{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":325,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":325,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"54a474e73a36","filters":{"topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms"}},"results":[{"id":"W1497381870","doi":"","title":"Reaction and resistance : feminism, law, and social change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Gender studies; Resistance (ecology); Heteronormativity; Law; Political science; Human sexuality","authors":[{"name":"Dorothy E. Chunn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susan Boyd","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hester Lessard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0455998071082363,"gpt":0.3032524608231148,"spread":0.2576526537148785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01591924,0.0008307208,0.0007654721,0.002298769,0.01125789,0.0217497,0.002296672,0.007990753,0.007260886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01649542,0.000442504,0.0005450186,0.002501599,0.0839119,0.01611151,0.01036407,0.008792413,0.0005999777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008801581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004815677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003218806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9772609,0.01802062,0.000250808,0.0009697753,0.001711526,0.00178648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850152,0.01223497,0.001016121,0.0005548419,0.0004617022,0.0007170737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002973276,0.00008240296,0.0007374805,0.0001887151,0.00001383029,0.0003321393,0.1725375,0.0002304641,0.0001665513,0.7713886,0.02801823,0.0262743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000291943,0.00006064397,0.001561904,0.0008464631,0.00001061275,0.0003023787,0.1912249,0.000388609,0.0003569669,0.3490043,0.4561628,0.00005114103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04905009,0.04866197,0.005789412,0.5257474,0.00362885,0.0001157435,0.00003926577,0.0001249204,0.3668423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950548,0.0168846,0.001297989,0.04065178,0.002496955,0.0002404236,0.0000290426,0.0001570468,0.0431874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0217497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08419001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135545778","doi":"","title":"Dignity and Speech: The Regulation of Hate Speech in a Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Alexander Tsesis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01992755604805733,"gpt":0.270995201432523,"spread":0.2510676453844656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006499696,0.0003225146,0.0002621278,0.0007721625,0.006411696,0.01096629,0.001113372,0.004880559,0.004480768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007602764,0.0002543826,0.0004126099,0.0005663659,0.03474316,0.006824297,0.007532547,0.005334603,0.0006072135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006007222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005942509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004985093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006730068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956567,0.002224905,0.0001805775,0.0004699938,0.0008767624,0.0005910707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952311,0.002721515,0.0005512484,0.0004112881,0.0005444501,0.0005404213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003009305,0.00003294237,0.0007313071,0.00004971517,0.000005983521,0.0002600483,0.01618607,0.0002695313,0.0005590774,0.9589179,0.003708549,0.0192488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003377291,0.00007785743,0.002305906,0.0003459544,0.00002035733,0.0003160379,0.01028019,0.0007018067,0.001381339,0.824517,0.159982,0.00003793672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08533397,0.01267719,0.02652857,0.1404826,0.001526463,0.00007358948,0.00005260752,0.00008719478,0.7332378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432189,0.00252419,0.00252464,0.009961388,0.00053544,0.00008165136,0.00001960623,0.00004133807,0.04109273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04358566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967915771","doi":"10.1146/annurev-polisci-010814-104523","title":"Campaign Finance and American Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Democracy; Corporate governance; Exceptionalism; Political science; Public administration; American exceptionalism; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02506261651835539,"gpt":0.361750234960103,"spread":0.3366876184417476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001456949,0.0001263744,0.0001796747,0.001417299,0.002048914,0.003600889,0.0002035455,0.001543692,0.008939839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003456198,0.00007822478,0.0001284382,0.001644169,0.004515626,0.002190362,0.001741067,0.0017304,0.0005790085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00200061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001507497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004775762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00595984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989472,0.0004723624,0.0000247319,0.0001237604,0.0002146654,0.0002172441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979734,0.0009654012,0.0004448223,0.0001123649,0.0002425497,0.0002614247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178045,0.00004891896,0.005605239,0.0000344747,0.000006640658,0.000045834,0.00114347,0.0002622177,0.00005588852,0.9388031,0.01089849,0.04307796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002256335,0.00003995552,0.02750883,0.000301178,0.00001042408,0.0001013723,0.001927458,0.0004720358,0.0001155383,0.5434579,0.4260185,0.00002416796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09918743,0.02525675,0.002545049,0.0805411,0.0004984763,0.00002003862,0.0002077223,0.00005034638,0.791693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656426,0.007613754,0.0003604894,0.006460421,0.0008623915,0.00002585678,0.0001033609,0.00001206699,0.01891892],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008939839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02990669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Timmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0628466398633027,"gpt":0.313046563790455,"spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01667282,0.0007017296,0.000878871,0.00551538,0.01827046,0.01754831,0.003052241,0.00872728,0.004062573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024754,0.0004028274,0.00075984,0.004601347,0.05550396,0.01543576,0.006656522,0.009760901,0.0004581838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05068175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04882752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8365045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8602208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822073,0.004329207,0.0004718624,0.001314841,0.008574798,0.003101917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989548,0.004799807,0.0004346066,0.0009775095,0.00346396,0.0007761404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169836,0.000004310669,0.0003168413,0.00001249648,0.00000233221,0.0000523176,0.005110081,0.00007272396,0.0000298928,0.981952,0.005732385,0.006710503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176126,0.00001089277,0.003000551,0.0006907091,0.00003192453,0.0001599745,0.01620591,0.0008216603,0.0003461212,0.7276666,0.2509463,0.0001017152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02677345,0.009958463,0.01851466,0.2112797,0.001965103,0.00006505218,0.0002489774,0.00009778732,0.7310967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942785,0.007058602,0.0125878,0.05524679,0.001010459,0.00008040737,0.000164742,0.0001554593,0.02941731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1634955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3677236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W569468412","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-1186","title":"The First Amendment in cross-cultural perspective: a comparative legal analysis of the freedom of speech","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Assertion; Law; First amendment; Sociology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Supreme court; History; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05204581979797503,"gpt":0.403175424796172,"spread":0.351129604998197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008080625,0.0003502698,0.0004668652,0.007953397,0.007822962,0.009231181,0.001126506,0.002606024,0.00513482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01227866,0.0001940234,0.0004239836,0.007096573,0.02658505,0.01138637,0.003756556,0.003000913,0.0003255969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008716607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00274522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01550361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02058059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902344,0.007840543,0.0001478689,0.0003383542,0.0008559785,0.0005828639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870838,0.01109456,0.0004937815,0.0004693456,0.0006469135,0.0002116352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002594639,0.00003262358,0.0008711782,0.00009304458,0.00001537968,0.0002962934,0.1035144,0.0001294406,0.0001383957,0.8788962,0.001333924,0.01465326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869747,0.0001490152,0.0175964,0.002226345,0.00008974379,0.0006208731,0.3720613,0.0008725681,0.001263036,0.3026623,0.3023503,0.00006947095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2521997,0.03043335,0.004464257,0.0124063,0.0003657691,0.00004580141,0.00009175509,0.00001123181,0.6999819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838832,0.00784417,0.000958198,0.0009884594,0.0001341105,0.00006222446,0.00005225224,0.00001950219,0.006057959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01550361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37596324","doi":"10.4337/9781781953860","title":"Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Law; Terrorism; Political science; National security; Legislature","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01700182366795913,"gpt":0.247507089064338,"spread":0.2305052653963788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569323,0.0003652778,0.0004312166,0.00131611,0.002843253,0.0068241,0.0007034192,0.001986065,0.01271715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007169757,0.0002807404,0.0002840328,0.001687645,0.01466654,0.007009754,0.002143255,0.003167367,0.002405925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007352711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003540528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005141635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005696425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974971,0.001277938,0.00009981364,0.0002441372,0.0006971802,0.0001837693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959765,0.002900532,0.0002704315,0.0003323545,0.0003870301,0.0001330731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008551862,0.000003330065,0.0000772952,0.00006080356,0.000001788197,0.00002589132,0.0009833812,0.0001188277,0.00003268614,0.9362806,0.05110206,0.01130469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003360618,0.000007203737,0.0004253591,0.0005594019,0.000002441744,0.00005306065,0.0007056469,0.0001232252,0.0000784217,0.3668058,0.6312267,0.000009383481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005415248,0.1677524,0.004522047,0.1463637,0.00649883,0.00002983366,0.0002233506,0.00009422211,0.6691003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5043754,0.1560967,0.005151889,0.02636522,0.01925847,0.0001615948,0.000437172,0.0002602317,0.2878933],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01271715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05334789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500111186","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315215.001.0001","title":"Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to Be Left Alone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Privacy policy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Framing (construction); Fundamental rights; Internet privacy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ronald J. Krotoszynski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02029877947338573,"gpt":0.2857658737801217,"spread":0.265467094306736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00526059,0.0009165329,0.0008214482,0.001629382,0.008022123,0.01774012,0.001969097,0.009819488,0.005671823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005670836,0.0003938139,0.001213675,0.003074175,0.0519969,0.02142257,0.01059322,0.01761737,0.0007225778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008002964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006454181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007524449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004541102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918646,0.004663785,0.0001915727,0.001047687,0.001111719,0.001120666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945288,0.004303179,0.0002439656,0.0003942659,0.0002633577,0.0002664793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006113523,0.00000344968,0.00007086453,0.00004242064,0.000003023956,0.00009583419,0.006636614,0.0001361468,0.00003099248,0.9815561,0.007465354,0.003953198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009103529,0.00002356084,0.000272154,0.0004780745,0.00001276829,0.0003494007,0.009901839,0.0002290364,0.000127035,0.6295692,0.3590112,0.00001668725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01201597,0.0539511,0.01631807,0.3662057,0.004609923,0.00003532113,0.0001227354,0.0000699171,0.5466712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936302,0.06091622,0.005277398,0.154598,0.007243714,0.0002106036,0.0001848009,0.0002632444,0.07767579],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01774012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05806583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597015980","doi":"","title":"I'm Right and You're an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinnovation journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Ignorance; Politics; Hyperbole; Civility; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Metaphor","authors":[{"name":"Howard A. Doughty","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04563214943999562,"gpt":0.3114813705965828,"spread":0.2658492211565872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003979767,0.001023922,0.0007915398,0.003214441,0.01097552,0.01457531,0.001228254,0.003154705,0.01746565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006819536,0.0007804024,0.00034071,0.003962329,0.01473059,0.01285353,0.002899217,0.007953146,0.009405697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01011745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01512343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1055319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2020297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970077,0.001496227,0.0001021573,0.0001903832,0.0009109723,0.0002925021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955229,0.001716783,0.0002425946,0.0001626926,0.001745612,0.0006095524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009272423,0.00001169926,0.0001483056,0.0002455369,0.000004224724,0.00006028226,0.01040643,0.00002628586,0.00009748051,0.02473659,0.9218082,0.04244562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000295751,0.000003722019,0.0005897399,0.0007834251,0.000003779381,0.00005854232,0.01991621,0.00001893248,0.00005653941,0.005987283,0.9725688,0.00001003948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00102451,0.5151972,0.0009226156,0.3830049,0.01974036,0.00003568544,0.0001005701,0.0001410384,0.07983304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0665478,0.3990687,0.0022654,0.06639405,0.01630303,0.0001942806,0.0002700351,0.0007015272,0.4482552],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1055319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2098354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147114429","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Tolerance: Studies on the Costs of Free Expression and Freedom of the Press","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incitement; Scope (computer science); Freedom of expression; Table of contents; Free press; Index (typography); Table (database); Political science; Freedom of the press; Expression (computer science); Free speech; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Raphael Cohen‐Almagor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02448660563499163,"gpt":0.3007121085294625,"spread":0.2762255028944709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006112877,0.0003663897,0.0004134668,0.003958783,0.002273356,0.009231599,0.001270239,0.001532843,0.03495941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05390064,0.0002760468,0.0004630653,0.006328751,0.009910197,0.01442953,0.003319528,0.00231945,0.001409373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004166268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002174903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002684586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002686296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920244,0.004116034,0.0002825262,0.0003749517,0.002656207,0.0005458439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180171,0.07135207,0.004473215,0.002672247,0.002619172,0.000866256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004208486,0.0000441231,0.003075739,0.0001771254,0.00001527813,0.00005964137,0.002554601,0.00052072,0.00003478432,0.9650222,0.007160579,0.02129317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003469748,0.00008724202,0.02509755,0.001898849,0.0000640166,0.0004628312,0.01375266,0.001354748,0.0002928531,0.8240272,0.1328815,0.00004580972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04709878,0.02713896,0.004692827,0.01404836,0.0002485187,0.00006617643,0.0003835666,0.00002351044,0.9062992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590078,0.01513053,0.0009243854,0.001196045,0.000508843,0.0001630708,0.0001785498,0.00005194395,0.02283878],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03495941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1169509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W567409246","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-0365","title":"Sexual violence: policies, practices, and challenges in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law enforcement; Sexual violence; Law; Politics; Sex offense; Sociology; History; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Sexual abuse; Medicine","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1621859144672266,"gpt":0.3561586997174577,"spread":0.1939727852502312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211133,0.0002976652,0.000440685,0.004115271,0.01355223,0.008898279,0.001913339,0.001712195,0.004995369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006649801,0.0004554424,0.0004745588,0.01179652,0.004594546,0.00161731,0.003279065,0.001988468,0.00033985],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1696537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3971898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958115,0.0003463636,0.0001617618,0.000225957,0.001808741,0.001645642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.000644788,0.0004840965,0.0001065428,0.003990819,0.003311233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000180067,0.0002363336,0.2968547,0.001238344,0.0001465607,0.000848878,0.03185215,0.00226832,0.0005348989,0.1102547,0.2215738,0.3340113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005006617,0.00005817046,0.4836051,0.002188112,0.00009971872,0.0002503077,0.1147577,0.001582052,0.0003163219,0.006356804,0.3905212,0.0002143657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3104453,0.149482,0.0007753894,0.31832,0.001513508,0.0003055679,0.009412879,0.000187067,0.2095583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260424,0.1105221,0.001723366,0.01527973,0.0001590459,0.0001362653,0.002293778,0.00007338114,0.04376989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1696537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652582","doi":"10.7164/antibiotics.44.723","title":"How Much Surveillance is Too Much? Some Thoughts on Surveillance, Democracy, and the Political Value of Privacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Antibiotics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Democracy; Political science; Public relations; Computer security; Law; Geography; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Goold","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01244560217391874,"gpt":0.269641667919304,"spread":0.2571960657453852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044948,0.0003888432,0.0005860726,0.001256731,0.002877043,0.006274331,0.001225307,0.00656605,0.003430726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004992106,0.0002428968,0.0004480748,0.001083347,0.03250392,0.01355675,0.001467403,0.005800381,0.0003116344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004156384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001270785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003597551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004110296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975036,0.00174583,0.00006445294,0.000187773,0.0002656032,0.0002326944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958522,0.003154962,0.0002414679,0.0001635079,0.0003188265,0.0002689624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625575,0.00002048143,0.0002508981,0.0000754851,0.000009662027,0.0001726583,0.002451717,0.0003582743,0.0001801004,0.9693044,0.01822902,0.008921019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001555805,0.00004326447,0.0005149259,0.0001942716,0.000004708299,0.0001353286,0.004682846,0.0005503657,0.0001416747,0.9020602,0.09162377,0.00003311532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009322708,0.05665874,0.004506628,0.8801128,0.002897188,0.00001718301,0.00005781009,0.00002189644,0.04640488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003349,0.06325765,0.004681455,0.09265562,0.01775353,0.00008794502,0.00004971477,0.00005020274,0.02112903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00656605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03015679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755938","doi":"10.1097/00006676-198904000-00001","title":"A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Intermediary; Selection (genetic algorithm); Filter (signal processing); Internet privacy; Computer science; Internet access; Voice over IP; Class (philosophy); Business; Advertising; World Wide Web; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer A. Chandler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04141274174560243,"gpt":0.297918509331501,"spread":0.2565057675858985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003699064,0.0002517963,0.0002380923,0.001625904,0.003282003,0.007626665,0.0009229256,0.002902611,0.02803415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009118159,0.000211111,0.0002648823,0.0009780863,0.0103529,0.01136936,0.005248607,0.002129449,0.00221429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002000256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001629106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001481968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977282,0.001380595,0.00004929616,0.0002352797,0.0003445947,0.0002621113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944062,0.00330387,0.0003830716,0.0007800796,0.0004440912,0.0006826775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006652014,0.00006182551,0.00156613,0.00003948095,0.000004087514,0.0002347638,0.00724005,0.0001896382,0.001112728,0.9487932,0.004008728,0.03668275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008740256,0.0001418673,0.002234742,0.0001841328,0.00003023255,0.0005870928,0.01499915,0.003679415,0.002797686,0.7403838,0.2348277,0.00004676953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1050078,0.001295332,0.03939544,0.0421713,0.0002668084,0.00009381409,0.00006228767,0.0003031078,0.8114043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939872,0.0006461875,0.007411866,0.002710597,0.0002779073,0.0001042017,0.00001751524,0.000104839,0.04885503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02803415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09378356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604518897","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential election; Political science; Democracy; Administration (probate law); Politics; Law; Election law; Primary election; Split-ticket voting; General election; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Richard L. Hasen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008920350884462315,"gpt":0.2741506829325709,"spread":0.2652303320481086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02920188,0.0006251489,0.0006691872,0.003362722,0.01825355,0.01871281,0.003014568,0.0111569,0.00851668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05957424,0.0008694179,0.001053632,0.002013338,0.009662178,0.0164773,0.01203698,0.01683669,0.002667576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009476005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03563956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02031878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04169139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970993,0.01236536,0.001231828,0.002391206,0.007008388,0.006010197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657708,0.01398814,0.0034338,0.003440696,0.007071574,0.006294988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001883944,0.0009246208,0.01177241,0.0002407332,0.00009801767,0.0005943516,0.01415111,0.002883475,0.002223688,0.4308723,0.2075009,0.32855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004548831,0.001282518,0.02675918,0.001136567,0.0002133568,0.0005061101,0.01573528,0.007028513,0.003320266,0.1894067,0.7538906,0.0002660688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1266925,0.01607539,0.03686227,0.5493702,0.006553396,0.0006852525,0.00008194752,0.001551013,0.262128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003556,0.003277052,0.01660583,0.1381174,0.004047781,0.0005082692,0.0001086319,0.0002281834,0.03675134],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02920188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1544362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234245804","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.4.499","title":"The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool: Suing the Government for Data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Plaintiff; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Law enforcement; Politics; Mainstream; Economic Justice; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Matthew G. Yeager","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1927595903490207,"gpt":0.3542346788122241,"spread":0.1614750884632035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2175179,0.001243154,0.001199039,0.01471387,0.01253255,0.01911657,0.004613076,0.008110153,0.002814898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2980585,0.001309468,0.001246684,0.01070801,0.06608563,0.02661105,0.01601007,0.009810317,0.0008140625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01137155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0175805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004703655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005275045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5974396,0.3741534,0.007320122,0.005778557,0.01332494,0.001983407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6364731,0.3127283,0.01039582,0.02823445,0.009658602,0.002509781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291723,0.00005137679,0.001546816,0.0002059938,0.00001899392,0.0001117009,0.01089647,0.0001901017,0.00006679901,0.9712705,0.003909385,0.01169888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001072589,0.000114258,0.0009971735,0.002689635,0.00006841467,0.0003116892,0.02721488,0.002521349,0.0006451875,0.8436146,0.1216426,0.00007294284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05569924,0.04736479,0.4601485,0.2918397,0.01175624,0.002916055,0.0006939587,0.000153985,0.1294275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633403,0.0121775,0.2603094,0.04488104,0.003869351,0.008079608,0.0002709546,0.0002612942,0.006810626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9649398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336937760","doi":"","title":"Reviewing PIPEDA: Control, Privacy and the Limits of Fair Information Practices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; FTC Fair Information Practice; Entitlement (fair division); Privacy policy; Privacy by Design; Internet privacy; Information privacy law; Information privacy; Scope (computer science); Control (management); Business; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02417420621057096,"gpt":0.2679656003852986,"spread":0.2437913941747276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04120047,0.0005588215,0.001139777,0.004258585,0.007769766,0.01552881,0.002590454,0.01510916,0.002077786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08824661,0.0009754541,0.00075414,0.003969893,0.03678735,0.01574267,0.004898621,0.01577904,0.0007697307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02457679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03484356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08587044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07585315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9608505,0.01625919,0.002180899,0.002740143,0.01632131,0.001647998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9110028,0.06792434,0.002225062,0.0028009,0.01499747,0.001049403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004455253,0.00000482374,0.000117517,0.0001584733,0.000003644923,0.00007200205,0.00282828,0.00037587,0.00003541067,0.9363537,0.04970427,0.01034154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108151,0.00002502351,0.0006043289,0.00203086,0.00002185345,0.00007976457,0.002264578,0.0006522203,0.0002740868,0.2386309,0.7553465,0.00005910366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009287056,0.1399226,0.04776926,0.4718001,0.01104313,0.0003257568,0.0002861807,0.0002617135,0.3193041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5007438,0.1783653,0.02848737,0.1873886,0.01693314,0.001306196,0.00035209,0.0004784351,0.08594509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2178915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301249481","doi":"","title":"The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Democracy; Supreme court; Adjudication; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Harm; Normative; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01622672385136342,"gpt":0.2372359148698847,"spread":0.2210091910185213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01267739,0.000261878,0.000360076,0.0009218389,0.004474013,0.008914505,0.001797444,0.004477729,0.001485638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457411,0.000291404,0.0003814195,0.000589379,0.03002632,0.006369827,0.004509585,0.006394392,0.0002475898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005129906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00785409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004741605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774702,0.01325085,0.0006827684,0.002210728,0.004445391,0.001940195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836628,0.008095394,0.001930402,0.003055116,0.002427447,0.0008288402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004052914,0.000004714942,0.0001138127,0.000005684708,0.000001147999,0.00001603345,0.0005452152,0.0002103575,0.00006861015,0.9964154,0.0006265013,0.001988428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002722736,0.00002628274,0.0005213899,0.00004760265,0.000003601091,0.00004787623,0.000500832,0.001855747,0.0003667073,0.9497105,0.04687498,0.00001727342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09293864,0.005718004,0.1359639,0.09403375,0.001109694,0.0001017787,0.00004221539,0.0001348263,0.6699571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980427,0.0006432486,0.003872712,0.004332741,0.0004876959,0.00006116496,0.000009055208,0.00001852262,0.01014777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01267739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06704521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30897024","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1429","title":"Racial and Ethnic Profiling: Statutory Discretion, Constitutional Remedies, and Democratic Accountability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Racial profiling; Statute; Democracy; Law; Political science; Accountability; Legislative history; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03839599351974181,"gpt":0.3137590781801511,"spread":0.2753630846604093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03355615,0.0004046627,0.0007916571,0.00197975,0.01494537,0.01283856,0.002447697,0.01078169,0.002924277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06361558,0.0006260226,0.0007480615,0.001421487,0.05017313,0.006935744,0.007879029,0.01382182,0.0002727833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01854121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04366152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1179495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1549231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9583676,0.01269073,0.001745581,0.003963557,0.01383814,0.00939443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613393,0.02236632,0.004316852,0.00468825,0.004141298,0.003148009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001497916,0.00001659652,0.0008676986,0.00001286622,0.00000721135,0.00005892576,0.001800891,0.0003888663,0.0002213991,0.9908534,0.001240423,0.004516685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007466125,0.00004005979,0.00370695,0.0001772774,0.00004503811,0.00005983024,0.002195658,0.001897297,0.001251649,0.9574772,0.03298361,0.00009079729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2064729,0.003836899,0.04792548,0.2743557,0.0009098967,0.0002697459,0.0001849181,0.0002352548,0.4658092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821295,0.0002939701,0.00209757,0.00919214,0.0002218059,0.0001006112,0.0000197042,0.00002013532,0.00592454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1179495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2345259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657512810","doi":"","title":"Surveillance : power, problems, and politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Politics; Political science; Criminalization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sean P. Hier","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joshua Greenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0190833287300728,"gpt":0.2565284746321886,"spread":0.2374451459021159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009199173,0.0007273704,0.0007186907,0.002187323,0.006649372,0.01723317,0.001427293,0.006546028,0.02144546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02149514,0.0005847686,0.0004083542,0.002204577,0.01583574,0.01769472,0.005132012,0.00828157,0.005889209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007327991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009350845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01169782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008113381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894779,0.004983392,0.0004381338,0.0009735628,0.003420224,0.0007068064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983823,0.009652966,0.0008130157,0.0008904978,0.003659805,0.001160757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230063,0.00001779986,0.0003602442,0.000217737,0.000007179638,0.0000514521,0.003744047,0.0001108095,0.00005955669,0.2100927,0.7057226,0.07960355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004332769,0.000006896548,0.0003103118,0.0008647495,0.000002067883,0.00005569015,0.003986028,0.00006342298,0.00003618847,0.04954776,0.9451116,0.00001097808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007769055,0.1371083,0.001968289,0.6886912,0.01540814,0.0000375305,0.00007563561,0.00007327639,0.1558606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1474177,0.2650449,0.00471844,0.2585064,0.05027226,0.0003131109,0.0002757195,0.0003725786,0.273079],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013724371","doi":"","title":"Canada's Residential Schools and the Right to Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Amy Anderson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dallas K. Miller","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01240378790515456,"gpt":0.2605882250086066,"spread":0.248184437103452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002986109,0.0002432612,0.0004007556,0.000944265,0.0324109,0.01020773,0.002183298,0.005944804,0.01104982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007951441,0.0004052862,0.0004273486,0.001451442,0.02668039,0.003104987,0.006498874,0.008446203,0.0004483148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06992608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1952303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925087,0.000887031,0.0001790365,0.0006399216,0.002594737,0.003190526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939616,0.001256964,0.0004191504,0.0005014698,0.002158453,0.0017024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009931409,0.00001345723,0.001912868,0.00002982463,0.000006183153,0.0002246007,0.007363824,0.0001877734,0.00009089059,0.9614006,0.01995096,0.008809007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000513966,0.00003743775,0.018953,0.0006870627,0.00004819091,0.00040583,0.02085123,0.0008804669,0.0006625944,0.1628733,0.7944006,0.0001490176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06327936,0.004889288,0.002352412,0.1469137,0.0003405394,0.00007832659,0.0004456439,0.00009129994,0.7816095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8387103,0.002414214,0.001760048,0.02493699,0.0000997258,0.00005512694,0.0001296112,0.00004774671,0.1318462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06992608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230790418","doi":"","title":"Criminal Responses to Hate Motivated Violence: Is Bill C-41 Tough Enough?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Redress; Denunciation; Hate crime; Political science; Law; Criminology; Parliament; Criminal law; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Martha Shaffer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02570333344592581,"gpt":0.2875243057062493,"spread":0.2618209722603235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009614041,0.0004974982,0.0008220796,0.001736168,0.01433593,0.01706394,0.002953816,0.03896844,0.006123701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04452626,0.0007871219,0.0009894331,0.001479775,0.01518582,0.005636229,0.006078246,0.01734626,0.001699503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008336197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01697192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05928682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06569409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9833812,0.003078848,0.0008850142,0.001236856,0.004569094,0.006848957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976595,0.01121335,0.003342006,0.001087491,0.002996498,0.004765607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229073,0.0001535999,0.007550021,0.0001129658,0.00002328112,0.001507282,0.008887378,0.0003164827,0.0007382349,0.6756556,0.2760032,0.02898962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001304509,0.000225118,0.05732116,0.002283201,0.0001097851,0.001658575,0.03277626,0.001699817,0.001605637,0.2182374,0.6834655,0.0004870324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06455023,0.003435099,0.001560209,0.6615478,0.003236857,0.0001270304,0.0001262553,0.00009368868,0.2653228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4205227,0.002127543,0.001421252,0.5137683,0.002344372,0.0003047056,0.0001473601,0.00009023356,0.05927349],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9407132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1178835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533284965","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1769","title":"Facebook Fatalities: Students, Social Networking, and the First Amendment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Internet privacy; First amendment; Social media; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Thomas E. Wheeler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06487862511180706,"gpt":0.3181166496825823,"spread":0.2532380245707753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003617498,0.0004055744,0.0002255077,0.001596361,0.0114533,0.008306099,0.001327577,0.01073799,0.008854458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469612,0.0002818679,0.0003939374,0.0007673677,0.01013567,0.004678451,0.006502732,0.008780685,0.0007150222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003965949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004841151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03111864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05837334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949356,0.002552685,0.0001514814,0.0004114102,0.0005518036,0.001397019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905738,0.004650101,0.001880615,0.0006923921,0.0006631267,0.001539837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003902043,0.0002467308,0.03448607,0.00009739291,0.00002640375,0.002624636,0.045418,0.0002605517,0.0001119711,0.7767856,0.1013955,0.03850813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005985117,0.0002253217,0.136237,0.003286728,0.00008505334,0.003284236,0.193063,0.001371987,0.0009886733,0.1177105,0.5434991,0.0001886268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1903061,0.008032631,0.0008921499,0.1979084,0.001709382,0.0001367878,0.0003671717,0.00007079151,0.6005765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520488,0.001865825,0.0001652862,0.02315548,0.0004984403,0.0001936017,0.00006708191,0.00001285071,0.02199256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03111864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06187499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268461570","doi":"","title":"The Power to Govern Men and Things’: Patriarchal Origins of the Police Power in American Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Law; State police; Legislation; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Sociology; Law enforcement; Business","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008960533000644606,"gpt":0.2635246320497798,"spread":0.2545640990491352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002373039,0.0001985945,0.0001571351,0.001056652,0.009445636,0.005716638,0.0006325757,0.002293185,0.00238907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002764082,0.0003323456,0.0001561962,0.001252578,0.03888171,0.005976278,0.002710196,0.005842267,0.0003607917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005601161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004456462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02558293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02124107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977284,0.001072113,0.00004433713,0.0002435152,0.000467207,0.0004444055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986486,0.000766509,0.0000967901,0.0001214789,0.0002371678,0.0001295714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002595669,0.000006356805,0.0001892542,0.000005862063,8.036179e-7,0.00004349792,0.02716796,0.00002667226,0.00003445796,0.9645174,0.002968755,0.005036537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008912165,0.00002289203,0.002123011,0.0001271905,0.000005182753,0.0001421561,0.02073108,0.0003855942,0.0002522791,0.407604,0.5685742,0.00002344858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08938751,0.009329121,0.00942672,0.1174413,0.000765342,0.00002904624,0.0000396559,0.00006072972,0.7735205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613501,0.002726226,0.001076583,0.007372511,0.0004436263,0.00003272216,0.00001454506,0.00003140316,0.0269523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02558293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05086803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009661012","doi":"10.1089/153312904323216186","title":"Improving the U. S. Electoral System: Lessons from Canada and Mexico","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Election law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Voting; Local election; Administration (probate law); Public administration; General election; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Α. Pastor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01239073253481552,"gpt":0.2702704301497055,"spread":0.2578796976148899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00575895,0.0003202326,0.0007031005,0.001908359,0.0201135,0.008198344,0.002485018,0.002578282,0.006103674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01859299,0.0002662668,0.0003665986,0.004628714,0.004199722,0.002583385,0.003714744,0.003217764,0.0003532719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08617074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1623629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956814,0.0008987766,0.00007459662,0.000217423,0.000633992,0.002493844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924751,0.001200109,0.0002840476,0.0002988367,0.003933227,0.001808728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007174109,0.0006035404,0.2744653,0.0005419448,0.0002588823,0.0009323897,0.04294281,0.009364497,0.0007948765,0.2414375,0.1730773,0.2548635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005159046,0.0003284219,0.4504174,0.0009115551,0.0004460035,0.0001693945,0.1187998,0.004636089,0.001291576,0.03078272,0.3915231,0.0001781374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6405655,0.006185224,0.001157225,0.1840884,0.000295381,0.0003149564,0.00184758,0.0001107249,0.1654349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719819,0.003888292,0.002017457,0.006145598,0.00008718373,0.00009549715,0.0006136696,0.000051603,0.0151188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08617074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6252154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02057622548626431,"gpt":0.2752041373246879,"spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576072,0.0004020433,0.0007645812,0.0009859133,0.007418836,0.008512023,0.001834276,0.01476287,0.00870814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04961096,0.000304278,0.0008209473,0.0006292735,0.02002752,0.01194796,0.006958762,0.01572581,0.001327968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00655881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002554666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002646547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838852,0.007552336,0.0005341129,0.002100451,0.004220227,0.001707595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975833,0.01718738,0.001771083,0.002197952,0.002078572,0.0009320253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005525885,0.000008104024,0.0001356763,0.00001600546,0.000003553891,0.00004502144,0.0006951289,0.000043721,0.00007980968,0.989082,0.007052226,0.00283326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763789,0.00002616216,0.0002429602,0.000213765,0.00001859026,0.0001228696,0.001004714,0.0004355964,0.0003675004,0.7769439,0.2205797,0.00001670515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769317,0.002713277,0.02579773,0.5592756,0.004426683,0.0001096076,0.00006530715,0.00006845599,0.3898501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7086132,0.002057862,0.01229511,0.222185,0.005611107,0.0004167197,0.00007293589,0.00013298,0.04861507],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1362373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237729157","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Social Value of Privacy in the Context of State Investigations Using New Technologies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Charter; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); The Right to Privacy; Value (mathematics); Privacy law; Agency (philosophy); Privacy laws of the United States; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Arthur J. Cockfield","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03627339416166526,"gpt":0.3181525709679934,"spread":0.2818791768063282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04324139,0.0003836674,0.0009628641,0.002281772,0.01668869,0.01892463,0.001774235,0.01534633,0.002007798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04373495,0.0005801572,0.001110263,0.001361572,0.06569823,0.01550898,0.01183792,0.01074067,0.0003265261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007142052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01348924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005456705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005769104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9583808,0.02958363,0.001259724,0.002792424,0.004554774,0.003428748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340983,0.05076238,0.004605055,0.005918742,0.003161186,0.001454412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006673835,0.00001128251,0.000312117,0.00001113147,0.000005525737,0.0001688588,0.005269783,0.0002321585,0.0001221494,0.9917172,0.0005252966,0.001617968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650911,0.00002372126,0.0004129284,0.0001365075,0.00002363581,0.0001443922,0.003838376,0.0008347657,0.0004610111,0.9662454,0.02783284,0.00002991142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1637274,0.003690877,0.06598023,0.2033779,0.0005752997,0.0002479333,0.00007677789,0.00009624633,0.5622272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825605,0.0008034401,0.004765962,0.005945114,0.0003980747,0.0001362182,0.00001318624,0.00001957183,0.005357887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04324139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.228685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Stephen L. Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139573574144865,"gpt":0.2291164190205911,"spread":0.2151590616061046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00349004,0.0004468822,0.0006024859,0.002853966,0.05387489,0.02109277,0.002209438,0.005974343,0.01668195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083077,0.0005618811,0.0004823648,0.005500339,0.01748738,0.003780004,0.007025354,0.008088349,0.001197139],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3497902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892877,0.0006815305,0.0001474311,0.0005815397,0.003324148,0.005977601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866383,0.001734887,0.0003989274,0.0002247938,0.003796818,0.007206235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001996673,0.00007853969,0.01064421,0.0001630142,0.00004462625,0.000831053,0.02851811,0.0005629496,0.0003354907,0.507524,0.3939039,0.05719452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006484421,0.00002911269,0.0318194,0.0005692733,0.00004599367,0.0001103242,0.05638567,0.0005605464,0.0002863785,0.01796156,0.8919178,0.0002490279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127693,0.02884223,0.0006923925,0.2861846,0.002706283,0.0001174169,0.001229255,0.0001395324,0.5673189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7770939,0.01078235,0.0005331531,0.05752356,0.0004737238,0.00008257011,0.0004765973,0.0001605844,0.1528735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2811549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jamie Cameron","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216580779953247,"gpt":0.2678625653255279,"spread":0.2356967575259954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007674193,0.000442771,0.0006939592,0.001334536,0.01577807,0.0141811,0.002515393,0.01379378,0.02408562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01944098,0.0004437082,0.0006066623,0.001568754,0.01961774,0.01202445,0.008266428,0.01563117,0.003137767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01010501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007112106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02639388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02756968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992985,0.002716884,0.0002170144,0.0009059444,0.001917076,0.001258194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875238,0.009481271,0.0004810055,0.0007361441,0.0007408928,0.001036862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001415722,0.00002323569,0.0001199806,0.00001340481,0.000003431149,0.0001305107,0.002389521,0.0001715775,0.00007526245,0.9789488,0.01442228,0.003687901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006054538,0.00001427123,0.0004301308,0.00009499017,0.00001126141,0.00008076071,0.003003204,0.0008696076,0.0002800204,0.8572062,0.1379045,0.00004451684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06976943,0.002839379,0.007767022,0.1796255,0.0008792972,0.00005926194,0.0003582576,0.000165579,0.7385363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061123,0.001234022,0.0008523365,0.03772921,0.001785812,0.0001060684,0.0001220629,0.0001493986,0.05190874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02639388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947337155","doi":"10.36643/mjrl.24.2.virtual","title":"Virtual Hatred: How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Race & Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; McGill University","keywords":"Hatred; Politics; Presidential election; Democracy; Racism; Political science; Nationalism; Xenophobia; Presidential system; Law; Public opinion; Persona; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William J. Aceves","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0141151370943991,"gpt":0.2579790512883151,"spread":0.243863914193916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027949,0.000435139,0.0002817981,0.0006297718,0.01799123,0.00800279,0.0007879817,0.002310259,0.004773441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004037359,0.0002852331,0.0004047775,0.0004313498,0.008210062,0.005081941,0.005151237,0.004990744,0.0009493613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004067811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001443262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02052556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03004739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976963,0.001427371,0.0000367327,0.000167243,0.0002198272,0.0004524498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999043,0.0004090337,0.0001401637,0.00008293604,0.00009471999,0.0002300698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002124221,0.0002177,0.02354834,0.0001339373,0.00008314785,0.003236451,0.8281834,0.0006890242,0.002624723,0.06362816,0.03351622,0.04392659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002741136,0.00024115,0.01655251,0.0003023669,0.00007766631,0.0009253608,0.6881655,0.0015034,0.001959303,0.01013579,0.2800243,0.00008519114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8677464,0.0009605019,0.001571869,0.01419253,0.0008089684,0.00002189558,0.00004637523,0.00006619583,0.1145853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863366,0.0004268927,0.0001880273,0.001935947,0.0000674926,0.000008618134,0.0000262073,0.00003847248,0.01097168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02052556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04081219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"James L. Turk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967104841624022,"gpt":0.2430327299145546,"spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00394768,0.0004366681,0.0003467122,0.001201253,0.02385075,0.01558896,0.001319262,0.006930504,0.04791499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01282363,0.000480734,0.000266651,0.002405942,0.01020917,0.008444972,0.00402196,0.006958103,0.008653373],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05946197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05819627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9204504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930034,0.0009844702,0.0001609456,0.0006312921,0.003111388,0.002108434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916418,0.001801661,0.0004350438,0.0004138398,0.00227741,0.00343035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487381,0.000004967168,0.0002137508,0.00002588345,7.477834e-7,0.00004058852,0.001948023,0.00002250012,0.00002406123,0.07076105,0.9181008,0.008842653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003842843,0.000002528974,0.0006337225,0.00005020511,0.000001087708,0.00001335331,0.002648743,0.00001735008,0.0000330967,0.001743144,0.994841,0.00001187821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006443878,0.02190881,0.0006383797,0.520974,0.01037465,0.00004839617,0.0007331613,0.0001888201,0.4386899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110822,0.009415097,0.0005774121,0.06358073,0.002609893,0.00007017291,0.0004320003,0.0002327981,0.8122598],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.940538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4314288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179536926","doi":"","title":"Hate speech, fighting words, and beyond - why American law is unique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Faith; Supreme court; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robert M. O apos","is_ca":false},{"name":"Neil","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02436251169976915,"gpt":0.3023062074226997,"spread":0.2779436957229305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003750365,0.0002455118,0.0002376233,0.0008406398,0.01901838,0.01452892,0.000737138,0.005286557,0.007422205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005573489,0.0002641731,0.0002521759,0.0006705812,0.04076763,0.01212558,0.004010581,0.01140858,0.001481479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003830269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003556145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01323883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02831754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958115,0.001651672,0.0001005236,0.0004999834,0.001018187,0.0009182404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966909,0.001471203,0.0002398304,0.0002985637,0.0005556131,0.0007439075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001746806,0.00003397017,0.001589097,0.00002938999,0.000004684735,0.0002914361,0.04972446,0.00002804589,0.0003690486,0.8509063,0.07533009,0.021676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007049955,0.00002014511,0.002565818,0.0002388259,0.00001001746,0.0005379193,0.07978376,0.0001111029,0.0004604935,0.1811378,0.7350828,0.00004420061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06447123,0.007763823,0.002888139,0.3350917,0.004140437,0.00001579037,0.00005112013,0.0001049505,0.5854729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811741,0.00274496,0.00066259,0.06901339,0.001788408,0.00002492477,0.00002731301,0.0001002661,0.04446416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01901838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02779067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121156435","doi":"","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Offensive; Criminology; Political science; Rationality; Profiling (computer programming); Reasonable suspicion; Law; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David M Tanovich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1401032799816692,"gpt":0.3488697523661616,"spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02735065,0.0005802318,0.0006610469,0.003043588,0.008971521,0.01408993,0.003025291,0.006191144,0.001796782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02742164,0.0005077241,0.0007636739,0.001391617,0.06696729,0.01388984,0.006501833,0.01067172,0.0004801199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01815149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02947959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05077955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0396894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9737409,0.01551605,0.0009866983,0.00208834,0.005509093,0.002158984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846001,0.007642287,0.001944325,0.001684025,0.00337094,0.0007582962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002913915,0.000005199443,0.0001664745,0.000005959809,7.57957e-7,0.00001818762,0.002706326,0.0002901235,0.00002330738,0.9923493,0.0009882668,0.003443192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001642073,0.00006018478,0.0008753783,0.0003508912,0.00001580809,0.0001085808,0.004361452,0.003489251,0.0006429937,0.8097522,0.1802486,0.00007833139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231445,0.007486898,0.357681,0.1311349,0.00326534,0.0002989871,0.0001161579,0.0002821072,0.4574201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8713061,0.002946818,0.07988134,0.01067138,0.001053106,0.0003233474,0.00006448578,0.0001514465,0.03360192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1446458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606914710","doi":"","title":"\"I'm Not That Kind of Girl\": White Femininity, the Other and the Legal/Social Sanctioning of Sexualized Violence Against Racialized Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Femininity; White (mutation); Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Developmental psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicole Pietsch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02699265925914724,"gpt":0.28414084329562,"spread":0.2571481840364728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005445911,0.0003632052,0.0004720719,0.001782115,0.04756186,0.007261729,0.001623913,0.003022492,0.004694764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009439357,0.0004075393,0.0002546733,0.001878403,0.02938412,0.003588409,0.004908442,0.007436312,0.0002611111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02045768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05116239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8526848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9412664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941298,0.002528001,0.00007811135,0.0002507167,0.0009426787,0.002070761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964182,0.001241028,0.0005699925,0.0001215403,0.0005448342,0.001104295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005560321,0.0001256316,0.01716291,0.00004868989,0.00001430967,0.0004292393,0.7607499,0.00004949089,0.0002618275,0.1985004,0.01098703,0.01161499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001328078,0.0000173893,0.02619273,0.0002279882,0.00002163168,0.0001536029,0.934244,0.00005588913,0.0001937355,0.00668406,0.03217156,0.00002404064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968408,0.002495093,0.000360522,0.07352505,0.000440663,0.0000616286,0.00009318482,0.00001191265,0.2261711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859423,0.0006739562,0.00008918507,0.003982007,0.00004879725,0.00002983815,0.00001474551,0.00001334376,0.009205877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1473152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2963655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898470522","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3293","title":"Narrating Dignity: Islamophobia, Racial Profiling, and National Security Before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Bombardier (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Dignity; Supreme court; Political science; Racial profiling; Law; Racism; Profiling (computer programming); Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics; Race (biology); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Reem Bahdi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01575714510787512,"gpt":0.2622361066063745,"spread":0.2464789614984994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002256883,0.0005161256,0.0005693956,0.0008991032,0.0785028,0.01087553,0.002631844,0.01373326,0.003183102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006804914,0.0003851887,0.0003095634,0.00125973,0.03343666,0.002987176,0.003682609,0.01747661,0.000400868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05776394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0445825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9261715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9506614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960709,0.0008740776,0.00004631328,0.0003064198,0.0009176517,0.001784726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961189,0.001994494,0.0001918343,0.0000951341,0.0008711346,0.0007285491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003966114,0.00003016754,0.001256609,0.00004854423,0.00001010644,0.004287336,0.5629636,0.0001957889,0.0004425184,0.2839276,0.1409064,0.005891671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001340275,0.00001956299,0.002061454,0.0003871706,0.00002161226,0.0006798669,0.4608446,0.0003660227,0.0006196662,0.01625876,0.518626,0.0001019594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2130084,0.009403579,0.001384473,0.4092019,0.00289194,0.00006514192,0.000236231,0.00006017305,0.3637482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070251,0.001968576,0.0002065595,0.04546974,0.0005053857,0.00003581834,0.00003465556,0.00005269179,0.04470153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0785028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4191087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983004278","doi":"10.2105/ajph.92.3.360","title":"Expressive Freedom and Tobacco Advertising: A Canadian Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Tobacco control; Constitutionality; Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Tobacco industry; Politics; Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Freedom of the press; Advertising; Political science; Business; Public health; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Christopher P. Manfredi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04318469929719825,"gpt":0.3080824665984404,"spread":0.2648977673012421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003636996,0.0008782591,0.0009681184,0.006500798,0.02575528,0.01741374,0.002860421,0.008697618,0.01653743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005265288,0.0006342225,0.001051523,0.0063775,0.0450178,0.007073776,0.004065646,0.01042821,0.0007674653],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1794564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1353603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993614,0.000910659,0.0001356072,0.0006493923,0.002580683,0.002109762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961848,0.001451067,0.0002016615,0.0001549483,0.001353353,0.0006542793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001015657,0.00001104107,0.0002165687,0.00004343656,0.000004128868,0.000097426,0.002551898,0.0001387598,0.00006664824,0.9859269,0.006055425,0.00487769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005840545,0.0000228158,0.004803971,0.0008473313,0.00006056178,0.0002553702,0.009789228,0.0007361784,0.0002912665,0.339058,0.6438966,0.00018021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009325238,0.04791876,0.001593869,0.1290503,0.0005728622,0.00004223705,0.0002343619,0.00003129803,0.8112311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7215173,0.1073666,0.003497034,0.04659328,0.001262944,0.00009979943,0.0002346995,0.0001189758,0.1193094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1794564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277796166","doi":"","title":"Obscurantism in Action: How the Ontario Human Rights Commission Frames Racial Profiling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Racial profiling; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Race (biology)","authors":[{"name":"Christopher J. Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1812501406239342,"gpt":0.3840557034588653,"spread":0.2028055628349311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008125612,0.0003936895,0.0004059087,0.001687013,0.0493621,0.01401187,0.00236435,0.003965179,0.006342437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01047304,0.0004802597,0.0003546148,0.002401955,0.05544737,0.004489729,0.007697461,0.004978097,0.0003351484],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1976512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1718529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909171,0.003350364,0.0001783052,0.0008427727,0.002130015,0.002581414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905503,0.0030786,0.001037948,0.0006142426,0.002487868,0.002230965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004162793,0.00002204735,0.007402963,0.00005859818,0.00001067125,0.0005168039,0.6194653,0.0002107179,0.0004775322,0.3474635,0.01364084,0.01068944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000187261,0.00001930447,0.01707979,0.0003601342,0.00003622716,0.0001207879,0.4820853,0.0005908172,0.0005317725,0.02912868,0.4699355,0.00009284321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3381426,0.003254845,0.004848782,0.09357217,0.0005981429,0.0001396113,0.0001953186,0.00006970856,0.5591789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731675,0.0005954938,0.0006135387,0.002250216,0.000042847,0.00002962388,0.00003067527,0.00003651418,0.02323353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1976512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W376257457","doi":"10.14264/240277","title":"Computer-assisted reporting and freedom of information","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Journalism; Freedom of information; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Freedom of the press; Currency; Law; Public relations; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Lamble","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0170786353740355,"gpt":0.2370141036910268,"spread":0.2199354683169913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06718951,0.0004284218,0.0005172074,0.006279304,0.003058173,0.01564947,0.001960916,0.002655679,0.005829572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2093897,0.0005138431,0.0007283894,0.007797108,0.01564424,0.01296425,0.005622273,0.00334831,0.001297591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004728151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005715747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003604666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001567236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9194534,0.05474707,0.005486747,0.005202997,0.01309225,0.002017574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4612966,0.4203968,0.0547355,0.04076413,0.02027321,0.002533797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001879194,0.0001263351,0.02297656,0.0006787378,0.00006729265,0.0001610564,0.01402787,0.001408441,0.0009320398,0.7638854,0.009975087,0.1855734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001747944,0.0004355866,0.03348561,0.00276374,0.000118912,0.001293764,0.008213164,0.006696447,0.006755849,0.5762257,0.363397,0.0004394677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2358836,0.04558559,0.1200495,0.08970797,0.002392474,0.0006895543,0.001101685,0.001289897,0.5032997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578491,0.005691124,0.0185422,0.003974938,0.001390482,0.0002763285,0.0002404521,0.0001175431,0.01191793],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06718951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3553364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217014079","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1446","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Criminology; Rationality; Reasonable suspicion; Profiling (computer programming); Law; Racism; Offensive; Political science; Pretext; Sociology; Race (biology); Politics; Gender studies; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"David M Tanovich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1401032799816692,"gpt":0.3488697523661616,"spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0270965,0.0005339592,0.0006293317,0.002726791,0.008847941,0.0132944,0.002702786,0.005795958,0.00174481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02742534,0.0004995975,0.0006909338,0.001263535,0.06734638,0.01302756,0.00588456,0.01076456,0.0004547505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01700114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02924679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0667896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05267908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9762117,0.01293907,0.000976063,0.002115105,0.005670894,0.002087206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850031,0.007476222,0.001783654,0.001682596,0.00330001,0.0007545238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002712762,0.000004832204,0.0001579193,0.000005717616,6.926564e-7,0.00001647824,0.00254795,0.0002359518,0.00002389316,0.9925643,0.001071092,0.003368515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001681508,0.00005832636,0.0009720913,0.0003258863,0.00001630712,0.0001064176,0.004246169,0.002869895,0.0006333353,0.8188333,0.1718436,0.00007780717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04486694,0.00722073,0.322239,0.1404847,0.003273185,0.0002962114,0.0001105361,0.0002720367,0.4812366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876251,0.002685454,0.07186788,0.01189848,0.0009196698,0.0002741632,0.00005302008,0.0001314765,0.03591884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1433017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246440081","doi":"10.5688/ajpe7958","title":"Minutes of the 2019 House of Delegates Sessions July 14-17, 2019 Chicago, Illinois","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Northeast Ohio Medical University; University of Texas at Tyler; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Midwestern University; Wilkes University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Idaho State University; University of South Carolina; University of Oklahoma; University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy; Touro University California; University of Pittsburgh; University of Arizona; University of Georgia; Oklahoma State University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; Creighton University; National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation","keywords":"Gerontology; Medical education; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01780870085772078,"gpt":0.3463865205908346,"spread":0.3285778197331138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124568,0.001010907,0.000421974,0.0006914519,0.004512748,0.003354247,0.0006296061,0.002443659,0.5771565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002150359,0.0004132442,0.0003829247,0.000517378,0.0004184054,0.001495847,0.002417418,0.002746149,0.4161729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001732213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003578025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01513992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05458334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.00009360258,0.00002429417,0.00009957218,0.0003148656,0.0002336239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884,0.00008180275,0.0000390333,0.00003378041,0.0005014068,0.0005039467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001877376,0.00001135542,0.00005459908,0.000009552178,3.244377e-7,0.000009238769,0.00001640388,0.000004989397,0.00004588046,0.0003232168,0.9958025,0.003703295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005429805,0.000008841611,0.0005570815,0.00002732201,6.734112e-7,0.000005843809,0.00014551,0.00001848849,0.00004559637,0.00009292969,0.999088,0.00000426916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001798363,0.002274364,0.0005938892,0.03045122,0.05038146,0.0004294239,0.00544243,0.0006236775,0.9080052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001585089,0.0003052459,0.0001070375,0.001628015,0.001110808,0.00008288588,0.0006815209,0.0001037798,0.9943956],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5771565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6031349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514596130","doi":"","title":"Democratic Communication and the Library as Workplace","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Censorship; Intellectual freedom; Politics; Intellectual property; Human rights; Sociology; Civil liberties; Law; Sustenance; Civil society; Political science; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Michael Carney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02076115615811365,"gpt":0.2936539790936085,"spread":0.2728928229354949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009483209,0.0004933324,0.000527533,0.00264314,0.01767727,0.03933045,0.001406768,0.007734741,0.0251834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213188,0.0003543046,0.000424373,0.00373122,0.0338999,0.01927013,0.01860255,0.006780183,0.007763268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008844742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01365188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004862108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005406185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9827953,0.01052276,0.0004609942,0.001063043,0.002480115,0.002677816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873268,0.006123698,0.001282761,0.001673702,0.001173708,0.002419285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002291672,0.00005752962,0.0003409875,0.00009455976,0.000005736698,0.0001287623,0.03070251,0.000139886,0.0001164559,0.8874779,0.04267748,0.03823531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002052675,0.00003304845,0.000375546,0.0002584122,0.000006085875,0.0001325758,0.01603912,0.0001875593,0.0002283257,0.2922646,0.6904286,0.00002566583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722106,0.007924206,0.005873598,0.1154663,0.001855059,0.00002903699,0.00005748709,0.0003116832,0.8587605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6923532,0.006465403,0.003395623,0.02269688,0.002992218,0.0001497852,0.00009866491,0.000305143,0.271543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08424687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283748176","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-057-4-199","title":"Reduction to Absurdity: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and the Need for Digital Enlightenment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IOS Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Enlightenment; Reduction (mathematics); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Ian Kerr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04002363597138207,"gpt":0.2719208503193032,"spread":0.2318972143479212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006774723,0.000286751,0.0003140302,0.0009170561,0.00677463,0.01150838,0.0017091,0.003351725,0.003347939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01152293,0.0002186094,0.0004433125,0.0009960273,0.04998452,0.007960568,0.004774302,0.006502732,0.0004867314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0192188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02478999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1528731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1042316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904665,0.003123309,0.000184587,0.0006139906,0.00444882,0.001162674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948362,0.002805283,0.0003229265,0.0007072001,0.001101306,0.0002271821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003326181,0.000003387682,0.00006561461,0.00001444636,0.000001156903,0.00002558506,0.005660729,0.0001076553,0.00004481737,0.9881441,0.002053767,0.003875431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001014047,0.00001423763,0.00070201,0.0002864247,0.000009596404,0.0001559967,0.008606232,0.0008072623,0.0004697423,0.7661696,0.22274,0.00002867907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02911309,0.005678535,0.03281073,0.1040774,0.0004677244,0.00006070094,0.00008221425,0.00009954066,0.82761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475397,0.002164515,0.004402684,0.007694184,0.0001930663,0.00005495749,0.00004973336,0.00004707573,0.03785415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1528731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3039666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618770897","doi":"","title":"The FTC, the Unfairness Doctrine, and Privacy by Design: New Legal Frontiers in Cybersecurity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business & technology law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Stuart Lloyd Pardau","is_ca":false},{"name":"Blake Edwards","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01478628708310893,"gpt":0.2676936259134297,"spread":0.2529073388303208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575003,0.0005217624,0.0006025244,0.001668032,0.007814395,0.02273994,0.001809258,0.02266456,0.005194062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0202614,0.0006141801,0.0008459488,0.001915761,0.07107574,0.02027581,0.007450583,0.017793,0.0005252346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01112823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01506712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009242217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008491524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823663,0.008819505,0.0006662573,0.001601755,0.00475587,0.00179047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728726,0.0209848,0.001276038,0.002411935,0.001536986,0.000917604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002937528,0.000007110055,0.00007782524,0.00001191772,8.289534e-7,0.00002863806,0.000698529,0.00003977138,0.00002176264,0.9936114,0.002692474,0.002806861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002251137,0.00003586423,0.0004821789,0.0004530498,0.000008321052,0.0001363807,0.002579971,0.0007294897,0.0002092011,0.8703495,0.1249634,0.00003013095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02310959,0.03811903,0.03101327,0.5254854,0.00160742,0.00007029249,0.000072328,0.00008268211,0.3804399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614554,0.01394069,0.01076005,0.07181683,0.002851169,0.0002829601,0.00003602128,0.00007427681,0.03878258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02273994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08329517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74659616","doi":"10.1177/009885881303900202","title":"Commercial Speech Law and Tobacco Marketing: A Comparative Discussion of the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commercial speech; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Tobacco industry; Statement (logic); Political science; First amendment; Legislation; Constitutional amendment; Tobacco control; Supreme court; Medicine; Public health","authors":[{"name":"Micah L. Berman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01775470523960748,"gpt":0.284094942793462,"spread":0.2663402375538545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00563026,0.0005274988,0.0009197522,0.007400926,0.03955364,0.0215377,0.003173886,0.009515166,0.0114268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01377024,0.0005608254,0.001450702,0.01238968,0.01789325,0.00482159,0.003887483,0.008917526,0.0003910075],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2004717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1960324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877551,0.001917656,0.000246937,0.0006835858,0.004463916,0.004932882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886832,0.005631944,0.0004702361,0.0001761644,0.00352475,0.001513697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001128687,0.0001221011,0.005988392,0.000364481,0.00007904806,0.0008493962,0.02706502,0.000453276,0.0003531138,0.8896933,0.04833291,0.02658602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001559297,0.0001170516,0.06546072,0.003057044,0.0003549813,0.0004323939,0.1142784,0.001178928,0.0006969196,0.0434656,0.7704746,0.0003274377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08440437,0.08954358,0.0005491566,0.1276189,0.0008466665,0.00008563343,0.0004734247,0.0000309688,0.6964474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643363,0.04530897,0.0005529301,0.05757027,0.0003892249,0.000106095,0.0002416865,0.00006476363,0.0314297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2004717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277668868","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-017","title":"Is Privacy a Casualty of the War on Terrorism?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Privacy by Design; Face (sociological concept); Computer security; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03968678878748014,"gpt":0.2435374770285415,"spread":0.2038506882410613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003387044,0.0002665798,0.0002906326,0.0007615689,0.008300559,0.01344629,0.00098273,0.003847554,0.005232884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007231511,0.0003313159,0.0003944682,0.00155145,0.04467558,0.01307437,0.003115505,0.005456112,0.0008037377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01352228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01500668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1572018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1165649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966889,0.00115708,0.00007015075,0.000341348,0.0009148219,0.0008277711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970105,0.001682976,0.0001720912,0.0004663649,0.0004067272,0.0002612965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008069169,0.000003293072,0.0001917823,0.00002066466,0.000004017934,0.00009085464,0.005049312,0.0000722424,0.00003966258,0.9730741,0.01352014,0.007925942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008207397,0.00001154402,0.0009741685,0.0003102712,0.00001350768,0.0003342186,0.01104015,0.0002107874,0.0002795977,0.502513,0.4842857,0.00001879545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01504258,0.01539069,0.004588749,0.2718775,0.001238913,0.00002411472,0.000175897,0.00005191706,0.6916096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282012,0.02099489,0.00146701,0.03084874,0.001579356,0.00004184377,0.0001421132,0.00009236977,0.1166325],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1572018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3125735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556840283","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2011v36n1a2252","title":"Interpreting Privacy on Campus: The Freedom of Information and Personal Privacy and Ontario Universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Political science; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy law; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Academic freedom; Sociology; Higher education; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Martin Dowding","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02244158160507998,"gpt":0.2281310398738215,"spread":0.2056894582687415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760598,0.0002788082,0.0003529643,0.001880547,0.0376753,0.01535063,0.001544429,0.002724844,0.004618082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874262,0.0004247611,0.0003876936,0.004082818,0.05069888,0.007564443,0.008463535,0.003362083,0.0002342736],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1712319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1620353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907557,0.003983993,0.0003533906,0.0005295064,0.002173701,0.002203686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859735,0.006882756,0.001759485,0.0008351292,0.002068494,0.002480547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005178098,0.00002375132,0.01725993,0.0001169749,0.00001070659,0.0006407085,0.7793022,0.0002777985,0.0003506266,0.1722856,0.007830445,0.02184953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650784,0.00001447638,0.02912884,0.0004788481,0.00002262396,0.0002009094,0.7656553,0.0004039268,0.0003667344,0.03217336,0.1714558,0.00008267708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5297461,0.008964577,0.003364879,0.1461335,0.0003146959,0.0001239104,0.0002464818,0.0000407769,0.3110652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875697,0.002292242,0.0004445708,0.001365572,0.00003161885,0.00001778011,0.00002387485,0.00001358568,0.008240922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991352347","doi":"10.1089/elj.2005.4.282","title":"Divergent Disclosure: The Value of Uniformity in State Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Stuart Olson (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Economics; Management; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Grant Davis-Denny","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0101467802105041,"gpt":0.2803441252298888,"spread":0.2701973450193847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05019081,0.0003143252,0.001422093,0.001782716,0.004990855,0.0106715,0.003049007,0.006386339,0.004769551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2661695,0.0007821755,0.0008681969,0.001742556,0.01526687,0.01163405,0.006755851,0.01174003,0.000388379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004291553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004520022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004028667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004370213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9538478,0.02500956,0.002421945,0.005334218,0.009894294,0.003492184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.630595,0.2864012,0.02195101,0.04393541,0.01381703,0.003300271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004156892,0.0001350859,0.01269258,0.00005874355,0.00009145634,0.00009470547,0.001989013,0.004518648,0.0004046391,0.9504988,0.002576401,0.02652429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002577783,0.0001904832,0.0147661,0.0001542477,0.0002219845,0.0001317075,0.001091352,0.01881328,0.001811886,0.9541941,0.008272423,0.00009450678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6632785,0.001842806,0.07364557,0.04927661,0.0004730683,0.0002619313,0.0004913955,0.0002683298,0.2104619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954813,0.00008250916,0.00188767,0.001331973,0.0001487294,0.00003952597,0.00003452714,0.00001679845,0.0009769863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05019081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2654375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039599175","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1481289","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging and the Mobile Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Political science; Law; Mechanics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003992351942040596,"gpt":0.2404815077640867,"spread":0.2364891558220461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004276966,0.0002748708,0.0005079594,0.0008549021,0.00669133,0.0127257,0.001174696,0.008593079,0.01181187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008461646,0.0003204165,0.0003634669,0.001076814,0.04538817,0.01460074,0.005858078,0.007182851,0.001139019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002276774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002973397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006817165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997228,0.001333276,0.00009130904,0.0003791074,0.0003802643,0.0005880595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994802,0.00352608,0.000382146,0.0006502041,0.0002786584,0.0003610082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008544034,0.000005287357,0.00006797086,0.000004736701,7.025842e-7,0.00002801483,0.003297709,0.00002393954,0.00002680618,0.9943857,0.000709853,0.001440758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002933548,0.00001680673,0.0002594734,0.0001035526,0.000006956189,0.0001534041,0.005184991,0.000222606,0.0001278963,0.9482969,0.04557787,0.00002009319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030131,0.00335272,0.01324495,0.03969048,0.0003530058,0.00004022833,0.00009312894,0.00004980461,0.8401626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640012,0.0006139162,0.0008685488,0.002297139,0.000198641,0.00005121118,0.00002453007,0.0000362809,0.03190851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03951466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282413001","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0014","title":"Identity Cards and Identity Romanticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National identity; Exceptionalism; Political science; Romance; Identity (music); Comity; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"A. Michael Froomkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03049302457046606,"gpt":0.2918854809929738,"spread":0.2613924564225078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003637981,0.000339811,0.0003628105,0.001388862,0.006337266,0.01121431,0.0008810943,0.001986385,0.01016115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004983608,0.0001788773,0.0002318988,0.001202698,0.04082517,0.009325987,0.006528423,0.005465129,0.001092122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00348258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001453369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001319577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009927097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953952,0.003287212,0.00009810569,0.0002980238,0.000524328,0.0003970063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969369,0.001532931,0.0003414875,0.0003852932,0.0003846817,0.0004186726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004429717,0.000009916462,0.0001588008,0.000005954472,5.331772e-7,0.00003721442,0.00919284,0.00001693133,0.00001673639,0.9866153,0.001780452,0.002160912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000208262,0.00003523686,0.0008577121,0.0001689701,0.000002892263,0.000227937,0.03878286,0.0003946505,0.0001927058,0.7452492,0.2140496,0.00001741426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0800043,0.004401595,0.004279493,0.02841705,0.0008290007,0.00002675929,0.00003300005,0.0000413604,0.8819675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700095,0.001301782,0.0005286234,0.001638709,0.0003048455,0.00002201627,0.00002477255,0.00001863998,0.02615109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01121431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03399235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2426990485","doi":"10.1017/s0898030616000178","title":"Deliberating Surveillance Policy: Congress, the FBI, and the Abuse of National Security Letters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy History","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer security; National security; Criminology; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William Bendix","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paul J. Quirk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01554753593477804,"gpt":0.2721080591219914,"spread":0.2565605231872134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02477247,0.0003184477,0.0005239909,0.001945009,0.01319288,0.02331631,0.001592552,0.01534325,0.01095667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05285881,0.0004806171,0.0003920192,0.002854013,0.01517362,0.009952188,0.00480928,0.009226328,0.0008676812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02117383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01861261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06868089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06417134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801139,0.01274184,0.0005462664,0.0008991066,0.002124976,0.003573908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565299,0.0355595,0.003499172,0.0007858963,0.00209548,0.001530067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009965032,0.0000659568,0.003471227,0.00008830516,0.00002731171,0.0003217847,0.01891311,0.0004492956,0.0001704661,0.8979867,0.05946413,0.01894213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938233,0.00009664369,0.01081886,0.002059594,0.0001039552,0.0002489291,0.06402896,0.001897896,0.001405876,0.4279243,0.4911603,0.000165194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08246231,0.009510467,0.001171369,0.5904221,0.0007524618,0.00003301416,0.0001230551,0.0000337223,0.3154915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323841,0.003360884,0.0003897322,0.04245482,0.0005520463,0.00004820028,0.00002698085,0.00002699006,0.02075626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06868089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1536276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W938569533","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Baker: A Critical Race Feminist Theory of Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Appeal; Supreme court; Poverty; Sociology; Political science; Critical race theory; Law; Duty; Criminology; Gender studies; Racism","authors":[{"name":"Alyssa Clutterbuck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759723442374994,"gpt":0.3736639926635501,"spread":0.2976916484260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847543,0.0005195056,0.0005562876,0.003860702,0.01448531,0.01028329,0.003234856,0.008284517,0.002544385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618049,0.0002668816,0.0003953871,0.002354591,0.08443645,0.01023765,0.005324412,0.01118022,0.0002693497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03794508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03965512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4278534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947978,0.002512126,0.00008137022,0.0003747607,0.001380809,0.0008530942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959664,0.002953632,0.0001697134,0.0001118745,0.0005547922,0.0002435388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001894254,0.000004190324,0.00007293498,0.00003002125,9.840876e-7,0.00006814399,0.01232725,0.00004931979,0.00001972544,0.9758069,0.007447287,0.004171307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009906852,0.00001119894,0.0005313326,0.0009547306,0.00000769773,0.0001327165,0.02575914,0.0003394599,0.0001110069,0.6451271,0.3269935,0.00002213833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01357888,0.05352009,0.01139859,0.5882469,0.001765033,0.00009309799,0.00008706534,0.00004155277,0.3312688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7952149,0.02870012,0.006365013,0.117268,0.001972468,0.0001952317,0.00005423767,0.00009459633,0.05013546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4278534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"A. Wayne MacKay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0129962240398342,"gpt":0.2663511772989537,"spread":0.2533549532591196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005944774,0.0003559506,0.0008496334,0.001183246,0.0125681,0.0287729,0.001711579,0.01067486,0.02687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008346467,0.0005243687,0.0003323526,0.002382605,0.03128594,0.02620388,0.004132928,0.01189775,0.002391383],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008895352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01815767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2093834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960189,0.001495603,0.00007001335,0.0004567468,0.0005746004,0.001384149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961598,0.001467968,0.0004169613,0.0001818214,0.000491736,0.001281677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001979252,0.00002869118,0.00107494,0.00002845943,0.00001256918,0.00005599371,0.004078283,0.00005022165,0.00007134124,0.9417028,0.04049991,0.01237682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003414802,0.00002352007,0.004287222,0.0006477988,0.00003839175,0.00007544044,0.0345033,0.000205937,0.0002503156,0.596873,0.3630055,0.00005530922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02183234,0.0208347,0.001584097,0.7469436,0.001262226,0.000008077243,0.0001050945,0.00002446587,0.2074054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220047,0.0182912,0.001043061,0.1521042,0.002894864,0.00004745265,0.00007758132,0.00009273826,0.1034442],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1621372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}