{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1344,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1344,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"167b2aade25a","filters":{"topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W4210554560","doi":"10.1093/0199240981.001.0001","title":"Politics in the Vernacular","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1475,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Democracy; Vernacular; Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Citizenship; Liberal democracy; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08369967993088637,"gpt":0.3571839419621174,"spread":0.273484262031231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317939,0.00009869321,0.0001315609,0.00004062872,0.0002357059,0.00005204896,0.00050742,0.0004785814,0.0004853857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002927496,0.00006867878,0.00008741079,0.00007097114,0.0005862233,0.00004210484,0.0000268751,0.0007024102,0.0003608104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002508242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000842467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002921103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001822981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.0001845629,0.0001404088,0.0001268043,0.0005562152,0.000388456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991354,0.0005128555,0.00002694802,0.0001992943,0.00003626792,0.00008926002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.8875e-7,0.00001063986,0.000005057469,0.000005271646,0.000003332595,0.00003102404,0.002351583,1.333106e-7,6.519736e-9,0.9537932,0.04374382,0.00005560228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001914893,0.000003711351,0.000007576077,0.00001138528,0.000005392504,4.072643e-7,0.0002113291,2.992224e-7,4.059798e-8,0.4976164,0.5020735,0.00005082593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000760782,0.0001114501,0.000009002109,0.02159741,0.0001673275,0.0001229159,0.000008072791,0.00002728443,0.9779489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005205175,0.0002456903,0.00001499113,0.01036408,0.002086296,0.000003583977,0.000008859356,0.000009082176,0.9820622],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4583297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5314633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121380055","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":927,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Citizenship; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Democratic theory; Political science; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1001922595167281,"gpt":0.42847313283175,"spread":0.3282808733150219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004957772,0.00006343071,0.0002319814,0.00003838878,0.0003890436,0.00000706841,0.0005532972,0.00004061804,0.0000195215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020229,0.00004189808,0.0000746268,0.0007713526,0.008517118,0.0003432579,0.00007112192,0.000159358,0.000007106142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001150939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001254761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002349015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004485838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997297,0.0006610823,0.000495768,0.000168539,0.0008274558,0.0005501879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965484,0.002500086,0.0001104029,0.0002223832,0.0003521989,0.0002665214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003922516,0.00002801281,0.0002879153,0.00008515328,0.000001251761,0.000002231488,0.001710898,9.108273e-8,0.00001133288,0.9968747,0.0002654163,0.0007290678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001174629,0.00007900422,0.01287547,0.001254341,0.000008221427,0.00000299769,0.003031836,0.000005630553,0.0009350315,0.9784083,0.003176763,0.0001049747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05789949,0.02931249,0.0001956379,0.09602498,0.0004162656,0.001112826,0.00005901333,0.0000377543,0.8149415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949291,0.0026894,0.00004303705,0.002022122,0.00005954923,0.000006011154,5.866224e-7,0.000002133526,0.0002480359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501779374","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.001.0001","title":"Culture, Citizenship, and Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Sociology; Economic Justice; Multiculturalism; Politics; Identity (music); Democracy; Neutrality; Identity politics; Epistemology; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09985828978042599,"gpt":0.3481530965415666,"spread":0.2482948067611406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007274329,0.000118747,0.0001777917,0.00002580171,0.001306768,0.0000688519,0.0002353655,0.0006834972,0.001215358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002341336,0.0001044096,0.00005612662,0.0000284125,0.001322403,0.00003617013,0.0000497838,0.001860865,0.0002062294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008114324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003298105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008635253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004158652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987678,0.0005174917,0.0001117788,0.0001027894,0.000255266,0.0002449052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989555,0.0005768568,0.00002487295,0.0001753763,0.00004266469,0.0002247269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001632139,0.000006303404,8.430908e-7,0.00001559094,0.000009822744,0.000001415966,0.004218135,6.833278e-9,3.225686e-8,0.8278331,0.1676217,0.0002913901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002562804,0.00001188758,0.00000393737,0.00002092174,0.00001037007,3.126504e-7,0.0001812281,4.994077e-8,2.228899e-7,0.5494363,0.4502295,0.0000796946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001921294,0.0002417162,0.000001533819,0.001885802,0.00007916782,0.00008784913,0.00003192083,0.00009640741,0.9975564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007510101,0.0007319062,0.000041167,0.00298306,0.0006482785,0.00000172867,0.00002585999,0.000009765513,0.9880481],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2826077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2148880415269112,"gpt":0.4882066868125774,"spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002803662,0.00007620553,0.0001488066,0.0000596012,0.000367717,0.00001735161,0.0001003811,0.0001050387,0.00002173614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008985677,0.00006731103,0.00003741575,0.0002102077,0.001080024,0.0000947996,0.00004449669,0.0002353942,0.00008621423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002799206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006746063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001572084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982615,0.0002311269,0.0002140969,0.0001459538,0.0003073195,0.000840037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962792,0.003292248,0.00001876239,0.00006789355,0.0001086655,0.000233273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970624,0.00003285061,0.0005017265,0.00002242272,0.00001125277,0.00001455297,0.007222126,2.638832e-7,0.000002008223,0.9915615,0.00008137197,0.0005302249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001173938,0.0000207383,0.006209877,0.00001962044,0.0000264809,4.024837e-7,0.02334911,0.000001538983,0.00002777408,0.9634901,0.006651351,0.00008560951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05986636,0.0007936559,0.0005716846,0.04068489,0.0005882345,0.0001487585,0.000005175083,0.0001035044,0.8972377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950522,0.00005256792,0.0001608985,0.003533563,0.0008522955,0.000005342045,5.816604e-7,0.00000493241,0.0003376325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9351858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4562325470873994,"gpt":0.4770953464145148,"spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079862,0.0001643321,0.0002974879,0.00004083699,0.0007845387,0.00004043439,0.0001624232,0.0001857672,0.0001037486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00808745,0.0001432536,0.0001165195,0.0001661959,0.004463138,0.0006287022,0.0001221575,0.0003182044,0.0004147761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005600393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001207226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005576343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007903963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961902,0.0004990413,0.0002975606,0.0002228416,0.0005863621,0.002203944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966512,0.00161916,0.00002714776,0.0001821864,0.0002348302,0.001285432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008083673,0.0001425075,0.005030706,0.00001416378,0.00003410367,0.000001327362,0.01036396,2.604148e-8,0.00000287639,0.9838837,0.0004558087,0.0000627446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001699547,0.00004701088,0.001605059,0.00001462673,0.00004222877,0.000001081526,0.05393122,0.000001199794,0.0001152793,0.9110231,0.03285271,0.0001964628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591111,0.001523577,0.0003211883,0.1497045,0.001333494,0.0003833358,0.00003645098,0.0003404922,0.7872458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896984,0.00002517018,0.0001854516,0.006116847,0.003530966,0.00003630821,0.000003078094,0.00001175162,0.0003920654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07751967023305721,"gpt":0.4214526396001939,"spread":0.3439329693671366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006443651,0.0001690435,0.0004383519,0.0000745669,0.002857146,0.0003192447,0.002094266,0.00004506982,0.00005697691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01515784,0.0001328503,0.0001359111,0.0007272719,0.01683385,0.0003940852,0.0002052542,0.0002843346,0.0002836062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001820543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003498092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004164939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955899,0.0004715968,0.000312993,0.0005419012,0.00110278,0.001980849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.0005092419,0.0001439574,0.0009083272,0.0002233275,0.002301816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001939647,0.0000689501,0.00008091579,0.0001550339,0.000002011515,0.000001369213,0.000116745,3.369835e-7,0.000004474715,0.9814754,0.0002382409,0.01785454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757784,0.0001155836,0.001808235,0.001004107,0.00006085989,0.000002325558,0.0003052125,0.00004693144,0.00002840223,0.9278968,0.06823055,0.0004134337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003673091,0.0004550607,0.003257084,0.1414539,0.00008394502,0.0007050057,0.000007243551,0.00008389502,0.8535866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438607,0.0003596917,0.005872612,0.04924927,0.0002323268,0.0000878529,6.165328e-7,0.0000102522,0.0003266415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254444181","doi":"10.1075/ds.6","title":"Action and Agency in Dialogue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Dialogue studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Social science; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1606874882911397,"gpt":0.3987149289340603,"spread":0.2380274406429206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007802866,0.000204477,0.0004275887,0.0001265486,0.0004815534,0.00003252074,0.0001559293,0.0007346828,0.00001961472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001962735,0.0001969722,0.00007567813,0.00007787047,0.00182753,0.0001162845,0.0001188872,0.001079317,0.00007030959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004075494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001188065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04170417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985897,0.0001708216,0.0002413941,0.0003134123,0.0002875828,0.0003970943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986882,0.0008548122,0.00008903851,0.0001457982,0.0001055097,0.0001166693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000878991,0.00002549987,0.0001151587,0.0001352154,0.00006917342,0.00002468058,0.04311493,1.352276e-7,0.000004590524,0.9408453,0.01124997,0.004406632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674469,0.00001824359,0.0005044042,0.00007256773,0.00002967932,2.612783e-7,0.0003936302,1.217072e-7,0.000001340036,0.7456539,0.253063,0.0001761658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00109706,0.004046753,0.00000177639,0.004701508,0.002587763,0.0002938152,0.00007935764,0.00006923656,0.9871227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3576434,0.06720365,0.0001146615,0.00223477,0.01393611,0.0001566903,0.0002063391,0.00008915755,0.5584152],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4287075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535884078","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.001.0001","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology; Moral rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1694781193279955,"gpt":0.4104665883826739,"spread":0.2409884690546784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006577682,0.0001316516,0.0002909418,0.0000859955,0.0005634472,0.00002632445,0.0003622366,0.0007382193,0.001511539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001898436,0.0001169246,0.0001395022,0.00006338126,0.00180689,0.00009260857,0.00005667058,0.0005246384,0.000356291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002319121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001130849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002404289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983769,0.0001226513,0.0002967887,0.000192146,0.000759375,0.0002521603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.0002789085,0.0001022518,0.0002402095,0.000378154,0.0003043726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001187234,0.00002933261,3.872402e-7,0.00001345021,0.00001753538,0.000001712466,0.0005716954,5.396161e-8,4.076803e-7,0.9583017,0.0410504,0.00001209355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004338381,0.00002399848,6.313287e-7,0.00002246003,0.00002240646,9.419058e-8,0.00000760639,1.958502e-7,0.000001496241,0.5740275,0.4257674,0.00008284383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008134901,0.0000243737,0.00001233504,0.01113943,0.0002510822,0.0001404311,0.00003447932,0.00007156697,0.9883181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08717442,0.000003646281,0.00006959842,0.0002900398,0.002700428,0.000002433401,0.00007454675,0.00001265929,0.9096722],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.384717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118928156","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139106931","title":"Collective guilt : international perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective responsibility; Collective identity; Collective memory; Social psychology; Psychology; Shame; Injustice; Criminology; Politics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06078802541807768,"gpt":0.3603555439838008,"spread":0.2995675185657232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002646179,0.0001259846,0.0001546236,0.00009056125,0.0003585141,0.00007294098,0.000652389,0.0004716613,0.003803232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001230235,0.0001237875,0.0001327428,0.00005831858,0.001005705,0.00009992978,0.0001161701,0.0005154815,0.0003018821],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007661361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01889433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006457158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008167631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987636,0.00005585184,0.0001254735,0.0002504335,0.0005618664,0.0002428022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.000248132,0.0000508336,0.0001786064,0.0003209463,0.0001430996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515873,0.0000235352,6.790075e-7,0.000002934311,0.00004964603,0.000005492911,0.03850872,9.30926e-7,6.400747e-8,0.9207304,0.04063342,0.0000397316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005552985,0.000009857558,0.00000450684,0.00002134425,0.000007927906,2.377512e-7,0.001345394,2.989585e-7,5.620709e-7,0.5557459,0.4427195,0.00008898968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[6.297611e-7,0.0001200234,0.00007073233,0.03465486,0.0006795392,0.0001423138,0.00003549799,0.00009928284,0.9641971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003253415,0.00009000382,0.0002194575,0.0008518513,0.002732823,0.000006457604,0.00001179164,0.00001321972,0.992821],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.402086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08810405537028261,"gpt":0.386122849723591,"spread":0.2980187943533084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004046127,0.0001272606,0.0004325974,0.0001077286,0.0003414571,0.00008660903,0.0003463233,0.0002180336,0.000031201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426338,0.00008524742,0.0002515709,0.0001553519,0.002846573,0.0004898895,0.00006637108,0.0006463465,0.000005412844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001470173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005004216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001050942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0007823463,0.0009137425,0.0001253493,0.0009738782,0.0004471756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969521,0.001409056,0.0003604288,0.0001640425,0.0005954668,0.0005188759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453272,0.0001336288,0.0001421275,0.00003334578,0.00003907473,0.000003391827,0.002428794,0.000005478013,0.00004157149,0.9969119,0.00002273923,0.00009259814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986739,0.0001250722,0.002922323,0.0000509987,0.00004787299,0.000009972703,0.0003839341,0.000002746979,0.0001755889,0.9938064,0.0003911956,0.00009710853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4102329,0.0002941077,0.0008597056,0.4184818,0.0004543875,0.000252548,0.00002775896,0.0000210367,0.1693757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.0000397342,0.0003363558,0.004056358,0.002209014,0.000001339155,9.543437e-7,0.000008668932,0.00001817941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05263516533756687,"gpt":0.3802951089819447,"spread":0.3276599436443778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007106146,0.0001150964,0.0002359079,0.00002566153,0.002229432,0.0001343925,0.0004398008,0.00003076307,0.00006857204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234045,0.00005638709,0.00005346275,0.0007105533,0.01959121,0.0003481611,0.0001443095,0.000312949,0.00006173406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004338278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008589965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001566843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.0007020332,0.0002152153,0.0002232184,0.0008458683,0.001115863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953497,0.003475465,0.00007650117,0.0001770626,0.0001220718,0.0007991785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001870364,0.00001550494,0.00006264466,0.00004213168,0.000002771538,1.933223e-7,0.0003989208,8.267434e-9,0.000001142957,0.9960306,0.0002135778,0.003230641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779206,0.00002731749,0.001640733,0.0002687574,0.0000376782,0.000009155612,0.0003302903,0.00001631012,0.000006780278,0.9223832,0.07507251,0.0001294799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01053796,0.01510786,0.00001500812,0.8074054,0.00008951415,0.0006817348,0.000008033145,0.00003268446,0.1661218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129086,0.00762409,0.00006333453,0.07906203,0.00022769,0.00003255335,2.707612e-7,0.000004409439,0.00007699982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394296857028716,"gpt":0.4071279646428375,"spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000768051,0.0001697968,0.0003010839,0.00009721453,0.0007946398,0.00008059051,0.0002396349,0.0003200261,0.0001276206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004284294,0.0001900293,0.0001567873,0.0002300519,0.001805457,0.0004266347,0.00003543571,0.0003141835,0.00003523512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009872601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003567353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004049067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004241797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0005153534,0.0004594069,0.0002935143,0.0007234391,0.000552489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.0003504411,0.0001071357,0.0001565487,0.0003527193,0.0001338815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169319,0.0002310287,0.00003729576,0.00004286222,0.00001134636,0.000008456932,0.008075449,5.969151e-7,0.0003562223,0.9904713,0.0006523611,0.0000961523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002732823,0.00009154494,0.0001638036,0.00001521398,0.00004858609,9.365527e-7,0.0007325259,0.00001369515,0.0003391852,0.9933772,0.004723747,0.0002202801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05516209,0.0001091661,0.0001942954,0.04212516,0.0004746818,0.0004877734,0.0001048839,0.0002194579,0.9011225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931685,0.000006479409,0.0002704299,0.002123902,0.004194998,0.00002283216,0.00003993298,0.00002268593,0.0001502114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7749171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039252732","doi":"10.1177/1463499608090788","title":"Value and virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Sacrifice; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Politics; Political science; Mathematics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08550895871700359,"gpt":0.3758603538217933,"spread":0.2903513951047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358303,0.00006426044,0.0001097585,0.00001610944,0.001154901,0.00001076749,0.0001182862,0.0001759788,0.0006015977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001127646,0.00004821132,0.00003971205,0.00007821989,0.009222529,0.00007989561,0.00005061779,0.000206537,0.0001116347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001764963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004670436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000311033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008341372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988313,0.0005210139,0.00008885731,0.0001518,0.0001608936,0.0002461796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.0008311503,0.00001628531,0.00008590685,0.00002238762,0.00017498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117682,0.00003548507,0.0002930914,0.000001212541,0.000004101206,0.00002827761,0.0009668153,1.588555e-7,0.0000118618,0.9979517,0.0001743375,0.0005212173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007116389,0.00006178916,0.001538772,0.000002843272,0.000003986461,0.000007769877,0.001389861,0.000001892653,0.00005604786,0.9838213,0.0129636,0.00008099274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1669741,0.0007248421,0.0008479126,0.01832378,0.0002979565,0.00009102476,0.000004344425,0.0001581484,0.8125779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951899,0.0008073089,0.0001475723,0.002848832,0.000313248,0.000002329701,4.582204e-7,0.000003457728,0.0006868644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211055638","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224","title":"Minorities within Minorities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority rights; Normative; Multiculturalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Autonomy; Feminism; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Deliberative democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04891012023346309,"gpt":0.2575390328833977,"spread":0.2086289126499347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600062,0.0003401072,0.0004308763,0.000165744,0.0009724358,0.0001199915,0.0008492793,0.0009715988,0.00001325406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009585592,0.0004364337,0.0002640272,0.00001797738,0.002555276,0.0002184013,0.0002455437,0.0009993444,0.00004608523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008476654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001564336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003126936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001979982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977866,0.0002601914,0.0002271739,0.0004436861,0.0006559635,0.0006264188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984396,0.0003499256,0.0001675318,0.000391394,0.0002404307,0.000411191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000239397,0.0000111641,0.000001185586,0.00009184852,0.00005502543,0.0000935553,0.002185541,6.067616e-7,5.340468e-7,0.8470289,0.1503402,0.000167499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002322775,0.00002709468,0.000003974887,0.0001534233,0.0001622976,0.00000229797,0.001520245,0.000002915592,0.00002528619,0.001361975,0.9960123,0.0004958732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008124284,0.0003446993,0.00001515699,0.0003179698,0.0007857281,0.0002915048,0.0004112945,0.0002618961,0.9974905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001382107,0.0001519317,0.0000886737,0.000415866,0.002701015,0.000001014132,0.00004103841,0.0000309269,0.9951874],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146926183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Relation (database); State (computer science); Political science; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249227603658969,"gpt":0.2638027518513514,"spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002753315,0.0003054336,0.0004395751,0.0003323122,0.0005516221,0.00006701531,0.0009950906,0.00102912,0.000007193374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950508,0.0003990053,0.0002454005,0.00005483817,0.001379582,0.0002396807,0.0002884165,0.001293457,0.00005878949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001104141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005383858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003857122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000212508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976234,0.0003056737,0.0002166472,0.0005100628,0.0006225656,0.00072162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0002709211,0.0001383019,0.0004198383,0.0001542944,0.0007304891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002224253,0.00001857984,0.000004588655,0.00003320485,0.00002751583,0.0003387546,0.0008128595,1.867309e-7,2.422944e-7,0.8514173,0.147149,0.0001755211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004716305,0.00002348824,0.00001338463,0.0001306136,0.00003500436,0.000002919139,0.00005594354,0.000002105965,0.000001791551,0.007513796,0.9913412,0.0004081084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002399347,0.0001759267,0.00003360087,0.001999162,0.0003207531,0.0003656404,0.0001036826,0.0001718405,0.9968054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00281805,0.0003801584,0.00004011484,0.0005761001,0.001367462,4.761053e-7,0.00003516875,0.00003053398,0.9947519],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08701216007564758,"gpt":0.3869992719661973,"spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004908868,0.0001772064,0.0004164214,0.0001739623,0.0004715576,0.00004426848,0.0007186441,0.00004148819,0.0002279543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003041297,0.0001293622,0.00007832451,0.002698341,0.01084266,0.0002842902,0.00006759504,0.0003316163,0.00009256322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003512593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001396177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957478,0.0006321523,0.0003845735,0.0004537474,0.000927044,0.001854668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978359,0.0005106816,0.0001149099,0.0002989903,0.0001311564,0.001108372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006323427,0.00009340997,0.001734061,0.0001040357,0.000002218314,0.00001388232,0.0005156061,1.554245e-7,0.000002653957,0.9929301,0.00001713602,0.00458045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004315079,0.0007499009,0.03338015,0.005511834,0.000132327,0.00001164289,0.004931101,0.00009580729,0.0001755852,0.9471161,0.006374615,0.00108943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03514291,0.002377055,0.00159231,0.0499948,0.0001761391,0.001232114,0.000008863032,0.0001955512,0.9092802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787315,0.0005205574,0.001431376,0.01914735,0.00007297439,0.00003589945,4.626587e-7,0.00001024661,0.00004964617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121206155","doi":"10.1017/s026505251600025x","title":"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS IDEAL THEORY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Normative; Mistake; Political philosophy; Original position; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04809742837355112,"gpt":0.3644644791981075,"spread":0.3163670508245564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009584742,0.0001849138,0.0002248988,0.00008538854,0.001738862,0.00008581988,0.0002980478,0.0004018961,0.0005275567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00106232,0.0001373914,0.0001540036,0.0002337423,0.001675626,0.0003482137,0.00009390429,0.0003030923,0.0007684389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001086172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004380883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003468922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.0004925927,0.0002113279,0.0002911029,0.0004244435,0.0006476283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986619,0.0006660734,0.00007623332,0.0001496716,0.0001217658,0.0003243448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004425478,0.00002541182,0.00007681121,0.00001477582,0.00002944644,0.000003824837,0.02234657,4.542211e-9,0.00004753532,0.970818,0.0009759001,0.005617483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002819695,0.0000437509,0.0002746612,0.00003487906,0.00001508564,8.279467e-7,0.0004793342,1.016937e-7,0.00003493908,0.9318324,0.06679998,0.000202108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01024243,0.000165357,0.00001547864,0.2170231,0.0002163168,0.0001157595,0.00005890909,0.0001087465,0.7720538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964563,0.0003123952,0.00001459977,0.0184401,0.01291101,0.000008497029,0.000001204747,0.00002090883,0.003728328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002896677","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12020","title":"Three Kinds of Social Kinds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3463273922816184,"gpt":0.4474865382176424,"spread":0.101159145936024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002158329,0.0001283152,0.0002757218,0.000159172,0.001207131,0.00009074749,0.0005009452,0.0003947853,0.001777181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001150222,0.0001041188,0.00007852472,0.0005648278,0.004630693,0.0002176424,0.0002814746,0.0009791598,0.0002336042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006347788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001293992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009920287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003586908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969939,0.0005188927,0.000279654,0.0003393232,0.0009952582,0.0008729537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977913,0.001197777,0.00004864463,0.0001775439,0.0004190553,0.0003656003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002803055,0.0001348386,0.0003895101,0.0000286973,0.0000169247,0.000002234224,0.003493186,1.05569e-7,0.00004901975,0.9919928,0.0002845318,0.003580073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001989137,0.0002439403,0.002996859,0.000009878043,0.000004299131,3.071999e-7,0.0007481186,0.000008924367,0.000009930551,0.9876505,0.008005732,0.0001226339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0437676,0.0002533652,0.00003365178,0.05866322,0.00006055721,0.0003317241,0.00001246155,0.00004755079,0.8968299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998042,0.0001030949,0.0001323634,0.0004552547,0.001024425,0.00005959405,0.000003022627,0.000009104403,0.0001711075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09047791347116682,"gpt":0.3278057112290845,"spread":0.2373277977579177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189227,0.0001454697,0.0003435038,0.0001507827,0.0002754274,0.00002222111,0.0003672573,0.0001555956,0.00009308838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00218869,0.0001026767,0.0001501321,0.0001958476,0.001651467,0.0001329097,0.00005174604,0.0006892002,0.00006315902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000159042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003767733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002989004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001224573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975856,0.0003782287,0.0005150019,0.0001511189,0.0007837715,0.0005862639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968812,0.001848942,0.0001414143,0.0001544161,0.0002302033,0.0007437859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212375,0.0001415031,0.006101336,0.00002130203,0.00002690234,0.0000692325,0.001921535,0.0000187676,0.00001414198,0.990319,0.001205376,0.00003972781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003404032,0.0003111348,0.01759688,0.0002071366,0.00002283007,0.00002137551,0.0006822222,0.00001075662,0.00005271724,0.9789677,0.001657724,0.0001291803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4497159,0.000182569,0.00007699103,0.5011173,0.000409307,0.0002006754,0.00002418233,0.00001180163,0.04826129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910935,0.00002703647,0.0003830801,0.007019803,0.001334504,0.000001292529,2.019291e-7,0.0000129609,0.0001276464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485884427","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Citizenship; Public philosophy; Political science; Key (lock); Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Law; Social science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249227603658969,"gpt":0.2638027518513514,"spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002753315,0.0003054336,0.0004395751,0.0003323122,0.0005516221,0.00006701531,0.0009950906,0.00102912,0.000007193374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950508,0.0003990053,0.0002454005,0.00005483817,0.001379582,0.0002396807,0.0002884165,0.001293457,0.00005878949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001104141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005383858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003857122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000212508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976234,0.0003056737,0.0002166472,0.0005100628,0.0006225656,0.00072162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0002709211,0.0001383019,0.0004198383,0.0001542944,0.0007304891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002224253,0.00001857984,0.000004588655,0.00003320485,0.00002751583,0.0003387546,0.0008128595,1.867309e-7,2.422944e-7,0.8514173,0.147149,0.0001755211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004716305,0.00002348824,0.00001338463,0.0001306136,0.00003500436,0.000002919139,0.00005594354,0.000002105965,0.000001791551,0.007513796,0.9913412,0.0004081084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002399347,0.0001759267,0.00003360087,0.001999162,0.0003207531,0.0003656404,0.0001036826,0.0001718405,0.9968054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00281805,0.0003801584,0.00004011484,0.0005761001,0.001367462,4.761053e-7,0.00003516875,0.00003053398,0.9947519],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604618828","doi":"10.1017/s0265052515000059","title":"DECOLONIZATION AND SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Subject (documents); Autonomy; Democracy; Politics; Colonialism; Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07526017402327566,"gpt":0.378642025725396,"spread":0.3033818517021203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046629,0.00008242193,0.0001064439,0.00008169515,0.0007627482,0.00007520185,0.00006827226,0.0002046266,0.000005627668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005643498,0.00008863671,0.00002383833,0.0002351698,0.0004808365,0.0002739174,0.00004049897,0.0001309186,0.00001358421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007436121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007778365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008002704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990966,0.0001926295,0.000111578,0.000140692,0.0002188814,0.0002396572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.00009717723,0.00004338929,0.00004519357,0.0001109544,0.000270203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005904767,0.00002908943,0.0002459814,0.00001236622,0.000004711243,9.722941e-7,0.0290776,7.669431e-8,0.000001073926,0.9682487,0.0001910869,0.002182441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002462383,0.00004083962,0.001093776,0.000004711676,0.00001282065,9.221972e-7,0.000551913,0.00001938199,0.000003636236,0.9818767,0.01604345,0.0001056376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05587119,0.0001818396,0.00004807843,0.1494042,0.0002231627,0.0002168239,0.00001756813,0.0001998522,0.7938373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935088,0.0001125841,0.0001226684,0.002230384,0.003881873,0.000005872027,0.00000419311,0.00000790488,0.0001257679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.586652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051490122","doi":"10.1007/s11159-005-5614-2","title":"Introduction: Education and social justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237841884103027,"gpt":0.4132711024110926,"spread":0.3808926835700623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123122,0.00004476478,0.00007784622,0.00004784982,0.0001489305,0.00002051551,0.0001036822,0.00004388464,0.0004786589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005268464,0.00004691433,0.00003356052,0.00009948581,0.0001618606,0.0001941404,0.00001164572,0.00007176792,0.00002994332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001017224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006556252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004970217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002447906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992819,0.00008001649,0.000205724,0.0001074847,0.0002515084,0.0000733563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992588,0.00006810908,0.0001140677,0.00005383994,0.0004770299,0.00002813137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000120466,0.0001322774,0.00005491087,0.0004698541,0.000003045922,9.268077e-9,0.000235849,5.81696e-8,0.00001233719,0.8888915,0.08504093,0.025158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002144084,0.000004204762,0.001951797,0.0003281002,0.00003630303,0.000001420251,0.0004512646,6.455974e-7,0.00001914503,0.1167826,0.8803561,0.00004696066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004162518,0.01047689,0.00009061813,0.3544374,0.004806324,0.000182867,0.000006317064,0.00001534946,0.6258218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512616,0.008647199,0.0006848993,0.007215228,0.020732,0.00004315279,0.0001359714,0.000006746827,0.01127322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06261548645886392,"gpt":0.4068541026422285,"spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798106,0.0001144172,0.0002679171,0.00002821973,0.00167593,0.00004943283,0.00160695,0.0000311521,0.00003550428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01087564,0.00006111372,0.0001236239,0.001311659,0.02155051,0.0001463628,0.0002352327,0.000214611,0.0001247262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002171285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007185112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001849689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000464877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966714,0.0003880842,0.0003380258,0.0003082111,0.0009699598,0.001324252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972449,0.0009554929,0.0001089533,0.0005944753,0.0003500284,0.0007461319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001103313,0.0000145092,0.00006776545,0.00004162928,0.000002538371,2.150813e-7,0.0008761703,2.299364e-8,0.00003606799,0.9819861,0.00005910305,0.01691478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009055949,0.0003488215,0.02895087,0.002829437,0.0000643928,0.000007748818,0.006309921,0.000009541192,0.0004844342,0.4617101,0.4987038,0.000490352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956369,0.006011977,0.00004480654,0.7312524,0.0004610236,0.0005911469,0.000005692075,0.00004507952,0.2516314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794731,0.006715727,0.0001465666,0.01333484,0.0002197603,0.00001243695,2.893328e-8,0.000005840035,0.00009174998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025727140","doi":"10.5840/philtopics2004321/24","title":"Responsibility and the Condition of Moral Sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08090817733398858,"gpt":0.3629408907319927,"spread":0.2820327133980041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001115522,0.00006346764,0.0001537525,0.00001925684,0.0002850639,0.00001796481,0.00009467374,0.0001461723,0.00002100764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002028652,0.0000445358,0.00006503095,0.0001139132,0.003071976,0.00008056872,0.00004534217,0.000279538,0.000006830451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003800857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001131258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003909007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005251106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988601,0.0003458151,0.0001899531,0.0001351818,0.000290714,0.0001782976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990567,0.0005242342,0.000043254,0.0001734469,0.00008573775,0.0001166169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009535698,0.00003265622,0.00009388482,0.00001035177,0.000005872431,0.000003451136,0.001734755,0.000003991169,0.000008513614,0.9978781,0.000004440135,0.0001286054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007152954,0.00002906409,0.001543944,0.00001065083,0.00001458137,0.000001816178,0.00008768265,0.000006946479,0.00007982759,0.9961809,0.001275339,0.0000539582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938756,0.0001105706,0.00009481783,0.5807549,0.0001736004,0.0002439917,0.00001649154,0.00004186172,0.1246882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970434,0.00004738233,0.0001495653,0.001980022,0.0007240417,0.00000370291,0.000001360733,0.000003179362,0.00004738716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7031677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1285266877168514,"gpt":0.3874451090091326,"spread":0.2589184212922812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187506,0.000165496,0.0002026793,0.00007647031,0.001359523,0.00005937613,0.0002434519,0.0002307676,0.001021669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007385185,0.0001423673,0.00009255638,0.00007116568,0.004973303,0.0001251592,0.00006750965,0.0004588605,0.0002324322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000592595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009684268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.0006766951,0.0001940557,0.0003510202,0.0003466155,0.001247912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976562,0.000932346,0.00002041811,0.0002387041,0.00008038943,0.001072004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002569727,0.0001994278,0.00007380322,0.000007189068,0.00001585345,0.00001529425,0.008670188,1.516772e-9,0.000005521812,0.9909397,0.00002934945,0.00001798544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001527289,0.0001497605,0.001658269,0.00001804625,0.00002419616,0.000002403533,0.008491671,3.480968e-7,0.0002110971,0.9855792,0.003515074,0.0001972116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06174503,0.00003389498,0.00004671662,0.002882591,0.0001044588,0.0001092195,0.00001523241,0.00013627,0.9349266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956064,0.000001324611,0.00008699365,0.002031422,0.0009423471,0.000008354599,0.000001227635,0.00001464055,0.001307272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03802008124738713,"gpt":0.3237438505211521,"spread":0.285723769273765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809699,0.0001368946,0.0002982825,0.0001404569,0.0002896394,0.00006665003,0.000240485,0.0001844559,0.0001051131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233242,0.000113861,0.0001322946,0.0001107472,0.001023224,0.0001310028,0.00003673708,0.0006518221,0.00004205102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001091212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001240396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005523363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003518604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975338,0.0005753192,0.0004194046,0.0001431111,0.0007042223,0.0006241409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960305,0.00241282,0.0001273067,0.0001354728,0.000224739,0.001069145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000691196,0.00005645219,0.0001116249,0.00002210522,0.00002205492,0.00001705042,0.0002789897,8.034494e-7,0.00000483923,0.9975191,0.001646466,0.0002514211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004167504,0.0003321671,0.001468017,0.00007839603,0.00002774283,0.00001477505,0.00008846133,0.00001456772,0.00002535056,0.9875711,0.009832962,0.0001297624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09582023,0.00009392686,0.0002499952,0.1391453,0.0007767029,0.00008056853,0.00001432404,0.00003073678,0.7637882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846168,0.00004080062,0.0001900363,0.01104477,0.00400033,6.464396e-7,6.343997e-7,0.00001356581,0.00009237957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969308910","doi":"10.1111/1469-8219.00001","title":"Normative Justifications for Liberal Nationalism: Justice, Democracy and National Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Democracy; Nationality; Identity (music); National identity; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy; Immigration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09001745119918635,"gpt":0.4101713365478809,"spread":0.3201538853486945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001120026,0.00009942287,0.0001018006,0.0003190101,0.003118417,0.0001889709,0.0001291055,0.0001528501,0.0001126262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004389481,0.0001091532,0.00004508113,0.0005445897,0.0004509219,0.001251761,0.00003231483,0.0001513879,0.00001394084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001379688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003767292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001021136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005368772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984733,0.0001005857,0.000259174,0.0002212378,0.0007330342,0.0002125948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959629,0.002095402,0.00009423946,0.00005773154,0.001622528,0.0001672166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005588665,0.00005668548,0.0001652633,0.0000167383,0.00001852577,2.371018e-7,0.002075736,0.00001348217,0.00001340804,0.9949028,0.002430946,0.0003005284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003547093,0.000008919183,0.009568977,0.000009692631,0.00004623321,0.000005075059,0.0005221369,0.0008932172,0.000004898935,0.8860784,0.1023766,0.0001312145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0463286,0.0009035413,0.02379896,0.4250902,0.001176799,0.001644747,0.001639138,0.000269969,0.4991481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879482,0.0004494717,0.003654693,0.002563119,0.0008469776,0.0001183139,0.0002298536,0.00000921311,0.004180188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03758842339145689,"gpt":0.3019908167526464,"spread":0.2644023933611895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088863,0.0001415734,0.0002169181,0.00003850912,0.0008584574,0.00007012438,0.0006135394,0.0001549561,0.00006753293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002034984,0.00007547508,0.0001047796,0.0001797659,0.001960671,0.0001185655,0.00003998351,0.000558643,0.0000171835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002070162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006775089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001142704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006447144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971294,0.001479754,0.0002651882,0.0002373186,0.0005105433,0.0003777886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312,0.005986132,0.00009700422,0.0005267449,0.00007490677,0.0001952651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006077249,0.00005481305,0.00001293495,0.00000670215,0.00001346256,1.886695e-7,0.0125753,0.000005560071,0.0000418174,0.985832,0.00006155329,0.001334861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000130425,0.0002702138,0.0002084413,0.00001944212,0.00002541696,8.934063e-7,0.000556172,0.001665918,0.000009416167,0.9968941,0.0001144858,0.0001050515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2470088,0.00001221809,0.001029124,0.6270505,0.00007000839,0.0002334399,0.0000126642,0.00006121514,0.124522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915081,0.000007345069,0.00002563561,0.007830223,0.0004897657,0.00001570827,7.881148e-7,0.00001257186,0.0001099161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7224173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467656450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491177.004","title":"Citizen representatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Representation (politics); Direct democracy; Citizen journalism; Government (linguistics); Participatory democracy; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Politics; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07930477289418897,"gpt":0.2854582871432851,"spread":0.2061535142490961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001690191,0.0002469546,0.0003252891,0.0001154741,0.0008935239,0.00003761889,0.0005876772,0.0006255247,0.00002164598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009217276,0.0003096532,0.0002530322,0.000009071226,0.002399105,0.0001147818,0.0002473776,0.0007383439,0.00005975362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002482895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003747428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001581406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001390475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.0001449712,0.0001513634,0.0004385632,0.0005065781,0.0004128417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986112,0.0003101025,0.0001335266,0.0003805923,0.0001925405,0.0003720221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002861059,0.000005240835,6.84886e-7,0.00001742377,0.00006386711,0.000340688,0.001275629,1.874375e-7,0.000001351899,0.9258513,0.07221047,0.0002045933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081274,0.00001926384,0.000006955093,0.00006936266,0.00007511838,0.000003647301,0.0002344985,0.000001053111,0.00002653857,0.001806439,0.9972092,0.0003398098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002498303,0.0001307524,0.00003817333,0.0003438584,0.0002559825,0.0002680003,0.0002093315,0.0001916445,0.9985373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003113659,0.0009017886,0.00004332423,0.0002414439,0.0006123867,3.722584e-7,0.00001979267,0.00002790434,0.9950393],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253700003","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.001.0001","title":"Faces of Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1770820188362782,"gpt":0.3913226072164424,"spread":0.2142405883801642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003775454,0.0000723344,0.000217197,0.00001674138,0.00008022698,0.00001023986,0.0002284239,0.000369222,0.000758967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005852396,0.00006462359,0.00009070058,0.0000388998,0.0006450445,0.00003760312,0.00004350947,0.0003137193,0.0001635431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005113592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009191993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007629682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002704514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990724,0.0001032828,0.0001799922,0.0001193256,0.0003841878,0.000140794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992728,0.0003503979,0.00006957249,0.00009534854,0.00007113786,0.0001408057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001461534,0.000006847644,0.000002540671,0.00005386711,0.000009426125,7.525734e-7,0.001934019,3.458131e-8,3.592916e-7,0.9630488,0.03480453,0.0001373781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001590342,0.000008194871,0.000002634886,0.00001226196,0.000006805891,6.48406e-9,0.00007927184,2.07832e-7,0.000004521147,0.5498468,0.4499781,0.00004532493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003346579,0.00008288187,0.00004401375,0.01242771,0.0001300214,0.00007177213,0.00004625163,0.00004726282,0.9871467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03426599,0.00006993774,0.00006478289,0.002097974,0.0008701853,0.000001153891,0.0000128345,0.000007374216,0.9626098],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4151735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8310156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03065475453241006,"gpt":0.3456204243549922,"spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810124,0.0001246499,0.0004725348,0.00002676702,0.0009286394,0.00011126,0.0004617242,0.00003899024,0.0001672079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004887344,0.00008598031,0.0002061006,0.0009002857,0.02608167,0.0002221477,0.0001583676,0.0002378878,0.00001645415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000206293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001411541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003188628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967893,0.0005657779,0.0003571751,0.000332569,0.0009205868,0.001034644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974754,0.001001899,0.00009975752,0.000318299,0.0003678552,0.0007368009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003093415,0.00002597755,0.0001576532,0.0001117773,0.00001017372,0.000004473819,0.001000747,1.911521e-8,0.000002964659,0.9973394,0.0001965555,0.001147129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000737328,0.0001864903,0.002543672,0.00209239,0.0003908162,0.00008694502,0.0355634,0.00002297548,0.00006605019,0.7022938,0.2553442,0.0006719482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01432383,0.01972685,0.00002711515,0.5601658,0.000289861,0.0003833051,0.00003056596,0.00003716076,0.4050155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634376,0.00923456,0.0002117207,0.02672619,0.0001001156,0.000007989827,9.290491e-7,0.000005087263,0.0002758633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793382062","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.1.3","title":"For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Constructive; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Contradiction; Racism; Feminism; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04690220087675831,"gpt":0.3207353323767127,"spread":0.2738331314999544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008852378,0.0001810236,0.0002772641,0.00005875985,0.001431002,0.000161774,0.0008381812,0.0002077513,0.00002363114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002801176,0.0001254298,0.0001801154,0.0004630734,0.005275138,0.0001766815,0.00004160372,0.0003606654,0.00001532608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000127076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005623095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006701115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979059,0.0003782448,0.0004590401,0.0003171785,0.0004484461,0.0004912436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980965,0.0007602588,0.000249438,0.000507743,0.0002479989,0.0001380393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003933682,0.00008231989,0.0009309599,0.00002575186,0.00002136153,3.624828e-7,0.05882881,2.709813e-7,0.00005796811,0.939239,0.0001539902,0.0006198465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004612289,0.0003758407,0.002021122,0.0001340165,0.00003685689,0.00000216115,0.02185988,0.00002664359,0.0003882994,0.9672207,0.00725387,0.0002194433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2465352,0.0001298535,0.0002207477,0.1629945,0.003358325,0.003335584,0.00123948,0.0001101425,0.5820763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958112,0.000003823241,0.0001271796,0.002566262,0.001291136,0.0000772362,0.000009206427,0.00001542881,0.00009859011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.749276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992335124","doi":"10.1177/1470594x09345680","title":"Public justification and the limits of state action","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law and economics; Redistribution (election); Distributive justice; Coercion (linguistics); Enforcement; Unanimity; Political science; Flourishing; Property rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1740698470078224,"gpt":0.3406155678701323,"spread":0.1665457208623099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107044,0.0001041225,0.0001856459,0.00007556016,0.0005143672,0.0001007394,0.0002703706,0.0001616145,0.00002161654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008860786,0.00009355559,0.00007775411,0.000082183,0.002509462,0.0003109534,0.00004172521,0.0004174177,0.00002305693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000536313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002544124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005861665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004981789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.0001372614,0.0003240963,0.0001870598,0.0001138332,0.0003582956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984309,0.0007037173,0.000172421,0.0002960778,0.0001613667,0.0002354928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001115144,0.00002893283,0.0002394991,0.00001697948,0.00001627909,6.337508e-8,0.001824577,0.000002541875,0.00004636396,0.9970772,0.00001319122,0.000723241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003315407,0.00001233664,0.0007403512,0.000003317274,0.00002359351,0.00000115643,0.0001686633,0.0001800328,0.0003294868,0.9877314,0.01037677,0.0001013728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6645768,0.0000420731,0.00004099904,0.1097762,0.0008637143,0.0002571433,0.00006594135,0.00004703872,0.2243301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973031,0.000373325,0.0001301793,0.000903349,0.00113523,0.00001134478,0.000006407311,0.00001283385,0.0001242778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3327262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114027695","doi":"10.5840/jphil2004101616","title":"Dialectical Delicacies in the Debate About Freedom and Alternative Possibilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06425650584006057,"gpt":0.3415913412221663,"spread":0.2773348353821058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002818982,0.00009479756,0.0001689093,0.00006761869,0.0004354465,0.00007253941,0.0005152895,0.00007563127,0.0000124342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001194765,0.00004926053,0.00007652943,0.000195145,0.001860439,0.0002669644,0.00004216387,0.0006485539,0.000007623825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008182712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002952817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981492,0.0006569247,0.0003124329,0.00007260776,0.00054482,0.000264063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980928,0.001407186,0.0001272352,0.0001266889,0.0001400024,0.0001061343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171693,0.00005893589,0.0001015801,0.000005763131,0.00001730207,0.00001866521,0.06176944,0.00009111951,0.00002004438,0.9377338,0.00002417331,0.00009750392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003768081,0.000154995,0.001334036,0.0000567168,0.0000286104,0.00003280696,0.00342748,0.000005014307,0.0000389497,0.9938841,0.000594837,0.00006564562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7210191,0.001193286,0.0001780098,0.2028721,0.0004572889,0.0001785712,0.000006667042,0.00001054253,0.07408444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953276,0.0004875615,0.00008018844,0.002212101,0.001869529,0.00000130854,9.76891e-8,0.000005310341,0.0000163061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2743085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6854867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075579913","doi":"10.1163/17455243-00903008","title":"Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Human rights; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1224041390958673,"gpt":0.3905063707044295,"spread":0.2681022316085622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079851,0.0001142213,0.0003178465,0.000130413,0.000394572,0.00002559944,0.0002154462,0.000189563,0.00006811644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000392066,0.0000915651,0.0001549225,0.0001464053,0.001512624,0.0005086642,0.00004158438,0.0005552527,0.000007199309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009204667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007776198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003527539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001495109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981811,0.0002481816,0.0004943082,0.00007994877,0.0005150559,0.0004813893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983894,0.0003087682,0.0002468222,0.0001041948,0.0002774947,0.0006733796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001878324,0.0001244148,0.001771106,0.00002019675,0.00002783401,0.000005299404,0.001067464,1.693573e-7,0.0002779624,0.9964588,0.0002136804,0.00001427998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003387338,0.0001589208,0.002460043,0.00007739619,0.00007237851,0.00002324152,0.0002919454,8.408106e-7,0.0001510532,0.9937508,0.002562908,0.0001117584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7340203,0.001417709,0.00003197748,0.04616009,0.0009218621,0.0001653265,0.00006039672,0.00002836565,0.217194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956967,0.000007396623,0.0002361311,0.0007072677,0.003298073,6.61606e-7,0.000001228003,0.000007362385,0.00004519667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2616764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1672080924497507,"gpt":0.4030050556124028,"spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008993624,0.00008568024,0.0001154632,0.00001473496,0.001188403,0.0001496186,0.0002709452,0.0001580675,0.0007332172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001008294,0.00005676553,0.0001055508,0.0002009669,0.0006930061,0.0001809933,0.0001251101,0.0003795452,0.0002628488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006157465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002150713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002631705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004637131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998325,0.0004045576,0.0001533401,0.0002258696,0.000526939,0.0003642307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985511,0.0008655644,0.00002683736,0.000315519,0.000110595,0.0001304206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007161881,0.00004202103,0.00001512997,0.000006617691,0.000009224802,0.00002550752,0.01626429,5.929136e-7,0.00001987597,0.9694639,0.009111186,0.005034457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006755734,0.0000170296,0.0004982942,0.00005781016,0.000009957848,9.482858e-7,0.009556447,0.000008878238,0.0001904213,0.3700615,0.6194604,0.00007081944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01235741,0.003646674,0.000007676716,0.5558536,0.001500309,0.0001338611,0.00001555458,0.00007446282,0.4264105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728667,0.0007969794,0.00001403069,0.01796564,0.0006381618,0.00000613404,0.000003402728,0.000006626656,0.007702352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9140354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02734212584362437,"gpt":0.3469111767575753,"spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249939,0.0001229947,0.0001536824,0.00001473705,0.0006028314,0.00006532734,0.000180314,0.0002142373,0.0001111921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00342814,0.000103651,0.00006300755,0.0001027647,0.002080484,0.0002463862,0.0000996381,0.0003621288,0.0000827433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002533639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007967911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005218312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002534261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997386,0.0007197724,0.0001530417,0.0001683723,0.0003622191,0.001210549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972735,0.001544558,0.0000225827,0.0001242618,0.00005900029,0.000976116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430765,0.00005048216,0.0005019589,0.00001210194,0.00001241013,0.000002754803,0.001145915,6.225861e-9,0.000002078689,0.9977953,0.0002574445,0.0001752718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537131,0.00001619557,0.003624581,0.00001026997,0.0000742071,0.000004033078,0.001223525,0.000001354291,0.00002664445,0.9051629,0.08956159,0.0001410364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04567479,0.0007842882,0.0003280824,0.01115666,0.004531835,0.0001501182,0.0002545341,0.0001533779,0.9369663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864981,0.000004979688,0.00007305642,0.001621329,0.01147222,0.000004113439,0.000005954375,0.000005908092,0.0003143278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08277732688224,"gpt":0.3780833816609621,"spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765066,0.0001279507,0.0003040463,0.00009593759,0.0004234549,0.00007814636,0.000302675,0.0003294569,0.0001597833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004009847,0.0001097911,0.0001810463,0.0001351998,0.002205424,0.0003633467,0.00005550143,0.001261516,0.00002236743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007170782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.0002669007,0.0004734394,0.0001501201,0.0006410991,0.0006176379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.0007534255,0.0001443763,0.0001532881,0.0004024633,0.0009159867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002467228,0.0001099984,0.001423218,0.0000174948,0.00001548091,0.00002451938,0.0007003954,3.192776e-8,0.0001553694,0.9971603,0.0002109033,0.0001576629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334709,0.00009200682,0.004450758,0.00001543841,0.00003548875,0.00003357672,0.0001846722,0.000001593042,0.00008258044,0.9857249,0.008921956,0.0001235677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5133258,0.0001468088,0.00006539666,0.1748618,0.001655695,0.0001393939,0.00002143644,0.00003919433,0.3097444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898362,0.00002183492,0.0005385668,0.003661559,0.00588266,6.907284e-7,3.792635e-7,0.00001118986,0.00004691294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4765104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011063172080465,"gpt":0.3646774222089,"spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001634287,0.0001138567,0.000299346,0.00006172985,0.0009226936,0.00002822213,0.0009357797,0.0001401496,0.00008192165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003979505,0.00007407344,0.0001391958,0.0006846114,0.007927242,0.0003109818,0.0001084542,0.0001956148,0.000001283089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001698482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001951956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00162948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001745273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980435,0.0004233408,0.0003200127,0.0001973043,0.0007225451,0.0002932326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989286,0.0005053186,0.0002367096,0.0001212079,0.0001421805,0.00006599061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714152,0.00009100531,0.001411602,0.00003055951,0.00003196152,5.501757e-8,0.05401647,0.0000288779,0.0003006206,0.9403814,0.00001753139,0.003672786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001284538,0.00005562184,0.004189858,0.0001037492,0.00001837917,1.528026e-7,0.003346822,0.00002687,0.002383796,0.9894926,0.0001567587,0.0000969224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6605939,0.0003580813,0.000004132954,0.02855583,0.00009300453,0.0001408048,0.00005033092,0.00001324909,0.3101907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990203,0.0002484717,0.00009086988,0.0001914351,0.0003694228,0.000002882599,3.341682e-7,0.000004287886,0.00007196986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3384265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513518358","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12337","title":"‘Justice and Colonialism’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1187968102789085,"gpt":0.3652442710790025,"spread":0.246447460800094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388736,0.00009930189,0.0001433146,0.00004329848,0.0005553011,0.0000436226,0.0002059126,0.0001186329,0.00009706142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005112765,0.00007306283,0.00004096002,0.0001125416,0.001010455,0.0002105041,0.00006265249,0.0001226902,0.0002019467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000824458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001926267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005053195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987838,0.0001905866,0.0001427678,0.0002116769,0.0003051915,0.0003659207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986723,0.0007400034,0.00003948685,0.0001562856,0.00008573176,0.0003061652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428166,0.00002652589,0.0001724334,0.00001893262,0.000005965226,0.000004941393,0.0009590753,5.954446e-8,0.00008193403,0.9969634,0.000939442,0.000812998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002751592,0.00003051951,0.0008366275,0.00003235215,0.00003526086,0.000001161161,0.00005639789,0.000002113371,0.00004487816,0.904802,0.09375066,0.0001328917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01796315,0.000132833,0.0003299525,0.3355519,0.0006392553,0.0001504914,0.0000287282,0.0001704315,0.6450332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484,0.0001342477,0.0001167538,0.00275585,0.001787698,0.000008591805,5.474457e-7,0.000008971379,0.0003474007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4270983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237455223","doi":"10.1080/0305724042000200047","title":"The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Sociology; Oppression; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Moral disengagement; Politics; Liberalism; Social cognitive theory of morality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06859331214350158,"gpt":0.3726162912145367,"spread":0.3040229790710351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009298135,0.0000536203,0.0001112124,0.00005460937,0.0004722554,0.00005926913,0.000161856,0.00006558478,0.000004192513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00172769,0.00003293206,0.00008035028,0.0001324981,0.0004367352,0.0004359067,0.00001194257,0.0001751484,3.496373e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008527954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001965173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001243734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991312,0.0001108743,0.0003385482,0.00005314411,0.0002505433,0.0001156934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.0007197866,0.0004596603,0.00008633189,0.0006086656,0.00006144884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004265722,0.0001178404,0.0007008172,0.00002327599,0.0000245828,4.398809e-8,0.02188284,0.0001823492,0.0001569828,0.9693215,0.0009656224,0.006581445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002439615,0.0001179308,0.01437529,0.000177125,0.00008576704,0.000006142132,0.01964919,0.00001681374,0.0008317106,0.9562946,0.008139009,0.00006244435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8807072,0.002832845,0.0002730583,0.1106179,0.001382502,0.0003453079,0.000008204926,0.000004258444,0.003828707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997963,0.0002149229,0.0007185816,0.0002255045,0.0005933155,0.00001031534,0.000001319658,0.000004016445,0.0002689861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1172559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3632255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07368246469849857,"gpt":0.4173249267825241,"spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101497,0.000281103,0.0007061585,0.0001333733,0.0009896,0.0001108861,0.000862154,0.00008857903,0.0002154726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803253,0.0001853745,0.0001675293,0.001257748,0.02742465,0.0004063869,0.0002616016,0.0002665804,0.0002468153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005651792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001636483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005413484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005274151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937121,0.0005212401,0.0005318379,0.0007823249,0.00134389,0.003108621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938393,0.001637367,0.000114399,0.0005133506,0.0003847045,0.003510882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000238852,0.00005249363,0.0003618415,0.0001563829,0.000007088151,0.00000979073,0.00005378421,2.501404e-9,0.00001646019,0.9893182,0.00008258387,0.009938998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001575031,0.0001168317,0.001690852,0.001431865,0.0001109169,0.00001687187,0.0002088707,0.000002032113,0.00006364258,0.9149105,0.08082137,0.0004687771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427467,0.005221527,0.0004813556,0.4593423,0.0005447112,0.0006786053,0.00007935479,0.0002823677,0.5279423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715475,0.004289411,0.0002694196,0.02283953,0.0008498551,0.00003029858,9.908418e-7,0.00001714979,0.0001557799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08130903967799825,"gpt":0.3457040570422679,"spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01589766,0.00006828606,0.000135139,0.00006885327,0.000232905,0.00002681174,0.0003083753,0.00003804702,0.0001794115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004832111,0.00004641749,0.000147166,0.000118775,0.0009841638,0.0001367515,0.00003725005,0.0005204828,0.00003209013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005502212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009168197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002013448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003350898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965987,0.001928945,0.0005020887,0.00006423383,0.0004614213,0.0004446364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.002549913,0.0001925354,0.00009534098,0.0002414217,0.0003037014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000507983,0.00002721923,0.0000377147,0.000005793879,0.00001911652,0.00004030155,0.003230279,8.421267e-7,0.0001169063,0.9918979,0.00002958542,0.004543549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001934197,0.00009631943,0.002389925,0.00009194828,0.00003875036,0.00001360612,0.005973043,0.000001181697,0.0007110702,0.9872056,0.003217238,0.00006795744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2028947,0.00008103825,0.005694647,0.00186998,0.0004227316,0.00004000749,0.000005061158,0.00001213505,0.7889797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962554,0.000009962047,0.0004827901,0.001240757,0.001930012,3.600698e-8,2.288297e-7,0.00001149651,0.00006930387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5784838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269198251","doi":"10.4324/9781315252629-15","title":"Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public reason; Order (exchange); Political science; Moral order; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1145890590365885,"gpt":0.3578013020341987,"spread":0.2432122429976102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004882002,0.0001636733,0.0002314246,0.00004945585,0.001036801,0.0003362671,0.0002145556,0.0005748812,0.000541706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008418472,0.0001372034,0.00003354375,0.000007231844,0.001890938,0.0002046933,0.0001648061,0.0004413834,0.00007431232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002619984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000222826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003521004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006358046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.00002811259,0.0001436682,0.0002765947,0.0003068129,0.0003380186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989319,0.0002497393,0.00008582315,0.000235777,0.0001225602,0.0003742128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001788976,0.000003487545,0.000007537994,0.00004660436,0.00001797114,0.000006339746,0.000467102,3.028045e-9,5.021836e-7,0.996907,0.0007156409,0.001826011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005545314,0.000009349557,0.00001668598,0.00002588357,0.00004271325,8.552908e-7,0.00003837738,0.000001075177,3.142947e-7,0.5405278,0.4591617,0.0001197989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041968,0.0004471759,0.00003232394,0.02381497,0.0002533676,0.0001417041,0.00001567017,0.00005089189,0.9752019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06824008,0.003110537,0.0002473137,0.002177956,0.001171342,0.000002868542,0.00000558479,0.00002378055,0.9250205],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4584461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7974343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561043220587807,"gpt":0.3084853928907133,"spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003727656,0.00007544483,0.0001175012,0.00008069194,0.000281842,0.00007911564,0.0004286705,0.00002180458,0.00003906786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005887803,0.00004924299,0.00005704966,0.0001814808,0.0009445383,0.0002236103,0.00004021576,0.0004137277,0.00005729428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001865788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006274546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005678273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005301288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976937,0.001318816,0.000291568,0.00008587736,0.0003828145,0.000227231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992417,0.0002365546,0.0001351883,0.0001128963,0.0001274797,0.0001462528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115814,0.0001289078,0.001313431,0.00001354101,0.00003164044,0.0004789233,0.053089,0.000002729493,0.0000758797,0.9367476,0.004961648,0.00304519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005879586,0.0004454017,0.01465624,0.00008253413,0.0000158631,0.00003270146,0.0007231585,0.000005342984,0.0000158652,0.905943,0.07736669,0.0001252581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1005244,0.0001974339,0.00009709191,0.0859509,0.000603396,0.00007769557,0.00000642604,0.00001091619,0.8125318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912886,0.00008559128,0.0001855855,0.005033291,0.003358192,8.449523e-8,1.095346e-7,0.000008715784,0.0000398293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3480191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004645244","doi":"10.1007/s12142-013-0269-z","title":"The Capability Approach and the Debate Between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Humanism; Human rights; Development aid; Politics; Social philosophy; Critical theory; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Social change","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1357908989806494,"gpt":0.4079345190962432,"spread":0.2721436201155938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00483367,0.0002511318,0.0005672459,0.00002462127,0.008668047,0.0004382454,0.0004719054,0.0001645142,0.0001877912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001038159,0.0001153006,0.0001388155,0.0001123906,0.01276366,0.0001918719,0.0001120409,0.000702832,0.00006429043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003834693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02149001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004224226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940213,0.003703575,0.000474971,0.0005127791,0.0005308558,0.0007565421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940758,0.004641348,0.00006872022,0.0005066433,0.0002405878,0.0004668493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003060345,0.00005677112,0.0001294212,0.000201178,0.0000233182,7.714053e-7,0.001541317,1.690658e-9,1.258436e-7,0.9975447,0.0004544866,0.00004486534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002242074,0.00005552648,0.01656971,0.0002399267,0.00009340813,0.000001996743,0.000236903,0.000001358155,9.490288e-7,0.9560552,0.02632109,0.0001997289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1468118,0.03656507,0.00002865661,0.07105482,0.0001509709,0.004199225,0.00007029778,0.0002075977,0.7409115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976131,0.0005657332,0.00001832798,0.0007486636,0.0004763486,0.00009152163,0.000008079562,0.0000110817,0.0004671224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8508013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02709649239832811,"gpt":0.2836578703277456,"spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005052232,0.00002853082,0.00005441151,0.000007644596,0.0007005301,0.000008441718,0.0001246044,0.00006374457,0.001025273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005876782,0.00003107289,0.00005112919,0.00001152732,0.0002344053,0.0005588051,0.00001309304,0.0001125016,0.00002590716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002777252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003697641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02969515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01796317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994602,0.00008646151,0.00004200604,0.00003011903,0.0002143423,0.0001668897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.00009213636,0.00004678933,0.00003884642,0.00006921629,0.0001855697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001967414,0.00004860582,0.00008056431,0.000001413093,0.000006793363,0.000001504487,0.009996054,0.000001079584,0.00001372299,0.9884877,0.0007844514,0.0005584509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001395707,0.0002732612,0.01201581,0.00009033593,0.00008488292,0.000007694897,0.0383081,0.0000247394,0.0001916732,0.2551529,0.6921501,0.0003048944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02064028,0.0000610877,0.0003660744,0.001574708,0.000302091,0.00002376083,0.000001902468,0.000005652541,0.9770244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.00006190332,0.0002382371,0.0001368252,0.0003226586,4.226856e-9,2.377404e-7,0.000001281467,0.000671754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917118741","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00344.x","title":"Theories of Political Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public reason; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06361517113202808,"gpt":0.3563501571556161,"spread":0.292734986023588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006103108,0.00008998565,0.0001629793,0.00006062268,0.0003155991,0.00002777266,0.0003409707,0.0001680689,0.0001552182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008584676,0.0000866632,0.00008178326,0.0001808254,0.001813447,0.0001488187,0.00003749755,0.0004219783,0.00008893997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002467382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001521984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000543557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.0001422201,0.0002303747,0.0001638925,0.000394396,0.000387782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986575,0.0005243793,0.00006280448,0.0002765292,0.0002058552,0.0002729346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009959478,0.00008223006,0.0003542951,0.00002087763,0.000005327239,6.095045e-7,0.000995156,2.37538e-7,0.0006478674,0.9976653,0.00007651633,0.0001415662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009147062,0.0000176101,0.002029629,0.000008043544,0.00001443589,5.325766e-7,0.0002082153,0.000009459523,0.001194478,0.9882774,0.008049614,0.00009915144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316723,0.00001329114,0.0002534724,0.07382185,0.0008561675,0.0001250732,0.00002706846,0.00009953414,0.8816363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973696,0.000003464402,0.0003043738,0.0006226762,0.00161581,0.000007481601,0.000005026292,0.000008195478,0.00006336386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6681719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0521453708720397,"gpt":0.3249026986403992,"spread":0.2727573277683595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357394,0.0001640381,0.0003101453,0.0001235577,0.0003308284,0.0001484243,0.0002158092,0.00017283,0.000120896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004567826,0.00009751412,0.0001221711,0.0001166909,0.001999342,0.000729902,0.0000404392,0.0003108069,0.00003785986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001743258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003472803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006087033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001613699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976526,0.0002729817,0.0004596656,0.0001843437,0.0008014789,0.0006289322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.001152543,0.0001714134,0.0001511037,0.0004180364,0.0009528055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006600421,0.00004820907,0.0005312415,0.00003064001,0.00005274416,0.00005429453,0.001503875,6.381431e-8,0.00008140251,0.9965848,0.0007034406,0.0003432628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244078,0.0002633839,0.001090286,0.0004270007,0.00006979672,0.00008704168,0.001063807,5.162553e-7,0.0002010074,0.991646,0.004247478,0.000179291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1155321,0.0008328494,0.0003774328,0.7180833,0.000522998,0.0001795133,0.00003102372,0.00003586277,0.1644049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868466,0.0005443823,0.0001385787,0.01014575,0.002004587,0.000001602548,4.661055e-7,0.00001491662,0.0003030691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621226479","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093","title":"Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Deliberation; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1270938749254998,"gpt":0.4376242868328923,"spread":0.3105304119073926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005616808,0.0001175941,0.0002933666,0.00002915899,0.001228587,0.000139714,0.0003025591,0.0001459641,0.0001452192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006929407,0.0001088444,0.0001014716,0.00002577442,0.003732994,0.0003614358,0.0001455995,0.0002388499,0.00001077229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004373865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006659715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003735403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008686249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984986,0.0001478302,0.0003417348,0.0002098893,0.0004684814,0.0003335158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985089,0.0005506066,0.0000758589,0.0001252333,0.000361238,0.0003782213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008553994,0.00004184758,0.0002018087,0.0006273885,0.00001427455,0.000002633539,0.0001614342,1.872279e-9,0.000006390361,0.9972554,0.0002704643,0.00140983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001663158,0.00002692301,0.003749061,0.001018458,0.00004134007,0.000002147981,0.00004418154,0.000008719867,0.00001279984,0.9639382,0.03086073,0.0001311201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00336227,0.003414288,0.00005306352,0.5697063,0.0003734897,0.0001601359,0.00008861959,0.00002364857,0.4228182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817843,0.004695212,0.0001928188,0.01140277,0.00182627,0.000009938395,0.00000912923,0.000007497437,0.00007207722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}