{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":118,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":118,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"4826bf06c3f2","filters":{"topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation"}},"results":[{"id":"W31708651","doi":"10.3747/co.26.5123","title":"Vagueness and Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","authors":[{"name":"Lawrence M. Solan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006984537640270599,"gpt":0.3094249273185949,"spread":0.3024403896783244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0425045,0.0003556369,0.0006840677,0.004913699,0.004909898,0.007321891,0.002249168,0.002553368,0.003560225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1783569,0.000687453,0.000885,0.003134326,0.02125985,0.005327825,0.006395007,0.00364994,0.0003874176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01471315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0206719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1222861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1001863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9513739,0.02559244,0.00553537,0.001753513,0.01387418,0.001870615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8317119,0.1140699,0.03155771,0.00573266,0.01468726,0.002240539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003760811,0.0001073693,0.1581007,0.00133966,0.0001633606,0.01090418,0.3094042,0.002268527,0.001642482,0.3456598,0.03390427,0.1361295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001577311,0.00012175,0.07970931,0.00416493,0.0001688025,0.01082793,0.1549874,0.006711062,0.001995274,0.6098592,0.1308227,0.0004739219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6168932,0.01732127,0.03097526,0.1644773,0.0006983492,0.000270689,0.001054317,0.000132017,0.1681776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909716,0.001577759,0.002661971,0.003242193,0.0001112104,0.00003227569,0.0001108573,0.00002368799,0.001268482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1222861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2431486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028847006","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000702x","title":"Theories of Categorization: A Case Study of Cheques","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jonnette Watson Hamilton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01751743508754228,"gpt":0.2704828636812669,"spread":0.2529654285937247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00704358,0.0004424177,0.0007171462,0.002798455,0.01311125,0.007157572,0.001909147,0.003860098,0.01098575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111629,0.0003165522,0.0006571005,0.004834278,0.01264722,0.006343855,0.004568,0.004270294,0.0009799298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002787737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01803922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03021988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908516,0.006930031,0.0001968128,0.0004967909,0.0009080808,0.0006166555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886088,0.008473176,0.0005247572,0.0009886869,0.001075803,0.0003287339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054855,0.000265442,0.01086161,0.0002827227,0.00001876092,0.00427515,0.5791871,0.0007232074,0.0007946422,0.3563594,0.005758684,0.04136777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004372795,0.0001617656,0.01329363,0.0005046319,0.0000301304,0.003039738,0.6027171,0.004876875,0.001435627,0.06803893,0.3057773,0.00008063183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.654089,0.001520487,0.01822364,0.006281499,0.000152039,0.0003090472,0.000135274,0.0001260818,0.319163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963449,0.000517964,0.005738596,0.0003261283,0.00002676743,0.0001439426,0.00006369854,0.00005936791,0.02967439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06370032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626759417","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0012","title":"Bilingual Interpretation Rules As A Component Of Language Rights In Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Law; Minority language; Linguistics; Secession; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michel Bastarache","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107821377210607,"gpt":0.2280969517864728,"spread":0.2170187380143667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003013114,0.0003012964,0.0004027906,0.001788995,0.01235642,0.01137184,0.001334911,0.001835199,0.005481034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004491083,0.0002527394,0.0002762543,0.002827458,0.02668951,0.00261977,0.002674495,0.003892859,0.000351775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0921316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1210093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9494794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9653179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946429,0.001066595,0.0001673308,0.0004829722,0.002331364,0.001308963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963667,0.001227832,0.0001815679,0.0002912547,0.001599907,0.0003326487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007409926,0.000006382835,0.0004498683,0.00002406909,0.000002376021,0.0001801504,0.01912984,0.0002406307,0.0001615802,0.9590517,0.007808992,0.01293696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001681062,0.0000123588,0.004925862,0.0005038563,0.0000235286,0.0002905301,0.02602202,0.002056669,0.001041537,0.3278052,0.6372139,0.0000877404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04346773,0.004603842,0.004703369,0.01707813,0.0002366321,0.0000433704,0.0001535211,0.000064601,0.9296488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423208,0.002254472,0.002713831,0.001461326,0.00009022471,0.00002416154,0.00009098779,0.00008354439,0.05096073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0921316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6684647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592716210","doi":"10.17118/11143/10153","title":"Les droits linguistiques au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Guillaume Rousseau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.00535703464936218,"gpt":0.2161291516655016,"spread":0.2107721170161394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001290265,0.000674238,0.0005001547,0.003381041,0.01097889,0.007796238,0.001074197,0.001815991,0.02887706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00478772,0.0004661246,0.0003089908,0.007458409,0.004611855,0.001859159,0.002088922,0.00368845,0.00448762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07462502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1586107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970431,0.0002322704,0.00009962834,0.0002684064,0.001788293,0.0005682835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961997,0.0004759301,0.0001604392,0.0002049558,0.002448669,0.0005103978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005698236,0.00001633407,0.002260745,0.0002251122,0.00001151466,0.0003446758,0.009900704,0.0002522328,0.000690997,0.168883,0.7120807,0.1052771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001923483,0.000001603057,0.003666629,0.0001282887,0.0000031104,0.00005434232,0.001304466,0.00004348501,0.0001196538,0.001292444,0.9933705,0.00001343055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01996832,0.1126787,0.001984259,0.08282331,0.005204863,0.00007689586,0.008237839,0.0005962576,0.7684295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1262296,0.04504613,0.002432765,0.007664202,0.0006423887,0.00006564135,0.002667118,0.0003756005,0.8148766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07462502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085476362","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmm002","title":"Legislative Drafting and Language in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Obligation; Normative; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Civilization; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"S. Lortie","is_ca":false},{"name":"R. C. Bergeron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026307517141617,"gpt":0.3208036186002156,"spread":0.3105405434287994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207993,0.0003603313,0.0007391089,0.004920367,0.02477647,0.01210803,0.003314725,0.003072234,0.01592783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02749294,0.0007664546,0.0004987044,0.01030563,0.008562414,0.002091864,0.003940158,0.004496678,0.001082282],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2356916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.412782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869351,0.001365144,0.0006754673,0.001057228,0.005865439,0.004101643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781788,0.005205234,0.001098529,0.0006578046,0.012164,0.002695649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006724893,0.00007636321,0.007330093,0.0004253722,0.00002822778,0.000946776,0.05283404,0.0009755865,0.0005763745,0.7038467,0.1654509,0.06744229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002967401,0.00002209581,0.02520896,0.0004382925,0.00003151257,0.00008524817,0.01064449,0.0006409188,0.0003755712,0.007599752,0.9548163,0.0001072177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261577,0.0257498,0.00123816,0.0996094,0.001898263,0.000409384,0.002952566,0.0002947335,0.74169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6850469,0.01264717,0.00258099,0.01127314,0.0002322083,0.0001813697,0.001306252,0.0001856019,0.2865464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2356916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8864895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887986758","doi":"10.29173/alr1297","title":"Legislating Language Use in Alberta: A Century of Incidental Provisions for a Fundamental Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislature; Political science; Subject matter; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Edmund A. Aunger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01598940405306635,"gpt":0.3278651499158751,"spread":0.3118757458628088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429988,0.0002137277,0.0003030678,0.001515156,0.01302735,0.007732563,0.002230922,0.003262251,0.002138462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007105738,0.000392176,0.0002322632,0.00212848,0.02474614,0.001781401,0.003391516,0.004685123,0.0001358075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09835143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1411364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9607677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941978,0.001208689,0.000133874,0.0005442231,0.002586167,0.001329099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953421,0.002329476,0.0002815359,0.0002247412,0.001395892,0.0004262192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275415,0.00002576379,0.003218166,0.0001339126,0.00001284571,0.0003624648,0.03426003,0.0006366362,0.0009520201,0.8698,0.02370065,0.06686474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003285149,0.00005472239,0.03422112,0.0007269336,0.00006385426,0.0001561832,0.02687547,0.0006985541,0.001230775,0.08406992,0.8517456,0.0001241081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2446934,0.0526912,0.005333577,0.1607172,0.001496383,0.00006955532,0.0001991816,0.0001262836,0.5346733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782561,0.01381332,0.002729548,0.02072533,0.0002955926,0.00003355875,0.0000759928,0.00005429676,0.08401626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09835143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7135929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563752931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026954","title":"Drafting Egypt's Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Transition (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Tamir Moustafa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008517625268013569,"gpt":0.2933754799184375,"spread":0.2848578546504239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02664454,0.0003674224,0.000659213,0.001678669,0.006983592,0.01018947,0.001954496,0.008843234,0.004868618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03373994,0.0004024831,0.0006453752,0.001257587,0.02564713,0.008431599,0.004794612,0.01256842,0.0007676032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01176421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02793295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03049517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03343255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918627,0.003127216,0.0007092914,0.0008084043,0.001748407,0.001744037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913383,0.003664549,0.0006615671,0.00185339,0.002072187,0.0004100787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002456107,0.00001558192,0.0002269604,0.0000266498,0.000009789126,0.0001070463,0.003835918,0.0002339869,0.0001587276,0.9855331,0.003221739,0.006605997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001684626,0.0000591246,0.002267507,0.0003482295,0.0000628028,0.0002000742,0.008972446,0.001529917,0.001285931,0.8195766,0.1654163,0.0001126953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1886488,0.003287606,0.03283498,0.3519661,0.003152593,0.0003327882,0.0002979629,0.0003401279,0.4191391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200987,0.0006786753,0.01851762,0.02694043,0.0003209481,0.000146592,0.00008397238,0.0001152162,0.03309796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03049517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1409115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077073892","doi":"10.7202/1023809ar","title":"Multilingual Legal Drafting, Translators’ Choices and the Principle of Lesser Evil","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Position (finance); Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Karolina Stefaniak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02210300764021899,"gpt":0.3175323212462504,"spread":0.2954293136060314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07227275,0.000680795,0.0008639613,0.002039733,0.007901832,0.01650744,0.002188338,0.008373681,0.00427069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1212599,0.000774278,0.000750615,0.00213213,0.0553318,0.01357669,0.008916101,0.009283999,0.001333736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00556029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006759429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001891946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002573169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8642933,0.09949766,0.007379677,0.009657302,0.01597007,0.003202087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8827562,0.07734482,0.009058869,0.01811914,0.01034637,0.002374606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003714655,0.00001216219,0.0003142676,0.00009692121,0.00001278075,0.0001457936,0.02251454,0.0001808366,0.0002726185,0.9638081,0.003593771,0.009011064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004434018,0.00005464879,0.0007991889,0.0004838793,0.00002746981,0.0005522434,0.009909067,0.0008382299,0.001323199,0.8421258,0.1437737,0.00006831543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0811651,0.008858386,0.1509942,0.2267772,0.002489871,0.0002486306,0.0001056391,0.0004117256,0.5289494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293963,0.001014093,0.02818604,0.01042707,0.0009376422,0.0002384531,0.00003892773,0.0003425631,0.02941884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07227275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3822194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555677156","doi":"10.7202/1037766ar","title":"Legal Language – Pragmatic Approaches to Its Interconnectivity with Legal Interpretation and Legal Translation1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scrutiny; German; Linguistics; Premise; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ingrid Simonnæs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293727444911907,"gpt":0.2813722736414379,"spread":0.2384349991923188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01685943,0.001173973,0.0009626678,0.006262055,0.009096107,0.01502178,0.002931435,0.006442999,0.008049326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01982517,0.000926497,0.001036777,0.005066787,0.06936448,0.02090764,0.009309885,0.004720537,0.00100344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007412277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006360626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004582626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00506609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670579,0.02702274,0.0009082886,0.001400974,0.002444376,0.001165756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793068,0.01530933,0.001750478,0.001620707,0.001484477,0.0005281593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001110194,0.00001183032,0.000179274,0.0001064736,0.000006441925,0.000273478,0.02183639,0.0001756351,0.0001550095,0.972911,0.0005808549,0.003752476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001463011,0.00002608768,0.000565348,0.0003248236,0.00001334103,0.0005183424,0.01568049,0.001357273,0.0003438413,0.9267844,0.05434045,0.00003105946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03302434,0.01412463,0.204798,0.04076516,0.0007495816,0.0001918712,0.0001165386,0.0001529952,0.7060769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421314,0.002928987,0.0407296,0.001432123,0.0005636624,0.0002395541,0.00009603183,0.0001758371,0.01170275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01685943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08916223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914810151","doi":"10.1515/npf-2018-0034","title":"Regulating Charity in a Federated State: The Australian Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Politics; Principal (computer security); Public administration; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Royal Commission; Law and economics; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ian Murray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02277930610077708,"gpt":0.3738998931947204,"spread":0.3511205870939433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008437297,0.0002079218,0.0003037954,0.001748473,0.008477439,0.008876341,0.001438801,0.00750071,0.004195415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629049,0.0003353473,0.0004450782,0.001426445,0.01304741,0.004408012,0.00586943,0.007941998,0.0003209197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01974663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01772829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1038546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1111609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927098,0.004375542,0.000217868,0.0004581172,0.00121088,0.001027882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946758,0.002209905,0.0004821906,0.0002769596,0.001527974,0.000827202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001175371,0.00003945294,0.0008142196,0.000101567,0.00000611867,0.0002892591,0.01597806,0.000388027,0.0002006599,0.9681042,0.006209196,0.007857394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001931315,0.0001802232,0.01565415,0.002061296,0.00005060324,0.0004890305,0.02743308,0.004335063,0.0006687238,0.3763404,0.5726444,0.0001237382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1468305,0.01470219,0.006503833,0.3922897,0.001964117,0.00009422785,0.00009574158,0.0000455415,0.4374742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135656,0.00552258,0.002387566,0.03919845,0.0005788831,0.00005455981,0.00001764272,0.00001668321,0.03865806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2065002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71792753","doi":"","title":"All Originals: Fiction and reality of multilingual legal drafting in the European Union and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Art; Engineering; Political science; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Agnieszka Doczekalska","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03599440214163162,"gpt":0.336226350933647,"spread":0.3002319487920154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003674872,0.0005938952,0.0006097282,0.00377927,0.0321597,0.02085835,0.002319711,0.003355441,0.01415637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02488592,0.0004464297,0.0004617608,0.007171452,0.02354818,0.002658149,0.004104837,0.00739636,0.000961983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1259523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1399577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931693,0.0008589291,0.0001972054,0.0005612972,0.003740263,0.001472956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988057,0.003612099,0.0004066539,0.0009075215,0.00607144,0.0009452705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005100719,0.00002349325,0.001288353,0.0001340536,0.00001690622,0.0005273556,0.09265327,0.0007589152,0.0001965699,0.692958,0.1853988,0.02599324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008222018,0.000007215318,0.003030204,0.0002639597,0.00001901565,0.0001551902,0.03155464,0.0003448017,0.0003623284,0.01398524,0.9502153,0.00005389029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0632164,0.008887637,0.002074667,0.05012748,0.003258836,0.00009530515,0.001192116,0.0001704781,0.870977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6447327,0.004820478,0.001511198,0.003696203,0.0004735826,0.00003634387,0.0004147268,0.0002917933,0.344023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1259523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Pierre-André Côté","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122690911422091,"gpt":0.304929082681889,"spread":0.2926599915396799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01902466,0.000674053,0.0008678198,0.002348209,0.02041694,0.01479578,0.003377937,0.008869314,0.006969892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05151371,0.0009152496,0.0008003245,0.004413108,0.02173551,0.006356654,0.00620947,0.01202756,0.0007007799],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08376876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3219948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9692134,0.008420366,0.001326963,0.002633275,0.01179013,0.006615871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762076,0.009088617,0.0009958602,0.001965155,0.01016842,0.001574424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005751124,0.0000340126,0.002575593,0.00009299382,0.00001984289,0.0004095191,0.03970978,0.0007374733,0.0003630737,0.9076205,0.02258348,0.02579618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760079,0.00009708305,0.01404785,0.001180572,0.0002248341,0.0008975577,0.06116195,0.007577667,0.004537434,0.4074377,0.5023426,0.0003186034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1210856,0.00334558,0.04150623,0.1204391,0.0005842185,0.0003606629,0.0005146668,0.0004085537,0.7117555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209247,0.001018072,0.01477532,0.009331117,0.0001170128,0.0001285597,0.0001168088,0.0002039129,0.05338446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6077877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205814575","doi":"10.2307/3504743","title":"10.2307/3504743","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Relevance (law); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Public law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004423186271412567,"gpt":0.2244806121938031,"spread":0.2200574259223906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009336318,0.001684204,0.001256108,0.002447907,0.001850023,0.005152586,0.002027027,0.002819352,0.984439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002408049,0.0008401493,0.0008408473,0.002803225,0.001826942,0.00609731,0.004395691,0.00180189,0.984632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001207124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001586287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004784802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005079495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993522,0.00005831631,0.00005138957,0.0001702582,0.0002665681,0.0001013551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978663,0.0004895515,0.00008260051,0.0003703469,0.000528582,0.00066257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001647251,0.0001555133,0.0004605424,0.0004199097,0.00001460057,0.0001749915,0.00009049429,0.000134317,0.001180698,0.005758276,0.5986125,0.3928334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002641424,0.00003381736,0.0008596335,0.0002075334,0.000006722722,0.0002174661,0.0001405085,0.0001042112,0.0001904542,0.001294532,0.996903,0.00001577128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003060565,0.000385478,0.0003488542,0.0003307354,0.0003859569,0.00005110788,0.0009881048,0.0006110116,0.9965926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001123096,0.0004288552,0.0005391195,0.0004714617,0.0001130072,0.00003823486,0.001477218,0.0004012239,0.9954078],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01556104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02219594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262115130","doi":"","title":"Bilinguisme legislatif : regard sur l’interpretation et la redaction des lois bilingues au Canada (Statutory Bilingualism: Examining Statutory Interpretation and Drafting Bilingual Laws in Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Statutory interpretation; Redaction; Law; Legislation; Statutory law; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Karine McLaren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01184163729770957,"gpt":0.272004085119629,"spread":0.2601624478219194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006366954,0.0002792251,0.0003051318,0.002282215,0.01133023,0.007775289,0.001164343,0.001112252,0.004943656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01227814,0.0003001358,0.000292886,0.003427403,0.01597687,0.002105638,0.002239869,0.002569995,0.0002919534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1453484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950299,0.001511721,0.0001764529,0.0006669565,0.001651801,0.000963113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908321,0.003289906,0.0006906005,0.0003700342,0.004335362,0.0004818995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008013582,0.00003353933,0.02981655,0.0002968184,0.00002461229,0.0004402142,0.3264097,0.0008758362,0.002231065,0.5644534,0.0151807,0.06015745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004389683,0.00005331883,0.1379452,0.0009413442,0.0001164898,0.0002821067,0.3292363,0.003116854,0.005071193,0.04507123,0.4779375,0.0001846607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5610257,0.003745407,0.02057522,0.03515853,0.0002945219,0.00027491,0.001102152,0.000183948,0.3776396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681078,0.0007303308,0.00390371,0.001102858,0.00002300519,0.00005280262,0.0001404497,0.00005770809,0.02588154],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7970868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493465670","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100002516","title":"Some linguistic properties of legal notices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Ambiguity; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phrase; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Allott","is_ca":false},{"name":"Benjamin Shaer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01352950252367318,"gpt":0.2472227994990346,"spread":0.2336932969753614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005702313,0.0002878074,0.0005092375,0.005159271,0.003471743,0.006332734,0.001290449,0.002220105,0.006403466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0422651,0.0005756186,0.0008002087,0.003445331,0.009422541,0.01538404,0.002929636,0.002763825,0.0004581777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002957799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001197716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002782672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001416239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917168,0.003187549,0.001039663,0.001078288,0.002539394,0.0004383611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489031,0.03573598,0.005283979,0.003826448,0.005464138,0.000786388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005908304,0.00003153178,0.00274261,0.0001093194,0.00001257306,0.0003157884,0.008095126,0.0004421521,0.00180071,0.9733534,0.0009012844,0.01213637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003852972,0.00008234494,0.008307999,0.0001612067,0.00004448901,0.001090257,0.006973914,0.01023608,0.002973713,0.9360783,0.03392772,0.00008547442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4895579,0.00147327,0.304493,0.01063237,0.0005016811,0.0002653839,0.001177396,0.001253257,0.1906459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829783,0.0001697954,0.01386188,0.000175315,0.0002408093,0.00005089876,0.0003222849,0.0001407433,0.002059855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006403466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03015709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592014777","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.2880","title":"Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fernand de Varennes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01883733901646776,"gpt":0.3346721171976231,"spread":0.3158347781811553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003634172,0.0004747251,0.0005244096,0.001119807,0.00763999,0.0158199,0.0008752938,0.003129193,0.008382348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325993,0.0002555465,0.0003616619,0.001230006,0.0184083,0.009476685,0.005332752,0.006974999,0.001726979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005057229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004956974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02313532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941345,0.003718153,0.0001893608,0.0004558735,0.0007311593,0.0007709766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945105,0.00338556,0.0005911153,0.0004077486,0.0006687141,0.0004362329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003917341,0.00001816047,0.001239585,0.00008922661,0.000007153615,0.0001097021,0.08291786,0.00002566058,0.0002374573,0.9037299,0.004044204,0.007541963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004054163,0.0001033923,0.008383126,0.00146699,0.00005780686,0.0004105566,0.2168711,0.0003285644,0.001113674,0.1215623,0.6495845,0.00007740298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1179955,0.01442617,0.003880388,0.0702735,0.001026661,0.00003338525,0.0001055975,0.00006983845,0.792189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526968,0.003707129,0.0005905575,0.006780342,0.0006108314,0.00004190056,0.00004689249,0.0001192408,0.03540636],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04600126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"Fábio Perin Shecaira","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05228908965120452,"gpt":0.3782583810100003,"spread":0.3259692913587958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09485225,0.001258326,0.001814979,0.005910817,0.006194675,0.01433111,0.00501349,0.005945994,0.003455116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1020187,0.001622654,0.002336147,0.003388146,0.08108193,0.02816895,0.01177834,0.01039737,0.0009154187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004726605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001594629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.903393,0.07466412,0.004172517,0.005490973,0.01064193,0.001637544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8283233,0.1408197,0.004789968,0.01948421,0.005310133,0.00127277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007216858,0.000007515525,0.0001031877,0.000064126,0.00001386736,0.00001878485,0.0009338165,0.0003672174,0.00004692198,0.9955511,0.0002682973,0.002617984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001003966,0.000007111769,0.00002495693,0.0000363388,0.000004264346,0.00002094765,0.0001172453,0.0007380135,0.0001387078,0.9952614,0.003634487,0.000006412008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01476097,0.008282404,0.8577682,0.03906286,0.0007045053,0.0001526178,0.0000901605,0.00022519,0.07895302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6381869,0.004607053,0.3471736,0.002969414,0.001575661,0.0005639642,0.00009987143,0.0002358578,0.004587641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09485225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5016326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955727152","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz008","title":"The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of ‘Plain Language’ and ‘Good Law’ Initiatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Plain language; CLARITY; Law; Simplicity; Political science; Negotiation; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas E. Webb","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Geyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04602867560778381,"gpt":0.330576084945479,"spread":0.2845474093376952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08343191,0.0004491626,0.0008374518,0.005847737,0.009938943,0.02386796,0.002506528,0.00572159,0.003993528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1162328,0.0008937304,0.000903923,0.00383054,0.0697378,0.02115671,0.008107891,0.009990703,0.0005791379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01900712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01698002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01807003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01785201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8868284,0.09167118,0.003082341,0.003127388,0.01313577,0.002154925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7756696,0.1907405,0.008347078,0.01065107,0.01226634,0.002325549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001196771,0.000006188107,0.0003420386,0.0001237101,0.000008596852,0.0001289804,0.04132592,0.0003653272,0.0001526234,0.9443161,0.004205817,0.009012604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003977124,0.0000576483,0.001912286,0.001650197,0.00003416203,0.000341628,0.04472866,0.001958077,0.0007907822,0.5538704,0.3945226,0.0000937821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1203431,0.03421174,0.1394232,0.3463511,0.002251417,0.0002577947,0.0001427237,0.0004588106,0.3565601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590949,0.004887343,0.01769572,0.007858796,0.0004767121,0.0001596881,0.00003947665,0.0002406335,0.009546567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08343191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4412354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020798792","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2008.11092571","title":"Writing Standard: Process of Macedonian Language Standardization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Macedonian; Norm (philosophy); Linguistics; Standard language; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Christina E. Kramer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007279359737407534,"gpt":0.283365411230471,"spread":0.2760860514930635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01828564,0.0004927353,0.0005198732,0.004477311,0.008212614,0.009023617,0.001272824,0.001101019,0.002056417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419552,0.0004571313,0.0002598139,0.002376676,0.01935556,0.003505948,0.008448267,0.002223713,0.0004762046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01362816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04353017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03384649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812851,0.00863513,0.001740803,0.00221403,0.004637017,0.001487994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783624,0.009398388,0.002575009,0.003418996,0.005462414,0.0007829921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003183109,0.00001445607,0.004595945,0.00008792895,0.000007425061,0.0004239774,0.8387945,0.0001237426,0.001275887,0.114381,0.001846052,0.0384173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003100281,0.0001427285,0.05409197,0.001089133,0.00003342416,0.001121842,0.3610837,0.001198047,0.006592567,0.07273793,0.5016748,0.0002028592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7406812,0.004221079,0.02152728,0.008332579,0.000438993,0.0003032995,0.0002174008,0.0002348969,0.2240433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840571,0.00029993,0.003293906,0.0002146813,0.00003828709,0.00004972255,0.0000485217,0.00004780029,0.01195005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04353017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09887969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740009593","doi":"","title":"Software Support for Multi-Lingual Legislative Drafting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Legislature; Work (physics); Software; Face (sociological concept); Civil society; Political science; Computer science; Software engineering; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Sociology; Law; Geography; Programming language; Social science","authors":[{"name":"William J. McIver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04031201512568208,"gpt":0.362732922926063,"spread":0.3224209078003809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02017626,0.001110847,0.001115358,0.004924594,0.002030102,0.006302814,0.005099146,0.001946792,0.02856291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05114209,0.001633197,0.001724331,0.00379312,0.001889249,0.01000711,0.007185877,0.002663282,0.01637759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001950634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004308823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002685423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003236515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899459,0.00386122,0.001700291,0.001354861,0.002715508,0.0004220782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9322957,0.03779543,0.002687264,0.01798392,0.007839449,0.001398297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006133282,0.000601443,0.004702181,0.001169502,0.0002222484,0.001717327,0.01049141,0.005698279,0.0164004,0.0801016,0.1045001,0.7737821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006469836,0.0002396219,0.003927128,0.0008452786,0.0001612953,0.001937277,0.001815959,0.09414247,0.02635175,0.1144159,0.7551914,0.0003249675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008495335,0.0002758702,0.8269962,0.00145327,0.0002549701,0.0008109931,0.0009745255,0.1298715,0.03086734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1021641,0.0006664204,0.8429473,0.0005825328,0.0003211909,0.001179544,0.005924277,0.01991131,0.02630334],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02856291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1067035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Roxana Goga-Vigaru","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02005083112389101,"gpt":0.3030818472898748,"spread":0.2830310161659838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667146,0.0001680005,0.0002500604,0.007349534,0.001933345,0.002140293,0.0005157079,0.0005508478,0.004417628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563738,0.000203169,0.0001938618,0.009904066,0.001911015,0.002152701,0.001697333,0.0008080516,0.0004296483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001759382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001104327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009105812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996956,0.001819248,0.0002347105,0.0003447676,0.0005873119,0.00005789598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720558,0.02200234,0.001547932,0.001159934,0.003015475,0.0002185367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001104467,0.0009444759,0.105696,0.006569679,0.0002196529,0.003267988,0.3166721,0.004787773,0.03303349,0.1265757,0.03892812,0.3622006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881985,0.0004210202,0.3724479,0.002303313,0.000254973,0.002062985,0.2151433,0.02169229,0.0213237,0.02617391,0.3377768,0.0002114841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367717,0.001771372,0.01913163,0.001031116,0.00009821504,0.0005447545,0.009900509,0.0001036708,0.03064709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670209,0.0006646074,0.01982483,0.00009313965,0.0000386053,0.0007187655,0.008794367,0.00007176671,0.002772999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007349534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01939398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107209022","doi":"10.3233/faia200865","title":"Plain Language Assessment of Statutes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Statute; Operationalization; Plain language; Computer science; Legislature; Legislation; Proxy (statistics); Plain English; Rewriting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Programming language; Law; Machine learning","authors":[{"name":"Wolfgang Alschner","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel D’Alimonte","is_ca":true},{"name":"Giovanni C. Giuga","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sophie Gadbois","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910768323006172,"gpt":0.3378805018336785,"spread":0.3087728186036167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008653994,0.0003921195,0.0003668614,0.00691071,0.001044403,0.006912929,0.00119704,0.0007784854,0.009668224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08020973,0.0002420281,0.0003846858,0.004160778,0.002295344,0.005808196,0.00163451,0.001299854,0.001848242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002371321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001894155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003588704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004548017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893863,0.003473547,0.0008797194,0.0007790003,0.005296727,0.0001846324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400312,0.03104394,0.005692275,0.004989716,0.0177678,0.0004750641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001424897,0.000137776,0.02384263,0.0006678535,0.00005778691,0.0002717301,0.01264188,0.007733458,0.006458226,0.3223751,0.02710141,0.5985696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003453806,0.000410739,0.08269626,0.002237804,0.0001136534,0.001145756,0.01292682,0.05341844,0.02686547,0.3998427,0.4200644,0.0002433838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.216814,0.004165867,0.2770579,0.00434454,0.0006454341,0.000700569,0.004153009,0.002088824,0.4900299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114754,0.001580266,0.1415874,0.0005438267,0.0002701535,0.0002738194,0.004083272,0.0006067253,0.03957906],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009668224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04576725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320169557","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4346447","title":"A First Nations Voice and the Exercise of Constitutional Drafting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Political science; Law; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"Gabrielle Appleby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Seán Brennan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Megan Davis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006774712304847665,"gpt":0.2740369906969946,"spread":0.2672622783921469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06131771,0.0006730536,0.001251434,0.003052905,0.0158299,0.02416815,0.003352169,0.02217301,0.009774512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09375612,0.0009577322,0.001129782,0.002831395,0.05127381,0.01247492,0.007681902,0.02033907,0.001037625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01446795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01082061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01418389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9329773,0.04845491,0.001967256,0.004816358,0.006450039,0.005334058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197131,0.06590743,0.002637242,0.006282715,0.003899914,0.001559587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006770343,0.000005538048,0.0000648108,0.000007619851,0.00000296453,0.00003285583,0.002084663,0.00008202031,0.0000377614,0.9953779,0.001137831,0.001159198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002146033,0.00001677539,0.0002952573,0.0001432792,0.00001278926,0.00005531248,0.001984981,0.000667459,0.0003398849,0.9649043,0.03152695,0.00003148261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03220379,0.00329554,0.0230747,0.08795115,0.0008746672,0.00008002569,0.00006591265,0.00009659644,0.8523576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379132,0.0007762084,0.006891677,0.009261774,0.0005484404,0.0001938431,0.00003117815,0.0001296313,0.04425419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06131771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042695409","doi":"10.7202/042406ar","title":"La stéréophonie législative, facteur de haute infidélité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CLARITY; Statute; Legislature; Simplicity; Style (visual arts); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Michel Sparer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006334597832786917,"gpt":0.2696395652041275,"spread":0.2633049673713406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00379163,0.0002430333,0.0002408782,0.001004776,0.002901159,0.003556557,0.0003759619,0.001213542,0.006426656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004826049,0.0001822474,0.0001627178,0.000978117,0.007207727,0.002880086,0.0008583798,0.002734073,0.001000719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004779965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00345484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04083057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04534524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962865,0.002171256,0.0001208981,0.0004123845,0.0006235638,0.0003853635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974149,0.001353609,0.0004278969,0.0001809947,0.0004926158,0.0001299345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002322448,0.000008204473,0.000988376,0.00006382539,0.000003884121,0.0001377295,0.03361394,0.00004551276,0.001361845,0.9310654,0.0129788,0.01970927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001144848,0.00003286855,0.005804533,0.0002243118,0.00001022687,0.0006037612,0.02402942,0.000285254,0.001467234,0.02928513,0.9382115,0.00003433063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1069537,0.01288007,0.03926527,0.1222346,0.003640767,0.00007657842,0.0005154455,0.000448005,0.7139856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924188,0.003230233,0.006530847,0.008502252,0.001158546,0.00008065585,0.0001504865,0.0001501864,0.05600879],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04083057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08118582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160071724","doi":"","title":"Plain English in Quebec Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Meaning (existential); Plain language; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Plain English; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication","authors":[{"name":"Lena Day","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008466890841817872,"gpt":0.2969843549676111,"spread":0.2885174641257932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002188776,0.0003560874,0.0002887138,0.001241048,0.009683637,0.005664614,0.0008029038,0.001903478,0.01755286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00594611,0.0002653555,0.0002550558,0.001740315,0.007557348,0.001595638,0.001287016,0.003232431,0.001064682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07768825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05860203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970576,0.0009110901,0.0001014696,0.000297149,0.001000595,0.000632205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962919,0.001174104,0.0002668596,0.0001722646,0.00181622,0.0002786781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002845644,0.00004380074,0.003744865,0.0001524868,0.00001009603,0.0008407641,0.05478029,0.00040499,0.001292189,0.7142197,0.1889237,0.03555878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001412602,0.00001543417,0.01950025,0.000370328,0.00001428035,0.0001596534,0.01692675,0.0006309454,0.0003552948,0.01124865,0.950702,0.00006226156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09490271,0.01317846,0.004233605,0.1516084,0.001928202,0.0001495272,0.001689462,0.0003032979,0.7320063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003249,0.004409549,0.00243784,0.02021096,0.0002184102,0.0001002559,0.0003926243,0.00009748904,0.1718079],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07768825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5636703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993357890","doi":"10.1093/slr/hml006","title":"How Legislation is Drafted and Enacted in Bangladesh","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Legislature; Mandate; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Legislative process; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gavin Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01136785493717765,"gpt":0.2900013341011395,"spread":0.2786334791639619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01785915,0.0002181967,0.0003843511,0.003545755,0.005880204,0.0130812,0.001251977,0.00232857,0.004405746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0290662,0.0006985612,0.0002596985,0.007904467,0.007482118,0.00312103,0.002128127,0.002975839,0.001635181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02646938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02342657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1088533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1723594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9766103,0.01317122,0.002137095,0.0009968103,0.005543518,0.001540975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843845,0.008744748,0.002133357,0.0007370585,0.003446158,0.0005540941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008100535,0.00009679024,0.01699341,0.0008581058,0.00005434227,0.005058158,0.4031109,0.001556006,0.003654771,0.4403349,0.02076009,0.1074415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004235026,0.0001332668,0.04422565,0.00157867,0.00004440831,0.0007398241,0.1586448,0.0005562961,0.001731894,0.01848797,0.7736533,0.0001616145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3277366,0.01082617,0.005433276,0.03308461,0.0004605736,0.0006383086,0.0007769905,0.0001069331,0.6209366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8998107,0.01304055,0.005272368,0.002445521,0.0000939722,0.0002859652,0.0003759411,0.0001273639,0.07854765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1088533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2164394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346719107","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Interpretation of Bilingual Legislation: The Demise of the Shared Meaning Rule","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Presumption; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Legislature; Legislative intent; Linguistics; CLARITY; Argument (complex analysis); Divergence (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"J. Paul Salembier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0117627796603356,"gpt":0.2776088555610687,"spread":0.2658460759007331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03298275,0.0005270711,0.001114086,0.003305422,0.007351336,0.0106817,0.002187927,0.00513664,0.001699766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05993351,0.0006220719,0.001110177,0.001828946,0.04286346,0.01198249,0.007476988,0.01021822,0.0004278553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008783558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01255731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01196768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9548413,0.02818087,0.002195194,0.003341567,0.009898937,0.001542098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691159,0.01938131,0.00222099,0.004180005,0.00462989,0.0004718784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001816308,0.000004628514,0.0003931062,0.00003290653,0.00000794716,0.0001275955,0.01995147,0.0002268021,0.0002835402,0.9691843,0.0009782416,0.008791338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002979735,0.00002576821,0.0007109516,0.0002161859,0.00002579609,0.0002690612,0.008045108,0.002624451,0.00125641,0.9458759,0.0408744,0.00004618745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2483492,0.006195866,0.2762547,0.1458722,0.002214114,0.0001430832,0.0001897496,0.0003977041,0.3203833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616279,0.0006286257,0.02975847,0.003490304,0.0003630055,0.0000540748,0.00004520877,0.0001538006,0.003878593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03298275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1744316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312552196","doi":"10.7202/1027339ar","title":"La langue du droit. Rosalind Greenstein (dir.), Langue, culture et code : regards croisés, CERLAC (Centre de recherches en Langues de Spécialité et Cultures) et L’Harmattan, 2003, 203 p., ISBN 2-7475-5334-5 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Le droit civil, avant tout un style ?, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2003, 228 p., ISBN 2-89400-180-0","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jean-Claude Gémar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01596541186247542,"gpt":0.2882900295783926,"spread":0.2723246177159172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002261231,0.001868951,0.001160292,0.002882561,0.00261855,0.007146331,0.001114171,0.003883993,0.0443932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003598482,0.00101982,0.0006686804,0.005168376,0.002851921,0.008735803,0.002406745,0.005867602,0.02915614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00862556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0978258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1475283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980184,0.0006264452,0.0001748162,0.0003895181,0.0006015093,0.0001893315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.0004619589,0.0001804666,0.00005492946,0.000463312,0.0001411224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002479815,0.000009654344,0.0002311785,0.0004615371,0.000008769513,0.00006599622,0.001449351,0.00005133786,0.00009987653,0.01882006,0.900439,0.07833849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004588441,0.000005942517,0.0008552914,0.0008245532,0.000004178911,0.0001539922,0.001005703,0.00002439348,0.00006848324,0.002954452,0.9940858,0.00001256773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003900173,0.8991182,0.0008582968,0.04850874,0.009525946,0.00001989741,0.0003772839,0.0000714741,0.04112998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01524739,0.6989631,0.001441626,0.009885581,0.004844619,0.00009568105,0.000616419,0.0004155788,0.26849],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0978258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1945128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412317208","doi":"","title":"Justifying the evidential use of intuitive judgements in linguistics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Evidentiality; Natural language processing; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Karen Kiil Brøcker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04315366923613121,"gpt":0.3518708716863299,"spread":0.3087172024501986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04953331,0.001144271,0.001857704,0.004898075,0.004285018,0.009479913,0.005039969,0.00931186,0.007777856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1790185,0.001854947,0.002019963,0.002403031,0.03346721,0.02135912,0.008451975,0.009891775,0.001030897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004506666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003382966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002452056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003003495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9451468,0.0356654,0.003977324,0.004593364,0.009030173,0.00158688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8144495,0.1435093,0.007380384,0.01996118,0.01311537,0.001584222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003076677,0.00001229355,0.0002435989,0.00009645339,0.00003185252,0.00007391693,0.0007754584,0.0005953609,0.0001060809,0.9934837,0.001169549,0.003380905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001455986,0.000005489869,0.0001266894,0.00005196318,0.00001120867,0.00003305303,0.0000920557,0.001690693,0.0001331402,0.9957841,0.002046078,0.00001101096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05497446,0.003611304,0.6985487,0.06958117,0.002199997,0.0001820158,0.0004896178,0.0005102853,0.1699024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236287,0.0005997246,0.06762427,0.003365033,0.001453803,0.0001494287,0.000123615,0.00017742,0.002877929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04953331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2619603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220723148","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-30","title":"Language Laws and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Nathan Brett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00953017180415712,"gpt":0.2714130888372983,"spread":0.2618829170331412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001494001,0.0004995269,0.0003194465,0.001622494,0.008561888,0.00549066,0.0008297093,0.00208895,0.02186978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001558382,0.0001969879,0.0003290583,0.001581394,0.02377445,0.00299711,0.002155648,0.002104654,0.001954311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01891428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01245213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3459135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4052793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.0003506072,0.00002343194,0.0001387028,0.0004433269,0.000447873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991031,0.000359262,0.00006955134,0.0001059256,0.0002762861,0.00008591754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.14973e-7,0.000002527454,0.00004390239,0.000009655055,6.19807e-7,0.00002158518,0.001513288,0.00005125475,0.0000221274,0.9899892,0.004986977,0.003358206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005659547,0.000007011419,0.0008262125,0.0002358198,0.000003329228,0.00005398975,0.00212518,0.0001530396,0.00008605096,0.3532355,0.6432585,0.000009767292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004097011,0.005759039,0.001832993,0.007486501,0.0001767472,0.00002003345,0.00005340996,0.0000313123,0.980543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4436884,0.007255482,0.002335993,0.005876217,0.0004916186,0.0001665563,0.0001582214,0.00007169239,0.5399559],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3459135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6878002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212796781","doi":"10.22215/etd/2004-05868","title":"Evaluating the punitive turn thesis: is Canadian penal discourse officially exemplifying a punitive mentality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey A. Meyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06448230649826289,"gpt":0.4475062885537224,"spread":0.3830239820554595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01048425,0.0007348918,0.0007507849,0.00543483,0.02707238,0.02077214,0.004381523,0.004413284,0.01421974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07392047,0.0005050034,0.0005255413,0.007255091,0.02866205,0.006690259,0.005494447,0.007123962,0.0007827112],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1568334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2010578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871323,0.001889816,0.0003091893,0.00108555,0.006588316,0.00299484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567103,0.009088585,0.003713477,0.001775831,0.02600111,0.00271077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002653802,0.0001169036,0.03531776,0.000176567,0.00007480717,0.0005315477,0.2338674,0.0006136796,0.000782273,0.646367,0.0526005,0.02928618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009985612,0.00006429525,0.1759107,0.00106503,0.0002593053,0.000228583,0.5239035,0.002577768,0.002259579,0.08524807,0.2079764,0.0004068147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4408547,0.001736641,0.0019149,0.0934796,0.0007307587,0.0001142671,0.0009171893,0.00006855297,0.4601833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815757,0.0005488543,0.0005613258,0.002781987,0.0000790098,0.00003379532,0.0001889204,0.00005890293,0.01417149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1568334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024403972","doi":"10.7202/042416ar","title":"Pour un manuel de légistique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Training manual; Computer science; Legislature; Cover (algebra); Scheme (mathematics); Process (computing); Order (exchange); Operations research; Information retrieval; Engineering; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Law; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Denis Le May","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005801337484957332,"gpt":0.2625865560614121,"spread":0.2567852185764548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489549,0.00117326,0.001287787,0.001966489,0.007977973,0.01403552,0.00136271,0.009169397,0.04417204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02242979,0.000478904,0.001134848,0.001773469,0.00906595,0.01178394,0.003923489,0.02150257,0.01804763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006385055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01065194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01216995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864733,0.006684418,0.0004655256,0.001251279,0.004262735,0.0008626754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879218,0.006641935,0.0006724401,0.001313139,0.002456197,0.0009944339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005444322,0.00004393827,0.0004478751,0.0001708859,0.00001546205,0.000357786,0.003625355,0.0001989188,0.0005435775,0.6958576,0.2492146,0.04946961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007491938,0.000009520956,0.0002302231,0.0001677908,0.000002509872,0.0002210711,0.0006986611,0.0000938575,0.0001201355,0.0169971,0.981437,0.00001460084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003844349,0.05049791,0.01715448,0.4731455,0.04354684,0.00008891736,0.0004425647,0.001107714,0.4101718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1197662,0.03393652,0.02718426,0.1375225,0.04569297,0.000440232,0.0007157195,0.001646377,0.6330952],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04417204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1477702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947589675","doi":"10.7202/1059339ar","title":"LA PRÉCARITÉ DES DROITS LINGUISTIQUES SCOLAIRES OU LES SINGULIÈRES DIFFICULTÉS DE MISE EN OEUVRE DE L’ARTICLE 23 DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Proulx","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008899178926120882,"gpt":0.2741951505575788,"spread":0.2652959716314579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205544,0.0004823088,0.0004226372,0.00143603,0.007619252,0.01246244,0.001650676,0.004350423,0.01637973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00693763,0.0003313971,0.0005399542,0.001832025,0.01886226,0.00477269,0.004326637,0.005646469,0.002960144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01046889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1043977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1766391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952558,0.001605257,0.0001953945,0.0007498858,0.001059575,0.001134081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968247,0.00146538,0.0003690395,0.0004103059,0.0006607098,0.0002697915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001547632,0.00001023618,0.0009666911,0.00007859911,0.000005785526,0.0001755789,0.01925668,0.0001057385,0.0002868165,0.957933,0.01298532,0.008179994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008140848,0.0000185401,0.003014812,0.0003505727,0.00001082363,0.0001868216,0.01358967,0.0001208206,0.0006964833,0.05346917,0.9284918,0.00004228448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03328998,0.009468011,0.004403181,0.04349365,0.0008004256,0.00005856561,0.0002564597,0.00006557386,0.9081641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6156155,0.005707807,0.002424189,0.01076389,0.0004451464,0.0001710446,0.0001786743,0.0001493554,0.3645444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540657271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1973558","title":"The Elimination of Broker Voting: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Voting; Business; Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ali C. Akyol","is_ca":true},{"name":"Konrad Raff","is_ca":false},{"name":"Patrick Verwijmeren","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01110100876592854,"gpt":0.2719066322574573,"spread":0.2608056234915287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02011275,0.0003176172,0.00145541,0.001116483,0.004086837,0.006429211,0.002524189,0.008706753,0.0238512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06671134,0.0003979541,0.0008529807,0.001060148,0.01249269,0.008700751,0.003277793,0.008947594,0.002045357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002183745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003539453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003346513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004838661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981681,0.009560726,0.0006115754,0.00188468,0.003513006,0.002748967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538019,0.02772028,0.003816548,0.007806102,0.004460623,0.002394454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893793,0.0001118185,0.003179295,0.000115277,0.00009069948,0.0001638325,0.001326077,0.0002855599,0.0002732678,0.9118031,0.04740282,0.03505902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292905,0.00004363505,0.002931876,0.0001063372,0.00007707397,0.0001751214,0.001570627,0.001167083,0.0005421339,0.9198054,0.07341994,0.00003154933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1002353,0.003426978,0.02110199,0.4221312,0.003220696,0.00007377915,0.000247812,0.0002431053,0.4493192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374486,0.0004425075,0.00210897,0.03431339,0.001911116,0.00005014346,0.00005092931,0.0001170786,0.02355717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1063676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220964383","doi":"10.30853/phil20220144","title":"Linguoculturological Comparative Analysis of Legal Terminology in Judicial Practice in the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philology Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Novelty; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Natalya Fedorovna Mikheeva","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elena Dmitrieva","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02498137040266672,"gpt":0.3670024669855947,"spread":0.342021096582928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001688897,0.0001173321,0.0003338006,0.005282642,0.007331147,0.003592252,0.0007943435,0.0004183227,0.00202116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009531822,0.0001292258,0.0001593118,0.01178111,0.00548093,0.0009253306,0.002014736,0.000716513,0.00008814047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04842171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05005847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9686971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975201,0.0006730605,0.0001000973,0.000190788,0.0009428693,0.0005729715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942847,0.001584136,0.0005121358,0.0001368071,0.003018048,0.0004640726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002484808,0.00008551854,0.136816,0.0003969224,0.00008283526,0.001593072,0.6640582,0.0008006236,0.00421804,0.1047037,0.003974389,0.0830222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000957988,0.00004229914,0.4969876,0.0002553562,0.00006651397,0.0003684297,0.4689393,0.0005247464,0.0006829688,0.002553466,0.02950303,0.00006676761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749297,0.0009088534,0.0001796718,0.0004965376,0.00001316382,0.00001511309,0.0001070602,0.000003453206,0.02334648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987798,0.0003153282,0.0001144632,0.00004354864,0.000001764726,0.000005586988,0.00004876696,0.000002626349,0.0006881164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04842171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3513258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345472701","doi":"","title":"Some Problems with the Shared Meaning Rule as Formulated in R v Daoust and The Law of Bilingual Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Law; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Ruth Sullivan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003891298027389843,"gpt":0.2513665626663399,"spread":0.24747526463895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0360565,0.0006322167,0.002056047,0.002366856,0.007801082,0.008107489,0.005802436,0.01486108,0.005949253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07064117,0.001151468,0.001971531,0.002344393,0.03304105,0.01783336,0.005705401,0.01889156,0.001098681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004434493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006391382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01189252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9794012,0.01167353,0.001957114,0.002653079,0.003083977,0.001231126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604286,0.02824742,0.001402763,0.005530013,0.00382316,0.0005681566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584131,0.000007322486,0.000148787,0.00001973078,0.000009754868,0.00007863216,0.002044134,0.0001619862,0.00006873204,0.9903949,0.003691219,0.003359076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003712098,0.00001036749,0.0001655267,0.00003403406,0.00001442968,0.000254901,0.0006557856,0.001693223,0.0002593359,0.9880105,0.00883105,0.00003375117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07431237,0.003622576,0.2704205,0.3791908,0.004874151,0.0003573807,0.0005080837,0.001015436,0.2656987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835702,0.001020887,0.115965,0.02595708,0.003162469,0.0005934251,0.00012284,0.0004041624,0.01707219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0360565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1906873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285795054","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p54","title":"The Competence of the Electoral Commission to Conduct Free and Fair Elections in Tanzania: A Legal Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Law; Public administration; General election; Impartiality; Jurisdiction; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ryoba Marwa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290626226697857,"gpt":0.305085606901815,"spread":0.2921793446348365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761495,0.00009736995,0.0001863613,0.002723124,0.005613163,0.006789511,0.001160568,0.002018456,0.004445025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02163333,0.000401852,0.0002632052,0.001861541,0.00577852,0.002296135,0.002136865,0.002432185,0.0003929688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01202894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07371302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09354837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951508,0.001642289,0.0004336699,0.0002986772,0.001109653,0.001364834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729206,0.0173767,0.004370291,0.000837031,0.003493715,0.001001697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004867086,0.00005504033,0.02154486,0.0001573229,0.000008398098,0.001986972,0.01706359,0.0008662583,0.0007844673,0.9411791,0.003508641,0.01279653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001917484,0.0005865085,0.4430758,0.003076941,0.000396741,0.003927249,0.09769373,0.0222134,0.004898455,0.203651,0.2199383,0.0003500443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7825624,0.002622888,0.004865082,0.01776012,0.000115878,0.0002233368,0.0001553022,0.00002799032,0.191667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932288,0.0003488308,0.0009029811,0.0005407143,0.00004996525,0.0000412595,0.00002730386,0.000004334472,0.004855821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07371302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387607509","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10051-w","title":"Correction: Religious and Cultural Expressions in Legal Discourse: Evidence from Interpreting Canadian Courts Hearings from Arabic into English","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arabic; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Eman W. Weld-Ali","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mohammed M. Obeidat","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ahmad S. Haider","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0193043582254333,"gpt":0.3482826755591805,"spread":0.3289783173337472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005076255,0.001884756,0.002539534,0.00418193,0.01623938,0.007347419,0.007623233,0.01727946,0.05939621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1403766,0.001329736,0.0009254894,0.007425898,0.008071247,0.003375085,0.004229565,0.01615436,0.02328133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01910787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6137957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6345025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909639,0.0008584394,0.001265317,0.001031943,0.00449127,0.001389092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828424,0.02028794,0.003338167,0.006175323,0.08423763,0.003118454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004620563,0.000005916007,0.0001638321,0.0001864592,0.00001173701,0.0003961896,0.001722348,0.00003532028,0.00007192347,0.001549535,0.9911678,0.004642701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008080496,0.00001948847,0.004485153,0.001008772,0.00007663464,0.0006325724,0.007272634,0.000425894,0.0006366479,0.001589888,0.9836314,0.0001402073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002360848,0.001017873,0.001111885,0.2391988,0.7338965,0.0001570717,0.004557271,0.000766272,0.01693339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1552721,0.00714465,0.006892858,0.1487271,0.1152327,0.001103992,0.003295946,0.003089902,0.5592408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3862043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7769575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904615132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264804","title":"Measuring Prescriptivity in Canadian Regulations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business","authors":[{"name":"Wolfgang Alschner","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Mark Keyes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0166863540775948,"gpt":0.2763803416534147,"spread":0.2596939875758199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02969724,0.0005354234,0.0008488132,0.01120108,0.01377035,0.009086652,0.00418549,0.002109495,0.002850697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1588391,0.0009222614,0.001260925,0.01453712,0.00659053,0.002652486,0.004317862,0.004283294,0.0003338687],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1608161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2222952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9449741,0.006874871,0.002926684,0.003859286,0.03649881,0.004866212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7853248,0.06393847,0.02967422,0.00710803,0.1061885,0.007766026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002136174,0.0002780577,0.8618742,0.0002218718,0.0001567185,0.0002209314,0.07021098,0.001640825,0.0009398004,0.0220185,0.006659606,0.03556489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742686,0.00007778369,0.9415411,0.000377553,0.000143445,0.0001065923,0.02531561,0.002353689,0.00136202,0.002320931,0.02619546,0.0001783261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508339,0.0006138385,0.001414712,0.001790425,0.00004431539,0.0002065886,0.001544337,0.00004276858,0.04350921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917571,0.0002848153,0.002339151,0.0003492799,0.00001393783,0.0001156158,0.001004374,0.00003158768,0.004104153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1608161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147357191","doi":"10.7202/042814ar","title":"Le sens ordinaire des mots comme règle d'interprétation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Meaning (existential); Legislator; Literal (mathematical logic); Mistake; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Statutory interpretation; Philosophy; Original meaning; Law; Epistemology; Legislation; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Lucie Lauzière","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01078234475187516,"gpt":0.2709654093437196,"spread":0.2601830645918444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007812588,0.001226903,0.0007615866,0.003009835,0.003986427,0.01418226,0.001862636,0.003536997,0.02113523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01633181,0.0006392048,0.001179972,0.002606049,0.01653394,0.009154121,0.003236848,0.006438926,0.007636321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005935496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005441489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01803733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01175833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875606,0.007047163,0.0005378526,0.001120394,0.00306049,0.0006734153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938792,0.003003326,0.0005811458,0.0009128182,0.001399699,0.0002237132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002211809,0.000005199689,0.0002529247,0.00006233047,0.000008621269,0.0001106263,0.005453889,0.0001327546,0.0003827278,0.9678777,0.01104882,0.01464226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000165978,0.00002358796,0.0007110491,0.0001860028,0.00001130044,0.0004045945,0.003739075,0.0006387525,0.001084192,0.141154,0.8519951,0.0000358596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009821462,0.007384095,0.1073683,0.03074894,0.005223311,0.0001688884,0.0008643502,0.001350365,0.8370702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5889063,0.007426181,0.07653147,0.006528433,0.005904657,0.0006698159,0.0009313255,0.001444844,0.311657],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02113523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0707044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Bilika H. Simamba","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03878955039522614,"gpt":0.2790808590525016,"spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08707437,0.001263694,0.001498043,0.01295809,0.01146391,0.01902401,0.004847873,0.004932309,0.2522977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3263761,0.002849074,0.001630222,0.00738215,0.005967551,0.0252784,0.01258138,0.006406586,0.09978124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01022003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03319328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01943419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02565359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9339767,0.02827941,0.005232109,0.008099506,0.01628806,0.008124174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5381969,0.2051268,0.02041235,0.09784213,0.1092064,0.02921555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002061857,0.0005928552,0.005669051,0.0005547879,0.00004328353,0.000409508,0.008872502,0.003105841,0.003482068,0.07077239,0.4686695,0.437622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531755,0.000197435,0.007904992,0.0007560485,0.0000565788,0.0002581662,0.00437961,0.005015813,0.002318356,0.0192979,0.9594139,0.0001479718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.047802,0.003393765,0.1196121,0.1356623,0.005205984,0.004124215,0.001799071,0.02924745,0.6531531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3874373,0.004353402,0.1728411,0.02123857,0.006236158,0.004334367,0.00491236,0.008269796,0.3903769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2522977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8440199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237208509","doi":"10.17118/11143/16164","title":"La jurilinguistique et l’égalité : les droits linguistiques en tant qu’accords incomplètement théorisés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Érik Labelle Eastaugh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01041891849776318,"gpt":0.2953072630133129,"spread":0.2848883445155498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003359983,0.0005281856,0.0005614461,0.001453449,0.004891555,0.01032337,0.001450793,0.00317111,0.007763444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005434956,0.0004433065,0.0005239781,0.001632823,0.02495223,0.01340681,0.004022054,0.006450296,0.001166992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007490716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003109552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02710172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02219762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960427,0.002172309,0.0001272209,0.0006869718,0.0006234784,0.0003473004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978527,0.001037158,0.0002450433,0.0004526778,0.0003022388,0.0001101747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006232523,0.000001551886,0.00007903546,0.0000105539,0.000001304157,0.00001531752,0.005104242,0.00004958853,0.00003824224,0.992233,0.0008116364,0.001649285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184572,0.0000135175,0.0009242219,0.0002158456,0.00001579999,0.0001327589,0.009171163,0.0009361331,0.0003468112,0.7022788,0.2859229,0.00003019921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04217228,0.008278961,0.05756082,0.04339262,0.0008601475,0.00002815711,0.0001419045,0.0001779998,0.847387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036584,0.002502042,0.006806862,0.00352566,0.0005084345,0.00008228224,0.00008352318,0.0002738606,0.08255889],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02710172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05434918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340449071","doi":"10.7202/1035644ar","title":"L’interprétation judiciaire des droits linguistiques au Canada et l’affaire Beaulac","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"André Braën","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008138708167493285,"gpt":0.2654651616229168,"spread":0.2573264534554235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002543282,0.000672259,0.0005126899,0.00196836,0.01400828,0.01050508,0.001749019,0.002797638,0.006774835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005086317,0.0003575824,0.0005011107,0.002848027,0.02407788,0.00314284,0.002713082,0.006406154,0.0007765176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0605134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07345387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9286203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939556,0.001584097,0.0001580922,0.0007457954,0.002351946,0.001204525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962709,0.0008039228,0.0002071588,0.0003285344,0.002066666,0.0003228874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000258485,0.000006573486,0.001994066,0.00005574253,0.0000173437,0.0001332691,0.02679683,0.0001916821,0.0004700494,0.9469646,0.01241538,0.01092861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002404316,0.00002510958,0.01657567,0.0004864191,0.00008128418,0.0003047225,0.03979218,0.001102424,0.001849379,0.1328348,0.8067625,0.0001614166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08017239,0.007606243,0.01978946,0.05276993,0.001138647,0.00005711849,0.0005613477,0.0001936018,0.8377113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8915898,0.002294988,0.003995261,0.005565614,0.0001773073,0.00003332803,0.0001761296,0.0001660437,0.09600161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07137966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4390575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053280603","doi":"10.7202/042323ar","title":"Loi et héritage culturel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Punctuation; Population; Law; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Legal writing; Political science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Legal research","authors":[{"name":"Michel Sparer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wallace Schwab","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005931192176188512,"gpt":0.2742402702540822,"spread":0.2683090780778937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009821194,0.0005778251,0.0003191421,0.001209621,0.007106286,0.008572499,0.0007267981,0.001789676,0.06657793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001562651,0.0001762151,0.0002035026,0.001389795,0.00775465,0.003383166,0.003840467,0.002705042,0.01097479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006775634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03710753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06182722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.0003735877,0.00002982119,0.0001392268,0.0002348763,0.0002104163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995695,0.00008762961,0.00004778245,0.00008941609,0.00008963055,0.0001161149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005132085,0.00005372822,0.002009284,0.0001267817,0.00001041555,0.0006273078,0.03069606,0.00008660117,0.0004934741,0.7557294,0.1094341,0.1006815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003805657,0.000008572043,0.001041494,0.00010921,0.000002065037,0.0002057076,0.006973702,0.00003298779,0.0001734722,0.009580966,0.981859,0.000008993856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01419704,0.005450136,0.0007254031,0.01514845,0.001054502,0.00002189546,0.0002481742,0.00008185517,0.9630725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2604074,0.005010738,0.001273647,0.003775986,0.0004620328,0.0000506071,0.0002909869,0.0001433393,0.7285852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06657793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2227254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120066650","doi":"10.32091/riid0024","title":"Application of information communication technology (ICT) to legislative drafting: case studies of legislative drafting assistant softwares in Nigeria and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering; Political science; Public administration; Law","authors":[{"name":"Tonye Clinton Jaja","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chantal Lamarre","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1366142706643352,"gpt":0.5273066232018672,"spread":0.390692352537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006120489,0.0004335199,0.0005052179,0.003646614,0.03610672,0.005668432,0.002091793,0.003061162,0.002664117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02546343,0.0006788025,0.0004388882,0.00793567,0.008888381,0.001737225,0.003008373,0.002842065,0.0004337107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06217815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07947072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894069,0.003998472,0.0004272737,0.0005315238,0.003410868,0.002224891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806456,0.01044254,0.001489414,0.0007202584,0.004724284,0.001977982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002202586,0.0005816238,0.0629373,0.0006519272,0.00004966489,0.02809865,0.7520598,0.002363993,0.002516419,0.04210589,0.01174909,0.09666545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006467816,0.0002046318,0.0595708,0.0006911153,0.00008803892,0.004092283,0.7144762,0.001877239,0.003408223,0.001404894,0.213975,0.0001469156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9258791,0.001322928,0.001611748,0.005138322,0.00006355072,0.0003143882,0.0001396576,0.00004554548,0.06548478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678296,0.002953076,0.004660653,0.0007763756,0.00001591526,0.00008584982,0.0001223043,0.00006487222,0.0234913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06217815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4511362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673226964","doi":"","title":"La mise à jour des droits linguistiques canadiens / Michel Bastarache et Michel Doucet (dir.), Les droits linguistiques au Canada (3e éd.), Édtions Yvon Blais, 2013, 1296 pages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Guillaume Rousseau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006353465623330921,"gpt":0.2144174990847365,"spread":0.2080640334614056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244065,0.0008896637,0.000677911,0.002267586,0.007175387,0.006642859,0.001223127,0.003321307,0.01228344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005982499,0.0005513532,0.0003441023,0.002989263,0.005125579,0.003095037,0.001943322,0.004206103,0.003008526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02323259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02753508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8903232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9218485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977549,0.0004131687,0.00009596813,0.0002548682,0.001178972,0.0003021786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974233,0.0005844814,0.0001993406,0.00005723738,0.001373727,0.0003618787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006729591,0.00001520895,0.00169644,0.0003262964,0.0000298875,0.0003424441,0.007198195,0.0001505114,0.0004458588,0.01867589,0.8489155,0.1221365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005239853,0.000006335266,0.005654753,0.0004684076,0.00001482874,0.000409991,0.006055837,0.0001066722,0.0003665341,0.001508766,0.9853567,0.00004601725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006057316,0.6756302,0.001173328,0.2708449,0.02072706,0.00001921121,0.0007558998,0.0001675867,0.02462442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1374441,0.5974317,0.003810159,0.02359844,0.0140762,0.00004827691,0.001024984,0.0004827509,0.2220834],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1096768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2206454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165623109","doi":"","title":"Bijuridism and Bilingualism in Canada: Ideals under Tension","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de linguistique appliquée","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Compromise; Political science; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Mathieu Devinat","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01854221084725983,"gpt":0.2675687920833613,"spread":0.2490265812361014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004101158,0.0003756529,0.0005418331,0.00289034,0.03946744,0.01180126,0.001632253,0.003604173,0.003604721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007308656,0.00032325,0.0003637424,0.004645797,0.03874884,0.002568876,0.006191819,0.005468048,0.0001643521],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1803074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2686453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941115,0.001127183,0.0001574666,0.0004764367,0.001928335,0.002199082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951172,0.001437631,0.0003681166,0.0001221154,0.00175525,0.001199815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000499485,0.0000281112,0.004797025,0.0001591915,0.00001595126,0.001013332,0.1801414,0.0001865797,0.0005436254,0.7809301,0.01110799,0.02102678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006716154,0.00004215426,0.02338315,0.001191557,0.00008769715,0.000898342,0.3405643,0.0009194185,0.001040003,0.1185135,0.5130397,0.0002530305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3544701,0.02639364,0.002248341,0.1759104,0.0006389543,0.00008127522,0.0003033561,0.00007746584,0.4398765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741122,0.00512815,0.001119249,0.006001318,0.00007499824,0.00001948514,0.00004016006,0.00002888728,0.01347563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800586352","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2018.1465250","title":"Professional legislative drafters: status, roles, education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Theory and Practice of Legislation","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; Professional development; Professional association; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Pedagogy","authors":[{"name":"Ronan Cormacain","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01292731522742003,"gpt":0.3650538824196346,"spread":0.3521265671922146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01929891,0.0002826516,0.0004095239,0.00176719,0.01144167,0.01826896,0.001149743,0.00392046,0.01048678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07354375,0.0004787477,0.0002117886,0.00256502,0.02369166,0.009466105,0.003652068,0.005741233,0.002022255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007193168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01629808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01448681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02119621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783853,0.01212307,0.0007057154,0.000800642,0.00542509,0.002560196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554315,0.03092591,0.003245512,0.001331018,0.005489454,0.003576664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002105038,0.0000614669,0.002181443,0.0001231445,0.00000262613,0.0001832378,0.2024395,0.00007519534,0.0001471363,0.6212015,0.1054516,0.06811212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001033598,0.00003228581,0.003547522,0.0006257824,0.000003280136,0.0001275557,0.06443553,0.0001261499,0.000136015,0.03108595,0.899845,0.00002461327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05099849,0.02466166,0.005362289,0.2199766,0.003848577,0.00009226045,0.00009944389,0.0001693297,0.6947914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6846008,0.01270948,0.002384834,0.01121234,0.001697014,0.0001583098,0.0001172355,0.0001645479,0.2869553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01929891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1020636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504073153","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.004","title":"Legal theory: epistemology, language and legal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Fiqh; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Islam; Computer science; Sharia; Algorithm; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Wael B. Hallaq","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01195684164787445,"gpt":0.233838866576516,"spread":0.2218820249286416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002193495,0.0004763229,0.0005313369,0.002004283,0.002834882,0.00789198,0.001084002,0.002400039,0.008675263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916901,0.0002952469,0.0003825952,0.002565431,0.02160322,0.008561726,0.001935032,0.005093897,0.001520129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004453518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003442434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003371192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998184,0.001133121,0.00005904812,0.0001264473,0.000379269,0.000118133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983011,0.001358644,0.00007238454,0.00008345795,0.0001295715,0.00005492433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001082425,0.000003583463,0.00002013171,0.00003458603,9.750402e-7,0.00001772528,0.001119305,0.00007369563,0.00001876091,0.9894803,0.004682008,0.00454803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002737528,0.000003890582,0.00007954818,0.0001754163,0.000001547593,0.00005275377,0.001241687,0.0002922883,0.00005348655,0.8577676,0.1403245,0.000004506058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005868921,0.06843241,0.03883693,0.04524038,0.001706184,0.00005231434,0.000115252,0.0000849326,0.8396627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6056811,0.08121964,0.04698179,0.01416408,0.004663083,0.0005124771,0.000503041,0.0002649778,0.2460098],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008675263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03231275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123822955","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Myles Mcgregor-Lowndes and Bob Wyatt (Eds.), Regulating Charities: The Inside Story, New York: Routledge (2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Legislator; Law; Storytelling; Sociology; Legislation; Narrative; Art","authors":[{"name":"John E. Tyler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01861569356652336,"gpt":0.3002693047657635,"spread":0.2816536111992401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230027,0.001434802,0.002079268,0.003712554,0.001108316,0.005718189,0.001807482,0.002672353,0.04315685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006574407,0.0009352463,0.0008541942,0.007745852,0.001181053,0.005287573,0.001439922,0.005519823,0.03528629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002552473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006688775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01067842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02231159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988948,0.000171126,0.00008482757,0.000130646,0.000649708,0.00006900564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960468,0.002011469,0.0002975002,0.00008644928,0.001308269,0.0002494068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008088424,0.000008933699,0.00003203381,0.001365065,0.000007738045,0.00002430857,0.00008775887,0.000040173,0.00003058519,0.00106718,0.9526319,0.0446962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005218877,0.000007581548,0.0001545165,0.002245924,0.000008432514,0.0001423006,0.00008397232,0.00001446842,0.00001787228,0.000653207,0.9966581,0.000008358837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001132276,0.9448674,0.0003467386,0.02123446,0.01411278,0.00004025943,0.0003190408,0.00006709773,0.01889909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008368042,0.9265314,0.0005565214,0.0115499,0.006794061,0.00008852691,0.0004818499,0.00007797846,0.05308286],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04315685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1443741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}