{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1585,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":44,"predictions_cover":1585,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"836114ef07fd","filters":{"topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2092342097","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008","title":"How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Curriculum; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Psychology; Life skills; Literacy; Skills management; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03660188518883507,"gpt":0.3936935274227215,"spread":0.3570916422338865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01025322,0.0002488367,0.0002405572,0.003370478,0.006153313,0.03708851,0.00219727,0.0001527652,0.0003024875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003117133,0.0002191477,0.00007248553,0.006553961,0.001512184,0.5269118,0.0003685021,0.0003714405,0.0007972819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002677065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004459056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001855522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.589329e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915199,0.0002011489,0.001149289,0.0002881141,0.005535265,0.001306319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957072,0.0003616991,0.0004666331,0.0005191381,0.002057839,0.0008874575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147822,0.00008464733,0.003078515,0.0001321969,0.0000136822,3.784308e-7,0.1751795,0.00006712415,0.0001410368,0.1618065,0.02167453,0.6377071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007357085,0.0001576103,0.04350426,0.00009339969,0.000003274431,0.000002110106,0.01048839,0.001241736,0.002120436,0.003194657,0.9381232,0.0003352744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662771,0.00007857505,0.008671458,0.04664814,0.001893904,0.006242173,0.000228696,0.0006282807,0.06933165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543712,0.0001858187,0.02888008,0.009291304,0.0002507834,0.0002904634,0.0006883373,0.000008109356,0.006033954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086487392","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.06.003","title":"What Qualifications and Skills are Important for Digital Librarian Positions in Academic Libraries? A Job Advertisement Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Academic library; Digital library; World Wide Web; Position (finance); Library science; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03391636860687126,"gpt":0.3310855055968902,"spread":0.2971691369900189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002186099,0.0001760861,0.0003660833,0.0007010892,0.0005739582,0.001165736,0.001200088,0.0002740594,0.00007369444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006440415,0.0001268355,0.0001945294,0.00212287,0.0003141435,0.07047731,0.0000638576,0.0008494783,0.000004555826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005190098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005899384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001004787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003150737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970838,0.0002989417,0.001419174,0.0001712454,0.0005786858,0.000448146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972346,0.0009770285,0.001115336,0.0002299851,0.00008646815,0.0003565656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003195509,0.0001680011,0.2195049,0.0000279587,0.0003137798,0.000007808752,0.1640714,0.0003532633,0.0001566846,0.5785663,0.01958849,0.01692196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001420002,0.0003194199,0.5735562,0.0005283564,0.0004622563,0.00003504896,0.07905074,0.0008945827,0.0002147475,0.248661,0.09429059,0.0005671099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5923613,0.007476482,0.003343764,0.3906211,0.0007444542,0.001240624,0.0001442671,0.0001017145,0.003966333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770748,0.009361595,0.0006988737,0.01110977,0.0005902122,0.000009539914,0.0000293673,0.00001135586,0.001114502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972694649","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2005.04.005","title":"The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Digital humanities; Exploratory research; Psychology; Information seeking; Sample (material); Humanities; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Art; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1920541147815348,"gpt":0.3791034512942355,"spread":0.1870493365127007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01283019,0.00007335062,0.000113355,0.0001660834,0.0009768418,0.0005138107,0.002573224,0.00007047578,0.00004192908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008096304,0.00003264534,0.00006703418,0.0006558934,0.0007849523,0.02520382,0.00008579463,0.00103166,0.00002009476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004470976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007354028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001593481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963711,0.001040613,0.000871643,0.00003267815,0.00137969,0.0003042801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996963,0.002026254,0.0006680665,0.0001641755,0.000129226,0.00004930435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005966987,0.00001230882,0.006931826,0.000007521741,0.00001503834,4.010431e-7,0.71385,0.0002416632,0.000008871027,0.2495022,0.01802926,0.01134121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003266209,0.00007156978,0.06607024,0.00008950461,0.000009675378,0.000009329507,0.3110399,0.0001439965,0.00009113776,0.01174422,0.6103254,0.00007839104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313092,0.001206285,0.00006889394,0.1935688,0.000418007,0.0004328191,0.000003615988,0.00001542989,0.07297699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901147,0.001494793,0.0000585527,0.007125777,0.0005397188,0.000002538779,6.226048e-7,0.000003059516,0.0006602362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5922961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993647569","doi":"10.29173/slw6797","title":"Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in the 21st Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"School library; 21st century skills; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0324914400112808,"gpt":0.2923696476136625,"spread":0.2598782076023817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235795,0.0002777962,0.0002813484,0.0004309272,0.001339038,0.003838832,0.002088722,0.0001571177,0.00655556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001585854,0.0002064829,0.0001367312,0.003311925,0.001025293,0.05007499,0.0002540975,0.0005687088,0.00154634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007321286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001310697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004451902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008247374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963348,0.0005845762,0.0007672326,0.0003904813,0.0009822865,0.0009406501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980719,0.0004844706,0.0002268567,0.0006836835,0.00006596777,0.0004671135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004038705,0.00004986403,0.1012981,0.000008683718,0.000009184318,0.00002002003,0.02919356,0.00001652512,0.000005025876,0.685101,0.1805842,0.003673469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003214119,0.00002275211,0.04703286,0.00004392517,0.000004784158,0.000005361417,0.0586454,0.000015163,0.0000298361,0.02556973,0.8680366,0.0002721789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07266963,0.002162491,0.00004455955,0.09268555,0.001890485,0.0009452569,0.0000159417,0.0005188849,0.8290672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8143189,0.004254511,0.00432916,0.1334007,0.004775363,0.0002301424,0.0001968985,0.00006689573,0.03842745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264958524","doi":"10.29173/slw6958","title":"Student Learning Through Ohio School Libraries, Part 1: How Effective School Libraries Help Students","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"School library; Mathematics education; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01591174856350437,"gpt":0.2869555078588018,"spread":0.2710437592952974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001500146,0.000927056,0.0009828634,0.0006108509,0.00446592,0.01803913,0.003746459,0.0004567126,0.01254751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004056307,0.000866989,0.0004298865,0.003957978,0.001609612,0.12206,0.001573382,0.001881024,0.004029016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003242404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003275867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005226768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906237,0.001508459,0.001290597,0.001283912,0.003112898,0.002180421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947289,0.001147675,0.000785762,0.001123565,0.0002694282,0.001944623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002623755,0.0002348988,0.6565815,0.00004734852,0.0002035617,0.00006989312,0.01563217,0.0001003368,0.00001807851,0.143718,0.1800596,0.003072276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001238325,0.0002386899,0.116511,0.000246774,0.00004936361,0.000007374087,0.02605905,0.00002262731,0.0002965322,0.01344914,0.8408991,0.0009820793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3253943,0.008532406,0.001153489,0.06315328,0.006767934,0.005938605,0.0001055026,0.004571594,0.5843829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5760782,0.003542793,0.00832757,0.03515091,0.008033233,0.001062329,0.0005273768,0.000274297,0.3670033],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6608394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994943872","doi":"10.1353/pla.2003.0040","title":"The Information Commons: The Academic Library Of The Future","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Variety (cybernetics); Commons; Space (punctuation); Knowledge management; Resource (disambiguation); Information technology; Public relations; Strengths and weaknesses; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Political science; Library science; Data science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008037748379486813,"gpt":0.2340465662001517,"spread":0.2260088178206649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001081949,0.00009960488,0.0001080863,0.00002266085,0.002635581,0.000598099,0.001173598,0.0001294773,0.0001377512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002153623,0.00003466746,0.00008899326,0.000573586,0.00232208,0.02016799,0.0002016362,0.0005276435,0.00001287155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002429875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001969463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002072301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000185968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984688,0.0003655674,0.0004280088,0.00006780922,0.000417358,0.0002525056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987332,0.0006294738,0.0003508346,0.0002106221,0.00001436984,0.00006154198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001582197,0.000001474696,0.004123627,0.000003303227,0.00000750757,2.108537e-8,0.01261483,0.000001906104,1.827331e-7,0.9495649,0.03060048,0.003065971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000162207,0.000004426939,0.008636023,0.000008655012,0.000007016986,0.000002448463,0.01690302,0.0000308777,0.00008946908,0.111595,0.8625082,0.00005264011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07164431,0.01054625,0.00001300829,0.531004,0.001240421,0.001105963,0.00004206743,0.000102649,0.3843014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588512,0.0060883,0.00004111832,0.03009995,0.000463163,0.00003248226,0.000007754767,0.000007018231,0.00440898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940113553","doi":"10.18438/b8ps4d","title":"Library Instruction and Academic Success: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Library Instruction Program","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Wyoming","keywords":"Library instruction; Information literacy; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Session (web analytics); Computer science; Academic library; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0218724044248119,"gpt":0.3794449953969189,"spread":0.357572590972107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001553566,0.0002037388,0.0002287875,0.0005220132,0.0005854511,0.001047385,0.0003608492,0.0002469562,0.0006776352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008554633,0.0001874519,0.00005829699,0.001541463,0.0004614468,0.8477998,0.0002411146,0.0004808811,0.00001389466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000128258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007281943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001589954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.264281e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968842,0.001051555,0.0009265777,0.0001854016,0.0005556019,0.0003966816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968865,0.001435226,0.001002717,0.000232364,0.0000493957,0.0003937766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001406938,0.00005978207,0.05333777,0.0002313531,0.00001408111,2.69686e-7,0.003130518,0.00001416945,0.0000255536,0.5682486,0.002216635,0.3725806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004356586,0.0001733144,0.115762,0.0002656573,0.00002805612,0.00002013118,0.007330034,0.002085451,0.001607804,0.0005099234,0.8715311,0.0002508536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6358925,0.00479892,0.008311318,0.2041879,0.003885134,0.003740039,0.000103001,0.00226838,0.1368128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5423385,0.01692599,0.3840645,0.05494244,0.0007671536,0.0001728062,0.000271744,0.00002997061,0.0004868746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8693145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155996729","doi":"10.18438/b8ms3d","title":"Effective Methods for Teaching Information Literacy Skills to Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Meta-analysis; Critical appraisal; Information literacy; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Relevance (law); Data extraction; Computer science; Critical thinking; Teaching method; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Library science; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03315069923086385,"gpt":0.4501357496774183,"spread":0.4169850504465545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009987609,0.0005590963,0.003162265,0.001436134,0.001049008,0.004961534,0.0008830128,0.0002469379,0.0001033447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01315232,0.0004050784,0.0009980608,0.002714687,0.0001338607,0.6483755,0.0002615523,0.0004717149,0.000092832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000692723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000494151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004770247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.485652e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907094,0.005035793,0.002658611,0.0003420334,0.0008212872,0.0004328395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812272,0.01440903,0.003122798,0.0005706699,0.0003072104,0.0003631106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002381934,0.0000621564,9.677399e-7,0.6464992,0.01211256,4.909197e-7,0.003837121,0.00002102222,5.002745e-9,0.1734699,0.003729549,0.1602432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008179511,0.00007834438,0.000002474957,0.0183755,0.1695084,0.000004851748,0.0003275291,0.00009778007,2.298532e-7,0.00008211824,0.8110526,0.0003883417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[7.408686e-8,0.898533,0.0537966,0.03506266,0.0001037332,0.0106667,0.0001792628,0.0001600529,0.001497952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001269247,0.8189804,0.0420194,0.1351754,0.00004693031,0.002460529,0.0005775481,0.000012875,0.0007256633],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152760149","doi":"10.1353/pla.2008.0000","title":"Learning Outcomes, Portfolios, and Rubrics, Oh My! Authentic Assessment of an Information Literacy Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Literacy; Information literacy; Authentic assessment; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Curriculum","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01360503349552559,"gpt":0.3078593811503291,"spread":0.2942543476548035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006284619,0.0001031309,0.0001889558,0.00009444273,0.0008525444,0.0004493091,0.0002333449,0.00007992377,0.00009061973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001143009,0.00006666668,0.00004557739,0.0002884495,0.0009913616,0.03109587,0.0001085153,0.0002221199,0.000002864699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000389588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001239313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001413973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.580509e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987418,0.0001111908,0.0004447604,0.0001020668,0.0003784217,0.0002217668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992991,0.0001241629,0.0003200134,0.00008554717,0.00003398093,0.0001372121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851383,0.0000301587,0.1587782,0.00002470911,0.00001839547,0.000001118324,0.05651051,0.000006400447,4.343899e-7,0.7385783,0.0001912513,0.0458421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007777243,0.0001164754,0.5591876,0.00002175516,0.00001718852,0.0000158255,0.007104262,0.003137265,0.00001390795,0.01159729,0.4178303,0.0001804788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635584,0.0002751927,0.00004078074,0.005740245,0.0001032913,0.0004691679,0.000009764056,0.0001199142,0.02968326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949266,0.0008006253,0.001534408,0.001648174,0.00006073341,0.00001748886,0.00004595341,0.000003974876,0.0009620521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030264525","doi":"10.11645/5.1.1513","title":"Faculty attitudes, perceptions and experiences of information literacy:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Value (mathematics); Discipline; Perception; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02410221687979632,"gpt":0.3191032241119445,"spread":0.2950010072321482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060721,0.0001224302,0.0002154843,0.000620749,0.0003555492,0.000579407,0.0004072775,0.00008674094,0.001016054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003833548,0.0000971813,0.0001094207,0.0005806824,0.0002719683,0.1573952,0.00005302481,0.0001728622,0.00007086873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004562579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002854175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008309991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.617499e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997483,0.00008363632,0.001469686,0.00004725012,0.0006993224,0.0002170639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969355,0.00007578407,0.001474152,0.0001319778,0.001172449,0.000210148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003860648,0.00003026866,0.00575297,0.00004241446,0.00001103435,3.139306e-7,0.9311168,0.000005098306,0.000003261494,0.01488034,0.001727748,0.0463911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009533869,0.0003749428,0.1206462,0.0002642356,0.00002192933,0.00006070331,0.3397561,0.0004888105,0.0002206289,0.001163498,0.5357215,0.0003280903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632214,0.00007607375,0.004377228,0.0005331862,0.000733707,0.0002380292,0.0000388366,0.00003579369,0.03074574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834313,0.000137652,0.01466534,0.001470456,0.0001095467,0.000006979589,0.00004676851,0.000002323638,0.0001295786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5913607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167940689","doi":"10.1002/asi.21474","title":"Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Alberta; Mount Royal University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Demographics; Literacy; Psychology; Exploratory research; Affect (linguistics); Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01272096981413784,"gpt":0.2794672697308718,"spread":0.2667462999167339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001829042,0.00007350396,0.0001877365,0.000505409,0.0009656961,0.000152282,0.0006650788,0.00005345222,0.000008854273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001632272,0.00004860763,0.0001219174,0.003865981,0.002254614,0.04215705,0.0001472813,0.0001746544,0.000004721338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001226595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005916751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006640431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.983705e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984042,0.00001962726,0.0006536809,0.00004656876,0.0006641748,0.0002117289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995226,0.0000513662,0.002097461,0.0001301291,0.002429673,0.00006534125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008917146,0.00003097239,0.2167194,0.00005724052,0.0000558904,5.325676e-8,0.128958,0.00006031743,0.0004751823,0.09075301,0.001981487,0.5608192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076869,0.0004554715,0.2615911,0.00006662694,0.00003674017,0.00004712322,0.1516865,0.0008647748,0.003110026,0.004975463,0.5758375,0.0002517902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991558,0.000008928697,0.001154961,0.005010316,0.0003245311,0.0001921982,0.000004935094,0.00002769599,0.001718451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896254,0.0001728171,0.008534071,0.001586357,0.0000225051,0.000004845893,0.000001223983,0.000001565382,0.00005120259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.573856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750482664","doi":"10.29173/slw6961","title":"An Analysis of Information Literacy Education Worldwide","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Government (linguistics); Literacy; School library; Political science; Czech; Critical literacy; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007353531525910433,"gpt":0.2979024677153383,"spread":0.2905489361894279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001448425,0.0001468736,0.000255556,0.001905663,0.0005035687,0.001088765,0.0007160675,0.00009141499,0.002444772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000549768,0.0001423129,0.0001554703,0.005795299,0.0002977902,0.08942223,0.00005247501,0.0001656479,0.0001699088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007695265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001180626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008393312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001076162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997698,0.000136665,0.0008842668,0.0001737172,0.0006751968,0.000432156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980361,0.000255693,0.0004706704,0.0004658038,0.0003085859,0.000463116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007782136,0.0001073107,0.2556156,0.00001933324,0.00009184558,4.42769e-7,0.0370965,0.0002098566,0.00003251858,0.5914151,0.005963858,0.1093698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000123985,0.00003143132,0.3824243,0.00002615075,0.0000850237,2.384574e-7,0.01344198,0.0005002491,0.0004218697,0.005320541,0.5974009,0.0002233326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5080893,0.0003478824,0.0140931,0.006130439,0.001746861,0.0007708641,0.0000712241,0.0005259002,0.4682244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710658,0.0000352905,0.01520606,0.008634661,0.000320448,0.00001250776,0.0005031644,0.000007717652,0.004214336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.591437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156637039","doi":"10.1353/pla.2004.0035","title":"Student Bibliographies Improve When Professors Provide Enforceable Guidelines for Citations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Regina","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06440320122532313,"gpt":0.364864969237602,"spread":0.3004617680122789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007728569,0.0001099882,0.0001473672,0.0004730844,0.001339894,0.0007742934,0.0004257026,0.00008267196,0.00006565964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000321976,0.00006693422,0.00009326322,0.001397221,0.0009307966,0.01388736,0.00009976565,0.000114504,0.000006557755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003406303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001556706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003194025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001257241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987544,0.00003708315,0.0004162885,0.0001567719,0.0003247314,0.000310668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993048,0.0002039955,0.0001883575,0.00009486832,0.00009733834,0.0001106289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002838239,0.000009150061,0.001113702,0.00001188095,0.00001854677,1.182373e-7,0.02256346,0.0000193731,0.000002208972,0.9507131,0.02465356,0.000866516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008747701,0.00003360279,0.001528469,0.00001863328,0.00001681089,6.558426e-7,0.02882076,0.00004572531,0.000134549,0.3955202,0.5728819,0.0001238762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2027081,0.004506372,0.001630068,0.6771994,0.001378701,0.005409731,0.0001801519,0.0005136645,0.1064738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675169,0.008538893,0.02059882,0.07386916,0.002043074,0.0007215986,0.00009919135,0.00004040584,0.02657194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963576462","doi":"10.1108/07378830610692109","title":"Research in librarianship: issues to consider","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Research methodology; Knowledge base; Engineering ethics; Library science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07590541604543907,"gpt":0.4008443637869906,"spread":0.3249389477415515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000789815,0.00009023524,0.0001234726,0.0006499831,0.0004110398,0.0007888274,0.0006917652,0.0001148071,0.002602762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006355844,0.00008498105,0.00003366965,0.0030836,0.0002745336,0.02810739,0.0001789085,0.0002529331,0.001201083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002195094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003763906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001398373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003859435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979308,0.0003029341,0.000323979,0.0002430139,0.0006149065,0.0005843996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.0002496121,0.00003410387,0.0002685708,0.00002722678,0.0001703589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008329946,0.0000327539,0.03136439,0.00000542817,6.743742e-7,0.00001237389,0.003937562,0.000009900976,0.00002654859,0.637133,0.3248707,0.002598355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009436286,0.00002620447,0.02063183,0.00003100203,2.64283e-7,5.470748e-7,0.003422716,0.00001768014,0.0009152167,0.08037368,0.8943669,0.0001195744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1210124,0.0002563815,0.00001526015,0.1282749,0.0002259257,0.0004288224,0.000007965229,0.0003533059,0.749425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8851503,0.00006300714,0.006000577,0.009989168,0.0008270158,0.00005068208,0.00003389001,0.00001896962,0.09786635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116982215","doi":"10.5860/crl.61.6.510","title":"Information Literacy Instruction in Canadian Academic Libraries: Longitudinal Trends and International Comparisons","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Literacy; Work (physics); Library instruction; Face (sociological concept); Library science; Medical education; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0602231121086861,"gpt":0.3759635502121532,"spread":0.3157404381034671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001186777,0.0001208472,0.0001494318,0.001820092,0.001285286,0.002020923,0.0006822039,0.0001766351,0.005268522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003562303,0.0001209406,0.00003198066,0.002775837,0.00104204,0.09580352,0.0001070043,0.0006096296,0.0001882535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001874674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05032152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01017611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997596,0.0002749142,0.0004743826,0.000175701,0.0007272871,0.0007517341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988517,0.0002481535,0.00006349051,0.0001624572,0.0001419438,0.0005322531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000996197,0.00001559064,0.1422927,0.00001159193,0.00000790298,0.000004338957,0.04813252,0.00001837248,5.142867e-7,0.5806693,0.07116442,0.1575831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003471415,0.0000312034,0.1261763,0.00003217503,8.076209e-7,0.000003839346,0.008425231,0.001316466,0.000007737254,0.005587006,0.8579517,0.0001204322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5254428,0.0004030594,0.00001092379,0.05120473,0.0004810677,0.0003675783,0.000209385,0.0001145484,0.4217658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98186,0.0006927838,0.0006058717,0.00119864,0.0002802634,0.0000444744,0.0001824507,0.000006666613,0.01512883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7867873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527652806","doi":"","title":"Faculty-librarian relationships in the information literacy context: A content analysis of librarians' expressed attitudes and experiences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08127113647031584,"gpt":0.2954200087277021,"spread":0.2141488722573863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072961,0.00009036077,0.0001946108,0.002532843,0.0008872324,0.001843914,0.0009615881,0.00005764339,0.0003171818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001854235,0.00006449654,0.00007487911,0.005046976,0.001116137,0.1347242,0.00001974524,0.0001973475,0.00001334204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007270875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00111209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002630998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000923802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975842,0.0001552559,0.001066053,0.00006396401,0.0008363739,0.0002941759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978014,0.0002469979,0.0008215625,0.0001666603,0.0005901926,0.0003732503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004551287,0.000007042455,0.0502907,0.000007759798,0.00001308327,8.500339e-7,0.8699102,0.0001665298,0.000002311452,0.06710174,0.0007510915,0.01174411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004243967,0.00007160044,0.3389758,0.00008003655,0.00002777104,0.00001016451,0.5149655,0.006378061,0.0000530148,0.0002368465,0.1386036,0.000173237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709129,0.0001571611,0.0008861932,0.00731018,0.0003004684,0.0002899958,0.0000554084,0.000009285143,0.02007836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969395,0.0000338976,0.0005353795,0.002417878,0.00002121658,0.000006683216,0.00001345591,9.314761e-7,0.00003110106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3549447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W301197066","doi":"10.29173/slw6962","title":"A Theoretical Understanding of Teacher and Librarian Collaboration (TLC)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0177247950809891,"gpt":0.2785760048502262,"spread":0.260851209769237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001061571,0.00009784914,0.0001404569,0.0002219602,0.0004867195,0.0006588368,0.0002426918,0.00009022535,0.004184129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005711365,0.0000876127,0.00003369584,0.001071571,0.001231364,0.01757896,0.00007511699,0.0001422955,0.00002440481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004632461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004604745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003512005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002671347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986537,0.000115001,0.0003730557,0.0001575176,0.0003790342,0.0003217523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.0003140213,0.0001376114,0.0001518179,0.00004045811,0.0002883736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004233394,0.0000121746,0.01575317,0.000007359708,0.000005706129,0.00000113108,0.009517898,8.315945e-7,0.00002418289,0.9706002,0.003008822,0.001026148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004417664,0.00006913947,0.01989222,0.00006160926,0.00001121926,0.000001318305,0.08047315,0.0001168165,0.0007953087,0.629781,0.268086,0.0002703913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06253832,0.0002704595,0.003439067,0.01886569,0.0003958585,0.0003408557,0.000009282908,0.000173643,0.9139668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910783,0.00003293355,0.003300553,0.001780238,0.0002291034,0.000002595983,0.00001007842,0.00000814927,0.003558088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075824576","doi":"10.1108/01435120810917305","title":"Librarians' skills and qualifications in a modern informational environment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Management","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Library science; Marketing; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01182578334542568,"gpt":0.2236287145102286,"spread":0.2118029311648029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001508171,0.0000777896,0.00007504477,0.0002194212,0.0003599408,0.0001584788,0.0002550279,0.00003558766,0.0008360694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005478304,0.00007664602,0.00002308783,0.0003186825,0.0001842503,0.02427591,0.0001327004,0.0000599683,0.0001641785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001482752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005284762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001295102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.691963e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00006396566,0.0002902695,0.0001362245,0.0003122244,0.0002110026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996275,0.00004062205,0.00006515261,0.0001559117,0.000002647892,0.0001082204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004980993,0.0001287008,0.03206336,0.00001858706,0.0000093088,0.000008048343,0.04711,0.0003466593,6.656792e-7,0.8908328,0.0116174,0.01785944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707792,0.00001091577,0.1909207,0.00001321321,0.000001723858,0.00000134811,0.002890803,0.001244104,0.000007183095,0.01084661,0.7936518,0.0001408457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2331118,0.0001635327,0.001509496,0.01990517,0.0001500656,0.0007915793,0.0000223382,0.0002178673,0.7441282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9278131,0.003899795,0.01113568,0.01092141,0.0001171202,0.0001074712,0.0001497866,0.00001197384,0.04584372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796792783","doi":"10.29173/istl2440","title":"Library Research Skills: A Needs Assessment for Graduate Student Workshops.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Medical education; Graduate students; Subject (documents); Focus group; Higher education; Perception; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1053380640205402,"gpt":0.4328636071265562,"spread":0.327525543106016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004135399,0.0001437426,0.000226062,0.00269822,0.00241533,0.0007903304,0.001924968,0.0002243406,0.0001050238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009938573,0.0001278058,0.00002986732,0.01171639,0.007612309,0.0244454,0.0005071334,0.0005189715,0.00002170743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007274159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001932943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006006411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000727456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966382,0.0001589858,0.000409476,0.0004619799,0.001338476,0.0009928709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985437,0.0004647067,0.00008839786,0.000430659,0.0002496487,0.0002228666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066886,0.0001030907,0.1406663,0.000006390628,0.00000265426,0.00001233125,0.03540673,0.000001214307,0.00002655281,0.8010592,0.008671216,0.0140377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007280049,0.0002927387,0.1072215,0.0001148719,0.000002988805,0.00001494594,0.09854778,0.0003117589,0.001185526,0.1739122,0.6172454,0.0004223221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7977309,0.0004870114,0.00008923783,0.1196276,0.0004842215,0.001057137,0.000006794674,0.0004286826,0.08008838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826299,0.00122529,0.007983746,0.001395827,0.0001775414,0.0001717936,0.000004628803,0.00001137836,0.006399922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.627147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532305657","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2011.4.2.92","title":"Why Information Literacy Is Invisible","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Critical literacy; Literacy; Subject (documents); Higher education; Perception; Position (finance); Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05233205478923168,"gpt":0.339579396082155,"spread":0.2872473412929233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270449,0.0001972314,0.0001947939,0.001171786,0.0009953071,0.001299405,0.002188258,0.0001636692,0.002095432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004903415,0.0002049846,0.00009946215,0.002223951,0.000400958,0.197228,0.0003888995,0.0003864691,0.002212299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003157083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001763299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002329647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971626,0.0002633464,0.001431333,0.000113803,0.0005655885,0.0004632748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967281,0.0002128024,0.0005752001,0.001542507,0.0007410327,0.0002003798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002016266,0.0000779119,0.006816987,0.00003091706,0.000007198317,1.564041e-7,0.5919299,0.000005723697,7.09153e-7,0.2616942,0.02961281,0.1098034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003977254,0.00002513222,0.007243567,0.00008020011,0.000003908314,0.000002086095,0.007792203,0.002375045,0.00004061716,0.005637381,0.9761478,0.000254275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01806981,0.0002685928,0.006277096,0.02048232,0.0008319873,0.001311187,0.0001274137,0.0005029689,0.9521286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899705,0.001897563,0.0586447,0.146566,0.0001221092,0.0003593303,0.00128761,0.00001671665,0.001135439],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312363694","doi":"10.5860/rusq.49n1.72","title":"Transforming the One-Shot Library Session into Pedagogical Collaboration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference & User Services Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Session (web analytics); Rhetoric; Focus (optics); Sociology; One shot; Library instruction; Composition (language); Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Information literacy; Engineering; Communication; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06600922887123753,"gpt":0.351475260169633,"spread":0.2854660312983955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099649,0.0001478516,0.0001481281,0.00009055038,0.001094701,0.001139535,0.0008400596,0.0001370362,0.0006719294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005000423,0.0000994937,0.00004969951,0.000923785,0.00009607944,0.02875114,0.00001330638,0.000193949,0.0002103014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002559206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002851509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002782753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002880295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981829,0.0002027766,0.0003807407,0.0002385269,0.0006365939,0.0003584953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00007588047,0.000145891,0.0002727638,0.00009507564,0.000175101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006093163,0.0001048195,0.00201536,0.00003873142,0.000006743211,0.000002101216,0.6127089,0.000006815045,0.0009375095,0.2492448,0.0007410715,0.1341321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002882656,0.0005753946,0.0172768,0.000126326,0.00001251306,0.000001040913,0.1562212,0.0002599164,0.0005205924,0.01676221,0.8076275,0.0003282404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050695,0.0001215361,0.0001501063,0.03415315,0.0002146337,0.0004228717,0.000007827051,0.0002599891,0.05960037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987122,0.0001325198,0.0004612723,0.01030057,0.0002745412,0.00001323957,0.00006781784,0.000005757848,0.001622274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8068864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1961449398","doi":"","title":"Learning space attributes: reflections on academic library design and its use","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of learning spaces","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Hierarchy; Ideal (ethics); Computer science; Mathematics education; Academic library; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Psychology; Library science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09842147116361516,"gpt":0.3578874722720411,"spread":0.2594660011084259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627159,0.00009188869,0.0001453494,0.0002741344,0.0008665748,0.000462235,0.0001830055,0.0001058238,0.000183798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001807424,0.00007412404,0.00005402928,0.0004886201,0.0001074226,0.03129234,0.00003572575,0.000952976,0.00006048769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002958616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001581752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007435798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.507757e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982891,0.0006055505,0.0002818653,0.00007337966,0.0004214396,0.0003286385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983391,0.0007602642,0.0005020077,0.00004009065,0.00008153254,0.0002770376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002146872,0.00009963827,0.546925,0.00003226004,0.00007681752,0.00001129126,0.2417807,0.0336184,0.001224676,0.1408726,0.02839132,0.006752578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001635868,0.0003627061,0.01178346,0.0001184484,0.00001194215,0.00002155595,0.01618773,0.0003685982,0.00041548,0.0001498388,0.9702852,0.0001314641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712153,0.0009862222,0.000668504,0.02064091,0.0005693292,0.0001176581,5.319205e-7,0.0000937615,0.005707781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814298,0.002046974,0.00235476,0.0005629167,0.0007515195,9.777829e-7,8.579012e-7,0.000009682104,0.01284251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2888939907","doi":"","title":"Information Literacy Assessment: Standards-Based Tools and Assignments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Toolbox; Best practice; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Literacy; Knowledge management; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01191650247892429,"gpt":0.3174318507402598,"spread":0.3055153482613355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009749259,0.0001990995,0.0002144946,0.0002760619,0.0005836484,0.002696923,0.0003027181,0.0002433459,0.002127644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008051036,0.0001753532,0.00007194535,0.00016539,0.000235111,0.04481664,0.00005245202,0.0002148696,0.0001143826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000449195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00331901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008928464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005073092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99746,0.00007355939,0.0005488727,0.0001306457,0.001480275,0.0003066647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987858,0.0001693972,0.0003724344,0.0001929269,0.0003196842,0.0001597806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005504258,0.00001151953,0.0003142456,0.00006078014,0.000008345726,7.261659e-7,0.002933579,0.0000110998,1.831031e-7,0.2684716,0.6548897,0.07329269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688686,0.00003616233,0.000737955,0.00008487915,0.000007846226,2.610569e-7,0.0002041022,0.0002466358,0.000001432466,0.003995832,0.9941803,0.0002357261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003025544,0.0000271924,0.004471889,0.001110604,0.0003146717,0.000465334,0.0006233483,0.0001341562,0.9928225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000673446,0.00004618585,0.002836819,0.008164519,0.0002892614,0.00002228992,0.002156527,0.000009705157,0.9858012],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3392906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157543825","doi":"10.5860/crl.76.6.771","title":"Using and Experiencing the Academic Library: A Multisite Observational Study of Space and Place","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Preference; Academic library; Perception; Observational study; Higher education; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4558419319409393,"gpt":0.4662820333152509,"spread":0.01044010137431156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001800385,0.00007846154,0.0001280021,0.0001787724,0.001192992,0.0005536503,0.0004268907,0.00006453004,0.00005298986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009808711,0.00005613958,0.00001251383,0.001273831,0.001330923,0.02579237,0.000507787,0.0002736935,0.000002429992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001922903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00105783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004607882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001663459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976885,0.0006135193,0.0002493199,0.0001794379,0.0009538775,0.000315343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998453,0.0009463897,0.00008356904,0.0001581369,0.000127945,0.0002309915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008889486,0.00003750785,0.1633546,0.00001291024,0.000008471247,0.000003114162,0.4661497,0.00003395522,0.00004236179,0.357399,0.01251314,0.0003563696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006497474,0.0002126806,0.02430908,0.00003894803,0.000003083966,0.000002515187,0.8137364,0.005182765,0.0002313605,0.007034237,0.1484719,0.0001272197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854451,0.0009116743,0.000009727032,0.007158246,0.00007191269,0.0006189711,0.00001483695,0.00003516426,0.005734304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952107,0.00009769023,0.001310084,0.0003687144,0.0001352842,0.00002410912,0.000002498813,0.000006946367,0.002843984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3503647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582617615","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2014-0052","title":"Situating information literacy in the disciplines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Discipline; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Literacy; Critical literacy; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05967301209942835,"gpt":0.3852315745808768,"spread":0.3255585624814485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202784,0.00007714209,0.0001261178,0.00006271598,0.0002001902,0.0004261899,0.0007023022,0.00003290177,0.0001125837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001497776,0.0000455692,0.00002829515,0.0009752577,0.00004321384,0.02667497,0.00005644761,0.0001095489,0.0006075529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002668062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001659391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006614274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001098738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985468,0.0002284741,0.0004204608,0.00007614039,0.000526386,0.0002017329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992713,0.00007303734,0.0001943018,0.000202338,0.0001769777,0.00008204419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005667328,0.00003869346,0.009095485,0.002289672,0.000003405996,0.000001326646,0.3744608,0.00001905439,6.103352e-7,0.1257083,0.003879758,0.4844972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006658902,0.00001193418,0.002803195,0.001128512,0.000003263421,9.621209e-7,0.0119142,0.0002410234,3.858367e-7,0.00154025,0.9822087,0.00008095981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099008,0.03347456,0.00009390002,0.0788416,0.0006028363,0.002192622,0.00002108214,0.0002075299,0.7746651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.810243,0.05784653,0.001364282,0.1290502,0.0003088996,0.0001462542,0.0003386162,0.000006690003,0.0006955113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49428035","doi":"","title":"Information literacy: Study of incoming first-year undergraduates in Quebec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009009485536658465,"gpt":0.2417276769792298,"spread":0.2327181914425714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007478931,0.0001593504,0.0001999562,0.0009222266,0.0003441858,0.0005128164,0.0004808163,0.00003740551,0.0008119938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003162698,0.0001530815,0.00007620257,0.001433249,0.0002045868,0.01662774,0.00009830816,0.000152514,0.00009110407],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001322629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01614353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.524455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.963234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975497,0.0003079649,0.0007121962,0.0001569512,0.001013085,0.0002601754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958992,0.003320643,0.0004011865,0.000195178,0.00007291502,0.0001108896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004149221,0.0003474174,0.6114138,0.00003184395,0.00002047718,9.654919e-7,0.2204977,0.0003865614,0.000009142785,0.1628418,0.003918736,0.0004900559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001866005,0.0001850143,0.5147264,0.0001112654,0.00001144751,0.00000183959,0.05318898,0.0004990076,0.0001294054,0.002084714,0.4268133,0.0003825944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992953,0.0001182928,0.0001725664,0.006088997,0.00007908642,0.0004323783,0.00001327336,0.00004669195,0.09375346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947063,0.00009074567,0.0004715629,0.0009343697,0.00003568063,0.00005156174,0.000006244612,0.00000833731,0.003695162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.438779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027566875","doi":"10.1080/00048623.2010.10721464","title":"Is an Online Learning Module an Effective Way to Develop Information Literacy Skills?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Academic & Research Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Computer science; Literacy; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07485080696826,"gpt":0.4202302387487618,"spread":0.3453794317805017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003491341,0.0002063331,0.0002037548,0.0007589693,0.001839379,0.002395759,0.001562399,0.0004368898,0.0015729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003264153,0.0001885656,0.00004383267,0.003135203,0.0008373184,0.13647,0.0002911198,0.002764159,0.001080111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006473635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005338468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000765345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003280191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956957,0.0007703259,0.0005912621,0.0003623622,0.00146054,0.001119833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971985,0.0004402738,0.0001495913,0.0003833948,0.0007687531,0.001059437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007236709,0.0000962716,0.02915462,0.00003608832,0.00001431754,0.000002686362,0.4652164,0.00003869655,0.002060446,0.1122158,0.02868303,0.3624093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001822811,0.0002303717,0.1744749,0.00004087171,0.000001881032,0.000002019484,0.01776602,0.0003033873,0.004561062,0.005158446,0.7970046,0.0002741178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977943,0.000007659253,0.00006735418,0.01599046,0.0003577665,0.0007863279,0.00006082585,0.0002670507,0.004519543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704724,0.00005539099,0.007921113,0.004827449,0.0009198054,0.0000797063,0.0004169934,0.00001866131,0.01528849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7683216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575274025","doi":"","title":"\"I Wish Someone Had Taught Me\": Information Literacy in a Teacher Education Program.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teacher librarian","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wish; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Literacy education; Literacy; Critical literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01729181460103844,"gpt":0.2858742378541513,"spread":0.2685824232531129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006182328,0.0001752604,0.0001734626,0.0004400539,0.0003485874,0.001429471,0.0005594474,0.0001810187,0.006708442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001884086,0.0001684393,0.00007374083,0.001384049,0.0001927084,0.07737885,0.0000644119,0.0003687277,0.001237231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003769487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005849724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002215807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979587,0.000234035,0.0005968903,0.0002027012,0.0005035301,0.0005041789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991121,0.00003663649,0.0002220578,0.0003154243,0.00006806142,0.000245697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007165054,0.0005332872,0.02309741,0.00001643899,0.000005027224,7.110867e-7,0.1504881,0.000002751752,0.000003466373,0.04387135,0.04822676,0.7337475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003211566,0.00004010182,0.02162639,0.00004178041,0.000003698998,0.000001434429,0.007267465,0.001993586,0.00001092718,0.00183422,0.9666178,0.0002414578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453108,0.0003368495,0.00007798237,0.02865964,0.000776571,0.001582596,0.000006866268,0.0006792069,0.8225695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964477,0.0001017116,0.005089644,0.008793782,0.000924843,0.0004125247,0.0001958808,0.00002195218,0.08801199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.918391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592916264","doi":"10.18438/b8hk7x","title":"The Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Education Majors: Does Library Instruction Play a Role?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Library instruction; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Information seeking; Psychology; Sample (material); Medical education; Association (psychology); The Internet; Academic year; Information seeking behavior; Information literacy; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009463759815349432,"gpt":0.2612915038416576,"spread":0.2518277440263081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006899749,0.0001486399,0.0001265131,0.0003444063,0.001700183,0.001148328,0.0004240027,0.0001140407,0.0001574604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001165883,0.000105107,0.00006203779,0.001033438,0.0004349642,0.7845756,0.0000950038,0.0002250439,0.00007031318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001878615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001616208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007747513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.559331e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977571,0.0003714538,0.0008547569,0.0001067287,0.0006589062,0.0002510427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972323,0.001164973,0.001026418,0.0002659964,0.0001455669,0.0001648039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002255427,0.00004044073,0.005052422,0.00005672139,0.000009441053,4.336428e-7,0.007191841,0.00003704937,0.00001246769,0.8918703,0.002972344,0.09253105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002377885,0.00008395315,0.01349712,0.0001553936,0.00001870227,0.00002334474,0.01493748,0.0006595248,0.0007611086,0.002186838,0.9672602,0.0001784983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2720782,0.001441646,0.002192246,0.5505896,0.003502005,0.003179581,0.00009102316,0.0009888161,0.1659369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100763,0.01280667,0.006784867,0.06829868,0.0003075384,0.0001567744,0.0002664202,0.00001211917,0.0012907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136134241","doi":"10.5860/crl.76.7.934","title":"Integrating Library Instruction into the Course Management System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuring the Effectiveness of Blended Learning on Students’ Information Literacy Levels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Computer science; Flexibility (engineering); Pace; Workload; Blended learning; Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Multimedia; Medical education; Psychology; World Wide Web; Educational technology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07618828300067394,"gpt":0.3588643926920954,"spread":0.2826761096914215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011635,0.0001550694,0.0001986677,0.0004035403,0.001956857,0.002334974,0.001315472,0.00006389697,0.00001058153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002045902,0.00009811828,0.00006679269,0.001724782,0.0002928924,0.04897868,0.0002949229,0.0003934614,0.00001014199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001865932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001049576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009579548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008267064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947105,0.002301011,0.0005006236,0.000208292,0.001879346,0.0004001934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952579,0.003546498,0.0001986596,0.0003771805,0.0004622477,0.0001574942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001670577,0.0002226008,0.05416078,0.001042269,0.0001077156,0.000003342053,0.2052327,0.01145452,0.000009282547,0.7147509,0.0004800019,0.01086525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002766162,0.002034129,0.06238351,0.00275413,0.00003205866,8.022026e-7,0.8556903,0.02707064,0.00142221,0.002541143,0.04296747,0.000337433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866018,0.0001403613,0.001951624,0.002412561,0.0005345185,0.004977955,0.00001702455,0.0002523284,0.003111886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979026,0.000009738072,0.001115796,0.00006662372,0.0001404513,0.0005865397,0.00001363034,0.00001336449,0.0001512561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003095637","doi":"10.1300/j120v43n89_03","title":"Finding Common Ground: An Analysis of Librarians' Expressed Attitudes Towards Faculty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Reference Librarian","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Medical education; Computer science; Social psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09745206559221226,"gpt":0.3631822932221854,"spread":0.2657302276299732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760687,0.0001546517,0.0003178007,0.0003137201,0.0007290128,0.0007234177,0.001586635,0.0001228143,0.002093549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006187421,0.0001063116,0.0001366079,0.001905162,0.0003937959,0.02734244,0.0001417022,0.0001904889,0.00005782244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003037268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003038667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001569602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002458635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979018,0.0003480472,0.0004894987,0.0002436237,0.0006256259,0.0003913806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987389,0.0001549974,0.0002873761,0.000561445,0.00004959484,0.0002076392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003977638,0.0001550158,0.03366712,0.00001274463,0.0002093214,8.419795e-7,0.08658835,0.0007824706,0.0001892395,0.8195207,0.001028804,0.05780564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003540695,0.0001098161,0.5672829,0.00004697292,0.0002202216,5.354972e-7,0.01636373,0.006951988,0.001362866,0.005020621,0.4018087,0.0004775693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.84308,0.00005108833,0.0002221452,0.009875093,0.0001227444,0.0002400807,0.0001245743,0.0001955226,0.1460887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941583,0.00005955409,0.001418688,0.001771055,0.0002145862,0.00001102607,0.0002286997,0.000007928304,0.002130112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552581395","doi":"10.18438/b8m60d","title":"Embedded Academic Librarianship: A Review of the Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Inclusion (mineral); Library science; CINAHL; Narrative; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Psychological intervention","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04798557075744648,"gpt":0.3566776937620775,"spread":0.308692123004631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002603865,0.0003241253,0.0007038527,0.0003173257,0.000532718,0.0007970103,0.001404514,0.0004733797,0.0009957148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005093147,0.0002050604,0.0003412902,0.003194904,0.0003451538,0.7596002,0.0002946336,0.001123703,0.0001477839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002050349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002564115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.908843e-9,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949769,0.002011363,0.001550188,0.000181661,0.0009097099,0.0003701661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931658,0.003226208,0.00260578,0.0006078656,0.0001251861,0.0002691569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001143773,0.00001159158,0.000005221495,0.06771619,0.00001662414,3.157139e-7,0.002039781,1.847411e-7,1.036478e-8,0.3450614,0.01312614,0.5720111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004286017,0.00001530719,0.00001083688,0.1835837,0.000222581,0.00001247481,0.0003420824,0.000003541842,0.000001566512,0.00004609454,0.8155167,0.0002022872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.293178e-7,0.9292777,0.00002086601,0.04969934,0.0005814267,0.001284247,0.00007122172,0.00008900101,0.01897603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001388219,0.8477259,0.0005655127,0.1502203,0.0003027027,0.00006725809,0.0001610891,0.00001088914,0.0009450252],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8023905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978878364","doi":"10.1108/01435120410510247","title":"Information skills of undergraduate business students – a comparison of UK and international students","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Management","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Curriculum; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); International business; Skills management; Medical education; Mathematics education; Study skills; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01090089361605807,"gpt":0.3138119003744668,"spread":0.3029110067584088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001640777,0.00006538537,0.0001122305,0.0002100238,0.00009327019,0.0002374929,0.0006095467,0.00002450247,0.00009389716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001133467,0.00006050355,0.0000232813,0.0004524963,0.0001215108,0.01490977,0.0003327847,0.000032092,0.00001859261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001473128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003296297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005044953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001309871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986967,0.00002434584,0.0004022465,0.00006442577,0.000698152,0.0001141113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995453,0.0000157096,0.0002448648,0.0001031045,0.00004081511,0.00005017561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002535523,0.0003082482,0.5575818,0.00009854187,0.00007348954,5.676281e-7,0.02489835,0.0005177883,0.000001763664,0.4014778,0.001805217,0.01321113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001428434,0.00005917371,0.8698189,0.0001710882,0.00001595138,2.177476e-7,0.01243116,0.00004276852,0.0001827395,0.01780734,0.09788726,0.0001550072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301929,0.00002679373,0.0007033755,0.005949173,0.0004370328,0.000416419,0.00001438528,0.00004366176,0.06221629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960763,0.000287265,0.001220399,0.0007129657,0.00002249054,0.000006117824,0.00004807281,0.000002317392,0.001624082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3836704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105814555","doi":"10.5860/crl.64.1.55","title":"Toward a New Enterprise: Capitalizing on the Faculty–Librarian Partnership","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Library science; Sociology; Library instruction; Higher education; Psychology; University faculty; Medical education; Public relations; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2514352655289953,"gpt":0.4022536165386668,"spread":0.1508183510096715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264305,0.000163427,0.0001674692,0.000283341,0.00260494,0.002605828,0.001287588,0.000118906,0.004193136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003267296,0.0001106781,0.000105563,0.002104949,0.001235019,0.01833028,0.0001688018,0.0004911849,0.000810348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006723817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002072794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000146857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954165,0.001339121,0.0003277585,0.0003162052,0.001616662,0.0009837723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973941,0.001425735,0.00007838019,0.0004401079,0.0001201705,0.0005415336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001788495,0.00001671735,0.0005219301,0.000004062147,0.000006011444,0.000005898678,0.03212481,0.000001379775,0.000002439987,0.636757,0.3301637,0.00037823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001875695,0.0000830192,0.0003585272,0.00003129003,0.000001285714,0.0000011062,0.05987823,0.00002592679,0.0006979086,0.07455111,0.8640506,0.0001334662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03217588,0.0004325305,0.0000520868,0.08420321,0.0003626563,0.0008858456,0.00003816731,0.0002025603,0.8816471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493425,0.00009529309,0.0006893569,0.008206677,0.0004968011,0.00008323107,0.0000231424,0.00002200386,0.141041],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8171666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138754662","doi":"","title":"Discourse and practice in information literacy and information seeking: gaps and opportunities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monash University Research Portal (Monash University)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Information seeking; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Literacy; Empirical research; Information behavior; Public relations; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Pedagogy; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395218133915019,"gpt":0.3199789264080244,"spread":0.2460267450688743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418954,0.0001196224,0.0001334548,0.001480426,0.0009875499,0.0003514164,0.0002980785,0.0001176655,0.0001165751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002972788,0.0001395673,0.00002429591,0.0009555129,0.001157364,0.1045988,0.0003945395,0.0003070557,0.00001732178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000817621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003727135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002766522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001261998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.0004226575,0.0001939302,0.0001636645,0.0005711811,0.0004078237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998692,0.0003206204,0.0001497332,0.0001373502,0.0003391969,0.0003610484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002886268,0.00005762321,0.01762637,0.00005958778,0.00001912669,0.000196918,0.195723,0.000001624867,0.000003924738,0.7478195,0.001123364,0.03708036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000494707,0.00008169054,0.02262942,0.00003958361,0.000008386062,0.00001206819,0.2701472,0.00018651,0.00000341171,0.0004008711,0.7058338,0.0001623797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4907624,0.00006876464,0.0000850232,0.0038018,0.00005415279,0.0003804195,0.00004157063,0.00006034028,0.5047455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878385,0.00615131,0.0005606088,0.0004974066,0.00002056804,3.57217e-7,0.00006057658,0.000003628348,0.004867014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009092618","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920397","title":"Investigating the efficacy of embedment: experiments in information literacy integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Information literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Library science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0505696941402474,"gpt":0.3512319207413276,"spread":0.3006622266010802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562283,0.00008439893,0.0001622559,0.00008016487,0.0002610295,0.00007852288,0.0004670048,0.00003754226,0.0002084703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001390892,0.00005486841,0.0000387825,0.0008849345,0.0001246323,0.0149504,0.00004769353,0.0001094835,0.0001154885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003305812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001461777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001018691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002507305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985148,0.0001849302,0.0006255121,0.00008129061,0.0004302153,0.0001632813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991305,0.00008809481,0.0003809406,0.0001967669,0.0001467468,0.00005692953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007729505,0.0001049936,0.02457007,0.002520731,0.00001082248,6.529588e-7,0.5124366,0.00002989229,0.0001013838,0.07518473,0.0008609091,0.3841715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005368926,0.00006841838,0.1055067,0.01133551,0.00001380897,0.00000324234,0.009539404,0.001108314,0.0004573167,0.0008307961,0.8702541,0.0003454483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897023,0.01538251,0.00004890171,0.004910412,0.0002420744,0.001595621,0.00001027959,0.00007852993,0.0880294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516097,0.03794868,0.0004618711,0.00970077,0.00003029306,0.00004119,0.00008814565,0.00000258164,0.0001167735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8693932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775922399","doi":"10.18438/b8g66f","title":"Understanding Factors that Encourage Research Productivity for Academic Librarians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor; Western University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; University of Windsor; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Productivity; Psychology; USable; Peer review; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3447769091229008,"gpt":0.4268576063855998,"spread":0.08208069726269906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003950988,0.0001327397,0.0001322849,0.0002658844,0.005330713,0.004557949,0.000903766,0.0001692689,0.0002309234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01098706,0.0001176667,0.00004719397,0.0003401189,0.0006844904,0.8621535,0.000172044,0.0004784039,0.00003033005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004467747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007754894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005745019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.116313e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977137,0.000468434,0.0003592645,0.0002138237,0.0007927695,0.0004519454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943101,0.004301696,0.0006037187,0.0004265704,0.00009608969,0.0002618253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001519184,0.00001644088,0.005696816,0.00006703053,0.000006404166,4.232237e-7,0.005999367,0.000006577882,0.00002153098,0.946521,0.03863421,0.00287829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002116315,0.00008412261,0.004348904,0.000148649,0.000007097585,0.000001150691,0.01928721,0.0006452931,0.001455768,0.003631247,0.9700021,0.0001768001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01978829,0.0004040157,0.0217745,0.8678054,0.001045119,0.002117495,0.0001170088,0.0003476095,0.08660054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647108,0.00222158,0.00169461,0.02863619,0.0002610622,0.00006602961,0.00008028594,0.00001072518,0.002318671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110982314","doi":"10.18438/b8930k","title":"Understanding Patterns of Library Use Among Undergraduate Students from Different Disciplines","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Discipline; Test (biology); Usage data; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); The arts; Scale (ratio); World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Geography; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04913575259180999,"gpt":0.3007287954640467,"spread":0.2515930428722367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004884313,0.0001588237,0.0001846783,0.0002463678,0.0004916305,0.002144166,0.0005092696,0.0000901302,0.0004405704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009971638,0.0001317228,0.00005830657,0.0004210288,0.000212011,0.7428478,0.000223781,0.0001689437,0.00002351221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000150259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001363886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001051912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.828228e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976802,0.0005306248,0.0006413269,0.0001596585,0.0007490744,0.000239081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954483,0.003369523,0.0006678078,0.0002575027,0.00003257563,0.000224315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174303,0.00004401868,0.4450015,0.00005463629,0.00001601205,4.949862e-7,0.002999702,0.0001027091,0.000003246215,0.5487456,0.001432665,0.001482074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000648501,0.0001554506,0.552775,0.000874669,0.00004378132,5.31817e-7,0.01151701,0.006951545,0.0005588116,0.005111208,0.4209766,0.0003869229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7654275,0.00009031074,0.03954022,0.1802166,0.0007680764,0.0007735303,0.0001269235,0.0004153255,0.0126415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598122,0.001281953,0.001077439,0.03707871,0.0001265262,0.00001082889,0.000161569,0.000008143975,0.0004426139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7407036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131343084","doi":"10.1002/asi.22723","title":"Factors affecting the adoption of online library resources by business students","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-efficacy; Anxiety; Psychology; Information literacy; Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01612077413067255,"gpt":0.3057966884080968,"spread":0.2896759142774243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001911415,0.00006215127,0.0001338408,0.0001743343,0.0009174602,0.0001859595,0.00104199,0.00003820815,0.000003202617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006492493,0.0000315141,0.00009388167,0.003522611,0.00279658,0.02193283,0.0001684222,0.0001360188,5.537186e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003726906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002473525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002329071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.596286e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998569,0.00002721783,0.000385652,0.0000383357,0.0007501748,0.0002296266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997887,0.0001550785,0.001319775,0.0001167968,0.0004614614,0.00005994912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000321269,0.0001428442,0.6610627,0.00004585708,0.00006028533,1.458505e-8,0.1721881,0.00002628026,0.001417576,0.01397589,0.02739668,0.1236517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002204329,0.0001188791,0.2923322,0.00003400402,0.00001686409,0.00000484408,0.3237944,0.00006628308,0.001519869,0.0002624977,0.3815324,0.00009731188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885927,0.00007092262,0.0001722605,0.010552,0.0002256457,0.0001555275,0.00001311224,0.00001743313,0.0002004302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970962,0.0001975292,0.0007203709,0.001873325,0.0000673276,0.000001337585,0.000001691767,0.000001803564,0.00004037432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3687305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594484590","doi":"10.1108/lm-06-2013-0048","title":"Keeping ahead of the curve","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Management","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Incentive; Irish; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Continuing professional development; Professional development; Qualitative research; Data collection; Qualitative property; Sociology; Exploit; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009260653857239011,"gpt":0.2351762677905612,"spread":0.2259156139333222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002645836,0.00004304545,0.00005552346,0.00004979393,0.0002470596,0.000105151,0.0005597823,0.00001763172,0.0005596619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001499196,0.000030029,0.00004831811,0.0004342051,0.0001313428,0.007490398,0.0001843066,0.00003731542,0.00007141752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004140399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001968578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002069612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.674369e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992234,0.0001115281,0.000164708,0.00007971813,0.0002713242,0.0001493506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996194,0.00003655427,0.00008272854,0.0002146971,0.000005918881,0.00004067635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001297066,0.000008897107,0.007776481,0.00001645987,0.000003961879,9.060464e-8,0.00262099,0.00001961089,9.990479e-7,0.9599605,0.01409271,0.01549804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006433184,0.00000759972,0.02935434,0.00002362388,0.000002269088,3.444594e-8,0.00107028,0.0002097531,0.0001075537,0.01009192,0.9590213,0.0000469772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02270833,0.00001816347,0.0002724439,0.01217204,0.0004335011,0.0001923932,0.000001393854,0.0000671895,0.9641346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946086,0.00005779095,0.001368571,0.01320799,0.0001642851,0.000007707321,0.000003915149,0.000004928889,0.03909875],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6127906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787291080","doi":"","title":"International students and the academic library: A case study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Information literacy; Academic library; Library instruction; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Graduate students; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06269133071963022,"gpt":0.3693257672073625,"spread":0.3066344364877323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001937905,0.00008360917,0.0001105765,0.0002918429,0.00206386,0.0006573658,0.001296391,0.00006688767,0.0004249248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001018999,0.00006350307,0.00004337371,0.0007027991,0.001268172,0.008527933,0.0008746246,0.000447271,0.00005463434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008122382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001853901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00572983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001888233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973961,0.0006599724,0.0001512574,0.0002276204,0.001196861,0.0003682249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999117,0.0003674581,0.00006259199,0.0001718267,0.0001358458,0.0001452787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003128989,0.0002864769,0.5813096,0.000008432567,0.00006752814,0.0009730672,0.1867974,0.000005898141,0.000002942087,0.1390341,0.08675857,0.004443051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001555119,0.00004531197,0.03170882,0.00000979704,0.00000640259,0.00001965482,0.2801314,0.00006741135,0.000003073984,0.0007739172,0.68558,0.0000990486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8860672,0.00007459009,0.000006503458,0.01024758,0.0001539322,0.0006675553,0.00001905203,0.00006416293,0.1026995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179288,0.000448786,0.00002305091,0.0002553171,0.0002776576,0.000002361072,0.000004930575,0.000004068149,0.08105505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5988215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020250223","doi":"10.1108/00907320210428697","title":"From the front line: information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Front line; Library science; Academic library; Literacy; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Higher education; Front (military); Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02936049768988975,"gpt":0.293652376689537,"spread":0.2642918789996472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004991316,0.0001107329,0.0001625406,0.0001058058,0.0003848573,0.0004412226,0.0007863885,0.000111157,0.003491363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001025216,0.00007639593,0.00003623936,0.0007419394,0.00007855349,0.03721471,0.00004566617,0.0003068765,0.001690163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009090924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002435436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3536826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05745482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.0001722374,0.0005343886,0.0001196503,0.0003449924,0.0003456887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00008025057,0.0002137373,0.0002375919,0.00008664206,0.0001970194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003019747,0.000007804008,0.01736031,0.0005436161,0.000006275034,7.670284e-7,0.1110334,0.0000077265,4.816447e-7,0.03094298,0.009244088,0.8308495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006981225,0.000006129295,0.008381722,0.001325285,0.000004615683,5.006439e-7,0.001690678,0.0007045321,0.000001257576,0.001166583,0.9865443,0.0001045737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2222959,0.2183256,0.00002173059,0.1951662,0.00198746,0.002980289,0.0003172704,0.0003501737,0.3585553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.437143,0.4420832,0.0004549122,0.1181176,0.0005179622,0.00008047104,0.0005262615,0.000008578675,0.001068061],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486968116","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2015-0047","title":"Learning from faculty voices on information literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Pedagogy; Digital literacy; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Originality; Qualitative research; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03436764857811462,"gpt":0.3346687161987958,"spread":0.3003010676206812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004822421,0.0001258913,0.000188959,0.00006931849,0.0003817563,0.0003361104,0.0005639821,0.00006466464,0.002540777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001383332,0.00007312031,0.00005840903,0.000414673,0.00005599953,0.02978426,0.00005529259,0.0001136204,0.006628446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004262075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009344423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000777833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002160888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984311,0.0001778187,0.0004306636,0.0001521511,0.0005455682,0.0002626825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.0001488656,0.0003378014,0.0002114663,0.0001936907,0.0001420606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000615523,0.0000111408,0.002566587,0.0004326788,0.000006846667,3.026214e-7,0.01098698,0.000001410099,0.000008776446,0.01619308,0.001128256,0.9686578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000944588,0.0000357429,0.004442747,0.003836287,0.000006077049,1.412944e-7,0.0006231887,0.00002255078,0.00001801865,0.0005104305,0.9902762,0.0001341833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2557991,0.0142705,0.0002524386,0.05935381,0.001031822,0.001822302,0.0002863865,0.001006019,0.6661776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6948828,0.2238583,0.0007450515,0.07228892,0.0003747135,0.00008185103,0.0008935173,0.000013454,0.006861459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154576199","doi":"10.29173/slw6985","title":"Collaboration: Critical Success Factors for Student Learning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Student achievement; Process (computing); Psychology; Academic achievement; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02103063060893732,"gpt":0.3395521172193498,"spread":0.3185214866104125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004311161,0.0001298914,0.0001586792,0.0001487309,0.001750357,0.00266365,0.0005136204,0.00007515588,0.002890655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00240142,0.0001174123,0.0000726023,0.001103348,0.0003610596,0.03132194,0.00007211576,0.0001732678,0.0001459435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005151964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000619893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006044071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000382661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982991,0.0001478333,0.0003532539,0.0002209736,0.0005081348,0.0004707599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983582,0.0008561873,0.00009324777,0.0001571942,0.0001817971,0.0003533107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002975006,0.00002975728,0.3758448,0.000009181155,0.00000805142,0.00000193381,0.01491343,0.00006033912,0.000005584496,0.5836087,0.02469986,0.0007885888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001922026,0.00004876911,0.02989757,0.00001599014,0.00000580396,3.428133e-7,0.03424127,0.00006351886,0.00009285055,0.00666202,0.9285994,0.0001803173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5358333,0.0005856965,0.003681169,0.1130698,0.00359566,0.001392631,0.00004303193,0.0009981049,0.3408006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581224,0.00006836344,0.002077201,0.003974477,0.0008530355,0.00006319314,0.00006532482,0.00001420605,0.03476178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023652228","doi":"10.1108/01435120710774477","title":"Promoting library services in a Google world","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Management","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Originality; World Wide Web; Computer science; Service (business); Variety (cybernetics); Resource (disambiguation); Digital library; Value (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008096400214764269,"gpt":0.2504904876509969,"spread":0.2423940874362326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004974173,0.0001106355,0.0001061421,0.0005400164,0.0002526465,0.0005925913,0.000674981,0.00003756442,0.002367047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002620893,0.0001054711,0.00004398404,0.002029732,0.00007499912,0.04274892,0.0003062387,0.0001068704,0.0002861829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001433277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003962582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004300632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002741479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984512,0.00006650464,0.0003898705,0.0002220081,0.0003623183,0.0005080564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994788,0.00005779611,0.0001025302,0.0002000332,0.000003617322,0.0001572871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117815,0.0001188244,0.1478399,0.0001793082,0.00001252549,0.00008696405,0.04074373,0.000009830873,0.000002744668,0.7151736,0.01375807,0.08204333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001808176,0.00001231262,0.05876382,0.00009316892,0.000001844169,1.930425e-7,0.006396244,0.000172825,0.0001216991,0.006364414,0.9277483,0.0001443834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1142945,0.0000933593,0.00001930735,0.01009239,0.0002691567,0.0004405206,0.000002436862,0.0003812753,0.8744071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7865659,0.0001914717,0.007389492,0.02646642,0.0004769088,0.00002767792,0.00007448392,0.00002746552,0.1787802],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514005156","doi":"10.18438/b8hs57","title":"Non-use of Library Services by Students in a UK Academic Library","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Curriculum; The Internet; Academic library; Service (business); Medical education; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Library science; Business; Medicine; Marketing; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01874456642117964,"gpt":0.2967062635750227,"spread":0.2779616971538431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000513698,0.0001852527,0.00022426,0.0004868496,0.0004035958,0.0008708911,0.0008629344,0.0002003889,0.0009945872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003766552,0.0001747949,0.00005307859,0.001693425,0.0003092122,0.8631652,0.0002763947,0.0004029642,0.0000947103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007654571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006760334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007742687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.085351e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997342,0.0003340768,0.0009665759,0.000192039,0.000824756,0.0003405669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971734,0.001552288,0.0007216801,0.0002633474,0.00002640409,0.0002629387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009727944,0.0001892005,0.7582732,0.000367664,0.0000239546,0.0000155544,0.0296238,0.0001551119,0.00005183768,0.09087047,0.113774,0.005682379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155268,0.00009508926,0.08028007,0.0004606432,0.000007157481,0.000005773979,0.003721627,0.001049279,0.001117595,0.0001068018,0.9125097,0.0002307099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8262854,0.001673193,0.0001362287,0.13831,0.0004005952,0.001290702,0.000116486,0.000424731,0.03136262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6501315,0.03184988,0.004813854,0.3090672,0.0001508443,0.00005089738,0.000356452,0.00002062335,0.00355876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64659201","doi":"10.29173/slw7124","title":"Instructional Intervention is the Key: Supporting Adolescent Information Seeking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Information seeking; Psychology; Focus group; Information literacy; Intervention (counseling); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01232863833693745,"gpt":0.2765844677205949,"spread":0.2642558293836574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001833664,0.0001126605,0.0000945155,0.0002251499,0.001325122,0.001416612,0.0004918398,0.00006703859,0.002396361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000509474,0.00008733485,0.000115362,0.0009115264,0.0003021584,0.04439299,0.0001210274,0.0002795485,0.0004857616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007918419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000300329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001516918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003064925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980171,0.00008710951,0.000678714,0.0001203582,0.0006491136,0.0004476018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990036,0.000128456,0.0003789137,0.0001923555,0.000105992,0.0001906268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006507357,0.00002837513,0.1092425,0.00003681274,0.00001995811,0.00000131513,0.03844484,0.00001741985,0.00001209875,0.61234,0.06160314,0.1781884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001732099,0.00001111272,0.08372185,0.00005206319,0.000003950925,0.000002183754,0.01590313,0.0001293412,0.0002538771,0.007806448,0.8918177,0.0001250715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.286427,0.0002946266,0.03180149,0.1186231,0.006054696,0.00154677,0.00004774308,0.0009928128,0.5542119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590545,0.00002319782,0.003732412,0.03146139,0.0009431647,0.00001230899,0.00008386034,0.000008725742,0.004680397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8302146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077319937","doi":"10.1108/01435120610715527","title":"LIS professionals and knowledge management: some recent perspectives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Management","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Originality; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Knowledge management; Library science; Political science; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008851639094242749,"gpt":0.2722499418113984,"spread":0.2633983027171557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000248379,0.0001251515,0.0001063771,0.0002462131,0.0005974526,0.0004397088,0.000362674,0.00004156621,0.00136047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003172679,0.000110127,0.00003897523,0.0006133366,0.0001865969,0.01764145,0.0003651287,0.00006857467,0.0002369031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002431984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003458163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001714478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001367241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986985,0.0001134045,0.0002482017,0.0002784501,0.0003223026,0.0003391974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995779,0.00003224039,0.00007831623,0.0001900696,0.00001599987,0.0001055161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000601147,0.0001014229,0.0005434058,0.00004385163,0.00001398733,0.000005925182,0.005953433,0.000001388198,2.892277e-7,0.8688288,0.1026549,0.02184652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002253763,0.0000130109,0.01546306,0.00004449757,0.000008119137,2.170476e-7,0.02927862,0.00002653442,0.00001476019,0.02797925,0.9267923,0.0001542786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01001715,0.001846734,0.00002375352,0.01824239,0.0003566295,0.0006122413,0.000006246602,0.0002661955,0.9686286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2400379,0.01263361,0.00670765,0.008615595,0.001101765,0.0001650003,0.0001069843,0.00003281788,0.7305987],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327309693","doi":"","title":"Theory, Research, Practice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Information literacy; Scholarship; School library; Sociology; Theme (computing); Literacy; Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04305181156251691,"gpt":0.364914689297252,"spread":0.321862877734735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004432806,0.0001045118,0.0001114345,0.0002959927,0.001733693,0.001795954,0.0008925797,0.00007755555,0.008563842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006896092,0.00009290408,0.00005818503,0.001558334,0.00089266,0.0691302,0.0001799778,0.0004661538,0.006176442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007877368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001073768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001459368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002348242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966833,0.001052551,0.0003270506,0.0002325607,0.001026275,0.0006782589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.001710874,0.0001036852,0.0003699626,0.0002127773,0.0004485839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342691,0.00002184931,0.0005626599,0.000001780515,0.000005025661,0.000001751803,0.009086118,0.000006527481,0.000003633505,0.7923766,0.1801224,0.0177783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001131313,0.00001842414,0.0008108058,0.000013858,0.000002535359,0.000001243909,0.01554818,0.00001654637,0.0001499122,0.06836846,0.9148358,0.0001211075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001930108,0.000531355,0.0001500803,0.1446577,0.0003265996,0.00024727,0.00000436028,0.0002629959,0.8518895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4351327,0.0005352305,0.04010247,0.09413242,0.005450604,0.000084017,0.00003319445,0.00003906276,0.4244903],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7347134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974822183","doi":"10.18438/eblip29547","title":"The Library’s Impact on University Students’ Academic Success and Learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Chicago; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","keywords":"Coursework; Qualitative property; Space (punctuation); Information literacy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Library science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01069574691804063,"gpt":0.2983116785261383,"spread":0.2876159316080977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230643,0.0001125822,0.00009227941,0.0001549732,0.001367386,0.00183781,0.0005322308,0.00009131447,0.000544116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008395663,0.0000793959,0.00003470295,0.0006220764,0.0001914998,0.6943911,0.000166222,0.0005101483,0.000228275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000140506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003552543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002273313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.65622e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982097,0.0006508696,0.0002610414,0.0001242058,0.0005143119,0.0002398333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953662,0.003925041,0.0003375821,0.0001526936,0.0000307435,0.0001878012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007760943,0.00001607863,0.1457259,0.00003697735,0.00001598082,0.000001499757,0.005677288,0.0004536937,0.000002710139,0.8191579,0.005360629,0.02277522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002280014,0.0001540915,0.07340936,0.00010428,0.00000583606,0.000001661527,0.0104134,0.001373945,0.00002904053,0.00006912722,0.9140953,0.0001159661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7081311,0.0004600434,0.00006861609,0.2102938,0.0003331313,0.0006950177,0.0000106293,0.0002848857,0.07972274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908839,0.01243402,0.0002490081,0.06958386,0.0001017056,0.000003109493,0.000028582,0.00000664437,0.008754043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}