{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2179,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2179,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"af0063289f12","filters":{"topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W603888656","doi":"10.3138/9781442627901","title":"Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Indigenous; Political science; Geography; Law; Biology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Macklem","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01822183805483626,"gpt":0.2149957950570768,"spread":0.1967739570022405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009721174,0.0003373853,0.000321167,0.001538176,0.02216082,0.00872599,0.001412683,0.002140741,0.009070534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002232237,0.0002675657,0.0002442165,0.002611701,0.01350789,0.001761278,0.002634153,0.00384403,0.0005685249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1365148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976689,0.000173687,0.00003422801,0.00019396,0.0009800553,0.0009490062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992544,0.0001415725,0.00002499463,0.00004765391,0.000370552,0.0001607583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004354393,0.000002843959,0.0001261546,0.00002141301,0.000001950083,0.00005419396,0.003644382,0.00008094051,0.00004005929,0.9667295,0.02393356,0.005360623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001007274,0.000004516639,0.001908337,0.0001702772,0.00001096057,0.00006009776,0.003614496,0.0001564038,0.00009149345,0.05421507,0.9397311,0.00002725228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007302639,0.01471692,0.000340121,0.01229495,0.0004993011,0.00003528585,0.0001740832,0.00003988642,0.9645969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4221992,0.01223777,0.001399945,0.009695999,0.0002238728,0.000100488,0.0002528308,0.00009143286,0.5537984],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.118613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651745859","doi":"","title":"The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Psychology Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Politics; Blame; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"D. Ramona Bobocel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05858516120892503,"gpt":0.3712442374378867,"spread":0.3126590762289617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093973,0.0008476591,0.001001392,0.002024493,0.01308253,0.01072246,0.001282927,0.007164976,0.02337876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004215852,0.0007679203,0.0007371707,0.004687824,0.02602534,0.007620961,0.004489593,0.003502808,0.003956405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07124843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03632515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6999395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8334804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976937,0.0006949859,0.00009567076,0.000306797,0.000760261,0.0004486276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980045,0.0005419604,0.000132125,0.0002042401,0.0006344158,0.0004826708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005459058,0.00004873609,0.001575722,0.0003949094,0.00002389215,0.0002532774,0.006210487,0.0003493202,0.0002181198,0.4421268,0.5045955,0.04414856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134133,0.00000632221,0.001774188,0.0006162022,0.000009231919,0.00004483915,0.002233324,0.00006916178,0.00003903682,0.07403757,0.9211391,0.00001764441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00195375,0.455809,0.0007269388,0.2506435,0.006048642,0.00002702822,0.0002559785,0.00003025176,0.284505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2115584,0.3295489,0.001325662,0.02300502,0.007377539,0.0001132605,0.0001948817,0.0001666742,0.4267096],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6999395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103406808","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521888622","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetoric; Heresy; Humanism; Literature; Performance art; Art; Classics; Power (physics); History; Opposition (politics); Art history; Philosophy; Theology; Law","authors":[{"name":"George M. Logan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04256960152990154,"gpt":0.2581052821609236,"spread":0.215535680631022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004373342,0.0006167184,0.0005213981,0.001941141,0.002458068,0.005296755,0.0006813036,0.001822023,0.2287457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001887417,0.0003969863,0.0002521533,0.002493679,0.001348113,0.00433706,0.002214019,0.002455318,0.1036264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003382574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001680101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006958963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01917942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.0001054472,0.00002428571,0.0001297125,0.0003214857,0.00006794202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994588,0.0001490243,0.00002821803,0.00007736443,0.0001796666,0.0001069069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005298756,0.000007373367,0.00002627435,0.0000698114,8.28521e-7,0.00003874518,0.0003817137,0.00002305592,0.00007127968,0.02707459,0.9363509,0.03595017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.623315e-7,0.000001064774,0.0000353647,0.0000535569,2.007355e-7,0.00003030386,0.00006460201,0.000004247742,0.00001124472,0.0008744117,0.9989235,0.000001139468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000380681,0.04063261,0.0006115983,0.01478678,0.006587623,0.000018311,0.0003898322,0.0002578246,0.9363347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002431603,0.009442243,0.000281548,0.00218802,0.0009099778,0.0000154103,0.0001711595,0.0001512006,0.9844088],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2287457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Llewellyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01702648649084273,"gpt":0.2311818217262822,"spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003457758,0.0003537895,0.0004759419,0.00238327,0.0540337,0.01340632,0.003423321,0.004716616,0.005026761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01079006,0.0004908305,0.0005051921,0.004702589,0.01806372,0.003957583,0.007509546,0.006860067,0.0002494339],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.170845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2845052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931213,0.0008426645,0.000217225,0.0005016053,0.002126941,0.003190158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953882,0.00117348,0.0005894417,0.0001453212,0.001421535,0.001281938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005784698,0.0002204278,0.04769889,0.0003349694,0.00007071228,0.006753836,0.2089522,0.001338362,0.0006852921,0.5701107,0.04586612,0.1179106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004719019,0.00009495806,0.07993902,0.001256624,0.0001787912,0.003381573,0.509914,0.00272225,0.001048874,0.05835555,0.3427652,0.0002958839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5006869,0.02381113,0.004621715,0.1737588,0.000620742,0.0002242769,0.0002349427,0.00008478329,0.2959568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660719,0.008549899,0.001609367,0.007752081,0.00008910128,0.00003520912,0.00004704142,0.00001926542,0.01582603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.170845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970444144","doi":"10.59962/9780774880497","title":"Revisiting the Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Geography; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764331129471004,"gpt":0.2436364103096546,"spread":0.2259930990149445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035813,0.0002950058,0.0002792684,0.001407621,0.01684226,0.007760605,0.001449748,0.005067647,0.005079633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004022996,0.0002937672,0.000282829,0.001130825,0.02294629,0.004325062,0.004888673,0.007409906,0.0008599742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03369592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04253093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6326513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7584095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970443,0.0009552641,0.00006036764,0.0002018692,0.001147839,0.0005904275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985005,0.0007017697,0.00004288946,0.00008247394,0.0005054103,0.0001670802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003313194,0.000007096332,0.0001745258,0.00005420729,0.000001614315,0.0003663343,0.07133573,0.00007361989,0.0000891814,0.8547384,0.0606829,0.01247308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002388729,0.000005488466,0.0006754464,0.0003971746,0.000004846257,0.0002645765,0.02932598,0.0001143521,0.0001159289,0.04652936,0.9225504,0.00001390393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121997,0.01583713,0.001154784,0.05721822,0.002342977,0.00003835286,0.00003029644,0.00002292116,0.9111556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3458995,0.01417087,0.002281639,0.03308181,0.0007810862,0.00006766713,0.00005572138,0.00008172636,0.6035799],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3673487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7390242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227803424","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Affirmative Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law: Neoliberal Sexual Subjects and Risky Women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Akron law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Lise Gotell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06517423869699798,"gpt":0.3290436951348115,"spread":0.2638694564378135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07667503,0.0006266987,0.001143532,0.006725314,0.02922582,0.02308937,0.006324269,0.02466464,0.005685427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1331359,0.0009435388,0.0009109866,0.008863924,0.06029147,0.01145908,0.005688204,0.02012952,0.0003482133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.136033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.349407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9561329,0.01225699,0.001769089,0.002898653,0.01587647,0.01106585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.841877,0.1138661,0.003454176,0.003898195,0.03220495,0.004699583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005401425,0.00004805836,0.003437855,0.0003351206,0.00002688123,0.000270717,0.0383653,0.0003986943,0.0002342786,0.8488921,0.06342897,0.04450811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584857,0.0000691938,0.03327253,0.003540888,0.0003387058,0.0002697665,0.0763858,0.00139921,0.001248994,0.2569106,0.6259844,0.0004214032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0730002,0.05362831,0.00332966,0.6764355,0.002867821,0.0002391668,0.000333724,0.00005357131,0.1901121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8237259,0.02410958,0.002777622,0.1197919,0.001470861,0.000183266,0.0001371044,0.00007356011,0.02773007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.136033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100052892","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040539","title":"Up the Creek: Fishing for a New Constitutional Order","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Politics; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Business","authors":[{"name":"Kiera L. Ladner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0572730117395688,"gpt":0.3475321722473593,"spread":0.2902591605077905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01034206,0.000336697,0.0006100766,0.001937871,0.03009779,0.02203792,0.002447167,0.005442833,0.01089463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01388797,0.0004093983,0.0005099961,0.003496666,0.05521348,0.009421926,0.005872572,0.009857868,0.000591429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09683737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1365024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.890674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9159666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884011,0.002248522,0.0003268921,0.001836339,0.004381828,0.002805387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903409,0.003178243,0.0003774606,0.001129601,0.003879843,0.001093972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002385021,0.000002278535,0.0001629038,0.000006310886,9.983062e-7,0.00002293824,0.003639983,0.00005651943,0.00003096203,0.9916766,0.002673718,0.001724435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493633,0.00001840141,0.002472332,0.0002277761,0.00002619873,0.00006977891,0.01800589,0.0007733054,0.0002914943,0.5056927,0.4723158,0.00008142817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05437957,0.003275659,0.01680949,0.1095857,0.0005900441,0.0001362556,0.0003564043,0.0001403399,0.8147266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099407,0.001335001,0.006244201,0.01065221,0.0002252812,0.00009509857,0.0001796386,0.00008965391,0.07123815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7026076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325547125","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007237","title":"From<i>Terra Nullius</i>to Affirmation: Reconciling Aboriginal Rights with the Canadian Constitution","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Constitution; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Asch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269755689766165,"gpt":0.2627731652592187,"spread":0.2400756083615571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002524104,0.000371865,0.0003285432,0.001832719,0.01758349,0.009956196,0.001674184,0.002082974,0.006356155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004395555,0.0001948382,0.0003167034,0.002350119,0.03655605,0.002565349,0.004616173,0.003039096,0.0002714379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1112901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1327523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970046,0.0005574703,0.0000480714,0.0002175364,0.0009070001,0.001265486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998053,0.0005527436,0.0001212856,0.000143738,0.0008201596,0.0003092836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008552069,0.000004016777,0.0005313219,0.00002823783,0.000002884861,0.00007461954,0.01846519,0.0001969718,0.00009888445,0.9721576,0.003811728,0.00461995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000344228,0.00002752981,0.009875511,0.0005494274,0.00007390491,0.0002101706,0.08356864,0.001172507,0.0007213881,0.3787627,0.5249127,0.00009101302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08533365,0.007139463,0.002983739,0.04703074,0.0003567633,0.00004642382,0.0001426493,0.00004513953,0.8569216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524707,0.002482972,0.001295168,0.002383195,0.00007166323,0.00002341219,0.00003595088,0.00002322583,0.04121388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1112901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8074703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1162489397","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1316","title":"Legal Pluralism and Human Agency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Normative; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Theme (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Legal realism; Legal research; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Webber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02487907968279396,"gpt":0.305183783413715,"spread":0.280304703730921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01183769,0.0003348821,0.000520452,0.001628349,0.01096083,0.01225697,0.001225004,0.004596095,0.00345001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00898784,0.0003153969,0.0006266838,0.001095261,0.0742826,0.007767879,0.008907573,0.004555236,0.0004164846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005971849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007168386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004157039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860486,0.008625421,0.0004051034,0.001845258,0.001952569,0.001123187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937972,0.003015008,0.0007012105,0.001108281,0.0006431356,0.0007351416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001462824,0.000003919441,0.00008634933,0.000005819823,0.000001706685,0.00001934251,0.002187401,0.0000820159,0.00002071935,0.9958569,0.0004412962,0.001293023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005618353,0.000005139662,0.0001122976,0.00002772247,0.00000192061,0.00003466254,0.001381202,0.0001900792,0.00003424013,0.9764242,0.02177873,0.000004214611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06103075,0.009828305,0.04069407,0.08590057,0.0004575599,0.00007343909,0.00004280405,0.00007713133,0.8018953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773983,0.001329343,0.004725301,0.002142115,0.0003027762,0.00006902875,0.00001926036,0.00002467835,0.01398914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01225697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06260443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820504405","doi":"","title":"From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Negotiation; Constitution; Political science; Law; Treaty; Good faith; Action (physics); Competence (human resources); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Sonia Lawrence","is_ca":false},{"name":"Patrick Macklem","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660251668214259,"gpt":0.321153408812515,"spread":0.3045508921303724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01370248,0.0002642124,0.0004291211,0.001140537,0.02204822,0.01551769,0.002194845,0.01901636,0.006976876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02858744,0.0004603101,0.0006242549,0.001122488,0.0515568,0.01038828,0.01680206,0.01126593,0.0007492611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01340992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03350011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09191687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09162904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812813,0.008985163,0.000464634,0.001173897,0.003253413,0.004841632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867955,0.007629364,0.000857312,0.001115108,0.00204752,0.001555073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008555409,0.000009830223,0.0001754844,0.00001924868,0.000003106659,0.0003765163,0.03580065,0.00008805198,0.00009199624,0.9548279,0.004977391,0.003621236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003077138,0.00003387675,0.001414948,0.0003840402,0.00001748538,0.0009585394,0.05349399,0.0005276461,0.0003598728,0.7047726,0.2379499,0.00005631091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0429279,0.003781966,0.006599057,0.189485,0.0005774783,0.00005535077,0.00002690649,0.00002989383,0.7565165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350609,0.001523555,0.001926406,0.02047187,0.0003638107,0.00007510529,0.00001723652,0.00003039226,0.04053063],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1827637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Hunt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carolyn McCarney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04782442497088262,"gpt":0.3398939775480977,"spread":0.2920695525772151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007519583,0.0004991664,0.0005864014,0.007197753,0.01564341,0.003192673,0.003226668,0.004006788,0.004161688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023724,0.0006030293,0.0006215376,0.01497226,0.002496537,0.0008346595,0.002113999,0.002784953,0.0004126461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1707836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905784,0.0004892691,0.0004770982,0.0006269621,0.005151717,0.002676524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815083,0.003530206,0.002584269,0.0004962218,0.01011547,0.001765545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005656177,0.0001347869,0.07351684,0.002211384,0.0003049004,0.006938321,0.02768254,0.0009219184,0.0009638339,0.04571583,0.7165828,0.1244612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001115609,0.00004516805,0.3984092,0.001349867,0.0003052907,0.001012836,0.01088674,0.0002467271,0.0005834244,0.0009636277,0.585948,0.0001376343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4295287,0.1438991,0.0005919214,0.07836659,0.003040276,0.0009047207,0.02824384,0.0001022227,0.3153226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811624,0.04969523,0.001045575,0.03023373,0.0008841965,0.000350046,0.008547888,0.00005562643,0.09756375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.113307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8221036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114583704","doi":"","title":"A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Life imprisonment; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Constitutional right; Prison; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"John Keown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06317269375793548,"gpt":0.3637814614843352,"spread":0.3006087677263997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006562148,0.000397929,0.0007052994,0.001162199,0.04964015,0.009778727,0.003204281,0.01408574,0.004043289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01429594,0.0007682164,0.000643375,0.002419685,0.01676593,0.002939377,0.003993651,0.01872174,0.0002457417],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1419905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2926501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989346,0.001350187,0.0002509689,0.0009757432,0.003258685,0.004818461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916211,0.002670582,0.000278657,0.0001336013,0.002604981,0.002691123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008876364,0.00006053241,0.004680208,0.000192138,0.00003136959,0.00192808,0.03186831,0.000492654,0.0006036129,0.6781774,0.2497963,0.03208064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008612548,0.00006368769,0.01106702,0.0006951257,0.00008279409,0.0007788774,0.0552266,0.0007394932,0.0008648208,0.04374393,0.8862187,0.0004328593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08533533,0.01638711,0.0009672143,0.7143943,0.00351368,0.0001080811,0.0002789406,0.00006412258,0.1789512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5695685,0.008537035,0.001108196,0.361039,0.0007278185,0.00008123171,0.00009178696,0.00008893762,0.05875753],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1419905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912807746","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.001.0001","title":"The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Federalism; Law; Political science; Charter; Indigenous; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Population; Sociology; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03634714006224919,"gpt":0.2506919954054982,"spread":0.214344855343249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577134,0.000936874,0.0006015197,0.006490538,0.00847413,0.008003755,0.001488777,0.001987206,0.07725769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00533451,0.0004548125,0.0003480331,0.01037621,0.005531318,0.003368525,0.001759205,0.00302384,0.01254409],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07175278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09450985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8726993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9033351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974023,0.0002439676,0.00009283113,0.0002135781,0.001679129,0.0003682346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979762,0.0003394384,0.00004654609,0.000175756,0.001264023,0.0001979743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000479078,0.000004247821,0.00005268916,0.0001261811,0.000001568894,0.0000329467,0.0005789606,0.0001616106,0.00004163968,0.3052084,0.6497631,0.04402381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.614083e-7,4.286598e-7,0.0000653938,0.0001103144,5.482893e-7,0.00000810406,0.00007389869,0.000008675695,0.000006839041,0.003338333,0.9963838,0.000003024719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003165921,0.06577466,0.0009116045,0.01301309,0.0034842,0.00005540652,0.001734672,0.0001838004,0.914526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01784641,0.09248638,0.003434638,0.004673982,0.001425911,0.0001606584,0.003026743,0.0003954635,0.8765497],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Benny K. K. Chan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Margaret A. Somerville","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03203193881503012,"gpt":0.3074328444333712,"spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002082728,0.0005816371,0.0007179898,0.003797492,0.0114084,0.01165964,0.003758576,0.006749617,0.00831802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004201763,0.0006195867,0.001685637,0.004428897,0.02163724,0.002804853,0.003463316,0.01004893,0.0005966944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0874836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08271263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901264,0.001194095,0.0001532071,0.000494972,0.003971182,0.004060142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981604,0.0006349327,0.0001245899,0.00006938772,0.0007055012,0.0003051779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009619856,0.0000171004,0.0006362212,0.00004768939,0.00001117321,0.000330282,0.002730855,0.0004878147,0.0001636793,0.9793473,0.01214275,0.004075588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008705747,0.00007498084,0.02703517,0.001030184,0.0001500748,0.0005910497,0.01743143,0.002430826,0.001150528,0.3177489,0.6320316,0.0002380692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05514807,0.01130244,0.00444636,0.0412107,0.0003303787,0.0004083244,0.001149276,0.00003494424,0.8859696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830526,0.01092325,0.004184554,0.05046082,0.0004314203,0.0003528674,0.001004214,0.0001023649,0.1020146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0874836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6347409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597048075","doi":"10.1017/9780585490809.008","title":"Where did all the Charters Go? Anglo-Saxon Charters and the New Politics of the Eleventh Century","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Demise; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Anglo saxon; Ancient history; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Charles Insley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01959419157782072,"gpt":0.2646780934082745,"spread":0.2450839018304538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002522227,0.0002630484,0.0002041161,0.001044968,0.01140427,0.01197381,0.0004976663,0.001179304,0.004977736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002412422,0.0001956283,0.0001020831,0.001418868,0.01743877,0.00474843,0.002002171,0.003874232,0.0006713597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003750742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0310491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05156389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981787,0.0009061452,0.00006869029,0.0001595765,0.0002400057,0.0004468661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986644,0.0004690688,0.0002435161,0.000111184,0.0001948259,0.0003170402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003079828,0.00001432108,0.001059763,0.00003583486,0.00000204255,0.0001122225,0.07825403,0.00008648668,0.00008936475,0.8953846,0.01295068,0.01197996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001627158,0.00003477055,0.007000379,0.0004719953,0.000006358014,0.0001114946,0.07007997,0.0001701258,0.000271457,0.04380428,0.87799,0.00004290365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2632578,0.0264628,0.001218882,0.07022135,0.001432462,0.00002522372,0.0001277151,0.00006067284,0.6371931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8898704,0.004794243,0.0004557043,0.002500707,0.0003944422,0.00001881492,0.00004597763,0.00003087905,0.101889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0310491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07585508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555512450","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Ethnology; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03254397821794328,"gpt":0.2749529513543675,"spread":0.2424089731364243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019222,0.0001784346,0.0004198005,0.003096747,0.03953281,0.005301027,0.001791729,0.0009444795,0.008082276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004753036,0.0002636191,0.0002434117,0.005035268,0.009253257,0.001336574,0.004447702,0.002636601,0.0002776368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1016308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2053678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997083,0.0002714134,0.00008175446,0.0002402755,0.001018726,0.001304744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935715,0.0006887895,0.0004454693,0.0001529162,0.002285561,0.00285575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000743367,0.0001631585,0.06923893,0.0005279857,0.00005749891,0.003458336,0.57217,0.0005016534,0.001117867,0.1994979,0.03981829,0.113374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002402705,0.00005054504,0.1808455,0.001410976,0.00006547436,0.0008196156,0.3545632,0.0005232669,0.0003132902,0.01016798,0.4510738,0.0001424099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7200318,0.01174824,0.0005452099,0.02336394,0.0003042052,0.0001238944,0.0004501065,0.00004487617,0.2433877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759605,0.004339161,0.0004825034,0.001690698,0.00002561011,0.00002240882,0.00009885972,0.00001599932,0.01736422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1016308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7373868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Aaron L. Mills","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365580843012047,"gpt":0.3125579615218664,"spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007556404,0.000522233,0.0005034493,0.002435357,0.0243335,0.01635806,0.002588622,0.005387567,0.004044549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636509,0.0003009768,0.00052187,0.001706525,0.1149556,0.01905897,0.009673482,0.009668235,0.0003895147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04323096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03893531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3426077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953589,0.001904495,0.00009125062,0.0003398309,0.0009944815,0.001311026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962011,0.001981559,0.0002120734,0.000440146,0.0006853821,0.0004797548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000170418,0.000007186248,0.00009968191,0.00001914296,9.394597e-7,0.00006976262,0.06343503,0.00006173497,0.00006046538,0.9308353,0.00163012,0.003778771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006011709,0.00001968077,0.0008837714,0.000317228,0.000007824514,0.0001451192,0.1547166,0.0004268082,0.0003294971,0.5128417,0.330269,0.00003682583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08359757,0.02041519,0.01764681,0.1813866,0.001350331,0.000108489,0.00004395292,0.0002080392,0.6952429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369811,0.007409603,0.00466228,0.01071557,0.0003011673,0.0000820027,0.00003206657,0.0001084856,0.03970768],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.681227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417315670","doi":"10.1093/pch/21.5.245","title":"Toward the full and proper implementation of Jordan's Principle: An elusive goal to date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Tribunal; Political science; Service (business); Law; Service provider; House of Commons; Public administration; Business; Politics; Economics; Economy; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Cindy Blackstock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0342140601147113,"gpt":0.3676809689479009,"spread":0.3334669088331896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04683115,0.0003784833,0.0007862396,0.0008346491,0.01613402,0.01410412,0.003411561,0.0141594,0.00297492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0385782,0.0004795904,0.0008200716,0.0009511771,0.05257581,0.01229396,0.01230456,0.02453299,0.001013368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009372925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0825406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0270819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04100678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977165,0.01040103,0.00140779,0.001726232,0.006395833,0.002904156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761835,0.008136001,0.002564473,0.001657837,0.00823901,0.003219286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008296891,0.00004603899,0.0008908412,0.00006699018,0.000007172387,0.0001986529,0.01671652,0.0001302668,0.0001401916,0.9386664,0.03062518,0.01250358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003004962,0.00005103999,0.001417177,0.0009995819,0.00001792322,0.0005945898,0.04232281,0.0005717514,0.001043441,0.3715433,0.5813097,0.00009855044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03208089,0.006459103,0.01101549,0.824793,0.002084203,0.000111292,0.00004498464,0.00009691334,0.1233141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5326831,0.006251822,0.0321923,0.3766918,0.002132354,0.0002742247,0.00006892411,0.00016849,0.04953709],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2476698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266116478","doi":"","title":"Critical Comparisons: The Supreme Court of Canada Dooms Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Immigration; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Daphne Gilbert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diana Majury","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01417047089759789,"gpt":0.2849856559420098,"spread":0.2708151850444119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02344102,0.0004737109,0.0007901004,0.002350634,0.02504609,0.01577356,0.003429102,0.009487456,0.004132465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04459101,0.0004689314,0.0007890347,0.003178973,0.03285856,0.008270546,0.004889599,0.01152457,0.0002895622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1208123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8133669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9711637,0.008470324,0.0009774627,0.003141793,0.01164326,0.004603444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802297,0.009695532,0.0008885672,0.0009914036,0.007207464,0.0009873495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006862089,0.000002256011,0.0001293586,0.00001481783,0.000003330768,0.00004061241,0.002082036,0.00005126204,0.00004206334,0.9803619,0.013995,0.003270424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004820152,0.00002886067,0.002327037,0.0004798906,0.00004841505,0.00008459234,0.006420039,0.0008163276,0.0005671153,0.5483378,0.4407327,0.0001089712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0333396,0.01168411,0.01784569,0.3069208,0.004639367,0.0002317716,0.0005451815,0.0001391702,0.6246542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8116524,0.003425406,0.01678986,0.09942467,0.001622094,0.0002258364,0.0002281251,0.0001285687,0.06650299],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1866331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6370655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85585993","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Aotearoa; Law; Sovereignty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shin Imai","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kent McNeil","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0184145415422912,"gpt":0.2510950958742552,"spread":0.232680554331964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007933823,0.000781174,0.001000612,0.006634127,0.02360891,0.01562743,0.002958091,0.008114873,0.004779267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009309053,0.0004898616,0.0004875445,0.007882182,0.05045098,0.011379,0.006235249,0.006554325,0.0003390607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02664462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01331659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04065512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03826156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927919,0.004741531,0.0001297534,0.0003063206,0.0009821818,0.001048381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912093,0.007034348,0.000370642,0.0001871747,0.0007377651,0.0004607601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001103649,0.00005093301,0.0001852277,0.0003311691,0.000005766841,0.0003594203,0.1276276,0.0001024826,0.00006029071,0.8454261,0.01804809,0.007791959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001088117,0.00004512266,0.001192874,0.002146119,0.00001155199,0.0003423605,0.2724718,0.0002386863,0.00009907034,0.1729906,0.5504229,0.00002791709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03735895,0.3016016,0.001948593,0.1806597,0.005773166,0.0001016593,0.00006245632,0.0000350422,0.4724588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7279333,0.1843328,0.001930929,0.02044097,0.009334012,0.0004618602,0.0000754733,0.00006546237,0.05542516],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04065512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1933211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244206916","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798","title":"Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Coke; Ignorance; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Opposition (politics); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Political science; History; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics; Archaeology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David C. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0185807655750713,"gpt":0.2229195654286238,"spread":0.2043387998535525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102558,0.0003598301,0.0002732833,0.0009370074,0.006033954,0.005912176,0.0004983541,0.002841365,0.006368478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004061785,0.0002664217,0.0001023523,0.0009122029,0.01307947,0.004568704,0.002113957,0.006470245,0.00162235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009220659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006869121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04188828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04655074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984605,0.0005475326,0.00003723641,0.0001960768,0.0005339215,0.0002247097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986854,0.0007155181,0.00007585397,0.00007474601,0.0003058011,0.0001425811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001571136,0.00001502492,0.0001188854,0.00007876852,0.000001819833,0.0001569107,0.01504718,0.00008277313,0.0001055994,0.7077459,0.2538894,0.02274198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001697693,0.000004849541,0.0001522252,0.0001465273,9.043349e-7,0.00008736798,0.001839111,0.00002835969,0.00006500196,0.01366126,0.9840075,0.000005157787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005857387,0.09224866,0.0008921531,0.1008339,0.00330515,0.0000292246,0.00002570726,0.000032662,0.7967752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1806438,0.04777903,0.0009852928,0.02501133,0.001650695,0.00006495445,0.00003663111,0.00008126364,0.743747],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04188828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08328891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227303418","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Women's Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Downtown; Poverty; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Diana Majury","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01240020040210402,"gpt":0.2212549969972075,"spread":0.2088547965951035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003204981,0.0006321673,0.0005282062,0.001302365,0.06750685,0.01928758,0.002956098,0.0133238,0.04141967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00885712,0.0007324175,0.0006489352,0.001484463,0.01460541,0.004772907,0.007080766,0.01500079,0.002885774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.130422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1483726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921501,0.0009863654,0.000121141,0.001023158,0.002335196,0.003384057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960537,0.0007441142,0.00009623481,0.0001284887,0.001432474,0.001545093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001846705,0.00001612932,0.0008232725,0.00004852833,0.000007599067,0.0009426371,0.01304048,0.0001569296,0.0001483292,0.5327305,0.4366411,0.01542613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007468095,0.000005633419,0.0007810287,0.000171059,0.000006079746,0.00008726439,0.01349499,0.0000920372,0.0000669581,0.01182745,0.9734268,0.00003320513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00797483,0.008013708,0.0011039,0.2189974,0.006821923,0.0001044211,0.000235753,0.0000926475,0.7566554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1709946,0.003845175,0.001112784,0.08120957,0.0007833347,0.0001268732,0.0001091583,0.0001871908,0.7416314],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.130422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Sanderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02225849214846924,"gpt":0.2682911348908973,"spread":0.2460326427424281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01528435,0.0005554831,0.0007419095,0.001284266,0.01860388,0.009540365,0.002308966,0.01425326,0.002731141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03115667,0.0004458839,0.0007729966,0.000718387,0.08260097,0.01201001,0.01011447,0.01667611,0.0003592469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01171022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01206677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02477461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02066466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797283,0.01061827,0.0005531873,0.001895778,0.004145116,0.003059406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820123,0.01076795,0.001632981,0.001872117,0.002379163,0.001335585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009367867,0.00001331869,0.0002072376,0.00003432442,0.00000529691,0.0001884796,0.008533329,0.0001520462,0.00007733705,0.9850798,0.003841342,0.001858057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004511006,0.00003814287,0.0005155444,0.0003598092,0.00002281384,0.0003331555,0.01313187,0.0007871826,0.0006319294,0.8670402,0.1170453,0.00004893215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04965701,0.006332709,0.0421485,0.3856353,0.002356065,0.0001555026,0.00004248858,0.0001123611,0.5135601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340788,0.0008772317,0.003260454,0.04160936,0.0006439834,0.00009739874,0.00000978827,0.00007182622,0.01935112],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02477461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08496404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262016348","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Interlocking Power Hierarchies: Sharing the Pieces of Jurisdictional Authority","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Law and economics; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Jurisdiction; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01294857069043029,"gpt":0.2937266258044696,"spread":0.2807780551140393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01041972,0.0004230261,0.0009445382,0.001995808,0.01056008,0.01383273,0.002880295,0.004032961,0.006235601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01724102,0.0006991242,0.0008631583,0.001738883,0.08210393,0.02597884,0.01401584,0.006025952,0.0006947231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005819425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005489894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00853576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005762836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908765,0.00439774,0.0002596761,0.001398726,0.00184397,0.001223348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906768,0.004423981,0.0007458543,0.002216373,0.0008038486,0.001133067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001293663,0.000005313138,0.0002594721,0.00001274108,0.000006968619,0.00005757621,0.01274395,0.0002441088,0.0001063328,0.9802624,0.0007302542,0.00555804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001854679,0.00001338492,0.0003081328,0.00005295677,0.000009071396,0.00004998874,0.00442577,0.000557174,0.0000773592,0.9746041,0.01986793,0.00001567183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2184401,0.007295956,0.1566468,0.1134355,0.0007405534,0.0001011798,0.0001039594,0.0002792035,0.5029567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858847,0.0006736341,0.004613137,0.001854053,0.0002139932,0.00005140217,0.00001866182,0.0000585888,0.006631755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01383273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05510539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234302354","doi":"","title":"Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Constitution; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444799545776432,"gpt":0.2827624268547247,"spread":0.2583144313969604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057831,0.0003192709,0.0003417005,0.002050775,0.01720905,0.01267484,0.001337071,0.004393613,0.009063587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01577337,0.0004383338,0.0002963671,0.003808847,0.02310803,0.004878771,0.002822108,0.004373877,0.0005054093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08417006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07967534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8794625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9129624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903065,0.003730257,0.0001945594,0.0008441922,0.002935316,0.001989264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950118,0.003132498,0.0003219438,0.0002847019,0.0008333458,0.0004156892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004239308,0.00000357966,0.0001694702,0.00001388108,0.000002081357,0.00008178065,0.004815752,0.0002175095,0.00004601337,0.9834797,0.006047009,0.005118908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002431852,0.0000187146,0.00621523,0.0004269789,0.00002944006,0.0001163172,0.01457441,0.00158705,0.0003868519,0.3966415,0.5798965,0.0000826476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0343839,0.01102602,0.005205976,0.05793112,0.0004219715,0.00007176413,0.0002763019,0.00005852042,0.8906245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024028,0.004630144,0.002954646,0.004758453,0.0001669085,0.00005766537,0.0001404829,0.0000348475,0.08485401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1205375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6106994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570479127","doi":"10.3138/9781442686007","title":"Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Law; Duty; Constitutional crisis; Governor; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Russell","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02553492946148992,"gpt":0.2588360971326202,"spread":0.2333011676711303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001721438,0.0004348238,0.000439749,0.0009232773,0.005957047,0.008925313,0.0009469665,0.00490782,0.08465043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006980186,0.0002966566,0.0002566678,0.001366781,0.003983254,0.005665455,0.00413912,0.005922108,0.01799558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008427804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0355253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975037,0.0008087268,0.0000914755,0.0002603793,0.0008188437,0.0005169853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978218,0.0005283396,0.0001201861,0.0001574919,0.0005407822,0.0008315303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009167772,0.0000121409,0.0001122794,0.00005895461,0.000001189505,0.00003363245,0.0009914112,0.00003711263,0.00004461175,0.08682449,0.8959653,0.01590973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001401379,0.000001404547,0.0001482376,0.0001195213,3.105744e-7,0.00001370641,0.0006493867,0.00001075103,0.00001312854,0.005845074,0.9931952,0.000001948199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001220375,0.076562,0.0004874452,0.5383269,0.03247708,0.00002989646,0.0003164764,0.0001667255,0.3504131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07683915,0.03791556,0.0006165194,0.1047797,0.0202129,0.0001029234,0.0003827339,0.0003526404,0.7587978],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08465043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2831839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246619878","doi":"","title":"Law, Theory and Aboriginal Peoples","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Liberalism; Oppression; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gordon Christie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01432710735319049,"gpt":0.2974042242211967,"spread":0.2830771168680062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00377229,0.000416639,0.0004707425,0.003136231,0.02715897,0.01031602,0.002368259,0.003654094,0.004834766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004763498,0.0002210487,0.000291397,0.003247033,0.08312438,0.004344782,0.004629896,0.004195256,0.0004130162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05081837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05228317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8234134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7751991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964237,0.00133478,0.00006993433,0.0002987086,0.000874785,0.0009980878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970464,0.001318488,0.0002250088,0.0001754273,0.0007273872,0.0005072624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001780532,0.00001285651,0.0005040083,0.00003606138,0.000001625419,0.0001223007,0.0518597,0.0000920684,0.00002633744,0.9362376,0.005653377,0.005452152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008787403,0.00001678316,0.002963637,0.0005804957,0.000009365183,0.0002337561,0.1060439,0.0003919849,0.00009527622,0.4636747,0.425952,0.00002936544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05031837,0.02948844,0.002138496,0.07511932,0.0006950277,0.00006024186,0.00004749199,0.00005862421,0.842074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881735,0.01136037,0.001793471,0.00770408,0.0002464413,0.00007445309,0.00004351508,0.00003908576,0.09056505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3687148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165876900","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2021.1926631","title":"Assistance in dying: A comparative look at legal definitions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Death Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Confusion; Terminology; Death with dignity; Diversity (politics); Glossary; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn Downie","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mona Gupta","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stefano Cavalli","is_ca":false},{"name":"Samuel Blouin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2461764561870247,"gpt":0.4090427128091024,"spread":0.1628662566220778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01248072,0.0005939609,0.001031457,0.01249377,0.01209784,0.01208201,0.001964157,0.003813282,0.003549465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01750487,0.0002330421,0.0005479397,0.01478796,0.03631923,0.01351506,0.007590653,0.005372018,0.0003627384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01333562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006582942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01560875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02690714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837157,0.01294924,0.0008490824,0.0003562703,0.001441218,0.0006884356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811383,0.01554807,0.001264568,0.0004066231,0.001217239,0.0004251526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001354403,0.00001895975,0.0003441029,0.0005638122,0.000006165616,0.0002160538,0.1426417,0.0001251076,0.0000858609,0.8385083,0.007261872,0.01021463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001146097,0.0000583119,0.003956588,0.006408957,0.00001700396,0.000696671,0.4440247,0.0002575336,0.000149324,0.158241,0.3861297,0.00004870144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06856932,0.3481328,0.007789436,0.1069166,0.003341113,0.0001251554,0.0002176449,0.00003419542,0.4648738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8163397,0.1539377,0.005443935,0.01483019,0.001757136,0.0003587502,0.0002285247,0.00008279466,0.007021221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01560875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09675717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Eniola Salami","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bonnie Lashewicz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04227486848726325,"gpt":0.3394451055679871,"spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002400558,0.0001978142,0.0002622188,0.0007245212,0.004039372,0.003476679,0.0005398037,0.0008787321,0.001529625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221384,0.0001523182,0.0002323261,0.0006783844,0.006728542,0.003703095,0.004096969,0.001676112,0.00008131615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003281897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003243733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03671448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05633912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.001182347,0.0001218727,0.000215893,0.0002768485,0.0003375344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965324,0.00195104,0.0007440049,0.0001275586,0.0002043348,0.0004405982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001618225,0.00004394208,0.02813883,0.0000373635,0.000003995274,0.000637137,0.9541453,0.00002497951,0.0001718262,0.005356065,0.0004741646,0.01095027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810225,0.00002933616,0.03241113,0.0001090172,0.000006444261,0.0006361644,0.9575172,0.00005966363,0.000104275,0.002129705,0.006980562,0.00001170496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847897,0.001570553,0.0002671259,0.004545509,0.00001713597,0.00001544075,0.0000279822,0.000002352955,0.008764197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984479,0.0006325468,0.0001250348,0.0002945682,0.000007740148,0.00001209359,0.000009054383,0.000001146036,0.0004697652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03671448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0730015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146001282","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249","title":"A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Positive law; Venn diagram; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Common law; Philosophy; Power (physics); Rule of law; Public law; Political science; Constitutional law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law; Private law; Physics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Walters","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03592682075332374,"gpt":0.2368067433654751,"spread":0.2008799226121513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001820905,0.0003355422,0.000463725,0.001814818,0.008200148,0.007044841,0.0007545423,0.002879623,0.004502003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005308825,0.0002800379,0.0002096145,0.002528429,0.02142641,0.006820023,0.002810625,0.004538988,0.0006385826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007531714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02453022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03117919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977173,0.0009857445,0.00005831043,0.0003767737,0.0005734707,0.0002884183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984792,0.0009813613,0.00008921725,0.0001650919,0.0001703227,0.0001147672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001532815,0.000001803889,0.00002959828,0.000009909959,4.091343e-7,0.00001538865,0.001446393,0.00002340879,0.00001026985,0.9894497,0.006191858,0.002819826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006253657,0.00001056246,0.0003561721,0.0002180179,0.000002239058,0.00009037042,0.001598704,0.0001214371,0.00005553851,0.3016676,0.6958642,0.000008942953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007146555,0.04064194,0.002237863,0.01918026,0.0008299329,0.00002518428,0.00003745792,0.00002844553,0.9298723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5660214,0.03330643,0.004067053,0.0165303,0.001450254,0.0002573084,0.0001116168,0.0000947273,0.3781609],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02453022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07400954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791951286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Tommy J. Curry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01665031955606958,"gpt":0.2386969532323604,"spread":0.2220466336762908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001911761,0.0007729944,0.0007677133,0.003315683,0.023218,0.01464219,0.002564801,0.00535565,0.03400921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007929557,0.0009083953,0.0006085525,0.005306562,0.006586773,0.002681085,0.002162922,0.005962583,0.002709998],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2967766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949254,0.0003422808,0.0001241197,0.0005546681,0.002421406,0.001632111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967762,0.0004222137,0.00006693799,0.000204884,0.002034945,0.0004948605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001012353,0.00001585481,0.0004259473,0.00004219127,0.000006708637,0.00004663076,0.0008538727,0.0001877284,0.00005030124,0.7525986,0.2371689,0.008593052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001236141,0.000005243742,0.001896463,0.00017111,0.00001490001,0.00002703221,0.0009789238,0.0001979078,0.00008366026,0.03316841,0.963408,0.00003591697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00558182,0.01238815,0.00058308,0.03854708,0.00106996,0.00009781212,0.00275277,0.0001270349,0.9388523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1458658,0.009361591,0.001610751,0.0170768,0.000497905,0.000199062,0.00119936,0.0001740809,0.8240146],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510850940","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and Dignity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legislature; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Denise G. Réaume","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0206575639304725,"gpt":0.3029320942038183,"spread":0.2822745302733458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005417658,0.0003433247,0.0006710796,0.001534823,0.004920783,0.006704133,0.001228146,0.005185606,0.003343558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01065024,0.0002087089,0.0003959111,0.0006254313,0.05173963,0.004811367,0.01058777,0.003948753,0.0004617027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00333209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003845704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003351697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003533367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950901,0.001384211,0.0003737762,0.0008884158,0.001530132,0.0007332978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963874,0.001547144,0.0006219464,0.0005279835,0.0004306583,0.000484954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603348,0.000009085871,0.0007549098,0.00001960285,0.000004057571,0.0001235972,0.001917485,0.00005635644,0.000194473,0.991268,0.0003932052,0.005250582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001615553,0.00006272942,0.002164238,0.0002543621,0.000008845022,0.000475741,0.002102875,0.000163232,0.0004230484,0.9629082,0.03140005,0.00002053145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1654585,0.008336226,0.01441808,0.04167268,0.0005325008,0.00007899888,0.0001248867,0.00003990611,0.7693383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810465,0.001109342,0.002017111,0.004618837,0.00009818287,0.00006396349,0.00003910812,0.000009990718,0.01099695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006704133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02865165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614274994","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789","title":"Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage And The Boundaries Of Civil Law And Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Legal pluralism; Multiculturalism; Marriage law; Religious law; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Citizenship; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Politics; Public law; Legal realism; Islam; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Joel A. Nichols","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01801676471121098,"gpt":0.2657856318087223,"spread":0.2477688670975113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002184575,0.0003694639,0.0006342325,0.001542422,0.01198101,0.006657979,0.0008897002,0.001166469,0.004917832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003924538,0.0003074627,0.0002109042,0.002398232,0.01026131,0.004528558,0.00505419,0.003344842,0.0002908832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005741108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005634501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04136623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09765182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978897,0.001380237,0.00004207813,0.0001479657,0.0003158862,0.0002242095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969776,0.001555245,0.0003026764,0.00007399938,0.0003620792,0.0007283084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000549225,0.0001437015,0.00856622,0.0003799876,0.00002005038,0.001329523,0.2169354,0.0002102776,0.0001258683,0.5966651,0.09359382,0.08197521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001691888,0.00008962672,0.02509641,0.001559836,0.00001867768,0.0008459415,0.3264361,0.0003184932,0.00009929387,0.1446648,0.5008023,0.00005170824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020002,0.4825954,0.0009795976,0.1429558,0.006644431,0.00006360175,0.00006728205,0.00002973907,0.2646641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169174,0.1368719,0.0005455162,0.008820001,0.004342732,0.00004693121,0.00005163127,0.00002022019,0.03238373],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04136623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08225089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171778160","doi":"10.5539/ach.v2n1p71","title":"Culture, Government and Development in South Korea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics","authors":[{"name":"Luis Felipe Alvarado","is_ca":false},{"name":"Julio E. Rubio","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01753483815476341,"gpt":0.2418062322150834,"spread":0.22427139406032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006158899,0.0001374889,0.0001096461,0.0009363417,0.002292801,0.003570349,0.0001765297,0.000351062,0.001958953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007123693,0.0001106919,0.0000962789,0.001943932,0.003801844,0.001962047,0.001731205,0.0007226467,0.00006050069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003820304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002940421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04310785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996512,0.0001751553,0.00002418339,0.00002997292,0.00003204402,0.00008744759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994882,0.000158736,0.0001574606,0.00001931206,0.00006018743,0.000115978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006568481,0.0001575315,0.1140653,0.0005368115,0.00008097821,0.002310356,0.151632,0.001343004,0.001483332,0.6388956,0.003578022,0.08585148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002980202,0.0001536871,0.3130886,0.001105656,0.00008549346,0.001571042,0.4555375,0.001086059,0.001270027,0.0813249,0.1446524,0.00009495591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.910592,0.0125427,0.0001756528,0.009591762,0.00005342643,0.000007087609,0.00002654288,0.000004796873,0.06700607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958191,0.002952064,0.00006183699,0.0002282683,0.000004893143,0.00000250314,0.000005361105,0.00000140972,0.0009245275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01972533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590791466","doi":"10.3138/chr.98.1.borrows","title":"Challenging Historical Frameworks: Aboriginal Rights, The Trickster, and Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Treaty; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous rights; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04600531027534598,"gpt":0.339512218896094,"spread":0.293506908620748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006709556,0.0006090196,0.0006397174,0.006564965,0.01289525,0.01237137,0.002254057,0.002209308,0.004582347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007197879,0.0002668437,0.0003339791,0.00801008,0.05618384,0.007288264,0.003444172,0.003979205,0.0002332197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06099039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07236137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7722676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8475778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955656,0.002253419,0.0001106441,0.0002890489,0.001115508,0.0006658757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951748,0.002467183,0.0004581511,0.0003008634,0.001202171,0.0003968635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005413744,0.000007823563,0.0003035014,0.0003128624,0.000007587907,0.0001818628,0.02907182,0.0001155894,0.00002709509,0.9412811,0.007613779,0.02107144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007303629,0.00001233542,0.003574319,0.004794362,0.00003927338,0.000354076,0.06852229,0.0001293613,0.0001040983,0.214545,0.7078905,0.00002710785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01745664,0.631163,0.00173133,0.08055657,0.001545044,0.00003069574,0.0001219681,0.00002073416,0.267374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6088031,0.3589199,0.001780089,0.007867827,0.00151769,0.00005059665,0.0001398222,0.0000410373,0.02088006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2277324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.458147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123410778","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596766.014","title":"The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples' Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dialectic; Bridge (graph theory); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Geology; Oceanography; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Hari M. Osofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0281640969411972,"gpt":0.2400107049448777,"spread":0.2118466080036805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001342366,0.0003285113,0.0003320587,0.0005402517,0.00998449,0.007730482,0.001161528,0.003156418,0.008217649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001854786,0.0001940477,0.0002163274,0.0009457998,0.01382111,0.008297007,0.003173751,0.006743383,0.0007942852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00589361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005742673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05573304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1154782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990153,0.0004772065,0.00001526659,0.00007295713,0.0001668752,0.0002524455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994525,0.0003268807,0.00002345244,0.00004157692,0.00007305353,0.00008246618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003695369,0.00001085179,0.00006438581,0.00001873205,0.00000121298,0.0001009736,0.0298517,0.00002285229,0.00003953824,0.9517025,0.01325919,0.004924428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006756733,0.000014679,0.0005556659,0.0003378439,0.000006929403,0.0002218277,0.05292456,0.0001936377,0.0002231562,0.2191195,0.7263799,0.00001548571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01238484,0.008164371,0.0008276941,0.03234852,0.001050364,0.00001085362,0.00001463871,0.00001555009,0.9451831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5716342,0.006719399,0.0006862554,0.01300796,0.0007184327,0.0000632275,0.00002530032,0.00007445041,0.4070707],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.944267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1108173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539682818","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000822","title":"Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sovereignty; Denial; Power (physics); Jurisdiction; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael McCrossan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kiera L. Ladner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01859644538915065,"gpt":0.2800407491324347,"spread":0.261444303743284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005329553,0.0001853865,0.0004857986,0.001499546,0.02073688,0.01154562,0.002116166,0.004065499,0.00397403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01380537,0.0002922041,0.000395332,0.001909528,0.02616919,0.002330315,0.003044047,0.006404255,0.000158484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08363952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1081744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9667591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912429,0.001196658,0.0001753136,0.000878323,0.003161363,0.003345377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991507,0.003788938,0.0005254348,0.0003824218,0.003013541,0.0007827059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006233154,0.000004320941,0.0008759532,0.00001274164,0.000006979683,0.0000973487,0.003564926,0.0002633252,0.0000786694,0.9892362,0.003666007,0.002187199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009725316,0.0000436932,0.02594701,0.0007081518,0.0002031836,0.0002370813,0.02618983,0.00514071,0.001330544,0.612666,0.3272023,0.0002341575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2238508,0.005120855,0.00491422,0.06478785,0.0003674163,0.00007859199,0.0002266892,0.00005213273,0.7006015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855368,0.0005790749,0.0005869992,0.003380131,0.00007776914,0.00001676533,0.00002121278,0.000009872914,0.009791399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08363952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948205569","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-038","title":"5.1 The Independence of the Judiciary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Statute; Law; Position (finance); Political science; Autonomy; Judicial discretion; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"W. R. Lederman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02851589847523751,"gpt":0.2377052668468951,"spread":0.2091893683716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001430014,0.0002248777,0.0003182167,0.001005224,0.007005909,0.006294851,0.000941729,0.001587649,0.004711148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00294776,0.0002294279,0.0003009129,0.0009331778,0.01625754,0.00194972,0.002006978,0.003862448,0.0007935109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01882114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03331885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5278664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6414006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961299,0.0006004613,0.00008197784,0.000401671,0.001599949,0.001186178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982224,0.0003840372,0.000115409,0.0001568715,0.0007686772,0.0003525421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003927646,0.000003221787,0.0002895101,0.00001410002,0.00000154001,0.00002916198,0.001377947,0.00007166288,0.00008743536,0.9920244,0.002002159,0.004094927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003557619,0.00004229139,0.01412694,0.0005595195,0.00002728452,0.0002770935,0.003715272,0.0008822092,0.000951826,0.3353606,0.6439684,0.0000528586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02343121,0.003770615,0.004127095,0.006297192,0.0001471678,0.00001957152,0.00008022576,0.00001499347,0.9621119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901755,0.002660805,0.002582462,0.002358242,0.0001856166,0.00003221297,0.00007890331,0.00002177308,0.09032492],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5278664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9498283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karine Poitras","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Francine Cyr","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shawna LeClair","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07694001248423663,"gpt":0.3333489573152807,"spread":0.256408944831044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03596871,0.0005729497,0.002194407,0.01240346,0.0100293,0.01283465,0.0076661,0.004442637,0.004999345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484228,0.000807324,0.001107423,0.0268648,0.01317316,0.004797463,0.003991988,0.006623696,0.0003324759],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1765982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3759319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9646822,0.004284749,0.002325721,0.003427652,0.02175177,0.003527911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450943,0.04474165,0.008432441,0.003082136,0.09028865,0.008360869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585957,0.0001059578,0.01876573,0.01149962,0.000378778,0.000537658,0.009279312,0.0006364395,0.0003189682,0.1252003,0.2098326,0.6232861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005729234,0.00008456849,0.05937206,0.02823302,0.0004342933,0.0005324964,0.01556278,0.000431837,0.0003551615,0.008067735,0.8866516,0.0002171746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007973439,0.8488504,0.0002914247,0.1179767,0.001815988,0.00003422115,0.0007267744,0.00002863385,0.02230239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1645976,0.7721039,0.001533651,0.05548089,0.001756833,0.00006084617,0.0006867381,0.00008942,0.003690076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1765982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870366","doi":"","title":"Protecting Children from Exposure to Domestic Violence: The Use and Abuse of Child Maltreatment Statutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Domestic violence; Juvenile court; Political science; Child abuse; Child protection; Criminology; Population; Law; Poison control; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Juvenile delinquency; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Lois A. Weithorn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02700128016482885,"gpt":0.28991874690504,"spread":0.2629174667402112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087786,0.0002272058,0.0002313575,0.004713186,0.004703184,0.007800776,0.002035338,0.002348944,0.0008175794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02082228,0.0004528241,0.0004174739,0.006512965,0.01248103,0.0033201,0.002679113,0.004423686,0.00008040765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02853174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03414907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7516965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900961,0.003314944,0.0005397397,0.0004108562,0.004359398,0.001278979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980221,0.01292232,0.002536187,0.0004774983,0.003297432,0.0005455902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002710842,0.00004658135,0.0422564,0.0003262073,0.00002123335,0.000388603,0.02291034,0.0009178302,0.000300848,0.8378929,0.01319914,0.08171277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003065749,0.0002252301,0.2381683,0.008630457,0.0002499355,0.001091339,0.07306169,0.003130028,0.001919729,0.08884043,0.5844062,0.0002459794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2516076,0.1720428,0.008156564,0.1738774,0.001137345,0.0001496059,0.0006116492,0.0001206694,0.3922963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118145,0.06134268,0.006026351,0.01403221,0.0003896558,0.00006688003,0.0002024614,0.00002344072,0.006101823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9628574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994861759","doi":"10.1179/003962611x12894696204821","title":"TSILHQOT'IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gazi Üniversitesi","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Common law; Order (exchange); Political science; High Court; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Oliver W. MacLaren","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael Barry","is_ca":true},{"name":"K. Sangster","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1741307909466114,"gpt":0.3510488529002058,"spread":0.1769180619535945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284763,0.0002924705,0.000474649,0.003640574,0.003223418,0.003220873,0.0008401741,0.001087052,0.007020646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004933964,0.0002012715,0.000398372,0.01015532,0.0009760351,0.0008167544,0.0006796048,0.001077208,0.0006399826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02130085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09007988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9598937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998293,0.0002544474,0.0001023692,0.00009922438,0.0009772389,0.0002737617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972281,0.000803386,0.00021669,0.00004745176,0.001528229,0.0001761536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246678,0.0000577031,0.008555133,0.02044195,0.0001736151,0.0008648844,0.004814996,0.0003010812,0.000667366,0.05582119,0.4379728,0.4702047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002203664,0.00003025294,0.0279079,0.009636615,0.0002093955,0.0001440508,0.002500704,0.00005856642,0.0003294405,0.001203539,0.9579248,0.00003263504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01598125,0.6648719,0.0003648213,0.02124376,0.001368486,0.0002808552,0.004345311,0.00005909331,0.2914844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1958706,0.6798123,0.000960504,0.01653153,0.0002295116,0.0003362528,0.002779297,0.00003373231,0.1034462],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0401063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1545492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423738415","doi":"","title":"Hearing the Sexual Assault Complaints of Women with Mental Disabilities: Consent, Capacity, and Mistaken Belief","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Voluntariness; Feminist legal theory; Criminology; Legislation; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Feminism","authors":[{"name":"Janine Benedet","is_ca":true},{"name":"Isabel Grant","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0551548563594436,"gpt":0.3060189640723233,"spread":0.2508641077128796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001394659,0.0001893903,0.0002652991,0.001098121,0.002079905,0.002001629,0.0003759228,0.001412038,0.004014127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01948226,0.0002574845,0.0001272135,0.0007330893,0.003497286,0.001871994,0.002133917,0.001077908,0.000352313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009010457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001067475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00823426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01105829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986042,0.0008035155,0.00008720627,0.00004671275,0.000203987,0.0002542965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942771,0.003512082,0.001596941,0.00009118343,0.0002413466,0.0002814138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481174,0.0002441291,0.4263769,0.0004330254,0.00003356957,0.01207063,0.4095767,0.00008297975,0.001105612,0.006150143,0.008383431,0.1353947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001378268,0.0001711125,0.2324078,0.0005090254,0.00002503893,0.01158803,0.7396575,0.0001250638,0.0004152595,0.002754443,0.01229748,0.00003549328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813108,0.002638311,0.0000942183,0.006688448,0.00005249743,0.00002165653,0.00003818085,0.000006660704,0.009149159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965279,0.001595715,0.00004722759,0.0007597736,0.00003358757,0.00001308463,0.00001166938,0.000001662906,0.001009447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00823426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01637268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245396718","doi":"10.3138/flor.20.035","title":"University of New Brunswick","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florilegium","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; History; Middle English; Classics; Archaeology; Art history","authors":[{"name":"Anne L. Klinck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03172135274545302,"gpt":0.2699495171561793,"spread":0.2382281644107263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007298966,0.0008318016,0.0007193198,0.001983206,0.005792813,0.006646516,0.00193394,0.001823982,0.4034879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003332951,0.0005561053,0.0003907743,0.003961006,0.001278072,0.003100326,0.00296851,0.003133604,0.1331796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01418135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02552192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5082024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.759307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987004,0.000119683,0.00008841111,0.0002970969,0.0004376398,0.000356769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997933,0.0002365059,0.0001138151,0.0002092903,0.0009505099,0.0005568651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001072074,0.0000619174,0.002886316,0.0006224679,0.00002023712,0.001831473,0.001456021,0.0002058539,0.001180467,0.07262433,0.6879774,0.2310263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005555241,0.000004668775,0.001726593,0.0002596798,0.00000297265,0.0001304819,0.0006346194,0.0000258528,0.0001376619,0.001202873,0.9958549,0.00001410979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003895255,0.01590342,0.0005717276,0.0203884,0.002775846,0.0001193312,0.005920175,0.0002205413,0.9502053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009495819,0.005810188,0.0007270268,0.001247729,0.00007449527,0.00006099029,0.00179178,0.0001307267,0.9806612],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5965121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461040750","doi":"10.58188/1941-8043.1540","title":"CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05541945124655202,"gpt":0.3296206300461241,"spread":0.2742011787995721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002840089,0.000762602,0.0005942451,0.003244831,0.01800142,0.009913268,0.001514665,0.003424871,0.01838269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007580006,0.0005092499,0.0004839676,0.003789912,0.00917188,0.00214646,0.00277788,0.007752213,0.001803964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2331489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918908,0.0005083725,0.0001883883,0.0008228745,0.004664819,0.001924748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950553,0.0004331415,0.0001402835,0.0003230075,0.003114082,0.0009340901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230393,0.000007311883,0.000340461,0.00003344447,0.000003117223,0.00005224942,0.001028159,0.0001806318,0.00007907859,0.7828622,0.2038088,0.01159219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007359785,0.000003931963,0.001296504,0.00006526123,0.000004253664,0.00002749491,0.0003140708,0.00009808181,0.00006516452,0.01074505,0.9873447,0.00002824479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005228269,0.006906467,0.001605194,0.04028232,0.002514428,0.000118104,0.003132273,0.000134403,0.9400786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677504,0.008835058,0.007502866,0.01464025,0.0009823572,0.0002322763,0.002187336,0.0002380527,0.6976315],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.105514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.765561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555998629","doi":"","title":"Notes Towards a (Re)Definition of the 'Secular'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Secularism; Judgement; Secular education; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Law; Secular state; Religious freedom; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic freedom","authors":[{"name":"Iain T. Benson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02489225236138337,"gpt":0.2895899914395437,"spread":0.2646977390781603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006152727,0.0005735065,0.0004562294,0.001276321,0.006952056,0.007988554,0.003406254,0.007055446,0.00396069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006587525,0.0002991283,0.000484558,0.00171644,0.03735723,0.006577725,0.003296249,0.01868168,0.000745198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02082546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02465806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.491742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5370775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935924,0.001383054,0.000262812,0.0007760123,0.003167108,0.0008185668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948338,0.001287978,0.0003839804,0.0004059385,0.002652987,0.0004352905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000254567,0.000003527054,0.0001045643,0.00001475258,0.000001232695,0.00002663469,0.004119362,0.00003643795,0.00005900271,0.962526,0.03149555,0.0016103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001194515,0.00001136887,0.001550437,0.0001922029,0.000007190866,0.0001235617,0.004904206,0.0002965387,0.0002338972,0.2086024,0.7840294,0.00003677184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009357314,0.00867604,0.01282491,0.6884041,0.004741344,0.00006668322,0.0003824717,0.0001004386,0.2754466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4084829,0.005173768,0.02215854,0.417753,0.004555953,0.0002017657,0.0003143919,0.0001807625,0.1411791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.491742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117194350","doi":"10.1017/s1326011100004154","title":"Special Schooling for Indigenous Students: a New Form of Racial Discrimination?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Racism; Ethos; Conformity; Sociology; Special education; Indigenous education; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy","authors":[{"name":"Loretta de Plevitz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03397934230549773,"gpt":0.370491552743335,"spread":0.3365122104378373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001643776,0.0001260169,0.0002645595,0.0009924817,0.004563416,0.002130792,0.0007329409,0.00143503,0.005762442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004593796,0.000136508,0.0002401011,0.001088678,0.006445601,0.002254525,0.003643632,0.00220793,0.0002163765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002013543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002598633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02050721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04509787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998315,0.0004451108,0.00006456844,0.0001948993,0.0004192881,0.0005611953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973249,0.0004685128,0.0009820308,0.0002998966,0.000347723,0.000576816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110154,0.0005007261,0.3359161,0.0002878627,0.00003408163,0.00638542,0.3166142,0.000129159,0.002777415,0.2296745,0.007076221,0.1004942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003194304,0.0003396527,0.3853143,0.0007677684,0.00009395057,0.01161938,0.4524837,0.001259752,0.001623293,0.06321494,0.08315092,0.0001005454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.929984,0.0005619418,0.0008892427,0.01873374,0.0001699803,0.00002234188,0.00003096974,0.00001117653,0.04959664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997583,0.0001836171,0.0001382615,0.0005177132,0.00005618863,0.000005756783,0.000005232946,0.000001772834,0.001508428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503800980","doi":"10.2307/4135186","title":"The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 B.C.-A.D. 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phoenix","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ancient history; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Susan Treggiari","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sara Elise Phang","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0187216192719451,"gpt":0.2857187943391229,"spread":0.2669971750671778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017443,0.0001822606,0.0001780508,0.0005941225,0.006497553,0.001905243,0.000481493,0.0009244688,0.00338731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009203377,0.0002847565,0.00008933018,0.001109752,0.003488321,0.001008813,0.00148504,0.001933367,0.0002707023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003390392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00208162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1184979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3139782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995703,0.000198473,0.00001345713,0.00004048165,0.00003130026,0.0001459693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997047,0.00007858805,0.00005400922,0.000008348801,0.00002583719,0.0001285092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003661718,0.0003555471,0.08143026,0.000339187,0.00004507648,0.004676948,0.611847,0.0004377513,0.001210616,0.1465401,0.06316829,0.08958305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004694425,0.0003300974,0.2144721,0.0004918085,0.00003928253,0.00235509,0.4870159,0.0003350928,0.001111655,0.006526271,0.2872252,0.00005053819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074586,0.01715426,0.00009460485,0.02880342,0.0002626101,0.00002997467,0.0001006556,0.000006531152,0.04608931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709203,0.009654204,0.00006615199,0.001459887,0.0001447684,0.00001274924,0.00002279692,0.000005033713,0.01771401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1184979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2356163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599730556","doi":"","title":"Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Respondent; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Legislation; Civil defense; Common law; Criminology; Business; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Heather Douglas","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robin B. Fitzgerald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678103966869254,"gpt":0.3206330723930911,"spread":0.3038520327243985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01473921,0.0003645579,0.0004572915,0.003344738,0.00773424,0.01211783,0.002137859,0.005799507,0.02246625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0547881,0.0006425165,0.0009461435,0.003232013,0.01560276,0.01401637,0.00926667,0.008461723,0.001337169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01234428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01145235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04153141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03744436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823095,0.007296416,0.0009971558,0.001554516,0.005516737,0.002325747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393826,0.04331175,0.00769316,0.001853991,0.005545645,0.002212987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002132467,0.0001027891,0.01433422,0.0001425489,0.00001052584,0.001043485,0.04609162,0.0001455382,0.0001067812,0.9078795,0.005623572,0.02449802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003554175,0.0001289117,0.0905392,0.003258757,0.00006903022,0.003956824,0.1007627,0.00174325,0.0006410499,0.4568577,0.3418617,0.000145434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2091428,0.02764424,0.01481916,0.08577265,0.0006994689,0.0002617002,0.0003566291,0.00009689886,0.6612065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965391,0.00572611,0.002708,0.004980639,0.0003792114,0.0001188294,0.0001433892,0.0000496058,0.02050322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04153141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0895645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Glenda Lux","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sandy Gill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05914237393214094,"gpt":0.3530770726104747,"spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0325805,0.000585471,0.001213813,0.01563331,0.009944608,0.009393229,0.003410247,0.00214875,0.001695707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06715012,0.0006560573,0.0008755061,0.01599067,0.01070246,0.003758166,0.00222409,0.002898161,0.0001425291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2992753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9695976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712514,0.007260484,0.002224013,0.001280609,0.01609612,0.001887338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280857,0.0321494,0.003001149,0.001548961,0.03433076,0.0008840843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405024,0.00004164563,0.01275831,0.02744935,0.0003518604,0.0009862336,0.03224701,0.001081937,0.0008582195,0.347119,0.05957822,0.5174542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003737046,0.00005840772,0.05916592,0.0816341,0.001037178,0.0008525962,0.02799391,0.0008752753,0.001518492,0.03255168,0.7940475,0.0002276282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01016621,0.9086882,0.001605652,0.03103322,0.0008707933,0.0001869136,0.0003441382,0.00001156335,0.04709321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2503569,0.7292731,0.006918645,0.008180993,0.0003268877,0.0001536647,0.0003335114,0.00002575517,0.004430513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7700306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945455563","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.8","title":"Rethinking Racine v Woods from a Decolonizing Perspective: Challenging the Applicability of Attachment Theory to Indigenous Families Involved with Child Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Commission; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Royal Commission; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science; Ethnology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Peter Choate","is_ca":true},{"name":"Taylor Kohler","is_ca":true},{"name":"Felicia Cloete","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brandy CrazyBull","is_ca":true},{"name":"Desi Lindstrom","is_ca":true},{"name":"Parker Tatoulis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01851872083693038,"gpt":0.2701148192813038,"spread":0.2515960984443734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03753363,0.0002746258,0.0005550898,0.00128159,0.01853081,0.009291191,0.00456121,0.01115858,0.002035772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0488154,0.0004540165,0.0004990548,0.001237145,0.03450508,0.008935366,0.006392008,0.0186905,0.0001593082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01940586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02809074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3682587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5980483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828597,0.01000888,0.000517975,0.001468454,0.002952118,0.002192897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607411,0.03063779,0.001213362,0.001592689,0.004508998,0.001306054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001627216,0.00002206411,0.001953958,0.0001240384,0.00001185862,0.001469231,0.1741575,0.0001535791,0.0002711762,0.7683218,0.03789592,0.01560259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002759084,0.00007200964,0.007213381,0.002516356,0.00008821081,0.001025033,0.3464903,0.00106869,0.0009466829,0.1879219,0.4524947,0.000135091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1280634,0.01222131,0.005874991,0.719421,0.003100448,0.0001199905,0.00004866183,0.0000336198,0.1311168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.884231,0.003994134,0.002466764,0.09730298,0.0007670752,0.00009884912,0.00001176603,0.00004629524,0.0110812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6317413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7322304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}