{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":229,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2ca9567f1ae6","filters":{"topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine"}},"results":[{"id":"W2002725840","doi":"10.1111/jeb.12648","title":"The evolution of respect for property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Simons Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Property (philosophy); Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1228399343557686,"gpt":0.4138418531958961,"spread":0.2910019188401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003084501,0.0001586597,0.0009715108,0.000169707,0.000451492,0.00001644114,0.0007141018,0.0003298831,0.00002684014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001217934,0.00005768433,0.0005867765,0.0002887967,0.0007103051,0.0001264642,0.00005279627,0.0003333096,0.000008100567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009690924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005250087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004597268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001474564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974099,0.0009271874,0.0009612223,0.0001403985,0.0002695089,0.0002917288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966228,0.0005870362,0.001371918,0.0001686426,0.00114181,0.0001077901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001620007,0.00008780008,0.00001164495,0.0005303336,0.0002582262,0.000003134452,0.000164224,7.853122e-7,0.00000182452,0.1744035,0.07795444,0.7464221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001666898,0.0004943247,0.000004635556,0.0007110001,0.0001945258,0.0000497297,0.0001006085,0.000003091545,6.267705e-8,0.01283486,0.9853448,0.00009571783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[8.510369e-7,0.9914297,0.0001826273,0.0009558445,0.001260044,0.0005533024,0.00004504274,0.000006504352,0.005566018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007284417,0.991298,0.0003614945,0.000007616042,0.001856126,0.00001815166,0.000008227237,0.00001114052,0.006366384],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9313428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04499553625122221,"gpt":0.3274981946011386,"spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007262208,0.0001044181,0.0001552913,0.00001431988,0.001360134,0.0007588347,0.0007269219,0.00007430002,0.0005082479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008206113,0.00004170667,0.0000244054,0.00005178471,0.0777647,0.0002135298,0.0003184566,0.0001812541,0.00002315124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003952631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005035402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005561388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.0001779557,0.0001005095,0.0002156875,0.0002423418,0.0003443691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.0001860644,0.00003381186,0.0004366148,0.00004202943,0.0001412186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003577447,0.00001850772,0.0004525579,0.000003752658,0.000003117228,0.000005104442,0.003776811,5.227717e-8,0.00004465658,0.9894404,0.0001999877,0.006019234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001743686,0.00008274764,0.001124232,0.00004082127,0.000006814612,0.000001295601,0.0005720662,0.00003624299,0.0006187509,0.8270534,0.1701241,0.0001651912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06898467,0.00009714495,0.002904244,0.1470783,0.0003890255,0.0006746377,0.000006351117,0.0000562635,0.7798094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933968,0.00006880022,0.0001005242,0.001563304,0.0002480206,0.00001903881,3.936753e-7,0.000006723943,0.004596405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280544097","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1084571","title":"Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transition (genetics); Precondition; Political science; Institutional change; Sociology; Economics; Law; Economic system; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03057576833617076,"gpt":0.2694286266308344,"spread":0.2388528582946637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001538742,0.00007341162,0.00008223107,0.00002956037,0.003752939,0.00007356731,0.0001232501,0.00003908046,0.00001688851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000454789,0.00003018312,0.00003029049,0.00007385574,0.0001310485,0.0002610943,0.00001421852,0.0003299012,0.000003889616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001658686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02614464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984819,0.00007535964,0.000168194,0.00009504544,0.0001697277,0.001009771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.00003136232,0.00008112386,0.00004765284,0.0001182635,0.00006653262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000138979,0.0001058223,0.001220743,0.00001117392,0.0001970641,0.0001088694,0.04518677,0.000006335506,0.00003563188,0.8345487,0.001641761,0.1167982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005430502,0.00009752703,0.00005979785,0.000006703974,0.0000126364,0.003091936,0.001467615,0.0000791049,0.00009235102,0.02514406,0.9692925,0.0001126891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165102,0.008694585,0.04029726,0.01095169,0.0005887308,0.001999722,0.00000249099,0.0001194256,0.0208359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983233,0.001188523,0.0001607006,0.0001039248,0.0003154524,0.00001420305,0.000001187615,0.000006082177,0.01497686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137910174835094,"gpt":0.2270170217185577,"spread":0.2132260042350483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004928429,0.00004210648,0.0001104489,0.000008759269,0.001927746,0.00003276326,0.0002134334,0.00005631148,0.002164013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004362275,0.00002018,0.00005602158,0.00002080997,0.0009264461,0.0004662713,0.00003176532,0.0002121714,6.893658e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005064844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001155849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1296217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4085228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994705,0.0001077336,0.00007308929,0.00005604725,0.0001915866,0.0001009995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996065,0.00005112381,0.0001256396,0.00004616974,0.0001142754,0.00005625773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006455868,0.00003388085,0.0004746931,0.000009609232,0.00008161477,0.00000942216,0.1911853,0.000002654642,0.0003399039,0.799889,0.002378579,0.004949788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236753,0.00006899094,0.005399639,0.00002081826,0.00008110094,0.00002305673,0.05492527,0.0001324745,0.00003569349,0.0009107749,0.9359183,0.0001163241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3243057,0.0001894094,0.00006351895,0.007866417,0.0003279183,0.0002019731,0.000008463411,0.00001805766,0.6670185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864755,0.00006464405,0.0005602805,0.00002003473,0.0001448449,1.740184e-8,1.643159e-7,0.000001981208,0.0127325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976046325","doi":"10.2753/jei0021-3624460302","title":"A Review and Assessment of the Heirs' Property Issue in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Issues","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1292080789868575,"gpt":0.4290147021253737,"spread":0.2998066231385161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003526264,0.0001635666,0.001124034,0.0001033987,0.0001243944,0.00007336045,0.0007404979,0.00008972034,0.0004516848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000628287,0.00005220609,0.0002443935,0.0001762146,0.0002164826,0.0002148859,0.00006561814,0.0004784393,0.000008033446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001470276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005151728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004076095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007382403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976828,0.001005268,0.0008799561,0.00009554961,0.000145568,0.0001908899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983962,0.0001829307,0.00109608,0.000203884,0.00006471244,0.00005619305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006045637,0.0002163952,0.0001584408,0.02580342,0.0004447733,0.000008782126,0.008896341,0.000003804292,6.722852e-8,0.009214545,0.05905384,0.8961936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000629722,0.00003962205,0.00002102831,0.01088203,0.0004792772,0.00002173118,0.0002563189,0.000001915198,9.046384e-8,0.00009885742,0.9880466,0.0000894871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002113661,0.9853985,1.563579e-7,0.007574402,0.0002441236,0.0005468098,0.000007633167,0.000001701493,0.006205569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006043898,0.996732,0.00004250268,0.0004651649,0.0005102382,0.000008701691,0.000002543498,0.00000978172,0.002168633],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6161863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562561535","doi":"","title":"Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Property rights; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03211227064352791,"gpt":0.3196289523413421,"spread":0.2875166816978142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009014542,0.0002239209,0.0002924076,0.0002524563,0.001118871,0.0004308042,0.0003037095,0.000273965,0.0001741171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009444953,0.0001607853,0.0001055412,0.00007491867,0.0003406043,0.0004980236,0.00003019368,0.003267873,0.00003904935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003011634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002911542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004885193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1130666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978627,0.0001511296,0.0002518101,0.0002970515,0.0005633618,0.0008739394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986755,0.000221695,0.0003654906,0.0001229309,0.0004949893,0.0001194117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005978638,0.00003314437,0.00003803866,8.437789e-7,0.000183721,0.000003669829,0.004514574,0.00000400164,0.000005583724,0.9932057,0.001374994,0.0005759405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003200878,0.0001106926,0.0002534777,0.00004883796,0.00003943613,0.00003703063,0.0004452931,0.0000296527,0.00000209073,0.4375294,0.5610137,0.0001703211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01341936,0.0008985806,0.0002078056,0.008180178,0.001256748,0.0007790222,0.00003221427,0.00008635932,0.9751397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2640632,0.001687713,0.00007128478,0.0001111681,0.002027791,0.000008227781,0.00004171658,0.00002235754,0.7319666],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5596387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585106935","doi":"","title":"First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults' and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006829426263310092,"gpt":0.2487262750853927,"spread":0.2418968488220826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001426806,0.0001173212,0.0001159569,0.00004578654,0.002823879,0.0002814971,0.0003298852,0.00007902113,0.00006572595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006399637,0.00006018686,0.00007429743,0.0001841272,0.0002455682,0.0004130101,0.00001959314,0.001306817,0.00001374145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003356911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007353983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004236845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04434837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978057,0.0001455302,0.0001797132,0.0001624662,0.0003230523,0.001383519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995424,0.00004240529,0.00009756228,0.0001176787,0.00007483089,0.0001251404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002950332,0.00004188189,0.0006905526,8.37709e-7,0.00002367877,0.000001636732,0.002866788,0.000001829669,0.00001050784,0.9809489,0.0002817102,0.01510215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072732,0.0005977711,0.02445915,0.00009186236,0.00006443919,0.0003393987,0.005925689,0.00003771858,0.00002385129,0.9060173,0.06102297,0.000347086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7072595,0.01737379,0.0009754142,0.1916506,0.0007238789,0.0007936438,0.00001011731,0.000174982,0.08103805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859726,0.009249921,0.00001739661,0.0009125037,0.0008822443,0.000002402444,0.000002710948,0.000007047816,0.002953213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.278713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145074","doi":"","title":"Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Real property; Real estate; Statute; Estate; Partition (number theory); Property (philosophy); Legislation; Business; Property law; Property rights; Law and economics; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608475479028058,"gpt":0.2872730475029215,"spread":0.2611882927126409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173467,0.0001739706,0.0002486286,0.00003697143,0.001294762,0.0003285549,0.0004760608,0.0001024511,0.0005231914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003029043,0.00009823571,0.00006944672,0.000253136,0.0002378616,0.0006037502,0.0001215625,0.0002714865,0.0008296916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001185231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009934507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1048655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1329372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979531,0.0002392338,0.0002834506,0.000376212,0.0005040624,0.0006438991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988902,0.00008164076,0.00007634034,0.0003139702,0.0001454425,0.0004923832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007108771,0.0000843351,0.002884561,0.00005163496,0.00003137777,0.00003104966,0.004756958,0.00004624177,0.0008590434,0.9619195,0.002174578,0.02708963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003258613,0.00009188873,0.0002173514,0.00009069,0.000009094239,0.000002649134,0.0002070859,0.0000462214,0.0008895678,0.001671123,0.9961817,0.0002667227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1647846,0.0001169571,0.000212898,0.005891144,0.0005592484,0.0006441475,0.00001356295,0.0003226942,0.8274547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703181,0.000009516896,0.001113128,0.003978773,0.001062812,0.00003842804,0.000005733889,0.00002529074,0.02344821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329572589","doi":"10.2307/4127184","title":"Restitution of Land to New Zealand Maori: The Role of Social Structure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01547433949204356,"gpt":0.2431250301993923,"spread":0.2276506907073488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001362948,0.00005784784,0.0001151147,0.00002999762,0.0002079071,0.00002012081,0.0001705915,0.00005982187,0.0007900185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004342571,0.00003221948,0.0000412316,0.0002238813,0.0001805103,0.00006735416,0.00001836336,0.00007308181,0.00001917948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002174047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004475857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003721179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993055,0.00006267471,0.0001275754,0.00009833575,0.0002522159,0.0001537281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.00002514282,0.00006315873,0.00009997088,0.00004511953,0.00006432832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001709052,0.0001436077,0.01103487,0.00002689162,0.00009002895,0.000004446856,0.3874829,0.00008602096,0.008596548,0.3827174,0.1018249,0.1078215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002185927,0.00005569678,0.0014317,0.0000113934,0.0000161059,6.882084e-7,0.02687539,0.000030353,0.001211062,0.006832158,0.9632205,0.00009636568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349498,0.0004045563,0.00003158113,0.005631764,0.0002636337,0.0003106181,0.00003954374,0.00003479126,0.9597885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849778,0.00002552589,0.00007347811,0.000005587212,0.0003207709,0.000001158928,0.000001631669,0.000003477129,0.01459057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8650148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01221489413963693,"gpt":0.2193244411147011,"spread":0.2071095469750642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001587978,0.0001315675,0.0003241606,0.00003544052,0.0008288141,0.00003783867,0.0007711616,0.00008661389,0.0006469464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000675827,0.00005765284,0.0001583302,0.000127624,0.0008804207,0.0006741668,0.0001120362,0.0002561659,0.000003554481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003805753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000162433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4134995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6904988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981222,0.0005001252,0.0003568115,0.0001714714,0.0004956996,0.0003537076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988799,0.0001154762,0.0003264381,0.0001958571,0.0003588256,0.0001235178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001902603,0.000403512,0.0009953722,0.00004309054,0.0001136172,0.00006972117,0.008161665,0.00002499262,0.003544317,0.9626924,0.003244916,0.01880376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001116983,0.0002170407,0.00248234,0.0001478124,0.00004059086,0.000008418867,0.002216093,0.00001903279,0.002371726,0.00410388,0.9870871,0.0001889407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1540226,0.002137545,0.00007201949,0.006894398,0.000592176,0.0008697645,0.00002461058,0.00003630576,0.8353506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702989,0.000307585,0.0005678341,0.00005276558,0.0001246856,1.861997e-7,0.00000121776,0.000006302346,0.02864048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.708361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124755466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1195","title":"Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sustainability; Investment (military); Business ethics; Business; Capitalism; Environmental law; Finance; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07829200082144241,"gpt":0.3288970684775235,"spread":0.2506050676560811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002197248,0.000167392,0.0002247692,0.00003402602,0.006093605,0.0001866662,0.0003635124,0.0004376179,0.0003729358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001897851,0.0001230587,0.0001780291,0.00005417445,0.001188437,0.0003894625,0.00007692133,0.001789115,0.00004483468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002670768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002766188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08198716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976577,0.0004463306,0.0003689821,0.0002353,0.0007773879,0.0005143574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989724,0.000330225,0.0001504636,0.0001377231,0.00006154713,0.0003476136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002607377,0.00008534755,0.00008646856,0.000009896415,0.00003400182,0.0000574269,0.01475936,0.00001217421,0.0002596264,0.9822144,0.001475559,0.0009796994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005058683,0.0001392132,0.00006904722,0.00004077918,0.00002204308,0.0001239659,0.0008485367,0.00004985163,0.0006562982,0.362408,0.6349367,0.0001997358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007141087,0.001924293,0.0009811522,0.07082718,0.001249906,0.0005550421,0.00001957493,0.0001191561,0.9171826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757422,0.0007652551,0.008327728,0.01185167,0.001321394,0.00001385028,0.000006548558,0.00002099855,0.001950322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526106016","doi":"","title":"Local Climate Change Law: Environmental Regulation in Cities and Other Localities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Climate governance; Local government; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Environmental governance; Greenhouse gas; Geography; Global warming; Public administration; Business; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02279885799940745,"gpt":0.1963625026865049,"spread":0.1735636446870975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001227938,0.0001753379,0.0002864997,0.0001017033,0.0003745007,0.00009821641,0.0002004758,0.0002567782,0.0001437392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002236968,0.0001900494,0.00009371958,0.00003711346,0.001512583,0.001257242,0.0001533074,0.0001635586,0.00003588493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003532521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005636631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003151551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002236291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988884,0.00005710211,0.0001538358,0.0002497666,0.000362534,0.0002883263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994829,0.00004486606,0.0001832727,0.0001531583,0.00001736406,0.0001184645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005007255,0.0003777269,0.01470629,0.0005511219,0.000227098,0.0003068133,0.07515466,0.000007571454,0.00006386967,0.8670628,0.00572968,0.03531163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003084792,0.00007040078,0.004524508,0.0002303542,0.00004200528,0.000008476356,0.006261081,0.00002776585,0.00001310735,0.002021767,0.9861469,0.0003451475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01045734,0.0008660492,0.00002353924,0.00007371552,0.0001791696,0.0002858535,0.0002114435,0.00004115054,0.9878618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5881701,0.0001602856,0.00001237393,0.00003893721,0.0002148027,4.395809e-7,0.00003703957,0.00001528693,0.4113508],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.774999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004621154","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n6p169","title":"Infrastructure Provision and Private Lands Acquisition Grievances: Social Benefits and Private Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Government (linguistics); Business; Eminent domain; Population; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Welfare; Land use; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01647330177117088,"gpt":0.246475232886589,"spread":0.2300019311154181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436877,0.0001225738,0.0002075233,0.0001340489,0.000764688,0.0001387733,0.000145777,0.00009818003,0.00006403323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005877344,0.000081135,0.00002520757,0.000178256,0.0001351453,0.0007295163,0.0001021996,0.0001795689,0.000001020658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002922626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003687227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008827547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002619073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987373,0.00006808259,0.0003373525,0.0001350009,0.0003788176,0.0003434081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.00001799425,0.0002791705,0.00004230736,0.0003590498,0.0001607836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001100372,0.0002370612,0.0561822,0.0003697805,0.0002136954,0.0006537759,0.2274677,0.000007014227,0.0004234929,0.4170988,0.001264815,0.2949814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001545246,0.0002977923,0.4781028,0.0001731754,0.00003583006,0.00004942221,0.01390398,0.000007437888,0.001361442,0.01053886,0.4936251,0.0003589143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995109,0.0007277674,0.00008023919,0.0006582274,0.0001037009,0.0002338445,9.097631e-7,0.00001378802,0.003072518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955628,0.0007135107,0.002521887,0.0001292226,0.0001957749,0.000003483894,0.000001383126,0.000008472495,0.0008634866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5881439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04068847619423283,"gpt":0.2877428786015839,"spread":0.247054402407351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001647094,0.00006196285,0.0001950581,0.00001368577,0.0001735936,0.000006362533,0.0002306613,0.00001229625,0.00004236579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001933988,0.00002714,0.00005672149,0.0002761424,0.0006136614,0.00009704675,0.0000370989,0.00008235945,5.433381e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001154565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003085349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.0001841523,0.00008902456,0.00008625475,0.0001492124,0.0001278066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.00007751123,0.0001208179,0.0001293799,0.00004156963,0.00005904982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004552473,0.0001753242,0.1139516,0.0001934085,0.0002466829,0.00003808211,0.004801953,0.00000359681,0.00001898823,0.8563104,0.01674789,0.007056881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003985655,0.0002290963,0.2659824,0.0007697422,0.00005418898,7.921977e-7,0.0000854132,7.446611e-7,0.0001487848,0.001361444,0.7308357,0.0001330143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433712,0.001200705,4.111317e-7,0.001344506,0.00005301759,0.0004072748,0.00005017358,0.000003837696,0.05356887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831684,0.003328697,0.000003475242,0.00004806314,0.00001477414,9.173917e-8,5.541958e-7,0.000001203799,0.01343469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8549489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2261061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917896605","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p98","title":"State Responsibility and the Question of Expropriation: A Preliminary to the “Land Expropriation without Compensation” Policy in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); International law; Government (linguistics); Law; Foreign direct investment; State responsibility; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01974152824491924,"gpt":0.3016964199461813,"spread":0.2819548917012621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002283748,0.00005075696,0.0001498026,0.0000631903,0.0001593338,0.00006821811,0.0000904062,0.00003035507,0.000007530756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002891348,0.00002334266,0.00002550187,0.0001204706,0.0002089062,0.0001487623,0.0000272653,0.0001113761,9.824482e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007964235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988409,0.0004212918,0.0002953915,0.00006760914,0.0002545337,0.00012025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992833,0.0001781028,0.0002133612,0.00008672679,0.0001754024,0.000063149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006587728,0.00003511262,0.01202202,0.00001850164,0.00001234439,8.435488e-7,0.09996915,0.00007625198,0.0001013974,0.8865947,0.00001942869,0.0004914991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007954251,0.001851439,0.5313058,0.0004162879,0.000101904,0.00002686196,0.01310875,0.002616734,0.000557796,0.3268519,0.1148274,0.000380889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819306,0.0001906895,0.00009490165,0.01425148,0.00007529786,0.0003259327,0.000005768488,0.000002326386,0.003122959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.00004292616,0.0001380624,0.0002302881,0.0001647147,0.000001700502,2.747734e-7,0.000002778119,0.0005181202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5597428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5979922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526265844","doi":"","title":"Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Legislation; Business; Natural resource economics; Reversing; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Agricultural economics; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Law; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02805671331928468,"gpt":0.2749402567215722,"spread":0.2468835434022876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004855576,0.0001233599,0.0001596044,0.00004622414,0.0003831502,0.00004695302,0.0002427553,0.0002454092,0.0006686984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002846843,0.00005093222,0.0001227729,0.0001209656,0.0002921117,0.0001271566,0.00002609943,0.0001721029,0.00002253062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001895806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001990634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004765327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987791,0.00007801152,0.0002408779,0.0001453739,0.0005251541,0.0002314835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.00004705122,0.0001804048,0.0001308674,0.0001525464,0.00005498546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007976909,0.00001058514,0.00001510835,0.00001031497,0.00003038741,3.737011e-7,0.001892648,0.00001188403,0.0001357653,0.8473113,0.1442398,0.006333863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006972804,0.0000134931,0.01154854,0.0000546353,0.00003222267,7.129672e-7,0.0002605048,0.000001677503,0.00009672629,0.004647343,0.9831569,0.0001174939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001677056,0.0005461007,0.0001003491,0.002692863,0.0002881279,0.0003016404,0.000005001017,0.00004514932,0.9958531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08258028,0.0002016399,0.00006585951,0.0002188167,0.00100524,0.000001651795,0.00003299562,0.000006656393,0.9158869],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8426639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7321779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518739","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1179","title":"Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecosystem management; Legitimacy; Natural (archaeology); Total human ecosystem; Precautionary principle; Environmental ethics; Utilitarianism; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Natural resource; Relevance (law); Ecosystem valuation; State (computer science); Ecosystem services; Ecology; Ecosystem health; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Computer science; Biology; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009999540753997602,"gpt":0.2463267147411843,"spread":0.2363271739871867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001409987,0.00008221977,0.0001947721,0.000006911142,0.0002596725,0.000006888939,0.0002960427,0.00003442256,0.0003279322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002579972,0.00003586331,0.0001346948,0.0001675943,0.0002728039,0.00006154418,0.00008314291,0.0001190111,0.00001561668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007226641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008701396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008072225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001098123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986538,0.0004862405,0.0002211207,0.0001304845,0.0003415604,0.0001668031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999424,0.0000405341,0.0001470271,0.0003544901,0.0000039329,0.00002995474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002129194,0.0001133626,0.0004292203,0.001314467,0.00004429511,8.141079e-7,0.0007309354,0.00000164034,0.00008079154,0.9923496,0.00043268,0.004500037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005615892,0.000008314038,0.0002887627,0.0005390026,0.00004914769,8.053835e-7,0.0003153795,6.809276e-7,0.0007095065,0.0002440975,0.9977344,0.00005376742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03537112,0.3851931,0.00003241561,0.02995364,0.0008730813,0.006251155,0.00007557015,0.00003637892,0.5422136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753576,0.02214225,0.00003798768,0.001357154,0.00001806039,0.00002223245,8.040872e-7,0.000004883016,0.001059052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3590627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081003266","doi":"10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.198","title":"Legal Geographies—<i>Kelo</i>, Contradiction, and Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Geography","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Redevelopment; Public use; Private property; Supreme court; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007497949538879941,"gpt":0.236717272869077,"spread":0.229219323330197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009226739,0.0001527693,0.0001748967,0.0004003205,0.0008983858,0.0001957869,0.0001925063,0.0001236206,0.0001748962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003080827,0.0001199691,0.0001368618,0.0007413946,0.0009141174,0.0003902585,0.00002639981,0.0001861501,0.000015333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001586362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003622201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01985099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005209364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984632,0.00006406193,0.0002365041,0.0002955028,0.000368895,0.0005718913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992734,0.00007194233,0.00006583868,0.000172649,0.00009514791,0.0003209834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005550677,0.0001117365,0.2723266,0.00001033685,0.0001045797,0.00005737223,0.004960167,2.331036e-7,0.0001281163,0.6899173,0.02134301,0.01098506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003469031,0.00005821067,0.1042384,0.00000829836,0.0000236012,0.000004594826,0.0005069163,0.000002250366,0.00004927256,0.002168888,0.8923972,0.0001955075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6312076,0.00959337,0.0004592568,0.003312001,0.00129751,0.0006027022,0.00002160294,0.0005262456,0.3529797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956113,0.000630546,0.0001613277,0.0007761774,0.0006440456,0.000006740411,0.000006952538,0.00001233958,0.002150574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06766350222503802,"gpt":0.2858179182738254,"spread":0.2181544160487873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008929551,0.00009771634,0.0001305378,0.00003978561,0.0006694747,0.0001075247,0.0002318868,0.00008072025,0.0007612827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000420771,0.000067074,0.00005157533,0.00008683249,0.0006610916,0.0003704133,0.00005600177,0.0001855075,0.00007179834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002393678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006927988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004303063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008391152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988449,0.0003396793,0.0001108768,0.0001913488,0.0002000656,0.0003131109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.0000466797,0.00004777066,0.0000856533,0.00004043156,0.00009458585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005550394,0.00003351906,0.0001611506,0.000004200219,0.00001804139,0.00001911264,0.02681075,8.951972e-9,0.00007977222,0.957697,0.0003153338,0.01480556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863378,0.00004571543,0.0006730127,0.000009518511,0.0000195683,0.000002721838,0.002460715,0.000004019216,0.0007646211,0.2692407,0.7262887,0.0002043868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06047804,0.0002092795,0.0002490605,0.00243288,0.000367468,0.0001478855,0.000006240561,0.0001183834,0.9359908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807047,0.00003786696,0.0001069191,0.00109871,0.0005895246,0.00000483321,0.00000121864,0.000009976085,0.01744625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54839640","doi":"10.29173/alr96","title":"Insurance Law Principles in an International Context: Compensating Losses Caused by Climate Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Context (archaeology); Subsidy; Liability; Loss and damage; Liability insurance; Business; State (computer science); Insurance law; Climate Finance; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Public economics; Political science; Law; General insurance; Finance; Economic growth; Developing country; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08042271661837308,"gpt":0.336927511584071,"spread":0.2565047949656979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004351742,0.0001310349,0.0003038356,0.00001441002,0.0002591069,0.0001654002,0.0004184168,0.00004945091,0.001183156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104664,0.00009158836,0.00005076364,0.0001375894,0.000222077,0.001302511,0.00005948589,0.0001219903,0.00025773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005357001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002057281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2955989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4671691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985861,0.0002345174,0.0003636974,0.0002491171,0.0002420493,0.0003245524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992931,0.0001535149,0.0001363493,0.0001979841,0.0001061327,0.00011288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001836017,0.00006894758,0.0103805,0.0001943129,0.000007875315,0.000002373458,0.001038355,9.023823e-8,0.00002885009,0.9775005,0.0002169584,0.0105594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001834209,0.00002129913,0.003987889,0.00158224,0.000006105292,7.526452e-7,0.00003439631,0.00002857164,0.00002010669,0.0001695865,0.9937984,0.0001672218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2420722,0.05108519,0.000001264297,0.04088508,0.0006881064,0.003490524,0.0000505969,0.0001128224,0.6616142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600411,0.02802644,0.00002661285,0.0108901,0.0001452988,0.0001688991,0.00003171399,0.00001166782,0.0006581439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1178932211","doi":"","title":"Dissolving Condominium, Private Takings, and the Nature of Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Private property; Political science; Business; Sociology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324628406985408,"gpt":0.278367712791918,"spread":0.2551214287220639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001492355,0.0001154483,0.000255677,0.0000202642,0.0003991153,0.0001610355,0.0003767974,0.0001394616,0.0001209156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009743487,0.00004764587,0.00005821785,0.0001718339,0.001034774,0.0003610683,0.00011657,0.0003948112,0.00002632268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003875216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001471015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01281906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004147343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986167,0.0002777363,0.0002202242,0.0002047103,0.0004054867,0.0002751505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991146,0.0001560528,0.0001260807,0.0002334224,0.0001510415,0.0002188096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002387835,0.00003117424,0.001259147,0.00001601452,0.00002919956,0.000005808694,0.003993753,0.000001408117,0.0003177513,0.9898058,0.003072494,0.001228712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001908587,0.0000384457,0.0004080408,0.00004966466,0.00002103204,0.000002542133,0.0004416864,0.0000431048,0.0007360518,0.007063874,0.9891544,0.0001325682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5078058,0.007190218,0.0000355055,0.02734896,0.001229872,0.00181902,0.00001670271,0.0001736679,0.4543803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989783,0.0001147509,0.0002465397,0.0008257469,0.0003242425,0.00002295724,0.000001645268,0.00001033756,0.008670819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1024829235516147,"gpt":0.3805958446446976,"spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003353739,0.0001278037,0.0002134026,0.000149182,0.0005079836,0.000495988,0.0009207643,0.00008496574,0.0008484651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003135095,0.0001024176,0.00003629231,0.0005062005,0.000532846,0.0008816152,0.000408611,0.0001064614,0.0001595331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004356932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000162198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0132339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986703,0.00005541349,0.0002252795,0.0003134758,0.0003776198,0.0003579149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893,0.00009652298,0.00007945985,0.0002648355,0.0003003493,0.0003288103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00181896,0.001305826,0.1029188,0.0007890292,0.0005132231,0.00008789986,0.09543494,0.0006236106,0.02456111,0.3528064,0.2785405,0.1405997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006127256,0.0003889728,0.1055132,0.0001930268,0.000222419,0.000001313434,0.0008693013,0.0001205593,0.002204484,0.001393152,0.8879655,0.0005153122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6316828,0.0001697023,0.004277767,0.01726017,0.001231448,0.001371205,0.00004028983,0.0001858093,0.3437808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935985,0.00002533445,0.001108889,0.001802372,0.001520309,0.00001887224,0.000001016563,0.00001742408,0.001907282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533708772","doi":"","title":"Water as a Public Commodity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Doctrine; Obligation; Theme (computing); Public trust doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public interest; State (computer science); Business; Principal (computer security); Political science; Law; Geography; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1208943914484766,"gpt":0.3146067123454818,"spread":0.1937123208970052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115621,0.0001074401,0.0002531674,0.00001432892,0.0004333039,0.0000711799,0.0004108582,0.00005531968,0.0170096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000516371,0.00005557587,0.0001108316,0.0001250536,0.0002705041,0.0003351126,0.00008037013,0.0001473205,0.002812857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003952918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005105541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01525931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004415748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.0003574982,0.0002115769,0.0001856419,0.0002544931,0.0003959774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.00001598297,0.00003983618,0.0002917261,0.00008253098,0.000174891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002405868,0.00005492775,0.00004627522,0.0002104827,0.00001333454,0.00001899232,0.0006224331,6.96723e-10,0.000006078195,0.9546496,0.03100325,0.0133722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005964954,0.00002010651,0.00002300763,0.0001963759,0.00002060345,0.000002934616,0.000005414206,1.429025e-7,0.0001003202,0.006076583,0.9933698,0.0001250316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006198246,0.01157399,0.000006014428,0.03792308,0.0001843421,0.0004596542,0.000004983796,0.0001202035,0.9491079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7421222,0.08159992,0.00033521,0.1419722,0.0006823844,0.0001924157,0.00006770583,0.00003553558,0.03299242],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313816677","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.70","title":"Law as Infrastructure of Colonial Space: Sketches from Turtle Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Colonialism; Law; Context (archaeology); Metaphor; Sociology; Constitution; Common law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01635021277521129,"gpt":0.2907901268462941,"spread":0.2744399140710828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002043573,0.00008901343,0.00016758,0.00003811635,0.0003465619,0.0001013666,0.0002360702,0.0001181699,0.00154597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000936016,0.00006314318,0.0000538274,0.0003395451,0.0004351944,0.0001610022,0.00005858587,0.0001218477,0.000278697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003822962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001980761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07727852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04987653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999051,0.00007060183,0.0001364978,0.0001716924,0.0003177258,0.0002524432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995242,0.0001183396,0.00006003094,0.000154067,0.00005904208,0.0000842928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001116906,0.00005877455,0.004258175,0.00001959544,0.0001165274,0.00008095449,0.03954537,0.00003276486,0.005273073,0.8896492,0.05716402,0.003689901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002917332,0.00004821836,0.005380456,0.00001297008,0.00001436678,6.139012e-7,0.0004994827,0.00001950306,0.00140887,0.08136996,0.9108454,0.00010842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.847551,0.0001226356,0.000003654577,0.003568294,0.0004972942,0.0001258793,0.00006073147,0.00008479376,0.1479857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857854,0.00008719406,0.00006035692,0.0001936787,0.0005047449,0.00000388194,0.00002367062,0.00000905095,0.01333209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8536814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124178933","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Resource Development, And The Source Of The Provincial Duty To Consult In Haida Nation And Taku River","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Resource (disambiguation); Supreme court; Geography; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01224063939410301,"gpt":0.2589663901231996,"spread":0.2467257507290966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006888344,0.00006211249,0.00009493363,0.00003320526,0.000448005,0.00004986803,0.0001484586,0.00003990616,0.00003960481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005864711,0.00002549245,0.00001271082,0.0001889957,0.0005694644,0.0001210822,0.00003286968,0.00008628402,0.000004254683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004607704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001431252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01870258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09389469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.0001377322,0.0001537659,0.0001267509,0.0002339759,0.000141287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996992,0.00008666732,0.00004777515,0.00007016731,0.00004883346,0.00004730026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000322464,0.00008833622,0.01023777,0.00001242922,0.00002080505,0.00000123235,0.1998991,0.00002154411,0.0001705712,0.7061473,0.003099945,0.07997853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006779103,0.000007496051,0.008474993,0.0000113942,0.000003839323,7.013478e-7,0.0004003102,0.00006721046,0.0008739958,0.0004227776,0.9889979,0.00006142391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370192,0.00009225059,0.00006413963,0.01189144,0.00002972413,0.0004236219,0.000001132628,0.00001427391,0.05046422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805579,0.00001220643,0.0005201607,0.0005407053,0.0001069098,0.000008602573,3.174305e-7,0.000002395805,0.0182508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.985898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0354172027079544,"gpt":0.2889424336074119,"spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005745558,0.00004953243,0.0001244578,0.0002393905,0.00005212383,0.00008130239,0.0001902444,0.00002609589,0.00007751696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008085764,0.00003082635,0.00003632646,0.0003773609,0.00008842765,0.0002784312,0.00001072904,0.0001110066,9.94044e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001057668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989598,0.00009338881,0.0003494902,0.00005841183,0.000444379,0.00009453647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.0001485716,0.0003362628,0.00004235016,0.0001849295,0.00002218263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005896392,0.00005172886,0.808708,0.00000331762,0.00007938557,0.00005578759,0.0007392606,0.01017538,0.00005513678,0.1796953,0.0002626394,0.0001151744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003711618,0.00001805228,0.9244629,0.00005403627,0.00003065803,0.000007742487,0.0001416923,0.001282819,0.00003321088,0.002559596,0.07098431,0.00005382198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963779,0.00004232344,0.0001184568,0.001511119,0.00007900998,0.00005650763,0.00001097343,0.000001209124,0.001802524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993978,0.00001712274,0.0001222369,0.00009208248,0.00008279435,7.250661e-7,0.00001434277,0.000001961963,0.0002709485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1771357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1257062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401967587","doi":"10.1111/josp.12587","title":"Property as power: A theory of representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Oxford; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Representation (politics); Power (physics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0503206177272159,"gpt":0.3463816251676915,"spread":0.2960610074404756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00110687,0.00007076503,0.0002046977,0.000125416,0.0002231465,0.00008146733,0.0002145151,0.00007875689,0.0005745168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002033119,0.00003783073,0.0002316265,0.0003437827,0.0002893752,0.000486572,0.00002147643,0.0002340998,0.00003614205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007246204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003691113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000188635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007494992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986061,0.0002550427,0.000360061,0.00009111719,0.0005542361,0.0001333797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993315,0.00008925128,0.0001930647,0.00005379914,0.0002584386,0.00007391578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001473751,0.00007706622,0.0000394095,0.0000274538,0.0001031325,0.00006063524,0.02558359,7.436479e-7,0.0008470269,0.9579527,0.003726089,0.0114348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002331956,0.0002344613,0.0003109473,0.0001063562,0.00005303104,0.00001172057,0.001445944,0.000002706552,0.0004330421,0.7018335,0.2952405,0.00009458781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04576465,0.001765275,0.00009841016,0.04615877,0.001350842,0.0002145473,0.000005760216,0.00004566423,0.9045961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937103,0.0001283703,0.00005110092,0.0001929112,0.002011249,0.000001050719,4.137403e-7,0.000009602131,0.003895011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6290557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405217431","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6726","title":"Compensatory justice and accountability for First Nations peoples: the Timber Creek case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Redress; Sociology; Originality; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03035385658338486,"gpt":0.3281378735954766,"spread":0.2977840170120917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05065891,0.002023769,0.002249291,0.001290848,0.03678649,0.02514819,0.00341346,0.001199923,0.003136241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04454156,0.001658645,0.001825704,0.003336824,0.0038356,0.01186196,0.001046214,0.007186024,0.00020784],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004483533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005943888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01666795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1623358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805748,0.00205891,0.005492921,0.00303985,0.004312291,0.00452119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479157,0.0355181,0.004906331,0.00239497,0.007834765,0.001430154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00163324,0.004840487,0.4498316,0.02331389,0.00512168,0.003271241,0.2311156,0.003883419,0.001058316,0.02395883,0.1712429,0.08072882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003878425,0.000392046,0.02908432,0.004833776,0.004223658,0.02795404,0.1272263,0.008822176,0.00006509601,0.01484443,0.7739101,0.004765662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553446,0.005964467,0.003804574,0.01359583,0.009772832,0.003430558,0.0004818251,0.001270571,0.006334742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728804,0.002551902,0.002763193,0.001966554,0.01844624,0.0003094168,0.00005614763,0.0004002408,0.0006259666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6026672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131571412","doi":"","title":"The Regulative Function of Property Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Property rights; Function (biology); Law and economics; Position (finance); Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Business; Control (management); Focus (optics); Economics; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Computer science; Right to property; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03633403168206132,"gpt":0.2402654757139376,"spread":0.2039314440318762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002564802,0.00005049319,0.0001023339,0.000009544057,0.0006731622,0.000005135449,0.0002575341,0.00004978568,0.007780478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001189771,0.0000276446,0.00006133845,0.00005174804,0.0005380234,0.0004143495,0.00004125792,0.00004241725,0.00001166556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008698237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006810278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.704811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5190331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994133,0.0001112187,0.00005231814,0.0000986765,0.0001915011,0.0001329671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00002605548,0.0001073683,0.0001488074,0.0001454865,0.00005270453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009599728,0.0001917619,0.0005983756,0.00001735316,0.0001685098,0.000005505268,0.292716,8.268944e-7,0.0007684973,0.5674205,0.004547854,0.1326049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006398564,0.0004639135,0.2735431,0.00003776773,0.00008974412,3.202525e-7,0.05212758,0.00007040946,0.0005297381,0.003414632,0.6688775,0.0002053949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0512774,0.0002331397,0.0001840453,0.0009531334,0.0001396163,0.000179487,0.000001632315,0.00002848026,0.9470031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221936,0.000122062,0.0002454097,0.000004685932,0.0000266939,9.164722e-8,4.007157e-7,0.000001857644,0.07740515],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8709162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485537388","doi":"","title":"Navigating the U.S. Transition to Sustainability: Matching National Governance Challenges With Appropriate Legal Tools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prosperity; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Government (linguistics); Business; Reflexivity; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Environmental planning; Economics; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0403146735381893,"gpt":0.3014132238926715,"spread":0.2610985503544822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007142775,0.00008920614,0.00009960228,0.00000643368,0.001106654,0.0001133052,0.0002067555,0.00003757064,0.00007427244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118682,0.00004481883,0.00003543756,0.0001832115,0.000186974,0.0006267413,0.00001942493,0.0002256385,0.00001422302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002066326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003755421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00944112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004550217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.0001169006,0.0001314541,0.0002106191,0.0006690411,0.0002631097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994116,0.00009367574,0.00004214138,0.00009926948,0.0002801803,0.000073155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005865738,0.00005997605,0.00002519317,0.00001614715,0.00001519502,0.00002417118,0.07312091,0.0006307167,0.00004109698,0.869648,0.0001734207,0.05618651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001249713,0.0004484402,0.01576396,0.0002149094,0.00002416213,0.000102028,0.05834411,0.0006048536,0.0007134649,0.06081924,0.8606999,0.001015214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5336792,0.0002805369,0.002673176,0.3275438,0.0001032828,0.0009138631,0.000007785634,0.0001792644,0.134619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959293,0.0001418241,0.0006598464,0.001001669,0.0002960083,0.0000381293,0.00000155659,0.000007088249,0.001924588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04304371401209892,"gpt":0.3476722668467948,"spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082844,0.0001071577,0.0002918119,0.00006669418,0.002908138,0.0001682506,0.0003492304,0.00009960878,0.00002863767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004593442,0.00003930577,0.00009457536,0.000140029,0.00100714,0.0003097241,0.00005366558,0.0004938925,0.000001229979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004487684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000179361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01504749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984915,0.0005404315,0.0003270552,0.00006409928,0.000356348,0.0002205793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.00004178711,0.0002439405,0.00008984676,0.0002040552,0.0001055269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004304559,0.0001223349,0.00003089082,0.0000118582,0.00003480551,0.000006151257,0.04516815,7.177308e-8,0.000825037,0.9471607,0.003285755,0.003311165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769996,0.0006217372,0.001216993,0.00004592823,0.00003657414,0.00002689005,0.001733491,5.09087e-7,0.000219497,0.1026003,0.8928094,0.0001117308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5097533,0.0002651958,0.000001763845,0.1783331,0.00006353084,0.0002862641,0.000004919846,0.00001811439,0.3112738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916766,0.00005310759,0.00002042318,0.001922942,0.001391939,6.116888e-7,3.193042e-7,0.000004959477,0.004929096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850908651","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.501462","title":"Loggers vs. Campers: Compensation for the Taking of Property Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02604270437387943,"gpt":0.2912896690020298,"spread":0.2652469646281504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002097739,0.00008529553,0.0001341967,0.00004638592,0.001199296,0.00007121867,0.0003409805,0.00005524022,0.00004257711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001050523,0.00003571689,0.0001162289,0.000150406,0.0002109141,0.0002450811,0.00001116373,0.0005550604,0.000005843181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007703361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002296962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01045636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03610464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981863,0.00008074891,0.0002169116,0.000111173,0.0003051856,0.001099692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993914,0.00007235504,0.0002251709,0.00009397844,0.0001659638,0.00005110065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009700922,0.0000481968,0.00006029934,0.00000383302,0.00008955754,6.709255e-7,0.003688785,0.0001958593,0.0003122374,0.9791445,0.00007480299,0.01628429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002096176,0.0006889283,0.0003693191,0.00006841926,0.0001010847,0.00005543186,0.006511181,0.0001494293,0.0008855435,0.6850212,0.3037941,0.0002592551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5987333,0.01404034,0.1377221,0.1658423,0.003504594,0.005659696,0.00001826392,0.0002828939,0.07419642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960321,0.0008815939,0.0001292406,0.0001153304,0.0004654004,0.000007608939,0.00000100866,0.000007556161,0.002360231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3972987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500955749","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Sprawl of Big Box Retail: The Smart Growth Approach to 'Zone it and They Will Come' Development","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Smart growth; Zoning; Metropolitan area; Scope (computer science); Big data; Land use; Politics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03482896630786438,"gpt":0.2381315928267977,"spread":0.2033026265189333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003588228,0.0001278694,0.0001739466,0.00006491219,0.00148191,0.0001126346,0.0005415413,0.0000524372,0.00003839108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008019021,0.00005748375,0.00006184571,0.0002379035,0.0001422772,0.0001561888,0.00006820518,0.0009314041,0.00001055757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004949124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000963747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007228034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975871,0.0002356022,0.000270928,0.0001620345,0.0004758244,0.001268553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994589,0.00007956707,0.0001211796,0.0001421401,0.00009597259,0.0001022042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003214681,0.0001499922,0.0009364081,0.00001013175,0.0002326652,0.000001590635,0.04680776,0.00001340143,0.00006925815,0.8685681,0.0004086564,0.08276985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009483676,0.0003595783,0.001981877,0.0000763326,0.0000848569,0.0002046753,0.03113823,0.000289053,0.0001670771,0.03686431,0.927392,0.0004936513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3704891,0.03350892,0.01382085,0.2606001,0.0007059389,0.001820566,0.00000320239,0.0001193469,0.318932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841018,0.008326162,0.00008729579,0.0003398369,0.0002873802,0.000008441066,2.681148e-7,0.00001131649,0.006837535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19482909","doi":"10.1177/0748233709105270","title":"The Concept of the Anticommons: Useful, or Ubiquitous and Unnecessary?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gridlock; Law and economics; Private property; Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Public property; Political science; Business; Property rights; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01367255370143845,"gpt":0.2627536908293838,"spread":0.2490811371279454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224688,0.00007907383,0.0001168052,0.00001733561,0.001425285,0.0001816515,0.0005392139,0.00004873851,0.00009941404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001698381,0.00002871573,0.00006017303,0.0001725079,0.0005936362,0.0002514304,0.00005689343,0.0007951589,0.000007551288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001405561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001556759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00402369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0229243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998046,0.0002664622,0.0001994232,0.00008786419,0.0002946536,0.00110554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.0001741549,0.0001431569,0.0001412011,0.0001041634,0.00006502813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003134422,0.00003836229,0.002169625,0.000001996897,0.00008879464,9.161607e-7,0.002638007,0.000001837484,0.0001430777,0.9273936,0.001535219,0.06595723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032877,0.0005170976,0.008025366,0.0000604054,0.00006641408,0.0001810692,0.02462512,0.00006213289,0.0006968914,0.479747,0.4847035,0.0002821418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168092,0.01696467,0.0001165827,0.05195651,0.0005969857,0.0005887825,0.000001931949,0.00003023407,0.0129351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802407,0.008039208,0.000005859446,0.0001506913,0.0002546599,0.000003634641,8.587248e-8,0.000006432353,0.01129875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4831682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801579507","doi":"","title":"Owning and Dissolving Strata Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Dissolution; Law; Confusion; Business; Dissenting opinion; Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03740769300889654,"gpt":0.3014414636170049,"spread":0.2640337706081083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005807686,0.0001171908,0.0001613417,0.0000172098,0.003554202,0.001297512,0.0005330702,0.00008206974,0.0005358325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003600988,0.00006515029,0.00003992816,0.00003763262,0.0005322481,0.001176578,0.0001611975,0.0002238366,0.0001172277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003878819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0470698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03252263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988266,0.0000785142,0.0001463417,0.0002881619,0.0002755002,0.0003849404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990965,0.00002952007,0.00009708802,0.0004307348,0.00005807193,0.0002881493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004232358,0.00008270207,0.02598949,0.00004240895,0.00004657963,0.00007981165,0.003584952,0.000001386154,0.00210087,0.9242245,0.00495384,0.03885114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003032593,0.00003700848,0.01169703,0.00007528866,0.00001235711,0.00000227385,0.0003137712,0.00004652987,0.000271351,0.002996188,0.9840183,0.0002266405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2241936,0.0006509052,0.00003327212,0.00963965,0.0005105575,0.0003805709,0.000009640539,0.0001641408,0.7644176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587895,0.000134108,0.0003521047,0.0002990693,0.0005713484,0.000009076289,0.000001713592,0.00001125396,0.03983177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23452499","doi":"10.1023/a:1012660302764","title":"Property rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Sciences","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Fisheries management; Fishery; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Fishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05247575094114326,"gpt":0.3042419196840851,"spread":0.2517661687429419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085336,0.000150204,0.0001840022,0.0002428919,0.001032392,0.0004387165,0.0004967484,0.00005086332,0.0002623942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004739353,0.00006343867,0.00003165811,0.0009404801,0.001907915,0.0009305217,0.0001045641,0.00009879105,0.00004935496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009893029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001320652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2396255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07579148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981199,0.0001638729,0.0002227827,0.0004101695,0.0004687709,0.0006144936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995744,0.00003560461,0.00005554304,0.0001358717,0.00003505175,0.00016358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001569429,0.0004789073,0.08851545,0.0001153301,0.00005690592,0.0002327315,0.07655706,0.00001556353,0.0001235581,0.4345219,0.1214408,0.2777849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520986,0.00007003643,0.005101633,0.00004988417,0.000003892918,0.000005641239,0.001900314,0.00007246854,0.00002655898,0.008208255,0.9841155,0.0001936564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1343873,0.00029145,0.0000152475,0.2348286,0.00021687,0.0008255853,0.000002643878,0.0001185327,0.6293138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299595,0.0003745158,0.0002363933,0.008139379,0.0002146206,0.00004495577,5.738645e-7,0.000005900113,0.06102416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9410729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262223792","doi":"","title":"The Trail Smelter, is What's Past Prologue? Epa Blazes a New Trail for Cercla","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smelting; Prologue; Environmental protection; Recreation; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022328123499463,"gpt":0.2908853324852567,"spread":0.2685572089857937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002726194,0.0001827182,0.000204655,0.00005468098,0.00198698,0.0008632638,0.0007086482,0.0001265416,0.0002201005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007485254,0.0001010803,0.0002525594,0.0001900859,0.0002299269,0.001085105,0.0000212433,0.001181496,0.00006946328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006674426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004117106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007803207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03752269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959903,0.0001603285,0.0003390323,0.0002421272,0.0004251068,0.002843041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991944,0.0001336186,0.0001615267,0.0001620337,0.0001195824,0.0002287889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001229271,0.00005292296,0.00001829858,0.000001461719,0.000101304,8.473863e-7,0.006313261,0.000003229202,0.00005160537,0.2293412,0.006049037,0.7579439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006881707,0.0003259246,0.0000429596,0.00001333774,0.00003596963,0.00004585411,0.005797292,0.00004618577,0.00009811567,0.1280711,0.8646735,0.0001616409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07076439,0.08016627,0.005142547,0.8204524,0.001777737,0.002108048,0.00001222839,0.0001672474,0.01940916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8211489,0.04450045,0.0002245913,0.001741494,0.007943394,0.00003858296,0.000002771794,0.0000372933,0.1243626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8586245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02453393702755719,"gpt":0.2797557446958232,"spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079462,0.00006990865,0.0001214544,0.00001800497,0.003227628,0.00003907225,0.0001899304,0.00007389172,0.0001875303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006836815,0.00002905698,0.00004470292,0.00009905135,0.0005991439,0.0004127649,0.0000374757,0.0004448633,0.000004514243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003653054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002729071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01602936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1382736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989895,0.0001567702,0.0002349061,0.00009956406,0.0002853043,0.0002339358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995204,0.00004549466,0.0001158912,0.0001038938,0.00009904718,0.0001152382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493178,0.00003422395,0.0006022808,0.000002500627,0.000005383411,0.00001210963,0.0001806159,0.000001629412,0.0002193141,0.9935731,0.00006790485,0.005251659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004849373,0.00007495374,0.002386447,0.00004127307,0.000009188536,0.00004916405,0.0003779877,0.00006259081,0.0003598858,0.03268825,0.9633676,0.00009775125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229116,0.0002089366,0.00000193045,0.00365227,0.0006665147,0.0002175248,0.000008462496,0.00001652159,0.9029367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986573,0.0001942451,0.0001414131,0.0001037442,0.0001958774,0.000001936016,2.86534e-7,0.000004435739,0.0007007832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572082001","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.303619","title":"Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139419027844496,"gpt":0.2860678836544981,"spread":0.2721259808700485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002879202,0.00009690795,0.0001245216,0.00008777017,0.0008916137,0.00007489669,0.0003322704,0.0001372467,0.000265544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002968693,0.00006649455,0.00008088766,0.0002989159,0.0002006462,0.0001771369,0.00001539726,0.001463427,0.00009713577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000997576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003790538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008811265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01146537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969442,0.0002096939,0.0001704199,0.0001528564,0.0002687193,0.002254102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995884,0.00002457651,0.00008141894,0.0001317881,0.00006769891,0.0001060949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007018391,0.00003005122,0.0001972601,4.96751e-7,0.00002862205,0.000003393667,0.0002293569,0.000007845824,0.0001171895,0.9894215,0.00009320542,0.00986399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002191027,0.00008484071,0.00001987815,0.000003239284,0.000007144242,0.00006403595,0.001353543,0.000005044066,0.0001734178,0.2932113,0.7047641,0.00009433832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5230139,0.01202144,0.01012676,0.03975433,0.001668757,0.000686519,0.000002986168,0.0005338812,0.4121914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714335,0.005980079,0.00009470016,0.0001415418,0.0002135742,0.000002753188,4.296942e-7,0.000009489661,0.02212393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6857662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07888899985329968,"gpt":0.3151188666197435,"spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010289,0.0001626627,0.0002380949,0.00002121542,0.001020506,0.0001304236,0.00039549,0.0003249111,0.0002577223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993246,0.0001273559,0.00005284301,0.0003406089,0.0004238134,0.0004660884,0.00009738691,0.0008752922,0.00003276879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001200758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009455315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.0002437989,0.0001811662,0.0003208392,0.0004459834,0.0004038483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.000120632,0.00009663124,0.000251898,0.0002386797,0.0003161424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004324857,0.00006290048,0.00004913778,0.0001685585,0.00002914104,0.00003813349,0.008534242,0.00001505677,0.00002833623,0.5327661,0.4536707,0.004594455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030896,0.00004437248,0.00005018435,0.0001541214,0.00007489687,0.000002165169,0.0004678948,0.00000680092,0.00008681729,0.001191439,0.9973033,0.0002149302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001120517,0.4299822,0.001261785,0.1070132,0.001869522,0.001612102,0.00005271009,0.0004858986,0.456602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102753,0.6083132,0.003360326,0.01784311,0.001793128,0.000004525945,0.00002674707,0.00004577264,0.3583379],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113519645","doi":"10.1017/s000819730000012x","title":"The Rule Against Perpetuities and the Law Commission's Flawed Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Rule of law; Perpetuity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0158566166796701,"gpt":0.2507193452691885,"spread":0.2348627285895184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00236817,0.0001363475,0.0001742557,0.000009252287,0.01226141,0.0009671108,0.000763801,0.00005056096,0.000237324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003413489,0.0000450164,0.000128437,0.0001000554,0.00364338,0.0002722738,0.00005914918,0.0005812004,0.0000634852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004323518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006835591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004980514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001584108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979867,0.0007793873,0.0002445936,0.0001120048,0.0004854595,0.0003918418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989982,0.000407503,0.00009412727,0.0002600361,0.00007809297,0.0001620069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001509988,0.00001278105,0.00000384006,0.000001487746,0.00003224445,0.00001124504,0.004025527,0.000004694249,0.000009312351,0.9794748,0.006641568,0.009631538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007155358,0.00002153177,0.00007925108,0.00002666672,0.00002348144,0.00005978812,0.001208276,0.00006420451,0.00002673195,0.01716828,0.9805074,0.0000988827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02272781,0.00292819,0.0000018318,0.1495748,0.000269359,0.0001821133,0.000005085453,0.00003064547,0.8242802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589634,0.003735567,0.000009542438,0.005506251,0.001787024,0.000006873173,7.049292e-7,0.0000120862,0.02997854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268489386","doi":"10.1215/9780822376149-012","title":"Dispossession and Canadian Land Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02222546812334088,"gpt":0.2573010534360088,"spread":0.2350755853126679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001855786,0.0001161559,0.0001571658,0.00007143338,0.0004345097,0.0001132343,0.0001192935,0.0002500546,0.004351649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008760902,0.0000691373,0.00003255186,0.00001058352,0.0001818799,0.00005152621,0.00002033651,0.0001587336,0.0001931202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006994128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002914973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6200503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993306,0.00001493777,0.00009368305,0.000184028,0.0001669709,0.0002098089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994241,0.00002472698,0.00003216162,0.0001083393,0.0000368272,0.0003738219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015132,6.463757e-7,0.00009910564,0.000004687146,0.00000603004,0.000007811671,0.0002006588,1.991112e-8,3.313809e-7,0.9678105,0.01121309,0.02065564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005488493,0.00001384784,0.0001159595,0.00003994114,0.000009221779,7.436238e-7,0.000008120182,0.000003650309,4.31634e-7,0.01755356,0.9820524,0.0001472445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004727903,0.0002222829,0.00001094938,0.003689719,0.0001808911,0.0001219504,0.000008658295,0.00003192915,0.9956864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04105171,0.0005282001,0.00002390209,0.0005821675,0.00048821,0.000001035405,0.00001193576,0.00001249245,0.9573004],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322773336","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/hus015","title":"The Justiciability of Housing Rights: From Argument to Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Justiciability; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Rhetoric; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03724283223681019,"gpt":0.3754973742260302,"spread":0.3382545419892201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00743972,0.0001620562,0.0003394931,0.00009182312,0.002348124,0.0002510864,0.000614273,0.00009792856,0.0003019743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00339739,0.0000788086,0.000150589,0.0002617884,0.0003202976,0.003612725,0.00007721135,0.0005730696,0.00005910564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003105476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001937464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00293217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956707,0.001501094,0.0009112635,0.0001555598,0.001267864,0.0004935373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922016,0.004238008,0.001569446,0.0003452339,0.001241991,0.0004037267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002247815,0.004421239,0.0004367354,0.00003047809,0.001034114,0.0001664522,0.08527011,0.00004151291,0.003208769,0.8661174,0.02986886,0.007156515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003322373,0.0002541653,0.0004515578,0.00005321718,0.0003889395,0.0000198613,0.002780123,0.000001926464,0.001240179,0.01015413,0.984183,0.0001406665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6908454,0.003372219,0.001340751,0.05953158,0.006801741,0.001112513,0.0000140437,0.00006248013,0.2369193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023,0.00005437147,0.005409091,0.000568007,0.002596539,0.000002701619,5.443732e-7,0.00001078854,0.001127976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531883695","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938745","title":"Re-Inventing Governance Using the Laws of Nature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322117716230404,"gpt":0.2924414276384237,"spread":0.2602296560153833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002305338,0.00006846683,0.0001053096,0.00001768494,0.0006358029,0.00003221411,0.0004354438,0.00008316101,0.0001429945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001055929,0.00003708326,0.00009489238,0.000188411,0.0001534085,0.0002331662,0.00002804738,0.001593711,0.00000297438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003131966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004627375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02038612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981772,0.0001455429,0.000180105,0.00008911032,0.0003191018,0.001088996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995056,0.00002429925,0.0002323432,0.0001067341,0.00008966486,0.00004132289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001999805,0.00002499767,0.001024619,0.000001867481,0.00004253257,0.000002123989,0.003325566,0.00000175798,0.0001722293,0.9897783,0.00005992033,0.005546054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006812522,0.0002519732,0.001574671,0.0001304945,0.000100634,0.00009310514,0.02377329,0.0001815171,0.002289194,0.7532147,0.217348,0.0003611109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7300004,0.02477038,0.001792948,0.00703026,0.001259595,0.0003584849,0.000004300829,0.00005580299,0.2347278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938337,0.002314081,0.0001037441,0.0001153592,0.0004081043,4.67113e-7,9.610331e-8,0.000007298523,0.003217161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2638333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094481967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3651556","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Pollution; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02144956558017472,"gpt":0.2555489914029239,"spread":0.2340994258227491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002966741,0.0001153092,0.0001307188,0.00002019777,0.00109602,0.000273961,0.0004072655,0.00005799158,0.00002244674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008248657,0.00005708743,0.00004954978,0.0002785138,0.00008646469,0.0002985252,0.00005075869,0.001722228,0.00001236292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005779337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01150042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973701,0.0004367235,0.000219586,0.000164354,0.0005825852,0.001226606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996237,0.00006004174,0.0001299674,0.00009234381,0.00002309657,0.00007089577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002889323,0.000235591,0.02685471,0.00003871593,0.0002564389,0.00003661809,0.1204737,0.0006041904,0.001676519,0.6452612,0.001212859,0.2030605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004940775,0.001604273,0.01965172,0.0002718967,0.0002933399,0.0007031609,0.1912149,0.00927475,0.0001613439,0.1597829,0.6106948,0.00140619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6008618,0.01406229,0.008860472,0.3501742,0.0001599405,0.0008558313,0.000003044822,0.00006269471,0.02495968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894454,0.007437607,0.00002852158,0.002255467,0.0004105756,0.000003868571,2.761448e-7,0.00001147625,0.0004068071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6094819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8429813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677036363","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i58.1158","title":"On Uprooting and Rerooting: Reflections on the Columbia River Project","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Agency (philosophy); Feeling; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0822073746875948,"gpt":0.3651381113061651,"spread":0.2829307366185703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007044723,0.00007524907,0.00009553989,0.00004078196,0.01586881,0.002808235,0.0003094376,0.00007185688,0.001187897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000668673,0.00005247006,0.00003420419,0.000984116,0.0002857751,0.0001828508,0.00007854507,0.0004528147,0.00002383575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005751468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002810684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6011319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990472,0.0001793942,0.0001179816,0.0002446404,0.0001849089,0.000225885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992569,0.0003331289,0.00005544161,0.0002007201,0.00008675775,0.0000670625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041697,0.0002191459,0.0001314141,0.000002025268,0.00003302902,0.000002637657,0.006310055,0.000003818138,0.0002926199,0.1766633,0.8137878,0.002512456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955866,0.0001567079,0.0004029679,0.00001671572,0.0000110868,0.000003558174,0.0009026786,0.00004692719,0.00006297663,0.009481534,0.9886084,0.0001109018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02572741,0.000002394651,0.000007552507,0.005363636,0.000505592,0.001050862,0.000007390171,0.00006272705,0.9672725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3664809,0.00001169867,0.0003340819,0.0005438642,0.0002451983,0.0001724947,9.23316e-7,0.00001032338,0.6322005],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3407535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02946621708068886,"gpt":0.2316438399930555,"spread":0.2021776229123667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007457917,0.00003417166,0.00008316351,0.000007970521,0.0009470219,0.00002045106,0.0001234704,0.0000178099,0.00001036123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000924677,0.00001581832,0.00002315035,0.00002672356,0.0008416532,0.0002258834,0.00001078514,0.00005096103,3.198181e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004922566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005944285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.000102871,0.00009660161,0.0000466696,0.0001642253,0.00009244504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999212,0.0001836081,0.0001473447,0.00003172374,0.0003826368,0.0000427152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001586013,0.00002067687,0.0001831418,0.00001216357,0.00003622575,0.000001055782,0.007371564,0.0004424022,0.00001755408,0.9861392,0.001134509,0.003055479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021601,0.00006831348,0.0002550465,0.00002781453,0.00001483766,0.000002687858,0.006020245,0.004392486,0.00003604328,0.006606931,0.9803727,0.00004275652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852731,0.003528476,0.05896254,0.06903922,0.002631804,0.0117592,0.0002898539,0.00004345214,0.06847239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991362,0.0001215762,0.000308746,0.00002470011,0.00003756033,9.334371e-7,0.00000227506,8.959225e-7,0.0003670838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522070982","doi":"","title":"The Hand is Invisible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Mandate; Multitude; Legislature; Political science; Environmental law; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007356384662353332,"gpt":0.2637705096628919,"spread":0.2564141250005386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641897,0.0001761471,0.0002794521,0.00005188408,0.002426832,0.0008221318,0.0004287741,0.0001645776,0.00001015724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006530423,0.00008013716,0.0000837273,0.0002046088,0.000690274,0.0004666803,0.00004414207,0.002025883,0.000002175193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002337499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008223496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005750624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01867531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972845,0.0004587373,0.0003768179,0.000199956,0.0005226567,0.001157277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991651,0.0001534991,0.0002665163,0.0001637453,0.0001432768,0.0001078429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003888805,0.00002356393,0.00002806846,0.00001744565,0.0001265489,0.000002517929,0.00183056,3.549465e-7,0.00006198976,0.9889022,0.001168755,0.00744908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004093837,0.0003873386,0.00009153959,0.0001743087,0.0002911233,0.0006961381,0.0153743,0.0005766718,0.0002047894,0.04421215,0.933593,0.0003047565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5490237,0.3506414,0.00002381863,0.05730685,0.001671407,0.001105484,0.00002479692,0.00003019661,0.0401723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580646,0.03378531,0.000005166572,0.0008837271,0.0006338838,0.000003177833,9.722504e-7,0.000008685555,0.006614508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615100587","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Idea of Private Property: A Small Step Along the Road from Common Sense to Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Property (philosophy); Sense (electronics); Private property; Epistemology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04045536146510969,"gpt":0.2425075260457761,"spread":0.2020521645806664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004655377,0.0001642093,0.0005752068,0.0001905318,0.00093999,0.00005925305,0.001207264,0.00005536651,0.0001811607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002609729,0.0000684397,0.0004671056,0.00110652,0.0006013699,0.0002759402,0.0001418237,0.0003729476,0.000006681751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001853748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1184653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1715522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961382,0.00227828,0.0004722067,0.0001494611,0.0006796232,0.0002822202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975665,0.0007743313,0.0007312431,0.0004765047,0.0003279885,0.0001234216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02594034,0.001661551,0.06719762,0.000109788,0.03859584,0.0006676265,0.4650762,0.07359031,0.01442915,0.1939494,0.002181282,0.1166009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01105079,0.001929884,0.2710532,0.0006536976,0.03585871,0.0001083918,0.2037199,0.009905621,0.0005888912,0.02423334,0.4388824,0.002015241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888868,0.0001397262,0.003827337,0.002803126,0.0004463372,0.000255312,0.00001333783,0.000009007871,0.003618961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708,0.000556783,0.0002105804,0.0000883438,0.0003060064,1.655724e-7,0.000001765829,0.000008425061,0.001747938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4367011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8874049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04223924788035284,"gpt":0.2432543048598389,"spread":0.2010150569794861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003729335,0.00005279083,0.000121588,0.000009347353,0.001046062,0.00001556696,0.0002738696,0.00004447329,0.0009458927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000181915,0.00002827612,0.00005463411,0.00003678482,0.0006435044,0.00035945,0.00005753294,0.0001026789,9.914978e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001606223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001894582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1995497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2310701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999357,0.0001446131,0.00009090995,0.00007540255,0.0001966503,0.0001353914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994859,0.0000285825,0.0001498834,0.00007730198,0.0001724365,0.00008596461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000528059,0.0002356747,0.003957529,0.00001686496,0.0002106087,0.00003381418,0.1318429,0.000001662332,0.0002916259,0.8555807,0.001695437,0.005605205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007310284,0.0002759693,0.008086464,0.00004095557,0.00006714163,0.00001592296,0.01480347,0.00001868024,0.0003425673,0.003498966,0.9720004,0.0001184391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0346519,0.0005937655,0.0001546001,0.0004258422,0.0001123881,0.0001642235,0.000003201271,0.000009667943,0.9638844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885042,0.0004263928,0.0003814309,0.00003556597,0.00004014769,3.434443e-8,9.696669e-8,0.000002550047,0.01060963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}