{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":229,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"73ad57275fec","filters":{"topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights"}},"results":[{"id":"W4242155877","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001","title":"Good Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Good governance; Cornerstone; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Accountability; Multi-level governance; Political science; Project governance; Democracy; Public administration; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Management; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0173596176300947,"gpt":0.2680484014684234,"spread":0.2506887838383287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001358992,0.0001141915,0.0001799754,0.00001786785,0.0001924575,0.00007122046,0.0003554063,0.0002644104,0.01841345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007440432,0.00009498081,0.00009933514,0.00001777894,0.0001612408,0.00007889803,0.0000312919,0.0001844266,0.01440267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008421893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002616587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008538809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990354,0.00002386188,0.0001047,0.0002112512,0.0004127986,0.0002119607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.00004993264,0.00009502307,0.000215023,0.00003721679,0.0000692987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.726172e-7,0.000002937187,0.000002454762,0.000005344299,0.000004996425,0.000001536436,0.0004961625,1.6186e-8,2.976496e-8,0.5957369,0.40336,0.0003892686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005447417,0.000009491215,0.00004231372,0.00003331896,0.000008175241,8.159866e-8,0.00002704587,1.99511e-7,5.308251e-7,0.07717222,0.9225014,0.0001506875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007261686,0.0002426459,0.000002626763,0.0003010488,0.0009309945,0.000185987,0.00001040759,0.00009769634,0.9982213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003100903,0.0002480671,0.00003403347,0.0003172894,0.00123557,0.000001515454,0.000008961184,0.00001690688,0.9978276],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5191414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946209890","doi":"10.1164/rccm.200701-024ed","title":"The New IGRA and the Old TST","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02264579828387906,"gpt":0.3373688375912197,"spread":0.3147230393073406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002179952,0.0001985436,0.0005872677,0.0001120638,0.001076596,0.0001249826,0.0004196657,0.000164102,0.00009821675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001195866,0.00008674584,0.0001195011,0.0001683107,0.0170466,0.00007900398,0.00003680207,0.001833873,0.000002388905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000496321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003119608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000452111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004236142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971708,0.000803191,0.0004973,0.000176784,0.0009384257,0.0004134823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951109,0.003673535,0.0002863451,0.0001936724,0.000386065,0.0003494266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001611509,0.000004139189,0.0001277153,0.00004065046,0.00005398741,0.0005359407,0.01831322,1.194278e-8,9.479639e-7,0.05217683,0.8489327,0.07965273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000686501,0.000879274,0.0001711498,0.0001778096,0.0002040781,0.00004253656,0.02490628,6.675597e-8,9.519781e-7,0.005033735,0.9677824,0.0001152226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004172812,0.03246319,0.00004677297,0.9529836,0.0008327115,0.0001375574,0.000002568899,0.00001066008,0.009350112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09147801,0.001631591,0.00003113255,0.878669,0.02638439,0.000001757003,8.742771e-7,0.00002445778,0.001778803],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1188497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186748699","doi":"","title":"Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Governance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Global governance; Civil society; Public administration; International law; Institution; Corporate governance; International human rights law; Economic growth; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349125492407853,"gpt":0.3402135667098585,"spread":0.3053010174690732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002351395,0.00009829733,0.00007635135,0.00003526232,0.003423498,0.0001403274,0.000228444,0.0000605117,0.0001820418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001621745,0.00007424477,0.00004092586,0.001280767,0.0005207494,0.0002694428,0.00002517503,0.00007998979,0.00004841069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004319473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002203074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007730906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1148171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987733,0.0001157422,0.0001396292,0.0001857837,0.000541418,0.0002440624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995176,0.00003841986,0.00009500916,0.0001080455,0.0001493865,0.00009154676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.471079e-7,0.00002872559,0.002031015,0.000001258403,0.0000110511,0.000001550198,0.0004408401,0.00001699464,0.000001095629,0.9907709,0.006657659,0.0000380054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001626409,0.000005531994,0.03607881,0.00001212675,0.000007657685,0.000002700955,0.0001088448,0.000004780587,0.000002925713,0.1659808,0.797541,0.00009212858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992437,0.0001582505,0.00006700547,0.00149634,0.000368411,0.0001505289,0.0001313051,0.00006702553,0.6983174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974738,0.00004787098,0.0001279302,0.0002438534,0.0001683606,0.000007282049,0.000008494146,0.000001987503,0.001920438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8247901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577914688","doi":"","title":"Security Council Targeted Sanctions, Due Process and the 1267 Ombudsperson","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Georgetown journal of international law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Obligation; Charter; Political science; Law; Security council; International law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01222873568539242,"gpt":0.2672882241836355,"spread":0.2550594884982431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002044382,0.00009130574,0.0001637331,0.00005008225,0.0006115371,0.0002055312,0.0004313108,0.00007815869,0.001329771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003781732,0.00005726157,0.0001022669,0.00007059523,0.0009270418,0.0004583751,0.00002489434,0.0004896904,0.00001753007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009958431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003954697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004532511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006394452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983282,0.0001008654,0.0003024363,0.000107153,0.0009966888,0.0001646253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981188,0.000152238,0.0002917604,0.00008064233,0.001234655,0.0001219559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000133682,0.00005703165,0.0004966304,0.00000387573,0.00006863748,0.00001466436,0.01283801,0.000003084639,0.0001001134,0.9822789,0.003784383,0.000221026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001461608,0.00003448382,0.001466796,0.00002599418,0.00003225244,0.000114176,0.002116515,0.00008223494,0.0002232893,0.1924564,0.8018633,0.0001230091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7378767,0.0003121246,0.00002937837,0.02128202,0.004106211,0.0001555471,0.00001134874,0.00002505845,0.2362016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939831,0.0001081283,0.0001066235,0.0005731988,0.001460757,0.00000253444,0.000001534276,0.000006626959,0.003757522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7980789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038776553","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0029","title":"Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Economic shortage; Government (linguistics); Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01818793404464711,"gpt":0.2843954877135595,"spread":0.2662075536689125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005681175,0.0002783529,0.0003067468,0.0001616113,0.004607338,0.0001789904,0.0004218826,0.000149116,0.002654127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004898744,0.0002362764,0.0001020908,0.0001942683,0.0002865362,0.0004246812,0.000006853416,0.0003743052,0.0000462062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001044848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004072144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4720215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965466,0.0004772703,0.0004796432,0.0004765029,0.00133045,0.0006895292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991181,0.00008954704,0.0001553718,0.0002259436,0.00008390282,0.0003271101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051895,0.0003521605,0.0004618954,0.000008645963,0.00002402884,0.0000513603,0.03451927,7.92386e-7,0.0006926506,0.9614133,0.00239295,0.00007775774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001724189,0.0002788424,0.01174215,0.0001116466,0.00002343957,0.00000674992,0.003163906,0.00001723464,0.001277592,0.5500866,0.430797,0.0007706361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7162266,0.00001165833,0.000003770145,0.0001533984,0.0001673826,0.0003401509,0.00001594675,0.00007039188,0.2830107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888374,1.041399e-7,0.00004886077,0.00005177401,0.0002424755,0.00002910005,0.00002521738,0.00002020247,0.01074484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5209187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590983153","doi":"","title":"International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Rule of law; Work (physics); Law; Academic freedom; Freedom of expression; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Engineering; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009322230827673868,"gpt":0.2955786973623498,"spread":0.2862564665346759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001841632,0.00007977465,0.0001538873,0.0001391969,0.0006746009,0.00007535065,0.0003847234,0.0000843069,0.0004096907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000203963,0.00006466894,0.0001052607,0.00004604732,0.0004462109,0.0003474995,0.00001291111,0.001259923,0.000003601408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001379631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008207971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003761796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02246121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983008,0.00009221279,0.0003403249,0.0000822296,0.0005796558,0.0006047572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990715,0.00005291259,0.0002918645,0.0000546556,0.0004164514,0.0001125491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003010174,0.00008130896,0.0001137989,0.000003035738,0.00008744301,0.000006099843,0.002522397,7.989608e-7,0.001939733,0.9944487,0.00006511341,0.000701422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008887551,0.0001485595,0.0008646005,0.00001968917,0.0001052653,0.0003145343,0.00114084,0.000002067857,0.000337845,0.9613081,0.03477031,0.00009948181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698281,0.000153993,0.0003110948,0.0008026955,0.0009507496,0.00004279644,0.000003672459,0.000006878542,0.02789999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970381,0.0001813742,0.0001941926,0.00003757038,0.001743209,2.713959e-7,0.000001262474,0.000006167403,0.0007978842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03470519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0750247104430044,"gpt":0.3655792180768747,"spread":0.2905545076338703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781242,0.0001092391,0.0002895789,0.000006502033,0.0007691894,0.00005435095,0.0002827322,0.00003986097,0.001352911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002005019,0.00005591932,0.0001185277,0.00006215662,0.0001326523,0.00007229389,0.000007716899,0.00006546939,0.00001772472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003533866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.476189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9679613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989609,0.00007537199,0.0002653112,0.0001538918,0.0002774606,0.0002670446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.00005434488,0.0001087178,0.0001777023,0.00008798138,0.00009376877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493776,0.00001667093,0.000001609055,0.0001385479,0.000009266869,0.000003583536,0.0003537428,3.323434e-7,0.000001324504,0.8853303,0.1139471,0.0001826133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380453,0.00008927486,0.00003282384,0.0005613354,0.00004199695,0.000001856307,0.00001737842,0.00001237429,0.00002381177,0.04014083,0.9588206,0.0001196685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244567,0.03732121,0.00007000533,0.1443111,0.00141433,0.01182422,0.0003959955,0.0001838611,0.6800226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578673,0.0007104095,0.0001587634,0.008776465,0.000208448,0.00005234914,0.000007437663,0.000004942056,0.0322139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112049446","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00203.x","title":"The Practice of One Ombudsman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666754751172351,"gpt":0.310421208748876,"spread":0.2937536612371525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001109346,0.00003782545,0.00006039828,0.00002754859,0.001376073,0.0001582004,0.0001883561,0.00003604916,0.003473252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002110262,0.00002628946,0.00004815795,0.00009965301,0.0001495866,0.0004141573,0.000004026938,0.0001649736,0.000167437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004494925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001330714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007526341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003341744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988566,0.0002917342,0.0002079414,0.0000523915,0.0004399444,0.0001513879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.0002445565,0.0001812476,0.0000824152,0.0001874581,0.00008047226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001373923,0.0002794303,0.0006613341,0.000004230239,0.00009786418,0.000007886285,0.07539813,0.00008851105,0.0000987528,0.6457543,0.02404585,0.2534263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002306152,0.00004331016,0.004439442,0.00001061158,0.00002063713,0.00000893548,0.002502179,0.00001434705,0.00005342548,0.01947417,0.9731519,0.00005038829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2172415,0.0003924349,0.0001609149,0.01972345,0.0006347723,0.0001377366,8.929117e-7,0.00003149761,0.7616768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836455,0.001119248,0.000378038,0.0002872606,0.0009012863,7.29578e-7,3.939239e-7,0.000004671447,0.01366289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994382601","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2007.tb02002.x","title":"The American distortion of the ombudsman concept and its influence on Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Humanities; Not for profit; Law; Management; Philosophy; Public relations; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01285996568857332,"gpt":0.2659342974849221,"spread":0.2530743317963488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003431452,0.00006290933,0.00006586266,0.00003734365,0.001307374,0.00009247295,0.0002208347,0.00003027347,0.00002086167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002377796,0.00004269406,0.00001807865,0.0002191364,0.0005402248,0.000117934,0.00000610675,0.00009159577,0.000001384992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004554192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004565714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7239959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990742,0.00007731668,0.0001608716,0.0001164061,0.0002887544,0.0002824204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991453,0.0001130546,0.0001579855,0.0001402742,0.0001181206,0.0003253225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006601717,0.00000658194,0.005314677,0.000001934419,0.000006629822,0.000003981114,0.001221626,4.400726e-7,0.00001203559,0.9827891,0.002782521,0.007853844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008385736,0.00008227259,0.3733132,0.000009218114,0.000006226361,0.000001493619,0.002658535,0.000006844225,0.0005202187,0.0009821205,0.6222107,0.0001252416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97021,0.00003076806,0.000003586389,0.02051501,0.0002204719,0.0001806534,0.00001688117,0.000007659009,0.008815004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977258,0.000007139095,0.000001466258,0.0006519935,0.00009909977,0.000002889907,0.000004358673,0.000003894895,0.001503324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.981807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041722","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00093","title":"Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the Weakening of Freedom of Information Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Secrecy; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Restructuring; Democracy; Business; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03010939618638189,"gpt":0.2985655148150158,"spread":0.2684561186286339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121976,0.00005612818,0.0001745384,0.00001167704,0.0002047631,0.00006422069,0.0001223402,0.00003606471,0.0007174159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008845149,0.00003885989,0.00006047608,0.0001263987,0.0004809204,0.0006648581,0.000009292478,0.00005110453,0.000006609088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001976355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000905566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001547792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988759,0.0001760547,0.0004001141,0.00006380497,0.0003978858,0.00008621227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993938,0.00005620539,0.0002995091,0.0001229572,0.00008176288,0.00004578648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009257008,0.00001385355,0.00005401392,0.0003109421,0.000007850732,5.729849e-8,0.001015384,1.897677e-7,5.506228e-7,0.9613424,0.0003188316,0.03692665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000700611,0.00005955658,0.001034689,0.0008242101,0.00007701046,0.000002325001,0.00211398,0.0000856297,0.00002805695,0.007943154,0.9870133,0.0001174203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09887326,0.01769771,0.0007072472,0.04686796,0.0002215341,0.00244334,0.00005352336,0.00007898752,0.8330564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850563,0.01344112,0.0001179328,0.0003944317,0.00004388209,0.00001829562,0.0000227056,0.000002308812,0.0009030386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7855201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178908084","doi":"10.29173/alr128","title":"Proportionality as a Remedial Principle: A Framework for Suspended Declarations of Invalidity in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Proportionality (law); Law; Remedial education; Adjudication; Discretion; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1346447614396684,"gpt":0.3905629564135247,"spread":0.2559181949738563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00104188,0.00009619047,0.0002805401,0.00003218071,0.0004259826,0.00001698108,0.0002306725,0.0001179667,0.003442969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009176759,0.00008599828,0.0001083168,0.000189134,0.001282727,0.000189028,0.00001627047,0.0001215829,0.00007175015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002171225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7819695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986212,0.0001846558,0.0004279658,0.0002078275,0.0002497216,0.0003086444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989333,0.0002697354,0.0001518946,0.0002075981,0.0001782596,0.0002592613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005272027,0.00006201698,0.001628135,0.0001523852,0.00001126769,0.000002129768,0.001030096,4.02371e-8,3.07723e-7,0.9967819,0.0002941699,0.00003222445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001053117,0.00001786965,0.0005895583,0.0005570517,0.00002926554,0.000001339017,0.00001651847,4.851989e-7,0.00002226554,0.4035106,0.5950524,0.00009738436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01092214,0.002394568,0.00008448604,0.004497814,0.0005274485,0.003777798,0.00007461166,0.00002488324,0.9776962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944369,0.0007583141,0.001633444,0.002279908,0.000123837,0.0001546785,0.00007197042,0.00000547064,0.0005355123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312315066","doi":"10.1111/capa.12150","title":"Who speaks for whom? Implementing the Crown's duty to consult in the case of divided Aboriginal political structures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Crown (dentistry); Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03758062790090474,"gpt":0.3662087455850959,"spread":0.3286281176841911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000931854,0.00007724857,0.00009266562,0.0001070446,0.0009280619,0.0003095499,0.0002834694,0.00005884491,0.0002530176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003874277,0.00004168521,0.00003846474,0.0001689208,0.0003645872,0.0001892523,0.000006376372,0.00006032041,0.000003758639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001920916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002948121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04319926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998746,0.0001611841,0.000224249,0.0001551436,0.0001520951,0.0005613384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989509,0.0003317457,0.0000652957,0.000174986,0.0001501867,0.0003268717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005098879,0.000005486086,0.001539396,0.000003618296,0.0000044842,0.00002827906,0.003087509,8.333364e-9,0.000006855387,0.9899193,0.003597571,0.001802363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004299908,0.0001140513,0.0187146,0.00001543479,0.00001594984,0.00004020383,0.01445234,0.000005888181,0.0001167646,0.06403338,0.9019026,0.0001588609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8767866,0.000005916963,0.0001400936,0.1139903,0.0001222007,0.0006373402,0.0002117573,0.000008933937,0.008096839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,5.648737e-7,0.00005540242,0.0008600315,0.0003385353,0.00003310698,0.000009990063,0.000005014411,0.0005066423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115521965","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00017.x","title":"Human rights commissions and public policy: The role of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in advancing sexual orientation equality rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Sexual orientation; Human rights; Political science; Promotion (chess); Politics; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03278025317332882,"gpt":0.3032909366875456,"spread":0.2705106835142168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006776808,0.0002065141,0.0002398646,0.0005497118,0.009615087,0.0001939954,0.0005926279,0.0001873082,0.0002725947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000934833,0.0001481377,0.00003654255,0.0009026654,0.0006460889,0.0005846962,0.00002880671,0.0004139942,0.000002148344],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004522495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02054544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969514,0.0006941392,0.0005690418,0.0003547081,0.0005789452,0.0008517785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977676,0.00009211357,0.0002248604,0.0004418494,0.0001815004,0.001292043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001729813,0.00003332076,0.07504615,0.000004978025,0.000006342029,0.00001942312,0.00383847,0.000001010366,0.00001813049,0.9196424,0.001285977,0.0001020539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004746713,0.00005030483,0.25743,0.00003745232,0.000007993289,0.00001090922,0.002734995,0.0000709111,0.0001304481,0.050026,0.6886926,0.0003336792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350215,0.00002220243,5.793747e-7,0.01327543,0.0001466179,0.0005517025,0.00006021727,0.00001403259,0.05090775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983802,5.032147e-7,0.000009282942,0.0001649685,0.0001628096,0.00002285215,0.00008298272,0.000009086064,0.001167282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091839077","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss091","title":"A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have used Freedom of Information in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Opposition (politics); Creatures; Freedom of information; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01777150176184071,"gpt":0.2626345562561618,"spread":0.2448630544943211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002061847,0.0001399136,0.0002268625,0.0001700501,0.000142678,0.00006878366,0.000556795,0.00007696028,0.0007403516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003179158,0.00008269464,0.00009735589,0.000263484,0.0004063962,0.0008418925,0.00003300769,0.0001780621,0.00002146396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001219907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005506991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009771359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06150029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978598,0.0005048437,0.0003905135,0.0001047414,0.0007454558,0.0003945837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999088,0.0002771839,0.0002610518,0.0002882092,0.00002822088,0.0000573005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009956559,0.0005478964,0.1025514,0.0000545445,0.00004678949,0.000004094464,0.8512831,0.00005277184,0.00004555688,0.03057502,0.01414921,0.0005900697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021777,0.0002350216,0.05019829,0.0001355955,0.00005908184,0.000001912435,0.9020905,0.00008809047,0.0009668845,0.002464577,0.04128189,0.0003003795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476719,0.0001426015,0.00001444416,0.002850316,0.0002638877,0.0007696453,0.00001747231,0.00001002132,0.04825974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.00005285078,0.00008245779,0.0001975024,0.0001077252,0.00002997641,0.00002228227,0.000004800344,0.00009777426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05235314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537271728","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1752","title":"The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01829577698368406,"gpt":0.3386227510650267,"spread":0.3203269740813426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007737898,0.00009085298,0.0002087767,0.00003604642,0.002271096,0.00008268782,0.0003022512,0.00006917808,0.0006521618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005109871,0.00006043894,0.00008804067,0.0001909168,0.000441845,0.00009408767,0.0000131674,0.0002675248,0.0001865849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001909355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9136164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988661,0.0001892724,0.0002303954,0.0001425081,0.0001996938,0.0003720007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.00008637722,0.00008526916,0.0002544161,0.00007274887,0.0002447164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.466483e-7,0.00001608665,0.0008014627,0.00004472536,0.000004570557,0.000003124017,0.0008370583,1.585021e-8,0.00001156303,0.9955829,0.002304293,0.0003937949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005985843,0.00001588634,0.001453781,0.0003171633,0.00001128156,8.897355e-7,0.00006713359,3.979994e-7,0.0000298274,0.01676404,0.9811897,0.00009004884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699823,0.004895096,1.005514e-7,0.004778654,0.001243638,0.0008321408,0.000004959888,0.00003998878,0.7182231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898971,0.001085815,0.00001220435,0.0002889337,0.0002160764,0.00002975137,0.000002152556,0.000006078648,0.008461878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385722488","doi":"10.59962/9780774824798","title":"Unjust by Design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02381004698990676,"gpt":0.1980694703710503,"spread":0.1742594233811435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002319863,0.0001245187,0.0004815925,0.00003805076,0.0007205229,0.0003428001,0.0008781603,0.0005214288,0.00212833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001267346,0.0003023336,0.0001863018,0.00001050402,0.001370418,0.0001398374,0.0001387717,0.0003077745,0.00005883876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000237636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005925855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4983765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5123865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983107,0.0002382533,0.000177318,0.0003957684,0.0005227521,0.000355169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988359,0.0001206418,0.0002827937,0.0002727393,0.0002637034,0.0002242002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000395008,0.00002493076,0.000001172022,0.000289329,0.00007333783,0.00006741537,0.001833271,1.4822e-7,0.000001147489,0.002916327,0.9924644,0.002324584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003613901,0.00004725718,0.00001526842,0.001027363,0.0001614075,0.000001954824,0.0003453659,0.000002089654,0.000001111872,0.006459244,0.9912194,0.0003581242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001514687,0.0004590968,0.00009069542,0.000006575485,0.0001909388,0.0009995048,0.0003130141,0.000132648,0.997656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003494669,0.000416781,0.0002295669,0.00003441784,0.0001167169,9.502947e-7,0.00003378187,0.00002716301,0.9987912],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01401004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900083978","doi":"10.1177/1478929918807972","title":"What Is an Ombudsperson? Global Diffusion, International Standardization, and Institutional Diversification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Democracy; Diversification (marketing strategy); Institution; Corporation; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Institutional theory; Public administration; Political science; Public institution; Civil society; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08904207041328743,"gpt":0.419098828666169,"spread":0.3300567582528816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003348103,0.00009468995,0.0001839391,0.00001915628,0.001074706,0.0001376608,0.000166198,0.00003865095,0.0009819313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000248054,0.00007488018,0.00004167221,0.0001215161,0.001490248,0.0006276732,0.0000914377,0.00004223501,0.0001148707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003204539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008180667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001368212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005189091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987568,0.0001133629,0.0001957701,0.0002447276,0.0004348297,0.0002545138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990604,0.00003655173,0.00004719087,0.0001073819,0.0005446487,0.0002038049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003375172,0.00003722873,0.001581815,0.00007890361,0.00003861367,9.656429e-7,0.00308471,6.496216e-9,2.358546e-7,0.9770133,0.004673568,0.01348731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002002631,0.00005078117,0.01120842,0.0005950727,0.00006926408,0.000002481992,0.004714362,0.00001032367,0.000002551692,0.04938157,0.9336084,0.0001565085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08693805,0.3441018,0.002080998,0.2596895,0.008950783,0.002253292,0.0003522352,0.0004444951,0.2951889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6923795,0.292267,0.0003045396,0.01236506,0.001586223,0.00001708447,0.00002911717,0.000005825124,0.001045621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528823845","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901","title":"Provincial &amp; Territorial Ombudsman Offices in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01713060166164425,"gpt":0.2175560764804966,"spread":0.2004254748188523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001618294,0.0002255062,0.0004477013,0.00003429957,0.0003214245,0.00003115615,0.0008523169,0.0003305851,0.0003937542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009588943,0.000276489,0.000120322,0.000001882146,0.0002949916,0.0001586191,0.0001006652,0.0002498332,0.000003626171],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004848125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008255256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982645,0.0001444747,0.0002099238,0.0003519937,0.0006662605,0.0003628544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.00006246853,0.0002822641,0.0002819882,0.0001032768,0.0001740506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003562145,0.00009229455,0.00006103933,0.0001631824,0.0001267296,0.0001984517,0.07129855,0.000005245823,0.00000700632,0.1685029,0.7492065,0.009981887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004550241,0.00003041893,0.0001569597,0.0001169044,0.00004906239,1.517814e-7,0.0002407829,8.028529e-7,0.00000311865,0.0006203944,0.9980326,0.000293761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001265688,0.0002538032,7.445646e-7,0.0000158789,0.0009188339,0.0004428764,0.0001259143,0.00003813958,0.9969381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00143994,0.0000872549,0.00007325579,0.00001508795,0.001307582,1.983555e-7,0.00004636242,0.00001336194,0.997017],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2488261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246097630","doi":"","title":"Powers and Functions of the Ombudsman in the Personal Information Protection andElectronic Documents Act: An Effectiveness Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Personally identifiable information; Business; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Private sector; Information privacy law; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00871426520693131,"gpt":0.2764079929548339,"spread":0.2676937277479026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004978654,0.0000963578,0.0001042455,0.0001214319,0.001157985,0.0001546579,0.0003020367,0.00006875659,0.00002836565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006129999,0.00005617797,0.00005432528,0.0002735121,0.0001882784,0.0009546743,0.00001788239,0.001737705,0.000003421247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003509832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001162686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1222063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.0006992315,0.0001950293,0.0001052048,0.0004388757,0.0007602938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995403,0.00005339092,0.0001604655,0.0001237189,0.00008050878,0.00004162473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005448294,0.001456091,0.1756331,0.00002992095,0.0002783498,0.000001407922,0.2607049,0.00002167584,0.001833051,0.4983581,0.00002587935,0.06111271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002819928,0.002184456,0.638576,0.00002352709,0.0000989792,0.0001106974,0.1611911,0.00008332476,0.00007131986,0.1914617,0.003101576,0.0002773223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974079,0.00003902308,0.0001002721,0.0003396373,0.0002642157,0.0007762352,5.911187e-7,0.00001072684,0.001061423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999618,0.00005406976,0.000001025455,0.00002189748,0.0001147333,0.00002346576,8.844196e-7,0.000004823368,0.0001611061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.462943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8938111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174334786","doi":"10.1177/03128962211022568","title":"Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Management","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Due diligence; Duty; Accounting; Business; Conflict of interest; Misconduct; Accounting management; Complaint; Finance; Public relations; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Accounting information system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1889821466644803,"gpt":0.4504966670188331,"spread":0.2615145203543527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005773671,0.0001024095,0.0004753594,0.0006014836,0.0002728222,0.00004880973,0.0002379106,0.0001809521,0.0001703004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008281916,0.00009540665,0.0001824348,0.0008663029,0.000345734,0.0001598286,0.00007402623,0.000734265,2.111951e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001195842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006171682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002589729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004751463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971738,0.000629011,0.0007176244,0.000151095,0.00111342,0.0002150343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981531,0.0005132075,0.0005005699,0.0001526716,0.0005693992,0.0001110474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005446426,0.001266636,0.1856742,0.0008420252,0.004945373,0.003300887,0.3540468,0.0284521,0.0004837725,0.404092,0.005959314,0.01039233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002469766,0.0003435611,0.8376222,0.00286412,0.00410503,0.00001485774,0.07482648,0.0002102639,0.00143133,0.04312314,0.03239771,0.0005915061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958043,0.0002339343,0.0007407321,0.001471901,0.0001987056,0.00007797771,0.00003083803,0.000003027565,0.001438577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954485,0.0005405178,0.003334303,0.00007791233,0.00005909468,2.835764e-7,0.000002176176,0.000005370797,0.0005317902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6519481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.389057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093995633","doi":"10.1111/capa.12392","title":"The duty to assist in Canadian Freedom of Information law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Freedom of information; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Law; Administrative law; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02666741190849772,"gpt":0.2663958405912401,"spread":0.2397284286827423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004131607,0.00005882962,0.00007237856,0.0001407105,0.0007165799,0.0003406073,0.0002718907,0.00007887968,0.0002120573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003271334,0.00005379815,0.00002298571,0.0003868146,0.0001665442,0.0005789028,0.000005116111,0.00008746491,0.00009501432],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005045961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007752681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990429,0.00006722425,0.0002259667,0.00008626621,0.0001892391,0.0003884044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982489,0.00003288141,0.00005607065,0.0001072822,0.0001214133,0.001433415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002360625,0.00000180264,0.001744504,0.00000245432,0.000002075329,0.000002133692,0.003212089,7.269737e-7,5.105827e-7,0.9881162,0.006002497,0.0009126663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000715617,0.00003880688,0.008698661,0.00000340711,0.000001517665,2.095248e-7,0.001901918,0.00006189773,0.000007565225,0.001314129,0.9878275,0.00007280878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09275743,0.00001880069,0.00004773365,0.4866657,0.0004158966,0.0006634091,0.0001342735,0.00003176435,0.419265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964669,0.000001715084,0.00003665433,0.003065774,0.0001338411,0.0000111272,0.00004534514,0.00000327258,0.0002353597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968488002","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb00913.x","title":"The privacy commissioner of Canada: Multiple roles, diverse expectations and structural dilemmas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Legislation; Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); The Right to Privacy; Privacy protection; Business; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02576048862781449,"gpt":0.26089804090367,"spread":0.2351375522758555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001591395,0.00006180412,0.00006301293,0.00004593321,0.002026962,0.0001370425,0.0001333527,0.00004484494,0.0002014154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004228282,0.00004849001,0.00001581283,0.0001073233,0.0002398502,0.0001787103,0.000005450711,0.00006369309,0.000001128937],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002216501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4660191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991933,0.0001154483,0.0001391398,0.0001047011,0.0001939631,0.0002534579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991317,0.0001022577,0.00006820629,0.0001230396,0.0001097764,0.0004650064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000170393,0.000003403758,0.00577629,0.000001790224,0.00000757879,0.000003458865,0.00306412,1.159646e-7,0.000003335173,0.9822284,0.008158002,0.0007517757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002035482,0.0000217149,0.01896226,0.000003944521,0.000006955714,0.000002436395,0.02134675,0.00006154615,0.00006518718,0.004329489,0.9548686,0.0001276138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491089,0.0001658805,0.00001460051,0.01940159,0.0003307169,0.0003083397,0.00005672805,0.00001696098,0.03059627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971815,0.000003913095,0.00005295415,0.00005986174,0.00004679878,0.000005653545,0.00001736623,0.00000393893,0.002628021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.977899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207754643","doi":"","title":"The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives Research Workshop Report","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Administrative law; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Common law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07104868652170832,"gpt":0.4176713423627071,"spread":0.3466226558409988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007112935,0.0001028505,0.0001595292,0.00008861689,0.00113549,0.0001082831,0.0006660055,0.0002060993,0.00003933737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001621221,0.00006757484,0.00007002822,0.0007370869,0.001067203,0.000270703,0.00003906625,0.002919996,0.000005021555],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001357835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01465388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005817305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1074393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963601,0.0005587286,0.0003199115,0.0002289992,0.0008431624,0.001689147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984117,0.000274833,0.000230912,0.000179233,0.0008151839,0.00008812571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002414124,0.0001099478,0.001842159,0.000003294981,0.00005112501,0.00004374551,0.06014284,8.812571e-8,0.000001531824,0.9367492,0.0003184469,0.0004962438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000221171,0.0002146973,0.001369869,0.00003690251,0.000006778891,0.00007701406,0.3091156,1.189685e-7,0.00003364693,0.6828619,0.00598438,0.00007795201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8209082,0.01491854,0.00003338471,0.002019214,0.001264411,0.0004104895,0.000001717494,0.00002918564,0.1604148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884403,0.004113646,0.00002399958,0.000004051508,0.00179468,0.000006071482,3.732908e-7,0.000006849343,0.005610033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2538872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205466114","doi":"10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3","title":"The Bidirectional Relationship Between Academic Freedom and Rule of Law: Hungary, Poland and Russia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hague Journal on the Rule of Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rule of law; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Academic freedom; International law; Power (physics); Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Higher education; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05818995099868315,"gpt":0.3121958537811012,"spread":0.254005902782418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001777229,0.0000673424,0.0001349207,0.00004437532,0.003330114,0.00006037523,0.000234001,0.00005436043,0.000128391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005910327,0.0000395483,0.00005737085,0.00007089169,0.0007641275,0.000116234,0.00006019738,0.0006176443,0.000003293437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004174171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000664512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005299344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003497519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986192,0.0004260697,0.000254991,0.00008472944,0.0004659444,0.0001490572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984404,0.001091861,0.0002610857,0.0000903139,0.00003517612,0.00008116999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002565149,0.00001392247,0.02177082,0.000003196894,0.00002563765,0.000001175361,0.003486686,0.000004542514,0.00003777577,0.9736645,0.00083608,0.0001299592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004722665,0.0001448226,0.3205287,0.00004503848,0.00005948386,0.00002718257,0.0009859682,0.00001256836,0.0001168792,0.5060203,0.1714698,0.0001169208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409671,0.001015622,0.000002428351,0.007455342,0.0002758244,0.0001011933,0.00002184108,0.000008790636,0.05015187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972434,0.0001421423,0.00002904817,0.0001138455,0.0004076491,0.000002352065,0.000001086977,0.000006699536,0.002053794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4676442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022970702","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000438","title":"A Human Rights Approach to Emergency Response? The Advocacy of Canada's Human Rights Commissions during the COVID-19 Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Political science; Public administration; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04834605542909221,"gpt":0.3336249588073124,"spread":0.2852789033782201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409597,0.0001544413,0.0002575449,0.0002171882,0.01157291,0.0001604411,0.002464905,0.00005754533,0.0008538965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001018971,0.00008576498,0.0001284059,0.001021344,0.002211727,0.0001979616,0.00006663055,0.0004029819,0.000005719569],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001301329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01055092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9479443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961365,0.0005724336,0.0005803674,0.0002658389,0.001153418,0.001291428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915059,0.0001796161,0.0001966978,0.0003290837,0.0003694407,0.007419236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169872,0.00001712848,0.0003651283,0.000008364518,0.00000975587,0.00004633259,0.01893915,0.00002408001,0.0001936793,0.9456534,0.03472981,0.00000141844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000568285,0.0002948516,0.2029494,0.00004242009,0.00007578551,0.00006317159,0.01615158,0.00001946768,0.0006531265,0.09245165,0.6861782,0.0005521063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8704665,0.00002595799,0.00003577166,0.1046458,0.0002682129,0.0002439033,0.00002506646,0.000008777062,0.02427997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957559,1.855266e-7,0.00005100426,0.002626808,0.0004405951,0.000002717031,2.438649e-7,0.000006582698,0.001115976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300089644","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2022.2126164","title":"Human rights and the city: A case of Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Virtue; Face (sociological concept); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Law; Environmental ethics; Public administration; Right to property; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1129940633542977,"gpt":0.434670105453925,"spread":0.3216760420996273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004296354,0.00004206301,0.00009438811,0.0000645124,0.006480448,0.00009756458,0.0001335833,0.00002003378,0.0005025766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001703816,0.00002788485,0.00001101136,0.0001315362,0.0006081011,0.000132657,0.0001632192,0.0006060212,4.397991e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001816485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009649381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978923,0.001022344,0.0001011038,0.000136666,0.0006179337,0.0002296047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981876,0.001469764,0.00005683273,0.0001039336,0.00009808227,0.00008380456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003349746,0.0001045761,0.003179546,0.00002924396,0.000100017,0.004915199,0.5464584,0.000007535552,0.00000895112,0.4076092,0.03686954,0.0003828038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005073671,0.00006772277,0.0008415902,0.00000908435,0.00001849202,0.0002356652,0.0393017,0.000007962736,0.000004707809,0.008740228,0.9502054,0.00006004561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8894752,0.0003445465,1.906957e-7,0.003206355,0.00005872989,0.0001695196,0.000003122864,0.000004889868,0.1067374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750035,0.000004252602,0.00001846151,0.00009285497,0.00006070992,0.00001340684,0.000001100696,0.00000262418,0.02480309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112602010","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00124.x","title":"The ombudsman and e‐government in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Premise; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01010591496879269,"gpt":0.2284280458398566,"spread":0.2183221308710639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002894136,0.00005046415,0.00004357266,0.00002390666,0.0008409211,0.0002582716,0.0001486726,0.00004397064,0.0001936802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001152142,0.00004192369,0.000007587789,0.00008300353,0.0001448054,0.0001401107,0.000005264545,0.0001438726,0.000004185864],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006928093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01208415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.00003902102,0.000106366,0.0001104352,0.0002489275,0.0002992349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00005854261,0.00003121156,0.0001105033,0.00002622435,0.0004458063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.179274e-7,0.000002540242,0.01698311,7.341067e-7,0.00000157076,0.00001072782,0.0003198893,7.298233e-9,0.000004292817,0.9738823,0.003024616,0.005769362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006386622,0.000007901814,0.04802919,0.000001121777,0.000001012784,0.000001390457,0.00208971,0.00001864201,0.00001095478,0.002317914,0.947389,0.00006929645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.880433,0.00001406361,6.816915e-7,0.06443315,0.0004682561,0.0001447087,0.00001074138,0.000006396122,0.05448898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973168,0.000009901731,0.000009696049,0.0003906017,0.0001326241,0.000009045953,0.000003805496,0.000003478803,0.002124047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599077220","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1223","title":"Contractual and Covenantal Conceptions of Modern Treaty Interpretation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty; Negotiation; Supreme court; Law; Covenant; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05609932130275677,"gpt":0.3180383364535931,"spread":0.2619390151508364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003132821,0.00007566313,0.0002401334,0.00001478905,0.0001695233,0.00001334871,0.0001081347,0.00004230671,0.001068897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003303353,0.00005997974,0.00006980124,0.00004211943,0.0005170685,0.0002098926,0.00001515496,0.00005797714,0.00003450198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002170823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005070589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007423966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003811025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992329,0.0001293899,0.0002219556,0.0001288321,0.0001539757,0.000132932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957,0.00004850945,0.00009864025,0.0001142505,0.00009103314,0.00007753644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136783,0.00007752545,0.0002686559,0.0003225566,0.00002855981,0.000002342363,0.01880045,4.207355e-8,0.00004839231,0.9604959,0.0006664791,0.01927535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001433083,0.0004115755,0.005730774,0.007316839,0.0007390641,0.00001372435,0.001445742,0.0001519746,0.0003868713,0.1607659,0.8208066,0.0007978431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.184221,0.1243486,0.001127938,0.0009994244,0.0005000013,0.002061105,0.00009440912,0.0001713926,0.6864761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844432,0.01465409,0.0001246102,0.0003352782,0.00003857079,0.000009768333,0.000006041094,0.00000460291,0.0003838516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8201401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112919139","doi":"10.1089/env.2020.0017","title":"Fiduciary Responsibility and the Green Energy Act, 2009 (Ontario, Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Ambiguity; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Legislature; Duty; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Law and economics; Energy (signal processing); Law; Business; Public relations; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079085176637997,"gpt":0.2049873650342076,"spread":0.1941965132678277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002647685,0.00009194206,0.0001135042,0.00000717814,0.0007193837,0.00003229834,0.0001983823,0.00004269947,0.002371292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003854885,0.00006782617,0.00002909112,0.00003403686,0.0006051413,0.000094772,0.00008611081,0.0001342028,0.00002390417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002559721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9285121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988253,0.0002601703,0.0001194633,0.000229106,0.0003594761,0.0002064651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994193,0.0002106521,0.00004350931,0.000133627,0.000002207103,0.0001906502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00259338,0.0002970203,0.01897172,0.00008958718,0.0002146904,0.0003478692,0.4527668,0.00005064513,0.0006839411,0.361309,0.1446449,0.01803037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008758242,0.00003948515,0.07240099,0.000004429725,0.0001570129,0.000002001074,0.00984313,0.00008544238,0.00008064634,0.002551894,0.9137287,0.0002305043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9098289,0.0005909106,0.00002214343,0.01989201,0.0002604848,0.0002327029,0.00003274248,0.00003439598,0.0691057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771312,0.00006415913,0.00003099056,0.007358523,0.0002993868,0.000003764315,0.000004699846,0.000006278303,0.01510093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7690837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992252252","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.864364","title":"Is Consent the Foundation of Fair Information Practices? Canada's Experience Under Pipeda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02938719690613084,"gpt":0.3274001810575127,"spread":0.2980129841513818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001127976,0.00006192279,0.00006981674,0.00003924182,0.0007842245,0.0001110497,0.0002540956,0.00003401127,0.0003115653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295973,0.0000430512,0.00003602237,0.0001052055,0.000149622,0.0009396489,0.00001174943,0.0004784591,0.0000261336],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00133373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01160741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2335543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998363,0.0001205723,0.0002405225,0.00005864571,0.0005058161,0.0007114575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990085,0.0001038318,0.0005897051,0.00009333104,0.0001526726,0.00005197274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002154715,0.00002560816,0.0006139925,0.000002886649,0.00004297173,2.21269e-7,0.0353117,0.00004661905,0.00002299245,0.9475405,0.00195798,0.01441301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004867308,0.00008600578,0.002571906,0.00001687815,0.00003311606,0.00004367482,0.1669556,0.00008978198,0.0003047762,0.1203975,0.7088274,0.0001866157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366093,0.0003368016,0.001956256,0.03206426,0.000350943,0.0002041588,0.000001315758,0.00001666999,0.02846028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995504,0.0007880369,0.00002065113,0.0008220824,0.000283727,0.000002233199,0.000001230765,0.00000282921,0.002575224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.827143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591112736","doi":"10.1111/capa.12091","title":"Asymmetric decentralization of the administration of public safety in the <scp>C</scp>anadian federal political system","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Sovereignty; Politics; Public administration; Federalism; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Political science; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02714652751484225,"gpt":0.2670178902906499,"spread":0.2398713627758076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931156,0.0001363513,0.0001958031,0.0004236951,0.0008366196,0.0003377925,0.000615818,0.0002139491,0.00004007118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001865689,0.0001034331,0.00009419175,0.001250382,0.0004212566,0.0004165843,0.00001037831,0.0001692302,0.000008400933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000692033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00545681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01866971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996915,0.001012462,0.0005671991,0.0002285096,0.0005931033,0.0006836987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981471,0.0003742519,0.0002741679,0.0003497838,0.00028449,0.0005701672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001392352,0.00003626702,0.01163395,0.00002630344,0.00000653796,0.000001715461,0.001011762,3.261806e-7,0.000001859754,0.9858189,0.0008493788,0.0006115769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008860278,0.0003706891,0.3878937,0.0001001578,0.00004962129,0.00003016908,0.02984792,0.0009398276,0.0002502473,0.01229077,0.5671113,0.0002296568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6352127,0.00006839706,0.001060983,0.046047,0.0008686442,0.001467292,0.0001252127,0.0000572861,0.3150925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988573,0.000003933446,0.00002961525,0.0003473281,0.0002278528,0.00001540384,0.00009050641,0.00001064025,0.0004174301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081658595","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.270908","title":"In Search of 'Effective Remedies': Applying the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Cultural rights; Political science; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law and economics; International human rights law; Law; Right to property; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03104983930765042,"gpt":0.3467678434883814,"spread":0.315718004180731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279241,0.00007266361,0.0001237197,0.0001177023,0.0004066937,0.00005823038,0.0002371599,0.00005484357,0.00009673346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001478455,0.00004672149,0.00004465612,0.0000705381,0.0002300589,0.0002080077,0.00002129671,0.001034369,0.00001357382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001418612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000369262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2336057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.0002236851,0.0001879397,0.0001174176,0.0002297291,0.0007737238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999726,0.000096882,0.0000796464,0.000034893,0.00003069199,0.00003187699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001269202,0.00005015965,0.006609124,0.000001393519,0.00004068646,0.000009388311,0.01778747,0.00001725762,0.00008713896,0.9717367,0.0001338675,0.003399839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002109394,0.0002539182,0.03885162,0.00005613865,0.00001029154,0.00005819468,0.02448827,0.00009663784,0.0002131693,0.8997377,0.03389632,0.0002283775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924354,0.00005862946,0.000003795257,0.001808724,0.0002112726,0.0002365614,9.557957e-7,0.000003073481,0.005241577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966266,0.00050335,0.000002328275,0.00002977575,0.0005480602,0.00001117263,5.94733e-7,0.000003022486,0.002275079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2263277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610719859","doi":"10.7202/1039192ar","title":"Modern Municipal Statutory Frameworks in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Panacea (medicine); Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02366752773579973,"gpt":0.2817927491311962,"spread":0.2581252213953965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001840077,0.00007675915,0.0001459285,0.00001671605,0.0007603089,0.0000963058,0.0007067004,0.0001089436,0.0001286951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001134291,0.00008131532,0.00002841112,0.00002878144,0.0001697338,0.0002414877,0.00005700277,0.0003770017,0.00002199986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009043606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.00005068058,0.0001341897,0.0001880339,0.0002225895,0.000345067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.00004450824,0.000160409,0.0004761827,0.00002704571,0.00009765419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000419543,0.0001136819,0.432405,0.00008966823,0.00003186334,0.0005255704,0.09887157,0.0006407052,0.00000980811,0.353579,0.03271136,0.08097985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003443966,0.000009096315,0.3599859,0.0002786147,0.000005397362,5.946874e-7,0.001085775,0.00117484,0.00001003923,0.02730777,0.6094669,0.0003307603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8981454,0.0004179648,0.0000177131,0.0008136202,0.001011213,0.0001163193,0.00001089309,0.00001755914,0.09944927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864662,0.0003547944,0.00009025416,0.000155959,0.0002978563,0.000009888294,5.684694e-7,0.000008344163,0.01261615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5767555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203232437","doi":"","title":"Something to Talk About: Is There a Charter Right to Access Government Information?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutional right; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Right to know; Constitutional law; Fundamental rights; Freedom of information; Constitutional court; Access to information; Human rights; Law and economics; Information access; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00961063109953833,"gpt":0.2949104122054095,"spread":0.2852997811058712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480869,0.0001323152,0.0001490168,0.0001095543,0.0009931051,0.0006946533,0.0006649845,0.0000707876,0.000917046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003329221,0.0001044323,0.00009493477,0.0002501288,0.00002750466,0.001419799,0.00003689472,0.0007685141,0.0004666975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001637527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008517819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001895506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006177785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969285,0.00007434328,0.0002769013,0.0001351829,0.0008687929,0.001716343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.00001966971,0.0001219844,0.0001415496,0.00008542618,0.0002770374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004489206,0.00006824418,0.0001746197,0.000002874636,0.0000639177,0.000004615694,0.0431768,0.00001282724,0.00005578007,0.888298,0.005604401,0.062493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004133075,0.0003624422,0.00417806,0.00004422705,0.00001910519,0.0000193124,0.006883139,0.000006961186,0.0002689497,0.4658402,0.521659,0.0003052659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7936463,0.0004598807,0.005348594,0.04420549,0.0005862656,0.0006445477,0.00000980135,0.00009760916,0.1550014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822779,0.0003472212,0.00007189599,0.007304165,0.0006501479,0.00000481072,6.649846e-7,0.00000704235,0.0093362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5160546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617067218","doi":"10.35492/docam/3/2/4","title":"A Duty to Document","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Duty; Transparency (behavior); Democracy; Legislation; Corporate governance; Business; Openness to experience; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0256882822546923,"gpt":0.3131869085696622,"spread":0.2874986263149699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009304634,0.0001816001,0.0001737881,0.00005754129,0.0008182324,0.0003305112,0.0009557707,0.0001276699,0.002944323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001433331,0.00009258707,0.00008781772,0.0002101229,0.000235256,0.0006815626,0.0001935574,0.0001774051,0.00239302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002610064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004201018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004849891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001175945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979612,0.00003657319,0.0002624252,0.0004177316,0.0007371953,0.0005848982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992567,0.0001709928,0.0001127051,0.00009384316,0.00006339353,0.0003023123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004375636,0.00002301933,0.003662344,0.000003475366,0.00004580664,6.628029e-7,0.0314386,4.765873e-8,0.001703556,0.841181,0.1120073,0.009890397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002875744,0.00002518071,0.003996082,0.00007158597,0.00002153099,2.158864e-7,0.001045679,1.450304e-7,0.002021876,0.2681894,0.7241595,0.0001811624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7574906,0.0001483496,0.00003475248,0.1814562,0.0003738616,0.0008767477,0.000008575883,0.0002679752,0.05934294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646829,0.0002157455,0.0002688204,0.004087016,0.001633495,0.0001018558,6.300904e-7,0.00001976688,0.02898981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984162081","doi":"10.1177/0020852319870241","title":"Media coverage of reports published by the Québec Ombudsman: an automated content analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Tone (literature); Media coverage; Mandate; Political science; Content analysis; News media; Print media; Visibility; Law; Sociology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08613295065847268,"gpt":0.4122552439056207,"spread":0.326122293247148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002802459,0.0001135816,0.0004051669,0.0001309965,0.0001997279,0.0001232079,0.0009218719,0.0000372665,0.003865206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009243252,0.00006755671,0.0002237371,0.0007426986,0.001389048,0.0006854237,0.00004295446,0.00008136738,0.00001295834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006853221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001031765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006775551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02100886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.0003031881,0.0007172391,0.0003325376,0.001387347,0.0001634211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976076,0.0004704735,0.0009286785,0.000256999,0.0006432721,0.00009291679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006064132,0.001157603,0.198731,0.0006593094,0.001773884,0.0000324317,0.02559059,0.00003206811,0.001119292,0.7347336,0.02965944,0.006450082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284,0.002351133,0.4119015,0.005813313,0.00159262,0.0000394202,0.03074314,0.001782353,0.006419569,0.02087859,0.5154969,0.00169744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8016158,0.004792347,0.00002074656,0.009900192,0.0008313762,0.0006478037,0.00009066379,0.00006260716,0.1820385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957194,0.001568994,0.0000745691,0.0003834307,0.00004606846,0.000009360831,0.0000380212,0.000002837967,0.002157353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7138551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774233808","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.31158","title":"L’Ombudsman face aux défis de l’évaluation : est-il possible d’évaluer l’intangible?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Valuation (finance); Task (project management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Business; Sociology; Management; Psychology; Accounting; Economics; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.151428523169439,"gpt":0.4234776728772624,"spread":0.2720491497078233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662244,0.0001582694,0.0002312975,0.0003803527,0.003052051,0.00129639,0.0007618806,0.0001905201,0.001338435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001676891,0.0001511037,0.0001727211,0.0001589012,0.0005028477,0.00104923,0.00001494699,0.0002965755,0.00009136457],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01195556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02983985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4095241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969752,0.0006465181,0.0004524832,0.0002017263,0.001085668,0.0006384411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965701,0.00006263915,0.0006996601,0.0003766521,0.001376493,0.0009144825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002556152,0.0001098516,0.02338957,0.00001987725,0.0001105334,0.0000621478,0.05168582,0.0003158617,0.0000744417,0.0444525,0.006952306,0.8728015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003439384,0.00105339,0.3381459,0.0003878729,0.000862071,0.00007409084,0.01191959,0.01098521,0.0005205206,0.2257296,0.4059238,0.0009585402],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.925222,0.0004349788,0.0002579601,0.007681068,0.001461031,0.001332128,0.000009118455,0.00003933904,0.06356232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948521,0.00005392033,0.001963118,0.0001026611,0.0009426486,0.00003642189,0.000009803931,0.00002184074,0.00201749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.871843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901759511","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1363","title":"Diagnosing Administrative Law: A Comment on Clyde River and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Skepticism; Political science; Public law; State (computer science); Rule of law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Duty; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07116693918474473,"gpt":0.3280372216470354,"spread":0.2568702824622907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004638118,0.0000959559,0.0002334658,0.000009958719,0.0004180219,0.00003599038,0.0001927595,0.000039842,0.000353573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003648673,0.00006060129,0.00008380754,0.00006967253,0.0004441086,0.0001225564,0.00003994181,0.00009598196,0.00004979522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004990849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004700174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001378873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01126025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989645,0.0002151564,0.0001918922,0.0001590272,0.0003280717,0.0001413239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993412,0.0002046686,0.000139196,0.000203544,0.00006266421,0.00004865915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002751166,0.00004846746,0.0006645777,0.0003630061,0.00001353786,4.271753e-7,0.003003617,1.785237e-7,0.000001577953,0.9918903,0.00357618,0.0004354551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001572537,0.0000736795,0.001419573,0.003409373,0.00004079345,3.789623e-7,0.000135376,0.000002091838,0.0001231714,0.008831322,0.9857079,0.00009904955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.180365,0.04149784,0.000003656853,0.1153985,0.001173944,0.004829116,0.00005680335,0.00008629245,0.6565889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814098,0.01123721,0.00002168871,0.006598532,0.00006675699,0.0000147659,0.000002969824,0.000006470828,0.0006417498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6283482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486549","doi":"10.32920/21977006.v1","title":"The Impact of Ombudsman Investigations on Public Administration: A Case Study and an Evaluation Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Public administration; Service (business); Political science; Public service; Public relations; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3036461516779929,"gpt":0.5011781117921159,"spread":0.1975319601141231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003709771,0.0001656696,0.0001873286,0.0001536889,0.001472153,0.0006664412,0.000301788,0.000140836,0.0001956512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004828259,0.0001058969,0.00008948722,0.0001883061,0.000466636,0.0001846939,0.0001211758,0.0002431963,0.00001509644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002011521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002299642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02021302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3886719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972837,0.0009998011,0.0004129975,0.0003758968,0.0007194293,0.0002081586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982174,0.0003112139,0.0002572735,0.0005379983,0.000454237,0.0002218812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493724,0.002244592,0.0431268,0.00005640834,0.0008276615,0.0003393124,0.250889,0.0004273945,0.000008711662,0.6609088,0.02127315,0.01984885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001787424,0.0044797,0.1398804,0.0001306995,0.0005494567,0.00005616925,0.290906,0.01278188,0.00002660846,0.5452669,0.002932652,0.00120207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768894,0.00001811316,0.000006097749,0.001825148,0.0002514738,0.001679525,0.0000172022,0.0001069062,0.01920611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955051,0.00001978609,0.00005409156,0.00001551081,0.000294334,0.0001288728,0.00003800949,0.00001360444,0.003930707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3684589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321360707","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.2014","title":"Accès à l’information et organisations internationales : le cas de l’Union européenne","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01731847717952876,"gpt":0.2780758538571587,"spread":0.2607573766776299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001505934,0.0001870475,0.0001556339,0.0002261489,0.0006085861,0.0005386812,0.000428367,0.0003335824,0.0007880796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003687116,0.0002031584,0.00009989063,0.0003828699,0.0003637205,0.004008735,0.00008638022,0.0005091054,0.0006550768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001182458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01566478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03622749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981222,0.0005198283,0.0003766168,0.0001994244,0.0003498729,0.000432106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987693,0.0001274587,0.0002162909,0.0002013741,0.0004533619,0.0002321672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003640039,0.0001414968,0.0001619604,0.00002763372,0.0000233404,0.000006145513,0.03881884,0.0002310539,0.00005104507,0.9549587,0.003982401,0.001593674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003889553,0.00004155803,0.007082371,0.00006969045,0.00001322106,0.00002043873,0.001818345,0.00006936401,0.0005663445,0.4116134,0.5780997,0.0002165662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.13273,0.0005926645,0.02685961,0.5735737,0.001799449,0.0005208593,0.00006970127,0.0003226866,0.2635314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592541,0.001162718,0.002629607,0.01691647,0.0007961312,0.00003252722,0.000160316,0.00002848903,0.01901957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083092465","doi":"10.7202/1026399ar","title":"L’accès des enfants à la justice et leur droit de participation devant les tribunaux : quelques réflexions","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04364192917881259,"gpt":0.3289911729351416,"spread":0.285349243756329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002349463,0.0002738617,0.0004775137,0.0001433011,0.001128364,0.0003694426,0.0005236437,0.0004546316,0.0007853447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000833717,0.0003856605,0.0002503162,0.0003852845,0.001020575,0.0007153252,0.00008509536,0.0005099959,0.000634697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007982227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004306853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00453667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03415975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958538,0.001488581,0.0005608125,0.0005332659,0.0003586913,0.001204861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976475,0.0009195985,0.0002817199,0.0004078189,0.0001931538,0.000550166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003233665,0.0003009667,0.005892221,0.0004196597,0.00005315016,0.00004394971,0.02355348,0.0001861373,0.0001621513,0.9316895,0.0008111576,0.03685528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006402542,0.0002163306,0.04020452,0.0007690076,0.0006395727,0.00004903346,0.00165144,0.005410138,0.0005722757,0.8666391,0.08253735,0.0006709944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.821444,0.001382315,0.0061381,0.00389502,0.0006984182,0.0003469066,0.00005056189,0.0002274938,0.1658172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679312,0.00185202,0.002405423,0.0008422714,0.001418735,0.00005592993,0.00003267904,0.00005904986,0.02540275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1464872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309495784","doi":"10.32920/21596715","title":"Equity in education: signed language and the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Equity (law); Political science; Sign language; Special education; Right to education; Linguistics; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03551462326332959,"gpt":0.3943018442702429,"spread":0.3587872210069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162681,0.00007243988,0.0001347301,0.00004915696,0.0003924116,0.0001563269,0.0003442157,0.00007225583,0.007615271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004045562,0.00004782036,0.00003891048,0.00004568037,0.0003365536,0.00003420583,0.0006500169,0.0002982564,0.00001376048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001356834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007040609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01621216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03745635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.0003278146,0.0001151193,0.0001897358,0.0002573975,0.0001395864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995627,0.0001220705,0.00005636261,0.0001953932,0.00001787768,0.00004555098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007787502,0.00003711376,0.0001156869,0.00001403847,0.000004596901,0.000001967137,0.105122,0.00000149137,2.717123e-7,0.8871407,0.004007506,0.003546846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005138943,0.000008592994,0.0034888,0.00003050313,0.00002048753,3.872791e-7,0.09036902,0.00001522708,0.000002836023,0.7850584,0.1202526,0.0002391504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2181315,0.001109985,0.000004177573,0.005319545,0.0008238837,0.0004830243,0.000003221317,0.00004278216,0.7740819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226209,0.0001607994,0.00006618566,0.0006163659,0.000345802,0.00007473936,0.0000101295,0.000004912422,0.07610016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243465984","doi":"","title":"Discretion and the Culture of Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Impartiality; Political science; Multiculturalism; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public service; Public administration; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004784448306542868,"gpt":0.2514394177206656,"spread":0.2466549694141227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00133262,0.00004117022,0.00007177766,0.00001976084,0.0006108456,0.00004463941,0.0001133181,0.0000352602,0.0000319603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000182154,0.00002231427,0.00004229843,0.00005690374,0.0003469485,0.00009414594,0.000005375062,0.0004384598,0.000003535894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001072518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000354926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007602017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01253407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989952,0.0001295604,0.0001049056,0.00005187705,0.0001810327,0.0005374227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997755,0.00003213039,0.00008633429,0.00004021752,0.00004482287,0.00002100249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002057205,0.000009147196,0.0000576325,0.000001637781,0.000009500487,1.985689e-7,0.004741677,0.000001887616,0.00001408113,0.993961,0.0001456979,0.001036928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000537574,0.00003515791,0.0003907954,0.000006136224,0.00005971331,0.00001504413,0.01705436,0.00001048461,0.00001139727,0.9748335,0.007004127,0.00004167316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6824984,0.01920932,0.008848717,0.007144035,0.0005887192,0.0004098937,0.000002533697,0.00005098146,0.2812474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818733,0.002876364,0.00001670577,0.00002665579,0.0004836312,5.652433e-7,4.190457e-7,0.000002791086,0.01471961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2993748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6994306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099702670","doi":"","title":"BRIDGING THE DIVIDE? Integrating the Functions of National Equality Bodies and National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Political science; European union; Human rights; Public administration; Economics; International trade; Law; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05501008516443931,"gpt":0.2863702898091359,"spread":0.2313602046446966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01662863,0.000174559,0.0001611749,0.0001393021,0.003893795,0.0003931927,0.0008819615,0.00009245478,0.0002221926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005901198,0.0001018772,0.0001093142,0.000100501,0.001734583,0.0002186738,0.0002136258,0.000513365,0.00003624934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001249531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005539125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.158208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914086,0.00685909,0.0004413103,0.000281705,0.000830316,0.0001790215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955243,0.00194964,0.0004047941,0.0004665966,0.001608743,0.00004589538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.856851e-7,0.00004195076,0.00007634157,0.000007501463,0.00001962819,2.379194e-7,0.03147318,0.000003337171,0.00001253072,0.9638251,0.00228812,0.002251683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002419786,6.559871e-7,0.01032696,0.0007675202,0.00003706622,0.000003960122,0.001175726,0.0001896709,0.00003730113,0.4033723,0.5835762,0.0002706699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003324101,0.0002146809,0.002192166,0.01437703,0.00009163595,0.0003988169,0.00004501413,0.00004200332,0.9793146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424825,0.00005779518,0.0001357267,0.0001068511,0.0001168669,0.00001881946,0.0001177217,0.00001136812,0.1569523],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018322449","doi":"10.7202/043805ar","title":"Standards of Judicial Review : Is it Time to Change our Analysis ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Deference; Injustice; Discipline; Judicial deference; Law and economics; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0241139530956317,"gpt":0.3263855059722428,"spread":0.3022715528766111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009443414,0.00009070156,0.0003452868,0.0001424898,0.0002546104,0.0000262932,0.0002654934,0.0001136128,0.005101775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008308392,0.00008968816,0.0002204606,0.00064525,0.0001296475,0.0001002991,0.00001785876,0.0001228095,0.0004141341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005925745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005028813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005518833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986615,0.00009530266,0.0002146139,0.0001849975,0.0005461528,0.0002974895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993816,0.00002243386,0.00009131247,0.0001901679,0.0001291847,0.0001852973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005007482,0.0001617529,0.0006774407,0.000295992,0.0008004089,0.00002166777,0.182035,0.00001125115,0.00004934137,0.04486531,0.6242555,0.1467763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001186614,0.00004225291,0.0009384442,0.0001781927,0.0005089798,2.925195e-7,0.0009756894,0.00002483812,0.00007372942,0.00199933,0.9949529,0.0001867235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3344809,0.01421835,0.001295967,0.1407916,0.0002689525,0.002031189,0.0006570075,0.0002648873,0.5059911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274357,0.005286416,0.000997592,0.03122726,0.001737737,0.00004098201,0.0000208034,0.00002913316,0.1332244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196990703","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_7","title":"The Role and Purpose of Ombudsmen in a Global Media World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"CBC (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Accountability; Political science; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Position (finance); Social media; Dual function; News media; Business; Engineering; Law; History; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0160923122638756,"gpt":0.264005168639099,"spread":0.2479128563752233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003146628,0.0001220129,0.0002351925,0.0000493701,0.000189645,0.00008043578,0.0002274763,0.0001366008,0.001599304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002020657,0.00008187917,0.0000651938,0.00004699636,0.0005542109,0.00004619026,0.00008554231,0.0001484031,0.00002679493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008085114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002155979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5130242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990153,0.00004061326,0.0002180241,0.0001955927,0.0003404527,0.0001900054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.0001642185,0.00008750262,0.0001649872,0.00005369025,0.00008409894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004460896,0.000005919293,0.0001982013,0.000003658039,0.00001269112,0.000009276412,0.001767672,1.780614e-8,2.440326e-7,0.9841492,0.0006444427,0.01320422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008602646,0.000005336084,0.0004464684,0.00004334058,0.000009385888,2.505608e-7,0.000610113,5.807883e-7,0.000001795661,0.4176176,0.5810971,0.00008197009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006450058,0.002870147,3.451777e-7,0.0004339954,0.0001791329,0.0001641748,0.00001113064,0.00001623986,0.9956799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03105659,0.001047191,0.00004158271,0.00006898875,0.0002210059,0.000002917396,0.000004691675,0.000008587847,0.9675484],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5804527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119447935","doi":"10.12927/hcpap..17764","title":"Determining the Utility of Public Reporting - Too Early to Judge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Data science; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1930516270180296,"gpt":0.3812789195046364,"spread":0.1882272924866068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00632799,0.0009793675,0.001766961,0.0006389315,0.002896809,0.0006081523,0.002140756,0.001231007,0.001184802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002218616,0.0007918835,0.0007238252,0.001192981,0.0003425144,0.0004437572,0.0006546274,0.002457165,0.0007508748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001368139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001556843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009128993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04442851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880586,0.001523528,0.00323657,0.001906089,0.002391469,0.002883716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916074,0.001672669,0.002949846,0.002038693,0.0006685552,0.001062866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007907591,0.0001423538,0.004185167,0.0001068317,0.0000738134,0.00005974498,0.06448955,4.414943e-7,0.000005512772,0.0005245115,0.9215753,0.00875771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004917285,0.0005611217,0.02656358,0.000004835702,0.00007909346,0.000009534197,0.0009218368,0.00002207167,0.00001159485,0.000120234,0.9703342,0.0008802027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.3588389,0.00005280894,0.00002387318,0.6246921,0.00098864,0.001659802,0.00008690169,0.0002742698,0.01338275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07055105,0.0000513177,0.0004074631,0.9152694,0.00108792,0.0003052947,0.0001273227,0.0001789899,0.01202127],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2905773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034896080","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1422","title":"Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Administrative law; Judicial review; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Citizenship; Confusion; Agency (philosophy); Standard of review; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170307241449274,"gpt":0.3775143552299142,"spread":0.2604836310849868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008522755,0.0000718371,0.0002775031,0.000006087148,0.0001986636,0.00003482657,0.0001342061,0.0000475502,0.0002111175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007456844,0.00004493034,0.00006192236,0.0001291587,0.0008379814,0.000131001,0.0000217684,0.0001082516,0.00001275519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001757608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001717437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008292811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01203403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987812,0.0005037041,0.0002656264,0.0001536339,0.0001973604,0.00009848553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994199,0.00009990641,0.0001079554,0.000177005,0.0001512889,0.00004391709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005731391,0.00002530331,0.00002632409,0.0003508221,0.000007640298,0.000004284792,0.006668825,1.352221e-8,0.00001129078,0.9903256,0.002396585,0.0001775789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003997979,0.00001485966,0.0001357619,0.001529148,0.00004361959,0.000001671544,0.002010273,9.200041e-7,0.0001269115,0.03163092,0.9640164,0.00008969633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001631784,0.2454179,0.000004933089,0.01104482,0.0001299481,0.0008447826,0.00001637131,0.00002031606,0.7408891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962014,0.03430931,0.00004991043,0.001630124,0.00005741186,0.00001847663,0.00001482772,0.000003901626,0.001902104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.671527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595183341","doi":"","title":"Ombudsing at Canadian universities through the eyes of a Dutch ombudsman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Confidentiality; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Spring (device); Work (physics); Public administration; Library science; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02600580208373471,"gpt":0.2728511248683081,"spread":0.2468453227845734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005123364,0.0001505559,0.0001907266,0.00006436963,0.001903469,0.00009361385,0.001354957,0.00005955158,0.0001326872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006116501,0.00008824181,0.00003899095,0.0001537792,0.0007818115,0.0005699145,0.0004515334,0.00009387573,0.00001889113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002054727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3331587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984261,0.0002810712,0.0001859584,0.0003433787,0.0002556189,0.0005078734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.0004373164,0.0001139741,0.0006481399,0.00003154968,0.0001870382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384116,0.00006408121,0.05431657,0.0002482884,0.0003113622,0.00006636954,0.6953282,0.00005472674,0.0004697364,0.2205887,0.007832907,0.02058064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008653298,0.00008042855,0.07049273,0.001189658,0.0001907977,0.00001348194,0.1170861,0.001604574,0.00008122277,0.02336067,0.7842699,0.0007651178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450081,0.0003346139,0.00008364011,0.001786588,0.0002272492,0.0001528812,0.0002794702,0.00005400331,0.05207347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943854,0.0005992664,0.0001410373,0.0002418271,0.0003324455,0.000001357988,0.00007611018,0.0000139955,0.004208564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7764369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410232913","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2024-014","title":"Human Rights Institutions: Systemic Underfunding and Policy Reform in Alberta","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03893102480479039,"gpt":0.3408124313066289,"spread":0.3018814065018385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030956,0.000140243,0.0001933626,0.002977074,0.00235877,0.0003836176,0.0003911959,0.0001857601,0.00007241584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001806869,0.0001360509,0.00003942134,0.001496729,0.0005285699,0.0004799744,0.00004108247,0.000184969,0.00005089678],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007091893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01167144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983816,0.0001084909,0.0002575312,0.0002754143,0.0001383342,0.000838615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998866,0.00003650877,0.0000488018,0.0002560435,0.00005258036,0.0007400251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.337258e-7,0.000007745631,0.001464875,0.00001567802,0.00001016926,0.000006271983,0.002286935,2.100891e-7,0.000001507352,0.9946558,0.001071033,0.0004794794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000397727,0.000009051922,0.01104413,0.0001410462,0.000006021569,0.000006237554,0.0009301113,0.000006327965,0.000001991121,0.2507773,0.7364536,0.0002264691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2168364,0.0000857422,0.000001835384,0.03545292,0.0001504435,0.0002570534,0.00001101657,0.00004174974,0.7471629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525352,0.00001672262,0.000005222634,0.001553429,0.0005050645,0.00002122659,0.000009359605,0.00000718178,0.04534664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7438785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}