{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":242,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":242,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2e19e91c622d","filters":{"topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty"}},"results":[{"id":"W2097803862","doi":"10.1177/1462474508101493","title":"Sex offender as homo sacer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Sovereignty; Institution; Criminology; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304793296370991,"gpt":0.3253373979651411,"spread":0.3022894650014312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007030643,0.0001087736,0.0001550506,0.000007975842,0.0006418533,0.00005031073,0.0002379687,0.0002075367,0.001540176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008513071,0.0001009834,0.0002134674,0.000124524,0.0004352742,0.0001518434,0.00003402326,0.0002186217,0.0002815431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001437781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001444626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005026629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985911,0.0001634204,0.0001316822,0.0002156261,0.0003337426,0.0005644517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994029,0.0001267944,0.00003563662,0.0001809648,0.00003869786,0.0002149986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004091953,0.00009645111,0.000270296,0.000001582931,0.00002742875,0.000002177478,0.006991128,7.707569e-7,0.00001919654,0.9785826,0.01211766,0.001886631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002918927,0.0000718032,0.006004463,0.000005349041,0.00002218077,0.00000115673,0.008745727,0.0000173095,0.0003127509,0.8724183,0.1119168,0.0001921889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1138283,0.0001875224,0.0001352272,0.007841493,0.0002183716,0.0001725844,0.000004874146,0.0001609172,0.8774507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691355,0.0002499315,0.0003131272,0.01260033,0.0003297286,0.000006279965,0.000003916391,0.00000498095,0.01735623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8600945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114170700","doi":"10.1177/03058298070350030401","title":"Political Sociology and the Problem of the International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Sociology; Articulation (sociology); Sovereignty; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); International relations; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03297284409057433,"gpt":0.3670573739382497,"spread":0.3340845298476753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002814587,0.00006122206,0.0001847704,0.00004901983,0.0002385902,0.000009371638,0.0005218674,0.00006431246,0.0000529481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347996,0.00003012706,0.0001351141,0.00003998402,0.003941769,0.00006331426,0.000173785,0.0002284512,0.000001425707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001157596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000767849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005297756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004001942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998742,0.0001974149,0.0003919158,0.00006250193,0.0004028503,0.0002033011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974863,0.001647415,0.0002455825,0.00004639099,0.0005228472,0.00005147849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001488639,0.00002505141,0.005454177,0.000002019197,0.0003338887,0.000002709507,0.002715844,9.042399e-7,0.00001271729,0.9894032,0.001586123,0.0003145018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001641531,0.00005929132,0.03170078,0.00006052496,0.00006163309,0.0000667705,0.03213583,0.000005057168,0.0004141987,0.8302858,0.1034859,0.00008256509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3012066,0.02307947,0.0003420015,0.0854767,0.003563026,0.0001862791,0.00001401029,0.000008781119,0.5861231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928305,0.004604884,0.0002540327,0.001206663,0.0006908448,0.000001089888,1.240314e-7,0.000002425333,0.0004095087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6916238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113112222","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064137","title":"Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Exceptionalism; Modernity; Law; Politics; Internationalism (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Sovereign state; International relations; State (computer science); Constitutionalism; State of exception; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548035154891523,"gpt":0.2992175608441761,"spread":0.2837372092952609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004597934,0.00007804369,0.0001544375,0.00005982253,0.0001704954,0.00002122322,0.0002668758,0.0001773798,0.001162087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004586089,0.00007971049,0.00009516314,0.0001081354,0.000796075,0.0001522073,0.0000556449,0.0001175146,0.00006350118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004443991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001478037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004127392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989075,0.0001900696,0.0002295296,0.0001510768,0.0002710232,0.0002508131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993929,0.0002267591,0.00007221806,0.0001089142,0.0001313425,0.00006782571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001983645,0.0001218941,0.003469039,0.000003990791,0.00001118411,0.000002463245,0.001032659,0.000001682457,0.00007255191,0.9941583,0.001025696,0.00008070466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263485,0.00001545209,0.008647311,0.000006541566,0.000006815336,7.808893e-7,0.0001969218,0.00001036376,0.0003175403,0.9628409,0.02764159,0.00008948149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6870461,0.00008604801,0.00004558246,0.0006770071,0.0009140206,0.00008404774,0.000141789,0.00004889051,0.3109565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.00006826585,0.00006935145,0.0001835271,0.001800164,0.000006929047,0.0000888147,0.000004888352,0.0002398654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3107167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128802201","doi":"10.1177/0263276408099017","title":"A Message in a Bottle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Silence; Politics; Empathy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01324816534242869,"gpt":0.3135001380964874,"spread":0.3002519727540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001377438,0.00008435518,0.0001370446,0.000006639712,0.0002863002,0.0000198054,0.0002080286,0.0002341107,0.000690401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002055402,0.00006752103,0.0001477942,0.0001597572,0.0004307268,0.00009220117,0.00001637971,0.0002702701,0.0000762498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009287682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006363968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002763546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002030032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987921,0.0004086349,0.0001050826,0.0001558836,0.0001447432,0.0003936315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996057,0.000124599,0.00002470569,0.0001202409,0.00002342503,0.0001013742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001170022,0.0000513176,0.00004246373,0.000001182923,0.000006132735,0.000002987517,0.03318983,7.661101e-7,0.00004419856,0.9642897,0.001842158,0.0005175259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021747,0.00002049896,0.001751625,0.000008195225,0.000006915918,6.088418e-7,0.01706803,0.000001907411,0.00005746148,0.9632276,0.01754345,0.00009620152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09055752,0.0004525934,0.0001321036,0.000962468,0.00008270727,0.0001243118,0.000004645468,0.0001057084,0.9075779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985989,0.0001308132,0.0002728639,0.004830927,0.0001933346,0.000004063547,0.000002113409,0.000003252943,0.008573638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7559407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02943232257484862,"gpt":0.3159791559848752,"spread":0.2865468334100266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260969,0.000111591,0.0002278878,0.00002864474,0.00266682,0.00002565988,0.0002615604,0.0001297987,0.001566826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000496543,0.00006420948,0.00008593262,0.00005187218,0.003529646,0.0002553716,0.00001576215,0.0001467884,0.0000680903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009631522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002890214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984461,0.0004666653,0.0002520103,0.0001359801,0.0002285066,0.0004707234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993218,0.0001474387,0.0000835301,0.0002337651,0.00004269716,0.0001707702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000663921,0.00005717679,0.00007601382,0.000004229104,0.00002319158,7.390325e-7,0.01495115,7.45904e-9,0.00001493228,0.9846529,0.0001935272,0.0000195437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004369946,0.000069057,0.00274074,0.00000643972,0.00002964931,0.00000101388,0.0003970926,4.770066e-7,0.00009711384,0.9393741,0.05674414,0.0001032211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5503259,0.0001200521,0.000006247327,0.00007918077,0.0001289331,0.0001123447,0.000004673364,0.00002901295,0.4491936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995158,5.859808e-7,0.00002188067,0.0001202101,0.0004258989,0.000009429438,0.000002949969,0.000004709797,0.004256333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4449373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584920505","doi":"","title":"Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; State of exception; Political science; State (computer science); Philosophy of law; Politics; Contradiction; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03569557848742904,"gpt":0.372193404638457,"spread":0.3364978261510279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003899788,0.00007705501,0.0001366781,0.00002048076,0.0003183731,0.00001239997,0.0002179026,0.00008680052,0.002183445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005106317,0.00004757632,0.00005118947,0.0002366529,0.0004636323,0.00008759147,0.00004375099,0.000133013,0.0000720495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002364065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001353596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01280041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005170922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989519,0.0002327062,0.0001563705,0.0001192295,0.0002072106,0.0003325442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993338,0.0002602305,0.00008404804,0.000166069,0.00009665261,0.00005919103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002223888,0.00003797524,0.00577318,0.000004899068,0.0000120985,0.000006468986,0.002124041,0.00002485542,0.00001158446,0.9880772,0.00382378,0.00008171653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003196954,0.00005707211,0.05600812,0.00002051946,0.00003880364,0.000001447167,0.03707488,0.00003919737,0.0007094849,0.7662131,0.1392858,0.0002319055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4689748,0.0002356027,0.0001404364,0.005370582,0.0002949563,0.0001146465,0.000007369745,0.00004966241,0.5248119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592831,0.00007787859,0.00008807324,0.0002763363,0.0002398318,0.00000518049,0.000001616137,0.000005887889,0.04002216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4903082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167606606","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110334","title":"Political Theology/Theopolitics: The Thresholds and Vulnerabilities of Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political theology; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; Historicity (philosophy); State (computer science); Secularity; Anthropology; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01894433118772749,"gpt":0.3659124243821515,"spread":0.346968093194424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001515777,0.0001368264,0.0006375794,0.0000292569,0.0003231579,0.000004545157,0.0002981234,0.000217004,0.004037596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004617142,0.00009367099,0.0001663257,0.000156876,0.01788003,0.00009258759,0.0001856605,0.0002486748,0.00001011277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002755909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005024538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000593519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006337486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996697,0.00170626,0.0005083896,0.0002416515,0.00022381,0.000622889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964241,0.002460372,0.0001382738,0.000381245,0.0004425673,0.0001534313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009145691,0.00007180105,0.001189028,0.0004991039,0.00004783771,0.000007267937,0.0007579674,2.523083e-8,0.000002107424,0.9966425,0.0002727253,0.0005005378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001309405,0.0001264161,0.00084507,0.0003422194,0.00007744998,0.00004468599,0.02069433,7.114392e-7,0.0005086507,0.9685443,0.008587225,0.00009798522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0261834,0.07645409,0.00007986619,0.02114658,0.0004071249,0.0002670986,0.0001634821,0.00002523634,0.8752731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95859,0.03541129,0.00008863466,0.005302991,0.0001486439,0.0000074397,0.000005341916,0.000007080595,0.0004386012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9324066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965472227","doi":"10.1177/0263276419860576","title":"Pastoral Power and Algorithmic Governmentality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Nominalism; Obedience; Temporality; Power (physics); Secularization; Sociology; Technocracy; Epistemology; History; Genealogy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00701329848802781,"gpt":0.2717793533975206,"spread":0.2647660549094928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037946,0.0001008647,0.0001434871,0.000002402574,0.0003411585,0.0000280175,0.0001495706,0.0002148366,0.001804254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005394572,0.00007952843,0.0001337165,0.00005912638,0.0007684125,0.0001533032,0.00006539861,0.0002178727,0.0001617559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004116633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003738577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003123572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988183,0.0003362553,0.00009046583,0.0002011681,0.0002226091,0.0003312259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.0001206357,0.00003612129,0.0001363269,0.000023899,0.0001317748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001235342,0.00002425296,0.001011749,0.00000394789,0.00003109291,5.246443e-7,0.01665112,7.757241e-8,0.00007961826,0.981117,0.0009190767,0.0001492157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003346957,0.00004054862,0.004697226,0.00000697424,0.0000185909,0.000001721321,0.05304859,0.000003391094,0.00008451773,0.8994125,0.04218286,0.0001683844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5208941,0.0002916714,0.00009612333,0.0002393517,0.0002711561,0.0001763319,0.00002690077,0.00007383343,0.4779306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885656,0.00007353601,0.0002510689,0.002704815,0.0001542273,0.00000371901,0.000002994468,0.000006008846,0.008238036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4696926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183524","doi":"10.1111/edth.12457","title":"Moving Up without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Democracy; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06122337556513519,"gpt":0.3847201385556069,"spread":0.3234967629904717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714134,0.00006587813,0.0001183564,0.00001219782,0.000480793,0.00001626236,0.0002966091,0.0001559177,0.001378938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00705153,0.00004928573,0.00007031095,0.0001250963,0.001393838,0.00006468726,0.0000512856,0.0004987352,0.00007168857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008070508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005825494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008587469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000458388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977264,0.001477733,0.000166513,0.0001568063,0.0002609067,0.0002116575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996383,0.0031674,0.00006104513,0.000132296,0.0001090631,0.00014726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131102,0.00003663274,0.002226089,0.000005091903,0.00001441024,9.999462e-8,0.01014321,0.000004048361,0.00002045568,0.9867042,0.0002531117,0.0005513339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006919786,0.00001198209,0.017393,0.0000120359,0.00001203855,5.390226e-7,0.008253207,0.00002590249,0.0001499551,0.9726289,0.00138072,0.00006254974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.671762,0.0002282038,0.001151218,0.05987849,0.0008430273,0.0002513375,0.0000209857,0.00004397395,0.2658208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928538,0.000007658161,0.00014082,0.005602282,0.0006282413,0.000009757008,0.000002954816,0.000005010131,0.0007495343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3210918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008344743393117108,"gpt":0.246607821110647,"spread":0.2382630777175299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067934,0.00008640531,0.000189541,0.00005429697,0.000395629,0.00003527593,0.000280149,0.0001941682,0.002209204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008345109,0.00009955046,0.00007520312,0.00006670356,0.0003018499,0.000991271,0.00005383805,0.0002619826,0.00004074678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009934134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001290318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4187845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3195043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987428,0.0003235472,0.0001387539,0.000139239,0.0002513077,0.0004043918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993412,0.00009494476,0.00007847339,0.0000914059,0.0001019405,0.0002919832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051912,0.00006627838,0.002825685,0.000002273582,0.00001385709,0.00003728747,0.01328191,0.00004439058,0.00004367145,0.981781,0.001367143,0.0004312874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008462459,0.0008674389,0.1616045,0.000390894,0.00007932958,0.00004251151,0.2242596,0.0002372887,0.0002623415,0.2944734,0.3080815,0.001238703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3507964,0.0001057187,0.0002873296,0.001505921,0.001124476,0.0002350512,0.000003925487,0.0000208862,0.6459203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967024,0.0001042791,0.0006039899,0.00008742038,0.0003991062,2.103609e-7,4.795517e-7,0.000003594547,0.002098538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916825268","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.12144","title":"The Symbiosis of the Urban and the Political","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Ontology; Subject (documents); Notice; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06028367724771856,"gpt":0.4029372009951572,"spread":0.3426535237474387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004661101,0.00004570101,0.0001046922,0.00005239497,0.0006202903,0.00007672037,0.0007043809,0.00006498739,0.00002088423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003765805,0.00001889114,0.00009732755,0.00008160561,0.006726769,0.00006558744,0.0001480916,0.000433268,0.000001829608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000494077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002114047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001951522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002317659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970772,0.001250052,0.0002206548,0.00006895672,0.001122936,0.000260253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934539,0.005567757,0.00009079859,0.0000895802,0.0006617879,0.0001362158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001741567,0.00001810631,0.00425448,0.000001311059,0.00005600059,0.000001294846,0.0004953003,1.579431e-7,0.000004895197,0.9915158,0.003028933,0.0004495335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000571678,0.00004599619,0.01748685,0.00004074206,0.000008675446,0.00002479256,0.001933019,0.00005877798,0.00004373494,0.9060405,0.07371633,0.00002888526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3963615,0.002577865,0.00003761689,0.3463085,0.0009246918,0.000204693,0.00001114182,0.000004524212,0.2535695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965662,0.0003550635,0.000008824795,0.0008114362,0.0007958906,0.000001369724,1.404257e-7,0.000002604765,0.001458522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6002046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0367875969956024,"gpt":0.2966084499146628,"spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02040517,0.00007809981,0.0002168256,0.00004600939,0.0002069204,0.00006561982,0.0003764798,0.00003456833,0.0001314052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01199615,0.00004539057,0.00010086,0.00008630017,0.003953797,0.000132417,0.0000830915,0.0003360355,0.00005639589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001776346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001894434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001356097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989853,0.008988287,0.0003271734,0.00008405761,0.000303163,0.0004443479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966863,0.002154206,0.0001130923,0.0001449276,0.0002253471,0.0006761666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001916553,0.00001709183,0.0002117745,0.000001045316,0.00002571471,0.00005577964,0.0008377555,4.515874e-7,1.857158e-7,0.9974834,0.0005570994,0.0006180782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001282695,0.0000765984,0.004582593,0.000008130086,0.00001518489,0.0000726818,0.003259928,0.000003258545,0.000001853561,0.9631627,0.02747151,0.00006288057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04312063,0.0004706144,0.001101321,0.005142886,0.0005492118,0.00004988582,0.000003048328,0.00001819209,0.9495442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953965,0.00002660884,0.0001304844,0.001776087,0.00143193,2.038744e-7,1.536518e-7,0.000009284378,0.001228738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0792369281200715,"gpt":0.3500334249339207,"spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011246,0.00007081548,0.0003075091,0.000008430248,0.0003110005,0.000006146431,0.0004651138,0.00005592365,0.0001490342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004930945,0.00003789099,0.0001149415,0.0001544719,0.002228852,0.00004886106,0.00007393355,0.0001244793,0.00001741836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000621694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003453862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005732999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.0005415595,0.0003738119,0.00010571,0.0002263987,0.0002296225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.000594284,0.0001084878,0.0002594486,0.00006541538,0.0000583011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002357928,0.00003928368,0.0005656104,0.00004736834,0.000008718369,1.503394e-7,0.0004563715,0.00006289787,0.000002835373,0.9966478,0.0001508337,0.002015712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001008183,0.00001056995,0.00059745,0.0007094505,0.00001889253,7.22957e-7,0.00004555998,0.001099954,0.00005329744,0.9563687,0.04092875,0.00006583199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136756,0.1092552,0.003318526,0.02120394,0.0002949666,0.001532603,0.00006412037,0.00002736264,0.8429357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930847,0.005023677,0.00004166594,0.001631933,0.00002299767,0.00001201102,3.442238e-7,0.000002233044,0.0001804949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8212299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775570581","doi":"10.1177/1354066117744867","title":"Weapons of mass participation: Social media, violence entrepreneurs, and the politics of crowdfunding for war","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle; Arab Council for the Social Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Sovereignty; Law; Organised crime; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04868596698425926,"gpt":0.3514871294967573,"spread":0.302801162512498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668683,0.00004123204,0.0001187766,0.00004784659,0.0006326311,0.00002435102,0.0003694019,0.00002441925,0.00009461528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007782749,0.00003134679,0.0001029571,0.00002142394,0.001189835,0.0001773946,0.00003972674,0.0001091019,0.000002858245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002402908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009231349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003591999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988914,0.0003601626,0.0003650939,0.00005048295,0.0002284417,0.0001044003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973063,0.001565301,0.0006141686,0.00007692677,0.000382198,0.0000550832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004792931,0.00001823943,0.00531117,0.000001770482,0.0000527361,0.000001409993,0.003135996,0.00002047226,0.00002028451,0.9907762,0.0001037419,0.000510016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001588933,0.00004321811,0.1932743,0.0001110944,0.0001030707,0.000003660682,0.001947796,0.0002126314,0.000260739,0.7999026,0.002485272,0.00006675874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6545209,0.0002261585,0.01582046,0.01061499,0.001312332,0.0001491512,0.0001125133,0.000006455537,0.317237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983783,0.00009909976,0.0005701808,0.00003558929,0.0004649766,7.91056e-7,0.000001264938,0.000003787233,0.0004460302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3438574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971695938","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-769x.2002.00097.x","title":"Nursing and the concept of life: towards an ethics of testimony","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Nursing; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1119883652902004,"gpt":0.3753485702669841,"spread":0.2633602049767838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007401449,0.00007590044,0.0002271084,0.00003263858,0.0003680663,0.0000116116,0.000195256,0.0002059587,0.0001080276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001312252,0.00005818524,0.00005369054,0.0001339701,0.009060757,0.0001080724,0.000008517707,0.0003036589,0.000002145355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003065209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008184289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001190487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001144471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985473,0.0006493232,0.0001925706,0.0001301972,0.0002657393,0.0002149112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987622,0.0007494193,0.00009398,0.0001666142,0.00009590934,0.000131852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003534511,0.0001067882,0.00006418055,0.000004588604,0.00000705487,3.054379e-7,0.0291748,0.000003186529,0.000004118348,0.9649886,0.00004226269,0.005568711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004922079,0.00007835932,0.0006717126,0.0001664545,0.00003128849,0.000001032664,0.001227835,0.0002566011,0.0001455815,0.9967948,0.00006790602,0.00006618364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04359728,0.001848541,0.0002129589,0.0332675,0.0003491523,0.0001743093,0.00001372902,0.00003889781,0.9204977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986904,0.00004243717,0.0003045724,0.0006215139,0.0002808344,0.000001224397,6.608351e-7,0.000005923939,0.00005248041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535351796","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.236","title":"Stopping the Anthropological Machine: Agamben with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human animal; Theology; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02276917304293379,"gpt":0.3459464215874375,"spread":0.3231772485445037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192524,0.00007925797,0.0001149727,0.00001570556,0.0007542821,0.000023996,0.0001534869,0.00008930659,0.0003778835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002405508,0.00004366393,0.00002664661,0.00009733479,0.001949574,0.00008227183,0.00004740928,0.0001790047,0.00001597625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002721582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003593022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001047458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008076442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998976,0.0001874102,0.00009764588,0.000155088,0.000167784,0.0004160617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990553,0.0006433957,0.00002961264,0.0001118909,0.00002639947,0.0001334419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003921858,0.00002068259,0.007073386,0.000001400903,0.00001460768,0.00002101786,0.0009843031,8.099922e-7,0.000005749851,0.9877117,0.000038777,0.004088316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052924,0.0002663673,0.2180891,0.00002483421,0.00007708798,0.00006256788,0.01518377,0.0001307848,0.0005270756,0.6998013,0.06425909,0.0005251294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4873464,0.0008680756,0.001878126,0.003062693,0.0001307255,0.0001423468,0.000002632876,0.00006863457,0.5065004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976041,0.0001118681,0.0001345722,0.001359605,0.0001946013,0.000002475673,7.353878e-7,0.000004423717,0.0005875751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5102577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7183285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971833369","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103635","title":"Lawless Sovereignty: Challenging the State of Exception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Sovereignty; Undoing; State (computer science); Law; Power (physics); Lawlessness; Economic Justice; Sovereign state; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Politics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06294519964535146,"gpt":0.3881065053250788,"spread":0.3251613056797273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007381971,0.00009172635,0.0002306554,0.0000195856,0.001432634,0.00001875933,0.0001821814,0.00006683037,0.00005063627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002662312,0.0000671155,0.0001110832,0.0001415061,0.001151753,0.0001403184,0.00004228381,0.0001649002,0.00001576822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008222808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005539272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000253005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001282613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987653,0.0002925538,0.0001736037,0.0001254397,0.0002712652,0.0003718143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994548,0.0002393727,0.0000803121,0.00007061338,0.0001172925,0.00003763311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499612,0.00002965495,0.00003079939,0.000004008488,0.00005402794,0.000001611735,0.01909543,0.000002819831,0.000005559951,0.9697654,0.0001595337,0.01083619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270866,0.00003997332,0.006683231,0.000009556102,0.00002068285,1.654175e-7,0.01505108,0.000001643236,0.0000531474,0.9741673,0.003760739,0.00008544057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3080468,0.002051715,0.00007342066,0.006344625,0.0002960339,0.0001988028,0.000009687178,0.00008537988,0.6828935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972031,0.0006204611,0.000006300188,0.0005799616,0.0005470709,0.000005349237,5.519083e-7,0.000003744382,0.001033455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6891563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035764081","doi":"10.1163/156916408x286950","title":"Antagonism and Democratic Citizenship (Schmitt, Mouffe, Derrida)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Phenomenology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Democracy; Citizenship; Politics; Context (archaeology); Agonism; Adversary; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2581204551153425,"gpt":0.4470033941616293,"spread":0.1888829390462867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002430401,0.00009220198,0.0002302699,0.0002849755,0.0009705531,0.00001760974,0.0003124602,0.0002679972,0.0002684065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001043133,0.00009110568,0.00002352855,0.0004175956,0.004687998,0.00008187119,0.0001640629,0.0007174787,0.0001275338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001638004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003617661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003198006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006584949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960383,0.001890177,0.0001957739,0.0003152791,0.0003488426,0.001211601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977556,0.001661742,0.0000214011,0.0001970276,0.00007791207,0.0002863377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002772185,0.00004019131,0.009371745,0.000007738717,0.00001250457,0.0001720657,0.001920342,5.603611e-7,0.00004831242,0.9875971,0.000201805,0.0005998914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003924219,0.0001094269,0.01462492,0.000005976979,0.000001555352,0.00002938899,0.001567461,0.00002523512,0.0000680698,0.9818789,0.00119701,0.00009965585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5859256,0.0005174466,0.00001776241,0.002175705,0.00007813152,0.0001668775,0.000002829855,0.00003002863,0.4110856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962994,0.001019916,0.000116637,0.0003254388,0.00020562,0.00003487618,0.000001886842,0.000008882407,0.001987332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4103738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570614875","doi":"","title":"The dual state : parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the national security complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Terrorism; State (computer science); Political science; National security; Politics; Humanities; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05127870855957217,"gpt":0.3341859185006953,"spread":0.2829072099411232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525606,0.000151726,0.0002263383,0.00001876484,0.001660389,0.0001025222,0.0002964619,0.0002572791,0.0007678878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005949521,0.00007925794,0.0001010841,0.0000259991,0.007561903,0.00007655159,0.0001366604,0.0004808163,0.0001290814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001493332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007553709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005012389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004953865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978225,0.0006896454,0.0002098454,0.0001639291,0.0005372896,0.0005767801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995876,0.003542562,0.00008550986,0.0001311801,0.0001762404,0.0001885614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641379,0.000006339217,0.00001394464,0.000003404007,0.00005598673,4.693074e-7,0.001064632,4.674596e-8,4.891318e-9,0.9756371,0.02313364,0.00006797862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001579716,0.000003061397,0.0001497918,0.000002426947,0.00001527508,0.000001152833,0.0002232791,0.000006275352,1.525839e-7,0.5817134,0.4176575,0.000069671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009367417,0.0006425948,0.000005688973,0.002434124,0.0003042347,0.0002598299,0.0001401108,0.00003752403,0.9960822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3108009,0.0004061814,0.000008254729,0.002098804,0.001136421,0.00001127579,0.00001707726,0.000007945645,0.6855131],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3945239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752361648","doi":"10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6835","title":"The Global Turn to Authoritarianism and After","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Capitalism; Political economy; Colonialism; Democracy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01465482336108202,"gpt":0.3301377273977942,"spread":0.3154829040367122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362221,0.00007520496,0.0001068037,0.000001335917,0.003035546,0.0002378843,0.0003618805,0.000127893,0.0000428799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007343221,0.00005419829,0.00008732203,0.00003332537,0.001193466,0.00009536844,0.0001522919,0.0001138506,0.00004825773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008220028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009370409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008013747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002996124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989762,0.0001558878,0.00008535454,0.0001800576,0.0001665258,0.0004360316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.0002045107,0.00003850802,0.000319817,0.00005023765,0.0001876373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118093,0.000004283657,0.0919572,0.000001148928,0.00001315645,0.000001469898,0.001306108,5.833196e-8,3.576022e-7,0.9041545,0.0007119893,0.001837964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007861147,0.000008501467,0.5871763,0.000002132097,0.000001739714,4.322496e-7,0.0009454148,0.000003676183,0.000001020184,0.3407246,0.07098593,0.00007168979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6056612,0.0006511435,0.0002488997,0.02012355,0.001317362,0.0002612546,0.00008702969,0.00008818899,0.3715614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997135,0.0002049084,0.0001711457,0.001025818,0.0003562484,0.00001259486,3.738245e-7,0.000003318701,0.001090605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5634299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323007045","doi":"10.1177/0953946813509334","title":"Surveillance and the Eye of God","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Panopticon; Sociology; Relation (database); Gaze; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Enlightenment; Law; Modernity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Brother","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1023518406475247,"gpt":0.4447861803062498,"spread":0.3424343396587252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005979587,0.00004823074,0.0001960977,0.00001320734,0.0003268567,0.00000401704,0.0001328807,0.000124326,0.00001097679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01720664,0.00003170345,0.00002316987,0.00008797487,0.008211792,0.00001849045,0.00007838687,0.0003725363,0.000002826008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001689166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004889983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005583093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001271326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982443,0.001201659,0.0001338811,0.00009435558,0.0001477988,0.0001780115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992984,0.006756696,0.00004359187,0.000107205,0.00008266838,0.00002583098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001504671,0.000004658163,0.005325743,0.00002124092,0.00001340656,3.855787e-7,0.02197895,8.614563e-7,9.308017e-8,0.972418,0.00003538525,0.0001862881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003807598,0.00001350928,0.01407762,0.00002492261,0.000004289826,1.397104e-7,0.01358936,0.00001706869,0.000004553835,0.9640861,0.007751184,0.00005050109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1547761,0.01200036,0.0003206712,0.03830195,0.001145723,0.0003052949,0.00001338059,0.00004449987,0.793092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958333,0.00307737,0.00005642891,0.0007043413,0.0001095525,0.000004299484,1.407863e-7,0.000002069464,0.000212508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8410572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687202","doi":"10.1353/mos.2014.0034","title":"Precarious World: Rethinking Global Fiction in Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02204042855320829,"gpt":0.3093032891609583,"spread":0.28726286060775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212181,0.00007230363,0.0001049147,0.00002440318,0.000479809,0.00005249212,0.0002260126,0.0001010262,0.0002559751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003244332,0.00005548157,0.00004327012,0.0003050474,0.0004663242,0.00009121209,0.00004584627,0.0001987986,0.00005230447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003322156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005760202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003471326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006896663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985787,0.0005511151,0.0001476998,0.0001651867,0.0002090718,0.0003482091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995214,0.0001915328,0.00004159913,0.0001671131,0.00001474782,0.00006359485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118589,0.0000200796,0.007554958,0.000001557039,0.000004385345,0.000001502256,0.002267272,0.00001499092,0.000002685194,0.9880043,0.000664124,0.001452316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001763408,0.00001816505,0.01952024,0.00001658684,0.000007275037,0.000001268783,0.0004443556,0.0003044408,0.00001925261,0.8643714,0.1150332,0.00008742692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.220615,0.0001399287,0.0001521446,0.002859181,0.000608271,0.000163184,0.00001000343,0.00007939782,0.7753729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953767,0.00001088792,0.00005332854,0.0009951096,0.0001967916,0.000009300337,0.000004759969,0.000003779828,0.003349343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7747617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009613245002529722,"gpt":0.248322618954292,"spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004819936,0.00003196565,0.00008625146,0.000003091867,0.001411127,0.000009607673,0.0002634267,0.00006042747,0.0008869388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003343743,0.00002682704,0.000085424,0.00001167502,0.0009735769,0.0002261518,0.00001871519,0.00008746472,0.000003623435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009179282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0247867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0633004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993652,0.0001808303,0.00007573824,0.0000408354,0.000163809,0.0001736409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995659,0.0001087293,0.00007858065,0.00006893276,0.0000794348,0.00009845201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005687529,0.0000247449,0.00003242988,3.924777e-7,0.00001290958,0.00000527762,0.0009957015,0.000001104014,0.00001321245,0.9976854,0.0001929936,0.0009789059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005189776,0.0001641972,0.003900854,0.00001374399,0.0000352941,0.000006612178,0.01160481,0.00000576528,0.0002008593,0.6278601,0.3556086,0.00008021453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01631218,0.0002362751,0.0000814977,0.0008415616,0.0001325303,0.00002620928,0.000002811595,0.000005582236,0.9823614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982715,0.000189136,0.0001272113,0.0001023186,0.00009509076,2.745874e-9,1.065475e-7,7.220115e-7,0.00121388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187267266","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199916931.013.019","title":"The Concept of the Rule-of-Law State in Carl Schmitt’s Verfassungslehre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Liberalism; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02091828083984944,"gpt":0.2431844424238095,"spread":0.2222661615839601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005021012,0.0001584801,0.0003459652,0.00003465879,0.0005160642,0.0000135016,0.001224555,0.0003921082,0.00001719509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535641,0.0001177621,0.0002001891,0.00001958504,0.004538575,0.0000648817,0.0003551358,0.0005180155,4.851089e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002039967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005999383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00200996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007447925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982788,0.0006054619,0.0002095554,0.0002014849,0.0003235973,0.0003811076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983033,0.0007790058,0.0002810305,0.0004318678,0.0001189193,0.00008590383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005278863,0.000007611494,0.00001953921,0.00001623942,0.00005057782,0.000003908116,0.002238239,0.000006593326,4.61823e-7,0.9967176,0.0003854579,0.000500989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707425,0.00001889541,0.00003961298,0.00007629598,0.00004599091,1.755228e-7,0.0002551378,0.000003108026,0.000113957,0.1820848,0.8169844,0.0001069283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008989238,0.00008927514,0.00002082906,0.00004027498,0.0002945347,0.0003129678,0.0001401644,0.00001685498,0.9981862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11037,0.00006863796,0.000007810448,0.00007048374,0.00005732916,5.479448e-7,0.000003144149,0.000009208184,0.8894129],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8165989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04991531528797417,"gpt":0.3507328770423187,"spread":0.3008175617543445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001583334,0.0001205887,0.0003002039,0.00003648717,0.0001321049,0.00002435385,0.0002454315,0.0002510321,0.000833332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001084959,0.0001015583,0.00004509252,0.0001676237,0.1316487,0.0001909511,0.0001365455,0.0002237366,0.00004733166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004061053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003162094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006376713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0005782214,0.0002707011,0.0002099546,0.0002911522,0.0004715722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985902,0.0007864654,0.0000430196,0.0002115444,0.00006921947,0.0002995362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009886451,0.0000570465,0.0006314787,0.000007169609,0.000009703099,0.000007519839,0.002143844,0.000001374456,0.000001781852,0.9968249,0.00005857201,0.0001577109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003923461,0.0000741269,0.00006239749,0.00002173735,0.00001025893,0.000002335353,0.00232682,0.000028829,0.0004171979,0.9921759,0.004359704,0.0001283669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09493637,0.0002916682,0.001942805,0.0005883651,0.000244363,0.0001377868,0.00001228705,0.00004162217,0.9018047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983481,0.00005714857,0.0003256671,0.0007089165,0.0001832284,0.000006429335,0.000002005966,0.000008833401,0.0003597303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232067","doi":"10.4135/9781446216217.n6","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04821778495263056,"gpt":0.3443616591084577,"spread":0.2961438741558272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002539473,0.00005813954,0.0001080855,0.00001571945,0.0003629505,0.000009514144,0.0001691527,0.0002348146,0.001570433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002219893,0.00003980967,0.00008419722,0.000009424142,0.001337839,0.00002337706,0.00002605327,0.0001261318,0.00008523038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006574575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002629631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004494201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006923553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993615,0.00003710824,0.000149752,0.00008420131,0.0001964289,0.0001709817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991577,0.0004834025,0.00007036827,0.000159222,0.00007232519,0.00005704164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001577915,0.000001977423,0.000003250981,0.000001623053,0.00001510851,8.164317e-7,0.0001635255,2.667252e-7,5.253964e-8,0.9993607,0.000173171,0.0002779134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003371426,0.000007727621,0.00002010594,0.00000936411,0.00001210992,1.660342e-7,0.0001808994,1.779927e-7,0.00001728396,0.9084969,0.09117962,0.00004188283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001723279,0.0001206137,0.00003464037,0.000657749,0.0001691831,0.0000839845,0.000007615292,0.00001922218,0.9988897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1353091,0.0003001085,0.0000312954,0.0001603393,0.0002106917,8.174758e-7,0.000002297787,0.000004899276,0.8639805],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1352918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141495258","doi":"10.1162/dram.2009.53.2.139","title":"“It Don't Gitmo Better”: Scenes from the Coney Island <i>Waterboarding Thrill Ride</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDR/The Drama Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Interrogation; Art history; Art; Advertising; Visual arts; History; Business; Archaeology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03080465173836948,"gpt":0.3238105292340789,"spread":0.2930058774957094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205126,0.0001949423,0.0004560896,0.000009970488,0.001009463,0.0001242366,0.0008617717,0.0001318681,0.001368055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000768221,0.00010198,0.0002407236,0.0002114272,0.0007338203,0.0001615697,0.0000750209,0.0003393333,0.0005958673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004498494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008109795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006163678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001731716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972763,0.001140063,0.0003661013,0.0002836439,0.0003460097,0.0005878623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980271,0.00112033,0.0001261142,0.0005258197,0.00006354869,0.0001370272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001469598,0.00004283732,0.0007106606,0.00006413811,0.00006956569,0.00001686411,0.001992832,6.253767e-7,0.00001275323,0.9186665,0.04148308,0.03692543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001736243,0.00002164212,0.001124715,0.0008540822,0.0001237199,0.000003988184,0.0002569609,0.000003704498,0.00003877859,0.3053272,0.6918883,0.0001832395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02412972,0.1524814,0.0001795614,0.2997085,0.0008839867,0.001398922,0.00009980632,0.0002025646,0.5209155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8022829,0.054504,0.00006608881,0.1410373,0.001073987,0.0000213296,0.0000133267,0.0000118098,0.000989303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7781532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937918814","doi":"10.1177/0047117819842330","title":"The securitization audience in theologico-political perspective: Giorgio Agamben, doxological acclamations, and paraconsistent logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Securitization; Contradiction; Epistemology; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01679351562429074,"gpt":0.3508487508608279,"spread":0.3340552352365371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006897043,0.00007884361,0.00009667145,0.00006762041,0.000470074,0.00007507177,0.0002370054,0.0001545649,0.0009364438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003145292,0.00005811106,0.00004729844,0.0001462745,0.0008446178,0.0002263892,0.00007467328,0.000251092,0.000295364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002929356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001111763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001725096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002090933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986249,0.0003515535,0.000228547,0.0002182089,0.0002563937,0.0003203581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997518,0.002035387,0.00005968276,0.0001101183,0.0001878901,0.00008891002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001097069,0.00003627832,0.02786915,4.601823e-7,0.00001143195,0.000002439599,0.0004987791,0.00004720461,0.000002841054,0.9713738,0.0000416494,0.0001050002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001590651,0.00001675029,0.1697907,0.000007747517,0.000004685766,0.00000499973,0.003684051,0.0007749508,0.000001864705,0.8227742,0.002715517,0.00006550307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.230515,0.0001683096,0.0005591023,0.02323082,0.0003742557,0.0002629813,0.00001041025,0.00004422743,0.7448349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938824,0.0001094233,0.0001517811,0.0006514002,0.00008729377,0.00002931338,0.000007010914,0.00000318694,0.005078248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7633674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998846440","doi":"10.1080/13576270701430692","title":"The rights of the corpse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mortality","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03293581823920734,"gpt":0.3607150509608982,"spread":0.3277792327216909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199887,0.0000288519,0.00005108098,0.000003137901,0.0007131461,0.000006146272,0.0002591352,0.00005526768,0.00008788738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969024,0.00001365832,0.00005678907,0.00008080633,0.001393653,0.00002408737,0.00003111319,0.00008132716,0.00001158271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004409637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002258172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004585535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992534,0.0001955166,0.0001087997,0.00005500504,0.0001805345,0.0002067532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992807,0.0003994209,0.000041349,0.0002012884,0.00003108219,0.00004615147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003211785,0.00001096976,0.02402556,4.414692e-7,0.000006791936,6.118294e-7,0.0002770312,7.602502e-8,0.000002834936,0.9754774,0.00007481778,0.0001202421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002367525,0.000002029642,0.3714419,9.003192e-7,0.000004296352,8.992422e-8,0.0001429287,5.579629e-7,0.0004684248,0.6168752,0.01102438,0.00001559076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824653,0.0000167476,0.00002579912,0.0001578714,0.0002130989,0.00004391232,0.000002528113,0.000006665259,0.4170681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976457,0.000002795082,0.000004376212,0.000165065,0.000087287,7.221706e-7,1.186165e-7,8.55805e-7,0.002093119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4151804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5485016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840930292","doi":"10.1177/030437540503000101","title":"The Folding of Liberal Government: Contract Governance and the Transformation of the Public Service in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives Global Local Political","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public service; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009976244010432152,"gpt":0.2635081351068602,"spread":0.253531891096428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071423,0.00007827711,0.0001597918,0.000002445589,0.0002127389,0.00001796277,0.000415616,0.00004576499,0.00001687575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004776455,0.00004065119,0.00004945622,0.0001296357,0.001765738,0.0001818437,0.00006287078,0.0001525645,7.935259e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007682224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005221643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5009657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7465131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998138,0.00048133,0.0002920293,0.00009289854,0.0005408991,0.0004549118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.00116158,0.00009159161,0.0001184873,0.00005043114,0.0001056331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978742,0.00001652557,0.003238159,0.000005004591,0.00001846319,5.423758e-7,0.0003693466,0.00001216537,5.463999e-7,0.9934394,0.000006301118,0.002823737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001922971,0.00002576946,0.1837371,0.00005679155,0.00002616845,0.000007373156,0.005380153,0.006106101,0.0004253825,0.7986808,0.003499483,0.0001319049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7642232,0.0003694658,0.0001288731,0.04761219,0.0001587026,0.0002299989,0.0001014581,0.000004005659,0.1871721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978158,0.00005783683,0.000006023132,0.002020004,0.00006794548,0.000004915482,2.078576e-7,0.000002053913,0.00002524037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2455474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6505935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081563109","doi":"10.1177/0263775820953855","title":"Being earthbound: Arendt, process and alienation in the Anthropocene","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Alienation; Politics; Epistemology; Praxis; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02215125473696165,"gpt":0.2814461455430706,"spread":0.259294890806109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003669858,0.00005762061,0.00007533158,0.000004393341,0.0004923254,0.00004012448,0.00004063176,0.00007464432,0.00002389929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000402451,0.0000454075,0.00001452955,0.0000364412,0.0005117838,0.00009798124,0.00002038997,0.0001353391,0.000001246368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006968007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007862434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002883775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001672624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994453,0.00009542593,0.00005595612,0.0001356821,0.0001094417,0.0001582432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997255,0.0001597758,0.0000188963,0.00002704463,0.000001765356,0.00006698795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002164196,0.00002591485,0.2610424,0.00003160291,0.00001867871,0.000008619353,0.2760406,0.0000517718,0.00001141175,0.4617652,0.0001932051,0.0007889111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001343869,0.0002579037,0.4202048,0.00008088146,0.00006218314,0.000006715895,0.2837895,0.003274145,0.0001017074,0.2582722,0.03204826,0.0005578844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810398,0.0007756784,0.0001764097,0.006539546,0.00001532849,0.00008352727,0.000002188326,0.00001042126,0.01135711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972371,0.001180743,0.00009148918,0.001346481,0.00008729001,0.000002812137,0.000002383469,0.000002182058,0.00004946386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.203493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3786619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122248100","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12135","title":"Hermann Heller <scp>NOW</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04958923047849809,"gpt":0.2942373642317216,"spread":0.2446481337532235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063695,0.0002722294,0.0003364803,0.00005620041,0.00149252,0.0003677573,0.0007833333,0.000172829,0.0007830441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00102331,0.000239824,0.0002565655,0.0001961174,0.001566072,0.0004120235,0.0002310173,0.001287593,0.03247424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001550093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002423425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005308954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002900886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993147,0.004170485,0.0005334053,0.0002994426,0.0007100861,0.001139577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971384,0.0003840362,0.0002579677,0.0002801274,0.0002635987,0.001675806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001174816,0.0001179505,0.0001982003,0.000004221555,0.0001292857,0.0009203552,0.004286489,0.00001758136,0.000002057141,0.9304468,0.06333296,0.0005323227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007058327,0.0001571761,0.0008017806,0.0000491833,0.00008228696,0.000113029,0.002931425,0.00002002393,0.00002104557,0.1551429,0.8398668,0.0001085199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01860765,0.004234084,0.0001505962,0.0006360478,0.005877858,0.00008336332,0.0000141313,0.00006415227,0.9703321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287437,0.0006959166,0.0001684354,0.003809763,0.01177649,4.375986e-7,0.000003657741,0.0000540542,0.05474756],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625903635","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.988","title":"The Dilemma of Democracy: Collusion and the State of Exception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State of exception; State (computer science); Sociology; Collusion; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Dilemma; Terrorism; Authoritarianism; Economics; Politics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08867233428926619,"gpt":0.3828580923509654,"spread":0.2941857580616992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001728634,0.0000441723,0.0001588664,0.00001095179,0.001077101,0.000002766678,0.0001293106,0.0000408384,0.000009906243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001946051,0.00002514418,0.00003223824,0.0001251977,0.006096345,0.00004259503,0.0001208122,0.00008554482,0.000001112977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002691425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000374907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004449534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004061192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988602,0.0005871332,0.0001797641,0.00006459675,0.0001387969,0.0001694509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979829,0.001730233,0.0001014073,0.00005300489,0.0001173654,0.00001506717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149534,0.00001382263,0.0003349126,0.00001980579,0.0000273117,4.563571e-7,0.08259519,2.201976e-7,0.000001687773,0.9145494,0.00007480945,0.002232854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003372073,0.00001800684,0.01978471,0.00001166369,0.00006803363,8.527374e-8,0.05709622,0.000002931125,0.0000151039,0.9223745,0.0002605724,0.0000309477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8239726,0.000980767,0.00003502601,0.0006042469,0.0005772805,0.000226487,0.000007621277,0.000008382273,0.1735876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968413,0.002629455,0.00002443973,0.00006802557,0.0001321456,0.000006993161,7.844923e-8,0.000001947512,0.0002956232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.173292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063154949","doi":"10.7202/1013697ar","title":"Précis de Que faire de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2096726475697303,"gpt":0.4057533566507805,"spread":0.1960807090810502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526044,0.0002191856,0.0002871701,0.00004830984,0.0004388336,0.00003069411,0.0003545388,0.0006081624,0.001289757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006817938,0.000230419,0.0001812267,0.000145044,0.00174498,0.000608532,0.00009577756,0.0005004174,0.0006910432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005906229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003553398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001733617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003711529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966372,0.001183593,0.0002366707,0.0002229573,0.0002196236,0.001499981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983987,0.000439444,0.00007612228,0.0002419189,0.00007325361,0.0007705585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001351968,0.0001958486,0.01270949,0.00003841115,0.00005189812,0.00001415206,0.004615013,8.055237e-7,0.0000107166,0.979203,0.002123479,0.001023671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001155519,0.00005083791,0.004730181,0.00006556536,0.00006459557,0.00001777171,0.0004223488,0.00002013416,0.0004966705,0.9445303,0.04923075,0.0002552561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261113,0.05207944,0.000251867,0.06556986,0.00135745,0.0001978388,0.00004536578,0.0001979281,0.754189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722968,0.001535555,0.0008553591,0.009986032,0.01048944,0.00002445892,0.000003246064,0.00002411507,0.004784938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119666334","doi":"10.24908/ss.v5i2.3433","title":"The Security Double Take: The Political, Simulation and the Border","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; International security; Political economy; State (computer science); Spectacle; Excellence; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02674484203846684,"gpt":0.3347715648777415,"spread":0.3080267228392747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002442004,0.00009551449,0.0001313921,0.000002330803,0.003064849,0.0001371628,0.0003038096,0.0001309401,0.0002393012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005891076,0.00004377779,0.0001453645,0.0001522712,0.004454765,0.00007997233,0.00006947754,0.0003017121,0.00003112067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005347234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003860443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006641733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004712496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980952,0.0007209897,0.0001536927,0.0001644014,0.0002775644,0.0005881896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955236,0.003972101,0.0000507716,0.0002725813,0.00008759536,0.00009338619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001740354,0.0000105584,0.001506075,0.000001580014,0.00002144071,1.280715e-7,0.00555006,0.00001570001,8.147101e-8,0.9911097,0.001479857,0.0002874517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001007425,0.00001000929,0.006138008,0.000002346525,0.00001079707,8.099193e-7,0.01388333,0.007860424,0.000002235717,0.7792776,0.1916775,0.0001295199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1960435,0.005140214,0.0002223297,0.1067232,0.0007237977,0.0009226752,0.00003054203,0.0001791498,0.6900146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940814,0.0007632201,0.00000605631,0.003530627,0.0003703733,0.00001685171,9.207655e-7,0.00000572376,0.001224871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7980378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266292988","doi":"10.1177/0967010615620972","title":"Exception and governmentality in the critique of sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Popular sovereignty; Relation (database); Power (physics); Population; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01777809370840609,"gpt":0.3101915019225172,"spread":0.2924134082141111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001277371,0.0000517876,0.0001044324,0.00001370011,0.000102326,0.000007810801,0.0001435707,0.0001122008,0.0002245469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006230529,0.00003128735,0.0000329899,0.00006111227,0.000893109,0.0001350793,0.00003241152,0.00007966362,0.000008636326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005609576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004011515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001225454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986915,0.0006778865,0.0001285755,0.0001156683,0.000183477,0.0002029079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991451,0.0006461642,0.00003454004,0.000111382,0.00001707534,0.00004575519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001248433,0.0000474862,0.01023955,0.000004920906,0.000002403026,0.000001511448,0.003356308,7.841253e-9,0.00003308684,0.9856361,0.00003765059,0.0006285421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002114177,0.00002047255,0.07372672,0.00001314137,0.00000335414,6.466093e-7,0.001683301,3.804528e-7,0.0001710076,0.9236496,0.0004737786,0.00004618225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7874394,0.00004278386,0.0000536482,0.001208342,0.0000647989,0.000121441,0.00007542338,0.000009548333,0.2109846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999167,0.0001622719,0.000005888394,0.0005304693,0.00009319123,0.000006969982,0.00000162813,0.000001868947,0.00003076514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2117275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3290697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098885524","doi":"10.1177/1368431013476567","title":"The paradox of political violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Michel foucault; Epistemology; Political violence; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01703643857446479,"gpt":0.2890538705755292,"spread":0.2720174320010644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005253328,0.00006578681,0.0001604273,0.00002564486,0.0006054839,0.00003397521,0.000537129,0.00003904579,0.0004642186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001544737,0.00004266998,0.000163998,0.00008177773,0.002330747,0.0001317499,0.00004824173,0.000284199,0.0001463942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003710001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001176744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001538797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.904362e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950998,0.003788242,0.0003781367,0.00005703324,0.0002841092,0.0003927037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980542,0.001223646,0.0002347351,0.00008025804,0.0002270038,0.000180176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003143031,0.00002427252,0.00007196928,0.000001477846,0.00002518786,0.000009005509,0.001349464,1.05424e-7,0.00001634107,0.9879835,0.0001955961,0.01029169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155218,0.00006245205,0.0169444,0.00002057164,0.00001434336,0.000004712723,0.008454346,3.68717e-7,0.00006706383,0.9701873,0.004036879,0.00005232724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2464623,0.0002256192,0.0004118743,0.001618126,0.0003728512,0.00006553614,0.000002078657,0.00001027745,0.7508313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997987,0.00007058784,0.0000560682,0.0004360599,0.0008774093,3.831471e-7,6.703166e-8,0.000007967526,0.0005645052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075649675","doi":"10.1177/0263276408095217","title":"Agamben at Ground Zero","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Nihilism; Praxis; Philosophy; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Common ground; Epistemology; Ground zero; Literature; Sociology; Art; Law; Poetry; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995937803269125,"gpt":0.2970224381637872,"spread":0.2670630601310959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009209597,0.0001291274,0.0001758843,0.000004982652,0.001851949,0.00001457299,0.0002841267,0.0003337199,0.001604109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001799861,0.0001017717,0.0002830953,0.0001298938,0.002032964,0.000155669,0.00008532296,0.000262074,0.000455109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002123824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008824188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007041387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001607217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984087,0.0004671153,0.0001277833,0.0002192802,0.0002599444,0.0005171524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992592,0.0002428234,0.00004562495,0.0001912411,0.00005959771,0.0002014853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001715235,0.00003185675,0.0001497114,0.000002628107,0.0000382264,0.000006037438,0.04866048,6.729259e-7,0.00004749008,0.9377532,0.01322324,0.00006930578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002192506,0.00001874267,0.001799396,0.000004079561,0.00001983227,0.00001065054,0.007964881,0.000001013341,0.0001358062,0.8989315,0.09073141,0.0001634475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3369038,0.0004795568,0.0002957108,0.0002084812,0.000225276,0.0001205236,0.00001202562,0.000175708,0.6615789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9309815,0.0004648088,0.0002510239,0.003056414,0.0004299501,0.000007321806,0.00000861776,0.000009350022,0.06479105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240386547","doi":"10.13169/islastudj.6.1.0014","title":"Cyber Homo Sacer: A Critical Analysis of Cyber Islamophobia in the Wake of the Muslim Ban","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Islamophobia Studies Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; State of exception; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Cyberspace; Politics; Media studies; Law; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ideology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04721300929903651,"gpt":0.3819142148287312,"spread":0.3347012055296947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002919846,0.0001805569,0.0007380101,0.0001625256,0.0008702129,0.00004774258,0.0006644145,0.0001766227,0.0007769095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469373,0.0001077346,0.0006835822,0.002004913,0.002437109,0.0001346659,0.0002166546,0.0007231235,0.000006979683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000136497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003678015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002141439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002821974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953959,0.00220384,0.0007320255,0.0002422755,0.0007908589,0.0006350882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957753,0.002876798,0.0002276384,0.000430544,0.0006057027,0.00008399404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004095616,0.0004142272,0.02277327,0.00002764902,0.001906547,0.0001789095,0.09028762,0.00006562133,0.0001756063,0.8816921,0.002002329,0.0004351634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001017519,0.0001034684,0.3026455,0.0001958854,0.002514345,0.0001156502,0.2388227,0.00004620093,0.0007765146,0.4491718,0.004189194,0.000401208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.912264,0.002191258,0.00001907724,0.007876714,0.0007470353,0.0001232597,0.00003792275,0.000007653955,0.07673311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966184,0.001404771,0.00008906243,0.001086712,0.0002441233,0.000007127692,7.395409e-7,0.000008320766,0.0005406971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4325204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8979629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03829163993774543,"gpt":0.3127088943739497,"spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004577858,0.00007938386,0.0001118736,0.00002829175,0.0004788533,0.00001373907,0.0001629948,0.00005619774,0.0006797722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004671159,0.00005403949,0.00005437315,0.00006564977,0.002151802,0.00007026619,0.00003577385,0.0001546041,0.00006041287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000486961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005053083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001794654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003384339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988482,0.0003738641,0.0001033461,0.000154878,0.000134188,0.0003855048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.0002411702,0.00003019077,0.000150102,0.00006091958,0.0001446242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002694127,0.00003364112,0.0002047098,9.908523e-7,0.00001845714,0.000001686193,0.1140646,6.957929e-8,8.810308e-8,0.8855324,0.00007811851,0.0000383562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002658045,0.00002940592,0.005078688,0.000002076858,0.00001160232,8.328046e-7,0.03285777,0.000006006106,0.00002072003,0.9601312,0.001520064,0.0000757771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151054,0.0003215517,0.00004127733,0.0009979578,0.0001576293,0.0001065456,0.0000127215,0.0000449767,0.7832119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899286,0.000656092,0.00007318214,0.0006771399,0.000179352,0.000006976775,2.28902e-7,0.000006488868,0.008471936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7928405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977439667","doi":"10.3138/md.53.4.557","title":"The Gray Zone of Victims and Perpetrators in Peter Weiss's <i>The Investigation</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Witness; Gray (unit); Dialectic; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0102341543067469,"gpt":0.2587954756499222,"spread":0.2485613213431753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008464102,0.00005186144,0.00007620075,0.00001536877,0.0003881383,0.00003425755,0.0001906686,0.00009883581,0.00003483969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003319905,0.00003011399,0.00002428154,0.00008570668,0.001718041,0.00007572653,0.00003196929,0.0002481918,0.0000065445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008926539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007178247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003849659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002024738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992576,0.0001818524,0.0001172818,0.00009822434,0.000135165,0.0002098917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992366,0.0004832055,0.00003309371,0.0001464375,0.00002970536,0.00007094791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004937551,0.000008434208,0.01556557,0.00000135967,0.000003663286,6.338298e-7,0.005140294,0.000001111295,0.000218825,0.9778293,0.00002357921,0.00120229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001363936,0.00001219688,0.04280058,0.000004122288,0.000005071643,0.000001165607,0.0007661578,0.000355033,0.0004733953,0.9494761,0.005909788,0.00005994627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370662,0.00005450756,0.00007606588,0.002141149,0.0001502437,0.0000868679,0.000002124067,0.0000115562,0.06041132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986719,0.00001728747,0.00005002467,0.0004911207,0.00007972245,0.00000769539,3.317933e-7,0.000003530733,0.0006784157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0616057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636427731","doi":"10.24908/ss.v13i2.5690","title":"Surveillance and the Rule of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03081573001976277,"gpt":0.3055874589371174,"spread":0.2747717289173546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004085392,0.00008446692,0.0002565081,0.000003831859,0.0003158861,0.00002128575,0.0002216617,0.0001240734,0.00003969772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005892146,0.0000581371,0.0001237398,0.0001169779,0.004132976,0.00007415387,0.0000713286,0.0001425961,0.00001272569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000403459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001316091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002102836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004332562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984398,0.0006343529,0.0001690208,0.0001581851,0.0002701822,0.0003284235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985385,0.0009048329,0.00007643413,0.0001989566,0.0001456837,0.0001356196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000343116,0.00001132958,0.01230333,0.000004675112,0.00002102287,2.752694e-7,0.008575902,0.000001589241,0.000001344053,0.9783532,0.00056164,0.0001313576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002006451,0.00002655773,0.0292799,0.000006130663,0.000005600259,0.00000171273,0.007257777,0.00007642435,0.00003502004,0.8862786,0.0748304,0.0001953743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086036,0.002181989,0.0001354263,0.003632978,0.0004101569,0.0002347994,0.00004228915,0.00008309849,0.6846756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976787,0.0003537047,0.0001246042,0.001173592,0.0001671769,0.000006224489,0.000002242987,0.000005626378,0.0004881303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086779842","doi":"10.3390/soc2040345","title":"Derrida Contra Agamben: Sovereignty, Biopower, History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Section (typography); State of exception; Sociology; Law; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05969841922317503,"gpt":0.3208444803983487,"spread":0.2611460611751736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008571523,0.0001155541,0.0001778945,0.00002151603,0.00043889,0.00001619125,0.0002164903,0.0002687432,0.006670185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002888232,0.0001117592,0.0001593275,0.00005671826,0.0017652,0.0003220428,0.00005028418,0.0002133806,0.0004176935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000405803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002331767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000201327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008124297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983889,0.0002599472,0.0001409893,0.000131421,0.0002822031,0.0007965285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991764,0.0002940117,0.00005130614,0.0001537202,0.00005228799,0.0002723043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005000175,0.00004436597,0.001098182,0.00000488111,0.00002361137,7.492157e-7,0.006882186,8.108766e-8,0.000008132384,0.9600651,0.03169195,0.0001757193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002121161,0.00001781219,0.002069097,0.000006373211,0.00002261323,0.000001309465,0.01225059,0.0000019855,0.0001296559,0.6070985,0.3779725,0.0002175254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02804131,0.005773787,0.00007093997,0.0004911665,0.001674716,0.0001037305,0.000008431852,0.0001587682,0.9636772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714022,0.0002436054,0.0001076619,0.002997577,0.0008793261,0.00001050116,0.000002835674,0.00001051874,0.02434574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565695582","doi":"","title":"Noises and Exceptions: Pure Mediality in Serres and Agamben","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Cultural studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01964282377590849,"gpt":0.3497941563259245,"spread":0.3301513325500161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739494,0.00004364031,0.00008119905,0.00003465879,0.0001582598,0.00001218408,0.00005495664,0.0001131104,0.0001796032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006721127,0.00003975197,0.00001170867,0.00006200914,0.001033761,0.0000907459,0.00002932186,0.00009651618,0.000009026873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001851946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002897126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001725668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008003842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993159,0.00020254,0.00008684772,0.0001071805,0.00007009988,0.0002174239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992002,0.0006078972,0.00001465623,0.00005772358,0.00001202845,0.0001075176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001437078,0.00001270915,0.01919971,0.000003410718,0.00000209176,0.000005166322,0.002250917,4.672289e-8,0.000009019427,0.9743173,0.00001403469,0.004171272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001046915,0.000006622261,0.1986953,0.000006120346,0.000002629865,8.232715e-7,0.003609379,7.343814e-7,0.00002586051,0.7962238,0.001278757,0.00004533677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837426,0.0003939657,0.00005601451,0.0002410612,0.00007595576,0.00005653046,0.000002621071,0.00001919749,0.215412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988145,0.0001705544,0.00003842015,0.0003796832,0.0001444317,0.000002211543,6.983806e-7,0.000002178531,0.000447319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2150719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3808935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139253736","doi":"10.4000/communication.4589","title":"Manuel CASTELLS (2009), Communication Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Power (physics); Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02810464043092309,"gpt":0.3176721762837136,"spread":0.2895675358527905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007144298,0.00006794591,0.00009758167,0.0000359567,0.0007436008,0.00006834528,0.0008444211,0.0001458244,0.003824299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003370804,0.00006960805,0.00004073236,0.0001238673,0.000678001,0.0003926171,0.000165402,0.0002225372,0.002125211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000784659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005265948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00149503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008221674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984254,0.0009162038,0.0001733139,0.00009571658,0.0001376306,0.0002517452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981075,0.0004989747,0.0000741526,0.001061897,0.0001505016,0.0001070043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001913525,0.00004225108,0.0005014285,0.000001163088,0.000006282204,7.878476e-8,0.001654023,6.615364e-7,0.00001083168,0.9905483,0.005445369,0.001787762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001542299,0.00001377369,0.02220394,0.00001917527,0.000008026012,9.997671e-7,0.003048839,0.00006427625,0.00006558041,0.9082774,0.06600967,0.0001340895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08687364,0.001974519,0.000215906,0.005180518,0.00006298596,0.0002955313,0.000002862263,0.0001060158,0.905288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932395,0.001171134,0.00113704,0.0008716295,0.00001405714,0.00004074278,0.0000198811,0.000006878214,0.003499181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131977390","doi":"10.1007/s11125-020-09536-4","title":"Toward a “thoughtful lightness”: Education in viral times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prospects","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Lightness; Pandemic; Interpretation (philosophy); State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Neoliberalism (international relations); Order (exchange); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Epistemology; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Virology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01875002710077399,"gpt":0.3269799545278382,"spread":0.3082299274270642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002301445,0.00005144041,0.00009837935,0.00002716014,0.0001147854,0.00002992046,0.0000957516,0.00009167312,0.0007818139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004621269,0.00005107935,0.00003143624,0.0001802418,0.0001461793,0.0001259971,0.00003082559,0.0001091869,0.0001931587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008978567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009218421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001395384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001437055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992196,0.0001464313,0.00009255759,0.0001600708,0.0001202529,0.0002610668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996911,0.00006776643,0.00001877433,0.00009309327,0.00005144296,0.00007783734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003997076,0.00009673742,0.003657883,0.000005424108,0.000002447492,0.0000144811,0.001574113,1.81286e-7,0.00001946482,0.9932983,0.0001550654,0.001171903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001139623,0.000008367737,0.01688877,0.00001553414,0.000003255277,0.000002161227,0.00103624,0.000004115221,0.002612542,0.969867,0.009370156,0.00007792067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2141479,0.0004761421,0.00001968601,0.002155632,0.0003766421,0.00009359215,0.000001152761,0.00004052439,0.7826887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980496,0.00004254993,0.0003256906,0.0005904508,0.0003055038,0.00001592949,0.00000272967,0.00000378272,0.01821729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588730977","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1287471","title":"<i>Pouvoir constituant</i>betrayed: a model of abjection in power relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proletariat; Power (physics); Biopower; Exceptionalism; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Limit (mathematics); Reflexivity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03903970062522288,"gpt":0.3601829460616507,"spread":0.3211432454364278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001106376,0.0000829664,0.0002930458,0.0001312251,0.0003258534,0.00003371847,0.000327491,0.0002253404,0.0004363847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004519139,0.0000720959,0.0001634382,0.00005542379,0.00161679,0.0004434389,0.00003929336,0.0004339084,0.00002297624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001575383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005672344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002441414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006654974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984364,0.0001709335,0.0004948389,0.00009338406,0.0003364023,0.0004680691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985531,0.0004287618,0.000271579,0.00019941,0.0002321577,0.0003149735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000414181,0.0001305893,0.004753465,0.000002045596,0.00001750061,0.00001385042,0.0004980142,0.00003346536,0.0000472916,0.9942726,0.0001750079,0.00001478662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005582482,0.0001072687,0.02671137,0.00005693408,0.00002425142,0.00001319946,0.00106162,0.0001421094,0.0001653523,0.9703488,0.0007140103,0.00009684336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3612317,0.00002954935,0.001346695,0.002292047,0.0004907959,0.00005630764,0.0000137458,0.000005763402,0.6345334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984455,0.000009305656,0.0004015382,0.0003585979,0.0001133909,6.409446e-7,1.595204e-7,0.000005330209,0.0006655601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6372138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5957131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274001421","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2015.1090527","title":"On the (geo)politics of belonging: Agamben and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Settler Colonial Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Queer; Politics; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Colonialism; Kinship; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05960855324850189,"gpt":0.3197436005712954,"spread":0.2601350473227935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149553,0.00008731426,0.0002076963,0.00001840192,0.001174201,0.00001338111,0.0002126721,0.00007256892,0.00001562106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002107832,0.00003671595,0.00004862509,0.0001091788,0.00294732,0.00002822637,0.0000738305,0.0001333794,0.000007315055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004635717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001194448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984692,0.0007324193,0.0001668388,0.00009822089,0.0002980299,0.0002352901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944794,0.005075598,0.0001036618,0.0001519631,0.0001497034,0.00003972543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007959533,0.00002903908,0.0003674265,0.00000313127,0.0001002296,5.73974e-7,0.06336868,0.000005588105,5.985601e-7,0.9356686,0.0003422651,0.00003430036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003358204,0.0001426157,0.005339379,0.00001592691,0.00004249061,3.567407e-7,0.0108743,0.000006031942,0.0002766423,0.9821076,0.0008091609,0.00004968127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544985,0.0006752867,0.000003661163,0.01939253,0.0001655237,0.0003505675,0.00002151139,0.000009673525,0.02488269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987053,0.0001396865,0.000006375134,0.0007139668,0.0001223548,0.00001993332,6.334741e-7,0.000003050607,0.0002887398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05249438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972834160","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834667","title":"SPINOZA AND THE BIOPOLITICAL ROOTS OF MODERNITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Modernity; Sovereignty; Vitalism; Philosophy; Immanence; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Transcendental number; Organicism; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01617659109486044,"gpt":0.2910240022325778,"spread":0.2748474111377174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003695826,0.0000387367,0.000100236,0.00001075095,0.0001793107,0.00001283663,0.0001097919,0.00007598014,0.0005325431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004062612,0.00002384898,0.00003455824,0.00003939679,0.002407155,0.00007772398,0.00003896256,0.00008008817,0.00007507944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000807613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003102973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003463195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005810244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.000209929,0.00008253226,0.00006997513,0.00009833548,0.0002130435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.0003723606,0.00001864035,0.00009455357,0.00003854967,0.00008778901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004880321,0.00001129087,0.001422204,0.000001925631,0.000006325476,2.630923e-7,0.0003848983,5.81724e-8,0.000003906413,0.9975629,0.00009744464,0.0005038535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002078075,0.000009423847,0.04410651,0.000002860565,0.000007909143,6.02674e-7,0.0006357034,0.00005492555,0.00005749368,0.9539725,0.0009097413,0.00003453977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5926046,0.0001145919,0.00003902218,0.001537492,0.00004469487,0.00009426976,0.000002456231,0.00001231643,0.4055506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998403,0.00002538725,0.00003666825,0.0005630701,0.00008835515,0.000007825738,2.858164e-7,0.000001831095,0.000873554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4057984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8869264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01223956724919104,"gpt":0.3298534615171496,"spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004478157,0.0001185915,0.0002383808,0.0001285444,0.0001905197,0.0001065826,0.0005573248,0.0001327547,0.004029917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007278953,0.00008120722,0.0001532471,0.000082807,0.001192668,0.0001847947,0.0001609218,0.0004192354,0.0004212496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003825265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004142132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003095138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.001317729,0.0004445838,0.0001553461,0.0006954763,0.000629356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962,0.002497849,0.0001026624,0.0001469002,0.000368481,0.0006841301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001144881,0.0000900258,0.0008682688,0.000002439721,0.00006867278,0.00003502463,0.0003888214,0.000001172853,0.00003968054,0.9965306,0.0006601831,0.0001702293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003574882,0.0002037163,0.006474323,0.00003861801,0.0000200799,0.0001299942,0.002892278,0.000002902891,0.0001256943,0.8187764,0.1708778,0.0001006922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2676464,0.00003084012,0.0004113572,0.0753639,0.002665716,0.0002883146,0.00004110983,0.00001302116,0.6535393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832278,0.000004191951,0.0001496917,0.008173764,0.005505925,0.000002795108,4.573484e-7,0.000007707704,0.002927608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7155814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}