{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":242,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":242,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2e19e91c622d","filters":{"topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty"}},"results":[{"id":"W2097803862","doi":"10.1177/1462474508101493","title":"Sex offender as homo sacer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Sovereignty; Institution; Criminology; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Dale Spencer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304793296370991,"gpt":0.3253373979651411,"spread":0.3022894650014312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008467516,0.0002649268,0.0002542662,0.0008236479,0.004609902,0.003204853,0.0003748131,0.003872437,0.003661732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001785164,0.0001516509,0.0001714067,0.0004190455,0.0185453,0.002590381,0.004700788,0.003671138,0.0004741971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001408801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001715304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002475959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986439,0.0006023351,0.00004036432,0.0001092828,0.0003019013,0.0003021515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995401,0.0001705237,0.0001117354,0.00006555655,0.00004496227,0.00006722481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001062278,0.00003385597,0.001013166,0.0000332259,0.000001887902,0.001502839,0.02959605,0.00005856222,0.0003690535,0.9533597,0.004420083,0.009601013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002914758,0.0001818372,0.005095316,0.000625883,0.00001773723,0.01711802,0.03694185,0.0004776767,0.001013156,0.3296258,0.6088126,0.00006096025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1447097,0.0103657,0.003604054,0.02309134,0.0008213885,0.00009595914,0.000046792,0.00008033928,0.8171847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452111,0.002888226,0.0008588128,0.004480858,0.0003557991,0.0000551517,0.00001882391,0.00001413629,0.04611711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004609902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01224971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114170700","doi":"10.1177/03058298070350030401","title":"Political Sociology and the Problem of the International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Sociology; Articulation (sociology); Sovereignty; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); International relations; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Social science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Didier Bigo","is_ca":false},{"name":"R. B. J. Walker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03297284409057433,"gpt":0.3670573739382497,"spread":0.3340845298476753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004725874,0.0003459899,0.0005228843,0.001842852,0.01093818,0.01330314,0.0008511331,0.003734533,0.006163834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006602786,0.000390179,0.0004224869,0.0016489,0.06402489,0.01453721,0.009220462,0.00652308,0.0007433876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005180796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003671415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002369643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001595481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959739,0.002422969,0.00009284381,0.0005484967,0.000485527,0.0004762903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959551,0.002412282,0.0003461508,0.0005942614,0.0002946595,0.0003974814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.199278e-7,7.03363e-7,0.00002321505,0.000002700404,3.642052e-7,0.000005579674,0.000899244,0.00002705669,0.00000567678,0.998163,0.0002856695,0.0005859578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003645812,0.000002872521,0.00006890015,0.00004012882,0.000001457681,0.00002897107,0.001677151,0.00008188176,0.00002135514,0.9471542,0.05091695,0.000002472415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03156098,0.009640395,0.0169613,0.09474268,0.0006178797,0.0000151604,0.00002710998,0.00006186769,0.8463726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698476,0.002777224,0.002035186,0.003385099,0.000699061,0.00005926602,0.00002058944,0.00007572523,0.02110029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01330314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03758943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113112222","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064137","title":"Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Exceptionalism; Modernity; Law; Politics; Internationalism (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Sovereign state; International relations; State (computer science); Constitutionalism; State of exception; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"R. B. J. Walker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548035154891523,"gpt":0.2992175608441761,"spread":0.2837372092952609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002997451,0.0003125425,0.000378296,0.00200475,0.004541479,0.01298366,0.0007147317,0.003033976,0.003917376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007567612,0.0002084838,0.0001838869,0.002105934,0.04717824,0.01176836,0.008122929,0.004498538,0.0002501629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00338049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001083383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001119722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001292484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965051,0.002275306,0.0001321142,0.0002863808,0.0004776414,0.0003234418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930055,0.003856504,0.001497334,0.0005770004,0.0004748309,0.0005889104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002729769,0.00001793584,0.001746083,0.00005070989,0.000003799222,0.0002379806,0.09948762,0.00009017465,0.0001341499,0.8906395,0.001467493,0.006097398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002547072,0.00006249848,0.006875183,0.0007664075,0.00001399293,0.001118679,0.3297364,0.0006973509,0.0004149197,0.5264702,0.1337816,0.0000372523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4407115,0.004751801,0.008845019,0.02584312,0.0003323885,0.00002719418,0.00005262537,0.00005222644,0.5193842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977826,0.0003259703,0.0001941135,0.000239075,0.00006037819,0.000008781745,0.000007591796,0.000008865734,0.001372454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01298366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02452731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128802201","doi":"10.1177/0263276408099017","title":"A Message in a Bottle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Silence; Politics; Empathy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fuyuki Kurasawa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01324816534242869,"gpt":0.3135001380964874,"spread":0.3002519727540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001584242,0.0007685159,0.0003671462,0.001088286,0.005926971,0.007952212,0.0008935822,0.003615005,0.02821557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090919,0.0002531641,0.0004113853,0.0005644439,0.006474792,0.01003133,0.005486995,0.005008031,0.006963324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001488936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001326651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001026816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001452377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983591,0.0009051748,0.00005066738,0.0001538418,0.0003595789,0.0001715684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974961,0.001136003,0.0001822969,0.0002560127,0.0004823646,0.0004471754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022256,0.0000904728,0.0007350818,0.000442136,0.00002363694,0.001356868,0.07940887,0.0001741376,0.003662192,0.5611898,0.2744813,0.07821298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000968957,0.00009327941,0.0001715658,0.0002145589,0.000007797827,0.0004789219,0.01285321,0.0002178058,0.0006890003,0.02214021,0.9631021,0.0000219732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03161068,0.005833846,0.03549198,0.129254,0.03158861,0.0004337056,0.0006482826,0.001539925,0.763599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4532163,0.003169134,0.01811849,0.03086643,0.007950988,0.0002873624,0.0003780991,0.000949515,0.4850636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02821557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09439045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Evan J. Criddle","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02943232257484862,"gpt":0.3159791559848752,"spread":0.2865468334100266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00531561,0.0002637287,0.0003810621,0.001014486,0.003960955,0.006742668,0.0007406309,0.003847119,0.003335071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214486,0.0002081447,0.0003059755,0.0008610298,0.05242027,0.006006311,0.003392931,0.005634039,0.0003855974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004241561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006838367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004258683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962915,0.001921885,0.000131889,0.0004843701,0.0007344612,0.0004359422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964328,0.002455206,0.0003030229,0.0003353448,0.0002873419,0.000186267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.226198e-7,0.000002159067,0.00003222335,0.000003913085,5.868652e-7,0.000008058981,0.0003208822,0.00007223634,0.00001074632,0.9982154,0.0004152453,0.0009176974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004572766,0.000004218781,0.00009946382,0.00003626829,0.000001197165,0.0000145799,0.0003668196,0.0001228915,0.00002976749,0.9745041,0.02481265,0.000003425896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04476702,0.01959084,0.0340476,0.1419531,0.001035874,0.00005020552,0.0001098967,0.00007107139,0.7583745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671466,0.004927066,0.003840499,0.006554952,0.0007505638,0.00008132261,0.00005427094,0.00002580175,0.01661891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006838367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03077477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584920505","doi":"","title":"Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; State of exception; Political science; State (computer science); Philosophy of law; Politics; Contradiction; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03569557848742904,"gpt":0.372193404638457,"spread":0.3364978261510279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002601255,0.0004689723,0.000465762,0.001589208,0.00870931,0.007429399,0.001308421,0.01754293,0.00722685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01433447,0.0005600543,0.0005366691,0.001169636,0.009948054,0.007132051,0.004003119,0.01197493,0.0006814727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009119547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008883594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05510641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07734986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968762,0.0006480122,0.0001459476,0.0005235336,0.00073956,0.001066696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964624,0.002442416,0.0002365683,0.000119018,0.0004558107,0.0002837257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005133383,0.000006274206,0.0006126559,0.00004027494,0.000004766909,0.0006395941,0.003072883,0.00009264133,0.0001198527,0.916863,0.07277614,0.005720548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009876941,0.00006553623,0.005051935,0.0006061507,0.00005526578,0.0009313239,0.007411886,0.0005868596,0.001328191,0.3937756,0.5899137,0.0001748822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05412356,0.01493447,0.00203979,0.377905,0.003303265,0.0001318453,0.0003496316,0.0001004337,0.547112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.641169,0.00395137,0.0007224096,0.2760444,0.001988305,0.0001962607,0.0001024411,0.00004235225,0.07578356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05510641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1095713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167606606","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110334","title":"Political Theology/Theopolitics: The Thresholds and Vulnerabilities of Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political theology; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; Historicity (philosophy); State (computer science); Secularity; Anthropology; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carlota McAllister","is_ca":true},{"name":"Valentina Napolitano","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01894433118772749,"gpt":0.3659124243821515,"spread":0.346968093194424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003960696,0.0003561392,0.0006008928,0.001599301,0.00258857,0.009651803,0.0006896835,0.002219062,0.002126351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005604352,0.0002350005,0.0003338493,0.001953454,0.0463975,0.01148974,0.004711585,0.005156408,0.0002657381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002366218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003390901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001716348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00188008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963835,0.002258985,0.0001706938,0.0003839394,0.0004902811,0.0003125416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963445,0.002502459,0.0003808971,0.0003153075,0.0002560959,0.0002007874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003125586,0.000002362585,0.0002135365,0.00009706058,0.000003025907,0.00004871032,0.002789054,0.00006417203,0.00005982325,0.9898298,0.001185282,0.005703891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003242532,0.000007664295,0.0008607277,0.0006908699,0.000006812242,0.0002616197,0.005799215,0.0001959245,0.0001099479,0.8667497,0.125304,0.00001030038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07262354,0.2432567,0.03841274,0.1548158,0.003553894,0.00004420308,0.00009373565,0.00007799557,0.4871214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226918,0.06026381,0.001979864,0.006498745,0.001770712,0.00006030759,0.00005570194,0.00004927648,0.006629905],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009651803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02094644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965472227","doi":"10.1177/0263276419860576","title":"Pastoral Power and Algorithmic Governmentality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Nominalism; Obedience; Temporality; Power (physics); Secularization; Sociology; Technocracy; Epistemology; History; Genealogy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"R.L. Cooper","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00701329848802781,"gpt":0.2717793533975206,"spread":0.2647660549094928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003602497,0.0001613211,0.0002435668,0.001240287,0.003938637,0.0046309,0.0006035115,0.0007405885,0.003711069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005759285,0.0001767974,0.0001890569,0.0009105344,0.04061992,0.006479275,0.003748514,0.001363867,0.0002854856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001375012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978946,0.001048744,0.0001017477,0.0004079355,0.0003102255,0.0002368059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967229,0.001263227,0.0005826009,0.0008662663,0.0003408497,0.0002241967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005218916,0.000003824917,0.000412551,0.000009894199,0.000001488795,0.00001496618,0.003417375,0.0001408886,0.0000658748,0.9922385,0.0001143731,0.003575098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001271665,0.00002754535,0.001560048,0.00006872013,0.000006006388,0.000112257,0.003945238,0.0007805168,0.0005606835,0.9508665,0.04204481,0.00001496487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4329242,0.002567138,0.06365616,0.01361558,0.0001777606,0.00004216331,0.00008936774,0.0001169742,0.4868107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956976,0.0001795376,0.001544253,0.00009129316,0.00002881502,0.000008905033,0.00001053251,0.00001023584,0.002428744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01905203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183524","doi":"10.1111/edth.12457","title":"Moving Up without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Democracy; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Martin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06122337556513519,"gpt":0.3847201385556069,"spread":0.3234967629904717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01791327,0.0003649317,0.000700596,0.001260611,0.01080029,0.01246539,0.001622012,0.01190329,0.01415206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04980677,0.0004726158,0.0005413812,0.001272647,0.06941028,0.02141108,0.008442469,0.01413421,0.001181092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005857003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006165812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005241424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00612187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9820403,0.01199623,0.0003614407,0.001421808,0.002241547,0.001938801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533327,0.03252183,0.003280333,0.00522745,0.003606429,0.002031298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106557,0.00001139139,0.0002131401,0.000008944601,0.000003198647,0.00004204568,0.00298334,0.0001536851,0.00002424751,0.9909903,0.002805602,0.0027535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111329,0.000004622438,0.0002153289,0.00005146397,0.000004524808,0.00005670227,0.003045068,0.0002994354,0.00006612788,0.9811723,0.01506377,0.000009467951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07684781,0.002350562,0.02153611,0.2665193,0.0008287327,0.00003747674,0.00006236436,0.00004213583,0.6317755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978668,0.0004667064,0.001979232,0.007077534,0.0003340161,0.00006518612,0.000009678524,0.00006331627,0.01133619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01791327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09473556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Mireille Hildebrandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008344743393117108,"gpt":0.246607821110647,"spread":0.2382630777175299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002930401,0.0002601701,0.0003616306,0.00110504,0.00609612,0.008788479,0.0007876738,0.003445346,0.004230605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006362434,0.0002244545,0.000302113,0.001291816,0.04717005,0.01447509,0.005146108,0.004635274,0.0004955239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005338504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00365969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01243225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972218,0.001312886,0.00006446183,0.0004228466,0.0004850973,0.0004928237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971696,0.001655373,0.0002479169,0.0003442315,0.0003033705,0.0002795649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003459102,0.000002166801,0.0001661505,0.000009014184,0.000001423131,0.00003506768,0.004509939,0.00008784491,0.00003382633,0.9905743,0.001726488,0.00285034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009013175,0.00001032357,0.001040753,0.000171876,0.000007587264,0.0001172003,0.009695827,0.0003260057,0.0001375992,0.9053914,0.0830767,0.00001568483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1403814,0.01533321,0.02922089,0.2544984,0.001032461,0.00003595881,0.0000775677,0.00008326666,0.5593369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869294,0.001657914,0.0007996449,0.004386545,0.0002774392,0.00002231893,0.0000115009,0.00002068181,0.005894564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03873372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916825268","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.12144","title":"The Symbiosis of the Urban and the Political","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Ontology; Subject (documents); Notice; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Warren Magnusson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06028367724771856,"gpt":0.4029372009951572,"spread":0.3426535237474387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002562952,0.0001900355,0.0002976311,0.001467408,0.004553565,0.01044001,0.0004854424,0.001245614,0.006786244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002491449,0.0002224026,0.0001993429,0.001523078,0.03763598,0.004574483,0.00687603,0.003190373,0.0004803389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002824634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003475343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004846332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958895,0.003053826,0.00006628058,0.000292673,0.0003940896,0.0003036342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975553,0.001220836,0.0002749609,0.0003283859,0.0002799079,0.000340674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002716857,0.000003610121,0.0001822689,0.000008199576,0.000001246421,0.00001458279,0.001479029,0.00007638506,0.00002897398,0.9957211,0.001019112,0.001462776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007173438,0.00001594034,0.001414359,0.000108785,0.000005461439,0.0001074559,0.008304495,0.0007660206,0.0001593957,0.8234941,0.1656047,0.00001203432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1133334,0.006609147,0.02622087,0.06932191,0.0005288295,0.00002539791,0.00009890748,0.00009756173,0.783764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876754,0.0008434478,0.001140946,0.0009662068,0.0001570084,0.00001225443,0.00001721775,0.00002190473,0.009165498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02759695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"J. Matthew Hoye","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey Monaghan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0367875969956024,"gpt":0.2966084499146628,"spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004326748,0.000169802,0.0002292036,0.0008281455,0.004061542,0.006897868,0.0004311054,0.001965687,0.004121291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005800717,0.0001714528,0.0003090417,0.0006911692,0.03505731,0.006046745,0.004187194,0.003340072,0.0004711562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002869335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002308273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965663,0.00197237,0.00009844449,0.0005219422,0.000475319,0.0003655944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966075,0.001765464,0.0003874591,0.0007403163,0.0002627259,0.0002366266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003132222,0.000002265978,0.0001127339,0.000003920101,8.536006e-7,0.000009184986,0.001368166,0.00006295521,0.0000321974,0.9955764,0.0005816575,0.002246633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008349664,0.00001462206,0.0006290389,0.00005777322,0.000003384855,0.00007023016,0.001340836,0.0004358798,0.0002395625,0.9135804,0.08360894,0.00001100448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0976156,0.004796247,0.02267961,0.04447041,0.0002860185,0.00003022312,0.00006632548,0.00006938445,0.8299863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806356,0.0005196652,0.001325174,0.001544584,0.00009902229,0.00002394174,0.00001846655,0.00001985105,0.01581368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006897868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02288228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"James Tully","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0792369281200715,"gpt":0.3500334249339207,"spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02120693,0.0002677625,0.0005791489,0.00270828,0.005750555,0.01179609,0.0009801674,0.002819806,0.002434713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02575337,0.0003021801,0.0003339247,0.002378996,0.06357101,0.01252947,0.005244879,0.007874989,0.0003720532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004212589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004032171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774702,0.01402809,0.000545295,0.001647209,0.005056531,0.001252643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820412,0.01192437,0.001531183,0.001966485,0.00179597,0.0007408711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005369333,0.000002953554,0.0001353121,0.00001972715,0.000002528613,0.00001154742,0.002346186,0.00005125724,0.00001883292,0.9933606,0.001128579,0.002916924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009803343,0.00002267344,0.0009194839,0.0001448096,0.000004466222,0.00007904431,0.003553095,0.0002019397,0.00007396957,0.8343706,0.1606107,0.000009309259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06312616,0.04606555,0.01682074,0.2428347,0.00175718,0.00004122013,0.00007312204,0.00005959164,0.6292217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589021,0.01222003,0.002915486,0.01128694,0.002587832,0.00006433675,0.00003056131,0.00005411697,0.0119387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02120693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1121543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775570581","doi":"10.1177/1354066117744867","title":"Weapons of mass participation: Social media, violence entrepreneurs, and the politics of crowdfunding for war","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle; Arab Council for the Social Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Sovereignty; Law; Organised crime; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Nicole Sunday Grove","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04868596698425926,"gpt":0.3514871294967573,"spread":0.302801162512498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006315349,0.0005409571,0.0003192745,0.003522898,0.01592924,0.01777042,0.001318802,0.005233278,0.01031706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01698537,0.0004245844,0.0003144658,0.001930168,0.02370807,0.01509147,0.01033227,0.00446627,0.0007952179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002856381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002069059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003532345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004223787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928429,0.004861847,0.0001092783,0.0005530913,0.0007065542,0.00092633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732032,0.02068055,0.00249059,0.0007695158,0.00059215,0.002263962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483322,0.0002136911,0.0185844,0.0001947421,0.00004543637,0.002116043,0.3524157,0.0002742093,0.0007927294,0.5350795,0.02961317,0.06052205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009623084,0.0001674235,0.0164257,0.001225187,0.00005968138,0.001194987,0.3917252,0.001482985,0.000973708,0.1460807,0.4404526,0.0001156229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5020724,0.005190216,0.003859664,0.08553333,0.001028635,0.00009669865,0.0001268047,0.0001152816,0.401977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892982,0.0007375192,0.0002738026,0.002730986,0.0005291704,0.00005067225,0.00001659611,0.00003293664,0.006330121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01777042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03451401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971695938","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-769x.2002.00097.x","title":"Nursing and the concept of life: towards an ethics of testimony","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Nursing; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Francine Wynn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1119883652902004,"gpt":0.3753485702669841,"spread":0.2633602049767838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02067198,0.0004831656,0.0005327142,0.001848715,0.00729468,0.01191087,0.001661305,0.011671,0.00128333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02188784,0.0003586911,0.0003271352,0.001001598,0.09466834,0.009344336,0.01153699,0.01055415,0.0002817572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004899355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001322204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001298833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9633226,0.03306592,0.000462408,0.0003971063,0.00209867,0.0006531865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778183,0.0180659,0.000999309,0.0007010415,0.001350298,0.001065242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006062266,0.000009563696,0.00006925884,0.00003412899,0.00000129793,0.000208493,0.01690066,0.0001181421,0.00006528001,0.9786243,0.001734857,0.002227945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009439333,0.00001768781,0.0001108023,0.0004395181,0.000002128326,0.0004686233,0.01951971,0.00077393,0.000147737,0.9202616,0.05823432,0.00001450657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06220747,0.02644827,0.1252169,0.4293125,0.002830873,0.0001688306,0.00004056439,0.00006399946,0.3537107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552779,0.004074274,0.01964541,0.01386592,0.0006822256,0.0001633528,0.00001309941,0.00002594762,0.006251948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02067198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1093252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535351796","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.236","title":"Stopping the Anthropological Machine: Agamben with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human animal; Theology; Biology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Kelly Oliver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02276917304293379,"gpt":0.3459464215874375,"spread":0.3231772485445037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006190502,0.000582582,0.0007407537,0.001328265,0.008555078,0.01010998,0.001018937,0.00658033,0.005402491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276719,0.0003628847,0.0002940516,0.001083082,0.04305165,0.02089963,0.006911571,0.01302411,0.0008102179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005272266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003100006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005732358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960229,0.002496715,0.0000508384,0.0004755639,0.0006101746,0.0003437994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957699,0.002991728,0.000191726,0.0003534912,0.000372893,0.0003203291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000154745,0.00001301454,0.0001051757,0.00001463885,0.000003192892,0.00004519722,0.01045474,0.00003566747,0.00003364305,0.9676241,0.01761112,0.00404407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001175806,0.00001339049,0.0001736903,0.0001445037,0.000003109835,0.00005300968,0.004379857,0.0001498708,0.0001027256,0.7637416,0.2312129,0.00001349474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02881623,0.03861418,0.01203774,0.6756578,0.003447139,0.00003566433,0.00003962649,0.0000795972,0.241272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8105518,0.009836854,0.005817753,0.09316132,0.003164989,0.0001353729,0.00002990008,0.0001712021,0.07713082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03825319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971833369","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103635","title":"Lawless Sovereignty: Challenging the State of Exception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Sovereignty; Undoing; State (computer science); Law; Power (physics); Lawlessness; Economic Justice; Sovereign state; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Susan Dianne Brophy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06294519964535146,"gpt":0.3881065053250788,"spread":0.3251613056797273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003754782,0.0002664835,0.0004734446,0.001109194,0.005895332,0.008522739,0.001170807,0.003509422,0.001244996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006871183,0.0002158206,0.0002447673,0.0008826303,0.05155899,0.006711466,0.00731077,0.007135617,0.0001732024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003155224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008825229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966221,0.002230558,0.0000610748,0.0002676873,0.0004252744,0.0003932643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997013,0.002251419,0.0002312723,0.000250306,0.0001313119,0.0001226433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003385801,0.000002029645,0.00005513033,0.00001421692,0.000001117625,0.0001015366,0.02132331,0.00007478565,0.00006604142,0.975976,0.001092571,0.00128984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001166774,0.00001449497,0.0005560457,0.0003634157,0.000006069997,0.0001730469,0.01176524,0.0005572938,0.0002281657,0.7987782,0.1875311,0.00001529631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1677441,0.01823948,0.01475355,0.1346196,0.0005728755,0.00002747121,0.00002547217,0.0000632733,0.6639541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843174,0.001865455,0.0008723467,0.003331788,0.0001939209,0.00002414912,0.000007294382,0.00002578785,0.009361752],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008522739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03880924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035764081","doi":"10.1163/156916408x286950","title":"Antagonism and Democratic Citizenship (Schmitt, Mouffe, Derrida)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Phenomenology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Democracy; Citizenship; Politics; Context (archaeology); Agonism; Adversary; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Matthias Fritsch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2581204551153425,"gpt":0.4470033941616293,"spread":0.1888829390462867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003805439,0.0001716984,0.0003119876,0.001161472,0.005567137,0.006102486,0.0005016372,0.00173345,0.003729999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004322982,0.0001649176,0.0002370071,0.0009149096,0.03176744,0.005109168,0.005450257,0.002598458,0.0002528553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003136614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001821168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00315296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003346275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968005,0.002172729,0.00005898945,0.0002757661,0.000355442,0.0003366509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975324,0.00148342,0.0003280776,0.00023901,0.000191388,0.0002257547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108192,0.00001251779,0.0004845365,0.00001445952,0.000003460365,0.00005050134,0.02411057,0.00006090521,0.0001337281,0.9720457,0.0007165241,0.002356194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002080862,0.00002620396,0.00185697,0.00007173764,0.000007897627,0.000189225,0.03536375,0.0003882959,0.0001894221,0.8986632,0.063198,0.00002436278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4230135,0.002226964,0.007666211,0.03677461,0.000179214,0.00003803083,0.00004112,0.00002826705,0.5300321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.0001257064,0.0002093087,0.0002690724,0.00001305435,0.00001041497,0.000003341329,0.000002582393,0.00165963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006102486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02275789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570614875","doi":"","title":"The dual state : parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the national security complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Terrorism; State (computer science); Political science; National security; Politics; Humanities; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Art","authors":[{"name":"Eric Wilson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05127870855957217,"gpt":0.3341859185006953,"spread":0.2829072099411232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007213806,0.0003893484,0.0002158856,0.00139351,0.005159283,0.005923711,0.0004766576,0.001822608,0.008799165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002176734,0.0002037201,0.0001202291,0.001714818,0.008709931,0.007808427,0.002040427,0.002811179,0.001233004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006030631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004877903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02026764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05624469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994966,0.0002340366,0.00001597559,0.00005212862,0.0001447941,0.00005652101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994214,0.0003245739,0.00004628649,0.00002390595,0.00009603624,0.00008781354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006270673,0.000008592665,0.0001167064,0.00004593674,0.000001146356,0.000050881,0.009321377,0.00006805242,0.0000490731,0.750559,0.2244994,0.01527341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002806325,0.000003373704,0.0002883231,0.0002479901,0.000001449865,0.00008788495,0.008340134,0.00007178079,0.00003932656,0.1486342,0.842276,0.000006797816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007812454,0.1323119,0.001768413,0.2403075,0.006077873,0.0000305475,0.0001090671,0.0000477217,0.6115346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3997469,0.08888406,0.00187869,0.03687405,0.003744448,0.0001649632,0.0001419516,0.0001137187,0.4684513],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02026764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04375553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752361648","doi":"10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6835","title":"The Global Turn to Authoritarianism and After","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Capitalism; Political economy; Colonialism; Democracy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"David Murakami Wood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01465482336108202,"gpt":0.3301377273977942,"spread":0.3154829040367122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002481114,0.0002735002,0.0003381936,0.0006266852,0.003480218,0.00812936,0.0004679352,0.001909428,0.005609999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004090596,0.0001461417,0.0003918555,0.0007273586,0.01578554,0.007458723,0.003503558,0.006260654,0.0006524626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002572368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001717942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001550012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002745421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975579,0.00098015,0.00007521663,0.0003844472,0.0004568627,0.0005453249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971902,0.001640664,0.0002126683,0.000378314,0.0003171089,0.0002610681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001063634,0.00000448126,0.0002576674,0.00003134993,0.000004287719,0.00007199342,0.00612745,0.00009633692,0.00006588594,0.9619777,0.02093305,0.01041914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004879649,0.00001340332,0.0007363772,0.0002134712,0.000005014736,0.0001349465,0.003929123,0.0001098859,0.0001979128,0.3667438,0.6278997,0.000011498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03034328,0.04276603,0.005570294,0.2718619,0.009350786,0.00001136223,0.00006761189,0.00008751306,0.6399413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671892,0.0132179,0.0009661446,0.03275372,0.007732346,0.00002273097,0.00007644571,0.0001513119,0.07789023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0187673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323007045","doi":"10.1177/0953946813509334","title":"Surveillance and the Eye of God","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Panopticon; Sociology; Relation (database); Gaze; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Enlightenment; Law; Modernity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Brother","authors":[{"name":"David Lyon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1023518406475247,"gpt":0.4447861803062498,"spread":0.3424343396587252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031671,0.0002641832,0.0002518431,0.0009130247,0.007395925,0.006223198,0.000478473,0.002775518,0.004098674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005271978,0.0001719791,0.0002539459,0.000601358,0.03896057,0.007653552,0.004745125,0.003496027,0.0005589401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003352638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00228546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005540509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004841294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968244,0.002078453,0.00005902035,0.000338246,0.0003595965,0.0003403306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972374,0.001481739,0.0003483167,0.0003393795,0.0003370963,0.0002559451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001597876,0.000006213462,0.0002972074,0.00003269199,0.000002701538,0.00007497559,0.03339949,0.00005065038,0.0001322968,0.9526085,0.006758513,0.006620887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001440256,0.00003878776,0.0009272673,0.0002555085,0.000007456211,0.0003019494,0.02678787,0.0002698774,0.0004481996,0.5604284,0.4104947,0.00002545134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1112799,0.02689135,0.01575782,0.1398965,0.001424748,0.00002977713,0.00009379315,0.0001061237,0.70452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734656,0.002826936,0.001590206,0.004923474,0.0002963548,0.00001411666,0.000018631,0.0000442633,0.01682039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007395925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02432525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687202","doi":"10.1353/mos.2014.0034","title":"Precarious World: Rethinking Global Fiction in Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Darda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02204042855320829,"gpt":0.3093032891609583,"spread":0.28726286060775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00184462,0.0006132722,0.0004253979,0.001488302,0.01467822,0.006715578,0.0007082742,0.002882369,0.003044086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003459506,0.0001913819,0.0002202062,0.001213829,0.03424523,0.004850797,0.003363541,0.00523199,0.0002900491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006452919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002360771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009056929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01815671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991348,0.0004901663,0.00001481591,0.000089619,0.0001323972,0.0001382179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982442,0.001375489,0.00009529127,0.00009326867,0.0001121763,0.00007953459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001303208,0.0000078422,0.0002046955,0.00004691225,0.000003379431,0.0005681731,0.2275289,0.0001181757,0.000139391,0.751448,0.01540688,0.004514532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451142,0.00003772895,0.0009386362,0.0003858563,0.00001084933,0.0006439786,0.1913617,0.0003546255,0.0005670263,0.1613397,0.6443228,0.00002263019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1866624,0.01221707,0.005779322,0.1547571,0.00471471,0.00005756093,0.00009086116,0.00007425518,0.6356467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783249,0.001740984,0.000650965,0.00462716,0.0006854646,0.00001886192,0.00001704857,0.0000413515,0.01389323],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01467822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04681939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009613245002529722,"gpt":0.248322618954292,"spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002243817,0.0001621449,0.0003089121,0.0005574195,0.01105405,0.008775471,0.0007855151,0.003840301,0.005260201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005240221,0.000271676,0.0001926389,0.0006469517,0.03694654,0.006303531,0.003823367,0.006644297,0.0005043117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008012146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007627888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05101681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05456324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985267,0.0004480487,0.00002926686,0.000205834,0.0003645874,0.0004254602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.0005359292,0.0001164768,0.0001509524,0.0001876624,0.0003165522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002949079,0.000003226016,0.0001481738,0.000004895967,7.447854e-7,0.00002942358,0.00307228,0.00003623963,0.00001921122,0.9882646,0.00628511,0.002133203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897808,0.00001202616,0.001411137,0.0001208111,0.000003044838,0.000108243,0.008065043,0.0002616869,0.00008368053,0.6577815,0.3321289,0.00001393301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08456938,0.01255294,0.001801898,0.214766,0.0006211339,0.0000128312,0.00007709938,0.00003323202,0.6855656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582116,0.002344422,0.0003251265,0.007262546,0.0004263864,0.000008798523,0.00002166953,0.00001485644,0.03138449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05101681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1014397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187267266","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199916931.013.019","title":"The Concept of the Rule-of-Law State in Carl Schmitt’s Verfassungslehre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Liberalism; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02091828083984944,"gpt":0.2431844424238095,"spread":0.2222661615839601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001701556,0.0006683962,0.0003632428,0.001764407,0.003704088,0.005778887,0.0008133115,0.002620515,0.005881676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002654578,0.0002799794,0.000334548,0.001636421,0.01797824,0.006542841,0.002127525,0.004196238,0.001228055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00751743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003975582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00974172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01096383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.0005176265,0.00003922738,0.0002005585,0.0003945837,0.0001443109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994795,0.0003195766,0.0000304885,0.0000733187,0.00006696901,0.00003015653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.122705e-7,8.241557e-7,0.000005422021,0.000003074239,2.477861e-7,0.000005413181,0.0003138205,0.00004587293,0.000007622322,0.9968789,0.001557537,0.001180489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002040942,0.000004538463,0.00003551072,0.00003806254,0.000001135209,0.00001605077,0.0001477738,0.0001493132,0.00004466812,0.8770343,0.1225209,0.000005599953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01035515,0.02411938,0.0269342,0.03655092,0.002263015,0.00005112442,0.0001549274,0.0001231646,0.8994481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6926066,0.01737607,0.01451197,0.009406341,0.002817607,0.000375772,0.0002044146,0.0002013503,0.2624999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00974172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05454302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04991531528797417,"gpt":0.3507328770423187,"spread":0.3008175617543445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946087,0.0003936852,0.0005806695,0.002444403,0.004840802,0.009186717,0.001259144,0.00542033,0.003747654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009263583,0.0003274266,0.0005326216,0.002071204,0.03451825,0.01380836,0.004127656,0.006867273,0.0004578106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003465751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004980993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960859,0.002514551,0.0001078923,0.0004269387,0.0006023325,0.0002622675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946942,0.003927173,0.0003194144,0.0003958458,0.000405477,0.0002577836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002820534,0.000002083942,0.00001539221,0.00000560622,9.289591e-7,0.0000133183,0.0008225022,0.00007388573,0.000009788096,0.9975998,0.000978854,0.0004749986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005821368,0.000002512767,0.00003477651,0.0000431866,0.000002064816,0.00001469969,0.0004901137,0.0002530937,0.00002212461,0.9866543,0.01247313,0.000004247658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05676159,0.0472562,0.03826322,0.4099948,0.00157693,0.0000470035,0.0001095006,0.00008513086,0.4459057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600258,0.007720186,0.004782479,0.01159723,0.000975227,0.00008253585,0.00003573082,0.00005537999,0.01472537],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07566684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232067","doi":"10.4135/9781446216217.n6","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04821778495263056,"gpt":0.3443616591084577,"spread":0.2961438741558272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002200521,0.0003605885,0.0003191424,0.0008274916,0.003872097,0.01003166,0.0007051408,0.001691885,0.007826746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003170584,0.0001877722,0.0002801228,0.001223971,0.02424452,0.007953382,0.003565293,0.003644371,0.001303967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003954746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001883624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001593163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001197828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970133,0.001795414,0.00005409935,0.0003238404,0.0005088451,0.0003044838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989364,0.0006221537,0.00008506401,0.0002049707,0.0000821212,0.00006931304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000126363,9.840992e-7,0.00001511608,0.000003958672,4.071766e-7,0.000004205353,0.001081897,0.000021833,0.00001830763,0.995959,0.001198718,0.001694424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000497127,0.00001130214,0.0001681508,0.00008328475,0.000002778261,0.00005506834,0.00156177,0.0002451543,0.0001552927,0.7115155,0.286192,0.000004741864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008762538,0.007036735,0.009475398,0.01476508,0.0004709092,0.00001363834,0.00002940063,0.00003876223,0.9594076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8285359,0.005116641,0.003186201,0.00238167,0.0009236301,0.00008733289,0.00006674011,0.0001068526,0.1595951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01003166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02869385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141495258","doi":"10.1162/dram.2009.53.2.139","title":"“It Don't Gitmo Better”: Scenes from the Coney Island <i>Waterboarding Thrill Ride</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDR/The Drama Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Interrogation; Art history; Art; Advertising; Visual arts; History; Business; Archaeology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Sara Brady","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03080465173836948,"gpt":0.3238105292340789,"spread":0.2930058774957094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001651086,0.0004909371,0.0002421541,0.0004917519,0.01191656,0.006129084,0.0008283151,0.002752888,0.01313488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003168011,0.0002604781,0.0002443304,0.0006928998,0.006148655,0.002800083,0.002189782,0.008753949,0.001101302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005550754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003701785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1399995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3528603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991257,0.0004685056,0.000008811035,0.00004585157,0.0001547466,0.0001964291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00042199,0.00005093835,0.0000378991,0.0001524789,0.0001707651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004959561,0.00002698432,0.000265695,0.0001778745,0.000007749821,0.0004165826,0.09416106,0.00005848463,0.0003444723,0.0382814,0.8519876,0.01422253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001127439,0.00001272352,0.001149033,0.0002185955,0.000007035659,0.0001139919,0.07386518,0.00003566099,0.0001822778,0.001237268,0.9231543,0.00001267111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05096066,0.03251763,0.0009969433,0.3005276,0.01092552,0.00007558196,0.0003037295,0.0001225939,0.6035698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5448644,0.01762909,0.00109066,0.080534,0.00491773,0.0001640329,0.0002878203,0.0006074256,0.3499049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1399995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2783691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937918814","doi":"10.1177/0047117819842330","title":"The securitization audience in theologico-political perspective: Giorgio Agamben, doxological acclamations, and paraconsistent logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Securitization; Contradiction; Epistemology; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. A. Murphy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01679351562429074,"gpt":0.3508487508608279,"spread":0.3340552352365371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003272356,0.0005450509,0.0005054913,0.001665672,0.004134469,0.007749664,0.0009635061,0.00315854,0.002704363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004490081,0.0003319159,0.0002628872,0.001368913,0.04011811,0.006742371,0.004029183,0.00449528,0.0006271378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007336972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002192389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003344256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959762,0.002829338,0.0000640224,0.0004005239,0.0004746327,0.0002553268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982018,0.001280078,0.0001569787,0.0001498107,0.0001170721,0.00009425617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004394043,0.000003669835,0.00003022776,0.0000139913,9.260214e-7,0.00003232134,0.003704373,0.00006646223,0.00002783453,0.9945729,0.0009826355,0.0005601484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001317336,0.000008381584,0.0001225986,0.0001458256,0.000005782611,0.00007415103,0.002826326,0.000515595,0.0001443632,0.9251722,0.07096063,0.00001098198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05611463,0.02374572,0.02868585,0.1061722,0.001243684,0.00003967791,0.00007880037,0.0001530601,0.7837663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677009,0.003563046,0.003724193,0.002722749,0.000705579,0.0000547366,0.00002669807,0.0001217028,0.0213805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007749664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05323374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998846440","doi":"10.1080/13576270701430692","title":"The rights of the corpse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mortality","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"John Baglow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03293581823920734,"gpt":0.3607150509608982,"spread":0.3277792327216909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004144939,0.0002582961,0.0003951035,0.001113181,0.00343608,0.006163691,0.0007764653,0.002407262,0.009346839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007748399,0.0001826041,0.000228806,0.0007392608,0.03344996,0.006963341,0.006003294,0.003817532,0.0008011555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001890655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002474175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002690608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001607914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969209,0.001439231,0.0001578954,0.0004180154,0.0006660081,0.0003979026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955866,0.001505504,0.0005350947,0.0009746355,0.0008331802,0.0005649579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002657792,0.000001818783,0.0001107429,0.000004074403,0.000001126579,0.00001526405,0.0008144644,0.00003801133,0.00004609181,0.997371,0.0004910984,0.001103722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005566078,0.00001805318,0.0003516751,0.0001043342,0.000004579833,0.00009296761,0.001396172,0.0001917406,0.0001730683,0.9074902,0.09016314,0.000008529955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07817864,0.004579562,0.02387966,0.0328931,0.0005331534,0.00004554216,0.0001895449,0.0000515125,0.8596492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646713,0.001003081,0.001175093,0.0011478,0.0003415059,0.00003685297,0.00006325659,0.00001927779,0.03154186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009346839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0312683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840930292","doi":"10.1177/030437540503000101","title":"The Folding of Liberal Government: Contract Governance and the Transformation of the Public Service in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives Global Local Political","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public service; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Management; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel O’Connor","is_ca":true},{"name":"Suzan Ilcan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009976244010432152,"gpt":0.2635081351068602,"spread":0.253531891096428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002529833,0.0001855521,0.0003014481,0.001232126,0.02246268,0.01154847,0.001662384,0.003032741,0.01025855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008762303,0.0003107888,0.0003387379,0.002721797,0.01424788,0.002711107,0.004414135,0.004117427,0.0003722979],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2109826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2833246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953987,0.0006840319,0.00007660877,0.0003186463,0.001169012,0.002352974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968784,0.0006496031,0.0001474695,0.0001920122,0.001098005,0.001034501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003189307,0.00001767819,0.004001135,0.00002059476,0.000006514739,0.0001890023,0.0116403,0.00119272,0.0001118799,0.9617668,0.009707275,0.01131426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008429454,0.00005449502,0.04102986,0.0002564953,0.00005760308,0.0001857173,0.06411672,0.01038495,0.001057343,0.2681948,0.6143981,0.0001796139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3779671,0.002012482,0.004093899,0.0829311,0.0002292757,0.0001311593,0.0003455099,0.00008337499,0.532206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548604,0.0003666117,0.0005506715,0.001420308,0.00001617337,0.000014503,0.00004252979,0.00002284917,0.042706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7890174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081563109","doi":"10.1177/0263775820953855","title":"Being earthbound: Arendt, process and alienation in the Anthropocene","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Alienation; Politics; Epistemology; Praxis; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Oliver Belcher","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeremy J. Schmidt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02215125473696165,"gpt":0.2814461455430706,"spread":0.259294890806109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003453814,0.0003130047,0.0003232296,0.001454338,0.009129476,0.01012344,0.00084335,0.004046296,0.002843268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00407358,0.0002036055,0.0002864829,0.001705427,0.05952043,0.01194402,0.007318419,0.004552181,0.0002053082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006396844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002154805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009016406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01282804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967569,0.002001107,0.0000536143,0.0002529689,0.0004008025,0.0005347299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979929,0.001445722,0.0001845176,0.0001419465,0.00009880791,0.0001361217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004800393,0.000004428444,0.0001491837,0.000007141536,8.207055e-7,0.00005124224,0.02566916,0.00002637888,0.00001949252,0.9720325,0.0009250397,0.001109846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001342383,0.00001214879,0.0009393171,0.0001530107,0.000005086678,0.0001709895,0.05224245,0.0001926233,0.0001136417,0.7864646,0.1596765,0.00001616982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244258,0.01461784,0.007542588,0.1479731,0.0006980036,0.0000305741,0.00003910883,0.00002403261,0.7046489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865025,0.001552076,0.0005078316,0.003026878,0.0001507302,0.0000233743,0.000009051269,0.00001569857,0.00821176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01012344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04641259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122248100","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12135","title":"Hermann Heller <scp>NOW</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science","authors":[{"name":"Agustín José Menèndez","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04958923047849809,"gpt":0.2942373642317216,"spread":0.2446481337532235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009657315,0.0004874903,0.0006065149,0.001596966,0.003540599,0.008108367,0.001288757,0.005624008,0.09476852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00880278,0.0003656752,0.0003263935,0.00192578,0.002127269,0.00507546,0.001920823,0.004463796,0.05378481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002335808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002490566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004395706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006645653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985868,0.0002208491,0.00006634471,0.0002341391,0.0007444011,0.0001476242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966134,0.001264565,0.0002514529,0.0002900322,0.001095627,0.0004847658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007857213,0.00000565052,0.00004103961,0.00005735949,0.000001808117,0.0000564017,0.00007913518,0.00001470479,0.00007789397,0.009022849,0.9794519,0.0111834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002607799,0.00000239228,0.0001375938,0.0001302424,0.000001675415,0.0000465282,0.00008893252,0.00004458539,0.0001501112,0.002704166,0.9966852,0.00000595621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001169354,0.04656156,0.001505139,0.4590195,0.1615759,0.00005866167,0.00108143,0.0006968389,0.3283316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02654883,0.02665575,0.00094768,0.1480441,0.09614513,0.0001538686,0.000700021,0.0009197242,0.699885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09476852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3170323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625903635","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.988","title":"The Dilemma of Democracy: Collusion and the State of Exception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State of exception; State (computer science); Sociology; Collusion; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Dilemma; Terrorism; Authoritarianism; Economics; Politics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Mark McGovern","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08867233428926619,"gpt":0.3828580923509654,"spread":0.2941857580616992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983714,0.0003206707,0.0005841065,0.0009748404,0.009079934,0.01106345,0.001234094,0.00335366,0.002209925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01393377,0.0002495597,0.0005236988,0.001175925,0.06167151,0.0106175,0.01134697,0.004985138,0.0003274079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005165008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005882368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004765599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004516561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853526,0.009988961,0.0002716272,0.00129091,0.001635476,0.001460523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894158,0.006989681,0.001256093,0.00113497,0.000577573,0.0006258916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007727142,0.000003919388,0.0002937671,0.00001600629,0.000002675116,0.00009684629,0.0143704,0.0002433935,0.00004261698,0.9818181,0.0007500124,0.002354587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001179193,0.00001684596,0.0003503754,0.0001143598,0.000004715972,0.0001126141,0.01091129,0.0005733022,0.0001262374,0.939814,0.04794937,0.00001518645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1996756,0.00696739,0.04918056,0.1396056,0.0007084943,0.00006723571,0.00003585959,0.00009581025,0.6036636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883389,0.0008991515,0.001877693,0.002170582,0.0001929267,0.00004940089,0.000007935751,0.00002841739,0.006435072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05202436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063154949","doi":"10.7202/1013697ar","title":"Précis de Que faire de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Jean François Kervégan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2096726475697303,"gpt":0.4057533566507805,"spread":0.1960807090810502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893945,0.00069216,0.0006875389,0.001052971,0.004564118,0.006357188,0.0008298833,0.006426465,0.01379085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01350479,0.0002812602,0.0002706915,0.0008864437,0.01054651,0.009390115,0.00255364,0.008963224,0.003527417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004739301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00416373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01732106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02048955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974927,0.001245898,0.0000618713,0.0003708825,0.0006130215,0.000215703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968101,0.001910186,0.0001818071,0.0002442514,0.0005956889,0.000257912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000293872,0.00000944845,0.00009099603,0.00004305696,0.000008946314,0.00006357219,0.00131085,0.0001085483,0.00008354726,0.6228645,0.3621563,0.01323095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123448,0.000006589922,0.0001559101,0.0001797985,0.00000519526,0.0001010621,0.00143355,0.0001167163,0.0001411218,0.2133996,0.7844187,0.00002946961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001863571,0.0460038,0.001237295,0.8626552,0.02676415,0.000006220843,0.00008615302,0.00005275648,0.06133097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1798139,0.03619055,0.001879483,0.3747122,0.03591232,0.00007533564,0.0001159582,0.0003612206,0.370939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01732106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04613495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119666334","doi":"10.24908/ss.v5i2.3433","title":"The Security Double Take: The Political, Simulation and the Border","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; International security; Political economy; State (computer science); Spectacle; Excellence; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Willem de Lint","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02674484203846684,"gpt":0.3347715648777415,"spread":0.3080267228392747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748401,0.000272936,0.0002632669,0.0006364077,0.003533554,0.01004328,0.0008351376,0.002265966,0.006414759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005876295,0.0002202077,0.0003687211,0.0005100639,0.02817323,0.01116115,0.006835726,0.003434987,0.00043833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002712274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002398217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001622176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975419,0.001680096,0.00003704817,0.0002094678,0.0002746901,0.0002567996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980196,0.001124036,0.0001685367,0.0003352829,0.0001232973,0.0002293006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009593111,0.000004449068,0.0001706735,0.000006233825,0.000001368495,0.00005394039,0.003097704,0.0005310779,0.00006304767,0.9942545,0.0005469724,0.001260324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002086731,0.00002930616,0.00024921,0.00007274826,0.000004408639,0.0001069066,0.009333573,0.003181721,0.0002654745,0.9409498,0.04577126,0.0000146687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1805397,0.002188389,0.08832941,0.05039647,0.0007727766,0.00004746592,0.00006516831,0.0001581813,0.6775025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924152,0.0002802442,0.002045269,0.0004733717,0.00004668029,0.00002133282,0.00001110309,0.00002491748,0.004681774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01004328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02145952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266292988","doi":"10.1177/0967010615620972","title":"Exception and governmentality in the critique of sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Popular sovereignty; Relation (database); Power (physics); Population; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Regan Burles","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01777809370840609,"gpt":0.3101915019225172,"spread":0.2924134082141111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005404072,0.0003274838,0.0006182772,0.001781613,0.004713441,0.007220564,0.001044794,0.003630152,0.001656636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009069493,0.0001975371,0.0004705917,0.001571575,0.05552437,0.007473609,0.005077078,0.005795291,0.0001581659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00618101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00326563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003775489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00272967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912582,0.006339267,0.000185768,0.0006308265,0.001149161,0.0004368022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939586,0.004610974,0.0003278585,0.0004734825,0.0004629613,0.0001661699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001980541,0.000001092199,0.00003787185,0.000007608294,0.000001095684,0.00001623864,0.002584026,0.0001298162,0.00002051951,0.9963965,0.000356869,0.0004464368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000512285,0.000004762637,0.0001227793,0.00008481923,0.000002989517,0.00002879685,0.001962427,0.0004233317,0.00006201319,0.9653546,0.0319435,0.00000501869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1496304,0.01866291,0.05762461,0.1782074,0.0009834224,0.00003033597,0.00006658844,0.0000908219,0.5947035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921209,0.00102708,0.000975791,0.001691724,0.0002903274,0.00002296664,0.00001147388,0.00002825649,0.003831509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007220564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04484659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098885524","doi":"10.1177/1368431013476567","title":"The paradox of political violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Michel foucault; Epistemology; Political violence; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mark Muhannad Ayyash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01703643857446479,"gpt":0.2890538705755292,"spread":0.2720174320010644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004170056,0.0002086981,0.0005449979,0.001252494,0.004709112,0.005805864,0.0007649912,0.002437493,0.004509198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01130245,0.0002067467,0.0003435752,0.001011309,0.02538086,0.008296728,0.006710783,0.004549603,0.000405997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003007284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002176429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001627462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008957791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948584,0.002966885,0.0001230742,0.000580006,0.0009332655,0.0005383792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951409,0.003137711,0.0004120053,0.0005748565,0.0004046299,0.0003298741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003777344,0.000002000153,0.00009281205,0.000009811674,0.000001680303,0.00002374986,0.0008416443,0.0001196694,0.00003059029,0.9970528,0.0006215785,0.001199881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004913423,0.000003952424,0.000126751,0.00002171838,0.000001547245,0.00006530272,0.0006632151,0.0003571303,0.00004504103,0.9858867,0.0128199,0.000003762018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.148695,0.007700782,0.0513514,0.1021274,0.0009156638,0.00003484307,0.0001124268,0.0001019385,0.6889606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906818,0.0008850415,0.001540949,0.001889269,0.0001446828,0.00002758918,0.00001778238,0.00001944026,0.004793427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005805864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02205366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075649675","doi":"10.1177/0263276408095217","title":"Agamben at Ground Zero","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Nihilism; Praxis; Philosophy; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Common ground; Epistemology; Ground zero; Literature; Sociology; Art; Law; Poetry; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Joel McKim","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995937803269125,"gpt":0.2970224381637872,"spread":0.2670630601310959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408377,0.0006834363,0.0003906536,0.001280589,0.007077155,0.006745032,0.0008693032,0.003269232,0.01444525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003696876,0.000257374,0.0002998927,0.0007760097,0.01488286,0.005976355,0.006808363,0.004988585,0.002718855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004494115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001999195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004472985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009731246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986433,0.0005944385,0.00002199371,0.0002169675,0.0002584869,0.00026483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.0002982251,0.00007718616,0.00009194467,0.0001102942,0.0001168634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002750765,0.000007840285,0.000128091,0.0000588715,0.000001876296,0.0001202947,0.01301148,0.00005905385,0.0001499342,0.9404366,0.03315723,0.01284118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005669738,0.00002254968,0.0002901068,0.000220924,0.000004745147,0.0001532276,0.004274463,0.0001139586,0.0002440765,0.1303335,0.8643247,0.00001204406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0377216,0.01889323,0.01307765,0.1092094,0.005246529,0.00004326692,0.00007540849,0.0003935579,0.8153394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.671595,0.005293573,0.006248781,0.01044502,0.001159409,0.0001108294,0.00006956375,0.000341296,0.3047365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01444525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04832417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240386547","doi":"10.13169/islastudj.6.1.0014","title":"Cyber Homo Sacer: A Critical Analysis of Cyber Islamophobia in the Wake of the Muslim Ban","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Islamophobia Studies Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; State of exception; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Cyberspace; Politics; Media studies; Law; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ideology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Zeinab Farokhi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04721300929903651,"gpt":0.3819142148287312,"spread":0.3347012055296947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005007287,0.0006606269,0.0004258527,0.002492334,0.01859026,0.01053723,0.00121205,0.004688309,0.004236179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007782175,0.0003857581,0.000273647,0.001407047,0.04301968,0.01148973,0.007767461,0.009178877,0.0003833135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005819899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002811027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005325308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009706455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962803,0.002555666,0.00005231704,0.000235313,0.000394092,0.0004823748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937657,0.0048513,0.0004225379,0.0002454214,0.0003485401,0.0003664095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001942878,0.00001602548,0.0005175657,0.00005719783,0.000002885179,0.000831473,0.8372285,0.00002605139,0.0002496693,0.155235,0.003029629,0.00278663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004384088,0.00001840558,0.001125151,0.0002972718,0.00000409726,0.0003691621,0.892321,0.0001156208,0.0003361207,0.01896985,0.08642373,0.00001513551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6093807,0.007163758,0.006201265,0.06292816,0.002007557,0.0001522356,0.0001007746,0.00007352314,0.3119919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875003,0.001130262,0.00043426,0.003750287,0.0002523618,0.00003779831,0.00001944996,0.00005260433,0.006822646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01859026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04222655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03829163993774543,"gpt":0.3127088943739497,"spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805061,0.0002834342,0.0002717455,0.001042502,0.003662177,0.006671819,0.000426188,0.002290323,0.009195023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003905404,0.0002011015,0.0002075407,0.001268956,0.01876952,0.004819996,0.002784327,0.004672623,0.001000424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004266844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003635417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003540997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005357637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985076,0.0008504238,0.00002858985,0.0001288582,0.000269073,0.0002154802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980703,0.001191825,0.0001710932,0.0001516509,0.0001591945,0.0002559544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005165552,0.000007772374,0.0001254693,0.00001476029,0.000001608779,0.0000205838,0.001075344,0.0001258152,0.00001356068,0.9687673,0.02438676,0.005456016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005776238,0.000004641275,0.0003980425,0.0001449146,0.000001294954,0.00003284239,0.001523983,0.000128351,0.00002415252,0.7842656,0.2134648,0.00000562284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008274965,0.08427382,0.00120932,0.2285655,0.00124415,0.000008544723,0.00006380393,0.00002870533,0.6763312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684833,0.02956055,0.0009545006,0.02243036,0.003151849,0.00004165021,0.00006261418,0.00005121578,0.075264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009195023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03095824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977439667","doi":"10.3138/md.53.4.557","title":"The Gray Zone of Victims and Perpetrators in Peter Weiss's <i>The Investigation</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Witness; Gray (unit); Dialectic; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Tammis Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0102341543067469,"gpt":0.2587954756499222,"spread":0.2485613213431753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532363,0.0006176299,0.0002810085,0.001236752,0.01347244,0.005213353,0.0007807919,0.001996631,0.003257685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005906411,0.0003888163,0.0001567036,0.001066287,0.03780913,0.004000458,0.006550045,0.003462433,0.0002036494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004642587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002263139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0266308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03534253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997911,0.001303727,0.00003804512,0.0001183332,0.0001659271,0.0004628392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984307,0.001001989,0.0002948079,0.00009457954,0.00006153697,0.0001163609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004864878,0.000008508292,0.00114888,0.00006128553,0.00000361836,0.001119227,0.7297814,0.00005849658,0.0005206077,0.2576304,0.00465832,0.004960596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001373539,0.00003472614,0.003738748,0.0003937948,0.00001688223,0.001320829,0.8147757,0.0001374031,0.001780619,0.0217123,0.1560422,0.00003298228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.7559593,0.003906683,0.00354485,0.03252971,0.0004040119,0.00007963971,0.00006294507,0.00006250779,0.2034503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992187,0.0004407684,0.0001962287,0.0006183906,0.00003785736,0.00002798138,0.000006193047,0.00002030107,0.006465328],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0266308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05295157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636427731","doi":"10.24908/ss.v13i2.5690","title":"Surveillance and the Rule of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03081573001976277,"gpt":0.3055874589371174,"spread":0.2747717289173546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005945095,0.0003073754,0.0006317391,0.001337516,0.003959053,0.01173679,0.0008435622,0.004218706,0.00896327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01241176,0.0002747854,0.0007157407,0.001382889,0.02840137,0.008997674,0.002630421,0.005219536,0.000725772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003052735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003985032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007133543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003925522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945632,0.003001276,0.0001982468,0.0009367884,0.0006673764,0.0006331906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892882,0.007024174,0.001042981,0.001356733,0.0009505225,0.0003373248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003958698,0.00000532206,0.0001794465,0.000004617038,0.000002537683,0.000009556987,0.0004045437,0.0001022344,0.000023231,0.9974988,0.0005411599,0.001224631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000779676,0.000009635171,0.0004735094,0.00002676322,0.000004048765,0.00002392553,0.0004673677,0.0004446743,0.00009880256,0.9876698,0.01076808,0.000005608955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07621136,0.005503828,0.04278649,0.05273135,0.0004808408,0.00006946929,0.0002057826,0.00006117258,0.8219497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817106,0.0007342199,0.001761384,0.001415768,0.0002670857,0.00004209527,0.00004532364,0.00001710329,0.01400655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01173679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086779842","doi":"10.3390/soc2040345","title":"Derrida Contra Agamben: Sovereignty, Biopower, History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Section (typography); State of exception; Sociology; Law; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05969841922317503,"gpt":0.3208444803983487,"spread":0.2611460611751736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918232,0.0003492984,0.0004356476,0.001145147,0.004155362,0.006115424,0.0009508623,0.004228904,0.003073465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298657,0.0001647346,0.0002045906,0.001694015,0.02338257,0.005879352,0.004444198,0.004006195,0.0004303866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004973772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001861223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007361239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007242926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980713,0.001227614,0.00003226386,0.0002112195,0.0002962375,0.0001614032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,0.000835391,0.0001125059,0.0001099052,0.00007798516,0.00005541855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007322486,0.000003789325,0.0001279972,0.00003029915,0.000002060975,0.00005452558,0.00694215,0.00006147588,0.00003630843,0.982502,0.005772788,0.004459263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001027126,0.0000138587,0.001322547,0.0004855101,0.000006268723,0.000233357,0.006655686,0.0002425878,0.0001504868,0.5937704,0.3970949,0.00001414614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06209306,0.1406509,0.007999024,0.2701061,0.001591888,0.00002218166,0.00004488257,0.00007816984,0.5174138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431981,0.01542648,0.001336318,0.01101531,0.001136783,0.00005174779,0.00002826447,0.00004584701,0.02776121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007361239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03608739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565695582","doi":"","title":"Noises and Exceptions: Pure Mediality in Serres and Agamben","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Cultural studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Crocker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01964282377590849,"gpt":0.3497941563259245,"spread":0.3301513325500161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654324,0.0003105495,0.0007707679,0.001844568,0.00630036,0.005800934,0.001043043,0.001963232,0.009941035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007078992,0.0003711098,0.0003075468,0.001708585,0.01505921,0.006247008,0.005422971,0.002214618,0.0007569037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001786115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006953216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02074307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967833,0.001255961,0.0001667633,0.0005776422,0.000441764,0.0007745868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997117,0.001328257,0.0004463148,0.0005550021,0.000300324,0.0002529935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290328,0.00001885549,0.003145733,0.00003955653,0.00000717371,0.0005015245,0.05138392,0.0001059974,0.0003767879,0.9343431,0.0008598656,0.009088512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007776188,0.0001711929,0.034258,0.0005723484,0.0000828345,0.001838729,0.1570896,0.001804985,0.001230653,0.6120709,0.1906488,0.0001541819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5308834,0.0007448905,0.003484278,0.001710483,0.00007187002,0.00002731976,0.00005922024,0.00005872712,0.4629598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883421,0.00006309145,0.0004556577,0.0001137085,0.00001697436,0.000009253105,0.00002300287,0.00002547424,0.01095074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009941035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03325611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139253736","doi":"10.4000/communication.4589","title":"Manuel CASTELLS (2009), Communication Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Power (physics); Physics","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Niemeyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02810464043092309,"gpt":0.3176721762837136,"spread":0.2895675358527905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001550437,0.0006490502,0.0002775161,0.001038751,0.004720264,0.006562505,0.0009615798,0.004883994,0.01000397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003935231,0.000240051,0.0002965904,0.001535188,0.005963714,0.005280117,0.001692397,0.005771722,0.002191809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006749087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005610941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04500966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06572976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987367,0.0005496496,0.00002652887,0.0002164737,0.0002791119,0.0001915361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985999,0.0008373259,0.0001430672,0.0000792839,0.0002465038,0.00009386255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002834087,0.00001353016,0.0005693306,0.0001106007,0.000007204216,0.00006232141,0.004239863,0.0001064091,0.00009745302,0.8656699,0.112597,0.01649792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001497809,0.00001026093,0.001484963,0.0004517424,0.000008852483,0.0001469438,0.002757607,0.0001425644,0.0004114872,0.2215908,0.7729508,0.00002902036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01100738,0.2069061,0.006996944,0.4369481,0.00544187,0.00003144653,0.0004219005,0.00007765364,0.3321687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5920362,0.099239,0.00402675,0.07820122,0.00476378,0.0001292561,0.0002530434,0.0001561288,0.2211947],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04500966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08949536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131977390","doi":"10.1007/s11125-020-09536-4","title":"Toward a “thoughtful lightness”: Education in viral times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prospects","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Lightness; Pandemic; Interpretation (philosophy); State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Neoliberalism (international relations); Order (exchange); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Epistemology; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Virology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Anne M. Phelan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01875002710077399,"gpt":0.3269799545278382,"spread":0.3082299274270642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007915005,0.0003994342,0.0003861047,0.001302577,0.01204734,0.01778948,0.001080701,0.008997091,0.01328986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01619624,0.0002143612,0.000323946,0.001083082,0.05124081,0.02002266,0.007374445,0.01686242,0.001022532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006180541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009616511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006889299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008625246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957172,0.002696437,0.00006630059,0.0003236749,0.0004572735,0.0007391123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911213,0.004909375,0.0005462157,0.0006124353,0.0007880289,0.002022615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878656,0.000006569173,0.00006239033,0.000006486018,7.799252e-7,0.000009005203,0.003321972,0.00003235416,0.00001526101,0.9906391,0.004483696,0.001418555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006957088,0.00000506689,0.00009554405,0.00005105133,0.000001257518,0.00001386568,0.005445452,0.0001267365,0.00005584506,0.9452889,0.04890264,0.000006719738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02885574,0.003759841,0.01181515,0.5441527,0.002857785,0.0000337912,0.00005513929,0.00006730085,0.4084025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275488,0.0009543186,0.001358167,0.03458213,0.001526823,0.00005593586,0.00002167819,0.00007448884,0.03387773],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01778948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04484314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588730977","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1287471","title":"<i>Pouvoir constituant</i>betrayed: a model of abjection in power relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proletariat; Power (physics); Biopower; Exceptionalism; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Limit (mathematics); Reflexivity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. A. Murphy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03903970062522288,"gpt":0.3601829460616507,"spread":0.3211432454364278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003547092,0.0003359187,0.0003783099,0.001434044,0.008522441,0.01119112,0.001104643,0.00201604,0.0042972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004275315,0.0002764403,0.0004624343,0.001208913,0.04629935,0.01117263,0.005857664,0.003284979,0.0006496004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003902845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001827259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002027913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966061,0.002260271,0.00006907377,0.0003632518,0.0004145509,0.0002867799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.0008463354,0.000200299,0.0003406239,0.0002160381,0.0001651163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004947764,0.00000399879,0.00009684726,0.000003626724,8.50687e-7,0.0000453355,0.01233888,0.00005756196,0.00005952656,0.9864165,0.0001688346,0.0008031038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118466,0.00002704058,0.0004201022,0.00006029994,0.000006371187,0.0001953474,0.01296516,0.002023696,0.0002379615,0.9498264,0.03420957,0.00001694646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.156425,0.0008942499,0.07317976,0.01144209,0.0002157053,0.00006485182,0.00004216942,0.0001299291,0.7576063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875731,0.0001544291,0.003004136,0.000250191,0.00004629861,0.00004240104,0.00001151809,0.00003177945,0.008886169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01119112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02831721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274001421","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2015.1090527","title":"On the (geo)politics of belonging: Agamben and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Settler Colonial Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Queer; Politics; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Colonialism; Kinship; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Rifkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05960855324850189,"gpt":0.3197436005712954,"spread":0.2601350473227935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003148438,0.00032499,0.000471348,0.0009299793,0.01551276,0.006842485,0.0008604677,0.003721954,0.003104085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003996668,0.0002336887,0.0001438124,0.001446765,0.02644412,0.004048975,0.008036582,0.005112672,0.0001559208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007132648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005751778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09081496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1740585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966804,0.001768165,0.00005481273,0.0002119378,0.0003845208,0.0009001238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.0007463093,0.0001315912,0.00006274934,0.0001012771,0.0001413512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002512037,0.00001240144,0.0004510366,0.0001018551,0.000003286793,0.0003899614,0.2340046,0.00009377128,0.0002383398,0.7460133,0.008340323,0.01032608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001416914,0.00004532109,0.007830652,0.002035625,0.00002124556,0.0002404057,0.1895692,0.0001665585,0.0002871393,0.08302937,0.7167035,0.00005676429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2243558,0.05360425,0.00134397,0.1217907,0.001265705,0.00003651248,0.00006839696,0.00002844045,0.5975062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682013,0.004264408,0.000284764,0.003861361,0.0001564828,0.00003034222,0.00001575359,0.00001760909,0.02316789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09081496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1805727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972834160","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834667","title":"SPINOZA AND THE BIOPOLITICAL ROOTS OF MODERNITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Modernity; Sovereignty; Vitalism; Philosophy; Immanence; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Transcendental number; Organicism; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Peter Gratton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01617659109486044,"gpt":0.2910240022325778,"spread":0.2748474111377174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002641658,0.0003418905,0.0004623373,0.001441663,0.006299145,0.007195133,0.0006134722,0.001978477,0.002600844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916107,0.0001971976,0.0003333557,0.00116181,0.06519582,0.007682026,0.004335989,0.00470808,0.0002815706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006224787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004662787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005315782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980525,0.001005809,0.00005899666,0.0003003152,0.000317246,0.0002652528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983549,0.0008293943,0.0002076599,0.0002703549,0.0001642659,0.0001734944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001908239,0.000001540446,0.00003997632,0.000005916561,7.87566e-7,0.000007120955,0.001494053,0.00003045525,0.00001847992,0.9973436,0.0001540651,0.0009020732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005160037,0.0000062103,0.0001645,0.00003620528,0.000002077557,0.00002310602,0.001218098,0.0001173829,0.00005494845,0.9759305,0.02243734,0.000004515625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1552946,0.01853531,0.03765693,0.08114425,0.0006125799,0.00003221935,0.00005205518,0.0001007893,0.7065713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889327,0.001493188,0.001804875,0.001079286,0.0001278796,0.00001913708,0.000009793383,0.00001785292,0.006515133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007195133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04516417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. A. Murphy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01223956724919104,"gpt":0.3298534615171496,"spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01295513,0.001324439,0.002392265,0.003490118,0.008635022,0.01664442,0.004269449,0.02231544,0.006058811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02672595,0.0008980866,0.001925806,0.004257673,0.02484915,0.02323507,0.01030642,0.03832651,0.001316483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006574936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00585284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920744,0.003798933,0.000552869,0.00125792,0.001423898,0.0008919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738429,0.01986936,0.001036131,0.0008659443,0.002911835,0.001473841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002751909,0.00006329217,0.0003852098,0.0002185539,0.00001146021,0.0002017203,0.003626293,0.0001286455,0.00006056945,0.1528005,0.8327937,0.009682582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002260679,0.00004040411,0.001178613,0.0006893631,0.00001740769,0.0004028565,0.007683877,0.0005743893,0.00007400234,0.08986098,0.8993903,0.00006523408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001099401,0.01648137,0.0007731219,0.8696151,0.1058567,0.00001780766,0.0000443518,0.00002383702,0.006088311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05004961,0.03751294,0.002268221,0.3963733,0.4927496,0.0002623148,0.0001639949,0.0002764974,0.02034355],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}