{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":780,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":780,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2ee5566a521c","filters":{"topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes"}},"results":[{"id":"W1868157597","doi":"","title":"A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream","year":2004,"lang":"ceb","type":"book","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Aside; Biography; Law; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; History; Political science; Art; Literature; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicola Lacey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02176347433607962,"gpt":0.28486191129631,"spread":0.2630984369602304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002275532,0.0004074208,0.0003846076,0.0005281553,0.01050432,0.008009281,0.0008539391,0.003572881,0.008393183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005088103,0.000385389,0.0002223547,0.0007769002,0.01245927,0.006571368,0.002988555,0.009699541,0.002404304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004958014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005761265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02397406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03893309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977751,0.001329506,0.00004263125,0.0001674197,0.0004502583,0.0002351448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970771,0.001072988,0.0001860445,0.0001872372,0.0005414325,0.0009351948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002220467,0.00003192708,0.0002781349,0.0000608651,0.000004635849,0.0001465319,0.01365242,0.00003095579,0.0001112834,0.09492286,0.8621554,0.02858287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003967,0.00001430799,0.0004061563,0.0001431315,0.000001562113,0.0001536744,0.01207875,0.00003014634,0.00005967825,0.01446356,0.9726301,0.00001501487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004395722,0.1020142,0.001090023,0.8234626,0.01641792,0.00001329172,0.00006972698,0.00006298538,0.0524735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2931844,0.08808693,0.002177705,0.2792473,0.01973001,0.00007033892,0.0001004434,0.0002931068,0.3171098],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02397406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04766905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183155047","doi":"","title":"Legal aspects of carbon trading : Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Carbon offset; Carbon market; Carbon fibers; International trade; Greenhouse gas; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David Freestone","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charlotte Streck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03198017485561127,"gpt":0.3339041531463252,"spread":0.3019239782907139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003308793,0.0005730226,0.0004748293,0.001301862,0.002791825,0.01414397,0.001162936,0.006326217,0.00515352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007749026,0.000514426,0.0003811729,0.002212136,0.006468707,0.01044235,0.002121313,0.006548013,0.001718857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006177452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01012362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01923921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02510154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961838,0.0007034464,0.0002688419,0.0003697609,0.002014824,0.000459323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981223,0.001119369,0.0001560211,0.0001452558,0.0003029228,0.0001542111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000296697,0.00001856349,0.0001587422,0.0002115404,0.000005135411,0.0001106503,0.002014472,0.0003798617,0.0002386587,0.7339793,0.2197457,0.04310767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002978175,0.000005349617,0.0003806651,0.0003217366,0.00000363661,0.00004378537,0.0006542897,0.00008212835,0.0001141985,0.0734346,0.9249383,0.00001845281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003790221,0.2574941,0.003306798,0.1284047,0.02342571,0.00004309059,0.0002494723,0.0001244326,0.5831615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2012887,0.2583556,0.006161514,0.06809622,0.02365194,0.0001824849,0.0004807443,0.0004641909,0.4413188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01923921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04482079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Yuval Sinai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.25700860748035,"gpt":0.3939149846991725,"spread":0.1369063772188225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01199626,0.0006199208,0.0008966108,0.004889956,0.01572854,0.02295459,0.003791584,0.0204627,0.01480026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01269293,0.0005302448,0.001033952,0.005073192,0.03895761,0.01575663,0.005057051,0.01570348,0.00146555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03142516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01014705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04591636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07902678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864281,0.007550151,0.0002667026,0.001119943,0.002124878,0.002510217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858103,0.01083487,0.0007288302,0.0004173669,0.001563542,0.0006450108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006261963,0.000009828132,0.00007044608,0.00002814571,0.000002621644,0.0001053723,0.002375741,0.00004668349,0.00003284362,0.9917169,0.003996411,0.001608714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004127107,0.00009313885,0.002243568,0.00088685,0.00003581834,0.0002891559,0.02639842,0.0004788544,0.0002425525,0.351124,0.6181023,0.00006414564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01150959,0.04153601,0.001542136,0.06892095,0.00158655,0.00002499092,0.00004212457,0.0000187862,0.874819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8288515,0.03335107,0.001253758,0.0514243,0.008731769,0.0001572189,0.0000861911,0.00009759124,0.07604666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04591636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2280066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889948538","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage in Canada: The impact of legal marriage on the first cohort of gay and lesbian Canadians to wed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Same sex; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Psychology; Cohort; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Heather B. MacIntosh","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elke D. Reissing","is_ca":true},{"name":"Heather Andruff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01045308544132911,"gpt":0.2243626244319366,"spread":0.2139095389906074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009794487,0.0003195111,0.000371746,0.001364797,0.01462639,0.002499889,0.001214754,0.0008524842,0.003004929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002513475,0.0003860043,0.0005013339,0.003141758,0.001642787,0.0007606815,0.002411487,0.001886733,0.0002082664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04315879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06121915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998776,0.0001146088,0.00002713193,0.00008544791,0.00037012,0.0006265675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977973,0.00008295056,0.000304003,0.00003553469,0.0005908502,0.00118944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001836087,0.000306744,0.8513249,0.00009549326,0.00005109943,0.0009765513,0.112265,0.00007806973,0.0005326461,0.00122578,0.005439341,0.02752089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001250254,0.00009463525,0.820228,0.00009224576,0.00002158486,0.0002387638,0.1724947,0.0001543124,0.0000887134,0.00009426694,0.006438165,0.00004208639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938197,0.000994432,0.00003015024,0.001604493,0.00003300271,0.00004932645,0.0004421833,0.000004015591,0.003022682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955631,0.001258005,0.00006430996,0.0004853993,0.000008472039,0.00001916071,0.0003216341,0.000004170022,0.00227583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04315879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3131404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W399115648","doi":"","title":"Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Steven G. Calabresi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antonin Scalia","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01895436692005132,"gpt":0.3052649355733305,"spread":0.2863105686532791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05990821,0.0008915458,0.002256695,0.00542077,0.01541779,0.03053701,0.005983165,0.02876154,0.01045878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08390233,0.000714623,0.001342293,0.008490536,0.08300006,0.05074458,0.01207051,0.03224059,0.002626639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0224141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01551634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007609322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9324651,0.04009109,0.002980129,0.006121614,0.01469407,0.003648033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.893779,0.08041993,0.00280116,0.006594087,0.0119917,0.004414137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007477885,0.00005791989,0.0002065823,0.0005344125,0.00002641095,0.0001655106,0.02027468,0.0001431573,0.00009498287,0.6013867,0.3282042,0.04883061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002090844,0.00001387899,0.0002209198,0.001431677,0.000007002982,0.0001104539,0.0152807,0.0001404408,0.00006204336,0.1780612,0.8046196,0.00003119224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001366256,0.08325604,0.0006589644,0.8828518,0.01701191,0.000007291143,0.00006525882,0.00002148665,0.01476092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1607022,0.1099654,0.00188894,0.6257398,0.08491244,0.0001082807,0.0002188018,0.000303901,0.01616038],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05990821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3168287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992990269","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.231","title":"The Youth Criminal Justice Act: New Directions and Implementation Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Proportionality (law); Presumption; Seriousness; Political science; Criminal justice; Accountability; Sentencing guidelines; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Restorative justice; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Barnhorst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09592288235905266,"gpt":0.355147543092551,"spread":0.2592246607334984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04921636,0.001002404,0.001159781,0.004496527,0.006538544,0.01855882,0.004538352,0.022129,0.007811992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05812106,0.0007619504,0.001249373,0.003857093,0.01614009,0.01801804,0.004987059,0.02044716,0.001322096],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01827291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07316571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08208247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0755978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.961077,0.01560584,0.003623262,0.002130085,0.0136111,0.003952735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319246,0.03643924,0.004144996,0.002470341,0.01523992,0.009780793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003095075,0.0002756305,0.002325211,0.0005537702,0.00001571021,0.0002961482,0.003068178,0.000478956,0.0001939321,0.7697345,0.1342669,0.0887601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007174779,0.0001737729,0.005243258,0.00291914,0.00003582502,0.0003598526,0.004585063,0.00149522,0.0002105871,0.1020219,0.8827749,0.0001088693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.003844261,0.03364705,0.004121956,0.9125268,0.00742414,0.000182648,0.0001764363,0.0001509495,0.03792575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.196987,0.1290867,0.07257261,0.5136309,0.03216232,0.002307887,0.001182211,0.0002629555,0.05180743],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2602841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02813690632838961,"gpt":0.3426470481351979,"spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02867957,0.0005928579,0.001290812,0.004201236,0.006550346,0.01180476,0.003322434,0.009401619,0.002414929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02528859,0.0003207832,0.0007142621,0.0024592,0.05633426,0.01761982,0.007687185,0.01525323,0.0004562065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007180878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002249493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001843387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776092,0.01037845,0.001153681,0.003607872,0.006054589,0.00119631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631551,0.02635885,0.002163842,0.00248559,0.004232213,0.001604419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001275076,0.00001143553,0.0002695967,0.00008685919,0.000007042237,0.00005967775,0.006327891,0.000190616,0.00005063351,0.9728252,0.002665556,0.01749253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006686054,0.00001713791,0.0004740675,0.000436405,0.000004884364,0.00008586411,0.006440672,0.0003404017,0.000113174,0.9515194,0.04053569,0.00002576528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06056989,0.1129161,0.04340678,0.6288601,0.004935408,0.00002922831,0.00007026594,0.0001163239,0.1490959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884602,0.04495912,0.01115029,0.04446101,0.004232966,0.00007550573,0.00006900427,0.0001144334,0.006477411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02867957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1516739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038600807","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007317299053915045,"gpt":0.193302972243602,"spread":0.1859856731896869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895639,0.0007804649,0.0008029343,0.006021769,0.031596,0.02768412,0.00532694,0.008779661,0.01551524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05932511,0.0008158311,0.0008320747,0.007933733,0.04548611,0.01296508,0.007379092,0.01213314,0.0006270076],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2543741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4023037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826241,0.003675052,0.0004203131,0.001639136,0.007478792,0.004162671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693338,0.01134689,0.0008317269,0.002771568,0.0128342,0.002881804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001223516,0.00001233458,0.0009093874,0.00003895883,0.000008163271,0.00004036038,0.009612646,0.000747484,0.00007824138,0.9341765,0.03776054,0.01660318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002665031,0.00001214556,0.005417585,0.0003334757,0.00004609822,0.00003116408,0.02019817,0.003411918,0.0004121372,0.394137,0.5758395,0.0001340676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05066328,0.006923204,0.01714282,0.4957275,0.002506897,0.0001666172,0.0007047586,0.0003388769,0.425826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411781,0.006082955,0.01812836,0.04522454,0.0006929451,0.0001530884,0.0003637604,0.0005229484,0.08765336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2543741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8648204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03309826142050176,"gpt":0.3159430235126354,"spread":0.2828447620921337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126507,0.0002648874,0.0006676383,0.001534899,0.01263741,0.00843551,0.002284664,0.007331241,0.003015273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599785,0.0002678789,0.0006412932,0.001595956,0.03938922,0.00720067,0.003760803,0.007217119,0.0002612003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02760485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03991754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4149426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.485729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903296,0.003198163,0.0002243271,0.001284383,0.002626699,0.00233672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941603,0.002655229,0.0003314322,0.0006607986,0.001601014,0.0005912657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001095516,0.000001111286,0.00005157656,0.000001588641,6.772457e-7,0.000007152174,0.0003938169,0.00005720761,0.00001473308,0.9986476,0.0003959314,0.0004275241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001386905,0.000006251356,0.0004626701,0.0000387337,0.00000615729,0.00002279409,0.001234287,0.001058737,0.0001198717,0.974358,0.02266151,0.00001712317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084676,0.002091925,0.0697207,0.1981876,0.0004357061,0.0001291529,0.0001391487,0.0001027506,0.6207255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751736,0.0003494952,0.006317027,0.00664975,0.0001603538,0.00007038502,0.00002696753,0.00002375817,0.01122868],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4149426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8250548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601954506","doi":"","title":"Penal Policy and Penal Legislation in Recent American Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Imprisonment; Legislature; Nothing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Period (music); Criminology; History; Sociology; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Franklin E. Zimring","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02438443165885253,"gpt":0.3599767195777031,"spread":0.3355922879188505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002847263,0.0001611644,0.0002419397,0.001887263,0.01142647,0.005111701,0.0007646719,0.003044742,0.008387118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007712014,0.0002856249,0.000196285,0.004839824,0.008045409,0.004730485,0.004236716,0.006661992,0.0007674379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007060863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007444256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0579283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1853177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996009,0.001873504,0.0001556161,0.000237392,0.0008923853,0.0008320156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937615,0.002216625,0.0009122097,0.0002016698,0.001130596,0.001777353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007720839,0.0008457602,0.04060744,0.0003154321,0.00002194617,0.001985989,0.3216831,0.0004001641,0.0005039452,0.1971201,0.2273726,0.2090663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006707668,0.00005537074,0.0351775,0.0002592338,0.000007643585,0.0007657623,0.09025554,0.0001178141,0.0001306402,0.004192417,0.8689916,0.00003966235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4132767,0.03022965,0.001020836,0.2385029,0.002222699,0.00002664899,0.0002022682,0.00009209771,0.3144263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8584735,0.02777109,0.0006208798,0.04584923,0.001005598,0.00005665468,0.0001925112,0.00006196793,0.06596866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0579283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1151822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164985285","doi":"","title":"Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitutional Social and Economic Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mandate; Political science; Accountability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law; Business; Human rights; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Alana Klein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04225991800826309,"gpt":0.2814863230624453,"spread":0.2392264050541822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0394251,0.0006165759,0.0008037511,0.003258292,0.006939897,0.01438271,0.003471435,0.006775011,0.004182796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0307711,0.0005620704,0.00091765,0.002801215,0.09457928,0.01485344,0.005717283,0.01181286,0.0003301905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01759131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01611562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01513872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02695039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728854,0.01639787,0.001186831,0.003072993,0.004878845,0.001578145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774096,0.01428004,0.001903993,0.004134793,0.001631321,0.0006402633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000147308,0.000004100586,0.00006478764,0.000009230102,0.000001283401,0.00000949035,0.0006591364,0.0002538978,0.00002591393,0.9963685,0.0001937009,0.002408362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113356,0.000007872441,0.0001526013,0.00006100481,0.000004245466,0.00001386522,0.0003850135,0.001006842,0.00008062893,0.9877217,0.0105451,0.000009750469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0270923,0.00623981,0.4690064,0.09753962,0.0006978088,0.0003686439,0.00008332946,0.0001825292,0.3987895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860713,0.002599002,0.09576184,0.004226147,0.0005512834,0.0003442516,0.00003475137,0.0000606059,0.01035084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0394251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2085024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542606338","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706","title":"Reconceiving the Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Robin Wilson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566545609024438,"gpt":0.2257886288656807,"spread":0.2001231727754363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004606967,0.0003310538,0.0003750024,0.001330374,0.01039223,0.008602993,0.001507697,0.004053146,0.01005387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129722,0.0002150917,0.0003608448,0.001036892,0.02270491,0.009598576,0.008865517,0.004480004,0.001576191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007410811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01095074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01519491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948844,0.003005531,0.0001027919,0.0005038718,0.0008598595,0.0006434224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985583,0.0005560848,0.00009292889,0.0003158375,0.0002519799,0.000224778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003307601,0.000004094606,0.00008781815,0.000009740362,0.000001249609,0.00005994825,0.008212646,0.00006248453,0.00002321074,0.9620741,0.01702472,0.01243655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005152635,0.00001102613,0.0002269038,0.0002169822,0.000004674107,0.0001742598,0.009502502,0.0001815064,0.0001189246,0.330363,0.6591859,0.000009097549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01408682,0.01304541,0.0131284,0.06745549,0.001430045,0.00004778616,0.00007002106,0.00009964431,0.8906363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7184024,0.00869213,0.006289545,0.01976748,0.0008612063,0.0001554559,0.00009963987,0.0001846987,0.2455475],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01202833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05376941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169239051","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners: What the United States Can Learn from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Rochester; Emory University","keywords":"Kingdom; Transgender; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Stephanie Saran Rudolph","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03753234677563057,"gpt":0.2903665470817529,"spread":0.2528342003061224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004880672,0.0003583138,0.0008824642,0.004121005,0.008653319,0.004427852,0.001646389,0.001994147,0.004114633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01899866,0.0003009507,0.001073733,0.006197215,0.002749955,0.00184857,0.002574027,0.001790883,0.0002319915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09308167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1282366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902611,0.002151532,0.0004896529,0.0003120299,0.002659129,0.004126536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753934,0.002848315,0.001320728,0.0005293815,0.01656381,0.003344368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003085809,0.0006934289,0.4194135,0.005264377,0.0007649969,0.004663669,0.09475454,0.00106561,0.001588678,0.06140021,0.1114036,0.2959015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001566015,0.0002764721,0.6998398,0.005849348,0.0006599877,0.0007608969,0.1882616,0.000322876,0.0006120224,0.0009624259,0.1020473,0.0002507676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146314,0.1130811,0.0004243993,0.08203714,0.001692603,0.0002732933,0.002716255,0.00002878063,0.08511512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498075,0.03284255,0.0005059799,0.01003756,0.000119411,0.00008679591,0.0008158633,0.00002500628,0.005759291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09308167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6753579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010941785","doi":"10.1215/03616878-25-1-133","title":"Riding the Bull: Experience with Individual Market Reform in Washington, Kentucky, and Massachusetts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Download; Citation; Section (typography); Politics; Library science; Political science; Law; Advertising; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Adele Kirk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02959835943018209,"gpt":0.345061260811961,"spread":0.3154629013817789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007770853,0.0002508283,0.0006139121,0.001164987,0.03290233,0.009263124,0.003436364,0.008930384,0.01114462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01492154,0.0005150143,0.0004704516,0.002420368,0.007500845,0.005133419,0.01025597,0.009047314,0.0006155355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02111684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02742934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4931722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7479225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939864,0.002108935,0.0001866214,0.0004482093,0.0006352351,0.002634637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919804,0.003491596,0.0006354377,0.0003473127,0.0009075851,0.002637606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004769463,0.001775683,0.08832821,0.0001997892,0.0002042124,0.006259385,0.5392435,0.002076107,0.002137808,0.1524,0.1005939,0.1063044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002266053,0.0006512317,0.09676566,0.0002625072,0.0002165687,0.0005522972,0.4629228,0.001839591,0.001445996,0.01363729,0.4213099,0.0001695012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.88741,0.001476332,0.0006399484,0.05551759,0.0002004766,0.0001361791,0.00007832515,0.0000664742,0.0544747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956975,0.0004676319,0.0003152461,0.01013106,0.00009078905,0.00009397853,0.00006036751,0.00002996722,0.03183598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4931722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918249602","doi":"10.70658/4486-1457.1451","title":"Social Enterprise Law in Action: Organizational Characteristics of U.S. Benefit Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Denver","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Legislation; Statute; Limited liability; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Ellen Berrey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02400868845019108,"gpt":0.2948512677926852,"spread":0.2708425793424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001887785,0.0001138611,0.0001647689,0.003630358,0.003293408,0.00367653,0.0005868188,0.0006723016,0.003252425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007573724,0.0001407177,0.0001533862,0.003756909,0.002947225,0.002715652,0.003014167,0.001110511,0.0003641687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002499854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01945334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03761154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99824,0.0004005866,0.0001012995,0.0002225294,0.0005293935,0.0005062076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876344,0.002743853,0.00509887,0.0004602556,0.00125143,0.002811243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414952,0.0002444946,0.9382666,0.00001992034,0.00001589203,0.0002523951,0.02204026,0.0001833567,0.0004127242,0.01279689,0.003525991,0.02220735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003454909,0.00005597721,0.9465008,0.0000456891,0.000006955845,0.0001497045,0.036893,0.0004818831,0.0001363099,0.001920222,0.01379435,0.0000116009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807522,0.0002934937,0.000190735,0.001434585,0.000008810369,0.00003063053,0.0001097259,0.000007367505,0.01717247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983865,0.0001552488,0.0001080055,0.000186192,0.000008037173,0.00001403518,0.0001126464,0.000003127752,0.001026203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03868026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766300202","doi":"","title":"Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Salvador Trinxet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01826609359649322,"gpt":0.2910363754042616,"spread":0.2727702818077684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005578967,0.001718253,0.001720417,0.008102463,0.01298046,0.01421422,0.00470808,0.0150143,0.0886328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02123623,0.0018102,0.001696076,0.0082229,0.004198805,0.003079656,0.003125934,0.01078968,0.03802729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06809833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2997477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9681476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856964,0.000714367,0.0006051406,0.0009914816,0.009394429,0.002598149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854703,0.001886249,0.0002750157,0.001445766,0.00955951,0.001363248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001901027,0.00004798811,0.0002445953,0.00008364351,0.000009109613,0.00005287352,0.0002691246,0.0001098798,0.0001017715,0.1030109,0.8844009,0.0116502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001188112,0.00000442803,0.001673486,0.0001269982,0.00001111654,0.00001641007,0.0001359891,0.00007433975,0.00006115639,0.003689137,0.9941643,0.00003080681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001000574,0.004052086,0.000496547,0.01826413,0.003333071,0.0004268687,0.01450716,0.0004210567,0.9574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008436163,0.003125973,0.001894361,0.01740892,0.0004892328,0.0005178326,0.004411108,0.0001683176,0.9635482],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0886328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4940903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203477145","doi":"","title":"Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach to Judicial Construction of Insurance Policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Insurance policy; Legislative history; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Erik S. Knutsen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jeffrey W. Stempel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672713502278176,"gpt":0.3001193273696865,"spread":0.2833921923469047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02609332,0.0007866271,0.001130668,0.004810928,0.009170485,0.02096617,0.005026828,0.007332213,0.004642749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0348372,0.0009142386,0.001679856,0.002408369,0.06027426,0.02059461,0.008209387,0.01080439,0.0007961501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01098823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01139303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007571155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008064836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828839,0.01056559,0.001086919,0.001877433,0.0024868,0.001099396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742216,0.01778908,0.001102212,0.002981585,0.003288374,0.0006171051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006674048,0.000007048655,0.00009563284,0.00001501784,0.00000498186,0.00006076028,0.009773628,0.0002007086,0.0001301388,0.9852104,0.0005659102,0.003929154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805168,0.00001689449,0.0001840542,0.000120756,0.00002029709,0.0000576177,0.004418654,0.001550705,0.0004013311,0.9643787,0.02880696,0.00002612506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05872857,0.003724913,0.4771408,0.043974,0.0009021385,0.0003211799,0.000113314,0.0004151456,0.41468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8735206,0.001258248,0.09750854,0.003869712,0.0008457126,0.0004282891,0.0001235728,0.0004664977,0.02197879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02609332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1379963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584632781","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Relationships: From 'Odious Crime' to 'Gay Marriage'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Eleventh; General partnership; Political science; Lesbian; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Cretney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05180808479814483,"gpt":0.3090935161142002,"spread":0.2572854313160554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007306102,0.0004031826,0.0003512018,0.0008957403,0.007343594,0.006160257,0.0007300472,0.002679605,0.006163544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002144384,0.0003278117,0.0002410783,0.001070957,0.01047211,0.004593526,0.004259752,0.006701044,0.001103587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003726648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009780592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04122499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09656693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987883,0.0005422228,0.00004335152,0.0000997366,0.0003025508,0.0002238858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.0001445063,0.00005769751,0.00004206748,0.0000972947,0.0001396006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000740042,0.00007179485,0.0006609266,0.00007742838,0.000002255226,0.0002480235,0.05582491,0.00009040008,0.00005735016,0.761593,0.1411023,0.04026408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008854078,0.00003334294,0.004975435,0.0007770419,0.000007024147,0.0007446623,0.07250066,0.000122098,0.0001271407,0.08471384,0.8359711,0.00001882229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01189178,0.02303597,0.0009474547,0.04157814,0.003439989,0.00008225888,0.00007527099,0.00003423708,0.9189149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4601905,0.03643886,0.001174348,0.03562632,0.002073311,0.0002567196,0.0001958408,0.0001120523,0.463932],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04122499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08197004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101647335","doi":"","title":"The Treatment of Transgender Prisoners, Not Just an American Problem--A Comparative Analysis of American, Australian, and Canadian Prison Policies Concerning the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners and a \"Universal\" Recommendation To Improve Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & sexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Prison; Criminology; Transgender Person; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Mann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07941484820139695,"gpt":0.3684944539112884,"spread":0.2890796057098915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005279027,0.0001521458,0.000279706,0.001224607,0.01193637,0.002491929,0.001728462,0.001583549,0.002553755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01737739,0.0002334955,0.0003631837,0.00161537,0.005609403,0.001111811,0.002534941,0.003171018,0.0001117814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0175837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06012965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6882391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8962675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994806,0.002177036,0.0001882542,0.0001577196,0.001121507,0.001549597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990797,0.002653911,0.001737977,0.0002758381,0.001948163,0.002587084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007403385,0.001383575,0.2891303,0.001016826,0.000171846,0.001338797,0.2262611,0.001302141,0.004002912,0.1571906,0.04023686,0.2772248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001371697,0.0005146113,0.6783338,0.002269975,0.0002632776,0.001126203,0.2485033,0.001028903,0.001212335,0.006888388,0.05958389,0.0001381683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273197,0.005580223,0.0003272137,0.04875785,0.0002043985,0.00006163721,0.00006813124,0.00001380874,0.01766707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892112,0.003111658,0.0003463285,0.005465053,0.00003622048,0.00002926775,0.0000316099,0.000005182744,0.001763551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3117609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6271938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Rahool Parkash Agarwal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04371893510183338,"gpt":0.26364144151413,"spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838013,0.0006901576,0.0006892568,0.001519616,0.02571766,0.007085541,0.004145992,0.03474118,0.01321872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009727874,0.0008359127,0.001225603,0.002954354,0.006681468,0.002436894,0.002009722,0.02266088,0.001829166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04725691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929914,0.0005696135,0.0001624352,0.0008288761,0.002693659,0.002753966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969037,0.0015052,0.000119511,0.00007759096,0.001031182,0.0003627628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000727275,0.00005616517,0.002214349,0.00007721025,0.0000255843,0.003334387,0.004572781,0.0003464001,0.0004705108,0.2193414,0.764557,0.004931426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001319581,0.00004780499,0.005924284,0.0003714207,0.0001139535,0.001306984,0.01091578,0.00102639,0.001211178,0.02632707,0.9524039,0.0002193122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02041417,0.003788878,0.0009766703,0.6999283,0.00367806,0.0002754018,0.00112292,0.0001190762,0.2696966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1333192,0.001886728,0.0006595887,0.7342112,0.001450713,0.0001487696,0.0003164056,0.0000711672,0.1279363],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08501732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70356315","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Floor, Conflict of Interest and the Parliament of Canada Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Gussow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04385619762350818,"gpt":0.2820548642309233,"spread":0.2381986666074151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02005907,0.0007059998,0.001256039,0.006545203,0.03497382,0.02461374,0.005264482,0.01892218,0.008205532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09229454,0.001144677,0.0008620966,0.009647291,0.01476216,0.004384801,0.003982531,0.01518899,0.0006629501],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2224768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.514694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9546009,0.006704712,0.00189408,0.002042967,0.02338619,0.01137128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410132,0.02121815,0.002879427,0.001051458,0.02594285,0.007894936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697841,0.00003945662,0.003298224,0.0002352804,0.0000621342,0.0003019495,0.005851295,0.000863899,0.000135126,0.6749418,0.2960487,0.01816512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001023462,0.0000347761,0.03330017,0.001330655,0.0002031745,0.0001374048,0.009067114,0.001427843,0.0004394644,0.0855123,0.8680685,0.0003764305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04200125,0.06362508,0.001572648,0.5343131,0.004318334,0.0002484239,0.001450671,0.00008041822,0.3523901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.689663,0.02241593,0.003473918,0.1524381,0.001549062,0.0002803409,0.0005092702,0.0001340769,0.1295363],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2224768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888161112","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1257","title":"The Day the Dialogue Died: A Comment on Sauve v. Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher P. Manfredi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672920529756181,"gpt":0.2717723883430372,"spread":0.2550431830454754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005783503,0.0009664421,0.0009687407,0.001400588,0.08099222,0.01424945,0.006016061,0.04036314,0.004711621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01571034,0.0009867408,0.001596787,0.002464004,0.01941854,0.004361057,0.003920214,0.03903982,0.0006315822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1074304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1280299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898637,0.001643023,0.0002013752,0.0008931856,0.003068762,0.004329956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992768,0.003887605,0.0002410912,0.0001298727,0.00191904,0.001054415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001371136,0.00002425758,0.001291469,0.0001420383,0.00003225828,0.002744092,0.0803856,0.0003123836,0.0006175724,0.1900128,0.7176661,0.006634244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006594903,0.00002541953,0.003652279,0.0004696785,0.00007510736,0.0004180069,0.07451449,0.0004687699,0.001002979,0.01694898,0.9021174,0.0002408869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01827989,0.007899996,0.0005140316,0.8980596,0.004905485,0.00003949527,0.0003330955,0.00006929295,0.06989914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2180456,0.003232847,0.0004744592,0.7124509,0.001981164,0.00006847823,0.0001403317,0.0001599401,0.06344628],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1074304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7794656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264846025","doi":"","title":"Written and Oral Persuasion in the United States Courts: A District Judge's Perspective on Their History, Function, and Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Persuasion; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Mark R. Kravitz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0183438170065567,"gpt":0.3047617679055159,"spread":0.2864179508989592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234308,0.0002273239,0.0004200263,0.002673572,0.01015333,0.02646218,0.001450654,0.006638052,0.004244654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01226465,0.0003959194,0.0002811004,0.002646022,0.01352917,0.006928431,0.004341395,0.008350154,0.0003755325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01321457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009835873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03989949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07348859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922255,0.004270407,0.0003646049,0.0005921688,0.001393869,0.001153553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879865,0.006747902,0.001103284,0.0003933316,0.00226101,0.001507995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004445478,0.0001197518,0.002358525,0.0001808615,0.000009152842,0.0003228089,0.04858204,0.0001350344,0.0001627424,0.8445568,0.02839993,0.07512789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004190396,0.0001406405,0.01555629,0.001732419,0.00003045751,0.0004303182,0.07860679,0.0004709464,0.0007667535,0.1103807,0.7917289,0.0001137361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07321206,0.1643437,0.001735029,0.2525697,0.002825509,0.00004120276,0.000117033,0.00005923332,0.5050966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324006,0.01559976,0.0009690795,0.01628153,0.001058176,0.000061559,0.00003857127,0.00002669638,0.03356402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03989949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09587884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Steven F. Rosenhek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vaso Maric","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01908005545827297,"gpt":0.2530409978543282,"spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007398702,0.001030014,0.001080219,0.002620065,0.03140074,0.01560456,0.005984904,0.02367019,0.01350337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02240971,0.001486024,0.001682704,0.003179153,0.007796746,0.002630846,0.004579173,0.02006514,0.001732635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1932707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9798305,0.0007081461,0.0005044293,0.002030679,0.01066035,0.006265949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875298,0.003261111,0.0003811645,0.0008195809,0.006317291,0.001691111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009112727,0.00006443823,0.004820807,0.00009978742,0.00007033379,0.001592807,0.002974455,0.0008496391,0.001004701,0.6883255,0.2820453,0.01806102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361513,0.00006515004,0.01102195,0.0007398039,0.0004023253,0.0003623192,0.002166094,0.002649406,0.002143531,0.05698527,0.9228271,0.0004008746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05078175,0.004731525,0.003743048,0.1051114,0.002866777,0.0004340577,0.002789399,0.0003252852,0.8292168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459915,0.004696866,0.004356599,0.1637672,0.001801333,0.0003559571,0.00133351,0.0002805423,0.2774165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08482594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179309874","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1800","title":"Inconsistent Responsiveness Determination in Document Review: Difference of Opinion or Human Error?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Computer science; Human error; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Psychology; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Epistemology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Maura R. Grossman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Gordon V. Cormack","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820519774678054,"gpt":0.4173457186269999,"spread":0.3391405208802194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4621453,0.0008368607,0.002481027,0.009135067,0.003299783,0.008428406,0.00396021,0.004035722,0.002395453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7678267,0.001110734,0.001712461,0.006068004,0.009740588,0.01033176,0.005931162,0.00420284,0.0009584726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008522191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007858316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003410049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2901982,0.4997053,0.04806607,0.0270328,0.1307318,0.004265893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09446057,0.7707266,0.05231562,0.03221213,0.04900026,0.001284745],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001300521,0.0004201488,0.08938374,0.005878466,0.003553636,0.001787237,0.09568591,0.006647318,0.007534902,0.1612246,0.03424042,0.5923431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001365845,0.002187407,0.1805046,0.009551043,0.002775077,0.003899028,0.03342911,0.04333993,0.03554024,0.4563482,0.2292317,0.001827874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2852983,0.02500533,0.5055553,0.09118725,0.005886963,0.003911816,0.0007928489,0.001457847,0.08090447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8798699,0.002451146,0.09566595,0.01451393,0.001889263,0.001510671,0.000271195,0.0003368093,0.003491081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5378547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049431473","doi":"","title":"Gender-Identity Protection, Trade, and the Trump Administration: A Tale of Reluctant Progressivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Sexual orientation; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Identity (music); Negotiation; Law; Business; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Jean Galbraith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Beatrix Lu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01362667380807939,"gpt":0.2765362668559764,"spread":0.262909593047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02416551,0.0006588607,0.0006000984,0.001684798,0.01868933,0.02023221,0.002276994,0.01420937,0.003071799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02605336,0.0005641677,0.0007396198,0.001417264,0.08988076,0.01823505,0.01043607,0.03461289,0.0007679255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01383645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01389499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01283376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01041949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9767308,0.01344536,0.0007039612,0.002363661,0.00475628,0.001999996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842746,0.01140647,0.0008987105,0.001325293,0.001388556,0.000706411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003271874,0.000006524875,0.00005979314,0.000008995925,7.665591e-7,0.00002429743,0.009136169,0.00002209603,0.00002810086,0.983066,0.005701596,0.001942383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001528134,0.00003628085,0.00029042,0.0004451956,0.000006103237,0.0001250976,0.02012821,0.0002922091,0.0003295959,0.4865436,0.491751,0.00003696592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04130503,0.01127619,0.01066085,0.5657975,0.004050863,0.00005608143,0.0000340323,0.0001241298,0.3666954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8063779,0.005281429,0.005262666,0.1089891,0.002884354,0.000215718,0.00003463358,0.0003091415,0.07064514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02416551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1278009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133852656","doi":"","title":"Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Adjudication; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution; Judicial activism; Accountability; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Judith Resnik","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00943560439557363,"gpt":0.2665854545057907,"spread":0.2571498501102171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01452706,0.0002285198,0.0006410393,0.002509909,0.007054841,0.009965098,0.001431684,0.003228796,0.01647226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03415962,0.0003401242,0.0003915672,0.003203799,0.02489587,0.00794862,0.004167519,0.004187987,0.001337438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007234962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004229848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00344547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852888,0.00769999,0.0004331032,0.001521709,0.003149466,0.001906961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508078,0.03456703,0.004795087,0.002837092,0.003536331,0.003456668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001608983,0.00003809866,0.001883791,0.00001952485,0.000002834155,0.00001993863,0.001534346,0.00025698,0.00003092609,0.9858191,0.002771625,0.007606602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004219998,0.00003057958,0.002690824,0.00007672024,0.000004559972,0.00004138723,0.001445986,0.0009918406,0.00008365843,0.962889,0.03168977,0.00001347752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1149248,0.005400172,0.02539828,0.09719058,0.0004435427,0.00007854095,0.0002718033,0.00005865382,0.7562336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808264,0.001003416,0.001254257,0.002686437,0.001004112,0.00006335347,0.0000550976,0.00003757176,0.01306932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07682741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Frances E. Chapman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.039273711452434,"gpt":0.3395010143025037,"spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002970345,0.0007495218,0.001177343,0.002791389,0.002236742,0.00362574,0.001942634,0.007980834,0.02008709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02203233,0.0004660631,0.0005307351,0.002269226,0.002123749,0.003161063,0.001348934,0.007459238,0.00972155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004999196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008053701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02247034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06992979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976572,0.000592128,0.0001871738,0.0002382517,0.001174103,0.0001511033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818971,0.009525544,0.0006618201,0.000337514,0.006437816,0.001140273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002802077,0.000002622025,0.00002903487,0.00004659127,0.000001043413,0.0000118584,0.000007066523,0.000007965636,0.000004947259,0.0004590693,0.9946385,0.004788516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001083067,0.00001084847,0.0006119045,0.0008473152,0.000009457953,0.0001202541,0.00007789147,0.00003638343,0.00002297983,0.001082618,0.9971578,0.00001171684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004255925,0.1838018,0.0003298199,0.5409244,0.2348455,0.0001094126,0.0004027254,0.00006890798,0.03909177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01078822,0.2168669,0.0005951942,0.3452807,0.2130227,0.0002476231,0.0005688061,0.0001780228,0.2124518],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02247034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06719804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965708235","doi":"10.2307/3504645","title":"10.2307/3504645","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Applied philosophy; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Politics; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008321394201013394,"gpt":0.2249205174454817,"spread":0.2165991232444683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008258066,0.001562221,0.00110683,0.00222088,0.001795259,0.0047883,0.001776187,0.002806078,0.9846922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093114,0.0007514048,0.0007158997,0.002675446,0.001722403,0.005701591,0.004011316,0.001684155,0.9845673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001138892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001358607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004266866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004697844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994512,0.00004847098,0.00004264865,0.0001508641,0.0002190818,0.00008765869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980977,0.0004461579,0.000073553,0.0003248004,0.0004664536,0.0005914291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644671,0.000155923,0.00049096,0.000403517,0.00001319111,0.0001697981,0.00009911361,0.0001463941,0.001340423,0.006847624,0.5921835,0.3979851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002366685,0.00003149394,0.0008079787,0.0001805184,0.000005844669,0.0001888959,0.0001303396,0.0001036072,0.0001845105,0.001205443,0.9971238,0.00001378603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002959842,0.0003396609,0.0002952394,0.0002986116,0.0003173388,0.00004190441,0.0007795653,0.0004670897,0.9971645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001114215,0.0003626414,0.0004219753,0.0003974262,0.00008950284,0.00002983745,0.0010906,0.0002990569,0.9961947],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02183461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498238348","doi":"","title":"Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America's Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse is Not the Answer- A Compartive Legal Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminology; Substance abuse; Psychology; Substance use; Child custody; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Linda C. Fentiman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02418125322418489,"gpt":0.3038653782064632,"spread":0.2796841249822783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005269831,0.0002184373,0.0002992769,0.00255721,0.01269624,0.009328705,0.001499242,0.00657573,0.003424282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183402,0.0002238635,0.0003616849,0.001762772,0.03508554,0.007426731,0.002726149,0.006748224,0.0002319165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01746407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01519887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.207553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2709184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950531,0.002261695,0.0001051339,0.0004982066,0.00101139,0.001070576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934283,0.00399615,0.000659692,0.0003037956,0.001233668,0.0003782975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008318068,0.00002123818,0.002369183,0.00003337282,0.000008113479,0.0003219063,0.01756192,0.00007027228,0.00005382016,0.9608675,0.008611241,0.01007315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003295095,0.00007433312,0.0173773,0.001067461,0.00006810127,0.0008243906,0.1493598,0.0006382315,0.0005526737,0.409044,0.4208755,0.00008519189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09942541,0.02021779,0.002048559,0.5461199,0.001144114,0.00002818335,0.00009924976,0.00004002316,0.3308768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162041,0.01057182,0.0008215361,0.05966893,0.0009786229,0.00003922442,0.00005976653,0.00004234801,0.01161373],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.207553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4126897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314285884","doi":"10.2307/3552548","title":"Beyond the Nass Valley: National Implications of the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw Decision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Nigel Bankes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Owen Lippert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03462854562494203,"gpt":0.3160677530455197,"spread":0.2814392074205777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006354878,0.0003132071,0.0009324818,0.00229633,0.02906338,0.01497304,0.003391549,0.009400367,0.01359438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02052366,0.0004935883,0.0007433504,0.002931564,0.01190553,0.004607796,0.004639379,0.009753995,0.0004116267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08916063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1744792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920592,0.0008310164,0.0001104952,0.0005871665,0.002025775,0.004386348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934151,0.002326282,0.000250253,0.0001687292,0.00221397,0.001625701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001610124,0.00008998813,0.007922601,0.0001041131,0.00004666253,0.000507156,0.007991568,0.0009210158,0.0002946259,0.8112721,0.149078,0.02161115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002987137,0.00008723292,0.1173223,0.0009635084,0.0003084525,0.0001841585,0.04980316,0.002680269,0.00087363,0.2461087,0.5810567,0.0003131462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1820255,0.004318356,0.0004318296,0.402179,0.0009540092,0.00008254922,0.0009435346,0.00003627249,0.4090289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427957,0.002291908,0.0006885356,0.08620409,0.0003463102,0.00007851802,0.0002791013,0.00005141088,0.06726444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08916063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6469086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164598656","doi":"","title":"The Paper Tiger Awakens: NOrth American Environmental Law After the Cozumel Reef Case","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tiger; Fishery; Reef; Geography; Law; Political science; Biology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Stanton Kibel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009028591866510343,"gpt":0.2471793717977171,"spread":0.2381507799312068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313434,0.0001623457,0.0002563787,0.0007645641,0.02048227,0.007783618,0.00117914,0.007783655,0.003439877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006103697,0.0002538851,0.0003035777,0.00143306,0.01097643,0.004381771,0.003506548,0.008936599,0.0002824711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01768527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01169628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3744569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5457337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99761,0.0005087162,0.00004426343,0.0003566813,0.0004468458,0.00103353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981794,0.0009029359,0.0002649725,0.0001177835,0.000305044,0.0002297607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000461248,0.00005466158,0.008561966,0.00007044449,0.000009893427,0.003378383,0.0521055,0.000260793,0.0004759207,0.7966491,0.1166509,0.02173624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002500681,0.00004068121,0.02317368,0.0003246255,0.00002402362,0.0007061229,0.04983921,0.0003340098,0.0007940308,0.04142993,0.8832335,0.00007506635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2463942,0.006339291,0.0008172592,0.3940796,0.001046935,0.00003206937,0.00008428215,0.00003762328,0.3511688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820568,0.002873767,0.0003771459,0.05343074,0.0004733572,0.00006044442,0.00004846948,0.000030768,0.06064846],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6255431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7445545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29320652","doi":"","title":"Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law reform; Law; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Deborah L. Rhode","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04000465346090345,"gpt":0.3178044839275043,"spread":0.2777998304666009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009763672,0.0003390707,0.0008954902,0.004980615,0.03339477,0.02020054,0.004096761,0.009530274,0.007660754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01966102,0.000413413,0.000807347,0.008107332,0.01680023,0.004324512,0.004533951,0.007779969,0.0002218964],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3273482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.421641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832135,0.002841192,0.000331856,0.0008025952,0.004040082,0.008770793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836779,0.00363094,0.0007737302,0.0002813084,0.00710946,0.004526786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000800069,0.0001123149,0.007742597,0.0001961434,0.00004006956,0.0004685616,0.01694163,0.001354363,0.0002771349,0.906018,0.03582661,0.03094262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002216023,0.0001403353,0.08219576,0.00265606,0.0003136149,0.0002689953,0.159376,0.004855472,0.0008680759,0.1255445,0.6231043,0.0004553097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1334157,0.03922944,0.001002464,0.5467311,0.00097628,0.0001227316,0.0004042184,0.00004646829,0.2780718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135382,0.01901857,0.001123958,0.04568378,0.0002609015,0.00007397625,0.0001533935,0.00002498813,0.02012227],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3273482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206020881","doi":"","title":"Gender and the Profession: The No-Problem Problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Honor; Pleasure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Representation (politics); Lesbian; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Deborah L. Rhode","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02631564516929536,"gpt":0.2723184401503823,"spread":0.246002794981087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02457745,0.0006138155,0.001167893,0.00248664,0.0157289,0.009619845,0.002935916,0.01380756,0.01735053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03957808,0.0005678724,0.0006873567,0.002178274,0.05776485,0.0233483,0.01059444,0.01843038,0.002723102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01020393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01242063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02325345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02316731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9734038,0.01424493,0.000812575,0.003145191,0.005125902,0.003267591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646071,0.02155787,0.001655806,0.00147407,0.003357313,0.007347744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007274506,0.0001244642,0.003872438,0.0002426848,0.00002028554,0.0005256223,0.01919319,0.00007908075,0.00007581391,0.7660415,0.1538531,0.05589903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000642649,0.00008044468,0.003164212,0.0009065717,0.0000159358,0.00153333,0.06053249,0.0002804533,0.00007595031,0.5117639,0.4215143,0.0000681311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006575206,0.009216283,0.001394055,0.9297423,0.004781186,0.00001538597,0.00004319861,0.00001718215,0.04821524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5188078,0.01516949,0.002408241,0.4103741,0.01734302,0.0001565797,0.00007474037,0.0001443197,0.03552178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02457745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1299796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161914410","doi":"10.1300/j082v48n03_06","title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sodomy; Sexual orientation; Gay rights; Gender identity; Homosexuality; Political science; Law; Same sex; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rory Elliott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mary Bonauto","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04396964410420226,"gpt":0.3737858610926049,"spread":0.3298162169884026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004057522,0.00007559516,0.0001613395,0.001229399,0.002556101,0.001169867,0.0001550492,0.0002380053,0.003539298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001023145,0.00007420604,0.0001042207,0.001699139,0.001109437,0.0005695251,0.0007574547,0.0004437896,0.0001295767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002259402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001934652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3441722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6668413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997438,0.00007108958,0.000007986107,0.00002158673,0.00006205808,0.00009353795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.000118342,0.0001956469,0.00001670259,0.0001262162,0.0002067537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001280731,0.0001909604,0.8103855,0.00009093508,0.0000366601,0.0007208132,0.1178401,0.00006379328,0.0007070346,0.01174011,0.004171586,0.05392437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002817872,0.00002758484,0.9110584,0.00008446765,0.000009678424,0.0002478096,0.07353867,0.00003085742,0.00005743803,0.0005177727,0.01441759,0.000006844154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732178,0.003299678,0.00002821331,0.001311728,0.00003498378,0.00000598909,0.0001274166,0.00000172821,0.02197247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995575,0.002142327,0.00003420128,0.0002900507,0.00001642561,0.000005474361,0.00006212822,0.000002162253,0.001872346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3441722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6843378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289942971","doi":"10.1177/14647001221114611","title":"Drafting injustice: overturning <i>Roe v. Wade</i> , spillover effects and reproductive rights in context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Reproductive rights; Spillover effect; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; History; Demography; Reproductive health","authors":[{"name":"Candace Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007330329053927768,"gpt":0.2650739796795479,"spread":0.2577436506256202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01652178,0.000351851,0.0004103837,0.001192367,0.009327917,0.01117035,0.002210402,0.01443163,0.004734214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0367132,0.0003651106,0.0004820293,0.0007704889,0.03187036,0.008111792,0.008006406,0.01271917,0.0003478052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006006527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01078158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03939349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08171217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987795,0.006984769,0.0004488073,0.001535934,0.001230545,0.002005006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764785,0.01728529,0.002466596,0.00180478,0.001311579,0.0006533219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002523031,0.00005281074,0.00177573,0.0000694337,0.00001264029,0.0003265988,0.02270678,0.0001992617,0.0003386939,0.9613375,0.005884335,0.007270981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001279568,0.0002293817,0.01831782,0.001876078,0.0002173676,0.0007599343,0.07983941,0.001493836,0.005164782,0.6736361,0.2181115,0.0002258754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2709953,0.005120395,0.008548125,0.1607843,0.0006720672,0.0001934213,0.00008559925,0.00004743913,0.5535534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655058,0.0009501752,0.0009643398,0.01773451,0.000148194,0.0000708111,0.00001191403,0.0000193812,0.01459482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03939349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08737659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394661373","doi":"10.29173/alr1409","title":"Clones, Controversy, and Criminal Law: A Comment on the Proposal for Legislation Governing Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Criminal law; Law; Government (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Political science; Government regulation; Reproductive technology; Human reproduction; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Timothy Caulfield","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05611255327318252,"gpt":0.3423504418763614,"spread":0.2862378886031788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02171764,0.001223287,0.001802331,0.002175644,0.02350091,0.01103599,0.009990991,0.1426171,0.005458604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04903845,0.001900092,0.002926811,0.003719338,0.01893386,0.006882695,0.003807016,0.06459626,0.002192437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02504407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05334386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4213326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5629486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857292,0.002892179,0.001082863,0.00224814,0.005269389,0.002778184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566424,0.03382937,0.001226407,0.000772391,0.005413743,0.002115647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005674892,0.0000300938,0.0006616102,0.0001112194,0.00002469589,0.0007396914,0.002865322,0.0002293796,0.0003152693,0.1122198,0.8787143,0.004031917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263519,0.0000854942,0.00397598,0.0006395835,0.0001846601,0.0004047183,0.003841036,0.0006775216,0.0008421639,0.03403691,0.9548262,0.0002592827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001658919,0.004098862,0.0002613308,0.9790025,0.005344618,0.00003415495,0.000101663,0.00003239346,0.009465588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009419264,0.001401103,0.0002885585,0.9709627,0.004983354,0.00005846934,0.00004009684,0.00003387672,0.01281248],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","authors":[{"name":"Gary Lawson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert D. Sloane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01791814809791823,"gpt":0.3145785384309697,"spread":0.2966603903330515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003745965,0.0001927723,0.0003222192,0.0005279281,0.006982606,0.00638502,0.001487323,0.002745729,0.003088727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00381839,0.000264534,0.0003215211,0.0007476602,0.01151203,0.003605684,0.004326781,0.004058029,0.0001610473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008702022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007622422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1999132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1891965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983938,0.0006340275,0.00006329578,0.000304074,0.0001578773,0.0004468268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988348,0.0005247447,0.0001348565,0.0002661847,0.000170194,0.00006924705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001909087,0.000005006747,0.0009700401,0.00002003438,0.000005238026,0.0002662205,0.01110074,0.0001881043,0.0005934777,0.9801405,0.001237419,0.005454124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102617,0.0001287098,0.01839682,0.0005538568,0.0002228787,0.0005693004,0.05874247,0.003294454,0.005747677,0.3665443,0.5454493,0.0002476238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4498767,0.003556859,0.00578546,0.04097389,0.0002273782,0.0001429755,0.0002203004,0.00006783144,0.4991486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800498,0.0006058644,0.0007179009,0.002241614,0.00005243476,0.0000755673,0.00002447338,0.00001832828,0.01621399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1999132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3974991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341806150","doi":"","title":"For their own good? Exploring legislative responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the Illinois Safe Children Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Legislation; Legislature; Legislative intent; Law; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Safeguarding; Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Angela L. Bergman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08878705201028878,"gpt":0.3367925412700385,"spread":0.2480054892597498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01493139,0.0004496856,0.000317952,0.003083776,0.01886713,0.01325506,0.003181139,0.01079915,0.007047453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02958031,0.0007090434,0.0006152323,0.003350646,0.01939306,0.006819338,0.007984187,0.01079603,0.0007020051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02717257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04489642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2722035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3902138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819791,0.008467549,0.000771859,0.001058717,0.004126123,0.003596555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618064,0.03003603,0.00240886,0.0004676619,0.003458226,0.00182288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003596655,0.0001021908,0.0108107,0.000305221,0.0000121856,0.00122364,0.4810567,0.0003019641,0.0006360709,0.3673486,0.11464,0.02352676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001393151,0.00005418845,0.01552269,0.001742687,0.00001819692,0.0001879811,0.4629407,0.0002434905,0.0005056469,0.007876482,0.5107672,0.0001268578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1712628,0.02132362,0.001502848,0.5479381,0.001960062,0.000194254,0.0002697289,0.0000979799,0.2554506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6911414,0.0165821,0.002468731,0.1893397,0.001213184,0.001036593,0.0003050511,0.000122595,0.09779063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2722035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489925341","doi":"","title":"Getting Sex \"Right\": Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Law; Transgender; Scholarship; Sociology; Bodily integrity; Political science; Normative; Adjudication; Gender studies; Human sexuality","authors":[{"name":"David B. Cruz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0268834498211064,"gpt":0.3242886311621533,"spread":0.2974051813410469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02251181,0.0002170188,0.000566071,0.001977127,0.01287474,0.01582472,0.001586047,0.007273984,0.003483951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01934646,0.0002497597,0.0003633508,0.001045064,0.1044175,0.0104873,0.01240274,0.007817109,0.0002583545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004794241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004764346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004034857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004131428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826841,0.01194185,0.0005304305,0.001442613,0.002378587,0.00102234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782627,0.01739969,0.001215627,0.001261208,0.001055877,0.0008049243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007353449,0.00001730229,0.0003986401,0.00001761899,0.00000202974,0.0001239942,0.04542044,0.00004534161,0.0001011101,0.9496205,0.0009500824,0.003295528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001713446,0.00005111771,0.001336706,0.000423357,0.00001122941,0.0003016766,0.1215633,0.0005398198,0.0006456072,0.7918536,0.08322693,0.00002950132],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562824,0.01129142,0.01561164,0.1804267,0.001369326,0.00005437008,0.00002815235,0.00005432866,0.5348817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806176,0.0009184963,0.0008684247,0.01070409,0.0003287974,0.0000487193,0.000007322619,0.00001705173,0.006489442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02251181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1190553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746090","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0278914142674676,"gpt":0.3094849583698926,"spread":0.281593544102425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002926354,0.0002147221,0.0002118437,0.0007687294,0.003801035,0.002101843,0.0003496892,0.0009495902,0.008738277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006408027,0.0001570592,0.0001878372,0.001328883,0.002338265,0.001477233,0.001179343,0.001997118,0.001105031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003153777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004012181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04297879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996213,0.00008616245,0.00001328157,0.00004211129,0.0001676532,0.00006959472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998272,0.00005589,0.0000166084,0.0000108483,0.00005090838,0.00003862153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009529048,0.00005768264,0.001042189,0.0001714798,0.000004583355,0.0003933943,0.02329774,0.0001464942,0.0002328343,0.580078,0.2626966,0.1318693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001751693,0.0000058296,0.001438947,0.0002159612,0.000001471532,0.0001591217,0.003755317,0.00002175021,0.00002844617,0.007121678,0.9872463,0.000003444194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009549753,0.111431,0.0002640035,0.02059989,0.002658566,0.00001721941,0.00005906295,0.00003324798,0.8553873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1948035,0.1660957,0.0007891512,0.01868865,0.001600355,0.00005415782,0.0001953125,0.00005780164,0.6177154],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04297879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08545727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","authors":[{"name":"Allison Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995210207593185,"gpt":0.29853962858674,"spread":0.2685875265108081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003236328,0.001098741,0.0006404098,0.002578431,0.07266212,0.01136872,0.003689472,0.005125971,0.005171655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007048577,0.0006750295,0.0005493642,0.002805524,0.04595716,0.005724351,0.009219592,0.008587572,0.000387051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1207221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07400392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939632,0.001985734,0.00007475707,0.0003522388,0.001254458,0.002369651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996114,0.001016399,0.0002655967,0.0001272034,0.0009624913,0.001514268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194277,0.00001525429,0.002317518,0.0000588313,0.00000738312,0.001318255,0.9375557,0.00007587576,0.0002052794,0.02863058,0.02374086,0.006042424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003860844,0.00001533945,0.00283474,0.0001645015,0.00001295643,0.0004208882,0.8741347,0.00007777687,0.0001095323,0.001649413,0.1205221,0.000054133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6237186,0.01437042,0.001055142,0.1665976,0.001709729,0.00009908395,0.000510614,0.0001070156,0.1918318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970177,0.003481581,0.0002648084,0.007915009,0.0001172054,0.00002768941,0.00006080192,0.00005009592,0.01790591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1207221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752244394","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1109","title":"Whose Best Interests?: Custody and Access Law and Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Premise; Law; Child custody; Contradiction; Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Noel Semple","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0232905646197808,"gpt":0.3312614555548316,"spread":0.3079708909350508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01377478,0.0003798043,0.0006318273,0.001874025,0.007505493,0.01581199,0.002097384,0.01002309,0.006326913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02442204,0.0004608172,0.0006432088,0.002000543,0.05116881,0.01810547,0.007326384,0.008357541,0.000854633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006760565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009354379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009853172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006325729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822189,0.01023523,0.0005958403,0.001509487,0.003559156,0.001881407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898224,0.007525612,0.000801751,0.0005057844,0.0007849896,0.0005593991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002644335,0.000003903358,0.0001049058,0.000005709395,0.000001156691,0.00004622818,0.001143231,0.00002323058,0.00001911364,0.9966917,0.0005723665,0.001385836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450955,0.00002201288,0.0004849142,0.000217726,0.000008624923,0.0002373368,0.002948715,0.0002329857,0.0001322004,0.9538035,0.04188149,0.0000160218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04597013,0.02574364,0.04519327,0.1443289,0.0007159092,0.00009043849,0.00007418064,0.0000591101,0.7378244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484668,0.005537625,0.006212655,0.0156071,0.0009161709,0.0001522813,0.0000329878,0.00006252967,0.02301173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01581199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Douglas W. Allen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02427893939090937,"gpt":0.331284516279577,"spread":0.3070055768886676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005320034,0.0004740079,0.0006974553,0.003356049,0.001814873,0.005688887,0.001530525,0.002303242,0.01312633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02124746,0.0003248447,0.001103376,0.002025966,0.004236863,0.005292157,0.002232963,0.002898295,0.000416512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004404567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002420694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004226642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002965013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963517,0.001277389,0.0001038057,0.000187427,0.0016299,0.0004497519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890326,0.007785447,0.001038886,0.0005250608,0.001116173,0.0005018297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002995379,0.00006733475,0.002568149,0.00003455047,0.00001416475,0.00008891977,0.0000728497,0.006703148,0.00003848451,0.9800047,0.001770586,0.008607213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003738597,0.0001554762,0.007718151,0.0002443092,0.00004633413,0.0002836851,0.001094282,0.06311526,0.0002068529,0.8892553,0.03779361,0.00004923506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946718,0.007354107,0.05351662,0.01288105,0.0005590168,0.0003934104,0.0005953865,0.00005756428,0.7299711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724639,0.003076107,0.004410691,0.0007887259,0.0004175998,0.0001704207,0.0001957948,0.00002655233,0.01845017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04391199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168019101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1110","title":"In the Park: A Jurisprudential Primer","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01238130242364787,"gpt":0.3160161615382893,"spread":0.3036348591146414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00569572,0.0003643849,0.0007151722,0.002051481,0.009525994,0.01560313,0.003242197,0.01132418,0.01713937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483249,0.0006036035,0.0007009563,0.002218673,0.0291131,0.01864104,0.006744661,0.01304911,0.002346062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004691382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006205643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006282687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01194504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952071,0.002787392,0.000169883,0.0005733234,0.0006357308,0.0006265129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947108,0.003712258,0.0002559807,0.0003497016,0.0005779023,0.0003932386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001401643,0.000007046507,0.00002867725,0.000008603996,7.015981e-7,0.00001768604,0.001083699,0.00001702831,0.00000969077,0.994679,0.002949706,0.001196913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001405132,0.00001588371,0.0001615069,0.0001688776,0.000004300518,0.00010284,0.003434748,0.0002732588,0.00005943435,0.8056407,0.1901151,0.000009323227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01008721,0.0239334,0.04857599,0.2751069,0.002323397,0.0001180539,0.00008707269,0.00008407202,0.639684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7521976,0.01191667,0.0171149,0.06035561,0.005013287,0.0004978725,0.0001045776,0.0002807764,0.1525186],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01713937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05733693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1000343132","doi":"","title":"James Madison Has Left the Building","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Nullification; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; State (computer science); Democracy; Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Sovereignty; Federalism; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Keith E. Whittington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02876443821679884,"gpt":0.2704875496667374,"spread":0.2417231114499385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001320025,0.0005642709,0.0004632061,0.001139798,0.004460771,0.005416848,0.0007696603,0.004014766,0.1961861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004705565,0.0003813559,0.0003159519,0.0006819353,0.001504216,0.002068439,0.002111115,0.004244974,0.0913435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003066401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006210238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02084237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05927351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99834,0.0002275593,0.00006305271,0.0003857343,0.0007563169,0.0002272847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974955,0.0004829904,0.000101867,0.0001995501,0.0007271949,0.0009929201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001812531,0.00001853439,0.0003169542,0.00004875256,0.000004913237,0.0001047226,0.00009789846,0.00002540999,0.0001535727,0.02241765,0.9076737,0.0691198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.016684e-7,0.000002486582,0.000109654,0.00003212515,0.000001009929,0.00002547271,0.00002568121,0.000006550291,0.00003819186,0.0005517503,0.9992039,0.000002348728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001427987,0.05047468,0.001267016,0.2143756,0.03164971,0.00005657278,0.0004541182,0.0004159797,0.6998784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006454697,0.009708558,0.0005492968,0.02354535,0.001956774,0.00002239224,0.0001048582,0.0001006574,0.9575574],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1961861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6563079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160729556","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Bankruptcy Counseling: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislature; Debt; Creditor; Agency (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Iain Ramsay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02214958015371033,"gpt":0.2593556414306408,"spread":0.2372060612769304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00285226,0.0005423359,0.0004192934,0.00121499,0.01671145,0.003675644,0.00339276,0.002731867,0.01281653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496154,0.0005286247,0.0003717061,0.005098135,0.005107283,0.001341627,0.002858239,0.003927768,0.0006464925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0474259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1293846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.954585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968559,0.0004860411,0.0001006072,0.000252277,0.001099642,0.001205503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918519,0.001049059,0.0004077595,0.0002041017,0.001712656,0.004774508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004252861,0.002847133,0.07860765,0.001239709,0.00007526666,0.01638423,0.1367695,0.001017031,0.001276608,0.03802704,0.2392088,0.4841218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001402997,0.0005564929,0.1181792,0.002230425,0.00007747607,0.01155222,0.08077624,0.0009674945,0.0006743713,0.002671402,0.7818977,0.0002766835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6300654,0.0415553,0.00167145,0.1130983,0.002252002,0.0006697284,0.001474892,0.0002520168,0.2089609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995498,0.04320168,0.002300743,0.01453326,0.0003612926,0.0001378943,0.0006239047,0.000149487,0.03914196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0474259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3441006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333618217","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.150202","title":"<i>Carter</i> v. <i>Canada</i>: What’s next for physicians?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Declaration; Law; Political science; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Medicine; Criminal law","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn Downie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02032390175597526,"gpt":0.2639546485015136,"spread":0.2436307467455383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003611414,0.000406547,0.0004413998,0.001175452,0.02092998,0.0068237,0.002421321,0.01298577,0.00923642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01628229,0.0005188914,0.0005279193,0.001605514,0.007184411,0.002723442,0.002072438,0.01880308,0.001532856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04993397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1559375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9541585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950675,0.0004271704,0.0001216889,0.0003364241,0.002039987,0.002007256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951717,0.001078045,0.0001798147,0.00007477996,0.001912411,0.001583197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001382237,0.000006878654,0.0006720263,0.00004382109,0.000005613241,0.0001723177,0.0009343615,0.00002831105,0.0001092544,0.03582594,0.9546503,0.007537342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000265944,0.00001402397,0.002978095,0.0006200874,0.00002896267,0.0002046538,0.004012995,0.0001129705,0.0003906442,0.009841976,0.9816784,0.00009054189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002604009,0.009809688,0.0002810334,0.9129738,0.005287077,0.00004125641,0.0003532084,0.00004950076,0.0686004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04658955,0.007713363,0.0008541493,0.8875268,0.001912302,0.00003913799,0.0002186896,0.00007179791,0.05507416],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04993397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.362298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297261397","doi":"10.1097/01.npr.0000873552.13618.91","title":"The overturn of Roe v. Wade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Nurse Practitioner","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Management; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Law; History; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Louise Kaplan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01582404112752196,"gpt":0.3050086687361152,"spread":0.2891846276085932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648584,0.0002274405,0.0004726003,0.0006266461,0.01349596,0.006063902,0.001226624,0.01140421,0.006228495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03227936,0.0004259508,0.0003630747,0.0004174427,0.008549669,0.003798748,0.004391692,0.02037887,0.001212744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005429266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01223936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06471618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2033715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928186,0.002479685,0.0002735133,0.0008631182,0.001344867,0.002220226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928105,0.003644687,0.0004214956,0.000810549,0.001297965,0.001014813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006906906,0.00006725856,0.004150425,0.00004635017,0.00002486434,0.002958814,0.02265991,0.0002058679,0.0005677759,0.6661752,0.2644871,0.03858735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002539388,0.00005571562,0.004022968,0.0003762062,0.00002247359,0.001153773,0.01456233,0.0002474672,0.0007023817,0.0483382,0.9304248,0.00006821116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06652716,0.005011138,0.001178203,0.3967366,0.004886486,0.00004743382,0.00006125229,0.00006629732,0.5254854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6271653,0.001417586,0.0003991501,0.2099075,0.0008200764,0.00004735107,0.00002680257,0.00007558666,0.1601406],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06471618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1286789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179633363","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1245","title":"The Charter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Beverley McLachlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01750348607281817,"gpt":0.2721527440633323,"spread":0.2546492579905142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01025642,0.0004496929,0.0004410397,0.0008305269,0.00977357,0.0184996,0.001012747,0.009352421,0.01208582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215891,0.0001884448,0.0005323183,0.001173089,0.009095104,0.01145625,0.002850129,0.02027733,0.002548617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008004623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01248868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0417282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05182753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908042,0.003280101,0.0002531748,0.0007388187,0.003381896,0.001541849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906847,0.002656857,0.0007692254,0.0005346359,0.003284259,0.002070408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003092752,0.0000275692,0.0006367592,0.00003092894,0.000004319154,0.0001136206,0.001930442,0.00007106174,0.0001045402,0.1866364,0.7886934,0.02172007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000867579,0.00002866512,0.00142293,0.000137536,0.000005363964,0.00006266784,0.002747712,0.00008210607,0.000148454,0.02061817,0.9747039,0.00003387461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00470929,0.01588245,0.0009865897,0.8844582,0.03372026,0.00001634656,0.0001212865,0.0000760597,0.0600296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2498145,0.01489288,0.002566911,0.4504412,0.03448873,0.00008569573,0.0002849673,0.0003950418,0.2470302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08297062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}