{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2078,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2078,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bbb2ea18f736","filters":{"topic":"Legal principles and applications"}},"results":[{"id":"W2139608255","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103622","title":"Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal `Technicalities' as Resources for Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Law; Temporality; Sociology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Valverde","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0295579003119574,"gpt":0.3803226695723262,"spread":0.3507647692603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698682,0.00104248,0.001353078,0.006569158,0.006383689,0.01331797,0.003296562,0.003579497,0.008594111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02901149,0.0009006625,0.001331087,0.006479951,0.1143331,0.03726381,0.01275842,0.006851106,0.0007507256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008301104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004535419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003694478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00236944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845889,0.01065714,0.0005691473,0.001486891,0.001927214,0.000770694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692537,0.02286471,0.001577824,0.004455994,0.001203642,0.0006440419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.569535e-7,0.000001624302,0.00004133213,0.00001178034,0.000001197095,0.000006534114,0.000555393,0.00009362841,0.000007790363,0.9984095,0.0001042303,0.0007662312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003469403,0.000002753177,0.00006230971,0.00003171114,0.000001866353,0.00001227645,0.0005679951,0.000254289,0.00001584673,0.9932901,0.005754162,0.000003229891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04062912,0.01809127,0.395126,0.08403227,0.00092219,0.0002383727,0.0002394339,0.0003140312,0.4604074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374322,0.00449135,0.04810593,0.002187897,0.0006454342,0.000454312,0.0000994307,0.0001540772,0.006429483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08983594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612390946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.001.0001","title":"Atiyah’s Introduction To The Law Of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Exposition (narrative); Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Exclusion clause; Commercial law; Private law; Political science; Sociology; Contract management; Economics; Management; History","authors":[{"name":"P. S. Atiyah","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen A. Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01609054020179672,"gpt":0.2924159980985068,"spread":0.27632545789671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182405,0.0009143257,0.0005940396,0.002390983,0.003142235,0.004686564,0.0009114741,0.002502708,0.03009069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002928894,0.0004659294,0.0005554929,0.002605609,0.005649015,0.004835294,0.001572354,0.00582885,0.007125837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006695597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003384108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009112583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005296069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986715,0.0003131018,0.00006274979,0.0001987753,0.0006460183,0.0001079319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0006543548,0.00004938097,0.0001000531,0.0002507998,0.00007797763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003968349,0.000009095707,0.00002945703,0.00003691066,0.000001205097,0.0000412069,0.0005356865,0.0001326267,0.00003811568,0.8111805,0.1733672,0.01462395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001584606,0.000005347922,0.0001044915,0.00009755744,9.6518e-7,0.0000681138,0.0000817343,0.0001282497,0.00002116341,0.0990707,0.9004152,0.000005077818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006606791,0.04590549,0.006328349,0.02009558,0.00740657,0.0000480875,0.0003169873,0.0001191349,0.9191191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05809391,0.05667063,0.009651517,0.01142247,0.01177255,0.0002374167,0.0004749309,0.0002915505,0.851385],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03009069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1006634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18233132","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660643.003.0006","title":"Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03117693106489048,"gpt":0.2737984705954415,"spread":0.242621539530551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006452338,0.0007169429,0.000872518,0.001550981,0.004881974,0.007527915,0.002012104,0.008784575,0.005558398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007250528,0.0004666861,0.00085851,0.0009235496,0.04602388,0.008144353,0.006239026,0.00757831,0.0006398906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00951496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01233364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01351459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887943,0.003929177,0.0005294307,0.001093761,0.004107112,0.001546273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975057,0.001128234,0.0003364742,0.0004147036,0.0004141793,0.0002006824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.576862e-7,0.000003107417,0.00001703188,0.000004684959,7.095254e-7,0.000009410031,0.0002001559,0.0001273621,0.00002550261,0.9985001,0.0002318911,0.0008790743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001126604,0.00001731175,0.0001910855,0.00008407038,0.00000607506,0.00007007014,0.0003212835,0.0006213919,0.0001489083,0.9572634,0.04125018,0.00001494019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02412572,0.007771766,0.1431124,0.04168982,0.0007068999,0.0002454107,0.0001077043,0.0001773028,0.782063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447149,0.005404288,0.03117142,0.008672564,0.0005417118,0.0003804885,0.00004998464,0.0000922636,0.1089723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01351459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06903619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304513168927904,"gpt":0.2465368943110173,"spread":0.2234917626217383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007528612,0.0004899622,0.0009888422,0.001763403,0.006965177,0.007608313,0.001921146,0.004779242,0.006825047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01144957,0.0005532583,0.001047318,0.001430846,0.04984551,0.01710983,0.009191674,0.006793055,0.0008920773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00587066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004559359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006329408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002944116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892505,0.004805311,0.0004239296,0.001605428,0.002787614,0.001127165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928575,0.004233445,0.0006927507,0.00105563,0.0007326364,0.0004280582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000230099,0.000002777319,0.00005549888,0.000004891297,9.337376e-7,0.00001273056,0.0003142332,0.00008119969,0.0000270464,0.9987753,0.000145981,0.0005771422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120138,0.00001069956,0.0001408664,0.00003908718,0.000003455007,0.00004672086,0.0002305966,0.0007005556,0.00008383209,0.9856777,0.01304736,0.000007075529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07946876,0.005088535,0.2687724,0.02786374,0.0003896282,0.000133452,0.0001138948,0.000170549,0.617999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632902,0.001051793,0.01006856,0.002130837,0.0004003306,0.0002882385,0.0000618981,0.00007910623,0.02262911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007608313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04259479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Rouhette","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235538640228112,"gpt":0.3418535535635373,"spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717408,0.0004428171,0.0008485856,0.004213084,0.001630647,0.01379484,0.002406652,0.009564579,0.005904029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01234054,0.0002884873,0.0006627698,0.005784655,0.01403503,0.01584602,0.003628735,0.006239364,0.0007342495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003720468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00263071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002337835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947786,0.001461344,0.0004161792,0.001443266,0.001381301,0.0005193748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.004319576,0.001892119,0.0007708027,0.001243996,0.0006753845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004531418,0.00004925779,0.00402461,0.0002130622,0.00002882249,0.0002717464,0.0009254162,0.0002925468,0.00008449027,0.9232404,0.01108781,0.05973655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148861,0.0001551543,0.03035029,0.003085543,0.0000480471,0.002374231,0.00286437,0.0009096255,0.0002779861,0.3558021,0.6040158,0.0000953638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06196013,0.4204705,0.0190363,0.1462439,0.006145145,0.00003876345,0.0006262219,0.00008839148,0.3453907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954862,0.1262394,0.00607663,0.03729818,0.01228479,0.000102409,0.0004849077,0.0001266466,0.0219008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01379484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614143649","doi":"","title":"Compromised Jurisprudence: Native Title Cases since Mabo","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Law; High Court; Publishing; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Garth Nettheim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07565362637497428,"gpt":0.4484386327215319,"spread":0.3727850063465576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008070843,0.0002329272,0.0006936907,0.0009899546,0.01359951,0.01332435,0.001822873,0.009293719,0.002522816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01865161,0.0006457849,0.0003880226,0.001776543,0.02303315,0.008191613,0.008715161,0.01080999,0.0004557766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01341904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007732424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05641677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06694671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917733,0.002889641,0.0003072582,0.0009630616,0.002453864,0.001612935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993023,0.004461692,0.0007238882,0.0003897824,0.0007565049,0.000645076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004750296,0.0000341208,0.001531962,0.0001569371,0.00001288938,0.002165399,0.1127636,0.0001450291,0.0004268039,0.7965271,0.06593782,0.02025086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002634397,0.00007306579,0.01130734,0.001461883,0.00003026257,0.001863484,0.04839012,0.0003091247,0.0004210304,0.09031178,0.8457259,0.00007954228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160264,0.1636167,0.001697237,0.1818099,0.003298672,0.00005643122,0.00006594956,0.0000414793,0.5333872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858638,0.01631544,0.0006426752,0.03135604,0.001516605,0.00006427283,0.00004116683,0.00004152545,0.09138431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05641677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1121768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248006959","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779008","title":"Vicarious Liability in Tort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Strict liability; Liability; Delict; Legal liability; Law; Joint and several liability; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Public law; Black letter law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Paula Giliker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01938234972451122,"gpt":0.2461958185591556,"spread":0.2268134688346443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001445599,0.00054007,0.0003571058,0.001390927,0.002005752,0.003246429,0.0008263946,0.002731589,0.004061673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002660046,0.0002786222,0.0003615127,0.001450465,0.01528572,0.004687581,0.002352024,0.003645159,0.001327517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004946467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003070869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002765517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002895485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986293,0.0005192204,0.00004703857,0.0001636915,0.0005234144,0.000117336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992666,0.0003805118,0.0000609937,0.00009777134,0.0001247132,0.0000694413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.802313e-7,0.000002973339,0.00002838813,0.00001271253,6.738636e-7,0.00001732303,0.0004458367,0.0001485786,0.00001882376,0.9910788,0.00389291,0.00435209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001964453,0.000008083492,0.0001938512,0.0001156286,0.000001765547,0.0001247134,0.0002192276,0.0003299496,0.00004036992,0.8540286,0.1449309,0.000004936483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005807779,0.05732409,0.02354451,0.01742387,0.000617764,0.00005867067,0.0000586799,0.00006729628,0.8950973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5149454,0.06045883,0.01524235,0.008032668,0.001708913,0.000245278,0.0001621609,0.0001269278,0.3990774],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004946467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03588933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157653217","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303006457","title":"Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs—A Reply to Professor Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Restitution; Law; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mitchell McInnes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02676736807740026,"gpt":0.3219218934099887,"spread":0.2951545253325884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131295,0.0008552219,0.001805171,0.001386939,0.006471606,0.008338802,0.004303908,0.04597166,0.005521954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02914527,0.0008860653,0.001422209,0.001622081,0.03217481,0.02466108,0.004791318,0.059729,0.002120969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01100171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01151523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03070277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04048521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927699,0.002809001,0.0004445423,0.001276973,0.001889208,0.0008104679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976346,0.01917994,0.0006068838,0.00053613,0.002051284,0.001279819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002827396,0.00002052236,0.0001581412,0.00006560997,0.00001016686,0.0001645456,0.0008099154,0.0001171231,0.00004889133,0.1475058,0.8437675,0.007303539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006040798,0.00003217516,0.000628564,0.0006403989,0.00001898332,0.0004409037,0.002355627,0.0003528158,0.0001554469,0.1982017,0.7970009,0.0001120047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001593862,0.007932646,0.0001047222,0.987241,0.003336414,0.000001252182,0.00000783705,0.000006146452,0.001210544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01253039,0.01126105,0.0003655243,0.9479049,0.02088738,0.00001975442,0.00001262846,0.00004479831,0.006973536],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04597166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07982332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965454850","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00208.x","title":"Confidence and the constructive trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Law; Declaration; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Commonwealth; Computer science; History; Process (computing)","authors":[{"name":"Tang Hang Wu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03741219411040349,"gpt":0.3505393579168602,"spread":0.3131271638064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02589393,0.0005180583,0.0008561951,0.00250414,0.006435078,0.01341581,0.001790041,0.00938131,0.004470996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06293241,0.0006393773,0.0009580252,0.001602014,0.097873,0.01455533,0.01248688,0.01139022,0.0005931287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005996403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006241827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003523886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00202903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9700162,0.01629265,0.001655779,0.002986311,0.006624151,0.002424945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445007,0.03697462,0.006316829,0.005425885,0.004655943,0.002125955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003052677,0.000002725518,0.00008917489,0.00001231355,0.000003021968,0.00002451367,0.0005894047,0.00005462423,0.00001926417,0.9977234,0.0003323813,0.001146145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130424,0.00001515961,0.000146479,0.00006671569,0.000005286651,0.00007344552,0.0003537918,0.0001782152,0.00008143957,0.9877072,0.01134785,0.00001125606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06239829,0.01024457,0.1353819,0.1478771,0.001425151,0.0002040497,0.0001407934,0.0001220065,0.6422062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811496,0.001220181,0.004953249,0.005667704,0.000486216,0.0001063108,0.00001535884,0.00002578448,0.006375702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02589393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1369419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20162444","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment and the Role of Legal History in England and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; High Court; Doctrine; Commonwealth; Political science; Appeal; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Common law; History; Restitution","authors":[{"name":"Warren Swain","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01080459723266096,"gpt":0.2586162968211432,"spread":0.2478116995884822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003054124,0.0001276054,0.0003987814,0.002100707,0.006651313,0.007000858,0.0006809699,0.001965385,0.002720072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008112743,0.0003060216,0.0001403114,0.001448662,0.02187718,0.006805314,0.005993659,0.002586778,0.0001472466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01964764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008586172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2158976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3711125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970078,0.00125451,0.000140112,0.0002805609,0.0006229717,0.0006939924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961106,0.001642467,0.0006345558,0.0002360866,0.0005448408,0.0008315123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003620808,0.00003557629,0.005922075,0.00009921539,0.000007759036,0.0006076287,0.1047602,0.0001899304,0.0003338539,0.8614873,0.001849614,0.02467064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002472097,0.0001215522,0.122182,0.001627241,0.00003626525,0.0009709746,0.07112351,0.001473057,0.0005795616,0.3801467,0.4215888,0.0001256686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6317764,0.02958463,0.001473391,0.04176291,0.0002508843,0.00004436876,0.00004961073,0.00001478961,0.295043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810418,0.002230875,0.0002922206,0.001295638,0.00004333773,0.00001582145,0.000009366196,0.00000673012,0.01506412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2158976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4292818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230356737","doi":"10.2307/3504968","title":"10.2307/3504968","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Substantive rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107878176035564,"gpt":0.2429843682392999,"spread":0.2319055864789442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009228658,0.001632241,0.001177029,0.002379613,0.001810673,0.005240243,0.001951181,0.002751538,0.9835613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002235322,0.0008135096,0.0008059526,0.002707723,0.001772581,0.006114627,0.004376207,0.001773062,0.9841461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001152159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001474631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993597,0.00005720828,0.00005244253,0.0001743261,0.0002578617,0.00009861147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978335,0.0004742437,0.0000863879,0.0004156648,0.0005253603,0.0006647279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170886,0.0001590956,0.0004902742,0.0004008905,0.00001515268,0.0001907554,0.0000944956,0.0001614199,0.001439156,0.006776751,0.5678436,0.4222575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002276322,0.00003244862,0.0006950693,0.0001724758,0.00000624328,0.0002104273,0.0001198195,0.0001143206,0.0002052769,0.001282533,0.9971243,0.00001437529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003340986,0.0003761588,0.0004520634,0.000327625,0.0004043812,0.00005144809,0.0009658949,0.0007172078,0.996371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001154527,0.0003849222,0.0005528251,0.0004435995,0.0001079631,0.00003564098,0.001369586,0.0004084308,0.9955425],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01643872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02344775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497077290","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.004","title":"Promises and Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; History","authors":[{"name":"Т. М. Scanlon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03506470121960031,"gpt":0.2413471066189535,"spread":0.2062824053993532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004415011,0.0005149971,0.0004918189,0.00122298,0.003662792,0.007340224,0.0009496051,0.004142477,0.01708676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006755367,0.0004099604,0.0004242318,0.002320124,0.02193353,0.01343767,0.003373111,0.004938864,0.002284533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006505129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003583996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00443491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003277238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938783,0.003541238,0.0001849108,0.0005351323,0.00140008,0.000460323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997364,0.001763779,0.0001665851,0.0002897125,0.0002716242,0.0001442257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001209889,0.000001187148,0.000007402831,0.000008545841,3.899394e-7,0.00000625056,0.000188622,0.00003975457,0.000006663657,0.9971148,0.001411326,0.001213866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003066521,0.000005883423,0.00005870116,0.000069714,0.000001126004,0.00004248696,0.0003411433,0.0001699778,0.00002797314,0.8989055,0.1003706,0.000003845886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004256586,0.01537417,0.02685717,0.024426,0.0005970451,0.00004208184,0.00009011762,0.00006068588,0.9282962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6248412,0.02376175,0.01873083,0.01058116,0.002085791,0.0003660789,0.0001736557,0.0002066075,0.3192529],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05716097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541056688","doi":"10.4324/9780203024393","title":"British System of Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"A. H. Birch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384878821456549,"gpt":0.2475689996684339,"spread":0.2337202114538684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006044143,0.0004228462,0.0004181773,0.001460775,0.004712332,0.008622177,0.0007302893,0.002031263,0.05594967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002072984,0.0003366964,0.0001957787,0.003372156,0.002361789,0.002187486,0.001426876,0.0024533,0.01888587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01631892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01132943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2146751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.356216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981655,0.0002544746,0.00009446673,0.0002869136,0.0009314324,0.0002671193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999375,0.00008829231,0.00002915756,0.00009305555,0.0003281537,0.00008639849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000725669,0.000004967006,0.00008900775,0.0000807863,0.000002872118,0.00004379116,0.0008306208,0.00008928985,0.00006490581,0.4839703,0.4801332,0.03468312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.580375e-7,0.000001598719,0.00019323,0.00003225451,7.868872e-7,0.00002183913,0.0001044681,0.00002158573,0.00001298584,0.005331967,0.994276,0.000002493592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007773878,0.006678002,0.0003821657,0.005027387,0.001185443,0.00001659234,0.0005969734,0.0001254578,0.9852107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02135513,0.003662652,0.0005563138,0.001239763,0.0001716839,0.0000359397,0.000420104,0.00008500135,0.9724733],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2146751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4268512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256221483","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302","title":"Principle and Policy in Contract Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Appeal; Formalism (music); Interdependence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03218009617870159,"gpt":0.2677997957201448,"spread":0.2356196995414432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007292564,0.0007463529,0.0007227634,0.001747175,0.005412108,0.009876669,0.001499868,0.006603893,0.007422714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006947963,0.000528422,0.0007917129,0.002493499,0.04053468,0.0110017,0.00386322,0.009029282,0.002385803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01009142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01071674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006255874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924562,0.003416833,0.0003156995,0.0008929468,0.002337817,0.0005805368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997726,0.001378617,0.0001374622,0.0003256734,0.0003044902,0.0001277555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.618691e-7,0.000001290749,0.000005802063,0.000006088877,3.79443e-7,0.00000374344,0.0001192419,0.00004793189,0.000006448867,0.9980239,0.000877489,0.0009072726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002991356,0.000003463414,0.00002644359,0.00005337886,0.000001176821,0.0000191029,0.00008617956,0.0001606111,0.00001981421,0.9516602,0.04796286,0.000003729263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002960854,0.01741754,0.05718051,0.03311646,0.001068491,0.0001102212,0.00009300668,0.0001061262,0.8879468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5608854,0.03651028,0.07430047,0.02241492,0.004605469,0.001240557,0.0003005555,0.0003953116,0.2993471],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01009142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07321876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572287427","doi":"","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Legal liability; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Strict liability; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Duncan Fairgrieve","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dan Squires","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02775398419859881,"gpt":0.2674589932856077,"spread":0.2397050090870089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001326586,0.0003892662,0.0003940503,0.001045682,0.002328994,0.005059314,0.0009829524,0.00373085,0.004476702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005005395,0.0004344702,0.0004317184,0.0007363366,0.006862725,0.003230604,0.001782089,0.004598259,0.001641459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00781914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008219973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007180148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973673,0.000562661,0.0001375358,0.0001988623,0.001486173,0.0002473935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974553,0.001805563,0.0001923059,0.0001606874,0.000291502,0.00009462557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004123708,0.00001664316,0.0001793394,0.0001097054,0.000004029857,0.0002842784,0.002338772,0.000635977,0.0001444328,0.8033695,0.1584629,0.03445041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003872726,0.00002122019,0.0008126858,0.000771267,0.000006919119,0.0005847017,0.000992724,0.0005180773,0.0001773633,0.2467306,0.7493625,0.00001815265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004017471,0.03945522,0.006874512,0.03229387,0.004038399,0.00008419972,0.00008004346,0.000098474,0.9130579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1853538,0.04940866,0.003632809,0.01615109,0.00516446,0.0001590216,0.0001664703,0.00007803264,0.7398856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008219973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03081888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935955596404381,"gpt":0.3850370660161229,"spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007490603,0.00117197,0.001003506,0.002148716,0.00413768,0.008768057,0.002972284,0.009140892,0.00639788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009743711,0.0005806402,0.001212372,0.001198906,0.0393025,0.01226907,0.007085558,0.009214379,0.0009778744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00605617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002494741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003239549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988059,0.0030962,0.0005053453,0.001751896,0.005434487,0.001153058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943818,0.002197701,0.0006197748,0.00159257,0.0009127,0.0002954677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000160457,0.000004021697,0.00001744004,0.000007803158,0.000001586583,0.00001642054,0.00009144362,0.0002229536,0.0000372439,0.9977582,0.0003661654,0.001475092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005320186,0.00001285054,0.00008442865,0.00004894727,0.00000641075,0.0000753296,0.00007119484,0.0005024603,0.0001427149,0.9785979,0.02043846,0.00001389775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01051173,0.01035997,0.2631404,0.02418519,0.001454087,0.0002100446,0.00009146264,0.0002673426,0.6897798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460099,0.005176599,0.04997512,0.008546245,0.001972834,0.0004387551,0.00006361181,0.0002156668,0.08760115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009140892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04394084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884400","doi":"","title":"To Recognize or Not? Good Faith Under Nigerian Law of Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Good faith; Supreme court; Duty; Jurisdiction; Political science; Faith; Scholarship; Uniform Commercial Code; Meaning (existential); Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Olabisi D. Akinkugbe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03565191012799302,"gpt":0.3205903600874097,"spread":0.2849384499594167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955198,0.0001280154,0.0002191729,0.000400799,0.005793453,0.00626226,0.0004162314,0.003884925,0.001533373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007569142,0.0001539723,0.0001337734,0.0004136348,0.02091052,0.004821089,0.002456541,0.004153829,0.000236259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004112883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007438329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01757638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02080426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966993,0.001412204,0.00012535,0.000348813,0.0007498548,0.0006644689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974684,0.001376075,0.0003339177,0.0002101747,0.0003874563,0.0002240898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003666004,0.000005004973,0.0004147661,0.000009560748,6.848798e-7,0.0001226777,0.005938822,0.00003624892,0.00007320661,0.9873865,0.001428911,0.004579952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000951168,0.0000345565,0.002311735,0.0005446909,0.000009059401,0.0006985698,0.03268919,0.0007067514,0.0005372542,0.8293725,0.1330484,0.00003771566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1716276,0.00682072,0.01434794,0.163259,0.001148618,0.00006542297,0.00002653377,0.00002431223,0.64268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810485,0.001107045,0.001566319,0.005526597,0.00008775778,0.00002260531,0.000004111272,0.000006229202,0.0106309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03494811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542624731","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559152.003.0002","title":"Criminal Law as Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Political science; Morality; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Private law; Analogy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm Thorburn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.120467672058992,"gpt":0.3234492986800562,"spread":0.2029816266210642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007227454,0.0004090682,0.0002722231,0.001186407,0.002894908,0.006597377,0.0005705805,0.002927208,0.01768477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001196124,0.000223222,0.0002530509,0.001039795,0.01134076,0.004723803,0.001885956,0.004498365,0.002327118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006607842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004907731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006651042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006190282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991857,0.0002732884,0.00001792818,0.0001113498,0.0002995426,0.0001120492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.0002783342,0.00003402323,0.00008100612,0.0001035064,0.00005367516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[4.108349e-7,0.000004098356,0.000008752646,0.000006890476,2.382633e-7,0.000006094078,0.0002071429,0.00007204618,0.000009888468,0.9896985,0.007268226,0.00271772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002530209,0.000004480839,0.00008468103,0.0001457603,0.000001213996,0.00003210934,0.0003048773,0.0002564382,0.00005067875,0.4760502,0.5230638,0.000003162261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001561772,0.01004802,0.003362195,0.01774057,0.0005307401,0.00001861429,0.00003767419,0.00005208224,0.9666483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3165319,0.02305268,0.003360442,0.01086901,0.002293412,0.0001758417,0.0001784466,0.0001469108,0.6433914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01768477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05916142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211105127","doi":"10.1090/surv/148","title":"Ordering Braids","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Mathematical surveys and monographs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Mathematics; Materials science; Composite material","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Dehornoy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ivan Dynnikov","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dale Rolfsen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bert Wiest","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04144003946280374,"gpt":0.2974285378805621,"spread":0.2559884984177583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004629748,0.00078819,0.000740873,0.002294215,0.002348155,0.003726409,0.0007695429,0.000800859,0.0564378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001299693,0.0005548918,0.000417895,0.002846979,0.003049049,0.005429706,0.001365036,0.003117512,0.01516598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00202957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001581719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002276964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003570789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.0001228996,0.0000302656,0.0001035921,0.0002411336,0.00007804564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.0001079208,0.00001975651,0.0001004422,0.0001404208,0.0000433243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003422084,0.000005863316,0.00001544501,0.00001989206,0.000001109803,0.00000861813,0.0001078772,0.00009685703,0.0001007206,0.9495857,0.03124138,0.01881304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003076651,0.00000475976,0.00004245197,0.00002831384,0.000002582822,0.00005439231,0.00006300803,0.0002545591,0.0001454255,0.6914895,0.3079061,0.000005729147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002467333,0.00336445,0.03003691,0.001744397,0.00153199,0.00004427839,0.0003722388,0.0002643909,0.9601741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06905201,0.005076465,0.01767674,0.001210315,0.001025644,0.0001346073,0.0008360781,0.0004320241,0.904556],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0564378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1888033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W352683167","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-2421","title":"Civil servants and their constitutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Political science; Law; History; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1336717964290577,"gpt":0.3676040947423057,"spread":0.233932298313248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006443063,0.0004248016,0.0005590991,0.001657254,0.01071637,0.01218628,0.001014603,0.004349926,0.009835088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007997602,0.0004334061,0.0004632346,0.001864048,0.04053709,0.006920637,0.00613015,0.007171492,0.002090475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006628667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005879271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01152449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007972062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928769,0.003536329,0.0003561471,0.0008184924,0.001057407,0.001354686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970495,0.001555989,0.0002922018,0.0005372954,0.0003589252,0.0002061807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.784509e-7,0.000001554084,0.00002144431,0.000002520725,4.393411e-7,0.000008339532,0.0007390407,0.00001943687,0.00000602646,0.9974059,0.001102141,0.0006921087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001491602,0.00001129448,0.0002947087,0.0001135268,0.00000391473,0.00004016754,0.001655207,0.0001027916,0.00007945721,0.6071891,0.3904818,0.00001321912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01350131,0.006097212,0.004661854,0.02807843,0.0008624435,0.00006995917,0.00008818561,0.00006510081,0.9465756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.781646,0.005909735,0.003785549,0.01468918,0.001184539,0.0003194214,0.000298438,0.0001212431,0.192046],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01218628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04809451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeannie Paterson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01579050959091266,"gpt":0.2533316598242262,"spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322553,0.0005763579,0.000778373,0.001385262,0.008207702,0.01031822,0.002284794,0.008440062,0.005705445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03781827,0.0005826761,0.0007319877,0.001270406,0.0602823,0.008467978,0.009986011,0.009819522,0.001339991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00638629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01162639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008488028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006769514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690064,0.01230825,0.002041241,0.002846643,0.009782193,0.004015211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725633,0.01110993,0.002839442,0.005696225,0.004769606,0.00302159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003935038,0.00001255645,0.000185155,0.00001460366,0.00000239614,0.00005715891,0.002209578,0.0001727799,0.0000755059,0.9935086,0.0009151385,0.0028426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002139321,0.00006120481,0.001135149,0.0002455739,0.00001083773,0.0003099992,0.002252203,0.0008195309,0.0003761684,0.919548,0.07517447,0.00004540256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05393357,0.002973103,0.06595857,0.0400751,0.000618002,0.0002464206,0.00006136322,0.0001170655,0.8360168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933365,0.001057796,0.01283523,0.005736823,0.0003260465,0.0001605038,0.0000377613,0.00005945731,0.04642137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02322553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1228298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246024616","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834","title":"The Theory of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Contract theory; Public law; Law; Philosophy of law; Normative; Exclusion clause; Frustration of purpose; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Privity of contract; Contract management","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02622442049486077,"gpt":0.2429123247132939,"spread":0.2166879042184331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004101397,0.001056305,0.001110639,0.002619602,0.004398444,0.01100402,0.002124004,0.005632385,0.01293396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00700364,0.0006148952,0.0008174774,0.004065133,0.02870246,0.008881255,0.003560093,0.006981595,0.004138478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009558881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008831133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007701694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003457272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938685,0.002348524,0.0002809189,0.0007193909,0.002356634,0.0004259723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962851,0.002332781,0.0002821352,0.0004288109,0.0004599024,0.0002111989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.916394e-7,0.000002106464,0.00001942725,0.00002211433,0.000001778526,0.00001348567,0.0001446978,0.0001329652,0.000009630568,0.9920831,0.004998726,0.002571036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005104276,0.000006798185,0.00006568596,0.0001497783,0.000002531278,0.00006215399,0.0001437237,0.0003836295,0.00002358042,0.8630398,0.1361107,0.000006496786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00245401,0.04354983,0.07890622,0.03467518,0.001919392,0.0001750254,0.0003336945,0.0001335342,0.8378531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4316549,0.1193784,0.08617574,0.02642362,0.00885802,0.0017823,0.0008330495,0.0003742987,0.3245197],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01293396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06935489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202003056","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Nature of State Legal Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01036644715519271,"gpt":0.2947773851912057,"spread":0.284410938036013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01132602,0.0002506358,0.0006612035,0.001416248,0.005558234,0.008669037,0.001271624,0.004232767,0.00367608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01914401,0.0004732637,0.0006733775,0.0007848375,0.03929538,0.008692578,0.005245506,0.005318765,0.0005853854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005120633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007304423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003837415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002358902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869551,0.005634414,0.000558403,0.002341514,0.003225574,0.001284979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903646,0.004836435,0.0008628343,0.002073698,0.001263384,0.0005991145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001699895,0.000002614763,0.00004561544,0.000002644612,0.000001081258,0.00000879168,0.0004060689,0.00006563051,0.00003629605,0.998638,0.0001106283,0.0006809228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001289666,0.000009962328,0.0002085414,0.00002910676,0.000005173028,0.00003219963,0.0001802862,0.0006895858,0.0001512134,0.9875141,0.01115723,0.000009647002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09314483,0.001903466,0.179701,0.03428221,0.0003227715,0.0001705746,0.0001050694,0.0001549023,0.6902152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797739,0.0003313081,0.007892738,0.001208288,0.0002250702,0.0001368621,0.00002066992,0.00002563641,0.0103855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01132602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05989844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610974288","doi":"","title":"Restitution at the crossroads : a comparative study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Mistake; German; Law; English law; Political science; Position (finance); Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Krebs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11326347407508,"gpt":0.4139500714319048,"spread":0.3006865973568247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005331174,0.0002394806,0.0004385785,0.003254519,0.01214868,0.008026602,0.001647283,0.002440569,0.01287759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01485068,0.0003142057,0.0003317318,0.006672502,0.01251946,0.009237424,0.006182551,0.003252397,0.0007758023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01417971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06828039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1087655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936084,0.003827166,0.0001367075,0.0002724054,0.0007859731,0.001369416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937916,0.00406045,0.0006650183,0.0002415536,0.0007716495,0.0004697505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009881936,0.0001523923,0.006960623,0.0001739437,0.00001604547,0.001548127,0.3807438,0.0001288544,0.0001438045,0.5630634,0.01182073,0.03514951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000197012,0.0001086015,0.02828961,0.000850309,0.00002442281,0.0006618545,0.8102923,0.0002188473,0.0001595752,0.01776664,0.1415851,0.00002297242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4894642,0.01207385,0.0009668564,0.008878476,0.0001909742,0.00005086699,0.00007448887,0.00001073483,0.4882896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789608,0.003013768,0.0001238072,0.0006745438,0.00003139907,0.00003044432,0.00004127193,0.00001431678,0.0171097],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06828039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1357659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630523282","doi":"10.5040/9781472560292","title":"Justifying Private Law Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Private law; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Theme (computing); Punishment (psychology); Conflict of laws; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Comparative law; Psychology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07381252395668485,"gpt":0.3005734188868517,"spread":0.2267608949301668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007890741,0.0005777876,0.0007294341,0.002169408,0.003929481,0.006304861,0.001747437,0.006904378,0.01271121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02630741,0.0003575375,0.000459196,0.0009855349,0.01555509,0.007345353,0.005358948,0.006916381,0.001970082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009227317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01133108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008294575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01122855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863839,0.00444235,0.0003957426,0.0008215056,0.006607811,0.001348572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924534,0.003267496,0.0007044279,0.001142731,0.002069551,0.0003624359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003778261,0.000009702362,0.00007524707,0.00002140279,0.000002578044,0.00002743337,0.0003167908,0.0003660294,0.00004836542,0.9859201,0.005432161,0.007776365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144696,0.00003238103,0.0005548514,0.0003462425,0.00001373693,0.00009081953,0.000730965,0.001859618,0.0004049983,0.8318824,0.1640469,0.00002250528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01949611,0.006467422,0.02331422,0.04949764,0.001304598,0.00009952739,0.0001180303,0.0001724337,0.8995301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8034778,0.003535686,0.007764906,0.005206883,0.001054686,0.0001393752,0.0001114783,0.000104524,0.1786048],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01271121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06694919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557657977","doi":"","title":"Waters' law of trusts in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Donovan Waters","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Gillen","is_ca":false},{"name":"David L. Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01467823862489577,"gpt":0.2504534176556549,"spread":0.2357751790307592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00207953,0.0005124352,0.0005950851,0.00192251,0.01689562,0.01288618,0.002268867,0.007802473,0.01159254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01105722,0.0008722246,0.0006206249,0.003608705,0.01189599,0.003997329,0.00332569,0.007090602,0.0008490401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1046582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1528003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947692,0.0004811235,0.0001375131,0.0004497554,0.002241715,0.001920658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965308,0.000671,0.0001608386,0.0001812749,0.001772054,0.0006839414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004215656,0.000003752215,0.0002357734,0.000009033912,0.000003057802,0.00004842208,0.0007437039,0.0002353749,0.00001595349,0.9738491,0.02174841,0.003103248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003297504,0.00001372944,0.003726059,0.0003326728,0.00004499544,0.0001229528,0.003728596,0.00203527,0.0001964321,0.3934989,0.5961553,0.0001120902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02109908,0.005329875,0.003858485,0.03952179,0.0004025079,0.0001063537,0.0004420107,0.0000724451,0.9291675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5633041,0.004135882,0.002088281,0.008159572,0.0002187024,0.000119752,0.0001404573,0.00009021845,0.421743],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1046582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7593522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03096325639208147,"gpt":0.3228814066680886,"spread":0.2919181502760071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006553776,0.00033187,0.0004477115,0.002311563,0.004082077,0.008767785,0.0008354883,0.003137588,0.006543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268372,0.0003577375,0.0004884173,0.001566403,0.04641888,0.01259506,0.005229358,0.004643221,0.0006032125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005329336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004074353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00201317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938409,0.003310393,0.000215021,0.0006366215,0.001422814,0.0005742052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887214,0.007543871,0.0008595322,0.001211724,0.001046065,0.0006173546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.550631e-7,0.000001551029,0.00002696798,0.000002473653,3.863231e-7,0.000005611491,0.0002220956,0.00005072614,0.000007489224,0.9991425,0.000138989,0.0004005723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003847049,0.000002770329,0.00008845708,0.00003120436,0.000001614782,0.0000145067,0.0002776012,0.0003488151,0.00004312251,0.9895744,0.009610858,0.000002937564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05873137,0.003745024,0.07939199,0.03800921,0.0003739626,0.00006548883,0.00009446368,0.00008595832,0.8195025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844232,0.0008439925,0.003288093,0.001148063,0.0002828922,0.00005141082,0.00002197058,0.00002348736,0.009916909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008767785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03866726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210955357","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564","title":"Dimensions of Private Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Tort; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law; Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Comparative law; Computer science; Philosophy; Liability; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02744762640502238,"gpt":0.2428728807868467,"spread":0.2154252543818243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002367186,0.0003746622,0.0003379254,0.002663299,0.005020885,0.01290374,0.0005660615,0.002681151,0.007373161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003605211,0.0003433771,0.000343344,0.002741812,0.04386474,0.01402404,0.006289816,0.004255486,0.0005346745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01072542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007242771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005701883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005416717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.001369546,0.0001271675,0.0004442284,0.001260889,0.0003890584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980716,0.0007840182,0.0002037313,0.0003468892,0.0002162159,0.0003776476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.917822e-7,0.000002698475,0.00006234178,0.000003580528,4.135929e-7,0.000003344394,0.0006750432,0.00002295121,0.00001132309,0.9973483,0.0005440775,0.001325153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003223389,0.000003752614,0.0004184833,0.00004101884,0.000001355351,0.00003799111,0.001175951,0.0001319916,0.00001878524,0.946869,0.05129534,0.000003019365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02292146,0.009445788,0.01153428,0.02411804,0.0002426507,0.0000614349,0.0001488637,0.00004239839,0.9314852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314781,0.007681642,0.007518274,0.002434586,0.0004244729,0.0001888153,0.0001420213,0.00004253236,0.05008956],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01290374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07781875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391964660","doi":"10.51644/9781771120999","title":"Literary Land Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; History; Art","authors":[{"name":"Margery Fee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04688339718372395,"gpt":0.334746389920026,"spread":0.2878629927363021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001468162,0.0004669845,0.0003585317,0.002739567,0.01257471,0.01285426,0.001521551,0.00302307,0.05196625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006637628,0.0002181875,0.0002900297,0.002818806,0.01136347,0.004965066,0.005307737,0.002583327,0.00973666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01171956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006363251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05288421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09574443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971131,0.0005157724,0.0001203503,0.0004033014,0.001293054,0.0005545013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965484,0.0008381156,0.0001706745,0.0006208607,0.001492652,0.0003292879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002327723,0.0000166933,0.0006300506,0.00008291117,0.000005664755,0.0004094322,0.02252686,0.00005858082,0.0002328304,0.8060789,0.1390617,0.03087307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003169879,0.000004279143,0.0004984766,0.0001330912,0.000003385123,0.0001448836,0.006518944,0.00003718584,0.0001716029,0.01455998,0.9779196,0.00000541593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006722881,0.001708627,0.000523411,0.005762802,0.0006735195,0.00002094449,0.0002024437,0.00005753019,0.9843277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3780441,0.002794868,0.0007103087,0.0035044,0.001274243,0.00006161568,0.0007884735,0.0002617766,0.6125602],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05288421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1738444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261242864","doi":"","title":"The Adulteration of Fiduciary Doctrine in Corporate Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Context (archaeology); Law; Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Corporate governance; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management","authors":[{"name":"Robert Flannigan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107755319445859,"gpt":0.2685400989717303,"spread":0.2574625457772717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157399,0.000486121,0.0007302657,0.00200026,0.0054915,0.008558468,0.001403482,0.007678425,0.001647488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02302042,0.0005260141,0.0007145747,0.001574066,0.05873896,0.01178173,0.004293433,0.01482474,0.00059738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008330072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005625537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005173162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002734297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866415,0.006115053,0.0005992286,0.002051101,0.003637926,0.0009551568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860339,0.009022503,0.001077761,0.001909915,0.001651355,0.0003045568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002796066,0.000002642185,0.00003060644,0.000006637874,6.686265e-7,0.00001061767,0.0006099287,0.00003607035,0.00003128167,0.996744,0.000551237,0.001973563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001154125,0.00004358187,0.0002380229,0.0001044539,0.000003707212,0.00009751673,0.0002452293,0.0006036928,0.0002588708,0.9322915,0.06608273,0.0000192895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06032311,0.03825954,0.1822977,0.1283876,0.00301336,0.00008551178,0.0001216145,0.0002338356,0.5872775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9337229,0.005391124,0.01994137,0.01359475,0.002300823,0.0001330088,0.00004133613,0.00009090406,0.02478374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0157399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08324158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128352995","doi":"10.1017/s000819730600715x","title":"A RE-APPRAISAL OF THE FIDUCIARY SELF-DEALING AND FAIR-DEALING RULES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Fiduciary; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Settlor; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Database","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Conaglen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01555527277765088,"gpt":0.2916567480682056,"spread":0.2761014752905547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03446482,0.0007266101,0.001264661,0.002433951,0.008267656,0.01344642,0.005604788,0.01687136,0.003288683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06633442,0.0007872487,0.001907874,0.001590369,0.04310589,0.01907928,0.006580005,0.03228775,0.0009079397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009949581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01595372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02950422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02141221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9582388,0.01105301,0.002783115,0.005028863,0.01890238,0.003993737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629285,0.02180403,0.001745401,0.004710565,0.007491795,0.001319701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004777333,0.000005129463,0.00005602663,0.00001311277,0.000002253059,0.00002509404,0.0004705377,0.00006702869,0.0000138984,0.9918131,0.00573829,0.001790955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001925355,0.00002237903,0.0005865745,0.000396918,0.00001635303,0.0001049149,0.0009247141,0.000822666,0.0002114707,0.8478202,0.1490349,0.00003976529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02306691,0.02283699,0.04481103,0.3250843,0.008029734,0.0001732261,0.0002509488,0.0001058584,0.575641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436791,0.01006589,0.02101405,0.1500349,0.01069861,0.0005400953,0.0001903704,0.0002604758,0.06351658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03446482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1822696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04325816009345367,"gpt":0.3568442583983873,"spread":0.3135860983049337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004217716,0.0002848852,0.0002875052,0.001885866,0.006649045,0.006452793,0.0008718994,0.003717464,0.006017546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932234,0.000285522,0.0002799536,0.002365711,0.01369575,0.004493503,0.003529404,0.004485718,0.0005114502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2358133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3086606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959956,0.001044771,0.000147803,0.0003188456,0.001112102,0.001380861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.00142289,0.0002479489,0.0001158141,0.0004356155,0.0002651629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003395602,0.0000246462,0.001427631,0.00002981093,0.000006665765,0.0004492604,0.03133714,0.000175196,0.00009775347,0.9494157,0.009568561,0.007433632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006101083,0.00008398715,0.05762367,0.000787185,0.00003502896,0.0003719609,0.02655637,0.000638939,0.0009890893,0.1383153,0.7744406,0.00009674129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646585,0.01800502,0.0009148393,0.02467548,0.0004099894,0.00005561448,0.0002380886,0.00001308735,0.6910294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395392,0.002243944,0.0001945059,0.004254522,0.0002158636,0.0000361989,0.00005253084,0.00001664698,0.05344655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2358133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072498805","doi":"10.1017/s000819731300038x","title":"CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND THE NO-PROFIT RULE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Business; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lionel Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01048198519934603,"gpt":0.2585663839237788,"spread":0.2480843987244328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01287962,0.00052208,0.001275764,0.001086357,0.004908987,0.009675419,0.002149238,0.008690282,0.006098019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03596672,0.0006454558,0.001089,0.0008654526,0.02701926,0.01248347,0.00445281,0.009400544,0.001141062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004848933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004673455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00327384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002872714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873768,0.004871467,0.000618449,0.002015886,0.003421756,0.001695668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702052,0.01914429,0.002285017,0.004356537,0.002957824,0.001051023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003388136,0.000003877148,0.00002538048,0.000004653722,0.000002355238,0.00001609475,0.00007259549,0.00008158838,0.00001459931,0.9988243,0.0004495692,0.0005016111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006615087,0.000002083414,0.00002782194,0.000005821599,0.000002101732,0.00001317986,0.00002737078,0.0002236286,0.00002535072,0.9981045,0.001558543,0.000002888237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06617557,0.004015703,0.1149315,0.06186718,0.0009139618,0.0001302133,0.0001485313,0.0001131027,0.7517043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651747,0.000703022,0.005283598,0.002969616,0.0006076447,0.0001259087,0.00002410156,0.00003829143,0.0250732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01287962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0681147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Josée G. Lavoie","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amohia Boulton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judith Dwyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06613390136467633,"gpt":0.3548929265915542,"spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007975396,0.0003875299,0.0006162992,0.002611451,0.01716139,0.006576316,0.002430241,0.001334302,0.003360987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0190721,0.000394269,0.0003932375,0.007060662,0.01750571,0.004097934,0.005239602,0.002307665,0.0001197695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09743371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08367603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935216,0.00275894,0.0001922514,0.000372317,0.001479453,0.001675476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887741,0.006556722,0.001111036,0.0004203132,0.002059498,0.001078414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005296371,0.0001143319,0.04205206,0.0002172295,0.00003220638,0.001673282,0.7531856,0.001510294,0.0002045159,0.1652756,0.002117103,0.03356488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002541891,0.00004736619,0.1039425,0.000408594,0.00004067252,0.0002561608,0.8248477,0.003851653,0.0001637976,0.0219461,0.04440989,0.00006025259],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048446,0.002709381,0.003854371,0.006989579,0.00003131111,0.0002676229,0.0001544933,0.00002054334,0.08112821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991801,0.001375026,0.002561027,0.0002374143,0.000009895064,0.00007873087,0.00006576894,0.00001653518,0.003854621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09743371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7069343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118854655","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Settlor; Trust law; Law and economics; Business; Property law; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lionel Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08946151875835523,"gpt":0.4285776937241007,"spread":0.3391161749657455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01355086,0.001021466,0.001159543,0.003374085,0.00403152,0.0120932,0.005374306,0.008612657,0.01495006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06121174,0.001157547,0.003158204,0.002121139,0.01999482,0.0301909,0.01534866,0.009648795,0.00265324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005853539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002729501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004035952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002234356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864093,0.003531921,0.0008738451,0.002444562,0.005550966,0.001189505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630868,0.01972711,0.001906089,0.01253715,0.002270234,0.0004726642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001368868,0.00001533004,0.0001749345,0.00002094369,0.000007647975,0.000282319,0.0005710432,0.0009855443,0.0002603689,0.9946539,0.0004168702,0.002597413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001843595,0.00001770386,0.000126257,0.000053892,0.00002620641,0.0001838757,0.0001774065,0.00366145,0.0009017542,0.9832081,0.0116078,0.00001697416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1815745,0.001800264,0.3320249,0.0173812,0.0005270502,0.0004404012,0.0003936321,0.0006209201,0.4652371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045425,0.001211856,0.04793392,0.001758353,0.0005800496,0.0002443133,0.0002796894,0.0002112137,0.043238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01495006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07166469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Farmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079713037986742,"gpt":0.2385564415872736,"spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409872,0.0001650067,0.0003732899,0.00136447,0.004434455,0.004766481,0.0006758126,0.001168135,0.00364331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004366247,0.0001936879,0.0003001504,0.00158098,0.05115286,0.003905024,0.006354983,0.001674566,0.0002080497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007751212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006333893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03475576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0320064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953159,0.002305628,0.0001547226,0.0006459387,0.0006419654,0.0009357338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974664,0.0008774724,0.0004196751,0.0003933188,0.0004977662,0.0003453599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002130937,0.000001472288,0.0005824706,0.000007610364,0.000001863457,0.00002537043,0.003627037,0.0001383523,0.00003414693,0.9935398,0.00026153,0.001778295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001487316,0.00003394781,0.0106677,0.0001720717,0.00002031405,0.0003510467,0.01625158,0.001217028,0.0002675086,0.8726461,0.0983303,0.00002751884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3221626,0.006220206,0.02282061,0.0131493,0.0001146256,0.00004740453,0.0001020889,0.00005468606,0.6353285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948776,0.000489786,0.0007066726,0.0001815387,0.00001635333,0.0000125829,0.00001354407,0.000006659493,0.003695237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03475576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06910694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093834217","doi":"10.4324/9781003122609-10","title":"Recovering Misdirected Money from Banks: Ministerial Receipt at Law and in Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Financial system; Law and economics; Monetary economics; Law; Accounting; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Bryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0606704291982241,"gpt":0.3115246814119224,"spread":0.2508542522136983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017504,0.0003053609,0.0002388187,0.0008385486,0.004896053,0.009199237,0.0008348484,0.002861399,0.006237155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00574788,0.0002523075,0.000154394,0.001355196,0.01348151,0.00643565,0.004115202,0.005693935,0.001538913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007675605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003900327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007590904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01225465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983304,0.0007533115,0.00004806294,0.000127513,0.0004843831,0.0002563461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990892,0.0005208798,0.00009334193,0.0001007529,0.0001104455,0.000085375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004979901,0.000006136265,0.0000789916,0.00001088949,4.968927e-7,0.0000541579,0.003710133,0.00002925673,0.00002660761,0.9697731,0.0193734,0.006931911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001067402,0.00001487032,0.0006256021,0.0002517592,0.000003210527,0.0002401787,0.003483776,0.0002002323,0.0002741062,0.2759653,0.718919,0.0000112828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01126101,0.0166872,0.002209789,0.0369868,0.001132736,0.00001907579,0.00002154939,0.00005578011,0.9316261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5113087,0.00911414,0.001439596,0.01261517,0.001217005,0.00005530921,0.00003283128,0.0001146554,0.4641026],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009199237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05569065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","authors":[{"name":"James Goudkamp","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01793305386216588,"gpt":0.2905690088404181,"spread":0.2726359549782523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02375467,0.001334224,0.002233457,0.006850406,0.003850678,0.008057642,0.006364526,0.006083888,0.008863962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04880118,0.001156426,0.002321017,0.002244353,0.04863816,0.02036031,0.008171674,0.01078448,0.001538079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008044443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003587594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980735,0.008564725,0.0008083458,0.002618479,0.005852888,0.001420546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320342,0.03900552,0.005576494,0.01254162,0.008795218,0.002046911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006827922,0.00001830372,0.00032334,0.00004990293,0.00001605449,0.0000287133,0.0002552063,0.0006161472,0.00001453006,0.9941266,0.001227353,0.003317143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000815822,0.000007539287,0.0002071156,0.000059761,0.000006253102,0.00003821124,0.0001769443,0.001337441,0.00002615724,0.9951932,0.002932021,0.000007060082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07663942,0.01399328,0.2360215,0.1828455,0.001590618,0.000253007,0.0006366792,0.000910424,0.4871096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623985,0.004075996,0.01697045,0.007389866,0.001511955,0.0002253675,0.0001678928,0.0001345746,0.007125352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02375467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199187393","doi":"10.1017/s0008197321000775","title":"MAKING SENSE OF MESNE PROFITS: REMEDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Tort; Duty; Breach of contract; Law; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Liability; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Charles Mitchell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Luke Rostill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07136537914229837,"gpt":0.3619567587059496,"spread":0.2905913795636512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01049384,0.0006207701,0.0007571653,0.002686434,0.005545987,0.009611132,0.002343206,0.008921648,0.00771432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02610916,0.0004186346,0.0006072451,0.000880545,0.03271688,0.007445807,0.008958329,0.007530145,0.0007558146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004389414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003971244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002191912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00396783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9809273,0.005795366,0.001175553,0.001908862,0.008030962,0.002161977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859223,0.007548763,0.001634536,0.001610057,0.002465814,0.00081857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002146412,0.00008308041,0.0009825793,0.00005574271,0.00001612442,0.0007308158,0.004121071,0.0006057318,0.0005944152,0.9710788,0.005259749,0.01645044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000497422,0.0001266021,0.004327317,0.0005025557,0.00005693966,0.001247981,0.008705062,0.003315233,0.002928625,0.7851735,0.1934426,0.0001238151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09400146,0.003126192,0.03226206,0.05703374,0.0009835873,0.0002932074,0.00005752645,0.0001554643,0.8120869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693216,0.0005571198,0.004349306,0.003222088,0.0003189064,0.00007658572,0.00001392579,0.00001765269,0.02212284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01049384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05549741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dennis McKerlie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04856816800905384,"gpt":0.3098308887936929,"spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580175,0.0009254347,0.001928956,0.004670972,0.009531512,0.007250072,0.001550433,0.009008225,0.006076212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005634832,0.0007988457,0.001273775,0.00249844,0.03315167,0.008802963,0.003465864,0.009425901,0.001769847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008439918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006329351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01329446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956774,0.00149909,0.0002537759,0.0005845316,0.001409919,0.0005752821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978514,0.001004592,0.0001562174,0.0002511671,0.0005818469,0.0001548603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001679371,0.0000021346,0.000008420142,0.00000730371,0.000001902668,0.000006711248,0.0001821017,0.00004741133,0.000005365738,0.9975715,0.001519583,0.0006458369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006305486,0.000003008646,0.00003127937,0.00001373315,0.000002336383,0.00001448525,0.0000419679,0.00008269184,0.00001745957,0.9879107,0.01187116,0.000004759685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007515504,0.005997184,0.06762736,0.03530819,0.002514745,0.00012456,0.0002366995,0.0001565615,0.8805192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7534103,0.004852525,0.04248855,0.01794822,0.004402267,0.0005749778,0.000120915,0.0001673421,0.1760347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01049532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06123614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01396040738108468,"gpt":0.2380048575908833,"spread":0.2240444502097986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00365257,0.0002537513,0.0004781345,0.001270005,0.00552291,0.007117543,0.001045147,0.002407791,0.003173817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003988346,0.0003419405,0.0004402731,0.001443281,0.06664536,0.01196721,0.005242717,0.002386181,0.0004585836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005326827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003709015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01114236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00869167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996531,0.002248014,0.0001014812,0.0004081517,0.0003692483,0.0003422269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978258,0.001150755,0.0002876662,0.0003533442,0.000160092,0.0002223485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003712969,0.00000284093,0.0001664997,0.000007518795,0.000001607368,0.00002509791,0.003205949,0.0001024307,0.0000249464,0.9944429,0.0003555806,0.001660938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009571071,0.000008022611,0.0005128376,0.00003072567,0.000002477381,0.00003705043,0.002417433,0.0002878714,0.00005101615,0.9739396,0.02269705,0.00000641413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.178613,0.01162635,0.1360158,0.08993901,0.0003916347,0.0001184995,0.0001866683,0.0001997865,0.5829092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860981,0.0009902109,0.005943467,0.001100391,0.0001025049,0.00005612072,0.00002628289,0.00002245215,0.005660516],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01114236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03864896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Vernon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1379899768674786,"gpt":0.4396970784488198,"spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03837847,0.00100216,0.001342859,0.001568682,0.01185798,0.01098564,0.003118726,0.01576378,0.006237167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03932614,0.0005153278,0.001627425,0.001304395,0.0668948,0.01326867,0.01482627,0.02808375,0.002038676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006986674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009472026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008194255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007350233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9689938,0.0132825,0.001324657,0.006080857,0.007103234,0.003214882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800887,0.009170607,0.00201347,0.004272664,0.003396422,0.001058244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006568244,0.000005460284,0.00009597468,0.00001745156,0.000006342938,0.00001809123,0.001510595,0.00005042182,0.00004341773,0.9910423,0.004855058,0.002348355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002619408,0.00003357268,0.0003146368,0.0003178189,0.00001959144,0.0001142742,0.001716967,0.0004190535,0.0006204725,0.7566069,0.2397788,0.00003164826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02798963,0.007913787,0.08182231,0.30708,0.003069713,0.0002140745,0.0001331011,0.00048655,0.571291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6889678,0.002548659,0.01425643,0.195127,0.002228321,0.000797157,0.000109361,0.000486341,0.095479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03837847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2029672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227159011","doi":"","title":"Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Orthodoxy; Preference; Law and economics; Political science; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Berryman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robyn Carroll","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1385218360534975,"gpt":0.4004734201286882,"spread":0.2619515840751907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02111774,0.0002944912,0.0007359845,0.001473102,0.007016515,0.006732928,0.002563423,0.004500614,0.004181065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03809455,0.0004317945,0.0004281299,0.001056164,0.04997281,0.005425965,0.006517872,0.007738383,0.0002739423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008954866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03227419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03406866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690542,0.01305356,0.001581688,0.002457925,0.009620273,0.004232345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972075,0.01698911,0.003333131,0.002824723,0.00335713,0.001420815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007113381,0.00001215623,0.000744124,0.00002744977,0.000005253374,0.00008226104,0.004153208,0.0002615632,0.0001118357,0.9899458,0.0007688532,0.003880328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005310447,0.00006315953,0.007062742,0.0006603836,0.00001677503,0.0003192683,0.009965406,0.001619215,0.0007268946,0.9089391,0.07051433,0.00005958046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2153589,0.005662383,0.05679681,0.1231303,0.0004681894,0.0002432061,0.0001102296,0.00008468133,0.5981454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904612,0.000447517,0.001677054,0.002435645,0.0001398775,0.00006986896,0.000006548773,0.00001741448,0.004744817],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03227419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1116826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235110027","doi":"","title":"Duties, Liabilities and Damages","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stephen A. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01383848270066181,"gpt":0.294221052076906,"spread":0.2803825693762442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002621791,0.0006157039,0.0007698701,0.002962663,0.00284033,0.007074151,0.0009497545,0.003580468,0.02031275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008247397,0.0005121876,0.0005696548,0.002547103,0.008450053,0.005382852,0.002453306,0.004348695,0.005134301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002264343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002613093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002730821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004029048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962379,0.0009237963,0.0003239239,0.0004096058,0.001733903,0.0003708634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976395,0.001118092,0.000265389,0.0004173263,0.0004242643,0.0001353431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096535,0.0000369145,0.0004137007,0.00003215533,0.000005975292,0.00004020662,0.0003547425,0.0002661007,0.0001756058,0.9822142,0.005445121,0.01100453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001005787,0.00002900006,0.001690903,0.00008640051,0.00001326201,0.0002475583,0.0006225092,0.0005187062,0.0001528877,0.9244123,0.07219686,0.00001963665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03275957,0.007830762,0.02226493,0.01103454,0.00105852,0.0001677074,0.001061449,0.00009907883,0.9237235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6260518,0.006801358,0.01556582,0.002186314,0.001874076,0.000522633,0.0004613126,0.00006324922,0.3464735],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02031275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06795293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"L. Green","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0382762265684625,"gpt":0.3736142316878724,"spread":0.3353380051194099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361099,0.001545059,0.001503965,0.004445711,0.006652479,0.01136018,0.002607383,0.02591629,0.03142028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607512,0.001144171,0.001997997,0.00223879,0.007338538,0.007289547,0.007844873,0.01676267,0.01971136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004884465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009935288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943588,0.0008070117,0.0003280018,0.0005967796,0.003126285,0.0007830558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930487,0.001530669,0.0003271771,0.000453148,0.002855995,0.001784232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002499681,0.00006695021,0.00009514491,0.0001123247,0.00000833152,0.0001923619,0.0001640599,0.00009474641,0.0001249166,0.02968539,0.9522463,0.01718449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001290794,0.00002280125,0.0004677049,0.0002834352,0.000005568413,0.00009887593,0.0001083538,0.00003196736,0.00003303758,0.01615988,0.9827627,0.00001270846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001095195,0.07008602,0.000749369,0.3975988,0.4068637,0.00006206059,0.0001759005,0.0001285573,0.1232404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02116449,0.04176198,0.001786961,0.1545452,0.2993651,0.0002843587,0.000445133,0.0002477336,0.480399],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03142028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1051112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02653600188505005,"gpt":0.2331907195830554,"spread":0.2066547176980054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006356104,0.0006912381,0.0005547371,0.001219786,0.008309741,0.01037714,0.0009818316,0.009853047,0.01752615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006596321,0.0004037247,0.0008964988,0.001231282,0.04560178,0.01502124,0.007785562,0.01093062,0.002630793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007680231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004582261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002798239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992648,0.002954986,0.0002924466,0.001398853,0.001453995,0.001251773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957252,0.002600251,0.00032277,0.0006878671,0.0004185842,0.0002455057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001557662,0.00000228248,0.00001429651,0.000004859483,5.921423e-7,0.000006555083,0.0001816847,0.00001796906,0.000007990918,0.9982332,0.0007195686,0.0008094564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009026579,0.000008235475,0.00007060159,0.00004703434,0.000002975906,0.0000428159,0.0002134744,0.00009311529,0.00006924336,0.9352657,0.06417139,0.000006367482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008423177,0.0113276,0.03130741,0.08398916,0.001056912,0.0000562699,0.0001260742,0.00008698538,0.8636264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7914847,0.008810461,0.01003762,0.0381079,0.003757696,0.0002721687,0.0001920356,0.0001821912,0.1471553],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01752615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05863082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609703429","doi":"10.29173/alr494","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Certainty; Treaty; Law; Legal certainty; Subject (documents); Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"T. M. Thomas Isaac","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony Knox","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01602953134337596,"gpt":0.3516439561028977,"spread":0.3356144247595217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007179679,0.0002206316,0.0005588231,0.001218561,0.006972642,0.007934713,0.001564002,0.009542127,0.004011577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01946966,0.0004319834,0.0003152063,0.001257556,0.007701158,0.00200609,0.002194054,0.004960442,0.0007808324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01353628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05800072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5591056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6384595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878499,0.00203029,0.0004551681,0.0006924812,0.007325414,0.001646691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912592,0.003669135,0.0006040753,0.0004667812,0.003131503,0.0008692995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001957333,0.00002402633,0.001755585,0.0002872034,0.00002410524,0.0007069067,0.009691593,0.0003424695,0.0006509881,0.7907968,0.1500408,0.04566002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001749372,0.00003472191,0.008156516,0.0007404371,0.00004214554,0.0004333921,0.003725119,0.000243277,0.0003530045,0.07139664,0.9148025,0.00005473809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0250251,0.04942862,0.002538242,0.1852605,0.001460095,0.0001224228,0.0001532301,0.00007196776,0.7359397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5967588,0.02447854,0.003869307,0.08989973,0.001014524,0.00007213567,0.0001327034,0.00004270287,0.2837316],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4408944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8869819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599550406","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.013","title":"Justice in the <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> Book <scp>v</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Hallvard Fossheim","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09106606279021817,"gpt":0.2819022777579852,"spread":0.190836214967767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006343359,0.0004732972,0.0003553255,0.0009623005,0.003862762,0.00351224,0.0007060011,0.002395786,0.009271048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001351701,0.000215386,0.0002024222,0.001359601,0.005226699,0.002371494,0.001160174,0.003312693,0.002358988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009384124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005468754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04408926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08820177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992425,0.000307995,0.00001940736,0.00007580515,0.0002514573,0.0001027526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997115,0.0001432584,0.00001524476,0.00002931411,0.00008265559,0.00001801754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004732966,0.000005379499,0.00004521621,0.00005153861,0.000001689875,0.00003703587,0.001116167,0.0001194598,0.00005874516,0.8774593,0.1072319,0.01386894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001216904,0.0000030086,0.0001717325,0.0002090629,0.00000152655,0.00006592098,0.0003014097,0.0001131172,0.00009961111,0.1274737,0.8715524,0.000007286812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001039783,0.03030041,0.002080815,0.007891521,0.0009746223,0.00001980172,0.0000527203,0.00003622498,0.9576041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06626331,0.02032089,0.002810672,0.008238187,0.0008910781,0.0001774641,0.0001341194,0.0001009341,0.9010633],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04408926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08766526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0215834691220999,"gpt":0.276891843250878,"spread":0.255308374128778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004630793,0.0002521785,0.000369024,0.0006866153,0.004571698,0.01038711,0.0008224976,0.007132017,0.01039829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008475075,0.000234557,0.0003349507,0.0006378408,0.02294275,0.01249315,0.002904972,0.007771339,0.002369799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003159113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004184328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951338,0.002217722,0.0001252391,0.0007823444,0.001191898,0.0005490183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964319,0.001752137,0.0003537055,0.000426727,0.0004683381,0.0005670909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003475936,0.00001359759,0.00022252,0.00005230531,0.000004636909,0.00007065808,0.003858588,0.00008051733,0.00007874671,0.9519836,0.03338572,0.01024568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006379811,0.00001373333,0.0002844447,0.0002693814,0.000005681258,0.0002489565,0.004990518,0.0002453898,0.0001191871,0.53395,0.4598534,0.00001284597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01360679,0.01994938,0.02668688,0.5485696,0.0056347,0.00004123146,0.00005554234,0.0001891841,0.3852668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432096,0.01955945,0.009489493,0.1543538,0.006837118,0.00009588948,0.00008796436,0.0001794861,0.1661872],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01039829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03478575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035728806","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808727","title":"Preventing corporate failure: the Cadbury Committee’s corporate governance report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit committee; Corporate governance; Stock exchange; Audit; Enforcement; Business; Chief audit executive; Internal audit; Finance; Joint audit; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mohammed B. Hemraj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06757351824286159,"gpt":0.2882434556933058,"spread":0.2206699374504442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01652495,0.0008370649,0.000384494,0.002928628,0.007696623,0.0112905,0.002315358,0.01224168,0.006230101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342358,0.0006789002,0.0005369365,0.00176549,0.006413684,0.003287549,0.004618159,0.007738675,0.002283745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01276451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07958783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4125176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4499522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9651138,0.005581656,0.001908547,0.001475073,0.02135312,0.004567734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976361,0.004264512,0.002337793,0.001394017,0.01126339,0.004379137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008008251,0.00002403377,0.0007041538,0.0000592061,0.000005437289,0.00009733789,0.0007324373,0.0001565627,0.0001084504,0.05245109,0.9233019,0.02235126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001201336,0.00001785048,0.002931095,0.0002328873,0.000006051425,0.00004473923,0.0003547771,0.0000893667,0.0001534648,0.0029922,0.9931269,0.00003866599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007247339,0.02417516,0.006015634,0.597013,0.02168423,0.0007765404,0.001195615,0.0005162673,0.3413763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1697233,0.02249338,0.01484548,0.2263755,0.009345235,0.001184391,0.002235577,0.0006253831,0.5531718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.820233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}