{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":149,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":149,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ad1d57e6e186","filters":{"topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W1525320904","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm.2012.18135caa.003","title":"American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and The Procedural Justice Alternative","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing An International Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Open Society Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03089794433752499,"gpt":0.2910879570120709,"spread":0.2601900126745459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006127529,0.000154038,0.0002586848,0.0002044157,0.0008453288,0.000324646,0.0003416228,0.00002497832,0.00003983042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324696,0.0001160423,0.00008966424,0.000132375,0.0006453131,0.0007701571,0.0002083486,0.0002402101,0.00005427528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004199065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003606288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04388181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004490598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998821,0.00003461093,0.0004137693,0.0001597639,0.0001252747,0.0004456043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990275,0.0001090794,0.0004412119,0.0000970825,0.0001620517,0.0001631003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101931,0.00004361284,0.2609436,0.000005713473,0.0001853371,0.000003304863,0.009115432,0.0001668676,0.000009626303,0.7285402,0.0004201719,0.0004642691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003291284,0.0001280053,0.8957409,0.00006537751,0.00007937763,0.001992559,0.00363797,0.002683409,0.0001562003,0.0538185,0.03781342,0.000592961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672224,0.0004587429,0.0004364151,0.01133153,0.0008501756,0.00008620996,0.00004245103,0.0000228451,0.01954925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915379,0.0004816368,0.0001579855,0.003987847,0.002650106,0.00001278442,0.000002893967,0.00001335091,0.001155548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6747217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166152439","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00163.x","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E‐Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the United States and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Information privacy; European union; Accounting; E-commerce; Privacy policy; Good faith; FTC Fair Information Practice; Personally identifiable information; Faith; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1260619102270193,"gpt":0.3945388260192302,"spread":0.2684769157922109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006646765,0.0000894066,0.0002936493,0.0003618398,0.0003909509,0.0001893168,0.0002706966,0.00003353885,0.000005016077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002317987,0.00005400834,0.00003242682,0.0009687245,0.0004772364,0.0004672994,0.0001371677,0.0005688092,6.798714e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008953577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009396092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002357276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985567,0.000253287,0.0005318228,0.0001266253,0.0003362567,0.0001953624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970709,0.001664305,0.0004734377,0.0001111428,0.0006538571,0.00002636568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01276756,0.001532806,0.2717565,0.00009419339,0.001171299,0.00003548986,0.1278697,0.008560516,0.00008931077,0.5725451,0.003119919,0.0004576423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05635795,0.003642885,0.4960113,0.000316345,0.0001357312,0.0001489956,0.2833914,0.004048004,0.0000419184,0.03766441,0.1176626,0.0005783734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924122,0.001883593,0.0001257587,0.004138372,0.00005993393,0.0002799257,0.00002671851,0.00000178314,0.00107171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987639,0.001030555,0.0000546987,0.00006224449,0.00006461104,0.000007569175,0.000003465756,0.000004046866,0.00000895533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5348806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034690477","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.001.0001","title":"City, State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Political science; City-state; Urbanization; Population; Constitutional law; Pace; Law; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Economy; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Demography; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0592733040141126,"gpt":0.1902316670155419,"spread":0.1309583630014293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005095528,0.0001479945,0.0003765077,0.00005488903,0.00006936805,0.00004188575,0.0001522974,0.00007801504,0.002662189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001797671,0.0001529497,0.0001334121,0.00003629406,0.00008150515,0.00005457398,0.0001409687,0.0001806878,0.0128213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001057767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007066755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007670646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002606486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992221,0.000001040843,0.0003222731,0.0003011052,0.00002451508,0.000128968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996588,0.00001497223,0.0001459013,0.0001083907,0.00001626717,0.00005564101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001466221,0.000004191858,0.0002533856,0.00001227107,0.00006741828,0.000005592561,0.00001987657,7.747148e-7,1.700894e-8,0.7238178,0.275605,0.0002122068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005491242,0.000009927222,0.000118854,0.000004795618,0.000002070479,5.939979e-7,5.704092e-7,0.000005974528,4.619676e-7,0.3638951,0.6357725,0.000134191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003336442,0.004230724,0.0006556712,0.001921,0.0003559724,0.00008268098,0.0004803376,0.00005628592,0.992214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001466658,0.0006000355,0.00009748942,0.00159592,0.0002599748,0.00000779155,0.00004560325,0.0000129813,0.9959136],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3601675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090208598","doi":"10.1177/0038038512450804","title":"Privacy as a Human Right: A Sociological Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Brandeis University","keywords":"Sociology; Relevance (law); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Supreme court; Human rights; Law; Sociology of law; Character (mathematics); Sociological theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05944698384741469,"gpt":0.2746551609278512,"spread":0.2152081770804365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005144683,0.00009788382,0.0002620726,0.00003577368,0.0003255239,0.000007885204,0.0001433262,0.0001656817,0.002333639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000145741,0.00008307962,0.000117534,0.00003282867,0.0007548169,0.00009245154,0.0001058331,0.0001772948,0.004650531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000108577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004576537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.712522e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991826,0.00004482635,0.0002368935,0.000183298,0.00001352955,0.0003388542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996181,0.0001017751,0.0001007201,0.0001103367,0.00001178509,0.00005730312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004518221,0.00005516826,0.118549,0.000001995822,0.00005425209,0.000001211302,0.001516836,1.452826e-7,0.00001541532,0.878796,0.0009618863,0.00004360812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537155,0.00004008603,0.0685704,7.963945e-7,0.000003224355,0.000005350106,0.0001047551,5.796266e-7,0.000004994237,0.7572558,0.173756,0.0001043857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7711263,0.009993551,0.0002320477,0.001638633,0.0003984096,0.00007242384,0.00002058189,0.0000486745,0.2164694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955992,0.0000487662,0.00007570675,0.001178676,0.0004861318,0.00003531311,0.00001047848,0.000005226726,0.002560562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2244729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278978939","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2693826","title":"The Death of Rules and Standards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02424408546567745,"gpt":0.2261757750307114,"spread":0.2019316895650339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987912,0.0000472188,0.0001117494,0.00002666681,0.0001878447,0.0000318852,0.00008842792,0.00001748917,0.000003724374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001488247,0.00003271408,0.00003516352,0.00003040006,0.00008813087,0.00007753271,0.00002771143,0.0002644428,0.00001136917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003780977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000636876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001534684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001608024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992287,0.000006720566,0.0001936039,0.00006463986,0.00006109642,0.0004452073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996992,0.00002061199,0.0001180348,0.00004784099,0.00007994615,0.00003432433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001589667,0.000006416067,0.01964527,7.498787e-7,0.0000633601,2.690244e-7,0.00005010573,0.000002378461,3.631498e-7,0.9780629,0.00009916672,0.002053132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002501573,0.00008444315,0.002623811,0.000002421142,0.000003022312,0.00005028661,0.0002659152,0.00001290751,0.000003615798,0.8876879,0.1089741,0.00004139735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5005007,0.3311417,0.007884327,0.005994862,0.0004802449,0.00009943591,0.00009665004,0.00001339054,0.1537887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866423,0.01256901,0.00002766262,0.00002219454,0.0000772376,0.00000125866,2.420302e-7,0.000002836483,0.0006572402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1444769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101363655","doi":"","title":"Federalism and subsidiarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; New Federalism; Dual federalism; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Law and economics; Supreme court; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; European union; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02199219278334496,"gpt":0.1703805813422849,"spread":0.14838838855894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001002573,0.00003547146,0.00008773639,0.00001738392,0.0001032531,0.00003170195,0.00002723021,0.00001774103,0.0001465718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002995104,0.00003320576,0.00001660451,0.00002458223,0.00004907269,0.00006231642,0.00002687719,0.00002712258,0.0003267635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006265646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001496648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004791156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997261,0.000001883746,0.00009189227,0.0001055145,0.000006952804,0.0000676697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998908,0.00001442965,0.00002086638,0.00004455339,0.000005738698,0.00002362564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.863491e-7,0.000005024063,0.06358028,0.000001689942,0.00000500761,1.004014e-7,0.00002442116,3.030036e-7,0.000001174926,0.9353487,0.0006156177,0.0004171048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001595036,0.00001092764,0.1501656,9.526945e-7,7.23944e-7,0.000001755749,0.00000599554,0.0002439494,0.00002042214,0.2858205,0.5634829,0.00008676156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1249546,0.001021245,0.003308267,0.003528207,0.0001376438,0.00002780846,0.000007180613,0.00002636997,0.8669886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963151,0.00006210042,0.0002480935,0.0008097226,0.00005089207,0.00000289334,8.103407e-7,0.000001483079,0.002508956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4199992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169633878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3855619","title":"Understanding Chilling Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Normative; Conformity; Empirical research; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1361496157125231,"gpt":0.2403606638520999,"spread":0.1042110481395768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001984907,0.00009854897,0.00037216,0.00001588257,0.0001896237,0.00003212245,0.00007690299,0.00002752285,0.0004916594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007184212,0.00009800037,0.0001302602,0.000149985,0.00005877431,0.0001155883,0.00005717744,0.00007482126,0.00128068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008458766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005621905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003034774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992519,0.00001267208,0.0002987966,0.000247152,0.00002787343,0.0001615952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964,0.00005053493,0.0000883269,0.000161265,0.00002028876,0.00003959443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.810701e-7,0.00001765344,0.0007923749,0.0009481811,0.00003667175,0.00002123032,0.000008927224,7.320517e-7,0.000002662816,0.9963062,0.001576863,0.0002880959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001146764,0.000007285328,0.0003209257,0.001037317,0.00001760826,0.00001929901,0.000003649513,0.000008979262,0.00005161437,0.05305355,0.9452017,0.0001633833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003732064,0.7166167,0.002932297,0.004677603,0.000385145,0.0001337326,0.00002035387,0.00002778396,0.2748332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7609485,0.2256407,0.0006557917,0.01104106,0.0002305834,0.00005685931,0.0000298806,0.00001920299,0.001377423],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124174232","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhs002","title":"THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Damages; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Business; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Commission; Incentive; Patent infringement; Government (linguistics); Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0188945258677762,"gpt":0.1958500298451659,"spread":0.1769555039773897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008451474,0.00009360492,0.0002373599,0.00002776875,0.0003628865,0.0001246164,0.0001099727,0.00003902877,0.00004110004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005340181,0.00008228585,0.00009008061,0.00003584065,0.0001396118,0.0006535568,0.00005701531,0.0001322061,0.00004554933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002458206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001204241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001732645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001672501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.00001364042,0.0006347561,0.00009624629,0.00004046547,0.0001759957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989406,0.0001012631,0.0007391061,0.0001006408,0.00004154073,0.00007682583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677493,0.00002828719,0.01117063,0.000005578765,0.00006605108,3.476777e-7,0.00009404284,0.00005202772,0.00001239276,0.9878341,0.0002197213,0.0004900387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000669741,0.00006456176,0.02931632,0.00002439188,0.00001491817,0.00007175199,0.0001587404,0.0002301034,0.0001691205,0.07832696,0.8907954,0.0001580372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.909973,0.006706522,0.001654652,0.006473423,0.002589697,0.0001302924,0.00006706531,0.00001095015,0.07239437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966483,0.001877342,0.0002197184,0.0004227102,0.0004263545,0.000003729461,0.000001549157,0.000007182776,0.00039318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3355519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994188556","doi":"10.3386/w14276","title":"Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5118614761099449,"gpt":0.4935828268371136,"spread":0.01827864927283129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00311252,0.0002765098,0.0008385888,0.001226432,0.0003597812,0.0002468918,0.0005063128,0.0004697588,0.003039831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002796396,0.0002932666,0.0002349946,0.0003340286,0.0006584017,0.001278915,0.000244205,0.001061583,0.001236367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003133877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004476586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001082507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967925,0.00009496988,0.001373025,0.0007527808,0.0005500584,0.0004366762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973415,0.0005801364,0.0006898209,0.0002477421,0.0009149017,0.0002259703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008401214,0.0001658259,0.003055618,0.0001102619,0.0002090398,0.000005723198,0.0002565845,0.0002437908,0.000001760812,0.9689921,0.02468525,0.002190032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005318559,0.00007834743,0.002693376,0.0003860178,0.000003894994,0.00001474781,0.0003498356,0.00005627908,0.000026741,0.6287662,0.3667592,0.0003335396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004741047,0.0485929,0.000003747304,0.001267821,0.001450329,0.0006758696,0.000432823,0.00001755592,0.9428179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8874012,0.1064523,0.00007499636,0.00005640997,0.001032795,0.0002797241,0.0002553779,0.00002443838,0.004422758],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820777877036614,"gpt":0.2358387415988572,"spread":0.1576309628284911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002263685,0.0004361791,0.0006497132,0.0002743119,0.002160375,0.0001270824,0.0003615935,0.0002583289,0.001282319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461787,0.0004615322,0.0002829299,0.00018151,0.005864208,0.0008002037,0.0003070237,0.0003039504,0.002287518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002783728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003248551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001562659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002942642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973427,0.00002261259,0.0008796009,0.0009080726,0.0001058214,0.0007411672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989508,0.00007476715,0.0003734839,0.0002838932,0.00008166734,0.0002353467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005654575,0.00009193016,0.04634273,0.000006401558,0.0002423332,0.00001789589,0.0006702617,0.00001336871,0.000006623278,0.948939,0.00348429,0.0001286856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00143818,0.00004166556,0.009271244,0.00003235156,0.00005017627,0.00004935773,0.0006043887,0.0002582704,0.00006616716,0.6555934,0.3318416,0.0007531729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03110122,0.01039195,0.06605152,0.009798464,0.003265106,0.0007625961,0.007449193,0.0004181716,0.8707618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973561,0.00006129742,0.001011956,0.0004446396,0.0002667619,0.0001041095,0.0001100897,0.00001273924,0.0006323736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606702854","doi":"","title":"The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional 'Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Existentialism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02441578566044129,"gpt":0.2237943688735075,"spread":0.1993785832130662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001854559,0.00007782965,0.0001128017,0.00005169904,0.001583881,0.0001643095,0.0001918128,0.00002580381,0.00001183654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008163822,0.00005510135,0.00004457249,0.0001304612,0.001331766,0.0002150466,0.00001895277,0.0004510362,0.00005503602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002019334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005583722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001278612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001506129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987226,0.00001375061,0.0002279649,0.0001462354,0.0000510268,0.0008384243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997099,0.0000619209,0.0001168379,0.00004847985,0.00002599608,0.00003684632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008796596,0.0000117846,0.002993468,2.447851e-7,0.00002931907,7.322585e-7,0.00001342916,0.00004752514,0.000002170525,0.9929683,0.0001309989,0.003793285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211264,0.000136083,0.002867151,0.00000319391,0.000002880808,0.0002263468,0.00007994279,0.0001181078,0.000003651556,0.9697902,0.0264639,0.00008740772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03846369,0.2381202,0.5297716,0.05247958,0.001084812,0.0003388643,0.00002039259,0.00005801356,0.1396629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988456,0.01022243,0.0001095926,0.0003181843,0.0001691813,0.000002176206,2.406802e-7,0.000001424216,0.0007207743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123802554","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00351.x","title":"A Canadian Copyright Narrative","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Normative; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Subject (documents); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; History; Computer science; Engineering; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05369986895425746,"gpt":0.1999083986745747,"spread":0.1462085297203172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004048334,0.00009468165,0.0002448279,0.0002074982,0.0005316981,0.00001750796,0.0002841276,0.00002062816,0.002682995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003261372,0.00004484657,0.00009485187,0.000308089,0.0002505783,0.0001573839,0.00003061099,0.0002801603,0.0006240411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002262523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002211385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0300274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02400826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992292,0.00002763646,0.0004349125,0.00007463764,0.00004929353,0.0001843547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993733,0.0001136123,0.0001938195,0.0000917343,0.0001237054,0.0001037852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002865671,0.0001057515,0.004867381,0.000007212563,0.000443197,0.0000690428,0.05408549,0.0001261587,0.00003020746,0.0330642,0.9061586,0.000756233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002353022,0.0001433665,0.0008730275,0.00001955519,0.00000745751,0.0003218671,0.000509023,0.0001336376,0.000174911,0.004547974,0.9929051,0.0001288141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958465,0.01614042,0.0007650442,0.03497729,0.001309893,0.0002667789,0.00003391032,0.00001662783,0.7506436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640164,0.0005435471,0.00005338602,0.001149558,0.0001884373,0.00000146471,3.366972e-7,0.000005976836,0.03404092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108032207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1907450","title":"The FTC, IP, and SSOs: Government Hold-Up Replacing Private Coordination","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01977063964838048,"gpt":0.1826440767130568,"spread":0.1628734370646764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001195138,0.00008642074,0.0001241796,0.00002354443,0.0006193312,0.00006817069,0.0001283779,0.00003036887,0.00001903567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008397048,0.00006644004,0.00005220844,0.00006642366,0.00008110967,0.0001948889,0.00005340685,0.0004558055,0.00004511363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005458219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008284655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009355837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.00001088528,0.0002810606,0.0001494902,0.00005857601,0.0006941021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996099,0.00002490573,0.0002213255,0.00008903568,0.00002072053,0.00003409213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024374,0.00001327038,0.0174692,0.000001395832,0.00009984178,6.684735e-7,0.0001614663,7.086904e-7,0.00000876797,0.9762952,0.00007747294,0.005847599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005081875,0.000132758,0.02851714,0.000008723177,0.00001069546,0.0001135903,0.0006540545,0.00007911232,0.00006193826,0.9080216,0.06174002,0.000152173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478602,0.05145318,0.01086966,0.004938599,0.001199336,0.000244228,0.00002067599,0.00003635728,0.08337773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868296,0.008824565,0.0000305057,0.0000780504,0.0001081174,0.000006574371,3.751177e-7,0.000006267723,0.004115994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1389693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4763457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125313674","doi":"","title":"Shortening Agency and Judicial Vacancies through Filibuster Reform? an Examination of Confirmation Rates and Delays from 1981 to 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Nomination; Administrative law; Voting; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public administration; Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07302038904737562,"gpt":0.2495993587713808,"spread":0.1765789697240051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001855548,0.00006864848,0.0001685939,0.00004752195,0.00006764367,0.00003159672,0.00003856542,0.00003721922,0.00005700905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003086607,0.00006309287,0.00001203901,0.00005596321,0.00006191598,0.0004998268,0.00004542465,0.00003013051,0.00002374055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003490264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000104922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005717983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004291202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.000007751149,0.0002515109,0.0001607931,0.00002956683,0.00007996905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997389,0.00001457521,0.00008328561,0.00006013419,0.00005809011,0.00004497717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005732314,0.0000510969,0.09742146,0.00002477235,0.00009153404,0.00000137956,0.01226694,0.00005039218,0.0002591342,0.87297,0.00152031,0.01528568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007048309,0.00024622,0.9150596,0.00001960005,0.0000156028,0.000002643644,0.002282795,0.002840614,0.0008518265,0.06700332,0.01067778,0.0002951143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451503,0.00153813,0.005961093,0.0003262696,0.0001057308,0.00009139982,0.00008099848,0.0000118184,0.04673433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978494,0.0001401224,0.001550642,0.0001975036,0.00006010087,0.000008939698,0.00002708547,0.000003186715,0.0001630367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8643919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983579864","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01577.x","title":"Independent foundations, public money and public accountability: Whither ministerial responsibility as democratic governance?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Publics; Democratic governance; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Humanities; Management; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04507411630960479,"gpt":0.243299754435981,"spread":0.1982256381263762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009741953,0.0002247548,0.0003063708,0.0002169949,0.000725252,0.001000009,0.0002059866,0.0001826656,0.00167202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00233783,0.0002596062,0.00007419648,0.000415544,0.0003177462,0.001384189,0.00003494198,0.0001820166,0.000279032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008226366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002948177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004206408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979372,0.00008466174,0.0006719771,0.0006452637,0.0001207931,0.0005400878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984518,0.00007545857,0.0002778833,0.0004081788,0.000176991,0.0006097081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001056548,0.0000673931,0.0922297,0.00001066572,0.00004154824,0.00000492989,0.00004949836,5.739729e-8,0.000002890121,0.9059159,0.000979412,0.0006874016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005886146,0.0001168501,0.05322398,0.000005097202,0.000008171975,0.00005985429,0.0003217766,0.00005718114,0.00001088232,0.104797,0.8404077,0.000402945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626847,0.001400001,0.0006352306,0.08062903,0.001103024,0.0007179382,0.000645642,0.00006541983,0.152119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966787,0.00005427393,0.0002060378,0.001028506,0.0001133492,0.0001111622,0.0001037266,0.00001599043,0.001688292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8394282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121324705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.428241","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. and the U.K.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"E-commerce; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02345028177225552,"gpt":0.2811300410800985,"spread":0.257679759307843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003157706,0.00009591848,0.0002428701,0.00004039018,0.0003046942,0.00005725756,0.0001339075,0.00002531698,0.000005843798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004169618,0.00005894002,0.00003340784,0.0001613196,0.0001944761,0.0002611384,0.00002889993,0.0005945793,9.187423e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002142296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004637173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008784775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988654,0.0001863603,0.0003115553,0.0001359274,0.00009481976,0.0004059683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.0002839024,0.0002559284,0.00009012457,0.00005463493,0.00001692256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005402294,0.0001132721,0.01269381,0.000001628789,0.0001888602,4.050961e-7,0.005963092,0.00002342262,0.000001823999,0.9800202,0.0001117103,0.0003415442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03857232,0.002893066,0.07623651,0.00002241592,0.0001806171,0.0005069534,0.2286953,0.0003048418,0.00000716471,0.5516497,0.1003266,0.0006043784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467819,0.0347512,0.0008708875,0.001563207,0.00008739743,0.0002995958,0.00001591722,0.000002246375,0.01562761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925427,0.007263961,0.00001362709,0.00004981428,0.00003073965,0.00001462485,6.319635e-7,0.000003045613,0.00008088937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4283704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624899232","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0023","title":"States of Emergency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Principle of legality; State of emergency; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Law and economics; Phenomenon; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07127432804805992,"gpt":0.2429273213849699,"spread":0.17165299333691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009625155,0.0001496457,0.0004777236,0.0001029042,0.00004987393,0.000006203406,0.0001540849,0.0001312545,0.009783403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002289143,0.000134968,0.0001633845,0.00009829231,0.00004817572,0.00008203962,0.0000899423,0.0001321213,0.001545713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003768242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002506251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008424391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003713795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990126,0.000003141043,0.00055921,0.0001940465,0.00003252835,0.0001984835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994264,0.00001492042,0.0003265559,0.0001484822,0.00004046244,0.00004319154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000190619,0.00005358546,0.01724351,0.0001375002,0.0001472279,2.397867e-7,0.00004921901,6.264835e-7,1.333147e-8,0.6320529,0.3481236,0.002189604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006031909,0.00001242625,0.002814448,0.00002242577,0.000009645025,3.058458e-7,0.00001623107,0.000002740615,0.000002070831,0.04566613,0.9512208,0.000172462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001904111,0.1180964,0.0002681953,0.0001544671,0.002495038,0.00006338237,0.001055908,0.00001442418,0.8776618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04396367,0.4061183,0.0001642675,0.00005445196,0.0006682968,0.00002405761,0.0002545578,0.00001626323,0.5487362],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6030971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2108142027829962,"gpt":0.3204444638352548,"spread":0.1096302610522585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002343173,0.00008128515,0.0003453856,0.00002962754,0.0003711243,0.00006673653,0.0001276626,0.000009302847,0.00002033636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000175875,0.00005382873,0.0000824882,0.000184492,0.000648754,0.0001689625,0.00005278266,0.0001221852,0.0000119554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003194115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004370086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003261198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001636601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992649,0.00007422249,0.0004074288,0.00009481037,0.00006576409,0.00009289023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989831,0.0001678581,0.0004605105,0.0001035627,0.0002441006,0.00004087991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006303612,0.00004443356,0.0003827089,0.000002842077,0.0001472232,0.000004131711,0.002684568,0.008187252,0.0009609912,0.9870421,0.0002250995,0.0002556665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004048196,0.003846437,0.2049665,0.0004089538,0.001119068,0.002067053,0.07551917,0.01594424,0.01756542,0.3401519,0.3326284,0.001734655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975303,0.003361643,0.009321622,0.004164078,0.000181934,0.00007678278,0.00004363871,0.000002185821,0.007545135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969649,0.0003504932,0.001194219,0.00132197,0.0001167815,0.000001608565,0.000001298896,0.000003308822,0.00004547068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2854426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01475583185653326,"gpt":0.1788928299163344,"spread":0.1641369980598012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002174639,0.00006659028,0.0002095864,0.00004254025,0.0002858362,0.00003247702,0.0002280428,0.00003450485,0.001484751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002347673,0.00008040413,0.00009596584,0.00003560632,0.00003139591,0.0004818208,0.000129708,0.0000972844,0.0006912657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003241033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001688746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03681001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006928404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994923,0.000006137005,0.0001587826,0.0001401782,0.00004959819,0.0001529567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.0000219448,0.0001158046,0.00009297801,0.00005735211,0.0001244623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006461497,0.00004094224,0.008453663,0.00001109885,0.0001012062,0.00001726195,0.004674908,0.0004458103,0.0001703974,0.9833593,0.001426825,0.001233998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464356,0.0001284016,0.01085358,0.00004896032,0.000008172106,0.00001434709,0.00251265,0.00004574284,0.00005859026,0.00437784,0.9811947,0.0002105958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3639366,0.001613137,0.006174259,0.003044682,0.0008090797,0.0001354225,0.00005936525,0.00001619983,0.6242113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910299,0.00007328795,0.004143881,0.0006800726,0.00008274383,4.31919e-8,4.299188e-7,0.00000376774,0.003985849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263008586","doi":"","title":"You Can't Pay Them Enough: Subsidies, Environmental Law and Social Norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Public economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Climate change; Social norms approach; Law and economics; Reputation; Environmental law; Social value orientations; Government (linguistics); Positive economics; Political science; Normative; Microeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009461731095218032,"gpt":0.1606078282565888,"spread":0.1511460971613708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003564408,0.0001283066,0.0002064117,0.00003397795,0.0006503718,0.00006234583,0.0001070776,0.00005534047,0.00007549068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003061385,0.0001045583,0.00008690861,0.00004296374,0.0001951398,0.0001491739,0.00004303929,0.0005893607,0.0001143283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005976057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001530581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002671394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.000007925816,0.0002840164,0.0001839392,0.00004865592,0.0009538155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997589,0.00001076743,0.0001460155,0.00005048946,0.000006202375,0.00002762352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009844154,0.00004459458,0.02683699,0.000001744888,0.00007826665,0.000002289811,0.0001207206,0.000001974338,0.00001713614,0.9720831,0.00009691445,0.000706404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769992,0.00005574426,0.01164155,0.000001803165,0.0000104424,0.0001718424,0.0004626871,0.000006074734,0.00003008027,0.8436084,0.1432252,0.0002092359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075728,0.03955411,0.0008385242,0.01272824,0.000555118,0.0001945459,0.0002697367,0.00004894138,0.138238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992977,0.003009876,0.00001671042,0.0002729191,0.0004988631,0.000004502765,0.00001211713,0.00001040067,0.003197602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1854042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5002199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854953337624345,"gpt":0.2380898457190175,"spread":0.189540312342774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002544901,0.00006511605,0.0001955158,0.00007857591,0.0002125704,0.00003658774,0.0001208999,0.00003710991,0.0001206377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884814,0.00006908323,0.00005086275,0.00008804885,0.0005265739,0.000257521,0.000005017724,0.00009882342,0.00002497115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006274243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001775507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007682657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009851957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993083,0.00001063261,0.0004080451,0.0001033725,0.00003302417,0.0001365851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992689,0.00003715535,0.0002913888,0.0000917099,0.0001198987,0.0001909733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001276315,0.000007324697,0.005622116,0.00001144555,0.00001832434,0.00001085788,0.0001922154,0.00000879747,0.00002227492,0.9939178,0.000158119,0.00002949988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472627,0.00009327324,0.02542792,0.0001065474,0.00002388377,0.0001987341,0.000130924,0.00001046837,0.000696416,0.4085456,0.5642062,0.0002126714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059886,0.03067852,0.001215682,0.002494349,0.001049968,0.0001624887,0.0004165001,0.000006365781,0.5579875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.000167088,0.0005938482,0.0003026426,0.00003216042,0.00000186883,9.685227e-7,0.000003436119,0.0001751497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469581622","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2782419","title":"Unequal Access: Making Sense of EI Eligibility Rules and How to Improve Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Brain Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03169207502845407,"gpt":0.2564811905166368,"spread":0.2247891154881828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008779464,0.0000992899,0.0002336942,0.00006928064,0.0001328797,0.0000597379,0.0001366984,0.00003831148,0.00002427221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839871,0.00007074627,0.00007320128,0.00007637104,0.00008665772,0.0002779847,0.0001022595,0.000235134,0.00003985511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002432008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001898232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006044478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.00001219227,0.0002515505,0.0002090765,0.00004227295,0.0006985947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999533,0.0000550362,0.0002122275,0.0001051005,0.00004990859,0.00004471997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004001229,0.00002143487,0.04346221,0.00000641251,0.0001037249,0.000001119892,0.00007561217,9.80495e-7,0.0001855064,0.9421013,0.00003772797,0.01396395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663099,0.000159118,0.01582594,0.0000311445,0.000009222287,0.00006174455,0.0002366135,0.00001074029,0.0002610655,0.9742408,0.008409955,0.0001873378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743308,0.00426838,0.01142268,0.005662885,0.0001652946,0.00008636476,0.00006839874,0.00000987879,0.003985286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966546,0.00246283,0.00008848789,0.00009178754,0.0001404754,0.000003707882,2.426225e-7,0.000006229888,0.0005516121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0321395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2884949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919621670","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2013.794609","title":"Can Tax Deadlines Cause Fatal Mistakes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHANCE","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Front page; Front (military); History; Computer science; Media studies; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0505357169112325,"gpt":0.2056770277270545,"spread":0.155141310815822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003791842,0.00008539692,0.0001533154,0.00003325804,0.0001174709,0.00004278868,0.0001094442,0.00003118778,0.0004281232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004288546,0.00008516868,0.00004310848,0.00008867601,0.00008395693,0.0001367766,0.00002404897,0.00005715241,0.002262023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003816437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001007018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001586939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000238947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.000001765666,0.000184784,0.0002041247,0.0000191579,0.0001783549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999702,0.00001206116,0.00007989932,0.0001275143,0.00003244989,0.00004607003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004019913,0.00005916433,0.0552449,0.00003078711,0.0000740781,0.000008320995,0.0004568425,0.00001179111,0.0001783556,0.9231752,0.01914354,0.00161298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007770695,0.00005960916,0.2066202,0.00003882697,0.000007692881,0.00001536409,0.0002441852,0.0004368778,0.00133797,0.1142223,0.6754388,0.0008011427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539518,0.01139161,0.001038621,0.01203476,0.001061897,0.0002938159,0.000422074,0.00008415798,0.1197212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901691,0.0001170767,0.0001540926,0.0005361122,0.0002101889,0.00006478345,0.000008610946,0.000005913708,0.008734101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8089529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892375663","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0512","title":"Campaign Finance Regulation in North America: An Institutional Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Election law; Scholarship; Democracy; Public administration; Commission; Language change; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01874524467677419,"gpt":0.2508199610559309,"spread":0.2320747163791567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001301172,0.0001141195,0.000184359,0.000250041,0.0009269211,0.0001067085,0.00007337778,0.00005082274,0.00004900304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008205416,0.000118563,0.00004465554,0.0003182019,0.0004737617,0.0004589178,0.00002347473,0.0001946567,0.00008807035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004466607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01348376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005073315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.00002040756,0.0003327635,0.000200108,0.00004973018,0.0002803637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994968,0.0000166284,0.0001657033,0.00007573654,0.0001513592,0.00009379303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001244793,0.00005060363,0.006723655,0.000002164612,0.00001734799,0.00000225207,0.0007415711,0.00006471133,0.000002497323,0.991552,0.00007380166,0.0007569746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004088759,0.0002840386,0.1963142,0.00001109644,0.000003674435,0.0001482508,0.0001883009,0.0007060824,0.00001941337,0.614495,0.1872221,0.0001989483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538392,0.00144663,0.002989872,0.003077651,0.0004231148,0.0001043736,0.0001551894,0.00002407221,0.1379399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964316,0.0004749625,0.0003198077,0.0009163015,0.001531565,0.000005316291,0.000008462933,0.000006800317,0.0003051391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.377057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803046184","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/dwus4","title":"Consumer Privacy in a Behavioral World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Consumer protection; The Internet; Information overload; Business; Private information retrieval; Consumer law; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04729736856716322,"gpt":0.2392773765646045,"spread":0.1919800079974413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006812414,0.00005352802,0.0001468298,0.000109549,0.00002067196,0.00001773186,0.00007324448,0.00001769907,0.002667331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005660833,0.0000528435,0.00003624369,0.0001520905,0.00003147694,0.0001103536,0.00004816948,0.00006019849,0.006075097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004046019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008511007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001279745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000424775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995141,0.000001681801,0.0001946675,0.0001543841,0.00001290246,0.0001222758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998342,0.00001059792,0.00003597623,0.00009382716,0.000006476085,0.00001893968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002029069,0.00003102284,0.5540096,0.000001467876,0.000003269621,9.225767e-7,0.00003256504,0.000001195369,0.000001756357,0.4453515,0.0004241346,0.0001405701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005110555,0.00001641138,0.4475087,0.000006018123,9.986547e-7,9.473115e-7,0.00002381826,0.00005176927,0.00001882122,0.01908183,0.5326283,0.0001514047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155127,0.0007900338,0.00002287765,0.0004946148,0.0001836586,0.0000823775,0.00001070258,0.00001363296,0.3828894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751767,0.00002270022,0.0001649854,0.000269946,0.00001393233,0.00001082243,0.000001930568,0.000002915005,0.02433606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5322042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0678599396383057,"gpt":0.2569127034808392,"spread":0.1890527638425335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461605,0.0002754095,0.0004432507,0.00005442606,0.001311336,0.0001743156,0.0002570771,0.0001281534,0.0003622595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001161538,0.0002489456,0.0004141933,0.0001743313,0.004389139,0.0003356849,0.000069997,0.0002559998,0.0004239867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000425864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004817747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000275617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001268278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977702,0.00004192854,0.0007935725,0.000577417,0.0000683752,0.0007484978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981068,0.001073918,0.0002186212,0.0002133519,0.000174879,0.0002123816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000864142,0.0000660657,0.00517811,0.00003037313,0.0001790325,0.000001321326,0.00001563262,0.0003574926,0.000003899952,0.9901106,0.004019965,0.000028807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005748555,0.00001869713,0.0003347708,0.0000271142,0.00002289491,0.00004295151,0.00003885854,0.00247948,0.00003851846,0.4058707,0.5902722,0.0002789536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002387826,0.002684785,0.5947558,0.008210364,0.0005531661,0.0006913916,0.0004545912,0.00007170423,0.3923393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855021,0.00001257877,0.005806637,0.007386537,0.0005476968,0.0003143254,0.00005272952,0.000008587729,0.0003688254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124799479","doi":"","title":"The Identifiability Bias in Environmental Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Lawmaking; Law and economics; Doctrine; Environmental law; Common law; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics; Legislature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.044115932583019,"gpt":0.2118373678747644,"spread":0.1677214352917454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000727828,0.00004127296,0.00007171043,0.0000169906,0.0001599603,0.00002691935,0.00007763674,0.00001869042,0.0001751384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002502409,0.00003080806,0.000035903,0.00004773575,0.0001889973,0.00007709767,0.00004437525,0.00005093333,0.0006947969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007227528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001966833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001089318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994812,0.0000029,0.0002432334,0.0001217435,0.00001752111,0.0001333929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997754,0.00007735567,0.00003601349,0.00009217162,0.000001464772,0.00001759197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003000005,0.00002206574,0.2124562,4.800957e-7,0.000004172819,8.809213e-7,0.0000282277,0.000001422489,0.000002915601,0.78699,0.0000772436,0.0004132947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001260926,0.000005801468,0.513747,6.989503e-7,3.691146e-7,7.606679e-7,0.0001096602,0.00001818317,0.00009027193,0.1301984,0.355637,0.00006575219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4802946,0.001646101,0.0003151271,0.0007425843,0.0002396008,0.00007067178,0.00001472417,0.000009513544,0.5166671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973456,0.00006682694,0.000030086,0.0002431885,0.00002708988,0.000003914499,0.000001116165,0.000001587058,0.002280591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6567917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.893044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1015747962184464,"gpt":0.2633780151215301,"spread":0.1618032189030837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003359717,0.0002177705,0.0005904189,0.00007648817,0.0002500082,0.00008120634,0.0001861149,0.00005826923,0.003370139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002577976,0.0002314393,0.0001006829,0.0002996326,0.00007520415,0.0004591476,0.00003848406,0.0001301079,0.001665098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005430137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006619329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006859623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984958,0.00005561814,0.0006227824,0.000539234,0.00008098838,0.0002055698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989854,0.00008932587,0.0003508804,0.0003237842,0.0001231661,0.0001274098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000304497,0.00005848662,0.005966233,0.00005347135,0.0000597051,0.000001233057,0.0008512165,0.0000479297,0.000003230622,0.9843664,0.002348654,0.006240353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007928912,0.0001040071,0.08618674,0.001028391,0.00005964237,0.00001046204,0.0007078657,0.0001281079,0.000043464,0.03922017,0.8710118,0.0007064553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0380908,0.8027033,0.00235623,0.003100532,0.00075216,0.0007841266,0.0001789284,0.0001302049,0.1519037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904932,0.09820559,0.003735797,0.003604365,0.0004738377,0.00005834344,0.0001657958,0.00003090033,0.00323219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0234347820337239,"gpt":0.177869600440651,"spread":0.1544348184069271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001332363,0.00004056092,0.0001111593,0.000009239434,0.0003002842,0.00001532966,0.00008721383,0.00003283638,0.001395283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001074398,0.00004335813,0.00004201035,0.000009583876,0.000226443,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.0001021638,0.00001255834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000361735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001385367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02539062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997101,0.000003532055,0.0001093119,0.00008064861,0.00002690993,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997059,0.000007358034,0.0001347452,0.00004818769,0.00005053746,0.00005329103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001167696,0.00002294365,0.02486117,0.000002987019,0.00002969322,0.000002909633,0.0002031117,6.206508e-7,0.00002833984,0.974164,0.0003421149,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.00003935722,0.2265078,0.00000710527,0.000008538743,0.00004074688,0.0002951655,0.00002050952,0.00001645827,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.0001195618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5389524,0.001468344,0.000306872,0.0007882337,0.0003194382,0.00004650891,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.4580447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.000246787,0.0008789309,0.00003003145,0.00005047942,2.995777e-8,0.000001100097,0.000001104737,0.000798699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101118422","doi":"10.1007/s11127-010-9594-9","title":"The price of transparency: do campaign finance disclosure laws discourage political participation by citizens’ groups?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Campaign finance; Public finance; Politics; Finance; Business; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237121506173112,"gpt":0.2341445634591671,"spread":0.211773348397436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003831079,0.0001312355,0.0002400822,0.00003645874,0.0003442456,0.0001233882,0.0002959248,0.00007456068,0.0001312499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004375511,0.0001016909,0.00009754352,0.0002392969,0.0003790512,0.0003045529,0.00004551454,0.0002376626,0.00006060622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003747645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004064509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003477487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004556409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987115,0.00001562159,0.0004838001,0.000275837,0.0000812463,0.0004319406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991523,0.000217093,0.0001989296,0.0002717242,0.00006692833,0.00009305039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000446533,0.00008671851,0.07627517,0.00001103106,0.00002839181,2.498898e-7,0.0001394893,0.000001121773,0.00004887989,0.9213896,0.00165653,0.0003583525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005696741,0.00004834214,0.3285128,0.00001095663,0.00001341913,0.000002655725,0.0001107255,0.0002589645,0.0001118049,0.1183714,0.5516663,0.0003229712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8379041,0.002584351,0.001639797,0.03176237,0.0008785038,0.000276193,0.0007475091,0.00004601516,0.1241612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986067,0.0001276757,0.00004388694,0.0001939542,0.0001859521,0.00008508076,0.00002040879,0.000009063557,0.0007272895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4146836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0234347820337239,"gpt":0.177869600440651,"spread":0.1544348184069271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001332363,0.00004056092,0.0001111593,0.000009239434,0.0003002842,0.00001532966,0.00008721383,0.00003283638,0.001395283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001074398,0.00004335813,0.00004201035,0.000009583876,0.000226443,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.0001021638,0.00001255834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000361735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001385367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02539062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997101,0.000003532055,0.0001093119,0.00008064861,0.00002690993,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997059,0.000007358034,0.0001347452,0.00004818769,0.00005053746,0.00005329103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001167696,0.00002294365,0.02486117,0.000002987019,0.00002969322,0.000002909633,0.0002031117,6.206508e-7,0.00002833984,0.974164,0.0003421149,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.00003935722,0.2265078,0.00000710527,0.000008538743,0.00004074688,0.0002951655,0.00002050952,0.00001645827,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.0001195618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5389524,0.001468344,0.000306872,0.0007882337,0.0003194382,0.00004650891,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.4580447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.000246787,0.0008789309,0.00003003145,0.00005047942,2.995777e-8,0.000001100097,0.000001104737,0.000798699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386235","doi":"10.29173/alr1371","title":"Economic Instruments and the Kyoto Protocol: Can Parliament Implement Emissions Trading without Provincial Co-operation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Emissions trading; Legislation; Economics; Opposition (politics); Public administration; Law; Business; Political science; Greenhouse gas; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04095168421376772,"gpt":0.2715737244063203,"spread":0.2306220401925526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002917353,0.0001431651,0.0003819053,0.00001604396,0.0004157246,0.00007892215,0.0001179923,0.00002520312,0.001306134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002645339,0.00009972267,0.00008174145,0.00002964133,0.0001251422,0.0001427682,0.00005226278,0.00007696613,0.0002718835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001291395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001753151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008221865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004564208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998945,0.00002681844,0.0005486623,0.0002663903,0.00003343791,0.0001796639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995236,0.00003782873,0.0002025584,0.0001660346,0.000006832477,0.00006308148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007544866,0.00003169633,0.0099609,0.0002137546,0.00006083631,2.3518e-7,0.0001565239,5.854807e-7,3.737754e-7,0.9828781,0.003245023,0.003444361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001081192,0.00003183729,0.0004250052,0.000209726,0.00002027566,0.000005990848,0.000006507766,0.0003336882,0.000007790615,0.002094216,0.9956256,0.0001581507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01615393,0.0389729,0.00004612099,0.07245632,0.0005373599,0.1323341,0.0003695383,0.00006049635,0.7390692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412711,0.007611162,0.00005518676,0.004980453,0.0001418418,0.04457722,0.00001874882,0.00001498974,0.001329306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945383277","doi":"10.3138/jcs.48.3.49","title":"The Dilemma of Positive Rights: Access to Health Care and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Charter; Political science; Patient rights; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02186579320423833,"gpt":0.2351126491272463,"spread":0.213246855923008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005159404,0.00008902176,0.0004436448,0.0002953204,0.0007756869,0.00005668772,0.0001733692,0.00002348099,0.000003209927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105159,0.00004941379,0.00006237606,0.0001687164,0.0006164444,0.000122279,0.00004082361,0.00009559134,0.000001534509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001461576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001523668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7354431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999172,0.00002864475,0.0004622905,0.00009210217,0.0000524243,0.0001925957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988939,0.0001749922,0.0003632523,0.00008519746,0.0002686217,0.000214103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004814234,0.000005059702,0.01238256,0.00003193782,0.0005543745,0.000003620494,0.00900657,0.000006943936,2.385378e-7,0.9616351,0.01487167,0.001453771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001183055,0.0003151683,0.1389375,0.0001425309,0.00003648677,0.00002358602,0.001456357,0.000005945024,0.0000175376,0.06974502,0.7879797,0.0001571217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5338218,0.229104,0.00003903446,0.1492023,0.001444859,0.0007837522,0.001068562,0.000003643732,0.08453213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974803,0.001245791,0.00003778372,0.001077417,0.0001103555,0.000003972248,3.771638e-7,0.000002776703,0.00004127359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5966035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059655840819562,"gpt":0.316639875857976,"spread":0.2106742917760198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002988449,0.0001530568,0.0002852586,0.000105248,0.0001004695,0.000124198,0.0005760846,0.00006056903,0.0002461979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002302422,0.0001271793,0.00006745325,0.0002361045,0.0001833088,0.0003514412,0.000112315,0.0002763381,0.000144901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002325939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007882398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003358869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001722881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989443,0.00001727464,0.0004178626,0.0003079235,0.00008048502,0.0002321397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992498,0.0001735816,0.0002026447,0.000247038,0.00006704104,0.00005993126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006249595,0.001199036,0.3020904,0.000292904,0.0003542842,0.00008285877,0.02461069,0.0004489188,0.0005390811,0.6509141,0.01395284,0.004889986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00102895,0.0003558607,0.86332,0.00004887833,0.00005965618,0.000008837767,0.00120834,0.0004289531,0.0009521411,0.05767652,0.07429979,0.0006120524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256456,0.0001618197,0.0003520392,0.006323654,0.0003530663,0.0004862518,0.0005287702,0.00001830533,0.2661305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965869,0.00001938924,0.0003207422,0.001664941,0.0001512954,0.00007168214,0.000004886287,0.00001103741,0.001169079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.518622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W405642559","doi":"10.7202/028861ar","title":"Compulsory Conciliation in Canada: Do We Need It?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Proposition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03947447185840714,"gpt":0.1992426403333252,"spread":0.159768168474918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001073163,0.00007847662,0.0001533523,0.0001099274,0.0001339581,0.00001843649,0.00007764786,0.00007633036,0.0004853453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008061103,0.00009006426,0.00002675297,0.0002897349,0.00004049227,0.0001488617,0.00002620751,0.000199455,0.0003345007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007417714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2939861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3812748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.000007952884,0.0003858738,0.0001583413,0.00003920634,0.0001415425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996648,0.00007326216,0.0001098407,0.00009316771,0.00002404302,0.00003483926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004284632,0.0000376509,0.354642,0.000001027976,0.00003025213,0.000002248299,0.0004182266,0.01366333,8.364827e-7,0.5880124,0.03533769,0.007850022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003574798,0.000004990347,0.05449053,0.00001803841,0.000002142788,0.000001285314,0.0006836716,0.00277705,0.000008788865,0.00394731,0.9375692,0.0001395154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4566786,0.03157704,0.001136563,0.1415184,0.0006865481,0.0003993917,0.0002647928,0.00004900009,0.3676896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968376,0.0004293545,0.000125706,0.0003159838,0.0001010105,0.00001291391,0.00001150003,0.000004172179,0.002161795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7107153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639320128","doi":"","title":"Economic and legal analyses of trade policy and institutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Political science; International trade law; Law; Economics; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.069168866136693,"gpt":0.277639236436804,"spread":0.2084703703001111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001030021,0.0002617429,0.000667228,0.0003605547,0.0001545381,0.00005548082,0.000126263,0.0001902729,0.00006139597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002184805,0.0002848414,0.0001437282,0.00002240499,0.0008213551,0.0000998723,0.0001213513,0.0001884557,0.00009352998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002140885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004499863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006920308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003283491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.000005733354,0.0006024722,0.0004064228,0.00002985975,0.000198994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993134,0.00004756389,0.000345716,0.0001920787,0.00001040283,0.00009088695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007668385,0.00001158189,0.0001213909,0.00005591063,0.0002089686,0.00000347072,0.00006394462,0.0000237784,0.000003059271,0.9935079,0.004263215,0.001729115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003515233,0.00003753416,0.0006994965,0.00004187654,0.00004761902,0.00001819788,0.000007927224,0.00003504875,0.00002820717,0.04434571,0.9540886,0.0002982263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001265955,0.01037529,0.00004406656,0.0004735856,0.0001159721,0.0001644319,0.0007692334,0.000021176,0.9867703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3193527,0.003566307,0.0002171842,0.0005542614,0.001170728,0.00002314008,0.00004559719,0.00003620585,0.6750339],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133444857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726262","title":"The Precedential Effects of the Supreme Court's Emergency Stays","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01117108646414607,"gpt":0.1928733200806567,"spread":0.1817022336165107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004530996,0.00008577371,0.0001531916,0.00001544345,0.0004950705,0.00002776917,0.0003854146,0.00002898959,0.00004342546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001894584,0.00005319724,0.0001798196,0.0001519146,0.00008405685,0.00009313145,0.00008206483,0.0006158733,0.00005880814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001463972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000242248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008024292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002382531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987487,0.0000227347,0.0003523273,0.0001197367,0.00006779077,0.0006887635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995267,0.00003612386,0.0002632284,0.00009761564,0.00003889126,0.00003747289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002054032,0.00001968174,0.01363548,0.00000919282,0.0002132668,3.068238e-7,0.0001618589,0.00002360638,0.00005040271,0.9837905,0.001089672,0.0009854642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008016234,0.0002590037,0.02094301,0.00001302683,0.00003797234,0.00002748713,0.0003668082,0.0001750211,0.0004186203,0.8441758,0.1325748,0.0002068729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712272,0.1920491,0.0176249,0.06691339,0.006498678,0.0008511564,0.00006277971,0.00005159824,0.04472131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876378,0.01100334,0.000003791048,0.00009869839,0.0003127657,0.000005100134,3.165541e-7,0.000006390675,0.0009318235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3164106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3807732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07894097353695297,"gpt":0.3136137131778003,"spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535264,0.0003064376,0.001872189,0.0006738087,0.0001641812,0.0001304242,0.0004828506,0.0001318564,0.0001921497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006432474,0.000230843,0.0003082461,0.0006221538,0.0004582107,0.0003547794,0.00005116874,0.0006867076,0.0001275717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005873741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001768355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0245199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09405098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976228,0.00005075357,0.001480821,0.0003198356,0.00006389714,0.0004619277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984721,0.0001073901,0.0005752653,0.0002051794,0.00006659555,0.000573469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001380185,0.00001615161,0.0001472145,0.005968933,0.00006495058,0.000272294,0.00005059967,2.229142e-7,2.504889e-9,0.8455943,0.00196801,0.1459159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008992777,0.00002836706,0.00006280923,0.03456197,0.00006531194,0.000371322,9.025483e-7,5.235762e-7,1.122228e-8,0.00471998,0.9598202,0.0002786704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001217727,0.967424,0.000008098892,0.006349237,0.0002306639,0.0002699296,0.0001623485,0.000002640762,0.02555186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003857143,0.9957266,0.0002637347,0.001832757,0.0004823507,0.00002345525,0.000002421281,0.00002133864,0.001261667],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122820070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1286","title":"Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of equity; Court of record; Public administration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02751140719575689,"gpt":0.2368840862889685,"spread":0.2093726790932116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001393222,0.0002974876,0.000753594,0.00003830661,0.0005419142,0.00007448719,0.0005047939,0.0000708997,0.001724248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002349677,0.0002125016,0.0002556059,0.0002076037,0.0002645038,0.0002915933,0.0001346198,0.0002194658,0.004629016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006817825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001399639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979783,0.0000471823,0.0008705052,0.0005014201,0.0001530122,0.0004496115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.00007633729,0.0003929365,0.0005637461,0.0001386346,0.0001054673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009879781,0.00008576936,0.001215205,0.001481207,0.0001571704,0.000002421387,0.00006533151,0.00001540442,0.000001899085,0.8944902,0.1005553,0.001920187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002879961,0.0000634058,0.0002276679,0.000812796,0.00006086117,0.00001218019,0.00001508831,0.0001328554,0.00001163401,0.04445583,0.9536089,0.0003108203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001742374,0.4851262,0.001667663,0.0449474,0.0008728546,0.002251163,0.0002049398,0.0001974745,0.46299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034039,0.07307433,0.0004577994,0.01307032,0.0009012358,0.0006881487,0.00008213939,0.00007268282,0.008249458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484547649","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Novel Search Technologies: An Economic Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Deterrence (psychology); Enforcement; Crime control; Law and economics; Legislature; Business; Deterrence theory; Personally identifiable information; Law enforcement; Economics; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Criminal justice","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02974497983420887,"gpt":0.2283527387874932,"spread":0.1986077589532844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001544992,0.0001131851,0.0002616039,0.00009496383,0.000205128,0.00006083412,0.000200218,0.00007902085,0.00005250236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003180499,0.0001213891,0.00005011231,0.0001156391,0.0002929253,0.0003742248,0.0001152726,0.0001208871,0.0001293254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009265074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003251039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004961273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002620239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990574,0.000005255838,0.0003486654,0.0003491001,0.00003137703,0.0002082193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999534,0.00002821492,0.0001124791,0.0002569697,0.00002701306,0.00004137881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005948749,0.00011165,0.02509918,0.00001698059,0.00002340173,4.374804e-7,0.00005101911,0.0002045313,0.00007712346,0.9740663,0.0002114684,0.0001320348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003736515,0.0003577285,0.1010935,0.00006292753,0.00003652355,0.00005703971,0.004420394,0.006898524,0.003492201,0.5397206,0.3385718,0.001552243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7751346,0.008872322,0.003508858,0.0009384789,0.0001285058,0.0003155337,0.0003890772,0.0001642756,0.2105483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936574,0.0001019468,0.00535656,0.000025233,0.00006699701,0.00004656903,0.00002565705,0.000009607427,0.0007100469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4343456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7499993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.110776023013309,"gpt":0.2567147494172821,"spread":0.1459387264039731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006389258,0.0001749096,0.0004433571,0.000169839,0.0003271186,0.00004645045,0.000291128,0.0001054013,0.00003124013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002582119,0.0001648843,0.0001575377,0.0004552702,0.0005973641,0.0003114101,0.0001335014,0.0001262029,0.00002627344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005913802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004105257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02903495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01391389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.00004137253,0.000746117,0.0003442029,0.0001116277,0.0002558455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988403,0.00007488322,0.0004930465,0.0002892741,0.0001620199,0.0001404264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050212,0.00006241543,0.02984107,0.0001709546,0.0001223879,0.000001479922,0.0008560863,0.003804957,0.0003643429,0.964469,0.0002318329,0.00002523492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006383837,0.0004361976,0.0358064,0.002984854,0.0004439623,0.0002152196,0.02994512,0.003621407,0.01036505,0.2245689,0.6822702,0.002958789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199445,0.005030517,0.03392009,0.005554543,0.004766537,0.001328853,0.001178791,0.0001135292,0.3281626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989954,0.00007879239,0.0003418651,0.0001799063,0.0001729324,0.00002013149,0.0000185159,0.000006148869,0.0001863413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124708831","doi":"","title":"Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-Examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Feminism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Empirical research; Judicial restraint; Political science; Judicial activism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02773671338730788,"gpt":0.2202374845159424,"spread":0.1925007711286345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002598185,0.00005405166,0.0001623852,0.00003945624,0.0001305909,0.00001786204,0.00005744417,0.00002523208,0.00007021223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006160917,0.00003999392,0.00003438433,0.00007182956,0.0001963277,0.00006335024,0.00002356649,0.00003816184,0.00002155445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001731998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008207382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001899008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001134561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995294,0.000006535261,0.0002395192,0.0001087387,0.00002442588,0.00009139707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997258,0.00005456224,0.0001090015,0.00007137771,0.00002095828,0.00001835094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000677445,0.00002670127,0.0009924817,0.000005713482,0.00001440549,2.886217e-7,0.0006278958,0.000002796974,9.662061e-7,0.9963542,0.0001163326,0.00185149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003367578,0.000258064,0.2073761,0.00002602019,0.00005426816,0.000007079543,0.002176021,0.001489265,0.0002121776,0.7353667,0.04935147,0.0003152722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1221793,0.004391902,0.001998283,0.003744107,0.0001236803,0.0001633821,0.00003942071,0.00001557242,0.8673443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974688,0.0002671918,0.0001911619,0.0006031773,0.00008177449,0.000004189103,0.000002397173,0.00000155999,0.001379745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1630905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281570989","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2732045","title":"The Questionable Presupposition Underlying Hartian Accounts of Legal Facts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02177629648615802,"gpt":0.2237949704471421,"spread":0.2020186739609841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000820181,0.00007379039,0.0001223409,0.00004941814,0.0004450929,0.00005862871,0.0001630086,0.00003238432,0.00003553976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000863498,0.00004548233,0.00007784127,0.00006971015,0.00009971958,0.0004098153,0.00002643625,0.0002648656,0.0001201629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005091729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003812755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000245903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004326403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998766,0.00001332713,0.0003154846,0.000113941,0.00005469145,0.0007365725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00005370137,0.0002283245,0.00008448222,0.00005677754,0.00002894756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002034476,0.00001707298,0.005734207,0.000001501582,0.00009132495,3.969371e-7,0.00001863612,0.000007383541,0.0001158865,0.9889051,0.0001207469,0.004967408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004208364,0.00009787501,0.01025402,0.00002224406,0.00000628656,0.00005951437,0.0001368795,0.00001451545,0.0001725607,0.9252861,0.0634312,0.00009800851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7058816,0.06236664,0.09877945,0.04580399,0.001881035,0.0004340388,0.0001470449,0.00007009092,0.08463614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913223,0.00448952,0.00001495897,0.0000444221,0.0001014047,0.00000508565,7.327337e-7,0.000005426216,0.004016177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2854407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.342334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404667689","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000660","title":"The Decriminalization of Abortion in Latin America: A Tale of Gradual Judicialization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Abortion; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Latin Americans; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0384592475274011,"gpt":0.2841566820455503,"spread":0.2456974345181492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003927857,0.00006265584,0.0001506178,0.000162778,0.0001382087,0.00004589531,0.0001478692,0.00002676021,0.00001319735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006698154,0.00005188014,0.00004293825,0.0006704422,0.001551696,0.0001664526,0.00004974368,0.00005784909,0.00002009429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001888283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001811755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002836553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004971672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988364,0.00001003403,0.0004811438,0.000174192,0.0001097685,0.0003884446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999543,0.0001160487,0.00008227846,0.00009760326,0.00008701225,0.00007406645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000130234,0.00002845964,0.01695847,0.00002285879,0.000003687188,5.234655e-7,0.0002994612,0.00002561239,0.0000483618,0.9822949,0.00002184069,0.0002945201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008160922,0.00005487891,0.1290559,0.00004841567,0.000007625736,0.000001865762,0.0003405738,0.007265846,0.001104691,0.8563367,0.005602608,0.00009925714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220751,0.002187576,0.01577549,0.004262661,0.0006745484,0.0002024237,0.0001298091,0.00003068536,0.05466172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995624,0.00007549909,0.00008638245,0.0001172614,0.00006211217,0.000006889188,0.000003820573,0.000003503141,0.00008209303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1259582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5717288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411352128","doi":"","title":"Law and Economics Scholarship and Supreme Court Antitrust Jurisprudence, 1950–2010","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02495020589981737,"gpt":0.2182291835445373,"spread":0.19327897764472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000390071,0.000204409,0.0003765638,0.00006711103,0.0004145493,0.0002285029,0.0001904419,0.0001282503,0.0003036311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007818332,0.0001777328,0.0000670728,0.00007154357,0.0005940786,0.0009464428,0.0001866745,0.0001838773,0.0009053492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007345546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002649499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001262113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001596829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986757,0.00001330961,0.0004151104,0.0005198644,0.00003862325,0.0003373591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992552,0.00008214687,0.0001496227,0.0002646752,0.00003942358,0.0002089688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001361499,0.00002008101,0.1856875,0.0000118535,0.00004038028,0.000003151906,0.00001558037,5.77311e-7,0.00003148684,0.813526,0.0003975402,0.0002523026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024648,0.00005802528,0.1685095,0.0000493116,0.000012422,0.00002215514,0.00001324257,0.00001201681,0.0002197265,0.1859113,0.6437297,0.000438036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500645,0.007725193,0.0001230805,0.004999746,0.0007274094,0.0002065752,0.0003878653,0.00006895825,0.1356967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930297,0.002537758,0.0004238511,0.00175864,0.0002299188,0.00001980946,0.000003850429,0.0000174035,0.001979128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247022395","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198790952.003.0040","title":"Environmental Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Public economics; CITES; Direct tax; Environmental law; Tax deferral; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Incentive; Business; Tax reform; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02522012738839058,"gpt":0.1530797117388194,"spread":0.1278595843504288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003668128,0.0001678414,0.0002648454,0.00008638344,0.000133539,0.00001953027,0.0001813448,0.0001702008,0.0002605885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002312937,0.0002162188,0.0001465186,0.000002293624,0.0001290203,0.00008193354,0.0001813507,0.0001675844,0.0001179005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001817701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000555719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005589707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993702,0.000002144395,0.0001545962,0.0003086955,0.00003928737,0.0001250892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.00001235437,0.0003757958,0.0001857389,0.000006858341,0.00003936545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001564359,0.000005959135,0.0001772729,0.0000124748,0.0001057211,0.000009489857,0.00004103039,0.000005000355,8.464346e-7,0.9979082,0.0009210483,0.0007972507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002572013,0.00002257281,0.0002975437,0.00001567348,0.000019878,0.000001541565,0.000007729317,0.00001613786,0.000003948349,0.007743147,0.9913656,0.0002490475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001619583,0.0005332974,0.0001979963,0.00002486209,0.0002359521,0.0001694924,0.0008041449,0.00002724562,0.9978451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02056753,0.0005732034,0.00004284105,0.000053146,0.00006640824,3.606042e-7,0.00004715706,0.00001361265,0.9786357],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117394527","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00006.x","title":"Changing Revenue Policy in the United States: An Overview of the Record and Perennial Puzzles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Budgeting &amp Finance","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; State (computer science); Revenue center; Economics; Tax revenue; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Fair share; Business; Economic policy; Finance; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09275192381125652,"gpt":0.2763864857368789,"spread":0.1836345619256224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008523961,0.0001024836,0.0001970795,0.000190771,0.0002549832,0.00006791215,0.000300281,0.00004032382,0.00001080815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003676953,0.00007542141,0.00004794016,0.0008980354,0.0001601373,0.0002198488,0.0001140377,0.0001539837,0.00001370746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005321332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003326013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002361204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00147896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990892,0.00004572556,0.0003444271,0.0002091556,0.0000453567,0.0002660993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.00007607647,0.0002398068,0.0002242061,0.00003267745,0.00001853807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000738453,0.0001016211,0.09888044,0.00005972869,0.00001612504,6.32509e-7,0.006993398,0.0001596925,0.000002986224,0.866773,0.0007325622,0.02627241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002294098,0.00001407831,0.1215809,0.00006398367,0.000001987757,0.000005420512,0.0002733704,0.0005910998,0.000003884363,0.01245019,0.8646521,0.0001335267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622424,0.007676133,0.00007658227,0.02714074,0.0001068857,0.0001375612,0.0001134904,0.00001080124,0.002495395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937635,0.003741667,0.0002314153,0.001535145,0.0002207323,0.00002821881,0.00001236164,0.000006986812,0.0004599778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.356945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780154711","doi":"","title":"The Rank-Order Method for Appellate Subset Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Random assignment; Law; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Economic Justice; Outlier; Political science; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02207075840620093,"gpt":0.2617362908625423,"spread":0.2396655324563414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289134,0.0000992229,0.0001744133,0.00003888054,0.003058436,0.0002813651,0.0003307888,0.00004786323,0.00001609366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002384115,0.000075239,0.0001380462,0.00004941724,0.00007678384,0.0002039202,0.00003532041,0.000544805,0.00009347992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003175508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002939027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002406023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001472357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984578,0.00001288712,0.0002807836,0.0001678163,0.00003463266,0.001046022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.00006404678,0.0003667048,0.0001464734,0.00008193423,0.00003206415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004412108,0.00001158326,0.004067406,0.000001728852,0.0001959124,1.447041e-7,0.00002269268,0.00003070875,0.000007023454,0.9808833,0.0005084355,0.01422694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005021782,0.00006737829,0.001932004,0.000002387351,0.000009515998,0.00005292669,0.00005999106,0.0007254923,0.00002145511,0.725239,0.2712882,0.00009949106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01170616,0.03061459,0.881929,0.0268811,0.001874565,0.0004723943,0.00004697048,0.00003824466,0.04643692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751223,0.01004972,0.001089863,0.0001738611,0.0007257368,0.00003011315,0.000002166745,0.00001644711,0.01278976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1065058339981717,"gpt":0.2607975038834354,"spread":0.1542916698852638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008184435,0.0006320565,0.0006997421,0.0003103252,0.003143176,0.0002270133,0.0008502889,0.0003230858,0.001740537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001031876,0.0005436424,0.0004785839,0.0005811527,0.01629221,0.001906514,0.0003991802,0.0004126526,0.002249997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006532106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009941404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004935761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001555566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957491,0.00007995276,0.001479905,0.001143574,0.0004044008,0.001143121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975398,0.0003419519,0.0005223191,0.0006932635,0.0004718236,0.000430848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003292764,0.0003693761,0.02235299,0.00001304093,0.00030868,0.0000259168,0.0001255948,0.0001793733,0.00003522919,0.9727232,0.003136379,0.0004009682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005026134,0.0002984227,0.006699379,0.0001514082,0.000124706,0.000341752,0.001436343,0.001972781,0.0003519367,0.5970467,0.3852528,0.001297634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03101917,0.004858882,0.3290075,0.004778684,0.009563494,0.001376426,0.002807319,0.0004453184,0.6161432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924417,0.0001552567,0.004410274,0.001141732,0.0004854091,0.00025892,0.0002820715,0.00001900597,0.0008056405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03108162068998933,"gpt":0.2053374216238098,"spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001302802,0.00009688525,0.0002313547,0.00001170226,0.001120465,0.00002287811,0.0001919816,0.0000423299,0.00009050039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431612,0.00006519156,0.0001156121,0.00002292488,0.0008112448,0.0001864664,0.0000649777,0.0001008123,0.00000634737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002611211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003470122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003041724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00002293456,0.0002351416,0.0001308305,0.00007914258,0.0001901949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.0001344672,0.00009038927,0.0001215736,0.0000465296,0.0000908549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549651,0.0003963276,0.02394989,0.00001579564,0.0004957204,0.0001270537,0.003880167,0.00003377433,0.00007470299,0.9684775,0.0005030631,0.001590987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002359605,0.0005802511,0.8713012,0.00004173366,0.00008148127,0.0002540727,0.002577555,0.0004915206,0.0001113621,0.003279523,0.1186872,0.0002345166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451395,0.003994189,0.0006191435,0.001781286,0.0002070192,0.0001024502,0.00002253777,0.000004726399,0.0481292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951524,0.004421279,0.0000887999,0.00002265623,0.000060625,1.932938e-7,4.75627e-7,0.000002785382,0.0002507517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.965198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}