{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2179,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2179,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"af0063289f12","filters":{"topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W603888656","doi":"10.3138/9781442627901","title":"Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01822183805483626,"gpt":0.2149957950570768,"spread":0.1967739570022405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001338788,0.000109702,0.0003053672,0.000003882396,0.0006960199,0.000008609292,0.0003124348,0.0001349353,0.00003940505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003688015,0.00008795714,0.00005854218,0.000001253372,0.002339146,0.00004041686,0.0001375456,0.00009658334,9.383196e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008330349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999161,0.0001115963,0.0001005469,0.0001314596,0.0003384791,0.000156891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992576,0.0001696191,0.0002445958,0.0001082011,0.000161738,0.00005828065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002866983,0.00002319113,0.0001698186,0.0002191735,0.0006131445,0.0000285127,0.4845642,0.000004941066,0.00001026511,0.4744064,0.02704584,0.01262791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004631356,0.00001211038,0.0005194931,0.00007816446,0.0001150504,3.26908e-7,0.003188346,0.000001402869,0.000005133762,0.0002065383,0.9952941,0.0001161972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006789615,0.003529619,0.000007511695,0.00005322477,0.0001097141,0.0004193992,0.00005495035,0.00001089226,0.9951357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01632719,0.002797951,0.0000287543,0.00001130513,0.00004665415,2.973458e-7,0.000002970346,0.000002547818,0.9807823],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8618681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651745859","doi":"","title":"The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Psychology Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Politics; Blame; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05858516120892503,"gpt":0.3712442374378867,"spread":0.3126590762289617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067038,0.000362301,0.0005083396,0.00003231494,0.002106422,0.00009887812,0.001295231,0.0009216727,0.00005288261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002380575,0.0002067766,0.0001746566,0.00001675625,0.006738188,0.00004875473,0.0002875577,0.001709826,0.0000173541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001126847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002219362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02838008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1856908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974185,0.0004742967,0.0005068376,0.0005851936,0.0004066495,0.0006085646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997094,0.001152548,0.0005467476,0.0007307551,0.0003585638,0.0001174175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002492646,0.00007685856,0.0001866532,0.000106906,0.0008040983,0.00001756422,0.1156354,4.425401e-7,0.0002769979,0.3094071,0.5566381,0.01660071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003637698,0.000053963,0.001622475,0.0000284313,0.0004131028,0.000008112255,0.0002970766,2.352637e-7,0.000006833152,0.006505721,0.9904671,0.0002332046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006932564,0.001975133,0.000006895034,0.00716556,0.003751717,0.001001631,0.00001901979,0.00005850505,0.9853283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001705348,0.002285882,0.0001199618,0.001738557,0.0010291,0.0001779103,0.000004891374,0.00003622113,0.9929021],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.433829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103406808","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521888622","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetoric; Heresy; Humanism; Literature; Performance art; Art; Classics; Power (physics); History; Opposition (politics); Art history; Philosophy; Theology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04256960152990154,"gpt":0.2581052821609236,"spread":0.215535680631022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004291827,0.000459867,0.0005130743,0.00007661663,0.00374247,0.0001836382,0.001564701,0.0004578866,0.000004045655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098415,0.000384843,0.0003354417,0.00004577304,0.001442112,0.0001385078,0.0008748174,0.0006215029,0.000134164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004304279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01372023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004187004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972516,0.0003484635,0.0002474772,0.0006123486,0.0007552091,0.0007849421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979631,0.0003235079,0.0002787768,0.0005562737,0.0004369056,0.0004414134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720388,0.000008177038,0.000009728787,0.00001791691,0.0001135205,0.00004063167,0.00309214,4.462274e-7,0.000005045796,0.4557292,0.5403949,0.0005510972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002416087,0.00003062988,0.0005039842,0.00009966054,0.0001621165,0.000001252937,0.003793189,0.000002428823,0.00003071616,0.000003419647,0.9946176,0.000513387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004435735,0.0004009528,0.00002928451,0.0005216952,0.0008979717,0.00128287,0.0001843628,0.0002840845,0.9959552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001180698,0.0004485216,0.00006563914,0.0001535505,0.0006379847,0.000006047575,0.00002758627,0.00003987385,0.9974401],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4557258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01702648649084273,"gpt":0.2311818217262822,"spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002309802,0.00005535204,0.0001216537,0.000008536652,0.001103249,0.00002561029,0.0001528837,0.00002603114,0.0002807759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009349418,0.0000421435,0.00002029077,0.00004388887,0.0004633477,0.0007650908,0.00002354619,0.0001370863,2.794091e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001889765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.0001938863,0.00009779492,0.00007174672,0.0003360666,0.0001225122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991866,0.0001427427,0.0001995996,0.00003839127,0.0003499871,0.00008264499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002895331,0.00006332823,0.01846591,0.0000420032,0.0003215229,0.0001254567,0.8833268,0.000543494,0.0001038668,0.08713073,0.008547643,0.001039671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009354628,0.00007091039,0.06569548,0.000127722,0.0001127591,0.000003931894,0.915519,0.00005993999,0.00004347088,0.00008291459,0.01721842,0.0001299701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633533,0.001858859,0.00003675347,0.003490351,0.00007654495,0.0001508404,0.0000066288,0.000004116115,0.03102255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982244,0.001035955,0.0003552522,0.00002738558,0.00005311771,5.479953e-8,1.489923e-7,0.000001694893,0.000301997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08704782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970444144","doi":"10.59962/9780774880497","title":"Revisiting the Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Geography; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764331129471004,"gpt":0.2436364103096546,"spread":0.2259930990149445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004317003,0.0001542453,0.0005412353,0.00001976056,0.001531937,0.0003511849,0.0009720146,0.000308581,0.0002780166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001727287,0.000261072,0.0002451401,0.00003378642,0.001113154,0.0001014668,0.00032791,0.0003944106,0.00004265562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004677648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007794663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7136884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7126833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997928,0.0002414301,0.0002205174,0.0004518915,0.0007282205,0.0004299092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980713,0.0005190533,0.0003401975,0.0002780552,0.0006302309,0.0001612344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003004621,0.00001745751,0.0006317381,0.0004105181,0.0003875638,0.0001349735,0.04560554,0.000006037646,0.000005962828,0.007834385,0.910153,0.03478282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002885404,0.00001981382,0.002651524,0.0008642489,0.0001567299,0.000003214773,0.007410273,0.00000120485,3.397532e-7,0.00008564818,0.9881932,0.0003252836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006244989,0.0006451245,0.000007459769,0.000354209,0.0003362126,0.001235923,0.0005938659,0.0001062241,0.990476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004570595,0.001030909,0.0002200275,0.00008981187,0.0004653329,0.000001588922,0.00001536075,0.00001917705,0.9935872],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07804023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227803424","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Affirmative Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law: Neoliberal Sexual Subjects and Risky Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Akron law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06517423869699798,"gpt":0.3290436951348115,"spread":0.2638694564378135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001346934,0.000212926,0.0005210026,0.00002582541,0.001251473,0.0000555661,0.0001939958,0.0001451418,0.0001349738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004117962,0.0001786824,0.00003611384,0.0002742675,0.001018948,0.000329794,0.000072419,0.0003683855,0.00006540022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003889945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9487525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973422,0.0007000338,0.0003542667,0.0003333553,0.0004480564,0.000822143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988836,0.000294028,0.0001303367,0.0001384547,0.000117102,0.000436503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015449,0.0001108303,0.01923785,0.002012446,0.000191949,0.000394765,0.7037853,0.000004578004,0.00002757619,0.2445375,0.01913283,0.01054421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005305,0.00010336,0.009532233,0.001003997,0.00003875025,0.0000212753,0.008254323,0.000005167011,0.000006388928,0.001298235,0.978619,0.000586806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8884375,0.048623,2.500243e-7,0.01241762,0.0001986519,0.001116797,0.00002147607,0.00008125375,0.04910344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696934,0.02151933,0.0001151734,0.006997341,0.0001314527,0.00008677661,0.000008211641,0.00001322007,0.001435126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100052892","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040539","title":"Up the Creek: Fishing for a New Constitutional Order","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Politics; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0572730117395688,"gpt":0.3475321722473593,"spread":0.2902591605077905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001525831,0.0000654628,0.0001146218,0.00005324313,0.00275586,0.0004358889,0.0006692253,0.00004395091,0.0003230905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007952724,0.00004409527,0.00007904568,0.0003502588,0.00644464,0.0005796922,0.00001870809,0.0001765138,0.0000154679],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001116974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01036411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2803311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.551571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981238,0.00004636489,0.0002208022,0.0001111522,0.0005044123,0.000993435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969524,0.0003468672,0.00007724492,0.00006297063,0.0006767175,0.001883759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001271052,0.000002572157,0.001139315,7.873324e-7,0.00000523326,0.000002090757,0.003197166,0.00001575913,0.00001312759,0.9740321,0.01928411,0.002306466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021941,0.00003528353,0.03694748,0.00003153166,0.00002306033,0.00002775356,0.00763811,0.00009268554,0.000037797,0.01469154,0.9400238,0.0001487957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2284142,0.0007314821,0.006224093,0.7079419,0.003096145,0.0005872328,0.0000513183,0.00002167015,0.05293199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920582,0.000003250761,0.002182287,0.002401981,0.001675853,0.000001663896,1.48517e-7,0.000001978262,0.001674695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325547125","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007237","title":"From<i>Terra Nullius</i>to Affirmation: Reconciling Aboriginal Rights with the Canadian Constitution","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Constitution; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269755689766165,"gpt":0.2627731652592187,"spread":0.2400756083615571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205228,0.0004026506,0.0006320071,0.00007038527,0.004976215,0.0005571292,0.0005370041,0.0004230313,0.001164117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010044,0.0003334344,0.000349286,0.0005284761,0.002941196,0.0008329664,0.00001379175,0.001041608,0.00004265633],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006352745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002677494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970022,0.0003175213,0.0005963,0.0003934411,0.0003016314,0.001388891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942773,0.0003403195,0.0004461565,0.0002263853,0.000855357,0.003854469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007031121,0.00001411949,0.0003080827,0.00004805153,0.0005452773,0.0003173398,0.5008367,0.0002789182,0.000004355144,0.4483694,0.04677444,0.002496369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005976472,0.000136525,0.0005477713,0.000429767,0.0003054012,0.0001717043,0.05069343,0.0001884123,0.000003986689,0.002088436,0.9443396,0.0004973176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.646274,0.01494707,0.00008375005,0.2354733,0.004365829,0.0007676667,0.0006783528,0.00001968557,0.09739033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804196,0.0006835029,0.0007519184,0.009766819,0.002291346,0.00001281378,0.00001404426,0.0000231121,0.006036796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1162489397","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1316","title":"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Theme (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Legal realism; Legal research; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02487907968279396,"gpt":0.305183783413715,"spread":0.280304703730921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004755448,0.000138873,0.0001852876,0.00002200485,0.004299539,0.000440823,0.0002035979,0.00009802809,0.0003085076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004087095,0.0001092041,0.00009819215,0.00008412422,0.0005077304,0.0005141749,0.00005854628,0.0003159254,0.00003032625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001471234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002428872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4816975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4889793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985058,0.0001725832,0.0002619827,0.0001652135,0.0004595989,0.0004348583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994479,0.00004565486,0.0001380501,0.00006970421,0.0001290427,0.0001696347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002765262,0.00003113387,0.002558449,0.000002829191,0.0000208594,0.00004402175,0.002688965,0.000003636524,0.0005054887,0.9899828,0.003505126,0.0006538593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239409,0.0001040654,0.0854298,0.00007335459,0.00008865893,0.0001167504,0.004968232,0.000004772393,0.0002196532,0.1879938,0.7190747,0.0006868066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1674692,0.0009303871,0.00001366789,0.004388309,0.0003322143,0.0001083204,0.000003185228,0.00006064512,0.8266941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919366,0.0001351141,0.0004963278,0.0001665351,0.001444147,0.000003528826,0.000001798903,0.00001049408,0.005805495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820504405","doi":"","title":"From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Negotiation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Treaty; Good faith; Action (physics); Competence (human resources); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660251668214259,"gpt":0.321153408812515,"spread":0.3045508921303724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003617026,0.0000944718,0.0001498282,0.00001193097,0.001124365,0.0001572957,0.0001274347,0.00005353157,0.003011611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004026635,0.00005387924,0.00002774696,0.0002199788,0.0003544425,0.0001585758,0.00001343338,0.00006575187,0.0007040056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001145815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004396413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1399241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0496183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998944,0.0001751224,0.0001708196,0.0002208282,0.0002888948,0.0002003629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.0007305504,0.00003121678,0.00008296764,0.0002124921,0.0001496074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005671187,0.00003677233,0.001672585,0.000003127967,0.0001014438,0.000003132344,0.8046401,0.0000379239,0.0000948341,0.06709722,0.08744846,0.03829726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001065298,0.00001839647,0.01822002,0.000009972741,0.0000210818,2.085029e-7,0.01370866,0.00002064694,0.00009822727,0.002619364,0.9640606,0.000157538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8734072,0.00009277253,0.0000300343,0.04163381,0.0001853728,0.0006470286,0.00002126787,0.00007465461,0.08390782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959453,0.00008263715,0.001834849,0.002573379,0.0004378592,0.00007348639,0.000004480862,0.000003427407,0.03553687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04782442497088262,"gpt":0.3398939775480977,"spread":0.2920695525772151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758211,0.0001893629,0.0003539473,0.00003531727,0.001304464,0.00009124436,0.0003779054,0.0001284248,0.001082054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001003222,0.0001526906,0.0001495809,0.0002990625,0.0003030809,0.0002283236,0.00004481781,0.0003230105,0.0007019311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004469676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5327355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8437976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981549,0.0001611246,0.0003075666,0.0002845067,0.0005641725,0.0005277623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.0001576097,0.0001152809,0.0002157009,0.0003040967,0.0004516555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001832037,0.00006974843,0.01519505,0.0002758402,0.00006866989,0.0001053036,0.003937737,6.383643e-7,0.00006224007,0.00761973,0.952109,0.02055418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007639806,0.00001473012,0.02354241,0.0003445396,0.00005093032,0.000007911522,0.001271263,0.000002501472,0.000002077845,0.00003604552,0.9744292,0.0002219224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252444,0.3478451,0.000008860213,0.2697962,0.008381438,0.004402705,0.0003605543,0.0005380273,0.2434227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89204,0.09768455,0.0003401981,0.006164419,0.0008200026,0.0001013886,0.00004578655,0.00001691072,0.002786736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114583704","doi":"","title":"A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Life imprisonment; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Prison; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06317269375793548,"gpt":0.3637814614843352,"spread":0.3006087677263997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003383562,0.0001915282,0.0004809001,0.0002769718,0.0004529271,0.0001410576,0.0006405484,0.000263782,0.0001131132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004113007,0.0001549492,0.0001006048,0.0007837065,0.0003135238,0.0005185505,0.0001344366,0.00146792,0.00001064631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003181902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005391034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960574,0.00101754,0.0007063302,0.0002071646,0.001265078,0.0007464841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755,0.0008545509,0.0003303522,0.0001637055,0.0005926901,0.0005087469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101911,0.0002885617,0.1716159,0.00008560525,0.000146966,0.0002292157,0.378995,0.0001988815,0.0005391832,0.4069359,0.03021179,0.01065105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039216,0.00009658487,0.1190996,0.0002099284,0.00001581415,0.00001246724,0.009007383,0.00004144955,0.00005321361,0.004774734,0.8652692,0.0003803271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6507953,0.0001171182,0.00001272718,0.3207349,0.0004784613,0.0001938465,0.00001540958,0.00001090241,0.02764136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840635,0.0001108328,0.000195752,0.01438112,0.0009502894,0.000005185706,0.000002093906,0.00001282646,0.0002783904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8350574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912807746","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.001.0001","title":"The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Charter; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Population; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03634714006224919,"gpt":0.2506919954054982,"spread":0.214344855343249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172971,0.0002077123,0.0002648307,0.00003391543,0.01103335,0.0001726891,0.001615556,0.0004044592,0.00001153051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542817,0.0001373428,0.0002569433,0.00001230452,0.00486374,0.0001084763,0.0003527952,0.0004279602,8.269796e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001651508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00271833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3736089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8891314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985194,0.000178613,0.0001450763,0.0002330225,0.0004995314,0.0004243901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984431,0.0001591915,0.0004205228,0.0004887538,0.0003105041,0.0001779474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001889313,0.000003233339,0.0001126591,0.00002234174,0.000167655,0.000009628613,0.004634453,0.000001887087,0.000001313934,0.9435369,0.04853744,0.002953584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001770541,0.000008620025,0.0001719463,0.0001858055,0.0001295377,3.950294e-7,0.0006537794,0.000001438942,0.00001686409,0.0004855691,0.9979905,0.0001784824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004553629,0.0003816158,0.000003675903,0.0005964068,0.0007138214,0.0007453585,0.0001176775,0.00003127589,0.9973646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005077453,0.001375676,0.00001934338,0.00003650803,0.0001830068,0.000001822893,0.000005637011,0.000007810693,0.9932927],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03203193881503012,"gpt":0.3074328444333712,"spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197511,0.0002389648,0.001007884,0.00002334589,0.0007439785,0.00002832256,0.0008467262,0.0000662797,0.0004535918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002010041,0.0001031382,0.0001335644,0.001233048,0.0003822598,0.00009765155,0.0001952405,0.0001369001,0.000005016223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001412339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957586,0.0006673761,0.0007322491,0.0004056527,0.001820319,0.0006157863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974954,0.0005517931,0.0002379296,0.0004492451,0.0004259727,0.0008396466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004694964,0.0001709037,0.008558331,0.0008623968,0.003010299,0.00005211874,0.008915166,0.00003592623,0.001704965,0.04868191,0.8894896,0.03847143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001104483,0.00002994117,0.007941698,0.0009345162,0.000647101,4.559216e-7,0.0003754098,0.00001728993,0.0003147673,0.000007891962,0.9894126,0.0002078474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1144572,0.0279141,0.000173713,0.8410913,0.0008011978,0.003006615,0.0004471874,0.00005044748,0.01205817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931713,0.001921062,0.0001006204,0.1033314,0.0004116253,0.0001141917,0.000008570855,0.0000180427,0.0009232663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5722156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597048075","doi":"10.1017/9780585490809.008","title":"Where did all the Charters Go? Anglo-Saxon Charters and the New Politics of the Eleventh Century","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Demise; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Anglo saxon; Ancient history; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01959419157782072,"gpt":0.2646780934082745,"spread":0.2450839018304538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003166127,0.0002879713,0.0003776702,0.00002016934,0.0007064567,0.0000965514,0.0007517171,0.0002256864,0.00199187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001021973,0.0001098512,0.0002446776,0.0001550918,0.001897323,0.00005341041,0.0001785678,0.0002912597,0.00004919129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004653925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03349981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01648211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979725,0.0004042748,0.0002356605,0.0002654116,0.0006340051,0.0004881576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989706,0.0002201078,0.000303818,0.0003526386,0.00004242524,0.0001104596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000403764,0.00001865688,0.0002673927,0.00003031454,0.0002113316,4.143256e-7,0.03823479,1.670168e-7,0.0000025147,0.02447829,0.9352199,0.001532186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000440742,0.00001062344,0.0007239504,0.0001052385,0.0001118407,4.751215e-7,0.0170597,0.000004724688,0.000002809487,0.0001607732,0.9812052,0.0001739321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003846447,0.01568132,0.000005051514,0.1023226,0.001177228,0.001781635,0.00005978167,0.0001157929,0.8784719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01624443,0.01764152,0.00004002984,0.001837659,0.001132304,0.00002440409,0.000002660385,0.00008431775,0.9629927],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1004849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555512450","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Ethnology; Law; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03254397821794328,"gpt":0.2749529513543675,"spread":0.2424089731364243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008263414,0.0001973284,0.0002838962,0.0001839941,0.003220465,0.0004550036,0.001308934,0.0001590113,0.0001581673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002079628,0.0002277162,0.00006989278,0.0008806019,0.0004194452,0.003734959,0.0001728597,0.0007888657,0.00002804834],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01394605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005659324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9650205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973383,0.0005204232,0.000329785,0.0004480699,0.0008174024,0.0005460063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.0001934596,0.000140472,0.0001913183,0.0001723171,0.0002528742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002859696,0.0008238407,0.7226537,0.00003171778,0.0001308599,0.002134152,0.06488542,0.01149664,0.0003358887,0.1913255,0.0025995,0.003296772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009413497,0.00001663022,0.3205431,0.0001070209,0.00001552307,0.0000125496,0.01549008,0.0000190267,0.00007376076,0.0001011659,0.6623055,0.0003742811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557892,0.0001075352,0.000004473868,0.001660027,0.0005061968,0.0005160731,0.00004892957,0.00003047166,0.1413371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934584,0.0001076793,0.0003978108,0.0002042615,0.0002104799,0.000006241325,0.00002485713,0.000007305332,0.005582929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.659706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365580843012047,"gpt":0.3125579615218664,"spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212012,0.000128575,0.0002038948,0.00001735985,0.01193105,0.0001151292,0.0003971156,0.00007740319,0.00008028853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004180023,0.00005968817,0.0001605982,0.0001132596,0.0007995277,0.0003270896,0.0000599691,0.0002352705,0.00004536561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000312713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001916223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01585066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07141685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980646,0.0003218275,0.0003356825,0.0001346489,0.0006578902,0.0004853934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987549,0.0004756796,0.0002614539,0.0001239978,0.000234506,0.0001494703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003285993,0.0000374087,0.0002710682,0.000004384853,0.00009320278,0.00001357317,0.00385832,0.000002971039,0.0001750994,0.9781104,0.0008498037,0.01655092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637206,0.00008435412,0.0003688835,0.0001139966,0.00001676662,0.000006510044,0.001846234,1.227987e-7,0.0005231883,0.001455085,0.9952025,0.0001186099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09197352,0.001247651,0.00001365313,0.03055447,0.001784399,0.00043813,0.00003288499,0.00007954177,0.8738757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0009021559,0.00009275394,0.0003992701,0.0004387185,0.000004844185,1.414886e-7,0.00001112424,0.001266161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417315670","doi":"10.1093/pch/21.5.245","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordan's Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Tribunal; Political science; Service (business); Law; Service provider; House of Commons; Public administration; Business; Politics; Economics; Economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0342140601147113,"gpt":0.3676809689479009,"spread":0.3334669088331896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175266,0.000110975,0.0001867288,0.00003716203,0.0009075576,0.0000357438,0.0002201963,0.00004212943,0.00004700999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002503079,0.00005648334,0.00003589607,0.0002772412,0.0001584701,0.0002094572,0.0001497545,0.00009248332,0.00001446052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001811389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002304697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01226319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983048,0.0002976088,0.0003003803,0.0002479363,0.0004374015,0.0004118542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.0001333566,0.0002104538,0.0001356386,0.0001709928,0.000237807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000796267,0.0001345942,0.1342873,0.0001507408,0.00007153006,0.000001627388,0.5397716,0.000004127113,0.0001812044,0.05427001,0.00569223,0.2653553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001190985,0.0006898552,0.7159691,0.00004251565,0.00004442993,0.000001646723,0.07799398,0.000002906709,0.0001176272,0.0007028379,0.2028861,0.0003580267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681748,0.0007936984,0.00008947711,0.1285488,0.0002419658,0.001347115,0.00007178321,0.00003916651,0.0006931749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947384,0.002722321,0.0006325504,0.001122816,0.0006775922,0.00003713967,0.000004573825,0.00000884564,0.00005575192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5816818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266116478","doi":"","title":"Critical Comparisons: The Supreme Court of Canada Dooms Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Immigration; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01417047089759789,"gpt":0.2849856559420098,"spread":0.2708151850444119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00147904,0.0001005294,0.000175897,0.00001650109,0.001796306,0.00006246871,0.0002712423,0.000063184,0.00006213961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003986027,0.00006552281,0.00008450322,0.0001764112,0.0003659599,0.0001502546,0.00002472162,0.001067528,0.000002623761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002300026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00322356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7843271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971179,0.0002591254,0.0002734386,0.0001078782,0.0006833577,0.001558281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991968,0.0002687933,0.0001207945,0.00007043869,0.000281507,0.00006171969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004491707,0.0001472275,0.02645351,0.00001002464,0.0002109073,0.000003435076,0.004704216,0.0002592655,0.0003719429,0.8793302,0.0868622,0.001602158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001147144,0.0003052203,0.07206938,0.00006524011,0.0002318549,0.0001090873,0.2650892,0.0002546983,0.0003939172,0.1710923,0.4885326,0.0007094058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.848388,0.01510394,0.001809129,0.09933524,0.002477346,0.0004728117,0.00001124956,0.00007081802,0.03233145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962008,0.0004596085,0.0000299614,0.00006620513,0.001081005,0.000003786989,8.321969e-7,0.000006334983,0.002151442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7082379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85585993","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Aotearoa; Law; Sovereignty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0184145415422912,"gpt":0.2510950958742552,"spread":0.232680554331964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001274681,0.0002180389,0.0005205824,0.00003611998,0.002326665,0.0002969682,0.0002973388,0.0002063993,0.000009171538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001252923,0.0001928181,0.0001572485,0.0000579418,0.006606616,0.0006250167,0.0002134226,0.0002787808,0.000006835053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001718243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002039964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00357223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986864,0.000138726,0.000134107,0.0003609427,0.0004367217,0.0002430434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983211,0.0009573495,0.0001855508,0.000134572,0.0002671741,0.0001343119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771033,0.00007674008,0.0002967112,0.00007450449,0.0003194663,0.00008164243,0.6948645,6.306146e-7,0.000003915537,0.2937158,0.009742288,0.0006466386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001270328,0.0002623316,0.01235842,0.0002862875,0.0004140937,0.0000316492,0.7682348,0.000006433064,0.000004776527,0.008894213,0.2075013,0.000735265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07022067,0.00841777,0.00000653821,0.0009820258,0.00009591942,0.0005124649,0.00008449176,0.00006502398,0.9196151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6751652,0.0009695959,0.00008669742,0.00002898758,0.0001909055,4.588096e-7,0.000009986491,0.000008502596,0.3235396],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244206916","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798","title":"Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Coke; Ignorance; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Opposition (politics); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Political science; History; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics; Archaeology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0185807655750713,"gpt":0.2229195654286238,"spread":0.2043387998535525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004538027,0.0001594297,0.000309178,0.00002048642,0.001211954,0.00004048253,0.000592343,0.0002231424,0.000001196256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001031627,0.00009311953,0.0001750251,0.00001624211,0.002529843,0.00008568268,0.0004455338,0.0002897404,0.000002554982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003158788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001235746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004709172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003352404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986772,0.0004187588,0.00014611,0.0001702882,0.0004009825,0.0001866853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.000262522,0.0003397899,0.000254211,0.0002065762,0.00005598307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004352953,0.000002701107,0.000009829784,0.00006112208,0.00008320277,8.413381e-7,0.006728725,9.274395e-7,0.000002258323,0.9020634,0.09045693,0.000546493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005175318,0.000007562217,0.0002386377,0.00008229476,0.0001509125,4.055204e-7,0.001649715,0.0000120997,0.00002172485,0.00002471758,0.9971671,0.0001273482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009027402,0.0001723942,0.00001398821,0.0005740363,0.0002527898,0.0006609902,0.00005177029,0.00003799538,0.9973333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01545369,0.0002431562,0.00001120781,0.00009289999,0.0001772984,0.000001247303,0.000005249813,0.000007479121,0.9840078],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227303418","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Women's Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Downtown; Poverty; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01240020040210402,"gpt":0.2212549969972075,"spread":0.2088547965951035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003159019,0.0001186333,0.0001785982,0.0004168367,0.0009966739,0.00002932039,0.0004130229,0.00005397088,0.00005783498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001608568,0.00009124263,0.00005811774,0.003410592,0.0003227014,0.0001827006,0.0001208618,0.0001403003,0.000002393569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001369026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986083,0.0001976308,0.0001243437,0.0002076069,0.0004211172,0.000441011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999288,0.0001774038,0.0001238303,0.0001653048,0.0001945979,0.00005081477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003344532,0.0006374862,0.02816932,0.0001998714,0.0008279289,0.0002931862,0.7293257,0.001429832,0.0001366204,0.131209,0.07747953,0.02995708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002079317,0.00001557416,0.001364655,0.00000862143,0.00001955859,2.69892e-7,0.03524972,0.0000121376,0.00008096683,0.00000204094,0.9629179,0.000120617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4184808,0.000003529265,0.0000232453,0.004393356,0.0002551504,0.0003725725,0.00001561664,0.00006170362,0.5763941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945014,0.004583413,0.000133314,0.00007984159,0.0002594637,0.000002082785,0.000002055375,0.000007029122,0.0004313909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8854384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02225849214846924,"gpt":0.2682911348908973,"spread":0.2460326427424281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006293116,0.0000759107,0.000116923,0.000002954948,0.0058577,0.00006093574,0.0004337092,0.00005107562,0.001499957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008181023,0.00004330632,0.0001063149,0.00002622141,0.0007316932,0.000696104,0.0001040068,0.0002016543,0.00001401755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008115617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003386231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3134826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2389834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987661,0.0004075088,0.00008829984,0.00007247775,0.0003976594,0.0002679691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999104,0.000342083,0.0001947743,0.00009008099,0.0001553832,0.0001137225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178277,0.0001617669,0.004185916,0.000004991766,0.0004812226,0.00001210233,0.8648837,0.00003298977,0.0001504306,0.08522715,0.0365178,0.008224071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002415073,0.00001593064,0.02933357,0.00002753836,0.0002561441,0.000002367546,0.39931,0.00001072172,0.00003865801,0.0002285287,0.5704445,0.00009051012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2159215,0.01237376,0.0005035436,0.01533362,0.004169668,0.0004155159,0.0000241243,0.00004755657,0.7512107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965931,0.0006063057,0.0003886983,0.0001046675,0.0007805995,7.80509e-8,4.889634e-7,0.000002676357,0.001523389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262016348","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Interlocking Power Hierarchies: Sharing the Pieces of Jurisdictional Authority","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law and economics; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Jurisdiction; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01294857069043029,"gpt":0.2937266258044696,"spread":0.2807780551140393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00331111,0.00009723274,0.0001554742,0.00002375082,0.002655114,0.00007493441,0.0006690223,0.00005189501,0.0002051538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001893462,0.000050919,0.0001687527,0.0002186841,0.0006073027,0.0001877862,0.00006053499,0.001082688,0.000006776206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003926204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004777935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001988679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01512265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976802,0.0002217595,0.000340151,0.0001184324,0.0005593002,0.001080124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.0002773635,0.0002135225,0.0001109349,0.0001483523,0.0000432026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001860463,0.0001402039,0.02112182,0.00001011827,0.0009309592,0.000001010211,0.1164426,0.000138038,0.0001715664,0.6941359,0.0009604536,0.1657613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007829011,0.0004066714,0.03392192,0.0001369806,0.0001259702,0.00004475866,0.2066547,0.0001514191,0.0002245602,0.4028035,0.3543577,0.0003890402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648309,0.006851999,0.00009620645,0.0113498,0.0003417309,0.0001670865,0.000003315009,0.00002131681,0.0163376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867806,0.008508298,0.00002097216,0.00001747983,0.0003283446,0.00000415573,2.833346e-7,0.000005966158,0.004333913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3533972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234302354","doi":"","title":"Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444799545776432,"gpt":0.2827624268547247,"spread":0.2583144313969604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00135958,0.0001091173,0.0001511832,0.00001985878,0.003486182,0.0001940252,0.0001783671,0.00008979349,0.00001727211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008729727,0.00007065592,0.00003983999,0.00008983944,0.002026923,0.000226212,0.00003079719,0.0009613949,0.000004690773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007378166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009414331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4249119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9639009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979246,0.0001857817,0.0001385647,0.0001224889,0.000268986,0.00135964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994353,0.0001785377,0.0000613614,0.00004992609,0.00007535686,0.0001994898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004984173,0.000003832918,0.1390692,7.137077e-7,0.00009872518,0.000003603184,0.003208647,9.75505e-7,0.000003390373,0.8539816,0.000331657,0.003292632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004808457,0.00008462188,0.121058,0.00001929461,0.00008816847,0.0001666017,0.01555865,0.000003132463,0.000002876206,0.2627865,0.5994866,0.0002647178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672482,0.01917245,0.00003993357,0.07139479,0.0002708451,0.0003104745,0.00002227771,0.00003702194,0.04150402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884024,0.01003172,0.00001188737,0.0003569226,0.0007489732,0.000002849569,0.00000364322,0.000003515348,0.0004381379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5991549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570479127","doi":"10.3138/9781442686007","title":"Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Law; Duty; Constitutional crisis; Governor; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02553492946148992,"gpt":0.2588360971326202,"spread":0.2333011676711303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001832974,0.0002109334,0.000446579,0.00001815622,0.0004484523,0.00002025252,0.0005918586,0.0003385948,0.0003610954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001985678,0.0002430585,0.0001928588,0.00000236132,0.0003875223,0.0002745893,0.0001857256,0.000205841,0.000008269365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002160601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8341303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6577279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985832,0.000159847,0.0001749308,0.000312218,0.0004521495,0.0003176497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992603,0.00009068396,0.0002288431,0.0001898235,0.0001158272,0.0001145322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001193186,0.00009196612,0.00009393866,0.000101817,0.0002846773,0.0001059269,0.2386463,0.000006870237,0.000006157294,0.03233119,0.7018836,0.02632827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003481141,0.00002882279,0.0004424605,0.0001174587,0.00009230228,1.02609e-7,0.007369953,0.000001265198,0.000004402602,0.0008944008,0.9904395,0.0002612261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001162486,0.002659281,0.000003797319,0.0003486896,0.0001060269,0.0004349547,0.00002730809,0.00005752414,0.9962462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001403173,0.002902985,0.0004558813,0.00008372174,0.0001446114,3.416177e-7,0.00001192087,0.00001037705,0.994987],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2885559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246619878","doi":"","title":"Law, Theory and Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Liberalism; Oppression; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01432710735319049,"gpt":0.2974042242211967,"spread":0.2830771168680062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032366,0.0001593584,0.0002076253,0.00001269717,0.001642709,0.0002018133,0.000176932,0.0001098037,0.0007953843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005810653,0.0001290168,0.00006739821,0.0001497039,0.0008967852,0.0003719768,0.00003021599,0.0001990113,0.0002503716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001168822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009025737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05583961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982011,0.0005472205,0.0001642342,0.0002841323,0.0003591451,0.0004441576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990072,0.0004390525,0.00006106402,0.0001412272,0.00009578963,0.0002556196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009299306,0.00002130329,0.004762044,0.000009599145,0.00002427805,0.000004475978,0.007223311,7.387777e-7,0.00008788504,0.9866765,0.001028308,0.0001523274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003248283,0.00002478394,0.005252324,0.00002332227,0.00002756489,0.000001863526,0.01342393,2.917467e-7,0.0002427009,0.02968178,0.950738,0.0002586708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5575953,0.003290754,0.00002364444,0.001408422,0.0004780091,0.0003006708,0.000009988388,0.000173358,0.4367198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900204,0.0006416857,0.0007381914,0.0009808278,0.0003000783,0.00002766448,0.000001566409,0.00001207099,0.007277499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165876900","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2021.1926631","title":"Assistance in dying: A comparative look at legal definitions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Death Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Confusion; Terminology; Death with dignity; Diversity (politics); Glossary; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2461764561870247,"gpt":0.4090427128091024,"spread":0.1628662566220778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002226442,0.0001498398,0.0004023535,0.00002727686,0.001577881,0.00007015618,0.0001092056,0.00005276935,0.00006934817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005243036,0.0001280657,0.0000827599,0.0003704117,0.0004764178,0.0001856796,0.0001996593,0.0001423596,0.0001072663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007087265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007901659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001560656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09240476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.0002320288,0.0002274677,0.0002980685,0.0003371269,0.000385278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.0004716899,0.00007212507,0.0001021957,0.0003238112,0.0000600265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003400745,0.0002605875,0.21307,0.0000536312,0.0005470884,0.000280328,0.4862337,0.00004525182,0.0002331079,0.2867191,0.01228017,0.000243013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008750561,0.00003506498,0.2006647,0.0001789592,0.00007890321,0.000002717444,0.5238382,0.00001410343,0.0004588091,0.003492022,0.2698042,0.0005572858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288494,0.0186909,0.000006862522,0.005794674,0.000356964,0.0002295526,0.00001965566,0.00009055813,0.1459615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990142,0.002995289,0.0005856446,0.0002219259,0.0001125095,0.0001038135,0.000005728478,0.000005161627,0.005827872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2832271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04227486848726325,"gpt":0.3394451055679871,"spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003734955,0.0001324682,0.0001671901,0.00002624303,0.0005376362,0.0001361508,0.0003682068,0.00006076315,0.00006220577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001389872,0.00008316562,0.00002536463,0.0001894692,0.0006486049,0.0005450113,0.0002454997,0.0001052572,0.00001655159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002388663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000219587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001571342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001135789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0000623299,0.0002057582,0.0002364867,0.0006497623,0.0002386484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986553,0.0007924038,0.00009837381,0.00009515582,0.0002235503,0.0001351995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008257247,0.0001592916,0.3171429,0.0001387379,0.0002276388,0.000005194346,0.630873,0.0005311326,0.00003126342,0.008602902,0.02211082,0.01935137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001210277,0.0001417836,0.445348,0.0006969926,0.0002235846,0.000003232689,0.4425949,0.0001635997,0.00006542211,0.0009122621,0.1080092,0.000630716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765624,0.0003276246,0.0001235429,0.004419277,0.0001293843,0.0005406325,0.00001960318,0.00004147162,0.01783602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926,0.00001288928,0.006357607,0.0002173164,0.000144776,0.00003988449,0.000002449156,0.00001039327,0.000614746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1882782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146001282","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Positive law; Venn diagram; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Common law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Rule of law; Public law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law; Private law; Physics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03592682075332374,"gpt":0.2368067433654751,"spread":0.2008799226121513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001951056,0.0002012482,0.0003460595,0.0000179136,0.002158923,0.00010226,0.0003543434,0.0002357668,0.000003413975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003448809,0.0001654227,0.0001507081,0.00001321036,0.01039752,0.0001208696,0.0002118692,0.0004306847,0.000008409565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004309052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002375457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004859798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001996964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986932,0.0003065126,0.0001226454,0.0002867323,0.0003876809,0.000203238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999112,0.0003615105,0.0001497403,0.0001185129,0.0001052595,0.0001530488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006422349,0.000003661318,0.000001548389,0.00002525922,0.0001025091,0.00003127802,0.002108571,3.785568e-7,7.981926e-7,0.8884176,0.1091493,0.00009484713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008663042,0.00001120225,0.00002662804,0.00005775051,0.000216482,0.000001960934,0.001336861,0.000009696936,0.00000337601,0.000159412,0.997101,0.0002093327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007025561,0.0003662048,0.00003221893,0.001636093,0.0002279946,0.0006327688,0.000288657,0.0001118618,0.9966339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0260341,0.0003728669,0.00002104172,0.0005089467,0.0004698721,0.00000247579,0.00007118805,0.000008126566,0.9725114],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791951286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665031955606958,"gpt":0.2386969532323604,"spread":0.2220466336762908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001926903,0.00009867187,0.0002093633,0.00004539023,0.0004022315,0.000006440542,0.0002233105,0.0000722108,0.0004461343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004022088,0.00007202528,0.00005447311,0.0001405894,0.00166092,0.0001127688,0.00001979248,0.00004824442,0.000005968258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006109783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003424394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00006261104,0.0002505543,0.0001401187,0.0004224534,0.0004007653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.0001927097,0.0001407569,0.0001110715,0.0001990346,0.0004073027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002797094,0.000004276698,0.006147774,0.000007504585,0.00002656776,0.000008861347,0.0009482982,7.103502e-7,0.00002461842,0.967437,0.02392959,0.001461948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537194,0.000008737502,0.009229148,0.00003438865,0.00001012363,5.183205e-7,0.0004922301,6.68074e-8,0.00006694902,0.0009246236,0.9889621,0.0001174422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476435,0.0001785234,0.000002385363,0.004734672,0.0003910584,0.0001843795,0.0002531362,0.00001180845,0.9694797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817765,0.0002163966,0.0001467994,0.0002998065,0.0001671085,0.000009966258,0.000002336517,0.000003997767,0.01737704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510850940","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and Dignity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legislature; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0206575639304725,"gpt":0.3029320942038183,"spread":0.2822745302733458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001664217,0.00006799916,0.00008359447,0.00001999682,0.001276623,0.00008281842,0.00007768169,0.00004518834,0.0000290691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005415059,0.00005196331,0.00003834534,0.00009321555,0.0001553585,0.0002550736,0.00001134784,0.000574433,0.00001039287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007883171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004450748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008156215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01164294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982494,0.000221963,0.0001015013,0.00009287746,0.0002364156,0.001097887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.00005281161,0.00006233167,0.00003148387,0.00007860352,0.00007219351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003256984,0.00002077733,0.008291186,0.000001555721,0.00003599943,5.67736e-7,0.008726373,5.304736e-7,0.00005016213,0.9685228,0.00008480933,0.01426193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006168079,0.0001316726,0.02254577,0.00001405121,0.00005788985,0.00004653782,0.1571691,0.000003229825,0.00006273104,0.7457,0.07336442,0.0002878147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494222,0.0052249,0.0008536388,0.004624452,0.0002577805,0.000156944,5.941156e-7,0.00003972741,0.0394198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888142,0.007577065,0.00006722649,0.0000419962,0.0001418744,0.000002474795,2.901332e-7,0.000004283492,0.003350633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2228228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614274994","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789","title":"Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage And The Boundaries Of Civil Law And Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Legal pluralism; Multiculturalism; Marriage law; Religious law; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Citizenship; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Politics; Public law; Legal realism; Islam; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01801676471121098,"gpt":0.2657856318087223,"spread":0.2477688670975113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008668292,0.0004469685,0.0009611639,0.00004673118,0.001495616,0.0006359968,0.000245902,0.0004803139,0.00009735724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006950587,0.0002528774,0.0001106389,0.00008060234,0.01061614,0.0003733776,0.0004473462,0.0004465739,0.000006400365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001141263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1310515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4437424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975332,0.0004189946,0.0005700173,0.0005252536,0.000470857,0.000481663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981245,0.0009351451,0.0003559221,0.0001898292,0.0002255223,0.0001690371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003076687,0.00006782297,0.001723421,0.0005310496,0.0004135997,0.00001670799,0.3856436,4.645185e-7,0.00007771718,0.5730832,0.03563638,0.00249837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01305423,0.0001621804,0.01218513,0.001102512,0.0004119788,0.00001067409,0.0943737,0.0002274128,0.00003021549,0.01629479,0.8604369,0.00171025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1117751,0.05545894,0.00001318621,0.01219123,0.001079988,0.008672451,0.0001926479,0.0002450944,0.8103713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6832455,0.005697676,0.0002757924,0.0005889803,0.0001609226,0.0001058568,0.00001539602,0.00002587906,0.309884],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8248006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171778160","doi":"10.5539/ach.v2n1p71","title":"Culture, Government and Development in South Korea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01753483815476341,"gpt":0.2418062322150834,"spread":0.22427139406032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001872679,0.0001286186,0.0001520103,0.00001236488,0.0004608403,0.00003165321,0.00008939339,0.0001505436,0.00007960752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007270039,0.00009515116,0.00002181658,0.00004442658,0.0003878933,0.0001309049,0.00005062501,0.0002661568,0.00001525095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004137472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006033722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007490331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02804316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990621,0.00003785386,0.0001328396,0.0002326146,0.0003050001,0.0002295967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997056,0.000009224294,0.00005669765,0.00006204841,0.00003218823,0.00013424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008279075,0.00003977844,0.01455666,0.00001761698,0.00002229685,0.000008600297,0.9386014,2.740878e-8,0.0007095896,0.01160871,0.02024653,0.01418046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002107953,0.00001065325,0.04231078,0.00001096653,0.000006666984,7.920254e-7,0.03905029,1.768723e-7,0.00002932973,0.00004104229,0.9181763,0.0001522238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2965007,0.01280466,0.000007718437,0.002082082,0.001188679,0.000689709,0.00001386904,0.0001263113,0.6865863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668691,0.0002906246,0.001904773,0.0003375045,0.0002166767,0.00002953513,0.000003396387,0.000007549826,0.03034091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590791466","doi":"10.3138/chr.98.1.borrows","title":"Challenging Historical Frameworks: Aboriginal Rights, The Trickster, and Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous rights; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04600531027534598,"gpt":0.339512218896094,"spread":0.293506908620748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008558562,0.0002189279,0.000499655,0.00003194186,0.006513496,0.0001939236,0.0008223606,0.0002437109,0.0001985778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212966,0.0001425761,0.000157608,0.0001696806,0.0002572765,0.0002615917,0.00004103334,0.0007036405,0.00007754517],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01947925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002841318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8033496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4319552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979889,0.0002158881,0.0003070803,0.0003699184,0.0004636982,0.000654458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998013,0.0002296597,0.0002130892,0.0004977706,0.00016318,0.0008832869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005305405,0.00003470859,0.001871859,0.000478484,0.00008159155,0.0001658715,0.007992099,1.430375e-7,4.574e-7,0.1170346,0.7547027,0.1176321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000809958,0.00001338377,0.0008251541,0.0004163968,0.0000804517,0.000003231562,0.00004904892,0.000001912506,4.834835e-8,0.0005900952,0.9977178,0.0002214862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005378199,0.6490948,0.00004295471,0.311795,0.002913241,0.0007325474,0.000005186607,0.00006515998,0.03481333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2055508,0.7275799,0.0006994245,0.007640963,0.003476185,0.000260694,0.000003873873,0.00004721583,0.05474091],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3713944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123410778","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596766.014","title":"The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples' Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dialectic; Bridge (graph theory); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Geology; Oceanography; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0281640969411972,"gpt":0.2400107049448777,"spread":0.2118466080036805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002486906,0.0002968802,0.0004025823,0.00007294596,0.002531068,0.00009549572,0.0003971409,0.0003523204,0.000003657877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004763394,0.0002557084,0.0001678451,0.00001886961,0.0011142,0.0001393572,0.0002715187,0.0003392662,0.000007131421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004359378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001326485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01410691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009783017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.0001234115,0.0002059129,0.0003498002,0.0004878862,0.0004342789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986476,0.0002916588,0.0003798074,0.000226204,0.0002941011,0.0001606579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007252608,0.00001275262,0.00002198889,0.00006948668,0.0001219215,0.00006327866,0.04898922,8.721565e-8,0.000005369298,0.9429413,0.001045033,0.006657055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003949045,0.0001310916,0.002302684,0.0002005997,0.0003392821,0.000005785111,0.002159285,0.000001042555,0.00002914991,0.0002397406,0.9937362,0.000460211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01757643,0.00101852,0.000001256124,0.0001598076,0.0002116564,0.001060189,0.0002325306,0.000081997,0.9796576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08344974,0.01385289,0.00002157233,0.00006825982,0.0004375927,0.00000310957,0.00001882516,0.0000220837,0.902126],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539682818","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000822","title":"Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sovereignty; Denial; Power (physics); Jurisdiction; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01859644538915065,"gpt":0.2800407491324347,"spread":0.261444303743284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310841,0.0000639155,0.0001523388,0.00006222499,0.001279169,0.00006299005,0.0003461787,0.000036356,0.00006763444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003292059,0.00003494658,0.00003870525,0.0001631945,0.003411454,0.0002927599,0.0000211819,0.00008730831,2.112754e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009366868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009058618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981812,0.0001042934,0.0003315975,0.00008363972,0.0007227598,0.0005765732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977884,0.0004957325,0.0001762973,0.00006036481,0.0008012285,0.0006780129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005684034,0.000009257672,0.02854754,0.000007541019,0.00002397384,0.000007722299,0.04105709,0.000001728599,0.000719586,0.9278039,0.001297704,0.0005182587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004163264,0.0001521729,0.9327155,0.0001622981,0.00003073627,0.00002316331,0.03885649,0.00000256547,0.001688582,0.009515326,0.01625369,0.0001831656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756152,0.0001420188,0.00001663015,0.02129762,0.0008891157,0.00008326418,0.00005132774,0.000001550339,0.001903288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.000007751622,0.00007951185,0.0001377664,0.0003731735,9.733504e-7,6.535505e-8,0.000002196446,0.0002036533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9182886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948205569","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-038","title":"5.1 The Independence of the Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Statute; Law; Position (finance); Political science; Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02851589847523751,"gpt":0.2377052668468951,"spread":0.2091893683716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002906847,0.00015416,0.0002495471,0.00002100639,0.0009961197,0.00002075967,0.000962701,0.0002953059,0.00004655301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003997366,0.0001009744,0.000287997,0.00001142229,0.00255033,0.00004307751,0.0006548279,0.0004791429,0.000009281765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001227456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001513016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03077076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01527225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986379,0.00007391543,0.0001566654,0.0002031364,0.0007448451,0.0001835378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.0002420559,0.0002522364,0.0002691463,0.000214803,0.0000521441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001890399,0.000002913124,0.000008539384,0.00003238122,0.0001762023,0.000008906304,0.009987987,7.943854e-7,0.000009316173,0.9850242,0.001757124,0.002972699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008273192,0.00001290924,0.0001408117,0.0002488647,0.0001891017,3.555313e-7,0.001370813,0.000005575595,0.00003751209,0.01990034,0.9778787,0.0001322264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009462364,0.002012023,0.000004838714,0.0002769954,0.0003837701,0.0003865105,0.0000228923,0.00003452412,0.9967838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01233806,0.001161925,0.00002590067,0.00002105728,0.00007449455,2.838364e-7,8.290758e-7,0.00001082663,0.9863666],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07694001248423663,"gpt":0.3333489573152807,"spread":0.256408944831044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261598,0.0001757144,0.0006088977,0.00001363078,0.001397072,0.0003165212,0.000530421,0.00005852111,0.00006553636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075006,0.000148586,0.0001024044,0.00008373075,0.0001761549,0.0005903917,0.0001545457,0.0002137801,0.00002533236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001150631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007322435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978961,0.000405383,0.0004078497,0.00027857,0.0005193745,0.0004927099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984304,0.0004768883,0.0004117602,0.0003175485,0.0002219438,0.0001414171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002370737,0.00003869236,0.8825356,0.0007110704,0.0001231959,0.0001299155,0.002693836,0.000001381093,0.0001873139,0.001131201,0.0802702,0.03215388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002982609,0.000002972303,0.6677237,0.002912414,0.00004369424,3.938688e-7,0.001772013,0.00001023381,0.000001327969,0.000009358922,0.3270291,0.0001965451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.857796,0.1044808,0.000003225402,0.01606979,0.001062836,0.001727199,0.0000863258,0.00007142177,0.01870239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951615,0.04571362,0.0001418742,0.001727517,0.0001627047,0.00004146949,0.000007661613,0.00001057432,0.0005796087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2467589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870366","doi":"","title":"Protecting Children from Exposure to Domestic Violence: The Use and Abuse of Child Maltreatment Statutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Domestic violence; Juvenile court; Political science; Child abuse; Child protection; Criminology; Population; Law; Poison control; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Juvenile delinquency; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02700128016482885,"gpt":0.28991874690504,"spread":0.2629174667402112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002194092,0.0001219985,0.0001632276,0.00001657167,0.001043163,0.0001077622,0.0001558528,0.00004954344,0.00006495771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004748444,0.000066391,0.00004064323,0.000196741,0.0002270438,0.0001927707,0.00006220602,0.0001122361,0.0000103313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000668845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001522635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0587237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006435464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989071,0.0001584954,0.0001691902,0.0002178282,0.0002903432,0.0002570457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992339,0.0003834855,0.00007299611,0.0001316568,0.00008288463,0.00009504974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004572589,0.0001630106,0.8177263,0.000005644052,0.0002299649,0.000004465031,0.1582012,0.0001143833,0.0001655697,0.001547637,0.0003343458,0.02146179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003657157,0.0001039677,0.9780428,0.0001167184,0.0000453819,0.00000197058,0.01727512,0.00000538294,0.0002264243,0.0002523165,0.003396764,0.0001674604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942854,0.0005084796,0.00003249931,0.003041781,0.00005022888,0.001051722,0.00001631158,0.00005592194,0.0009576214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969974,0.00112725,0.001150337,0.0002540103,0.000117218,0.00005764208,0.000002178969,0.000005906969,0.0002880147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1603165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9475443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994861759","doi":"10.1179/003962611x12894696204821","title":"TSILHQOT'IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gazi Üniversitesi","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Common law; Order (exchange); Political science; High Court; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1741307909466114,"gpt":0.3510488529002058,"spread":0.1769180619535945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00339677,0.00005563455,0.0002557286,0.000006297956,0.000299908,0.00008449746,0.0001826408,0.00005368874,0.002081001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002494467,0.00007217524,0.00006149393,0.0004020364,0.0001351655,0.0001738962,0.00003647389,0.00008970393,0.0001693709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001196129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004495623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8043751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980108,0.001082013,0.000246528,0.0001770628,0.0002498572,0.0002337743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.0001222023,0.00008469247,0.00008573598,0.0001762841,0.00006128471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001668369,0.00008418491,0.808731,0.0003842089,0.00002130033,0.00001048095,0.004654162,1.678268e-8,9.199959e-7,0.0002723665,0.08204301,0.1037967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006771146,0.000006237968,0.8575646,0.0006704563,0.000007183944,3.245605e-7,0.0001524257,1.384082e-7,1.922129e-7,0.0001406214,0.1412871,0.0001029263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591408,0.4447568,0.000007701702,0.001646572,0.001570307,0.003307127,0.0000732761,0.0002649578,0.2892325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6566021,0.3327386,0.0002324534,0.0007942683,0.0001224304,0.0001061969,0.0000248324,0.00001279118,0.009366274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3974613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423738415","doi":"","title":"Hearing the Sexual Assault Complaints of Women with Mental Disabilities: Consent, Capacity, and Mistaken Belief","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Voluntariness; Feminist legal theory; Criminology; Legislation; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Feminism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0551548563594436,"gpt":0.3060189640723233,"spread":0.2508641077128796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001493994,0.0001594903,0.0002640047,0.00001300542,0.001358581,0.0001032229,0.0002258437,0.00008312219,0.0001481556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004328558,0.0001023018,0.00003042282,0.000141806,0.002715479,0.0001949992,0.0001098931,0.000250322,0.00001586832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005488463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006701502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09072077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1092039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981155,0.000178673,0.0002574161,0.0002488024,0.0006291645,0.0005704385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986375,0.0007165232,0.0001076861,0.000160918,0.0001227517,0.0002546363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002828318,0.0002833333,0.3969586,0.0001690476,0.0004031306,0.000008636979,0.5214111,0.000009616917,0.002055738,0.07432014,0.002991361,0.001106487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305396,0.0002933284,0.1654377,0.00009322416,0.00003021726,0.000007842616,0.6989236,0.000005073065,0.0004716614,0.0007614744,0.1322211,0.0004493985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710176,0.0001640629,0.000007013777,0.001402104,0.0001118232,0.0004194992,0.00003019264,0.00004984969,0.02679784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980039,0.00001719492,0.0002589973,0.0002697648,0.0001500812,0.00001834154,0.000002449925,0.000009949476,0.001269314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2315209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245396718","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.035","title":"University of New Brunswick","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; History; Middle English; Classics; Archaeology; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03172135274545302,"gpt":0.2699495171561793,"spread":0.2382281644107263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001631993,0.00005579334,0.0001108346,0.00001192194,0.0003489357,0.000009830395,0.0001339908,0.00005732472,0.0007997943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001969318,0.00005457126,0.00006125306,0.0001698497,0.0001845564,0.000122734,0.00002115131,0.00005883574,0.0001135025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009097666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003121665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04802985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01741372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993492,0.00008757667,0.00006252044,0.0001096482,0.0002046345,0.0001863712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996573,0.00004231781,0.00004769946,0.00007867752,0.00007144122,0.0001025283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001305601,0.00003796598,0.01740888,0.00001021873,0.00004670642,0.000005605662,0.0694478,0.00001754306,0.00001769145,0.3687595,0.5439022,0.0003329351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001681188,0.00001047339,0.008988746,0.000004647663,0.00001036635,9.861157e-8,0.01224423,0.000001474058,0.00001381388,0.0004780615,0.97801,0.00006998845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404804,0.0009146621,0.0025846,0.006072239,0.04391113,0.0005951076,0.00000669885,0.0002604961,0.8051747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8311929,0.0002767497,0.00773281,0.0001173572,0.007198583,2.490615e-7,0.000002036391,0.00001130584,0.153468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9717262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461040750","doi":"10.58188/1941-8043.1540","title":"CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05541945124655202,"gpt":0.3296206300461241,"spread":0.2742011787995721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002441413,0.00007704717,0.0002342952,0.000136984,0.000357194,0.00003519988,0.0003025803,0.0001041408,0.00001303128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009603986,0.00004589084,0.00004859476,0.0004211761,0.0003135645,0.0002393666,0.00002263044,0.0003943162,0.000001761333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005785448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004640947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08463512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985422,0.0004368873,0.0002838831,0.00007053045,0.0004340912,0.0002324047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989234,0.0003839408,0.000248136,0.00003189345,0.0002353499,0.000177262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001167651,0.00004665258,0.04770472,0.000004319178,0.0001721831,0.0000294147,0.8912503,0.00005039475,0.000080077,0.02102431,0.03895263,0.0005683052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003945928,0.0007301169,0.3401985,0.0003094942,0.0001405214,0.00006837247,0.236604,0.0001023791,0.0002935191,0.2466861,0.1704278,0.0004932054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867804,0.001708422,0.000009218345,0.01410574,0.000203874,0.0002802885,0.000003814897,0.000004596992,0.09690361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998621,0.00004624131,0.0002123693,0.0003120198,0.0002867512,0.000003053852,5.567129e-8,0.000003323964,0.0005152075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6546463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9623089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555998629","doi":"","title":"Notes Towards a (Re)Definition of the 'Secular'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Secularism; Judgement; Secular education; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Law; Secular state; Religious freedom; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic freedom","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02489225236138337,"gpt":0.2895899914395437,"spread":0.2646977390781603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001232633,0.00009243053,0.0001389399,0.0000168947,0.001006835,0.00003987495,0.0003266313,0.00007263088,0.0004716207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002799317,0.00005703976,0.0001907285,0.0002315013,0.0002728619,0.000147392,0.00002375285,0.0007736888,0.00003235865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007410478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008946505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005120036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977841,0.0002413715,0.000200198,0.0001010041,0.0005076117,0.001165668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995752,0.00006163054,0.0001176529,0.00008585276,0.0001122247,0.0000474625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008522072,0.0002026506,0.006029901,0.00001245396,0.0004838459,0.000002662607,0.06292891,0.00005530962,0.0007808798,0.7423339,0.0006591824,0.186425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001404002,0.0003297393,0.03573455,0.0001105868,0.0001970666,0.00006781594,0.06851671,0.00001407051,0.0007629216,0.8305645,0.06175105,0.0005469743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9368361,0.003209264,0.00005070167,0.01445786,0.0001920213,0.0001785061,0.000002854372,0.00002821851,0.04504444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903808,0.007758036,0.00007188506,0.0001264384,0.0002916623,0.000003941365,4.57056e-7,0.000006530389,0.001360299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117194350","doi":"10.1017/s1326011100004154","title":"Special Schooling for Indigenous Students: a New Form of Racial Discrimination?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Racism; Ethos; Conformity; Sociology; Special education; Indigenous education; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03397934230549773,"gpt":0.370491552743335,"spread":0.3365122104378373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122731,0.0001331317,0.0002584954,0.0001113645,0.001282884,0.0001509023,0.0006205295,0.0000912498,0.00006510348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002779288,0.00009388541,0.0001925434,0.0002638999,0.0001878747,0.0004244933,0.00002161477,0.0001950353,0.000006976251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006031626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001571856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00626223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980706,0.0001168849,0.0006430933,0.0001035314,0.0006954011,0.0003704914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.0001237078,0.0009444096,0.0001023432,0.0007248421,0.0001118922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000164996,0.0006410896,0.02823607,0.0000430928,0.000153182,0.000001285485,0.9194682,0.00008198633,0.0003647619,0.002240808,0.01860452,0.02999999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001761797,0.0008710984,0.4704309,0.0002962449,0.0005178939,0.00002854923,0.3543191,3.338815e-7,0.002291779,0.03320907,0.1357485,0.000524691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933836,0.0003256075,0.0001087182,0.002428605,0.002031373,0.0008629976,0.00001024563,0.000009068098,0.0008397168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777388,0.00009168955,0.001135684,0.00004049646,0.01625698,0.00001233078,0.000008775057,0.00001221149,0.004703004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5651491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503800980","doi":"10.2307/4135186","title":"The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 B.C.-A.D. 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phoenix","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ancient history; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0187216192719451,"gpt":0.2857187943391229,"spread":0.2669971750671778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007316014,0.00009597217,0.0001406704,0.000009538564,0.001017257,0.00008933806,0.0003079264,0.00005617124,0.0000101564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002092375,0.00005022346,0.00005712709,0.0001510893,0.0009982664,0.0001172166,0.00006893119,0.0001317668,0.000005915168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008979331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003494931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06049373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05969677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988859,0.0001813086,0.0001758537,0.0001394049,0.0003197406,0.0002977512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.0002504816,0.00006890287,0.0001183946,0.00004033803,0.00004332657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100531,0.000108356,0.002786137,0.00001889194,0.00008418415,0.00001410183,0.6613407,0.00003076505,0.006431057,0.3211944,0.003612753,0.004278081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003298063,0.0002168481,0.144375,0.00006985963,0.00007655133,0.000002717987,0.2589118,0.000007850345,0.001485766,0.04333147,0.5476576,0.0005664824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558724,0.0009338344,0.000001342789,0.004770009,0.0003071206,0.000331536,0.000005702562,0.00001874334,0.03775933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986683,0.000529731,0.00004428617,0.0004430594,0.0001980933,0.00002701071,7.386048e-7,0.000004852183,0.00008394621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599730556","doi":"","title":"Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Respondent; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil defense; Common law; Criminology; Business; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678103966869254,"gpt":0.3206330723930911,"spread":0.3038520327243985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008472432,0.0001484076,0.0001575232,0.00004249904,0.002484488,0.0003816566,0.000239728,0.0001024056,0.00002430239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005970417,0.0001185697,0.00005921272,0.0002860374,0.000412643,0.0006925162,0.00002931702,0.0006419733,0.00002120708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007711159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001565293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005009869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005162891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975954,0.0000730566,0.0002383402,0.0002556808,0.0003000648,0.001537477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.0001075003,0.0001800322,0.00007160792,0.0006402929,0.0001214733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278796,0.0002865934,0.01035602,0.0003262199,0.0004726548,0.000001196559,0.009504695,0.0001147457,0.001929676,0.4269519,0.000186021,0.5497425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001536372,0.0004959967,0.008239228,0.0001963769,0.0001016391,0.0001157197,0.05131472,0.0001665925,0.0001880811,0.9150675,0.02186936,0.000708399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208371,0.009974963,0.05749138,0.005612442,0.0002476871,0.004747741,0.000007468757,0.0001928092,0.0008884224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873456,0.0103241,0.0003141826,0.0000509092,0.0004201861,0.0009109582,0.000001445015,0.00001280137,0.0006198047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5490341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05914237393214094,"gpt":0.3530770726104747,"spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001550366,0.0001577023,0.0006575034,0.00006447706,0.0005496317,0.00007735648,0.0005617835,0.00008359501,0.00002055905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001206598,0.00009623649,0.0003145927,0.001707577,0.0003418923,0.0001547307,0.0001102859,0.0003107693,0.00001416183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005348527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000316177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6791298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972542,0.001017184,0.0005630493,0.0002711701,0.0004302126,0.0004641979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0003281976,0.0002173251,0.0003037092,0.0002543778,0.0001045207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001132557,0.000191769,0.9137537,0.0009988928,0.001146316,0.0001144003,0.05320062,0.00008400616,0.0002248024,0.006886317,0.003772552,0.01961534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004226538,0.000009758757,0.9038206,0.00561486,0.0006558151,5.245176e-7,0.01663785,0.00006656005,0.0000042841,0.00006210505,0.07247329,0.0002316707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5865469,0.3317837,0.00001023605,0.03475698,0.0006766437,0.002386303,0.00008713755,0.00002620115,0.04372591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645193,0.02865823,0.00002027075,0.006585366,0.00004460683,0.00005507866,0.000004416988,0.000007235611,0.0001055533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3779724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4227378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945455563","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.8","title":"Rethinking Racine v Woods from a Decolonizing Perspective: Challenging the Applicability of Attachment Theory to Indigenous Families Involved with Child Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Commission; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Royal Commission; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science; Ethnology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01851872083693038,"gpt":0.2701148192813038,"spread":0.2515960984443734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183882,0.0001877743,0.0004686865,0.00004075354,0.00181598,0.00009305441,0.0003125628,0.0001620738,0.00003314626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002345782,0.0001429221,0.0002069063,0.0002602189,0.0006281606,0.0002296259,0.0000336076,0.000617571,7.917807e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002426181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4518042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8732967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983373,0.0002778595,0.000349121,0.0002727687,0.0002045977,0.0005584093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.0003330928,0.000346339,0.0001819296,0.000455869,0.0005522654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002578639,0.00001394839,0.003526736,0.00004872902,0.00031977,0.000006651918,0.8957897,0.0001157644,0.0000600695,0.09866161,0.0000127027,0.001418543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007229369,0.0003035451,0.02117854,0.0004102057,0.0001351187,0.00001254679,0.952183,0.00002553528,0.00004976324,0.01620685,0.008438844,0.0003330772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854552,0.001460959,0.0001598078,0.007609996,0.0002433674,0.001000419,0.00002928313,0.00001197303,0.004029022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979503,0.0002265347,0.0004146854,0.001000028,0.0002642434,0.00002676067,0.000001833002,0.00001811503,0.0000974821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4214925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}