Implications for Organization and Environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization & Environment","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0288852413057361,"gpt":0.2701298358701066,"spread":0.2412445945643705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001175713,0.0001935054,0.0001792869,0.0001264174,0.0002822661,0.00002141752,0.0000974282,0.000136695,0.003234453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000127165,0.0001983941,0.00001773772,0.0003809092,0.00008305232,0.0001361127,0.00006246867,0.00006931902,0.0001554681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000660204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001528657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006188738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.494344e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988273,0.00007190104,0.0003362536,0.0004610219,0.0001242331,0.0001792853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992126,0.0000626449,0.000214197,0.000312062,0.0001048007,0.00009368692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113798,0.003711405,0.08549529,0.0001803017,0.0005745505,0.000004482291,0.0346284,0.0001425838,0.4635745,0.394033,0.003579805,0.01396186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002623833,0.0007875948,0.6747392,0.00002810962,0.000625021,0.0001016368,0.00248056,0.00001349559,0.3066897,0.004091122,0.006988122,0.0008316166],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6757048,0.0009270185,0.3084348,0.001797562,0.0004903693,0.002946961,0.0004838422,0.0003154431,0.00889917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951199,0.001108601,0.001746195,0.0003152857,0.00007836252,0.00005343958,0.0004790972,0.00008937371,0.001009734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5892439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143576058","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275","title":"Effects of Emotional and Sensorimotor Knowledge in Semantic Processing of Concrete and Abstract Nouns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Psychology; Semantic memory; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Computer science; Neuroscience; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01817361299391491,"gpt":0.2954889059435537,"spread":0.2773152929496388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002725222,0.00008180705,0.0001802124,0.0001952891,0.00004156322,0.000009616952,0.00007549631,0.00004893951,0.000006668214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006909479,0.00007779541,0.00001595859,0.0001898845,0.0003595728,0.0001735847,0.00002394444,0.0001068229,2.878347e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009858158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001326282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002123719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003125978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992095,0.00007945656,0.0002021832,0.0002050691,0.0001017446,0.0002021119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996989,0.00005063174,0.0001047772,0.00007726665,0.00002142209,0.00004698781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005840205,0.000237275,0.6528467,0.000908648,0.00000511081,0.00002634237,0.01451271,0.000001951168,0.3225535,0.0009452176,0.0001871971,0.00771695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006103548,0.00007960811,0.993371,0.0001166787,0.00001089491,0.00001128428,0.0005196763,0.0001649333,0.004809742,0.000189476,0.00003191377,0.00008449942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956934,0.001870259,0.0006306506,0.000004486143,0.0006913517,0.0001740731,0.000003249752,0.00000669857,0.0009258565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995783,0.00001781024,0.0002221513,0.00002914444,0.00003587957,0.000007352387,7.296284e-7,0.000006433638,0.000102202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3405243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3172405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166773464","doi":"10.1177/0261927x04266809","title":"How Sarcastic are You?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Irony; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Social psychology; Task (project management); Literal and figurative language; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02946743152895986,"gpt":0.3443762912813962,"spread":0.3149088597524363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002926982,0.0001324188,0.0003298779,0.0001587734,0.0001057603,0.00004397694,0.0001398422,0.0002084114,0.0003101382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005663241,0.0001079421,0.0001511153,0.0001223062,0.0001323081,0.0001123234,0.00001544707,0.0003600992,0.00003612114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002286719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002080474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002142503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002524996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990019,0.0001448926,0.0002693211,0.0001685908,0.0001563569,0.0002588909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992902,0.000040794,0.0003740241,0.000112819,0.0001015993,0.00008061764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002535674,0.002654995,0.007038116,0.0001535905,0.001982445,0.01887211,0.4646905,0.000001747939,0.03011343,0.06256121,0.03291639,0.3764798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02878913,0.00340425,0.3636312,0.0001775006,0.001057345,0.01216452,0.4722722,6.008018e-7,0.0007535114,0.07157073,0.04480579,0.001373262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978209,0.003999454,0.002309142,0.007517241,0.001370364,0.00007044634,0.00001178161,0.00001883608,0.006493702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944338,0.00005499788,0.0001656966,0.00293119,0.001633618,0.000002724248,0.000003778267,0.00001829232,0.0007558811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3751065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4401752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988456614","doi":"10.1348/026151008x401903","title":"Children's understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hyperbole; Sarcasm; Rhetorical question; Irony; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Rhetorical device; Literal and figurative language; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Metaphor; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03164774598334397,"gpt":0.2953124170123475,"spread":0.2636646710290035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003855197,0.00009153235,0.0002315212,0.0002476252,0.00005274495,0.00001530741,0.00009238879,0.0001043663,0.0001107296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003898399,0.0001089234,0.00004572487,0.0002135144,0.0001141311,0.0001602497,0.000009369829,0.0002409768,0.000006579676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008634033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003978573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003746196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003727486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988695,0.0001189924,0.0005016847,0.0001884542,0.0001404635,0.0001808819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999561,0.00002215242,0.0002543069,0.00005578411,0.00005102803,0.00005574513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001583137,0.002766704,0.1442578,0.00003577838,0.0006531469,0.001465345,0.02073097,0.00000489681,0.04008126,0.0063134,0.02520438,0.7569032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002343925,0.0002556382,0.9749082,0.0001083501,0.00002487771,0.009641638,0.005346869,2.13522e-7,0.0001995529,0.006942249,0.0001057144,0.0001227596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903786,0.00133892,0.0006998775,0.0003745101,0.0009775712,0.000129283,0.00000561497,0.000007732558,0.006087952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977618,0.0004411242,0.001141905,0.0004551158,0.0001186182,0.000001636637,0.000009499651,0.000007883835,0.00006235014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4441768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109176859","doi":"10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00304.x","title":"Saying What You Don't Mean","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Literal and figurative language; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Metaphor; Class (philosophy); Point (geometry); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Irony; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06909248748340094,"gpt":0.4131902838720157,"spread":0.3440977963886148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009356496,0.0001716501,0.0001732214,0.0003613841,0.0003800953,0.000203174,0.000516647,0.0001011061,0.0012085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712182,0.0001346334,0.0000922808,0.002432779,0.0007140515,0.000641114,0.00006547591,0.0004324174,0.0006125594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001762831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002800094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000855709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006613632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977282,0.0001091911,0.000312601,0.0008795826,0.0003707331,0.0005996414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991579,0.00005757173,0.00007934841,0.0004513591,0.00008067377,0.0001731277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103717,0.001991282,0.003975435,0.000004854611,0.000007186909,0.0000320579,0.004207869,0.00002322821,0.001665279,0.03265981,0.0003346475,0.9550573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005731787,0.0008688253,0.7283052,0.0006426277,0.00007582139,0.0004740546,0.0235862,0.00003582388,0.001888789,0.1646869,0.07188746,0.001816549],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9187572,0.004388267,0.001996628,0.0004851751,0.01335485,0.0003000142,0.000004115649,0.0002379341,0.06047584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981055,0.0007099519,0.0003563165,0.0003119406,0.000214445,0.000120851,0.000004630363,0.000008093352,0.0001682952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}