{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":1344,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1344,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"167b2aade25a","filters":{"topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W4210554560","doi":"10.1093/0199240981.001.0001","title":"Politics in the Vernacular","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1475,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Democracy; Vernacular; Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Citizenship; Liberal democracy; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08369967993088637,"gpt":0.3571839419621174,"spread":0.273484262031231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008092141,0.0004240698,0.0002870582,0.0005445165,0.003061794,0.007830931,0.0004247641,0.001180375,0.01379177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001696338,0.000164933,0.0001676406,0.0007689869,0.006227318,0.00444501,0.002174253,0.003902265,0.002738137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002011455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002460837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003433082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988164,0.0006591345,0.00002553432,0.00015816,0.0002322301,0.0001087099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995148,0.000235181,0.0000332625,0.00007142242,0.00009092486,0.00005442482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005736728,0.000006056483,0.00007257948,0.00002070376,0.000001070444,0.00004302575,0.005740472,0.00003535558,0.0001113367,0.9536547,0.03057729,0.009731771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002250563,0.000007189195,0.0001407478,0.0001284875,0.00000139282,0.00003013846,0.002177195,0.00007469357,0.00007687073,0.05891124,0.9384466,0.00000317456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002805195,0.005126784,0.001068741,0.007251268,0.001947726,0.000007362439,0.00002332798,0.00003047673,0.9817392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2433391,0.004158114,0.0006193055,0.006227023,0.001276253,0.00004905734,0.00009838928,0.0001647063,0.7440681],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01379177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04613805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121380055","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":927,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Citizenship; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Democratic theory; Political science; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Nadia Urbinati","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark E. Warren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1001922595167281,"gpt":0.42847313283175,"spread":0.3282808733150219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457598,0.0006509825,0.00113515,0.002087799,0.006156017,0.009953301,0.001920173,0.004870627,0.004859527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569037,0.0004080194,0.0008752017,0.003276444,0.05054168,0.01499785,0.006414485,0.008676781,0.0009682042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006223631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004489484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00205113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001320873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9773128,0.01444384,0.0007231169,0.002388356,0.00385581,0.001276005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990449,0.006704352,0.0006415456,0.001121169,0.0007057512,0.0003781352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001326223,0.000001754137,0.00001860543,0.000009598263,9.017564e-7,0.000002933258,0.0002890846,0.00006045077,0.000007375081,0.9978043,0.0004415915,0.001361993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003670378,0.000004721163,0.00003857836,0.00002944326,0.000001696322,0.00001331239,0.0001270044,0.0001716483,0.00002503335,0.9759384,0.02364266,0.000003850516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01447034,0.02454592,0.2007767,0.07478001,0.002950458,0.0001392856,0.0001335858,0.0001079653,0.6820958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882783,0.01545383,0.03973413,0.01354875,0.00618871,0.00068294,0.0001541293,0.0001586583,0.0358005],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01457598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07708609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501779374","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.001.0001","title":"Culture, Citizenship, and Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Sociology; Economic Justice; Multiculturalism; Politics; Identity (music); Democracy; Neutrality; Identity politics; Epistemology; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Joseph H. Carens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09985828978042599,"gpt":0.3481530965415666,"spread":0.2482948067611406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002528876,0.0003035366,0.0002027164,0.0006985225,0.002463312,0.003310695,0.0003807641,0.0007789633,0.008599354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005121844,0.0001054576,0.0001439983,0.0009452024,0.00350625,0.002205692,0.001357339,0.001664089,0.001226001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002239371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00198783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01364064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997863,0.00008102007,0.000004154468,0.00002214739,0.00008286646,0.00002347923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.0001036562,0.00001173392,0.00001611836,0.00005084559,0.00004489204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006864367,0.00004252197,0.000338539,0.00007225364,0.000003597925,0.00009679613,0.004845224,0.0003881796,0.0001129439,0.7690643,0.1740364,0.05099238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003413646,0.00001349674,0.0006221217,0.0001922824,0.000003982418,0.000116964,0.004222088,0.0003553158,0.0001089994,0.1781181,0.8162369,0.000006284137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00466232,0.01765501,0.002332864,0.01816256,0.00126305,0.00001556216,0.00004006011,0.00004325623,0.9558253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2424234,0.01750274,0.001669317,0.005568177,0.0010365,0.00007339259,0.0001144119,0.00008002701,0.731532],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008599354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02876765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Colin Farrelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2148880415269112,"gpt":0.4882066868125774,"spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144836,0.0007042633,0.001210151,0.003207453,0.006279312,0.006613983,0.003261372,0.008716417,0.00653189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02888774,0.0004136168,0.001843208,0.001695424,0.0491647,0.01368967,0.008411995,0.01566588,0.002086656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005644807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005145065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003636458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001944871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864854,0.005517684,0.0006434195,0.001822366,0.004637918,0.0008932849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796937,0.01346939,0.0009165749,0.002584823,0.002611227,0.0007241723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003141912,0.00000578895,0.00002833576,0.00001876264,0.000002806193,0.00001287561,0.0001574148,0.00007148798,0.00000826527,0.9952005,0.002855423,0.00163513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000455616,0.000004027528,0.00002144619,0.00003432294,0.00000184002,0.00002098912,0.00006714289,0.000191966,0.00002313465,0.9856895,0.01393742,0.00000372254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01245994,0.01503007,0.1433589,0.4869711,0.009776825,0.00008568772,0.0002395464,0.0002777066,0.3318003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.777816,0.008836263,0.04536127,0.1276806,0.0130264,0.0003351185,0.0002393115,0.0004296585,0.02627542],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07659751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Holly Lawford‐Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4562325470873994,"gpt":0.4770953464145148,"spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03204265,0.0008781236,0.001149929,0.00687376,0.007446674,0.01301969,0.002916205,0.005810666,0.009248951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04224114,0.0008716887,0.001403863,0.005919961,0.08475504,0.03000342,0.009250337,0.00979879,0.0006385703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007438114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006004549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001837085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9646532,0.02726219,0.0009916226,0.001783571,0.004027774,0.001281662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489272,0.04155166,0.00305574,0.001936296,0.003059634,0.001469512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002906766,0.000005233532,0.00008919675,0.00002386754,0.000001902258,0.00001664848,0.0008212336,0.0001162183,0.00001250499,0.9979109,0.0001316209,0.0008677406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007899333,0.00001330833,0.0002107961,0.00009620476,0.000005025739,0.00006281315,0.002090693,0.0008101845,0.00003892603,0.988728,0.0079272,0.000008847036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08324175,0.01032681,0.2455281,0.08527792,0.0007271296,0.0004276748,0.0002066249,0.0001183227,0.5741457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734281,0.001891815,0.01981656,0.001145357,0.0003032871,0.0003888175,0.00007472618,0.00005726462,0.002894132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03204265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1694598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","authors":[{"name":"Mark E. Warren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07751967023305721,"gpt":0.4214526396001939,"spread":0.3439329693671366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014607,0.001380577,0.001560139,0.003953358,0.004657192,0.01095832,0.004177334,0.005371926,0.008756887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279802,0.0006966123,0.001825457,0.003623114,0.04645278,0.01083,0.005744393,0.01141681,0.00186353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01087635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008266041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003440008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002412962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830791,0.0110448,0.0006463062,0.001776353,0.002784378,0.0006690402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888222,0.007713879,0.0005285222,0.001446016,0.001073699,0.0004155623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001057178,0.000004653692,0.00001586689,0.00002539624,0.000003317791,0.000005834878,0.0001267758,0.0004251213,0.000008321673,0.9976335,0.0007088887,0.001041263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004596548,0.000003044374,0.00001277828,0.00003230128,0.000001659797,0.000009501651,0.00006510003,0.0007629241,0.00001852925,0.9836537,0.01543317,0.000002672438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003283134,0.01525098,0.5023667,0.09295207,0.001223164,0.0003049751,0.0002099256,0.00016266,0.3842464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5885878,0.0209796,0.3099398,0.01733534,0.003660908,0.002340988,0.0004410796,0.0003046826,0.0564099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254444181","doi":"10.1075/ds.6","title":"Action and Agency in Dialogue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Dialogue studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Social science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"François Cooren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1606874882911397,"gpt":0.3987149289340603,"spread":0.2380274406429206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002489491,0.0007805869,0.0005438646,0.001070565,0.005569922,0.01236964,0.001010658,0.0029518,0.004693549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003842858,0.000300313,0.0004919335,0.001283448,0.0345683,0.01260689,0.004834952,0.004234968,0.001556062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004800529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003005996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003270633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002295295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935095,0.004679268,0.0001094863,0.0005656425,0.000711689,0.0004244921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981035,0.001225897,0.0001509984,0.0001967885,0.0001452808,0.0001774993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006712558,0.000005876407,0.00005667517,0.00006284003,0.000003726906,0.00004502468,0.0185682,0.00007597658,0.00007298121,0.9674557,0.007151853,0.006494492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691647,0.00001582976,0.0002319377,0.0002917846,0.000006194643,0.000166374,0.01257464,0.0002462147,0.0001111605,0.5263736,0.4599608,0.00001183825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005089572,0.03163204,0.01282873,0.01824678,0.00132364,0.00005358466,0.00004658882,0.00008546536,0.9306936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6924619,0.0264374,0.01123328,0.008369529,0.00227133,0.0005269562,0.0001360555,0.000240769,0.2583228],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01236964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03483045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535884078","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.001.0001","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology; Moral rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1694781193279955,"gpt":0.4104665883826739,"spread":0.2409884690546784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002757528,0.0006207269,0.0005584826,0.001243003,0.00292807,0.006691989,0.0009770278,0.00375985,0.009543227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003780297,0.0003263673,0.0004010645,0.001291474,0.03247489,0.006506026,0.002635282,0.007039133,0.002201294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006449838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003247147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003324367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001964838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996596,0.002031604,0.00008170753,0.0002769497,0.0008051103,0.0002085377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979168,0.001418593,0.00009028478,0.0001755031,0.0002958083,0.0001029539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.776142e-7,0.000002046272,0.0000083974,0.00001724697,7.186394e-7,0.000006482285,0.0003489059,0.00005606086,0.00001387055,0.9946143,0.003401991,0.001529109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002014087,0.000002747501,0.00004023728,0.0001882335,9.862596e-7,0.00002266073,0.0003865321,0.0001532763,0.00002506738,0.8833073,0.1158685,0.000002516171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001517294,0.03783055,0.01170451,0.04599285,0.001283231,0.00003287366,0.00007175538,0.00003908202,0.9015279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5178121,0.07437691,0.01511989,0.02551254,0.00588453,0.0004025325,0.0002834564,0.0001711479,0.3604369],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04679704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118928156","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139106931","title":"Collective guilt : international perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective responsibility; Collective identity; Collective memory; Social psychology; Psychology; Shame; Injustice; Criminology; Politics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Nyla R. Branscombe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bertjan Doosje","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06078802541807768,"gpt":0.3603555439838008,"spread":0.2995675185657232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00344564,0.00106549,0.0007105055,0.003261115,0.006033651,0.01326899,0.001130768,0.004585063,0.01139535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003307351,0.0002744403,0.0005404385,0.003553166,0.02651547,0.01216513,0.004600054,0.007258241,0.001573322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008981634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002248459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003955533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975129,0.001497305,0.00006141877,0.0002183336,0.0004095196,0.0003003585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973221,0.001842128,0.0001328209,0.0001598916,0.0003184006,0.0002246287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006636381,0.00001678498,0.0001099832,0.00008363223,0.000004709859,0.00008312603,0.007031883,0.0001118135,0.00003011317,0.9596471,0.01945518,0.01341902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005026357,0.0000212583,0.0007730644,0.0009008674,0.00000856973,0.0003017459,0.01546195,0.0001553838,0.00006060473,0.3283293,0.6539713,0.0000110457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00297768,0.09937756,0.001130146,0.05244401,0.002407511,0.000007095986,0.00002567009,0.00001421192,0.8416162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709768,0.2399617,0.002242943,0.02277761,0.0146791,0.0002202791,0.0001472877,0.0001739001,0.1488205],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01326899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06516659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Simone Chambers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08810405537028261,"gpt":0.386122849723591,"spread":0.2980187943533084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03383681,0.0003302793,0.00086058,0.001776043,0.003973105,0.01680285,0.001249515,0.005497228,0.009047565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1541372,0.0006292015,0.0006777999,0.002035415,0.02953183,0.02039213,0.005990126,0.006363365,0.0005791798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003311503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00466887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001954152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00165592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9677417,0.02304771,0.00117242,0.001560637,0.004367548,0.002109932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7466441,0.2060867,0.02261298,0.01358115,0.007360925,0.003714124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004250441,0.00009764465,0.009109193,0.0001080582,0.00007332234,0.0001846948,0.02998718,0.002019248,0.0003056339,0.9374102,0.00176814,0.01851165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005725924,0.00004029144,0.002786594,0.00009749131,0.00003244345,0.00008359177,0.01050741,0.002087628,0.0004242344,0.9780731,0.005775371,0.00003446921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.617956,0.00414657,0.06462677,0.07200322,0.0004727714,0.00008795253,0.0001962931,0.0001176032,0.2403928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.0001498139,0.0007130209,0.000203859,0.00004818408,0.000008883577,0.000009449054,0.00001530641,0.000730824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1789483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Arash Abizadeh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05263516533756687,"gpt":0.3802951089819447,"spread":0.3276599436443778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003136872,0.0001459871,0.000587021,0.001142376,0.003851505,0.003304617,0.0006771313,0.002763986,0.003679334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005115471,0.0001415301,0.0001965826,0.00160208,0.02252879,0.01045627,0.003546187,0.003832119,0.0003966368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003633623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002946911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006361385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01026389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974125,0.001789243,0.00005120322,0.0001957194,0.0003450377,0.0002062819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997255,0.001886837,0.0002157477,0.000173836,0.0002673908,0.0002012214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006801933,0.000005681359,0.0002296913,0.00005511456,0.000002999936,0.00006544122,0.002413775,0.00009606357,0.00001563773,0.9779847,0.005448576,0.01367557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006983818,0.000006647325,0.0008144628,0.0003441707,0.000003968951,0.0001447088,0.004737172,0.0001094411,0.00004211974,0.8925667,0.1012159,0.000007799219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06215762,0.2338542,0.007217401,0.2021773,0.001650199,0.00002358286,0.0000505241,0.00001955837,0.4928496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968044,0.06377092,0.001306677,0.01446754,0.001174758,0.00004693953,0.00004702296,0.0000286145,0.02235309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006361385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Matthias Fritsch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394296857028716,"gpt":0.4071279646428375,"spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0200037,0.0005987801,0.0009405767,0.001335149,0.007615892,0.01039827,0.002209709,0.006852677,0.00457883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02941224,0.0003825938,0.0007770801,0.0008636453,0.07784231,0.02563066,0.01402058,0.01077871,0.0007206426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005625374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006613109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001813201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735245,0.01571349,0.0006774872,0.003066478,0.004370102,0.00264796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836816,0.008469268,0.001331401,0.003227816,0.001729165,0.001560757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007844803,0.000006399397,0.00006272423,0.00001297298,0.000004661075,0.00001971597,0.001921293,0.00003919066,0.00004365635,0.9947779,0.0006391145,0.002464466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005645539,0.000009080146,0.00006373822,0.00002777322,0.000004109584,0.00004026223,0.001291378,0.0001041211,0.0001318455,0.9791589,0.01915729,0.000005797122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05520732,0.004516781,0.122557,0.2376889,0.001872793,0.0001221441,0.00004243293,0.0001661777,0.5778264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687948,0.0005655902,0.005995892,0.01123229,0.0005710023,0.00009482197,0.00001586526,0.00008619711,0.01264355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0200037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039252732","doi":"10.1177/1463499608090788","title":"Value and virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Sacrifice; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Politics; Political science; Mathematics; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Lambek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08550895871700359,"gpt":0.3758603538217933,"spread":0.2903513951047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00373547,0.0004094904,0.0004475999,0.001525717,0.004177923,0.007488905,0.0006281844,0.002516822,0.006495503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004698368,0.0001892547,0.0003479838,0.001077556,0.0415983,0.007188773,0.005310006,0.002967269,0.0007926943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003959356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00263542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001784599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001943426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996466,0.002040765,0.0001012019,0.0003663974,0.0006539418,0.0003716722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974272,0.001277929,0.0002340356,0.0004318573,0.0003308947,0.0002981481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000217923,0.000002145449,0.00009677076,0.000008654103,0.000001116953,0.000009089563,0.000575112,0.0000272616,0.00001539473,0.9965275,0.0006504622,0.002084208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000314004,0.000006905496,0.0002320051,0.00004447654,0.000001397201,0.00004848327,0.0007083144,0.00007312361,0.00004155351,0.9537492,0.04508781,0.000003636884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01899484,0.00915284,0.02266122,0.03357885,0.0005561661,0.00003250559,0.00004774677,0.00004507625,0.9149307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498975,0.003365575,0.006181716,0.004650781,0.00062186,0.00007387965,0.00004085005,0.00004609376,0.0351218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007488905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02872729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211055638","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224","title":"Minorities within Minorities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority rights; Normative; Multiculturalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Autonomy; Feminism; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Deliberative democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04891012023346309,"gpt":0.2575390328833977,"spread":0.2086289126499347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315088,0.000341263,0.0003592763,0.0005483349,0.009581936,0.005935634,0.0006038961,0.001445169,0.009877183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001776477,0.0001380425,0.0003122703,0.0006085728,0.007821404,0.004403529,0.009216578,0.002320361,0.00187052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003040961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003000259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006831467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009226681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975691,0.001176878,0.00005322113,0.000312154,0.0005147172,0.0003738125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0001813087,0.00006312302,0.00006249271,0.00007058388,0.0001484442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463038,0.00001447789,0.0006041385,0.00008225248,0.000004573107,0.0001813436,0.04514879,0.00005335453,0.000555218,0.9190327,0.007398341,0.02691025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003713668,0.00002311707,0.0006940491,0.0002617184,0.000006632526,0.0001960008,0.01245426,0.00005472324,0.0003494726,0.08282766,0.9031233,0.000005302868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0300115,0.01589636,0.001608152,0.01446819,0.001780904,0.00003780381,0.00002725221,0.00001937865,0.9361506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6207306,0.01227119,0.001306014,0.007620766,0.00191716,0.00009123547,0.00003763488,0.00006049564,0.3559649],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009877183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03304243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146926183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Relation (database); State (computer science); Political science; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"James Tully","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249227603658969,"gpt":0.2638027518513514,"spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003131827,0.0005732889,0.0006710568,0.001765083,0.005468113,0.01311987,0.0008013804,0.003532513,0.01441412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003485368,0.0004195135,0.0005964257,0.001307626,0.02069679,0.01521262,0.005853753,0.009272384,0.002487086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01060583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006559171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00206269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002622871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972873,0.001249364,0.0000666707,0.0003719056,0.0007541646,0.0002705783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982496,0.0008630931,0.00009219188,0.0003033656,0.0002560129,0.0002357172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001950417,0.000006659488,0.00001340242,0.00001086089,7.623241e-7,0.000009072844,0.0008794939,0.00004637361,0.00002658319,0.9857075,0.009913647,0.003383645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005071243,0.000007499917,0.00005992599,0.0001022871,0.000001767169,0.0000314643,0.0008786288,0.0001985967,0.00004805381,0.4916057,0.507057,0.000004024413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003284656,0.01777865,0.01661006,0.1034944,0.003597541,0.00004278089,0.00006580805,0.0001758358,0.8549504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3725804,0.01895033,0.01125938,0.02952544,0.005696026,0.0003620371,0.0001631442,0.0005047181,0.5609585],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01441412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07695103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Mark E. Warren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08701216007564758,"gpt":0.3869992719661973,"spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01403096,0.0004545813,0.0005993893,0.00129659,0.005563081,0.006234777,0.001126457,0.003483208,0.006583264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01125349,0.0003107325,0.0007084143,0.001101114,0.04348785,0.01157484,0.006918693,0.005749273,0.0008631669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003165865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002671924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001092571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888049,0.007411599,0.0002824999,0.001327489,0.001140333,0.001033186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921211,0.004823605,0.0007245776,0.0009958459,0.0006397595,0.000695241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005779147,0.000007616865,0.0001451897,0.00001341769,0.000001568485,0.00001949421,0.0008609119,0.000203181,0.0000212479,0.9951026,0.0006611166,0.002957853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009737552,0.000009291585,0.0001327489,0.00003413282,0.000002180684,0.0000261371,0.0003768229,0.0005318851,0.0000511758,0.9840024,0.01481779,0.000005778246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04342707,0.005181846,0.1908005,0.08495864,0.001479756,0.0001512437,0.00008064661,0.00008740718,0.6738329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548257,0.001596425,0.01491163,0.00532561,0.0008427371,0.0001819379,0.00004959109,0.00005268563,0.02221356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01403096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07420373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121206155","doi":"10.1017/s026505251600025x","title":"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS IDEAL THEORY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Normative; Mistake; Political philosophy; Original position; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jacob T. Levy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04809742837355112,"gpt":0.3644644791981075,"spread":0.3163670508245564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007960289,0.0005740835,0.0009081028,0.001856689,0.004755263,0.008196383,0.002381132,0.003299849,0.01347194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01413036,0.0004199987,0.00103971,0.001133258,0.04110474,0.01772194,0.004845136,0.0109257,0.003498621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005797464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004807758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002189369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001399818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900731,0.004877731,0.0003712761,0.001350713,0.002735953,0.0005911897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892116,0.004997566,0.0007479171,0.002270777,0.001933764,0.0008384082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002205028,0.000003734538,0.00003466729,0.00001046056,0.000001649473,0.000004547875,0.0001268567,0.00007353434,0.000009200656,0.9968364,0.002146307,0.0007504259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000273387,0.000003114808,0.000027604,0.00003250127,0.000001630862,0.00001197751,0.0001841633,0.0002370032,0.00003509155,0.9741401,0.0253209,0.000003166065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01122014,0.00568741,0.240051,0.1628978,0.00357654,0.00007823617,0.0002805488,0.0003603981,0.5758479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456576,0.003984908,0.0493757,0.03047324,0.003570979,0.0003548947,0.0004830265,0.0007809734,0.06531865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01347194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04506809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002896677","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12020","title":"Three Kinds of Social Kinds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3463273922816184,"gpt":0.4474865382176424,"spread":0.101159145936024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005813196,0.0004370962,0.0004827351,0.002500511,0.005453098,0.006010312,0.001043813,0.002820702,0.006603674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009360095,0.0004179701,0.001181029,0.001319596,0.03065116,0.01219802,0.005744105,0.002795589,0.0005011805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003397932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001811624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002132838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001845109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994303,0.00242246,0.0003249695,0.0009103919,0.001320704,0.0007184841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929278,0.002968531,0.0007027512,0.001630592,0.001125549,0.000644714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003945587,0.00000322234,0.0002120858,0.00001350953,0.000002861328,0.00001844674,0.0006174695,0.00003751034,0.00004456018,0.9976552,0.0003611038,0.001030227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122233,0.000009252436,0.000822615,0.000027647,0.00000649971,0.00008906407,0.001299132,0.0002900149,0.00008262666,0.9681425,0.02920784,0.00001155466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1192462,0.002748606,0.1040244,0.03364512,0.0007117373,0.0002744201,0.0005096832,0.0003206608,0.7385193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706176,0.0005627511,0.01827375,0.00170515,0.0002075943,0.0003058353,0.0002303424,0.00005465917,0.008042394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006603674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03074348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Joseph H. Carens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09047791347116682,"gpt":0.3278057112290845,"spread":0.2373277977579177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007872134,0.0002268357,0.0002869832,0.001099132,0.01343148,0.006205402,0.0006162085,0.001507441,0.03276214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263365,0.0001728947,0.0001332637,0.001502164,0.01005048,0.005003694,0.004159841,0.00201326,0.002810005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001639822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00504532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01996461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.0003321716,0.00001196132,0.0000843146,0.00006256832,0.0001867074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984677,0.0004072607,0.0001930435,0.0001405761,0.0001935231,0.0005977981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001805107,0.0001216016,0.04640144,0.0002215222,0.00003665613,0.001151729,0.1994442,0.0003410441,0.001692083,0.5102711,0.1171746,0.1229635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001182612,0.00006408038,0.02316199,0.0002411139,0.00001699505,0.0006735235,0.5161591,0.0002734072,0.000521087,0.1201638,0.3386884,0.0000246101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3969258,0.001260182,0.006603474,0.06292462,0.0008336034,0.00002833824,0.0002571029,0.0001103621,0.5310565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624817,0.00041207,0.0007577958,0.001999099,0.0001271035,0.00001710997,0.00005658234,0.00006135245,0.03408716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03276214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1096003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485884427","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Citizenship; Public philosophy; Political science; Key (lock); Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Law; Social science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"James Tully","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249227603658969,"gpt":0.2638027518513514,"spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093671,0.000418571,0.0004806661,0.001310266,0.003814027,0.01159975,0.0006612199,0.002337547,0.01251583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003300725,0.0003112508,0.0004184465,0.001174852,0.01345968,0.0152367,0.005107809,0.006724817,0.002558631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008357675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001661289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002495238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979639,0.000802107,0.00006257909,0.000271209,0.0006743277,0.000225934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987741,0.0005784337,0.00008046434,0.000195436,0.0002017656,0.0001696674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003683572,0.000006601185,0.00002164352,0.00001681231,0.000001115571,0.00001750526,0.001449299,0.00006050161,0.0000574814,0.9755229,0.01766559,0.005176801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004762896,0.000007658765,0.0001050119,0.00009492331,0.00000215249,0.00004856177,0.00108083,0.0001615268,0.00007148874,0.2921281,0.7062901,0.000004930606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005561016,0.01318712,0.01120045,0.0757071,0.005166639,0.00003523547,0.00005889895,0.0001436488,0.8889399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3434494,0.01503717,0.006345015,0.02238446,0.005444185,0.0002142343,0.0001360937,0.0004026131,0.6065868],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01251583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06063944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604618828","doi":"10.1017/s0265052515000059","title":"DECOLONIZATION AND SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Subject (documents); Autonomy; Democracy; Politics; Colonialism; Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Anna Stilz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07526017402327566,"gpt":0.378642025725396,"spread":0.3033818517021203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008405562,0.0002451373,0.0002995566,0.0007810974,0.004803354,0.004889086,0.0007976111,0.002168923,0.002535157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007659138,0.0001845291,0.0003796814,0.0007065039,0.06365949,0.004559359,0.006792881,0.003979735,0.0003264311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005811622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005051205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00200558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919389,0.004770963,0.0003235569,0.0007243674,0.001353493,0.0008887912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922667,0.003019755,0.001073305,0.001318566,0.001786423,0.000535281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004100837,0.000009468223,0.00032067,0.00001178044,0.000002182531,0.00001883604,0.002843024,0.000097624,0.00006596229,0.9944625,0.0003566578,0.001807007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001888464,0.00004217324,0.001031175,0.0001356849,0.000008329165,0.0001451481,0.003755549,0.0005766281,0.0008069471,0.9358311,0.05763092,0.00001749315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.174729,0.002852921,0.03145113,0.02871763,0.000323238,0.00006991018,0.00002619833,0.0000455041,0.7617844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916161,0.0002564722,0.0008000844,0.0007301205,0.00003904137,0.00002297765,0.0000049335,0.00001147666,0.006518777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008405562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051490122","doi":"10.1007/s11159-005-5614-2","title":"Introduction: Education and social justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Zajda","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Majhanovich","is_ca":true},{"name":"Val D. Rust","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237841884103027,"gpt":0.4132711024110926,"spread":0.3808926835700623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027775,0.001315149,0.001216619,0.003476159,0.002129301,0.005461165,0.001926727,0.008516644,0.04008728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007983394,0.0003989374,0.0006901586,0.006449266,0.004279346,0.007676146,0.003068867,0.009573745,0.01074081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004240673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00575553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007244225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983159,0.0005440303,0.0001066204,0.0003834681,0.0005415487,0.0001083901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916697,0.00478415,0.0004725431,0.0003318626,0.002137736,0.0006041134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001361151,0.00001564496,0.0001131041,0.0009769783,0.000008010205,0.00001961063,0.0001904529,0.00006532307,0.00004242955,0.0631238,0.9018774,0.0335536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009021519,0.00001083251,0.0005674122,0.001253299,0.000009719914,0.00005902765,0.0002397586,0.0000376735,0.00002352853,0.02107406,0.976705,0.00001067137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005582591,0.3550374,0.002485784,0.405399,0.1813547,0.00004406594,0.001207598,0.0001202337,0.05379297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01624117,0.2381828,0.002929613,0.3773903,0.2763998,0.0002258654,0.001232208,0.0001902843,0.08720793],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04008728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1341053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Bagg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06261548645886392,"gpt":0.4068541026422285,"spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02675323,0.000509305,0.001179093,0.00225234,0.008819892,0.01333363,0.001742908,0.008176981,0.004549531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04744882,0.0005781149,0.0007410269,0.001938676,0.05543444,0.03223646,0.01132013,0.01126208,0.0006842597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003323339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003305992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008335673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001002266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810326,0.0144096,0.0004067141,0.001428457,0.001776429,0.0009462403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507997,0.03964422,0.002460822,0.00371293,0.002021817,0.001360538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008562537,0.000005549053,0.0001605221,0.00002942711,0.00000388334,0.00003665859,0.001931658,0.0001835009,0.00002237017,0.9924287,0.001188532,0.00400059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005333943,0.000003017963,0.00005336602,0.00004290972,0.00000192731,0.0000199567,0.0008844748,0.0002450556,0.00001665234,0.9934096,0.005314357,0.000003338909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546521,0.01802193,0.07997962,0.575686,0.001541471,0.00003609001,0.00008083983,0.0000926167,0.2590963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765303,0.004228972,0.004488857,0.009327629,0.001885648,0.00005763127,0.00002238769,0.00003891465,0.003419563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02675323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1414863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025727140","doi":"10.5840/philtopics2004321/24","title":"Responsibility and the Condition of Moral Sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Paul Russell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08090817733398858,"gpt":0.3629408907319927,"spread":0.2820327133980041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004386,0.0004288948,0.001094922,0.002075741,0.004098422,0.007865777,0.001241455,0.005710565,0.009579587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03256334,0.0005002035,0.0009763537,0.001201162,0.03840807,0.01300854,0.004347302,0.006362584,0.0006627817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003284865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003620961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001478585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000824679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904518,0.005067573,0.0004676905,0.001277927,0.001606614,0.001128397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701076,0.02189073,0.001946388,0.002544289,0.001943231,0.001567721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001478861,0.00001157579,0.0001964571,0.00001380311,0.000004989008,0.00003146499,0.0005591614,0.00008978548,0.00006143116,0.9978408,0.0003084674,0.0008672544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001224618,0.000005401557,0.0002269092,0.000009033568,0.000003282677,0.00003599419,0.00026468,0.0001962138,0.0000499634,0.9977813,0.001410474,0.000004399218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.235029,0.00381297,0.09818739,0.0879721,0.001043339,0.0001007574,0.0002776488,0.0001170417,0.5734598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934535,0.0003472,0.00267909,0.0005396573,0.0002515205,0.00005776344,0.00003283593,0.00002373733,0.002614638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01004386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05311763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1285266877168514,"gpt":0.3874451090091326,"spread":0.2589184212922812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008020552,0.0007474601,0.000698073,0.003214536,0.006127803,0.00998944,0.001169636,0.007576026,0.007757813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006240555,0.000358155,0.0005736399,0.002380843,0.0709087,0.01070543,0.004578178,0.0088459,0.0007097506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007870363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004081866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003205686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002970332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897255,0.00646603,0.0001814412,0.0006506665,0.002122833,0.0008534619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923523,0.005884773,0.0004675906,0.0003390609,0.0004705821,0.0004856323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.621907e-7,0.000002385088,0.000009102766,0.000005438134,5.258732e-7,0.000006487876,0.0003541284,0.0000425987,0.000007452475,0.9988558,0.0003339963,0.0003815283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004187049,0.000005208602,0.00006053246,0.00006391417,0.000001329828,0.0000200675,0.0005834795,0.000123315,0.00003212097,0.9543597,0.04474297,0.000003172261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009915745,0.01839279,0.03008223,0.1705402,0.001577781,0.00002969015,0.00006255798,0.00002455993,0.7693744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788617,0.02165838,0.01120437,0.03105522,0.006062251,0.0002361681,0.00007434988,0.00007556222,0.05077193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00998944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05710375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03802008124738713,"gpt":0.3237438505211521,"spread":0.285723769273765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304749,0.0003711132,0.000695142,0.001198729,0.00290134,0.005551341,0.0007671096,0.003458299,0.006060908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005189568,0.0002619245,0.0003661948,0.001899884,0.02359118,0.00754933,0.002348345,0.00296552,0.000274184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002931415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00206301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006987369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006629298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998358,0.001103305,0.00004597386,0.0001213783,0.0001714236,0.0002000492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948208,0.00437496,0.0002175862,0.0002064994,0.0002528115,0.0001272755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002711731,0.000003533345,0.00007686301,0.000004045221,0.000001198943,0.000009883689,0.0002390555,0.0001394779,0.000006421046,0.998307,0.0005066741,0.0007030969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028298,0.000002619598,0.0001526947,0.00001622854,0.00000141727,0.000006779337,0.0003242745,0.0001869372,0.000009937013,0.9954073,0.003886843,0.000002115726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1377709,0.02875249,0.02859676,0.1433859,0.0008610327,0.00003513839,0.0001877461,0.00003078164,0.6603792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792398,0.006855605,0.001201309,0.002477887,0.0006129465,0.00004042485,0.00003537444,0.00001279431,0.009523835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006987369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02126902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969308910","doi":"10.1111/1469-8219.00001","title":"Normative Justifications for Liberal Nationalism: Justice, Democracy and National Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Democracy; Nationality; Identity (music); National identity; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy; Immigration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09001745119918635,"gpt":0.4101713365478809,"spread":0.3201538853486945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914283,0.0002868978,0.000503284,0.0008544193,0.004798893,0.006989576,0.00112846,0.004908034,0.003543372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01231344,0.0001808711,0.000364742,0.001045639,0.03322286,0.007026199,0.00432256,0.005510748,0.0004137044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00443358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003632791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001754998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002224088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993296,0.004321435,0.0002050889,0.0004754416,0.001200362,0.0005017896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934683,0.004311013,0.0005416124,0.0005842585,0.000653104,0.0004417361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001426743,0.000003070268,0.00003066436,0.000003647866,5.077267e-7,0.00000899568,0.000440236,0.00003321443,0.000007192826,0.9985133,0.0004123094,0.0005453436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003036551,0.000002168394,0.00008959121,0.00003598029,8.174567e-7,0.00001947652,0.0005432476,0.0001668205,0.00004008532,0.9862642,0.01283215,0.000002493822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05092579,0.004925079,0.05285205,0.1314476,0.001264612,0.00004254487,0.00005237452,0.0000462723,0.7584437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763145,0.001036479,0.005865246,0.005329631,0.0003942773,0.0001231525,0.00003249322,0.00003062681,0.0108735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006989576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03216809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Yann Allard‐Tremblay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03758842339145689,"gpt":0.3019908167526464,"spread":0.2644023933611895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002826884,0.0003612658,0.0003913263,0.001047452,0.005022156,0.007375276,0.001215398,0.002363072,0.004402629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002553624,0.0002350495,0.0005614646,0.001658132,0.02160821,0.008524415,0.002744171,0.005133098,0.001044394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005030554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003968042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005708754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974432,0.001618393,0.00004381024,0.000217411,0.0004109102,0.0002662581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.0005409751,0.00008093235,0.0001258348,0.0001175612,0.00012791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000159524,0.00000280457,0.00002566195,0.000003426662,6.712352e-7,0.000009249315,0.0006540167,0.0001596259,0.00000635253,0.9973632,0.001105963,0.0006674661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006392316,0.000005452823,0.00007914921,0.00002517681,0.000001527654,0.00001792554,0.0005767483,0.0007508681,0.00002134893,0.9613312,0.03718099,0.000003227414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975806,0.004178091,0.0478586,0.05743242,0.0006483314,0.00007535051,0.0001139753,0.00007238513,0.8698628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774345,0.002244572,0.01091349,0.00452365,0.0005265043,0.0001939794,0.00008064331,0.00008127208,0.1040014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007375276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03649944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467656450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491177.004","title":"Citizen representatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Representation (politics); Direct democracy; Citizen journalism; Government (linguistics); Participatory democracy; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Politics; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Mark E. Warren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07930477289418897,"gpt":0.2854582871432851,"spread":0.2061535142490961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004243311,0.0006681714,0.0006575005,0.001613794,0.004704732,0.007987541,0.001832852,0.004719034,0.1183022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008323202,0.0005681,0.0006973164,0.00236977,0.002851607,0.007225194,0.006975921,0.0044156,0.05326928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003503717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00433171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00177936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002962508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922441,0.002734899,0.0004081221,0.001633868,0.001980379,0.0009987942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978316,0.0005022367,0.0001200865,0.0005597837,0.0006770922,0.0003091546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001533243,0.00003285178,0.0001994427,0.00009042407,0.000004590221,0.00008064941,0.002479363,0.00008613756,0.0001926043,0.7507252,0.1846174,0.0614761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002870119,0.000004238684,0.00004472076,0.00003299336,0.000001139168,0.00003537687,0.0002320787,0.00002639826,0.00007176537,0.01433261,0.9852132,0.000002529965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001505374,0.001371623,0.008560591,0.006982275,0.001318706,0.0002455195,0.0001958683,0.0002583776,0.9795617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02866635,0.001176521,0.004683283,0.006179487,0.0004664268,0.0003217619,0.0004020532,0.0002085331,0.9578955],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1183022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3957603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253700003","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.001.0001","title":"Faces of Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","authors":[{"name":"Sophia Moreau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1770820188362782,"gpt":0.3913226072164424,"spread":0.2142405883801642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001025663,0.0003075744,0.0003900892,0.0007772612,0.006203755,0.006639657,0.0007747595,0.002670911,0.02613928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002237097,0.0001216023,0.0002833671,0.0006642856,0.01134517,0.006341123,0.005912094,0.004382607,0.002469592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003693832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001559321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003911731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005033365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986193,0.000444905,0.000020494,0.0001475883,0.000382142,0.0003855625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994755,0.0002006362,0.00003287024,0.00007619229,0.0001009691,0.0001138012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002416726,0.000002427787,0.00004597958,0.000005047383,4.864004e-7,0.00002689737,0.000616955,0.00003340836,0.00001520509,0.9833661,0.01304181,0.002843363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005427667,0.000007499765,0.0003038994,0.0001164168,0.000001707207,0.0001413109,0.002555538,0.0002011064,0.00006862756,0.5592502,0.4373423,0.000005857613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006125558,0.003581175,0.001580516,0.03666897,0.0007781122,0.00001033628,0.00006688697,0.00001951961,0.951169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5399132,0.005761188,0.001411494,0.01941605,0.001887762,0.0001299362,0.0002373473,0.0001062667,0.4311368],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02613928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08744466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Arash Abizadeh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03065475453241006,"gpt":0.3456204243549922,"spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004043923,0.0001801317,0.0003250241,0.0007050185,0.002390574,0.004283251,0.0005972195,0.001776793,0.002528268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004228225,0.0001329058,0.0002831614,0.0009016736,0.01994499,0.006626822,0.002675971,0.003207698,0.0002226338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003141232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00261442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003002047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003528699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.001644905,0.00005850093,0.0002902557,0.000437279,0.000253246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977708,0.00128913,0.0003591157,0.0002066516,0.0002216646,0.0001526063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003532845,0.000001979219,0.00008240258,0.00001189515,0.000001169582,0.000007793997,0.0004295843,0.0000461442,0.00001676163,0.9963338,0.0006412005,0.002423533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007343149,0.000007734285,0.000555859,0.00009669068,0.000003108158,0.00003748356,0.0005296209,0.0002256167,0.00007559052,0.9628619,0.03559515,0.000003907508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1065252,0.06596103,0.04152614,0.1654353,0.001377,0.0000449788,0.00008729751,0.00004806777,0.618995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977778,0.00678912,0.001952466,0.004170297,0.0006247656,0.00003314087,0.00002395019,0.00001746567,0.008610758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004283251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02279139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793382062","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.1.3","title":"For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Constructive; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Contradiction; Racism; Feminism; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Dilek Huseyinzadegan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04690220087675831,"gpt":0.3207353323767127,"spread":0.2738331314999544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01480803,0.0008143089,0.0006880705,0.001778534,0.009174502,0.01376809,0.002158098,0.006163624,0.0048247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01649899,0.0003905238,0.0008982029,0.001332323,0.07602715,0.01561507,0.008299774,0.009827248,0.0009141096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007617082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004547517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002836237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824381,0.01277501,0.0002114577,0.0009956718,0.002284565,0.001295035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890447,0.006629776,0.0007388295,0.001982059,0.001020796,0.0005839276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006740961,0.000004290062,0.00006770351,0.00001588179,0.000003045773,0.00002696698,0.006670384,0.0000698739,0.00002803296,0.9897841,0.001791706,0.001531328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000911869,0.00001275893,0.00008368312,0.0001141332,0.000007356004,0.00007735549,0.01083791,0.0002594636,0.0002488702,0.8809718,0.1073608,0.00001681989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03476482,0.0109927,0.08936349,0.3537816,0.002487516,0.00009767694,0.00009491909,0.0003015787,0.5081158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444229,0.001503013,0.0102962,0.01410941,0.0007004546,0.00017175,0.00002975944,0.0001888497,0.02857757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01480803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07831329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992335124","doi":"10.1177/1470594x09345680","title":"Public justification and the limits of state action","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law and economics; Redistribution (election); Distributive justice; Coercion (linguistics); Enforcement; Unanimity; Political science; Flourishing; Property rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1740698470078224,"gpt":0.3406155678701323,"spread":0.1665457208623099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02123063,0.0005325932,0.001549538,0.002334753,0.00519287,0.01415688,0.002292886,0.009321555,0.006046608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04858616,0.0009060912,0.001692565,0.001440791,0.04194614,0.01239916,0.009520182,0.009013182,0.0007452708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009887303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002727262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733564,0.01259979,0.001305462,0.004006706,0.005932807,0.002798887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491168,0.03516275,0.003594251,0.007430552,0.003540747,0.001155051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000402168,0.00000439436,0.00006109205,0.000008142276,0.000003825405,0.000006692265,0.0001475803,0.0003364616,0.0000234187,0.9985042,0.0001215947,0.0007786654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001191348,0.000005182441,0.0000811487,0.00002697513,0.000003853115,0.000008435446,0.00007324305,0.0005813704,0.00006199421,0.9965445,0.002597547,0.00000369501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06838492,0.004463161,0.1128833,0.05123662,0.0002532933,0.0001456746,0.0001632362,0.0002635456,0.7622063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836435,0.0005307585,0.008056369,0.001340749,0.0001659247,0.0002766283,0.00004128837,0.00005642192,0.005888249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02123063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1122796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114027695","doi":"10.5840/jphil2004101616","title":"Dialectical Delicacies in the Debate About Freedom and Alternative Possibilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael McKenna","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06425650584006057,"gpt":0.3415913412221663,"spread":0.2773348353821058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03898148,0.0008252131,0.00175856,0.003642673,0.01146868,0.02058637,0.003385263,0.01329596,0.004571308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03630171,0.001126036,0.001301414,0.003396381,0.1234557,0.0290062,0.01094489,0.01978564,0.0006017336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01319346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006617866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004676646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004912293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9652222,0.02627277,0.0009814488,0.0019905,0.004160853,0.001372242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588698,0.03573852,0.0009592305,0.002049759,0.001452562,0.0009300629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003429251,0.000002379132,0.0000109872,0.000005795496,0.000001553724,0.000005236458,0.00123467,0.00004269349,0.000006852778,0.9981776,0.0002005033,0.0003082774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006856702,0.000001332206,0.00001534964,0.00001753836,0.000001202626,0.000007460404,0.0006147616,0.0001163191,0.00001484839,0.9960564,0.003144844,0.000002996846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06207196,0.01788786,0.1079131,0.3095365,0.001894488,0.000124661,0.0001659305,0.00009863736,0.5003068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970547,0.002171808,0.01092466,0.006783666,0.0008138287,0.0002205177,0.00003741192,0.00009629958,0.008404791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03898148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2061563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075579913","doi":"10.1163/17455243-00903008","title":"Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Human rights; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"S. Matthew Liao","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam Etinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1224041390958673,"gpt":0.3905063707044295,"spread":0.2681022316085622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02165542,0.0007002252,0.001443459,0.003131373,0.006431307,0.01449561,0.003354084,0.01003542,0.005281361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0283662,0.000561926,0.0008025301,0.001989438,0.0807716,0.02822759,0.006889161,0.01593187,0.000943101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006120483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004236418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002776549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001615672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774207,0.01412528,0.0005337831,0.001809651,0.005080557,0.001030049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738115,0.01794258,0.001959572,0.002573643,0.002471968,0.001240797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004552423,0.000008158484,0.00003849408,0.00001739191,0.00000294166,0.000006661263,0.0005746767,0.00004103347,0.00001105682,0.9961447,0.001593893,0.001556488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438081,0.000003990654,0.00008741449,0.0000457915,0.000002098587,0.00001970236,0.0005583079,0.0001383293,0.00002298965,0.9863301,0.01277686,0.000004927583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01373007,0.01563707,0.03126599,0.7687596,0.002824036,0.00003301336,0.0001245765,0.0000640311,0.1675615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874952,0.008884608,0.01401308,0.08373623,0.00844295,0.0003062699,0.0001375937,0.0001120067,0.009415319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02165542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1145262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Stéphane Zuber","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nikhil Venkatesh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Torbjörn Tännsjö","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christian Tarsney","is_ca":false},{"name":"H. Orri Stefánsson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katie Steele","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dean Spears","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeff Sebo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marcus Pivato","is_ca":false},{"name":"Toby Ord","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yew‐Kwang Ng","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michal Masny","is_ca":false},{"name":"William MacAskill","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas Lawson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin Kuruc","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michelle Hutchinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Johan E. Gustafsson","is_ca":true},{"name":"H. R. G. Greaves","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa Forsberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marc Fleurbaey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Diane Coffey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susumu Cato","is_ca":false},{"name":"Clinton Castro","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tim Campbell","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Budolfson","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Broome","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexander Berger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nick Beckstead","is_ca":false},{"name":"Geir B. Asheim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1672080924497507,"gpt":0.4030050556124028,"spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05650076,0.001235501,0.003693728,0.002976099,0.01218201,0.01605523,0.01436136,0.03611225,0.01322167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1249054,0.0007106372,0.002787184,0.001990397,0.05223085,0.04224143,0.01201943,0.06054688,0.007427898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005896919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006993658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005842877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004769698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9669794,0.0140563,0.002495471,0.005596908,0.007971529,0.002900422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441156,0.03086483,0.003523776,0.003636434,0.01328937,0.004570058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001100804,0.00004917731,0.000619609,0.0003179094,0.0001290061,0.0003343509,0.005210416,0.0002724417,0.0001654101,0.7877799,0.191766,0.0132458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005976503,0.00004100659,0.0005297399,0.000681605,0.00005196186,0.0001488564,0.006393461,0.000458927,0.0002403806,0.840618,0.1506761,0.0001002355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001251973,0.00187863,0.005348945,0.9768341,0.006458723,0.000024535,0.00007245712,0.00005053703,0.00808007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06244558,0.002693133,0.01216693,0.9011138,0.01401504,0.0003520821,0.0001513958,0.0002368415,0.006825167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05650076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2988082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02734212584362437,"gpt":0.3469111767575753,"spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006231321,0.0002820782,0.0004983546,0.001072844,0.004428429,0.006033768,0.0007735987,0.003967298,0.006811331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003537152,0.0001924707,0.0004862325,0.001088627,0.05051157,0.007254504,0.00512876,0.004032784,0.0005026897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004120518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003701493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005930754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006967137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946709,0.002748998,0.0001528103,0.0008852633,0.0008068455,0.0007350308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971491,0.00146168,0.0003021029,0.0004896918,0.00029401,0.0003035625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001648152,0.000002634079,0.00005519955,0.000003621876,0.000001265349,0.00000775194,0.0002141162,0.00008682452,0.00001391107,0.9986184,0.0003093399,0.0006853633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006380913,0.000004686066,0.0002030696,0.00002028542,0.000001865626,0.00001812444,0.0002657123,0.0001810536,0.00002929675,0.9847941,0.01447244,0.00000309632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04150551,0.005554258,0.03074323,0.04437927,0.0003035385,0.00003748295,0.00007615475,0.00003900696,0.8773614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692912,0.00141153,0.004271095,0.004381147,0.000264561,0.00006946077,0.0000384612,0.0000329219,0.02023956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006811331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03295475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08277732688224,"gpt":0.3780833816609621,"spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02246134,0.0005266246,0.001207511,0.002978857,0.008372096,0.0167413,0.002616743,0.01560567,0.02342766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07885087,0.000734033,0.001112171,0.002450915,0.03155125,0.02363616,0.006666386,0.01044109,0.001556395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004511583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006316004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001716593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001264313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812367,0.01293538,0.0005480805,0.001635731,0.002522575,0.001121406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116975,0.07476565,0.002736981,0.004633857,0.004514038,0.001651996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002020376,0.00001106934,0.0001178511,0.00001969855,0.00000410247,0.00002082284,0.0003285359,0.0001195714,0.00001986196,0.9951415,0.002249481,0.001947286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001647089,0.000006008142,0.00009437709,0.00003481031,0.000004776747,0.00002180215,0.000376648,0.0004476683,0.00004682545,0.9887016,0.01024438,0.000004621639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123949,0.003937444,0.04452469,0.3328172,0.002527025,0.0001573833,0.0002296733,0.00008871364,0.5644783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670522,0.0007814695,0.006704543,0.005944645,0.001933848,0.0002369489,0.00009247655,0.00008189094,0.01717198],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02342766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1187884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011063172080465,"gpt":0.3646774222089,"spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0193834,0.001075446,0.001232929,0.002692905,0.003673977,0.009819469,0.003310155,0.004504724,0.009977351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01812936,0.0008337963,0.001542244,0.002213585,0.04285786,0.02029113,0.007401153,0.007233058,0.002454756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003819028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003689987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001367887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001851302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870618,0.006666827,0.000728582,0.001760396,0.003030656,0.0007517979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838726,0.007191368,0.001422965,0.004377385,0.001973283,0.001162535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003223661,0.00001906028,0.0003387954,0.0001000274,0.00001423822,0.00001285272,0.0008194358,0.0001006124,0.00004573857,0.9798314,0.00179951,0.01688604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308929,0.00001525336,0.0002574234,0.0001317572,0.00001054303,0.00005895747,0.0007789527,0.000461405,0.00008926389,0.9826009,0.01556578,0.00001672406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03951147,0.01574586,0.2947301,0.1307964,0.002287134,0.00027144,0.0003627888,0.000728872,0.515566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7838275,0.01095752,0.1626686,0.01159428,0.001610291,0.001210815,0.0003015235,0.0004635857,0.02736588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0193834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1025105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513518358","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12337","title":"‘Justice and Colonialism’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1187968102789085,"gpt":0.3652442710790025,"spread":0.246447460800094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952953,0.0001620807,0.0002489464,0.0008376046,0.003108224,0.00462481,0.0003566473,0.00148558,0.004905384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006640308,0.00009585558,0.0001571162,0.0009703679,0.01665297,0.00309236,0.003037536,0.002922495,0.0002392891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003096491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001974714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008610604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009149015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975495,0.00164506,0.00005537444,0.0001658763,0.0003195349,0.0002646649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684,0.001831179,0.0003459502,0.0002678467,0.000424137,0.0002909579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005504776,0.00000627387,0.0004525112,0.00003461387,0.000002919781,0.00007608622,0.004646669,0.00007929331,0.0000699116,0.9822844,0.006802887,0.005538852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008816446,0.00001669965,0.002828378,0.0003128265,0.000006047591,0.0002356888,0.00554339,0.0002632157,0.0001944918,0.6410626,0.3495145,0.00001330282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06809366,0.04600237,0.00423855,0.1868623,0.001700192,0.00001715168,0.00005307988,0.00002964043,0.6930031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662592,0.004840354,0.0005637544,0.007038912,0.0008322118,0.000008489154,0.00001278111,0.00001868764,0.02042571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008610604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02246672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237455223","doi":"10.1080/0305724042000200047","title":"The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Sociology; Oppression; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Moral disengagement; Politics; Liberalism; Social cognitive theory of morality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Boyd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06859331214350158,"gpt":0.3726162912145367,"spread":0.3040229790710351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02344134,0.0007450496,0.001231308,0.002753971,0.01336087,0.02394396,0.002498644,0.01247671,0.00391163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02228337,0.0004946075,0.0007741584,0.002168308,0.1985805,0.02908358,0.0166687,0.020937,0.0008488335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006536961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002505971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760723,0.01793724,0.0004616333,0.001425494,0.002894665,0.001208812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747198,0.01896263,0.001479602,0.001989969,0.001196502,0.00165148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004933901,0.000008056066,0.00008248814,0.00001598435,0.000001584841,0.00002225317,0.007240144,0.00003618848,0.00001551934,0.9889293,0.0008795915,0.002764026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006301395,0.000005736977,0.00006422637,0.00005833362,0.000001197644,0.00002921761,0.003358738,0.00007910406,0.00002698936,0.981092,0.01527338,0.000004777172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03989091,0.01983143,0.04545082,0.5910533,0.002612388,0.00005374,0.00003557801,0.0001302765,0.3009416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426486,0.00513428,0.008554466,0.02342186,0.004753768,0.0001610172,0.00002378951,0.0001465725,0.01515561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02394396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1239712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Yael Peled","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matteo Bonotti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07368246469849857,"gpt":0.4173249267825241,"spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00529937,0.0002855335,0.0003510969,0.001642034,0.001692864,0.004925826,0.0007379056,0.002037263,0.003530799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007717971,0.0002201183,0.0003558453,0.00124836,0.02751112,0.00799492,0.002706503,0.003476087,0.0003823693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002270801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001278457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001826253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001408568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973369,0.001663112,0.00008505231,0.0003241557,0.0004304431,0.0001603607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949318,0.003506606,0.0006052527,0.0003952425,0.0004101474,0.0001509916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730145,0.000009504657,0.0004234779,0.00006903594,0.0000104268,0.00007469713,0.007006781,0.0001225445,0.0001786608,0.9826071,0.001146259,0.008334252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006269607,0.00000954384,0.001042372,0.0000866815,0.000007834393,0.0001063072,0.001985572,0.0002684501,0.0001579264,0.9734069,0.02291162,0.00001066111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.172385,0.03956039,0.06453727,0.1332606,0.0008200058,0.00003935513,0.00009609159,0.0001624584,0.5891388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871773,0.0030354,0.002474243,0.002838994,0.0003024322,0.00001684074,0.0000164629,0.00003147424,0.004106817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00529937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0280261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nikolas Kompridis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08130903967799825,"gpt":0.3457040570422679,"spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0240568,0.0005814764,0.001292381,0.001954644,0.01529347,0.02029972,0.002624471,0.01095327,0.00433865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233198,0.0006019567,0.0007323327,0.001655906,0.1488893,0.03327994,0.01355723,0.01703766,0.0008789197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01018013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009996204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004260807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003307375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9683571,0.01844241,0.001169233,0.003798163,0.005541589,0.002691434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872944,0.006920826,0.001136737,0.001780999,0.001566408,0.001300714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003093085,0.00000352201,0.00004227132,0.000007114032,9.54422e-7,0.00001289307,0.003486298,0.00002476013,0.00002115121,0.9937539,0.000876546,0.00176752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006950049,0.000009800225,0.0001401702,0.00008502416,0.000002627787,0.00005477779,0.005301232,0.000124542,0.00005677761,0.9654663,0.02873923,0.00001272224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04564291,0.009072285,0.04370672,0.3265974,0.001967468,0.00005520569,0.00004954509,0.00008832249,0.5728202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646604,0.002119226,0.004563915,0.01207572,0.001080606,0.0001082885,0.00003214484,0.00009378233,0.01526594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0240568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.127226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269198251","doi":"10.4324/9781315252629-15","title":"Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public reason; Order (exchange); Political science; Moral order; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1145890590365885,"gpt":0.3578013020341987,"spread":0.2432122429976102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304009,0.0005458869,0.0004144649,0.001467341,0.004277821,0.00772567,0.0006499292,0.003736694,0.003734946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003157861,0.0003941114,0.000440113,0.001720907,0.02979617,0.009532543,0.00286459,0.006291893,0.001189444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004632747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004338595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004288489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971026,0.00136428,0.00007301053,0.0002719343,0.0008561473,0.0003321061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988875,0.0007172625,0.00006981129,0.0001251341,0.0001302449,0.0000700598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002020111,0.000003735534,0.000009497356,0.000009666746,8.175338e-7,0.000005469562,0.0005456074,0.00007653728,0.000009926413,0.9949299,0.002772088,0.001634904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002476034,0.000002578407,0.00003564195,0.00004928214,0.000001120539,0.00001437966,0.0002840674,0.00008494961,0.00003640174,0.9452446,0.05423937,0.00000503697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009772779,0.04590757,0.01866801,0.06835974,0.001239395,0.00003344027,0.00008645132,0.00008601439,0.8558466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7832821,0.02853872,0.009783683,0.01812318,0.002149505,0.0001474129,0.0001155704,0.0001795102,0.1576803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008835304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06410491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Rafeeq Hasan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561043220587807,"gpt":0.3084853928907133,"spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242599,0.0002492164,0.0003551842,0.001105821,0.004526384,0.004157596,0.0005027067,0.002632895,0.003415182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003962647,0.0001985191,0.0003444591,0.0008811955,0.03796196,0.004986855,0.005239883,0.003523609,0.0003010506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00551413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00325385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969531,0.001836699,0.00007669607,0.000233884,0.0005154891,0.0003841857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976835,0.001349199,0.0002212292,0.0002432902,0.0003050207,0.000197673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002943947,0.000002012357,0.00002377516,0.000004058712,8.533956e-7,0.000006225594,0.0004529995,0.0001743529,0.00001300161,0.9985833,0.0003362102,0.0004002097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003774229,0.000003291524,0.00004695476,0.0000132289,0.00000131472,0.000007968804,0.0002119814,0.0002427383,0.00003732296,0.992375,0.007052733,0.000003672384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1337693,0.006387256,0.03955513,0.07761105,0.0003738666,0.00004402611,0.0001170324,0.00008491726,0.7420574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905441,0.0006286371,0.001114818,0.001059653,0.00008761758,0.00002407752,0.000009749298,0.00001220995,0.006519043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00551413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04000801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004645244","doi":"10.1007/s12142-013-0269-z","title":"The Capability Approach and the Debate Between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Humanism; Human rights; Development aid; Politics; Social philosophy; Critical theory; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Social change","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1357908989806494,"gpt":0.4079345190962432,"spread":0.2721436201155938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01111658,0.0005521933,0.0009107083,0.006818322,0.001650283,0.005102803,0.001162948,0.004906893,0.005298536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02369385,0.0003634928,0.0004017073,0.006169623,0.01388842,0.01238322,0.001645949,0.004810622,0.0004904257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007148649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006296223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009898059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948854,0.003193212,0.0001807124,0.0003257533,0.001101674,0.0003132595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496386,0.04592213,0.0008571491,0.0005253968,0.002661867,0.0003947182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003695053,0.00002336875,0.0003886084,0.00296185,0.00004732815,0.0001130299,0.0021734,0.0003479783,0.0001975745,0.8232402,0.07461999,0.09584969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001473201,0.00003503244,0.001700881,0.009450014,0.00003023342,0.0001706219,0.003732979,0.0002704123,0.0002117626,0.3257419,0.6586166,0.00002483402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001248877,0.9021477,0.001132702,0.07735629,0.001239063,0.000006124729,0.00002323385,0.000004628213,0.01684153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08897352,0.8844979,0.0006817906,0.01772438,0.004683234,0.00003851494,0.00004424819,0.00002151673,0.003334959],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0587908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Ян Шапиро","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02709649239832811,"gpt":0.2836578703277456,"spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009071508,0.0005889817,0.0006022138,0.001225097,0.006402204,0.006683312,0.001466702,0.002682897,0.004121055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008030349,0.0001826424,0.0006769452,0.001032508,0.05169659,0.009803025,0.006552161,0.006247201,0.0006666118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006647741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003729019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004013582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003015328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921833,0.004051968,0.0001754896,0.000956392,0.001605599,0.001027268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937757,0.003510795,0.0004156692,0.0008399881,0.001077114,0.0003806484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001106211,0.000001441611,0.0000352183,0.000005061435,8.966784e-7,0.00001461855,0.0008419391,0.00002406604,0.000017314,0.998117,0.0003702727,0.000571172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003643822,0.00000614247,0.0001060927,0.00004393237,0.000002398833,0.0000408321,0.0007946052,0.0001430207,0.00009282353,0.9674221,0.03134038,0.000003996623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03518863,0.008814922,0.04570381,0.06249252,0.0009276933,0.00006220547,0.00003567635,0.00004621017,0.8467283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434977,0.002561953,0.00272478,0.007673474,0.0006693121,0.0001115061,0.00002028068,0.00007653226,0.0426644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009071508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04823291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917118741","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00344.x","title":"Theories of Political Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public reason; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Simone Chambers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06361517113202808,"gpt":0.3563501571556161,"spread":0.292734986023588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008350995,0.0005793524,0.001080494,0.004918462,0.003103942,0.008592823,0.001663813,0.00590864,0.01208176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581807,0.0003423905,0.0009286312,0.00343272,0.02688261,0.008164724,0.003062427,0.005422752,0.001386604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006728182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004991064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002311807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002321498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913434,0.004470107,0.000223248,0.0006106519,0.002641659,0.0007109732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853576,0.0105359,0.0008275454,0.001169338,0.001747123,0.0003625282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.535245e-7,0.000003310115,0.00002724209,0.00001249329,0.00000168592,0.000004577495,0.00006761498,0.0001494921,0.000003085607,0.9981142,0.0008335977,0.0007819764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145236,0.000002014188,0.00005853282,0.0000518764,0.000002278964,0.000009117385,0.0000886114,0.0004275693,0.00001116741,0.9880398,0.0113033,0.000001739401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.012717,0.01570836,0.0677815,0.07782497,0.0009629142,0.00008444469,0.0001841768,0.0001137883,0.8246229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496191,0.008035669,0.009315101,0.004345127,0.002064501,0.0002395008,0.0001824657,0.00008515901,0.02611342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01208176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04881662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kieran Oberman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0521453708720397,"gpt":0.3249026986403992,"spread":0.2727573277683595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0310557,0.0004577835,0.0008424834,0.001244413,0.009305471,0.01049357,0.001733494,0.01746912,0.003771414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05187632,0.0003267169,0.0006308919,0.00177865,0.1011248,0.01869339,0.009220228,0.01343575,0.0005034165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007292908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01360448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01236011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007453769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9654289,0.02688534,0.001219521,0.001999697,0.002246842,0.002219673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96785,0.02580163,0.001388263,0.001526853,0.001569267,0.001864062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002848858,0.00002066809,0.0006713345,0.00008391597,0.000005707178,0.0002481722,0.01578755,0.00009570837,0.00003071503,0.962588,0.01022893,0.01021085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002304678,0.00002544782,0.0006210068,0.0005009966,0.000007031324,0.0002850054,0.01188924,0.0001725335,0.00005690104,0.948127,0.03826204,0.00002974266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02787602,0.0190837,0.003252973,0.8752738,0.001730376,0.00005354723,0.00005133729,0.00002826907,0.07264998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787498,0.01220894,0.001869486,0.09477535,0.002863516,0.0001601001,0.00005541306,0.00003367343,0.00928377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0310557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1642402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621226479","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093","title":"Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Deliberation; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1270938749254998,"gpt":0.4376242868328923,"spread":0.3105304119073926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02498827,0.000786055,0.001145828,0.002857575,0.005134128,0.01007215,0.002079255,0.005811372,0.003520215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987058,0.0004631074,0.0009497676,0.002523364,0.08383811,0.01074789,0.007084314,0.007984772,0.0006969134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01095562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008892213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003108058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002787522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9643097,0.02543596,0.001098416,0.00284504,0.004449829,0.001861115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984133,0.01144523,0.001352662,0.001217766,0.001238227,0.000613193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005771424,0.000004698179,0.00004537136,0.0001103129,0.00000962477,0.00002698683,0.001874957,0.0004000203,0.00002821546,0.992233,0.001335317,0.003925602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007099919,0.000006422886,0.00005070922,0.0001933675,0.000003313987,0.00002410059,0.0005205004,0.0001843448,0.00004725921,0.970117,0.02883925,0.000006554827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01641194,0.1538769,0.1186461,0.1416615,0.002767858,0.0002933731,0.00007468991,0.00009865221,0.5661691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805509,0.04751061,0.03052442,0.01212399,0.002576104,0.0004695583,0.0000769475,0.0001105302,0.02605694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02498827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}