{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":442,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":442,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4d71120b810e","filters":{"topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods"}},"results":[{"id":"W2012785947","doi":"10.1139/f01-004","title":"Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1416,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permutation (music); Univariate; Resampling; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Statistics; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Null distribution; Variance (accounting); Omnibus test; Regression analysis; Random permutation; Linear regression; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Test statistic; Random variable; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1771478290689739,"gpt":0.4305256572153112,"spread":0.2533778281463374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003918683,0.0001049723,0.0004145557,0.0007662869,0.0003412035,0.0003535706,0.0003511451,0.00004633331,0.0001633201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005430776,0.00006162531,0.00007977113,0.00196189,0.0006575108,0.0006918316,0.00001762234,0.00005354447,3.342144e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002790624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005850398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002505257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005119578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982663,0.0001998165,0.0006354429,0.0002322154,0.0004584844,0.0002077368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966973,0.002040703,0.0006084673,0.000123701,0.0002006106,0.0003291896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006842731,0.0000735861,0.4591888,0.00002961368,0.0005100553,0.0001467657,0.02085963,0.001576772,0.01516677,0.008336632,0.00158962,0.4918375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986107,0.003154141,0.5202607,0.0003071519,0.0007760612,0.0002602899,0.02483036,0.3776685,0.001501398,0.05761554,0.01103644,0.0006032783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427358,0.0008080105,0.05340109,0.001819561,0.0002919484,0.0001504526,0.00001474098,0.000002274901,0.0007761102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910168,0.00004997936,0.08927039,0.00009784889,0.0000252359,0.000001604427,4.534658e-7,0.000003651154,0.0003828307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6501538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205685297","doi":"10.1002/0470013192.bsa239","title":"Functional Data Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1304,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Functional data analysis; Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Functional principal component analysis; Functional analysis; Data mining; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2096176508594192,"gpt":0.4953812503248293,"spread":0.2857635994654101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005776207,0.0003216754,0.0008218284,0.003072457,0.00008088689,0.0001557296,0.004721376,0.0001904941,0.02782145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002113557,0.0002732236,0.00008480747,0.007038528,0.001742321,0.0004545434,0.001301614,0.0003236093,0.0003102316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001582477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006153195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001382314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920384,0.0002284999,0.001166374,0.001617882,0.004458647,0.0004901685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954304,0.0007037633,0.0008379397,0.002560423,0.0002379979,0.0002295531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000254773,0.00068937,0.03508258,0.000008272552,0.00004093994,0.00005625782,0.0002610566,0.0003431485,0.0003829877,0.006779161,0.7002522,0.2560786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008021454,0.0002922266,0.1984691,0.00009312644,0.0008669948,0.000008229084,0.0006145057,0.009627615,0.0001671438,0.005033217,0.7823747,0.001650985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002848346,0.0005144595,0.2198269,0.00002817699,0.001626576,0.0004186557,0.006092207,0.00005612027,0.7711521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001233783,0.000211436,0.6593134,0.00001789526,0.0001586698,0.00001121443,0.0001983711,0.00008026812,0.3387749],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4394866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129917462","doi":"10.4141/a03-123","title":"The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":534,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated measures design; Covariance; Akaike information criterion; Mixed model; Statistics; Univariate; Mathematics; Missing data; Linear model; Random effects model; Analysis of covariance; Analysis of variance; Generalized linear mixed model; Bayesian information criterion; Bayesian probability; Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4737523180852924,"gpt":0.4474979553343907,"spread":0.02625436275090165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01247333,0.0001429307,0.000438106,0.001114391,0.0003383658,0.00047148,0.004921573,0.00004050591,0.00002341271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003461843,0.0000693257,0.0001176464,0.007052027,0.001934209,0.002000894,0.0001277738,0.000200573,9.720089e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002685889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01133952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950409,0.000494953,0.001058393,0.0003964567,0.002576158,0.0004331265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959512,0.0007632936,0.0008366937,0.001119576,0.0009311532,0.0003981044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001732079,0.0001927664,0.02318595,0.000002624541,0.0003261318,0.0003051204,0.01194539,0.07227905,0.8741441,0.00800758,0.0005778198,0.007301369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001741765,0.005056032,0.7786109,0.0001794708,0.0004527802,0.0002839058,0.0231326,0.05558627,0.1299465,0.00311772,0.001305468,0.0005865986],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956015,0.0004879629,0.002977568,0.0004117177,0.00007294287,0.0001348638,0.000038789,0.000001363813,0.0002732624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781027,0.00001075844,0.02179457,0.00006760234,0.00001167829,0.000001070436,5.425528e-7,0.000005540307,0.000005552475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.755425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046447653","doi":"10.1037/a0014164","title":"Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial; Factorial experiment; Arithmetic; Psychology; Statistics; Confidence interval; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3054079905872321,"gpt":0.4825623642055711,"spread":0.177154373618339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007991952,0.0004601036,0.0009241914,0.0009298141,0.0002459974,0.0001704111,0.003372748,0.0003126141,0.001207359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002502865,0.0003725477,0.0004338605,0.001588755,0.0009576699,0.0006468757,0.00006284652,0.0007691163,0.00006859405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001196704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007528568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003157446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008157791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934385,0.001369149,0.00254159,0.0008686665,0.0004666611,0.001315402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947641,0.0007418569,0.001332129,0.001492134,0.0004720995,0.001197718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007007308,0.0009171267,0.1160663,0.000005864224,0.0001516986,0.001461248,0.02170754,0.000341112,0.8173596,0.01431376,0.01604146,0.01093361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006378845,0.004208156,0.5775158,0.0006042775,0.00008145311,0.008037413,0.04791563,0.0002327969,0.2633139,0.07505245,0.01506741,0.001591827],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802341,0.003137432,0.002526396,0.002817303,0.001895292,0.0005689759,0.00004116552,0.00001301853,0.00876632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763377,0.00003360292,0.0197666,0.003310454,0.0001433535,0.00002883115,0.000004259239,0.00003442006,0.0003407412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5540457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983981102","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asn057","title":"Orthogonal and nearly orthogonal designs for computer experiments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Washington State University","keywords":"Latin hypercube sampling; Generalization; Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Computer experiment; Orthographic projection; Orthogonal basis; Orthogonal transformation; Base (topology); Design of experiments; Projection (relational algebra); Factorial experiment; Algorithm; Statistics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3559474796527072,"gpt":0.5003541112410744,"spread":0.1444066315883672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868376,0.000258713,0.0004215994,0.001127968,0.0002315868,0.0005251875,0.0005848093,0.0001391341,0.0002546783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007769443,0.0002030645,0.0001821843,0.002223463,0.0001587721,0.0004342462,0.0001261033,0.00009257206,0.000119022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005079079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006824843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000294084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.766905e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966256,0.0002504569,0.0006567619,0.00081233,0.001193595,0.0004612772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973077,0.00149356,0.0001950816,0.0004432132,0.0002432709,0.0003172063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004889032,0.0004427624,0.005844913,0.000004302895,0.00004858212,0.00001919798,0.0004888416,0.00001510904,0.2299905,0.01132914,0.01205595,0.7392718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0104546,0.01338706,0.4308777,0.00007586806,0.00008730013,0.0002343542,0.0008418007,0.02642513,0.2662221,0.06327575,0.1851886,0.002929709],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3898014,0.001698119,0.6037072,0.0004029942,0.0008523652,0.0008465113,0.00006711038,0.0001050481,0.002519251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4811983,0.000007313895,0.5170013,0.0007034978,0.000223822,0.00002248038,0.000007955905,0.00001521073,0.0008201554],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7363421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.828073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884878604","doi":"10.1038/s41592-018-0083-2","title":"Optimal experimental design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computational biology; Design of experiments; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2251656041605317,"gpt":0.5845820471417642,"spread":0.3594164429812325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01965009,0.0003738864,0.0005671358,0.0004298831,0.0003535427,0.0003981602,0.001770565,0.0006294202,0.004690396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008689243,0.000274704,0.0002629244,0.001624763,0.0005870594,0.0005372126,0.0004537562,0.0008105739,0.001204592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001291362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001090041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005235876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.596257e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900789,0.005639257,0.0007766404,0.001155955,0.001736762,0.0006124742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929113,0.004695754,0.0002628601,0.001309058,0.000500216,0.0003208305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003947322,0.0001747989,0.00007130169,0.000001032302,0.0000338065,0.00002005371,0.00128126,0.00009382342,0.8257694,0.00564539,0.03034677,0.1361676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004052598,0.0006484679,0.0002741434,0.000005871701,0.00000945488,0.00004924504,0.0007076598,0.007274033,0.9056861,0.006576358,0.07802934,0.0003340807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009282229,0.002816162,0.9446625,0.0002248197,0.003239444,0.0003976351,0.000004082442,0.0001691127,0.03920407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1259927,0.000002260168,0.868608,0.001169668,0.0007177049,0.00003639812,0.000001013902,0.00004326389,0.003429015],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1358336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967636732","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2009.01.001","title":"A new definition of mixing and segregation: Three dimensions of a key process variable","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mixing (physics); Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Robustness (evolution); Scale (ratio); Field (mathematics); Statistical physics; Computer science; Physics; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06359765893898006,"gpt":0.3238981229150358,"spread":0.2603004639760558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563123,0.0001420946,0.0002596575,0.0001207712,0.000183865,0.00003133289,0.0001096409,0.00009631985,0.0001006676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001980456,0.0001098769,0.00003329894,0.0003606208,0.000128407,0.0006088636,0.00004413584,0.0001170727,0.00000308196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003083348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002879413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003830079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002207332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983169,0.0000888764,0.0005196116,0.0003737475,0.0005643354,0.0001364591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992812,0.0001032114,0.0003369011,0.0001568512,0.0000302306,0.00009164499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002882487,0.0006311695,0.005328865,0.0002876885,0.00004934296,0.000002283741,0.005936469,0.008321824,0.5963771,0.00892018,0.000008135074,0.3712544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001605868,0.001409784,0.02175043,0.000181703,0.00005621991,0.00009003196,0.002623696,0.02651369,0.1379139,0.8074034,0.00008581479,0.0003654573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2778731,0.0008557827,0.7177608,0.0002381518,0.00005668946,0.0008019962,0.0000190082,0.00002869126,0.002365803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581725,0.00006687779,0.04164662,0.00002803657,0.00001559102,0.00001488773,0.000004393406,0.000007296591,0.00004382157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.448065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001211064","doi":"10.3758/bf03207805","title":"Statistical power for the two-factor repeated measures ANOVA","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Univariate; Monte Carlo method; Type I and type II errors; Correlation; Analysis of variance; Unavailability; Variance (accounting); Power (physics); Statistical power; Mean squared error; Multivariate statistics; Physics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5420606524719409,"gpt":0.6332398172327909,"spread":0.09117916476084997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0294339,0.0004618288,0.0007302167,0.000616808,0.001169989,0.001431786,0.003217392,0.000180076,0.005929198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005755567,0.0003030637,0.0003605272,0.001912762,0.001232502,0.0005460372,0.0006030669,0.0009341954,0.0004025917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003574628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003072411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000330883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008566113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807056,0.009718955,0.001487294,0.001623965,0.004953129,0.0015111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783369,0.01780107,0.0002103073,0.002036561,0.00102076,0.0005943901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004347181,0.0003004586,0.001772543,0.000003070705,0.00006260627,0.00002622356,0.0004679795,0.00004586587,0.01724143,0.001310341,0.007556433,0.9707783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009137262,0.004111735,0.1398221,0.0001359284,0.0001783651,0.000280156,0.0036896,0.03077017,0.1233159,0.0202432,0.6659735,0.002342177],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2345982,0.0002915699,0.7558526,0.0007477507,0.002065645,0.003830631,0.000269833,0.0001792237,0.002164526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1749001,0.00003448631,0.821976,0.0002631634,0.0001373926,0.0005804335,0.00001534682,0.00007282935,0.002020276],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048699385","doi":"10.1037/1082-989x.5.3.370","title":"How important is transient error in estimating reliability? Going beyond simulation studies.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Transient (computer programming); Observational error; Statistics; Standard error; Range (aeronautics); Error analysis; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3949998641647077,"gpt":0.6121051813343663,"spread":0.2171053171696586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02329171,0.0003757823,0.0009214871,0.0002629205,0.0001811867,0.0002739564,0.0007994767,0.0002686549,0.00205451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01718145,0.000254636,0.0002936258,0.001765109,0.0003551664,0.0005637128,0.00009106511,0.0005056309,0.000081247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001470001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001538378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005079465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.944565e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902726,0.004620101,0.001688804,0.001600527,0.001193172,0.0006247857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881411,0.01004401,0.0003419381,0.001049158,0.0001967008,0.0002270927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660546,0.000391252,0.002555382,0.000008725655,0.00001683563,0.00003614882,0.003024217,0.01702082,0.008320876,0.0001021174,0.000377097,0.9678805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283782,0.0008190936,0.01488405,0.00005653888,0.00002499016,0.00002506416,0.001867353,0.7896479,0.003035121,0.1776195,0.01006006,0.0006765568],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4723047,0.001514813,0.5145627,0.002997641,0.0009272154,0.0007061131,0.000007553786,0.0001226361,0.006856704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2960408,0.00002457077,0.7019984,0.001038842,0.0000708488,0.00005159187,7.504109e-7,0.00001720276,0.0007570368],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973353515","doi":"10.2307/3316054","title":"An adaptive randomized design with application to estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive design; Estimation; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Population; Completely randomized design; Statistics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1074360952197745,"gpt":0.4002492733428469,"spread":0.2928131781230724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004714634,0.0001175693,0.000404327,0.0005004883,0.0001288031,0.00023825,0.0004512281,0.00004121084,0.0002049518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00300912,0.00008293283,0.00003718574,0.00059089,0.0001589978,0.0003599878,0.000004768621,0.0001164617,0.00006954601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001839879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000934999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00190726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975308,0.0007427041,0.0006641314,0.0001783597,0.0006695469,0.0002144738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955943,0.00177224,0.000453053,0.0002491232,0.0009646225,0.0009667091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03483181,0.00006707732,0.0006087323,0.000002408649,0.00008830046,0.0005600554,0.004149945,0.3955779,0.001787832,0.05298691,0.01171641,0.4976226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02817354,0.003510204,0.002176408,0.00005892594,0.0001287106,0.0007048476,0.002268602,0.7939001,0.001785175,0.1636332,0.003145497,0.0005148315],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002443089,0.00005066706,0.9961929,0.0001909107,0.0001196649,0.0004075426,0.0000389021,0.000003984752,0.0005523764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3818073,0.00000184988,0.6179112,0.000160247,0.00003388387,0.000007251043,0.000001600818,0.000009222777,0.00006743713],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4971077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3602415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054451345","doi":"10.1007/s10985-008-9108-y","title":"Review and implementation of cure models based on first hitting times for Wiener processes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lifetime Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inverse Gaussian distribution; Computer science; Wiener process; Variety (cybernetics); Gaussian process; Inverse; Mixture model; Gaussian; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Applied mathematics; Process (computing); Class (philosophy); Maximization; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Maximum likelihood; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3148332102313453,"gpt":0.5538587081506247,"spread":0.2390254979192794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00643788,0.0005112365,0.003699296,0.00105408,0.0001795462,0.0002188516,0.002178846,0.0001711001,0.000672406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002717585,0.0003498536,0.0006653201,0.004703594,0.00007808853,0.0007154171,0.000355637,0.0001473705,0.00001970813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004499029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002866717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004838202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003716078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994118,0.0007119257,0.002192468,0.001579316,0.001097608,0.0003007118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907033,0.004139764,0.002033244,0.002574794,0.0004106045,0.0001382338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008400039,0.00007776015,0.000006971999,0.01826873,0.0007705559,8.337509e-7,0.00002475758,0.0004596338,1.796276e-7,0.00005918737,0.01988311,0.9604399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001784204,0.0001503055,0.000001562258,0.008676422,0.02280822,0.000001495286,0.00004764889,0.03663307,0.000006648952,0.0002815117,0.9307622,0.0004525071],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[6.077477e-8,0.9397576,0.05364706,0.0001961263,0.00001976048,0.00135901,0.004751225,0.00001981445,0.000249373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003191186,0.9035496,0.09059369,0.0003723258,0.00004801739,0.0001368502,0.005125769,0.00003018086,0.0001403751],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977717747","doi":"10.1063/1.2748617","title":"Weighted complex projective 2-designs from bases: Optimal state determination by orthogonal measurements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Physics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Queensland Government","keywords":"Orthonormal basis; Mutually unbiased bases; Abelian group; Dimension (graph theory); Prime (order theory); Projective test; State (computer science); Linear subspace; Constant (computer programming)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3189365063873684,"gpt":0.4689869735994283,"spread":0.1500504672120599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007714035,0.0002627504,0.0006841116,0.0001673527,0.0001207018,0.000222135,0.0007226569,0.00008174311,0.0005501329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001876416,0.0001838034,0.0003005201,0.0005681241,0.0001844634,0.0008320732,0.0001024751,0.0003405169,0.00014036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002112592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001287485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000298932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.39256e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935176,0.0006081763,0.001704673,0.0003221869,0.003482441,0.0003649028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932235,0.003772326,0.001297068,0.0003194121,0.001094108,0.0002936125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001386048,0.003239396,0.001012896,0.00002705859,0.0003011128,0.0001168353,0.005148092,0.0002102559,0.8080656,0.002345825,0.008014967,0.1701319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352654,0.001233477,0.002622333,0.0001650858,0.0001311765,0.00007222972,0.001662639,0.03640939,0.3416333,0.6123759,0.0007655748,0.0005763464],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513272,0.00003165511,0.7464122,0.00005824953,0.0001315508,0.0002152167,0.00003115276,0.00001251237,0.001780312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4580458,0.000001556479,0.5415081,0.0001322997,0.0001713268,0.000002703787,0.0000039345,0.0000248908,0.0001094857],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.61003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7495286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734623983","doi":"10.5709/acp-0214-z","title":"Varieties of Confidence Intervals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Statistics; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Population mean; Robust confidence intervals; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Computer science; Econometrics; Data mining; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3120979891867028,"gpt":0.6219433147655263,"spread":0.3098453255788235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002961952,0.0001445583,0.0004594879,0.0002263914,0.0001172759,0.0000818831,0.001430014,0.00009490932,0.0008816834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01359199,0.0001193963,0.00008604967,0.000180329,0.001703941,0.001081835,0.0002694074,0.0001869092,0.0001554903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001171732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002332688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000256656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005051364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974088,0.0005480014,0.0006995586,0.0006074065,0.0004822593,0.0002539507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953116,0.002885566,0.0005614447,0.000796527,0.0003895406,0.00005537188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009820504,0.0003201122,0.1189883,0.000009846815,0.00002535711,0.00007000918,0.001759575,0.00001592266,0.01598186,0.04130268,0.000278748,0.8202655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001662822,0.0007262184,0.19977,0.0001337093,0.000009163889,0.00003192606,0.002363893,0.000118938,0.04233975,0.7460121,0.006538772,0.0002927518],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2005608,0.006933577,0.3163048,0.0007606355,0.003055855,0.0004781403,0.00004116349,0.00002711336,0.471838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812736,0.0004595538,0.01717798,0.0005375323,0.00003398471,0.00003158632,6.456901e-7,0.000008586726,0.000476533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8199728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071064599","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.08.003","title":"Mixture designs and models for the simultaneous selection of ingredients and their ratios","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Raw material; Process engineering; Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Design of experiments; Computer science; Property (philosophy); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Mixture model; Biochemical engineering; Materials science; Biological system; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Statistics; Engineering; Thermodynamics; Organic chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1110223545161616,"gpt":0.3588083474859413,"spread":0.2477859929697797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002651342,0.0001797781,0.000344104,0.0004202401,0.0002027383,0.0003197321,0.0001952113,0.0001236972,0.000004286233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001722216,0.0001051804,0.00003877019,0.001927357,0.0001539865,0.000218532,0.00006764275,0.00008993208,7.136411e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000364498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003630511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004375121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002949245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982542,0.0001712683,0.0005918944,0.0003888282,0.0004151137,0.000178633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942107,0.004397953,0.0003019332,0.0002089151,0.0007986848,0.00008176554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007345372,0.000756082,0.02916145,0.000778017,0.0004384835,0.000007720506,0.008544055,0.06820402,0.645214,0.03960127,0.01246654,0.1940938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003195436,0.0004317541,0.0001618877,0.00003295702,0.00002479573,0.00001352548,0.003311229,0.7796847,0.201726,0.00289042,0.01116929,0.00023393],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3048182,0.0283195,0.6650413,0.00003517036,0.0004600728,0.001011309,0.00009740888,0.00002142691,0.0001955919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959037,0.0003317911,0.00331751,0.00003449289,0.00008862464,0.00003613206,0.000002209639,0.00001552065,0.0002699657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7114807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4289131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144125453","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2015.03.003","title":"Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Bayes factor; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Sample size determination; Null hypothesis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Posterior probability; Bayesian inference; Repeated measures design; Bayesian average; Econometrics; Bayesian hierarchical modeling","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6247835408792345,"gpt":0.5520142874432188,"spread":0.0727692534360157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01381051,0.000227919,0.0008219573,0.0004575014,0.00007655067,0.0001564987,0.001278525,0.0001286744,0.000169905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07202473,0.0001539724,0.0002430162,0.0006664257,0.0001885934,0.0002716397,0.00007120139,0.0002400965,0.0002210086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009081581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001422583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001284579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.970864e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950693,0.0009657572,0.001747209,0.0004430235,0.001364699,0.0004099869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863609,0.01020672,0.0009185584,0.0005371504,0.001352513,0.0006241633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003811957,0.002150782,0.002231536,0.00005062951,0.0003315442,0.0003122083,0.007670871,0.00191927,0.5071679,0.01146166,0.1392377,0.3236539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001790504,0.004503813,0.001064026,0.0001350476,0.00005488552,0.0008420093,0.001738138,0.00250052,0.02447138,0.9571002,0.005412458,0.0003870778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02494668,0.0001307104,0.9575857,0.002560489,0.0005530745,0.0004190601,0.000004951748,0.00002314515,0.01377623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2761238,0.000001174585,0.7222739,0.0008756763,0.0002437729,0.00002126781,5.552702e-8,0.0000270973,0.0004332868],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.935792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110742637","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-9876.2003.05029.x","title":"Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Restricted randomization; Plot (graphics); Factorial; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Design of experiments; Main effect; Statistics; Table (database); Computer science; Algorithm; Arithmetic; Data mining; Randomization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07178356171609879,"gpt":0.369274802522208,"spread":0.2974912408061092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002086731,0.0005805499,0.000996276,0.00008290734,0.000913245,0.0007327779,0.001370687,0.0002273125,0.0009899703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002065538,0.0003394638,0.0003575091,0.0005653996,0.00104174,0.0004840009,0.0003035449,0.001063821,0.00008379001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007312308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006384557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007352287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008106988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920789,0.0004450425,0.001752879,0.0006297088,0.004349898,0.0007435993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930364,0.003681768,0.001449735,0.0005468103,0.0007086974,0.0005765255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009952045,0.002856746,0.005503826,0.0001153907,0.002437799,0.0002968763,0.02013291,0.09731606,0.09114518,0.6441902,0.1155394,0.01051359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01660175,0.007401453,0.07162046,0.0003422602,0.001003182,0.0003241414,0.04097831,0.002784651,0.1119451,0.7008995,0.0424622,0.003636928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01521966,0.00006325923,0.9805551,0.0002869485,0.001748205,0.00040465,0.0008450557,0.00003856188,0.0008385159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3684084,0.000005083843,0.6304008,0.0002183407,0.0004161066,0.0000127548,0.00001442626,0.00006271343,0.0004614581],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3531887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902241019","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.033","title":"A new Bayesian approach to multi-response surface optimization integrating loss function with posterior probability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Bayesian optimization; Bayesian probability; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematical optimization; Multivariate statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3873727016503927,"gpt":0.486740999509749,"spread":0.09936829785935625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06228998,0.0001839094,0.0003012998,0.0005028056,0.0002763557,0.001142208,0.0009708447,0.00003545629,0.0002057355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01954625,0.0001177795,0.00008124208,0.001587398,0.0001544718,0.001145633,0.0002554339,0.0005855267,0.0001626655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003434246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001600708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000170833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002756976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810716,0.01276279,0.001071371,0.0004947035,0.004249495,0.0003500775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919962,0.001309842,0.0002656463,0.0004150046,0.005166068,0.0008472297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01532413,0.0003914237,0.001849656,0.00000402445,0.00003677802,0.00009373774,0.005418729,0.9307947,0.0287517,0.0004375924,0.005294857,0.01160269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01693009,0.03668132,0.05747248,0.0005389283,0.00005713489,0.003227124,0.04010072,0.8092034,0.0180798,0.001513235,0.01443265,0.001763084],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1647009,0.00006307018,0.8294302,0.001402131,0.0001405408,0.000434855,0.000003550036,0.00001064879,0.003814123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4091906,4.909356e-7,0.5888735,0.00008474848,0.0001268911,0.000001880054,0.000001811317,0.00002253721,0.001697573],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2444896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998682508","doi":"10.1080/01621459.2000.10474272","title":"Integer-Valued, Minimax Robust Designs for Estimation and Extrapolation in Heteroscedastic, Approximately Linear Models","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Mathematics; Minimax; Extrapolation; Polynomial regression; Integer (computer science); Mathematical optimization; Variance (accounting); Regression; Linear regression; Simulated annealing; Minification; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.162310535485618,"gpt":0.4370829804680685,"spread":0.2747724449824506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004733172,0.0001404666,0.0004747102,0.0001758671,0.0001103323,0.000168616,0.0003093254,0.00005818749,0.00005741967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547094,0.00009481218,0.0001111635,0.0005344274,0.0001384017,0.0005503477,0.00003140316,0.0002242605,0.000007328458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004000427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007420917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003764842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005739574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964612,0.0009065037,0.00108089,0.0002286269,0.001082145,0.0002406034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934017,0.004643064,0.001371654,0.0001537385,0.000328979,0.0001008448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002211308,0.0004691662,0.00941339,0.00001844871,0.00009179724,0.000006285049,0.001864264,0.3321851,0.008465904,0.007194828,0.002743137,0.6353363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006002901,0.0004398939,0.02208037,0.00002871306,0.00003559104,0.00001290783,0.0002596089,0.918671,0.0004120697,0.05729602,0.00005293875,0.0001106416],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1827263,0.00003310243,0.8162668,0.0004206198,0.0001134905,0.0002419153,0.00004669551,0.000005839636,0.0001451665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5209032,0.00001184881,0.4787678,0.0001274085,0.00004600448,0.000007105044,0.000001708425,0.00001033574,0.0001246168],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9035122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001620004","doi":"10.1002/qre.1298","title":"Ensemble of Surrogates for Dual Response Surface Modeling in Robust Parameter Design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Kriging; Parametric statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Basis function; Variance (accounting); Radial basis function; Ensemble forecasting; Function (biology); Regression; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial neural network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3270333269392578,"gpt":0.4503719677255961,"spread":0.1233386407863383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02066754,0.0001316365,0.0002975233,0.0001489471,0.00002962333,0.00005258147,0.0002378359,0.0001033446,0.00003513718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01771365,0.0001123913,0.00009599431,0.0001884551,0.00005301399,0.0004118175,0.00008946536,0.000122763,0.0000033834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008628188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003034235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006609753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001300778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974275,0.0006144884,0.0008334579,0.0003109031,0.0005725742,0.0002411006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882861,0.01101559,0.0001156559,0.0002585921,0.0002319837,0.00009204127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009129738,0.0001549631,0.0101139,0.00002050677,0.00001268849,2.257652e-7,0.0008513802,0.9440436,0.04161008,0.001788686,0.00002049914,0.000470442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000415269,0.00007199716,0.01545833,0.00002210648,0.000003510118,0.000003237455,0.0002253723,0.9573051,0.02321581,0.00299834,0.0001307669,0.0001502118],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5478636,0.00007824463,0.4513756,0.0001775614,0.0003025724,0.0001548267,0.00001453818,0.00001279903,0.00002030012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6684568,0.000003863709,0.3314224,0.00001263229,0.00002567503,0.00001331217,0.000001947798,0.000007146669,0.00005624911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1205932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194305686","doi":"10.1023/a:1019288220413","title":"Maximization of Manufacturing Yield of Systems with Arbitrary Distributions of Component Values","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of computation; Bounded function; Hypercube; Monte Carlo method; Mathematical optimization; Probability density function; Nonlinear system; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Function (biology); Random variable; Yield (engineering); Computer science; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4890581218960466,"gpt":0.5390253233917611,"spread":0.04996720149571454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004335475,0.00009099196,0.0003809317,0.0004488743,0.0001436658,0.00005635909,0.0005394144,0.000060196,0.0008130998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000819845,0.00006642669,0.00008376158,0.0009299661,0.0005356341,0.0003709786,0.00007927034,0.0001426238,0.0000120042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001337286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001562293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009106672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001264912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958913,0.0008344238,0.0009583235,0.0002469996,0.001863795,0.0002051035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963526,0.001215292,0.0001265681,0.0005961391,0.001631431,0.00007797206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009829028,0.002134815,0.003114894,0.000238739,0.00023186,0.000006994289,0.003032923,0.5470456,0.4013068,0.02345353,0.003229073,0.01522192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001676814,0.0005530567,0.006908783,0.0001590534,0.000005099046,0.00000375129,0.001187138,0.01695572,0.9730361,0.0008245536,0.0001284679,0.0000706053],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783577,0.0004966091,0.01391819,0.0003098703,0.00002724262,0.0004809664,0.0002128262,0.000006137822,0.006190505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845866,0.0001355582,0.01434573,0.000005161085,0.00001252524,0.00002269939,0.00002148942,0.000007808841,0.0008624367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8902873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095999217","doi":"","title":"Variational bounds for mixed-data factor analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Binary data; Categorical variable; Exponential family; Algorithm; Quadratic equation; Simple (philosophy); Binary number; Missing data; Upper and lower bounds; Exponential function; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Factor (programming language); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3099378766018399,"gpt":0.5271086331942241,"spread":0.2171707565923842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003869143,0.000113294,0.0002704502,0.0003541739,0.0001545656,0.0004980324,0.001739898,0.00009237334,0.01115843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005429323,0.00007795621,0.00018627,0.001245064,0.00007574261,0.0006247672,0.0003225453,0.0001042228,0.0002843713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001344445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000860927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004540874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001750413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975029,0.000130961,0.0004675569,0.0006629793,0.001029863,0.000205694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945728,0.003382404,0.0001394986,0.001494963,0.0002764905,0.0001338503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002005373,0.0005774639,0.07185369,0.000003789526,0.001255411,0.00000299147,0.0005441313,0.000323999,0.3606494,0.2679904,0.1315579,0.1650403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007450326,0.0001285329,0.1591155,6.678505e-7,0.000244523,0.00000392832,0.0003595354,0.5251324,0.02479785,0.07655941,0.2123967,0.0005159956],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03246647,0.00001226707,0.955208,0.0004972268,0.0009755783,0.000184112,0.0003831069,0.0000436965,0.01022957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3828995,2.492294e-7,0.6109343,0.0001710103,0.0001131093,0.00001332008,0.00006128782,0.000006314308,0.005800977],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5248083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012573364","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00711.x","title":"Robust Discrimination Designs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Neighbourhood (mathematics); Computer science; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Regression; Linear regression; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Algorithm; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3793253462304638,"gpt":0.4644865830517543,"spread":0.08516123682129051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01556285,0.0003931439,0.001130052,0.00009032072,0.0005110531,0.0003478596,0.001684084,0.00030215,0.001648549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06375954,0.0002258309,0.0006068167,0.00072384,0.001307548,0.0004240646,0.0002548399,0.001067522,0.00005491144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002613071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002248829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000169808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003015507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876405,0.00656549,0.002120439,0.0005581748,0.002431024,0.0006843545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736848,0.02332131,0.001085514,0.0005898725,0.0008217062,0.0004967883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001464759,0.0005605128,0.0005560867,0.00002527735,0.0002005695,0.0001295986,0.001801313,0.005322491,0.007457546,0.6490361,0.1409952,0.1924506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009647284,0.002366866,0.06852888,0.00004316093,0.0002789225,0.000274312,0.002234221,0.01533063,0.003270216,0.9003861,0.005849018,0.0004729556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001615585,0.000194182,0.989406,0.005302819,0.001424126,0.0002537733,0.0001401246,0.00002588619,0.001637462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05858833,0.00001778182,0.9382148,0.001624563,0.0003258186,0.000004083111,0.000003583602,0.00002420155,0.001196786],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.25135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076644634","doi":"10.3758/pbr.17.1.135","title":"Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Value (mathematics); Arithmetic; Statistics; Confidence interval; Relation (database); Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2783904230339247,"gpt":0.4936683544901512,"spread":0.2152779314562264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02154912,0.0003522824,0.00103527,0.0001370945,0.0002013494,0.0003348761,0.001725801,0.0001308391,0.00772532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01710639,0.0002748223,0.0005399149,0.0004043266,0.0001868925,0.0001382739,0.0001393116,0.000399272,0.003251984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004422087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007035123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002027639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001923572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947356,0.001013445,0.001923674,0.001170207,0.0006690166,0.0004880456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932441,0.003509133,0.0008699555,0.00159646,0.0005200444,0.0002603446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009835164,0.00005654481,0.0001570794,0.0003495062,0.00004027293,0.000003632082,0.0000869666,0.000002611274,0.07428189,0.003831955,0.2533735,0.6677176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003820848,0.00008745011,0.0001658406,0.001762757,0.00005011751,0.00005255493,0.00004411228,0.00009784641,0.004804314,0.004037089,0.9881331,0.0003827322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007770857,0.3025759,0.5274844,0.05705743,0.009691709,0.0114474,0.00009672495,0.0006501044,0.08322542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06673849,0.02222978,0.8814934,0.0186553,0.001270121,0.001212239,0.00001495333,0.0001715245,0.008214138],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7347596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965247940","doi":"10.2307/3315869","title":"Bounds on the maximum number of clear two‐factor interactions for 2<sup><i>m‐p</i></sup> designs of resolution III and IV","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Factor (programming language); Fractional factorial design; Resolution (logic); Mathematics; Upper and lower bounds; Combinatorics; Factorial experiment; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2183201231851042,"gpt":0.4065257131675449,"spread":0.1882055899824408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001385573,0.0001171325,0.0003100065,0.0002615145,0.0001935308,0.00010863,0.0003520234,0.00004616061,0.001628241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003356224,0.00008324439,0.00008887415,0.000278574,0.000353392,0.0001913976,0.00001531512,0.0002052946,0.00001519853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001253324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002397574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007889569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008883373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980324,0.0002990836,0.0008158446,0.0001416737,0.000484651,0.0002263635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946932,0.003481632,0.0006104297,0.0002349343,0.0006426327,0.0003371287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001535223,0.0004044449,0.008450942,0.00008092225,0.0005183105,0.0002033078,0.02983668,0.007922927,0.01018277,0.2645847,0.4888929,0.1873868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008388393,0.007957255,0.01305956,0.0007857078,0.0004771759,0.001637288,0.03162088,0.3617197,0.01597514,0.3796494,0.1773097,0.001419792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.301332,0.0004463848,0.6863183,0.001717146,0.0009505664,0.0005686106,0.002370642,0.000005064264,0.006291338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8302414,0.00001860951,0.1689651,0.0001663553,0.00006436411,0.000002232351,0.000001193385,0.00001453893,0.0005262325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5289094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168158999","doi":"10.1002/sim.3356","title":"Two‐stage design for dose‐finding that accounts for both efficacy and safety","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.347662342250195,"gpt":0.5197216396087865,"spread":0.1720592973585914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007135877,0.0002209699,0.0005895959,0.0003118919,0.0002841088,0.00004493769,0.0004151735,0.00007513678,0.0002035692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01386422,0.0001626722,0.00003125757,0.0003593129,0.0004927636,0.0001633283,0.00007675168,0.0001414776,0.000008149917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009646926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009244185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000405781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001165399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970332,0.0002902276,0.0007582186,0.0005775079,0.0009267807,0.0004141098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784201,0.02064208,0.0002606893,0.0003576505,0.0001610944,0.0001583578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01397061,0.00074481,0.02858442,0.0003042897,0.0001956052,0.0004389438,0.02936806,0.004161478,0.03871695,0.2682002,0.213393,0.4019216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08643343,0.009719736,0.1179888,0.0007835618,0.0002354665,0.0002197629,0.01381088,0.2300305,0.01508881,0.4333339,0.08980787,0.002547403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005485381,0.0004060037,0.9904995,0.0002026722,0.0005897167,0.001479968,0.0003226353,0.00002093211,0.0009931651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1429448,0.0001285734,0.8547421,0.0003415147,0.0001540768,0.00008471996,0.00002424947,0.00003010867,0.001549872],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3993742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104082640","doi":"10.1002/pst.483","title":"Additional results for ‘Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Theratechnologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bioequivalence; Crossover; Sample size determination; Statistics; Crossover study; Type I and type II errors; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Pharmacology; Artificial intelligence; Pharmacokinetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8859019112477156,"gpt":0.5762477195149607,"spread":0.3096541917327549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003572407,0.0003287175,0.0004718461,0.0001207598,0.0003945016,0.0001903087,0.0006521198,0.00009237118,0.002965274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01371136,0.0002311937,0.0001159436,0.0003384704,0.001055186,0.0002676624,0.0001299261,0.0001544623,0.00008714548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001771452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000218801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001783932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960055,0.0004802803,0.0008702521,0.0009015109,0.001092489,0.0006500178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745771,0.02361286,0.0003139712,0.0003507526,0.0008409287,0.0003043883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02612999,0.0007628513,0.0000266126,0.0001057121,0.0004658889,0.00004089857,0.001869147,0.0007008105,0.001747026,0.1159482,0.7650716,0.08713125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01020024,0.004330629,0.0002301054,0.00009376231,0.0004897055,0.0000561542,0.001300187,0.2287255,0.11606,0.4899949,0.147058,0.001460892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004112441,0.0002288968,0.947814,0.00008327632,0.0003020517,0.001498242,0.04912106,0.00005460373,0.0008567678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01161774,0.00001882546,0.9854012,0.0003040605,0.0001802599,0.001099433,0.0003465071,0.0000403833,0.0009915975],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6180137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080431129","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.12303","title":"<i>Q</i><sub>ST</sub>–<i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> comparisons with unbalanced half‐sib designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology Resources","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05057743418490428,"gpt":0.3419944330701836,"spread":0.2914169988852793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004899491,0.000894921,0.001604969,0.0007014795,0.0007877018,0.0005781789,0.002326286,0.0006105475,0.0001691468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002245903,0.0007321631,0.0004395376,0.00179929,0.001359454,0.0003635587,0.000653511,0.0008287452,0.001005814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001774539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001681227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002326549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001536038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889085,0.00388545,0.00143648,0.002147637,0.002045747,0.001576155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928281,0.003050226,0.000881326,0.002054237,0.0004819345,0.0007041973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004581035,0.0003995045,0.006629011,0.00001407148,0.0001789822,0.0002578233,0.0005928589,0.004471228,0.9720014,0.0009797363,0.008234146,0.005783085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236116,0.001775109,0.01538433,0.00004701948,0.0001373649,0.0001783314,0.0006437955,0.007432206,0.9449739,0.00243346,0.0235079,0.001125428],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893914,0.000511239,0.1006171,0.0009442481,0.0004403819,0.0008459167,0.00002981794,0.0002855749,0.006934335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655793,0.00001946817,0.03077492,0.002966782,0.0001483879,0.000217045,0.00002562511,0.0001441213,0.0001243792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07618786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091280909","doi":"10.1080/02664760903301127","title":"Bayesian and likelihood inference for cure rates based on defective inverse Gaussian regression models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Gibbs sampling; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Bayesian inference; Econometrics; Bayesian linear regression; Mathematics; Inference; Regression; Biostatistics; Mixture model; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06860073087418259,"gpt":0.4269199345563927,"spread":0.3583192036822102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002653504,0.0002094912,0.0004331876,0.0003152258,0.000170728,0.0002265221,0.0003771318,0.0001391181,0.00009024874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002051041,0.0001380259,0.00007644561,0.0002539548,0.0001664173,0.0002265816,0.00005153085,0.0005008054,0.000007247213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003816578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002272291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002404272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001290886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.0001297636,0.0007198938,0.0002997674,0.0009330348,0.0002426742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935102,0.004597816,0.0007968126,0.0002859896,0.000505593,0.0003035526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007810959,0.001026646,0.001767486,0.00008925852,0.0001209318,0.0001192725,0.005073522,0.02633001,0.2252453,0.3401343,0.04442031,0.347862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001337075,0.0007317006,0.0004749321,0.00004170607,0.00003258339,0.00001020274,0.0006657892,0.4301445,0.01475296,0.5510386,0.0005779291,0.0001919341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01046056,0.00001514184,0.9857051,0.000142544,0.0003742512,0.000293698,0.0001298157,0.000007841176,0.002871092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4785246,0.000006428171,0.5211922,0.0001752505,0.00006205484,0.000006506622,0.000001885203,0.00001278577,0.00001831116],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.468064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5628535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973746593","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asz043","title":"Column-orthogonal strong orthogonal arrays of strength two plus and three minus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Orthogonality; Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Column (typography); Property (philosophy); Orthogonal functions; Combinatorics; Orthogonal basis; Space (punctuation); Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Statistics; Computer science; Connection (principal bundle); Taguchi methods","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1184559223021082,"gpt":0.4147318128645278,"spread":0.2962758905624197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003217063,0.0002590129,0.0006463635,0.001380767,0.00008516681,0.0001890719,0.0007590753,0.0001266656,0.002075538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001228563,0.0002121049,0.000186923,0.003521285,0.0003236972,0.0003754874,0.0003663177,0.0001685734,0.0002812004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007671911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001885648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007399344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003904091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956328,0.0002689927,0.0008694106,0.0007859154,0.002014645,0.0004282509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962161,0.002097582,0.0004244095,0.0007284496,0.0002738069,0.0002596293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007488611,0.000444895,0.4249418,0.00004157002,0.0001831914,0.00003629455,0.0004767295,0.0002160076,0.2449684,0.03522621,0.001988664,0.2907274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01536258,0.004872262,0.7012211,0.0001816331,0.000148187,0.0001966129,0.004191662,0.04388448,0.1715712,0.02666096,0.0290975,0.00261175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685297,0.001149861,0.0200888,0.000035727,0.0006802217,0.0004188901,0.0001425563,0.00003238628,0.008921871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9013624,0.000009104752,0.09714448,0.00003859474,0.00008477409,0.000009152992,0.000008811779,0.0000213779,0.001321275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2881156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078249808","doi":"10.1198/jasa.2009.0119","title":"Screening Experiments for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Computer science; Treatment effect; Factorial; Design of experiments; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Medicine; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1221508952870196,"gpt":0.4961811498570252,"spread":0.3740302545700056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002444586,0.0001334941,0.0004796273,0.000118846,0.0001823996,0.0001669252,0.0004473521,0.00003143113,0.00001634269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007091734,0.00007724363,0.0002208327,0.0004536202,0.00006502683,0.0002084779,0.00003100138,0.0001012556,0.000006849025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001192422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001243778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001121635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001073442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968966,0.0006134523,0.0008200403,0.0001848784,0.001232678,0.0002523133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933329,0.003774046,0.002242424,0.0001866471,0.0003792248,0.00008479656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007676568,0.0002906135,0.007806007,0.000001446431,0.0002391066,0.000009385299,0.001013071,0.0003650033,0.03110911,0.008203857,0.01130411,0.9388906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004184469,0.007686215,0.6891676,0.000118426,0.0003035532,0.00007473346,0.004877194,0.02507039,0.04167277,0.2091181,0.01694449,0.0007821683],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0854026,0.00007955555,0.9088184,0.004843088,0.0003359183,0.000210357,0.00003000425,0.000008866235,0.0002711766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4697489,0.00001029954,0.5288751,0.0005568006,0.00007048492,0.000003582939,9.190695e-7,0.000006947008,0.0007269392],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8489981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124704652","doi":"10.1115/1.1829728","title":"A Model-Based Formulation of Robust Design","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Design matrix; Probabilistic design; Computer science; Design of experiments; Norm (philosophy); Isotropy; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering design process; Engineering; Machine learning; Regression analysis; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.384120982725377,"gpt":0.4468542260209646,"spread":0.0627332432955876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01747728,0.0002090538,0.0006886659,0.0005030229,0.00007528679,0.00009775893,0.001034344,0.000192049,0.0003712273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004999444,0.0001470605,0.0004046662,0.000683239,0.00005207468,0.0007791647,0.00006084186,0.0003078987,0.00004713693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000157117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003840203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001126054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.555237e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993429,0.00159188,0.002037949,0.000286989,0.002358686,0.0002955174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992832,0.004057931,0.001446632,0.000441297,0.0009421377,0.0002800209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008343055,0.0002140872,0.000003454876,0.000002182585,0.00001715569,0.000007148589,0.0000642645,0.7568233,0.2121953,0.002536657,0.001717322,0.02558487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008145041,0.0008155486,0.00001259289,0.00002906554,0.00002660977,0.00002561836,0.0000344459,0.6698631,0.2948322,0.03334682,0.00009411803,0.0001053229],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002742939,0.0001979544,0.9958397,0.0004918811,0.000193011,0.0002823183,0.000002031728,0.00001343342,0.0002366999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4598762,0.000004631338,0.5397952,0.0001587595,0.00007564649,0.000002287918,1.03457e-7,0.00001330211,0.00007391717],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4571333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083839279","doi":"10.1198/004017007000000038","title":"Incorporating Prior Information in Optimal Design for Model Selection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Interpretability; Bayesian information criterion; Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Prior probability; Bayesian probability; Model selection; Hellinger distance; Machine learning; Identification (biology); Design of experiments; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.214121415020881,"gpt":0.4495098550792087,"spread":0.2353884400583277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01595649,0.0001420012,0.0002317745,0.004548046,0.0001356565,0.0002076095,0.0005131824,0.0001858552,0.00001124891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01267918,0.0001281245,0.00006626178,0.01074741,0.00004845509,0.001443481,0.0001001916,0.0001846526,0.00003897474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000331651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009877978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007816485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002091612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974188,0.00005416389,0.0009785307,0.0002829124,0.000929598,0.0003359606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969063,0.001991142,0.0003985731,0.0002622111,0.0003633773,0.00007838851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002683284,0.0001344327,0.002499468,0.00000985681,0.000004510731,0.000001221023,0.0004419253,0.3485863,0.01695369,0.01220232,0.0006528465,0.6182451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005073551,0.0002201285,0.0006106996,0.000004931433,0.000002820283,0.000003616632,0.0004570906,0.9215321,0.05575415,0.020386,0.0003505315,0.0001705463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06615272,0.00004207562,0.9316128,0.00003131581,0.00008998001,0.0007781978,0.000004616456,0.0001313948,0.001156883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4386746,0.000001070566,0.5611628,0.0000428595,0.00001174368,0.00003185014,0.000001867193,0.000007352762,0.00006586518],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6180746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188071017","doi":"10.1080/16843703.2009.11673206","title":"Finding Design Space and a Reliable Operating Region Using a Multivariate Bayesian Approach with Experimental Design","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Technology & Quantitative Management","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Regina","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Bayesian probability; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Engineering design process; Product (mathematics); Multivariate statistics; Quality by Design; Grid; Bayesian optimization; Data mining; Reliability engineering; Machine learning; New product development; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Power (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3813962571045307,"gpt":0.4967356325960857,"spread":0.1153393754915549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007445628,0.0004980045,0.0007749468,0.001097356,0.0007045935,0.0004190663,0.0008057968,0.0002230675,0.00002049015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007751338,0.0003952996,0.00007889771,0.002205301,0.0005868847,0.0006898197,0.0003761203,0.0003523855,0.00001739916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002666343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004502749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006253905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.123677e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938081,0.001976452,0.0009754992,0.001544607,0.001006735,0.0006886133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997278,0.0008869797,0.000597022,0.0009167083,0.0001867649,0.0001345686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001074069,0.0009318994,0.0009846959,0.00003376008,0.0002553128,0.0002307153,0.006332727,0.02410556,0.1640888,0.7890512,0.0003379293,0.01257331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00447131,0.005534183,0.001662362,0.0003408029,0.0001423135,0.0001737553,0.1372188,0.5733609,0.1870428,0.08803095,0.0002074916,0.001814376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04845319,0.0005910464,0.9450485,0.0007545641,0.00005932911,0.001734434,0.000001447311,0.0002727298,0.00308478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4487439,0.000006898894,0.5508199,0.0001287321,0.000005932493,0.00006417266,8.3976e-7,0.00002058895,0.0002089762],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7010203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048882670","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.08.015","title":"A powerful estimation scheme with the error-in-variables-model for nonlinear cases: Reactivity ratio estimation examples","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; Fraction (chemistry); Focus (optics); Computer science; Estimation; Scheme (mathematics); Algorithm; Estimation theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Iterative method; Applied mathematics; Engineering; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0938544274180493,"gpt":0.3726196765032083,"spread":0.278765249085159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912782,0.0002373496,0.0003148648,0.0001326984,0.00006610306,0.0001639612,0.0004259672,0.0000959836,0.000008015895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001655965,0.0001660552,0.00008075083,0.0004954347,0.00006013127,0.0008214734,0.0001140666,0.0002101508,0.00001157151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001667603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005088592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001113554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.426855e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.00005880405,0.0004182179,0.0003842255,0.0005401656,0.0004152588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996139,0.003049352,0.0001409647,0.0004353657,0.00009590836,0.0001394239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007644813,0.00009119134,0.0000758505,0.00001889548,0.00001318172,0.000001783459,0.0007768858,0.8389709,0.152042,0.001145839,0.0003166769,0.006470378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003921177,0.00003332779,0.00008518827,0.00004172849,0.000009723359,0.00002966587,0.00004859391,0.9532484,0.04555556,0.0001500614,0.0001990415,0.0002065866],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.198492,0.00005742639,0.8006802,0.0001427729,0.0001409973,0.0003670304,0.000007042451,0.00006948345,0.00004306202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4811927,2.112992e-7,0.5186336,0.00004275044,0.00005622302,0.00003477192,0.00001121571,0.00001653341,0.00001192831],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2827007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6771533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097065132","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asaa089","title":"A method of constructing maximin distance designs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Distance measures; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Construct (python library); Class (philosophy); Computer experiment; Optimal design; Computer science; Algorithm; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4146035653202773,"gpt":0.4987667399126151,"spread":0.0841631745923378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003847949,0.0001606465,0.0004984083,0.000614778,0.00005890684,0.0001074648,0.0008694357,0.00008173326,0.000790291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009872567,0.0001275223,0.0001723663,0.007507237,0.0002112285,0.000224264,0.0002082907,0.0001087702,0.000164062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003459595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006735316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009848641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.307449e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963944,0.0006878523,0.0008317307,0.000574927,0.001249809,0.0002612953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995199,0.003503475,0.0004274765,0.0004047065,0.0002229009,0.0002424172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000992526,0.00003510528,0.003408927,0.00001004901,0.00001967598,0.000009992129,0.00063854,0.000008542961,0.6027223,0.003785185,0.001268547,0.3879938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006440013,0.0003958346,0.0005377328,0.00001566746,0.00001697137,0.00002216525,0.004513965,0.004306688,0.9571407,0.003035824,0.02907293,0.000297501],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01051893,0.0005128207,0.9807139,0.0004918639,0.000187593,0.0001966862,0.00003799001,0.00004822951,0.00729196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2842655,0.000003367853,0.7153772,0.00019464,0.00004331381,0.000004304483,7.160722e-7,0.00001145273,0.00009957046],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3876964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069118402","doi":"10.1007/s11336-014-9422-0","title":"On the Asymptotic Relative Efficiency of Planned Missingness Designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Missing data; Mathematics; Latent variable; Regression analysis; Efficiency; Sample size determination; Latent variable model; Regression; Set (abstract data type); Linear regression; Econometrics; Variable (mathematics); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2177927608237771,"gpt":0.4436560650062292,"spread":0.225863304182452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009043328,0.0002034153,0.0003989077,0.0008207982,0.0002101598,0.0001383895,0.001335611,0.00009760136,0.0009165765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155631,0.0001132951,0.0001795874,0.004212299,0.0003074744,0.0001788706,0.00007338438,0.00021888,0.0006582824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000404014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003239516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004353087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.205988e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951721,0.001508339,0.0007001036,0.0005606874,0.001738184,0.0003205554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701863,0.02803238,0.0004104849,0.001027895,0.000210731,0.0001322126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002246517,0.002727043,0.02140242,0.00002686781,0.0001899642,0.000007882151,0.006477767,0.001705825,0.1175199,0.5585734,0.04813561,0.2409868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003640495,0.008364165,0.08381246,0.0002594978,0.00007340871,0.00002376308,0.002594776,0.02369199,0.2723637,0.5899833,0.01387432,0.001318104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4235824,0.0003448637,0.4185736,0.001144061,0.001222534,0.0005518478,0.000009819018,0.0000601873,0.1545107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793056,0.000002696351,0.0187526,0.0003512974,0.00004479337,0.00001309853,5.698965e-7,0.00001833181,0.001510976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5557232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135683075","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.04.003","title":"Application of desirability function for optimizing the performance characteristics of carbonitrided bushes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Response surface methodology; Function (biology); Variable (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Hardness; Surface (topology); Materials science; Computer science; Process engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Composite material; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1164876662519134,"gpt":0.3698494016880249,"spread":0.2533617354361115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001888152,0.00009157026,0.000257971,0.0002891828,0.00004012014,0.00007557871,0.0006074815,0.00006476491,0.00001759307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00287824,0.00006570921,0.0001525278,0.0003195226,0.00006202488,0.0003581039,0.00004591109,0.0001678543,0.000001992152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007728515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001056272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002091732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.477925e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977525,0.00008054062,0.001218684,0.0001082395,0.0007516844,0.00008830822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940404,0.002384183,0.001044976,0.0001484063,0.002337718,0.00004434784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001835912,0.0001089435,0.006374147,0.000007963679,0.0001563963,2.218097e-7,0.0002888355,0.8060001,0.07588068,0.001347612,0.0001393727,0.1095121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001034442,0.0003509828,0.04167762,0.00007989453,0.00004621177,0.00001831151,0.0002812647,0.920156,0.03446908,0.001438739,0.0003351512,0.0001122706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.476863,0.00001705132,0.5218862,0.0001714282,0.0008362394,0.0001986647,0.000009024811,0.000004397077,0.00001397233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384704,0.000003231207,0.06116346,0.00001144396,0.0003162309,0.00001688819,0.000003866309,0.000007966268,0.000006485578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4616074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.344573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998973039","doi":"10.2307/3316099","title":"Robust sequential designs for nonlinear regression","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Nonlinear regression; Parametric statistics; Computer science; Inference; Nonlinear system; Regression; Algorithm; Regression analysis; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.43052303994889,"gpt":0.4281379789056735,"spread":0.002385061043216508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002070515,0.000135007,0.0003152154,0.0004218057,0.0002292716,0.0002794396,0.0006046036,0.00008275874,0.002456952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005791555,0.0001019765,0.0001126224,0.0003107513,0.0001667459,0.0002426453,0.0000135563,0.0001853481,0.00007867548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001758116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000513254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001937211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009188734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977683,0.0002401982,0.0008142056,0.0001835705,0.0006496735,0.0003440095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996176,0.001332929,0.0005036822,0.0002311592,0.000896422,0.0008598069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008401054,0.00005479736,0.0009145874,0.00001184858,0.00005231565,0.0007660451,0.001444119,0.002917852,0.003690988,0.007777561,0.8340095,0.1482763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004040811,0.003206478,0.001186708,0.0002614687,0.0001975062,0.001344247,0.002808258,0.3168595,0.01412943,0.07906406,0.5757455,0.001156063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001955581,0.0005801212,0.993769,0.0003731715,0.00135835,0.0001485926,0.0007146858,0.000003438829,0.001097043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04047079,0.00001618107,0.9568779,0.0002272338,0.0003303969,0.000001770537,0.000004481771,0.00002204614,0.002049169],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3139416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068618230","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(99)00185-8","title":"Crossover designs for two-treatment clinical trials","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Crossover study; Mathematics; Repeated measures design; Clinical trial; Statistics; Sample size determination; Design of experiments; Optimal design; Sequential analysis; Treatment and control groups; Clinical study design; Computer science; Medicine; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7098386298084299,"gpt":0.672377921310636,"spread":0.03746070849779393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01626038,0.0001522756,0.0009337456,0.00009720597,0.0001334544,0.0003706447,0.0002532061,0.00008214239,0.001263815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03169401,0.00008874269,0.0001856388,0.0001172166,0.0002451774,0.0002889296,0.00002044468,0.0001888658,0.00003649892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003430561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001593636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000728087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.931773e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953322,0.001412546,0.002147434,0.0002650507,0.0006109321,0.0002318346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520695,0.04653335,0.0006316298,0.0001565398,0.0002747634,0.0003342648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003218303,0.000278601,0.009905938,0.000004371524,0.0001024114,0.00009292165,0.0005152105,0.0008180674,0.001333603,0.008902488,0.00903574,0.9657924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02799615,0.03354097,0.1129515,0.0005198724,0.0006630694,0.0006768259,0.00182569,0.08983385,0.00597553,0.600633,0.1239445,0.001439092],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08902163,0.0005379848,0.9076267,0.0001387687,0.0003579361,0.0001970104,0.0001070912,0.000007419201,0.002005399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6173777,0.00005684201,0.3814595,0.0001864719,0.000255707,0.000004551997,0.000001598672,0.000007717722,0.0006499065],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099320460","doi":"10.1002/sim.6523","title":"Adaptive sampling in two‐phase designs: a biomarker study for progression in arthritis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Estimator; Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Exploit; Adaptive sampling; Optimal design; Sample size determination; Phase (matter); Biomarker; Resource allocation; Statistics; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5332255921247048,"gpt":0.6223730082861888,"spread":0.08914741616148403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681547,0.0002189865,0.0006904062,0.000936709,0.00004038219,0.00004562034,0.0004157151,0.00005715426,0.00009064612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02275156,0.0001645401,0.00002063214,0.001445801,0.0002559694,0.0001788721,0.0001139775,0.0002351264,0.00001343715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002439845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001673373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004204844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001370751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950075,0.001178837,0.00135897,0.0006596996,0.001375219,0.0004197959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933094,0.005585012,0.0002466503,0.0003700105,0.0002906165,0.0001983057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003311131,0.002182264,0.05219485,0.00001034054,0.00001402821,0.0007217414,0.01972146,0.0004948592,0.002937945,0.004077883,0.003632787,0.9107007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08519574,0.01592045,0.04915426,0.001959624,0.00002886716,0.00003102818,0.1176389,0.2505443,0.000721098,0.4770866,0.0008112194,0.0009079779],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1043509,0.001606732,0.8900298,0.0001457448,0.0005935245,0.002568183,0.00008724842,0.00001852951,0.0005993692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5425953,0.00001357011,0.4570244,0.00005603696,0.00004182171,0.0002119647,0.000009784405,0.00001515714,0.00003196095],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048504327","doi":"10.1002/aic.17021","title":"Using prior parameter knowledge in <scp>model‐based</scp> design of experiments for pharmaceutical production","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIChE Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Fisher information; Computation; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Selection (genetic algorithm); Bayesian information criterion; Invertible matrix; Prior information; Sequential analysis; Design of experiments; Algorithm; Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Model selection; Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6399688166531778,"gpt":0.5589323547005753,"spread":0.0810364619526025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005473673,0.0002051249,0.0004487169,0.0002851388,0.0001336735,0.0001483931,0.0005716475,0.0001123886,0.00005642097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009402196,0.0001634309,0.0001935991,0.000731855,0.0001239818,0.0005525965,0.00009765608,0.0003622307,0.00002128299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001439867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003524847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.708992e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.248335e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962264,0.000988248,0.001051201,0.0004768522,0.0008587127,0.0003985549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961745,0.002481442,0.0004288529,0.0002331213,0.0003729542,0.0003090955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770661,0.0002868451,0.000449994,0.00001477955,0.00002590963,0.000006423843,0.003262616,0.1429141,0.8391071,0.00004115005,0.003195659,0.01041833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007529481,0.0002123292,0.00003459704,0.00002308864,0.00001740107,0.00001784533,0.0007228044,0.5435487,0.4530412,0.001102321,0.0004753531,0.00005138831],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2198454,0.0007135333,0.7781219,0.0002625374,0.0004117595,0.0005139324,0.000002712934,0.00001256623,0.0001156042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4216004,0.000006884689,0.5778939,0.0002396861,0.00016593,0.00001560012,2.492278e-7,0.00002036522,0.00005700999],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4006346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076423843","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asr071","title":"Optimal fractions of two-level factorials under a baseline parameterization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Baseline (sea); Context (archaeology); Isomorphism (crystallography); Factorial experiment; Orthogonal array; Optimal design; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5168909803614168,"gpt":0.4891589472899692,"spread":0.02773203307144761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00425404,0.0001738397,0.0004011538,0.001690217,0.00008448691,0.00008350651,0.0005790103,0.0001191894,0.004102022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006341956,0.000135546,0.0001693586,0.004904062,0.0001621286,0.0004753603,0.0001339355,0.0000876184,0.0003381811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000559507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007951918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000192194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001940914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965553,0.0006449618,0.0009260071,0.0004694606,0.00115947,0.0002447449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961221,0.002170341,0.0004767331,0.0006412956,0.0004343141,0.0001552013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002162063,0.0006630386,0.004240252,0.000004860481,0.00007266514,0.000003971011,0.000686714,0.0002645715,0.9514441,0.004079523,0.000852153,0.03747186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001036045,0.0005215742,0.02654849,0.00001332987,0.0000377774,0.000008671318,0.0008414504,0.003166404,0.9571823,0.007636704,0.002652262,0.0003549269],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2259243,0.000124607,0.7696459,0.00002805957,0.00121691,0.0002154343,0.0001169045,0.00004166985,0.002686246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5743217,0.000006530527,0.4251138,0.00004407215,0.00007435425,0.000009204127,0.000006757511,0.00001206518,0.000411492],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3483975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963676859","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550340404","title":"Some robust design strategies for percentile estimation in binary response models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Minimax; Binary number; Mathematical optimization; Estimation; Computer science; Estimation theory; Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2014466815106305,"gpt":0.3944487031194451,"spread":0.1930020216088146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006697822,0.0001360608,0.0003274771,0.0008661293,0.0001335474,0.0004789275,0.0004568199,0.00007635602,0.0001262029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00242051,0.0001185437,0.00006885456,0.0003544786,0.0001391183,0.001043061,0.000009700692,0.0001506063,0.00001270656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003408113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002715922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001448218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001945019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970726,0.0007518177,0.001090345,0.0001892477,0.0005691128,0.0003268868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954792,0.003042085,0.0004405994,0.000201658,0.0005346025,0.000301853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003668505,0.00002158053,0.00007643893,0.000003694284,0.000004647569,0.0002071812,0.0005050138,0.9282731,0.002048105,0.036064,0.03007481,0.002354562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003502474,0.0003226766,0.003044129,0.00002172842,0.000008057375,0.00004026577,0.001330228,0.5315542,0.0002176599,0.4627301,0.0002688048,0.000111912],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03109124,0.0003906629,0.9673536,0.000180459,0.0003613936,0.0002175354,0.0002740035,0.000002777286,0.0001282823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4015892,0.0000024541,0.5980772,0.0000459605,0.00004585801,0.000003524115,0.000003861774,0.00001210126,0.0002199214],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4266661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4834071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545991974","doi":"10.1109/nsspw.2006.4378829","title":"SMC Samplers for Bayesian Optimal Nonlinear Design","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software deployment; Monte Carlo method; Bayesian probability; Nonlinear system; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian experimental design; Bayesian network; Machine learning; Bayesian inference; Bayesian statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Software engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.217923709102971,"gpt":0.4595369197990576,"spread":0.2416132106960866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004176128,0.0002181321,0.0003461933,0.0002320955,0.0001957071,0.0003556388,0.0007955991,0.0001105541,0.001825045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001240828,0.00015971,0.0002280218,0.0005858156,0.0001352161,0.0003700666,0.00009375287,0.00008198679,0.0003450825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005892838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000881466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008818522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968417,0.0003407354,0.0007170385,0.0006763425,0.000951009,0.0004731543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952734,0.003736418,0.0001493671,0.0004637547,0.0002289775,0.0001480661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001110754,0.0008712325,0.001478338,0.00001115912,0.00006520523,0.00003039464,0.0004427195,0.07576691,0.3494013,0.06311375,0.3872394,0.1204688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001628081,0.0007566039,0.0008570757,0.000006899577,0.00002130965,0.00002155499,0.0009121842,0.5345176,0.30879,0.0533081,0.09847537,0.0007052401],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002415373,0.00007817276,0.9786049,0.0003702518,0.0002497882,0.0006417815,0.00002206877,0.0001119447,0.01750573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0362156,7.8712e-7,0.9516937,0.0003429047,0.0002248576,0.00006313076,0.00000611158,0.00002973008,0.01142324],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4587507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125878398","doi":"10.1002/mren.200900033","title":"Design of Optimal Sequential Experiments to Improve Model Predictions from a Polyethylene Molecular Weight Distribution Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Reaction Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Maxima and minima; Design of experiments; Optimal design; Estimation theory; Computer science; Experimental data; Work (physics); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05081623766829962,"gpt":0.3529426931396546,"spread":0.302126455471355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009132262,0.0003749348,0.0004613169,0.0003373174,0.0001030016,0.0001358428,0.0005614098,0.0001977125,0.00003019255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004533233,0.0003859896,0.0002377376,0.0007458029,0.0000339302,0.0004790534,0.0001297226,0.0002518506,0.00003048455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003177247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008957992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003768893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.040463e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963244,0.000165587,0.000872585,0.0008392861,0.00133155,0.0004665673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982738,0.0001071775,0.0002264367,0.0008297096,0.0002390247,0.000323805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978166,0.00006986842,4.598013e-7,8.890063e-7,0.00002345801,0.00000931701,0.0001478307,0.4896799,0.5087999,0.0002732758,0.00005081167,0.0008744574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002603042,0.0001171009,0.00001649593,0.00001281895,0.00002215756,0.000005366116,0.00002332418,0.5140201,0.4847806,0.0005390755,0.00002573791,0.0001768931],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1444887,0.0001469329,0.8540338,0.00009051946,0.0002941647,0.0004978487,0.0001313715,0.0001935009,0.0001230951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6385943,0.000004549134,0.3611223,0.00006047475,0.00003642773,0.00005201943,0.00004220891,0.00003156392,0.00005619361],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4941055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088655298","doi":"10.1198/004017004000000176","title":"The Design of Blocked Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Blocking (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Plackett–Burman design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Restricted randomization; Design of experiments; Statistics; Plot (graphics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Randomization; Artificial intelligence; Response surface methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.30237494260827,"gpt":0.4710541812441454,"spread":0.1686792386358754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004198939,0.0001908218,0.0003113057,0.001027231,0.0003003037,0.0001833107,0.001469428,0.0001575859,0.0001755386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103959,0.0001220402,0.000144346,0.006124789,0.0003160812,0.0002699916,0.0002532004,0.0002280858,0.0001999251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002438586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001479396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003019057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.811452e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956998,0.0001776318,0.000820713,0.0004383604,0.002534509,0.0003290046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945037,0.003767236,0.0004207361,0.0008564538,0.0003403127,0.0001115222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001039988,0.001909177,0.003258121,0.000007983871,0.0001897556,0.00002537408,0.001190646,0.01116623,0.5727378,0.2099775,0.007544029,0.1909534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001674945,0.0007224777,0.00224813,0.00001117042,0.00001635186,0.00001159157,0.001080243,0.0008136627,0.7639751,0.206405,0.02264703,0.000394291],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05311438,0.001182956,0.9408087,0.0001686103,0.001765431,0.0005832852,0.00001593494,0.0001466783,0.00221405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7703283,0.00003605827,0.2291466,0.00002907006,0.000105659,0.00003660619,9.42583e-7,0.00001992702,0.0002968599],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7172139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140217706","doi":"10.1348/000711003321645412","title":"Pairwise multiple comparisons: A model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Selection (genetic algorithm); Normality; Model selection; Multiple comparisons problem; Set (abstract data type); Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Computer science; Econometrics; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2715206547783738,"gpt":0.4866960714425734,"spread":0.2151754166641996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004214033,0.0002199207,0.001033768,0.0001494682,0.0001521193,0.0002721469,0.0004868354,0.0001689518,0.0004544082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01908389,0.0001808818,0.0001403566,0.0002566504,0.0006746527,0.000207851,0.0000668162,0.0005538597,0.00005319386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002603101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008966122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002092263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002842764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951512,0.001102604,0.001776594,0.00046508,0.001087768,0.000416742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930182,0.005416847,0.0004818027,0.0002563735,0.0003183979,0.0005084319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004841383,0.01062352,0.00290718,0.0002743962,0.0003540334,0.0008753542,0.001853881,0.00194995,0.001647909,0.6336246,0.2053784,0.1356693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008575572,0.001771056,0.003664838,0.0001494341,0.0001291212,0.006980786,0.002424435,0.2827255,0.0001210897,0.6909167,0.001949166,0.000592271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02812224,0.001523545,0.9566978,0.0001153947,0.0002180462,0.0002138967,0.00003849315,0.00001526223,0.01305528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4780823,0.00003499978,0.5216356,0.0001206705,0.00002226563,0.000006821894,9.648272e-7,0.00001272582,0.00008370102],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.44996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156197192","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.02_101.x","title":"Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed Models","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Mathematics; Allowance (engineering); Normality; Econometrics; Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2841348147446454,"gpt":0.4782819453410699,"spread":0.1941471305964245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002871004,0.0001652458,0.0005671565,0.0003260365,0.0000968808,0.0001129211,0.0007338555,0.00007164495,0.00008416528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002953797,0.0001241108,0.0001766894,0.0004613947,0.0002106012,0.0004275783,0.00005307512,0.0001597513,0.00001211444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001230921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002503305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001002685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003996899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967848,0.0001551709,0.001344805,0.000206948,0.0012355,0.0002727456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953761,0.001713663,0.001186025,0.000289438,0.001178542,0.0002562291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002470204,0.001404701,0.006036699,0.0001520693,0.0003419316,0.000440437,0.006466852,0.09793715,0.05423578,0.5483533,0.03384184,0.2483191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002344651,0.001720806,0.002740211,0.0001592735,0.00005946705,0.0001828987,0.001254282,0.002747498,0.01888824,0.9692949,0.0003950286,0.0002127613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212615,0.0003759424,0.9653016,0.0001173609,0.000901749,0.0001847034,0.0003843955,0.000004923348,0.0006031436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4863736,0.00001514179,0.5133697,0.00002506675,0.00006250521,0.000001953935,0.00000122377,0.00001290292,0.0001379222],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4542475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044892297","doi":"10.2307/3316055","title":"Restricted minimax robust designs for misspecified regression models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Robustness (evolution); Parametric statistics; Mathematics; Polynomial regression; Class (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Regression; Polynomial; Regression analysis; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4242684117404009,"gpt":0.4286993554738206,"spread":0.004430943733419679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00265179,0.0001892235,0.0004807089,0.000708648,0.0002622338,0.0003537654,0.000889308,0.0001171486,0.0007622099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007813448,0.0001418363,0.000136304,0.0006802204,0.0001599584,0.0003754665,0.00001657312,0.0002225988,0.00002683121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002568488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001528418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004013148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001135988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966133,0.0004026534,0.001336945,0.0002731738,0.0009204614,0.0004535134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932262,0.002773026,0.0008314897,0.0003879019,0.001611429,0.001169996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006007513,0.00006184571,0.001283563,0.000008234479,0.00005791563,0.001581664,0.001322202,0.01886323,0.004202975,0.03054901,0.8239239,0.1175447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003949706,0.002494018,0.006843665,0.0002723755,0.0001386652,0.001319747,0.004626969,0.1776492,0.003333395,0.555907,0.2424223,0.001042961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005067272,0.0005609303,0.9893271,0.0003947078,0.0008179343,0.000226804,0.0003628739,0.000004508797,0.003237841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09089511,0.00005114852,0.9058377,0.0002123324,0.0002154145,0.000003492981,0.000008103016,0.00003023091,0.002746439],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5815016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9353992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516925883","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2002.11980155","title":"Analyzing Unreplicated Blocked or Split-Plot Fractional Factorial Designs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Replication (statistics); Plackett–Burman design; Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Randomization; Statistics; Computer science; Main effect; Design of experiments; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Arithmetic; Response surface methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.498105257362466,"gpt":0.5329440955844972,"spread":0.03483883822203121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007743036,0.0002374585,0.0008757318,0.001397753,0.0001969492,0.000151813,0.001487142,0.000445355,0.003764129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01791913,0.0001609922,0.0003129657,0.002500724,0.0003792561,0.0005147742,0.0001826917,0.0008446361,0.0002612704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002281274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001134703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001571367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004493174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994149,0.001061597,0.00233021,0.0004696254,0.001585371,0.0004041626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929814,0.003145572,0.001930497,0.0007693708,0.0009767256,0.0001964111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002188464,0.001756418,0.02026913,0.00001235811,0.0005313829,0.0003486445,0.0008395403,0.0002585423,0.6878563,0.04144916,0.02982739,0.2146627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008343837,0.005762239,0.0161215,0.0001145429,0.0002244905,0.003277558,0.005786781,0.005217345,0.4071437,0.3904088,0.1558667,0.001732483],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6131732,0.0007109909,0.3712052,0.0106562,0.002246241,0.0002784842,0.00001662248,0.0002027846,0.001510278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8589334,0.00004296154,0.139392,0.0002404235,0.0003949541,0.000005322749,4.721127e-7,0.00002243452,0.000968056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3489596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}