{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2078,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2078,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"bbb2ea18f736","filters":{"topic":"Legal principles and applications"}},"results":[{"id":"W2139608255","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103622","title":"Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal `Technicalities' as Resources for Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Law; Temporality; Sociology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0295579003119574,"gpt":0.3803226695723262,"spread":0.3507647692603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007743859,0.0001169914,0.0002130635,0.00003082285,0.002952409,0.00015929,0.0001463943,0.0001107865,0.00001319415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002458881,0.0001066547,0.0001036323,0.0001745917,0.0007098418,0.0002472976,0.00005320427,0.0001371952,0.000009162767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007007678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009698145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009980858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988917,0.0001107523,0.0001930073,0.0002404387,0.0002480062,0.0003160782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994118,0.0002186221,0.00008080641,0.00007932663,0.0001392439,0.0000701785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003552629,0.00003551493,0.00004666281,0.000006594172,0.00003354943,4.88753e-7,0.02416588,2.337081e-7,0.0000622497,0.9521249,0.006226137,0.01726229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001825931,0.00006821156,0.002520359,0.000008276157,0.00004216578,5.273037e-7,0.02473469,9.926994e-7,0.00003420602,0.1227717,0.8495033,0.0001329291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5171079,0.004513272,0.000532916,0.09148419,0.0003551076,0.001330025,0.00005827964,0.0005897448,0.3840286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867778,0.0004147551,0.0001636566,0.0009631861,0.001403663,0.00009470961,0.000002001817,0.000008590861,0.01017161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612390946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.001.0001","title":"Atiyah’s Introduction To The Law Of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Exposition (narrative); Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Exclusion clause; Commercial law; Private law; Political science; Sociology; Contract management; Economics; Management; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01609054020179672,"gpt":0.2924159980985068,"spread":0.27632545789671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003095737,0.00006325985,0.0001106373,0.00001595493,0.0002602845,0.00003684504,0.0002453357,0.00009857071,0.0005252656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002368635,0.00004240416,0.00006160118,0.0000637242,0.0001618412,0.00003935986,0.00002905976,0.0001125525,0.0001929268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009534024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001988345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01710979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0486878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.00002804134,0.0001584699,0.0001376981,0.0002317473,0.0001071644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994905,0.0000501573,0.00009258515,0.0002297155,0.0001017474,0.00003528362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.21964e-7,0.00000524831,7.034125e-7,0.000001348842,0.000003243124,2.33674e-8,0.0002312648,0.000008780366,0.0000034165,0.5911844,0.408009,0.0005519927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001987661,0.000006407936,0.00003511502,0.000003729886,0.00001300001,7.319402e-8,0.00005886622,0.000001442646,0.00001368511,0.009588663,0.990204,0.00005508004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001111292,0.00002883828,0.000276954,0.03893472,0.000162044,0.0003871205,0.00002410943,0.00002870095,0.9601464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01235233,0.000009829269,0.000141694,0.0005415138,0.004081812,0.00002122614,0.0000248338,0.000007130232,0.9828196],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.582195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18233132","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660643.003.0006","title":"Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03117693106489048,"gpt":0.2737984705954415,"spread":0.242621539530551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001684209,0.00005207129,0.0000611115,0.00001718809,0.000499221,0.00003496746,0.0001265959,0.00003742719,0.00002387668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001188418,0.00005344597,0.00002385367,0.00001248101,0.0001610044,0.0001627178,0.0001167626,0.00005801848,0.000001035266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006271675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000281998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002273716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994695,0.00004205323,0.00004656369,0.00009054168,0.0001367604,0.0002146028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996431,0.00003723214,0.00003583638,0.0000971101,0.00002665333,0.0001600032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008649984,0.00002498285,0.001860547,0.000003360379,0.00001453779,0.000001107958,0.005187677,2.386734e-7,0.00004651191,0.9876778,0.000514581,0.004660015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001495704,0.00000871213,0.002783375,0.000003963786,0.00002230199,2.474155e-7,0.002714089,0.000004229654,0.0001547701,0.0001363246,0.9939524,0.00007000916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1221943,0.00004967556,0.00009579768,0.0006245383,0.00006967287,0.0002098952,0.000007510173,0.00004878786,0.8766999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272948,0.0002290669,0.00014284,0.00008026582,0.00008607774,0.000001533058,0.000001499558,0.000002792542,0.07216116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3839655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304513168927904,"gpt":0.2465368943110173,"spread":0.2234917626217383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379434,0.00003521557,0.00007799811,0.000006933059,0.001447426,0.0000113053,0.0001443635,0.00004119267,0.0003034211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007402626,0.00003046916,0.00002959667,0.00002305706,0.0003999716,0.000460784,0.00006421795,0.00008522046,0.000002330874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006219808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7218105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.00006958297,0.00006242159,0.00007148166,0.0001523583,0.0001097536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997188,0.00001853582,0.00005564757,0.00005480061,0.0000558327,0.00009642432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007281487,0.0002410482,0.007508669,0.000009740302,0.00001535199,0.0001003483,0.05869813,0.00002031884,0.000781048,0.9245343,0.001274646,0.006743609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005334726,0.00004183078,0.01325945,0.00002124249,0.00000690705,0.00002301074,0.007266921,0.00003153187,0.00002997183,0.0009852322,0.9777099,0.00009056892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.313279,0.0002470609,0.0001270911,0.001585016,0.00004387055,0.00009839998,0.000003183458,0.00001133752,0.6846051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970623,0.0007981037,0.0004444138,0.00005102147,0.00004717608,2.706447e-8,2.381886e-7,0.000001571034,0.001595192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235538640228112,"gpt":0.3418535535635373,"spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003687546,0.00007625727,0.0001246234,0.00004845181,0.0008478577,0.0001176044,0.0003063525,0.0000457372,0.00009539941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005280672,0.00004885827,0.00006051185,0.0005269473,0.0005318581,0.0002097046,0.00002570035,0.0003200261,0.00001029757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002832097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004097147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.0002575197,0.0004098152,0.0001142627,0.000404334,0.0003164323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983908,0.0008014556,0.0002016282,0.0001464946,0.0003362986,0.0001233434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118336,0.0008892283,0.02866448,0.00002956027,0.0001688241,0.0005050295,0.2282658,0.0001769084,0.003192663,0.6018135,0.0102207,0.124955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000791829,0.00009665619,0.04545507,0.0000603328,0.00002777525,0.00005490271,0.04871481,0.00002949136,0.0003353591,0.00248032,0.9017515,0.0002019974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390044,0.0006352371,0.0006616244,0.002858213,0.0002723514,0.000220446,0.0000198275,0.00001969688,0.05630823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971521,0.0009151461,0.0001428949,0.0001722295,0.0002099034,0.000002384625,0.00000108134,0.000006938464,0.001397302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614143649","doi":"","title":"Compromised Jurisprudence: Native Title Cases since Mabo","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Law; High Court; Publishing; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07565362637497428,"gpt":0.4484386327215319,"spread":0.3727850063465576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005098807,0.0005061468,0.0006714722,0.0001361574,0.00168718,0.0001788175,0.0005789819,0.000169267,0.0004559273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009021314,0.0004595519,0.0002020506,0.001062271,0.001717492,0.0003734063,0.00005947351,0.0004606247,0.001563348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000748915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000392917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006914416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003147451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966092,0.0001614824,0.0006025273,0.0007239521,0.0008488372,0.001054023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980604,0.0003014657,0.0003011255,0.0003726683,0.0007254059,0.0002389448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004722073,0.0002233163,0.005611895,0.0001042471,0.0004333187,0.0002302984,0.002987212,0.00002958046,0.0001166092,0.479874,0.5096783,0.0006640154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004181776,0.0000881961,0.003928123,0.0001076302,0.000148206,0.00001217091,0.009919525,9.424077e-7,0.000375911,0.003338937,0.9811014,0.0005607819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5046265,0.01345723,0.0000640813,0.07992533,0.00665776,0.003861539,0.001102307,0.001772025,0.3885333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7942087,0.00404358,0.001234232,0.0001997985,0.002152447,0.000183457,0.00002639402,0.00004555201,0.1979059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4765351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248006959","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779008","title":"Vicarious Liability in Tort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Strict liability; Liability; Delict; Legal liability; Law; Joint and several liability; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Public law; Black letter law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01938234972451122,"gpt":0.2461958185591556,"spread":0.2268134688346443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003066236,0.000180732,0.0002647277,0.00009458009,0.000400757,0.00006174197,0.0007641486,0.0006052006,0.00001093576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004163012,0.0002271275,0.000140845,0.00002760778,0.0005706642,0.00008420768,0.0002766886,0.0008740971,0.00002369642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007148649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001226398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01087054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986899,0.00009414876,0.0001587478,0.00043787,0.0002925084,0.0003268345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.0001086197,0.0001275654,0.0005175636,0.0001241962,0.0001985988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001047874,0.00002246049,0.00004645765,0.00001960005,0.00001151332,0.00003274117,0.0005385718,6.266861e-7,0.000009945101,0.9585151,0.04004766,0.0007448458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001783499,0.000006727328,0.0003117434,0.00002487334,0.00003523051,3.352747e-7,0.0001219849,0.000005345801,0.00001260408,0.00004717538,0.9990143,0.0002413628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001306156,0.00002243591,0.00003539453,0.0001146095,0.0002139727,0.0006082546,0.0001414819,0.0001181006,0.9974396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004478086,0.00004432891,0.00007395045,0.00005627386,0.0002762504,0.000002760765,0.0000301617,0.00001681611,0.9950213],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157653217","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303006457","title":"Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs—A Reply to Professor Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Restitution; Law; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02676736807740026,"gpt":0.3219218934099887,"spread":0.2951545253325884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001409175,0.00008093124,0.00009272729,0.00002006151,0.002088876,0.0002249841,0.0002022791,0.00003548772,0.00009421124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009285851,0.00005554575,0.00004451026,0.0001761349,0.000188702,0.0002342272,0.00004092772,0.0003245453,0.00008286077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001483361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008583684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001638553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001448285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988888,0.0002478866,0.0001948922,0.0001372783,0.0002409037,0.0002902669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993098,0.00008670353,0.0001073924,0.0001549247,0.0001308645,0.000210364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590871,0.0000465018,0.0002874764,0.000002082134,0.00002051811,0.000003346809,0.006691751,0.000006105179,0.0003147164,0.9699997,0.02084848,0.00176337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001527917,0.00004328773,0.002955984,0.00001443076,0.00002039814,0.00005221197,0.01374302,0.000002634166,0.0002232464,0.001515737,0.9811785,0.00009772451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4258718,0.0002831024,0.00248194,0.09696639,0.0008773024,0.000842605,0.00001230749,0.00006803572,0.4725965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903687,0.0001374831,0.0002329397,0.002992007,0.0003833433,0.00002320499,4.431534e-7,0.000008642686,0.005853211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965454850","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00208.x","title":"Confidence and the constructive trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Law; Declaration; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Commonwealth; Computer science; History; Process (computing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03741219411040349,"gpt":0.3505393579168602,"spread":0.3131271638064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003723152,0.00004401734,0.0000921503,0.000005969398,0.0009995062,0.00005965036,0.00007095364,0.00001639087,0.00002219425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004772695,0.00002662503,0.00002098427,0.00009093554,0.0019698,0.00008301968,0.00002855069,0.0000648107,0.00001312345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002002235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004026357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001514965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001141937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.0001031308,0.00007091108,0.00009570016,0.0001063573,0.0001160773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.0002783679,0.00003120456,0.0000676324,0.00006606286,0.00002683291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002815525,0.000002517227,0.0005600424,0.000001143286,0.00002009853,3.532991e-7,0.008187997,3.076721e-7,0.000002364865,0.9904658,0.0003872969,0.0003692344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003436498,0.000005405,0.00083289,0.000004804893,0.00001785065,0.000002058852,0.05071006,0.000002516933,0.00004899586,0.1213842,0.8265831,0.00006441861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08778202,0.007499872,0.0002751311,0.02649375,0.0002656962,0.0004837381,0.000005488548,0.00005659465,0.8771377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954624,0.0009742328,0.0001346763,0.0003631344,0.00005702638,0.00003584006,5.338193e-8,0.000001759929,0.002970934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7687495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20162444","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment and the Role of Legal History in England and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; High Court; Doctrine; Commonwealth; Political science; Appeal; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Common law; History; Restitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01080459723266096,"gpt":0.2586162968211432,"spread":0.2478116995884822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124422,0.00004270856,0.00007766939,0.00002740591,0.0001523612,0.00003085458,0.0001031487,0.00002879843,0.0000509338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002488205,0.00002884106,0.00001924007,0.00005014975,0.0002333625,0.0001616947,0.00002131056,0.0004420273,0.000003360394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003750941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004822611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02124042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02371175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990676,0.00008946221,0.0001256399,0.00006623749,0.0001167182,0.0005343084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997633,0.00004822995,0.00006824022,0.00004817796,0.0000277995,0.00004432127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008320504,0.0000147302,0.006108851,9.220975e-7,0.00001019394,9.499638e-8,0.004003448,0.00000117345,0.0001466265,0.9833797,0.00004026997,0.006285653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001414681,0.00006243039,0.01684708,0.000007173976,0.00001973238,0.00002276547,0.0117164,0.00004877745,0.00001783151,0.4174379,0.5523084,0.00009681276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848513,0.006558427,0.00003046218,0.002746338,0.0000313999,0.0001611133,3.707379e-7,0.00000345172,0.005617134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944604,0.002912215,0.00001386176,0.00003348796,0.00009455198,0.000009480146,1.505299e-7,0.00000240964,0.002473443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5659418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230356737","doi":"10.2307/3504968","title":"10.2307/3504968","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Substantive rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107878176035564,"gpt":0.2429843682392999,"spread":0.2319055864789442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001291285,0.00004019636,0.00005041349,0.00001480564,0.0002703009,0.00004980436,0.0001834897,0.00003005191,0.9926003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002062496,0.00003978195,0.00002699083,0.0001855064,0.0000445653,0.00006486699,0.00001613534,0.00003766828,0.9854494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002782932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004343954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006172575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007429094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995072,0.00002404376,0.00006717989,0.0001057415,0.0001305666,0.0001652519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996936,0.00002596138,0.00001005555,0.0001294651,0.00002242639,0.0001185452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006051367,0.00003360102,4.622561e-7,6.780102e-7,0.00000350298,6.25131e-7,0.0002982659,0.00002487417,0.00001995981,0.001313754,0.1851338,0.8131644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003493638,0.0000112392,0.00004664364,0.00000176088,0.000002971441,1.469076e-7,0.000007091774,0.00001467031,0.000006833134,0.00006000727,0.9997532,0.00006047507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001110821,0.00001154805,8.362001e-7,0.003105615,0.000001122247,0.0001261177,0.000006918896,0.0000927908,0.9955443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003925429,6.252833e-7,0.00008707421,0.0001160824,0.0001799419,0.00001905622,0.000002799906,0.000005236888,0.9956638],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8146194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2078964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497077290","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.004","title":"Promises and Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03506470121960031,"gpt":0.2413471066189535,"spread":0.2062824053993532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009550938,0.0001493299,0.000184644,0.00005018464,0.0005490098,0.00007426402,0.0002571572,0.0002410374,0.0000107416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001262607,0.0001769535,0.00007035435,0.000005237202,0.0004673269,0.00008338088,0.0001381915,0.0002274778,0.00001219483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001078243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001552072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001729752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009436536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992272,0.00002387674,0.00008770525,0.0002806443,0.0001797283,0.0002008112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993199,0.00006525218,0.0001136796,0.0002039312,0.00009736708,0.0001998588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001130353,0.000004408213,0.000002814467,0.000009245747,0.00002623906,0.00004269653,0.0001696493,1.086664e-7,0.000006924036,0.9864747,0.01146393,0.001787997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002062757,0.000009398542,0.00002667384,0.00003790698,0.00007952737,0.000002196078,0.0001060237,0.000002493249,0.00001108065,0.00007087737,0.9992456,0.0002018801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002085429,0.0001399257,0.00004603189,0.0001551707,0.00005583822,0.0004498245,0.0001052221,0.0001003405,0.9987391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00587511,0.0006617559,0.00003363974,0.0000647525,0.0001876272,8.308341e-7,0.00001038365,0.00001556563,0.9931504],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7215954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541056688","doi":"10.4324/9780203024393","title":"British System of Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384878821456549,"gpt":0.2475689996684339,"spread":0.2337202114538684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001238837,0.00004972608,0.0001313125,0.000004320523,0.00008191325,0.00005068801,0.0002166143,0.0001247781,0.003325063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007874193,0.000054195,0.00006523188,0.0000216888,0.00009579087,0.00003538382,0.00004769992,0.0000654617,0.0002577506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003855765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001978067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01696574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005849989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.00001385273,0.000156047,0.0001113934,0.0004484631,0.0001005655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996173,0.00003081719,0.0001163267,0.0001341204,0.00004340988,0.00005805649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.235635e-8,0.000004715818,0.000003615398,0.0000299674,0.000006357748,3.115724e-7,0.0000926162,1.134336e-7,8.104707e-7,0.698054,0.3000373,0.001770135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002370164,0.000003380388,0.00003268728,0.00008273076,0.000010065,2.988404e-7,0.0005357605,0.000003155747,0.000002723878,0.0009709335,0.9982708,0.0000638336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002669517,0.00008876438,0.00008601441,0.0001659269,0.00007847071,0.0002999933,0.00005858631,0.00004083007,0.9991547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009064031,0.00008216525,0.0001426769,0.00003094689,0.0002468328,0.00002845469,0.000005234452,0.000007812459,0.9903919],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256221483","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302","title":"Principle and Policy in Contract Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Appeal; Formalism (music); Interdependence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03218009617870159,"gpt":0.2677997957201448,"spread":0.2356196995414432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001827668,0.0001625031,0.0002365569,0.0001154427,0.0003866261,0.0000555917,0.0004092349,0.0003115689,0.000004266992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001836327,0.0001986417,0.00006983837,0.00002198823,0.000637035,0.0001140856,0.0002527205,0.0003492316,0.000009666626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004351775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007160113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0483245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989972,0.00008450145,0.0001270266,0.0003214264,0.0001664379,0.0003034653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992802,0.00007235904,0.0001235102,0.0002672696,0.00005942598,0.0001972602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132193,0.00001297332,0.00001395999,0.00001947189,0.00001501649,0.00003102563,0.0007673342,1.50465e-7,0.000003449268,0.9948249,0.003892096,0.0004064149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002893491,0.000009757219,0.0002213875,0.00004316007,0.00002944591,9.998409e-7,0.00008539501,0.000003879849,0.0000137449,0.0001448554,0.9989517,0.0002063034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004979786,0.00007864895,0.00001675841,0.00008047663,0.00004481771,0.0004845411,0.0001430761,0.0000707996,0.9985829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02255311,0.0001868255,0.00003451619,0.0001361708,0.0002158214,0.000001978838,0.00001513076,0.0000161488,0.9768403],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572287427","doi":"","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Legal liability; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Strict liability; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02775398419859881,"gpt":0.2674589932856077,"spread":0.2397050090870089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01107172,0.0001905918,0.0002751046,0.00006624463,0.00140465,0.0004299052,0.001925525,0.0002774718,0.0001773055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00309497,0.0001663736,0.0002169339,0.0003016749,0.001421615,0.0001817352,0.0004494246,0.0004388353,0.0001099643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002027093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002488242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939662,0.004039044,0.0005036735,0.0004405327,0.0006664654,0.0003840476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904126,0.004366707,0.0005596902,0.00183149,0.00266691,0.0001626245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001013435,0.00006509104,0.0001568743,0.0000339987,0.00001883278,1.075886e-7,0.006160543,5.378858e-7,0.00001657836,0.9532977,0.005974974,0.03427369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006623554,1.745242e-7,0.0002805103,0.0002499983,0.00001664395,2.769083e-7,0.0005306455,0.0001134316,0.0003435654,0.03449736,0.9637318,0.0001693953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004005729,0.001830274,0.00420151,0.02210305,0.0001988502,0.0005685937,0.00007891032,0.0001091933,0.9705091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0585945,0.002441524,0.001497122,0.00004056351,0.0000585587,0.00005302712,0.00008661797,0.00002656528,0.9372015],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935955596404381,"gpt":0.3850370660161229,"spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070636,0.00007724884,0.0001029024,0.00002697033,0.000550747,0.00006421548,0.0002718944,0.00009314171,0.001201373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006378957,0.00007118707,0.00003046512,0.0003176001,0.06060011,0.0001943616,0.00009282873,0.0001889517,0.0003198398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001038353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002873811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001435741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989771,0.0001763556,0.0001510398,0.0001873832,0.0002269383,0.0002812243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990987,0.0005097641,0.00002611887,0.0001858869,0.00006994436,0.0001095529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261255,0.00006165609,0.0001862962,0.000002587431,0.000002636747,0.00001625998,0.003630136,0.00001984352,0.00001466864,0.9951944,0.000424994,0.0004139626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009764964,0.00002484029,0.0001144769,0.00001468416,0.00001319237,0.000004159591,0.004870369,0.00005400699,0.00005580415,0.8050727,0.1895796,0.00009852877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04431149,0.00006474841,0.01670347,0.009292071,0.0003292173,0.0002079273,0.000005740331,0.0001054847,0.9289799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965164,0.0001234906,0.0002941326,0.001321029,0.0003390574,0.00003343296,0.000004256206,0.000006716535,0.001361488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884400","doi":"","title":"To Recognize or Not? Good Faith Under Nigerian Law of Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Good faith; Supreme court; Duty; Jurisdiction; Political science; Faith; Scholarship; Uniform Commercial Code; Meaning (existential); Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03565191012799302,"gpt":0.3205903600874097,"spread":0.2849384499594167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005106703,0.0001161401,0.0002072718,0.00002334112,0.0006160449,0.00013561,0.0004100127,0.0001161737,0.002369267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001526339,0.00009797002,0.00007347552,0.0003256023,0.0004179061,0.0002631867,0.00007485504,0.0001398472,0.001289527],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007829939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002133012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03338704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1911384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986358,0.00009920117,0.0002777082,0.0002886671,0.0003265723,0.0003720391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988354,0.000145648,0.0001065264,0.0003540361,0.0002085848,0.000349761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000702094,0.00007773298,0.0002756295,0.000005339305,0.00002155054,0.000001263274,0.00126433,0.000002405028,0.002667269,0.9925967,0.002065769,0.0009517685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003728711,0.0001250183,0.003348312,0.0000296741,0.00001787431,8.65811e-7,0.0009952021,0.000004383989,0.004822282,0.004926027,0.9851494,0.0002080458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3230631,0.00003562326,0.0007987701,0.01556422,0.0005232649,0.000914663,0.0001319379,0.0001881051,0.6587803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829501,0.000009682994,0.001958424,0.005947298,0.0007774843,0.00004126939,0.000004277691,0.00001704076,0.008294437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542624731","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559152.003.0002","title":"Criminal Law as Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Political science; Morality; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Private law; Analogy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.120467672058992,"gpt":0.3234492986800562,"spread":0.2029816266210642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001971701,0.0001436157,0.0001513426,0.00002616685,0.0006794865,0.0001715642,0.0004400945,0.0002844041,0.02244167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008677802,0.00012979,0.0001243274,0.00001810018,0.0006497427,0.0001672153,0.0001018991,0.0002301355,0.005739382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000644933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001997524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03521474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05922622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989979,0.00001279482,0.0001683732,0.0002622765,0.0003074909,0.0002511846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992577,0.00003524233,0.00008558321,0.0002956743,0.0001190876,0.0002067438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.703994e-7,0.00001012372,3.686563e-7,0.000003565032,0.00001132952,0.000001895092,0.000636559,5.203939e-9,6.14158e-7,0.9946207,0.003576297,0.001137809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001989637,0.0000080531,7.616295e-7,0.000004742256,0.00001785209,5.290053e-7,0.00007771886,6.605696e-8,0.000003549366,0.3745398,0.625213,0.0001140086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003550591,0.00006781161,0.00004638684,0.003111265,0.0001227002,0.0002012467,0.00001377031,0.0001425027,0.9962907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05769918,0.0001022077,0.0001800752,0.002771865,0.0005022925,0.00001567169,0.00001512359,0.00002290233,0.9386907],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6216367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211105127","doi":"10.1090/surv/148","title":"Ordering Braids","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Mathematical surveys and monographs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Mathematics; Materials science; Composite material","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04144003946280374,"gpt":0.2974285378805621,"spread":0.2559884984177583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544051,0.0001926685,0.0003429803,0.00008464817,0.0006155694,0.0001187109,0.0002248152,0.0002824559,0.0002834727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001079994,0.0001709111,0.0001484484,0.0001466366,0.0005424373,0.00007162082,0.00009893303,0.0002604289,0.000115715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003560022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001715426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001937194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003236274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985805,0.0002265787,0.0002779301,0.0002821235,0.0003186485,0.0003142006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.0003713871,0.00009426154,0.0002363348,0.00006022331,0.0002350263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.60724e-7,0.00005318866,0.0001044812,0.00007761068,0.00004391026,0.000005025237,0.001958922,2.128621e-7,0.000001003545,0.9636742,0.01491445,0.01916632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000723773,0.00001406484,0.0003133103,0.00005749287,0.00002221028,0.000002524904,0.00008338837,0.00001488983,7.723903e-7,0.1524063,0.8467774,0.0002352904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004860895,0.0005204949,0.006680647,0.0003545229,0.000058753,0.0003635286,0.00004704271,0.0001255005,0.9913634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01190874,0.003468449,0.002094971,0.0001223168,0.0003716116,0.00007642028,0.00005798365,0.00005768908,0.9818418],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.831863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6969554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W352683167","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-2421","title":"Civil servants and their constitutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Political science; Law; History; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1336717964290577,"gpt":0.3676040947423057,"spread":0.233932298313248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000245828,0.00007382694,0.0001585108,0.00001676697,0.0004592294,0.00003999534,0.0001442717,0.00003946257,0.0004926753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002978767,0.00005409688,0.00004814763,0.0002134845,0.0002248183,0.0001277963,0.00003510939,0.00009344525,0.0001848971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002386696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002454397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003591077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007637755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993855,0.00007060298,0.0001761906,0.0001467747,0.00006377868,0.0001571844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.00009145519,0.00006301449,0.000179805,0.00003696973,0.000117416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.087878e-7,0.0005878077,0.005903792,0.0001670143,0.00002587191,0.000001402925,0.005464224,0.000002539939,0.0003119915,0.2106064,0.0373476,0.7395806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006400781,0.00000349015,0.0006759399,0.00006189099,0.000008415133,8.869284e-7,0.0001388795,0.00009989676,0.000002583628,0.000259134,0.9986153,0.00006963426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09375413,0.3276988,0.001728097,0.08250283,0.000576425,0.003474426,0.0005869484,0.0004824037,0.489196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6244381,0.3535357,0.002541414,0.00367676,0.001457657,0.0001126331,0.00004360333,0.0000169147,0.01417726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5394449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01579050959091266,"gpt":0.2533316598242262,"spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008660387,0.00007137463,0.000134113,0.00006523562,0.001990057,0.0000821711,0.0004030012,0.0000666139,0.000121123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002172093,0.00007351188,0.00004404554,0.0002282274,0.0001982135,0.0004857501,0.00005204929,0.0004070134,0.000009571142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001690508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006802718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05888196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989911,0.0002113497,0.000144067,0.0000993867,0.000219824,0.0003342514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.0001061227,0.0001336219,0.000117381,0.00008418508,0.0002124858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002319529,0.00004785506,0.03082862,0.000004979438,0.000004654534,0.000004427906,0.001696101,0.00007435604,0.000001795676,0.959352,0.0001705648,0.007791467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004935974,0.00004973472,0.02677643,0.00002114767,0.000006020507,0.000005403052,0.002785316,0.0003847821,0.000004216673,0.001061906,0.9683172,0.00009428158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195266,0.00001901547,0.000304158,0.004302915,0.0001020466,0.00009264369,0.000003983692,0.00002827017,0.5756204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997647,0.0005591977,0.000300593,0.0003235517,0.0001538947,2.135437e-7,0.00000146938,0.000004388527,0.001009659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246024616","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834","title":"The Theory of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Contract theory; Public law; Law; Philosophy of law; Normative; Exclusion clause; Frustration of purpose; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Privity of contract; Contract management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02622442049486077,"gpt":0.2429123247132939,"spread":0.2166879042184331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275065,0.000124795,0.0001855297,0.00002396156,0.001071742,0.00005259825,0.0007932257,0.0002157497,0.000005283782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002339843,0.000111442,0.0001629741,0.00001411673,0.0013627,0.00005533363,0.0001536918,0.0002857001,0.000008392802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000196856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004756826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003131384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003217884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990075,0.0001785471,0.0001305885,0.0001903838,0.0002597636,0.0002332786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986345,0.0004932993,0.0002203014,0.0003864368,0.0001622482,0.0001032149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002458104,0.000007422296,7.652612e-7,0.000007906969,0.00004704769,0.000009321546,0.0002464528,3.711566e-7,0.00000363931,0.9539183,0.04442782,0.001306356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001390238,0.000008337319,0.000009139271,0.00002774072,0.00008510404,5.260386e-7,0.0003700682,0.000001842382,0.00002727652,0.0004556128,0.9987516,0.000123718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000341845,0.0001539836,0.0001338021,0.0000888119,0.000108528,0.000385844,0.0001472686,0.00005397556,0.9988936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006079704,0.0003403084,0.000008951568,0.00006391737,0.0001954092,0.000001099701,0.00001120157,0.0000123074,0.9932871],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.824308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202003056","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Nature of State Legal Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Duty","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01036644715519271,"gpt":0.2947773851912057,"spread":0.284410938036013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002011144,0.00005708261,0.00007852107,0.00002074459,0.002016654,0.0000395758,0.0003993599,0.00007043675,0.00001495227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115173,0.00003916736,0.00008671145,0.0001968124,0.0002503394,0.0001578144,0.00002707281,0.00193628,0.0000104156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002535775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003940173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01123759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982083,0.000124343,0.0001746138,0.00008581058,0.0003321333,0.001074739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.00008809633,0.0001303148,0.0001209279,0.0001165049,0.00006549211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009866896,0.00002331695,0.0007096407,4.902149e-7,0.00002581308,0.000001207272,0.0009230878,0.000004007112,0.00003623299,0.9903989,0.0007835281,0.007083843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001458854,0.00004651837,0.002893357,0.000003370018,0.00000895359,0.00006872403,0.003028452,0.00001608081,0.00009550157,0.412958,0.5806526,0.00008259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191582,0.007173308,0.001531332,0.01916135,0.0004298065,0.0002312317,0.000008319077,0.00004502672,0.05226146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779701,0.0112685,0.00003085547,0.00005113266,0.0003402278,0.000002534286,5.003167e-7,0.000005409196,0.01033079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.579869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610974288","doi":"","title":"Restitution at the crossroads : a comparative study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Mistake; German; Law; English law; Political science; Position (finance); Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11326347407508,"gpt":0.4139500714319048,"spread":0.3006865973568247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004177152,0.0001120877,0.0001490658,0.00001924034,0.001974294,0.0001409765,0.0003592802,0.0001093981,0.001599921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000170811,0.00007084754,0.00006643053,0.0001100113,0.0005885146,0.00005883477,0.0001336239,0.0002127336,0.001185734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005065635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006083298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004531874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1098914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989591,0.0001008985,0.0001591073,0.0002284113,0.0003766001,0.0001758502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993179,0.0001270525,0.0001001298,0.0003033927,0.00009146437,0.00006005812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005483778,0.00008536512,0.0001625507,0.000001173437,0.00002834788,0.000002209449,0.01623416,0.00001499829,6.466389e-7,0.5895619,0.3935874,0.0003157129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008169246,0.00002216383,0.000424658,0.000005152391,0.00002683867,3.482037e-7,0.003486707,0.000003641675,6.525551e-7,0.004730816,0.9911159,0.0001013716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001430602,0.00008262823,0.00005522913,0.001679767,0.0001021336,0.00114831,0.0000136742,0.00007308136,0.9954146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05534993,0.00004677287,0.00001088845,0.0001261064,0.0004453259,0.00009218858,0.00001936097,0.000005585708,0.9439039],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5975286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630523282","doi":"10.5040/9781472560292","title":"Justifying Private Law Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Private law; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Theme (computing); Punishment (psychology); Conflict of laws; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Comparative law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07381252395668485,"gpt":0.3005734188868517,"spread":0.2267608949301668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008392175,0.0002648541,0.000333888,0.0001119299,0.002152998,0.00240225,0.001076386,0.0005727835,0.0001179992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003586689,0.0002715537,0.0001864834,0.0000617138,0.000806527,0.001018369,0.0003250646,0.001009153,0.0002281616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000408674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001139484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001900563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004023272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975765,0.00008519838,0.0003880699,0.0004973356,0.0008822035,0.0005706978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984472,0.0002026927,0.0003023252,0.0005317369,0.0002442984,0.0002717677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001129059,0.000004766656,0.000002377355,0.00002215514,0.00001681944,0.000007957772,0.003304801,3.694836e-7,0.0000104571,0.7042742,0.2908187,0.001536267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000907908,0.000005541812,0.000006508845,0.0001344325,0.00003013557,0.00000245582,0.0001512592,0.000002022455,0.0000227392,0.02599171,0.9732518,0.0003106509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003515839,0.0001748012,0.00004836715,0.002921673,0.0006249674,0.0004291543,0.00005137446,0.0004835771,0.9952309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003219705,0.0001062451,0.0006730533,0.001658644,0.003223591,0.00007936834,0.0001110344,0.00006529709,0.9908631],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6824331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557657977","doi":"","title":"Waters' law of trusts in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01467823862489577,"gpt":0.2504534176556549,"spread":0.2357751790307592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003568975,0.0002360432,0.0004536756,0.00007202454,0.0001902481,0.00003133048,0.0006332833,0.0002644937,0.0002167983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001075286,0.0002389642,0.0001170477,0.00004806653,0.0003445508,0.00004427883,0.0001055697,0.0004217561,0.00004777046],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001606686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006897555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9559243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980568,0.00009211964,0.0004791977,0.0003386062,0.0005651828,0.0004681466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989771,0.0001201731,0.0002366357,0.0004215204,0.00007505712,0.0001695198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001028192,0.00001739001,0.00007160213,0.00005777906,0.0000274601,0.00001722248,0.00444821,0.00002735631,0.00002163776,0.9706708,0.01543758,0.009192703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001703065,0.000007980194,0.00005277852,0.00009442366,0.00002616163,5.464923e-7,0.0004159303,0.000006640083,0.0001586073,0.007542889,0.9912647,0.0002590302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001717069,0.0001350957,0.000003188739,0.0003894732,0.0001796082,0.0004921761,0.0001101049,0.00003147703,0.9969418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2869185,0.00004178778,0.00008969645,0.0003340366,0.0004124315,0.00002853974,0.00002272498,0.00003295867,0.7121193],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03096325639208147,"gpt":0.3228814066680886,"spread":0.2919181502760071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125334,0.00006908748,0.00009102749,0.00003202557,0.0001726774,0.000112217,0.0002909045,0.00006498351,0.0001038165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001182384,0.00006505165,0.00003904546,0.0002295033,0.000292735,0.0003768681,0.00005964902,0.0001657703,0.0002829508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001151498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001616482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008717176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990099,0.0001956773,0.0001341946,0.0001591063,0.0002282901,0.0002728101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.00007094273,0.0000361114,0.0001821014,0.00003432361,0.0001600048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001575606,0.00003283819,0.0001578661,9.643287e-7,0.000002625535,0.000006813314,0.002618783,0.00001677982,0.00004538028,0.9957712,0.0005043739,0.0008266299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744865,0.00001069515,0.0001531861,0.000005222989,0.000002191609,5.63694e-7,0.001620419,0.0000074122,0.00008435397,0.1575669,0.840291,0.00008361947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08615957,0.0000868231,0.0002452458,0.00312911,0.0002026214,0.0001711712,0.000004266989,0.00008382795,0.9099174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882125,0.000007315586,0.0002343946,0.001048829,0.0002100993,0.00001938732,0.000002287665,0.000008854229,0.01025639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210955357","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564","title":"Dimensions of Private Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Tort; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law; Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Comparative law; Computer science; Philosophy; Liability; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02744762640502238,"gpt":0.2428728807868467,"spread":0.2154252543818243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001491623,0.0001516818,0.0002538142,0.0000567363,0.0005463728,0.00002364075,0.0004888183,0.0002741795,0.000006211918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001356849,0.0001602758,0.0001626616,0.00002179733,0.0007570906,0.00006359808,0.0001882862,0.0002637465,0.00001367678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002394829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005373921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001683703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005870255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989652,0.0001035585,0.0001458031,0.0002708739,0.0002766907,0.0002378423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989893,0.00008161202,0.0002077998,0.0004077319,0.0001506061,0.0001629479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004688558,0.00001268738,8.568358e-7,0.00002090763,0.00003272515,0.000008864692,0.0001580816,0.000001021944,0.00002450692,0.8953388,0.1043434,0.00005339509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001526924,0.000009954626,0.000002557267,0.00004967969,0.00009900062,4.269581e-7,0.00008179994,0.000001544739,0.0001661845,0.0001354751,0.9991175,0.0001831992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009551626,0.0000566646,0.0001120123,0.00003995466,0.000113763,0.0004002667,0.0002299771,0.00006793585,0.9988839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001478324,0.0001287984,0.0001638146,0.00007919078,0.00007595484,9.2146e-7,0.00002456353,0.00001712653,0.9980313],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6535858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391964660","doi":"10.51644/9781771120999","title":"Literary Land Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; History; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04688339718372395,"gpt":0.334746389920026,"spread":0.2878629927363021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002202438,0.00007479414,0.0001053038,0.00002463763,0.0001731615,0.00009287334,0.0002372023,0.0001975495,0.001349125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001059044,0.00006311948,0.00005005137,0.00004051716,0.0000744579,0.00006860672,0.0000519886,0.0001519267,0.001412703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001313964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004779732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001029507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.00002057157,0.00009881335,0.0001437374,0.0002542866,0.0001357851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.00003691023,0.00004403715,0.0001694551,0.00007947973,0.0001366205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.342274e-7,0.000003652358,0.00001535177,0.000002072316,0.000003264715,7.066853e-7,0.0007151031,8.436825e-8,3.166106e-8,0.4991178,0.4987944,0.001347234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002907263,0.000003352296,0.000006504108,0.000007878662,0.000005486147,1.294005e-7,0.00002541251,0.000001575901,1.105513e-7,0.205221,0.794623,0.0000764309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004551963,0.000305737,0.00003230393,0.001786067,0.0001181407,0.0001633928,0.00003127152,0.0001038963,0.9974546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006102117,0.0000700407,0.0001613147,0.0003972322,0.001199069,0.00001152347,0.00007014932,0.00001095826,0.9974695],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2958286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261242864","doi":"","title":"The Adulteration of Fiduciary Doctrine in Corporate Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Context (archaeology); Law; Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Corporate governance; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01107755319445859,"gpt":0.2685400989717303,"spread":0.2574625457772717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698512,0.00003973474,0.00005683578,0.00002237493,0.0005095116,0.00005383761,0.000172435,0.00002842569,0.000007074335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000209366,0.00002869867,0.00003526917,0.0001937683,0.000106383,0.000125239,0.00001051572,0.000435699,0.000006183897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002929805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008697024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008544967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2315026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988305,0.00009275688,0.0002055453,0.00006105412,0.0001655865,0.0006445745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996132,0.0000523276,0.0001790415,0.00006961225,0.00006711617,0.00001875493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006898907,0.00002226978,0.001023394,3.876289e-7,0.000003448918,2.395367e-7,0.0001422234,0.00006258513,0.0001731522,0.9959655,0.00004890941,0.002550952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000237788,0.00003412954,0.002392882,0.000005792686,0.000004475058,0.000005749231,0.001224861,0.00005574439,0.0001741915,0.9346319,0.06117818,0.00005427067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995318,0.002149277,0.001374464,0.01590174,0.00015456,0.0002938293,0.000003135573,0.00002239855,0.08056872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964253,0.001294211,0.00002307552,0.00003179641,0.0002696447,0.000004757292,0.00000170885,0.000003235638,0.00194622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2229576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128352995","doi":"10.1017/s000819730600715x","title":"A RE-APPRAISAL OF THE FIDUCIARY SELF-DEALING AND FAIR-DEALING RULES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Fiduciary; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Settlor; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01555527277765088,"gpt":0.2916567480682056,"spread":0.2761014752905547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001245048,0.00007622087,0.000110382,0.00001436448,0.002160994,0.0001530019,0.0003914237,0.00004735835,0.00001128575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004583055,0.00004426749,0.00009073004,0.0001354685,0.0003376335,0.0001251209,0.00008912019,0.0002907213,0.000004609237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003864216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009840675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009930403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00382479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998888,0.0002071343,0.0002550903,0.00009810585,0.0003185299,0.0002331085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992199,0.0002555561,0.0002109682,0.0001750707,0.000077944,0.00006054698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005177409,0.00003150669,0.001549533,0.00000629431,0.00001781005,0.000001718668,0.002037446,0.00008351357,0.0003430495,0.9921691,0.003176635,0.0005782079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006984336,0.00003427609,0.03946544,0.0001338001,0.0001635432,0.000100912,0.01132776,0.0006780041,0.001312229,0.02206254,0.9236762,0.0003468864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.809256,0.000744141,0.0002447216,0.01947081,0.0003143291,0.0001926377,0.00002281071,0.00004696147,0.1697076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980108,0.0001073947,0.0004064691,0.0002308322,0.0009817613,0.000003501506,7.849113e-7,0.000008793347,0.0002497294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04325816009345367,"gpt":0.3568442583983873,"spread":0.3135860983049337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559444,0.00007940488,0.0001619066,0.00002511054,0.0003399931,0.00001742178,0.0009617469,0.00007339168,0.0001337795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003608942,0.00003421259,0.0002208208,0.0001547628,0.0006704423,0.0004182192,0.00009190851,0.0007261192,0.000004827064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006446449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009549597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002368059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984583,0.0004672097,0.0002997777,0.00004310902,0.0004535665,0.0002779904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985755,0.0003589114,0.0005270119,0.0002673246,0.0001630427,0.0001082305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465649,0.0007316203,0.008121475,0.00001454613,0.000155395,0.000002897808,0.2389977,0.0003558439,0.006378372,0.6284802,0.1145726,0.001942797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002245071,0.00003480904,0.07493383,0.00002731132,0.00004842502,0.000007483248,0.001329719,0.000004428674,0.0001073161,0.0007554386,0.9224615,0.00006521679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620299,0.007851331,0.00001071875,0.005542811,0.001258794,0.0003051427,0.0000101094,0.0000116643,0.3229795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977852,0.0001300051,0.000008326918,0.0003506014,0.0009355861,0.000001553765,1.230096e-7,0.000006431374,0.0007822113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8078889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072498805","doi":"10.1017/s000819731300038x","title":"CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND THE NO-PROFIT RULE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Business; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01048198519934603,"gpt":0.2585663839237788,"spread":0.2480843987244328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008123582,0.00005970086,0.00008860017,0.000007366576,0.002513084,0.0003786327,0.0003045283,0.00003122583,0.0001840747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005784817,0.0000286048,0.0000526347,0.00007495072,0.001540032,0.0002053298,0.00005842655,0.0002828631,0.0002743228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000314028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005519855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006937664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003357225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999182,0.0002104822,0.000131906,0.00007350979,0.0002004405,0.0002016994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.0002045708,0.00009696854,0.0001286718,0.0001424442,0.0001006413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007846692,0.000002756997,0.0002286441,6.377198e-7,0.0000143664,4.953989e-7,0.001260211,6.795534e-7,0.00003125573,0.991281,0.005120812,0.00205133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001872158,0.00002612725,0.01990094,0.00002307402,0.00007530794,0.0002239373,0.01463028,0.0002882766,0.0001222323,0.09237207,0.870216,0.0002496666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3418271,0.0002633772,0.00007866911,0.04920714,0.0003316368,0.000403322,0.000006366802,0.0000211206,0.6078613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951659,0.0001589484,0.0001105057,0.001109861,0.0008805493,0.00002312553,2.504643e-7,0.000005030549,0.002545852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06613390136467633,"gpt":0.3548929265915542,"spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001998649,0.00006417021,0.0001083755,0.00003240861,0.0002668875,0.0001442464,0.00008829276,0.00004148724,0.0001107613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003712209,0.00006902832,0.00001176477,0.000139101,0.00003146382,0.0002441685,0.000005820687,0.00009672893,0.000003856815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991313,0.00006110757,0.0002028191,0.0001731477,0.0001812012,0.0002504191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994971,0.00004002615,0.0001070547,0.00008972296,0.000007245219,0.0002588703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005007963,0.0006516639,0.2789907,0.000005066711,0.0000758839,0.00002388443,0.03725585,0.00005709639,0.0006158761,0.2398733,0.01406828,0.4283323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002427057,0.00004014284,0.743007,0.000003759939,0.000006077294,6.613371e-7,0.001423306,0.00003780458,0.00002124031,0.002331512,0.2527754,0.0001103876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575416,0.00003763551,0.0004970621,0.1409611,0.00002918947,0.0002223567,0.00004853753,0.000009789565,0.0006527443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998109,0.00004945806,0.0001751476,0.00065803,0.000111297,0.000003836226,0.0001049054,0.000002212205,0.0007860775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4640163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4671242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118854655","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Settlor; Trust law; Law and economics; Business; Property law; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08946151875835523,"gpt":0.4285776937241007,"spread":0.3391161749657455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002774938,0.0001631374,0.000241747,0.000309692,0.002296805,0.0003538874,0.0008095104,0.0001641978,0.0007460803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004844457,0.0001620296,0.0001098618,0.002601254,0.0002287791,0.0004653389,0.0001369744,0.0006008924,0.0005302111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008122812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002586751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960118,0.0001698111,0.0003531923,0.0005291298,0.001626807,0.001309273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980697,0.0002325056,0.00006559561,0.0004011278,0.0005364,0.0006946623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006206094,0.0003471377,0.002263597,0.00002324298,0.00002119676,0.00007889877,0.00371217,0.00005212593,0.001722116,0.9331794,0.04755118,0.01098692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004032819,0.0001983584,0.009215604,0.00005755304,0.000007741934,0.000004008194,0.005370501,0.0001064855,0.0004842097,0.01834428,0.9654699,0.0003380994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3576346,0.0001896498,0.0001932299,0.02872829,0.0001202153,0.002475399,0.0000550078,0.0002922447,0.6103113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762484,0.00005757277,0.0007079908,0.0006032731,0.0005668612,0.0001495169,0.000009543432,0.00002223128,0.02163461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079713037986742,"gpt":0.2385564415872736,"spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009893355,0.00002242496,0.00003876151,0.000005264124,0.000749866,0.00003942915,0.0000747261,0.00002677637,0.0009575172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005689929,0.00002470702,0.00002080429,0.00001032359,0.0001140613,0.0005813382,0.000016438,0.00003599826,0.000005286667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001064752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002725318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.305547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997077,0.00003615154,0.00004473778,0.00004175217,0.0001067158,0.00006293254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997301,0.0000111658,0.00005649967,0.00003119158,0.00009742953,0.00007366981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539635,0.00006110724,0.001900778,0.000006089662,0.00002305995,0.000001915587,0.02568272,0.000007869309,0.000594124,0.9472193,0.01011958,0.01436803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002502087,0.0000306226,0.009835538,0.00000833326,0.00002222789,0.000002525341,0.01494692,0.00006053308,0.00001757782,0.002636058,0.9721365,0.00005294858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981476,0.0003797721,0.006737577,0.004291568,0.0009528993,0.0002799064,0.000006250513,0.00004574133,0.6891587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979632,0.0003086319,0.0006533847,0.00001497339,0.0003644159,4.416389e-8,6.223807e-7,0.000001250668,0.0006934889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093834217","doi":"10.4324/9781003122609-10","title":"Recovering Misdirected Money from Banks: Ministerial Receipt at Law and in Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Financial system; Law and economics; Monetary economics; Law; Accounting; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0606704291982241,"gpt":0.3115246814119224,"spread":0.2508542522136983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001523102,0.0001696662,0.0002828159,0.00002381808,0.0002677456,0.000135538,0.0002243905,0.0003092975,0.002297964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000385687,0.0001758726,0.00006128686,0.0000344092,0.0001989832,0.00009149179,0.0004247027,0.0002077402,0.0001555685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000214597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009104218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01693548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1218318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988391,0.00002983678,0.0002722621,0.0004339537,0.0002349444,0.0001899049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993873,0.0001293899,0.0001080271,0.000183061,0.00002691581,0.0001652653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009958092,0.00001280865,0.00002717722,0.00001660145,0.00003287696,0.00001180467,0.002081729,6.562882e-7,0.0006045713,0.9889687,0.003508429,0.004635027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001664761,0.00001217683,0.00006613108,0.00004505545,0.00001672474,1.729977e-7,0.00004965912,0.000009938709,0.00007075991,0.02632637,0.9730111,0.0002254484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001925157,0.0001497623,0.000006943902,0.002714891,0.000215141,0.0003063401,0.0002143224,0.00009629478,0.9943712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1452844,0.001224972,0.001489653,0.002444838,0.001696135,0.00004288355,0.000263637,0.00007189288,0.8474816],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01793305386216588,"gpt":0.2905690088404181,"spread":0.2726359549782523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006813,0.00003835172,0.00007051566,0.000008214862,0.0002296837,0.00002234645,0.0002952933,0.00003643119,0.00003032874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001134747,0.00002569014,0.00004315063,0.000114455,0.0009969494,0.0001275255,0.00004837116,0.00006113487,0.000008983098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000233919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001719639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002407283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993785,0.0001591362,0.000104294,0.00006144093,0.0001886061,0.0001080058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993536,0.0002353689,0.00007192339,0.0001707822,0.0001160771,0.00005218128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021626,0.00001278305,0.0000599603,0.000001488439,0.000008465339,2.163574e-7,0.004608361,0.000004703842,0.00009500254,0.9942243,0.0003885352,0.0005745507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006267147,0.00001383291,0.00003025442,0.000003275638,0.000005901836,1.137134e-7,0.01544921,0.000001248781,0.0007120119,0.3851998,0.5984942,0.00002746077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779885,0.0001884992,0.000471455,0.002955408,0.0001311361,0.0001371058,0.00001444587,0.00002818499,0.9582749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938918,0.00001195213,0.0001016553,0.00005195287,0.00009332078,0.000003114798,7.210734e-7,0.000003499256,0.00584197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3673302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199187393","doi":"10.1017/s0008197321000775","title":"MAKING SENSE OF MESNE PROFITS: REMEDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Tort; Duty; Breach of contract; Law; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Liability; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07136537914229837,"gpt":0.3619567587059496,"spread":0.2905913795636512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008633755,0.0000477262,0.00009702241,0.00001022016,0.001071115,0.00008897115,0.0001672695,0.00002919075,0.00006247395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001107392,0.00003265393,0.00007348898,0.0001743453,0.00027583,0.0001017454,0.0000600268,0.0002047206,0.00001542288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003983296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001571202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004030298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001456574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.0001788225,0.0001883369,0.00006982029,0.0002949979,0.0001798201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.00009781465,0.000134817,0.0001498747,0.0002250076,0.00005566989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004985698,0.00001907784,0.0001021303,0.000005015729,0.00002217734,0.00002377791,0.002444863,0.000008034171,0.002114391,0.9902815,0.003572006,0.001402021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896735,0.00001354604,0.001458994,0.00007347398,0.00004275242,0.0001945579,0.01122919,0.00002393956,0.006369412,0.004472081,0.9758294,0.0001029769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2356676,0.001440067,0.0005476192,0.0530972,0.0004981528,0.0001715797,0.0000177817,0.00003764415,0.7085224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959918,0.000250574,0.0003809153,0.0005258496,0.0006342961,0.000002487076,6.378049e-7,0.000005563688,0.002207822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8238257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04856816800905384,"gpt":0.3098308887936929,"spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421053,0.00005209564,0.0001157881,0.00003468388,0.0002954837,0.00001780763,0.0004872891,0.0000350301,0.0002557117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001490856,0.00003183812,0.0001246593,0.00017931,0.000318545,0.00006747896,0.00002620184,0.0001767079,0.00006780656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002186909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009254061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007221137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001517352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990828,0.0002012566,0.0002530183,0.00004668469,0.0003025321,0.0001136822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.0002116103,0.0003498208,0.0001508617,0.0001688843,0.00006762642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903289,0.00007272866,0.0002745831,0.000005717206,0.00004035826,0.000004150872,0.02630227,0.00005502006,0.000304634,0.9701928,0.000120698,0.002558029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001912738,0.00004263771,0.000199961,0.00002479799,0.0001198076,0.00001112634,0.01401409,0.000003880002,0.00003846579,0.9236223,0.06167487,0.00005681473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4539325,0.001268374,0.003521304,0.03775445,0.0004056326,0.0002057036,0.00002486527,0.00002378726,0.5028633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978167,0.00009627337,0.0001176284,0.0002304822,0.001107869,7.326094e-7,1.278066e-7,0.000007094596,0.0006230746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2799863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01396040738108468,"gpt":0.2380048575908833,"spread":0.2240444502097986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577417,0.00002985585,0.00007275044,0.00000535749,0.001922886,0.00002473959,0.00018567,0.00004396525,0.0009377296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003262863,0.0000178785,0.00004491987,0.00001924689,0.0006805978,0.0002853538,0.00003319486,0.0001591467,6.662944e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004432163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07388999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3291917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996231,0.00005901755,0.00005980293,0.00004618632,0.0001386119,0.00007327312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.00005709138,0.0001201955,0.00004599915,0.00009069625,0.00004410491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458177,0.0000151553,0.0003708386,0.000003403118,0.00002605232,8.747921e-7,0.0954606,0.000003573785,0.0001864425,0.9016161,0.0008296221,0.001392758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00174806,0.00003160014,0.01272727,0.00001348062,0.00008524245,0.0000124562,0.1484376,0.0001777035,0.00002640306,0.001767506,0.834864,0.000108625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4446351,0.00006845636,0.0001830567,0.008439128,0.0001374616,0.0001906324,0.00001353686,0.00001424357,0.5463184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943316,0.00003685592,0.000988478,0.00001398169,0.00009896553,3.570491e-8,1.886255e-7,0.00000157038,0.00452832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1379899768674786,"gpt":0.4396970784488198,"spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002035729,0.00003683096,0.00006158461,0.000009861878,0.0005955276,0.00001986289,0.00005111978,0.00002308048,0.00002223458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001148457,0.0000307821,0.00002503057,0.00009049773,0.000416523,0.0000458022,0.00001672319,0.00004537304,0.0001442425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005610008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003152292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000248904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993776,0.00005995395,0.00007457165,0.00008640721,0.0001202818,0.0002812016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996442,0.0001167603,0.00001005305,0.000064668,0.0000620073,0.0001023797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.146205e-7,0.00001380222,0.0007058829,0.000001820405,0.000006428133,4.78882e-7,0.0005520725,4.351153e-7,0.00000747872,0.9977244,0.0007790796,0.0002078788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004387512,0.000004040387,0.0009463521,0.000004040721,0.00000542824,1.257638e-7,0.004328618,0.000001013598,0.00009905951,0.140722,0.8537935,0.00005199654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04081483,0.0004733871,0.0001656897,0.01252129,0.0001296018,0.00009340087,0.000002883336,0.00006866242,0.9457303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970873,0.000139125,0.0002554646,0.0007251169,0.0001428503,0.00002038045,3.746846e-7,0.000002001081,0.001627396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4580378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227159011","doi":"","title":"Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Orthodoxy; Preference; Law and economics; Political science; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1385218360534975,"gpt":0.4004734201286882,"spread":0.2619515840751907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006814676,0.00006438268,0.0001110745,0.00008514288,0.00149538,0.00007240783,0.0001635836,0.00009640859,0.000081262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000292031,0.00006655521,0.00003114161,0.0001394616,0.001289243,0.0001515409,0.0001141086,0.0002142806,0.00001563588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005106174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006172509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008191154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003115214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998796,0.0002539449,0.00009120497,0.0002386629,0.0003863137,0.0002338342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.0001381534,0.00005008528,0.0001557768,0.0001570192,0.0001871249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858454,0.0003697163,0.03278034,0.0002265439,0.00009275405,0.00002989497,0.03892314,0.00002187015,0.02666829,0.8848571,0.004062232,0.01178227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209788,0.002004471,0.1861556,0.0005797425,0.00008337279,0.00002656225,0.1217169,0.000321066,0.01319009,0.00379664,0.6693585,0.0006691832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457549,0.00001595101,0.0001035343,0.001775059,0.00004777543,0.0003323366,0.00001120898,0.00002433437,0.05193483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803535,0.0001976719,0.0002335557,0.00001221259,0.00006993196,0.000001361769,0.000003725901,0.000003782225,0.0191243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8810605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235110027","doi":"","title":"Duties, Liabilities and Damages","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01383848270066181,"gpt":0.294221052076906,"spread":0.2803825693762442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001715659,0.00004900047,0.00005868384,0.00002450473,0.000703636,0.00007353503,0.0001195289,0.00003665827,0.00007532568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007402524,0.00004202915,0.00002927615,0.0000746917,0.0001504304,0.0003340725,0.0000181494,0.0005111655,0.00001957173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002968307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007654848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006844967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002287437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983109,0.0000712329,0.00008976811,0.00005681111,0.0001422928,0.001328949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996988,0.000053319,0.00004161384,0.00006214628,0.00003139634,0.0001127266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001365636,0.00001619931,0.008579322,8.891108e-7,0.00001000359,3.590771e-8,0.003388966,2.43118e-7,0.00001532373,0.981655,0.0001217891,0.00621086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001109826,0.00003149628,0.003653045,0.000003403942,0.0000138628,0.00002556238,0.04688396,0.000002014179,0.00001624737,0.3499409,0.5992172,0.0001013931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8348895,0.01553574,0.001176928,0.0138385,0.0002858802,0.0001824325,0.000003587548,0.00007396305,0.1340134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848455,0.004555697,0.00007872318,0.00007199062,0.0006939106,0.000003834844,4.140259e-7,0.000005119527,0.009744802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6317141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.541187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0382762265684625,"gpt":0.3736142316878724,"spread":0.3353380051194099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438017,0.00009275068,0.000221991,0.00006431331,0.0006610644,0.00007777732,0.0003132335,0.00004274883,0.00006872549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001239431,0.00007256205,0.0001407474,0.0002082445,0.0002695031,0.0006431108,0.00007237585,0.0002148117,0.00001424428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002414789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002900803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001822492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000613426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988344,0.00006894184,0.0003153301,0.00009846262,0.0004321472,0.0002507587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.00006260289,0.000253541,0.00008471226,0.0003368652,0.0001216197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029467,0.000354448,0.008719889,0.000024625,0.0006104814,0.000102173,0.05097004,0.0006972366,0.0004981734,0.7747021,0.09025398,0.07296392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381653,0.00005612365,0.001448968,0.00002157204,0.00003552538,0.00001140431,0.00453082,0.00002156326,0.00007695444,0.0007676426,0.9926982,0.00009305549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657607,0.01157439,0.0005277029,0.04773798,0.0006657969,0.0001956718,0.000009227671,0.00004446344,0.1734841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769971,0.006196701,0.003530456,0.0004525967,0.002372531,0.000003357605,2.298322e-7,0.000007367058,0.01043967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.508444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02653600188505005,"gpt":0.2331907195830554,"spread":0.2066547176980054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000180424,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.000005518194,0.001143102,0.00003038293,0.0002107537,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.00003305259,0.00003477165,0.00001591632,0.0003900687,0.0006089158,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003311244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2073144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4694005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996068,0.00004406185,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.0001148521,0.0001222026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.00001112766,0.00007159852,0.00006342345,0.00006918833,0.0001548861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.00002736226,0.0004774625,9.704557e-7,0.00001102292,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.710558e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.0001944718,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722871,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.000004534506,0.00001203512,0.000003844001,0.005503806,0.000002307509,0.00002338053,0.007363654,0.9846539,0.00005103222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352234,0.0001474228,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.00004741042,0.00004330657,0.000003435601,0.00001317979,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967847,0.0002739386,0.002100363,0.00006960508,0.00005069968,1.84528e-8,2.522757e-7,0.000001674206,0.0007186963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609703429","doi":"10.29173/alr494","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Certainty; Treaty; Law; Legal certainty; Subject (documents); Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01602953134337596,"gpt":0.3516439561028977,"spread":0.3356144247595217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006446834,0.00007296119,0.000138226,0.000003710764,0.001069686,0.00009485996,0.0002951462,0.00002628885,0.0004576255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004462077,0.0000477907,0.00006651597,0.0003581649,0.0001224499,0.00007068422,0.00001521833,0.00007645172,0.001264036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003371284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001696231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0355694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2018454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.0001608543,0.0001758136,0.00015708,0.0001788153,0.0002544076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.0004588643,0.00005138989,0.0003106704,0.00008563829,0.0001488683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.406325e-7,0.000009937456,0.0001047695,0.00002635718,0.000003965297,1.305183e-7,0.0003429072,1.365507e-7,0.000001519947,0.9841221,0.01417536,0.001212362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003253287,0.000004722378,0.000108349,0.0001026696,0.00001895963,9.743717e-7,0.00005257657,2.16984e-7,0.000007418889,0.0008962774,0.9986982,0.00007713612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001494584,0.02122165,0.00002880309,0.05931806,0.0001736644,0.0009146403,0.000003667644,0.00002496746,0.9168199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.688033,0.1931852,0.0006806341,0.03775222,0.0003491186,0.0008138632,0.000008144691,0.00003473796,0.07914306],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599550406","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.013","title":"Justice in the <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> Book <scp>v</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09106606279021817,"gpt":0.2819022777579852,"spread":0.190836214967767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007965813,0.0002573008,0.0002550132,0.0001008087,0.001017507,0.00009183346,0.001434139,0.0006319224,0.00001017549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001042316,0.0002544452,0.000185071,0.00002237327,0.0007516804,0.0001325297,0.0002938797,0.001572968,0.00007800736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002010686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004242828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004525552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.0002391171,0.0001928913,0.0004286905,0.0004770549,0.0003981801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980063,0.000867943,0.0002102611,0.0006030736,0.0001486998,0.0001637412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003469517,0.00001380083,0.000001238006,0.00003167711,0.00002031181,0.00004749603,0.006185513,4.379162e-7,0.000002390881,0.8835589,0.1099791,0.000155684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001854777,0.00001486097,0.00001609901,0.0000669232,0.0002265757,0.000001987734,0.002023729,0.000002935422,0.00001300251,0.0002400941,0.9970796,0.0001287474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000356287,0.000387939,0.0001381797,0.0003284346,0.0001683718,0.000652861,0.0001290582,0.00009925535,0.9980603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002244597,0.0009768779,0.00003076625,0.001361238,0.0003147003,0.000003185796,0.00001994545,0.00002802051,0.9950207],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0215834691220999,"gpt":0.276891843250878,"spread":0.255308374128778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486703,0.00003477193,0.00006873216,0.000004227716,0.005144157,0.0001525537,0.0007670113,0.00004079227,0.000835515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001571839,0.00003727581,0.0000681451,0.00000556587,0.0002954232,0.0007559512,0.0001238556,0.00008711915,0.00001287873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001492866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005465037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.159183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.334065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995056,0.00003352964,0.00005342604,0.00006288055,0.0002185894,0.000125953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994509,0.00001406362,0.0001840811,0.0001698174,0.00007931097,0.0001018786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008602111,0.00002352649,0.001711659,0.000001522167,0.00001828428,0.000008934388,0.008950232,0.00000253708,0.00005903827,0.9863088,0.00111225,0.001794674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002026913,0.00001046998,0.009041224,0.00001517718,0.00001422387,0.000001864761,0.003625374,0.000007549653,0.000008752191,0.004421322,0.9825984,0.00005292656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03931186,0.0001090746,0.0007928499,0.003479361,0.0001941981,0.00006257423,0.000004021302,0.00001772734,0.9560283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935752,0.0002781753,0.002436764,0.00005957237,0.0001585434,1.72048e-8,2.243177e-7,0.000002268474,0.003489219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035728806","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808727","title":"Preventing corporate failure: the Cadbury Committee’s corporate governance report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit committee; Corporate governance; Stock exchange; Audit; Enforcement; Business; Chief audit executive; Internal audit; Finance; Joint audit; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06757351824286159,"gpt":0.2882434556933058,"spread":0.2206699374504442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615375,0.0001106739,0.00022378,0.00002657351,0.0008281177,0.0001337919,0.0005434507,0.0000915826,0.0002132501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007614386,0.00008152053,0.0001767448,0.0003941506,0.0002538668,0.0003716085,0.00005735934,0.0004655194,0.0000629657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001127768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003079173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004182341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005785394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982788,0.0001421584,0.0006325334,0.0001321834,0.0005257038,0.0002886506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964842,0.0001046468,0.002680492,0.0002371893,0.0003715477,0.0001219527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003902235,0.0003683035,0.01690084,0.00002339305,0.00005174439,0.0008928287,0.007376935,0.00008707589,0.001260388,0.4914101,0.4598218,0.02176762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002429608,0.00004955745,0.04734391,0.00005028623,0.00004365546,0.0001573416,0.0002608525,0.00003663233,0.000179971,0.01206136,0.9394166,0.0001568261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290352,0.002883949,0.002090939,0.0614204,0.00234921,0.0007755767,0.0000375689,0.00008001127,0.1013272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878285,0.0002510033,0.000721968,0.0004418313,0.00147119,0.000005356632,6.958023e-7,0.00001144997,0.009268041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4795949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6369295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}