{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1053,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":1053,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"89f55f32de67","filters":{"topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making"}},"results":[{"id":"W2136050606","doi":"10.1080/13658810600661508","title":"GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Geographical Information Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Geographic information system; Computer science; Decision support system; Geography; Data science; Operations research; Management science; Data mining; Engineering; Cartography; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0503917347026865,"gpt":0.3773240429621981,"spread":0.3269323082595116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009445806,0.000207432,0.0006524052,0.003659571,0.0001050989,0.001691084,0.002604203,0.0001951125,0.0001146307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007346414,0.0001170635,0.0008761024,0.005047041,0.000149415,0.001945031,0.0002021327,0.0003492036,0.00002624513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006597694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005441809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001423527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885877,0.0008408671,0.004343916,0.0001898568,0.005839577,0.000198077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804328,0.003174209,0.003764574,0.0006301092,0.01188702,0.0001113024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001288442,0.0003136393,0.8363274,0.00002149369,0.0008317344,0.00002210041,0.0006977864,0.1331102,0.000650705,0.002329504,0.008594649,0.01581236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303556,0.00004586146,0.9056069,0.0003421956,0.00007367687,0.00007834745,0.0001683465,0.08043235,0.0001240573,0.0009998196,0.01067623,0.0001486102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8081788,0.0003851419,0.1842054,0.0005130268,0.005653375,0.0002670517,0.0004559866,0.00001492836,0.0003262181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977626,0.000007289915,0.001767982,0.0001956945,0.0001820591,0.000003697957,0.00004319816,0.000006474903,0.00003102313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1895837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313893761","doi":"10.3390/encyclopedia3010006","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":708,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Computer science; Section (typography); Process (computing); Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1900828840705096,"gpt":0.5537171911985436,"spread":0.3636343071280339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01060281,0.0004091832,0.0007185536,0.001100874,0.0003677236,0.0009003914,0.001361663,0.0002419225,0.002709615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02592579,0.0003221317,0.0001935064,0.00256174,0.0002323728,0.0007769669,0.001357617,0.0003347378,0.003118173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005181134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007785843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000116392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002839991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933148,0.001076305,0.001502706,0.001480492,0.001857938,0.0007677529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856792,0.0118723,0.0003768932,0.00138193,0.0003706715,0.0003190155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005771484,0.00003241063,0.007541938,0.000006127559,0.00001145914,0.0001147921,0.002508335,0.00004705141,0.005093261,0.0001990321,0.02930624,0.9550816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00179735,0.00007906032,0.3009104,0.0002082397,0.00002884769,0.00008022937,0.002120692,0.09732521,0.0003095287,0.04244336,0.5537871,0.0009100848],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6748522,0.0009058324,0.3067137,0.0004574172,0.00644676,0.0006230995,0.00006079579,0.0006056573,0.009334556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4205154,0.000241397,0.5741576,0.0004315879,0.000375288,0.00003844704,0.000006062756,0.00006228748,0.00417194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101950038","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2013.795978","title":"A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Stakeholder; Decision support system; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Operations research; Business; Mathematics; Data mining; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07641263583973068,"gpt":0.477567586573558,"spread":0.4011549507338273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002876601,0.001876987,0.00619053,0.002097478,0.000236699,0.0006585193,0.002951017,0.001139335,0.001996576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008230354,0.001282503,0.001426175,0.002255806,0.0001747282,0.0006385929,0.001505181,0.001219098,0.00001213834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002029574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001834011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001643999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.539481e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900944,0.0005146427,0.004736196,0.00222666,0.001388399,0.001039735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881326,0.005642547,0.002394743,0.002547313,0.0008883309,0.0003944836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105129,0.000006018719,0.000001783017,0.0647475,0.0002894764,0.000006048782,0.00007992125,0.000171606,0.00002721323,0.0004312861,0.01054459,0.9236841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482633,0.00004592886,0.00006574395,0.1054427,0.0008049317,0.0002568335,0.00003576386,0.005266947,0.000006562258,0.008197204,0.8783682,0.001060956],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005519088,0.6741161,0.3200372,0.000008647158,0.002424607,0.002793226,0.0004884587,0.00007962969,0.0000465973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001206762,0.5281755,0.4710036,0.0001541507,0.0002800901,0.000142393,0.00005642811,0.0001425276,0.00003322133],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093360043","doi":"10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1","title":"Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Analytics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":346,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Goodness of fit; Cutoff; Component (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Statistics; Mathematics; Residual; Econometrics; Sample (material); Computer science; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2662953277231987,"gpt":0.4471563692783302,"spread":0.1808610415551316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01582035,0.0002861819,0.001374268,0.00150422,0.0001213357,0.0006671169,0.001333312,0.000152942,0.0004590868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0277718,0.0002192198,0.0009333612,0.001925239,0.00005564196,0.0003750982,0.0002377214,0.0004089686,0.000004379458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001292334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001633685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008957476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003109778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927008,0.001152858,0.003001541,0.0005192962,0.002214081,0.0004114822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909315,0.004956764,0.00201004,0.0004899573,0.001260309,0.0003514549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00394008,0.0001017553,0.03448304,0.00003472545,0.0006289902,0.00008788765,0.001145967,0.9225304,0.008429416,0.00009328064,0.022525,0.005999493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001758353,0.00006013058,0.02791054,0.00004731005,0.0003588383,0.00001180555,0.0002174154,0.9635924,0.0001020386,0.003667994,0.002043516,0.0002296772],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8143025,0.0001604277,0.1821406,0.002784397,0.0002879667,0.000151368,0.00006346151,0.00001270719,0.00009655125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872623,0.00002952799,0.1112313,0.001008768,0.0002900791,0.00000147333,0.000003759252,0.00002350414,0.0001492953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07295986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054219113","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.005","title":"Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":318,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; TOPSIS; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Process (computing); Sustainable transport; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1614085459001022,"gpt":0.4177091967761213,"spread":0.2563006508760191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003506012,0.0002326335,0.0005564934,0.0006922716,0.0001927517,0.0001525509,0.0008856718,0.000139357,0.00004844363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002880068,0.0001797847,0.00007716288,0.002200389,0.00009604097,0.0005137414,0.00003502993,0.000125386,0.00009914937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001462103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000137788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004883371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001624573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950851,0.0003111848,0.001828301,0.0008080543,0.001581314,0.0003860081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954345,0.0006838739,0.0009808377,0.001430412,0.001339305,0.0001310438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007283877,0.001639712,0.1572188,0.0006299656,0.0001415312,0.00003413835,0.0597609,0.03436721,0.03481584,0.6375299,0.002681727,0.0704518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006528664,0.0008434805,0.2144661,0.0009496356,0.000131658,0.0001109117,0.2728688,0.3462545,0.004070389,0.02192322,0.1292072,0.002645448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1012748,0.00147903,0.8830506,0.00006599615,0.0001957199,0.005089411,0.00003861318,0.0001225093,0.008683341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983732,0.00000734026,0.009715517,0.00001839645,0.00008944904,0.005556068,0.000022592,0.00003288734,0.0008257112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7382229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176008306","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.011","title":"Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Supplier evaluation; Supply chain; Context (archaeology); VIKOR method; Nominal group technique; Computer science; Supply chain management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Process management; Operations management; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2914001476932958,"gpt":0.3637968851658938,"spread":0.072396737472598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001684871,0.0002839191,0.0003652576,0.0004528739,0.0001320842,0.0004853912,0.0004240324,0.000211685,0.00003914008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003012918,0.0002567349,0.00005908439,0.0005213668,0.00004132461,0.0003524616,0.0003556272,0.0003129418,0.0000557435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003677316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001380877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002676779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000215088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969078,0.00008660826,0.0007522671,0.0006324864,0.001189756,0.0004310393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987192,0.0003403586,0.0001667989,0.0003149668,0.00009417043,0.0003645263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000494553,0.00006190535,0.001284512,0.00000373147,0.0000492839,0.0000134771,0.0005056012,0.39685,0.003513197,0.0001217548,0.0008735718,0.5966735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002230257,0.0001257842,0.002533896,0.00007569072,0.00002165533,0.00006199085,0.0001799189,0.8555366,0.001467301,0.0004482768,0.1367386,0.0005800566],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5685316,0.00005715966,0.4289017,0.0001376913,0.001653649,0.0005091827,0.000002268709,0.0001616399,0.00004505578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395751,0.000001148296,0.2592589,0.00006456472,0.0008560126,0.00002760694,0.00000553393,0.00004744966,0.00016362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059097960","doi":"10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1","title":"The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Normalization (sociology); Ideal solution; Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05644978036009427,"gpt":0.3778595338313747,"spread":0.3214097534712804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612678,0.0002896398,0.0004619615,0.0006277407,0.0006596879,0.0003278714,0.0003343416,0.0001403355,0.00002072863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00125715,0.0001744518,0.00006945666,0.001443927,0.0001044406,0.001237723,0.0004092949,0.0001846907,0.000001532018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001696028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004026091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000489356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004346514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962214,0.0005280325,0.001365957,0.000671211,0.0008676103,0.0003457404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974721,0.001401994,0.0004485553,0.0003661848,0.0002468915,0.00006427579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009761316,0.0000305812,0.1553936,0.00001055897,0.00000485486,0.0001037234,0.002508268,0.8261021,0.0002333423,0.00002094338,9.26485e-7,0.014615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003862688,0.0004815479,0.09399402,0.00009200435,0.00001666478,0.0003579036,0.002595852,0.89557,0.0002682054,0.002564142,5.161765e-7,0.0001964772],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222301,0.00004815067,0.0758301,0.00002949672,0.0005513105,0.001257437,0.00001961486,0.00002710588,0.000006687191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875078,0.00001586988,0.01233529,0.000003029714,0.00005213236,0.00004400339,0.00001481632,0.00002114218,0.000005965343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06946792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348410","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2011.07.006","title":"Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Trigonometric functions; Possibility theory; Mathematics; Base (topology); Function (biology); Artificial intelligence; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3666811522813856,"gpt":0.4523683107298756,"spread":0.08568715844849001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005956053,0.0001357536,0.0003281371,0.000644341,0.00006565481,0.0003885261,0.001127547,0.00005025208,0.0002766193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029135,0.0000997321,0.00007978183,0.0004338737,0.0001311343,0.001107916,0.0002340215,0.0001842794,0.00001031946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006940513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007890357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008384019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009339977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962586,0.0007210433,0.001104904,0.0002732611,0.001471055,0.0001711557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937676,0.003125234,0.0009193211,0.0002084149,0.001877361,0.0001020275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001302972,0.0001651464,0.8883235,0.000006719331,0.0001252331,0.0003614779,0.006802472,0.0006777758,0.001545321,0.0423231,0.0004719127,0.05789435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039714,0.00006814687,0.902595,0.0007174803,0.00001046951,0.000414777,0.001946868,0.01595746,0.0005035697,0.07570972,0.0008088096,0.0002279726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225955,0.001388021,0.07424439,0.0001241058,0.0008841042,0.00007925919,0.000017029,0.000007978028,0.000659632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974053,0.0002978891,0.02538455,0.0001001901,0.00008806651,0.000001998358,0.000001519963,0.00001101588,0.00006177376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05766638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012323948","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.071","title":"Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"SWOT analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Vagueness; Operations research; Selection (genetic algorithm); Context analysis; Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Business; Mathematics; Marketing; Government (linguistics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0424467241313793,"gpt":0.3690723420025249,"spread":0.3266256178711456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001534711,0.0002441616,0.0003947716,0.0008737287,0.000542827,0.000705547,0.0003284732,0.000160103,0.00006622064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003957584,0.0001740946,0.00005649552,0.003068088,0.0001189523,0.0002547966,0.00005599911,0.0002354535,0.00007051004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003432272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007639964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002873493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006791913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968669,0.0001437334,0.0006772379,0.0009688328,0.001068275,0.0002750449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968706,0.0008632026,0.0003467306,0.0009387917,0.0007556294,0.0002250452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006525869,0.001595601,0.2170049,0.0001151776,0.0008055503,0.000009628206,0.006046299,0.03102637,0.103204,0.03837558,0.005367836,0.5957965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283391,0.0001818735,0.02461779,0.00004698053,0.0001702181,0.00004999408,0.001554408,0.694321,0.000869113,0.0005319966,0.2756586,0.0007145907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1243313,0.000141735,0.8705643,0.001090313,0.0001979942,0.002200572,0.00002146365,0.0001941997,0.001258153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241421,0.000003637706,0.07353516,0.0001418381,0.0002330324,0.001517174,0.00003011617,0.00002708002,0.0003698749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7099373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988428279","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.005","title":"Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Supply chain; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical optimization; Dynamic programming; Order (exchange); Supply chain management; Process (computing); Function (biology); Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1482788018086866,"gpt":0.4015870338649926,"spread":0.253308232056306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003838151,0.0002346781,0.0003873139,0.001070163,0.0001511902,0.0006045637,0.001433766,0.00009482794,0.001482359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003458237,0.0002080387,0.0002290038,0.0004378593,0.0001246614,0.001946564,0.0001746922,0.0003279191,0.0001334992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003653286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002395509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003657327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000850725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960958,0.000188578,0.001945434,0.0006175538,0.0008880484,0.0002645861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940334,0.0002344788,0.001730674,0.000432508,0.003417809,0.0001511461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003045778,0.0028113,0.07552458,0.00002774722,0.001265027,0.00006195404,0.01291804,0.06483227,0.0149332,0.00966107,0.008042651,0.8068764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008238188,0.0005804558,0.05272507,0.0001462448,0.0001581902,0.006149021,0.01064031,0.4947329,0.02116257,0.0379792,0.3655431,0.001944735],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7428302,0.00006794505,0.2422513,0.001471132,0.01127915,0.0003833017,0.00002301706,0.000048466,0.001645466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8095919,0.00002802096,0.1876706,0.0001259303,0.001004393,0.00001442912,0.000008962571,0.00002938353,0.001526381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124417247","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2000.11732409","title":"Web-Hipre: Global Decision Support By Value Tree And AHP Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Java applet; Decision tree; Decision support system; Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Decision analysis; Java; World Wide Web; Data mining; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1312893094682656,"gpt":0.4697411430817452,"spread":0.3384518336134796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01174448,0.0002126033,0.00045624,0.001083268,0.0008248567,0.005208646,0.0006324589,0.0002655288,0.00212922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002993643,0.0001552582,0.0001096728,0.002822573,0.000210169,0.004834314,0.0002593373,0.0003186423,0.001492785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001420964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003261278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003854577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009341657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912784,0.0003767963,0.001886441,0.0004211344,0.00557904,0.0004581831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949372,0.00205453,0.0001936062,0.0005871592,0.001835019,0.0003924741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003648808,0.00004202282,0.02437617,0.00002049955,0.00013966,0.00000522438,0.001327913,0.007684621,0.0000735418,0.02514958,0.1645686,0.7762473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009611461,0.00009410628,0.03066415,0.00002318664,0.00001557444,0.00004675446,0.001026139,0.3101327,0.00001038403,0.0007763779,0.656049,0.0002004966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967711,0.0005193654,0.02333957,0.001299076,0.0004025283,0.001324798,0.001203169,0.00007258035,0.07506779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935175,0.0001946832,0.00161974,0.0004589166,0.00008554565,0.00007140325,0.0001836094,0.00000640256,0.00386226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7760468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979683159","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.010","title":"Using AHP and Dempster–Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Modelling & Software","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Sustainability; Dempster–Shafer theory; Measure (data warehouse); Sustainable transport; Computer science; Intelligent transportation system; Process (computing); Operations research; Engineering; Transport engineering; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5116639428476715,"gpt":0.4163416386453372,"spread":0.09532230420233423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00468195,0.0002985076,0.0003753237,0.000240182,0.0009462798,0.0001299828,0.0005284717,0.0001466795,0.0007308142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005176604,0.0002635202,0.0001934006,0.0001730776,0.0002382318,0.0007457689,0.0002614429,0.0001788376,0.00004711013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001514952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004663886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003819281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002172759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962819,0.0002327742,0.0008472216,0.0009158399,0.001021922,0.0007003614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975947,0.001226647,0.0002627356,0.0006568501,0.00006319004,0.0001959378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001679805,0.0009630417,0.08594617,0.0001424627,0.0002142754,0.0001347251,0.04085265,0.6878147,0.007555908,0.0119812,0.000259046,0.1624561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001019861,0.0001350548,0.003992945,0.00006016516,0.0001117451,0.0000330886,0.005660646,0.7875281,0.0003770588,0.1996031,0.0009339083,0.000544329],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4183902,0.0003864387,0.5805605,0.000007820207,0.0001049902,0.0003954132,0.00004301768,0.00004278043,0.00006883012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711167,0.0000117033,0.2874533,0.00008520512,0.00004091976,0.00003671171,0.000009415791,0.00004380093,0.001151956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2931072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975078995","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2014.03.016","title":"Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras","keywords":"Group decision-making; Preference relation; Granularity; Granular computing; Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Preference; Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Data mining; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Rough set; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0687755994867641,"gpt":0.3726914780555157,"spread":0.3039158785687516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007065434,0.000151723,0.0004181094,0.0006277449,0.0001215022,0.0005318087,0.000339896,0.0001126538,0.000007883707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002010339,0.000104206,0.0000322828,0.0005724409,0.00006983285,0.0008243875,0.00008851088,0.0001116687,0.00001150551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003408491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002458814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000275105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002546175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996491,0.0004802254,0.001196763,0.0003419303,0.001281487,0.0002086191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967477,0.001630212,0.0005816302,0.0005603934,0.0003900554,0.00008998968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007549398,0.0001023985,0.1099111,0.0001287958,0.00001395247,0.000009756459,0.003137893,0.0086041,0.002159071,0.06000239,0.0003532281,0.8148224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997386,0.0003687248,0.2940205,0.0009374451,0.00001159137,0.0001055599,0.002343561,0.6653209,0.00004214904,0.02941262,0.005071959,0.0003676058],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551049,0.00006282198,0.1435215,0.00003344821,0.0003629948,0.0003087057,0.00001114698,0.00001995082,0.0005745738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732828,0.000001955716,0.02660965,0.00004396287,0.0000357181,0.000008986878,0.000005320058,0.000007813471,0.00000379371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8144548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5128244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026792038","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.027","title":"A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials & Design (1980-2015)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Universidade de Coimbra","keywords":"ELECTRE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ranking (information retrieval); Material selection; Computer science; Operations research; Rank (graph theory); Process engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Materials science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1537640010272997,"gpt":0.3909698871581196,"spread":0.2372058861308199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009735261,0.0006451411,0.001147348,0.0007326949,0.0005726155,0.001347461,0.001980545,0.0003923669,0.002220208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007291269,0.000424459,0.0002772876,0.00114122,0.0002732873,0.0005992868,0.0003952749,0.0002283671,0.0006192055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002994634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003964673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001181445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002630208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905396,0.001574052,0.002478213,0.001309749,0.003241184,0.0008572625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904606,0.005400032,0.001328315,0.001711875,0.0009171647,0.0001819588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002058003,0.000234272,0.0001593223,0.0000107102,0.0000261058,0.0000203825,0.0006254293,0.2809836,0.7044091,0.001962078,0.00526077,0.004250226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003197022,0.0004413234,0.001215578,0.000491381,0.00005279084,0.00002829883,0.0002276449,0.1701842,0.7957126,0.02704872,0.0007188866,0.0006814807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.468758,0.00001862994,0.5278042,0.0004111567,0.001639215,0.000920744,0.0003032234,0.0001112784,0.00003350629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209734,0.000002577267,0.07773239,0.000665681,0.0003278439,0.000110681,0.00002064737,0.00008871716,0.00007810684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4522153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036961948","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.026","title":"Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Supply chain; Programming paradigm; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3715824838578539,"gpt":0.5019066362398276,"spread":0.1303241523819737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04659226,0.0001673714,0.000331304,0.0008362844,0.0008924467,0.001520039,0.0007346931,0.00004870658,0.00003533199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02055938,0.0001169097,0.0001633175,0.0008431883,0.0001192133,0.0008503135,0.0001425077,0.0008193773,0.000021303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001321014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003185292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008244446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004850268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915034,0.003192468,0.001278065,0.0006163838,0.002989289,0.0004204476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915959,0.00154565,0.0003293115,0.0002942682,0.005948815,0.0002860294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003735122,0.00210398,0.01182113,0.0000222497,0.0001539527,0.00005944977,0.008651354,0.1416635,0.01163171,0.004489042,0.004264675,0.8114039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002502206,0.001140726,0.04207812,0.00003239453,0.0000151728,0.0002343832,0.001790071,0.9419771,0.0001431659,0.007369033,0.002509329,0.0002082849],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.447406,0.0001588096,0.5498318,0.0002579712,0.00008050785,0.0005311965,0.0000145248,0.000009055043,0.001710076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7090271,0.00001883009,0.2903121,0.00003280311,0.0003175257,0.000004798521,0.000002920033,0.00001521216,0.000268712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8111956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780521829","doi":"10.3390/su10010014","title":"Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Feng Chia University; Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi; Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; National Central University; Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi; Gaziosmanpasa Üniversitesi; Korea University; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Chongqing Jiaotong University; Korea Environment Institute; Isfahan University of Technology; Tsinghua University; Heriot-Watt University; Klaipedos Universitetas; Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee; Politechnika Poznańska; Akdeniz Üniversitesi; Kocaeli Üniversitesi; Beijing University of Technology; George Mason University; Concordia University; Beijing Normal University; Yonsei University; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Cairo University; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research; East Carolina University; Université Laval; Firat Üniversitesi; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Imperial College London; Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur; Asian Institute of Technology; Dalian University of Technology; Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Indian Institute of Science","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Publishing; Engineering; Engineering management; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02602933962922416,"gpt":0.3920856375640207,"spread":0.3660562979347965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007416313,0.0002877676,0.0005820507,0.001627718,0.0008841024,0.001480097,0.001603448,0.0003010626,0.0002163985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1771912,0.0002566304,0.00009735417,0.0009846304,0.0006736158,0.001367203,0.001939067,0.0004560879,0.000009827015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009005581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001507673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002601979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957502,0.000147401,0.001061074,0.001209157,0.0009755596,0.0008566158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922449,0.002536357,0.0005108867,0.002589198,0.001977885,0.000140795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001107771,0.00005496001,0.51531,0.00006085236,0.000006608018,0.0002927532,0.0004506676,0.0009961999,0.000157642,0.09333076,0.0001681917,0.3890606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005873173,0.00003696567,0.2421938,0.00007847104,0.000004883207,0.00006440509,0.005296782,0.0105736,0.00009199324,0.7302192,0.01056714,0.0002853909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.928909,0.0001778503,0.06781424,0.001470465,0.0004371609,0.0005883619,0.000002897224,0.0001057974,0.0004942071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701602,0.000005465141,0.02949229,0.00002290447,0.00005410163,0.00003877785,1.756865e-7,0.00002118739,0.0002048852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6368885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160777395","doi":"10.1002/atr.5670430206","title":"The multi‐actor, multi‐criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Management science; Computer science; Process management; Order (exchange); Evaluation methods; Inclusion (mineral); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4136676087511625,"gpt":0.5639888913116063,"spread":0.1503212825604439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05275189,0.0001958058,0.0006103129,0.0005091829,0.0003119039,0.00009797093,0.000605772,0.0001041889,0.00003868344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02511506,0.0001026936,0.0004431156,0.001160166,0.0001651755,0.001191975,0.000003675724,0.0002299926,5.018788e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004779357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001710755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000704314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001954776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925798,0.002504054,0.002212404,0.0003630287,0.002106666,0.0002340724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648303,0.02777016,0.002607805,0.0004646785,0.004249011,0.00007806457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01015958,0.0003556635,0.00205626,0.00001562376,0.000897068,0.0000107045,0.0232618,0.1031721,0.06434281,0.002583044,0.00004633035,0.793099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005771586,0.0005504355,0.9009522,0.0000569919,0.004823904,0.00003746836,0.02720038,0.02883436,0.002755623,0.02500893,0.003763693,0.0002443976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.286967,0.001839919,0.7087039,0.001203027,0.0005179665,0.0007174502,0.00003290619,0.000006734344,0.0000110173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7657304,0.000259947,0.2337653,0.0001250981,0.00005867322,0.00001610132,0.000006348353,0.000009881393,0.00002819227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998366350","doi":"10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9","title":"Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Pairwise comparison; Vagueness; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Analytic network process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Structuring; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07732360547300776,"gpt":0.4586990703335935,"spread":0.3813754648605858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009285622,0.0006102829,0.0007744192,0.001576109,0.002294254,0.001099418,0.001245818,0.0002397,0.001363225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001972025,0.0004826993,0.0002658146,0.0009676934,0.001486361,0.0007000084,0.00106588,0.001414718,0.000286105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001153762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002486804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001899375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008699998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853802,0.001314059,0.001648353,0.002087868,0.00806726,0.00150227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988223,0.008935011,0.0007706404,0.001411633,0.00008040689,0.000579319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009082436,0.002336914,0.5247338,0.00002356644,0.000126932,0.00034312,0.000393148,0.2026696,0.005377097,0.0002756196,0.0004146795,0.2623972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002079711,0.0005659784,0.332042,0.0001798118,0.00008300884,0.00005679228,0.002688442,0.5351433,0.0001248789,0.1260651,0.0002778822,0.0006931179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7296976,0.0005725599,0.2679029,0.00004389149,0.0001856521,0.0008391801,0.0004064286,0.00003335983,0.0003184633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701365,0.0001185494,0.02911445,0.00003270807,0.000233409,0.00007688515,0.00003219187,0.00008008337,0.0001752202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3324736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385548388","doi":"10.1007/s00500-023-09011-0","title":"A review on TOPSIS method and its extensions for different applications with recent development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5713732761471263,"gpt":0.5695728295020038,"spread":0.001800446645122467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005868213,0.0006301145,0.002711883,0.0005774675,0.00065993,0.000336671,0.001051937,0.0001790943,0.00005467023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00590142,0.0003706591,0.000347344,0.001695822,0.00003062974,0.00005643299,0.0008450071,0.0003851788,0.0002883043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001584526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003186605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.267071e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000496129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936809,0.0006551084,0.002237658,0.001659847,0.001256511,0.0005100068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978272,0.01823788,0.001370252,0.00107933,0.0007862385,0.000254358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003332641,0.00003241656,4.804352e-7,0.007271009,0.0000609976,0.00000274888,0.00005698586,0.00001059897,2.04687e-7,0.0002569216,0.001994452,0.9903098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001463789,0.0000319325,0.000009411018,0.07434335,0.0002424534,0.00003571649,0.00002067649,0.001331428,7.810568e-7,0.0004818058,0.9229398,0.0004163221],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001343252,0.6947595,0.3014183,0.0001558013,0.0002063708,0.003271103,0.00003136678,0.0001101231,0.00004610058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001504779,0.9116825,0.08634186,0.0005143856,0.0001599119,0.0007888249,0.00004477676,0.0000884053,0.000377842],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078620473","doi":"10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z","title":"Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Analytic hierarchy process; Ambiguity; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Premise; Fuzzy logic; Structuring; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1104602599298816,"gpt":0.489091797081638,"spread":0.3786315371517564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01385579,0.0005567267,0.0007150097,0.001511456,0.002295405,0.001012137,0.001132078,0.0002471198,0.001626051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002274504,0.0004458758,0.0002074741,0.0009985404,0.001801042,0.0007015439,0.001393913,0.001370892,0.0002747258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001842315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002301041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006167478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007377008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865001,0.0007280501,0.00169775,0.001889035,0.007545159,0.001639878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864992,0.01081385,0.0005367472,0.001200069,0.00009870715,0.0008513812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001943124,0.002713097,0.08657613,0.0000437913,0.0003402185,0.0007098163,0.002273839,0.2145923,0.01089346,0.002425668,0.0002172965,0.6772713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00228178,0.0009185164,0.2682404,0.0003464807,0.0001019635,0.0002547008,0.02480421,0.2969403,0.00008199068,0.4047583,0.0002682151,0.001003147],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5889574,0.0002702223,0.4094412,0.00004376962,0.0002152094,0.0006341692,0.0001495574,0.000023364,0.000265049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826089,0.0001619698,0.01665352,0.00007293082,0.0002195617,0.00003832831,0.00002334524,0.00006816527,0.0001532724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6762682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053481674","doi":"10.1068/a35156","title":"GIS–Multicriteria Evaluation with Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA): Case Study of Developing Watershed Management Strategies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Watershed; Function (biology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Transformation (genetics); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Machine learning; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1004777202162674,"gpt":0.347490874293913,"spread":0.2470131540776456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105899,0.0002034836,0.0003087281,0.0002460197,0.0002698778,0.0003762241,0.0001102889,0.00004282005,0.0002201813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004100932,0.000152646,0.00001839091,0.0001120402,0.00006862868,0.0004249647,0.00009187891,0.00007945595,0.000006571885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000362195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000204566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003301339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002081343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980369,0.0003234952,0.0004819775,0.0005628173,0.00038589,0.0002089605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990199,0.0003312366,0.0002340615,0.0003049297,0.0000346094,0.00007524675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008083264,0.0007139457,0.6859978,0.0001718357,0.0007895071,0.004080844,0.1671481,0.04033345,0.0007824824,0.00436835,0.0004526443,0.09435274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01217566,0.0007737202,0.05806658,0.000277808,0.0003033592,0.001091143,0.7779351,0.114853,0.0006387123,0.007183445,0.02535378,0.001347732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980933,0.0002064044,0.01657507,0.00007770389,0.00005974087,0.0005621405,0.000001911087,0.00001136681,0.001572722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845321,0.0000137349,0.01518072,0.00002539015,0.00001144046,0.00002934617,0.000003439686,0.00001025245,0.0001935844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6279312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6224722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040404944","doi":"10.1155/2014/459375","title":"Cloud Service Selection Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Scientific World JOURNAL","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universiti Malaya; Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Cloud computing; Computer science; Scalability; Service (business); Selection (genetic algorithm); Provisioning; Taxonomy (biology); Data science; Management science; Operations research; Database; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3311839264977251,"gpt":0.5105724779710321,"spread":0.179388551473307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05256742,0.000926559,0.00375946,0.009542572,0.004230333,0.01686585,0.007120283,0.0003253592,0.005334319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006433469,0.0004974607,0.003072651,0.03551824,0.0003942189,0.0008507762,0.001257849,0.001925405,0.002837812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005826712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007883589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003853159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001156231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800263,0.00486402,0.005105143,0.002000581,0.006880664,0.001123296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801458,0.008370472,0.0046977,0.003265917,0.002975133,0.0005450149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003075096,0.00005050543,0.00001207096,0.0001401091,0.0004380142,0.00001751466,0.0002399835,0.001988718,0.00002701695,0.00005627098,0.01474557,0.9822535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002300325,0.00001302,0.00001432261,0.002851838,0.003400819,0.0006321848,0.00007229642,0.06101456,0.000002429155,0.002699594,0.9285294,0.0005395104],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006942317,0.8834434,0.08921661,0.0002292553,0.02522624,0.0008185307,0.00006616436,0.00007947079,0.0002261265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002099852,0.8776278,0.07094683,0.0008462999,0.0123857,0.00005056599,0.00007207851,0.0004566324,0.03551419],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.981714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970872931","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2013.03.001","title":"Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research for Health Care","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute; McMaster University","funders":"Pfizer Canada; Pfizer","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Health care; Decision analysis; Transparency (behavior); Management science; Operations research; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3606274506282388,"gpt":0.6206862944118692,"spread":0.2600588437836304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02102559,0.0004086442,0.001729502,0.27053,0.002477856,0.003933222,0.002288337,0.0002559623,0.002898894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02402073,0.0003337881,0.0008431994,0.4553356,0.0001937197,0.001408422,0.0006789419,0.000744812,0.0006403365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002112691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002422314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0193444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824317,0.003635696,0.003605722,0.002160147,0.006195838,0.001970904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789537,0.006621515,0.0003327477,0.002871734,0.009945201,0.001275153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000201079,0.0005228431,0.04111974,0.0002008618,0.000606948,0.00001209669,0.0229448,0.07281745,0.0002089098,0.000253484,0.04926787,0.8118439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016878,0.0005473841,0.3441489,0.00007657146,0.00007676705,0.000001946955,0.02232168,0.5940195,0.00001719197,0.0001648442,0.0361525,0.0004557703],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5562984,0.01443185,0.399214,0.01791862,0.0007876722,0.009191401,0.001748314,0.0001428364,0.0002668989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.842609,0.0003491373,0.1536921,0.001027583,0.0001043792,0.001135956,0.0004378073,0.00004400617,0.0005999487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343846868","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2500273","title":"On Pythagorean and Complex Fuzzy Set Operations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Mathematics; Generalization; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Distributive property; Algebra over a field; Fuzzy classification; Defuzzification; Negation; Artificial intelligence; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3181631374413859,"gpt":0.4184486697844043,"spread":0.1002855323430184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002777856,0.0003458858,0.0005797331,0.000842003,0.0005550167,0.001202011,0.0006758082,0.0001780271,0.0001921555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003528709,0.0002675501,0.000151846,0.0009177462,0.0001520728,0.0005113981,0.000007300025,0.0003348975,0.00217415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001473051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003772387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003464292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946507,0.0007254794,0.001115778,0.0009059075,0.002196031,0.0004061286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959458,0.001502944,0.0001632546,0.001258551,0.0005889364,0.0005405755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007697143,0.001017625,0.0002964745,0.00004824022,0.0002194552,0.0001470016,0.009034244,0.7279772,0.005145371,0.01547767,0.163793,0.07607403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0131965,0.003076623,0.003436018,0.0007796525,0.0002426165,0.001192063,0.02951817,0.7390448,0.002274905,0.02754305,0.1760573,0.003638295],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3494151,0.0001834947,0.6081713,0.001568659,0.01171593,0.001741595,0.0007349998,0.000451863,0.02601699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939083,0.000006223847,0.001137842,0.0003435147,0.0001608197,0.00008408864,0.00000770284,0.00004145334,0.004310071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6444932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041505992","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040","title":"Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Balanced scorecard; Analytic network process; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Performance measurement; Process (computing); Process management; Dependency (UML); Set (abstract data type); Scarcity; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4029990021949929,"gpt":0.5727073674400269,"spread":0.169708365245034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06652182,0.0002460379,0.0004313056,0.0001406978,0.006115627,0.003037481,0.00528461,0.00009454336,0.0006646045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01349492,0.0000858948,0.0008238227,0.003965654,0.0008698191,0.001001088,0.001027392,0.001976243,0.0000385538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000390507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001841145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001667651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001302227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843957,0.002520359,0.00176286,0.0004547077,0.009823166,0.001043248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832516,0.00866783,0.001032236,0.001196769,0.005682176,0.0001694253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001935465,0.0001247301,0.018236,0.00001924242,0.0004154573,0.000004834514,0.01363007,0.8452362,0.00210099,0.00121184,0.1070127,0.01181442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001000078,0.00006290284,0.01498069,0.0002719277,0.0001063704,0.0002914797,0.01560775,0.8621515,0.0003257902,0.02914658,0.07576593,0.0002890121],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116583,0.0009557603,0.01188287,0.07329622,0.0005689135,0.001056572,0.00001750338,0.00001013665,0.00055366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902579,0.0000620043,0.003219507,0.00227262,0.002768307,0.00002070359,0.000001176901,0.00002554465,0.001372277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0785995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072154622","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.014","title":"Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of disinfection by-products—a risk-based indexing system","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Haloacetic acids; Chloramine; Chlorine; Fuzzy logic; Disinfectant; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Environmental chemistry; Water treatment; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Organic chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06524766010393328,"gpt":0.3440693890118531,"spread":0.2788217289079198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096753,0.000185686,0.0003762189,0.0006259434,0.0001398581,0.0001294206,0.0005661328,0.00005727263,0.000212648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006759203,0.000143538,0.000205094,0.0003972779,0.00009182315,0.0004378871,0.0001647747,0.0001746423,0.00009960663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001014023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003080469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009391101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001368746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926195,0.0005664808,0.001537768,0.0003803146,0.0046973,0.0001986272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967458,0.0002369466,0.002181716,0.000612009,0.0001275952,0.00009591184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004310529,0.001755958,0.01613132,0.0001230054,0.0003294609,0.00007301553,0.0005490285,0.4494272,0.05108655,0.0008841127,0.001287655,0.4779217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02968539,0.002486123,0.7476622,0.00294323,0.003371142,0.0003713695,0.02038075,0.04650872,0.08415571,0.04702545,0.01355738,0.001852543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598973,0.0004287798,0.03651666,0.0001849597,0.0009722333,0.000463861,0.00002018765,0.000009936772,0.001506021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950437,0.00003140709,0.004731654,0.00002824682,0.00007784506,0.000006320606,0.000001728309,0.00001753412,0.00006157032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7315308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996483892","doi":"10.1108/13598540810860958","title":"An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supply Chain Management An International Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Supplier evaluation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Supplier relationship management; Flexibility (engineering); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Process management; Purchasing management; Operations research; Hierarchy; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Business; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1226700524367627,"gpt":0.4025641343434532,"spread":0.2798940819066905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004200912,0.0002815133,0.0003095038,0.00174363,0.0008577205,0.001779619,0.001811092,0.0001050081,0.0005064899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009274861,0.0002262791,0.000168153,0.0005498429,0.0001230613,0.001591078,0.0002514196,0.0003178355,0.00001854868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001677135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006210822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001519816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001327039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949166,0.0003404607,0.001032969,0.000832047,0.002466967,0.0004110021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971356,0.0004443218,0.0004081276,0.0004354311,0.001241982,0.000334562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002104766,0.001702708,0.05812032,0.000009525483,0.000564007,0.0002636054,0.004561439,0.03734691,0.003298403,0.01988356,0.03367971,0.838465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003753928,0.0004063423,0.06217201,0.00005526579,0.00004474857,0.00207043,0.005838824,0.8209689,0.0001435575,0.02156711,0.08234346,0.0006354754],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2356336,0.00002352563,0.7617975,0.0002855848,0.00084479,0.0004030605,0.00004007996,0.00004487098,0.0009270089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6410934,0.0001047448,0.3564635,0.0003369205,0.0006480444,0.00003751107,0.0001077055,0.00003227662,0.001175861],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8378296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986891604","doi":"10.1081/ese-120004517","title":"USING MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING DECISIONS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Solid waste management; Decision analysis; Computer science; Business; Process management; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Management science; Waste management; Municipal solid waste; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3728181641152625,"gpt":0.506573838305495,"spread":0.1337556741902324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01558576,0.000177106,0.0007622686,0.001578449,0.0007338694,0.0001986804,0.0009109965,0.00005044963,0.0006812218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053058,0.0001284487,0.000297024,0.001692169,0.0004186236,0.0009366592,0.0004199954,0.0001256289,0.00001014718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002510711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006834463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006871365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001352636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993099,0.0001157463,0.002625956,0.0005309241,0.003067059,0.0005612842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953022,0.001334552,0.002164676,0.0004901918,0.0002028431,0.000505542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002574771,0.0007325819,0.07659303,0.00002821342,0.0001632345,0.00004275834,0.002886184,0.007808923,0.02650125,0.00009174074,0.006893691,0.8780009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003315573,0.001002521,0.1587546,0.0004484685,0.0003000924,0.0001865352,0.01029912,0.8036629,0.001727744,0.004489397,0.01531571,0.0004973843],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8693633,0.0004575751,0.1288471,0.0003880181,0.0004788411,0.0003373412,0.00006675013,0.000003012423,0.00005803379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911427,0.0003497451,0.08773441,0.0003320765,0.00008488548,0.00000258304,5.066892e-7,0.000008728462,0.00006004843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8775035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7458901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101001634","doi":"10.1002/mcda.313","title":"A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Rank correlation; Mathematics; Correlation coefficient; Distance correlation; Statistics; Correlation; Measure (data warehouse); Combinatorics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Random variable","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0879760005428058,"gpt":0.3877226847301167,"spread":0.2997466841873109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020757,0.0004878293,0.001411045,0.003601718,0.0005593346,0.001439027,0.002374019,0.0001930879,0.002985269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006524525,0.0002689841,0.0009359595,0.009534388,0.0001324167,0.0004630753,0.0003089308,0.0005330063,0.0008276777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002228979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001210328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006429858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000314178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881183,0.0009428157,0.003813205,0.0009801937,0.005588617,0.0005568811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862559,0.005200139,0.002765589,0.001838274,0.003262793,0.0006772971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001239758,0.0003771389,0.004052607,0.000003301505,0.0006051927,0.0000922408,0.003995488,0.3463057,0.00266512,0.00007969951,0.04431206,0.5962716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003927859,0.0002684051,0.01213085,0.0001364112,0.0009991501,0.0003041773,0.001268625,0.9134006,0.0001259842,0.0006255617,0.06637138,0.0004410333],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09057266,0.0005044203,0.9037524,0.003623207,0.0006413922,0.0006736022,0.00001838746,0.00003386917,0.0001801114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7479072,0.00002629447,0.250239,0.0006222996,0.0002578414,0.00001121953,0.000002821225,0.00003586652,0.0008974121],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387430003","doi":"10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220","title":"A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Social Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Closeness; Decision matrix; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal (ethics); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2200494718585969,"gpt":0.5303405396287614,"spread":0.3102910677701645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01140411,0.0004250448,0.0007183865,0.00106294,0.003011834,0.001364696,0.00211928,0.0001976945,0.0003978836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436575,0.0003020816,0.0003243393,0.004180849,0.0000726869,0.0003465577,0.002148515,0.0002048111,0.001089526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007238689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005652105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008847735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925284,0.0006156866,0.001712504,0.001251146,0.002443525,0.00144868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895481,0.005951619,0.0003710444,0.0008170102,0.003102981,0.0002092215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002530316,0.00004846137,0.0001302217,0.00003985707,0.00005421819,0.00007620563,0.02163805,0.0005871792,0.0003658348,0.003054763,0.3641225,0.6096297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008592246,0.00002970275,0.01855021,0.00004530133,0.00001249167,0.000004992555,0.05312723,0.01351186,0.0002330111,0.01289567,0.9003076,0.0004226938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02935471,0.00007213411,0.9606954,0.004618755,0.001678053,0.00258291,0.0000347647,0.0002643368,0.0006988698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0692231,0.000004222442,0.8922322,0.003336153,0.000464328,0.0009606215,0.00001784463,0.00009124625,0.0336703],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898707181","doi":"10.1186/s12911-018-0663-1","title":"Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Health informatics; Decision analysis; Management science; Health care; Data science; Systematic review; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Operations research; Public health; Nursing; Engineering; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2916750320558953,"gpt":0.5327586909619075,"spread":0.2410836589060122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05527872,0.0009081828,0.0101938,0.002210573,0.0003485564,0.0007430808,0.003088563,0.0008789469,0.0003728254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1431291,0.0004530744,0.001435083,0.004955711,0.0005497694,0.0003347063,0.00337989,0.0009899373,0.00004478488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002439216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001091598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008298876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001085103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705348,0.005439358,0.01507657,0.001024265,0.007187154,0.0007378384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9132283,0.07516522,0.007514854,0.002768472,0.0007322055,0.000590995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002608269,0.00002729421,0.0000482163,0.3936303,0.0000853127,0.000009555461,0.0004246366,0.000001135326,9.451981e-9,0.0001043124,0.0003365584,0.6053066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005042534,0.00008363964,0.0001741668,0.9192603,0.001359839,0.0002282273,0.0007426111,0.05202074,2.055179e-8,0.001192495,0.02390733,0.0005263721],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001989017,0.7120968,0.2848749,0.00001384547,0.000566771,0.002088893,0.0001103002,0.00001685099,0.00003280721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001034565,0.7297919,0.2689843,0.0009326051,0.00006480289,0.00006917549,0.00001382139,0.00003070157,0.000009168441],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6047802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132686745","doi":"10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103578","title":"Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Automation in Construction","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"ELECTRE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1719052379239028,"gpt":0.4475848583406495,"spread":0.2756796204167467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002190635,0.0002945134,0.0005653683,0.0008565722,0.0004330081,0.00055632,0.0002123057,0.000199739,0.001041989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004278381,0.0002638615,0.0001169791,0.001989617,0.0001811202,0.0006616591,0.00002269824,0.0001946985,0.00003721502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000539145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009528066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004235276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003356246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947835,0.0008212382,0.001408015,0.0009336469,0.001701215,0.000352435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992933,0.001611217,0.0008814654,0.0004621422,0.004010497,0.000101683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002333198,0.0004377121,0.02567716,0.00007350736,0.0001767988,0.00001762129,0.004683667,0.07744621,0.1539645,0.02095243,0.00226985,0.7119674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006663286,0.0001290134,0.01276988,0.0001034168,0.00009823673,0.0001831961,0.001418637,0.894944,0.07038812,0.01066966,0.002220848,0.0004117677],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019154,0.00007790775,0.3944162,0.0002813751,0.001573719,0.001016851,0.00002069759,0.0001418461,0.0005559637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8399228,0.000002826601,0.1591271,0.0001205195,0.0002616589,0.0003650334,0.00010821,0.00002061569,0.000071245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8174977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609326230","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.037","title":"Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"TOPSIS; Acronym; Dynamic decision-making; Computer science; Group decision-making; Choquet integral; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Management science; Preference; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1499718089568222,"gpt":0.4917454530510231,"spread":0.3417736440942009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003614762,0.0001766022,0.0002564273,0.0005971739,0.001740141,0.007030819,0.0008462158,0.00007191364,0.0001505001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005127101,0.0001054797,0.00004905291,0.0002339852,0.0004578511,0.006738675,0.0002526644,0.00007253436,0.00002884717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003701413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000678924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000240128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001337288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973241,0.00006085574,0.000731897,0.0004197506,0.001199673,0.0002636974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961616,0.001879055,0.0007997063,0.0005910025,0.0004674561,0.0001012157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002793791,0.00001098444,0.006122805,0.00001386807,0.000004874064,0.000001849789,0.0008917429,0.0008598053,0.0002225447,0.0001728872,0.0004691307,0.9909501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008532341,0.0002340338,0.05051173,0.0001765457,0.000008721422,0.00008095508,0.0009595571,0.9261999,0.0002768484,0.0062911,0.01415926,0.0002481829],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7135849,0.00002570938,0.2834364,0.0008463819,0.0006018867,0.0003759274,0.00003339364,0.00003274276,0.001062623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405987,0.000006243099,0.0587777,0.0005282587,0.00002460543,0.00002747857,0.000002330332,0.000005001901,0.00002962658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.990702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058693307","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.007","title":"Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Omega","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Defuzzification; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy associative matrix; Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification; Matrix (chemical analysis); Fuzzy mathematics; Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07725751484461374,"gpt":0.3920464369452687,"spread":0.314788922100655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001663621,0.0002378212,0.0004253482,0.000408768,0.0001954311,0.0008268965,0.0006860136,0.0001021836,0.000276973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001324537,0.0001496856,0.00007758577,0.0008925805,0.0001910843,0.0005450801,0.0002615557,0.0001654303,0.0008017487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004817358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009138987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000481302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000760686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964756,0.0001138839,0.0006163956,0.0007602162,0.001627551,0.0004063965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975401,0.0008327597,0.0002348433,0.0009057721,0.0002492464,0.0002373091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001257625,0.0006606068,0.1405084,0.00006741867,0.0001791348,0.001381125,0.008514835,0.00332726,0.03184831,0.07715429,0.04381738,0.6912836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007298762,0.0005864692,0.1946813,0.0002983259,0.00005557916,0.0005449395,0.002883243,0.0003662422,0.002413175,0.4157561,0.3737357,0.001380098],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753516,0.0007194921,0.003664746,0.001794043,0.0003741459,0.0002636405,0.00002251151,0.0001015924,0.01770817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734218,0.00002720765,0.02157487,0.0004194652,0.0001303094,0.00001281696,0.000001526174,0.00002650681,0.004385517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6899035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144037545","doi":"10.1002/mcda.319","title":"Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Risk assessment; Hierarchy; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1443539490945168,"gpt":0.4050596931320101,"spread":0.2607057440374933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01219557,0.0005541711,0.001817906,0.003809882,0.0007704159,0.002008652,0.002233642,0.0001944562,0.002339737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006210801,0.0002762399,0.001025796,0.007344215,0.0004052634,0.001214334,0.0003048174,0.000895114,0.00009013533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007358413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005670292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001506139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888458,0.001260484,0.003153193,0.001030067,0.005095837,0.0006146153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843519,0.007143354,0.003042726,0.001610887,0.003272268,0.0005788633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006907412,0.0003140095,0.01038831,0.000006380102,0.001022456,0.000246624,0.003453949,0.8387772,0.0001234255,0.00001638696,0.00251517,0.1424453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002152216,0.0001838644,0.003331466,0.00008222856,0.001590562,0.0002511801,0.002799511,0.9825892,0.00002258073,0.002085732,0.004539409,0.0003719849],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5014018,0.001172267,0.4963329,0.0006687674,0.0001750707,0.0001513477,0.00002548786,0.00001531036,0.00005711996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484982,0.0004953938,0.05002613,0.000306571,0.0001824697,0.000005478362,0.000001386605,0.00003985765,0.0004444397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4470965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992359248","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2014.2387096","title":"Grey-Based Preference in a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Multiple Decision Makers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Royal Society of Canada","keywords":"Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Statistics; Political science; Theoretical computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2564759892431872,"gpt":0.3571632700916665,"spread":0.1006872808484793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00372137,0.0004402979,0.0008074194,0.001160285,0.0002411417,0.0008993297,0.0005982262,0.0002998877,0.000004623214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002718822,0.0003313799,0.0001434821,0.0009054417,0.0001601851,0.0003375283,0.000006569235,0.0002848736,0.00004600258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002143215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000215738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006731333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001312781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941525,0.0004866149,0.001568644,0.001127497,0.002116678,0.0005480892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948581,0.002173318,0.000494984,0.001077773,0.0009617729,0.0004339943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001383807,0.0001661069,0.0007695933,0.00006589694,0.00002398299,0.00001074945,0.001202642,0.9911689,0.0002246442,0.0003200936,0.0008657927,0.003797751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004976985,0.0004117725,0.0002892642,0.0007006654,0.00003090753,0.00004498327,0.002139263,0.9876566,0.00009452199,0.0003150338,0.002925248,0.0004147627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1606746,0.0003536911,0.8351463,0.00004333965,0.001280197,0.001995801,0.00017964,0.00008418381,0.000242184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927678,0.00001495049,0.004909603,0.0000484555,0.00005403957,0.0005373755,0.000004993366,0.00005648524,0.001606308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139377411","doi":"10.1109/fuzz.2001.1008855","title":"Fuzzy entropy: a brief survey","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Randomness; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy set; Joint entropy; Entropy (arrow of time); Vagueness; Mathematics; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Information diagram; Defuzzification; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy measure theory; Probabilistic logic; Data mining; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Principle of maximum entropy; Maximum entropy thermodynamics; Joint quantum entropy; Statistics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.379553425103814,"gpt":0.4312292821626859,"spread":0.0516758570588719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00400022,0.0001738623,0.0003430905,0.0003477221,0.0001555688,0.0008315679,0.001262944,0.00008763685,0.0368195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364232,0.0001181174,0.0001378301,0.001203143,0.00008136393,0.000419559,0.0003240234,0.0001337968,0.01397878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002155065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001445491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001963465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002271906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951587,0.000634735,0.0008657058,0.0007200388,0.002217294,0.0004034977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940464,0.003997267,0.0001803053,0.001235174,0.000322714,0.0002181547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004234492,0.0001918088,0.08163409,0.000001161659,0.00001580699,0.00006306585,0.0004837431,0.00004597972,0.002952777,0.01005841,0.6184344,0.2860765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001542645,0.000090569,0.5002928,0.00001423419,0.000006936468,0.00005506368,0.0002488606,0.04133005,0.0008157875,0.02998193,0.4249774,0.0006436585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4997893,0.0003735097,0.03157907,0.002122372,0.002444405,0.0004158453,0.00006840629,0.0003173737,0.4628897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592634,0.000009381584,0.005664549,0.001213989,0.0001059053,0.00000424666,0.000001879541,0.0000156447,0.03372098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044423959","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.009","title":"Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Data envelopment analysis; Preference; Preference relation; Ranking (information retrieval); Relation (database); Fuzzy logic; Preference learning; Rank (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics; Decision maker; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8028777714725182,"gpt":0.6170902791930558,"spread":0.1857874922794623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1824228,0.0001352024,0.0002990419,0.002406017,0.0007274479,0.001104396,0.001851435,0.00003511835,0.001502296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01794057,0.00009550138,0.00005950738,0.003335195,0.000154942,0.002225906,0.0006658748,0.0006395185,0.00008715755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001818094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008721004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001246521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004265389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9833649,0.006830701,0.001810746,0.0006103255,0.007050716,0.0003325568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874967,0.003250398,0.0004316781,0.0009146651,0.007625578,0.0002809698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003422381,0.0001583377,0.03308113,0.000002147033,0.0002462359,0.00009377829,0.002124989,0.04343881,0.008815152,0.0004853013,0.00155737,0.9096545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004605781,0.0001364657,0.4067813,0.00003207737,0.00006413768,0.00009688012,0.0009054141,0.5845974,0.0002125566,0.0002642882,0.006338442,0.0001104674],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6690629,0.0001092462,0.3274578,0.0002830926,0.0001230234,0.0001482322,0.00001765953,0.000003930494,0.002794137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7016531,0.00002045612,0.2977929,0.00003866624,0.0001490509,4.407911e-7,0.00002766283,0.00001023865,0.0003075187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041377425","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.011","title":"Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Geosciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Operationalization; Decision maker; Fuzzy logic; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1901081355967842,"gpt":0.4395995889815037,"spread":0.2494914533847195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009207637,0.0004716994,0.0006864769,0.0007524439,0.001913234,0.003185953,0.005045492,0.000162487,0.00006071304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004618745,0.0002894908,0.0004580717,0.00251694,0.0006715941,0.001042105,0.0004807658,0.0002702308,0.00002449728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001174549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001810628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003524375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001542417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921975,0.0005013728,0.001447278,0.001789236,0.003053663,0.001011019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883765,0.0084173,0.0006708344,0.001673092,0.000613023,0.0002492655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002719788,0.000406341,0.002091408,0.00001170203,0.00001318615,0.000019833,0.001281615,0.04397622,0.003761437,0.003159945,0.005297401,0.9397089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006903065,0.0001687893,0.01038309,0.00009977633,0.00001855977,0.00002977555,0.0006503368,0.9407441,0.00006344078,0.0413238,0.005403518,0.0004244723],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1386886,0.0002108298,0.8562835,0.0005335141,0.002967254,0.0008488456,0.00002896517,0.0001140995,0.0003244129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5295947,0.000001057557,0.4686649,0.001446058,0.0002504511,0.00001218787,0.000002468052,0.00001090602,0.00001733924],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298258403","doi":"10.1007/3-540-32371-6","title":"Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and Fuzzy Matrix Games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Fuzzy logic; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1731573772874644,"gpt":0.4588837149646848,"spread":0.2857263376772203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005608871,0.0007651788,0.00213967,0.000873815,0.0005609087,0.0008703679,0.000815669,0.0003858914,0.00003131405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005597376,0.0005753044,0.0001944606,0.0005090035,0.0009084906,0.0002594512,0.002967648,0.0007510491,0.00006852774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001254166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003591155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002768473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932937,0.0002581049,0.002284482,0.001599537,0.00176819,0.0007959945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891641,0.008414072,0.0008443673,0.0007652803,0.0006230617,0.0001891938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020839,0.00006994489,0.001975863,0.0005952921,0.0001385082,0.0002034485,0.008251335,0.0001342397,0.00000359796,0.01717731,0.009767966,0.9616423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002826434,0.0001890569,0.003564046,0.007785978,0.0002051649,0.0004934488,0.01692211,0.01552867,0.000002041292,0.7211946,0.2285684,0.002720046],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1659891,0.2709755,0.02430916,0.003878981,0.01108747,0.007245103,0.0001480513,0.001370831,0.5149959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4671595,0.003910377,0.193982,0.0007783633,0.006743651,0.0001367201,0.00002839724,0.0004750412,0.326786],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063373779","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.018","title":"Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Dempster–Shafer theory; Domain (mathematical analysis); Component (thermodynamics); Evidential reasoning approach; Task (project management); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Risk analysis (engineering); Machine learning; Data mining; Natural language processing; Decision support system; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1018287816704744,"gpt":0.3575505341706405,"spread":0.2557217525001662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002731167,0.0002874653,0.0006512955,0.001289224,0.0003050398,0.0003413765,0.001204075,0.0001304646,0.0002868893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009772193,0.000211238,0.0002042244,0.00303254,0.0001506509,0.0001682464,0.0001208228,0.0002146617,0.0005010551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001364397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008294972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001998206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001551117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949508,0.0005671014,0.001253667,0.001228064,0.001605231,0.0003950943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957283,0.0008548039,0.000765878,0.00220304,0.0002178366,0.0002301848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009720697,0.00420889,0.7359698,0.00007074387,0.001380352,0.0001090919,0.04249275,0.1665712,0.0007281682,0.02449477,0.003066189,0.01993597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407483,0.0001379796,0.09343627,0.0001390025,0.0004976878,0.00003211882,0.005273935,0.8293366,0.0001103737,0.002120499,0.06526011,0.001247916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01056925,0.0008940536,0.9792183,0.00001907491,0.0001004344,0.00136395,0.00004403158,0.00008831071,0.007702579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374027,0.00001050657,0.05949941,0.00003929279,0.000160909,0.002523704,0.00002034044,0.00003082984,0.0003123696],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8614036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036704845","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3003501","title":"Consistency- and Consensus-Based Group Decision-Making Method With Incomplete Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Probabilistic logic; Group decision-making; Preference; Missing data; Computer science; Complete information; Data mining; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1621447902779261,"gpt":0.3734027041551108,"spread":0.2112579138771847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260873,0.0004883538,0.0009275525,0.0006406492,0.0008547925,0.0008648064,0.0007297534,0.0002092806,0.0001985634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004309403,0.0003680126,0.0001821274,0.001725833,0.0003424321,0.0001902658,0.0000123668,0.0005819635,0.0003121638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001321167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003160443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007657121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001979595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928808,0.00118959,0.001770459,0.001518074,0.002158791,0.0004822756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754891,0.02133749,0.0006110015,0.001117956,0.0009809015,0.0004635065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003015969,0.0005528759,0.001492089,0.0003260874,0.000272765,0.0003582442,0.004309713,0.8578898,0.002280438,0.007195242,0.001508978,0.1207978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002414148,0.000876983,0.001521262,0.001436679,0.000220146,0.0002268847,0.001327281,0.9781603,0.0000852724,0.008049296,0.004758223,0.0009235337],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0282424,0.0001532218,0.9663456,0.0005088701,0.001156014,0.001351126,0.0002319761,0.0002525327,0.001758277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930196,0.000001950705,0.1062521,0.0003515664,0.00009190634,0.0001311066,0.000002078399,0.00005280596,0.00009681778],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285061422","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2022.3179594","title":"Expertise-Structure and Risk-Appetite-Integrated Two-Tiered Collective Opinion Generation Framework for Large-Scale Group Decision Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Weighting; Computer science; Group decision-making; Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Cluster analysis; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07594165579841897,"gpt":0.3739535721521505,"spread":0.2980119163537315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003132641,0.000462347,0.0007505104,0.001114261,0.003009689,0.001016083,0.0007354035,0.0002744991,0.0004915791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065082,0.0003966075,0.0003044198,0.001926914,0.00006453784,0.0004744984,0.00002439262,0.0007997322,0.00002787711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006900869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001419436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003484847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928669,0.001437269,0.001428926,0.00147565,0.002209533,0.0005817763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936704,0.003820208,0.0007239041,0.001041081,0.0005398784,0.0002044981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004894197,0.0009113574,0.001304082,0.00006013864,0.0003593831,0.00002570824,0.01691632,0.57996,0.01911814,0.002063688,0.01381148,0.3605755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003429699,0.0006627532,0.0003940744,0.0003660899,0.00006966089,0.0001334498,0.00963452,0.9571568,0.001479856,0.01113128,0.01476228,0.0007795295],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1372807,0.000477201,0.8473158,0.00006103236,0.01074609,0.001705199,0.002220992,0.0001360368,0.00005688668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573619,0.00003854464,0.04084414,0.0001237068,0.0004079516,0.0007529132,0.00003026791,0.00007815911,0.0003624645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8200811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112179347","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.05.002","title":"A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); TOPSIS; Robot; Selection (genetic algorithm); Industrial robot; Production (economics); Industrial production; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Range (aeronautics); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4305681931939317,"gpt":0.5038414020667886,"spread":0.07327320887285688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007299322,0.0002675305,0.0006712349,0.00148646,0.0001982393,0.0003151629,0.001665768,0.0001550909,0.0001416751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01393528,0.0001885208,0.0003220273,0.0008763762,0.00006293291,0.0007300611,0.0001800863,0.0006727329,0.000007401708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001873252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002372199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009061775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002147828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949762,0.0005350259,0.002301501,0.000334179,0.001610905,0.0002421607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828322,0.01263824,0.001627336,0.0002686353,0.00254233,0.0000912449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002880643,0.001239473,0.005394415,0.000003072766,0.0009458478,0.00001545607,0.009933136,0.7446572,0.004616692,0.001746299,0.001103802,0.227464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006305638,0.001234243,0.01220562,0.000743001,0.00009955736,0.00008761766,0.002186747,0.9698212,0.003875203,0.002474668,0.0006377283,0.0003287588],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4887814,0.00001456547,0.5062217,0.00008237817,0.00441525,0.0004416564,0.00001427385,0.00001472308,0.00001404428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8389698,0.000001193353,0.1600453,0.0000328791,0.0009013046,0.00002045223,0.000001208498,0.00002066378,0.000007164888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3501884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893690280","doi":"10.1111/itor.12598","title":"Techniques to model uncertain input data of multi‐criteria decision‐making problems: a literature review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Transactions in Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ambiguity; Randomness; Computer science; Uncertain data; Uncertainty analysis; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Dempster–Shafer theory; Uncertainty quantification; Uncertainty theory; Decision analysis; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6858293864569663,"gpt":0.6579447337881719,"spread":0.02788465266879447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02640322,0.000678619,0.002096201,0.006374763,0.0003778494,0.001491839,0.01025571,0.0006030746,0.003655426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02467737,0.0005237772,0.0005473545,0.006522648,0.0003590255,0.001812245,0.001229494,0.001872001,0.0004874188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000846337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002370189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004041761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003913425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814194,0.002106223,0.004803762,0.002609953,0.008358328,0.0007023463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789382,0.008860596,0.000622801,0.003506062,0.007812807,0.000259572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006041265,0.000346833,0.000001624071,0.00256581,0.00009301157,0.0000352931,0.0003127311,0.001302597,0.00001047575,0.00037333,0.02047767,0.9744202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001842703,0.00005110586,0.000001932291,0.1464533,0.00003534123,0.0001080371,0.0000275167,0.0916831,0.000003392558,0.002085307,0.7589814,0.000385296],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001102027,0.6830899,0.3082944,0.0008483587,0.0006920382,0.00270911,0.003467743,0.00003841699,0.0008589903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008077845,0.7867752,0.2089195,0.0003447895,0.0002945347,0.0009180438,0.0004724451,0.00007998591,0.002114734],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079360386","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.029","title":"Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Multiplicative function; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Index (typography); Mathematics; Group decision-making; Preference relation; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3369501165587278,"gpt":0.4166686395739496,"spread":0.07971852301522186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002671328,0.000148226,0.0002129044,0.000493405,0.0007422188,0.001606812,0.0007332743,0.00007281051,0.0001833758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005527849,0.0001023701,0.00006158925,0.0009767247,0.0006303589,0.004317287,0.0001083449,0.00008061384,0.0004880231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003536355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001760444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007137858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002610821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969649,0.00009623825,0.0009977095,0.0003630754,0.001294444,0.0002835795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929873,0.004601394,0.000580902,0.0004112771,0.001274571,0.000144529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001164317,0.0000842439,0.01096558,0.00002979098,0.00001612962,3.220589e-7,0.01168227,0.1205031,0.0008539428,0.2093685,0.04303828,0.6033415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000437125,0.00004261895,0.01025495,0.00001868072,0.000002543755,0.000001793911,0.001871283,0.8097752,0.0001384584,0.1686323,0.008680091,0.0001450212],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1631333,0.00004557714,0.8144453,0.00308999,0.0002534695,0.001255498,0.00009761255,0.00008059538,0.01759862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194978,0.000001791376,0.07948554,0.0005479129,0.00001514057,0.0002069622,0.000005755023,0.000003107113,0.0002359934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7563645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985369104","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.022","title":"An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Ranking (information retrieval); Group decision-making; Aggregate (composite); Operator (biology); Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); TOPSIS; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.157470969285867,"gpt":0.4766061745075416,"spread":0.3191352052216745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003230141,0.0004124008,0.0006882114,0.0006932936,0.0008628225,0.0008210727,0.001723357,0.0001938368,0.0001679619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001143306,0.0003027431,0.0001787798,0.001149844,0.0001296856,0.0009523986,0.0001843796,0.0002233582,0.0003546909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002696985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008683932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000236609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946989,0.0004983745,0.00151215,0.001534355,0.001228363,0.0005278511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908871,0.004440382,0.0008903341,0.002188723,0.001301047,0.0002924241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002411827,0.003820561,0.004382204,0.0001078142,0.0004062919,0.0000487118,0.02879743,0.003160156,0.0269161,0.08829436,0.008578839,0.8330757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004369643,0.0008805158,0.01554958,0.0008444048,0.0001076964,0.0004195321,0.02452711,0.8350672,0.0004126621,0.03881811,0.07711362,0.001889965],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001860484,0.0002689184,0.9930935,0.00004810693,0.0006265712,0.003235632,0.0002262599,0.0002327831,0.0004077784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5344304,0.000003024591,0.4612775,0.0001073512,0.0001129792,0.003874795,0.00003617375,0.00004769537,0.0001100055],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040833276","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2013.01.006","title":"A proof for the positive definiteness of the Jaccard index matrix","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Jaccard index; Mathematics; Positive definiteness; Matrix (chemical analysis); Positive-definite matrix; Distance matrix; Metric (unit); Combinatorics; Euclidean distance; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Statistics; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07018941519558516,"gpt":0.4050584867001693,"spread":0.3348690715045841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003754134,0.000152954,0.0003413005,0.0003129054,0.0001596575,0.0006210196,0.002819515,0.00007018918,0.0001843595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008102923,0.00007136312,0.0004487842,0.000389981,0.000142088,0.0006270367,0.000406776,0.0002520306,0.00001350693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008667951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004144775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004035255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995499,0.0002040208,0.001301163,0.0002132107,0.00257369,0.0002089631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886426,0.004460064,0.001979453,0.0003892037,0.0044616,0.00006707713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024865,0.0006686108,0.1235155,0.00004585546,0.001924231,0.00005986408,0.008400453,0.02815823,0.02866256,0.06838538,0.013717,0.7239758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005092713,0.0002709343,0.2763802,0.001810967,0.0001746616,0.001740945,0.007389954,0.4806672,0.02449545,0.1909067,0.01048777,0.000582572],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6985486,0.0005199024,0.2904885,0.005354436,0.003078177,0.0008509039,0.00006108772,0.000009273923,0.001089122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850309,0.00001228517,0.01423389,0.0001726604,0.000301762,0.0000240057,7.152777e-7,0.00001732171,0.0002064115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398526858","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.027","title":"A hybrid intelligent fuzzy predictive model with simulation for supplier evaluation and selection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system; Artificial neural network; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Neuro-fuzzy; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Parametric statistics; Supplier evaluation; Perceptron; Process (computing); Sensitivity (control systems); Supply chain management; Supply chain; Fuzzy control system; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1372853844337297,"gpt":0.4290438737337837,"spread":0.291758489300054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001927225,0.0002201254,0.0003003077,0.0003240277,0.0003720622,0.0002846591,0.0002811717,0.00007233339,0.00002819774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004381099,0.000116834,0.00004397078,0.0004120748,0.0001016659,0.000526005,0.00004499575,0.00005478431,0.00003415581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002161141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001555584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001851379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001361519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965774,0.000150006,0.0006763251,0.0008920602,0.001452352,0.0002517915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954997,0.001518205,0.0004196906,0.0005484774,0.001865802,0.0001480802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001432107,0.0002283714,0.001271186,0.00002285401,0.000105097,3.247765e-7,0.002205909,0.8283973,0.009473287,0.009557868,0.004476649,0.142829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497938,0.0001464045,0.0002833679,0.00006242849,0.00002953299,0.00002379427,0.000508143,0.9791583,0.0004849003,0.005071294,0.01252622,0.0002076359],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01221805,0.0001731272,0.9815072,0.0002322977,0.00005425937,0.005059256,0.00008212372,0.00008834483,0.0005852944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584019,0.000007099063,0.03148456,0.0000472159,0.0001855273,0.009134118,0.00001648516,0.00003473689,0.0006883289],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053585552","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.015","title":"Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Flood myth; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Value (mathematics); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Geography; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.130756900421959,"gpt":0.4103394159219969,"spread":0.2795825155000379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004565493,0.0002844645,0.000850097,0.0008602611,0.00009175984,0.00005148713,0.001050164,0.0000826634,0.0008904718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000342056,0.0002286449,0.0006143694,0.0004542892,0.0001349084,0.0006369366,0.0005687319,0.0001407893,0.00003899395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002584247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001299075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000135959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001016962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931327,0.0002013978,0.003144983,0.0004541381,0.002727754,0.0003390745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947982,0.0007947491,0.003447615,0.0007068442,0.000148034,0.00010456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00124896,0.002998146,0.0121102,0.0001758714,0.0007173612,0.00004601261,0.001927472,0.006986985,0.003066383,0.001937286,0.002218497,0.9665668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04146872,0.002159168,0.6823322,0.006101724,0.001991777,0.0001805863,0.07131608,0.03307397,0.02242473,0.0449124,0.09207124,0.001967477],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7193476,0.0004980176,0.2760839,0.00006832332,0.0005005967,0.001180698,0.0001306635,0.000005368738,0.002184873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7333835,0.0001710631,0.2659752,0.00006798344,0.00004859073,0.00001180704,0.000001529602,0.00002272214,0.000317563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}