{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":648,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":648,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e7b4f8aa6eee","filters":{"topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory"}},"results":[{"id":"W1551385672","doi":"10.1093/0195137167.001.0001","title":"Virtue, Vice, and Value","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Virtue ethics; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03314536050562716,"gpt":0.2323159011454509,"spread":0.1991705406398238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001560299,0.0001973414,0.0002422021,0.0000729495,0.0001882776,0.0001490502,0.0001191477,0.000221032,0.008614457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001186691,0.0001519638,0.00007470443,0.000004662405,0.0004909527,0.00005849593,0.00008131076,0.0005040405,0.0004840518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002052033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008173065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004091487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001761089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.0000194315,0.0001659274,0.0002263903,0.0001678965,0.0001317046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.0001421305,0.00005652066,0.0001832535,0.00006000533,0.00008479699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004720881,0.00001073598,5.961854e-8,0.00003857126,0.00003566143,0.00001317849,0.0004838024,8.664809e-8,1.989609e-7,0.9827072,0.01597764,0.0007281493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005041705,0.0000214657,1.728092e-7,0.0000336306,0.00001708951,0.000001909827,0.00001426183,0.000005174475,1.467842e-7,0.5021535,0.4975873,0.0001150357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006613205,0.00055868,0.00000536987,0.001473727,0.0003409612,0.00008578676,0.00003964288,0.00007942122,0.9974098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004045967,0.0003417075,0.000006246722,0.004340437,0.002262762,0.000004070008,0.00003642725,0.0000375536,0.9889248],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4816096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05836533605621926,"gpt":0.2532884893290386,"spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306262,0.000150654,0.0002440884,0.000314836,0.0003192211,0.0001882642,0.0003409478,0.00007390408,0.001077807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007675174,0.000131158,0.0001463089,0.00005877556,0.000193928,0.0002746806,0.000007048699,0.0006050858,0.0001242696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009523037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004054256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004723917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008407574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989293,0.00006443246,0.0003639254,0.0001457874,0.0002306367,0.0002659707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985159,0.00003953352,0.0001506519,0.0001865051,0.0002562171,0.0008512048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956847,0.00001848122,0.000008413176,0.000002441492,0.00003312533,0.0001136071,0.01316818,0.00006810419,0.00009038221,0.9830424,0.002520776,0.0008944876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002953503,0.0002937675,0.00007569155,0.00009519466,0.00002707587,0.00003375882,0.000319118,0.000009084529,0.00005788141,0.9547541,0.04388088,0.0001581094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.245987,0.0007140331,0.00004661713,0.289579,0.005125455,0.0002009107,0.0004570636,0.00003679131,0.4578531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814886,0.000004749594,0.00009086268,0.006715486,0.01153284,6.241609e-7,0.000008873257,0.00001505146,0.0001429356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587872364","doi":"10.1002/9780470776377","title":"The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02478602166072085,"gpt":0.2502269178739709,"spread":0.2254408962132501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003101015,0.0002710175,0.0002556816,0.00005974068,0.0006264587,0.0003789474,0.0004197374,0.0001769056,0.00443325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003570839,0.0001546999,0.0001918952,0.000008761627,0.0005255502,0.00003521662,0.0001153476,0.0004485018,0.002922778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000791353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000157745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003275173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005785954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987958,0.00003635354,0.0003370688,0.0002677832,0.0002988392,0.0002641653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998739,0.0004431062,0.00008380524,0.0004837339,0.0001496844,0.0001006504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004380681,0.000007041909,1.337122e-8,0.000006376693,0.00001893575,0.000004365887,0.0002469528,4.853798e-7,1.195484e-7,0.5316594,0.4671612,0.0008906619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004173073,0.00002912711,1.280535e-7,0.00002460913,0.00001834928,3.148207e-7,0.00001381969,0.000001311182,9.066143e-7,0.4891391,0.5106022,0.0001283844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001087516,0.0003537847,0.00001589315,0.006365972,0.0005052858,0.0002333863,0.00009495135,0.00009825655,0.9923314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003809982,0.00007496124,0.00001449002,0.003652859,0.003968049,0.00002053842,0.00006221399,0.00005610281,0.9917698],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04344104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388215874","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198238843.003.0002","title":"Particularizing Particularism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Normative; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05910414877023559,"gpt":0.2201857957965149,"spread":0.1610816470262793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000150551,0.0002582126,0.0002888652,0.00005688013,0.0002276328,0.0001710576,0.0001443925,0.0002591617,0.09316266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008550199,0.0002045862,0.0002345388,0.00000235219,0.0004442755,0.00006276775,0.00004620301,0.0006230329,0.004477551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001626397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003305781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002454308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008241235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989592,0.00001225091,0.0002819817,0.0002735414,0.0002547282,0.0002182251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993696,0.00006759851,0.00006989554,0.0003201716,0.00006055979,0.0001121736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005538166,0.00001109235,2.274588e-8,0.00001208701,0.00007770849,0.00003806911,0.0008290554,6.949288e-7,0.000001006327,0.996201,0.0008017095,0.002021989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004251538,0.00001471553,4.416531e-8,0.00003775433,0.00004051748,0.000001136179,0.000006525828,0.000009376743,0.00000312791,0.5057727,0.4939118,0.0001598534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009955514,0.000433102,0.000007441687,0.002145275,0.000296978,0.0001057074,0.00002070552,0.0001409067,0.9968399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116115,0.0001498091,0.0000127065,0.002708056,0.001519218,0.000007140678,0.00003211118,0.00006252587,0.8793935],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4931101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081277561","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0311","title":"\"All Is Revolution in Us\": Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Law; Self; Aesthetics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0984612116391918,"gpt":0.3290845162988819,"spread":0.2306233046596901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004116729,0.0001118249,0.0002060428,0.00008367238,0.0001683027,0.00005247681,0.00006588882,0.00004474718,0.001039655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005998281,0.0000978483,0.00003880225,0.00004104191,0.0004913735,0.0002663819,0.0000602031,0.0002347201,0.00007461726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004267768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009920057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005553521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00662146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991829,0.00005341375,0.0002172214,0.0002109915,0.0001475468,0.0001879051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997417,0.00008175743,0.00002862269,0.00007870716,0.00004130619,0.00002785274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009574209,0.0001195837,0.002572797,0.0001189409,0.0000706674,0.00002827933,0.1585464,0.000001337212,0.0000115672,0.8357166,0.00116069,0.001557437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005978955,0.00005828937,0.02080442,0.0001492515,0.00001616222,0.000001584266,0.003787786,0.00006982974,0.000002474168,0.9246185,0.04969582,0.0001979854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132614,0.008807317,1.720143e-7,0.005459274,0.0001074979,0.00008988478,0.00003086737,0.0000230552,0.07222052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931726,0.002750918,0.000004673051,0.001617518,0.0002618197,0.00001360471,0.00000295157,0.000007383475,0.002168471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1547586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043947406","doi":"10.1353/hph.2014.0090","title":"Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sensibility; nobody; Epistemology; Philosophy; Power (physics); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Moral psychology; Practical reason; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08887765228295902,"gpt":0.2221591317300255,"spread":0.1332814794470665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008086531,0.00010572,0.0002494093,0.00008539352,0.0001101728,0.00001096302,0.0001826323,0.00005012436,0.00008327953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003037493,0.00006590293,0.0001753365,0.00001544082,0.0007935329,0.0001234318,0.00004070806,0.000392626,0.000003325692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005664563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001338543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000497941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989318,0.0001861809,0.0003745472,0.00009587765,0.0003258651,0.00008572832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,0.0001933478,0.0004986605,0.0002169872,0.0002180458,0.00006253412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001230466,0.0001040838,0.0001186556,0.00004103469,0.00002581331,0.000001273282,0.002894976,0.00002212461,0.0003394218,0.9951819,0.0008223709,0.000325305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003524027,0.000327863,0.00122642,0.00009427156,0.00003217089,0.000006476172,0.00002643537,0.0000899794,0.00005770472,0.9768394,0.02087171,0.00007511854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7682466,0.0005434903,0.00001411613,0.01807116,0.005142482,0.0001210093,0.000012095,0.00001369939,0.2078354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969888,0.000006635413,0.00002285647,0.001249425,0.001296498,3.124343e-7,3.045719e-7,0.00001026519,0.0004249189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2287422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2923805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153697664","doi":"10.1017/s1369415414000016","title":"Kant and the Art of Schematism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Linguistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02008460463850959,"gpt":0.2272349435232986,"spread":0.207150338884789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035265,0.00005972684,0.0002524656,0.0000101664,0.00008309518,0.00002095264,0.00009502515,0.00001562542,0.0007843479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001708234,0.00003015322,0.00006861491,0.00001329128,0.0005947392,0.00003143711,0.00003481425,0.0001059504,0.0001099246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":8.421002e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005986219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007740761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001274343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.0001155488,0.0001924154,0.00007334928,0.000094221,0.00006616939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999488,0.0001800758,0.00008328827,0.0001832778,0.00004045404,0.00002493725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001758673,0.00000609321,4.875413e-7,0.001232985,0.00001136536,1.610394e-7,0.0004044739,5.453231e-9,0.0000022364,0.9914441,0.0009228928,0.005973421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119244,0.000008171751,0.000003425702,0.001430258,0.00003355003,0.000001490855,0.000007834088,0.00001206416,0.000005941296,0.4748467,0.5234985,0.00003288322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006014383,0.1960643,0.00008366145,0.05875287,0.0001794365,0.0003462931,0.000007607513,0.00002359984,0.7439408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477783,0.04433548,0.00003189851,0.007014908,0.000171331,0.00000926474,0.000002079614,0.000007326483,0.0006494024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.858806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211251895","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084","title":"Freedom and Religion in Kant and his Immediate Successors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Faith; Exposition (narrative); Epistemology; Critical philosophy; Character (mathematics); Confusion; Literature; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02253104033015182,"gpt":0.1923031074433635,"spread":0.1697720671132116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001788347,0.0002758111,0.0003763267,0.0002255567,0.0002186246,0.00009937465,0.0002158046,0.0003085827,0.000007099204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001408843,0.0002912293,0.0000709072,0.00000405635,0.001047987,0.0001179587,0.0003147495,0.0007245989,0.000004125431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001163717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009744304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002576523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989355,0.00006893199,0.0001798286,0.0004063763,0.000171672,0.0002377439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992641,0.0001547225,0.0001342923,0.0002243549,0.00007498025,0.0001475544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270112,0.00001166419,0.000001553051,0.0001195962,0.00003717961,0.0001438062,0.001397299,7.18141e-7,0.000002671794,0.9895816,0.008195009,0.0004362122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007353113,0.00004748519,0.00001301856,0.0002489917,0.00008937353,0.000004968858,0.00008883427,0.00006719162,0.000005072169,0.006821502,0.9915109,0.0003673461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003771859,0.001099348,0.00000183519,0.000246197,0.0002329757,0.0002185257,0.0002597752,0.00005203085,0.9941174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04731151,0.00167464,0.000005819299,0.0002111342,0.000676616,8.639588e-7,0.00004481283,0.00003250427,0.9500421],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969878553","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0015","title":"The Circumstances of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037403417050015,"gpt":0.3241856297699282,"spread":0.2204452880649267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003206965,0.00005755877,0.000104752,0.00001219669,0.0006859277,0.00003193423,0.0001323447,0.00001716334,0.0001149158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003312248,0.0000309748,0.00004142871,0.00001238302,0.001635182,0.00004115218,0.00004948942,0.0001935136,0.00002345336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001941994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001085425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009539023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009292025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.00001871171,0.0001252718,0.00007023512,0.0001152021,0.0001015579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.0005923979,0.00005595121,0.0001372562,0.0001886234,0.0000150075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005237947,0.00001022461,0.000004614762,0.0000328865,0.00005353993,4.994055e-7,0.013256,7.868107e-8,0.0001423258,0.9850942,0.0005951551,0.0008052172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004351106,0.00001814658,0.00002789936,0.000008732583,0.00002823129,2.192628e-7,0.007376675,0.000001474858,0.00007350538,0.7529108,0.2394717,0.00003912793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1106299,0.008086024,0.000002173816,0.01063045,0.003981513,0.00009707158,0.00001788651,0.0000490378,0.8665059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969714,0.0005757745,0.000006300845,0.0002130009,0.0007868719,0.000007312248,2.3464e-7,0.000004655358,0.001434453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986328627","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0241","title":"Moral Skepticism and Moral Naturalism in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Morality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Wonder; Relation (database)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1768750336287885,"gpt":0.3203677747415037,"spread":0.1434927411127152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001798853,0.0001692654,0.0002960933,0.00009183378,0.0003104234,0.00007661224,0.00008424057,0.00005214177,0.0002449986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007793969,0.0001273964,0.00005056341,0.00003678551,0.0008457373,0.00016191,0.0001055113,0.0002640263,0.00003454092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002395143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008338873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002317067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00191538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991394,0.00005051695,0.0002041055,0.0002141095,0.0001430394,0.0002488619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995683,0.0001361364,0.00004273194,0.0001256292,0.00007824023,0.00004889187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851864,0.0000409735,0.0006706266,0.00002358818,0.00005503846,0.00006862972,0.027586,8.749427e-7,0.000007228763,0.9692799,0.0004593443,0.001789251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260297,0.00008119799,0.002548185,0.00006434873,0.00002595653,0.000006202879,0.004020064,0.00002821135,0.00000582459,0.9719934,0.02049629,0.0002043256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7475083,0.01234948,3.405584e-7,0.009703053,0.0004779104,0.0001624386,0.00002302162,0.00008148896,0.229694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929287,0.001577568,0.00001333616,0.0008959018,0.0005151146,0.00002030221,0.000004553038,0.00001435101,0.004030192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2454204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1411886569","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.010","title":"Perfecting pleasures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08420714989336162,"gpt":0.1981324787680872,"spread":0.1139253288747256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001612683,0.0003320174,0.0003442688,0.0001357483,0.0005315582,0.00008300695,0.0004203664,0.0003074589,0.000201705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001484265,0.0003541984,0.000276722,0.000001208471,0.0007969131,0.00007868474,0.0002749838,0.0009079194,0.00008618294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006900157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007105082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000377462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002318445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989459,0.00004051048,0.0001579899,0.0003887049,0.0002217898,0.0002450912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989707,0.0001026128,0.0001791399,0.0003927935,0.0002096735,0.000145058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005708148,0.000008361558,8.725065e-8,0.00007041699,0.0001407621,0.0001266612,0.001212322,8.053983e-8,0.000003404805,0.9944291,0.003251042,0.0007007402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002082241,0.00005227408,4.679904e-7,0.0001404702,0.0001659757,0.000004415325,0.00007498312,0.000002770164,0.00002547876,0.02467091,0.9742348,0.0004191849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004741616,0.0001739977,0.00001458054,0.00003417336,0.0004972874,0.0001753796,0.0002183321,0.000177644,0.9986612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05679081,0.00006005327,0.000004031856,0.0001883853,0.0007676163,3.673529e-7,0.00002057279,0.00005741486,0.9421108],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092335477","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.520.x","title":"DESIRING THE BAD UNDER THE GUISE OF THE GOOD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05312159902442484,"gpt":0.2617596452451342,"spread":0.2086380462207094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002792364,0.0002629232,0.000247689,0.00003490277,0.001593141,0.000163494,0.001735472,0.0001218214,0.0003304363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008851013,0.00009213226,0.0003626978,0.0001391815,0.003263621,0.00009753394,0.000149674,0.001228638,0.0001070912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002807723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005185946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001257052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003836855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976144,0.000437108,0.0005483619,0.0002540799,0.0006790062,0.000467068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962147,0.002064889,0.0002266141,0.001241746,0.0001655695,0.00008645472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005742704,0.00008596923,0.000006744364,0.000009754441,0.00007388344,0.000001971898,0.01272985,0.000007502194,0.0001535805,0.9855238,0.00005763974,0.001291873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002458235,0.0001769989,0.0007898532,0.00004071815,0.00008568986,0.000009961015,0.00223483,0.00006014152,0.0001058056,0.9883053,0.007792592,0.0001522798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.191268,0.000483078,0.0002221167,0.601033,0.001120448,0.0006746968,0.00003341854,0.00008896667,0.2050763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883067,0.000007492345,0.000003674459,0.008546988,0.002737534,0.00001727404,0.000001299154,0.0000344056,0.0003446118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7970387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298425731","doi":"10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00152.x","title":"Justice Between the Young and the Old","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy &amp Public Affairs","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Baker Hughes (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1109195808303103,"gpt":0.2716645176174735,"spread":0.1607449367871631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001534256,0.000261003,0.0002980876,0.00008640531,0.001626267,0.0006950144,0.000671994,0.0001024074,0.000663172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003968611,0.0001340936,0.0001679798,0.0001226537,0.002924137,0.0003719128,0.0002591385,0.0007466654,0.0002041386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002246383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003598096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001393004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001825633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981494,0.0002943927,0.0003406533,0.0003361709,0.0004477794,0.0004316356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977098,0.001193329,0.0001452292,0.0006114095,0.0001743002,0.0001659349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003782487,0.00003001855,0.00007522038,0.00001842755,0.00009506133,0.000003621141,0.007010766,4.985652e-7,8.477642e-7,0.9916284,0.0005310753,0.0005682505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000602834,0.00002194031,0.00007078147,0.00001316653,0.0001195473,0.00001331026,0.001577921,0.00002258406,4.194073e-7,0.7641976,0.2331959,0.0001639153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00545773,0.0006087862,0.00004301224,0.2669651,0.0004580408,0.0002700627,0.00003345119,0.0001201248,0.7260437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886515,0.0002447095,0.000009556207,0.003278576,0.00605671,0.00005204883,0.00002294517,0.00003634712,0.001647644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596386193333154,"gpt":0.2243051721624456,"spread":0.1683413102291141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002939514,0.00008227784,0.0001911397,0.0002031574,0.0001610586,0.00003112798,0.0001474833,0.00004692767,0.0007937688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000142508,0.00005344236,0.00009203201,0.00002715283,0.001128996,0.0001950833,0.000009679838,0.0001593739,0.00000812646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003157975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003305789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001609601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007255998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993194,0.00004696526,0.0003013402,0.00007586246,0.000113248,0.0001431734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00009153968,0.0001816521,0.0001204658,0.000296033,0.0004051278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009170923,0.00001128125,0.000156436,0.00001368602,0.00003935585,0.00001579428,0.001250787,5.007939e-7,0.0001327348,0.9974234,0.0003106214,0.0006362448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690101,0.0001109677,0.00024109,0.000111592,0.00002554549,0.00003032833,0.00009090867,6.952487e-7,0.00006448468,0.9640465,0.03493251,0.0000763939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555741,0.002625168,0.0000861873,0.1969678,0.003240915,0.0001565213,0.0006254409,0.00001459449,0.2407093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980612,0.00003231842,0.00003487435,0.0002822268,0.001463592,4.936695e-7,4.120633e-7,0.000009373714,0.0001155043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4424871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8691213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071692372","doi":"10.1017/s0031819109000394","title":"Human Nature, Personhood, and Ethical Naturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Deliberation; Epistemology; Creatures; Value (mathematics); Naturalism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03641396381475498,"gpt":0.2875273827064387,"spread":0.2511134188916838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002803443,0.0002023206,0.0002245988,0.00009492224,0.000578683,0.000173074,0.0002003202,0.0004442963,0.0003667122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007140888,0.0001646604,0.0001037424,0.00003405653,0.0005326667,0.0001082324,0.00004763376,0.002401725,0.00005830504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001405591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001246352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001315755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001008079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988784,0.00007045234,0.0001965481,0.0003202993,0.0002855345,0.0002487326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.00007565822,0.00005738629,0.0002279348,0.00009882011,0.0001540272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001256938,0.00003883909,0.000001710901,0.00001469417,0.00001615737,0.00001437214,0.003038975,7.898795e-8,0.0001356714,0.9958444,0.0004084648,0.0004740332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002987602,0.0001557357,0.0001565723,0.00003501279,0.00001800211,0.000006970622,0.00006025432,0.00001079537,0.00002813994,0.9689817,0.03002029,0.0002278051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06575461,0.001550335,0.000001161085,0.1876564,0.0004752817,0.0001504337,0.00003111974,0.0002037448,0.7441769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588143,0.00002351835,0.00002309279,0.03813792,0.002707296,0.000003751652,0.00001382834,0.00001694689,0.0002593062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148588350","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00591.x","title":"Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01240672994725301,"gpt":0.2136927744530457,"spread":0.2012860445057927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001365465,0.0001089265,0.0002064755,0.0002175001,0.0004148647,0.0001563715,0.0001088921,0.00004709735,0.002963456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001274985,0.00009045706,0.0003359918,0.0001865545,0.0002268329,0.0001093926,0.00002917539,0.0001536023,0.0003149396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001799333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001304397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001517355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004170914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00004557748,0.0001944806,0.0001868962,0.0001810691,0.0001719719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994863,0.00009378666,0.00005685586,0.0002536649,0.00005695731,0.00005246111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004805096,0.00009520953,0.0001520202,0.000002005128,0.0003762738,0.00001430473,0.0004474496,0.0001087237,0.00002878163,0.9981379,0.0002136246,0.0004189317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001211183,0.00003351054,0.001287164,0.000004171769,0.001349313,0.000001051036,0.0001352429,0.0009034999,0.00004658714,0.9365289,0.05937536,0.0002141181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1721139,0.0002409075,0.0007028492,0.004837073,0.0001686678,0.00006647462,0.0001398722,0.0001606971,0.8215696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930108,0.00001073279,0.00001334574,0.0007701081,0.0006958767,0.000008641675,0.00009207879,0.00001131141,0.005387125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118633274","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00861.x","title":"Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious History","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Passion; Dissent; Sublime; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02903302792967402,"gpt":0.2695261898402651,"spread":0.240493161910591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009349423,0.0001394946,0.000242272,0.0001231678,0.0003192801,0.0001136111,0.0000821042,0.00009089792,0.00008535914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002632645,0.0001146283,0.00007595444,0.00001462982,0.0006929007,0.0003162462,0.00004058336,0.0007622448,0.000002281135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006866834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001692482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008559576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003394297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.00005815636,0.0004588377,0.0001448931,0.0003106297,0.0001459045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989338,0.0001331815,0.000378824,0.00009424629,0.0002941994,0.0001657502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918231,0.0001085388,0.001111943,0.0001197559,0.00007806063,0.00005172846,0.03237703,0.000004920669,0.007198409,0.9550223,0.002503877,0.001324263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001572857,0.0006546444,0.004638037,0.0005277731,0.0001701385,0.001053245,0.00222552,0.0003097338,0.000363695,0.2848012,0.7029696,0.0007136133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783449,0.006468989,0.00004035669,0.00356361,0.001856405,0.00007785202,0.000004405826,0.00002362793,0.009619828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973257,0.000375885,0.0002557158,0.0005359882,0.001186614,0.000001555873,0.000002220322,0.00001831324,0.0002980067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4674406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535814262","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000273","title":"Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction: Kant’s Starting Point and his Humean Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0878308471345856,"gpt":0.3036181692407237,"spread":0.215787322106138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009099918,0.0001060377,0.0001836381,0.00003133278,0.0001760982,0.00005716913,0.00009794036,0.0000320275,0.00105748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004394082,0.00005321047,0.00007454824,0.00003358707,0.0002799494,0.0001611629,0.0000159621,0.0001770299,0.00006431444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001208655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001779089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000145051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002035123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989931,0.0002139716,0.0002912835,0.0001780684,0.0001626526,0.0001609034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999623,0.0001133424,0.00006563754,0.0001202685,0.00003670328,0.00004107629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001247863,0.0001153854,0.00009155128,0.001313974,0.00002299633,0.00001871188,0.007616141,1.260688e-8,0.00008820659,0.938563,0.00179334,0.05036416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004518377,0.00009731222,0.0002075652,0.006164574,0.0001018938,0.00004376374,0.0006157455,0.000001698859,0.00003054127,0.7360072,0.2560549,0.0002229285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05126636,0.1030566,0.0001024714,0.6733488,0.0005307363,0.001856757,0.00009153626,0.0001378104,0.169609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785285,0.01284746,0.00001355744,0.00819497,0.0002919067,0.0000265755,0.000005104849,0.000009708458,0.00008223239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093941507","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190086596.001.0001","title":"Fichte's Moral Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Normative ethics; Feeling; Moral philosophy; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Perfection","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1091246907669095,"gpt":0.2296373154740055,"spread":0.1205126247070959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009553805,0.0003285659,0.0004205718,0.00007253762,0.0001967232,0.0001696164,0.0003539308,0.0002732457,0.02581395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000257522,0.0002651603,0.000282896,0.000008889411,0.000583123,0.00007804222,0.000144717,0.001032318,0.004804843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002010286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000957448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003196439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987875,0.00002622758,0.0002842551,0.0003646269,0.0003330246,0.0002044206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992209,0.0001112928,0.000108581,0.0002897856,0.0001032779,0.0001661677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001165455,0.00001463673,2.576826e-8,0.00008728384,0.00006892237,0.00003214228,0.001057377,1.150861e-7,1.841431e-7,0.8742411,0.124264,0.0002225712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000639318,0.00004518532,2.233994e-8,0.00003944541,0.00002553932,4.784227e-7,0.000008021837,0.000005917933,4.301955e-7,0.5060535,0.4935717,0.0001858114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[2.760029e-7,0.0003444797,0.000005043069,0.01895452,0.0007971709,0.0001405361,0.00018665,0.0002393043,0.979332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01136836,0.00003531635,0.00002220705,0.01304495,0.01135961,0.000009000893,0.000220164,0.00008290877,0.9638575],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3693077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905697073","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/10877.001.0001","title":"The Dash—The Other Side of Absolute Knowing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dash; Absolute (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08568161660758085,"gpt":0.2596792442235722,"spread":0.1739976276159914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00132482,0.0002940902,0.0003083322,0.00002475469,0.001169396,0.000249601,0.001414642,0.000186905,0.000218273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006214459,0.0001239814,0.0002903294,0.000002897887,0.003698521,0.00002791966,0.0003839289,0.0009050361,0.00009379927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002444016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001242302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003450114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008326329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983968,0.0002515739,0.0004092875,0.0002277448,0.0004044384,0.0003102098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968244,0.001495228,0.0003409031,0.001118492,0.0001789692,0.00004198035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003376909,0.000006549564,4.307272e-9,0.0000439178,0.0002695154,0.000001259863,0.01151744,5.476224e-7,0.000008071003,0.97357,0.01219094,0.002357914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005709054,0.0000221721,1.345995e-7,0.0001203263,0.00009278478,7.720224e-7,0.00004468318,0.000009001591,0.00003666144,0.4770742,0.5224466,0.00009547245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000230893,0.002530602,0.000004384136,0.001133345,0.0008082658,0.0003977668,0.0001027975,0.00004622443,0.9949535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01609682,0.00005970543,0.000001581518,0.001131669,0.004257519,0.00004537057,0.000003663633,0.00008353209,0.9783201],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5102557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967744870","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0000","title":"A Conversation between Annette Baier and Anik Waldow about Hume's Account of Sympathy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Conversation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1515377144260957,"gpt":0.2918947842477799,"spread":0.1403570698216841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002541725,0.0001383315,0.0003213271,0.00006336228,0.0004181128,0.00002425179,0.00007819795,0.00005043492,0.0001275485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008893187,0.0001096394,0.00005883461,0.00002538092,0.001334428,0.0001530418,0.00009157402,0.0001641319,0.00002209998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001600432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001895753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008417069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006028807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991573,0.00004386402,0.000241193,0.0001781587,0.000217645,0.0001618169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992447,0.0002165339,0.0001075533,0.0001341746,0.0002571159,0.00003986879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748599,0.00004808143,0.002726717,0.0001746193,0.0004162801,0.00001078539,0.208248,7.80394e-7,0.00005922198,0.7858111,0.001618029,0.0008588921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001386118,0.0004927184,0.04704854,0.000253663,0.000254314,0.000006486723,0.02538104,0.00002614569,0.0004242336,0.849892,0.07418723,0.0006475649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651611,0.004495546,0.000003180075,0.002685683,0.0002401874,0.00014189,0.00007231336,0.00004597711,0.02715409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.001471072,0.00001026159,0.0004445427,0.0006613718,0.0000104889,0.000007428208,0.00001248385,0.0004038562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.182867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4916754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137152741","doi":"10.33134/eeja.251","title":"Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estetika The European Journal of Aesthetics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Hedonism; Autonomy; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Key (lock); Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03550923264450717,"gpt":0.241125158425664,"spread":0.2056159257811568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003512403,0.0002115091,0.000324388,0.00006055661,0.0004355961,0.0002040586,0.0009653608,0.00003647878,0.0002145232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000223976,0.0001126611,0.0003520754,0.00009677295,0.001258754,0.00009462855,0.0002031361,0.0009931443,0.00004723461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002347844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003405116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001499958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001092652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966968,0.001489105,0.0008502378,0.0001419789,0.0005678234,0.0002540465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973815,0.0002731049,0.0007461171,0.0006373966,0.0008432358,0.0001186187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002913156,0.0001613943,0.0000242415,0.00002243595,0.00008508571,0.0002564547,0.0201926,0.0001284441,0.00007799888,0.9702196,0.0004528186,0.008349823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005515662,0.0003888571,0.0001673802,0.0001586965,0.0001612993,0.0005220111,0.002341122,0.00003642842,0.000365387,0.2644689,0.7306497,0.0001885964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2733287,0.00568703,0.0003529948,0.0943198,0.002813585,0.0002807474,0.0000540946,0.00004545407,0.6231176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953704,0.0002573043,0.000178304,0.002205702,0.0009061238,5.084043e-7,0.000001618838,0.00005690534,0.001023102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7301969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.463793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238295738","doi":"10.1093/0199267677.001.0001","title":"Moral Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Subordination (linguistics); Moral realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Morality; Normative ethics; Objectivity (philosophy); Distributive justice; Social cognitive theory of morality; Economic Justice; Moral psychology; Distributive property; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08775112809342979,"gpt":0.2387883081316185,"spread":0.1510371800381887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001146619,0.0001923214,0.0002456115,0.00005921452,0.0001388449,0.0001283606,0.0001821265,0.0002052553,0.02964201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001077781,0.0001476601,0.0001544594,0.000003218295,0.000495375,0.00003805223,0.00005955383,0.000514255,0.00147272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000609536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003185265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001746163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992612,0.00001044426,0.00017838,0.0001963372,0.0001962786,0.0001573763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995392,0.0000524245,0.00006301345,0.000197493,0.00008036407,0.00006751925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004430678,0.0000111869,1.268887e-8,0.00003934417,0.00003047149,0.00001541102,0.001233847,3.289699e-7,1.687377e-7,0.9886588,0.009862176,0.0001438384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005103412,0.00002865345,4.626369e-8,0.00004195382,0.00001167672,5.96345e-7,0.000008563939,4.008729e-7,6.808629e-7,0.5109442,0.4887984,0.0001137234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001265942,0.000414523,0.000002530797,0.001871786,0.0004345299,0.00008748524,0.00007175584,0.0001208666,0.9969953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02147376,0.00002402843,0.00001041592,0.001938782,0.003076843,0.000004202919,0.00004424658,0.00004114893,0.9733866],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4789362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1159716171938444,"gpt":0.2357518051722436,"spread":0.1197801879783992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214259,0.00009145075,0.0001613397,0.0001288754,0.0004056117,0.000146352,0.0001707439,0.00003810438,0.0001265592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003625808,0.0000453341,0.00008225963,0.00004630073,0.001069208,0.00007392665,0.000003963605,0.000583786,0.000004519662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008645178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002328076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006962793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01411033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.0003862333,0.0002445666,0.00008182076,0.0001626834,0.000170569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.000564662,0.0001009546,0.0001536077,0.00005864198,0.0001519203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002819834,0.000008594509,0.00003059595,0.00000566906,0.00001420205,0.00006429302,0.01222932,0.000005497915,4.609841e-7,0.9875023,0.00008186326,0.00002905438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006118332,0.00007205255,0.00005205799,0.00004854855,0.00001314558,0.00004407555,0.002468959,0.000007321614,0.000001685173,0.9847788,0.01184127,0.00006023474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1114521,0.001168307,0.00002118701,0.1377058,0.000866104,0.0002339267,0.00002182947,0.000003553346,0.7485272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993886,0.00001787206,0.000002901367,0.005614624,0.0004538927,7.897074e-7,2.277189e-7,0.00000686353,0.00001681243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.882434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979254916","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2315306","title":"Sidgwick's Axioms and Consequentialism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Certainty; Ethical egoism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Nothing; Dishonesty; Objectivism; Consequentialism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05166272757574716,"gpt":0.2666611078554058,"spread":0.2149983802796586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001394264,0.000196268,0.000385796,0.00002552165,0.0004278612,0.0001031735,0.0003289851,0.0000626184,0.001175348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005669306,0.0001106348,0.0001406326,0.00004259415,0.001626409,0.00007941642,0.0001443944,0.0004943368,0.0003604975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008182159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001981321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002863339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001140861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985026,0.0003768425,0.0003434446,0.0002600854,0.0002765945,0.000240397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985837,0.0006162355,0.000101233,0.0004533886,0.00009260585,0.0001528557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005529145,0.00002151075,1.892271e-7,0.0003753782,0.00002169182,0.000002041261,0.0003237042,4.773343e-8,0.000009217754,0.9936799,0.0001415867,0.005419202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001097135,0.00004512766,0.000002866203,0.0005816729,0.00007827405,0.00001299999,0.000006370813,0.00002953792,0.000002514155,0.7671972,0.231805,0.0001286963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005933393,0.03474718,0.00004906002,0.8081377,0.0002915274,0.0003167926,0.00001322764,0.00008507662,0.1557662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290254,0.01859514,0.000006353494,0.05049821,0.001647316,0.00003024669,0.000006158369,0.00002180639,0.0001693391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076562610","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0136","title":"Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Metaphysics; Certainty","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1676121852224575,"gpt":0.351752536256458,"spread":0.1841403510340004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001246969,0.0001254013,0.0003853524,0.00008386475,0.00006804392,0.00001902575,0.00006218297,0.00005709372,0.00006671511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004213669,0.0001045563,0.00003187,0.000046741,0.001186676,0.0001017852,0.0000609163,0.0002601346,0.00000135122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005211802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002609417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01343696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986709,0.0003270641,0.0004073841,0.0002508038,0.0001381141,0.000205702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.0002974094,0.00004955231,0.0001759149,0.00007526052,0.00004103452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004025688,0.0002373615,0.01062641,0.0000820657,0.00001234431,0.00001159642,0.04679364,0.000004068645,0.000012974,0.942076,0.000004683788,0.00009861313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006628553,0.0001102433,0.01717653,0.0000722994,0.000006107964,5.057126e-7,0.007924633,0.00002099283,0.00002248597,0.9734231,0.0004595368,0.0001207224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693473,0.001166563,4.619916e-7,0.001144669,0.00006155672,0.0001674257,0.00001574322,0.000008786694,0.02808747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995261,0.0001797433,0.0000184748,0.000178358,0.00003348775,0.00002748124,0.000001530031,0.000006314414,0.00002844771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.038869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7498138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509904696","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383327","title":"Hume's Recantation Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Personal identity; Epistemology; Identity (music); Perception; Causation; Reflexive pronoun; Consciousness; Nothing; Psychology; Self; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2028833437903789,"gpt":0.3462706873515908,"spread":0.1433873435612119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002424153,0.0001035748,0.0001742609,0.00005282555,0.0004690767,0.00006082716,0.0000781525,0.00002730876,0.0009488919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000149686,0.00007976042,0.00005728189,0.00003696902,0.0003759408,0.0001163521,0.00004837102,0.0001363813,0.0002663949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001821629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008020656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002271957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001449167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999338,0.00004840667,0.0001688606,0.0001521714,0.0001391972,0.0001533238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.0001330013,0.00005438171,0.0001317128,0.0001937399,0.00003090215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001581076,0.00001638535,0.00004904649,0.00002657379,0.00007684601,0.00001064952,0.01446949,3.800878e-7,0.00002309372,0.9812794,0.002139921,0.001892365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374979,0.00004420945,0.000127365,0.0000508394,0.00002471349,0.00000173878,0.002530264,0.000004856518,0.00001379711,0.6716572,0.3252975,0.0001100419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778898,0.007362338,0.00001221523,0.01006527,0.0007216093,0.0001596557,0.00001564646,0.0001957493,0.9036785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887806,0.00230989,0.0000142449,0.001404157,0.001073729,0.00001491936,0.000007997045,0.00001185499,0.006382583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604954642","doi":"10.1017/s1369415415000060","title":"Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Assertion; Consciousness; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2973595687472745,"gpt":0.3479459424600616,"spread":0.05058637371278707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007621992,0.0001046547,0.0002076792,0.000006773405,0.000346291,0.0002102199,0.0002770753,0.00002692462,0.0006219271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008015477,0.00005789587,0.00009975562,0.00003329054,0.0003828218,0.0002403119,0.00007612324,0.0002543094,0.0003524531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009152692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003649377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001443088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001171983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991688,0.0001211912,0.0002188091,0.0001331797,0.0001952831,0.0001627306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994263,0.00006205644,0.00007917012,0.0002729837,0.0001027872,0.00005670726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001214724,0.000009945249,0.000001220674,0.0002718764,0.00001053506,0.000003713582,0.001811068,3.681417e-7,4.242123e-7,0.9936978,0.001803779,0.002388011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033072,0.000006687791,5.2349e-7,0.0008230144,0.0000274612,0.000002348707,0.00008804046,0.000006707971,0.000002512202,0.4606148,0.5383292,0.00005842609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002530135,0.1934086,0.00002289032,0.03987496,0.0005256906,0.0001715375,0.000005612749,0.00005728682,0.7656804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489465,0.009636246,0.00005559952,0.03984371,0.001056687,0.00001060718,0.000006398986,0.00001802713,0.0004262408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142322623","doi":"","title":"Sidgwick's Philosophical Intuitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Intuitionism; Intuition; Internalism and externalism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280465078184942,"gpt":0.2597589158014681,"spread":0.131712407982974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148632,0.0005913481,0.0009664429,0.0004086319,0.001971011,0.0001814319,0.0009447166,0.0003532502,0.01005492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004541265,0.0005795206,0.0002921783,0.0005592135,0.004341657,0.001041632,0.0004197578,0.001247678,0.001127441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009975625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006583132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005950492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006330456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996466,0.0003207267,0.0009089909,0.0007137661,0.0008541642,0.0007363198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996153,0.0005065445,0.0004582732,0.001024036,0.001379286,0.0004788522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002491253,0.0003303504,0.00001883804,0.00009773787,0.0001603375,0.0002489853,0.0165169,0.00001363305,0.00008015609,0.9684662,0.01338921,0.0004285845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00176233,0.0006464191,0.0001517435,0.000347681,0.0001480113,0.00007799733,0.007896936,0.0002313107,0.000100134,0.3451411,0.6425937,0.0009025807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1818236,0.000379069,0.0001159569,0.05197808,0.001223081,0.0007481055,0.0006356481,0.0002549909,0.7628415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742554,0.000620447,0.0001429067,0.002885266,0.0009885477,0.00002536517,0.0002468052,0.00009253113,0.02074267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142782002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0234","title":"Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subjectivism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1655308733859838,"gpt":0.3582634954299187,"spread":0.1927326220439349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109961,0.0002072829,0.0003120971,0.00009422571,0.0008620753,0.00008044855,0.000183821,0.00009630965,0.0006996776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004829017,0.0001629457,0.0001140709,0.00004299289,0.001363896,0.00007721336,0.0001561057,0.0005281214,0.0001994496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004698635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003864558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004171057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006200551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986816,0.00005643388,0.000302467,0.0002715357,0.0003328184,0.0003551684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987471,0.0005328177,0.00008583327,0.0002566132,0.000281623,0.00009602497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003108584,0.0000442441,0.000007589326,0.00003894359,0.000150083,0.00004744023,0.04823139,2.186269e-7,0.00004047247,0.9494741,0.001187688,0.0007467574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674604,0.0001170974,0.00004095359,0.00004836875,0.00003144501,0.000002635697,0.01023324,6.055434e-7,0.00008047836,0.7347952,0.254296,0.0001865387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03834058,0.003429438,0.000006236061,0.03642003,0.001107731,0.0001640263,0.00004275045,0.0001914982,0.9202977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778447,0.0002984962,0.00001403594,0.008771628,0.001386252,0.00001392822,0.000006380931,0.00002609823,0.01163846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7660978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042417103","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0294","title":"Relations of Literary Form and Philosophical Purpose in Hume's Four Essays on Happiness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1184411344764323,"gpt":0.3138282458599027,"spread":0.1953871113834704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006146581,0.0001470808,0.0002968072,0.0001847999,0.0002633713,0.00002737263,0.00008640626,0.00007178298,0.00008738936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002031321,0.000115234,0.00005874136,0.00006010894,0.0007701349,0.0001453331,0.0001018405,0.0003193555,0.00001416078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000212919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001245931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001550831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003425485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.00003594996,0.0003567708,0.000195042,0.0001873227,0.0002009956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990513,0.0005352239,0.00008140389,0.0001459982,0.0001381131,0.00004792588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006320397,0.0001016737,0.0003053549,0.00007148145,0.00005194011,0.00002101969,0.02322657,7.037922e-7,0.00001653236,0.974589,0.00005337421,0.001499092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004018926,0.0001385447,0.002033382,0.0001724313,0.00001667639,0.000001932334,0.001125859,0.000009377765,0.00002044592,0.9898899,0.006056143,0.000133426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.548431,0.004728428,0.00001583223,0.01457877,0.0004080323,0.0003041591,0.00004331391,0.00006268797,0.4314278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981974,0.0002377237,0.00002423782,0.0004887403,0.000457259,0.00001352865,0.000004102586,0.00001356361,0.0005634829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4497664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4699108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09520054357920177,"gpt":0.2460012440795053,"spread":0.1508007005003036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001517218,0.00005771737,0.00006509842,0.00002523789,0.0001065681,0.0000321661,0.00007465875,0.00001414211,0.001946754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001701084,0.00003597048,0.00005152655,0.00002200046,0.0001256756,0.0000723574,0.00001027418,0.00008417468,0.000144126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001130425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001995154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002289246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009687218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.0000495198,0.0001229892,0.00007507581,0.0001788487,0.00007053552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.0001505307,0.00007198739,0.0001207143,0.00003884673,0.0000155739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004345656,0.00008454471,0.000002925842,0.000004838708,0.0000233149,2.020325e-7,0.006648478,0.00000583405,0.0002256469,0.9904896,0.0006050958,0.001905157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001842481,0.0001315673,0.00005201002,0.00001757953,0.00002526438,1.174633e-7,0.0007106946,0.000411196,0.005620243,0.9507328,0.04204168,0.00007259302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4835065,0.0001725188,0.00004520866,0.020177,0.0005034186,0.0003050588,0.00002126058,0.00007341895,0.4951956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977205,0.00005172668,0.000008730316,0.001566733,0.0001559704,0.00001368175,0.000003862702,0.000008845352,0.0004699406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.514214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1114586155937869,"gpt":0.2807317843998352,"spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004722314,0.0001647381,0.0003281799,0.00004894129,0.0006835427,0.0001022725,0.0004825811,0.00006205013,0.0008047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008693278,0.000136715,0.0005064657,0.00002344347,0.001215003,0.0001552114,0.00003952456,0.0007535829,0.00002909945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001032563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001355167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000357497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001471309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986196,0.0001135002,0.0004342252,0.000203604,0.0003967769,0.0002323588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983304,0.0008297087,0.00017251,0.0001504853,0.0003284175,0.0001884536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001619594,0.0001312037,7.847456e-8,0.00007564049,0.0001202138,0.00004637272,0.003804922,0.00001551388,0.00009689755,0.9311388,0.06118562,0.003222777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000306143,0.0002589914,7.946318e-7,0.00008248344,0.00006889674,0.00005149286,0.00006146549,0.00005222205,0.00001514024,0.5369906,0.4620099,0.0001018355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001884295,0.07275093,0.002248912,0.2478857,0.02154907,0.0009569534,0.0008116953,0.0002133947,0.6516991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746215,0.0002389413,0.00008144522,0.01636984,0.007373002,0.00001589406,0.000003925723,0.00004630744,0.001249132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160531423","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00370.x","title":"A Wolff in Kant’s Clothing: Christian Wolff’s Influence on Kant’s Accounts of Consciousness, Self‐Consciousness, and Psychology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Soul; Epistemology; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Theology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06405905668201921,"gpt":0.2741651518845293,"spread":0.2101060952025101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006368,0.0004173005,0.0007265693,0.0004041674,0.0002755756,0.00007565036,0.0005935469,0.0002327432,0.0003040433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113279,0.0003786297,0.0001178013,0.0001364033,0.001739819,0.000320884,0.0001689895,0.0008207688,0.00009830167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004892067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001021988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000926603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006963926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975156,0.0002087255,0.0007504218,0.0006517122,0.0003768437,0.0004967447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982905,0.0003202215,0.0003448244,0.0006209026,0.0002382262,0.0001853017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000274408,0.0006996295,0.002208245,0.0001433838,0.00007381359,0.00005859694,0.0184399,0.000003173555,0.00007059206,0.9776993,0.000154049,0.0001748829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413037,0.0003347174,0.006551024,0.000260646,0.00004036879,0.00001541477,0.0002575994,0.00007386142,0.0000747555,0.9832907,0.007219308,0.0004685542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7968201,0.000625731,0.000007530695,0.007797279,0.0008493246,0.0004556155,0.0001356795,0.0001899466,0.1931188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948608,0.0001768125,0.00006346832,0.004369248,0.000405941,0.00004649169,0.000008439286,0.00004968593,0.00001910846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1980407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908572182","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12428","title":"Freedom immediately after Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Moral philosophy; Practical reason; Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02666420575667123,"gpt":0.2076794640272321,"spread":0.1810152582705609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098603,0.0001673903,0.0002706035,0.0001555453,0.00007866164,0.0001162901,0.0003927213,0.00002311748,0.003673447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005549653,0.0001214075,0.0002635199,0.00003168088,0.0002700342,0.0002740135,0.00008444853,0.000607926,0.002378711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001633733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003270973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001467738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.387854e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984609,0.0002929564,0.0005320815,0.000140359,0.0003734575,0.0002001925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989148,0.00009827598,0.0003302196,0.0002333913,0.0002563299,0.0001669913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002423367,0.0001072705,0.00006306989,0.00003518613,0.0000867398,0.0004818758,0.004798646,0.000009714763,0.0002010409,0.9929252,0.0004089701,0.0006399354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187965,0.0008164775,0.0005276129,0.0002151142,0.00004463405,0.00005389919,0.0001566128,0.00001094577,0.00003505484,0.7669786,0.229699,0.0002741264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2282455,0.0008093867,0.00001903749,0.007676559,0.002928148,0.00008114133,0.00002340642,0.00002421466,0.7601926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906451,0.00004067829,0.00005704552,0.001890898,0.006827006,4.224874e-7,0.000001499338,0.00004678206,0.0004905465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906870716","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i9.65","title":"Davidson on Practical Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Generality; Epistemology; Confusion; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3285005292270333,"gpt":0.3635806165487618,"spread":0.03508008732172851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627721,0.0001766994,0.0003288337,0.0001431946,0.000290011,0.00004641108,0.000339033,0.00009361463,0.0003969005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001124839,0.0001070524,0.0004043762,0.00003352516,0.001278287,0.0001738189,0.00004581939,0.0008285624,0.0001702058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004387415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004461062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005138985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000533602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985279,0.0001290911,0.0004623519,0.0001731966,0.0004676087,0.000239806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972574,0.00130064,0.0002377949,0.0002910228,0.0005843465,0.0003288339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005041301,0.0003343868,5.122425e-7,0.00002155326,0.0001087849,0.000007366925,0.003355257,0.00001287696,0.000002341499,0.8652065,0.1301814,0.0002649536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004479594,0.0005018666,7.331143e-7,0.00002722355,0.00009275178,0.00001191208,0.000103117,0.0007852156,0.000001203127,0.5025919,0.4953577,0.00007837139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005731725,0.002225921,0.0003116541,0.06824773,0.009353341,0.0002249758,0.00002433677,0.00003453746,0.9190043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707947,0.0000330119,0.00006048282,0.002256825,0.006223018,0.000007943816,0.000002442657,0.00003579894,0.02058573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4709902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06562803257129741,"gpt":0.23684473839375,"spread":0.1712167058224526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001500791,0.00009701783,0.0002005952,0.00002962269,0.0009907465,0.0000310789,0.0003479823,0.00003926543,0.0001671044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001055979,0.00005387044,0.0002520398,0.00001657423,0.002346273,0.000121773,0.00004067636,0.0004021198,0.000001673598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008592556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001074966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002685354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007941611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989397,0.0001384958,0.0003905052,0.00007029259,0.0002875625,0.0001734357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.0004093653,0.0002542242,0.0001219796,0.0001136109,0.00006010205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481301,0.0001456574,0.00000664239,0.00007329653,0.0001332059,5.320401e-7,0.04971956,8.087009e-7,0.0001001929,0.9435339,0.000692352,0.005445698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001699537,0.00004132202,0.0002523354,0.0002056546,0.0001601215,0.0001878117,0.0006343927,0.00001102282,0.00005068858,0.8375746,0.1590606,0.000121888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3583077,0.2673559,0.0007876459,0.03457384,0.05000979,0.003102025,0.0002474041,0.00006435512,0.2855513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970545,0.0001527199,0.00003492067,0.000440916,0.00128263,0.00001407876,5.243969e-7,0.00001614317,0.001003535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8644942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30883871","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.006","title":"Aristotle on <i>eudaimonia, nous</i>, and divinity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Eudaimonia; Virtue; Happiness; Philosophy; Pleasure; Meaning (existential); The good life; Epistemology; Contemplation; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05601453510714435,"gpt":0.187455381144123,"spread":0.1314408460369786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001269147,0.0003477661,0.0003681207,0.0001235457,0.0004997991,0.00007738369,0.000321312,0.0003194539,0.00008455784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001042516,0.0003591158,0.000163429,0.00000130817,0.001134109,0.00006333134,0.0003316538,0.0008927874,0.00006859128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005719768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004906417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003855666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002884819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989464,0.00003666328,0.0001478698,0.0004366091,0.0002092171,0.000223232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989681,0.0001309335,0.0001571267,0.0004298892,0.0001251336,0.0001887971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102168,0.00002139689,1.506918e-7,0.00005825303,0.0001014285,0.0001301955,0.0009025825,5.82854e-8,0.000001662819,0.995414,0.002657293,0.0006108684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028075,0.0001365335,0.000002106228,0.0001376236,0.000135724,0.000002346195,0.00003867377,0.000002368575,0.0000186197,0.05788931,0.9409524,0.0004035715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001939974,0.0001248511,0.000008406193,0.00006246215,0.0003483518,0.0001999348,0.0005733893,0.0001162669,0.9983723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1142279,0.0001511328,0.000003167052,0.0004096432,0.0003644628,4.696651e-7,0.00002451785,0.00004676882,0.8847719],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06079187571652715,"gpt":0.2361941257216291,"spread":0.175402250005102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003020285,0.0001514095,0.0002574039,0.000244497,0.0002848447,0.0004091584,0.0004229927,0.0000756955,0.001223067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004269533,0.0001299211,0.0001616843,0.00004441261,0.0002848791,0.0002768179,0.00001871542,0.0007354483,0.00009708147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008666736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04555918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.00005261531,0.0003055675,0.0001418772,0.0001806844,0.0002726868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981284,0.0001059752,0.0001624207,0.0001854639,0.000376053,0.001041665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103871,0.00001565297,0.00006706186,0.000004535891,0.00004407981,0.00006146834,0.007972781,0.0000042048,0.00001109946,0.9866998,0.001661563,0.003447389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171453,0.00005625883,0.00006067903,0.00005182042,0.00001385912,0.000004532219,0.0001213002,0.000005931795,0.00001959693,0.5303224,0.4691234,0.0001031091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1001609,0.0009909469,0.0001815188,0.4405347,0.00270885,0.0001630583,0.0004845004,0.00002879661,0.4547468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800894,0.000001874491,0.0003710033,0.005898295,0.01318266,0.000001526649,0.000005426947,0.00002043772,0.0004293845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156616183","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374.x","title":"Kant and the Claims of the Poor","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1620843667100244,"gpt":0.3277990332554144,"spread":0.16571466654539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002339769,0.0001057463,0.000196745,0.00004842594,0.0009625328,0.0001096422,0.0004291286,0.0001032947,0.0006011734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005225479,0.00004301214,0.000063575,0.00007372075,0.01069753,0.000054245,0.0005077583,0.001593524,0.00001345625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004052437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002711355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005600711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003970559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985234,0.0003833655,0.0001963247,0.0002227324,0.0003987944,0.0002753512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997732,0.001661194,0.00004789546,0.0003014831,0.0001674285,0.00008994486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627007,0.00005760331,0.0000195316,0.0000233662,0.00002000026,9.303911e-7,0.003922644,6.281036e-8,0.0001428396,0.9944754,0.0000201091,0.001154874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005181903,0.0001199665,0.00008601796,0.00001185904,0.000007326822,0.000002619428,0.0003380717,0.00003221719,0.00002364724,0.9806629,0.01813312,0.00006408368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.20066,0.0006916086,7.730598e-7,0.1001312,0.0001948224,0.0003156059,0.00002570165,0.00001510741,0.6979651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979411,0.0002058738,0.000007095579,0.0008758491,0.0006792301,0.00002954787,8.210117e-7,0.000007357038,0.000253101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01787471168403942,"gpt":0.2244475776745353,"spread":0.2065728659904958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008322637,0.0000693847,0.00007685283,0.00002146984,0.00020953,0.0001404595,0.00005081636,0.00002661605,0.0002014138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001597901,0.0000521389,0.00002661289,0.00001122695,0.0001954635,0.0001340334,0.00002153537,0.0001793494,0.00003347636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007239846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001171379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001132604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000630117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.00002088199,0.00009185476,0.0001011602,0.00009196805,0.00009952119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997792,0.00005860777,0.00002407004,0.00007135615,0.00004701898,0.00001971805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005535037,0.0000117048,0.00001346481,0.000008676158,0.000004644126,0.000002398109,0.0007988077,5.06309e-7,0.0001984243,0.9982725,0.0003095134,0.0003738286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001967398,0.00001651524,0.0005166894,0.00001206338,0.00000804267,0.000002966537,0.0001255538,0.0003953878,0.0001513958,0.8991334,0.09931476,0.0001265032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5291942,0.004097723,0.00001602711,0.008301891,0.001937456,0.000149486,0.00002068671,0.0001340185,0.4561485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913189,0.000006035268,0.000009318176,0.0006605376,0.001142234,0.000003360453,0.00001633218,0.000006786013,0.006836533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4621246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480578946","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385726","title":"Explaining General Ideas","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1287022311872871,"gpt":0.3167838316640034,"spread":0.1880816004767163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001668678,0.0001031961,0.0001614835,0.00002633773,0.0005310759,0.00005437423,0.00008561702,0.00002232419,0.005574386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000371662,0.00007833939,0.00006143851,0.00001428669,0.0004545756,0.00008847263,0.00003575629,0.0001362769,0.0005475733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007726007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002653143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008131735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993864,0.00003281001,0.0001382527,0.0001406187,0.0001233139,0.0001785961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996817,0.00008741166,0.00002120657,0.0001137682,0.0000612343,0.00003473216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009567781,0.00001444986,0.00000552249,0.000009908273,0.00007198357,0.000007492824,0.02811268,0.000003467401,0.000004930805,0.9661658,0.001713741,0.003880391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001092405,0.00003167628,0.00002102275,0.0000189852,0.00001120973,8.707677e-7,0.001987035,0.00001105808,0.00000871747,0.6632125,0.3344892,0.00009854569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2284052,0.003633329,6.349196e-7,0.00274172,0.0003297021,0.00004576559,0.000008217677,0.00009653843,0.7647389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761818,0.0005530607,0.00002242201,0.001654823,0.001576538,0.00001559458,0.000002252972,0.00001176145,0.01998173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032908795","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0016","title":"Sympathy and the Mechanics of Character Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Character (mathematics); Relation (database); Epistemology; Moral character; Function (biology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Philosophy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2277726261961615,"gpt":0.3043627204079108,"spread":0.07659009421174934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005096093,0.00007217435,0.0001778002,0.00001937787,0.0002144798,0.00001384118,0.00005582852,0.00001992424,0.00008719554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006849281,0.00003737969,0.0000425991,0.000009764039,0.0005928716,0.0001065778,0.0001060626,0.00009642199,0.00001542296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003357469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000194717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001620635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002153434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995685,0.00004845321,0.0001088014,0.00005677514,0.00009140143,0.0001261336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.000202651,0.00005593329,0.00009702933,0.00007312054,0.00002219236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140345,0.00001638084,0.00001300546,0.00003312905,0.00007132662,1.327597e-7,0.1086397,2.066533e-9,0.000006773721,0.8907524,0.00004143206,0.0004117393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003573703,0.00003214513,0.0001540659,0.00003657529,0.00005830987,8.527671e-7,0.007761374,0.000006398512,0.00003198003,0.9270213,0.06445686,0.00008275858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5542524,0.1595602,0.00001047189,0.05661622,0.005219418,0.001159871,0.0001320337,0.0001500721,0.2228993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955841,0.001696046,0.000002285187,0.001260228,0.001186157,0.00003206999,6.912481e-7,0.000006417386,0.0002320318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4413316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.218446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527422774","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2141","title":"A Defense of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments (AILACT Essay Competition Winner)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Strengths and weaknesses; Philosophy; Analogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03471161287276179,"gpt":0.2513523004739812,"spread":0.2166406876012194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002019791,0.0001075007,0.0002211467,0.000105214,0.0001380058,0.00002009117,0.0001174393,0.00007952692,0.0008713002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005199759,0.00008210728,0.0001218415,0.00005340687,0.0008599556,0.0002719483,0.00004476211,0.0002190641,0.00004329447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002740815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008247259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009115302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004569371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991843,0.00002276039,0.0003747958,0.00009752002,0.0001676605,0.000152944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999364,0.00006009183,0.0002002674,0.0001320079,0.000189874,0.00005373447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005948109,0.0001224204,0.00004391811,0.00003148045,0.00003653326,0.000002167575,0.004486478,0.0001730649,0.0001385873,0.9945418,0.00000288874,0.0003612198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005897242,0.0003910073,0.0006751403,0.00006736378,0.00002457847,0.00001455117,0.001459691,0.00002164604,0.0005555313,0.9951048,0.0009756971,0.0001202408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5311416,0.0000217963,0.0002173773,0.0003409177,0.0002635428,0.0001169046,0.00009407061,0.00002218153,0.4677816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992754,0.00001579087,0.0002295292,0.0002440849,0.0001394457,0.000006807961,0.00002502127,0.000004738771,0.00005912298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4681339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9540126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045112857","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0018","title":"Hume, Malebranche, and the Self-Justification of the Passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08869480473911803,"gpt":0.2834883854118251,"spread":0.1947935806727071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880388,0.00007110651,0.0001309113,0.00001356972,0.001045136,0.00001575654,0.000102251,0.00002246831,0.00007484746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001665606,0.00003016449,0.00005529818,0.0000222558,0.001435704,0.00006884443,0.000172674,0.0001367699,0.000009115429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005522471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007635028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000429448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994656,0.0001005108,0.0001381868,0.00006678342,0.0001166812,0.0001122743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.0003690789,0.00007785395,0.0001646676,0.00009310347,0.00001935268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007512418,0.00002852832,0.0001556318,0.00003322252,0.00007427316,2.729814e-8,0.06520681,9.921271e-8,0.00001660966,0.933906,0.000416138,0.000155187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004147989,0.0000161948,0.005334132,0.00005473573,0.000157522,0.000001305572,0.01217074,0.000008892092,0.000138031,0.8605619,0.121039,0.0001027712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523274,0.03404458,0.00000628001,0.06733351,0.00233371,0.0006855396,0.00005017581,0.0001087103,0.3431101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975289,0.0006114971,0.000007055471,0.0004010189,0.0004878472,0.00002729758,4.712419e-7,0.000005611382,0.0009303293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4452015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151405763","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198748922.001.0001","title":"Kant's Transcendental Deduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Epistemology; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06550582024578556,"gpt":0.211377725781975,"spread":0.1458719055361895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006304622,0.0001830898,0.000213715,0.00004460829,0.0001520087,0.0001047283,0.0001437519,0.0001758924,0.0194273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006080351,0.0001519051,0.0001923627,0.000004641897,0.000334212,0.00006812462,0.00002167066,0.0006448266,0.001498087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004065092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001256367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001927939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001657776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992462,0.00001707866,0.0001742976,0.0002287433,0.0002142006,0.000119415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996684,0.00003606112,0.00004977257,0.0001153772,0.00004398617,0.00008643181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001088414,0.00001431393,8.182193e-9,0.00005486659,0.00004817595,0.000009325894,0.002593973,6.590321e-8,0.00000341349,0.964106,0.03219521,0.0009637781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005109701,0.0000273877,2.842884e-8,0.00001933426,0.00002530342,0.00000145067,0.00008779552,0.000002467541,0.000004073941,0.4991349,0.5005377,0.0001084935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003701226,0.0001875388,0.00001445163,0.00555845,0.001148705,0.00009932956,0.0000837758,0.0001438527,0.9927602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04247918,0.00006736776,0.000005376017,0.00245837,0.006294813,0.000004650641,0.0001588867,0.00004326597,0.9484881],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4683425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138030685","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0003","title":"Filling the Gaps in Hume's Vacuums","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Interpreter; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1722157259676711,"gpt":0.3276957438219384,"spread":0.1554800178542673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000636472,0.0001108215,0.0001672659,0.00003872074,0.0004919568,0.00004502997,0.0001296768,0.00002889306,0.0004012196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001321593,0.0000631756,0.00005948072,0.0000285556,0.0005225876,0.000132091,0.0001128293,0.0002673261,0.0001645628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000181402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006641729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004440939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003227346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992443,0.00006790768,0.0001668481,0.0001002347,0.0001374699,0.0002832453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993671,0.0003526213,0.00004070502,0.0001503819,0.00005806152,0.00003114574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004503221,0.00003408516,0.0002138611,0.00001942645,0.00004773385,0.000001227431,0.07110368,0.000001112243,0.00000621423,0.9275041,0.0007136638,0.0003504398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001348629,0.0000215821,0.0005600122,0.00005001331,0.00001855573,7.650456e-7,0.01405038,0.000004960713,0.00002999028,0.7047511,0.2802438,0.000134007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3313197,0.0511595,0.000003302996,0.01840465,0.002466481,0.0002770735,0.00002037435,0.0001176156,0.5962313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950586,0.0006288801,0.00000537503,0.001257719,0.001575636,0.00002798584,0.000001305261,0.00001135136,0.001433176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6637389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4393074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01732302339000507,"gpt":0.2014930318476231,"spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001944363,0.0002531302,0.0004157007,0.0003247861,0.0002849971,0.0002163367,0.0005371089,0.0001241877,0.007915581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003746619,0.0002068322,0.0003336243,0.00004064494,0.0002870694,0.0002629947,0.00002767649,0.000783193,0.0003595734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001107714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002935871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005774919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005115373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984772,0.00007123736,0.0005139922,0.0002332182,0.0003197555,0.0003846523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982641,0.0001126736,0.0003059014,0.000311703,0.0002326612,0.0007730083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005454119,0.00003834478,0.007964685,0.00002544344,0.0002654842,0.00006105402,0.01106398,0.000003330219,0.00004690583,0.9792905,0.0008165119,0.0003692444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008727178,0.0002205997,0.00488545,0.0004195763,0.00007102511,0.00001553342,0.0001930932,0.000024259,0.0001099107,0.9694811,0.02339069,0.0003160329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109712,0.0009009915,0.000004034706,0.01380669,0.002140808,0.0001375569,0.000312255,0.00001271852,0.07171372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905704,0.00003014387,0.00001583378,0.004717687,0.004361198,0.000001164387,0.00001794079,0.00004250925,0.0002431685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07959913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121360315","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002004","title":"Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Duty; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law; Theology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05909160075580563,"gpt":0.2991831635566609,"spread":0.2400915628008552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000533141,0.00008589456,0.0002657284,0.00003957516,0.00004915723,0.00002279971,0.0001019582,0.00003147534,0.001009055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008772954,0.00006694449,0.00004719897,0.00003108401,0.0001776775,0.0001121629,0.00004097967,0.0001605552,0.00006833544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006737395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001774586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003107647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002458803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993349,0.00005926524,0.0002805418,0.0001226358,0.0001035427,0.00009914399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996094,0.00008266439,0.00007676638,0.0001523413,0.00003994308,0.00003892502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002861881,0.00003081411,0.000005044382,0.002797102,0.000006561672,0.000003581798,0.0003958955,2.460439e-7,0.00001293769,0.9847724,0.0002092494,0.01176324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002743494,0.00003876505,0.000141194,0.005308626,0.0001831071,0.000005787107,0.000107059,0.00004889447,0.00002064522,0.1833423,0.8103303,0.0001989654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02122279,0.4853104,0.00001101873,0.02975206,0.0003593244,0.0005586743,0.00006224414,0.00004129128,0.4626822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452494,0.04949592,0.00003168401,0.004767852,0.0002697179,0.000005628951,0.000002777443,0.000008606266,0.0001684578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059240278","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.006","title":"Kant’s concept of natural purpose and the reflecting power of judgement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Epistemology; Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Teleology; Relation (database); Action (physics); Identification (biology); Power (physics); Critical philosophy; Subject (documents); Practical reason; Causality (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2063392021736191,"gpt":0.3404160020800884,"spread":0.1340767999064693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003472803,0.0002452857,0.0009175891,0.0003097506,0.0005361082,0.000005398068,0.0003423497,0.00008929047,0.00003029471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007151458,0.0001349572,0.00008000455,0.0002572663,0.1877533,0.000182676,0.0004108876,0.000286526,1.049007e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000929751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007422386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003575413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974805,0.0002274923,0.0009092363,0.0005517954,0.000530161,0.0003007913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977718,0.001324665,0.000484467,0.0001325096,0.0002129564,0.00007361624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024525,0.0002013803,0.0007796643,0.0003447895,0.00004597826,0.000004257843,0.03984748,7.038341e-7,0.0005194609,0.9571381,0.00008731496,0.0007856336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008047,0.0012819,0.0005300939,0.0005832304,0.00003111552,0.00000539613,0.007467817,0.00001554182,0.0001102486,0.9809391,0.007793166,0.000234354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6915052,0.2757534,4.536339e-7,0.004010806,0.001650685,0.0003022438,0.00002852302,0.000008023886,0.02674067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938815,0.005593492,0.00005159415,0.000227374,0.0002058379,0.00001407732,7.826705e-7,0.000002772321,0.00002257932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3023763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}