{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":149,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":149,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ad1d57e6e186","filters":{"topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W1525320904","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm.2012.18135caa.003","title":"American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and The Procedural Justice Alternative","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing An International Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Open Society Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stephen J. Schulhofer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tom R. Tyler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Aziz Z. Huq","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03089794433752499,"gpt":0.2910879570120709,"spread":0.2601900126745459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761057,0.0003463446,0.0004275167,0.001197464,0.008040642,0.009993897,0.00153419,0.005534432,0.003275001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01575516,0.0003323659,0.0005004768,0.001401721,0.02874702,0.006728325,0.004316612,0.0087656,0.0003750431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006058225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01124606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02726166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03077578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903873,0.004712702,0.000241157,0.001074444,0.001950737,0.001633588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913442,0.003007428,0.001455629,0.001581208,0.001468387,0.001143192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008808048,0.00003357932,0.0004455848,0.00001242962,0.000006467656,0.00002419345,0.00085301,0.0006206208,0.00003509849,0.9880192,0.002520613,0.007420436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001176853,0.00001881869,0.001483597,0.0001020938,0.000009827499,0.00002228677,0.001491035,0.001355277,0.00008492781,0.9678264,0.02757378,0.00002021918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1314263,0.005307026,0.05438834,0.4192278,0.001002557,0.00006862399,0.00009043203,0.0001021848,0.3883867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771293,0.001176171,0.003710699,0.010116,0.0003999319,0.00004345517,0.00001860297,0.00002805771,0.007377822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02726166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05420601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166152439","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00163.x","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E‐Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the United States and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Information privacy; European union; Accounting; E-commerce; Privacy policy; Good faith; FTC Fair Information Practice; Personally identifiable information; Faith; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Karim Jamal","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael S. Maier","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shyam Sunder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1260619102270193,"gpt":0.3945388260192302,"spread":0.2684769157922109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00504303,0.0001059473,0.0004470571,0.002484156,0.001169514,0.004171737,0.000508591,0.0008692043,0.002963602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03539643,0.0002767982,0.0003531069,0.005172521,0.002746022,0.002752859,0.003106541,0.0008370014,0.0002599809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004667118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001669467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09259441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1222234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911323,0.004563138,0.00109029,0.0004429689,0.001829123,0.0009421607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387042,0.02625556,0.01977762,0.002650493,0.01085061,0.001761588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008836506,0.0001739503,0.8277931,0.0002912364,0.0001704772,0.0008144654,0.1276673,0.000420343,0.0009625667,0.00721186,0.001360904,0.0322501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891576,0.0001586403,0.9103218,0.0001854002,0.00003201929,0.0003073358,0.08251826,0.000236128,0.0002563201,0.0003068491,0.005617324,0.00004101912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957202,0.0007192735,0.00005884662,0.000376241,0.000005376208,0.000006016442,0.00006033832,0.00000152099,0.00305225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994766,0.0002153753,0.00002542805,0.00006130829,0.000002114429,0.000003416829,0.00004032669,0.000002117839,0.000173283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09259441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1841109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034690477","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.001.0001","title":"City, State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Political science; City-state; Urbanization; Population; Constitutional law; Pace; Law; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Economy; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Demography; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0592733040141126,"gpt":0.1902316670155419,"spread":0.1309583630014293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001089876,0.0004677724,0.000288746,0.0009765727,0.001681854,0.004793185,0.000508918,0.0008819859,0.217367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004783403,0.0002020441,0.0001760572,0.003216778,0.0008907625,0.003124324,0.001560674,0.00140744,0.07780606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002056531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001753265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01676836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0285506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997692,0.00004015465,0.000009863715,0.00006022944,0.00007766711,0.00004281869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998863,0.00001557989,0.000008648495,0.00001500047,0.00005007392,0.00002434227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007809764,0.0000119708,0.0003085043,0.0000772978,0.000001729459,0.00005157257,0.0003707253,0.0001320423,0.00004677559,0.2637818,0.6700876,0.06512216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001110513,0.000002011639,0.0002111459,0.00003186322,5.629754e-7,0.00002166644,0.000143825,0.00002855476,0.00001331406,0.005007489,0.9945372,0.000001334115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004456289,0.002376391,0.0003533077,0.001644087,0.0006168527,0.00002178754,0.001677623,0.00008751353,0.9927769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01343918,0.00373695,0.0003521054,0.000621351,0.0001736042,0.0000523706,0.001987901,0.00007915767,0.9795574],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.217367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090208598","doi":"10.1177/0038038512450804","title":"Privacy as a Human Right: A Sociological Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Brandeis University","keywords":"Sociology; Relevance (law); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Supreme court; Human rights; Law; Sociology of law; Character (mathematics); Sociological theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Katayoun Baghai","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05944698384741469,"gpt":0.2746551609278512,"spread":0.2152081770804365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101182,0.0006027226,0.0008588163,0.003571836,0.007016867,0.01082743,0.001877167,0.006505064,0.004065252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027661,0.0004749217,0.0009190093,0.002291478,0.09023618,0.01836864,0.006464583,0.006703568,0.0004312937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008000743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005210876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003974072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002524512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926715,0.004437508,0.0002432872,0.0007998993,0.001254807,0.0005930177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866439,0.01061299,0.0006422123,0.001089087,0.000576258,0.0004357051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.676587e-7,0.00000197939,0.0000303064,0.000005291004,7.379996e-7,0.00001176093,0.0005451907,0.00007775726,0.000006286262,0.9988309,0.0001347416,0.0003543133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003925876,0.000004925115,0.00006371157,0.00003417042,0.000001398176,0.00003619118,0.0006258009,0.0002530222,0.00002076575,0.9891775,0.009774527,0.00000405609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04291619,0.01415084,0.2211466,0.1891496,0.0009668553,0.0001704415,0.0002358638,0.00009467717,0.5311689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604424,0.004842024,0.01884099,0.006920343,0.00117011,0.0002475255,0.00006593932,0.00004990227,0.007420732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01082743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05804974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278978939","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2693826","title":"The Death of Rules and Standards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Anthony J. Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02424408546567745,"gpt":0.2261757750307114,"spread":0.2019316895650339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01125721,0.0003330774,0.0009884915,0.001668472,0.004703566,0.008517337,0.001110659,0.007101396,0.008845666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04333946,0.0004899227,0.0005703698,0.001187247,0.03741002,0.0135779,0.004166226,0.01517311,0.001451096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005171743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004923172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006568209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928519,0.003210517,0.0002581024,0.001042376,0.0018864,0.0007506551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756728,0.01204885,0.001398791,0.005164523,0.004339543,0.001375611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000639438,0.000003630281,0.00007677608,0.000003760428,0.000002493588,0.00001122752,0.0004010062,0.00006699691,0.00001118263,0.9921117,0.004717566,0.002587234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008526895,0.000004692098,0.0001644075,0.00002079295,0.000001970137,0.00001767908,0.0002593255,0.0001496111,0.00003921639,0.964731,0.03459615,0.000006557641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0622249,0.008880896,0.03100338,0.2981516,0.004782321,0.00006813985,0.0004401342,0.0001347371,0.5943139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548011,0.001956776,0.003787508,0.02431491,0.003172712,0.00009470784,0.0001222237,0.0002233271,0.1115267],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05953449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101363655","doi":"","title":"Federalism and subsidiarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; New Federalism; Dual federalism; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Law and economics; Supreme court; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; European union; Economics","authors":[{"name":"James E. Fleming","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jacob T. Levy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02199219278334496,"gpt":0.1703805813422849,"spread":0.14838838855894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00336959,0.0002214563,0.0004496214,0.001115421,0.003742466,0.004288903,0.0005821632,0.001858264,0.007347481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006885209,0.0001931354,0.0006238085,0.001480148,0.01877495,0.005876125,0.003006598,0.003551312,0.000625795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004348947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003391377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004596449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003780395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971685,0.001327244,0.00009541689,0.0005314884,0.0004444059,0.0004328846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972841,0.001348431,0.0004151804,0.0004455608,0.0003474965,0.0001592415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001083054,6.457435e-7,0.00006098857,0.00000203628,6.412769e-7,0.000002472641,0.00005736191,0.00003287317,0.000004312317,0.99873,0.0004719918,0.0006355782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006923328,0.000005131515,0.0004427456,0.00001806006,0.000002635783,0.00001925358,0.00009181131,0.0002326922,0.00003824995,0.9745437,0.02459552,0.000003292395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06134419,0.009510992,0.1009624,0.07988831,0.001069191,0.00005575116,0.0002249413,0.0001194477,0.7468247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684688,0.001999252,0.007168252,0.004315654,0.0008680076,0.0000971677,0.00007252763,0.00003198361,0.0169783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007347481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03155398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169633878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3855619","title":"Understanding Chilling Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Normative; Conformity; Empirical research; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jonathon W. Penney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1361496157125231,"gpt":0.2403606638520999,"spread":0.1042110481395768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005388878,0.0004393235,0.0009572806,0.002794072,0.002140237,0.006190798,0.001493853,0.003406282,0.02578674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02537491,0.0004263696,0.000603397,0.001762507,0.007070802,0.007281064,0.001730509,0.006021369,0.001619647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004672313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004916033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03388344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04108506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975726,0.0006685365,0.00007694554,0.000415569,0.0007824575,0.0004838355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807041,0.01286121,0.00106883,0.002038213,0.002558087,0.0007696924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001195965,0.00002143942,0.001375626,0.00004845447,0.00001701548,0.00007977341,0.0002677249,0.001471798,0.0001016228,0.9611415,0.02054772,0.01491538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000957899,0.00001130137,0.002005151,0.0001117216,0.00003172178,0.00003364859,0.0002425038,0.00268374,0.0002094231,0.943972,0.0506756,0.00001358338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0658061,0.0322462,0.06659602,0.1092081,0.001589686,0.00009638894,0.0008944952,0.0004543451,0.7231086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902621,0.01313606,0.004606758,0.01369645,0.001659658,0.00008560471,0.0002707684,0.0003066023,0.07597603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03388344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08626533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124174232","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhs002","title":"THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Damages; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Business; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Commission; Incentive; Patent infringement; Government (linguistics); Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Richard A. Epstein","is_ca":true},{"name":"F. Scott Kieff","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel F. Spulber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0188945258677762,"gpt":0.1958500298451659,"spread":0.1769555039773897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01417136,0.0005932367,0.000691973,0.001677053,0.007480248,0.01693276,0.002269058,0.02316914,0.006537271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02906613,0.0004960525,0.001400028,0.00192146,0.03276988,0.0145698,0.007676565,0.01596891,0.0006917046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01870603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01700649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02819298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01974348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.976764,0.006698076,0.0008830997,0.00357733,0.008368822,0.003708679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779669,0.01111826,0.001979169,0.004827384,0.002795448,0.00131279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001015845,0.000007717519,0.0001768957,0.000009423932,0.00000307632,0.00004371284,0.0002345898,0.0002312158,0.00005261413,0.9903668,0.004178319,0.004685557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004861911,0.00008152852,0.001531234,0.0002131411,0.0000305685,0.0001563656,0.0007386194,0.002715979,0.000662894,0.8295827,0.1641596,0.00007888334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0630285,0.005081804,0.05487769,0.2232467,0.00155012,0.0001291042,0.0001126135,0.0003461738,0.6516274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206717,0.001084344,0.008226382,0.03148493,0.001330782,0.000172491,0.00004421139,0.0001010109,0.03688413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02819298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1357224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994188556","doi":"10.3386/w14276","title":"Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Jesse Rothstein","is_ca":true},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5118614761099449,"gpt":0.4935828268371136,"spread":0.01827864927283129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02007745,0.0002351815,0.000581819,0.001716951,0.006761475,0.00826983,0.001273133,0.004446883,0.01441012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07736894,0.0002800619,0.0006034669,0.002785087,0.007896716,0.00706785,0.005253299,0.006324898,0.001361109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006502874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008398205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0277619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04899934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982093,0.009924733,0.0004553506,0.0008717268,0.003411611,0.003243694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622306,0.01811157,0.007505148,0.001092569,0.003436078,0.007624082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008373706,0.002250077,0.315131,0.000260029,0.0001498506,0.0004017196,0.03036349,0.001264044,0.0003830707,0.4214391,0.05005408,0.1774662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002480765,0.000446997,0.4091524,0.0008000162,0.0001413016,0.0001939487,0.04508584,0.001571335,0.0007382052,0.4820355,0.05947027,0.0001161391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5006937,0.006704297,0.00219496,0.3142413,0.000796731,0.0001181449,0.0005066572,0.00002214184,0.1747221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841886,0.0013142,0.0002464476,0.009358063,0.0007495731,0.00008535387,0.00008823191,0.0000091267,0.003960419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0277619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Cass R. Sunstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820777877036614,"gpt":0.2358387415988572,"spread":0.1576309628284911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003302204,0.0006390269,0.000841497,0.001588173,0.004230684,0.005294738,0.0007438383,0.002732683,0.01018906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006894296,0.0002936261,0.0003762207,0.002656178,0.009323035,0.009984738,0.004994518,0.005018897,0.0003673053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00818198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009239641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08237856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.000431828,0.00004930326,0.00007206632,0.0001057063,0.0004446062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995128,0.003770664,0.0002494775,0.0001539284,0.000370363,0.0003274776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001312324,0.00008653415,0.00256178,0.001160612,0.00004720245,0.003784291,0.06124995,0.001013412,0.0005487522,0.8155044,0.01598186,0.09792993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009200482,0.00006279703,0.008449169,0.006085052,0.00008971066,0.001107422,0.1100189,0.0004864155,0.0007005699,0.559375,0.313473,0.00005997623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1325432,0.1229715,0.002474607,0.395559,0.001055208,0.00009214596,0.0002027967,0.00002070434,0.3450809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903722,0.06942596,0.001044823,0.01313483,0.0004441818,0.00006581158,0.00005450127,0.0000302305,0.01207767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1273618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606702854","doi":"","title":"The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional 'Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Existentialism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02441578566044129,"gpt":0.2237943688735075,"spread":0.1993785832130662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09678686,0.0006226642,0.0009741111,0.002208207,0.004899571,0.01573847,0.001678581,0.004900988,0.01100041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.129251,0.0005372869,0.0006104419,0.002042591,0.05132268,0.01352078,0.006767828,0.006963509,0.0006054957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009277961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007350253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001858522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00159018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9212012,0.06011862,0.002350403,0.003259007,0.01047714,0.002593603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7815104,0.1913471,0.006405915,0.01115911,0.006636844,0.002940512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001085048,0.00002157637,0.0004643691,0.00006324388,0.000007988422,0.00001404467,0.001500114,0.0003707174,0.00003742354,0.9938735,0.0005384028,0.003097783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006383517,0.0001030697,0.001146877,0.0001741852,0.00001529158,0.0000573973,0.003941031,0.001424812,0.0004458808,0.9396955,0.0529069,0.00002533892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.090601,0.00806474,0.1860876,0.1616407,0.001156032,0.0005150063,0.0001624462,0.0001708426,0.5516017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726015,0.001329048,0.01689614,0.00322591,0.0002637996,0.0003761139,0.00002885739,0.00007115417,0.005207447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09678686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5118639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123802554","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00351.x","title":"A Canadian Copyright Narrative","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Normative; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Subject (documents); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; History; Computer science; Engineering; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel J. Gervais","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05369986895425746,"gpt":0.1999083986745747,"spread":0.1462085297203172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002858519,0.0005101716,0.0003818675,0.002580136,0.02057232,0.01413592,0.001470959,0.003407546,0.01971871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01148496,0.0002759526,0.0003788854,0.004956372,0.01255052,0.003551017,0.002298793,0.003300924,0.001288259],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1420858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1769305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953535,0.0004346326,0.00008593126,0.0005113808,0.002629041,0.0009856112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948846,0.0009976792,0.0001936788,0.0003241416,0.002722582,0.0008773609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001436254,0.000005653206,0.0004927791,0.0000459422,0.000003575951,0.0001236379,0.00377425,0.000197067,0.00007723852,0.8505774,0.1301517,0.01453655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004397535,0.00000423169,0.001351108,0.0001052878,0.000006092925,0.0000556961,0.002675831,0.0002722236,0.00007308934,0.02338779,0.9720386,0.00002559724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02252007,0.01653885,0.001898884,0.1566753,0.001795568,0.00005983387,0.001499067,0.0001092785,0.7989032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4939614,0.01714051,0.002956142,0.01893198,0.0006361365,0.00006943924,0.0006901879,0.0001536996,0.4654605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1420858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108032207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1907450","title":"The FTC, IP, and SSOs: Government Hold-Up Replacing Private Coordination","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Richard A. Epstein","is_ca":false},{"name":"F. Scott Kieff","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel F. Spulber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01977063964838048,"gpt":0.1826440767130568,"spread":0.1628734370646764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003481189,0.0003939249,0.0009372114,0.0009154162,0.002811683,0.009853047,0.001361543,0.007182171,0.0302578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0181005,0.0004016345,0.0006263995,0.001868552,0.009286626,0.01565383,0.003271965,0.006074228,0.001349448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004504854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005705229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01446248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01160582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972497,0.0008798434,0.0001013929,0.0006340306,0.0004525945,0.000682425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893783,0.005273285,0.001804878,0.002092218,0.0005524874,0.0008988605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001181085,0.00001709982,0.001454551,0.00002462907,0.00001291481,0.00008271325,0.0002998607,0.001487497,0.0001123667,0.9758831,0.008694586,0.01181258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009529939,0.0000639772,0.002531076,0.00007349075,0.00006371843,0.0001160021,0.001029583,0.004433759,0.000758538,0.9604667,0.03032969,0.00003809986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3392824,0.003097366,0.04296677,0.08630295,0.0007580623,0.00006873527,0.001004774,0.0007863605,0.5257326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863253,0.0002709859,0.0009167978,0.001205218,0.0002349407,0.00001805127,0.00003031313,0.00007277729,0.01092571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0302578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125313674","doi":"","title":"Shortening Agency and Judicial Vacancies through Filibuster Reform? an Examination of Confirmation Rates and Delays from 1981 to 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Nomination; Administrative law; Voting; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public administration; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Anne Joseph O’Connell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07302038904737562,"gpt":0.2495993587713808,"spread":0.1765789697240051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009897573,0.0002509644,0.0004686447,0.003608133,0.002129765,0.003935794,0.001604412,0.001035314,0.006641326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07274806,0.0004146635,0.0005884312,0.005627023,0.001455184,0.003386503,0.002623515,0.002832858,0.001578529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005709672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00625057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06286442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07489597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908674,0.001293468,0.0009450003,0.001135691,0.003091807,0.002666672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9100967,0.01649115,0.05050312,0.002808994,0.01439009,0.005709941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005162659,0.0002387219,0.900043,0.0002319067,0.0001081603,0.0004688293,0.006503737,0.001196287,0.000501047,0.004461369,0.01285172,0.07287887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001906136,0.0001948912,0.9732876,0.0001251914,0.00003180802,0.0001403343,0.006392051,0.0003327844,0.0003862098,0.0002998911,0.01875446,0.0000357054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809445,0.001878176,0.0004326961,0.003857767,0.0001273645,0.00005592478,0.001767754,0.00005622527,0.01087966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936705,0.0007104425,0.0001574651,0.0003675905,0.000177747,0.00005210928,0.001430663,0.00003467908,0.003398832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06286442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983579864","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01577.x","title":"Independent foundations, public money and public accountability: Whither ministerial responsibility as democratic governance?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Publics; Democratic governance; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Humanities; Management; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Aucoin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04507411630960479,"gpt":0.243299754435981,"spread":0.1982256381263762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01401486,0.0003491326,0.000365332,0.001869288,0.00582869,0.01498688,0.001290082,0.004677012,0.004036302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02187136,0.0003436708,0.0004857618,0.002332894,0.03208033,0.01224985,0.008046007,0.006247248,0.0003984595],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01188366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01188727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007419873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007272194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808065,0.01305932,0.0004644005,0.001017183,0.002797286,0.001855157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853291,0.007907832,0.002514162,0.00139257,0.001349469,0.001506926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001572897,0.00001517137,0.0005782734,0.00002457287,0.000004028098,0.00002357302,0.002538387,0.0002831846,0.00004525327,0.9889466,0.001494001,0.006031165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004080281,0.00005685671,0.002321986,0.0003053049,0.00002141829,0.00009292874,0.003968866,0.001519605,0.000349943,0.8962118,0.09507852,0.0000319311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1368348,0.01394709,0.05357143,0.2571995,0.001424797,0.0001019257,0.00006345783,0.0001758777,0.5366812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863052,0.0010235,0.002203151,0.002330228,0.0002459059,0.00004931852,0.000008581437,0.00002002377,0.007814182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08622241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121324705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.428241","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. and the U.K.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"E-commerce; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Karim Jamal","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael S. Maier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shyam Sunder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02345028177225552,"gpt":0.2811300410800985,"spread":0.257679759307843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007093019,0.00007827052,0.0002420731,0.001896227,0.001444459,0.003757735,0.0007147725,0.001311236,0.00364783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04366374,0.0002074024,0.0003509602,0.005426591,0.004330079,0.004661692,0.002646533,0.001827247,0.0003359591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004646058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004300068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04899518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09547333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992427,0.003694952,0.0005863127,0.0004914507,0.001873313,0.0009270827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289496,0.0356278,0.02138573,0.003452834,0.008482366,0.002101602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001579508,0.0007236393,0.7557104,0.0002035033,0.0002030477,0.0004018524,0.0713724,0.001387713,0.0006804098,0.0722366,0.00418938,0.09131153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007712065,0.0003917563,0.9106042,0.0001696574,0.00007969258,0.0002165243,0.07092374,0.001000141,0.0004438124,0.006840919,0.009199713,0.00005269016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986326,0.0008656116,0.0002115084,0.002217261,0.00001036201,0.00001464223,0.0000789992,0.000003417587,0.0102722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992392,0.0002066035,0.00005240421,0.0001686149,0.000003492982,0.000003525559,0.00002455475,0.000002944563,0.0002987589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04899518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09741998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624899232","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0023","title":"States of Emergency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Principle of legality; State of emergency; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Law and economics; Phenomenon; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Computer science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07127432804805992,"gpt":0.2429273213849699,"spread":0.17165299333691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273553,0.0003435655,0.0003254765,0.0009706019,0.003592954,0.005870576,0.0006709356,0.0024652,0.09597287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004710735,0.0002241786,0.0004603574,0.001570157,0.003104017,0.00530279,0.003874012,0.003045328,0.008305619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002851774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003238769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006714487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008606966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983675,0.0004070401,0.0001151808,0.0003225678,0.0003337454,0.0004539938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986479,0.0004453675,0.0001756937,0.0002655392,0.0003071795,0.0001583787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008886847,0.000003893325,0.0002000396,0.00003508369,0.000002042529,0.0000546809,0.0004613046,0.00008189825,0.00002765017,0.9394994,0.04971253,0.009912553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000434456,0.000008723324,0.0004836957,0.0001214138,0.000002949708,0.0001238627,0.0006067213,0.00008010826,0.00005665675,0.07837497,0.9201266,0.00001005433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004317499,0.003250039,0.00356013,0.01429797,0.001373946,0.00005164067,0.00109073,0.0001482157,0.9719097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4597123,0.008070681,0.005167312,0.02002886,0.001653065,0.000324309,0.002311254,0.0002069214,0.5025254],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09597287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Mota Prado","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marta Rodríguez de Assis Machado","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2108142027829962,"gpt":0.3204444638352548,"spread":0.1096302610522585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009514119,0.0003010468,0.0003567354,0.001784072,0.005364606,0.008141569,0.001258844,0.004643287,0.003015633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01668506,0.0002420103,0.0004317467,0.0008073759,0.01767026,0.003049894,0.003650348,0.004143364,0.0002083264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006192729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007756425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05381015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09578424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936516,0.003445682,0.0001606007,0.0004518056,0.001270095,0.001020196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859029,0.008963547,0.001578021,0.00115427,0.001764817,0.0006364079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002493463,0.00008749287,0.009829025,0.00008950273,0.0000248634,0.0006134651,0.004463586,0.001008263,0.0005324903,0.9589724,0.004690807,0.01966326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373163,0.0004073291,0.03565636,0.0032625,0.0003246458,0.001541375,0.03372306,0.02048602,0.005258856,0.6044566,0.2945479,0.0002416867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3643067,0.007777046,0.01048439,0.1042432,0.000325087,0.0001444342,0.00004983887,0.0000584753,0.5126108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923338,0.0005154472,0.0007296877,0.002211764,0.00004744212,0.00002084097,0.000004458886,0.000006490958,0.004130167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05381015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1069939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Ignacio Cofone","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01475583185653326,"gpt":0.1788928299163344,"spread":0.1641369980598012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007285646,0.0003947528,0.0005408768,0.0004984651,0.004774284,0.006363091,0.0009942974,0.006570919,0.01030709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01941352,0.0003407266,0.0005096496,0.0004823044,0.04014257,0.01590027,0.005354664,0.008614253,0.002588446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001887576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001881949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001747521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001717194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922554,0.003640374,0.0002074358,0.001132588,0.001979317,0.0007847787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913003,0.00462319,0.001007653,0.001866325,0.0007372111,0.0004654021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003237624,0.00001493475,0.0004913258,0.00005059902,0.0000207339,0.0001477527,0.003944591,0.00009098378,0.0001884936,0.9651281,0.02205513,0.007834964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001958621,0.00004424129,0.0006353987,0.0002499024,0.00002366503,0.0007677698,0.00369134,0.0002333297,0.0006396513,0.7320877,0.2615671,0.00004041738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04333168,0.006466981,0.03859848,0.4864478,0.002694649,0.00004470166,0.0002589638,0.0001309332,0.4220257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8467233,0.002370154,0.00338683,0.08621135,0.001425896,0.00006042884,0.00008980383,0.0001257337,0.05960644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01030709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03853059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263008586","doi":"","title":"You Can't Pay Them Enough: Subsidies, Environmental Law and Social Norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Public economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Climate change; Social norms approach; Law and economics; Reputation; Environmental law; Social value orientations; Government (linguistics); Positive economics; Political science; Normative; Microeconomics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Green","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009461731095218032,"gpt":0.1606078282565888,"spread":0.1511460971613708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005483811,0.0001706194,0.0003466359,0.0008426479,0.002189051,0.005099772,0.0006463943,0.002837411,0.004474249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01926303,0.0001600825,0.0003064624,0.001213751,0.0161677,0.005775384,0.001993233,0.002316132,0.0003023991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005136477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008146148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00689282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959455,0.002436903,0.0000999767,0.0003029392,0.0007725299,0.0004421131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828374,0.01173276,0.002749,0.0006501441,0.001312155,0.0007185275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000239267,0.00005899578,0.002721883,0.00002405802,0.000007419099,0.00005784868,0.001100732,0.0008913667,0.00009061815,0.9868456,0.001894813,0.006282805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003305276,0.00003409338,0.006010438,0.0000880434,0.00001390817,0.00004996308,0.002017499,0.001876558,0.000178837,0.97426,0.01541441,0.00002312541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5263919,0.005633729,0.01293105,0.1488833,0.0003022661,0.00005051843,0.0001547426,0.000056776,0.3055958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940341,0.000646463,0.0007044086,0.00168454,0.00007619189,0.00001861489,0.00001188772,0.00001012858,0.002813564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008146148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03726792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854953337624345,"gpt":0.2380898457190175,"spread":0.189540312342774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01166664,0.0004318517,0.001014323,0.003468104,0.005853728,0.009696056,0.001494977,0.006576837,0.01183691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02274012,0.0007694351,0.001286559,0.001193762,0.03250236,0.01359324,0.006039462,0.008131048,0.001774722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00265514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002244144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859569,0.003943065,0.001194773,0.003457016,0.003730541,0.001717727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812351,0.01033759,0.001497377,0.002321493,0.003646342,0.000962057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001809574,0.000003994041,0.00007338383,0.00001138524,0.000001569528,0.000009138023,0.0001480226,0.0000404398,0.00003966572,0.9985086,0.0003334792,0.0008284133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002002162,0.000008650776,0.0002824494,0.00006713107,0.000006593684,0.00005244382,0.0002402736,0.0004617172,0.0002464061,0.9789532,0.01964908,0.00001204006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03547703,0.003853027,0.1103479,0.02941115,0.0008364585,0.0002418561,0.0004787773,0.000224818,0.819129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192842,0.001939061,0.04745775,0.002866974,0.001034719,0.0007040639,0.0004949982,0.0001251365,0.02609311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01183691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06169981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469581622","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2782419","title":"Unequal Access: Making Sense of EI Eligibility Rules and How to Improve Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Brain Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"David Gray","is_ca":true},{"name":"Colin Busby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03169207502845407,"gpt":0.2564811905166368,"spread":0.2247891154881828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04132121,0.0006016696,0.001802551,0.003284747,0.004206786,0.01604929,0.003941736,0.004790687,0.02397065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2293407,0.0007905753,0.001032591,0.004153276,0.01132501,0.03496172,0.008366971,0.008971699,0.001372471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002697937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005448813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007075739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007229878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733714,0.01408486,0.002238148,0.003232419,0.004357942,0.002715265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8396595,0.1201278,0.01008158,0.01729405,0.008625892,0.004211171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154376,0.0001492669,0.01053061,0.0001058049,0.00005787642,0.000196006,0.003266051,0.003344763,0.0002927109,0.9121999,0.005321824,0.06441978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002210249,0.00001923968,0.002250685,0.000101883,0.00002732025,0.0000435347,0.002129144,0.00717302,0.0002267898,0.9827967,0.00517888,0.00003079986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2952462,0.003041578,0.3613121,0.08641127,0.001494517,0.0004679223,0.001021602,0.0006262796,0.2503785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644141,0.0006700232,0.02656637,0.002333229,0.0003863838,0.0001619207,0.0001384564,0.0001718699,0.005157692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04132121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919621670","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2013.794609","title":"Can Tax Deadlines Cause Fatal Mistakes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHANCE","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Front page; Front (military); History; Computer science; Media studies; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Donald A. Redelmeier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher J. Yarnell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0505357169112325,"gpt":0.2056770277270545,"spread":0.155141310815822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00210948,0.0004504162,0.0003955691,0.001925375,0.003127339,0.005013083,0.0006907205,0.002655237,0.6672164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01390247,0.0003107616,0.0003422876,0.002069862,0.001320669,0.004839426,0.00214561,0.002427541,0.3921366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001480574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001898304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01540798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0236384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991013,0.0001769849,0.00006078318,0.0001251019,0.0003424283,0.0001934593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948822,0.00172207,0.0006220801,0.0005727333,0.001313998,0.0008869292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003678946,0.00002938156,0.002080039,0.00003098857,0.000004323634,0.0001043819,0.000141091,0.00008615436,0.00004636205,0.005760421,0.8977231,0.09395698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001821707,0.000022024,0.005952804,0.0003582857,0.00001025736,0.0003411901,0.00160788,0.0004476923,0.0001670191,0.008332041,0.9827156,0.00002699791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006415155,0.002302578,0.0009907647,0.06624689,0.003084576,0.00004802807,0.002560158,0.001408127,0.9169437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06394061,0.004532611,0.0006499417,0.008622252,0.00123487,0.00004579908,0.001216525,0.0006321357,0.9191253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6672164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4746754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892375663","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0512","title":"Campaign Finance Regulation in North America: An Institutional Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Election law; Scholarship; Democracy; Public administration; Commission; Language change; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel P. Tokaji","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01874524467677419,"gpt":0.2508199610559309,"spread":0.2320747163791567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002270265,0.0002438519,0.0003642213,0.002602919,0.01011932,0.01436303,0.001677021,0.003395744,0.006025666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003985066,0.0003712987,0.00037159,0.003432254,0.01229172,0.003591254,0.002852016,0.003794459,0.0002271934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04093486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04106938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6386482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7106792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997465,0.0006389387,0.00006543943,0.0002910682,0.0004685542,0.001071017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958115,0.00142666,0.0007267469,0.0002475929,0.001214522,0.0005730799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001450313,0.000083711,0.007740485,0.00009969609,0.00002315547,0.0003648509,0.01183965,0.001133732,0.0002448507,0.949937,0.01157338,0.01694494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004204546,0.00006982384,0.08402315,0.001533424,0.0001146692,0.0002928883,0.06037736,0.002214067,0.0007415133,0.1237483,0.7266663,0.0001764737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1312342,0.01776571,0.002954605,0.1259335,0.0003450669,0.00008740874,0.0003355855,0.00009889097,0.7212451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475157,0.01286728,0.001597568,0.0126565,0.0003618395,0.0001522036,0.0001616726,0.00003172605,0.02465555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6386482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7269598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803046184","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/dwus4","title":"Consumer Privacy in a Behavioral World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Consumer protection; The Internet; Information overload; Business; Private information retrieval; Consumer law; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ignacio Cofone","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adriana Robertson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04729736856716322,"gpt":0.2392773765646045,"spread":0.1919800079974413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00580434,0.0002202976,0.000268995,0.0006815153,0.0015382,0.005813251,0.000488727,0.002097252,0.004996689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01898609,0.0001782195,0.0003367067,0.0009403563,0.006209173,0.005258295,0.002195129,0.002981319,0.0004014348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002870704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945101,0.003049216,0.000121125,0.0005928146,0.001343257,0.000383536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885547,0.005768781,0.002087025,0.001840859,0.001323079,0.0004255616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647776,0.00006304306,0.01042414,0.0000343276,0.00002700365,0.00008417827,0.001762585,0.001267902,0.0003104382,0.9702685,0.003033198,0.01268813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003406314,0.0001006753,0.01473511,0.0001366837,0.00003740826,0.0001878477,0.002735858,0.005970211,0.0007425383,0.8999109,0.07536329,0.00004541416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4213042,0.004528828,0.05541026,0.1594469,0.0003981974,0.00009716251,0.000806991,0.00009576001,0.3579118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882622,0.0006188608,0.002283144,0.004787107,0.0001515167,0.00003936572,0.00007247635,0.00001426152,0.003771063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005813251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03069669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Zane A. Spindler","is_ca":true},{"name":"Xavier de Vanssay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0678599396383057,"gpt":0.2569127034808392,"spread":0.1890527638425335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01156742,0.0004045646,0.001669623,0.001335355,0.004276726,0.009390939,0.002763707,0.005928958,0.01668038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02790909,0.0005389939,0.001020988,0.001557898,0.01430132,0.008940963,0.001980538,0.006254855,0.0010545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003086712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003880628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920596,0.004027293,0.0002893719,0.001115936,0.001351415,0.001156446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871331,0.006868001,0.0009490345,0.00229214,0.001648642,0.001109091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005104036,0.000007767399,0.00006385623,0.000008958972,0.000003638452,0.000008794946,0.00007852571,0.0002802938,0.00005721783,0.9975951,0.000580969,0.001309835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001209991,0.000006667992,0.0001327857,0.000008190959,0.000004703017,0.00001324831,0.00008827603,0.002127637,0.0000780362,0.995508,0.002014523,0.000005886553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2593524,0.001698996,0.2652946,0.09798836,0.0007924749,0.000273231,0.0004617053,0.0001707203,0.3739676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758568,0.0003352878,0.01116935,0.001419784,0.000412482,0.0001099741,0.00004870968,0.00006030937,0.01058721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01668038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06117505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124799479","doi":"","title":"The Identifiability Bias in Environmental Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Lawmaking; Law and economics; Doctrine; Environmental law; Common law; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics; Legislature","authors":[{"name":"Shi-Ling Hsu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.044115932583019,"gpt":0.2118373678747644,"spread":0.1677214352917454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07631566,0.0007418861,0.001727473,0.002585447,0.005738019,0.009965643,0.003125893,0.01155015,0.01911258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1911618,0.0009428225,0.001642881,0.002401907,0.04116278,0.02091553,0.005827679,0.01547845,0.001571023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007567584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009671368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005406389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9340761,0.0418627,0.002219785,0.009587738,0.009396306,0.002857323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7141457,0.2406956,0.008288003,0.02257184,0.01279368,0.001505114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001450482,0.00001098028,0.0006434516,0.00005148376,0.00003041447,0.00008056276,0.0003843478,0.0005065966,0.00002471707,0.9880515,0.005608858,0.004592548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001607788,0.000008522463,0.0002479575,0.0000856781,0.00001051458,0.00004158192,0.0001267309,0.001018223,0.00006422393,0.9862168,0.0121483,0.00001549832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03225289,0.01366686,0.2134743,0.3071566,0.003100098,0.0003177758,0.001653096,0.0004067109,0.4279717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709005,0.004553254,0.0324198,0.05911693,0.004949914,0.0006453217,0.0004015074,0.0002876509,0.02672506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07631566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","authors":[{"name":"Parbudyal Singh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Naresh C. Agarwal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1015747962184464,"gpt":0.2633780151215301,"spread":0.1618032189030837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847029,0.0004490697,0.0008490769,0.006007558,0.003830376,0.0144764,0.001489248,0.01174385,0.005577685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02174843,0.0004169603,0.0006276969,0.004515313,0.01922787,0.02749734,0.002197681,0.01194147,0.0006383653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00321977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961296,0.001610555,0.0002170114,0.0004580994,0.001186985,0.0003977006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542369,0.03621098,0.002010813,0.001187222,0.004957621,0.0013964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341659,0.0001019086,0.001501845,0.0004108478,0.00002476142,0.00025451,0.002516149,0.0002993491,0.0001930851,0.8550031,0.06668586,0.07297448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493548,0.00005316743,0.007348965,0.002156721,0.00005096121,0.00051919,0.006673758,0.0008698801,0.0001941906,0.5078869,0.4741723,0.00004906714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059939,0.2754672,0.004491265,0.6468678,0.01110399,0.000009969857,0.0000582014,0.00001587172,0.0513863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.419524,0.2782636,0.004074077,0.1403436,0.1401495,0.00005515853,0.0001029,0.0001043408,0.01738278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0520767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Chapman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0234347820337239,"gpt":0.177869600440651,"spread":0.1544348184069271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.000656162,0.001179823,0.004117671,0.005528109,0.0008437908,0.001739376,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0160464,0.0003280002,0.0006370652,0.001681984,0.02237687,0.00771,0.004213138,0.003561514,0.0004223454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002044265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00324282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.0003864511,0.001143996,0.002671418,0.0007995301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926332,0.004433869,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.00001318879,0.000004766205,0.00002466776,0.0007123124,0.0002327278,0.00003526895,0.9941422,0.0008633829,0.003862676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006423881,0.000005732167,0.00008861747,0.00001017344,0.000002149167,0.00002751805,0.0002050757,0.0002972904,0.00002711179,0.9913356,0.007990304,0.000003817947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.143895,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.00009997471,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.001188638,0.01033468,0.001965557,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.00003481767,0.0197952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05087417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101118422","doi":"10.1007/s11127-010-9594-9","title":"The price of transparency: do campaign finance disclosure laws discourage political participation by citizens’ groups?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Campaign finance; Public finance; Politics; Finance; Business; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Alexandre Couture Gagnon","is_ca":true},{"name":"Filip Palda","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02237121506173112,"gpt":0.2341445634591671,"spread":0.211773348397436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094798,0.0002262132,0.0007417705,0.0008815335,0.001638668,0.00517469,0.001125105,0.005713143,0.01380741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1119259,0.0004553806,0.0004893601,0.001044286,0.007218326,0.006287202,0.001542983,0.006405369,0.0007076241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001914248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006306889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006305906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928328,0.003525714,0.0002337171,0.0006229193,0.001523049,0.001261883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7524835,0.1929304,0.04289409,0.004966052,0.004079575,0.002646344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002227805,0.001658386,0.1471279,0.0005385223,0.0006351224,0.000757011,0.006542259,0.004096976,0.002181428,0.7102593,0.04031629,0.08365896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001513881,0.0005950917,0.2586035,0.000444987,0.0009119715,0.0003499231,0.007981412,0.01585139,0.006820954,0.6539804,0.05278259,0.0001640196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7079064,0.001773557,0.004971007,0.1759381,0.0005242712,0.00007385389,0.0003844482,0.00004856708,0.1083798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951193,0.0001473135,0.0001643951,0.003065972,0.00025176,0.00001282308,0.00001893269,0.000007511958,0.001212041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01380741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05789918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Chapman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0234347820337239,"gpt":0.177869600440651,"spread":0.1544348184069271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.000656162,0.001179823,0.004117671,0.005528109,0.0008437908,0.001739376,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0160464,0.0003280002,0.0006370652,0.001681984,0.02237687,0.00771,0.004213138,0.003561514,0.0004223454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002044265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00324282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.0003864511,0.001143996,0.002671418,0.0007995301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926332,0.004433869,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.00001318879,0.000004766205,0.00002466776,0.0007123124,0.0002327278,0.00003526895,0.9941422,0.0008633829,0.003862676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006423881,0.000005732167,0.00008861747,0.00001017344,0.000002149167,0.00002751805,0.0002050757,0.0002972904,0.00002711179,0.9913356,0.007990304,0.000003817947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.143895,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.00009997471,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.001188638,0.01033468,0.001965557,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.00003481767,0.0197952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05087417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386235","doi":"10.29173/alr1371","title":"Economic Instruments and the Kyoto Protocol: Can Parliament Implement Emissions Trading without Provincial Co-operation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Emissions trading; Legislation; Economics; Opposition (politics); Public administration; Law; Business; Political science; Greenhouse gas; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Philip K. Barton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04095168421376772,"gpt":0.2715737244063203,"spread":0.2306220401925526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285958,0.0001732267,0.0003720699,0.001419673,0.003295596,0.004749381,0.0009170404,0.003826444,0.002845581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02251332,0.0002513655,0.0003580232,0.002009928,0.00596045,0.003129622,0.001145151,0.003050904,0.0005615657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009661365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01686526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09148983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1093385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912289,0.002947274,0.0003288406,0.000529635,0.003497336,0.001467993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934268,0.003833005,0.0007059326,0.0004701157,0.001319226,0.0002448837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000180298,0.00000851613,0.0004574371,0.00004974428,0.000007705923,0.00003785808,0.0002153952,0.0004651838,0.0001194565,0.9853758,0.003866096,0.009378914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787558,0.00005423262,0.008179177,0.0002923852,0.00004601329,0.00008061148,0.0005791262,0.001469796,0.0007351091,0.7358361,0.2525982,0.000051386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07832632,0.03346128,0.01238361,0.1162582,0.0009073542,0.0001347061,0.000305732,0.00007916994,0.7581436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448625,0.0113639,0.003163369,0.01052023,0.0003800876,0.00009399579,0.0001061065,0.00003184618,0.029478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945383277","doi":"10.3138/jcs.48.3.49","title":"The Dilemma of Positive Rights: Access to Health Care and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Charter; Political science; Patient rights; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02186579320423833,"gpt":0.2351126491272463,"spread":0.213246855923008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008375541,0.0003894232,0.0005836886,0.001737879,0.01826568,0.01658562,0.002713853,0.00772948,0.004151721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01526937,0.0004042265,0.0005061597,0.002428327,0.06290684,0.00673711,0.003987518,0.010747,0.0002961886],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08991746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1195392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.946539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864635,0.003190798,0.000235898,0.0008984215,0.006429982,0.002781315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991699,0.004461186,0.0005304472,0.0004304499,0.001882164,0.0009967192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002913967,0.000002613847,0.0001592513,0.00001052493,0.00000136578,0.00002282249,0.001117768,0.0000551564,0.00002308306,0.9888487,0.007351225,0.002404553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000353656,0.00001239864,0.003423135,0.0003429656,0.00002113836,0.0001022631,0.006258632,0.0008043792,0.0002495049,0.7404857,0.2481935,0.00007113116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01896878,0.01143374,0.00450902,0.6523138,0.000789096,0.00002893106,0.0001597893,0.00002494832,0.3117719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8849429,0.009401603,0.003842013,0.06917078,0.0009688822,0.00004668585,0.00007695463,0.00004652491,0.03150358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6523999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Russell L. Weaver","is_ca":false},{"name":"Linda Jellum","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059655840819562,"gpt":0.316639875857976,"spread":0.2106742917760198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006915458,0.0001282397,0.0002815483,0.001084152,0.008577542,0.009609271,0.0007085709,0.004396411,0.006589997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01407299,0.0004163877,0.0002544845,0.001166904,0.02088993,0.01246086,0.002849759,0.006758615,0.001115822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008228093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007784531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04032326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06786304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955299,0.001928042,0.0001417766,0.0006467378,0.001024817,0.000728712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953578,0.002521743,0.0004021543,0.0004282668,0.0008313305,0.0004587623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763014,0.000005544521,0.0005459587,0.000008531947,0.000001413817,0.00001876083,0.001629976,0.00005484759,0.00003156988,0.9800496,0.0107837,0.006862439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000226763,0.00004083592,0.002511329,0.0002068693,0.00001027069,0.00006501484,0.003023563,0.0003981734,0.000169909,0.4833885,0.5101196,0.00004324558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06783969,0.02086549,0.01150129,0.2362328,0.002012796,0.00004293844,0.0001070777,0.00006491307,0.6613331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8669252,0.007198367,0.00304544,0.02658438,0.001857857,0.00006940515,0.00004754699,0.00006201676,0.0942097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04032326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08017713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W405642559","doi":"10.7202/028861ar","title":"Compulsory Conciliation in Canada: Do We Need It?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Proposition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"John D. Misick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03947447185840714,"gpt":0.1992426403333252,"spread":0.159768168474918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226141,0.0002649598,0.00073679,0.001971754,0.01513312,0.007546823,0.003544709,0.005581277,0.01097234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04506233,0.0004479581,0.0006369711,0.004066639,0.008155296,0.003556742,0.003473819,0.006061793,0.0004564432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0926505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3300865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791966,0.002072095,0.0005516118,0.001253481,0.007793527,0.009132582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604333,0.008672881,0.00409956,0.00183116,0.01640411,0.008558965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002791968,0.0002687149,0.07649687,0.0005682501,0.0002274198,0.0006455688,0.006514284,0.003771513,0.0005640098,0.7107705,0.1075451,0.0923485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634319,0.0003429337,0.2445857,0.001719041,0.0006268329,0.0005633325,0.02623018,0.007206312,0.002694831,0.1528617,0.5620027,0.0005321509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4334996,0.01207106,0.004609054,0.3312644,0.001120662,0.0003969015,0.002252902,0.0002034639,0.2145819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483011,0.002647413,0.001795941,0.02560965,0.0002022859,0.00006348226,0.0003082097,0.00004014615,0.02103186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6722296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639320128","doi":"","title":"Economic and legal analyses of trade policy and institutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Political science; International trade law; Law; Economics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"E. Kwan Choi","is_ca":false},{"name":"James C. Hartigan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.069168866136693,"gpt":0.277639236436804,"spread":0.2084703703001111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001637434,0.0004650388,0.0003246809,0.003135035,0.002416398,0.006615716,0.0006201087,0.001420094,0.03022252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004046797,0.0002526437,0.0003983304,0.005135061,0.00607504,0.004702686,0.001373708,0.001897493,0.002868458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003226924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007554595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005893211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983534,0.0006699485,0.00007001499,0.0001762764,0.0005644352,0.0001659914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997161,0.001628568,0.0002860377,0.0002721741,0.0005507258,0.0001014826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001589796,0.000005680538,0.0001055176,0.00001782144,0.000001688276,0.00000721872,0.00007960605,0.0005875683,0.00001380475,0.9885938,0.006707122,0.003878637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002528267,0.000003609747,0.0007448468,0.0001632733,0.00000451193,0.00001986409,0.0003127978,0.001162578,0.00005655045,0.8517321,0.1457906,0.000006638474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005513316,0.02894723,0.01566166,0.0444834,0.0006830011,0.00004876747,0.0009150938,0.00006537126,0.9036822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.652534,0.05988082,0.0166112,0.004845406,0.004041019,0.0003434232,0.001438663,0.0001211671,0.2601843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03022252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1011044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133444857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726262","title":"The Precedential Effects of the Supreme Court's Emergency Stays","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Trevor McFadden","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vetan Kapoor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01117108646414607,"gpt":0.1928733200806567,"spread":0.1817022336165107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005065494,0.0002361941,0.001009112,0.001364633,0.004037387,0.006826812,0.002010372,0.004979743,0.03165299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04350055,0.0004361024,0.000582797,0.001506388,0.004046374,0.003249219,0.002171231,0.007047937,0.001145178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005543057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005919837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04217373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07324076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957435,0.001004904,0.0001322668,0.0004585681,0.0009469742,0.001713819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630796,0.02626538,0.003284512,0.001398786,0.002380552,0.003591221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00199878,0.0008240203,0.01725294,0.00008995881,0.0001664287,0.001897665,0.001982894,0.01436886,0.001653179,0.9040364,0.03228313,0.02344571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001207814,0.001150234,0.1369109,0.000214982,0.0007293881,0.0005021123,0.01194835,0.02704231,0.002506542,0.7700202,0.0474847,0.0002824729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7114834,0.001289321,0.00200416,0.02196605,0.000428913,0.00005425889,0.0006674693,0.00006665626,0.2620398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932036,0.0001344863,0.00006270091,0.0007135355,0.0001299901,0.000006148896,0.00003826468,0.000008868626,0.005702359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04217373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1058898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","authors":[{"name":"David G. Duff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07894097353695297,"gpt":0.3136137131778003,"spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002347657,0.0005414196,0.00117968,0.006443824,0.001059145,0.002857584,0.000873198,0.002665051,0.00259441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006035384,0.0005678924,0.0004799574,0.009931026,0.003089432,0.004584225,0.0008799923,0.002482911,0.000871938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005097034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007610233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01741655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01954354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990562,0.000361758,0.0000700882,0.0001299074,0.0003252379,0.00005693464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960502,0.002682002,0.0002093566,0.00007224978,0.0009246516,0.00006166769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006691507,0.00009576443,0.001004459,0.01753642,0.0001612076,0.0003546225,0.001138827,0.001754416,0.0002588757,0.2370115,0.1497542,0.5908627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001062894,0.00002721038,0.001575276,0.01775218,0.00007848859,0.0002134225,0.0006970834,0.0002299749,0.0001470267,0.02711863,0.9521282,0.00002180307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001386735,0.9951408,0.00009849097,0.002406226,0.0001493994,0.000003299756,0.000007738918,0.000001622108,0.002053784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003083901,0.995639,0.0001214679,0.0005813888,0.0002397222,0.000006384481,0.00001295724,0.000001766837,0.0003134173],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01741655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0369817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122820070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1286","title":"Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of equity; Court of record; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02751140719575689,"gpt":0.2368840862889685,"spread":0.2093726790932116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0332319,0.0002079939,0.0004773704,0.005200759,0.006076008,0.00958782,0.001429272,0.001681063,0.001849619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09059632,0.0008228763,0.0005879275,0.01025694,0.002641702,0.004273748,0.004319482,0.005204209,0.0006090068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02614485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03934346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1168228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2214092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709423,0.005897115,0.002682257,0.001711854,0.01411747,0.004649009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291733,0.01942596,0.01768073,0.004653897,0.02387107,0.005195098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006016212,0.0009407041,0.3126011,0.0008710418,0.0001455982,0.001135667,0.0477777,0.005706156,0.0035784,0.08779474,0.08527403,0.4535734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004615726,0.0004743442,0.6539465,0.0004725848,0.00004958728,0.0002261335,0.01708704,0.00254011,0.002545364,0.004617669,0.3177873,0.0002072729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.837136,0.006953913,0.011523,0.03380373,0.002341204,0.001401096,0.005029073,0.0005611264,0.1012508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667574,0.002184712,0.00578954,0.002562882,0.0006608496,0.0003577297,0.002289812,0.0001032315,0.01929387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1168228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2322856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484547649","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Novel Search Technologies: An Economic Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Deterrence (psychology); Enforcement; Crime control; Law and economics; Legislature; Business; Deterrence theory; Personally identifiable information; Law enforcement; Economics; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Criminal justice","authors":[{"name":"Steven Penney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02974497983420887,"gpt":0.2283527387874932,"spread":0.1986077589532844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092627,0.0007372469,0.001181482,0.002710736,0.001974279,0.008547235,0.002501954,0.005574226,0.005010555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03367819,0.0006465843,0.001316293,0.00154883,0.01717822,0.0104592,0.00274188,0.004802623,0.0003237518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01727749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007664456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01812961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009896517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912367,0.005135914,0.0002038058,0.0006877652,0.002047413,0.0006883722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693494,0.02559595,0.001672857,0.001417057,0.001371993,0.0005926838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007516926,0.00001159274,0.0001417892,0.00001646407,0.000006936694,0.00002410344,0.00003626062,0.008736921,0.00002114512,0.9893548,0.0003120435,0.001330501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001560249,0.00001212926,0.0001990497,0.00003709632,0.000007428438,0.00002538122,0.00005208371,0.03163881,0.00004652246,0.9652421,0.002708037,0.00001579695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315316,0.008308234,0.55875,0.06131185,0.0002810218,0.0003856503,0.0005053947,0.0001188217,0.3171858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512613,0.003432993,0.03189512,0.001989814,0.0004240521,0.0003325046,0.00008440013,0.00003871778,0.01054115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01812961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1253576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Karen Busby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.110776023013309,"gpt":0.2567147494172821,"spread":0.1459387264039731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004167196,0.000262487,0.0003081641,0.001469479,0.01087833,0.007341145,0.001425105,0.00692496,0.00342562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01401236,0.000344422,0.0003980195,0.002155268,0.01541256,0.002462931,0.002017113,0.004409259,0.0003103042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04618844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1344302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945005,0.0007675714,0.0001692941,0.0003903155,0.002278507,0.001893859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958115,0.001634235,0.0004861472,0.0002424003,0.001341575,0.000484239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007139335,0.000009618301,0.001569925,0.00003116558,0.000003083701,0.00007636141,0.003389145,0.0003306014,0.0001113692,0.9706826,0.02043973,0.00334931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893958,0.00005399583,0.04426704,0.0008086207,0.00007155563,0.0002140082,0.01458304,0.002536371,0.000837011,0.3187214,0.6176099,0.0002281242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1399402,0.00799796,0.006246895,0.3350094,0.0008211581,0.0001781354,0.002563711,0.00009518004,0.5071474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928618,0.003880454,0.005150125,0.05163337,0.0003315653,0.0001223038,0.0003085353,0.00002775415,0.04568409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04618844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3351222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124708831","doi":"","title":"Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-Examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Feminism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Empirical research; Judicial restraint; Political science; Judicial activism","authors":[{"name":"Rosalind Dixon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02773671338730788,"gpt":0.2202374845159424,"spread":0.1925007711286345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006043551,0.0003344912,0.000591639,0.002052516,0.008894428,0.009800419,0.001156122,0.003221008,0.006936519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006407855,0.0002868967,0.0003874235,0.001727354,0.02289485,0.006978977,0.002937209,0.006218345,0.0005212108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01020021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004526925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0268752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05170859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929703,0.003570919,0.0001335057,0.0009185969,0.001261402,0.001145362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942436,0.004343302,0.0004318681,0.0001739356,0.0004163685,0.0003908813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002699789,0.0000328204,0.002753269,0.00009516573,0.000007247698,0.0003024926,0.04947559,0.00005719314,0.0001568872,0.9108846,0.01046153,0.02574617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001557643,0.00006902194,0.01742149,0.001422447,0.00001718415,0.0004472628,0.08542831,0.0002968717,0.0003734677,0.1239189,0.7705509,0.00003863039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353014,0.1130085,0.002284543,0.2478597,0.002729521,0.00001922217,0.00008968569,0.00001653112,0.4986908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395649,0.01956595,0.0003106618,0.0110734,0.003091123,0.0000172244,0.00002156875,0.00004282484,0.02631233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0268752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07400811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281570989","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2732045","title":"The Questionable Presupposition Underlying Hartian Accounts of Legal Facts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stefan Sciaraffa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02177629648615802,"gpt":0.2237949704471421,"spread":0.2020186739609841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009125724,0.0004163802,0.001144607,0.002639898,0.00423891,0.006806423,0.003704904,0.008367225,0.01450587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04058643,0.0008425866,0.0008234543,0.002468216,0.03356871,0.02022351,0.003064044,0.009078789,0.002396591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003860851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002832641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00583579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004957209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935446,0.002378719,0.0003860131,0.001251741,0.001784226,0.0006548613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674421,0.02089867,0.002539046,0.004976001,0.003466858,0.0006773031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001027461,0.000004840127,0.00008240368,0.00001519992,0.000006134912,0.00002101757,0.0002807244,0.0001191917,0.00001287729,0.996101,0.002037336,0.001308983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006813507,0.000003237578,0.00006277193,0.00000918206,0.000003985982,0.00001730316,0.00007067694,0.0003272478,0.00003192826,0.9957776,0.003684788,0.000004454158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08047611,0.004890015,0.2261888,0.2556679,0.003453969,0.0001853795,0.001771092,0.0004619593,0.4269047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571325,0.0009873873,0.01367455,0.01008258,0.003256662,0.000110263,0.0001462603,0.00008704663,0.01452273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01450587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04852694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404667689","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000660","title":"The Decriminalization of Abortion in Latin America: A Tale of Gradual Judicialization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Abortion; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Latin Americans; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Jordi Díez","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alba Ruibal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0384592475274011,"gpt":0.2841566820455503,"spread":0.2456974345181492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01255251,0.0001634722,0.0002926786,0.001555859,0.003999421,0.007683738,0.0008640935,0.002704256,0.001199411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01542778,0.0002423576,0.0003980717,0.001343112,0.03343851,0.004091643,0.004018379,0.00635014,0.0001134062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01135621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007626954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02080877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01878044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946119,0.002893145,0.0001678554,0.0005619269,0.001061164,0.0007040682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902126,0.005277319,0.001471485,0.001171789,0.001542162,0.0003246998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002829612,0.00002362684,0.002918834,0.00007807299,0.00001606066,0.0002274403,0.007832039,0.0005695659,0.0005428557,0.962012,0.004351808,0.02139935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008065902,0.00007439038,0.01701724,0.0007988108,0.00003112264,0.0003357648,0.01026572,0.001081786,0.001826712,0.5743047,0.3940755,0.0001075711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2281647,0.04337231,0.018407,0.3923003,0.0008162164,0.0001377409,0.0001596866,0.0001051895,0.3165369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635354,0.008637589,0.0033916,0.01568704,0.0007050454,0.00006645442,0.00004080246,0.00004361173,0.007892422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02080877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08239555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411352128","doi":"","title":"Law and Economics Scholarship and Supreme Court Antitrust Jurisprudence, 1950–2010","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Camden Hutchison","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02495020589981737,"gpt":0.2182291835445373,"spread":0.19327897764472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003843217,0.0003958394,0.000326911,0.002514767,0.009694485,0.01040046,0.0008950876,0.009324898,0.005185978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01079295,0.000515628,0.0004113827,0.003271805,0.0269187,0.007161385,0.003143236,0.01075213,0.0008377774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03530588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01695633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1117873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.155382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997501,0.0006674884,0.0001234223,0.0005022591,0.0007301551,0.0004757027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960968,0.002314653,0.0003934044,0.000220393,0.0006249381,0.0003498574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009165378,0.00002373304,0.0003834074,0.00002021799,0.000003716769,0.00007047113,0.002506949,0.0001371196,0.00005452348,0.9713757,0.01921495,0.0062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002563854,0.00003343647,0.007745153,0.0007454655,0.00001911554,0.0001292917,0.002684872,0.0005333193,0.0002882125,0.3564883,0.6312657,0.00004148042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05499306,0.09732167,0.002182344,0.157368,0.003352679,0.00004551076,0.0002527163,0.00003682103,0.6844471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705039,0.03838178,0.001396803,0.05216609,0.0045713,0.0001101778,0.0001996593,0.00007909941,0.1325912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2561632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247022395","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198790952.003.0040","title":"Environmental Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Public economics; CITES; Direct tax; Environmental law; Tax deferral; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Incentive; Business; Tax reform; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income; Market economy","authors":[{"name":"Janet E. Milne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02522012738839058,"gpt":0.1530797117388194,"spread":0.1278595843504288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006394284,0.0002817938,0.0002634208,0.001430989,0.001181612,0.00384367,0.0006348786,0.001134071,0.06176357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002188658,0.000170996,0.0002644997,0.001950533,0.001182254,0.002248277,0.001142426,0.001513927,0.0116604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002775823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002366029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004769832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005411033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992179,0.0001311896,0.00002910736,0.0001016484,0.0004446644,0.00007560091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993507,0.0001750432,0.00004903708,0.0001335296,0.0002522648,0.00003929339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004556305,0.000009101367,0.0001148528,0.00004767316,0.000001837662,0.00002767974,0.00009813423,0.0003818025,0.00006680396,0.9441485,0.02525217,0.02984691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002472787,0.000004308412,0.0002701497,0.0001756868,0.000002389938,0.00006906542,0.0001001998,0.0001990274,0.0001810146,0.06903519,0.9299567,0.000003648594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001776264,0.004042279,0.002029763,0.00240219,0.0002344757,0.00001641712,0.0002890136,0.00004575493,0.9891639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1583875,0.01668861,0.003420356,0.002683199,0.0005631318,0.00007282117,0.001288494,0.0001525051,0.8167433],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06176357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2066197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117394527","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00006.x","title":"Changing Revenue Policy in the United States: An Overview of the Record and Perennial Puzzles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Budgeting &amp Finance","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; State (computer science); Revenue center; Economics; Tax revenue; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Fair share; Business; Economic policy; Finance; History","authors":[{"name":"John L. Mikesell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09275192381125652,"gpt":0.2763864857368789,"spread":0.1836345619256224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366449,0.0003085383,0.000329907,0.004768187,0.001402749,0.007608879,0.000590617,0.001940071,0.002868318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003882512,0.0002909242,0.0002792676,0.01075224,0.002069251,0.0057831,0.00122568,0.002586476,0.0003621148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00662571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003737774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01933637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03276783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987657,0.0004562343,0.0001159455,0.0001195147,0.0003811193,0.0001615363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977152,0.001177345,0.000305088,0.00007472889,0.0005734718,0.0001541466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009242532,0.0001940749,0.01915009,0.00242255,0.00008131288,0.0002841197,0.002893121,0.002351658,0.0003657955,0.3286463,0.2146978,0.4288208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001116088,0.00006617632,0.04184813,0.003423923,0.00005211144,0.0002222735,0.005637407,0.0007687296,0.0002117469,0.05168933,0.8960227,0.00004624856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03060766,0.786332,0.000976828,0.1129699,0.002459263,0.0000204511,0.0005420678,0.00005951976,0.06603239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1756269,0.7996444,0.001519522,0.01415405,0.003078759,0.00002701051,0.0007093605,0.00003833535,0.005201715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01933637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04807311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780154711","doi":"","title":"The Rank-Order Method for Appellate Subset Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Random assignment; Law; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Economic Justice; Outlier; Political science; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Hasday","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02207075840620093,"gpt":0.2617362908625423,"spread":0.2396655324563414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0230876,0.001382352,0.002087147,0.005003806,0.002299688,0.003503682,0.002340519,0.001514278,0.0184302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08273254,0.0008377295,0.001663955,0.006127501,0.002121148,0.002823754,0.002304225,0.004114278,0.00660211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001684534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00524094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003498593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006002713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9678282,0.02235369,0.001063651,0.002743238,0.005508158,0.0005031434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501954,0.03475948,0.001973967,0.007199966,0.005299518,0.0005716614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003752512,0.0002272021,0.007630143,0.0005098804,0.000319693,0.0002401873,0.0007780326,0.0363718,0.001288064,0.3267426,0.05673773,0.5687795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004306737,0.0003843329,0.00471977,0.0002483701,0.0001675018,0.0005851222,0.000519269,0.3850672,0.00336044,0.4842232,0.120104,0.0001900638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002273751,0.0003212307,0.9909388,0.0003648873,0.0001292744,0.000603175,0.000518584,0.0004599255,0.004390365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05650853,0.0004351406,0.9306638,0.0002977533,0.0003553663,0.002308535,0.001710739,0.0003505045,0.007369619],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0230876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1221004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","authors":[{"name":"Bruce M. Hicks","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1065058339981717,"gpt":0.2607975038834354,"spread":0.1542916698852638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07640944,0.001031937,0.002575582,0.002305291,0.01473424,0.02590039,0.006433718,0.03966484,0.009419532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1110864,0.001845419,0.001633594,0.001874839,0.02592085,0.0171602,0.006589314,0.03714676,0.002122246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01593287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04414407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03759132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04158729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.937905,0.02598933,0.004883307,0.008458796,0.01161252,0.01115113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404784,0.03896049,0.003680894,0.003832899,0.008453512,0.00459373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587599,0.00005851646,0.0002257027,0.00002303136,0.00002297732,0.00006962414,0.0008496331,0.0004721483,0.0001894265,0.982079,0.0127235,0.003250549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002895465,0.00008675046,0.0008421516,0.000185314,0.00006005745,0.00006586373,0.001049539,0.003115191,0.001187343,0.9133424,0.07956684,0.0002089832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06242341,0.003179733,0.06734508,0.4886456,0.006501615,0.0006524326,0.0003997448,0.0002586007,0.3705938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8187729,0.001018387,0.02953234,0.09109838,0.003685236,0.0007388802,0.0001128088,0.0002515404,0.05478946],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4040965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ittai Paldor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03108162068998933,"gpt":0.2053374216238098,"spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007707082,0.0005881562,0.0009413873,0.001855541,0.00341803,0.007548967,0.003904417,0.01146227,0.004938011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02013898,0.0005932146,0.001760309,0.001350666,0.02416508,0.01179525,0.005558637,0.01349212,0.0009272185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00483106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006112683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914056,0.002220382,0.0005010965,0.001183133,0.003700244,0.0009895832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886788,0.006376164,0.001309743,0.001764908,0.001437968,0.0004323748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002604337,0.000003893188,0.00004056865,0.000006703681,0.000001660178,0.00003194228,0.00008193505,0.00009835592,0.00004176078,0.9987015,0.0004469244,0.0005420818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002457808,0.000008962248,0.0001758347,0.00005649275,0.000005975795,0.00005357463,0.0001355328,0.001791528,0.0001474023,0.9892687,0.008317489,0.00001398595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965426,0.005883127,0.1683787,0.1165074,0.001520867,0.0001279487,0.0002991074,0.0002512087,0.6073775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491246,0.001840843,0.01456363,0.01340808,0.001351988,0.0001856559,0.00009400728,0.0001337615,0.01929751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01146227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04075938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}