{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":118,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":118,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4826bf06c3f2","filters":{"topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation"}},"results":[{"id":"W31708651","doi":"10.3747/co.26.5123","title":"Vagueness and Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006984537640270599,"gpt":0.3094249273185949,"spread":0.3024403896783244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000237183,0.00003185867,0.0000454058,0.00004186439,0.00005538372,0.00004398322,0.00004726354,0.00003363329,0.0002553717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008544651,0.0000290214,0.00001121251,0.00008142988,0.00004498924,0.0006210232,0.000010492,0.00004540379,0.00002797328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005027373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003078783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01146481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06128931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995866,0.00006078054,0.00008474445,0.00008430405,0.00008947379,0.00009412244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998696,0.000028011,0.00001566403,0.0000357465,0.00002122765,0.00002975092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004941957,0.00006994525,0.01483471,0.000009114693,0.000006519083,0.000006549127,0.223157,0.00004839765,0.0009001984,0.1388522,0.0008233903,0.6212426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997143,0.0002036532,0.151646,0.0001708581,0.00003016125,0.000007155079,0.03845084,0.03484065,0.008374192,0.005282541,0.7580166,0.0009801537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551583,0.0001584974,0.001163698,0.001679529,0.00006956078,0.00007324546,3.809025e-7,0.00003454948,0.4416622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963388,0.00002079842,0.0003455049,0.0006472311,0.0000825219,0.00000403362,0.000001242638,0.000002014142,0.002557821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7571933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028847006","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000702x","title":"Theories of Categorization: A Case Study of Cheques","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01751743508754228,"gpt":0.2704828636812669,"spread":0.2529654285937247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975312,0.0001772925,0.0005362587,0.00007140328,0.0004301915,0.00007362183,0.000226616,0.0002214352,0.0006176871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001795827,0.0001928701,0.0002861336,0.0003565341,0.001047311,0.0006373583,0.00001312106,0.0003503282,8.38102e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006688691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6575085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9094021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982275,0.0002994744,0.0007179959,0.0001733503,0.000143124,0.0004385668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.0002098957,0.0006639576,0.0001620166,0.0007032226,0.0007765862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002521818,0.00005756647,0.000379236,0.0001108466,0.0002038856,0.0007098919,0.6074064,0.00001725601,0.00001051149,0.3879089,0.0003103395,0.002882651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001266947,0.001517409,0.0001436564,0.0004320504,0.0005926223,0.001909653,0.9492481,0.0004084624,0.00006303602,0.01182249,0.03218373,0.0004118891],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.94726,0.01171507,0.00006376544,0.001938761,0.00118553,0.00023224,0.00009657357,0.000003560397,0.03750456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945099,0.0007011202,0.0000979621,0.0006625236,0.0003900073,0.000002504154,0.000002769396,0.0000196406,0.003613509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3760864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7865013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626759417","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0012","title":"Bilingual Interpretation Rules As A Component Of Language Rights In Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Law; Minority language; Linguistics; Secession; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107821377210607,"gpt":0.2280969517864728,"spread":0.2170187380143667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001221635,0.0001509311,0.0002488443,0.0001353544,0.0000969221,0.0000146337,0.0002377188,0.0001629698,0.0002003371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001368005,0.0001635418,0.0001024567,0.000007478183,0.0001271386,0.0001395286,0.00007627428,0.000220791,0.000001610744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007752326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009853457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9599164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990124,0.00008089752,0.0001867656,0.0001801349,0.0003385961,0.0002012819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993526,0.00009356211,0.0002206881,0.0001584144,0.00008148358,0.00009325113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000150597,0.00001342745,0.00002181457,0.00005112149,0.00008027356,0.0001677536,0.07783878,0.000005899852,0.00005539919,0.9119443,0.00009579908,0.009574817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000221984,0.00002475786,0.00001881002,0.0002154684,0.00007354698,0.000001126096,0.002326804,0.00004284941,0.0003381126,0.0003323809,0.9961889,0.0002152573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02323929,0.0002271101,0.00002333846,0.000009716545,0.0001831583,0.0002496667,0.00008317096,0.0000206157,0.975964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6017826,0.00003468114,0.00005363613,0.00002925937,0.00005906898,3.052906e-7,0.00004443093,0.000008755337,0.3979872],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592716210","doi":"10.17118/11143/10153","title":"Les droits linguistiques au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.00535703464936218,"gpt":0.2161291516655016,"spread":0.2107721170161394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003624817,0.0001636337,0.0002139999,0.00005534913,0.0005211342,0.00004409825,0.0003645731,0.0002446769,0.0008615018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003153522,0.0002276071,0.000115845,0.0002110843,0.0001648707,0.0001582043,0.00006784769,0.0002508551,0.00005575464],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001060267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985132,0.0002345061,0.0001742341,0.0002752781,0.0002141041,0.0005887321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990675,0.000185971,0.0001137314,0.0002019652,0.000123905,0.0003068838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291898,0.00003646733,0.00990693,0.0002539467,0.00006590011,0.0002772766,0.04401853,0.0002985061,0.0002437552,0.9050354,0.00378512,0.03604528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002052406,0.00007205919,0.003455767,0.0003840508,0.00009798232,0.00002357465,0.001177795,0.002533387,0.0009651484,0.00146559,0.9893278,0.0002915387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2049174,0.001719823,0.001299314,0.001822118,0.0007707388,0.00009679187,0.00001741921,0.00005201249,0.7893044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7912009,0.0001768468,0.0003479109,0.0004780187,0.001230781,0.000001027868,0.0000117835,0.00001884044,0.2065339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085476362","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmm002","title":"Legislative Drafting and Language in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Obligation; Normative; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Civilization; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026307517141617,"gpt":0.3208036186002156,"spread":0.3105405434287994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006345079,0.00004572343,0.0001124598,0.00001057287,0.00006959262,0.00001552441,0.0000530031,0.00001441866,0.00008224297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133104,0.00003993739,0.00001362194,0.0001385774,0.00004177073,0.0002361442,0.00001193509,0.0000786322,0.000003887324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001701912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002450905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993656,0.00007685501,0.0001456132,0.00009033495,0.0001401698,0.0001814565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999742,0.00008872333,0.00004361236,0.0000531407,0.00002005936,0.00005245491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005161107,0.000008148833,0.003837486,0.0004973966,0.000009810995,0.0002013128,0.1961852,8.856008e-8,0.00002450303,0.2748452,0.0004672305,0.5239184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006221061,0.000005837195,0.001489357,0.001005941,0.000007131541,7.543927e-7,0.001780658,0.00000201007,0.00003101417,0.00004223807,0.9954895,0.00008336234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01339513,0.1193817,0.00003437482,0.001086118,0.0001207577,0.0003585989,0.000006400033,0.00001434784,0.8656026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861553,0.007079495,0.0001448309,0.006265691,0.00006353054,0.000005405761,0.000004747395,0.000003768987,0.0002772073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1628599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887986758","doi":"10.29173/alr1297","title":"Legislating Language Use in Alberta: A Century of Incidental Provisions for a Fundamental Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislature; Political science; Subject matter; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01598940405306635,"gpt":0.3278651499158751,"spread":0.3118757458628088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002415062,0.00009773914,0.0002417192,0.00002943467,0.0001008711,0.00004642486,0.0001497416,0.00004952179,0.0003488412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005483794,0.00008410924,0.0001328296,0.0001677956,0.00008484237,0.0006414032,0.00003590697,0.00007638438,0.0000725254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007499713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4765635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.545319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.0000900829,0.000349383,0.0001776937,0.0001672519,0.0002232045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.0003956917,0.0001370355,0.0001469073,0.00003114684,0.0000539227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000668738,0.0006116085,0.02430648,0.00337953,0.000100666,0.00002324398,0.2727829,0.000007661341,0.001305884,0.6780293,0.001622766,0.01776304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002467883,0.000286184,0.00183554,0.02141147,0.0002452846,0.0000182229,0.005483001,0.00002192921,0.001005497,0.0008548016,0.9655134,0.0008567693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6715277,0.0388298,0.000109172,0.01033933,0.0005885966,0.006408892,0.00005965912,0.00004094714,0.2720959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936888,0.0008847497,0.0004442888,0.003577082,0.00005045049,0.00008447297,0.00004075586,0.00001312725,0.001216282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.526922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563752931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026954","title":"Drafting Egypt's Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Transition (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008517625268013569,"gpt":0.2933754799184375,"spread":0.2848578546504239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001713387,0.000110739,0.0001419286,0.00006793505,0.000790672,0.0001690194,0.0001795232,0.0001229061,0.0003696969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002882271,0.0001023514,0.0001292308,0.00024558,0.0001243449,0.0009467974,0.000008271716,0.001438591,0.0000580682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001069406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004669344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00493457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008035421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997255,0.0002348168,0.0002327939,0.0001162229,0.0003486016,0.001812509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999392,0.00007171,0.0001230098,0.00008418454,0.00009055652,0.0002385105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268879,0.00002361815,0.0002656219,0.000002140908,0.0000562451,0.000003563991,0.06702068,0.000005538675,0.00007164276,0.9204314,0.0001581663,0.01193865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001600437,0.0005297091,0.0002901696,0.0005238306,0.0003659296,0.001001131,0.1134543,0.00005758639,0.0004145888,0.2428052,0.6379348,0.00102233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1004548,0.03022175,0.3116443,0.03920803,0.003281057,0.0007666555,0.000008910536,0.0003028419,0.5141116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924663,0.0007439653,0.0005141384,0.0008908672,0.003214903,0.000003246637,0.000003433566,0.000008581903,0.002154569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077073892","doi":"10.7202/1023809ar","title":"Multilingual Legal Drafting, Translators’ Choices and the Principle of Lesser Evil","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Position (finance); Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02210300764021899,"gpt":0.3175323212462504,"spread":0.2954293136060314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002381928,0.0001004426,0.0002613045,0.0000543744,0.0004678199,0.0001905099,0.0002458372,0.00004720653,0.00011264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006887562,0.00005804979,0.0001920542,0.0001283515,0.0006993093,0.0005287834,0.00001008697,0.0002373951,0.000002165449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001404673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006314533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001073742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983653,0.0006700578,0.0003014748,0.000117039,0.0003422716,0.0002038794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.0002841215,0.0001894825,0.00009544695,0.0001241923,0.00009569319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004318065,0.0001798135,0.008908999,0.0001193589,0.001377196,0.00001678561,0.2492241,0.0001105654,0.00495994,0.2595761,0.00006997381,0.4750254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002297172,0.0001812979,0.006960971,0.00008889938,0.001212855,0.00007771324,0.001381242,0.000449781,0.01007567,0.007321798,0.9696565,0.0002961328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707242,0.01738212,0.00127175,0.0006789229,0.0003101684,0.0001261735,0.000001714948,0.00001765254,0.009487264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966118,0.001540741,0.0005437488,0.0001324743,0.0003486997,0.000002904287,4.096401e-7,0.000009273234,0.0008099237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.359814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555677156","doi":"10.7202/1037766ar","title":"Legal Language – Pragmatic Approaches to Its Interconnectivity with Legal Interpretation and Legal Translation1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scrutiny; German; Linguistics; Premise; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293727444911907,"gpt":0.2813722736414379,"spread":0.2384349991923188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001164653,0.0002085694,0.000316441,0.0002120379,0.0003994826,0.0005921909,0.0002272478,0.00006509584,0.0001991007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004869501,0.0001251217,0.0001386241,0.0002831958,0.0002244602,0.00347271,0.0000158043,0.0002344657,0.00002030956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001246671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001370238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006150468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005460659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979398,0.0006431926,0.0003235614,0.0002893487,0.0004461501,0.0003579455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,0.0002255486,0.0001513544,0.0001263711,0.0001194306,0.0002727024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007095283,0.0001944701,0.0005743988,0.00008670671,0.001056075,0.0002147674,0.1263216,0.00006590821,0.01762312,0.122991,0.0001567552,0.7300056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01397186,0.009798414,0.03543503,0.004118436,0.01030794,0.008702445,0.06588385,0.003735346,0.09242763,0.01583918,0.7326559,0.007123947],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.830249,0.004020692,0.1463083,0.007418227,0.0003073888,0.0004533695,0.00001620004,0.00008387609,0.01114296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948198,0.0001915793,0.00230405,0.0002237956,0.0002550905,0.00002485528,0.000002122423,0.00002441288,0.002154308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7324992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914810151","doi":"10.1515/npf-2018-0034","title":"Regulating Charity in a Federated State: The Australian Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Politics; Principal (computer security); Public administration; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Royal Commission; Law and economics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02277930610077708,"gpt":0.3738998931947204,"spread":0.3511205870939433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004612079,0.00008031278,0.00008671241,0.00007916229,0.0006524738,0.0001602193,0.0001807066,0.00007035722,0.0001875008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005031159,0.00005970707,0.00004027964,0.0005302639,0.0003223982,0.0003121965,0.00003507727,0.0001610228,0.0001528671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003533798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002791058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2310472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1064601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988766,0.0001660921,0.0001480617,0.0001680388,0.0002057283,0.0004354523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.0000382131,0.00006581606,0.0001137833,0.0001671453,0.00005799239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006202587,0.00003848562,0.01182418,0.000004831654,0.00002059221,0.00000456358,0.5790496,0.000001265992,0.0008661467,0.3908459,0.00514349,0.01213889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002010981,0.000627271,0.08288004,0.0002450373,0.00003123565,0.000009485099,0.497494,0.002036754,0.02603702,0.157691,0.2297161,0.001221056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.465565,0.0000267115,0.00004183194,0.0661478,0.0002153574,0.000408231,0.00001098724,0.00007583918,0.4675083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855471,0.000002951095,0.00005047621,0.001578633,0.0005644084,0.00001690024,0.000002137089,0.00000782181,0.01222954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5199822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9098446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71792753","doi":"","title":"All Originals: Fiction and reality of multilingual legal drafting in the European Union and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Art; Engineering; Political science; International trade; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03599440214163162,"gpt":0.336226350933647,"spread":0.3002319487920154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004944271,0.0001554838,0.0001864826,0.0002503455,0.0009652034,0.0001784753,0.0004571934,0.00009676706,0.0000025304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005783915,0.0001489457,0.0000425714,0.0002967218,0.0003849349,0.0005289587,0.00006099382,0.0008035656,0.00000140868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004685787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001087043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8907596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8706025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916077,0.006664618,0.0002714361,0.0003893055,0.0007502105,0.0003167042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988611,0.000213735,0.0001900917,0.0002379408,0.0003632531,0.0001338211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000971593,0.0004863639,0.005684572,0.0009993778,0.0002778718,0.02083746,0.7540057,0.0001434595,0.008222132,0.02335794,0.01161433,0.1733992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006029453,0.0001529955,0.09243587,0.0005598438,0.00007303511,0.0000284426,0.08229704,0.00004708893,0.0005083071,0.000009989356,0.8229159,0.000368515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5123839,0.000162024,0.000003619944,0.0001104961,0.0002140769,0.0001982259,0.000005710225,0.00001502372,0.4869069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890714,0.0004169196,0.00001481979,0.00002973135,0.00026462,2.801652e-7,0.0001199244,0.000012203,0.01007009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7423663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122690911422091,"gpt":0.304929082681889,"spread":0.2926599915396799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005738911,0.00006384954,0.0001357152,0.0001155218,0.00003759837,0.00003186648,0.0002932031,0.00003432904,0.00008386878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001262698,0.00005772922,0.00007560786,0.0001003673,0.00006524362,0.0008666854,0.00002099315,0.0001524468,0.00000261752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001026288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002694611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7658559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9277936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984609,0.0001066071,0.0005590139,0.00007562153,0.0006848486,0.0001129414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.0001977347,0.0005712706,0.0000523884,0.0006261421,0.00005877246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007761055,0.0003849989,0.007518081,0.00002069295,0.0003013824,0.0003053505,0.06635343,0.01043171,0.002744733,0.9028784,0.0000538335,0.008231269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01409768,0.001811914,0.05063331,0.005001069,0.0003727039,0.0005452914,0.1221143,0.001943728,0.09453329,0.02618846,0.6812661,0.001492236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6750532,0.0006066137,0.002080806,0.003664656,0.001873773,0.0001585122,0.00001256289,0.00000644441,0.3165434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973581,0.00006578969,0.001687693,0.0005663311,0.0001587735,9.419183e-7,0.000002732206,0.00000521697,0.0001543604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.87669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4780125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205814575","doi":"10.2307/3504743","title":"10.2307/3504743","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Relevance (law); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Public law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004423186271412567,"gpt":0.2244806121938031,"spread":0.2200574259223906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001252421,0.0000393856,0.00005041931,0.00002275967,0.0001173312,0.00005220836,0.0001181659,0.00003269879,0.9967319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000574457,0.0000375416,0.00002742942,0.000124319,0.00002792797,0.0001534955,0.000006878406,0.00003348021,0.9804688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002946378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003120407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009619088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001050361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995202,0.00004677827,0.00006408462,0.00008777741,0.0001396976,0.0001414316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997852,0.00002403459,0.000009672946,0.00007890281,0.00002600555,0.00007619229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001682984,0.0000133881,2.067424e-7,7.645917e-7,0.000003703092,0.000002704666,0.003476008,0.000005682909,0.00003136193,0.00005321765,0.09216771,0.9042284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003743834,0.00003690241,0.00001086303,0.000005293301,0.000003524896,2.269145e-7,0.0000142535,0.00002120527,0.00003230395,0.000008871581,0.9997723,0.00005684778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000935518,0.00003840294,8.185868e-7,0.0005852329,0.000003131296,0.00007957085,0.000002593536,0.00007801148,0.9982767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007152473,3.192323e-7,0.00004144108,0.0002348483,0.0001745955,0.000005226683,0.000003883541,0.00000480784,0.9923824],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1530902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262115130","doi":"","title":"Bilinguisme legislatif : regard sur l’interpretation et la redaction des lois bilingues au Canada (Statutory Bilingualism: Examining Statutory Interpretation and Drafting Bilingual Laws in Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Statutory interpretation; Redaction; Law; Legislation; Statutory law; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01184163729770957,"gpt":0.272004085119629,"spread":0.2601624478219194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200114,0.0004915999,0.0005412725,0.0003530238,0.0006609073,0.0002669445,0.0003104669,0.0002812468,0.00004633277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003425622,0.0005192807,0.0001119954,0.0006124626,0.0003909465,0.002469958,0.00007468012,0.002977497,0.000002504122],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02862516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09287937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916864,0.00220982,0.001184376,0.0005472559,0.001016737,0.00335542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965745,0.001522886,0.0008225735,0.0002244898,0.0004641357,0.0003914093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000379023,0.0001576895,0.1462855,0.0002244905,0.0003387222,0.00009502591,0.5084435,0.002533142,0.0006566675,0.02267761,0.00006142362,0.3181472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003925396,0.001412962,0.05300739,0.004349945,0.0008027908,0.001528607,0.7948069,0.03761663,0.001254465,0.01479968,0.08280892,0.003686317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578606,0.0230248,0.001376041,0.0005430245,0.003766328,0.0003145415,0.00002524872,0.00003643935,0.01305293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927458,0.003285693,0.000259129,0.0003775429,0.001298059,0.00001007529,0.00003611106,0.00007498413,0.001912667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3144609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493465670","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100002516","title":"Some linguistic properties of legal notices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Ambiguity; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phrase; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01352950252367318,"gpt":0.2472227994990346,"spread":0.2336932969753614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002184581,0.000180942,0.0003592981,0.0002960321,0.0005533714,0.0003153186,0.0008298847,0.0001862145,0.00009750415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06914889,0.0001464183,0.0001595922,0.0002479597,0.0007320648,0.00009053054,0.00001786336,0.000615942,0.00001083008],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006847952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005723934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7291602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8903201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978058,0.0004079199,0.0007131481,0.0001474011,0.0001834729,0.0007423109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940138,0.0004272679,0.0006351818,0.0002780206,0.003613681,0.001032087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002359058,0.00002413091,0.001642575,0.0001633092,0.0001161085,0.0006134713,0.2083933,0.0004161947,0.0003263474,0.786918,0.0008306096,0.0005322798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004741241,0.0003247491,0.001747817,0.001577822,0.000318351,0.0001527979,0.009275715,0.001256969,0.0014515,0.03532439,0.947448,0.0006477751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8323635,0.007643815,0.0001064014,0.004758154,0.007580418,0.000689166,0.00005179193,0.00003651437,0.1467702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903156,0.00004307539,0.0007822817,0.0004225293,0.006888016,0.000006993475,0.000001976121,0.00003134546,0.001508142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592014777","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.2880","title":"Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01883733901646776,"gpt":0.3346721171976231,"spread":0.3158347781811553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406731,0.000270701,0.0002663072,0.00005295907,0.0003628073,0.0001827648,0.0003260893,0.0003460393,0.002306934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000748489,0.000250473,0.0002033944,0.0002787889,0.0003148918,0.0007067625,0.00007396132,0.0003567588,0.000787273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008108811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006166337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002455284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979015,0.0003488932,0.0002931126,0.0002884084,0.0004560649,0.0007119979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989457,0.0002260245,0.0001641178,0.0002148471,0.0001844232,0.0002649628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007056202,0.0002775947,0.0003272965,0.00005099829,0.0001215293,0.00002142022,0.2885917,0.000007925497,0.0005962759,0.6567251,0.03952247,0.01368711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004644229,0.0001556483,0.001075434,0.0001649009,0.0001509793,0.000005741895,0.02132198,0.0000676925,0.004911159,0.001868844,0.9693244,0.0004888221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.14768,0.06475459,0.000101164,0.005768403,0.006338094,0.0002615772,0.0001132321,0.0002520073,0.774731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245697,0.001304571,0.0005820869,0.00105188,0.003713968,0.00001489738,0.00009431649,0.00003030892,0.06863824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05228908965120452,"gpt":0.3782583810100003,"spread":0.3259692913587958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126502,0.00003552866,0.00006482285,0.0000275612,0.0001669408,0.00002483183,0.0001174579,0.00005260477,0.000114482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006158869,0.00002115785,0.00002823167,0.0001245937,0.0005268179,0.0002389584,0.0000230609,0.000068805,0.0000259936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000322301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006079211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000896118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004865593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993222,0.0001787553,0.0001674136,0.00005039332,0.0001411696,0.0001400259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995872,0.0001967884,0.0000752138,0.00005994917,0.00006041535,0.00002041907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005019395,0.00001210462,0.002035131,0.00000226454,0.000005631549,7.615693e-7,0.03212092,0.00001168595,0.0003332137,0.9085543,0.00004979822,0.05682406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001643102,0.002546427,0.1744471,0.0001240849,0.00005015345,0.00003417502,0.09498813,0.002386275,0.04188587,0.2638929,0.4172347,0.000767067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769414,0.00006528036,0.001926105,0.0005762869,0.0004821308,0.0001355124,6.719254e-7,0.00001981828,0.4198528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996348,0.00002249929,0.003110064,0.0002057949,0.0001250896,0.00000544118,5.66722e-7,9.517642e-7,0.0001816034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6446614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1941082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955727152","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz008","title":"The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of ‘Plain Language’ and ‘Good Law’ Initiatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Plain language; CLARITY; Law; Simplicity; Political science; Negotiation; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04602867560778381,"gpt":0.330576084945479,"spread":0.2845474093376952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001352028,0.00005782781,0.000164578,0.000006149878,0.0003759211,0.00005404258,0.000127569,0.000019172,0.00001439753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003487683,0.0000274622,0.00004594705,0.0001196985,0.001544864,0.0002915348,0.00003590927,0.00008809716,0.000002231436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008428095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003377086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002880834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006347382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988086,0.0005970571,0.0002296284,0.00008591884,0.0001801872,0.00009865328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983103,0.001216734,0.0002238971,0.0001491027,0.00008344455,0.00001655622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008093081,0.000003665495,0.00006668705,0.0001050923,0.00001628854,9.901035e-8,0.08633845,2.567287e-7,0.00003177298,0.9017015,0.00001654246,0.01171161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001754685,0.0001969738,0.007595091,0.004327545,0.0003849169,0.000003287718,0.06692725,0.000377805,0.000407068,0.03623297,0.8814167,0.0003756793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04286482,0.2102609,0.0002246694,0.01729185,0.0001987022,0.00220194,0.00006106342,0.00002575962,0.7268702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719225,0.02666728,0.0001232326,0.001135175,0.00002208415,0.00001554996,0.000006457776,0.000003465737,0.0001042226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5692118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020798792","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2008.11092571","title":"Writing Standard: Process of Macedonian Language Standardization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Macedonian; Norm (philosophy); Linguistics; Standard language; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007279359737407534,"gpt":0.283365411230471,"spread":0.2760860514930635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002508565,0.00006976393,0.0001174529,0.0001128749,0.0004821562,0.00003257972,0.0001374634,0.0000732714,0.0007503663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002504895,0.00007389955,0.00004650427,0.0002764356,0.0002217103,0.0001931748,0.000003979908,0.00008189533,0.00001103263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003992409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002209864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1455883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5659197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990516,0.00006820787,0.0001584125,0.0001332078,0.0002893128,0.0002993039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994394,0.00002855155,0.00006401916,0.0001045037,0.000127408,0.0002361587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004090223,0.00001393019,0.01073763,0.00006561098,0.00006165269,0.0002087131,0.9138543,0.0001463286,0.002439222,0.01479163,0.001232806,0.05640728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001645327,0.0002998891,0.007556969,0.0003725221,0.00008393756,0.00002938646,0.2212913,0.000185182,0.01266021,0.000232213,0.7546032,0.001039845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.468168,0.0005980707,0.00007702488,0.0005425625,0.0001170479,0.0001762548,0.00009951069,0.00004284214,0.5301787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983746,0.00005753054,0.00008810913,0.0003621053,0.00008701405,0.000005504082,0.0000177382,0.00001068856,0.00099674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7533704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8601013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740009593","doi":"","title":"Software Support for Multi-Lingual Legislative Drafting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Legislature; Work (physics); Software; Face (sociological concept); Civil society; Political science; Computer science; Software engineering; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Sociology; Law; Geography; Programming language; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04031201512568208,"gpt":0.362732922926063,"spread":0.3224209078003809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464462,0.00005239707,0.00006988085,0.00002586582,0.0002788398,0.00005094433,0.00009773654,0.00005303348,0.0003706036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007645446,0.00004985107,0.00005644991,0.00006950989,0.00006955019,0.0002500742,0.00001174901,0.0000605071,0.00005527679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008057497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002076268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005847073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001189356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994056,0.00002419965,0.0001020008,0.0001247633,0.0001417637,0.0002016421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996862,0.00006430284,0.00004452225,0.00005523047,0.00009943794,0.0000502795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002597951,0.00006872841,0.0006287571,0.00001338247,0.0000222814,0.00001096432,0.8874704,0.00003310628,0.003517743,0.04312786,0.0003439195,0.06473688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004784901,0.0006964192,0.0009749966,0.0001895189,0.00009168497,0.000003960261,0.02912614,0.0007065779,0.04131721,0.03276814,0.8883254,0.001015084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04610223,0.00004446643,0.1360587,0.001277785,0.000641315,0.0006267012,0.00002898405,0.0002610919,0.8149587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274772,0.00000203083,0.06653556,0.0004178626,0.0002844407,0.00002148654,0.00001287121,0.000008129972,0.005240452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.405785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02005083112389101,"gpt":0.3030818472898748,"spread":0.2830310161659838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007972074,0.00007384107,0.0002805464,0.0001048466,0.0001327164,0.0000233787,0.0001106918,0.0001006581,0.000006760006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001689434,0.00006122216,0.00006984198,0.0004201213,0.000611426,0.0003798932,0.00002837823,0.0001058222,1.820261e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009301746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01350052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004960111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990137,0.000259252,0.0002793359,0.0001132144,0.0001776845,0.0001568076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993994,0.0002762628,0.0001724195,0.00006049881,0.00005369873,0.00003772549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102474,0.0001081193,0.2877592,0.0001840043,0.00008641701,0.000003025117,0.1590891,0.000005934248,0.0009666538,0.5510843,0.00003711076,0.0005736186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00557617,0.0004144475,0.8212879,0.001432128,0.005295535,0.00000351296,0.1259879,0.009812795,0.003881715,0.008273647,0.01651839,0.001515819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439054,0.001646314,0.00004492846,0.0003959989,0.0001141343,0.0001590079,0.00001538401,0.000007058482,0.05371174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993581,0.00001848526,0.0000283826,0.0003759292,0.0000571477,0.000004679334,0.000004708862,0.000004438827,0.0001481869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107209022","doi":"10.3233/faia200865","title":"Plain Language Assessment of Statutes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Statute; Operationalization; Plain language; Computer science; Legislature; Legislation; Proxy (statistics); Plain English; Rewriting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Programming language; Law; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910768323006172,"gpt":0.3378805018336785,"spread":0.3087728186036167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002028097,0.0001210792,0.0002364735,0.0001320963,0.0001182221,0.00004537138,0.000194475,0.0001572145,0.0002079497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003424298,0.0001300667,0.00005917404,0.00009449835,0.0003225757,0.0000983132,0.0000328222,0.0002343937,0.00001769071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007203143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001598766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003971517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007498455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990078,0.0000283265,0.0003679275,0.0002546273,0.000209379,0.000131997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994934,0.00006739384,0.0001657488,0.0001422736,0.00005733464,0.00007385849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004681968,0.00001666403,0.00005859384,0.00002086412,0.00001487948,0.00000213867,0.009071566,0.00001097053,0.00003339942,0.8301644,0.0005406453,0.1600612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002858127,0.000081795,0.00002675676,0.0001720672,0.00007045623,3.346211e-7,0.01895908,0.001673034,0.0008737855,0.4354908,0.5421934,0.0004298754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000265113,0.001414601,0.2104827,0.0006849074,0.0001591067,0.0006363614,0.00009649428,0.00003417654,0.7864652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249902,0.006435236,0.04181156,0.0009980532,0.001746594,0.0004673704,0.0004916441,0.0001101913,0.1229492],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5303965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320169557","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4346447","title":"A First Nations Voice and the Exercise of Constitutional Drafting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Political science; Law; First amendment","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006774712304847665,"gpt":0.2740369906969946,"spread":0.2672622783921469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00188361,0.00003310321,0.00006192103,0.00007396913,0.000946731,0.00003245218,0.0001016196,0.00002471002,0.00002263463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006581495,0.00002278464,0.00004178527,0.0002886949,0.0005067674,0.0001798577,0.0000142243,0.0002998131,0.00001630663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007090271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01431342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991302,0.00007190756,0.0001181095,0.00004990165,0.0001933188,0.0004365672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994848,0.000304815,0.00007381888,0.00003214261,0.00008134486,0.00002301624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001645578,0.000004240648,0.0003057927,0.000002430385,0.00001866666,5.003845e-7,0.01987226,0.00003458815,0.00001049828,0.9781342,0.00002573635,0.00157468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00407698,0.0001612365,0.001787839,0.0004307523,0.0002251575,0.0001502858,0.1300999,0.003987702,0.0001248471,0.7692171,0.08936165,0.0003764735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4068252,0.01904668,0.02122155,0.04821202,0.001246272,0.001083705,0.00001893933,0.0002270259,0.5021186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939209,0.004473674,0.00002073716,0.00003261463,0.0001200665,0.000004267183,0.000001139261,0.000001955655,0.001424623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5870958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7987225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042695409","doi":"10.7202/042406ar","title":"La stéréophonie législative, facteur de haute infidélité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CLARITY; Statute; Legislature; Simplicity; Style (visual arts); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006334597832786917,"gpt":0.2696395652041275,"spread":0.2633049673713406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005006995,0.0000825494,0.0001030404,0.00005681165,0.0002476439,0.0001060282,0.0001927157,0.0002189476,0.0003876653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216089,0.00008695394,0.00007367993,0.0001478209,0.0002766697,0.0003348726,0.00001288669,0.0003184375,0.0001226562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006869323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001432319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003498598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002303981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990105,0.0002033569,0.0001256607,0.0001453447,0.0001908853,0.000324278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995125,0.0001620371,0.00005746207,0.0001131144,0.00003581929,0.0001190555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002557817,0.00005806814,0.007735959,0.00001424997,0.00005283576,0.00004962899,0.5836962,0.0001787863,0.002322983,0.1965856,0.002045679,0.2072345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472941,0.00003933698,0.01489602,0.00003309694,0.00002937599,0.000008431027,0.007879148,0.0006289876,0.00298624,0.007835492,0.9650251,0.0002914279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6746885,0.000162116,0.004198796,0.0006278588,0.00005466616,0.00007769278,0.000005383694,0.00008975523,0.3200953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980445,0.00006388548,0.001531461,0.001382944,0.0002459514,0.000008443298,0.000005983394,0.00001177439,0.01630459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9629795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5288858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160071724","doi":"","title":"Plain English in Quebec Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Meaning (existential); Plain language; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Plain English; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008466890841817872,"gpt":0.2969843549676111,"spread":0.2885174641257932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006196599,0.00002276609,0.00002970453,0.00005174382,0.00004719499,0.0000369476,0.00004639228,0.00004127686,0.0004900784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002588745,0.00002104221,0.00001281197,0.0001369277,0.00002477844,0.0003876761,0.000004001925,0.00004159528,0.00003228739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008815986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004015424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3119841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9023615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995973,0.00003346428,0.00008315287,0.00005775535,0.0001119923,0.0001163033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998257,0.00006519496,0.0000151517,0.00003348594,0.00003568748,0.00002477133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001426394,0.00002533469,0.0128838,0.000001226658,0.000001798614,0.000008330173,0.5987442,0.000005361626,0.0002187247,0.300547,0.001349397,0.08620059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003329492,0.00002550799,0.0343141,0.00001859763,0.0000026218,8.232659e-8,0.05958815,0.0001444233,0.001789231,0.0009967728,0.9026114,0.000176134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1316348,0.00002277784,0.002022703,0.0002029682,0.0001780003,0.00005819741,1.471391e-7,0.00004237982,0.8658381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788932,0.000001860674,0.0002003089,0.0002600459,0.0002175436,9.429077e-7,0.000002383097,0.00000166478,0.02042203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.901262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6925974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993357890","doi":"10.1093/slr/hml006","title":"How Legislation is Drafted and Enacted in Bangladesh","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Legislature; Mandate; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Legislative process; Public administration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01136785493717765,"gpt":0.2900013341011395,"spread":0.2786334791639619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002579077,0.00006145088,0.0001339652,0.00002181613,0.00008248635,0.0001082509,0.0000544063,0.00004160265,0.0001109231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005358789,0.00005385794,0.00002969259,0.0002297704,0.00007033005,0.000545077,0.000009040161,0.000068178,0.00001148212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004238437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000356868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01415713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02107809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993066,0.0001309017,0.0001349963,0.0001293788,0.000151084,0.0001470834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997565,0.00003190721,0.00005906922,0.00007859072,0.00004415266,0.00002979846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000800836,0.00004457869,0.001154739,0.0006304802,0.00001122052,0.00002251592,0.0131521,1.767315e-7,0.0002747677,0.8515719,0.02071088,0.1124187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009321714,0.000009335383,0.0005733112,0.0005380816,0.00001177516,3.661827e-7,0.00005588409,0.000007369798,0.00006374135,0.000886073,0.9976865,0.00007432983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01340017,0.2087841,0.0002777157,0.02845319,0.0002270187,0.001224508,0.00004217682,0.0001247867,0.7474663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969428,0.01998333,0.0002961798,0.004745234,0.0001423135,0.00002391155,0.00008211267,0.000008911171,0.005289987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346719107","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Interpretation of Bilingual Legislation: The Demise of the Shared Meaning Rule","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Presumption; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Legislature; Legislative intent; Linguistics; CLARITY; Argument (complex analysis); Divergence (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0117627796603356,"gpt":0.2776088555610687,"spread":0.2658460759007331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004409945,0.0000644075,0.00008962033,0.00002909925,0.0006227185,0.0000637265,0.0004305682,0.00005226814,0.00006104697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001548207,0.00003136044,0.000129509,0.0002724457,0.0001809283,0.0002752563,0.00001903456,0.0008292548,0.000001533774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002409837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00203181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005263286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00513871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980777,0.0006504413,0.0002915888,0.00007792631,0.0004221826,0.0004801505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989781,0.0002634406,0.0003852845,0.0001474311,0.0002093026,0.00001649186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002538432,0.00001381895,0.001158927,0.000002969017,0.0000703551,1.860532e-7,0.3800237,0.0003270689,0.0009297171,0.6059689,0.00002283932,0.01145613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005182573,0.000170117,0.000595918,0.0002274977,0.0001700225,0.0000602771,0.1254844,0.002307787,0.00497505,0.8575245,0.007772791,0.0001934357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7809844,0.008420202,0.01622065,0.00769948,0.001185183,0.0006285395,0.000003381617,0.00003316112,0.184825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987992,0.0002023578,0.00005045472,0.0001566556,0.0001337335,0.000001805442,4.958579e-7,0.000006452846,0.0006488261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2545393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.478951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312552196","doi":"10.7202/1027339ar","title":"La langue du droit. Rosalind Greenstein (dir.), Langue, culture et code : regards croisés, CERLAC (Centre de recherches en Langues de Spécialité et Cultures) et L’Harmattan, 2003, 203 p., ISBN 2-7475-5334-5 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Le droit civil, avant tout un style ?, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2003, 228 p., ISBN 2-89400-180-0","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01596541186247542,"gpt":0.2882900295783926,"spread":0.2723246177159172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003897374,0.0008506136,0.001096836,0.0002388683,0.0008403774,0.0008184107,0.001167389,0.00174859,0.00206427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002621402,0.001047305,0.0005583387,0.001156231,0.0005844641,0.001875766,0.0002490842,0.002363503,0.0007193647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002336159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00159724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1144647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2758161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909395,0.004017855,0.00117633,0.00119159,0.0008714893,0.001803224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961714,0.0006156992,0.0007037111,0.0009043542,0.0008145384,0.0007903553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476799,0.001001023,0.001093315,0.0003974134,0.0004219231,0.0007150323,0.109705,0.0005887457,0.003499594,0.05029152,0.8232542,0.008884543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002037445,0.0001544167,0.002217405,0.001625212,0.0005702251,0.000711726,0.01414335,0.001864433,0.003561405,0.006111252,0.9654089,0.001594242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.131281,0.2462771,0.004334343,0.1578117,0.002158406,0.003736,0.01077827,0.001864817,0.4417583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3005023,0.05441268,0.01399783,0.01244188,0.005624427,0.0002807794,0.004027028,0.0005034921,0.6082096],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1918644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412317208","doi":"","title":"Justifying the evidential use of intuitive judgements in linguistics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Evidentiality; Natural language processing; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04315366923613121,"gpt":0.3518708716863299,"spread":0.3087172024501986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002500131,0.000025621,0.00004734096,0.00002779985,0.00003747582,0.00004044451,0.00008936711,0.00002367882,0.0005663367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001380957,0.00001761831,0.00002031415,0.0001019182,0.00004239771,0.0001167691,0.00002525982,0.00004977968,0.00005586116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000289458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003728026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01147054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004317794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995316,0.00007452415,0.0001039843,0.0000574583,0.000151697,0.00008069649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996289,0.0001587597,0.00003925074,0.00006128139,0.0001007586,0.00001103521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006632074,0.0001055448,0.1337734,0.00004750187,0.00004513429,0.000005706443,0.4200486,0.0001738181,0.001383426,0.4258795,0.00309104,0.01538002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001679649,0.0003634975,0.08622718,0.0007589854,0.0001425207,3.377192e-7,0.1199874,0.007572832,0.01300497,0.004465743,0.7650623,0.0007345689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5915105,0.00004175361,0.0004107842,0.0002112185,0.001067536,0.0003007541,0.000002051,0.00001518309,0.4064402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960279,0.00001178346,0.0001482873,0.0002529868,0.00009520992,0.000001579444,9.969575e-7,0.000001922193,0.003459376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7619713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220723148","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-30","title":"Language Laws and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00953017180415712,"gpt":0.2714130888372983,"spread":0.2618829170331412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001274617,0.00009179564,0.0001233314,0.0000629767,0.0004125649,0.00005518553,0.00008978045,0.0001089404,0.03363901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001954575,0.00007974569,0.00004798045,0.00002172724,0.0001030983,0.0001191285,0.000043495,0.0001714671,0.00007886635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000162954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001190995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006570927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01283129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993712,0.00003392605,0.00008636015,0.0001734276,0.0002321459,0.0001028966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997134,0.0000734261,0.00005242684,0.00007874117,0.00003096589,0.00005107775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005930008,0.000003711362,0.000001023557,0.000002740547,0.00002303012,0.00002889458,0.08384771,2.947891e-8,0.00000325274,0.9053649,0.008901142,0.001817651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007256219,0.00003590155,0.00000198918,0.000009699909,0.00001896493,9.421244e-7,0.0009068134,0.0000017548,0.000011487,0.02214893,0.9766684,0.0001225123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006274815,0.0007222452,0.000007501533,0.0001953193,0.0001681191,0.000188624,0.00002231273,0.000062109,0.998571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01239589,0.00005668508,0.00005541839,0.0003774224,0.0001833043,0.000007901305,0.00002136825,0.00001052754,0.9868915],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212796781","doi":"10.22215/etd/2004-05868","title":"Evaluating the punitive turn thesis: is Canadian penal discourse officially exemplifying a punitive mentality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06448230649826289,"gpt":0.4475062885537224,"spread":0.3830239820554595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107995,0.0002843812,0.0002557823,0.0001892997,0.001747276,0.0005061953,0.0004992005,0.0002849164,0.002777939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005964349,0.0002055219,0.0002035448,0.0003218022,0.000179303,0.0005030548,0.0000174859,0.0004862632,0.0001330512],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008228558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005833064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8755399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972757,0.000529005,0.0003552079,0.0003803504,0.0009034548,0.0005562472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985976,0.0002367551,0.000283755,0.0001998213,0.0004622841,0.0002197551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006609613,0.00003837499,0.00006543357,0.00002734962,0.0001714907,0.00002026979,0.9202207,0.000008011774,0.0001426947,0.04701208,0.0003332111,0.03189431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268247,0.0001390397,0.002009094,0.0006734115,0.0003602543,0.000001594687,0.9893811,0.0000841292,0.001187335,0.002793383,0.002536362,0.0005659895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1928694,0.0003332398,0.00002557454,0.002950627,0.0006365709,0.001017974,0.0001109243,0.00005569218,0.8019999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586649,0.0000432472,0.0000923118,0.002563002,0.0004782772,0.00008418735,0.0006136482,0.00003497901,0.03742547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7657954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024403972","doi":"10.7202/042416ar","title":"Pour un manuel de légistique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Training manual; Computer science; Legislature; Cover (algebra); Scheme (mathematics); Process (computing); Order (exchange); Operations research; Information retrieval; Engineering; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Law; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005801337484957332,"gpt":0.2625865560614121,"spread":0.2567852185764548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003204775,0.00005247473,0.00006123335,0.00003288423,0.0002021671,0.00005731676,0.00015283,0.0001446428,0.0005612012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002475175,0.0000569896,0.00005047622,0.00007374179,0.0001296695,0.000153967,0.000006915758,0.000179103,0.0001376786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007769018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001115198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002037067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002334914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993665,0.00008579162,0.00008203578,0.0001005017,0.000118174,0.0002469865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996956,0.00007154621,0.00003277588,0.00008015566,0.00002646369,0.00009344114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002463764,0.00005983319,0.002697805,0.00001186815,0.00003349855,0.00005809299,0.2694124,0.00008528095,0.002806196,0.5575429,0.00479671,0.1624707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008727188,0.00008910547,0.0138071,0.00007161106,0.00008583559,0.00003058104,0.01933529,0.002989621,0.02115159,0.1471894,0.793639,0.0007381104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5342378,0.0001928646,0.03270928,0.002918667,0.00005767301,0.00007623234,0.000003716916,0.00009001697,0.4297137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679467,0.00003507396,0.004376958,0.002694709,0.0002825669,0.000007323104,0.000003602161,0.000007938894,0.02464511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.614476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947589675","doi":"10.7202/1059339ar","title":"LA PRÉCARITÉ DES DROITS LINGUISTIQUES SCOLAIRES OU LES SINGULIÈRES DIFFICULTÉS DE MISE EN OEUVRE DE L’ARTICLE 23 DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008899178926120882,"gpt":0.2741951505575788,"spread":0.2652959716314579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002163691,0.0003241271,0.0004524979,0.0001313198,0.0005020475,0.0005056575,0.0005569832,0.0006440718,0.0002718145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002134208,0.0004387834,0.0002655614,0.0004382269,0.0008360476,0.0006257091,0.00009292378,0.0006757278,0.0001240218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001835992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006616105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1212571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.152024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956083,0.001653175,0.0004605032,0.0005447319,0.0002460063,0.001487275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975182,0.001089959,0.000206623,0.0003329771,0.0002071511,0.0006451019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172598,0.0004508725,0.09866386,0.001032998,0.0001874743,0.0007484256,0.6406,0.0004936959,0.01898105,0.1780427,0.0005199137,0.06016179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00359611,0.001561769,0.4066012,0.01340819,0.001187086,0.001550415,0.04383164,0.02804764,0.04511601,0.3128352,0.1382392,0.004025538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096501,0.005460585,0.0002712639,0.001470944,0.0002844596,0.0004155461,0.00006188529,0.0001897556,0.08219542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754511,0.001024956,0.002698502,0.0004924091,0.0008600542,0.00005387111,0.00002471113,0.00008513832,0.01930923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540657271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1973558","title":"The Elimination of Broker Voting: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Voting; Business; Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01110100876592854,"gpt":0.2719066322574573,"spread":0.2608056234915287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375522,0.00005476951,0.00006713467,0.00004205322,0.0005439305,0.00005283176,0.00026815,0.00005329086,0.00009094748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003515291,0.0000378725,0.00007500096,0.0001174597,0.0001023182,0.0003078942,0.00001217431,0.000584444,0.00001979887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002903614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009132159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001383796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007143192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998484,0.0001451555,0.0002029189,0.00007140836,0.0002910788,0.0008054847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999456,0.00006845938,0.0001919982,0.00006613292,0.0001815339,0.00003587049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003122461,0.00002439196,0.0006221393,0.000001543784,0.00003729746,6.374239e-7,0.09991828,4.241703e-7,0.0002240727,0.8451961,0.00006361399,0.05388034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002140153,0.002145125,0.01613043,0.0002804287,0.0003067176,0.0001603459,0.3862658,0.0009471743,0.0142294,0.3900709,0.1863014,0.001022166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5220081,0.01040638,0.01995403,0.004914562,0.001376178,0.0003843342,0.000001758746,0.0000829303,0.4408718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952756,0.0006749241,0.00005565804,0.00009702527,0.0002209199,0.000001742768,4.371153e-7,0.000006690399,0.003666991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4732676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4183528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220964383","doi":"10.30853/phil20220144","title":"Linguoculturological Comparative Analysis of Legal Terminology in Judicial Practice in the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philology Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Novelty; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02498137040266672,"gpt":0.3670024669855947,"spread":0.342021096582928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003938031,0.00007346898,0.0002510918,0.0001561355,0.000267241,0.00001845176,0.0002731108,0.00005769636,0.0003044572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006656163,0.00005774618,0.00003214325,0.0006451068,0.0003642887,0.0004034884,0.00008128354,0.0005572133,0.000001192618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001076368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003694204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7857196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9159809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912496,0.007833772,0.0002582311,0.0002050309,0.0002541757,0.0001991997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.008047045,0.0002736116,0.0001141511,0.00007973011,0.0000230558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001287175,0.0003083683,0.009560666,0.000001344227,0.0002667637,0.0003857547,0.2230615,0.0003515418,0.000065929,0.7638836,0.000123028,0.000704294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007724467,0.000726564,0.06804453,0.000003184983,0.001417044,0.0001471614,0.3551645,0.0002654247,0.00002403018,0.009262241,0.5638794,0.0002934628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7746651,0.0004445446,0.00001317172,0.0191897,0.000148921,0.0001870863,0.000009589649,0.000005151449,0.2053367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900976,0.00004330767,0.00006364253,0.009637116,0.00004927811,0.00003279337,0.00000805408,0.00000172349,0.00006641875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7546214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7968529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345472701","doi":"","title":"Some Problems with the Shared Meaning Rule as Formulated in R v Daoust and The Law of Bilingual Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Law; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003891298027389843,"gpt":0.2513665626663399,"spread":0.24747526463895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002386087,0.0000629798,0.00009702941,0.00004103639,0.0002955944,0.0001070778,0.0001912754,0.00004831023,0.00002047483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000165589,0.00003114781,0.00003953438,0.0001357489,0.0002741746,0.0004726828,0.00001572909,0.001029918,0.000001672724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009505702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007848432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00582312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1161756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988763,0.000155468,0.0001693042,0.00008207661,0.0002169343,0.0004998947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.0001273082,0.0001515668,0.00006875074,0.00008541835,0.00002340867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001729258,0.00001328913,0.0001837057,0.000002759406,0.00004187925,7.417689e-7,0.1240319,0.00003232381,0.001852233,0.8697193,0.000001602704,0.003947325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004005321,0.0006851765,0.0003511324,0.0001767323,0.0001240702,0.00017025,0.1149921,0.004149921,0.00174502,0.8717088,0.001596773,0.0002947631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827527,0.0008323818,0.0002465126,0.002270079,0.00008050777,0.0002593458,6.405691e-7,0.00001193943,0.01354584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992554,0.0001806742,0.00002041949,0.0001808188,0.0001160742,0.000004521131,0.000001310554,0.000006847838,0.0002339108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1103525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8999519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285795054","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p54","title":"The Competence of the Electoral Commission to Conduct Free and Fair Elections in Tanzania: A Legal Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Law; Public administration; General election; Impartiality; Jurisdiction; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290626226697857,"gpt":0.305085606901815,"spread":0.2921793446348365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004338031,0.00002829262,0.0000911625,0.000049767,0.0005452608,0.00005274187,0.0001524881,0.00001211141,0.00002343121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001224637,0.00001656599,0.0000477144,0.0003086429,0.0001190401,0.00008166768,0.00005267336,0.0001522668,3.489813e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005010711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009175668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01341111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02380433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.0001853256,0.000161285,0.00003557782,0.0001981798,0.00009492892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996099,0.0001102952,0.00009915469,0.00005903123,0.0000727294,0.00004889146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002076631,0.00004031834,0.01169763,0.0000029546,0.00007579473,0.000004575662,0.01765201,0.0001025811,0.001638325,0.967721,0.0007886229,0.0002554386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011114,0.001225051,0.1297207,0.00006671669,0.0005541124,0.00007591888,0.03896374,0.001686753,0.001942196,0.02845176,0.7959237,0.0002778727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792342,0.0004554495,0.00004845924,0.007959021,0.0001363868,0.00006359161,0.0000124192,0.000001573095,0.01208888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992142,0.00001155249,0.0000386843,0.0003463152,0.00003711667,7.873085e-7,1.346403e-7,0.00000137083,0.0003498496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387607509","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10051-w","title":"Correction: Religious and Cultural Expressions in Legal Discourse: Evidence from Interpreting Canadian Courts Hearings from Arabic into English","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arabic; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0193043582254333,"gpt":0.3482826755591805,"spread":0.3289783173337472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001367136,0.0001848816,0.0002458071,0.0002886486,0.0003927838,0.0004929983,0.0009768116,0.0001894661,0.00005846389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005863167,0.0001619539,0.000190492,0.0001533315,0.0002757218,0.001093737,0.0001340387,0.0006560344,0.000006561359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009639852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007473323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4161242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3740052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997903,0.0002580562,0.0006653313,0.0003045186,0.0005255279,0.0003435523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947228,0.003403607,0.0003915546,0.000169515,0.001092674,0.0002198439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008548406,0.0002173691,0.04477788,0.00006643533,0.00122661,0.0006095446,0.684872,0.01517404,0.01210194,0.1888631,0.03772877,0.01350741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003548157,0.0004676342,0.03892411,0.02504139,0.0004000309,0.0003570682,0.05523046,0.121671,0.02342482,0.1612624,0.5674224,0.002250529],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412389,0.001416752,0.00407945,0.03370286,0.01098607,0.0005075183,0.0002352142,0.00008349423,0.007749714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991593,0.002949094,0.001149834,0.0009591854,0.002023709,0.00003265264,0.00007554345,0.00002738664,0.001189614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6296416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904615132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264804","title":"Measuring Prescriptivity in Canadian Regulations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0166863540775948,"gpt":0.2763803416534147,"spread":0.2596939875758199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189178,0.00004203774,0.00005128267,0.000141454,0.0004674033,0.00008203046,0.0001545783,0.00004685343,0.0001275845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002709647,0.00004153438,0.00002909435,0.0001979567,0.00006984735,0.0004047813,0.000005757132,0.0005011192,0.00004273672],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002369083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005677332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7188969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980829,0.0001430924,0.0001044451,0.00007747062,0.0001819109,0.001410129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996865,0.00001427434,0.00003616202,0.00005645173,0.00008855332,0.0001179901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001919229,0.00002569821,0.03560355,0.000001185669,0.00003249223,0.000005799195,0.06365021,0.00001093582,0.0004275949,0.8602255,0.0002418679,0.03975598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008531,0.0004861226,0.08016721,0.0001270243,0.0000408851,0.00009403429,0.03671083,0.0008859825,0.0005281344,0.5097403,0.3695554,0.0006555236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6493655,0.0008584677,0.001106257,0.003408071,0.0004485147,0.0001368505,0.00000118275,0.0000261185,0.344649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961647,0.0001031109,0.00002645268,0.0001065707,0.0005218895,0.000001600817,5.644882e-7,0.000004731812,0.003070404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3693135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147357191","doi":"10.7202/042814ar","title":"Le sens ordinaire des mots comme règle d'interprétation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Meaning (existential); Legislator; Literal (mathematical logic); Mistake; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Statutory interpretation; Philosophy; Original meaning; Law; Epistemology; Legislation; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01078234475187516,"gpt":0.2709654093437196,"spread":0.2601830645918444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002551693,0.00006893804,0.00008527787,0.00005229042,0.0004844881,0.00009054627,0.0001397971,0.0001294066,0.0001329939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002105764,0.00007690192,0.00005987469,0.0001261156,0.0003203202,0.0004102474,0.00001041206,0.0001608645,0.0001008905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005143288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009781454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005946917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01468984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992529,0.0001002764,0.0001179646,0.0001270153,0.0001512785,0.0002506379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996394,0.000071116,0.00004797613,0.00009597329,0.00005812449,0.00008743649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003364667,0.00008299943,0.002103576,0.00001962065,0.00003555439,0.0000206354,0.4603478,0.0001316635,0.001829123,0.282548,0.00338366,0.2494636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002008077,0.0003778571,0.02025446,0.00032646,0.0001449379,0.00004632332,0.1237825,0.00740084,0.01847426,0.1198873,0.7058114,0.001485535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6286879,0.000144547,0.0185527,0.00227255,0.00008732148,0.0001055586,0.000004389125,0.0001189158,0.3500261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857883,0.00002380746,0.001853065,0.001240567,0.0002619708,0.000007761676,0.00001143535,0.00001114332,0.01080194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7024277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03878955039522614,"gpt":0.2790808590525016,"spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006032444,0.00009905933,0.0001402983,0.00002897119,0.000907574,0.0001209795,0.0002245093,0.00008884004,0.003576446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003356933,0.00009830301,0.00005999424,0.0001202284,0.0002482889,0.0001583862,0.00004245233,0.0002522405,0.0007666126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001342922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04871847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008636263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.0003243425,0.0002190301,0.0001971129,0.0002602863,0.0003854801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992682,0.0002055782,0.0001309992,0.0001705412,0.00008523349,0.0001394735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001271158,0.0001015759,0.0005754634,0.00003965299,0.00001651519,0.00001635637,0.4231924,0.000005712121,0.0002132271,0.5208194,0.01316414,0.04184281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539789,0.00003847714,0.0000435938,0.00002825197,0.000005950904,8.595622e-7,0.0009363848,0.0004002916,0.0001345478,0.0001714499,0.9979526,0.0001336398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008659726,0.0004353751,0.0004580241,0.009518951,0.0002766751,0.0002093568,0.000004830213,0.0001628365,0.9802742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899762,0.00002185835,0.001045894,0.003653579,0.0003295144,0.00001432971,0.000002587966,0.00001228712,0.004943694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237208509","doi":"10.17118/11143/16164","title":"La jurilinguistique et l’égalité : les droits linguistiques en tant qu’accords incomplètement théorisés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01041891849776318,"gpt":0.2953072630133129,"spread":0.2848883445155498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001642332,0.0003297619,0.0004170007,0.000123855,0.001371498,0.0003797048,0.001117635,0.0006085018,0.0005936272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001262949,0.0004257979,0.0002986205,0.0001267359,0.0004956732,0.0004301627,0.0003899791,0.0006834968,0.00009963733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005075509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03965113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02783693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972845,0.0007710515,0.0003759096,0.0005284956,0.0003400202,0.0006999939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979458,0.0003538923,0.000432239,0.0006556092,0.0002680701,0.0003443761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000996363,0.0001544036,0.01250153,0.000350752,0.0001494482,0.00129655,0.09340351,0.00008463293,0.0004941652,0.8686656,0.0006868757,0.02211294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006334688,0.0002172125,0.0139713,0.001549275,0.000253833,0.0000773674,0.003587603,0.00153961,0.001629692,0.01226689,0.9636269,0.0006468176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2338113,0.003462469,0.001508201,0.003204343,0.0009504774,0.0003015557,0.00006271342,0.0001262846,0.7565727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010482,0.002979395,0.00152724,0.0003316682,0.00140808,0.000006763119,0.00002333238,0.00004707724,0.0926282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340449071","doi":"10.7202/1035644ar","title":"L’interprétation judiciaire des droits linguistiques au Canada et l’affaire Beaulac","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008138708167493285,"gpt":0.2654651616229168,"spread":0.2573264534554235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005607004,0.0001879276,0.0002875189,0.00007193346,0.0003388688,0.00008636705,0.0003202467,0.0002281959,0.0004789941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001372337,0.0002255093,0.0001535359,0.0002967386,0.0004027971,0.0006110424,0.00004417833,0.0001977117,0.0001343934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003486415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002077496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8359935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997843,0.0003252346,0.0004052646,0.0003884904,0.00032819,0.0007098502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986108,0.0003719063,0.000220218,0.0002433565,0.0002730356,0.0002806774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006885723,0.0001380279,0.01096095,0.0004670901,0.0001463378,0.0004493438,0.127004,0.00003696405,0.001431798,0.5656368,0.01271026,0.2809496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001785478,0.000877223,0.03101511,0.01744888,0.0005682712,0.0002103292,0.01431191,0.001786615,0.01056197,0.3229244,0.5957395,0.002770299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3320611,0.004000568,0.002788023,0.02667465,0.002733061,0.0003291875,0.0001234167,0.0001245953,0.6311654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724003,0.0008972901,0.0004543371,0.001093985,0.001908556,0.00002279696,0.00002458235,0.00003944993,0.02315872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6403392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9196002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053280603","doi":"10.7202/042323ar","title":"Loi et héritage culturel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Punctuation; Population; Law; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Legal writing; Political science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Legal research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005931192176188512,"gpt":0.2742402702540822,"spread":0.2683090780778937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000279446,0.00005212523,0.00006149562,0.00002727534,0.000188963,0.00007770226,0.0001353146,0.0001361907,0.000357797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001611538,0.00005095416,0.00005440835,0.00008977643,0.0001359942,0.0002841288,0.000006916862,0.0001969399,0.0001647246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003426413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005049355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001327832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00007286053,0.00007864411,0.0001033386,0.0001550994,0.0001947673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975,0.00004209843,0.00002917516,0.0000763225,0.00002726983,0.00007517819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039126,0.00003494653,0.000378602,0.000005833932,0.00001702381,0.00001570377,0.3918707,0.00003138223,0.00123123,0.5507516,0.008146211,0.04750635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001656478,0.00002258257,0.0006555235,0.00001446665,0.00001304098,0.000002496024,0.008057927,0.0001324269,0.001072021,0.005093264,0.9846208,0.0001498069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2310733,0.0003341103,0.004314189,0.003599077,0.00009586581,0.0000916119,0.000005199337,0.0001094708,0.7603772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463138,0.00004897563,0.00144815,0.004658078,0.0002779838,0.000005531506,0.000007772941,0.000006587672,0.04723313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3917626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120066650","doi":"10.32091/riid0024","title":"Application of information communication technology (ICT) to legislative drafting: case studies of legislative drafting assistant softwares in Nigeria and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering; Political science; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1366142706643352,"gpt":0.5273066232018672,"spread":0.390692352537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003888,0.0001280041,0.0004607761,0.0004115408,0.0002472579,0.0001607296,0.0007238238,0.00007653292,0.00007012705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002747918,0.0001236913,0.00003489097,0.001079786,0.0002553081,0.00250363,0.0003991462,0.0002076807,4.835426e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002001342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000379392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3953159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3865384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998143,0.0003047944,0.0008395044,0.0001591591,0.0003866785,0.0001668365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973648,0.0005411498,0.001134279,0.0001808325,0.0006901096,0.00008888558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001995379,0.00005839207,0.3735048,0.0001753,0.0001792968,0.00002095095,0.5651381,0.0003869487,0.01690502,0.001996717,0.0005911427,0.04084378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003958901,0.0003515658,0.2952037,0.004697923,0.000409627,0.00005497809,0.4358598,0.005129843,0.1530129,0.01185722,0.08688135,0.002582202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727069,0.005677045,0.003424546,0.001855265,0.0000737645,0.0009538768,0.00005910343,0.00002602908,0.01522344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981474,0.000771135,0.0007962958,0.0001997925,0.00001834984,0.00004072347,0.000007965559,0.000007546903,0.00001083785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1361079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6246557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673226964","doi":"","title":"La mise à jour des droits linguistiques canadiens / Michel Bastarache et Michel Doucet (dir.), Les droits linguistiques au Canada (3e éd.), Édtions Yvon Blais, 2013, 1296 pages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006353465623330921,"gpt":0.2144174990847365,"spread":0.2080640334614056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108024,0.00054165,0.0005562918,0.0002334891,0.001959064,0.0001521169,0.0007092933,0.0005524099,0.000352871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001975013,0.0006362635,0.0002708006,0.0005085198,0.00065211,0.0004484921,0.0001955727,0.0007574147,0.00005389359],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01233254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001965239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958679,0.001239919,0.0004550984,0.0006886555,0.0005852869,0.001163125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967976,0.0006906487,0.0004195055,0.00044326,0.0007029946,0.000946022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001641212,0.0002890057,0.003791419,0.0003680865,0.000507824,0.002563133,0.1339403,0.0005799753,0.0007867121,0.08122522,0.7187445,0.05703969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517697,0.0001508707,0.001502877,0.0004921088,0.0003433407,0.0000867922,0.007629172,0.001655897,0.0004838899,0.001028556,0.9853984,0.0007104523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690308,0.2184607,0.0008306329,0.06835338,0.00213292,0.0006050912,0.0007295724,0.0003005012,0.1395565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8829829,0.0145763,0.001454065,0.001739445,0.001184107,0.0000102408,0.0001473998,0.00007497169,0.09783054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3139522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165623109","doi":"","title":"Bijuridism and Bilingualism in Canada: Ideals under Tension","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de linguistique appliquée","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Compromise; Political science; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01854221084725983,"gpt":0.2675687920833613,"spread":0.2490265812361014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007126856,0.0002611343,0.000397593,0.0001099997,0.0001658696,0.0000352518,0.0002323141,0.0003260775,0.0003179248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006219531,0.0002901077,0.00007361048,0.0003873705,0.0002449791,0.0001167293,0.00006616597,0.00048707,0.00003459084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000662056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002442682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978956,0.0002763876,0.0005290193,0.0004652356,0.0002200264,0.0006137532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988562,0.0002411683,0.0001848749,0.0002590359,0.0001721031,0.000286613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001298481,0.0002070819,0.01645013,0.0006237913,0.00007303593,0.0017455,0.374189,0.0001204843,0.0007290248,0.5788481,0.00219495,0.02468902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002025283,0.0003216897,0.03724447,0.003724837,0.0003543098,0.0001899927,0.01911092,0.009410088,0.004045904,0.08040083,0.8405519,0.002619796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.842782,0.05924628,0.001725216,0.006975876,0.002845905,0.0008946189,0.00007154734,0.00008474345,0.08537386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913952,0.001456482,0.001452456,0.001632878,0.0009956637,0.0000338568,0.00001012073,0.00004047575,0.002982907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8383569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800586352","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2018.1465250","title":"Professional legislative drafters: status, roles, education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Theory and Practice of Legislation","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; Professional development; Professional association; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01292731522742003,"gpt":0.3650538824196346,"spread":0.3521265671922146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003344509,0.00005759529,0.00006353439,0.00004138029,0.0004308537,0.00005310386,0.00008650981,0.0000523386,0.0002691842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002781969,0.00004048576,0.00001970226,0.0001355034,0.0004726912,0.001539563,0.00002063406,0.0001019563,0.000024562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002692149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002910991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007732631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002783293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974363,0.001983977,0.0001424512,0.0001023965,0.0002153983,0.0001194202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974476,0.001881398,0.0002327303,0.000113657,0.0002876096,0.00003697387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005706261,0.00004837104,0.0001080164,0.000003203287,0.00001642022,1.049982e-7,0.3274285,5.87784e-7,0.0006778767,0.6130586,0.000422761,0.05766496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002123072,0.000192025,0.001348004,0.00008858104,0.00009015454,0.00000383407,0.09789582,0.00004949986,0.0008521416,0.08505903,0.8140782,0.0001304113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04640424,0.0008450248,0.002646236,0.005677437,0.00060208,0.0003234662,0.000004355134,0.00002797897,0.9434692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925661,0.00009402393,0.0004667291,0.0008084103,0.0005204185,0.000009823166,0.000008986965,0.000004861451,0.005520651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3330477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504073153","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.004","title":"Legal theory: epistemology, language and legal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Fiqh; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Islam; Computer science; Sharia; Algorithm; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01195684164787445,"gpt":0.233838866576516,"spread":0.2218820249286416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004085747,0.0002329043,0.0002841714,0.0001152567,0.0004395103,0.0001140109,0.0003042019,0.0004036108,0.00004840458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004882671,0.0002620701,0.0001258128,0.000006509116,0.0006050932,0.000366643,0.0001872755,0.0004276368,0.00002618949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001901358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001406155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006786802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001655213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987802,0.0001975145,0.000126263,0.0003261421,0.0002300919,0.0003397825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991699,0.0001237374,0.0001700704,0.000246365,0.00008567167,0.0002041935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006271991,0.000003949922,0.000003878376,0.00002445402,0.0000717298,0.0003278207,0.004996163,4.914725e-8,0.00002734509,0.9876103,0.002048368,0.004823183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002032502,0.00002832782,0.00001120179,0.00009712661,0.0001788254,0.00002213634,0.001600144,0.000004141987,0.00006724177,0.00001680705,0.9974724,0.0002983763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008568568,0.001519774,0.0001636704,0.00003747677,0.0002824829,0.0002618059,0.0000879306,0.0001319947,0.996658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09165044,0.0001013567,0.00006804542,0.0001224333,0.0004006629,5.055915e-7,0.00003348072,0.00002679737,0.9075963],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.995424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123822955","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Myles Mcgregor-Lowndes and Bob Wyatt (Eds.), Regulating Charities: The Inside Story, New York: Routledge (2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Legislator; Law; Storytelling; Sociology; Legislation; Narrative; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01861569356652336,"gpt":0.3002693047657635,"spread":0.2816536111992401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948155,0.0001467378,0.0002142462,0.00003394627,0.003284124,0.0005123473,0.0006243599,0.00008365056,0.0002551787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008988624,0.0001029094,0.0001142104,0.00004836907,0.0003012731,0.001005429,0.00006318501,0.00120345,0.00002527374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000390137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00178522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00368856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01267886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976687,0.0002994252,0.000251374,0.0001931704,0.0003726504,0.001214621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.0001124507,0.0004089945,0.000316988,0.00009124707,0.000125711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004592456,0.00002935339,0.0008180262,0.00008382821,0.000224042,0.00001105912,0.0634802,0.000001505659,0.0001368588,0.1002057,0.2814703,0.5534932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003072153,0.0001115634,0.0004705835,0.0005753337,0.00007580231,0.0000889686,0.007597971,0.00003643336,0.00002769031,0.01572976,0.9747705,0.0002081753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003211776,0.9300733,0.0004558049,0.03467828,0.0003842856,0.0002830767,0.000001605965,0.00003903148,0.03087281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5594515,0.358814,0.00005600247,0.006698896,0.002325552,0.000009469303,0.000002396243,0.00002749523,0.07261473],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6933002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}