{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":229,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2ca9567f1ae6","filters":{"topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine"}},"results":[{"id":"W2002725840","doi":"10.1111/jeb.12648","title":"The evolution of respect for property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Simons Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Property (philosophy); Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas N. Sherratt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mike Mesterton‐Gibbons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1228399343557686,"gpt":0.4138418531958961,"spread":0.2910019188401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162182,0.0003761438,0.000476796,0.001435396,0.000468169,0.001598677,0.0007506551,0.001854831,0.0017356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002256982,0.0001804346,0.0003699918,0.001517477,0.003958318,0.002652616,0.001084694,0.001410713,0.000396041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001888299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00155333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002881163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002283289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.0001608169,0.00003008955,0.00009950649,0.0001196517,0.00003739116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.0005570799,0.0001407252,0.00006015278,0.0001095074,0.00004164977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003185623,0.00003737365,0.0009716834,0.003633076,0.00006071742,0.0002389249,0.001149167,0.001463789,0.00102795,0.4014972,0.006888717,0.5829996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103841,0.00007797876,0.005825059,0.004346617,0.00006134285,0.001562267,0.000696632,0.0007742747,0.0009974734,0.161838,0.8237614,0.00004857851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00495177,0.9685264,0.001925471,0.00275223,0.0002328376,0.000006933177,0.00002693281,0.0000116481,0.02156567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1064087,0.8877442,0.0009771216,0.0007194023,0.0002710069,0.00001422664,0.0000483325,0.000009473948,0.003807615],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002881163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01370066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04499553625122221,"gpt":0.3274981946011386,"spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593382,0.0006388266,0.001561684,0.003292718,0.004865879,0.01179673,0.002822323,0.008561665,0.01534693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06142423,0.0006696663,0.0007624922,0.002240902,0.06045348,0.04390896,0.00877394,0.01405853,0.002133391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005518455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003122675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005639264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002922148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868067,0.00872709,0.000677747,0.001371499,0.001851378,0.0005656781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566031,0.03315588,0.00166897,0.003969796,0.003395944,0.001206354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001287987,0.000007358055,0.0001457846,0.00004422144,0.000008769546,0.00006555624,0.001734076,0.0001942905,0.00002495406,0.9880977,0.00475687,0.004907515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004893408,0.000003426323,0.0000510081,0.00007267779,0.000004001425,0.00004053544,0.0005312013,0.0003000326,0.0000445619,0.9831245,0.0158163,0.000006933201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02670625,0.02607684,0.1660133,0.4362513,0.005787133,0.00009874352,0.0004068269,0.0003136741,0.338346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202047,0.007981989,0.02584996,0.02685884,0.002585935,0.0001593441,0.0002425718,0.0002545156,0.01586213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01593382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280544097","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1084571","title":"Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transition (genetics); Precondition; Political science; Institutional change; Sociology; Economics; Law; Economic system; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Trebilcock","is_ca":true},{"name":"Paul-Erik Veel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03057576833617076,"gpt":0.2694286266308344,"spread":0.2388528582946637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01142546,0.0005095153,0.001077449,0.001535306,0.005045907,0.00809854,0.002511448,0.005553205,0.01220814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02150057,0.0005902323,0.001455948,0.001419267,0.03766904,0.01806478,0.007151841,0.008294139,0.0006543669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005094876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00487975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004366785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002358267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933172,0.003131719,0.0003125285,0.001257586,0.0009623405,0.001018572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811465,0.01115776,0.001396907,0.004475422,0.001117433,0.0007060178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001619863,0.000002791983,0.00002052441,0.000002433591,9.157176e-7,0.000009772919,0.00004642459,0.00009873339,0.00001081733,0.9994385,0.00007594658,0.0002916699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008882326,0.000003241819,0.00003128977,0.00001080024,0.000001943188,0.00001516598,0.00004493176,0.0005496221,0.00002859904,0.9976128,0.001690157,0.000002620698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08797448,0.002239633,0.3400611,0.04568152,0.0003023536,0.0002362301,0.0002824215,0.0001826543,0.5230396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773049,0.0004105204,0.01324824,0.0008281344,0.0001905628,0.0002187369,0.00005501026,0.00004055452,0.007703382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01220814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06042439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137910174835094,"gpt":0.2270170217185577,"spread":0.2132260042350483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003488621,0.0002421363,0.0004906742,0.001164191,0.004270705,0.006198296,0.001081904,0.002502558,0.003981277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003847398,0.0002685297,0.0005159985,0.00121336,0.05515101,0.01267342,0.004556739,0.002514387,0.000603381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003879444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002841501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005949879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004664461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967448,0.001992572,0.0001080976,0.0004208045,0.0003674896,0.0003662067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977618,0.00108444,0.0003078708,0.0004435577,0.0001715714,0.0002307799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002478288,0.000002655427,0.0001238496,0.000006480417,0.000001407066,0.00001889678,0.001770752,0.00007587536,0.00002801189,0.9960703,0.0002746521,0.001624779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000685629,0.000007268393,0.0002840129,0.00002421086,0.00000187742,0.00003183052,0.001500632,0.0001828036,0.00004779996,0.9793682,0.01853958,0.000004887243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1526832,0.0109999,0.1519124,0.09882338,0.000491227,0.0001081562,0.0001648804,0.0001995768,0.5846173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836342,0.001183753,0.006436806,0.001398387,0.0001628398,0.00005579821,0.00002681725,0.0000252924,0.007076022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006198296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02814746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976046325","doi":"10.2753/jei0021-3624460302","title":"A Review and Assessment of the Heirs' Property Issue in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Issues","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Brady J. Deaton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1292080789868575,"gpt":0.4290147021253737,"spread":0.2998066231385161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196463,0.0006009784,0.00140289,0.006666793,0.000477722,0.001407937,0.0008075251,0.001286716,0.002847543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002829023,0.0004112588,0.0006642152,0.01052394,0.0007290315,0.00188291,0.0006429018,0.001118594,0.0005275302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001362671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004557822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007542132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01734417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995554,0.0001072371,0.0000800153,0.00005533202,0.0001761137,0.00002586437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979324,0.001244718,0.0002812142,0.00003054906,0.0004432267,0.00006778962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005925589,0.00006605286,0.0006049464,0.07881016,0.0002601912,0.0002703306,0.0003446307,0.0006940515,0.000650957,0.01009173,0.05377318,0.8543745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001098879,0.00008737312,0.00425876,0.04717829,0.0004076671,0.0005597572,0.0004088634,0.0001222551,0.0002656566,0.003416006,0.9432552,0.0000291904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001157062,0.9987032,0.00003529767,0.0002560149,0.00008109632,0.000002348796,0.0000105502,0.000001208342,0.0007944466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008001669,0.998812,0.00005537995,0.0001206365,0.00006142759,0.000002175163,0.00001220541,3.451455e-7,0.0001357066],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007542132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01499647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562561535","doi":"","title":"Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Property rights; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rachelle Alterman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Evanthia Balla","is_ca":false},{"name":"Melanie R. Bueckert","is_ca":false},{"name":"M. Gdetz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Georgia Giannakourou","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karin Hiltgartner","is_ca":false},{"name":"Fred Hobma","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas Kalbro","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katri Nuuja","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Purdue","is_ca":false},{"name":"B. Putters","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vincent Renard","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. Edward Roberts","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gerd Schmidt-Eichstaedt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bryan P. Schwartz","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Sheehan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kauko Viitanen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03211227064352791,"gpt":0.3196289523413421,"spread":0.2875166816978142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733054,0.0004981841,0.0004280364,0.002867311,0.005811578,0.009154887,0.001081829,0.003877205,0.01207646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004522685,0.0002285939,0.0005755374,0.004209247,0.01889523,0.009611926,0.002508609,0.004325785,0.0007716666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004807245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01526696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02029093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965533,0.001740042,0.0001021342,0.0003512765,0.0007578192,0.0004954189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975402,0.00167423,0.0001857909,0.0002341955,0.0002672663,0.00009830997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002456464,0.000004780828,0.00005625046,0.00001383951,9.143769e-7,0.00001144517,0.0008209588,0.00005006327,0.00001894865,0.9933576,0.003085225,0.002577492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001396628,0.00003153416,0.001345044,0.0006402113,0.00001377557,0.00009281116,0.00773796,0.0002752905,0.0003153192,0.5104043,0.4791123,0.00001755552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006867571,0.02329249,0.001772566,0.02801112,0.0003318936,0.00001132737,0.00005776382,0.00001297748,0.9396423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870585,0.03295343,0.002533688,0.01339233,0.001459955,0.0001742401,0.0002077544,0.0001003422,0.1621198],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01526696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06998962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585106935","doi":"","title":"First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults' and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ori Friedman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karen R. Neary","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006829426263310092,"gpt":0.2487262750853927,"spread":0.2418968488220826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003390519,0.0002664586,0.0003432511,0.0009360554,0.0005917856,0.003562358,0.0005246513,0.001348364,0.004357805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01393802,0.0006130677,0.0004974844,0.0004654757,0.006653528,0.008726262,0.001813063,0.002105444,0.0006512803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00109494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008588061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006542993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989966,0.0002434847,0.0000899128,0.0001960147,0.0003287334,0.0001453071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912788,0.005640266,0.001459108,0.0005448908,0.0006167131,0.0004601491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005080986,0.0003301232,0.2417751,0.0006103921,0.0000903859,0.004053306,0.4187691,0.00206043,0.01291244,0.2365232,0.003676017,0.07869143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000146281,0.0007528799,0.3712113,0.001151154,0.0002037969,0.01009274,0.140727,0.006249494,0.007101722,0.401031,0.06098513,0.0003475574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592776,0.002537281,0.005285007,0.001411491,0.00002898932,0.00002241226,0.0001443522,0.00005199137,0.03124079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965518,0.0007279803,0.001420189,0.0001788649,0.000007083095,0.000008621314,0.00006621014,0.000010055,0.001029171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005478043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01793098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145074","doi":"","title":"Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Real property; Real estate; Statute; Estate; Partition (number theory); Property (philosophy); Legislation; Business; Property law; Property rights; Law and economics; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas W. Mitchell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608475479028058,"gpt":0.2872730475029215,"spread":0.2611882927126409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006982405,0.000457373,0.0003263213,0.00184695,0.004885962,0.007437276,0.003247203,0.007691443,0.01500011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02017146,0.0003558128,0.0007180219,0.0008597313,0.008640203,0.00989073,0.006531293,0.00931773,0.002500807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00460849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02352686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951468,0.0009989181,0.0001912602,0.0006477967,0.001812585,0.001202719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923564,0.002785671,0.0006886478,0.001017647,0.002262967,0.000888794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001653653,0.0002165791,0.001776853,0.00008443719,0.00001645743,0.0005027899,0.002529567,0.001294821,0.0009298243,0.8535581,0.0845926,0.05448152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005627032,0.0001361779,0.001750072,0.0003885114,0.00003976803,0.0003242172,0.002695828,0.003542912,0.001090082,0.2617567,0.7281631,0.00005638409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05339714,0.006839355,0.059427,0.288184,0.006107165,0.0003447044,0.0001588915,0.001318337,0.5842234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6983714,0.005235095,0.0178856,0.1222221,0.003400448,0.0003205805,0.000222295,0.0003796629,0.151963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01628933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05018038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329572589","doi":"10.2307/4127184","title":"Restitution of Land to New Zealand Maori: The Role of Social Structure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Steven C. Bourassa","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ann Louise Strong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01547433949204356,"gpt":0.2431250301993923,"spread":0.2276506907073488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016503,0.0001839395,0.0002391801,0.001405301,0.007190434,0.005715408,0.00102877,0.001019718,0.004853217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004796626,0.0001874715,0.0001791617,0.001080064,0.03228376,0.002646054,0.005277277,0.001154823,0.0002434823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01041916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006957233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1227301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2601838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.0004042971,0.00003213603,0.000118941,0.0002556373,0.000416735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981937,0.000494222,0.0005455257,0.0001695006,0.0002008503,0.0003963089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007609972,0.00009216748,0.04523667,0.0001717893,0.00003301297,0.001602674,0.243063,0.0004076902,0.001790333,0.6182807,0.003099177,0.08614668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007789102,0.0003719562,0.3218427,0.0008848581,0.00007057735,0.001103975,0.2887492,0.001856754,0.0008347968,0.1974374,0.186678,0.000091899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893818,0.001850447,0.001359581,0.01029589,0.00004155282,0.00006013318,0.00003522266,0.00001851972,0.2969568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946845,0.0004500207,0.0002061661,0.0001147531,0.00001404556,0.00001331694,0.00000614381,0.000003325958,0.004507716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1227301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2440315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Betsy Byrd","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joachim Hruschka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01221489413963693,"gpt":0.2193244411147011,"spread":0.2071095469750642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002648961,0.0004635538,0.0003541996,0.001035905,0.003584551,0.005869817,0.001367306,0.005953431,0.004345789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002835853,0.0004266359,0.0005416199,0.0009628191,0.03849439,0.01000933,0.002946386,0.00673083,0.001106469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004771095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002412949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004528511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.001221415,0.0000690954,0.0003249606,0.0004533922,0.0002683221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989519,0.0006102563,0.00008280834,0.0001551397,0.0001335053,0.00006637587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002174527,0.000002386403,0.00001295288,0.000004769204,5.292893e-7,0.00001104711,0.0003377405,0.0000530141,0.00001288823,0.9970908,0.001837536,0.0006340983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003682954,0.000004367215,0.00007399916,0.00004151891,0.000001865037,0.00002879318,0.0001576227,0.0002633809,0.00004834534,0.966535,0.0328351,0.000006262318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01359717,0.01210484,0.04842927,0.06803865,0.001248523,0.00005417664,0.0001889573,0.00009806942,0.8562403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903561,0.004068137,0.01080395,0.01031287,0.001512906,0.0001712493,0.00008875159,0.00008943574,0.08259666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005953431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03461689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124755466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1195","title":"Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sustainability; Investment (military); Business ethics; Business; Capitalism; Environmental law; Finance; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07829200082144241,"gpt":0.3288970684775235,"spread":0.2506050676560811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01558215,0.0004202045,0.000453405,0.001022455,0.006076859,0.007545427,0.001229523,0.01169902,0.002345258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02017241,0.0003937895,0.000655157,0.0005909988,0.04487064,0.01008028,0.005696941,0.0122964,0.0006496394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004852349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007209078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003694159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003884969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853532,0.007782068,0.000549581,0.001031539,0.003932744,0.001350837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895921,0.006700427,0.0008364211,0.00108477,0.001336683,0.0004495739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011128,0.000003739778,0.00003751207,0.000004079859,5.420076e-7,0.00001565623,0.0005696048,0.00005200371,0.0000277378,0.9972425,0.001030327,0.001015282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008648933,0.00001364992,0.0001293716,0.00008531177,0.00000248535,0.00004946275,0.0005429584,0.0003145158,0.0001307955,0.9484472,0.05026361,0.00001197424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02745674,0.006468539,0.09243052,0.2411954,0.002070053,0.00009706991,0.00004862745,0.00007962374,0.6301534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768212,0.002494517,0.02162796,0.05462066,0.00213796,0.0002888135,0.00003406001,0.00008843253,0.04188644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01558215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0824073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526106016","doi":"","title":"Local Climate Change Law: Environmental Regulation in Cities and Other Localities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Climate governance; Local government; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Environmental governance; Greenhouse gas; Geography; Global warming; Public administration; Business; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02279885799940745,"gpt":0.1963625026865049,"spread":0.1735636446870975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008089612,0.0002388865,0.0002824832,0.0005684242,0.003665853,0.005337018,0.001176646,0.002079348,0.009012333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001155171,0.0002037616,0.0003246936,0.001718487,0.008228241,0.003448897,0.002994132,0.002648171,0.001496792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006274132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005293972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04144768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06208156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993563,0.0001999127,0.00001905799,0.00008530502,0.0002179666,0.000121374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996601,0.00009999821,0.00003591942,0.00005410409,0.00009235359,0.00005752862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000436318,0.00001730392,0.0003790184,0.00005603618,0.000002686219,0.00007780505,0.005357793,0.0005258459,0.0001102358,0.925136,0.05073128,0.01760163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007863479,0.00001641425,0.002360949,0.000287116,0.000008703182,0.0001224358,0.006273808,0.0006896429,0.0001897761,0.1114726,0.8785539,0.00001677974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01108485,0.01157188,0.004290317,0.02133785,0.0005247591,0.00005583114,0.00009648137,0.0001345488,0.9509036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3744887,0.006675649,0.001750697,0.006165922,0.0004897984,0.0001639845,0.0001654352,0.0001031472,0.6099967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04144768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0824129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004621154","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n6p169","title":"Infrastructure Provision and Private Lands Acquisition Grievances: Social Benefits and Private Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Government (linguistics); Business; Eminent domain; Population; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Welfare; Land use; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Funlola Famuyiwa","is_ca":false},{"name":"M. M. Omirin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01647330177117088,"gpt":0.246475232886589,"spread":0.2300019311154181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009138832,0.0001363446,0.0001567547,0.00104789,0.001847362,0.002456262,0.0002650286,0.000806033,0.01228723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003775749,0.0001174636,0.0001527469,0.001133891,0.002945222,0.002020752,0.00195755,0.0006556754,0.0003315522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003663199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004081854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01066338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04178886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982927,0.0006860195,0.00005891212,0.00005622265,0.0004165096,0.0004895569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972243,0.001047541,0.0006749966,0.0001533111,0.0004109351,0.000488899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001846155,0.0005150712,0.1744935,0.0002340139,0.0000599117,0.001625093,0.008361006,0.004685016,0.0008347871,0.6454235,0.006435642,0.157148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006819962,0.0007827299,0.5454067,0.0009531534,0.00009272592,0.003138904,0.08892916,0.01067442,0.001253226,0.1811091,0.1674965,0.00009519039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7949079,0.001819509,0.001540778,0.009558609,0.00004159174,0.00007509244,0.0001875349,0.000007980224,0.1918609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939714,0.0002897001,0.0001347374,0.0000569096,0.0000127881,0.000006693,0.00001638768,0.000001202848,0.005510152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01228723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04110485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","authors":[{"name":"Blake A. Watson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04068847619423283,"gpt":0.2877428786015839,"spread":0.247054402407351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004862948,0.00022437,0.0003478152,0.002592848,0.01936089,0.006711307,0.001353953,0.003650401,0.002326087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259068,0.0003040426,0.0004121715,0.002974446,0.01694185,0.002573153,0.003976936,0.007050871,0.0001337414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1212791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898511,0.001203577,0.0002309332,0.0006503452,0.005010323,0.003053623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933016,0.00242748,0.0004678264,0.0001870161,0.002665219,0.0009508632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003179,0.0000269202,0.003238557,0.00007157378,0.00002205118,0.0004310939,0.01081265,0.0002638634,0.0003659232,0.9553202,0.01396146,0.01545397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353317,0.00008646557,0.07450751,0.001038197,0.0001904404,0.0005292358,0.03171993,0.001330658,0.001393468,0.1599528,0.7288371,0.0002787722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1763367,0.01729604,0.0007421584,0.08954215,0.0004109745,0.00006792347,0.0001443835,0.00001919966,0.7154404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430858,0.009002858,0.0005577777,0.01508688,0.0001412596,0.00004635551,0.00004568552,0.0000154858,0.03201781],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06780376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.491953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917896605","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p98","title":"State Responsibility and the Question of Expropriation: A Preliminary to the “Land Expropriation without Compensation” Policy in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); International law; Government (linguistics); Law; Foreign direct investment; State responsibility; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Abdul Hamid Kwarteng","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas Prehi Botchway","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01974152824491924,"gpt":0.3016964199461813,"spread":0.2819548917012621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008112495,0.0003486413,0.0004694902,0.001321808,0.01461218,0.01206992,0.00138495,0.009905361,0.003906634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01349814,0.0004710963,0.0009345547,0.001689715,0.03162514,0.01178523,0.007313169,0.01363454,0.0002036202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01214924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01388311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04065685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03921127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947582,0.003048366,0.0002105485,0.0003876344,0.0005065965,0.001088589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903562,0.008118824,0.0005649843,0.0001878432,0.0004621398,0.0003100329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003926246,0.0000148722,0.0004435935,0.00003551849,0.00000160951,0.000471647,0.0216285,0.0001311232,0.00007598617,0.9751016,0.0009075398,0.001184126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000320401,0.000079433,0.004975515,0.001398465,0.00002660952,0.0008081378,0.1260373,0.001435702,0.0008383532,0.5505524,0.3137436,0.00007245105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2046449,0.01090474,0.0112299,0.3955925,0.0008669253,0.0002243169,0.00005247649,0.00001402499,0.3764703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684286,0.003500198,0.000986502,0.01185197,0.0002748365,0.0001005378,0.00000942486,0.00001058139,0.0148373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04065685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08814925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526265844","doi":"","title":"Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Legislation; Business; Natural resource economics; Reversing; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Agricultural economics; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Brubaker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02805671331928468,"gpt":0.2749402567215722,"spread":0.2468835434022876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912581,0.0003494091,0.0002773434,0.0008844821,0.005291363,0.005078888,0.001599237,0.003343374,0.007632495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002297453,0.0003436145,0.0004093124,0.001488263,0.01477054,0.002588617,0.002063069,0.004855366,0.0005023872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04006189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05058173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8379803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9275326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985612,0.0002306219,0.00004058508,0.0002003137,0.0006399527,0.0003273874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990268,0.0002916866,0.00008878013,0.0001948122,0.0002896906,0.0001083707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000690016,0.00002535487,0.0006167996,0.00004390882,0.000007339077,0.00005412014,0.003464529,0.00128895,0.000427308,0.9555076,0.02479326,0.01376386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162087,0.00001855017,0.006648924,0.0002608249,0.00002401644,0.00005060224,0.002340178,0.001270065,0.0006193662,0.2010805,0.7876259,0.00002952284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0191763,0.01475299,0.009126101,0.07558239,0.0008955605,0.0002007451,0.0002405633,0.0001352862,0.8798901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3125418,0.01199277,0.005972277,0.0160586,0.0006709085,0.0001445176,0.000152525,0.00007735425,0.6523892],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3259478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518739","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1179","title":"Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecosystem management; Legitimacy; Natural (archaeology); Total human ecosystem; Precautionary principle; Environmental ethics; Utilitarianism; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Natural resource; Relevance (law); Ecosystem valuation; State (computer science); Ecosystem services; Ecology; Ecosystem health; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Computer science; Biology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Pardy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009999540753997602,"gpt":0.2463267147411843,"spread":0.2363271739871867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01018211,0.0003096998,0.0004311218,0.001269657,0.005194703,0.008967317,0.001692257,0.006708866,0.002579561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01298978,0.0002458141,0.0004844054,0.0007979886,0.06588031,0.01230616,0.00449708,0.008568156,0.0004257072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00550895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00546052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002929928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002905331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907449,0.005123423,0.0002883431,0.0009636112,0.002264197,0.0006154699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900115,0.007310894,0.0006463854,0.0008783013,0.000700134,0.0004528655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002622244,0.000005336379,0.00008389768,0.00001607332,0.000002391714,0.00002372863,0.0005428793,0.0001258012,0.00002514359,0.9946153,0.002319238,0.002237689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006531633,0.000008206329,0.0001435942,0.00009705417,0.000002416697,0.00003812771,0.0004323471,0.0001848349,0.00004044396,0.9416347,0.05740582,0.000005940924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02112658,0.02999529,0.0343179,0.5687783,0.002032296,0.00004408392,0.00005308781,0.0000620654,0.3435903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8760698,0.01419376,0.009767864,0.0750389,0.003494362,0.000252424,0.00004104928,0.00007200485,0.02106989],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01018211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0538488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081003266","doi":"10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.198","title":"Legal Geographies—<i>Kelo</i>, Contradiction, and Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Geography","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Redevelopment; Public use; Private property; Supreme court; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007497949538879941,"gpt":0.236717272869077,"spread":0.229219323330197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001974995,0.0002473163,0.0002541731,0.001204658,0.008131575,0.008530656,0.001107833,0.003910722,0.003342589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003222593,0.0002225129,0.0002714886,0.001359546,0.05724462,0.005716771,0.003861582,0.004004361,0.000329603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01019143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004995375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03306399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05111401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976866,0.001072151,0.00006707814,0.0003012109,0.0004391579,0.0004337945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983766,0.0009324174,0.0002726455,0.0001573868,0.0001579761,0.0001029931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001252244,0.000001046794,0.00007872397,0.000003870405,4.091471e-7,0.00002839008,0.002234456,0.00002311425,0.00001287091,0.9940243,0.003013521,0.0005779398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001747491,0.000008791562,0.001376495,0.0002298074,0.000005873497,0.0001841879,0.02021573,0.0002688147,0.0001945269,0.6734407,0.3040341,0.00002350851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07618251,0.008744778,0.005543125,0.3008228,0.0009924388,0.00002109718,0.0001306172,0.00005160147,0.607511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518408,0.001582258,0.0008233437,0.02610956,0.0003767799,0.00002898905,0.00003853,0.00002501027,0.0191747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03306399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07394445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06766350222503802,"gpt":0.2858179182738254,"spread":0.2181544160487873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744293,0.0002976396,0.0004131908,0.001200019,0.003890951,0.006839307,0.001368493,0.003472802,0.004211454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002887419,0.0002311806,0.0007256606,0.001114213,0.04569628,0.01045603,0.005317774,0.003561081,0.0006028443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002748822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002217816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001608963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963892,0.001934424,0.00009912245,0.0003634414,0.0007187821,0.0004951224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980952,0.0008302461,0.0002652525,0.0003903373,0.0002532491,0.000165772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001313067,0.000002707323,0.00002294978,0.000003935842,9.066459e-7,0.000005830771,0.0002675575,0.00006886561,0.00001158052,0.9988099,0.0002289067,0.0005755114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002748169,0.000004543764,0.00006493201,0.00001975154,0.000002262616,0.00001362996,0.000329442,0.0002998345,0.00005643113,0.9903123,0.00889086,0.000003294511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08665663,0.009471376,0.125457,0.09951933,0.0006589754,0.00004420388,0.00009909309,0.0001107923,0.6779826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.001494319,0.005422328,0.00246698,0.000373206,0.00004923081,0.00001830116,0.00002500716,0.01324068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006839307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02777827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54839640","doi":"10.29173/alr96","title":"Insurance Law Principles in an International Context: Compensating Losses Caused by Climate Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Context (archaeology); Subsidy; Liability; Loss and damage; Liability insurance; Business; State (computer science); Insurance law; Climate Finance; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Public economics; Political science; Law; General insurance; Finance; Economic growth; Developing country; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Craig Brown","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sara L. Seck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08042271661837308,"gpt":0.336927511584071,"spread":0.2565047949656979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492759,0.0003955433,0.0003618945,0.001588775,0.005045067,0.007953401,0.001401375,0.006562741,0.003358674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005759171,0.0002562242,0.0008507866,0.001403728,0.0139986,0.003944869,0.00328285,0.008159736,0.0003692639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007339855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01242462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1148668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968199,0.0008151334,0.0001301971,0.0003084285,0.001126601,0.0007996959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980491,0.0007854951,0.0002231327,0.0002440666,0.0005394532,0.0001588217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002123568,0.000007598309,0.0003016902,0.00001248492,0.00000412968,0.00006295271,0.0005537462,0.0003324848,0.00007882692,0.9922857,0.003470127,0.002888163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002065813,0.00005390617,0.004452528,0.0005618898,0.00006062874,0.0003334045,0.002808293,0.001441684,0.0006322771,0.5737303,0.4158435,0.0000608708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02427034,0.01097283,0.0132797,0.09550519,0.001103028,0.00004414319,0.000105399,0.00006999346,0.8546494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8866495,0.01101735,0.007428509,0.0354507,0.001833343,0.0001110095,0.0001364635,0.00007579417,0.05729738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2031923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1178932211","doi":"","title":"Dissolving Condominium, Private Takings, and the Nature of Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Private property; Political science; Business; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Douglas C. Harris","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicole Gilewicz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324628406985408,"gpt":0.278367712791918,"spread":0.2551214287220639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003825281,0.0002062055,0.0003516556,0.001140803,0.008060909,0.01002782,0.001641729,0.002231683,0.003323608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007060575,0.0004940138,0.0003601021,0.001540467,0.03993108,0.00658293,0.00382873,0.003718632,0.0002781322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01401911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009848684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2057359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3354659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933252,0.001823744,0.0003198805,0.00115364,0.00199365,0.001383936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949265,0.002015682,0.000900932,0.00113908,0.000580257,0.0004376995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001140663,0.000008301278,0.002200761,0.00002879251,0.000003238558,0.0001369219,0.009789276,0.0001266974,0.0002709439,0.9731265,0.001323638,0.01297359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000457955,0.0001666209,0.03462025,0.0008299215,0.00006094446,0.0009662643,0.02913412,0.002216205,0.004059827,0.3664249,0.5613536,0.0001215708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3422876,0.009547562,0.02495623,0.01274497,0.000234819,0.0001248352,0.000140521,0.00008611013,0.6098773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681578,0.001135555,0.001950391,0.0007929853,0.0000711831,0.00004396657,0.00003467448,0.0000270605,0.02778633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2057359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4090768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Terry Skolnik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1024829235516147,"gpt":0.3805958446446976,"spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005066388,0.0008494002,0.0008336647,0.003915019,0.005753685,0.01185419,0.002431478,0.004362071,0.005689302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005108756,0.0004966346,0.001382353,0.00274736,0.0854581,0.01527608,0.01402337,0.006707195,0.0004554196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009420071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003851029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008180842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00441302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953094,0.001661869,0.0001941612,0.0006326018,0.001366062,0.0008359802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972787,0.001325061,0.0003325511,0.0004079385,0.0002702562,0.0003854737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002544572,0.000005907095,0.0001114706,0.00000856695,0.000001016035,0.00001102851,0.001336419,0.00005793187,0.00001243615,0.9969415,0.0002204335,0.001290756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009640912,0.000009265104,0.0005671423,0.0000925815,0.00000438264,0.00005410262,0.001968746,0.0002622073,0.00006378082,0.980302,0.0166521,0.00001405865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09200669,0.0194376,0.06750736,0.05669354,0.0006725147,0.0001766024,0.0003816348,0.0001572616,0.7629668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969715,0.005020761,0.007575424,0.002015329,0.0003878138,0.0002966323,0.000137658,0.00005065216,0.0148006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01185419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06834769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533708772","doi":"","title":"Water as a Public Commodity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Doctrine; Obligation; Theme (computing); Public trust doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public interest; State (computer science); Business; Principal (computer security); Political science; Law; Geography; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Thompson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Huw Barton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1208943914484766,"gpt":0.3146067123454818,"spread":0.1937123208970052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004863989,0.0002627554,0.0004246192,0.001223576,0.004212547,0.009072126,0.001020127,0.00811037,0.007460668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007049125,0.0003097972,0.0005401277,0.001170592,0.01945503,0.01038178,0.004468779,0.00519387,0.001089174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00561692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009067043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007718242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006294293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949863,0.001747624,0.0001704221,0.0008154343,0.001689465,0.0005906963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996896,0.001795254,0.0002832386,0.0003306185,0.0005335269,0.0001614418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001074327,0.000004027917,0.00002884607,0.00001505688,8.199404e-7,0.00001335453,0.0002343922,0.00004100201,0.00003148936,0.9952062,0.002862766,0.001560906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001054943,0.00002841419,0.000212772,0.0001782501,0.000006533663,0.00005761477,0.0007377476,0.0002428958,0.0002325337,0.6915607,0.3067224,0.000009602883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01690578,0.02210555,0.01612853,0.2466412,0.001466622,0.00006960746,0.000145555,0.00006670472,0.6964704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7646137,0.01954967,0.00495635,0.07133179,0.005201716,0.0002785586,0.0001277849,0.00009224628,0.1338482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009072126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04075378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313816677","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.70","title":"Law as Infrastructure of Colonial Space: Sketches from Turtle Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Colonialism; Law; Context (archaeology); Metaphor; Sociology; Constitution; Common law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Cowen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01635021277521129,"gpt":0.2907901268462941,"spread":0.2744399140710828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004921228,0.0005180108,0.0002402323,0.001419206,0.005785376,0.005367039,0.0009668496,0.001533388,0.005573052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00127397,0.0003636859,0.0003379031,0.001451058,0.02574756,0.004377594,0.003208922,0.002871842,0.000456969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006796958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002185879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06466298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1004454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996099,0.0002311565,0.00001015459,0.00003330655,0.00004884931,0.00006663366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.0004363997,0.00004295926,0.00004421958,0.00003190951,0.00006261561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689621,0.00002143865,0.001004031,0.0001425298,0.000005870342,0.001919233,0.1981133,0.0008216503,0.0003798906,0.7831709,0.003756022,0.01064817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002074063,0.00009008229,0.01200702,0.0008395035,0.00003122605,0.002435196,0.1921811,0.002483342,0.0003522827,0.1999927,0.5895163,0.00005043342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1908038,0.01362563,0.01218493,0.01413765,0.0002769126,0.0001824296,0.0001355999,0.0001805675,0.7684725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96335,0.004774534,0.003356822,0.0005926386,0.00007890102,0.0001135082,0.00004744947,0.00007654032,0.02760956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1285732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124178933","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Resource Development, And The Source Of The Provincial Duty To Consult In Haida Nation And Taku River","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Resource (disambiguation); Supreme court; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Kent McNeil","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01224063939410301,"gpt":0.2589663901231996,"spread":0.2467257507290966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962663,0.0001705186,0.0002713729,0.0007970326,0.02534822,0.01133389,0.001764919,0.003618175,0.004735409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003992413,0.0004622162,0.0002549264,0.001326665,0.01891845,0.002654688,0.004831264,0.005090324,0.0002707003],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04034832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06914799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9015796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996705,0.0004733788,0.00006956369,0.000234477,0.0006927766,0.001824863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973786,0.0009097542,0.0002231608,0.0001444472,0.0005828327,0.0007612657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003063121,0.00003642525,0.005854763,0.00004604574,0.000007592234,0.001836005,0.0802711,0.0002056428,0.000376628,0.897038,0.005688757,0.008608472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007811327,0.00008904232,0.07286536,0.0007777742,0.0001089681,0.002006033,0.3017933,0.001834731,0.001357948,0.1949325,0.4239496,0.0002066842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561738,0.001752835,0.0008328574,0.02225911,0.0001097358,0.00006929813,0.00007417438,0.00001545969,0.6187127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440541,0.0005060788,0.0003763437,0.00180171,0.00002097544,0.00003900088,0.00002261289,0.00001093296,0.05316831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2927489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Donna R. Christie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0354172027079544,"gpt":0.2889424336074119,"spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087039,0.0003882955,0.0004457981,0.004145828,0.01978766,0.00924333,0.001978992,0.002637739,0.002452671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004160543,0.0003254479,0.0007761817,0.005510008,0.02503889,0.003584323,0.00314707,0.006731197,0.00009233568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1050188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951817,0.0006124611,0.0001042003,0.0003540075,0.00240184,0.00134567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969008,0.0007526964,0.0001875553,0.0001007873,0.001542676,0.0005155985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000885046,0.00002393166,0.003891136,0.00004200097,0.00001088489,0.00022184,0.01817666,0.0007691896,0.000166793,0.9595141,0.005328506,0.01184622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003123892,0.00007571894,0.08403578,0.001366656,0.0001820447,0.0003169438,0.1336365,0.006771508,0.001578425,0.3800338,0.3916349,0.0003365368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2148761,0.01306276,0.006562021,0.06417595,0.0002475498,0.0002214828,0.0002298142,0.00004457753,0.7005798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457539,0.008687775,0.003965463,0.009407693,0.00005970127,0.00008971174,0.00008910286,0.00004107984,0.03190557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1050188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7619681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401967587","doi":"10.1111/josp.12587","title":"Property as power: A theory of representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Oxford; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Representation (politics); Power (physics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","authors":[{"name":"Rutger Claassen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0503206177272159,"gpt":0.3463816251676915,"spread":0.2960610074404756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003677068,0.0007513583,0.0007055337,0.002172898,0.004492394,0.01153894,0.002684354,0.004774903,0.01120798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005241705,0.0004097684,0.001523344,0.002426598,0.03329276,0.01968684,0.005480483,0.005039997,0.001829945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005493178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003467567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001738467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950994,0.00268784,0.0001590102,0.0007118014,0.0008503571,0.0004917694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965118,0.001885716,0.0003281563,0.000625134,0.0004191087,0.0002302048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001341346,0.000001710142,0.00001922158,0.00000419476,7.091203e-7,0.000007430699,0.0002725789,0.00007329349,0.000007106473,0.9986793,0.0003100993,0.0006229566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005158649,0.00000415673,0.00003119323,0.00002002751,0.000002305736,0.00002668704,0.0001748488,0.0007653519,0.00002252421,0.9848979,0.01404682,0.000003083851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01661281,0.006219642,0.2255175,0.02964181,0.0006895607,0.0001193645,0.0002555354,0.0001530261,0.7207907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067879,0.004045849,0.03282515,0.003845532,0.001518044,0.0003559578,0.0002416526,0.000177489,0.05020248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01153894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03985602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405217431","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6726","title":"Compensatory justice and accountability for First Nations peoples: the Timber Creek case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Redress; Sociology; Originality; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Ellie Norris","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shawgat Kutubi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Glen Finau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03035385658338486,"gpt":0.3281378735954766,"spread":0.2977840170120917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160628,0.0002207791,0.0003488988,0.0008743973,0.02547223,0.007551856,0.001334507,0.005248961,0.003474851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02160447,0.0002307561,0.0002683472,0.001048379,0.02194643,0.003578017,0.00687643,0.005730975,0.0001735607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009952522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01055833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0630075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1280878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872207,0.00684631,0.0003264768,0.0008504515,0.002027089,0.002728903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861264,0.008952314,0.001384175,0.0008826853,0.001177051,0.001477357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004500628,0.00008275254,0.01665148,0.00007602059,0.00001405942,0.01340784,0.3956263,0.0003677108,0.0006921454,0.5568081,0.00398246,0.01224619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004905314,0.0001676433,0.03400361,0.001029192,0.00005932409,0.006294252,0.6378121,0.00227752,0.002039972,0.1396313,0.1764676,0.0001684155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8503735,0.0008254243,0.0021165,0.02279152,0.0001549801,0.00007404006,0.00001584883,0.00001351965,0.1236346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931179,0.0001357564,0.0003154557,0.001180035,0.00004005768,0.00003088906,0.000002820807,0.000003807107,0.00517336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0630075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1252815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131571412","doi":"","title":"The Regulative Function of Property Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Property rights; Function (biology); Law and economics; Position (finance); Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Business; Control (management); Focus (optics); Economics; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Computer science; Right to property; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03633403168206132,"gpt":0.2402654757139376,"spread":0.2039314440318762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01598177,0.0005284701,0.0005200724,0.001511349,0.003488166,0.007130234,0.002131272,0.003223022,0.006357371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01784213,0.0005309863,0.0009854678,0.001006743,0.0370474,0.009361058,0.004531004,0.003689248,0.001009344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004717364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006022648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004389491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002548354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879823,0.005338111,0.0004835509,0.002049886,0.002891716,0.001254282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838052,0.007907713,0.001772049,0.00430584,0.001723592,0.000485535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002433772,0.000004359621,0.00009171869,0.000007497732,0.000002640386,0.00001239104,0.0003197053,0.0002364517,0.00009876805,0.9976254,0.0001567557,0.001441832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001720434,0.00002069849,0.0002760515,0.00006816612,0.00001137639,0.00004158162,0.0002141142,0.001233975,0.0006137681,0.977661,0.01982794,0.00001401922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04896265,0.001797606,0.3368533,0.02369489,0.0003407581,0.0001654141,0.0001321098,0.0002120613,0.5878412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617667,0.0007104317,0.01570863,0.001335998,0.0003313135,0.0002489936,0.00004614518,0.00006047291,0.01979134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01598177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08452064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485537388","doi":"","title":"Navigating the U.S. Transition to Sustainability: Matching National Governance Challenges With Appropriate Legal Tools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prosperity; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Government (linguistics); Business; Reflexivity; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Environmental planning; Economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"John C. Dernbach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0403146735381893,"gpt":0.3014132238926715,"spread":0.2610985503544822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04253542,0.0007587484,0.0007239719,0.003096306,0.02008623,0.03371768,0.004000491,0.01915062,0.005536272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05697523,0.000818288,0.0007921786,0.002814697,0.02813255,0.02594062,0.01821427,0.02422846,0.0008087392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01986892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08736778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05684346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09777899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840779,0.008139484,0.0007993231,0.001290109,0.002633342,0.003059812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760341,0.01282711,0.001815745,0.001393302,0.003524189,0.004405541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001311599,0.00009437742,0.001223233,0.00009270509,0.000009538856,0.0001736858,0.004352187,0.001280216,0.0001310287,0.9026409,0.05687517,0.0331138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003134596,0.00005854767,0.001760212,0.001447363,0.00001503646,0.00007277556,0.02091476,0.002119751,0.000200304,0.7965561,0.1767511,0.00007275766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009168415,0.005174901,0.01121038,0.9130026,0.001231429,0.0001266667,0.00008492111,0.0001291511,0.05987165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6806618,0.01561836,0.06538396,0.2201827,0.002858381,0.001417734,0.0003348906,0.0002292342,0.01331291],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05684346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Hamill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04304371401209892,"gpt":0.3476722668467948,"spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01242064,0.0003598762,0.0008228751,0.001602634,0.007143993,0.009575802,0.001964114,0.007395512,0.005976988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01524609,0.0002964994,0.0006659177,0.001478627,0.08561238,0.0202377,0.008980509,0.007836898,0.0006355782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00694442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006914223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00878813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920378,0.004308399,0.0001820593,0.001097436,0.001502885,0.0008715336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989007,0.007171218,0.000882978,0.001479438,0.0007352945,0.0007241248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001714833,0.000002396466,0.00002627959,0.000005784069,9.401207e-7,0.000006248454,0.0003913835,0.00003322987,0.000007133169,0.9979944,0.0004138396,0.001116647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004973266,0.00000492064,0.00004834128,0.00002552701,0.00000130477,0.00001364828,0.0003786451,0.0001071998,0.00002844622,0.9903875,0.008996397,0.000003046895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0541519,0.01545755,0.06464087,0.3120284,0.0009033388,0.00006917956,0.00008507228,0.00009823195,0.5525654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715618,0.00294023,0.004815775,0.008855991,0.0005901351,0.00009208901,0.00002161773,0.00005352522,0.01106877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01242064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850908651","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.501462","title":"Loggers vs. Campers: Compensation for the Taking of Property Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ron Giammarino","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ed Nosal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02604270437387943,"gpt":0.2912896690020298,"spread":0.2652469646281504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01194498,0.0004564268,0.0008298371,0.001710913,0.005162723,0.00744427,0.002833187,0.01452637,0.04464846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04463616,0.0004921157,0.000694634,0.001497325,0.006048992,0.006312348,0.003926998,0.007316476,0.003149133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004658169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02373901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880632,0.003116838,0.0005596007,0.001379563,0.003346128,0.003534732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774827,0.01214018,0.004055095,0.003201272,0.001684205,0.001436493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000555486,0.0003080461,0.0160458,0.00008575917,0.00006033416,0.0009712187,0.005282411,0.0006330931,0.0008527705,0.8793167,0.05237961,0.04350873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115217,0.000837356,0.06733259,0.0006705092,0.0004409346,0.00259988,0.02483552,0.01136566,0.0052121,0.6754876,0.2097408,0.0003618223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3728142,0.001191551,0.007789747,0.08326192,0.0008110127,0.0002713526,0.0003961931,0.0002350196,0.533229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481152,0.0001405483,0.0004787795,0.003183359,0.0002315001,0.00005565978,0.00004039103,0.00003146853,0.04772322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04464846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.149364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500955749","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Sprawl of Big Box Retail: The Smart Growth Approach to 'Zone it and They Will Come' Development","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Smart growth; Zoning; Metropolitan area; Scope (computer science); Big data; Land use; Politics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Curran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03482896630786438,"gpt":0.2381315928267977,"spread":0.2033026265189333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002383468,0.0001818932,0.0001859933,0.000512699,0.004994122,0.006165908,0.0008595679,0.002572616,0.00305303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002486895,0.0001571483,0.0002467035,0.0006255079,0.03220281,0.005917458,0.006755668,0.002663609,0.0001987123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004441496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004037441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007252759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01989591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983838,0.0007689287,0.00003702971,0.0002016148,0.0002753409,0.0003333917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987749,0.0004778148,0.0001349919,0.0002358575,0.0001624468,0.0002139048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004881541,0.000007682409,0.000474836,0.00001056541,0.000001815009,0.00007857729,0.004277065,0.0003957855,0.0001385102,0.9897358,0.0009539009,0.003920559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001758249,0.00003303654,0.001872618,0.00008585215,0.000006984794,0.0001287453,0.02331158,0.002364393,0.0005447426,0.8651173,0.1065,0.00001721608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3388891,0.002178209,0.03613168,0.08364397,0.0001387963,0.0000874684,0.00003868567,0.0001017107,0.5387905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899194,0.0002085081,0.002055883,0.00125723,0.00001786383,0.00002238659,0.000005479806,0.000008285465,0.006504877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007252759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03222549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19482909","doi":"10.1177/0748233709105270","title":"The Concept of the Anticommons: Useful, or Ubiquitous and Unnecessary?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gridlock; Law and economics; Private property; Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Public property; Political science; Business; Property rights; Economics; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Lametti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01367255370143845,"gpt":0.2627536908293838,"spread":0.2490811371279454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008818487,0.0007542536,0.001144862,0.001686511,0.002786472,0.005349636,0.002276813,0.006581246,0.003241197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406387,0.0003162683,0.0005543219,0.001124102,0.05074313,0.01270579,0.004598473,0.00877847,0.001238398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002342619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004378955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002343237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003101775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925358,0.004312153,0.0003882041,0.0008759827,0.001443149,0.0004447082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875655,0.006484819,0.001482413,0.001260592,0.00183985,0.001366923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004578276,0.0002058902,0.01344687,0.002230377,0.000185305,0.002578572,0.01432778,0.0002399171,0.002176373,0.5780492,0.1126082,0.2734938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004903297,0.0005304443,0.00475071,0.001956179,0.00009673325,0.006760064,0.0111134,0.0002989575,0.000925885,0.2872698,0.68613,0.0001187887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02558907,0.2155437,0.01796799,0.645296,0.03112566,0.00005977786,0.0001323528,0.0002268919,0.0640585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.540414,0.1086438,0.01409443,0.2804238,0.03262841,0.000190223,0.0001102071,0.0002120499,0.02328311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008818487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04663718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801579507","doi":"","title":"Owning and Dissolving Strata Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Dissolution; Law; Confusion; Business; Dissenting opinion; Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Douglas C. Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03740769300889654,"gpt":0.3014414636170049,"spread":0.2640337706081083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002829121,0.0002664997,0.0003410599,0.001042108,0.009090031,0.005997643,0.001667309,0.001539095,0.006950579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005895628,0.0004303419,0.0004423622,0.001023727,0.008490448,0.002505798,0.004228011,0.002681764,0.0007096789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006617205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008315476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2222057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5113927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947737,0.0007059812,0.0001998966,0.0005817162,0.00205963,0.0016791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996901,0.0009199291,0.0003300953,0.0007114395,0.0006037822,0.0005336066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119507,0.0001175036,0.06995373,0.000102482,0.00003862659,0.002945669,0.04111502,0.0009622341,0.004080332,0.7893891,0.01002619,0.08115704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009677342,0.0004915142,0.1207725,0.0004963395,0.0002673211,0.00316373,0.0855019,0.005755956,0.01875991,0.09443012,0.6700687,0.0001952207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5986452,0.0003542753,0.00585244,0.001638586,0.00008674523,0.0002131141,0.0001109879,0.00005237459,0.3930463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301574,0.0001817396,0.001389638,0.00053572,0.00002355446,0.00004415611,0.00008524588,0.00001917362,0.06756337],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4418246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23452499","doi":"10.1023/a:1012660302764","title":"Property rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Sciences","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Fisheries management; Fishery; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Fishing","authors":[{"name":"Toddi A. Steelman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Richard L. Wallace","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05247575094114326,"gpt":0.3042419196840851,"spread":0.2517661687429419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01015674,0.0003971014,0.00119108,0.001956237,0.004435485,0.01050858,0.00161367,0.008219099,0.008897658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03929029,0.0005685255,0.0005901806,0.002408316,0.03763454,0.02633949,0.006245711,0.007067465,0.0004311397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00408492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004562719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007096778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01119438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938263,0.003788076,0.0001960308,0.0007037185,0.0008731873,0.000612572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533696,0.03707721,0.003802356,0.001840415,0.002477884,0.001432435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003095077,0.00004000796,0.002441257,0.0001026649,0.00002248397,0.0001304629,0.00254881,0.0006253764,0.00008190489,0.9826367,0.00161359,0.009725602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102565,0.000004472118,0.001039804,0.00006458334,0.000009822062,0.00002555998,0.001414875,0.0003414667,0.00003835826,0.9943603,0.002682355,0.000008097488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2970654,0.03568134,0.067203,0.3957938,0.001191761,0.00008970472,0.0003131047,0.0000773846,0.2025845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908741,0.002148444,0.002151176,0.003085966,0.0003543549,0.00002887245,0.0000169702,0.00001933964,0.001320851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01050858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262223792","doi":"","title":"The Trail Smelter, is What's Past Prologue? Epa Blazes a New Trail for Cercla","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smelting; Prologue; Environmental protection; Recreation; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Robinson-Dorn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022328123499463,"gpt":0.2908853324852567,"spread":0.2685572089857937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769222,0.0003243251,0.0002658255,0.0005893318,0.0121299,0.01354228,0.0008253063,0.004714535,0.03422216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006068173,0.0003631174,0.0003668327,0.0007798976,0.005493983,0.008837393,0.002596603,0.01002493,0.009356757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004381548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0170715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07537094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2001419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981486,0.0002672238,0.00007033294,0.0002688408,0.0007687834,0.000476264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.000260636,0.00008109903,0.0001503926,0.001000784,0.0008729642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268705,0.00003253658,0.0007884486,0.00004821108,0.000003354641,0.000158855,0.0008699932,0.00003289846,0.0001544935,0.03422392,0.9326268,0.03103778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001780188,0.00000978379,0.0002058418,0.0000657647,0.000001803702,0.00005951395,0.002143975,0.00001455022,0.00007771356,0.001953727,0.9954582,0.000007250545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004936478,0.00954411,0.00138832,0.6518532,0.02035584,0.00003019318,0.0003145685,0.000345263,0.311232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05581032,0.007791116,0.001763844,0.1863452,0.002292717,0.00002565289,0.0002464027,0.0003292604,0.7453955],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07537094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1498644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02453393702755719,"gpt":0.2797557446958232,"spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005529637,0.0002131807,0.000551642,0.0007714994,0.004279169,0.00731436,0.001149154,0.005595855,0.003903221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01235689,0.0002163171,0.0005251935,0.0007865918,0.04713023,0.01146691,0.005893185,0.008050323,0.0003075718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004922354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002743464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003223649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002104139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961848,0.002212228,0.00008983005,0.0003600107,0.0006832394,0.0004700348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950463,0.003301661,0.0004296687,0.0005376168,0.0003614693,0.0003234105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000323427,0.000003973375,0.00003645501,0.000003138388,5.532177e-7,0.00002354312,0.0004917262,0.00006093485,0.00001624601,0.9985043,0.0003832577,0.0004727168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691318,0.000004952363,0.00009685337,0.00001493892,0.000001197078,0.00002978383,0.000369389,0.0004353269,0.00003792869,0.9939787,0.005017542,0.000003646288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1981149,0.004339091,0.03802831,0.1871499,0.0006999877,0.00003993131,0.00005642711,0.00008342377,0.5714881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900843,0.0003239807,0.00111504,0.002383374,0.0001758472,0.00001989965,0.000006095297,0.00001387208,0.005877472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00731436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03571439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572082001","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.303619","title":"Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark A. Lemley","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dan L. Burk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139419027844496,"gpt":0.2860678836544981,"spread":0.2721259808700485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008276908,0.0006268982,0.001051342,0.001422406,0.002529465,0.005291802,0.0015224,0.01015435,0.009491449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02179673,0.0005083997,0.001277606,0.0008593909,0.01269528,0.00811396,0.004137399,0.007073474,0.001439598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002903192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002638796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001074275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006651389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930446,0.001761962,0.0002304559,0.001181794,0.003113048,0.0006680894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878165,0.009189556,0.0005931862,0.001270476,0.0008472176,0.0002830175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004967916,0.000004511044,0.00002192894,0.000009238723,0.000003664582,0.0000124337,0.00004491009,0.0002526955,0.00003207232,0.9965888,0.001588091,0.001436533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003612023,0.000002985576,0.00002408717,0.00001090219,0.00000190435,0.00001344158,0.00001018899,0.0002232464,0.00006054336,0.9943038,0.005342857,0.000002526762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845647,0.004397233,0.08529503,0.08796938,0.001052917,0.0001059107,0.0003484944,0.0001079092,0.8022668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975353,0.00213656,0.01198464,0.02528318,0.002405148,0.0004051776,0.000126923,0.0000758723,0.06004725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01015435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Jan Narveson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07888899985329968,"gpt":0.3151188666197435,"spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004458995,0.00146056,0.001427479,0.00351787,0.001018208,0.00220492,0.001137973,0.001444134,0.06210172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001827879,0.0005110314,0.0005559604,0.004469248,0.0007668125,0.002780768,0.000784275,0.00180194,0.03040867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001728808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002077215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009370442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02647868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995965,0.00007233173,0.00002849724,0.00005391215,0.0002152317,0.00003350838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.0004514837,0.00008134503,0.00003058452,0.000380141,0.00009036049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008078223,0.00001158115,0.00004067635,0.0007552321,0.000006631936,0.00003623783,0.0001049678,0.00005553297,0.00005629216,0.002601907,0.9503042,0.04601863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002781871,0.000006186529,0.0002725108,0.0007446324,0.000006023943,0.0001876562,0.0000848761,0.00001834449,0.00002676569,0.00195532,0.9966898,0.000005105292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002007596,0.912137,0.0004097492,0.01076321,0.007585799,0.00002133085,0.0004080731,0.00006731431,0.06840666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001966347,0.8376334,0.0006619141,0.004340734,0.005607733,0.00003819234,0.0007006933,0.00008671798,0.1489644],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06210172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.207751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113519645","doi":"10.1017/s000819730000012x","title":"The Rule Against Perpetuities and the Law Commission's Flawed Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Rule of law; Perpetuity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas P. Gallanis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0158566166796701,"gpt":0.2507193452691885,"spread":0.2348627285895184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04961703,0.0005577549,0.001716165,0.002852018,0.01093921,0.02332673,0.004299314,0.03052819,0.00169113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06387585,0.0008171619,0.001502924,0.002155896,0.1008699,0.01456598,0.006858813,0.03682509,0.0006244045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01790937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02765249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04339316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0250375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9581921,0.01525511,0.002413225,0.005365946,0.01575899,0.003014561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649053,0.02313409,0.001764924,0.003640172,0.00521349,0.001341939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001450563,0.000002198652,0.00001768556,0.000003267249,0.000001282359,0.00000981849,0.0003367748,0.00004696579,0.000005990754,0.9974447,0.001475569,0.0006542542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002277711,0.00001082146,0.00005113022,0.00006993839,0.000009209755,0.00003759101,0.0002387636,0.0003470079,0.00008315343,0.9448364,0.05426817,0.00002497896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01945757,0.01340574,0.07321402,0.5732622,0.007722038,0.0001430948,0.0001297849,0.0002413116,0.3124242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7701332,0.003762643,0.03426703,0.1323083,0.005681016,0.000420542,0.00005386907,0.0002426038,0.05313088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04961703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2624031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268489386","doi":"10.1215/9780822376149-012","title":"Dispossession and Canadian Land Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","authors":[{"name":"Colin Samson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02222546812334088,"gpt":0.2573010534360088,"spread":0.2350755853126679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624908,0.0006038598,0.0004903507,0.002990112,0.01468526,0.009301836,0.001861816,0.004703959,0.02022324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003686206,0.000383923,0.0005690175,0.004635791,0.01384623,0.002883926,0.002051898,0.004968436,0.0008509442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09381989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07423382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975325,0.0002194294,0.00004039861,0.0002114559,0.001208087,0.0007881717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.0003148621,0.00003620384,0.00007199979,0.0004760055,0.00009055877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003456492,0.000004709205,0.0001085025,0.00001065566,0.000001679563,0.00003253178,0.0007921841,0.0001368554,0.00002076995,0.9784722,0.0147731,0.005643346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112827,0.000006513229,0.002493345,0.0002539393,0.00001556921,0.00009033514,0.002638727,0.0008253266,0.0001773174,0.4170519,0.5763899,0.00004586571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105817,0.00921212,0.00106787,0.01037281,0.0003021336,0.0000256156,0.0001567305,0.00001998841,0.9682611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4171854,0.009971031,0.001371199,0.003723665,0.0002911214,0.0000573422,0.0001660138,0.00004812997,0.5671861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09381989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6807141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322773336","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/hus015","title":"The Justiciability of Housing Rights: From Argument to Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Justiciability; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Rhetoric; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Ludovic Langlois-Thérien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03724283223681019,"gpt":0.3754973742260302,"spread":0.3382545419892201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02412216,0.0008269193,0.0007405515,0.003488972,0.00934148,0.01408524,0.002144517,0.008616147,0.003885833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02559018,0.0004205351,0.0004277562,0.003067789,0.1106536,0.02018304,0.007530893,0.008566859,0.0002899216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0180433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007189277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007978576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004800987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811596,0.01512355,0.0004115867,0.0007729813,0.001145172,0.001387199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961835,0.03351381,0.001795991,0.0009795756,0.001348437,0.0005272212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000355192,0.000005818977,0.00004596003,0.00004872755,0.00000102714,0.0001253838,0.009978371,0.00009681901,0.00002825766,0.9873078,0.0007758832,0.001582415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001945403,0.00003613633,0.0002537736,0.001283291,0.000007207828,0.0001531252,0.04127659,0.0005849137,0.0003664784,0.8688489,0.08714461,0.00002555495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08432243,0.04240712,0.06563526,0.4175653,0.003680972,0.0001780623,0.00004305068,0.00006349634,0.3861043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704009,0.00770108,0.005248801,0.01035138,0.0007142111,0.0001228157,0.00001219476,0.00002289101,0.005425647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02412216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1309139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531883695","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938745","title":"Re-Inventing Governance Using the Laws of Nature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Shann Turnbull","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322117716230404,"gpt":0.2924414276384237,"spread":0.2602296560153833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01316732,0.0003083963,0.0006116859,0.001009332,0.002062805,0.006565135,0.001415817,0.003436859,0.005041878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02300159,0.0003444581,0.0007585873,0.0006419503,0.01719385,0.008952954,0.004450312,0.004349765,0.0005093942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002987732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002608012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003922997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935006,0.002830534,0.000382591,0.001442456,0.001058808,0.0007850471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783659,0.008846535,0.001620638,0.009237552,0.001277659,0.0006515863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003951689,0.000009435414,0.0002623813,0.000006980099,0.00000481696,0.00001754706,0.0002992619,0.0006200086,0.0001208579,0.9955323,0.0002803771,0.002842078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001046305,0.00001175711,0.0002732253,0.00002439263,0.000005486268,0.00002277758,0.0001697726,0.001678302,0.0002314616,0.9869414,0.010624,0.000006867534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.158751,0.001405053,0.2857252,0.02312461,0.0005581732,0.000201496,0.00009808365,0.0002380551,0.5298983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710499,0.0002674331,0.01108515,0.0008859406,0.0001065644,0.00007469355,0.00001685482,0.00004485601,0.01646857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01316732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06963629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094481967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3651556","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Pollution; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Oliver","is_ca":true},{"name":"Taylor Wormington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02144956558017472,"gpt":0.2555489914029239,"spread":0.2340994258227491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01371681,0.0003774686,0.0007621257,0.001488667,0.01060306,0.01563398,0.002012999,0.01830203,0.007705401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04229094,0.0005574726,0.0007742057,0.001441629,0.03937683,0.01534591,0.00654061,0.02137338,0.0007168743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008819621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01182865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01430982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01521664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903452,0.005098387,0.0002941134,0.0009281448,0.001725924,0.001608248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768896,0.01833078,0.001477297,0.001405919,0.001244264,0.0006521797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007149376,0.000008036296,0.00006754941,0.000004114384,0.000001970255,0.00002459951,0.0008597209,0.0001500991,0.00003048325,0.9971169,0.0009542611,0.0007750641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002047669,0.000006038018,0.0002170126,0.00002610819,0.000008772923,0.00001051058,0.0007078662,0.0007471076,0.0001160167,0.9895856,0.008541017,0.00001346995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1320342,0.002719102,0.03646035,0.2681454,0.001393621,0.0001116542,0.00008235779,0.00009568013,0.5589576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801446,0.0003465384,0.001694466,0.008737937,0.0007409346,0.00005191359,0.000008041726,0.0000308751,0.008244726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07254225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677036363","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i58.1158","title":"On Uprooting and Rerooting: Reflections on the Columbia River Project","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Agency (philosophy); Feeling; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"J. W. Wilson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Maureen Conn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0822073746875948,"gpt":0.3651381113061651,"spread":0.2829307366185703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007601041,0.0008823558,0.0005940679,0.001820764,0.0754488,0.01292504,0.004741922,0.01016462,0.006047654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139949,0.0008356526,0.0003980542,0.003355516,0.03578926,0.005700154,0.01379576,0.02107501,0.0006400503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04397575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04926345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7386103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8765601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869465,0.005603237,0.0001683588,0.0004710337,0.002636544,0.004174411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914335,0.003864474,0.0004080143,0.0002431326,0.001379533,0.002671455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001726878,0.00005585947,0.0008430854,0.00006594841,0.000004360914,0.002639829,0.9492961,0.00007903062,0.0005065802,0.01102024,0.02678642,0.008685215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002826531,0.00001213059,0.0009159755,0.000101482,0.000002739236,0.0001311735,0.9099516,0.00003050666,0.0001144442,0.0006140427,0.08810262,0.00002041408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6016684,0.00570985,0.001372206,0.1768616,0.002037724,0.0002424138,0.00009924033,0.00009500071,0.2119136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.885965,0.004119781,0.0006131284,0.02105345,0.0003076754,0.0001245574,0.00005235984,0.0001610751,0.08760303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.525858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","authors":[{"name":"Cherie Metcalf","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02946621708068886,"gpt":0.2316438399930555,"spread":0.2021776229123667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002655294,0.0001797387,0.0005423103,0.002197453,0.01196274,0.008756494,0.001661067,0.00257823,0.004550386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01051491,0.0002217434,0.0005024092,0.003284812,0.01466335,0.002352339,0.001820368,0.003178645,0.0001281227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1128316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1183285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943663,0.0004986789,0.0001267572,0.0004256532,0.001975659,0.002606958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955897,0.001269704,0.0004447911,0.0001971156,0.001844811,0.0006537981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000325824,0.00001240892,0.005373647,0.00004016106,0.00001847003,0.0001370775,0.002547395,0.0007758827,0.000227251,0.9777628,0.003698408,0.009374131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002432263,0.0001327086,0.2607203,0.00152325,0.0006280772,0.0007154858,0.04593593,0.009765151,0.003268759,0.3763834,0.3001904,0.0004932075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3918362,0.01005571,0.002716931,0.06297225,0.0002367126,0.00006656917,0.0005701823,0.00005342896,0.531492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923691,0.001166104,0.0003824952,0.001666381,0.00002162908,0.000007666381,0.00003599675,0.000005754242,0.004344788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1128316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8186547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522070982","doi":"","title":"The Hand is Invisible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Mandate; Multitude; Legislature; Political science; Environmental law; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Pardy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007356384662353332,"gpt":0.2637705096628919,"spread":0.2564141250005386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008611395,0.0005458765,0.0006466183,0.002014085,0.008583708,0.01514952,0.001909757,0.007440082,0.003837349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093602,0.0004478855,0.0006021604,0.001841185,0.08409999,0.02108427,0.007041582,0.007296893,0.0004596304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008117672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008418879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009381439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005932483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936718,0.003610986,0.0001417387,0.0005858339,0.001212476,0.0007771244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914801,0.006046357,0.0008237734,0.0005579834,0.0005737838,0.0005179342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004144233,0.000007886852,0.00009810082,0.00001200358,0.000001588337,0.00002424042,0.0007306629,0.0001452254,0.00001499191,0.9960285,0.001201324,0.001731394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005307314,0.000005134752,0.0001025154,0.00005497808,0.000002013043,0.00002250562,0.0006550712,0.0003073804,0.00003305378,0.9867474,0.01205781,0.000006872014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0522875,0.03392838,0.04792207,0.3989378,0.001368471,0.00006723696,0.000110088,0.0001334597,0.465245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499702,0.0070699,0.007125581,0.0165218,0.001140233,0.0001426585,0.00004039286,0.00007376836,0.01791552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01514952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05889815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615100587","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Idea of Private Property: A Small Step Along the Road from Common Sense to Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Property (philosophy); Sense (electronics); Private property; Epistemology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth R. Melchin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04045536146510969,"gpt":0.2425075260457761,"spread":0.2020521645806664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005259211,0.0003931271,0.001007818,0.001864529,0.004828033,0.01343421,0.001897369,0.004125996,0.007143668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008208692,0.0003626924,0.0008565942,0.002458565,0.07309129,0.03268011,0.008621419,0.007426818,0.0003925113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007199215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007429659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01153543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01384567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966323,0.002151001,0.00006635178,0.0002973425,0.0004673779,0.0003857432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925297,0.005402463,0.0003309779,0.001037224,0.0003288834,0.0003707968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002625439,0.000005061872,0.0000929389,0.00001028917,0.000001694469,0.00002140355,0.002016187,0.0001287823,0.00003351699,0.996206,0.0002207796,0.001260658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002706715,0.000004313291,0.0001132524,0.00002464306,0.000001761364,0.00002793772,0.003093288,0.0005252893,0.00003781542,0.9895399,0.006626166,0.000002854094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2042514,0.007083343,0.2641006,0.2178199,0.0002988035,0.00009295092,0.000162772,0.0001256246,0.3060645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790046,0.001336275,0.01340892,0.001620112,0.00007158356,0.00004637252,0.00002913187,0.00004973589,0.004433375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01343421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05223417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Avihay Dorfman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04223924788035284,"gpt":0.2432543048598389,"spread":0.2010150569794861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007064059,0.0003195245,0.000606804,0.001400274,0.006057221,0.008510655,0.001523381,0.004887852,0.004545065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007422985,0.0003367882,0.000953217,0.0008508895,0.06787675,0.01108515,0.006745051,0.005031629,0.0008858146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006079542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004397064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004384089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939471,0.002687376,0.0002863705,0.00113678,0.001275099,0.0006672933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956839,0.002104562,0.0004364486,0.001006125,0.0004519176,0.0003171164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001586692,0.00000143462,0.00003107622,0.000003509232,5.28545e-7,0.000006245677,0.0002791373,0.00003469693,0.00001609007,0.9989331,0.00023782,0.0004548193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005897949,0.000006277005,0.0001071294,0.00002854863,0.000001826765,0.00003481113,0.0002238658,0.0003423173,0.00008372821,0.9815856,0.0175745,0.000005588967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04341135,0.00271118,0.1539711,0.04947685,0.0005733331,0.00008072792,0.00009236208,0.0001523847,0.7495307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595953,0.0005222452,0.01532728,0.00306839,0.000449155,0.0001593623,0.00003850048,0.00007461826,0.02076521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04411036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}