{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":392,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":392,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"eb708d3185d7","filters":{"topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2794570269","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139175982","title":"Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Humanity; Modernity; Positivism; Reinterpretation; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; History; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02297884368533876,"gpt":0.2230338885146572,"spread":0.2000550448293184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003926785,0.000166379,0.0003696238,0.00006153963,0.0008431125,0.00004430379,0.0005004629,0.0003221545,0.000001791264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003054822,0.0001490835,0.0001857925,0.00002037498,0.002533311,0.00008338979,0.0002539128,0.000395835,0.000002591196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001866523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003280719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01010312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001778948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987179,0.0003478378,0.0001459323,0.0002298831,0.0003542697,0.0002041436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990233,0.000206513,0.0002501465,0.0002429296,0.0001713701,0.000105762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001002982,0.000006331299,0.000003370264,0.0000405918,0.00005281145,0.00002235501,0.001906458,1.096979e-7,6.457346e-7,0.9326262,0.065083,0.0001578093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007734605,0.0000182527,0.00001292971,0.0000756153,0.0001689806,7.237406e-7,0.000292227,0.000001817104,0.000004384609,0.001710927,0.9967734,0.0001672589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003990614,0.0002262704,0.00001099388,0.0001599196,0.0001849714,0.0004401928,0.00006218677,0.00005679438,0.9984596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008279113,0.0007785788,0.000005049679,0.0001187572,0.0004084437,4.575529e-7,0.00001229478,0.00001290876,0.9903844],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593079736","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139175982","title":"Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity: The Post-theistic Program of French Social Theory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Perfection; Theism; Philosophy; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Index (typography); Epistemology; Social science; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01886100098327888,"gpt":0.2854410266913446,"spread":0.2665800257080657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868987,0.0002004902,0.0005048844,0.00004583874,0.0009839871,0.00007110692,0.0005987883,0.00036883,0.0001478117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001972432,0.0001046789,0.0002941844,0.0001378625,0.00537771,0.00006293859,0.0001439195,0.0004461959,0.000008933831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006630601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005256482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007225016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003878513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977619,0.0007557954,0.0004000131,0.00019937,0.0006386935,0.0002441948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980091,0.0009312853,0.0004569603,0.0002107951,0.0003457822,0.00004609211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004871497,0.00004509269,0.00001405268,0.00005385204,0.00009245527,0.000001076473,0.02032537,3.925442e-8,4.308382e-7,0.9672305,0.008757237,0.003431201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003435618,0.00009075076,0.0001317192,0.00005071186,0.0001846794,4.020023e-7,0.001065649,8.866133e-7,7.569822e-7,0.783962,0.2140401,0.0001287736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005389989,0.0006507791,0.000004709713,0.004239668,0.0002019603,0.0010928,0.00003171088,0.00005638153,0.993183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2711448,0.0006574687,0.00001696181,0.0007562333,0.001725416,0.00003312094,0.00002568941,0.00002892068,0.7256114],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50522690","doi":"10.1177/007327530304100102","title":"Herbert Spencer and the Disunity of the Social Organism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Organism; Sociology; Philosophy; Ethnology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02808570538584797,"gpt":0.2691350406271201,"spread":0.2410493352412721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001717334,0.00004325651,0.0001026289,0.00001981296,0.001231425,0.00001043684,0.000480945,0.00003140333,0.0001050216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005297415,0.00002473129,0.00004893812,0.0003753132,0.02498023,0.0001755314,0.00005395254,0.0000902917,0.000002283798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002184781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000984113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00225566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002753617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988779,0.0002152426,0.0001099352,0.0001083842,0.0005505236,0.0001379904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995501,0.00007565977,0.0001141596,0.0001075877,0.0001120132,0.0000404823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004195921,0.00001842136,0.0008214564,0.000003686546,0.000001510324,7.954571e-8,0.1263882,1.430546e-7,0.001414564,0.8704696,0.0007077524,0.0001703139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263946,0.00004669904,0.05352119,0.00003357235,0.00005617578,0.000001170475,0.03622695,0.000007864794,0.002192658,0.3233444,0.5829495,0.0003558736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4051712,0.000361981,0.000006546588,0.003789936,0.001138979,0.0001577911,0.000001225299,0.00000851674,0.5893638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946211,0.00001512814,0.00002551263,0.000268908,0.0000629378,0.000001305313,1.306174e-8,0.000001837583,0.005003288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5894499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9776732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554741490","doi":"10.7202/001460ar","title":"Pour la reconnaissance d’une normativité juridique implicite et « inférentielle »","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3639554928152602,"gpt":0.468344836487703,"spread":0.1043893436724427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002413524,0.0005281453,0.0007608939,0.00006494639,0.001207607,0.0002070526,0.0007553183,0.001294558,0.006377776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008478538,0.0005431541,0.0006929853,0.0006399113,0.00246228,0.001171416,0.0002789848,0.001784922,0.002145916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003882009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004625959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001712146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002774172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934291,0.003635282,0.0006584041,0.0006486474,0.0004957826,0.00113279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961918,0.002455279,0.0004534156,0.0003908534,0.0002079946,0.0003006464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231499,0.0004865871,0.001547831,0.00008893677,0.0002153276,0.00003966525,0.08220729,0.00002476988,0.0001164457,0.7294401,0.1614519,0.02436879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008957955,0.0001162164,0.002115781,0.0001214945,0.00007718998,0.000005614621,0.01101091,0.00007086677,0.00005723389,0.6357896,0.348907,0.0008322887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04587647,0.006756699,0.0001811987,0.3384213,0.003863135,0.0003657883,0.0001000076,0.0002823263,0.604153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9068912,0.01579413,0.0004072609,0.009071938,0.001466444,0.00008142226,0.00001977765,0.00006032137,0.06620749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040964371","doi":"10.7202/043842ar","title":"La Disposition préliminaire du Code civil du Québec, le droit commun et les principes généraux du droit","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Civil code; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008917562468047287,"gpt":0.2334263894663684,"spread":0.2245088269983211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001763991,0.0005213071,0.0006756473,0.0001319,0.002783915,0.0003798269,0.001032395,0.001303714,0.0003979998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000427882,0.0006555099,0.0005625684,0.0005715166,0.00415196,0.00112573,0.0002053746,0.001713207,0.0002663719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003387027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001142398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4110362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955124,0.001322562,0.0006643567,0.0006502835,0.000793924,0.001056537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975768,0.0008271441,0.000389499,0.0004764977,0.000204137,0.000525901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009172998,0.0008289257,0.006413837,0.0001314042,0.0001699835,0.0001313869,0.08820475,0.0001575484,0.00009896037,0.8595427,0.004064756,0.04016396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002149747,0.0003390679,0.02748812,0.0005098504,0.0004617225,0.0001269538,0.02131098,0.00160411,0.0004862365,0.226029,0.7176931,0.00180108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.653586,0.003725196,0.001852018,0.1709871,0.0005720425,0.000487808,0.0001424364,0.0003175655,0.1683298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742373,0.002460544,0.0003587092,0.003890818,0.002944352,0.0000761248,0.0000791463,0.0001013164,0.01585164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7136284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511278305","doi":"10.1017/s1060150316000127","title":"“NO ARTIST HAS ETHICAL SYMPATHIES”: OSCAR WILDE, AESTHETICS, AND MORAL EVOLUTION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian Literature and Culture","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Morality; Criticism; Aesthetics; Proposition; Philosophy; Action (physics); Art; Literature; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01098784183933423,"gpt":0.2436771407028385,"spread":0.2326892988635042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002490874,0.0001676448,0.0001836341,0.00003052432,0.000895322,0.000469619,0.0001125045,0.0007809141,0.00002509427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001502113,0.000101437,0.00006368407,0.0002146737,0.0006179957,0.0003763644,0.00003730644,0.0004580484,0.00002769094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000577779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006992954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007294104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001765387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987521,0.0002003883,0.0001445466,0.0003041434,0.0003098786,0.0002889212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993334,0.00003111023,0.00005338648,0.0001182969,0.000214564,0.0002492061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002954311,0.00002449051,0.001711795,0.00001496634,0.00001578694,0.00001418056,0.09183991,1.016322e-8,0.0008386669,0.8862383,0.01843263,0.0008396809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003350364,0.00008123164,0.0009429642,0.0001343315,0.00001743759,0.00000392556,0.0002432792,3.91752e-7,0.00001680193,0.1364651,0.861576,0.0001834395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1198385,0.03804021,0.0003341759,0.4258383,0.01206908,0.00176546,0.0006575283,0.001064544,0.4003922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783037,0.0005014676,0.0001074347,0.0011012,0.004181098,0.000007717461,0.00001113499,0.00001115754,0.01577509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6886184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050761374","doi":"10.7202/1026985ar","title":"What is \"Equity\"? Of Comparative Law, Time Travel and Judicial Cultures","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Estoppel; Law; Common law; English law; Equity theory; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice; Doctrine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02826968977303457,"gpt":0.3141044765476384,"spread":0.2858347867746038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003983052,0.00007304847,0.0002925841,0.00002453892,0.0003097012,0.0001069519,0.0001854681,0.0001268631,0.00008828686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002693958,0.00009307856,0.00008412251,0.0001288421,0.0005313893,0.0003538895,0.00004988526,0.0001131979,0.00005437817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005614708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000436223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001331176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006819783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990692,0.0001395186,0.0001663431,0.0001737489,0.0002104631,0.0002407145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.00009123851,0.00009281277,0.00009614466,0.00007549531,0.0001278289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466357,0.00004420134,0.0001722485,0.00002674959,0.00002358847,0.000001554854,0.07928092,0.000001244125,0.0009446669,0.9170515,0.0009987444,0.001439898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003220005,0.00009186556,0.001704862,0.00009653477,0.00004096717,0.000001537182,0.004158344,0.00009006843,0.00141647,0.9790353,0.01282718,0.0002148521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.381533,0.0003174469,0.00002580512,0.005053917,0.0002212903,0.0002157265,0.00001828464,0.00003553969,0.612579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958529,0.0001742719,0.00008341787,0.0008285198,0.0008836183,0.000004946559,0.000004269554,0.000006341173,0.002161735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6143199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3795634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050094321","doi":"10.7202/1027040ar","title":"Regard civiliste sur le droit des biens de la common law : pour une conception transsystémique de la propriété","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01982939621329812,"gpt":0.2664718904461225,"spread":0.2466424942328244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003392087,0.0002836268,0.0006176235,0.00006572063,0.0009438948,0.0002907266,0.0005692239,0.0008877512,0.00009077109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002840498,0.0004208612,0.00042994,0.000593567,0.003105311,0.0005137477,0.00005352892,0.0008148041,0.0001118735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001211746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007381006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02529528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944847,0.003141385,0.0004971844,0.0004960966,0.0003344571,0.00104618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978736,0.0008851162,0.0002440009,0.0003512023,0.0001551349,0.0004909249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000550467,0.0003751101,0.005166456,0.0004593653,0.0000598925,0.0000855931,0.02535532,0.0001929264,0.002154167,0.9554039,0.0004768365,0.01021534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001067073,0.0001735123,0.00467291,0.000570046,0.0001359693,0.00008177307,0.001184866,0.0009561371,0.0009203285,0.9282557,0.06144297,0.0005387652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6031086,0.0007648648,0.002346931,0.0106068,0.000297013,0.0004044201,0.00005204014,0.0001759739,0.3822433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833037,0.000643537,0.0008850279,0.0008980035,0.002470179,0.00005865207,0.00001936545,0.00007133639,0.01165016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112837031","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040436","title":"Protecting the Right of Local Self-Government","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Locale (computer software); Political science; Humanities; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01370168049413762,"gpt":0.2626608752109757,"spread":0.2489591947168381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490744,0.0001173043,0.0002227273,0.00006822021,0.001765265,0.0001367649,0.001048114,0.000106184,0.0004163692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114956,0.00008158917,0.0001645616,0.0008928162,0.008009095,0.0006374308,0.00003665587,0.0007213859,0.00003455663],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003076795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008511406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1010047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08195593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962991,0.0003684462,0.0004947968,0.0001499607,0.001361023,0.001326703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964858,0.0003040933,0.0002592299,0.0001315191,0.000396095,0.002423297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001799678,0.00003260271,0.0002735683,0.000009184555,0.00001187429,0.00002463936,0.006982028,0.00002236773,0.00003147916,0.9852953,0.0002271612,0.007087976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007581822,0.0008580797,0.03157185,0.0005470609,0.0002508167,0.000270752,0.04089731,0.0009127219,0.008306776,0.2169939,0.6978915,0.0007410682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4111527,0.002064925,0.0006316327,0.3666925,0.003538942,0.000343615,0.00004579466,0.000008045281,0.2155219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948061,0.000007453125,0.000374188,0.00143677,0.00252331,6.073162e-7,2.170849e-8,0.000005482264,0.0008461314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7683015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574723685","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1211","title":"Courting Constitutional Danger: Constitutional Conventions and the Legacy of the Patriation Reference","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Supreme court; Law; Political question; Political science; Politics; Veto; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Convention; Constitutional economics; Constitution; Judicial review; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08771034750402737,"gpt":0.3139274568977658,"spread":0.2262171093937384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001594135,0.00008664894,0.0002293532,0.000009847233,0.001161043,0.00003488378,0.000271026,0.00005854456,0.0003464953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005276296,0.00005047171,0.0001431105,0.000185854,0.00967462,0.0002971333,0.00006875066,0.000165754,0.00001863499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004503151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001652731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004125428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984503,0.0005056057,0.0003480058,0.0001372146,0.0004106432,0.0001482377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990432,0.0001895572,0.0002503236,0.0001622615,0.0003011406,0.00005348809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006664425,0.00001980809,0.0003959566,0.00008830099,0.00002374366,2.749538e-7,0.0007543939,1.176543e-7,0.000004512045,0.998035,0.0003982245,0.0002730151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007710963,0.00001285888,0.0009343513,0.001321179,0.0002896334,0.000004878574,0.0003076851,0.000005287383,0.00002033923,0.2306749,0.7654886,0.0001691394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00168481,0.04071927,0.0004429664,0.02487067,0.0008563535,0.001688851,0.00009013789,0.0000532563,0.9295937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915746,0.006542189,0.00008299812,0.001445648,0.0001672885,0.000032243,0.000007022972,0.000002179941,0.0001458445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316598391","doi":"10.15640/jble.v2n2a2","title":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Ohada Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Law and Ethics","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Normative; Corporation; Field (mathematics); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Public relations; Conceptual framework; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1260198108122804,"gpt":0.3488431091313301,"spread":0.2228232983190497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008471778,0.0000758387,0.000212079,0.00002776802,0.001095469,0.000167072,0.0002443889,0.0002476927,0.000007725856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009328822,0.00005010294,0.00006256182,0.0003409812,0.001150247,0.0003431354,0.00002766328,0.0008932214,0.000002064168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003723774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003853117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005229231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01715831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975196,0.001342374,0.0003013865,0.00008594654,0.0005784946,0.0001722409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981514,0.0008282998,0.0003212481,0.00007161182,0.000570244,0.00005723358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007229878,0.00004479398,0.0003129368,0.00001749448,0.000004937606,0.00001022576,0.03128074,0.000003214824,0.00002216442,0.967819,0.0001876542,0.0002245466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003765823,0.00003793284,0.01187029,0.00003104691,0.00001844427,0.000004644547,0.002320001,0.000003220607,0.000006231672,0.8102272,0.1750078,0.00009668867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4962817,0.0001720829,0.0001342434,0.2693698,0.000997145,0.0001482454,0.00000423604,0.00001504792,0.2328774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891188,0.00006604443,0.00004973572,0.009247247,0.001436657,6.346976e-7,3.791464e-7,0.000004637205,0.00007588809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.492837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575274493","doi":"","title":"« Qui dit contractuel, dit juste. » (Fouillée) …en trois petits bonds, à reculons","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02473961729008749,"gpt":0.2857636367444556,"spread":0.2610240194543681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149185,0.0003522208,0.0004928573,0.00007485578,0.007740747,0.0003546936,0.0006430237,0.0003845842,0.002747011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002433833,0.0003332329,0.000442809,0.0004627936,0.0009327937,0.001827468,0.00009448924,0.001207561,0.001273092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006632209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007097271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006846258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03224687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959221,0.0008504937,0.0007276776,0.0003709873,0.001005468,0.001123259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978858,0.0003011645,0.0003693866,0.0002243634,0.0003001329,0.0009191126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004411373,0.0003501524,0.0002177357,0.00001267826,0.0001297599,0.0001552258,0.003984847,0.00006193047,0.0000587707,0.957452,0.004053232,0.03347956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009334873,0.000201153,0.0005575589,0.00009977164,0.0001434571,0.000174279,0.001534535,0.00003095075,0.00009054454,0.02978283,0.9660062,0.000445252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02586161,0.005280854,0.0000344017,0.1900434,0.004259615,0.0002235279,0.0001340509,0.00008304802,0.7740795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710419,0.002183534,0.0005202389,0.00327482,0.01367155,0.000005389293,0.000002737636,0.00004235836,0.009257434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974794565","doi":"10.7202/043560ar","title":"Les juristes inquiets : classicisme juridique et critique du droit au début du XXe siècle en France","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009560809970860158,"gpt":0.268122906651152,"spread":0.2585620966802918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001701582,0.0005357718,0.0007047323,0.0001052522,0.001909946,0.0002852554,0.0009324024,0.001614229,0.0004344938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006649597,0.0006525768,0.0005411447,0.0006383338,0.003701066,0.001006729,0.0001308958,0.001810923,0.0004928399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003447329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00111207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01914928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009615131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953586,0.001095655,0.0006761969,0.0007665522,0.0007443741,0.001358557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975878,0.0009136108,0.0002775052,0.0003849616,0.0002256297,0.0006104883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002949729,0.0003120725,0.004160207,0.0001037706,0.00009286963,0.000102162,0.083275,0.00008424153,0.0001317646,0.8746925,0.004427378,0.03258857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006829816,0.0001550632,0.01709669,0.0001868036,0.0001143,0.0000204919,0.002821669,0.0002282222,0.0004880776,0.3333195,0.643989,0.0008972482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5391986,0.002312955,0.002283204,0.2244407,0.001317503,0.0004165466,0.0001080043,0.0002515542,0.2296709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312527,0.002401297,0.0009369745,0.009007898,0.008102302,0.00007006188,0.00002215954,0.00009339667,0.04811321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6395617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1846048872","doi":"10.4000/vertigo.16343","title":"La représentation de la nature devant le juge : Plaidoyer pour une épistémologie juridique du fictif","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"VertigO","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02612917709485401,"gpt":0.3229748295290416,"spread":0.2968456524341876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398643,0.0002017531,0.0002394585,0.00004850357,0.0004265319,0.0001463276,0.000317669,0.0009853403,0.00006101848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001038705,0.0001988174,0.0001583792,0.0004941383,0.0007581314,0.000427543,0.0000887158,0.0008053614,0.0002856307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01233572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008903629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969031,0.001628475,0.0002517881,0.0003517973,0.0004125985,0.0004522294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987264,0.0004857254,0.0001202114,0.0001925618,0.0001675084,0.0003075814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005995332,0.0002669432,0.009568441,0.00002617474,0.00004572456,0.0002133399,0.02571615,0.0000487774,0.0001823677,0.8945034,0.06765419,0.00171458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005748101,0.00005460396,0.003821431,0.00003862988,0.00004094013,0.00001677259,0.003027446,0.00005042161,0.0004953208,0.3616048,0.6300326,0.0002422526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4020941,0.002756626,0.0004390723,0.1341797,0.002948942,0.0002234015,0.00002813444,0.0001647687,0.4571653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790368,0.0003671982,0.0007938133,0.001734872,0.002263941,0.00001598125,0.0000128096,0.00002568259,0.0157489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897177565","doi":"10.7202/1052476ar","title":"Agir seul en justice : du droit au choix — État de la jurisprudence sur les droits des justiciables non représentés","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01221717294704481,"gpt":0.2817273845579331,"spread":0.2695102116108883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003164831,0.0005905356,0.0007034435,0.0001725192,0.00362642,0.0004483607,0.00123135,0.001649895,0.0003667471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003062638,0.0007074387,0.000418541,0.001182611,0.01061325,0.0009168206,0.0002148319,0.001451696,0.0004278337],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00128606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05193657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941462,0.001340622,0.0006638814,0.0009517889,0.0009272188,0.001970258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956673,0.002093505,0.0003601572,0.0005184687,0.0004993608,0.0008612458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001417205,0.0005344272,0.02146,0.0008536635,0.0002910378,0.0004482685,0.1918007,0.0001622732,0.001254314,0.7367695,0.005332342,0.04095181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001556376,0.0005711981,0.04266796,0.001162893,0.002064446,0.0001339912,0.02851875,0.001884136,0.002081655,0.771366,0.145868,0.002124595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8358827,0.001912014,0.005820295,0.006157641,0.00246435,0.000407799,0.00007199646,0.0002243656,0.1470588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93699,0.002367447,0.001910824,0.001334956,0.01057696,0.00003994198,0.0000123155,0.0001018978,0.04666564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1632819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008917034","doi":"10.3917/riej.071.0001","title":"La méthodologie juridique en quête d'identité","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue interdisciplinaire d études juridiques","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03929492932603818,"gpt":0.3334914767499066,"spread":0.2941965474238685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002118426,0.0006990098,0.0009694213,0.0002069113,0.0008831625,0.0007112973,0.001468091,0.001201173,0.001424241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006249203,0.0007067521,0.0008550944,0.0006995958,0.001872428,0.00207044,0.001194915,0.001282023,0.003603175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000972914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007306952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006469784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931999,0.003055835,0.001010884,0.0009723054,0.0005544703,0.001206566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965682,0.001372485,0.0004304835,0.0006471747,0.0004372033,0.0005444353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003015209,0.0004973485,0.001200451,0.0006546929,0.0002932667,0.0002336178,0.04831073,0.000010935,0.0002656571,0.8563948,0.03212117,0.05998715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291462,0.0003014735,0.006312744,0.001574301,0.000173738,0.00006013086,0.003150298,0.00003918032,0.0004800345,0.6656044,0.3209103,0.001101974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2908212,0.005579549,0.0003479009,0.2510514,0.00556911,0.0012066,0.000052936,0.0006642377,0.4447071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409087,0.003771728,0.001909803,0.0006455443,0.006187813,0.0002532002,0.0000153806,0.0001096388,0.04619823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6500875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462406649","doi":"10.7202/1036575ar","title":"L’affectation à un but durable, vers une nouvelle forme d’appropriation des biens communs? Réflexions autour de l’article 1030 du Code civil du Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539664960478526,"gpt":0.2315398468494757,"spread":0.2161431972446904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079981,0.0002437746,0.0003819563,0.00009035278,0.001817955,0.0001408375,0.0004753433,0.0003930917,0.0007189288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007260566,0.0002837575,0.0002981394,0.0008327972,0.001061892,0.001034974,0.00008579699,0.0003205952,0.000706225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002522327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001248981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1122691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1985611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971216,0.000609154,0.0004805383,0.0003951467,0.0003698098,0.001023716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980484,0.000646203,0.0002986085,0.000331405,0.0002450605,0.0004302926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002041811,0.001000477,0.03856267,0.0003461656,0.0002684164,0.00009307809,0.1643127,0.0002447499,0.01922465,0.7117088,0.003249671,0.06078444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00368551,0.0006078919,0.04608533,0.0007997073,0.0004828647,0.0000743683,0.0175972,0.005010255,0.006349503,0.8917094,0.02627131,0.001326656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7818764,0.0003797138,0.002980927,0.162126,0.0006075762,0.0004458215,0.0001027562,0.0001982496,0.05128255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901481,0.001246949,0.0006490217,0.0006072622,0.001488486,0.00006455852,0.00001555107,0.0000523489,0.005727743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2082717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043447992","doi":"10.7202/043160ar","title":"La loi dans le droit : tradition, critique et transformation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01004970559816854,"gpt":0.2548036962849289,"spread":0.2447539906867603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098407,0.0002032792,0.0002492568,0.00007358134,0.0009139683,0.0001620422,0.0002988775,0.0007657625,0.0002037453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007515466,0.0002654993,0.0002624842,0.0004084848,0.001646334,0.001321695,0.00000763538,0.000866112,0.0001437958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001623891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004730466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007038216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008429565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997818,0.0006879017,0.0003464973,0.0002572635,0.0003857932,0.0005045646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992274,0.0001960692,0.00009232934,0.0001351394,0.0000731129,0.0002759343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009754189,0.0001492398,0.00002761359,0.00004432168,0.00002889831,0.0000131639,0.1599653,0.0000776348,0.00008991469,0.8081063,0.000758063,0.03072977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004807939,0.00005388659,0.001013818,0.00006196588,0.00005858476,0.00001802451,0.01422555,0.0002261649,0.0004085197,0.6701155,0.3129984,0.0003387309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3150437,0.0007709677,0.02523738,0.08953639,0.0004048327,0.0002778055,0.0001384256,0.0001447964,0.5684457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975049,0.000516418,0.0004702607,0.003660555,0.001311011,0.00002966808,0.00005892196,0.00003076423,0.01887343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6600053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385310854","doi":"10.59962/9780774867146-005","title":"The Judicialization of Everyday Life in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Political science; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01962682648664599,"gpt":0.2032687543708576,"spread":0.1836419278842116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003423173,0.0000691015,0.0003104008,0.00003465396,0.0007443146,0.00008031555,0.0005371395,0.0002278438,0.0004813346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005713438,0.0001458747,0.0001635976,0.00002193544,0.001045657,0.000103911,0.0002149889,0.0002588017,0.000001290528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002050581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006528023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986827,0.0001575355,0.0002244678,0.0002041839,0.0005616131,0.0001694499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991155,0.0001286616,0.0003488617,0.0001540142,0.0001796426,0.00007336358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062058,0.0000543479,0.0002790196,0.00008794624,0.0001650107,0.0001136002,0.01923066,0.00001010914,0.000001583761,0.8941727,0.05385817,0.03196482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002748285,0.00002381689,0.0004178324,0.0001213646,0.00004638218,2.14013e-7,0.00105501,0.000001455312,1.300773e-7,0.02449382,0.973413,0.0001521571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008936037,0.0003698629,0.000002306181,0.00009675511,0.0002476691,0.0003886987,0.000207428,0.0000252762,0.9977684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05465521,0.000876527,0.000006623367,0.00003706776,0.0001116354,5.923354e-7,0.00001355157,0.00001407199,0.9442847],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5948598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526769944","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1505","title":"Réflexions sur la Codification du Droit Privé","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Law; Globality; Civil law (Civil law); Code (set theory); Political science; Civil procedure; Face (sociological concept); Comparative law; Democracy; Sociology; Private law; Law and economics; Public law; Computer science; Globalization; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02041858564804856,"gpt":0.2621992305744472,"spread":0.2417806449263986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216591,0.0002268753,0.0003010542,0.0000390941,0.00270085,0.0005383798,0.0005333478,0.0003857664,0.007796971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008365094,0.0002374675,0.0003272195,0.0003660763,0.00105478,0.001183121,0.00003032934,0.0008790674,0.001789344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003174283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003390649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06094764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05040354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970765,0.0007983233,0.000503087,0.0002761661,0.0007282173,0.0006177602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985824,0.000227058,0.000234266,0.0001942332,0.0002346622,0.0005274164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002714245,0.0003469347,0.00008850756,0.00001050422,0.00006210308,0.00007292622,0.004525698,0.00008360242,0.00002284631,0.9597492,0.003003587,0.03200698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003425471,0.00005328435,0.0002277972,0.00006272615,0.00005290243,0.00008958484,0.0001773673,0.00006233658,0.00001147662,0.5046756,0.4940462,0.0001981896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004216737,0.002249108,0.0001038249,0.08413055,0.001459402,0.0001396935,0.00003028662,0.00005666473,0.9076138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936815,0.004469932,0.0002436979,0.001534455,0.005478652,0.000005583337,0.000007166034,0.00003064117,0.05141482],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9325983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121686399","doi":"","title":"Courting Constitutional Danger: Constitutional Conventions and the Legacy of the Patriation Reference","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Supreme court; Law; Political question; Political science; Politics; Veto; Constitutional court; Constitution; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Convention; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09414513468919772,"gpt":0.3136960553675037,"spread":0.2195509206783059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002885079,0.000321693,0.0005554467,0.00003995419,0.003870434,0.000137218,0.0009582454,0.0001647407,0.000721834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053729,0.0001827433,0.0003451919,0.0004280811,0.07348999,0.0009085266,0.0003025683,0.0005966419,0.00004547174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002955405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005793003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001692926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956806,0.001353506,0.0009013706,0.0004223986,0.001195999,0.0004461804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957897,0.001170086,0.0006766868,0.0004752864,0.001719329,0.0001688773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008601441,0.00007417118,0.0003614604,0.00008999954,0.00009452381,0.000005952503,0.001462243,0.00000543347,0.00001553524,0.9964839,0.001132675,0.0001881308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00290946,0.0001167559,0.001541211,0.002754054,0.001227286,0.0003265728,0.004429896,0.00008796129,0.0001159523,0.4027806,0.5827678,0.0009424737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006533438,0.03544913,0.005989485,0.04774766,0.002640682,0.005187997,0.00305112,0.0002100967,0.8931904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925029,0.004176671,0.0001022124,0.002403271,0.0003496431,0.0001231636,0.00005427732,0.000005650436,0.0002822206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400794680","doi":"10.1515/9782763716633","title":"L'Invention du Bénévolat","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03411793589262945,"gpt":0.2586852143198238,"spread":0.2245672784271943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004278281,0.0003407792,0.0004349596,0.00006712289,0.001058794,0.0001896235,0.0004698829,0.0009367025,0.0275334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007760838,0.0003180848,0.0005184205,0.0002193127,0.001385351,0.0005979299,0.0001202088,0.0004900565,0.02834178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006155981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005947474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01194082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976192,0.0003253373,0.0004036001,0.0004307003,0.0007110702,0.0005101091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988447,0.0001414479,0.0002335632,0.0002107155,0.0002509985,0.0003185348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001756663,0.00005737831,0.0001779922,0.00003588878,0.0000539682,0.000005044803,0.001740665,3.610257e-7,0.00000296633,0.8678242,0.1245787,0.005521058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642503,0.00003317399,0.0001306067,0.00004362471,0.00004571364,3.933871e-7,0.0001406177,0.00001667019,9.631455e-7,0.4272026,0.5720518,0.0002474219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006811519,0.0004403903,0.00004856002,0.02171302,0.004480838,0.0005016801,0.00001182842,0.0001419735,0.9719806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0657045,0.0007047822,0.0001331132,0.001616457,0.01047455,0.0000247032,0.00004643998,0.0000358876,0.9212596],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.447473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010152412","doi":"10.7202/043894ar","title":"Vers un repli de l’individualisme contractuel ? L’exemple du cautionnement","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01109665090186136,"gpt":0.2448501018646775,"spread":0.2337534509628162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374488,0.0002686577,0.0003355692,0.0000702191,0.001697993,0.0001741866,0.0004668078,0.0006842332,0.001285696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003097495,0.0003262549,0.000303822,0.0004010547,0.00176197,0.0004326764,0.00005019279,0.0007286975,0.0003533427],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004775702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004629766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01219628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002081491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971079,0.0003993352,0.0003949828,0.0004267864,0.0005986619,0.001072299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986653,0.0002522352,0.0002000199,0.0002659835,0.00009793001,0.0005185152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000231809,0.0002247696,0.001154901,0.00002208601,0.0001492227,0.00006356039,0.08021218,0.0001175588,0.00005575856,0.8782542,0.007093808,0.03262882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008696158,0.00007106613,0.0026763,0.00003511406,0.0001767945,0.00001323238,0.004869397,0.0001647583,0.0001660774,0.2082672,0.7822775,0.0004129196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6332132,0.003731736,0.001802033,0.1717645,0.001566293,0.0004741804,0.0001711685,0.0002007765,0.1870761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610513,0.0008271226,0.001156915,0.008483979,0.003898081,0.00003011438,0.00002817741,0.00003441644,0.02448988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316169808","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv360npz6","title":"A Written Constitution for Quebec?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03020053773155672,"gpt":0.2526894086566829,"spread":0.2224888709251262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000317793,0.0003270163,0.0004837316,0.0002068167,0.002259684,0.00009277345,0.000648621,0.0008374487,0.00001758065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008733478,0.0003934373,0.0004344079,0.00005097371,0.0009879114,0.000224185,0.0002503677,0.0004399591,0.00005496807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001350225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001049563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05782964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000425918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.0002012416,0.0002175885,0.0005587555,0.0005441844,0.0005454009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.0002866732,0.0002450718,0.0002890899,0.0003411766,0.0002627235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006153962,0.00001425174,6.818254e-7,0.00007855506,0.0001265568,0.00006255537,0.001073299,0.000002039896,7.808476e-7,0.9261926,0.07176752,0.0006196459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005466174,0.0000356328,0.000002121455,0.0001221627,0.0002097691,1.208767e-7,0.0004283778,0.000001471543,0.000008197778,0.0250386,0.9731556,0.0004513967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001391182,0.00000123997,0.0000649469,0.001249827,0.0008624662,0.001165797,0.001175438,0.0005746064,0.9949043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000473389,0.00007084839,0.0000613852,0.0002181826,0.0009880934,0.000008947925,0.0001477093,0.00003964153,0.9979918],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.901388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266694311","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2015.20474","title":"Entre trust et fiducie, le malentendu québécois","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Order (exchange); Law; Civil code; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Express trust; Trust law; Code (set theory); Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Commercial law; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05126368018360599,"gpt":0.3031107196355574,"spread":0.2518470394519514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004998383,0.00008926675,0.0001543775,0.00006812378,0.000165274,0.0001070528,0.0004227692,0.00007314164,0.0001641624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003018722,0.0001078133,0.0001131884,0.00014036,0.0001309723,0.0002773253,0.00005411137,0.0001632988,0.0004004097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004636249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006496185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03143134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01848128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988588,0.0001328351,0.000195364,0.0001911759,0.0003852279,0.0002365855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992313,0.0001003794,0.00009376939,0.0001187746,0.000239454,0.0002162622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001261108,0.0001232493,0.01305314,0.000005682964,0.00002964447,0.00002081871,0.01902942,0.00006125528,0.00001131541,0.9612276,0.005349764,0.001075512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004432436,0.00001808831,0.004284584,0.0000368645,0.000009708986,0.000008411875,0.003289901,0.0003440414,0.00002894646,0.1009414,0.8904189,0.0001758414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2572133,0.0001972052,0.0002935737,0.01661492,0.0006310862,0.0001354102,0.0000302037,0.0000999404,0.7247844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969188,0.00005803671,0.000220417,0.001044151,0.001072286,0.00001614961,0.00002640808,0.00001170101,0.02836281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947034898","doi":"10.7202/1059380ar","title":"LES POLITIQUES DU DROIT QUÉBÉCOIS EN MATIÈRE DE DURÉE DU BAIL RÉSIDENTIEL","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.014331671805678,"gpt":0.2541553865620677,"spread":0.2398237147563897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001039354,0.0003112935,0.0006434855,0.0001234642,0.0005902969,0.000279977,0.0008518643,0.000736207,0.003090363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003369982,0.0004821968,0.0005437181,0.0005238511,0.0005047467,0.000812222,0.0001769115,0.0006218398,0.002676123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002383927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006362133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3293871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03451198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965131,0.0006274492,0.00056372,0.0005762316,0.0004887738,0.001230718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982674,0.0003674854,0.0002608588,0.0004230428,0.000204341,0.0004769041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001990823,0.0001835376,0.05265511,0.0003914129,0.0001040438,0.0001219358,0.05637963,0.00001397475,0.0001330497,0.8821841,0.003018451,0.004794867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005628855,0.00015468,0.03515089,0.0004662737,0.0001638028,0.00007612084,0.009052557,0.0002611103,0.0001662387,0.7777907,0.1753368,0.0008178647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5187781,0.00124215,0.00004204518,0.03470726,0.001214023,0.000364497,0.00006631514,0.0001406942,0.4434449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547233,0.002121555,0.0002485479,0.001266653,0.008516216,0.00003267822,0.00001994664,0.00006866192,0.1330024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3359452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389362772","doi":"10.7202/1107378ar","title":"LE STATUT JURIDIQUE DU CORPS HUMAIN OU L’OSCILLATION ENTRE L’OBJET ET LE SUJET DE DROIT","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009379812726065759,"gpt":0.2161353387956792,"spread":0.2067555260696135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009891554,0.0003285068,0.0004639463,0.0001526024,0.001363075,0.0001557329,0.00058051,0.0006501072,0.0002804262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001179338,0.0005049617,0.000387218,0.0006475472,0.0003987446,0.0007507302,0.0001131864,0.00060118,0.0001575571],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00467563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003830115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01068031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01500721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997043,0.0005731747,0.000348252,0.0005548503,0.0003943581,0.001086383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985056,0.0001775924,0.0002596308,0.0003124414,0.0001626803,0.0005820466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009857998,0.000305314,0.001950081,0.0000821525,0.00006728174,0.0004906378,0.01899163,0.0008556966,0.0008049559,0.9712502,0.002927357,0.002176143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001541577,0.0002461377,0.008209314,0.0002554382,0.0001457572,0.00006764157,0.003438264,0.0004056838,0.0004615073,0.2924937,0.6919897,0.0007453023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2234933,0.001134306,0.001515019,0.0472801,0.0003812412,0.0003898709,0.00008882958,0.000165618,0.7255517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069087,0.00177023,0.0005069792,0.001815563,0.001127638,0.000002377096,0.0000563813,0.00003920715,0.08777291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012434601","doi":"10.7202/042925ar","title":"Le Code et la protection du consommateur","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01251193027095387,"gpt":0.2517865269501841,"spread":0.2392745966792302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008881526,0.0001503784,0.0001968501,0.00004460681,0.0008496112,0.0001443356,0.000219933,0.0005751552,0.0001350506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001578039,0.000184336,0.0001539571,0.0002959713,0.001583385,0.000426235,0.00002754024,0.0006951411,0.0003508636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005357499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003613362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00678305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003580999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982102,0.0006580199,0.0002000621,0.0002391491,0.000270773,0.0004218172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993986,0.0001265597,0.0001058622,0.0001180262,0.00006171319,0.0001892201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000162363,0.0001230398,0.0001140037,0.00002459468,0.00003236029,0.00001717469,0.02611693,0.00006773407,0.0001151179,0.9440456,0.001116388,0.02821079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003540044,0.00003833402,0.0004090751,0.00003008081,0.00002832451,0.00001276184,0.001747333,0.0001730208,0.0001726752,0.1899239,0.8068958,0.0002147046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2664539,0.0008406663,0.00193481,0.1082212,0.0006333409,0.0003452423,0.00003853274,0.0001662079,0.6213661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201797,0.0004030118,0.0003627417,0.002928295,0.001701371,0.00002995375,0.00000455211,0.00002455512,0.07436585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8057794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781751371","doi":"","title":"Code Civil Du Québec","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02180897772467938,"gpt":0.2542755627307239,"spread":0.2324665850060445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004509936,0.0002042516,0.0003575933,0.0001646867,0.002111652,0.0001435994,0.0010857,0.0003151687,0.003647122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006715694,0.0002318377,0.000205087,0.0002602379,0.00239754,0.0006221412,0.00006874382,0.0002700753,0.0006146022],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004960047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007676953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981377,0.0001532246,0.0003227931,0.00028704,0.0003906542,0.00070865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978186,0.000104007,0.0002952644,0.0005385455,0.0001677425,0.001075867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005926713,0.00005299558,0.02304268,0.00004248298,0.00006294256,0.0001071661,0.02505592,0.000001310287,0.000002628942,0.7095772,0.2165577,0.02549107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001948942,0.00003652871,0.008524316,0.00004996529,0.00004836111,0.000001040324,0.0006571939,0.00000459369,0.000007175119,0.01253806,0.9776735,0.0002644082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0222709,0.002430711,9.606858e-7,0.1950536,0.004098931,0.000158387,0.0002066749,0.000014733,0.7757651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849743,0.004091462,0.00005474406,0.001141159,0.00476039,0.000008759029,0.000004177842,0.00002631126,0.14017],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036389729","doi":"10.3917/dio.214.0116","title":"L'origine de l'art","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Diogène","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01104861802868989,"gpt":0.2687124512031214,"spread":0.2576638331744315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003498234,0.0001368096,0.0001864667,0.00003272317,0.0003960778,0.00007770905,0.0002087032,0.0002032619,0.001034588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000327719,0.0001465996,0.0001616704,0.0004746389,0.0005390822,0.0002463978,0.00003060223,0.0001892131,0.002918982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002265199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001844997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01460827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001572035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985883,0.0001626712,0.0001870234,0.0001976277,0.0003163724,0.0005480511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995449,0.00006061386,0.00006050551,0.0001243757,0.00005873675,0.0001508604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000445019,0.0001473712,0.002598004,0.00001358447,0.00001462549,0.00003076797,0.001650919,0.00001285705,0.00007448308,0.8304441,0.1619031,0.003105767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001200652,0.00002455711,0.001866851,0.00001689558,0.00002613635,0.000001231199,0.00009935256,0.0000186597,0.00008966967,0.1926698,0.8049123,0.000154421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04961018,0.005051838,0.0001292168,0.06584997,0.002361602,0.0001144,0.00002533667,0.00009347274,0.876764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5977756,0.0001853416,0.0002211565,0.001040059,0.007589742,0.000006185664,0.0000127262,0.00001354593,0.3931556],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6430092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943181917","doi":"10.7202/1058516ar","title":"Portrait critique de l’union de fait en droit québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009780876432012604,"gpt":0.2534415073192133,"spread":0.2436606308872007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002420534,0.0002835597,0.0005814303,0.0001115741,0.0004117883,0.0001742853,0.0007577628,0.0009115739,0.001741599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002965198,0.0004730585,0.0005073186,0.000639773,0.000414208,0.0006571657,0.0001072782,0.000881648,0.001389548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002286272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001507155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08112604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01514583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959573,0.001044867,0.0005055068,0.0005972108,0.0004275658,0.001467551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982819,0.0002793761,0.000217977,0.0004241818,0.0001424235,0.0006541352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700778,0.0002378011,0.013297,0.0003889269,0.00008289862,0.0002060949,0.0403307,0.00005934175,0.0008779272,0.9317602,0.002277,0.01046508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000534584,0.0002033447,0.01847698,0.0004616203,0.0001453932,0.000101255,0.004255207,0.0003865361,0.0002831231,0.8167071,0.1576401,0.0008046899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5647803,0.001777373,0.0004920707,0.04493734,0.001289211,0.0005387389,0.00008464614,0.0001671803,0.3859332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9015417,0.001326889,0.0006752679,0.002482,0.004184344,0.00003749991,0.00002405766,0.00007239074,0.08965588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3367614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810484469","doi":"10.7202/1045539ar","title":"LE PRINCIPE DE SÉCURITÉ JURIDIQUE EN DROITS ALLEMAND, COMMUNAUTAIRE ET FRANÇAIS","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0162632211852654,"gpt":0.25174350590441,"spread":0.2354802847191446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117239,0.0003264463,0.0005607011,0.00006050591,0.001797865,0.00008418739,0.000727533,0.0006472311,0.0002716558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003384491,0.0003865598,0.0003831164,0.0004685106,0.0007714909,0.0005958517,0.0002531625,0.0008781512,0.0006325283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000233553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001712405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05220632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01320859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967605,0.001159928,0.0004720266,0.0004275091,0.0004075959,0.0007724201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984186,0.0004606824,0.0001916554,0.0004170284,0.0001467836,0.000365288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002493587,0.0003865709,0.006076623,0.0001000628,0.00008063747,0.0002207942,0.1277933,0.00008497123,0.00002797192,0.8617319,0.002458433,0.001013809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007567476,0.0001019649,0.01229927,0.0001722854,0.00006054165,0.00005748165,0.0005724763,0.0001478397,0.00004187931,0.04343119,0.9418149,0.0005434039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4211181,0.005461039,0.0002174114,0.2491109,0.002197255,0.0005708016,0.00006857746,0.000192831,0.3210632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678763,0.004700298,0.0005314698,0.002656917,0.003615635,0.00003411025,0.00002041454,0.00005422304,0.0205106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173894122","doi":"","title":"Marie-Claude Prémont. \"Tropismes du droit. Logique métaphorique et lógique métonymique du langage juridique\".","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01268503513837207,"gpt":0.2484251913365808,"spread":0.2357401561982087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003197059,0.0006429568,0.001088081,0.0002124071,0.0009847073,0.0004034413,0.001229715,0.001712301,0.001043488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001153363,0.0009432242,0.0008332237,0.0009428672,0.001044137,0.00139141,0.0002988335,0.002218221,0.001228473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00246586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001763089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0207262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931301,0.002369527,0.001027718,0.001095783,0.0006324634,0.001744409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996488,0.001018862,0.0005367678,0.0007258343,0.0003502127,0.0008803748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679182,0.0006376391,0.004813847,0.000270381,0.000159064,0.0005043407,0.01907089,0.0002425219,0.0003072782,0.9541201,0.01299535,0.006811812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354426,0.0002706276,0.003513331,0.0003893195,0.0001353099,0.0001195987,0.0008479696,0.0004821611,0.0007318946,0.4384836,0.5530798,0.001210969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2505255,0.00691866,0.003890151,0.2884371,0.002557446,0.001677938,0.0002984815,0.0007610671,0.4449337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899318,0.01520862,0.003179693,0.009155575,0.01489671,0.0002124156,0.0000874036,0.0001703411,0.05777127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6487925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009915179","doi":"10.7202/1005441ar","title":"Contribution à une étude des troubles de voisinage et de la nuisance : la notion de devoirs de la propriété","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01405247720271721,"gpt":0.2761878311355999,"spread":0.2621353539328827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004343611,0.0003049021,0.0003631182,0.0000824054,0.001059638,0.0002553899,0.0004699113,0.001296152,0.00005288863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012422,0.000350337,0.0002623871,0.0006092074,0.004524759,0.0005402713,0.00005369202,0.001123242,0.00003451515],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004203251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02455354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00521142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994742,0.003041908,0.0003251301,0.0003777513,0.0003591024,0.001154075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.0008397707,0.0002209676,0.000190313,0.0001456259,0.0004352037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327161,0.0003203547,0.01557601,0.00009074304,0.00008897782,0.0001646371,0.1258729,0.00007789623,0.001712835,0.8478706,0.0001527715,0.007939599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009580821,0.0001242248,0.09852006,0.0001915262,0.0001924842,0.00005780734,0.004770507,0.0001852572,0.002708664,0.8772525,0.01458276,0.0004561837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8349832,0.001449361,0.02701744,0.002229183,0.0001862711,0.0003034933,0.00004346512,0.0001647687,0.1336228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883075,0.001057899,0.006530246,0.001070387,0.0006190495,0.00006101527,0.00001338197,0.00004782481,0.002292639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1533243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966264975","doi":"","title":"LA COUR SUPREME ET LA REFORME DU CODE CIVIL","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Precedent; Jurisprudence; Common law; Public law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0326566559703614,"gpt":0.3028596492287302,"spread":0.2702029932583688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003268853,0.0002115782,0.000400886,0.00002328563,0.001018507,0.0001473821,0.0007015683,0.0002368956,0.01718314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001644494,0.0001578318,0.0002434682,0.0004943667,0.0009984269,0.0002453644,0.00002296575,0.0005346879,0.004349538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005546106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002039836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.589067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961976,0.002294919,0.0003049146,0.0002307655,0.000367037,0.000604805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986346,0.0001926685,0.00007848734,0.00033524,0.00007799963,0.0006810552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001671654,0.00001924144,0.0001008494,0.0004032865,0.00003913312,0.00006991396,0.005609461,6.24153e-7,1.518992e-7,0.8297014,0.08465286,0.07940146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008659802,0.00001335812,0.0003619378,0.001612481,0.0001094951,0.00001963097,0.00008909889,0.000002346769,1.655939e-7,0.01573095,0.981759,0.0002150112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008047379,0.1141051,9.236905e-8,0.3272104,0.0002172943,0.0002858878,0.00009926316,0.00001801694,0.5572592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4326119,0.4593255,0.000008788121,0.05399863,0.001079716,0.00002626255,0.00001426014,0.00003271789,0.05290223],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8971061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971548033","doi":"10.7202/042522ar","title":"Une analyse quantitative de la doctrine en droit civil québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Law; Minor (academic); Law and economics; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009632720753373706,"gpt":0.2896780740636577,"spread":0.280045353310284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001150213,0.0001465465,0.0002587874,0.0001113216,0.0006258202,0.000110909,0.00036619,0.0003570284,0.0001518788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005301864,0.0001617152,0.0001936659,0.0006821288,0.0009792715,0.0002623177,0.0000261516,0.0005269772,0.0001059391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001486515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003994178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09358267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1414999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981644,0.0004992928,0.0002114259,0.0002518003,0.0003615756,0.0005115784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998809,0.0006075338,0.00009540317,0.0001566868,0.000067311,0.0002640838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002845373,0.00007787634,0.001843569,0.000007454113,0.0000883761,0.00003743976,0.139963,0.00008798204,0.0002517194,0.8497565,0.0007477776,0.007109917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007638875,0.0001032436,0.01086758,0.00002760698,0.0001704955,0.00000565596,0.02849,0.0002479141,0.0003778533,0.6729686,0.2854041,0.0005730989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680962,0.0003101469,0.001324952,0.008051908,0.00006879091,0.0001377947,0.00001401505,0.0001469307,0.3218493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864762,0.0001985235,0.001769662,0.001561962,0.0008110574,0.00001531941,0.00000660293,0.00001941852,0.009141223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3183801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083202690","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2020.1810911","title":"Between panacea and poison: “democracy” in British socialist thought, 1881–1891","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Socialism; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; Representative democracy; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Law; Communism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1070818721705752,"gpt":0.3102864847186863,"spread":0.2032046125481111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006668127,0.0001639017,0.0006252307,0.00003400177,0.0003993142,0.00004707113,0.0003424297,0.0001502394,0.001666282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002183881,0.0001991822,0.0001688328,0.0004614324,0.0006534651,0.0002450891,0.00008628052,0.0004176348,0.0003314358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006112278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004317689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003233381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978156,0.0006110764,0.0004498189,0.0003872306,0.0003824587,0.0003538362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999013,0.0003773527,0.0001221377,0.0001038762,0.00008239294,0.0003012476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001393566,0.0000679708,0.002412939,0.001310232,0.00005121031,0.00008968842,0.08965343,5.214778e-8,0.000007953859,0.01141371,0.738197,0.1567819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001258485,0.00003871491,0.0002645857,0.0005551236,0.00004338715,0.000001228829,0.0003897038,8.708079e-7,7.483951e-7,0.001971476,0.9963621,0.0002461676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01125908,0.7062694,0.00003568711,0.08127248,0.0006152109,0.001100029,0.0000302441,0.0002477679,0.1991701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6421728,0.3114614,0.0001152879,0.03544086,0.003513739,0.00004513982,0.00002270093,0.00005765486,0.007170522],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009458201","doi":"10.7202/038029ar","title":"La fiction du contrat social","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0740104406818117,"gpt":0.4310317175434534,"spread":0.3570212768616416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133001,0.0002747905,0.0003859006,0.00004520853,0.001155927,0.0002109145,0.0002705111,0.000816969,0.002528186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002095825,0.0003145781,0.0004103729,0.0003227059,0.000841427,0.0006933467,0.00003266529,0.0007503482,0.0002125468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004975959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003818776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004064612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002377323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963017,0.001785558,0.000346876,0.0003329568,0.0004681336,0.0007648111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990212,0.000257381,0.0001666935,0.0001154369,0.000171473,0.0002678705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001373225,0.0002279656,0.0001376265,0.00001460835,0.00003770097,0.0000233335,0.03860411,6.936769e-7,0.00002191698,0.9113122,0.03348132,0.01612482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004564688,0.00007424671,0.005806944,0.00002572957,0.00005245425,0.000003986513,0.004220976,0.000008440871,0.00002051606,0.5242462,0.4647872,0.0002969128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01283656,0.00112437,0.00004100788,0.3793512,0.002447467,0.0001880661,0.00004904747,0.0001441733,0.6038181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677992,0.002499971,0.00003635263,0.01104211,0.008617086,0.00001418068,0.00001793321,0.00002442091,0.009948714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942839276","doi":"10.4000/books.septentrion.38646","title":"Trois concepts de reconnaissance","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0329685351576156,"gpt":0.2506392873483936,"spread":0.217670752190778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000290368,0.0007112993,0.0008256005,0.0002099011,0.002390336,0.0001137956,0.001045601,0.001052604,0.003172506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001204869,0.0008251368,0.000821894,0.00008935025,0.004100059,0.0005154033,0.0003213325,0.000892639,0.0006304897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009480313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007109233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002344142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005048984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964619,0.0004211705,0.0005097806,0.0008418438,0.0008105302,0.0009547365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997393,0.0004762645,0.0005938536,0.0004273011,0.0004670424,0.000642597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001615548,0.00007899764,0.0004069522,0.00008958922,0.0004479992,0.000885875,0.0197405,0.0000361476,0.00003805773,0.9295599,0.01902143,0.02953302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008608076,0.0001763889,0.0001034475,0.0003120321,0.0003634937,0.00003109383,0.001025748,0.0000304065,0.00008837105,0.0338778,0.9622554,0.0008749819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004051941,0.004878225,0.0001181734,0.006891361,0.001434496,0.0006952652,0.000174008,0.0002742565,0.9814823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7431632,0.006948692,0.0001227892,0.0006605908,0.00199867,0.000006408435,0.00004481454,0.00007945285,0.2469754],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951726489","doi":"","title":"CARTOGRAPHIE DE LA MIXITE : LA COMMON LAW ET LA COMPLETUDE DU DROIT CIVIL AU QUEBEC","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Framing (construction); Humanities; Engineering; Public law; Philosophy; Civil engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01509738438777682,"gpt":0.2939697133400309,"spread":0.2788723289522541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005018896,0.0002719403,0.0005436605,0.00005167809,0.001599348,0.0003024255,0.0009347496,0.0003686241,0.0008813945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001899626,0.0002350989,0.0003810022,0.0006415421,0.004371466,0.0002048947,0.00006749572,0.001217351,0.0003674387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005400188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003138555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944335,0.003842423,0.0003377148,0.0002679302,0.0003550185,0.0007633862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975036,0.0008493928,0.0001411069,0.0004556366,0.00008940751,0.0009608887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.734707e-7,0.0000279718,0.0008579899,0.0003208375,0.00004605317,0.00007165335,0.006067196,3.132088e-7,0.000003003403,0.9686797,0.01441194,0.009512338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001088007,0.00001133045,0.003305587,0.0008694237,0.0001665789,0.00002649454,0.00008780882,0.000001959123,3.952838e-7,0.09635594,0.8988051,0.0002605927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009001002,0.03946853,7.819593e-7,0.2430101,0.0006887467,0.0005040349,0.0001216673,0.00003760603,0.7071675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269061,0.03149649,0.0000271974,0.0352477,0.001198077,0.00003555555,0.00001818164,0.00004001036,0.005030701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252124446","doi":"10.3917/riges.272.0081","title":"Recensions","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0724104640285743,"gpt":0.2816392230696319,"spread":0.2092287590410576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001829828,0.00006981617,0.00008250343,0.00002138112,0.0005271349,0.00003444692,0.00007870156,0.0002134594,0.003810077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001731889,0.00007585916,0.00006481099,0.00034389,0.000303599,0.0002353375,0.00001666831,0.0001887502,0.004119391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001565963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001165389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001982334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991032,0.0002132127,0.0001054279,0.0001348806,0.0002118916,0.000231388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996349,0.00006488457,0.0000393155,0.00008140824,0.00006058922,0.0001188754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001014342,0.00008515133,0.0001429886,0.000005510873,0.000005912918,0.000005749249,0.008552659,0.000008015688,0.00001925216,0.819603,0.05469843,0.1168723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007768934,0.00002968679,0.001080934,0.00003137697,0.00002023997,0.000001103421,0.0002175399,0.0002211566,0.000004458152,0.04988717,0.9483252,0.0001034143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01281659,0.004657892,0.00002173025,0.6243466,0.004092417,0.00008766309,0.000006465442,0.00006862156,0.353902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7883589,0.001895185,0.0001333314,0.0007617053,0.00190997,0.000003005413,0.000002097151,0.000006367587,0.2069294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8936268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911083342","doi":"","title":"Spending Power, Social Policy, and the Principle of Subsidiarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Welfare state; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Social policy; Action (physics); Public administration; Economics; Welfare; Law; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05304713381432047,"gpt":0.3460608155569254,"spread":0.2930136817426049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008382802,0.00009153238,0.0002344983,0.00004014051,0.004534686,0.0002051573,0.0004268398,0.0001040624,0.0000308283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406735,0.00007178175,0.0001158164,0.00008047465,0.005750129,0.0002780445,0.0001673303,0.0001311514,0.000008493955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006930743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003535579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004355958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001976232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.0001523251,0.0001911686,0.0001563849,0.0002033984,0.0002095276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992707,0.0001474516,0.0002330388,0.0002009313,0.00007984397,0.00006807072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003036197,0.00002528691,0.003713649,0.00001466364,0.00002614309,0.000002374735,0.008276491,7.929056e-7,0.00002853798,0.987597,0.00001473077,0.0002699541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003977086,0.00004506208,0.0873869,0.0001951943,0.0001540484,0.00001138414,0.008961101,0.00003485826,0.000291413,0.5610467,0.3372243,0.0006719437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5319358,0.0003028131,0.00006369353,0.01632578,0.0004131265,0.0003684884,0.00002319354,0.00004216277,0.450525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980526,0.0002742357,0.0000573274,0.00006756462,0.001182016,0.000007143572,0.000001117255,0.000004193798,0.0003538076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4661168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018705091","doi":"10.7202/043236ar","title":"Le rôle de l'État et les modifications apportées aux principes généraux du droit","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02052881512509105,"gpt":0.2697702730291007,"spread":0.2492414579040096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143648,0.0003138328,0.0004012074,0.0001147592,0.002168585,0.0002468754,0.0007206825,0.0008610399,0.0002432685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000350728,0.0004045548,0.0003706922,0.0005719922,0.00256623,0.0007093429,0.00007862895,0.0009884717,0.0003068601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001408128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00158055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01266057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007805121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970211,0.0004572821,0.0004809477,0.0005222965,0.0005273106,0.0009911073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984307,0.0002910688,0.0002426893,0.0003509307,0.0001666161,0.0005179393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001301003,0.0003305847,0.001264456,0.00003984341,0.00008495811,0.00002171167,0.03554184,0.0005405748,0.0001755547,0.9370495,0.001925739,0.02301221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004119395,0.00004914319,0.003285,0.00004742681,0.0001094744,0.00001303131,0.008262934,0.0007397239,0.0002807261,0.4883782,0.497894,0.0005284596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4520378,0.003126138,0.006379071,0.2024453,0.0005056272,0.0004366352,0.0001045055,0.0002877901,0.3346771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164301,0.001300388,0.001934271,0.002284358,0.002209961,0.00007021084,0.00002976297,0.00005472957,0.07568619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4959683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058138434","doi":"10.7202/1018332ar","title":"Le libéralisme de la prudence : contribution à un minimalisme politique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008791242107452519,"gpt":0.2643897139599557,"spread":0.2555984718525032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001446422,0.0002978894,0.0003645418,0.00006404335,0.0009459831,0.000390348,0.0005042258,0.001431029,0.0005066372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006649406,0.0003378347,0.0002589709,0.0004400754,0.001975428,0.0007927511,0.0001057899,0.001018432,0.0003020141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007452622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001171487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1104573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951068,0.002587691,0.0003897281,0.0003953372,0.0003583266,0.00116211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998175,0.0005409039,0.0002004696,0.0001894022,0.0003265617,0.0005676748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001361697,0.0001499193,0.002559956,0.00004465754,0.00005321864,0.00005232408,0.0184115,0.00001603416,0.0009594786,0.9732423,0.001803063,0.002693878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004497464,0.00009528155,0.007072826,0.0001243965,0.00004691648,0.00002628731,0.003207574,0.0002203687,0.001763996,0.8650241,0.1214913,0.0004772058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4829913,0.00382001,0.001138759,0.2783461,0.000810914,0.0007557395,0.00005069742,0.0002459188,0.2318406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825842,0.002025019,0.001036293,0.00826792,0.001801232,0.0001098473,0.00001497957,0.0000400453,0.004120426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4995929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804021747","doi":"10.7202/1032034ar","title":"L’intérêt des parties dans l’abus d’exercice des voies de droit","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04609403044040379,"gpt":0.2733334207853674,"spread":0.2272393903449637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001651228,0.0003283282,0.0006335735,0.00009862166,0.001229675,0.0003413852,0.0008065642,0.0005564899,0.000194932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007792399,0.0005037351,0.000389332,0.0009363143,0.003890238,0.001095456,0.000157693,0.0005591531,0.0008300657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002679413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007482936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01985427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009448339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961028,0.0005814455,0.0005386293,0.0005444811,0.0005505147,0.001682196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977124,0.0002296595,0.0002315539,0.0004016493,0.0003570399,0.001067651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009235999,0.0004639768,0.04945982,0.0005789716,0.0001731671,0.0002973291,0.3815066,0.0003850102,0.0002408634,0.5459318,0.003663205,0.01720698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004613739,0.0002145114,0.006273118,0.0004261402,0.0002176704,0.00006140851,0.02752155,0.0002357443,0.0005628648,0.9337637,0.02958894,0.0006729177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7486472,0.007861005,0.0003844544,0.003782952,0.001027056,0.0002865751,0.00005777711,0.0002028737,0.2377501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460402,0.002634102,0.001588823,0.0004386326,0.003951109,0.000063001,0.00001335403,0.00007034191,0.04520044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.387832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108376763","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071284","title":"Tolérance et modernité juridique","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03149079409272505,"gpt":0.3306653352126631,"spread":0.2991745411199381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006466973,0.0001604185,0.0002812446,0.0003110577,0.001030057,0.0002790803,0.001053708,0.000196907,0.0003267593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001909664,0.0001550361,0.0001848757,0.001352837,0.007665375,0.001287853,0.00002862991,0.0007148214,0.0001125039],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00189945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0254797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2816492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3136899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995655,0.0001826705,0.0005440725,0.0002254497,0.0009490224,0.002443773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916541,0.000274281,0.0001846455,0.0001429485,0.0007940695,0.00694995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003362745,0.00002330539,0.00119687,0.000007654721,0.000006014138,0.0003085198,0.004250355,0.000006938623,0.00005810633,0.9910542,0.0004757834,0.002608933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003319768,0.0002609013,0.07981114,0.0002314005,0.0000453589,0.0001868977,0.003172,0.00003200361,0.0005446453,0.6275423,0.2874042,0.0004372309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3874708,0.00243454,0.00160826,0.169439,0.006648781,0.000122982,0.00003752577,0.000009167145,0.432229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864354,0.00002960332,0.0005061164,0.006993542,0.002557151,2.68169e-7,1.461898e-7,0.00001021491,0.00346761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5989646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997549484","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00686.x","title":"Deploying ‘Ethics’ in Victorian England","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literature Compass","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Period (music); Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Utilitarianism; Sociology; Normative; Rhetorical device; Contingency; Aesthetics; Literature; Media studies; History; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02190214534978222,"gpt":0.3204216777454022,"spread":0.29851953239562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007638211,0.00009580213,0.0001424472,0.00007150379,0.0004432398,0.0003062977,0.0002650805,0.0003462747,0.00006350409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003843805,0.00008701372,0.00005414143,0.0004666466,0.0001295753,0.000278213,0.00003143912,0.001512205,0.00002953271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001146668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005216024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01289731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998866,0.0002366202,0.000139945,0.0001831814,0.0002938855,0.000280427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993612,0.0002315109,0.00003755256,0.0001381395,0.0001043562,0.0001272341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001092315,0.00004090695,0.01654764,0.00001175829,0.000004807608,0.00002995591,0.2157638,4.782897e-7,0.0009076009,0.7660629,0.000277472,0.0003417959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003318624,0.000007963192,0.007347602,0.00003922236,0.000002492569,6.968327e-7,0.0002409251,0.000005449172,0.00004288058,0.05364046,0.9381955,0.0001449937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6917982,0.0003350785,0.0000174037,0.027965,0.006463894,0.0002769312,0.00001465695,0.0002187252,0.2729101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994898,0.00001313972,0.0002129345,0.0007477509,0.003466442,0.000008299815,0.000007473842,0.0000094507,0.0006364763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.937918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7197003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090326345","doi":"10.7202/042952ar","title":"Le juge et les droits acquis en droit public canadien","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01099310632568787,"gpt":0.242009162366214,"spread":0.2310160560405261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511095,0.0003912628,0.0005216354,0.0001843568,0.001760938,0.0003647725,0.0009866268,0.0012987,0.0006461729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004608714,0.0005085055,0.0003934864,0.0009051985,0.002200224,0.00111601,0.0001109444,0.001384126,0.0004626465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003553707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001389609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1232827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.232164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958375,0.0007917536,0.0004803135,0.0006302815,0.0007019384,0.001558241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997933,0.0003757413,0.0002165639,0.0003713218,0.0001651831,0.0009382452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001010641,0.0001538987,0.0009842046,0.0000338611,0.0001121969,0.0000611238,0.03869576,0.00002777328,0.0000341332,0.9113877,0.003725538,0.04477366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000514782,0.0000834231,0.002204489,0.00004806406,0.000076,0.00001650127,0.004545587,0.00007300192,0.00007936251,0.2348082,0.7569205,0.0006301508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4009501,0.003122857,0.0003588688,0.1406122,0.0009209914,0.0003196787,0.0001245985,0.0001819852,0.4534087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8215704,0.0005588686,0.0004559809,0.004940732,0.002994793,0.00003033668,0.00003082181,0.00006341009,0.1693546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7531949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040394467","doi":"10.7202/1006806ar","title":"Un peu de débroussaillage dans le domaine de l’épistémologie juridique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.019635947245889,"gpt":0.2398885399333316,"spread":0.2202525926874427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669387,0.0003111744,0.0003929778,0.00007020924,0.001521056,0.00008602577,0.0007850476,0.001141596,0.0002882203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003586044,0.000359375,0.0003492785,0.0005052857,0.003712846,0.0002895068,0.00009018236,0.0009545634,0.000169534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003254666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001445386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03734263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002770074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996567,0.000996068,0.0003378052,0.0004408303,0.0003198729,0.001338466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986497,0.0002277884,0.0001697197,0.0003226742,0.0000717556,0.0005583256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003883297,0.0002369906,0.003461427,0.00004533312,0.00009159759,0.0004422444,0.1043639,0.000006954299,0.0007465175,0.8853418,0.0008102045,0.004414284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000459342,0.0001556162,0.007292083,0.00003674328,0.0001091725,0.00004229547,0.00577236,0.0000238495,0.002750424,0.9358839,0.04697883,0.0004954044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6420006,0.001522057,0.01245256,0.009005306,0.0006297044,0.0002269093,0.00004177985,0.0001854855,0.3339356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398649,0.0006967018,0.005201944,0.002447268,0.001288995,0.00003091074,0.000007871508,0.0000526639,0.05040876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2978643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983878672","doi":"10.7202/042702ar","title":"La théorie générale des contrats. Pour sortir du dogmatisme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Statutory law; Methodological individualism; Law; Legal practice; State (computer science); Sociology; Civil code; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009136704948136912,"gpt":0.2457799815904671,"spread":0.2366432766423301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005647285,0.0001097937,0.0001749141,0.0000382453,0.0008498409,0.0001314723,0.000271693,0.0003067093,0.0002341313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002468566,0.0001198597,0.0001261283,0.0001858663,0.00112537,0.0003068701,0.00001863517,0.000330767,0.0001512333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006049791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001881484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001267101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001999253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987391,0.0002123919,0.0001675678,0.0001760885,0.0002690988,0.0004357272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993519,0.0001984941,0.00006627004,0.00011004,0.00006001665,0.0002132451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001077774,0.00005749763,0.004337355,0.000007896985,0.00002695188,0.00002666319,0.04119205,0.000009465256,0.0001287447,0.9274601,0.001403207,0.02533927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004195543,0.0000208392,0.005119123,0.00001579967,0.00002717667,0.000004223656,0.004900943,0.00003444067,0.0001579227,0.9196066,0.06945287,0.0002404764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523049,0.0001472367,0.0005721588,0.009630702,0.00008836103,0.0001128586,0.000008102206,0.0001360201,0.4369997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875285,0.0001712987,0.0008943198,0.001268975,0.001391457,0.00001532372,0.000003377244,0.00001663202,0.008710135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4352236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6536375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}