{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":780,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":780,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2ee5566a521c","filters":{"topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes"}},"results":[{"id":"W1868157597","doi":"","title":"A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream","year":2004,"lang":"ceb","type":"book","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Aside; Biography; Law; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; History; Political science; Art; Literature; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02176347433607962,"gpt":0.28486191129631,"spread":0.2630984369602304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01022294,0.0009194955,0.002614783,0.0006174562,0.002011422,0.001277065,0.003155697,0.0006085548,0.0002928776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007647038,0.0005993874,0.0005009728,0.0008711366,0.05703564,0.001825162,0.001643167,0.001137678,0.0000272403],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02560376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04210223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003983859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907005,0.0003270294,0.003063884,0.001753147,0.0007486739,0.003406734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872799,0.00301147,0.001746274,0.001145476,0.001012083,0.005804803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002218665,0.0001756456,0.002103263,0.000205149,0.00008863373,0.000001144749,0.0007616037,0.00006636063,0.00003741698,0.9958308,0.00008761176,0.0004204895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005199356,0.001426553,0.01475939,0.001017122,0.0006706871,0.00007625268,0.01147998,0.003841036,0.0009568835,0.9050044,0.05367521,0.001893131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.877502,0.002669187,0.000009074816,0.03346872,0.0008380699,0.001611848,0.001218603,0.00001888868,0.08266363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842327,0.008864773,0.0001782055,0.003180372,0.001245159,0.00001644329,0.00001193304,0.0000488148,0.002221588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1067307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183155047","doi":"","title":"Legal aspects of carbon trading : Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Carbon offset; Carbon market; Carbon fibers; International trade; Greenhouse gas; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03198017485561127,"gpt":0.3339041531463252,"spread":0.3019239782907139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003682816,0.0002063057,0.0006155653,0.0003129625,0.0002803481,0.0002428505,0.0005429141,0.0004534592,0.00009594717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007262323,0.000229028,0.00009391329,0.0001985984,0.0005853463,0.0001577438,0.000325941,0.001031472,0.000002198122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005829611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001693297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01293576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972405,0.0004359343,0.0006121618,0.0006345811,0.0004153756,0.0006614071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986623,0.0003787365,0.0002424857,0.0003495779,0.0001387403,0.0002281757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002669457,0.0005233772,0.009124114,0.001589368,0.000301615,0.0002478395,0.03062877,0.0007716781,0.001006279,0.1536034,0.000670445,0.8012662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003499503,0.001552841,0.03450446,0.004273774,0.0001485141,0.0000353986,0.04103742,0.005506292,0.006440219,0.1774357,0.7209221,0.004643806],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3643492,0.0007851465,2.568283e-7,0.0003253498,0.0002186696,0.0005007233,0.000009464882,0.00001809047,0.6337931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928789,0.005013951,0.00008407265,0.00003921523,0.0004990801,0.00003954662,0.000004746008,0.00002545103,0.001415008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.25700860748035,"gpt":0.3939149846991725,"spread":0.1369063772188225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542265,0.0001423962,0.0004301477,0.0001528632,0.0003758909,0.0001210006,0.0005201025,0.00006276739,0.0006370611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001353351,0.0001230519,0.0001634475,0.0001948838,0.0005934883,0.001056131,0.00004986016,0.0003096375,0.00006700416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003266842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003624707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981098,0.0002661495,0.0005767279,0.0001663172,0.0006697603,0.0002112884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.000240178,0.0007434255,0.00008099315,0.002044062,0.0001604109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159575,0.0001129556,0.0005525336,0.000002106219,0.0002331119,0.00002284219,0.1153116,0.00001019461,0.0001428561,0.881342,0.002080568,0.00002961073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007560106,0.0003076408,0.001952032,0.0002229368,0.00005144505,0.0000601739,0.1028922,0.00002353521,0.005838765,0.09310542,0.7944976,0.0002921686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08743487,0.0007261143,0.0004400399,0.001159226,0.001183446,0.0001341276,0.00001022274,0.00001994792,0.908892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971203,0.00006346333,0.0008681355,0.0002221189,0.000969458,0.000005122346,9.642333e-7,0.000006633129,0.000743796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6975372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889948538","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage in Canada: The impact of legal marriage on the first cohort of gay and lesbian Canadians to wed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Same sex; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Psychology; Cohort; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01045308544132911,"gpt":0.2243626244319366,"spread":0.2139095389906074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008026353,0.0001019511,0.0002651424,0.00008040555,0.0003650052,0.00001684652,0.0005231084,0.00007672864,0.0008467919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001758157,0.00007898668,0.00007358828,0.0003129906,0.0004168393,0.0001004118,0.00009516759,0.000236024,0.000005434511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002429829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001555883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989696,0.00009018328,0.0001548423,0.0001887395,0.0003424681,0.0002541866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991278,0.0001937047,0.0001711292,0.0002630483,0.00008659068,0.0001577171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007248787,0.00004536661,0.9272313,0.00003505247,0.00008277076,0.00001891934,0.05896994,0.0000702485,0.0004063991,0.009566531,0.002412984,0.001087997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002485819,0.000046777,0.9242774,0.0000657932,0.00001484589,7.55286e-7,0.06262916,0.00002428427,0.0001466431,0.0002371805,0.01217296,0.000135571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651151,0.000007306454,0.000005461923,0.003090307,0.0001113544,0.0004331814,0.00009193132,0.000004666301,0.03114063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990216,0.000009505849,0.00001045969,0.00006784212,0.00003777413,7.402185e-7,9.627827e-7,0.000005635841,0.0008454533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03390647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9271778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W399115648","doi":"","title":"Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01895436692005132,"gpt":0.3052649355733305,"spread":0.2863105686532791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007180835,0.0001599887,0.0004004557,0.0001257237,0.0001670808,0.00006648996,0.0003224056,0.000435684,0.001082309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005677116,0.0001375504,0.0001364048,0.0001523247,0.0002928687,0.0001721798,0.00002407818,0.000201699,0.0001720534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001662329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001391668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02433789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01058602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983451,0.00004890184,0.0003846378,0.0002197552,0.000691084,0.0003104897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989862,0.0001081905,0.0002968926,0.0001559588,0.0003205922,0.0001321606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044664,0.00002608647,0.00003527058,0.0001768005,0.00004175198,0.00001895202,0.004756331,8.13308e-8,0.000003465524,0.7526901,0.2390251,0.003215672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008025246,0.00003538138,0.000004041583,0.0001662684,0.00002706374,7.205844e-7,0.0007670686,1.593824e-7,0.000009874309,0.01547926,0.9832577,0.00017221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003746133,0.001694008,0.0001090206,0.0002188194,0.0008257338,0.0002454458,0.00001007724,0.00007619367,0.9967833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01699208,0.0005815669,0.00006106816,0.0001911873,0.001727738,0.000003648258,0.00001070238,0.00002013516,0.9804119],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992990269","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.231","title":"The Youth Criminal Justice Act: New Directions and Implementation Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Proportionality (law); Presumption; Seriousness; Political science; Criminal justice; Accountability; Sentencing guidelines; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Restorative justice; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09592288235905266,"gpt":0.355147543092551,"spread":0.2592246607334984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00231299,0.0003698993,0.0005172525,0.0004420635,0.002984201,0.0004987147,0.0006675471,0.0004648873,0.00006096896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005088696,0.0003419362,0.0001258697,0.0002062785,0.001508019,0.0006233692,0.0000577567,0.00102691,0.0000065242],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001104451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3253205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6630904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963134,0.000567494,0.000757187,0.0004267173,0.0001977815,0.001737427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953513,0.001116791,0.0005465826,0.0002562821,0.0006397214,0.002089339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049043,0.00004782055,0.0007919061,0.00154483,0.0001770125,0.001354554,0.4081262,0.000174472,0.0001569966,0.5319504,0.002638048,0.05283288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009875258,0.0006145404,0.01209905,0.0002716749,0.01525297,0.002518421,0.888036,0.000008146771,0.0001318089,0.01230091,0.06727918,0.0004997339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616042,0.01048989,0.000995919,0.01740986,0.001901561,0.0003005725,0.00003630011,0.00004481664,0.007216851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865189,0.007827725,0.001216078,0.001575833,0.002291601,0.00001300498,0.000006735271,0.00003668846,0.000513481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02813690632838961,"gpt":0.3426470481351979,"spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072253,0.0001137436,0.0002346876,0.00002606031,0.0007833231,0.0001166235,0.0001689279,0.0001022354,0.0002485669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002004563,0.00007629122,0.00003886193,0.0002776204,0.09687977,0.00008654746,0.00008592375,0.0002919734,0.0000254311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005752448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009427048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981169,0.0007991098,0.000201569,0.000211439,0.0003521282,0.0003189306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964148,0.003241017,0.0000597511,0.0001165812,0.00008200672,0.00008579043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003235993,0.00003178675,0.000635261,0.00001091214,0.000009737651,0.00001061504,0.02943283,0.000007131487,9.329245e-7,0.9687384,0.0002410164,0.0005578189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636399,0.00006474703,0.0001305314,0.00008767892,0.00004971709,0.000009158202,0.02378194,0.0002385861,0.00001179309,0.9617819,0.0129208,0.0001595729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1516086,0.0004187915,0.002539537,0.02098496,0.001052167,0.0004180246,0.000004194536,0.00007202769,0.8229017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997584,0.000080899,0.0000137686,0.001518957,0.0004257379,0.00001463721,4.436119e-7,0.000008568855,0.0003529977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.905578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038600807","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007317299053915045,"gpt":0.193302972243602,"spread":0.1859856731896869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007265629,0.0000838522,0.0001299827,0.00006000893,0.001222755,0.0001682595,0.0002031376,0.0001093096,0.000008306671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001541015,0.000106698,0.00005673495,0.0001175183,0.0007279121,0.001170985,0.00006055139,0.0001067508,0.00001301471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004036111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002855533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7964298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5309868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991961,0.00002370711,0.00008510234,0.0001878211,0.0002626447,0.0002446454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.00002121226,0.00008277747,0.00009703825,0.00002603083,0.0002666501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002720086,0.00005239411,0.005444002,0.00003133609,0.00005730472,0.000270599,0.03403928,0.00001704493,0.0006634402,0.9580454,0.0001619372,0.001190119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002193767,0.0003887097,0.03345326,0.0003927518,0.0001004629,0.000123482,0.0767716,0.00001264962,0.0009954101,0.09203923,0.7921739,0.001354774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383152,0.0001493975,0.000005265102,0.0006990325,0.0001202447,0.00008918903,0.00002951429,0.00002993963,0.4605622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976375,0.00001858776,0.00004649512,0.0001883069,0.0001774804,7.070239e-8,0.000005936836,0.000006365143,0.001919219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9404568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03309826142050176,"gpt":0.3159430235126354,"spread":0.2828447620921337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474055,0.0001886312,0.0004120966,0.0001610776,0.001772054,0.0001008263,0.0003737702,0.0001534062,0.0001054235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001556422,0.0001521782,0.0001196611,0.0006257662,0.008913334,0.0006322287,0.0001234611,0.0002723474,0.00002442024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001916733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002689807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004367332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00625573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973848,0.0003717128,0.0007967973,0.0002934748,0.0006623683,0.0004907817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.0005620237,0.0003161957,0.0002298522,0.0009747045,0.0001207399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004048413,0.00008163574,0.02215163,0.00005406523,0.00003223014,0.000001632717,0.002198815,0.00302253,0.0002373732,0.971685,0.0002531412,0.0002414583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782323,0.0005547586,0.01866266,0.002914364,0.0001647264,0.0001552752,0.1006757,0.009671791,0.01743502,0.1248901,0.7137905,0.002302847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4015867,0.001512927,0.15216,0.02797694,0.002711106,0.003514117,0.0003715137,0.0001842896,0.4099824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989593,0.0000368414,0.0003098247,0.0003140638,0.0001287298,0.00005874303,0.00002004553,0.000005247128,0.0001672106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601954506","doi":"","title":"Penal Policy and Penal Legislation in Recent American Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Imprisonment; Legislature; Nothing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Period (music); Criminology; History; Sociology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02438443165885253,"gpt":0.3599767195777031,"spread":0.3355922879188505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002353827,0.00004791154,0.00008672097,0.00006324283,0.000177708,0.00007829958,0.00007519397,0.00002368144,0.0001832893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002043935,0.00004177093,0.000009716093,0.0004321248,0.0002216829,0.0003777752,0.00001854265,0.00004842368,0.0000171325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001042847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001879957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1938333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09168822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992805,0.00005478181,0.0001293829,0.0001303676,0.0002074732,0.000197483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997537,0.00003561447,0.00004890391,0.00004158716,0.00004060067,0.00007965395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000304065,0.00009184754,0.0635216,0.000006461888,0.000004234355,0.000003378375,0.1414838,0.00005047169,0.000386663,0.2216965,0.001004912,0.5717197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001974985,0.00003956007,0.02353321,0.00001419776,0.000001264592,0.000001299494,0.01721226,0.0001557315,0.0001396961,0.000950712,0.9575965,0.0001580558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954572,0.0001302847,0.0001043914,0.01194488,0.00004714324,0.0001183018,4.473423e-7,0.00003377721,0.3921636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968691,0.000314814,0.0001881791,0.0004742444,0.000722389,0.000008023619,3.421072e-7,0.000002780794,0.001420055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9248861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164985285","doi":"","title":"Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitutional Social and Economic Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mandate; Political science; Accountability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law; Business; Human rights; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04225991800826309,"gpt":0.2814863230624453,"spread":0.2392264050541822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036374,0.00007715807,0.0001424451,0.00001869139,0.001960161,0.00004375143,0.0001797526,0.00005029828,0.00003879913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005032571,0.00005609869,0.00007723598,0.00005208041,0.0005970207,0.0002233815,0.00001577806,0.0002937864,0.0000029073],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005317427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006200582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01552843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01099767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986928,0.00003478632,0.0002181703,0.0001082037,0.0002141951,0.0007318761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.0001003265,0.0002390361,0.00003585686,0.00003942408,0.00005445464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002578903,0.000008453564,0.0004545581,0.00000346149,0.00006642759,2.528027e-7,0.002608542,0.00005094499,0.000003674211,0.9935117,0.0004290054,0.00283718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006299,0.0001366904,0.0004061229,0.00002197636,0.00005194652,0.0001226586,0.006092752,0.0001583307,0.00008417611,0.7486042,0.2431271,0.0001877513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6450678,0.04171731,0.07135475,0.03093337,0.002405825,0.002272216,0.0000399699,0.00009649178,0.2061123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950235,0.001882243,0.00002620463,0.00004165441,0.001418527,0.000005720607,6.078884e-7,0.000003901531,0.001597608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3499557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542606338","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706","title":"Reconceiving the Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566545609024438,"gpt":0.2257886288656807,"spread":0.2001231727754363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004176452,0.0002259222,0.0003131241,0.00006924292,0.001406597,0.0001793905,0.0009105796,0.0003993457,0.000002857751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004044807,0.0002076886,0.0001897302,0.0000298117,0.0007053796,0.0001427621,0.0001796257,0.0004707217,0.00002326569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005179137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05193851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007487386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998378,0.0002230565,0.0001787441,0.0003581755,0.0004696051,0.0003924597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988724,0.0002067287,0.000270668,0.0003217337,0.0002116722,0.0001168043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005518693,0.00000279477,0.000002466785,0.00002704053,0.00002427467,0.00003309353,0.0003754672,6.929167e-7,0.000002089283,0.425303,0.5736141,0.0006094729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236282,0.00001103029,0.00002669019,0.0001485187,0.00008470579,8.310932e-7,0.000557594,0.000002066239,0.000004965921,0.00003119516,0.9987413,0.0002674207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006823115,0.0005645861,0.0000696983,0.00008469576,0.0006592466,0.0004708006,0.00007602104,0.0001677867,0.9978389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00250998,0.00008544703,0.00000686219,0.0001357394,0.001498376,0.00000118107,0.00001500809,0.00002604724,0.9957213],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4252718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169239051","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners: What the United States Can Learn from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Rochester; Emory University","keywords":"Kingdom; Transgender; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03753234677563057,"gpt":0.2903665470817529,"spread":0.2528342003061224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002916592,0.0001232821,0.0004337823,0.00004285792,0.0006289525,0.0001646594,0.0002511555,0.00005006519,0.0001044278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006503256,0.0000587927,0.0001280024,0.002041105,0.0007166563,0.0001110572,0.00002249529,0.0001120756,3.415103e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001253251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006676399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979735,0.0009016857,0.0002906102,0.0001834717,0.0004587665,0.0001919913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984148,0.0007330767,0.0002140304,0.0002674287,0.0002894017,0.00008130637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004603172,0.0005674903,0.09002198,0.000073117,0.01305052,0.00002029649,0.7169734,0.01728318,0.0005003999,0.158694,0.001393584,0.0009617014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002914573,0.0001171457,0.03211017,0.0001948387,0.003296702,5.827072e-7,0.4548335,0.001542374,0.005257001,0.003023496,0.4963093,0.0004003515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906069,0.002052483,0.00001103322,0.006036348,0.0001333315,0.000285461,0.0001122769,0.000008038889,0.0007541027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998181,0.0007813083,0.000006843954,0.0005955008,0.00006155504,0.00001597556,0.00005551774,0.000004926837,0.0002973382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4949157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4837458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010941785","doi":"10.1215/03616878-25-1-133","title":"Riding the Bull: Experience with Individual Market Reform in Washington, Kentucky, and Massachusetts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Download; Citation; Section (typography); Politics; Library science; Political science; Law; Advertising; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02959835943018209,"gpt":0.345061260811961,"spread":0.3154629013817789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002272478,0.00008900694,0.0002376281,0.00007998342,0.0008758429,0.0001660183,0.0001726427,0.00006194981,0.00002440424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001216182,0.00005419172,0.0000200553,0.0002105593,0.0004656182,0.0003633309,0.00002115084,0.0002677812,4.973882e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002261802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006808655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1414619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007824295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983015,0.0002793858,0.000463127,0.00009524504,0.0003935396,0.0004672099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919,0.0001655932,0.0002671557,0.00006989769,0.00006112057,0.000246184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006258071,0.00005606037,0.01069648,0.0001403273,0.00002357842,0.00002273403,0.1494635,0.000002999689,9.07216e-7,0.8315756,0.001317117,0.00663813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008732689,0.00045966,0.0259902,0.0005790133,0.00001450618,0.0001923916,0.03563252,0.000008134108,0.00001087023,0.02303478,0.9130034,0.0002012279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8356325,0.002003911,0.000002751563,0.06249188,0.00008365582,0.0001702601,0.000009354722,0.000008656571,0.09959704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916058,0.001606812,0.00004280994,0.005538455,0.0007275149,0.000002095333,1.808038e-7,0.000007013085,0.0004693051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9116863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918249602","doi":"10.70658/4486-1457.1451","title":"Social Enterprise Law in Action: Organizational Characteristics of U.S. Benefit Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Denver","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Legislation; Statute; Limited liability; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02400868845019108,"gpt":0.2948512677926852,"spread":0.2708425793424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003046461,0.00008983385,0.0001951541,0.00004143962,0.0007282327,0.0001039199,0.0001909899,0.0001301426,0.0009709303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000144394,0.00009694405,0.00003926042,0.0004843796,0.0004866275,0.0004299451,0.00003791221,0.0001210355,0.0001664803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002490612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02313154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.0000706977,0.0003449783,0.0001751041,0.0003633547,0.0002071421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991013,0.00004306426,0.0002120353,0.0000944956,0.0004540532,0.00009504527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001766857,0.00007854911,0.01858514,0.00001744263,0.000009793202,0.00000161229,0.002695178,4.430197e-7,0.0003778177,0.9772767,0.000710198,0.0002293981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001139096,0.0001970265,0.1154117,0.0001858247,0.00005064732,0.000002888493,0.002961825,0.00002211764,0.002463664,0.1054752,0.77142,0.0006699457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7836701,0.00007465654,0.0002574218,0.002782136,0.001334142,0.0004103102,0.00009082387,0.0001206235,0.2112598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995945,0.00001535486,0.00008073161,0.000422626,0.002272654,0.000009815097,0.00002460036,0.00001240003,0.001216848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766300202","doi":"","title":"Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01826609359649322,"gpt":0.2910363754042616,"spread":0.2727702818077684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004349394,0.0001177313,0.000219479,0.0004124725,0.005372407,0.0002090337,0.0008447528,0.000172119,0.0009784512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002273773,0.000119076,0.00006673004,0.0002010693,0.0003399313,0.0004553242,0.00001695567,0.000131232,0.0001207148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003944494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002920343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985624,0.00005889421,0.0002247697,0.0002060638,0.0002905328,0.0006573398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978198,0.00002604126,0.000165945,0.0004236397,0.0001470387,0.001417578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002625475,0.00001584156,0.06975306,0.00003048547,0.00004098116,0.0001448189,0.009388356,9.70675e-7,0.00001060518,0.8073262,0.1085773,0.004708775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008935959,0.00001445528,0.02127578,0.00002811002,0.000009107329,4.361538e-7,0.0001542304,2.383798e-7,0.0000167566,0.005222539,0.973029,0.0001600304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06789552,0.00008707481,2.84683e-7,0.004043915,0.0007829748,0.000199595,0.00004502041,0.00001726207,0.9269283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755649,0.00005242978,0.00002632522,0.0001242252,0.001025039,0.00000866818,0.000005412883,0.00001205831,0.02318096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203477145","doi":"","title":"Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach to Judicial Construction of Insurance Policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Insurance policy; Legislative history; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672713502278176,"gpt":0.3001193273696865,"spread":0.2833921923469047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202367,0.0001165593,0.0002698044,0.0001142714,0.0007214842,0.0001216684,0.0002376081,0.00009934468,0.00001188917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007298731,0.0001047659,0.00008435566,0.0009636672,0.0001903125,0.0004501067,0.00002622255,0.0009748678,0.000003030899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005959451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004741436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01129035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05098878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974078,0.0004076666,0.0003497746,0.0002030051,0.000428231,0.001203552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989848,0.00006218458,0.0002571644,0.00009489532,0.000467964,0.0001330036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006949958,0.0001139993,0.01047414,0.00001239698,0.00008542293,0.000001676645,0.03687376,0.00003628859,0.000962922,0.8855621,0.00002703027,0.06578076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004591175,0.0003330989,0.003224992,0.0002071576,0.00003572096,0.0002107394,0.4907171,0.000007553016,0.001954292,0.4972957,0.005184419,0.0003700337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461183,0.00170393,0.00604981,0.0009063149,0.0005291591,0.0001547207,0.000003418671,0.00003839322,0.04449596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967181,0.0007073678,0.0006415505,0.00007906364,0.00133694,0.00000469146,0.000001428092,0.00001177169,0.0004991026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4538434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584632781","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Relationships: From 'Odious Crime' to 'Gay Marriage'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Eleventh; General partnership; Political science; Lesbian; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05180808479814483,"gpt":0.3090935161142002,"spread":0.2572854313160554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007538036,0.0002982141,0.0005278394,0.0001507463,0.0009861023,0.0003597586,0.0005361638,0.000772071,0.002244188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005261379,0.0002834113,0.0001632338,0.0002141587,0.0001675736,0.0002048502,0.00008670059,0.0005258075,0.00295585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005046746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1977966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08920963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973789,0.0002327327,0.0005159531,0.0005643954,0.0008587954,0.0004492188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984005,0.000532949,0.0002186306,0.0003462111,0.0002081659,0.00029352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004439356,0.00001609867,0.0002052144,0.00001805898,0.00002968977,0.00001146452,0.003572564,0.000003943157,0.000001949556,0.08634137,0.9086329,0.001162342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008633883,0.00001962277,0.0002815999,0.0001272834,0.00004588452,1.90026e-7,0.0005934602,6.466935e-7,0.000004439344,0.08260244,0.9158586,0.0003794989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004554968,0.0008130471,0.0004497818,0.001251554,0.001084323,0.0006648334,0.0001145152,0.0003163928,0.99526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00981868,0.00002955508,0.0004176834,0.0008357408,0.006036573,0.00003290865,0.0001334477,0.00005348033,0.9826419],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.108587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101647335","doi":"","title":"The Treatment of Transgender Prisoners, Not Just an American Problem--A Comparative Analysis of American, Australian, and Canadian Prison Policies Concerning the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners and a \"Universal\" Recommendation To Improve Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & sexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Prison; Criminology; Transgender Person; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07941484820139695,"gpt":0.3684944539112884,"spread":0.2890796057098915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003156831,0.000250813,0.00079936,0.00008600287,0.0006313967,0.00006689563,0.000127714,0.0000558515,0.0000101105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004380884,0.0001552537,0.0001232697,0.00082591,0.001480912,0.0001417944,0.0000048066,0.00003985776,1.880911e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006325912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002894937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9579745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979153,0.0005162341,0.0005389836,0.0003722926,0.0002647621,0.0003924596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986472,0.0002356628,0.0005090434,0.0002338099,0.0001556981,0.0002185447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005578854,0.001792453,0.0664037,0.0000556376,0.003367929,0.000001638996,0.8100851,0.0006708749,0.002954088,0.02184417,0.0000681966,0.09219836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002302593,0.01190107,0.1351569,0.00002317949,0.0033203,6.463096e-7,0.5265522,0.0002751994,0.01114773,0.0001446939,0.3085223,0.0006532503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923118,0.0002147846,0.00007002486,0.003981641,0.00003710238,0.001216086,0.0004250199,0.00001677668,0.001726735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986552,0.00057435,0.0001625892,0.00004405713,0.00005848337,0.00007114906,0.00004539069,0.000009287607,0.0003794892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3084541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6331062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04371893510183338,"gpt":0.26364144151413,"spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010756,0.0003626745,0.0004083019,0.00007617256,0.00922015,0.0001629553,0.0006752914,0.0002702719,0.0005566534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001579854,0.0003649729,0.0002382513,0.0004894538,0.00541215,0.001028796,0.0002548767,0.0005853421,0.00007027644],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008255287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9490386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968998,0.0003367059,0.0006377875,0.0003950975,0.0007325535,0.0009980808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979702,0.0001979378,0.0002885811,0.0004251233,0.0006008998,0.0005172521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002161892,0.000160619,0.01392275,0.00006751518,0.0001188059,0.0002542647,0.003256801,0.00003483712,0.00001728811,0.9582093,0.02364597,0.0002902301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676568,0.00004405176,0.0002334911,0.0001636078,0.00008663787,0.0008641987,0.05265709,0.0001441355,0.0001800278,0.01371631,0.9302342,0.0007085961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1093069,0.001867131,0.01171773,0.0132351,0.007136274,0.001693056,0.001364158,0.0006377604,0.8530419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904121,0.00007263736,0.0006144912,0.007877312,0.0003741453,0.00007414546,0.0001055137,0.00001271108,0.0004569645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70356315","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Floor, Conflict of Interest and the Parliament of Canada Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04385619762350818,"gpt":0.2820548642309233,"spread":0.2381986666074151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001033688,0.00009604981,0.0003321685,0.00001806432,0.0005715009,0.00006382268,0.0002842727,0.00002658094,0.000213963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010022,0.00005514699,0.00005909533,0.0002009458,0.0009278819,0.00007479229,0.00002056442,0.00008646732,0.000001430143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002219836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002983974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.0002289578,0.0004021019,0.0001195446,0.0002061897,0.0002680181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.0001279709,0.0002246789,0.0001774646,0.00008104698,0.0001445799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006540224,0.00006532302,0.0397094,0.006577604,0.0003999619,0.00004629382,0.01258087,0.00001338826,0.00006040762,0.1295085,0.6972801,0.1136927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002088271,0.00001026934,0.002340267,0.001481587,0.00006260475,0.000001969108,0.001721383,0.000002215622,0.00003812683,0.0003307026,0.9937155,0.00008652347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2079512,0.6622092,0.000004407137,0.0691554,0.0007001488,0.002325066,0.000154322,0.00001148617,0.05748878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857728,0.01003915,0.000004682149,0.003695382,0.0001336473,0.00001939272,0.000003821118,0.000006057313,0.0003250523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7778216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5293443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888161112","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1257","title":"The Day the Dialogue Died: A Comment on Sauve v. Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672920529756181,"gpt":0.2717723883430372,"spread":0.2550431830454754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004973504,0.0001069722,0.0001272927,0.00001158058,0.006328461,0.000399985,0.000568792,0.0000587565,0.00004546207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003025771,0.00005404266,0.00006633894,0.0001388538,0.0002636416,0.0001072094,0.00003816468,0.0004631921,0.00001451165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003756375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005617869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997826,0.0003808337,0.0002988958,0.000109294,0.0008526391,0.0005323004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982743,0.001019775,0.0001981456,0.0001551415,0.0001328944,0.0002197893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002035832,0.00002288366,0.0003092414,0.000001800357,0.00003141531,0.00005307571,0.002573092,0.00001069479,0.000003784801,0.9277846,0.06317223,0.006016809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001349222,0.00003813705,0.0005251574,0.00003075384,0.00001065644,0.00001219349,0.00504282,0.000002012604,0.00004023551,0.02468378,0.9693869,0.00009239575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006812304,0.0006356746,0.0001520665,0.08153648,0.002201012,0.0001784968,0.00000556474,0.00001585373,0.9145936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988403,0.000171241,0.000006406387,0.008642157,0.002113178,0.000003662547,6.107286e-7,0.000009489308,0.0006502483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264846025","doi":"","title":"Written and Oral Persuasion in the United States Courts: A District Judge's Perspective on Their History, Function, and Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Persuasion; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0183438170065567,"gpt":0.3047617679055159,"spread":0.2864179508989592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002586698,0.0001107097,0.0001662938,0.00008712415,0.0004508047,0.0001370245,0.0001457461,0.00006815801,0.000008551542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002766011,0.00005537241,0.00001919731,0.0002826713,0.0001807442,0.0006319185,0.00001028674,0.000413237,6.421395e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008560594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002218418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002224749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998718,0.0004921306,0.000204934,0.0001054359,0.0003237838,0.0001556639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985473,0.0005835798,0.0003667628,0.00005941738,0.0003749626,0.0000679563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005119448,0.0004570522,0.001128415,0.0001046417,0.0001453381,0.00004651144,0.9211416,0.00007029025,0.00006579212,0.02309917,0.01042614,0.03819561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006107968,0.000933697,0.004027329,0.00008364337,0.0001397116,0.0001219322,0.5415093,0.00004271468,0.000005465711,0.01837769,0.434021,0.0001267482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8313127,0.02204424,0.00003515898,0.1340304,0.0001916927,0.0002885819,0.000002825929,0.00001132346,0.01208308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799291,0.01694027,0.000004957255,0.002601466,0.0004726717,6.538986e-7,6.64896e-7,0.00000467378,0.00004552021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4235948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01908005545827297,"gpt":0.2530409978543282,"spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002661773,0.0001325123,0.0002153026,0.00009932093,0.003149084,0.0002612641,0.000630959,0.00008675163,0.000124227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004351458,0.00007917073,0.00007968002,0.0005095546,0.0001265232,0.0001925248,0.00001868835,0.0004173985,0.00001115361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005718046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004867033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975733,0.0004439766,0.0003510189,0.0001495546,0.0009069828,0.0005751532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.0003154819,0.0002523556,0.0002015059,0.0005246883,0.0004755576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147165,0.00006749154,0.01105895,0.00008103411,0.0004515044,0.00008703696,0.1989075,0.0004809347,0.0009541515,0.04539834,0.7335991,0.008799233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009977377,0.00003147323,0.001778731,0.00005538753,0.00003445877,0.00003527018,0.009563899,0.00002113599,0.00008231055,0.002283242,0.9858868,0.0001275372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5162268,0.001424863,0.0003876444,0.2496339,0.004115255,0.0008798266,0.0000619002,0.0000459399,0.2272239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937186,0.0001195094,0.00001105309,0.002623709,0.001540209,0.000009708051,5.798719e-7,0.00001444382,0.001962234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4774917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179309874","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1800","title":"Inconsistent Responsiveness Determination in Document Review: Difference of Opinion or Human Error?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Computer science; Human error; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Psychology; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Epistemology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820519774678054,"gpt":0.4173457186269999,"spread":0.3391405208802194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002601799,0.0001060382,0.0004852774,0.0000283927,0.0001590746,0.00001545899,0.0001815946,0.00005257427,0.0001288955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006922764,0.00007787577,0.00007452226,0.0003894258,0.0001242356,0.0002824263,0.00004768326,0.00007993258,0.00001929373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001181433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001112101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006492675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006215663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979517,0.0007771663,0.0005064097,0.0001465316,0.0003696356,0.000248524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.0001579705,0.0003277721,0.0001854904,0.0001478304,0.00009328737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006360505,0.0005724577,0.0149139,0.1527165,0.00003851966,0.00001002546,0.008451799,3.942681e-7,0.0004709448,0.7026374,0.004018829,0.1161055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451576,0.00006170986,0.002958626,0.07579434,0.00004844321,0.000002395471,0.0001906159,3.4353e-7,0.00008740863,0.0006062858,0.9199017,0.000202934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005989031,0.9606301,0.00002135497,0.00555252,0.0005025616,0.002080751,0.000004154659,0.0000345648,0.02518499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7329552,0.2655224,0.00003574947,0.0009430788,0.000109194,0.0001002077,0.000003127183,0.000006267459,0.0003247791],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049431473","doi":"","title":"Gender-Identity Protection, Trade, and the Trump Administration: A Tale of Reluctant Progressivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Sexual orientation; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Identity (music); Negotiation; Law; Business; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01362667380807939,"gpt":0.2765362668559764,"spread":0.262909593047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003117761,0.00007425867,0.0001664021,0.00003413739,0.0005369891,0.0001351271,0.0001906009,0.00006780509,0.00003080848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001302872,0.00004903677,0.00006826991,0.000231962,0.0002731781,0.0004812354,0.00001506617,0.0006175361,0.000005114624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001589338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001112772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005303136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982878,0.0002207311,0.0002648751,0.0001213106,0.000431085,0.0006742156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994666,0.00003092334,0.0002912465,0.00007929283,0.00008169162,0.00005025283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001388435,0.00004093574,0.002461817,0.00003160224,0.00007428766,0.000001007832,0.004394795,7.6906e-7,0.0001271057,0.9858371,0.00002133738,0.006870424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00234902,0.0006770527,0.004221335,0.00007926593,0.00007070274,0.0003470162,0.02619529,0.00003348377,0.0002223811,0.945686,0.01988681,0.0002316396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652929,0.009818612,0.001040763,0.009574268,0.0004539412,0.001111024,0.000001632032,0.00003414495,0.01267275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972602,0.001598968,0.000008041783,0.00002856853,0.0003925909,0.00001266581,2.232086e-7,0.000006646262,0.0006921592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04015107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4746868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133852656","doi":"","title":"Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Adjudication; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution; Judicial activism; Accountability; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00943560439557363,"gpt":0.2665854545057907,"spread":0.2571498501102171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006174403,0.00007291973,0.0001263725,0.00003553492,0.0006658473,0.0001216212,0.00004027244,0.00009049486,0.000189083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002733697,0.0000588845,0.00001474391,0.000160117,0.000140552,0.0003086626,0.00001869251,0.00007362992,0.00001538068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002166574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001113756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02471802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992297,0.0001202467,0.0001268713,0.0001577691,0.0001710258,0.0001944183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.00009494583,0.00004177661,0.00003236084,0.00005297009,0.0001499237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008737014,0.00008761079,0.07900187,0.00007177672,0.00006832562,0.0000029908,0.02268664,0.00001151269,0.0005491881,0.7721399,0.02311447,0.1021783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002074697,0.0004159866,0.05193469,0.0001490309,0.0002144234,0.00003080332,0.01860547,0.0008852925,0.0009970969,0.2312371,0.6922997,0.001155692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7946978,0.003050235,0.001847303,0.01474219,0.0002370885,0.0004943404,0.000002736248,0.0002109226,0.1847174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954755,0.0002325319,0.0001796876,0.000687168,0.001146985,0.000006920018,4.814991e-7,0.000005991872,0.002264769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6691853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.039273711452434,"gpt":0.3395010143025037,"spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007603595,0.000168048,0.0005329464,0.00005147899,0.002005352,0.0004479944,0.000710034,0.00007657654,0.000102003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003290051,0.000145966,0.0002057141,0.0001039972,0.001226368,0.0007725757,0.0000146332,0.0002032454,0.00002242605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.663627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5474086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980336,0.0001150429,0.0005101728,0.0001890499,0.0003986718,0.0007534335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969669,0.00006482146,0.0008055117,0.000283647,0.0005579814,0.001321128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039332,0.00001029136,0.0003419348,0.00006912588,0.00004629078,0.00002680994,0.000592725,5.605897e-7,0.00007454852,0.02949832,0.9675267,0.001802301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003059951,0.0001292869,0.0004024285,0.0004601343,0.00006137388,0.000002354223,0.0007844738,8.745037e-7,0.00001889622,0.0005531322,0.9970812,0.0001999013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004804295,0.5467082,0.00011849,0.02159228,0.003202416,0.0009634959,0.0004360544,0.00002510955,0.4221496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574647,0.02850346,0.0001742767,0.1028586,0.002399401,0.00003716768,0.00001242534,0.00005811362,0.008491811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965708235","doi":"10.2307/3504645","title":"10.2307/3504645","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Applied philosophy; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008321394201013394,"gpt":0.2249205174454817,"spread":0.2165991232444683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263006,0.00006477649,0.0001102847,0.00002802078,0.000322263,0.00008825952,0.0001966571,0.00005674157,0.9906479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007925043,0.00006119642,0.00003450643,0.0002926999,0.00005877435,0.000152222,0.00001349135,0.00004697922,0.9761655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003643037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009069694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005249878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003460255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991865,0.0000554824,0.0001139791,0.0001414591,0.0002513829,0.0002511593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996346,0.00003549901,0.00001983906,0.0001000686,0.00005223936,0.0001578157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000218675,0.00003053612,0.000001166036,0.000004891033,0.000007402634,0.000004021518,0.0007265737,0.000008429716,0.00001418224,0.0001608882,0.2801903,0.7188297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005463716,0.00003644835,0.00001784136,0.00001175207,0.000004281159,3.653075e-7,0.00001610844,0.000002535041,0.00001018261,0.00006410536,0.9996851,0.00009663894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001000492,0.00008939848,2.939261e-7,0.001123372,0.000006399937,0.0001441095,0.00000347369,0.0001249358,0.9975075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01421198,9.635273e-7,0.0000143917,0.0001096637,0.0005901165,0.000009961095,0.000001370857,0.00000840778,0.9850531],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7194948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7936281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498238348","doi":"","title":"Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America's Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse is Not the Answer- A Compartive Legal Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminology; Substance abuse; Psychology; Substance use; Child custody; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02418125322418489,"gpt":0.3038653782064632,"spread":0.2796841249822783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005466165,0.0001002367,0.0002361968,0.0000543862,0.0005930571,0.0002015517,0.0003890628,0.00003839145,0.0003633035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003241157,0.00005413111,0.00012988,0.001133253,0.0003141802,0.000282153,0.0000055899,0.00008179551,0.00001059057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003920905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004606599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06975929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01932338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985467,0.0002463759,0.0002603692,0.0001746208,0.0005407254,0.0002312423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992032,0.0001202535,0.00022464,0.0001843684,0.0002230317,0.00004450902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003274275,0.00032444,0.08845665,0.0000562004,0.001032018,0.000009556135,0.7716677,0.002411767,0.003505876,0.103103,0.013877,0.01522836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008621383,0.0005865277,0.2555473,0.0001721919,0.002148646,0.00000426317,0.1519771,0.01078822,0.02284528,0.003460983,0.5505615,0.001045789],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531527,0.0003344632,0.009987441,0.009260171,0.0001086157,0.0002865592,0.000009105965,0.00005164282,0.02680929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960768,0.0001350752,0.00003707123,0.002442749,0.0001766181,0.000005797869,9.737919e-7,0.000004753889,0.001120226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6196905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314285884","doi":"10.2307/3552548","title":"Beyond the Nass Valley: National Implications of the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw Decision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03462854562494203,"gpt":0.3160677530455197,"spread":0.2814392074205777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008156399,0.00007783794,0.00009987182,0.0001772982,0.001534611,0.000185534,0.0008791699,0.0000974881,0.0001977974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002041235,0.00005122542,0.00007755902,0.001514944,0.0003866237,0.0002654799,0.00004152979,0.0001155763,0.00003004394],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006471196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01343142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.783797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.0001156941,0.0002157751,0.0001435937,0.000488955,0.0004399485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984897,0.0001981858,0.0001127168,0.0002581213,0.0005633092,0.0003779424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.078191e-7,0.00000870952,0.00763033,0.000001506972,0.00001056242,2.278322e-7,0.001101342,0.000003488261,0.000007424526,0.9007799,0.08339433,0.007061452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006953307,0.000003988517,0.04637295,0.000006111919,0.000003625386,0.000003634573,0.0004093616,0.000008169742,0.000002301276,0.1091832,0.8438741,0.00006298733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03842505,0.0002369772,0.00005956931,0.4025541,0.0003258356,0.0003433381,0.0001007323,0.00002456577,0.5579299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991607,0.00005608735,0.00001234899,0.005333574,0.001037392,0.0000268782,0.000003992434,0.000008874968,0.001913872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164598656","doi":"","title":"The Paper Tiger Awakens: NOrth American Environmental Law After the Cozumel Reef Case","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tiger; Fishery; Reef; Geography; Law; Political science; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009028591866510343,"gpt":0.2471793717977171,"spread":0.2381507799312068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003557033,0.00009626574,0.0001004737,0.000006635647,0.001795665,0.0001942889,0.0002149521,0.00002804899,0.0006398308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002968992,0.00004678944,0.00006017127,0.0001898615,0.00122958,0.0002141897,0.0000491661,0.0001133639,0.0002832542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005526894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1355924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5253386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988422,0.0001492656,0.0001628263,0.0001657769,0.0003397085,0.000340162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994397,0.0001714295,0.0000678076,0.0002104748,0.00001654706,0.00009399504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003653372,0.0004398313,0.6038603,0.00001499004,0.0002656805,0.003238591,0.07100947,0.000008760619,0.00009531513,0.1321703,0.05388743,0.1346439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005831385,0.00002481258,0.0162238,0.000001992817,0.000010197,0.00004251086,0.01295318,0.000002838319,0.000003445918,0.0002109338,0.9703649,0.0001031008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7304789,0.00048871,0.000009637091,0.008230459,0.0002072296,0.0002816085,0.000007495823,0.00004766473,0.2602483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984529,0.000406557,0.000006913849,0.003784337,0.0005277699,0.00004287261,9.18672e-7,0.000009475612,0.0106922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29320652","doi":"","title":"Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law reform; Law; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04000465346090345,"gpt":0.3178044839275043,"spread":0.2777998304666009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006873684,0.00008503905,0.0001343468,0.00002854039,0.0006358768,0.0001094956,0.0001376772,0.00004532724,0.00004448479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000673918,0.00005855789,0.00001569989,0.0002121421,0.0001509831,0.0004547912,0.00001033486,0.0001057802,0.000003448594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003034685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001721914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990081,0.0001912465,0.00013036,0.0001401854,0.0002610062,0.0002691141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.0001728731,0.00006259979,0.0001067891,0.0001061077,0.000112321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004602696,0.00006958981,0.004254613,0.00001507096,0.00001429454,9.127781e-7,0.1057726,0.00003094186,0.00001084172,0.8859599,0.003756361,0.00006883398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003104833,0.00009380947,0.01862879,0.0000318644,0.000008824652,6.636426e-7,0.3037586,0.00004140553,0.0001010147,0.003219246,0.6736326,0.0001727245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.944041,0.0005130212,0.00001143157,0.002766951,0.0001852748,0.0004669655,0.00002794019,0.00002213475,0.05196526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979527,0.00003018507,0.0000384142,0.0009575117,0.0005043073,0.00003796204,0.00002122512,0.00000555685,0.000452138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4890715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206020881","doi":"","title":"Gender and the Profession: The No-Problem Problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Honor; Pleasure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Representation (politics); Lesbian; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02631564516929536,"gpt":0.2723184401503823,"spread":0.246002794981087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001546903,0.0001425654,0.0002029726,0.00001418403,0.002417258,0.0003842592,0.0004517506,0.0001245857,0.001020976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001854987,0.0000706789,0.00006971028,0.0002839458,0.0008604375,0.0003811707,0.000111274,0.0003570983,0.0006785576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003816377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007951545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01225911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005834131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980333,0.0004853877,0.0002723573,0.0002663687,0.0005288559,0.0004136659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.0002352473,0.000135252,0.0002612256,0.0001578031,0.0001564988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002034526,0.00003284325,0.0009189066,0.00005180939,0.0000278596,0.000003067286,0.01167981,0.000001706239,0.00002190396,0.9504141,0.03552972,0.001297885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006492805,0.00002148534,0.0002214976,0.00006428677,0.00002313277,0.000003010414,0.003723226,0.00003073613,0.00001476067,0.03604921,0.9590341,0.0001652103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007731536,0.006353517,0.00002131894,0.02635484,0.0006242228,0.001273547,0.000003821565,0.0001446695,0.9574925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748369,0.0003867096,0.0001423907,0.002414864,0.001373138,0.0001302542,6.141246e-7,0.00001578473,0.02069937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161914410","doi":"10.1300/j082v48n03_06","title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sodomy; Sexual orientation; Gay rights; Gender identity; Homosexuality; Political science; Law; Same sex; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04396964410420226,"gpt":0.3737858610926049,"spread":0.3298162169884026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001264306,0.00005661028,0.000176323,0.0000665689,0.0001613738,0.00009274865,0.0001202545,0.00004303948,0.00004541493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003324401,0.00004986921,0.00002108769,0.0003902539,0.0001271077,0.001272777,0.00002053721,0.0001514462,0.000006094699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001096819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001771178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05907522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.0002173438,0.0003943435,0.00009725176,0.0004500741,0.0001542274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00006647295,0.0003117071,0.00005379571,0.0001725245,0.0001036629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006442537,0.0002914737,0.7900157,0.00006611293,0.00003424811,0.00002789804,0.1304865,0.00008016481,0.0001450232,0.004411917,0.0009230793,0.07345348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007798386,0.0001716963,0.8654379,0.00001243158,0.00002768367,0.00001366904,0.04409102,0.0000174844,0.00002184726,0.004653277,0.08456675,0.0002064248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955148,0.0005330546,0.0003948109,0.0007154862,0.0002176015,0.00006343322,0.0000026747,0.000006592937,0.002551581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986445,0.00009347351,0.0002327691,0.0001704022,0.0007531377,7.533236e-7,6.161993e-7,0.000003266696,0.000101025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08639548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289942971","doi":"10.1177/14647001221114611","title":"Drafting injustice: overturning <i>Roe v. Wade</i> , spillover effects and reproductive rights in context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Reproductive rights; Spillover effect; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; History; Demography; Reproductive health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007330329053927768,"gpt":0.2650739796795479,"spread":0.2577436506256202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654981,0.0001239406,0.0002400811,0.00007009623,0.001427269,0.00008397884,0.0001949783,0.00005825617,0.000139771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001131493,0.0001193277,0.00003729251,0.0003587844,0.0003015603,0.0001909793,0.0001762913,0.0003440106,0.00001269193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001648463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001272921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006699967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000941152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979223,0.0007366735,0.0002339322,0.0004137284,0.0003569966,0.0003363857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987029,0.0008703452,0.0001508626,0.0001551629,0.00003583147,0.000084838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001573101,0.0000755124,0.004825301,0.00009456948,0.00002234081,0.0000758839,0.165541,0.000007041105,0.000343789,0.8238092,0.0008925528,0.004155503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007722467,0.0001955931,0.001668314,0.0001519364,0.00003803763,0.00001338083,0.06246122,0.000009732221,0.0004994405,0.09578922,0.8379806,0.0004203052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5449327,0.002229398,0.00002047494,0.0004168422,0.001116217,0.0004961795,0.00001028833,0.00008691607,0.450691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958274,0.00001002482,0.00001576986,0.0006452168,0.0005724225,0.00005406429,0.000001912125,0.00001183683,0.002861343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.837088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394661373","doi":"10.29173/alr1409","title":"Clones, Controversy, and Criminal Law: A Comment on the Proposal for Legislation Governing Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Criminal law; Law; Government (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Political science; Government regulation; Reproductive technology; Human reproduction; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05611255327318252,"gpt":0.3423504418763614,"spread":0.2862378886031788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218448,0.0000980894,0.0002237847,0.000006312766,0.001203169,0.0001143027,0.0001044426,0.00004583817,0.00004252007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004846252,0.00006629982,0.00006220736,0.0001036419,0.0001707378,0.0001815933,0.0000174216,0.00008304791,0.00001178074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000698912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005360145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1765062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1264678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988398,0.0002300701,0.0002518965,0.0002503022,0.0002447232,0.000183202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991318,0.0003372082,0.0002042705,0.0001758387,0.0001034396,0.00004747268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001338798,0.0000316638,0.00007752481,0.0003108238,0.0000154673,4.227073e-7,0.0006114829,1.308675e-7,0.00002045965,0.9858977,0.00848822,0.004532742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685995,0.00009408335,0.0000792582,0.000953809,0.00009646374,0.000003354111,0.0001626072,0.000002695794,0.00001160923,0.002281762,0.9960515,0.0000941798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005228915,0.0399285,0.00009499235,0.4046113,0.0006841214,0.005398687,0.000008251274,0.00007767657,0.5439675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768599,0.005449353,0.00003644071,0.01476235,0.0007857447,0.0001931231,0.00001806387,0.00001394791,0.001881049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01791814809791823,"gpt":0.3145785384309697,"spread":0.2966603903330515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00200831,0.0001343309,0.0004296544,0.00001497751,0.001243407,0.00008532161,0.0002237693,0.0001047333,0.0001118946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002181586,0.000102069,0.0001058709,0.0006888744,0.0004331014,0.0003412779,0.00001918214,0.0001222307,0.00001602176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002405694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01786769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975173,0.0006701767,0.0006598338,0.000215134,0.0005476767,0.0003898584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.000402655,0.0004907645,0.0001802801,0.0005140246,0.0001411255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001378451,0.0001006271,0.0002684013,0.0001356299,0.00003035379,0.000004226061,0.0001056729,7.555576e-7,0.00002104728,0.8939839,0.1027912,0.002544427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002476273,0.00005986766,0.0003113121,0.0006609849,0.00004662025,0.00000126902,0.0001342902,0.000002230553,0.00004667091,0.004171149,0.9941823,0.0001356046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01179475,0.3395185,0.0001120747,0.04794032,0.001412143,0.005176493,0.001174488,0.000287894,0.5925833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552748,0.04099988,0.00002652531,0.002400748,0.00006292797,0.00002814753,0.00003879387,0.00000657107,0.00116166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341806150","doi":"","title":"For their own good? Exploring legislative responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the Illinois Safe Children Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Legislation; Legislature; Legislative intent; Law; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Safeguarding; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08878705201028878,"gpt":0.3367925412700385,"spread":0.2480054892597498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003562201,0.0001538257,0.0004332306,0.00002238964,0.0009426837,0.00006550218,0.0003126592,0.00005017918,0.00001944288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001014843,0.00007668615,0.0001084847,0.0002896037,0.0003637098,0.0005236045,0.00007213594,0.0001100585,0.000007224543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002860868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007708475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01126283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004435479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980797,0.0007491283,0.0003808373,0.0001829371,0.000290092,0.0003172914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979389,0.001354054,0.0002401226,0.0002252286,0.0001412914,0.0001003994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004772027,0.0001729824,0.03177739,0.0008605069,0.0004158965,1.164385e-7,0.1609668,0.000004718541,0.00002988848,0.6149741,0.006355424,0.183965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001624717,0.0002881818,0.06537955,0.00211265,0.000427209,0.000005078261,0.005162746,0.000001960706,0.000258415,0.001992374,0.9221794,0.0005677015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5909759,0.3139151,0.001193849,0.04754326,0.001250233,0.01558301,0.0002742847,0.0001446929,0.02911957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837712,0.01298887,0.00005352206,0.001714818,0.0009709329,0.0003344488,0.000008136398,0.00001511209,0.0001429536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.915824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489925341","doi":"","title":"Getting Sex \"Right\": Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Law; Transgender; Scholarship; Sociology; Bodily integrity; Political science; Normative; Adjudication; Gender studies; Human sexuality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0268834498211064,"gpt":0.3242886311621533,"spread":0.2974051813410469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154649,0.00008803243,0.0001977953,0.0001091618,0.0002788768,0.0001939971,0.00008804144,0.0001236215,0.00001113734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002349798,0.00007124912,0.00002713794,0.0001116268,0.0003444756,0.0008252261,0.0000261149,0.000395075,4.247852e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003313042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001099732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006920919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008096231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990162,0.0002199747,0.000302538,0.0001057963,0.0001508259,0.0002047204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.0001087722,0.0001970066,0.00004538108,0.00006093557,0.00015924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007979293,0.0001130661,0.2999232,0.0003035875,0.00009686413,0.0000519324,0.1943917,0.000002060737,0.05465176,0.4056707,0.0001002591,0.04461508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003563205,0.000478916,0.6168687,0.000436905,0.00007937522,0.0004308697,0.0201119,0.00006990206,0.006376154,0.2595569,0.09110405,0.0009231908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850135,0.0004483797,0.00005831239,0.002759011,0.0001207224,0.00008402281,0.000003192154,0.000007376924,0.01150548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986665,0.0002167461,0.0001364391,0.000378988,0.0005688316,9.61981e-7,2.916692e-7,0.000005324977,0.00002596923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3169455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746090","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0278914142674676,"gpt":0.3094849583698926,"spread":0.281593544102425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392295,0.0002604794,0.0004405449,0.0001166391,0.0005326777,0.0003132832,0.0009460492,0.0006293653,0.0003829129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002332618,0.0001972371,0.0001533723,0.0001318148,0.0005986867,0.0001265237,0.00007117265,0.001321514,0.000257194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02971684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03901032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977221,0.0002290229,0.0003819618,0.0003841142,0.0007960444,0.0004867249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.0003435484,0.0003023415,0.0003932869,0.00006608989,0.00009804146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002193827,0.00006869453,0.0002766081,0.0001795218,0.00004823952,0.0001757751,0.08891741,9.821235e-7,0.00005351794,0.5832545,0.2936855,0.03331732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008908821,0.00002681637,0.0000361693,0.0001165985,0.00001478674,0.000001553893,0.001281144,5.864786e-7,0.000007082374,0.05190019,0.946273,0.0002530264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022229,0.0004790512,0.00001029565,0.001544712,0.0008571388,0.0005634307,0.00001063719,0.00009308556,0.9962193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02485522,0.00009450803,0.00003306114,0.002334345,0.003822179,0.00004833864,0.0000119402,0.0000443229,0.9687561],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6525875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995210207593185,"gpt":0.29853962858674,"spread":0.2685875265108081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003120515,0.0001323134,0.0006326049,0.0001007572,0.001186765,0.0001198743,0.0002513073,0.00007280048,0.00000327061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007046064,0.00007980422,0.00009142965,0.0001427432,0.001099889,0.0002931884,0.00002702152,0.0002128328,9.117721e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005656207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.313063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7000428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.0003658672,0.0005556113,0.0001052652,0.0005788366,0.0003432937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982637,0.0003124183,0.0004878844,0.00008820599,0.0006575961,0.0001901977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311018,0.00004439157,0.009368723,0.0005988228,0.001029354,0.00003380472,0.6981804,0.00004261649,0.00002690596,0.2811479,0.004223137,0.004992994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00175453,0.0003192393,0.001784979,0.0003756376,0.0001803541,0.00004830395,0.3944597,0.00001009008,0.00005346805,0.002222474,0.5985407,0.000250512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699719,0.0539801,0.0001809516,0.01288345,0.002726057,0.000562009,0.00002297771,0.00004510324,0.05962749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.0008373864,0.00004168477,0.00009334675,0.000632025,0.000006973034,8.61343e-8,0.00000950698,0.0003644814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752244394","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1109","title":"Whose Best Interests?: Custody and Access Law and Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Premise; Law; Child custody; Contradiction; Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0232905646197808,"gpt":0.3312614555548316,"spread":0.3079708909350508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006873537,0.0001354763,0.0002034731,0.00003599927,0.001761717,0.001401129,0.0003214999,0.0001711712,0.0001328251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001404524,0.0001102348,0.00003749008,0.0001088059,0.0006079297,0.00126918,0.0001097321,0.0006325576,0.0000146372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002081263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1562167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8325098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988047,0.000078034,0.0002409356,0.0002101308,0.0003248434,0.0003413056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991241,0.00006224177,0.000161665,0.00009087455,0.0001788207,0.000382356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711191,0.00005329665,0.005522338,0.00004528913,0.00001893248,0.00003045803,0.002463788,3.039854e-7,0.0005752677,0.9886423,0.0005411928,0.002089699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001434299,0.0002826143,0.002927348,0.0005303222,0.0001144661,0.0008385697,0.006371576,0.0000228678,0.0008332375,0.3545892,0.6312222,0.0008332789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1533705,0.0009257592,0.00001848055,0.002938461,0.0008093473,0.0001761844,0.000004424373,0.00003996669,0.8417169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970038,0.0002877009,0.00009767753,0.0006380653,0.001461346,0.000004785682,4.797634e-7,0.00001568445,0.0004904572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8436333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02427893939090937,"gpt":0.331284516279577,"spread":0.3070055768886676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00739974,0.0005381692,0.001756417,0.001358015,0.001020235,0.001940098,0.001771883,0.0004547867,0.0006962397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006622178,0.0004606654,0.0007373748,0.0007986155,0.001529402,0.006229694,0.000171388,0.0009892902,0.00003017248],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001072098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01047982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1516711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01579331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919302,0.001323426,0.003212175,0.0003660399,0.001733035,0.001435053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908932,0.0004591773,0.004643447,0.0004815875,0.001777543,0.001745054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006794651,0.0004699379,0.004921244,0.00008054595,0.0003231176,0.0000571105,0.001218806,0.00003693764,0.00052584,0.9848905,0.004427408,0.002980642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002097489,0.000800268,0.00386904,0.0001601387,0.0001128626,0.0006150948,0.0007405467,0.00002562907,0.0001720547,0.05263998,0.9383073,0.0004596325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3026725,0.0008183157,0.00077749,0.02869998,0.00205055,0.0005940291,0.0003473049,0.0000834807,0.6639563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807761,0.001062388,0.0007755791,0.002794999,0.01395671,0.0000047489,0.000007903381,0.00006888852,0.0005527107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168019101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1110","title":"In the Park: A Jurisprudential Primer","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01238130242364787,"gpt":0.3160161615382893,"spread":0.3036348591146414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003629145,0.0002208737,0.0003156016,0.00006745776,0.00206139,0.001686909,0.001088699,0.0003120592,0.0007807544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001615379,0.000149018,0.0002083156,0.000401107,0.0005032654,0.0008825468,0.00008111394,0.001823846,0.0002696058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003066871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2324972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5043016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967157,0.0005475335,0.0005783222,0.0002588959,0.001137589,0.0007619667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.0001785378,0.0003821468,0.0002456923,0.0001679082,0.0002236106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003325339,0.0002622227,0.002235165,0.00002836277,0.00003274151,0.0001528227,0.008889839,0.00000167047,0.000648742,0.982547,0.003322608,0.001845534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000953801,0.0001370558,0.004314243,0.0001754052,0.00009110683,0.000315999,0.003791966,0.000009126399,0.000247055,0.08009693,0.9094638,0.0004034677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06947953,0.0008329428,0.00002025097,0.01401836,0.005405228,0.0003051306,0.000008458506,0.0000187723,0.9099113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894623,0.0005867036,0.00006539751,0.001070872,0.008420676,0.000008704064,6.317385e-7,0.00002074766,0.0003639217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9199828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1000343132","doi":"","title":"James Madison Has Left the Building","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Nullification; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; State (computer science); Democracy; Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Sovereignty; Federalism; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02876443821679884,"gpt":0.2704875496667374,"spread":0.2417231114499385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009992525,0.00006063492,0.0001872999,0.000007557699,0.001409664,0.00002808198,0.0006144252,0.00003554868,0.0005022164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006962828,0.00003693375,0.0001054003,0.000150698,0.0008141506,0.0001729007,0.00006543383,0.0001159087,0.00007072087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003526389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000881787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0164983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01150301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991549,0.0002516641,0.0001059243,0.00009501239,0.0002447013,0.0001478009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.0001309354,0.0001250834,0.0001828952,0.00006507824,0.00004249578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007268957,0.00002985196,0.00006876713,0.000465619,0.00003976356,0.000001394003,0.0133413,0.000006685624,0.00002732497,0.916881,0.04603199,0.023099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004799877,0.0000070543,0.00004943718,0.0006829205,0.00005891488,8.423285e-7,0.000866581,0.000002356782,0.00001475029,0.0009401297,0.9972763,0.00005271956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008593055,0.1909942,0.0001816895,0.3103744,0.0001667741,0.0008471875,0.000006609667,0.00008748707,0.4887486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615127,0.03477054,0.0000757435,0.001977438,0.000203935,1.269399e-7,4.104766e-7,0.000003651084,0.001455422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160729556","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Bankruptcy Counseling: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislature; Debt; Creditor; Agency (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02214958015371033,"gpt":0.2593556414306408,"spread":0.2372060612769304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005441349,0.00009519829,0.0001507948,0.00006861112,0.002566807,0.00004606893,0.0007898271,0.0002242797,0.0001697392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005322998,0.00009349104,0.00007959732,0.0003276066,0.0006880955,0.0004323571,0.00003722591,0.0003311661,0.00003568033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008827979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6145609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3006927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.0001544995,0.0001657229,0.0002285047,0.0005486668,0.0003495001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991244,0.00006443222,0.000184492,0.000186969,0.000161732,0.0002779669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001222371,0.00007981854,0.3761117,0.00007335416,0.0001292938,0.0003854874,0.5120308,0.00006620544,0.002503193,0.03266435,0.07184714,0.003986484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766621,0.00001855519,0.01023196,0.00006454722,0.00002719133,0.00001131409,0.05478216,0.00003199482,0.00009115904,0.0002924805,0.9341125,0.0001593949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8561422,0.001378378,0.00004519316,0.002812912,0.0007434105,0.0002600695,0.000002658123,0.0000564384,0.1385588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878724,0.0009180273,0.00001152741,0.0001847783,0.0003473253,6.627109e-7,0.000001280913,0.000005804769,0.01065825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333618217","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.150202","title":"<i>Carter</i> v. <i>Canada</i>: What’s next for physicians?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Declaration; Law; Political science; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Medicine; Criminal law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02032390175597526,"gpt":0.2639546485015136,"spread":0.2436307467455383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003106379,0.00009604615,0.0002121306,0.00005827464,0.0008306361,0.0009125915,0.000341742,0.00026783,0.0003088657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003717609,0.00009652197,0.00007978394,0.0002710072,0.00005529902,0.00123364,0.000007676388,0.0003896218,0.00004054784],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00236189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8926794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965795,0.0002158899,0.0003395363,0.0001355381,0.002052341,0.0006771531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959884,0.0002166752,0.0002402104,0.00006157247,0.001120537,0.002372578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003614234,0.00001001937,0.001410952,0.000004283874,0.00003438942,0.00004172848,0.002981659,0.000002264325,0.00000110652,0.003148164,0.9151033,0.07725859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004103431,0.00002323706,0.000160185,0.00006417591,0.00001096417,0.000007917845,0.02024257,0.00002050474,0.000003618734,0.001212878,0.9777217,0.0001219329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04164626,0.006760837,0.0007391039,0.7718863,0.03631433,0.001022156,0.00008325929,0.0001106753,0.141437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274082,0.0004205784,0.00005948108,0.05369912,0.01533534,0.00002085104,0.000007808033,0.0000222196,0.003026444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297261397","doi":"10.1097/01.npr.0000873552.13618.91","title":"The overturn of Roe v. Wade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Nurse Practitioner","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Management; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Law; History; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01582404112752196,"gpt":0.3050086687361152,"spread":0.2891846276085932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155345,0.00003978124,0.00006166909,0.00001256184,0.002742891,0.000053125,0.0002848208,0.00001770924,0.0006455872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000308283,0.00002240943,0.00004286805,0.000231172,0.0001912827,0.0001815611,0.00002667456,0.0001756924,0.00003218861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006144794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001817947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01041454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001159986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.0003895189,0.0001250057,0.00007168917,0.0004667134,0.0001436386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992325,0.0003742976,0.0001608524,0.0001413471,0.00006504256,0.00002591512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008453825,0.0001307278,0.0005024223,0.000006590764,0.00004919853,0.000001851259,0.0381154,0.0001271134,0.0005255609,0.8464224,0.1086373,0.005396931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006207741,0.00001962988,0.0004992617,0.00000297887,0.00001181644,0.000002006753,0.02482103,0.000007410619,0.00007711985,0.01253962,0.9619178,0.00003924352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03694758,0.001581106,0.00005857167,0.1184247,0.002407075,0.0005076851,0.0000240293,0.00007339397,0.8399759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853837,0.00005873496,0.000004136054,0.0004478495,0.0003739592,0.00004857057,0.000001360541,0.000005237878,0.01367638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179633363","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1245","title":"The Charter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01750348607281817,"gpt":0.2721527440633323,"spread":0.2546492579905142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008022892,0.0001185417,0.0001496684,0.00001248008,0.005522249,0.0008099799,0.0007558022,0.00008820176,0.00004102913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001379447,0.0000421157,0.0001084792,0.0001133716,0.00133685,0.0002163395,0.00008079477,0.0005458246,0.00003654755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003209221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006362645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0275092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3605759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.0005263067,0.000288909,0.0001337949,0.0006014123,0.0004767023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983824,0.0009628182,0.0002111454,0.0002232632,0.0001103782,0.0001100221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003298242,0.00000921684,0.0001410188,0.000002507036,0.0000446037,0.000008036386,0.01638592,6.450795e-7,0.000004707504,0.9646611,0.0008189852,0.01789032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005451061,0.00003464594,0.004560652,0.00003941195,0.00003905906,0.00008255662,0.0203976,0.000006241092,0.00001337509,0.1474673,0.8266976,0.0001163724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005255346,0.02286324,0.00002955131,0.1082735,0.001093988,0.0003513007,0.000001699703,0.00002671074,0.8621046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988339,0.006979524,0.000005335469,0.001085866,0.002387495,0.0000077646,8.7839e-8,0.00001250613,0.001182433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}